Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leakage remains a critical complication following esophagectomy, occurring in 8–20% of patients. While indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) is commonly used to assess perfusion, it requires dye injection and does not directly measure tissue metabolism. This study evaluates a real-time, contrast-free spectral imaging (SI) system for quantifying gastric conduit oxygenation () and compares its performance to ICG-FI.
Methods
Intraoperative SI was successfully performed in 33 patients undergoing laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy using a video-rate snapshot spectral camera, acquiring 16 spectral bands in the 460–600 nm range. A deep learning model estimated of the gastric conduit and quantitative perfusion metrics were derived from ICG-FI time-intensity curves. Local capillary lactate levels were measured as a physiological reference for tissue hypoxia. Statistical analyses compared and ICG-FI metrics.
Results
SI successfully differentiated well-perfused from ischemic tissue (median : vs. , p < 0.001). The estimated showed a strong negative correlation with local capillary lactate (r=-0.72, p < 0.001). While quantitative ICG-FI metrics ( and ) revealed significantly reduced perfusion at the anastomosis site compared to well-perfused tissue (p < 0.001), they showed only a moderate correlation with (r=0.50, p < 0.001). Notably, in a patient who developed anastomotic leakage, both modalities detected ischemia intraoperatively, but they show different transition borders, with SI indicating a more extensive hypoxic area than ICG-FI.
Conclusion
Snapshot SI provides a real-time, objective assessment of tissue oxygenation without the need for contrast agents. Its strong correlation with lactate suggests it may offer potential complementary value to dye-based perfusion imaging, potentially improving anastomotic site selection, although outcome-based validation studies in larger cohorts are needed.
Keywords: Spectral imaging, Fluorescence imaging, Tissue ischemia, Graft oxygenation, Esophagectomy, Deep learning
Esophageal cancer is the eleventh most common and seventh most lethal malignancy worldwide [1]. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment. Following esophagectomy, the stomach is most commonly used to restore continuity of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most feared complication, occurring in % of cases and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality [2]. Adequate vascularization and oxygenation of the gastric conduit are critical determinants of anastomotic healing. However, intraoperative selection of the anastomotic site is still largely based on subjective assessment of tissue color, bleeding, and vessel pulsation. A quantitative, non-invasive method for intraoperative assessment of tissue ischemia could substantially improve surgical decision-making.
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) is widely used for intraoperative perfusion assessment, yet important limitations remain. The technique requires intravenous dye administration, a wash-out time, and primarily reflects blood flow rather than actual tissue oxygenation. Alternative approaches, including laser speckle contrast imaging, gastric tonometry, Doppler-based techniques, and spatial frequency domain imaging, have been investigated [3–6], but limited integration into minimally invasive workflows and insufficient reproducibility have hindered their use in everyday practice.
Spectral imaging (SI) has recently emerged as a promising modality for assessing gastric conduit perfusion and oxygenation [7–9]. Comparative studies indicate that SI provides complementary information on tissue status beyond ICG-FI [9, 10]. However, conventional spectral imaging systems rely on scanning mechanisms that are bulky and require several seconds per acquisition, limiting their applicability in real-time laparoscopic surgery. Snapshot spectral cameras overcome the speed limitations of scanning-based systems by capturing all spectral bands simultaneously in a single exposure, enabling video-rate tissue oxygenation () monitoring without disrupting the surgical workflow.
Recent advances in deep learning have further improved estimation of from spectral data, replacing traditional linear unmixing approaches with robust neural network-based methods [11, 12]. Training on physics-based simulations of light–tissue interaction enables accurate oxygenation mapping without the need for invasive reference measurements. To address the domain gap between simulated and clinical data, we developed a domain-invariant deep learning framework based on previous work [12].
In this study, we integrated a snapshot spectral camera into a laparoscopic system to enable real-time intraoperative monitoring during esophagectomy in 33 patients. Previous work has either employed slow scanning-based systems [7, 8, 13], estimated an ischemia index rather than quantitative directly [11], or demonstrated real-time imaging only in a single-animal preclinical model [14]. To our knowledge, the present study is therefore the first to apply a video-rate spectral imaging system for real-time intraoperative estimation in a clinical human cohort undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. The represents the ratio of oxygenated hemoglobin to total functional hemoglobin, within the microvascular bed of the sampled tissue. It is conceptually analogous to pulse oximetry, but reflects microvascular oxygenation rather than systemic arterial oxygenation.
We evaluated the clinical utility of this technology by comparing spectral oxygenation measurements with quantitative perfusion metrics derived from ICG-FI time-intensity curves and with local capillary lactate levels as a physiological reference for tissue hypoxia. Figure 1 illustrates the complementary data content and processing pipelines of SI and ICG-FI. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of real-time intraoperative quantification of gastric conduit oxygenation using deep learning–enhanced snapshot SI. Secondary endpoints included comparison with quantitative perfusion metrics derived from ICG-FI and validation against local capillary lactate levels. Accordingly, the study aims were:
Fig. 1.

Comparison of spectral imaging (SI) and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI). SI acquires pixel-wise spectra, which can be processed using deep learning models to generate tissue oxygenation maps. In contrast, ICG-FI captures time–intensity curves from selected regions of interest (ROIs), allowing for post hoc calculation of perfusion metrics
Primary endpoint: To evaluate the feasibility of a deep learning-enhanced snapshot SI system for real-time, intraoperative quantification of gastric conduit oxygenation.
Secondary endpoint: To compare the diagnostic value of SI versus quantitative perfusion metrics derived from ICG-FI.
Secondary endpoint: To validate spectral-based estimates against local capillary lactate levels as a physiological reference for tissue hypoxia.
Methods
Study population, design and ethics
This single-institution, single-arm prospective observational study included 38 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic esophagectomy for cancer between February 2024 and November 2025 at Ghent University Hospital. The sample size of 38 patients was determined by logistical feasibility for this initial observational study, rather than formal power calculations, as the primary aim was to evaluate the technical feasibility. Five of the 38 enrolled patients were excluded due to technical acquisition issues (e.g., incorrect light cable connection, lens condensation or corrupted data files), resulting in a final cohort of 33 patients with complete data. This same subset of 33 patients was used consistently across all comparative analyses, ensuring a matched dataset between SI and ICG-FI. Patient demographics, clinical status and tumor characteristics are summarized in Table 1. In this cohort, five patients had postoperative AL (15%). The study was approved by the ethical committee of Ghent University Hospital (B670201836427), and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03587532).
Table 1.
Baseline demographics, clinical status, and tumor characteristics of the esophagectomy cohort
| Characteristic | Overall Cohort () |
|---|---|
| Baseline demographics | |
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 69.97 (61.67–74.44) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 23 (69.70%) |
| Female | 10 (30.30%) |
| BMI, median (IQR) | 24.50 (22.50–27.63) |
| Smoker, n (%) | 9 (27.27%) |
| Clinical status | |
| Physical status (ASA score), n (%) | |
| I–II (Healthy/mild systemic disease) | 5 (15.15%) |
| III–IV (Severe systemic disease) | 28 (84.85%) |
| Patients with 1 Comorbidity, n (%) | 16 (48.49%) |
| Tumor characteristics | |
| Primary tumor location, n (%) | |
| Esophagus (middle third) | 5 (15.15%) |
| Esophagus (lower third) | 13 (39.40%) |
| Gastric cardia | 15 (45.45%) |
| Histology, n (%) | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 23 (69.70%) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 10 (30.30%) |
| Clinical stage (cTNM), n (%) | |
| Early (T1–T2) | 8 (24.24%) |
| Advanced (T3–T4) | 23 (69.70%) |
| Tx | 2 (6.06%) |
| Clinical outcomes | |
| Anastomotic leakage (Clavien–Dindo at 90 days), n (%) | |
| IIIb | 4 (12.12%) |
| IVa | 1 (3.03%) |
Inclusion criteria were: (a) age between 18 and 75 years, with ability and willingness to provide informed consent, (b) planned minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, and (c) intrathoracic circular stapled esophago-gastric anastomosis.
Exclusion criteria were: (a) pregnancy or lactation, (b) participation in other investigational studies, (c) use of anti-VEGF agents (e.g., Avastin) within 30 days prior to surgery, (d) intraoperative findings preventing study procedures, (e) non-standard anastomotic technique, and (f) excessive bleeding ( mL) prior to anastomosis.
Operative workflow and ROI selection
Standard minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed by experienced upper-GI surgeons, with intrathoracic circular stapled anastomosis. During the thoracic phase, the gastric tube was mobilized into the chest. Prior to constructing the anastomosis and performing any imaging, three regions of interest (ROIs) were demarcated with sutures (Fig. 2): the surgeon-chosen anastomotic site (ROI-A), a well-perfused proximal region 2–3 cm from the pylorus (ROI-P), and an ischemic control region (ROI-I) excised from the proximal stomach. As this was an observational study, an a priori decision was established that SI and ICG-FI findings would not influence the surgeon’s choice of anastomotic site, which was based on standard clinical criteria. Intra-opertive decision-making and anastomosis site selection thus remained entirely dependent on the surgeon’s clinical judgment. Selection of the ROIs is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Region of interest (ROI) demarcation using sutures: ROI-A (anastomosis), ROI-P (well-perfused), and ROI-I (ischemic control). Shown on schematic of the gastric tube (a), reconstructed RGB image (b), and fluorescence imaging frame (c)
Video-rate SI was performed with all ROIs in the field of view, immediately followed by ICG-FI after dye injection. ROI locations were matched across modalities. Local capillary lactate (LCL) was measured at all ROIs via serosal puncture using a handheld lactate analyzer (EDGE Analyzer, Apex Biotechnology, Taiwan, margin of error of 0.35 mmol/L) to further assess tissue hypoxia.
Spectral imaging
Imaging hardware and data acquisition
Spectral recordings of the gastric graft were obtained using the XIMEA SNAPSHOT VIS camera (Imec, Belgium), capturing 16 spectral bands in the 460–600 nm range ( nm (peak ± full width at half maximum). This spectral resolution and range has shown to be sufficient for reliable estimation [11, 15–17]. The sensor resolution is 20481088 pixels (5.5 µm pixel pitch). The camera was mounted to a standard laparoscope via a C-mount zoom adapter (18–35 mm, RVA Synergies, UK) and coupled to a Xenon light source (CLV-S190, Olympus, Japan). The field of view was adjusted to include all three ROIs.
Preprocessing and reflectance estimation
Radiometric calibration was applied [18]. Raw images underwent dark subtraction, followed by demosaicking using an algorithm developed by Muszyński and Luong [19]. Pixel spectra were corrected using the manufacturer-supplied matrix and normalized by the min-max spectrum of the light source. Further area-under-the-curve normalization compensated for variations in imaging distance and angle, preserving spectral shape critical for oxygenation estimation.
To create images familiar to the surgeon, synthetic RGB (sRGB) images were reconstructed by mapping bands at 600, 540, and 450 nm to R, G, and B channels, respectively, followed by histogram equalization and gamma correction to enhance visual clarity.
Neural network-based oxygenation estimation
The deep learning framework for estimation has been described in detail previously [12]. Briefly, a pixel-wise fully connected neural network (DA-FCN) was trained on Monte Carlo–simulated reflectance spectra with ground-truth oxygenation [12]. Domain-adversarial training addressed the gap between simulated and real in vivo data. The network generates real-time maps at 16.8 ms per frame on an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU.
ICG fluorescence imaging
Acquisition and preprocessing
A 0.5 mg/kg bolus of ICG (ICG-Pulsion, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) was administered via central venous catheter. Fluorescence imaging (Visera Elite II, Olympus, Japan) was recorded at 15 fps from immediately before injection for three minutes. ROIs were manually annotated based on sutures and tracked using PerfusionWorks software (PerfusionTech, Denmark), obtaining the time-intensity curves. Baseline subtraction used the first five seconds to correct for background fluorescence. The ischemic ROIs were excluded from analysis, as no dye perfused these resected areas.
Perfusion metrics
The obtained time–intensity curves were low-pass filtered (4th-order Butterworth) and normalized by maximum intensity to reduce noise and mitigate inter-subject variability. This preserves relative perfusion dynamics and facilitates comparison between ROIs and across patients. Absolute metrics were computed, as summarized in Table 2, grouped into: ingress (wash-in), egress (wash-out), and global perfusion indices. Metric selection was guided by comprehensive reviews [20–22] and informed by prior studies on esophagectomy [23–25] and bowel or colonic perfusion [9, 10, 26, 27] with particular focus on anastomotic healing.
Table 2.
Definitions of perfusion metrics
| Metric | Definition | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ingress | ||
| Maximum intensity | AU | |
| Onset | Time when intensity exceeds 5% of maximum | s |
| Rise time | Time from 10% to 90% of maximum | s |
| Inflow slope | Rate of intensity increase (10%–90%) | AU/s |
| TTP | Time from onset to maximum | s |
| Time from onset to 50% of maximum | s | |
| Area under curve from onset to 50% of maximum | AU | |
| Area under curve from onset to maximum | AU | |
| Egress | ||
| Time to drop from maximum to 80% | s | |
| Outflow slope | Rate of intensity decrease (max 80%) | AU/s |
| Relative intensity at end of recording | AU | |
| Perfusion indices | ||
| TR | /TTP | / |
| Inflow/Outflow ratio | Inflow slope/Outflow slope | / |
Mapping perfusion and oxygenation along the graft
Points were manually annotated along the graft centerline on the first ICG-FI frame (avoiding specular reflections) and tracked along the video recording using CoTracker [28]. For each pixel ROI around these points, mean green-channel intensity generated time–intensity curves, and were processed to obtain perfusion metrics as in Sect. "ICG fluorescence imaging".
Spectral images were registered to the first ICG-FI frame using their sRGB reconstructions. Registration was performed in two stages: (1) a perspective transformation based on LoFTR features [29], followed by (2) a non-rigid B-spline transformation using SuperGlue-based correspondences [30]. After registration, the tracked ICG-FI points were mapped onto the spectral image for pointwise comparison of and perfusion metrics (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Workflow for registering tissue oxygenation maps to fluorescence imaging frames and extracting paired pointwise metrics along the graft
Clinical validation against capillary lactate measurements
The predictions were compared with the measured LCL. This was normalized to each patient’s preoperative systemic lactate to account for baseline variability. The relationship was modeled exponentially [12]:
| 1 |
where A and B are fitted parameters. For ICG-FI perfusion metrics, linear regression was used [31, 32]:
| 2 |
where fitting parameters C and D were estimated via ordinary least squares, and the quality of the fit was quantified using the mean absolute error (MAE) and the correlation coefficient (r).
Results
The primary endpoint of this study was to investigate the ability of spectral imaging–derived to discriminate between perfused and ischemic tissue. Secondary endpoints included comparison with quantitative ICG-FI perfusion metrics and local capillary lactate levels.
In each patient, three ROIs were defined intraoperatively, before any imaging was performed: a well-perfused control region located 2–3 cm proximal to the pylorus (ROI-P), the selected anastomosis site (ROI-A), and an ischemic region consisting of excised gastric tissue (ROI-I). LCL levels were measured for each ROI as a physiological reference for tissue hypoxia. Spectral imaging results were obtained for all three ROIs, whereas ICG-FI metrics were available only for ROI-P and ROI-A, as excised tissue does not receive fluorescent dye.
Due to the limited sample size of this study, it lacks statistical power to evaluate the predictive value of SI and ICG-FI for AL. As an exploratory analysis, the predicted values and ICG-FI perfusion metrics at the anastomosis site are compared between the patient cohort with and without AL. In addition, an anecdotal case study is presented comparing the two modalities in a patient who developed leakage versus one who did not, illustrating their potential clinical utility for guiding anastomosis placement.
Spectral imaging reveals impaired oxygenation at ischemic tissue sites
This analysis addresses the primary endpoint. Figure 4 presents boxplots of the neural network-estimated across the different ROIs. For comparison, values derived from conventional linear unmixing are also shown [33].
Fig. 4.

Boxplot of tissue oxygenation () values across perfused (ROI-P), anastomosis (ROI-A), and ischemic (ROI-I) tissue regions (n = 33 patients)
The values are expressed as Median [IQR], and were for ROI-P, for ROI-A, and for ROI-I. The was significantly lower in ROI-I compared with ROI-P and ROI-A, using a Mann–Whitney U-test (). No significant difference was observed between ROI-P and ROI-A ().
A logistic regression classifier trained to distinguish ROI-P from ROI-I achieved an accuracy of and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation. The optimal discrimination threshold was . Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Compared with linear unmixing, neural network–derived estimates for perfused and anastomotic tissue were lower and demonstrated a reduced interquartile range.
Fluorescence imaging highlights lower perfusion at anastomotic sites
This analysis addresses the secondary endpoint comparing quantitative ICG-FI perfusion metrics between ROIs. For egress-phase parameters, six patients (in addition to the five excluded earlier) were excluded because of incomplete dye wash-out acquisition, resulting in and for ROI-A and ROI-P, respectively.
Table 3 summarizes median, first quartile (Q1), and third quartile (Q3) values for all metrics, ordered by statistical significance. Definitions are provided in Sect. "Perfusion metrics". Metrics are categorized as ingress (arterial inflow), egress (venous washout), and combined perfusion indices.
Table 3.
Comparison of ingress, egress and perfusion metrics values between anastomosis (ROI-A) and perfused (ROI-P) regions. Median, first quartile (Q1), and third quartile (Q3) values are reported, along with their scaling factors () and corresponding p-values
| Metric | Anastomosis | Perfused | Scale | p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Q1 | Q3 | n | Median | Q1 | Q3 | n | () | ||
| Ingress | ||||||||||
| 4.47 | 3.93 | 5.07 | 33 | 3.27 | 3.13 | 3.67 | 33 | — | ||
| 1.12 | 0.98 | 1.32 | 33 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 33 | — | ||
| Inflow slope | 0.81 | 0.61 | 1.05 | 33 | 1.38 | 1.12 | 1.43 | 33 | −1 | |
| Rise time | 0.99 | 0.76 | 1.31 | 33 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 33 | 1 | |
| 1.75 | 1.28 | 2.37 | 33 | 1.25 | 0.89 | 1.79 | 33 | 1 | ||
| 1.20 | 0.84 | 1.69 | 33 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 1.43 | 33 | 1 | ||
| Onset | 2.19 | 1.92 | 2.63 | 33 | 1.91 | 1.63 | 2.19 | 33 | 1 | |
| 1.04 | 0.86 | 1.15 | 33 | 0.89 | 0.74 | 1.13 | 33 | 2 | ||
| Egress | ||||||||||
| 6.25 | 5.40 | 7.75 | 27 | 6.18 | 5.03 | 8.37 | 26 | 1 | ||
| 5.67 | 4.16 | 7.64 | 33 | 6.59 | 3.96 | 7.95 | 33 | −1 | ||
| Outflow slope | 0.80 | 0.60 | 1.25 | 27 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 1.38 | 26 | −2 | |
| Perfusion Indices | ||||||||||
| Inflow/Outflow ratio | 1.14 | 0.80 | 1.73 | 27 | 1.44 | 0.84 | 2.68 | 26 | 1 | |
| 2.94 | 2.30 | 3.37 | 33 | 3.06 | 1.92 | 3.65 | 33 | −1 | ||
Bold p-values indicate statistical significance
Among ingress-related parameters, all metrics except differed significantly between ROI-P and ROI-A at . The most significant parameters were and (. The median was 27% lower in ROI-P (3.27 s vs 4.47 s), and the median was 29% lower in ROI-P (0.80 vs 1.12 AU), indicating faster and more efficient dye inflow dynamics in well-perfused tissue. Additionally, significant differences were observed for the inflow slope, rise time and time-to-peak (. Furthermore, () and onset time () showed significant differences. In contrast, none of the egress-related parameters reached statistical significance, including , , and outflow slope. Similarly, combined perfusion indices such as inflow/outflow ratio and did not differ significantly between groups (). The interquartile ranges were generally larger in ROI-A compared with ROI-P, indicating greater variability at the chosen anastomotic site.
Correlation of tissue oxygenation, perfusion, and capillary lactate
This analysis addresses the secondary endpoint comparing SI-derived oxygenation and quantitative ICG-FI perfusion metrics with the measured LCL levels.
The normalized LCL levels were mmol/L in ROI-P and mmol/L in ROI-A, with no significant difference between these regions (). In contrast, ROI-I showed significantly higher lactate levels compared with ROI-P and ROI-A (), with a median of mmol/L. Values are expressed as Median [IQR] and taken from the patient cohort of 33 patients.
Figure 5 illustrates the relationships between , , and LCL. Prior to model fitting, outliers were excluded using a Z-score threshold of 3. An exponential model captured the inverse relationship between and LCL, yielding a strong negative correlation (, , ) with a median absolute error (MAE) of 0.90 mmol/L:
| 3 |
This indicates that LCL increases exponentially as decreases, consistent with physiological expectations of anaerobic metabolism under hypoxic conditions [34]. Linear unmixing-derived showed a weaker correlation with LCL (, , ) and a higher MAE of 0.99 mmol/L.
Fig. 5.

Relationships between tissue oxygenation (), perfusion metric (), and normalized local capillary lactate (LCL). Exponential fits are shown for estimated using the neural network (a) and linear unmixing (b) approaches versus LCL, while a linear fit is shown for versus (c). Pearson correlation coefficients (r), corresponding p-values, and the number of patients (n) are indicated
A significant linear relationship was also observed between and (, , ), suggesting that higher perfusion (indicated by lower ) is associated with increased tissue oxygenation. The corresponding linear fit had an MAE of 3.55%:
| 4 |
No significant correlation was observed between LCL and ().
Oxygenation and perfusion in patients with and without anastomotic leakage
Table 4 summarizes the and five most significant ICG-FI perfusion metrics at the anastomosis site for patients who developed AL versus those who did not. In addition, p-values comparing these values among the two groups were obtained from Mann-Whitney U-tests. Due to the limited sample size, these results are purely exploratory.
Table 4.
Comparison of and ICG-FI perfusion metrics at the anastomosis site between patients with and without anastomotic leakage. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
| Spectral Imaging | ICG-FI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StO (%) | Rise time | Inflow slope | T | AUC | I | |
| Leakage | ||||||
| 1 | 48.02 | 75.87 | 0.011 | 27.93 | 9.44 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 75.94 | 13.07 | 0.061 | 4.73 | 1.26 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 23.22 | 58.27 | 0.014 | 41.40 | 11.33 | 0.95 |
| 4 | 83.67 | 10.20 | 0.078 | 5.00 | 1.25 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 85.19 | 16.33 | 0.049 | 4.87 | 1.28 | 0.79 |
| Overall () |
63.20
|
34.75
|
0.043
|
16.79
|
4.91
|
0.79
|
| No leakage | ||||||
| Overall () |
75.7
|
13.43
|
0.089
|
4.80
|
1.19
|
0.55
|
| p-value | 0.51 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.042 | 0.022 | 0.026 |
The five patients with AL had a mean of , which was lower than the mean of observed in patients without AL, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (). However, significant differences were observed for all the given ICG-FI perfusion metrics (). Patients with AL exhibited a longer rise time, a slower inflow slope, a longer , a higher , and a higher relative intensity at the end of recording , compared with patients without leakage.
Leakage patients 1 and 3 had notably low values of 48.02% and 23.22%, respectively, which were below the optimal discrimination threshold of 52.90% identified in the primary analysis. Remarkably, these two patients also exhibited the most impaired perfusion metrics among the leakage group, with rise times of 75.87 s and 58.27 s, inflow slopes of 0.011 AU/s and 0.014 AU/s, values of 27.93 s and 41.40 s, values of 9.44 AU and 11.33 AU, and values of 1.00 AU and 0.95 AU, respectively. Leakage patients 2, 4, and 5 had values above this threshold (75.94%, 83.67%, and 85.19%, respectively), suggesting that alone may not be sufficient to predict AL risk in all cases.
Case study: tissue ischemia monitoring to guide anastomosis placement
Figure 6 compares SI and ICG-FI in two patients: one without postoperative AL and one who developed AL. According to Kumagai et al. [35], a suitable anastomosis site should exhibit a clear fluorescent signal within 60 s after dye injection. Accordingly, the first and 60 s post-injection frames of the ICG-FI video are shown. The black dots indicate the selected points along the stomach graft, allowing a direct comparison between perfusion metrics and . The black line denotes the anastomosis site chosen by the surgeon, and the dotted line represents the ischemic threshold of determined by the classifier in Sect. "Spectral imaging reveals impaired oxygenation at ischemic tissue sites". As such, the dotted line corresponds to the point along the graft where falls below the threshold for distinguishing perfused from ischemic tissue.
Fig. 6.

Comparison of spectral and fluorescence imaging in two patients: one without anastomotic leakage (AL) in the top row and one with AL in the bottom row. From left to right: registered sRGB image, first ICG-FI frame, frame at 60 s post-injection, and registered SI-derived tissue oxygenation map. Black dots indicate tracked points along the graft, while the black line shows the selected anastomosis site and the black dotted line marks the ischemic threshold
Figure 7 illustrates the gradient of and perfusion metrics along the points. The perfusion metrics , rise time, inflow slope, and were chosen for their robust display of the perfusion gradient along the graft.
Fig. 7.

Comparison of with selected ICG-FI perfusion metrics along annotated points on the stomach graft for patients with and without anastomotic leakage. Lower perfusion is indicated by higher and , and lower and . Vertical black lines indicate the anastomosis site and vertical dashed lines indicate the ischemic treshold
For the patient without AL, ICG-FI displays high signal intensity 60 s post-dye injection at the anastomosis site, matching the high levels. Proximal to the ischemic threshold, the anastomosis line resides at a well-oxygenated margin (). Key perfusion metrics reinforce this viability: = 2.95 AU, rise time = 19.20 s, inflow slope = 0.042 s, and . Toward the graft tip, and perfusion gradually decrease.
The patient with AL shows a high intensity 60 s post-dye injection at the anastomosis site, although adjacent to a low-intensity boundary. In contrast, SI shows a low region surrounding the anastomosis, with the ischemic threshold occurring more proximally. Quantitatively, this patient’s anastomosis site showed an of 54.44%, of 9.59 AU, rise time of 71.80 s, inflow slope of 0.011 s, and of 78.21. This suggests that the anastomotic site was positioned too distally within the oxygenation and perfusion gradient, potentially contributing to the developed AL.
Discussion
This study demonstrates the feasibility of SI-based intraoperative to assess gastric conduit ischemia during esophagectomy, providing a direct quantitative comparison with ICG-FI. The primary challenge in preparing the gastric conduit and preventing AL is the identification of the demarcation between perfused and ischemic tissue by the operating surgeon. Our findings indicate that both SI and ICG-FI successfully identify tissue ischemia, and capture the ischemic gradient toward the distal tip of the graft, with SI providing a real-time assessment of actual tissue hypoxia. The compact snapshot spectral camera allowed for seamless OR integration by attachment to a standard laparoscope. It provided continuous, video-rate mapping without the need for large scanning equipment, contrast injections, or added operative time.
The median in well-perfused gastric tissue was approximately and significantly different from ischemic tissue, aligning with other spectral imaging studies, reporting values around [7, 8, 36, 37]. However, reported values vary in the context of conduit formation. Safi et al. observed an average decrease of after creation of the gastric conduit, reflecting the physiological impact of vascular division, which should be considered when comparing absolute values across studies and clinical settings [36]. Moreover, we found no significant difference in or LCL between the selected anastomosis site and the well-perfused control region, suggesting the surgeons generally selected suitable anastomosis sites in this cohort.
Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, an threshold of was identified to discriminate perfused from ischemic gastric tissue. This range is consistent with previously proposed thresholds of approximately in colorectal surgery [27] and around in plastic and vascular surgery [8]. While promising, such thresholds remain system- and cohort-dependent and are derived from the most perfused and ischemic regions. In clinical practice, the relevant threshold for anastomosis selection would likely be higher. Moreover, the leave-one-patient out calculation showed a relatively high standard deviation of for this threshold, indicating that the optimal threshold may vary significantly between patients. This underscores the need for larger studies to establish robust, generalizable thresholds for clinical decision-making.
demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with LCL, supporting its physiological validity as a marker of tissue hypoxia. In contrast, ICG-derived perfusion metrics showed only moderate or non-significant correlations. This likely reflects the fact that ICG-FI metrics are calculated solely from clinically well-perfused tissue, as no dye enters the ischemic control tissue. Detecting significant associations between fluorescence metrics and LCL likely requires sampling more physiological states. However, previous preclinical studies also reported stronger correlations between and LCL compared to ICG-FI parameters, although most were conducted in small animal models [6, 10, 31].
Among quantitative ICG-FI parameters, ingress-related metrics (, , rise time, and inflow slope) demonstrated the strongest discriminatory performance, whereas intensity-based parameters such as appeared less robust, consistent with prior reports [20, 22]. Egress-related metrics did not reach statistical significance, likely due to the limited three-minute acquisition window. Longer recordings are recommended in future studies to enable reliable assessment of wash-out dynamics, which may provide additional information regarding venous congestion. Because this study did not include a sufficiently large cohort with clinically confirmed leakage, no definitive ICG-FI thresholds were established. Nevertheless, previously reported reference values provide useful context. Suggested cut-offs include TTP > 30 s, > 10 s, and abnormal inflow slope values, although these vary widely depending on imaging platform and analysis methodology [21, 24, 26, 27]. In esophagectomy specifically, delayed fluorescence intensity beyond 60 s has been associated with impaired perfusion [35]. These observations underscore the ongoing need for standardization of quantitative fluorescence metrics.
In the exploratory comparison between patients with and without AL, quantitative ICG-FI ingress metrics at the anastomosis site were significantly different between groups, whereas alone did not reach significance. This likely reflects the multifactorial nature of AL. While reduced perfusion and tissue hypoxia frequently co-occur, as illustrated by leakage patients 1 and 3, other contributing factors including technical, mechanical, and patient-related variables may lead to AL, as seen in leakage patients 2, 4, and 5. Together, these observations suggest that perfusion and oxygenation metrics provide complementary rather than redundant information. However, given the small leakage cohort (), these findings are exploratory and should not be interpreted as evidence of superiority of either modality for outcome prediction.
Both imaging modalities demonstrated a clear decline in oxygenation or perfusion toward the distal conduit. In an anecdotal case study of a patient who developed AL, ICG-FI demonstrated high fluorescence intensity at the chosen anastomosis site, whereas SI revealed that this region was already hypoxic. This finding suggests that although mapping and ICG-FI are complementary, they visualize different physiological phenomena. Similar observations have been reported by Hennig et al. and Studier-Fischer et al., who described a more peripheral ischemic boundary with ICG-FI compared with SI in esophageal and small bowel surgery [9, 13]. This discrepancy likely stems from the different light penetration depths of the two modalities. ICG-FI captures fluorescence signals up to 6 mm deep, reflecting deeper vascular inflow and potential dye pooling in the tissue bed. In contrast, SI evaluates the superficial serosal and subserosal microcirculation at a depth of up to 2 mm. Additionally, diffusion of ICG dye into partially ischemic regions may further alter perfusion boundaries, as discussed by Diana et al. [38]. As such, both modalities could offer complementary insights, with potentially providing a more direct assessment of the tissue’s metabolic viability, while ICG-FI reflects macro-perfusion dynamics.
An important consideration when interpreting these metrics is the differentiation between arterial inflow-related hypoxia and venous congestion. SI measures , which can drop in both scenarios, either due to a lack of freshly oxygenated arterial blood or the pooling of deoxygenated blood in congested veins, as demonstrated by Fischer et al. [39]. ICG-FI, particularly its wash-out dynamics, is theoretically better suited to specifically evaluate venous congestion. Our limited three-minute acquisition window restricted the evaluation of egress metrics. Future studies with extended monitoring could clarify the modalities’ combined ability to differentiate these states.
Due to the limited sample size of this study, it lacked statistical power to formally evaluate the predictive value of SI and ICG-FI for AL. Crucially, the lack of outcome-based validation limits the definitive clinical applicability of these findings. The evidence supporting the potential of SI is primarily derived from an exploratory analysis and an anecdotal case presentation. Therefore, conclusions regarding the superiority of one modality over the other cannot be drawn. Rather, they should be viewed as providing complementary insights. Future large-scale, multicenter trials are essential to correlate and ICG-FI metrics with clinical outcomes, such as the Clavien–Dindo classification, and to establish statistically robust predictive models.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of utilizing intraoperative spectral imaging (SI) and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) to assess gastric conduit viability during minimally invasive esophagectomy. While both modalities successfully map the progressive ischemic gradient toward the distal tip, they yield distinct physiological insights. SI provides continuous, contrast-free mapping of superficial tissue oxygenation () showing a strong correlation with local capillary lactate, suggesting it may be sensitive to early metabolic hypoxia. In contrast, ICG-FI captures deeper vascular macro-perfusion dynamics, with ingress-related metrics serving as robust indicators of blood inflow. Crucially, our findings indicate that both modalities are complementary
Future large-scale trials with outcome-based validation are essential to translate the obtained metrics into clinically validated thresholds, ultimately aiming to optimize anastomosis site selection and reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage.
Acknowledgments
This research received partial funding from the Flemish Government under the ’Onderzoeksprogramma Artificiele Intelligentie (AI) Vlaanderen’ program.
Declarations
Disclosure
Jens De Winne, Hanne Vanommeslaeghe, Danilo Babin, Hiep Luong, Siri Luthman, Elke Van Daele and Wim Ceelen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A (2024) Global cancer statistics 2022: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 74(3):229–263. 10.3322/caac.21834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oesophago-Gastric, Anastomosis study group on behalf of the west midlands research collaborative (2022) Rates of anastomotic complications and their management following esophagectomy: results of the Oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA). Ann Surg 275(2):382. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Linder G, Hedberg J, Björck M, Sundbom M (2017) Perfusion of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus Off J Internat Soc Dis Esophagus 30(1):143–149. 10.1111/dote.12537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Milstein DMJ, Ince C, Gisbertz SS, Boateng KB, Geerts BF, Hollmann MW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Veelo DP (2016) Laser speckle contrast imaging identifies ischemic areas on gastric tube reconstructions following esophagectomy. Medicine 95(25):3875. 10.1097/MD.0000000000003875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsekov C, Belyaev O, Tcholakov O, Tcherveniakov A (2006) Intraoperative doppler assessment of gastric tube perfusion in esophagogastroplasty. J Surg Res 132(1):98–103. 10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cinelli L, Felli E, Baratelli L, Ségaud S, Baiocchini A, Okamoto N, Rodríguez-Luna MR, Elmore U, Rosati R, Partelli S, Marescaux J, Gioux S, Diana M (2021) Single snapshot imaging of optical properties (SSOP) for perfusion assessment during gastric conduit creation for esophagectomy: An experimental study on pigs. Cancers 13(23):6079. 10.3390/cancers13236079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nickel F, Studier-Fischer A, Özdemir B, Odenthal J, Müller LR, Knoedler S, Kowalewski KF, Camplisson I, Allers MM, Dietrich M, Schmidt K, Salg GA, Kenngott HG, Billeter AT, Gockel I, Sagiv C, Hadar OE, Gildenblat J, Ayala L, Seidlitz S, Maier-Hein L, Müller-Stich BP (2025) Optimization of anastomotic technique and gastric conduit perfusion with hyperspectral imaging and machine learning in an experimental model for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 51(1):106908. 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Köhler H, Jansen-Winkeln B, Maktabi M, Barberio M, Takoh J, Holfert N, Moulla Y, Niebisch S, Diana M, Neumuth T, Rabe SM, Chalopin C, Melzer A, Gockel I (2019) Evaluation of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for the measurement of ischemic conditioning effects of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 33(11):3775–3782. 10.1007/s00464-019-06675-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Studier-Fischer A, Schwab FM, Rees M, Seidlitz S, Sellner J, Özdemir B, Ayala L, Odenthal J, Knoedler S, Kowalewski K-F, Haney CM, Dietrich M, Salg GA, Kenngott HG, Müller-Stich BP, Maier-Hein L, Nickel F (2023) ICG-augmented hyperspectral imaging for visualization of intestinal perfusion compared to conventional ICG fluorescence imaging: An experimental study. Int J Surg 109(12):3883. 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Barberio M, Felli E, Seyller E, Longo F, Chand M, Gockel I, Geny B, Swanström L, Marescaux J, Agnus V, Diana M (2020) Quantitative fluorescence angiography versus hyperspectral imaging to assess bowel ischemia: A comparative study in enhanced reality. Surgery 168(1):178–184. 10.1016/j.surg.2020.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ayala L, Adler TJ, Seidlitz S, Wirkert S, Engels C, Seitel A, Sellner J, Aksenov A, Bodenbach M, Bader P, Baron S, Vemuri A, Wiesenfarth M, Schreck N, Mindroc D, Tizabi M, Pirmann S, Everitt B, Kopp-Schneider A, Teber D, Maier-Hein L (2023) Spectral imaging enables contrast agent-free real-time ischemia monitoring in laparoscopic surgery. Sci Adv 9(10):6778. 10.1126/sciadv.add6778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Winne J, Willems S, Luthman S, Babin D, Luong H, Ceelen W (2026) Clinical validation of deep learning for real-time tissue oxygenation estimation using spectral imaging. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025. Springer, Daejeon, South Korea, pp 119–126
- 13.Hennig S, Jansen-Winkeln B, Köhler H, Knospe L, Chalopin C, Maktabi M, Pfahl A, Hoffmann J, Kwast S, Gockel I, Moulla Y (2022) Novel intraoperative imaging of gastric tube perfusion during oncologic esophagectomy: A pilot study comparing hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and fluorescence imaging (FI) with indocyanine green (ICG). Cancers 14(1):97. 10.3390/cancers14010097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.MacCormac O, Horgan CC, Waterhouse D, Noonan P, Janatka M, Miles R, Jacobs J, Dockerill C, Trotouin T, Schizas A, Seeliger B, Ourselin S, Ebner M, Vercauteren T, Shapey J (2025) Hyperspectral abdominal laparoscopy with real-time quantitative tissue oxygenation imaging: a live porcine study. Front Med Technol 7:12456. 10.3389/fmedt.2025.1549245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Winne J, Babin D, Luong H, Luthman S, Van Daele E, Vanommeslaeghe H, Ceelen W (2025) Real-time assessment of graft oxygenation and perfusion using spectral imaging for improved outcome in esophageal cancer surgery. In: Optical Biopsy XXIII: Toward Real-Time Spectroscopic Imaging and Diagnosis, 13311, pp. 17–23. SPIE, San Francisco, USA . 10.1117/12.3042274 [DOI]
- 16.Ayala L, Isensee F, Wirkert SJ, Vemuri AS, Maier-Hein KH, Fei B, Maier-Hein L (2022) Band selection for oxygenation estimation with multispectral/hyperspectral imaging. Biomed Opt Express 13(3):1224–1242. 10.1364/BOE.441214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.De Winne J, Danilo B, Luong H, Luthman S, Milosavljevic AM, Jonjev Z, Hrubik J, Velicki L (2025) Real-time multispectral imaging for intraoperative monitoring of coronary artery bypass graft patency. J Biomed Opt 30(3):036001. 10.1117/1.JBO.30.3.036001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vunckx K, Charle W (2021) Accurate video-rate multi-spectral imaging using IMEC snapshot sensors. In: 2021 11th Workshop on hyperspectral imaging and signal processing: evolution in remote sensing (WHISPERS), pp. 1–7. 10.1109/WHISPERS52202.2021.9483975 [DOI]
- 19.Muszyński R, Luong H (2024) Cube it : Training hyperspectral demosaicing models using synthetic datasets. In: 2024 14th workshop on hyperspectral imaging and signal processing: evolution in remote sensing (WHISPERS), pp. 1–5. IEEE, Helsinki, Finland. 10.1109/whispers65427.2024.10876469 [DOI]
- 20.Goncalves LN, van den Hoven P, van Schaik J, Leeuwenburgh L, Hendricks CHF, Verduijn PS, van der Bogt KEA, van Rijswijk CSP, Schepers A, Vahrmeijer AL, Hamming JF, van der Vorst JR (2021) Perfusion parameters in near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green: A systematic review of the literature. Life 11(5):433. 10.3390/life11050433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Slooter MD, Mansvelders MSE, Bloemen PR, Gisbertz SS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Hompes R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Bruin DM (2021) Defining indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during gastrointestinal surgery: Systematic review. BJS Open 5(2):074. 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lütken CD, Achiam MP, Osterkamp J, Svendsen MB, Nerup N (2021) Quantification of fluorescence angiography: Toward a reliable intraoperative assessment of tissue perfusion - a narrative review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(2):251–259. 10.1007/s00423-020-01966-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Joosten JJ, Slooter MD, van den Elzen RM, Bloemen PR, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Daams F, de Bruin DM, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2023) Perfusion assessment by fluorescence time curves in esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction: A prospective clinical study. Surg Endosc 37(8):6343–6352. 10.1007/s00464-023-10107-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jansen SM, de Bruin DM, Wilk LS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Strackee SD, Gisbertz SS, van Bavel ET, van Leeuwen TG (2022) Quantitative fluorescence imaging ofperfusion: An algorithm to predict anastomotic leakage. Life 12(2):249. 10.3390/life12020249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.von Kroge P, Russ D, Wagner J, Grotelüschen R, Reeh M, Izbicki JR, Mann O, Wipper SH, Duprée A (2022) Quantification of gastric tube perfusion following esophagectomy using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(7):2693–2701. 10.1007/s00423-022-02546-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wada T, Kawada K, Hanada K, Obama K (2022) Quantitative analysis of colonic perfusion using ICG fluorescence angiography and its consequences for anastomotic healing in a rat model. Cancers 14(16):4024. 10.3390/cancers14164024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Son GM, Nazir AM, Yun MS, Lee IY, Im SB, Kwak JY, Park S-H, Baek K-R, Gockel I (2023) The safe values of quantitative perfusion parameters of ICG angiography based on tissue oxygenation of hyperspectral imaging for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Biomedicines 11(7):2029. 10.3390/biomedicines11072029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Karaev N, Makarov I, Wang J, Neverova N, Vedaldi A, Rupprecht C (2021) CoTracker3: simpler and better point tracking by pseudo-labelling real videos. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11831
- 29.Sun J, Shen Z, Wang Y, Bao H, Zhou X (2021) LoFTR: detector-free local feature matching with transformers. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.00680
- 30.Sarlin P-E, DeTone D, Malisiewicz T, Rabinovich A (2020) SuperGlue: learning feature matching with graph neural networks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11763
- 31.Heuvelings DJI, Scheepers MHMC, Al-Difaie Z, Okamoto N, Diana M, Stassen LPS, Bouvy ND, Al-Taher M (2024) Quantitative analysis of intestinal perfusion with indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue (MB) using a single clinically approved fluorescence imaging system: A demonstration in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 38(7):3556–3563. 10.1007/s00464-024-10864-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Orii R, Sugawara Y, Hayashida M, Uchida K, Yamada Y, Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Hanaoka K (2001) Lactate is correlated with the indocyanine green elimination rate in liver resection for cirrhotic patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia 92(4):1064. 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Winne J, Strumane A, Babin D, Luthman S, Luong H, Philips W (2024) Multispectral indices for real-time and non-invasive tissue ischemia monitoring using snapshot cameras. Biomed Opt Express 15(2):641–655. 10.1364/BOE.506084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wasserman K, Beaver WL, Whipp BJ (1990) Gas exchange theory and the lactic acidosis (anaerobic) threshold. Circulation 81(1 Suppl):14–30 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kumagai Y, Hatano S, Sobajima J, Ishiguro T, Fukuchi M, Ishibashi K-I, Mochiki E, Nakajima Y, Ishida H (2018) Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: efficacy of the 90-second rule. Dis Esophagus Off J Internat Soc Dis Esophagus. 10.1093/dote/doy052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Safi N, Johannessen H-O, Medhus AW, Mala T, Kazmi SSH (2020) Laser doppler flowmetry and visible light spectroscopy of the gastric tube during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Vasc Health Risk Manag 16:497–505. 10.2147/VHRM.S269138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Benaron DA, Parachikov IH, Friedland S, Soetikno R, Brock-Utne J, van der Starre PJA, Nezhat C, Terris MK, Maxim PG, Carson JJL, Razavi MK, Gladstone HB, Fincher EF, Hsu CP, Clark FL, Cheong W-F, Duckworth JL, Stevenson DK (2004) Continuous, noninvasive, and localized microvascular tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy. Anesthesiology 100(6):1469–1475. 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Diana M, Agnus V, Halvax P, Liu Y-Y, Dallemagne B, Schlagowski A-I, Geny B, Diemunsch P, Lindner V, Marescaux J (2015) Intraoperative fluorescence-based enhanced reality laparoscopic real-time imaging to assess bowel perfusion at the anastomotic site in an experimental model. Br J Surg 102(2):169–176. 10.1002/bjs.9725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Studier-Fischer A, Bressan M, Qasim Ab, Özdemir B, Sellner J, Seidlitz S, Haney CM, Egen L, Michel M, Dietrich M, Salg GA, Billmann F, Nienhüser H, Hackert T, Müller BP, Maier-Hein L, Nickel F, Kowalewski KF (2024) Spectral characterization of intraoperative renal perfusion using hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence. Sci Rep 14(1):17262. 10.1038/s41598-024-68280-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
