Abstract
Background
The aim was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) alone and in combination with metronidazole, Punica granatum extract, and Curcuma longa extract against Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Materials and Methods
An in vitro experimental study was performed using P. gingivalis strain ATCC 33277. Bacteria were cultured under anaerobic conditions. Ten experimental groups were evaluated: 0.2% CHX, 0.5% metronidazole, 100% P. granatum extract, 0.1 and 1.0% C. longa extracts, their respective combinations with 0.2% CHX, and distilled water. Antibacterial activity was assessed using an agar-well diffusion assay, and the diameter of the bacterial growth inhibition zone was measured in millimeters. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.
Results
The combination of 0.2% CHX and 0.5% metronidazole demonstrated the greatest antibacterial activity, producing the largest inhibition zone (21.67 ± 1.60 mm). This value was significantly greater than those observed for CHX alone (16.44 ± 1.09 mm, P < 0.01), P. granatum combined with CHX (18.11 ± 0.11 mm, P < 0.01), 0.1% C. longa combined with CHX (18.89 ± 0.40 mm, P < 0.01), and 1.0% C. longa combined with CHX (18.40 ± 0.62 mm, P < 0.01). Among the individual agents, 100% P. granatum extract demonstrated the greatest antibacterial activity (20.67 ± 0.00 mm), whereas metronidazole alone, both C. longa extracts, and the negative control produced no measurable inhibition zones.
Conclusions
The combination of CHX and metronidazole exhibits the strongest antibacterial activity, whereas P. granatum extracts demonstrate substantial antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis.
KEYWORDS: Chlorhexidine, metronidazole, Porphyromonas gingivalis, periodontitis, antibacterial agents
Introduction
Poor daily oral hygiene maintenance is the classical clinical risk factor for oral diseases, including periodontitis [1, 2]. However, from a microbiological aspect, periodontitis results from dysbiosis in the subgingival biofilm that elicits an exaggerated host inflammatory response, with Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria playing significant roles in disease initiation and progression [3–5]. Among these microorganisms, Porphyromonas gingivalis has been labeled as a major pathogen due to its ability to evade host immune defenses, disrupt microbial homeostasis, and promote chronic inflammation [6–8]. Therefore, suppression of P. gingivalis remains a major therapeutic objective in periodontal treatment. Mechanical debridement represents the cornerstone of periodontal therapy [9–12]; however, eliminating periodontal pathogens from deep periodontal pockets and complex biofilm structures is often challenging. In this context, residual bacterial colonization may contribute to persistent inflammation and disease recurrence, thereby justifying the adjunctive use of antimicrobial agents [13].
Chlorhexidine (CHX), particularly at concentrations of 0.12–0.2%, remains the gold-standard antiseptic in dentistry owing to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, substantivity, and proven efficacy in reducing dental plaque and gingival inflammation [14, 15]. However, combination antimicrobial therapy has emerged as a promising approach to improve antibacterial efficacy through combined interactions [16–18]. Metronidazole is a nitroimidazole antimicrobial agent that is highly effective against obligate anaerobic bacteria, including P. gingivalis [19, 20]. It disrupts bacterial DNA synthesis and has been widely used as both a systemic and locally delivered adjunct in periodontal therapy [19, 20]. An in vitro study [21] showed that CHX and metronidazole exhibit significant antimicrobial activity against P. gingivalis, resulting in 50 and 99.9% reductions in bacterial growth, respectively. However, growing concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance and the increasing demand for naturally derived therapeutic agents have stimulated research into plant-based compounds with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. Curcuma longa contains curcumin, a polyphenolic compound exhibiting antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities [22, 23]. Although C. longa has demonstrated inhibitory effects against P. gingivalis under optimized laboratory conditions, its poor aqueous solubility and limited bioavailability considerably restrict its antimicrobial performance in conventional formulations [24]. Similarly, punicalagin-rich extracts derived from Punica granatum, which are abundant in the water-soluble antioxidant polyphenol punicalagin, have demonstrated significant antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against periodontal pathogens [25, 26]. Despite such encouraging results [24–26], comparative evidence evaluating these natural products individually and in combination with CHX against P. gingivalis remains limited.
The aim of the present in vitro study is to evaluate the antibacterial activity of CHX alone and in combination with metronidazole, P. granatum, and C. longa extract against P. gingivalis. The null hypothesis is that combining CHX with metronidazole, P. granatum, or C. longa does not produce greater antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis than CHX alone.
Materials and methods
Ethical guidelines and study design
This study was exempt from ethical approval and informed consent requirements, as it involved exclusively laboratory-based in vitro experiments using bacterial cultures without the involvement of human participants, human tissues, human-derived biological specimens, and/or experimental animals. Accordingly, institutional ethics committee review was not required under applicable institutional and national research guidelines.
Bacterial strain and culture conditions
The P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was used as the test microorganism. The bacteria were cultured on supplemented Brucella blood agar containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood, 5 µg/mL hemin, and 1 µg/mL menadione (vitamin K₁), and incubated at 37°C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions consisting of 80% N₂, 10% H₂, and 10% CO₂. Fresh bacterial colonies were suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard (approximately 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL) prior to antimicrobial testing.
Preparation of antimicrobial agents
Metronidazole and P. granatum extract were prepared at concentrations of 0.5 and 100%, respectively. The C. longa preparations were evaluated at concentrations of 1 mg/mL (0.1%) and 10 mg/mL (1%). Commercially available 0.2% CHX gluconate solution and sterile distilled water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Combination groups consisted of each test material mixed with 0.2% CHX immediately before antimicrobial testing.
Experimental groups
The antibacterial activity of the test agents was evaluated using the following experimental groups: (1) 0.2% CHX; (2) 0.5% metronidazole; (3) a combination of 0.5% metronidazole and 0.2% CHX; (4) 100% P. granatum extract; (5) a combination of 100% P. granatum extract and 0.2% CHX; (6) 0.1% C. longa extract; (7) 1.0% C. longa extract; (8) a combination of 0.1% C. longa extract and 0.2% CHX; (9) a combination of 1.0% C. longa extract and 0.2% CHX; and (10) sterile distilled water.
Assessment of antibacterial activity and outcome measure
Antibacterial activity was assessed using the agar-well diffusion method. A standardized suspension of P. gingivalis equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was uniformly inoculated onto the surface of supplemented Brucella blood agar plates using a sterile swab. After inoculation, circular wells were aseptically prepared in the agar using a sterile cork borer. An equal volume of each test solution was dispensed into the respective wells. The plates were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions. Following incubation, antibacterial activity was determined by measuring the diameter of the bacterial inhibition zone, in millimeters. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Differences among the experimental groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple pairwise comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
To directly address the null hypothesis, pairwise comparisons were performed between 0.2% CHX alone and each CHX-containing combination. Compared with CHX alone (16.44 ± 1.09 mm), the CHX–metronidazole combination produced a significantly greater inhibition zone (21.67 ± 1.60 mm; P < 0.01). The CHX–P. granatum combination (18.11 ± 0.11 mm), CHX–0.1% C. longa combination (18.89 ± 0.40 mm), and CHX–1.0% C. longa combination (18.40 ± 0.62 mm) also showed numerically greater inhibition zones than CHX alone; however, the statistical significance of these pairwise comparisons should be reported explicitly. The CHX–metronidazole combination demonstrated the greatest antibacterial activity among all CHX-containing combinations. In the present study, 0.5% metronidazole, 0.1% C. longa extract, 1.0% C. longa extract, and sterile distilled water produced no measurable inhibition zones under the agar-diffusion assay conditions (Table 1).
Table 1.
Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine, metronidazole, pomegranate extract, and Curcuma longa extracts against Porphyromonas gingivalis.
| Experimental group | Inhibition zone (mm), mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Sterile distilled water | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| CHX (0.2%)* | 16.44 ± 1.09 |
| Metronidazole (0.5%) | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| C. longa extract (0.1%) | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| C. longa extract (1.0%) | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| P. granatum extract (100%) | 20.67 ± 0.00 |
| P. granatum extract (100%) + Chlorhexidine (0.2%)* | 18.11 ± 0.11 |
| C. longa extract (0.1%) + Chlorhexidine (0.2%)* | 18.89 ± 0.40 |
| C. longa extract (1.0%) + Chlorhexidine (0.2%)* | 18.40 ± 0.62 |
| CHX (0.2%) + Metronidazole (0.5%) | 21.67 ± 1.60 |
P. granatum: Punica granatum; C. longa: Curcuma longa; SD: standard deviation; CHX: Chlorhexidine.
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (mm).
Compared with Chlorhexidine (0.2%) + Metronidazole (0.5%) (P < 0.01).
Discussion
In summary, the principal finding of this in vitro study was that the combination of 0.2% CHX and 0.5% metronidazole showed the greatest antibacterial activity, producing the largest inhibition zone, which was significantly greater than CHX alone and all other combination therapies. Moreover, P. granatum extract alone demonstrated substantial antibacterial activity, whereas metronidazole alone and both C. longa preparations failed to produce measurable inhibition zones under the present experimental conditions. Accordingly, the null hypothesis was rejected, since combining CHX with metronidazole resulted in significantly greater antibacterial activity than CHX alone. An unexpected yet interesting observation was the absence of detectable antibacterial activity with metronidazole alone. Since P. gingivalis is generally considered highly susceptible to metronidazole, this finding is unlikely to reflect intrinsic resistance alone. Rather, several methodological factors may explain this observation. Agar diffusion assays depend not only on antimicrobial potency but also on the ability of the agent to diffuse through the agar matrix [21]. Metronidazole possesses different diffusion characteristics than CHX, and inadequate diffusion, incomplete dissolution, reduced stability during incubation, or insufficient local bioavailability may have limited measurable inhibition despite preserved antibacterial potential [27, 28]. Furthermore, obligate anaerobe susceptibility is influenced by inoculum density, agar composition, anaerobic conditions, and incubation methodology. Similarly, Lorenzi et al. [21] demonstrated that metronidazole exhibits dose-dependent inhibition of P. gingivalis and that even subinhibitory concentrations retain biological activity when appropriate experimental conditions are employed. Nevertheless, the superior antibacterial efficacy observed with the CHX–metronidazole combination is biologically plausible and consistent with previous experimental evidence [21, 29]. CHX primarily disrupts bacterial cell membranes by interacting with negatively charged phospholipids, thereby increasing membrane permeability and causing leakage of intracellular components. This membrane damage may facilitate intracellular penetration of metronidazole, which subsequently undergoes reductive activation within anaerobic bacteria and generates cytotoxic intermediates that inhibit DNA synthesis. Thus, the two agents target distinct bacterial structures, producing complementary rather than overlapping mechanisms of action. It has been reported that even concentrations of metronidazole that were ineffective when administered alone markedly potentiated the antibacterial effect of suboptimal CHX concentrations, resulting in substantial inhibition of P. gingivalis growth and bacterial killing [21]. The findings of the present experiment therefore further support the concept that combining membrane-active antiseptics with intracellularly acting antimicrobials may represent a promising strategy for enhancing antibacterial efficacy while potentially reducing the concentration required for each agent individually.
The present results showed that among the naturally derived products evaluated, P. granatum extract demonstrated considerable antibacterial activity when used alone, producing an inhibition zone that exceeded that of CHX alone. This finding agrees with previous investigations demonstrating that pomegranate-derived polyphenols, particularly punicalagin and ellagic acid, exert antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis through disruption of bacterial cell walls, inhibition of biofilm formation, interference with bacterial adhesion, and suppression of virulence-associated enzymes. Nevertheless, combining P. granatum with CHX resulted in only a modest increase in antibacterial activity compared with CHX alone and remained inferior to the CHX–metronidazole combination [15, 30, 31]. One possible explanation is that both CHX and pomegranate polyphenols predominantly target the bacterial surface and membrane, resulting in partially overlapping antimicrobial mechanisms and consequently limited pharmacological synergy. Moreover, the antibacterial activity of plant extracts depends on the concentration and stability of their bioactive constituents, which may vary according to extraction procedures and botanical composition. These factors may have limited any additional antibacterial benefit beyond that already provided by CHX. Although curcumin has been reported to possess antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, and curcumin formulated as nanoparticles demonstrates substantially greater antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis [32–34], its clinical translation has consistently been hindered by poor aqueous solubility, rapid degradation under physiological conditions, and limited bioavailability [35, 36]. Therefore, the concentrations evaluated in the present study (0.1 and 1.0%) may have been insufficient to achieve effective intracellular concentrations capable of inhibiting bacterial growth.
Based upon the present experimental results, the enhanced antibacterial activity observed with CHX–metronidazole may represent a useful adjunctive approach for suppressing P. gingivalis, particularly in patients exhibiting elevated bacterial loads. However, host-related factors should also be considered. Habitual use of combustible and non-combustible nicotinic products adversely alters the subgingival microbiome, impairs neutrophil function, reduces tissue perfusion, and promotes persistence of periodontal pathogens, thereby potentially diminishing the clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial therapies [37, 38]. Likewise, persistent hyperglycemia, a characteristic feature of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, promotes the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, which may impair the host response and consequently reduce the overall effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy despite adequate suppression of the bacterial burden [9, 38, 39]. The authors applaud the study by Isola et al. [40], according to which, CHX-based oral rinses effectively reduce P. gingivalis carriage; however, patient-related factors, including smoking status significantly influence treatment outcomes. Future randomized clinical trials should evaluate the efficacy of CHX combined with metronidazole as an adjunct to mechanical periodontal therapy in patients with periodontitis and peri-implant diseases. Such investigations could include microbiological, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures while stratifying participants according to smoking status, diabetic status, and glycemic control.
Conclusion
Within the limits of the present in vitro experiment, it is concluded that the combination of CHX and metronidazole exhibits the strongest antibacterial activity, whereas P. granatum extracts demonstrate substantial antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis.
Acknowledgment
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number PNURSP2026R388, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Funding Statement
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number PNURSP2026R388, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
References
- [1].Corbet EF. Periodontal diseases in Asians. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2006;8:136–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Nijakowski K, Lehmann A, Rutkowski R, Korybalska K, Witowski J, Surdacka A. Poor oral hygiene and high levels of inflammatory cytokines in saliva predict the risk of overweight and obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:6310. 10.3390/ijerph17176310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Patel MR, Song X. Microbial complexes in supragingival plaque. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2008;23:196–205. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00411.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Pussinen PJ, Paju S, Mäntylä P, Sorsa T. Serum microbial- and host-derived markers of periodontal diseases: a review. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2402–12. 10.2174/092986707781745604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].van Winkelhoff AJ, Rurenga P, Wekema-Mulder GJ, Singadji ZM, Rams TE. Non-oral gram-negative facultative rods in chronic periodontitis microbiota. Microb Pathog. 2016;94:117–22. 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Javed F, Romanos GE. Does photodynamic therapy enhance standard antibacterial therapy in dentistry? Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31:512–8. 10.1089/pho.2012.3329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Zhang Z, Liu D, Liu S, Zhang S, Pan Y. The role of porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles in periodontal disease and related systemic diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:585917. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.585917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Mombelli A. Microbial colonization of the periodontal pocket and its significance for periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2018;76:85–96. 10.1111/prd.12147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Akram Z, Safii SH, Vaithilingam RD, Baharuddin NA, Javed F, Vohra F. Efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy in the management of chronic periodontitis among obese and non-obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20: 903–14. 10.1007/s00784-016-1793-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Javed F, Al Amri MD, Al-Kheraif AA, Qadri T, Ahmed A, Ghanem A, et al. Efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy with adjunct Nd:YAG laser therapy in the treatment of periodontal inflammation among patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a short-term pilot study. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2015;149:230–4. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Javed F, Al-Daghri NM, Wang HL, Wang CY, Al-Hezaimi K. Short-term effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment on the gingival crevicular fluid cytokine profiles in sites with induced periodontal defects: a study on dogs with and without streptozotocin-induced diabetes. J Periodontol. 2014;85:1589–95. 10.1902/jop.2014.140150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Javed F, Salehpoor D, Al-Dhafeeri T, Yousuf M, Malmstrom H, Khan J, et al. Is adjunctive photodynamic therapy more effective than scaling and root planing alone in the treatment of periodontal disease in hyperglycemic patients? A systematic review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018;22:1–6. 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Jeyakumar J, Sculean A, Eick S. Anti-biofilm activity of oral health-care products containing chlorhexidine digluconate and citrox. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18:981–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kommuri K, Michelogiannakis D, Barmak BA, Rossouw PE, Javed F. Efficacy of herbal- versus chlorhexidine-based mouthwashes towards oral hygiene maintenance in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2022;20:100–11. 10.1111/idh.12567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Al-Amry N, BinShabaib MS, AlHarthi SS, Binnjefan S, Alnafissah S, Aabed K, et al. Effect of a chlorhexidine gluconate-based oral rinse containing natural bioflavonoids on soft tissue inflammation and subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis carriage in patients with peri-implant mucositis. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2025;23:779–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Herrera D, Alonso B, León R, Roldán S, Sanz M. Antimicrobial therapy in periodontitis: the use of systemic antimicrobials against the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:45–66. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01260.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Khattri S, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Arora A, Eachempati P, Kusum CK, Bhat KG, et al. Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11:Cd012568. 10.1002/14651858.CD012568.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Slots J, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antimicrobial therapy in periodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1993;21:51–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Serbanescu MA, Oveisi M, Sun C, Fine N, Bosy A, Glogauer M. Metronidazole enhances killing of Porphyromonas gingivalis by human PMNs. Front Oral Health. 2022;3:933997. 10.3389/froh.2022.933997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Wright TL, Ellen RP, Lacroix JM, Sinnadurai S, Mittelman MW. Effects of metronidazole on Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilms. J Periodontal Res. 1997;32:473–7. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00560.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lorenzi C, Lio F, Mazzetti V, Carosi P, Lamelza S, Pistoia ES, et al. Synergistic effect of metronidazole and chlorhexidine against Porphyromonas gingivalis growth: an in vitro study. Dent J (Basel) 2024;12:307. 10.3390/dj12100307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Jalaluddin M, Jayanti I, Gowdar IM, Roshan R, Varkey RR, Thirutheri A. Antimicrobial activity of Curcuma longa L. extract on periodontal pathogens. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11:S203–7. 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_295_18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Pitic Coţ DE, Popovici RA, Ille CE, Talpoş-Niculescu IC, Chevereşan A, Pop D, et al. Curcumin-based nanoformulations for oral health: mechanistic insights, antimicrobial efficacy, and future clinical perspectives. Biomedicines. 2026;14:815. 10.3390/biomedicines14040815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Maleki Dizaj S, Shokrgozar H, Yazdani J, Memar MY, Sharifi S, Ghavimi MA. Antibacterial effects of curcumin nanocrystals against porphyromonas gingivalis isolated from patients with implant failure. Clin Pract. 2022;12:809–17. 10.3390/clinpract12050085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Faisal Madhloom A, Bashir Hashim Al-Taweel F, Sha AM, Raad Abdulbaqi H. Antimicrobial effect of Moringa Oleifera L. and red pomegranate against clinically isolated Porphyromonas gingivalis: in vitro study. Arch Razi Inst. 2022;77:1405–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Lima Bezerra JJ, Domingos da Silva JM. Dental applications of Punica granatum L. in the treatment of gingivitis: a review of ethnomedicinal uses, randomized clinical trials, and antibacterial potential against Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2025;336:118701. 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Leitsch D. A review on metronidazole: an old warhorse in antimicrobial chemotherapy. Parasitology. 2019;146:1167–78. 10.1017/S0031182017002025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Suvarna V, Murahari M, Pawar S. Metronidazole – an old drug for structure optimization and repurposing. Chem Biodivers. 2025;22:e03389. 10.1002/cbdv.202403389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Mirzaeei S, Zangeneh M, Veisi F, Parsa S, Hematti M. Chlorhexidine, clotrimazole, metronidazole and combination therapy in the treatment of vaginal infections. J Med Life. 2021;14:250–6. 10.25122/jml-2019-0160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Alqutub MN, Alhumaidan AA, Alali Y, Al-Aali KA, Javed F, Vohra F, et al. Comparison of the postoperative anti-inflammatory efficacy of chlorhexidine, saline rinses and herbal mouthwashes after mechanical debridement in patients with peri-implant mucositis: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2023;21:203–10. 10.1111/idh.12582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Alamry N, Aloumi DE, Alghamdi SS, Mohammed AE, Subhi AS, BinShabaib MS, et al. Efficacy of a bioflavonoid-enriched herbal versus 0.12 and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes in reducing peri-implant inflammation and subgingival Porphyromonas gingivalis carriage in patients with peri-implantitis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2025;84:583–9. 10.2340/aos.v84.44870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Al-Askar M, AlMubarak AM, Alqutub MN, Mokeem S, Javed F, Vohra F, et al. Analgesic efficacy of Curcuma longa (Curcumin) after surgical periodontal therapy. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022;20:19–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Sterniczuk B, Rossouw PE, Michelogiannakis D, Javed F. Effectiveness of curcumin in reducing self-rated pain-levels in the orofacial region: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:6443. 10.3390/ijerph19116443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Muglikar S, Patil KC, Shivswami S, Hegde R. Efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of chronic gingivitis: a pilot study. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2013;11:81–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Kotha RR, Luthria DL. Curcumin: biological, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and analytical aspects. Molecules. 2019;24:2930. 10.3390/molecules24162930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Sohn SI, Priya A, Balasubramaniam B, Muthuramalingam P, Sivasankar C, Selvaraj A, et al. Biomedical applications and bioavailability of curcumin – an updated overview. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:2102. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Javed F, Warnakulasuriya S. Smokeless tobacco and its effects on periodontal health. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2026. [Google Scholar]
- [38].Javed F, Näsström K, Benchimol D, Altamash M, Klinge B, Engström PE. Comparison of periodontal and socioeconomic status between subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic controls. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2112–9. 10.1902/jop.2007.070186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Akram Z, Alqahtani F, Alqahtani M, Al-Kheraif AA, Javed F. Levels of advanced glycation end products in gingival crevicular fluid of chronic periodontitis patients with and without type-2 diabetes mellitus. J Periodontol. 2020;91:396–402. 10.1002/JPER.19-0209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Isola G, Polizzi A, Santagati M, Alibrandi A, Iorio-Siciliano V, Ramaglia L. Effect of nonsurgical mechanical debridement with or without chlorhexidine formulations in the treatment of peri- implant mucositis. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025;36:566–77. 10.1111/clr.14405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
