Skip to main content
Surgical Neurology International logoLink to Surgical Neurology International
. 2026 Sep 25;17:544. doi: 10.25259/SNI_896_2026

Microsurgical resection of a pure third ventricular craniopharyngioma through an interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal approach

Umid Sulaimanov 1, Ufuk Erginoglu 1, Taha Sukru Korkmaz 1, Umut Tan Sevgi 1, Yerkebulan Serikkanov 1, Tugrul Sensoy 1, Mustafa Kemal Baskaya 1,*
PMCID: PMC13633603  PMID: 42829572

Abstract

Background:

Craniopharyngiomas account for approximately 2–4% of all intracranial tumors and demonstrate a bimodal age distribution, typically affecting children aged 5–9 years and adults aged 55–69 years. Third ventricular craniopharyngiomas are rare, benign epithelial tumors that may arise primarily within the third ventricle or secondarily extend from the suprasellar region; the purely intraventricular subtype is particularly rare, with a reported incidence ranging from 0.5% to 14% of all cases. Despite benign histology, infiltration of adjacent neural tissue imparts clinically aggressive behavior and complicates complete resection. Their deep location near the hypothalamus, optic apparatus, and fornices poses major surgical challenges, and transcallosal approaches risk cognitive or memory deficit. A purely third ventricular craniopharyngioma, classified as Type D by Yaşargil and Type IV by Kassam, is confined to the third ventricle and is not accessible through an endonasal approach, making transcranial routes more suitable given the tumor’s deep location and proximity to critical neurovascular structures, although select cases of successful endonasal resection have been reported.

Case Description:

We present a 34-year-old woman with galactorrhea and progressive weight gain over 6 months, together with intermittent diplopia and headaches. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a homogeneously contrast-enhancing mass occupying the third ventricle, measuring 3.0 × 2.9 × 2.3 cm, with preservation of the pituitary stalk and third ventricular floor, causing moderate obstructive hydrocephalus. An interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal approach was performed, with the dural opening adjusted according to the drainage pattern of the bridging veins, a 1.5 cm callosotomy, and septal fenestration. Gross total resection was achieved with preservation of the pituitary stalk, and a third ventriculostomy was performed to allow cerebrospinal fluid flow. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirmed complete resection, and histopathological examination confirmed a World Health Organization Grade I papillary craniopharyngioma. Surveillance imaging at 27 months confirmed tumor recurrence, and the patient was referred for radiation therapy, after which no further recurrence was observed. Follow-up imaging at 48 months demonstrated continued absence of disease.

Conclusion:

Although there are reports of purely intraventricular craniopharyngiomas resected through the endonasal route, traditional transcranial approaches remain the standard for tumors located entirely within the third ventricle. Although this case was treated before routine molecular testing and targeted therapy became standard, modern management now requires a multidisciplinary strategy integrating microsurgery, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy with BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) and MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibitors when appropriate.

Keywords: Craniopharyngioma, Interhemispheric transcallosal approach, Intraventricular tumor, Third ventricle, Transforaminal


graphic file with name SNI-17-544-inline001.jpg

[Video 1]-Available on:

www.surgicalneurologyint.com

Video 1:

Microsurgical resection of a pure third ventricular craniopharyngioma through an interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal approach.

Download video file (560.5MB, mp4)

Video Annotations[1-10]

00:08 – 00:30: Background information

00:31 – 01:14: Clinical history and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging

01:15 – 02:52: Management

02:53 – 03:41: Patient positioning and skin incision

03:42 – 05:11: Interhemispheric dissection and callosotomy

05:12 – 08:12: Transforaminal access and tumor resection

08:13 – 08:17: Hemostasis

08:18 – 08:38: Postoperative imaging

08:39 – 09:31: Postoperative course

09:32 – 09:52: Conclusion

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Sulaimanov U, Erginoglu U, Korkmaz TS, Sevgi UT, Serikkanov Y, Sensoy T, et al. Microsurgical resection of a pure third ventricular craniopharyngioma through an interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal approach. Surg Neurol Int. 2026;17:544. doi: 10.25259/SNI_896_2026

Contributor Information

Umid Sulaimanov, Email: sulaimanov@wisc.edu.

Ufuk Erginoglu, Email: erginoglu@wisc.edu.

Taha Sukru Korkmaz, Email: t.sukrukorkmaz@gmail.com.

Umut Tan Sevgi, Email: umuttan1995@gmail.com.

Yerkebulan Serikkanov, Email: serikkanov@wisc.edu.

Tugrul Sensoy, Email: tugrulsensoy@gmail.com.

Mustafa Kemal Baskaya, Email: baskaya@neurosurgery.wisc.edu.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understands that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship:

Nil.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Video available on:

https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_896_2026

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Journal or its management. The information contained in this article should not be considered to be medical advice; patients should consult their own physicians for advice as to their specific medical needs.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Behari S, Banerji D, Mishra A, Sharma S, Sharma S, Chhabra DK, et al. Intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngiomas: Report on six cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2003;60:245–52. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00132-0. discussion 252-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brastianos PK, Twohy E, Geyer S, Gerstner ER, Kaufmann TJ, Tabrizi S, et al. BRAF-MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:118–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deopujari C, Behari S, Shroff K, Kumar A, Thombre B, Karmarkar V, et al. Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas-overcoming their relative inaccessibility: Institutional experience with a review of literature. Front Neurol. 2021;12:755784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.755784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Forbes JA, Ordóñez-Rubiano EG, Tomasiewicz HC, Banu MA, Younus I, Dobri GA, et al. Endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngioma: Surgical results. J Neurosurg. 2019;131:1152–62. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.JNS18198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gu Y, Zhang X, Hu F, Yu Y, Xie T, Sun C, et al. Suprachiasmatic translamina terminalis corridor used in endoscopic endonasal approach for resecting third ventricular craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:1166–72. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS132842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Karatas D, Martínez Santos JL, Uygur S, Dagtekin A, Kurtoglu Olgunus Z, Avci E, et al. A new classification of parasagittal bridging veins based on their configurations and drainage routes pertinent to interhemispheric approaches: A surgical anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2024;140:271–81. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.JNS222866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: A new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:715–28. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Momin AA, Recinos MA, Cioffi G, Patil N, Soni P, Almeida JP, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngiomas in the United States. Pituitary. 2021;24:517–22. doi: 10.1007/s11102-021-01127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nishioka H, Fukuhara N, Yamaguchi-Okada M, Yamada S. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for purely intrathird ventricle craniopharyngioma. World Neurosurg. 2016;91:266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yaşargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P. Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:3–11. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video 1:

Microsurgical resection of a pure third ventricular craniopharyngioma through an interhemispheric transcallosal transforaminal approach.

Download video file (560.5MB, mp4)

Articles from Surgical Neurology International are provided here courtesy of Scientific Scholar

RESOURCES