Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of death throughout the world, and currently there are no approved drugs to treat this debilitating condition, emphasizing the clear unmet substantial clinical need. It is well recognized that microglial activation and the hostile neuroinflammatory response arising after the initial insult provide a therapeutic window for pharmacological intervention. The purinergic P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) is a key driver of neuroinflammation in a range of animal models of traumatic brain injury.
To generate translational evidence for the role of the P2X7R, we optimized two human inflammatory models, human cells (monocyte-derived microglia) in vitro and human brain tissue ex vivo, to test the impact of clinical-stage brain-penetrant P2X7R antagonists.
Using lipopolysaccharide-primed human monocyte-derived microglia, the P2X7R agonist 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP (BzATP), evoked a concentration-dependent increase in pro-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 release, which was antagonized in a concentration-dependent manner by selective P2X7R antagonists and also by inhibitors of either the NLRP3 complex or caspase-1, implicating a role for the inflammasome in P2X7R-mediated cytokine release. Using slices of human brain tissue, BzATP similarly evoked cytokine release in a concentration-dependent manner that was also antagonized by selective P2X7R antagonists at pharmacologically relevant concentrations.
The present study demonstrates the ability of P2X7R antagonists to suppress the neuroinflammatory response from primed human monocyte-derived microglia and human brain slices to offer direct translational data that central P2X7R antagonism might limit pathology-driven pro-inflammatory responses in the brain. This is predicted to improve the clinical outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury and other neuroinflammatory pathologies.
Keywords: P2X7 receptor, microglia, traumatic brain injury, neuroinflammation, P2X7 receptor antagonists, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors
Cowley et al. show that CNS-penetrant, selective P2X7 receptor antagonists reduce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from human microglia and brain tissue. These findings support P2X7 receptor antagonism as a potential therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes following traumatic brain injury.
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health problem and is the leading cause of death and disability in the first four decades of life.1 In addition to the serious impact upon patients and their families, estimated total costs in the USA alone exceed US$40 billion per annum.2-4 Current clinical management focuses on the maintenance of life and early detection of associated secondary injuries, because the damage associated with primary injury is often irreversible.5,6 Nevertheless, despite the evident major clinical need, there are currently no approved pharmacological treatments to improve clinical outcomes for patients with TBI.1,7,8
The mechanical damage associated with TBI drives a neuroinflammatory response that triggers a cascade of disturbances to CNS homeostasis, such as ionic imbalance,9,10 glutamate excitotoxicity,11,12 oxidative stress,13 lipid peroxidation,14 neuronal apoptosis15 and mitochondrial dysfunction.16,17 The primary response to the injured site is characterized by activation of CNS-resident microglia18-23 and astrocytes.24,25 In animal models, depletion of microglia is sufficient to reverse neuroinflammation and neuropathology.20,26 Activated microglia and astrocytes can secrete chemokines27 that promote the infiltration of circulating immune cells, such as monocytes,28,29 macrophages30,31 and neutrophils.32 This facilitates a local pro-inflammatory environment and oedema, with consequential damage to the integrity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB),33 facilitating further entry of peripheral immune cells.34 The introduction of sampling from the injured brain using microdialysis has seen a step-change in the quality of relevant data to inform pathological cellular mechanisms.35 It is now better understood that the neuroinflammatory response is triggered almost immediately post-injury and can persist for months.36-39 Upregulation of cytokines, such as pro-inflammatory interleukin (IL)-1β, occurs within hours of TBI in both rodent and human studies.36,37,40-42 This pro-inflammatory response instigates an increasing cycle of pathological processes43 that probably contribute to the secondary injury, increasing the volume of brain tissue damaged by the initial TBI into the penumbra,44 to the further detriment of the patient’s clinical outcomes and subsequent quality of life.45,46 Pharmacological intervention to limit the damage associated with this latter secondary injury is likely to offer the greatest potential to improve the clinical outcomes for patients.45
The purinergic P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) is a central driver of inflammation and is activated by millimolar concentrations of ATP.47 The P2X7R is expressed by microglia,48-54 the resident immune cells of the CNS,55,56 that participate in a multitude of developmental, homeostatic and pathological roles.57-60 Activation of the P2X7 ligand-gated ion channel receptor triggers cation influx and potassium efflux,61 leading to activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome62 and the subsequent processing and release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18.63-74 Animal models of TBI are associated with a substantial cellular efflux of the endogenous purinergic agonist ATP into the extracellular space54,75 sufficient to activate the P2X7R, such that antagonists reduce arising neuronal damage and pro-inflammatory cytokine release in rodent models of neuroinflammation,64,76-78 neurotrauma54,79-81 and neuropathic pain.82 If the data from animal models translate to the clinical situation, following TBI the bathing of the penumbra in high concentrations of extracellular ATP discharged from the damaged tissue would result in P2X7R activation. This would suggest that P2X7R antagonists would limit neuroinflammatory and secondary damage, which warrants further investigation in the prospect of finally identifying an efficacious pharmacological therapy for TBI. Reported clinical studies to date with Pfizer’s selective P2X7R antagonist, CE-224,535,83 include peripheral inflammatory conditions, such as arthritis, and despite the medication being well tolerated, clear overall therapeutic benefit was not apparent,84 although there were issues with the trial design. CE-224,535 appears to penetrate the intact BBB poorly,85 a hurdle that has been overcome by clinical stage selective P2X7R antagonists, such as JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942, that are likely to be more amenable to impact central neuroinflammatory disorders,86-92 which further highlights the therapeutic opportunity in TBI and beyond.
Critical to the clinical translation of P2X7R antagonists, major pharmacological differences exist between the mouse, rat and human P2X7R,93,94 and important differences exist between rodent and human microglia relevant to their pro-inflammatory response and disease-relevant gene expression.95,96 Human primary microglia are embedded deep within CNS tissue, making their isolation difficult, and efforts to mitigate their activation to date have often failed.97 Even once isolated from the CNS, further issues arise owing to their restricted proliferative capacity in culture,98 and concerns remain around phenotypic changes to their CNS identity once removed from their brain microenvironment97,99 or following antemortem and post-mortem delay.100 Considerable recent efforts have focused on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia, which offer a suitable model to study inflammation, although some limitations are apparent.101,102 In the present study, we used an alternative human microglia model, in which human peripheral blood monocytes are differentiated into microglia-like cells, so-called human monocyte-derived microglia (hMDM), a system that has been increasingly shown to be informative to study a range of neuroinflammatory/neurodegenerative diseases.103-112 This enabled us to demonstrate the ability of clinically relevant P2X7R antagonists, including brain-penetrant molecules, to curtail pro-inflammatory cytokine release. The relevance of these findings was then further translated using adult human precision-cut brain slices generated subsequent to neurosurgical resections for clinical management. This latter tissue preparation better reflects the functional interconnections of different cell types in the brain, which may also express the P2X7R.113 Our findings provide direct relevant evidence for the use of P2X7R antagonism to inhibit human microglia-mediated inflammation, with arising potential benefits for patients with TBI and other neuroinflammatory diseases.
Materials and methods
Generation of human monocyte-derived microglia
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from leucocyte cones (from healthy donors; National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHS-BT) through Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) density centrifugation, and monocytes were further enriched by negative selection using EasySep Human Monocyte Enrichment Kits (STEMCELL Technologies). Anti-CD14 (BioLegend) labelling was used to verify CD14+ monocyte purity. For differentiation into hMDM, monocytes were cultured [black-walled imaging plates (Greiner)] at 1.0 × 106/ml in serum-free RPMI-1640 with penicillin/streptomycin (penicillin 100 U and streptomycin 0.1 mg/ml; Sigma), plus human (h) hM-CSF, hGM-CSF, hNGF-β, hCCL2 and hIL-34 (BioLegend) for 5–7 days in an atmosphere of air enriched with 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Immunolabelling of human monocyte-derived microglia
For immunocytochemistry, hMDM and originating monocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 12 min and washed twice with PBS (Gibco). Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 min, blocked with 5% goat serum (Sigma) in PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) for 1 h and labelled with primary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. After washing with PBS (Sigma), cells were incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature in the dark for 1 h. Primary antibodies used in this study were anti-TMEM119 (ATLAS; 1:250), anti-P2RY12 (ATLAS; 1:250), anti-CX3CR1 (Invitrogen; 1:100), anti-TREM2 (Invitrogen; 1:200), anti-Iba1 (Invitrogen; 1:300), anti-P2X7 (DSHB; 1:100), anti-CD45 (BioLegend; 1:250) and anti-CD68 (BioLegend; 1:200) diluted in blocking solution. Depending on the species of the primary antibodies, either Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen; 1:500) or Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen; 1:500) conjugated secondary antibodies were used, and cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher; 1:1000). Cells were imaged and immunofluorescence was quantified using high-content confocal imaging (Yokogawa CQ1 imaging platform; 40× objective lens, imaging at least nine fields of view per well). Positive cell surface immunolabelling on cells was quantified as the total intensity per cell, using CQ1 image analysis software (version 1.02.02.00).
Human monocyte-derived microglia cytokine release assays
After 5–7 days of culture, hMDM were primed with lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/ml; InvivoGen) for 2 h, followed by, where relevant, addition of antagonists [JNJ-54175446 or JNJ-55308942 both (generous gifts from Janssen) or A-804598 (Sigma)] or relevant vehicle (DMSO; 0.03%) for 30 min prior to 4 h treatment with 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP (BzATP; Sigma) or vehicle (water; 0.14%). For experiments investigating inflammasome pathway modulation, hMDM were preincubated with the selective inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 (Selleck Chemicals) or the selective caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 (InvivoGen) or relevant vehicle (water/DMSO; 0.03%) for 1 h prior to priming with LPS (100 ng/ml), for 2 h, followed by stimulation with BzATP for 4 h.
Human brain slice culture experiments
Human brain tissue, obtained upon resection from the cerebral cortex or cerebellar cortex (patient demographics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1), was placed immediately in ice-cold transport medium (Hibernate-A; Gibco) and processed within 20–30 min at 4°C using a McIlwain chopper (Stoelting) to yield slices of an optimal size (350 µm × 350 µm × thickness of brain tissue). The slices were washed twice with ice-cold Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco), and approximately equal numbers of slices were plated into each well of a 96-well plate and rested overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2 in Neurobasal-A (Gibco; 10888022) medium containing penicillin/streptomycin (penicillin 100 U and streptomycin 0.1 mg/ml; Sigma), supplemented with 2% B27 (Gibco).
Human brain slice cytokine release assays
After resting overnight, human brain slices were washed twice with pre-warmed (37°C) HBSS and resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% B27. Where stated, slices were primed with LPS (100 ng/ml; InvivoGen) for 2 h, followed by where relevant, addition of the antagonist A-804598 (Sigma) or relevant vehicle (DMSO; 0.03%) for 30 min prior to 4 or 18 h treatment with BzATP (Sigma) or vehicle (water; 0.14%). For studies investigating antagonism of the BzATP response by JNJ-54175446, the brain slices were not primed with LPS.
Assay of biomarkers
Supernatants from cultures of hMDM and human brain slices were harvested, centrifuged at 400g for 5 min and stored at −80°C until analysis. Biomarkers in the tissue culture supernatants were quantified by ELISA (IL-1β and IL-18; R&D Systems) or the Luminex platform (ProcartaPlex Human Cytokine/Chemokine/Growth Factor convenience Panel; Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sample acquisition was performed in triplicates using a Bio-Rad Bio-Plex BP-200 instrument.
Immunolabelling of human dissociated brain tissue
Human brain tissue (as earlier) was initially minced into approximately 3 mm × 3 mm slices before incomplete digestion with hyaluronidase, collagenase and DNAse (7.5 mg/ml, 1.0 mg/ml and 40 μg/ml, respectively; all Sigma) for 90 min at 37°C. The cell suspension was then washed through a 100 μm cell strainer with complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium/F-12 medium (Gibco). Arising cells were plated at 2.0 × 106/ml in imaging plates (Greiner) and allowed to rest overnight in complete medium. Non-adhered cells were then removed with wash steps and adherent cells fixed with 4% PFA, washed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 min, followed by blocking with 5% goat serum (Sigma) in PBS + 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma) for 1 h. Cells were then immunolabelled with anti-P2X7R (DSHB), anti-TMEM119 (ATLAS) and anti-P2RY12 (ATLAS) antibodies, followed by visualization via Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) or Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen) secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature in the dark.
Study approval
All human tissue samples were obtained with written informed consent and with approval from the appropriate Research Ethics Committee (brain tissue; REC reference 20/WA/0327; UHB Research Project Authorization RRK732). Human fresh blood cells were obtained from NNHS-BT with approval from an appropriate research ethics committee (REC reference 20/WA/0216). All research was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All methods were approved by the relevant institutions.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean + (or ±) standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least five independent experimental repeats (independent repeats used cells/tissue from a different donor) unless otherwise indicated. Differences among multiple treatment groups were determined by a one-way ANOVA test, and differences between two groups only were determined using Student’s unpaired t-test. Where data were non-parametric, Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used. Normality was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The specific analysis used is indicated in the figure legend. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The P-values are indicated with an asterisk or a plus symbol on each graph (*/+P < 0.05, **/++P < 0.01 and ***/+++P < 0.001) and are shown in the figures. Iterative curve-fitting data analysis using, where appropriate, a four-parameter logistic equation was performed using KaleidaGraph (version 4.5.4, 2018; Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA) and GraphPad Prism Software (version 10.0.3; GraphPad Prism Software LLC, Boston, MA, USA). All statistical analysis and generation of graphs was performed in GraphPad Prism Software (version 10.0.3; GaphPad Software LLC, Boston, MA, USA) unless otherwise stated.
Results
Phenotypic characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia
Microglia, being essentially specialized macrophages of the CNS, share various common markers with peripheral macrophages, including ionized calcium binding receptor 1 (Iba1), fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) and triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), whereas transmembrane protein 119 (TMEM119) and purinergic receptor (P2RY12) expressions are often considered as specific phenotypic markers of CNS-resident microglia. Initial experiments in this study used both myeloid and microglia-specific markers to characterize our hMDM against originating monocytes and GM-CSF + IL-34-only treated cells. After 5–7 days in culture, hMDM displayed typical microglia-like characteristics, such as a small soma and elongated morphology, in comparison to the rounded appearance of originating monocytes (Fig. 1A). As assessed using immunocytochemistry and quantified by total fluorescence intensity per cell (Fig. 1B and C), TMEM119 and P2RY12 expression was relatively high on hMDM [1.91 ± 0.10 × 106 and 1.62 ± 0.19 × 106 RFU (relative fluorescent units)], with both markers appearing lower on originating monocytes (6.91 ± 1.99 × 105 and 8.34 ± 1.24 × 105 RFU) and GM-CSF + IL-34-treated cells (1.30 ± 0.09 × 106 and 8.80 ± 1.67 × 105 RFU; Fig. 1B). In addition, hMDM also expressed common myeloid markers known to be upregulated by activated microglia, such as CX3CR1, TREM2 and Iba1 (Fig. 1B and C). These markers were present ubiquitously on all three cell types, although notably expression was highest on hMDM (3.59 ± 0.41 × 106, 1.46 ± 0.15 × 106 and 1.33 ± 0.18 × 107 RFU; Fig. 1B) compared with originating monocytes (1.69 ± 0.25 × 106, 8.21 ± 1.55 × 105 and 4.73 ± 0.79 × 106 RFU; Fig. 1B). The P2X7R was readily expressed across all three cell types (Fig. 1B and C). Monocytes evidently displayed higher CD68 labelling (2.57 ± 0.26 × 106 RFU) than hMDM (9.59 ± 1.35 × 105 RFU) and GM-CSF + IL-34-treated cells (4.67 ± 0.40 × 105 RFU; Fig. 1B), whilst CD45 expression was higher on hMDM and GM-CSF + IL-34-treated cells (1.21 ± 0.89 × 106 and 1.14 ± 0.69 × 106 RFU) than on monocytes (0.75 ± 0.10 × 106 RFU) (Fig. 1B and C). Together, these results confirm that hMDM express key markers enriched in human brain microglia and are phenotypically distinct from originating monocytes.
Figure 1.

Generation and characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia. (A) Differentiation of peripheral blood monocytes to hMDM over 5–7 days in culture using a cocktail of cytokines, with representative confocal images displaying co-immunolabelling of the P2X7 receptor (green) and TMEM119 (red) and with cell nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). (B) Quantification of immunostaining total intensity [as relative fluorescent units (RFU)] for monocytes (grey-filled bars), hMDM (green-filled bars) and GM-CSF + IL-34-treated cells (purple-filled bars) from images acquired by high-content confocal microscopy for cells labelled in C. (C) Representative confocal images of hMDM and originating monocytes displaying immunolabelling of TMEM119, P2YR12, CX3CR1, TREM2, Iba1, CD45, CD68 and P2XR7 (green), with cell nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue), (original magnification, ×40). Images are maximum-intensity projections from sequential z-stacks. Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean from five independent experiments with cells originating from five different donors. Significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for comparison of phenotypic marker expression between monocytes, hMDM and GM-CSF + IL-34-treated cells. Significant difference between indicated data: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. GM-CSF = granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; hMDM = human monocyte-derived microglia; IL = interleukin.
P2X7R-dependent soluble factor release from human monocyte-derived microglia
Next, we identified the functional capacity of hMDM to respond to P2X7R activation using a range of soluble factors as the readout. Initially, we investigated the concentration-dependent impact of the non-selective P2X7R agonist BzATP on LPS-primed hMDM IL-1β and IL-18 cytokine release. BzATP induced a concentration-dependent release of IL-1β and IL-18 in LPS-primed hMDM cultures (IL-1β, pEC50 = 4.04 ± 0.05; and IL-18, pEC50 = 3.95 ± 0.02, respectively; Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2). To characterize the P2X7R-evoked cytokine release by hMDM further, LPS-primed hMDM cultures were treated with a near-maximal effective concentration of BzATP, and the release of 45 different cytokines, chemokines and growth factors was quantified using a ProcartaPlex kit (Fig. 3; values are in picograms per millilitre; see Supplementary Table 3). The greatest mean LPS + BzATP-treatment percentage change relative to basal release levels was for IL-1β (19 817% ± 3152%), followed by IL-6 (14 002% ± 6663%), IL-1α (3908% ± 1093%), TNF-α (1665% ± 645%), MIP-1β (942% ± 615%) and, lastly, IL-18 (556% ± 67%) (Fig. 3A–C). Notably, the BzATP-evoked release of IL-1β, IL-1α and IL-18 was antagonized by pretreatment with the moderate-affinity and selective competitive P2X7R antagonist, A-804598 (tested at 3.0 μM; IL-1β, 1017% ± 216%; IL-1α, 299% ± 82%; and IL-18, 153% ± 11%; Fig. 3A–C). As expected, various other cytokines and chemokines displayed LPS-dependent release, e.g. TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, MIP-1-β, IL-23 and FGF-2 (4163% ± 1340%, 47 362% ± 34 780%, 2238% ± 1319%, 2084% ± 975%, 599% ± 237% and 491% ± 31%, respectively), although a consistent impact of BzATP addition was not apparent with these latter soluble factors (Fig. 3A–C).
Figure 2.

Concentration-dependent BzATP-induced IL-1β and IL-18 release from LPS-primed hMDM. Human monocyte-derived microglia (hMDM) cultures were treated in the absence (vehicle) or presence of LPS (100 ng/ml; 2 h) and were subsequently stimulated with the non-selective P2X7 receptor agonist BzATP (0.3–300 μM) for 4 h when release of IL-1β (A) and IL-18 (B) was monitored. Graphs display percentage release relative to a maximal response at 300 μM BzATP and represent an iterative curve fit according to a four-parameter logistic equation. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean from five independent donors. Significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for comparison of maximal picograms per millilitre BzATP-induced IL-1β release (300 µM BzATP; IL-1β levels = 2688 ± 134 pg/ml and IL-18 levels = 282 ± 56 pg/ml) compared with either LPS (IL-1β levels = 2.43 ± 0.58 pg/ml and IL-18 levels = 11.35 ± 3.67 pg/ml) or vehicle control (IL-1β levels = 1.02 ± 0.23 pg/ml and IL-18 levels = 8.21 ± 3.19 pg/ml). Significant difference between indicated data: **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 3.

P2X7 receptor-dependent release of various biochemicals from LPS-primed hMDM. Human monocyte-derived microglia (hMDM) cultures were primed with LPS (100 ng/ml), with subsequent addition of the non-selective P2X7 receptor agonist BzATP (100 μM) in the absence (vehicle) or presence of the selective P2X7 receptor antagonist, A-804598 (3.0 μM). Heat maps [A(i), B(i) and C(i)] show percentage fold change in cytokine levels relative to vehicle (i.e. no LPS priming), and radar plots [A(ii), B(ii) and C(ii)] show cytokine release in picograms per millilitre (except for IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8 and MIP-1-β levels shown as nanograms per millilitre) from cultures treated with vehicle (black solid line), LPS (black dashed line), LPS + BzATP (red solid line) and LPS + BzATP + A-804598 (blue solid line). Data show three independent donors {Donor 1 [A(i and ii)], Donor 2 [B(i and ii)] and Donor 3 [C(i and ii)]} expressed as the mean percentage fold change derived from triplicate wells. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; MIP = macrophage inflammatory protein.
In addition to releasing a plethora of soluble factors, hMDM readily phagocytosed human myelin basic protein, and uptake was amendable to inhibition with the actin polymerization dysrupter, cytochalasin-D (Supplementary Fig. 1), confirming that these cells are capable of performing crucial microglial functions. In addition to key phenotypic markers, hMDM also express HLA-DR (Supplementary Fig. 2), implying that hMDM might also function as antigen presenting cells. We also investigated the impact of BzATP stimulation (using either LPS-primed or non-primed hMDM), on the expression of the P2X7R and the homeostatic marker, Iba1, by immunocytochemistry (Supplementary Fig. 3). No significant impact of BzATP was evident on Iba1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 3B), whilst a small, but non-significant reduction in P2X7R expression was apparent during BzATP stimulation of both LPS-primed and non-LPS-primed hMDM cultures (Supplementary Fig. 3A). Further to this, we also investigated the impact of P2X7R activation upon hMDM morphology, noting little impact upon cellular circularity (Supplementary Fig. 3C) and cellular circumference (Supplementary Fig. 3D).
Together, these results confirm the expression of human functional P2X7Rs by hMDM that promote pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-18 release and demonstrate that the assay window is suitable for studying modulators of this response.
P2X7R inhibition by clinical-stage P2X7R antagonists
The hMDM model was also used to investigate the pharmacology of two clinical stage competitive P2X7R antagonists that penetrate the BBB readily, JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942, in comparison to another P2X7R antagonist, A-804598. JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942, along with A-804598, displayed concentration-dependent antagonism of a near-maximal effective concentration of BzATP to evoke IL-1β cytokine release from LPS-primed hMDM; maximal antagonism of the BzATP-induced response was evident for all three compounds (Fig. 4A–C). Of the three antagonists investigated, the rank order of apparent affinity (pIC50) to prevent BzATP-induced IL-1β release was JNJ-54175446 (pIC50 = 8.92 ± 0.14) > JNJ-55308942 (pIC50 = 8.18 ± 0.08) ≥ A-804598 (pIC50 = 8.09 ± 0.25) (Fig. 4A–C and Supplementary Table 2). The ability of these three antagonists to inhibit the BzATP-induced increase in IL-18 displayed the same pharmacological rank order of apparent affinity with effective concentrations also in the nanomolar range (Fig. 4D–F and Supplementary Table 2). These data confirm that selective P2X7R antagonists, including one with demonstrated CNS penetrance (JNJ-54175446), mediate potent inhibition of human microglial P2X7-driven pro-inflammatory IL-1β and IL-18 release.
Figure 4.

Ability of various P2X7 receptor antagonists to antagonize BzATP-induced IL-1β and IL-18 release from LPS-primed hMDM. Human monocyte-derived microglia (hMDM) cultures were treated in the absence (vehicle) or presence of LPS (100 ng/ml) for 2 h and were then incubated for 0.5 h with a P2X7 receptor antagonist [A-804598 (A and D), JNJ-54175446 (B and E) or JNJ-55308942 (C and F)], followed by stimulation with BzATP (100 μM) for 4 h. Filled circles (left y-axis) display IL-1β (A–C) or IL-18 levels (D–F) in the cell culture supernatants (in picograms per millilitre) and curve fits (iterative curve fit according to a four-parameter logistic equation) of the impact of the indicated P2X7 receptor antagonist upon percentage release relative to the LPS + BzATP response (open circles; 100 µM BzATP). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean from at least five independent donors. Significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for comparison of picograms per millilitre BzATP-induced IL-1β or IL-18 release compared with either LPS or vehicle control (left y-axis), or comparison of percentage IL-1β release at each concentration of P2X7 receptor antagonist to vehicle control (set to 100%; right y-axis). Significant difference between indicated data: ***P < 0.001. Significant difference from LPS + BzATP: +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 and +++P < 0.001. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide.
Modulation of inflammasome pathway-mediated IL-1β and IL-18 release
We extended the study with the hMDM model to investigate the impact of the selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 and the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 upon BzATP-evoked release of IL-1β and IL-18. Either MCC950 or VX-765 was effective, in a concentration-dependent manner, to inhibit BzATP-evoked IL-1β and IL-18 release (Fig. 5A–D and Supplementary Table 2); MCC950 was more potent than VX-765 (Fig. 5A and B and Supplementary Table 2), although, notably, near-maximal inhibition was not evident with VX-765-treated cell cultures at the highest concentration tested (Fig. 5C and D).
Figure 5.

Ability of inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome or caspase-1 to inhibit BzATP-induced IL-1β and IL-18 release from LPS-primed hMDM. Human monocyte-derived microglia (hMDM) cultures were preincubated for 1 h in the absence (vehicle) or presence of the NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor MCC950 (A and B) or the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 (C and D) prior to priming with LPS (100 ng/ml; 2 h), followed by stimulation with BzATP (100 μM) for 4 h. (A and D) Three circles to the left (left y-axis; mean ± SEM) display IL-1β or IL-18 levels in the cell culture supernatants and curve fits (iterative curve fit according to a four-parameter logistic equation) of the impact of the MCC950 or VX-765 upon percentage release relative to the LPS + BzATP response (open circles; 100 µM BzATP). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean from five independent donors. Significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for comparison of picograms per millilitre BzATP-induced IL-1β or IL-18 release compared with either LPS or vehicle control (left y-axis), or for comparison of the percentage IL-1β or IL-18 release at each concentration of inhibitor to their relative vehicle control (set to 100%; right y-axis). Significant difference between indicated data: ***P < 0.001. Significant difference from LPS + BzATP: ++P < 0.01 and +++P < 0.001. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide.
P2X7R-dependent cytokine release from human brain slices
To translate our key findings from hMDM cultures further, we developed a human brain optimized slice culture model using tissue from neurosurgical resections to investigate the ability of the P2X7R expressed on human microglia to drive pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Using a human dissociated glial cell preparation, we confirmed co-expression of the P2X7R with key microglial markers, TMEM119 and P2RY12 (Fig. 6A). In accordance with the findings with the hMDM model, human LPS-treated brain slices demonstrated increased release of IL-1β (Fig. 6B), which was further enhanced in a concentration-dependent manner by BzATP (Fig. 6B and Supplementary Table 4) with comparable potency to that evident using the hMDM model (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2). To extend the human translational evidence for the potential of P2X7R antagonists to suppress inflammatory cytokine release, we demonstrated that the selective P2X7R antagonist A-804598 inhibited a near-maximal effective concentration of BzATP to evoke IL-1β release from human LPS-primed brain slices in a concentration-dependent manner with nanomolar affinity (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 6.

Concentration-dependent antagonism by the selective P2X7 receptor antagonist A-804598 of BzATP-induced IL-1β release from LPS-primed human brain slices. Human fresh brain tissue was dissociated and cultured overnight before immunolabelling for TMEM-119, P2X7 receptor and P2RY12 receptor immunoreactivity. (A) Representative confocal images displaying indicated immunolabelling of dissociated brain cells with P2X7 receptor (green), TMEM119 (red) and P2RY12 receptor (red). (B) Concentration-dependent ability of BzATP to evoke IL-1β release (in picograms per millilitre) from human LPS-primed (100 ng/ml) brain slices [donor tissue was obtained from ≥12 donors; mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)]. (C) Three circles to the left (left y-axis) display IL-1β levels in the brain tissue slice culture supernatants (in picograms per millilitre; mean ± SEM), and the percentage maximal release (right y-axis; maximum to LPS + BzATP (open circle; 70 µM BzATP) was subjected to iterative curve fitting according to a four-parameter logistic equation. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM from six independent donors. In B, significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test for comparison of picograms per millilitre BzATP-induced IL-1β release compared with vehicle control or in C, a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test was carried out for comparison of picograms per millilitre BzATP-induced IL-1β release compared with either LPS or vehicle control (left y-axis), or for comparison of the percentage IL-1β release at each concentration of antagonist relative to vehicle control (set to 100%). (B) Significant difference of addition of BzATP treatment from vehicle control: ***P < 0.001. (C) Significant difference between indicated data: *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. Significant difference from LPS + BzATP: ++P < 0.01 and +++P < 0.01. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide.
To investigate the potential of BzATP to impact the release of various soluble factors, a broad panel was used to quantify biomarker release from human brain slices (Fig. 7 for percentage release; for levels expressed as picograms per millilitre see Supplementary Table 5). LPS evoked the release of various biomarkers (e.g. IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MIP-1β and IL-10; Fig. 7A–C), and the additional presence of a near-maximal concentration of BzATP further enhanced release of various biomarkers (e.g. IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, GRO-α, LIF, IP-10, SDF-1-α and HGF; Fig. 7A–C), although no apparent impact of BzATP stimulation upon neurofilament light (NfL) release was evident (Supplementary Fig. 4) over the relatively short time course of the stimulation. Furthermore, pretreatment with the P2X7R antagonist A-804598 (3.0 μM) reduced the BzATP-evoked release of IL-1α, IL-1β, GRO-α, IP-10, IL-10 and HGF (Fig. 7A–C).
Figure 7.

P2X7 receptor-dependent cytokine release from human brain slices. Human brain slices were treated in the absence (vehicle) or presence of LPS (100 ng/ml; 2 h) before application of vehicle or BzATP (100 μM) in the absence (vehicle) or presence of the P2X7 receptor antagonist A-804598 (3.0 μM). Heat maps [A(i), B(i) and C(i)] show the percentage change in cytokine levels relative to vehicle control (i.e. no LPS priming), and radar plots [A(ii), B(ii) and C(ii)] show cytokine release in in picograms per millilitre (except for IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8 and MIP-1- β levels shown as nanograms per millilitre) from cultures treated with vehicle (black solid line; ‘basal’), LPS (black dashed line), LPS + BzATP (red solid line) or LPS + BzATP + A-804598 (blue solid line). Data show three independent donors {Donor 1 [A(i and ii)], Donor 2 [B(i and ii)] and Donor 3 [C(i and ii)]}, expressed as the mean percentage fold change derived from triplicate wells (except for Donor 3, where data are shown originating from duplicate wells). BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; MIP = macrophage inflammatory protein.
Given that the human brain tissue used in these studies was from patients undergoing neurosurgery, we hypothesized that the surgical procedure itself might prime the resected tissue. Indeed, brain tissue slices from the majority of donors were responsive to BzATP in terms of IL-1β release (Fig. 8A), and the BzATP-evoked release was antagonized fully by pretreatment with JNJ-54175446 in a concentration-dependent manner, yielding an apparent affinity in the nanomolar range (Fig. 8B and C and Supplementary Table 3). Overall, these findings are in accordance with those evident in our hMDM model and provide further translational evidence for the importance of the role of the human P2X7R in driving central pro-inflammatory cytokine release, and antagonist action by selective, CNS-penetrant P2X7R antagonists.
Figure 8.

Concentration-dependent ability of the P2X7 receptor antagonist JNJ-54175446 to antagonize BzATP-induced IL-1β release from human brain slices. (A) IL-1β release from human brain slice cultures treated with BzATP (70 μM); levels display normalized fold change relative to vehicle control (data points represent 15 individual donors), after 4 h (filled circles) or 18 h (filled squares) application of BzATP. (B and C) Two circles [left y-axis; mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)] display IL-1β levels in the culture supernatants (in picograms per millilitre), and curve fits (right y-axis; mean ± SEM) show the impact of JNJ-54175446 upon percentage maximal release relative to BzATP response (open circle; 70 µM BzATP) at 4 h (B) and 18 h (C). Data in B and C are expressed as the mean ± SEM from five independent donors. In A, a non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out for comparison of BzATP-induced IL-1β release compared with basal release (set to one) or, in B and C, a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test was carried out for comparison of the percentage IL-1β release at each concentration of P2X7 antagonist to vehicle control at 4 h and 18 h (set to 100%). (A) Significant increase: **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. (C) Significant difference from BzATP: +P < 0.05 and ++P < 0.01. BzATP = 2′(3′)-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl) ATP; IL = interleukin.
Discussion
The present study provides direct translational evidence from human cellular and brain tissue models to support the clinical use of P2X7R antagonists to limit secondary ATP-driven neuroinflammatory events, such as those that occur in TBI, and thus might improve the clinical outcomes for patients.
Although several trials have investigated the potential clinical benefits of P2X7R antagonists in patients with inflammatory diseases (inflammatory bowel disease114,115 or rheumatoid arthritis84,116,117), the development of CNS-penetrant P2X7R antagonists82,86,87,90,118,119 enables targeting of the P2X7R in neuroinflammatory conditions. We provide data from two independent human translational neuroinflammatory models that support the use of JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942 to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine release in neuroinflammation. In an induced human microglial in vitro model, we demonstrated inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release by three structurally diverse yet selective P2X7R antagonists (A-804589, JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942). Effective concentrations of these antagonists were in good agreement with their affinities for the P2X7R,86,87,91,120 effective concentrations for inhibiting cytokine release73,86,88,89,91,120 and, for JNJ-54175446 and JNJ-55308942, achievable brain concentrations from animal pharmacokinetic studies.121,122 These data confirm that P2X7R antagonists, including two clinical-stage molecules with ability to penetrate the BBB, display target concentration relevant inhibition of human microglial P2X7R-driven inflammatory cytokine release.
With increasing evidence demonstrating the contribution of microglia in neuroinflammatory pathology, such as in TBI,18-21,123-125 and being implicated in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders,55,126 major importance rests on the generation of human translational models that more closely recapitulate microglial dysfunction in disease whilst also retaining their phenotypic and epigenetic features.98,99 In the present study, we have applied an hMDM model adapted from previous reports103,105,107-112 to generate translational evidence supporting the use of brain-penetrant P2X7R antagonists in neuroinflammation, which performed as a functionally relevant model predicting drug action in human brain slices. Mechanistically, as expected, the pathway of IL-1β release by hMDM exhibited concentration-dependent inhibition by the selective NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950,127 which specifically targets the nucleotide-binding domain of the NLRP3 complex, preventing the hydrolysis of ATP and thus inhibiting NLRP3-induced apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a C-terminal caspase recruitment domain (ASC) oligomerization and subsequent cleavage of caspase-1,127,128 and also the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765.129 However, the apparent lower level of maximal inhibition by the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 might implicate other additional caspases (or pathways) also being involved in IL-1β processing and release.130-134 Collectively, these results confirm that hMDM might offer a useful drug screening platform for testing pharmacologically active compounds targeting the P2X7R expressed on human microglia and relevant NLRP3 inflammasome/caspase-mediated cytokine release mechanisms contributing to the neuroinflammatory response evident in the human brain resulting from various pathologies.
Importantly, we extended our findings from the hMDM model to a second ex vivo model that we consider a closer representation to the clinical pathology of TBI and other neuroinflammatory diseases. This second optimized methodology uses human precision-cut brain sections from patients undergoing neurosurgical resections. At concentrations in good concordance with the hMDM model, BzATP evoked a pro-inflammatory cytokine release profile from human primed brain sections (Fig. 7) and with largely equivalent potency to promote IL-1β release (Fig. 6B). Confirmation of the role for the P2X7R came from the concentration-related ability of the selective P2X7R antagonist A-804589 to prevent the BzATP-evoked response at pharmacologically relevant concentrations (Fig. 6C).
Previous work using rodent models of neurotrauma,64,75-81,135 and the known association of elevated brain cytokine levels, such as IL-1β, in patients with TBI and subsequent detrimental clinical outcomes,37,136 emphasizes the relevance of the data presented in this paper, which supports the evaluation of P2X7R antagonists to improve the clinical outcomes of patients following TBI. We believe arguments can be made either way concerning the evaluation of a P2X7R antagonist that crosses the intact BBB. Thus, it might be considered that as the integrity of the BBB is reduced around the injured site after TBI, use of a drug that does not cross the intact BBB would limit brain exposure to areas of injury and thus avoid potential side effects that might arise from exposure to other areas of the brain. Alternatively, it might be considered pertinent to use a P2X7R antagonist that readily crosses the BBB, unlike AZD9056 and CE-224,535.85 The P2X7R antagonist JNJ-54175446 was developed to penetrate the BBB and has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in early-phase clinical studies,88,89,92 hence it offers a suitable candidate to evaluate the therapeutic benefit for patients suffering with TBI. This was further evident by the activity of JNJ-54175446 in our hMDM model to inhibit P2X7R-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine release, which builds on previous work where JNJ-54175446 reduced P2X7R-mediated IL-1β release in a whole blood assay,88,89 where the IL-1β is likely to originate from monocytes.74 Our studies further extended the evaluation of JNJ-54175446 to demonstrate reversal of BzATP-induced IL-1β release from human brain slices (Fig. 8), again effective concentrations of JNJ-54175446 were in the nanomolar range consistent with the known affinity of JNJ-54175446 for the human P2X7R.87 The known impact of IL-1β to promote apoptosis,137 further pro-inflammatory cytokine release,138 stimulation and recruitment of peripheral leucocytes139 and damage of endothelial tight junction proteins leading to BBB breakdown140 adds additional support to the hypothesis that P2X7R antagonists82,86,87,90 would deliver clinical benefit to patients with TBI. Importantly, we extended our findings with a modification of our human brain slice model to evaluate the potential of the brain-penetrating P2X7R antagonist, JNJ-54175446. The modification in the methodology was the omission of the LPS-priming step, because it was reasoned that the ‘physical insult’ of neurosurgical resection and slicing of the tissue would be sufficient to prime the tissue, to some extent replicating a physical trauma as occurs in TBI.5 This appeared to be the case, because BzATP was able to evoke IL-1β release from these brain slices in the majority of samples from donors (Fig. 8A) (note that in the hMDM model BzATP was essentially ineffective to evoke IL-1β release from non-LPS-primed hMDM; Fig. 2). This BzATP-evoked IL-1β release in the human brain slices was antagonized in a concentration-dependent manner at both early (4 h) and more prolonged (18 h) time points (Fig. 8B and C), importantly again, at clinically relevant JNJ-54175446 concentrations that have been predicted to be achieved in early-stage clinical studies in depression.89
Conclusion
Overall, our findings with both human cells differentiated from peripheral blood monocytes that displayed the phenotype and functional characteristics of microglia (hMDM) and also slices of human brain tissue, demonstrated that P2X7R activation (as can occur in the brain following cell damage caused by TBI) promoted a pro-inflammatory response that was prevented by P2X7R antagonists and inhibitors of NLRP3/caspase-1. Such findings support evaluation of relevant pharmacological agents for their ability to improve the clinical outcomes of patients following TBI and other disorders with a neuroinflammatory pathology, such as depression,125 schizophrenia,141,142 multiple sclerosis,143 motor neuron disease,144 epilepsy113 and, perhaps, neuropathic pain.145,146
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the Department of Neurosurgery at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and the NIHR SRMRC Research Team for providing primary brain tissue samples and James Palmer (Janssen Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC) for the generous gifts of JNJ-55308942 and JNJ-54175446 used in these studies.
Contributor Information
Jamie Cowley, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Neale Harrison, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Ashley Pegg, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Hujo Chan, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Zhi Li, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Arshpreet Kaur, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Emma Welsh, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Alex Brewin, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Juan Carlos Yam-Puc, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Grace Fensome, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Edward Broome, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Ines M Morano, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Elizabeth Jinks, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Gillian Grafton, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Alison J Cooper, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Zubair Ahmed, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Andrew R Stevens, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Freya G Anderson, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Victoria Wykes, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; Department of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Ramesh Chelvarajah, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Georgios Tsermoulas, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; Department of Metabolism and Systems Science, School of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Ismail Ughratdar, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Athanasios Zisakis, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Philip J O’Halloran, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin D02 HC66, Ireland.
David J Davies, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Thomas Land, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Yasir A Chowdhury, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Zenab Sher, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Kamal M Yakoub, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Colin Bergin, NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Luke Galloway, Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK.
Rachel Upthegrove, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK; Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Birmingham Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK.
Catherine A Brady, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
John Gordon, Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Omar Qureshi, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of In Vitro Pharmacology, Celentyx Ltd, Birmingham B15 2SQ, UK.
Antonio Belli, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2QW, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Nicholas M Barnes, Neuropharmacology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Data availability
All data that support the findings of this study are present within the article. Data were generated at the University of Birmingham and Celentyx Ltd and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All materials are commercially available, except for JNJ-54175446.
Funding
This work was supported by Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) (MR/R006008/1), the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre and Celentyx Ltd. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the funders or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Competing interests
J.C., N.H., A.P., H.C., Z.L., A.K., E.W., A.B., J.C.Y.-P., G.F., E.B., I.M.M., E.J., G.G., C.A.B., J.G., O.Q. and N.M.B. are current or former employees of Celentyx Ltd and/or hold stock or stock options in Celentyx Ltd. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at Brain online.
References
- 1. Leibson CL, Brown AW, Ransom JE, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury across the full disease spectrum: A population-based medical record review study. Epidemiology. 2011;22:836–844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Miller GF, DePadilla L, Xu L. Costs of nonfatal traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2016. Med Care. 2021;59:451–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Capizzi A, Woo J, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Traumatic brain injury: An overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and medical management. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:213–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:987–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 2000;356:923–929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Seule M, Brunner T, Mack A, Hildebrandt G, Fournier JY. Neurosurgical and intensive care management of traumatic brain injury. Facial Plast Surg. 2015;31:325–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kochanek PM, Jackson TC, Jha RM, et al. Paths to successful translation of new therapies for severe traumatic brain injury in the golden age of traumatic brain injury research: A Pittsburgh vision. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37:2353–2371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Blennow K, Brody DL, Kochanek PM, et al. Traumatic brain injuries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Katayama Y, Maeda T, Koshinaga M, Kawamata T, Tsubokawa T. Role of excitatory amino acid-mediated ionic fluxes in traumatic brain injury. Brain Pathol. 1995;5:427–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Stiefel MF, Tomita Y, Marmarou A. Secondary ischemia impairing the restoration of ion homeostasis following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:707–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Guerriero RM, Giza CC, Rotenberg A. Glutamate and GABA imbalance following traumatic brain injury. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Palmer AM, Marion DW, Botscheller ML, Swedlow PE, Styren SD, DeKosky ST. Traumatic brain injury-induced excitotoxicity assessed in a controlled cortical impact model. J Neurochem. 1993;61:2015–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cornelius C, Crupi R, Calabrese V, et al. Traumatic brain injury: Oxidative stress and neuroprotection. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:836–853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hall ED, Detloff MR, Johnson K, Kupina NC. Peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration and lipid peroxidation in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:9–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yakovlev AG, Knoblach SM, Fan L, Fox GB, Goodnight R, Faden AI. Activation of CPP32-like caspases contributes to neuronal apoptosis and neurological dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci. 1997;17:7415–7424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Robertson CL, Scafidi S, McKenna MC, Fiskum G. Mitochondrial mechanisms of cell death and neuroprotection in pediatric ischemic and traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2009;218:371–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Verweij BH, Muizelaar JP, Vinas FC, Peterson PL, Xiong Y, Lee CP. Impaired cerebral mitochondrial function after traumatic brain injury in humans. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:815–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Donat CK, Scott G, Gentleman SM, Sastre M. Microglial activation in traumatic brain injury. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hernandez-Ontiveros DG, Tajiri N, Acosta S, Giunta B, Tan J, Borlongan CV. Microglia activation as a biomarker for traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2013;4:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Witcher KG, Bray CE, Chunchai T, et al. Traumatic brain injury causes chronic cortical inflammation and neuronal dysfunction mediated by microglia. J Neurosci. 2021;41:1597–1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ramlackhansingh AF, Brooks DJ, Greenwood RJ, et al. Inflammation after trauma: Microglial activation and traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:374–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:752–758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gentleman SM, Leclercq PD, Moyes L, et al. Long-term intracerebral inflammatory response after traumatic brain injury. Forensic Sci Int. 2004;146:97–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jayakumar AR, Tong XY, Ruiz-Cordero R, et al. Activation of NF-κB mediates astrocyte swelling and brain edema in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1249–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cheng X, Wang J, Sun X, Shao L, Guo Z, Li Y. Morphological and functional alterations of astrocytes responding to traumatic brain injury. J Integr Neurosci. 2019;18:203–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Henry RJ, Ritzel RM, Barrett JP, et al. Microglial depletion with CSF1R inhibitor during chronic phase of experimental traumatic brain injury reduces neurodegeneration and neurological deficits. J Neurosci. 2020;40:2960–2974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Glabinski AR, Balasingam V, Tani M, et al. Chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is expressed by astrocytes after mechanical injury to the brain. J Immunol. 1996;156:4363–4368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang H, Huang Q, Zhang Z, Ji J, Sun T, Wang D. Transient post-operative overexpression of CXCR2 on monocytes of traumatic brain injury patients drives monocyte chemotaxis toward cerebrospinal fluid and enhances monocyte-mediated immunogenic cell death of neurons in vitro. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19:171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Makinde HM, Cuda CM, Just TB, Perlman HR, Schwulst SJ. Nonclassical monocytes mediate secondary injury, neurocognitive outcome, and neutrophil infiltration after traumatic brain injury. J Immunol. 2017;199:3583–3591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mishra SK, Kumar BSH, Khushu S, Singh AK, Gangenahalli G. Early monitoring and quantitative evaluation of macrophage infiltration after experimental traumatic brain injury: A magnetic resonance imaging and flow cytometric analysis. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2017;78:25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hsieh CL, Kim CC, Ryba BE, et al. Traumatic brain injury induces macrophage subsets in the brain. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43:2010–2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Liao Y, Liu P, Guo F, Zhang Z-Y, Zhang Z. Oxidative burst of circulating neutrophils following traumatic brain injury in human. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Scholz M, Cinatl J, Schädel-Höpfner M, Windolf J. Neutrophils and the blood–brain barrier dysfunction after trauma. Med Res Rev. 2007;27:401–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Alam A, Thelin EP, Tajsic T, et al. Cellular infiltration in traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Helmy A, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ. Microdialysis in the human brain and its potential role in the development and clinical assessment of drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:1525–1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hutchinson PJ, O’Connell MT, Rothwell NJ, et al. Inflammation in human brain injury: Intracerebral concentrations of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and their endogenous inhibitor IL-1ra. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1545–1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Helmy A, Carpenter KL, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ. The cytokine response to human traumatic brain injury: Temporal profiles and evidence for cerebral parenchymal production. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:658–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Russo MV, McGavern DB. Inflammatory neuroprotection following traumatic brain injury. Science. 2016;353:783–785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Helmy A, Antoniades CA, Guilfoyle MR, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ. Principal component analysis of the cytokine and chemokine response to human traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Goodman JC, Van M, Gopinath SP, Robertson CS. Pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic elements of the neuroinflammatory response are activated in traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2009;102:437–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Flygt J, Ruscher K, Norberg A, et al. Neutralization of interleukin-1β following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the mouse attenuates the loss of mature oligodendrocytes. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35:2837–2849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fan L, Young PR, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ, Smith DH, McIntosh TK. Experimental brain injury induces expression of interleukin-1β mRNA in the rat brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1995;30:125–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Israelsson C, Bengtsson H, Kylberg A, et al. Distinct cellular patterns of upregulated chemokine expression supporting a prominent inflammatory role in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:959–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Stoffel M, Eriskat J, Plesnila M, Aggarwal N, Baethmann A. The penumbra zone of a traumatic cortical lesion: A microdialysis study of excitatory amino acid release. In: James HE, Marshall LF, Raulen HJ, eds. Brain Edema X. Springer; 1997:91–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kumar A, Loane DJ. Neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:1191–1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:728–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Surprenant A, Rassendren F, Kawashima E, North RA, Buell G. The cytolytic P2Z receptor for extracellular ATP identified as a P2X receptor (P2X7). Science. 1996;272:735–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kaczmarek-Hajek K, Zhang J, Kopp R, et al. Re-evaluation of neuronal P2X7 expression using novel mouse models and a P2X7-specific nanobody. Elife. 2018;7:e36217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Janks L, Sharma CVR, Egan TM. A central role for P2X7 receptors in human microglia. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15:325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Skaper SD, Facci L, Culbert AA, et al. P2X7 receptors on microglial cells mediate injury to cortical neurons in vitro. Glia. 2006;54:234–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Brough D, Le Feuvre RA, Iwakura Y, Rothwell NJ. Purinergic (P2X7) receptor activation of microglia induces cell death via an interleukin-1-independent mechanism. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;19:272–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Monif M, Reid CA, Powell KL, Smart ML, Williams DA. The P2X7 receptor drives microglial activation and proliferation: A trophic role for P2X7R pore. J Neurosci. 2009;29:3781–3791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Maschio CA, Moreno O, Wang J, et al. Increased levels of GFAP and purinergic P2X7 receptor in Alzheimer's disease brain are associated with Aβ, tau pathologies and synaptic loss. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025;17:274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Liu X, Zhao Z, Ji R, et al. Inhibition of P2X7 receptors improves outcomes after traumatic brain injury in rats. Purinergic Signal. 2017;13:529–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Aguzzi A, Barres BA, Bennett ML. Microglia: Scapegoat, saboteur, or something else? Science. 2013;339:156–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hailer NP. Immunosuppression after traumatic or ischemic CNS damage: It is neuroprotective and illuminates the role of microglial cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;84:211–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lannes N, Eppler E, Etemad S, Yotovski P, Filgueira L. Microglia at center stage: A comprehensive review about the versatile and unique residential macrophages of the central nervous system. Oncotarget. 2017;8:114393–114413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Muzio L, Viotti A, Martino G. Microglia in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration: From understanding to therapy. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:742065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Prinz M, Jung S, Priller J. Microglia biology: One century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2019;179:292–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Woodburn SC, Bollinger JL, Wohleb ES. The semantics of microglia activation: Neuroinflammation, homeostasis, and stress. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Di A, Xiong S, Ye Z, et al. The TWIK2 potassium efflux channel in macrophages mediates NLRP3 inflammasome-induced inflammation. Immunity. 2018;49:56–65.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Muñoz-Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martínez-Colón G, Smith BL, Rajendiran TM, Núñez G. K⁺ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38:1142–1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ferrari D, Pizzirani C, Adinolfi E, et al. The P2X7 receptor: A key player in IL-1 processing and release. J Immunol. 2006;176:3877–3883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Choi HB, Ryu JK, Kim SU, McLarnon JG. Modulation of the purinergic P2X7 receptor attenuates lipopolysaccharide-mediated microglial activation and neuronal damage in inflamed brain. J Neurosci. 2007;27:4957–4968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. von Mücke-Heim IA, Martin J, Uhr M, Ries C, Deussing JM. The human P2X7 receptor alters microglial morphology and cytokine secretion following immunomodulation. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1148190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Gicquel T, Robert S, Loyer P, et al. ILr1β production is dependent on the activation of purinergic receptors and NLRP3 pathway in human macrophages. FASEB J. 2015;29:4162–4173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Griffiths RJ, Stam EJ, Downs JT, Otterness IG. ATP induces the release of IL-1 from LPS-primed cells in vivo. J Immunol. 1995;154:2821–2828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Brough D, Le Feuvre RA, Wheeler RD, et al. Ca2+ stores and Ca2+ entry differentially contribute to the release of IL-1β and IL-1α from murine macrophages. J Immunol. 2003;170:3029–3036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Qu Y, Franchi L, Nunez G, Dubyak GR. Nonclassical IL-1β secretion stimulated by P2X7 receptors is dependent on inflammasome activation and correlated with exosome release in murine macrophages. J Immunol. 2007;179:1913–1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Karmakar M, Katsnelson MA, Dubyak GR, Pearlman E. Neutrophil P2X7 receptors mediate NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent IL-1β secretion in response to ATP. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pelegrin P, Barroso-Gutierrez C, Surprenant A. P2X7 receptor differentially couples to distinct release pathways for IL-1β in mouse macrophage. J Immunol. 2008;180:7147–7157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Bockstiegel J, Engelhardt J, Weindl G. P2X7 receptor activation leads to NLRP3-independent IL-1β release by human macrophages. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21:335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. He Y, Taylor N, Fourgeaud L, Bhattacharya A. The role of microglial P2X7: Modulation of cell death and cytokine release. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ward JR, West PW, Ariaans MP, et al. Temporal interleukin-1β secretion from primary human peripheral blood monocytes by P2X7-independent and P2X7-dependent mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23147–23158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Faroqi AH, Lim MJ, Kee EC, et al. In vivo detection of extracellular adenosine triphosphate in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2021;38:655–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Melani A, Amadio S, Gianfriddo M, et al. P2X7 receptor modulation on microglial cells and reduction of brain infarct caused by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:974–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Arbeloa J, Pérez-Samartín A, Gottlieb M, Matute C. P2X7 receptor blockade prevents ATP excitotoxicity in neurons and reduces brain damage after ischemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45:954–961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Chu K, Yin B, Wang J, et al. Inhibition of P2X7 receptor ameliorates transient global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury via modulating inflammatory responses in the rat hippocampus. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Kimbler DE, Shields J, Yanasak N, Vender JR, Dhandapani KM. Activation of P2X7 promotes cerebral edema and neurological injury after traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Franke H, Schepper C, Illes P, Krügel U. Involvement of P2X and P2Y receptors in microglial activation in vivo. Purinergic Signal. 2007;3:435–445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Peng W, Cotrina ML, Han X, et al. Systemic administration of an antagonist of the ATP-sensitive receptor P2X7 improves recovery after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:12489–12493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Bhattacharya A, Wang Q, Ao H, et al. Pharmacological characterization of a novel centrally permeable P2X7 receptor antagonist: JNJ-47965567. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170:624–640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Duplantier AJ, Dombroski MA, Subramanyam C, et al. Optimization of the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic attributes in a 6-azauracil series of P2X7 receptor antagonists leading to the discovery of the clinical candidate CE-224,535. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:3708–3711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Stock TC, Bloom BJ, Wei N, et al. Efficacy and safety of CE-224,535, an antagonist of P2X7 receptor, in treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:720–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Bhattacharya A. Recent advances in CNS P2X7 physiology and pharmacology: Focus on neuropsychiatric disorders. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Bhattacharya A, Lord B, Grigoleit JS, et al. Neuropsychopharmacology of JNJ-55308942: Evaluation of a clinical candidate targeting P2X7 ion channels in animal models of neuroinflammation and anhedonia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2586–2596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Letavic MA, Savall BM, Allison BD, et al. 4-Methyl-6,7-dihydro-4H-triazolo[4,5-c]pyridine-based P2X7 receptor antagonists: Optimization of pharmacokinetic properties leading to the identification of a clinical candidate. J Med Chem. 2017;60:4559–4572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Timmers M, Ravenstijn P, Xi L, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of JNJ-54175446, a brain permeable P2X7 antagonist, in a randomised single-ascending dose study in healthy participants. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32:1341–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Recourt K, de Boer P, van der Ark P, et al. Characterization of the central nervous system penetrant and selective purine P2X7 receptor antagonist JNJ-54175446 in patients with major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2023;13:266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lord B, Aluisio L, Shoblock JR, et al. Pharmacology of a novel central nervous system-penetrant P2X7 antagonist JNJ-42253432. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;351:628–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Chrovian CC, Soyode-Johnson A, Peterson AA, et al. A dipolar cycloaddition reaction to access 6-methyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-c]pyridines enables the discovery synthesis and preclinical profiling of a P2X7 antagonist clinical candidate. J Med Chem. 2018;61:207–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Recourt K, van der Aart J, Jacobs G, et al. Characterisation of the pharmacodynamic effects of the P2X7 receptor antagonist JNJ-54175446 using an oral dexamphetamine challenge model in healthy males in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose trial. J Psychopharmacol. 2020;34:1030–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Donnelly-Roberts DL, Namovic MT, Han P, Jarvis MF. Mammalian P2X7 receptor pharmacology: Comparison of recombinant mouse, rat and human P2X7 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:1203–1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Michel AD, Chambers LJ, Clay WC, Condreay JP, Walter DS, Chessell IP. Direct labelling of the human P2X7 receptor and identification of positive and negative cooperativity of binding. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151:103–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Galatro TF, Holtman IR, Lerario AM, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1162–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Gosselin D, Skola D, Coufal NG, et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science. 2017;356:eaal3222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Bennett ML. Isolation and culture of microglia. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2019;125:e70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Tucker AF, Collins HY, Mulinyawe SB, Barres BA. Diverse requirements for microglial survival, specification, and function revealed by defined-medium cultures. Neuron. 2017;94:759–773.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Caldeira C, Oliveira AF, Cunha C, et al. Microglia change from a reactive to an age-like phenotype with the time in culture. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Watkins LR, Hutchinson MR. A concern on comparing ‘apples’ and ‘oranges’ when differences between microglia used in human and rodent studies go far, far beyond simply species: Comment on Smith and Dragunow. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:189–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Muffat J, Li Y, Yuan B, et al. Efficient derivation of microglia-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. 2016;22:1358–1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Abud EM, Ramirez RN, Martinez ES, et al. iPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron. 2017;94:278–293.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Leone C, Le Pavec G, Même W, et al. Characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia-like cells. Glia. 2006;54:183–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Quek H, White AR. Patient-specific monocyte-derived microglia as a screening tool for neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2023;18:955–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Ryan KJ, White CC, Patel K, et al. A human microglia-like cellular model for assessing the effects of neurodegenerative disease gene variants. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaai7635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Sargeant TJ, Fourrier C. Human monocyte-derived microglia-like cell models: A review of the benefits, limitations and recommendations. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;107:98–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Banerjee A, Lu Y, Do K, et al. Validation of induced microglia-like cells (iMG cells) for future studies of brain diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:629279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Ohgidani M, Kato TA, Setoyama D, et al. Direct induction of ramified microglia-like cells from human monocytes: Dynamic microglial dysfunction in Nasu-Hakola disease. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Sellgren CM, Gracias J, Watmuff B, et al. Increased synapse elimination by microglia in schizophrenia patient-derived models of synaptic pruning. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:374–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Smit T, Ormel PR, Sluijs JA, et al. Transcriptomic and functional analysis of Aβ1–42 oligomer-stimulated human monocyte-derived microglia-like cells. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;100:219–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Quek H, Cuní-López C, Stewart R, Lim YC, Roberts TL, White AR. A robust approach to differentiate human monocyte-derived microglia from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. STAR Protoc. 2022;3:101747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Etemad S, Zamin RM, Ruitenberg MJ, Filgueira L. A novel in vitro human microglia model: Characterization of human monocyte-derived microglia. J Neurosci Methods. 2012;209:79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Engel T, Gomez-Villafuertes R, Tanaka K, et al. Seizure suppression and neuroprotection by targeting the purinergic P2X7 receptor during status epilepticus in mice. FASEB J. 2012;26:1616–1628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Arulkumaran N, Unwin RJ, Tam FW. A potential therapeutic role for P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) antagonists in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2011;20:897–915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Eser A, Colombel JF, Rutgeerts P, et al. Safety and efficacy of an oral inhibitor of the purinergic receptor P2X7 in adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase IIa study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21:2247–2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. McInnes IB, Cruwys S, Bowers K, Braddock M. Targeting the P2X7 receptor in rheumatoid arthritis: Biological rationale for P2X7 antagonism. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32:878–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Keystone EC, Wang MM, Layton M, Hollis S, McInnes IB. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of the P2X7 purinergic receptor antagonist AZD9056 on the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with active disease despite treatment with methotrexate or sulphasalazine. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1630–1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Rech JC, Bhattacharya A, Letavic MA, Savall BM. The evolution of P2X7 antagonists with a focus on CNS indications. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:3838–3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Donnelly-Roberts DL, Jarvis MF. Discovery of P2X7 receptor-selective antagonists offers new insights into P2X7 receptor function and indicates a role in chronic pain states. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151:571–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Donnelly-Roberts DL, Namovic MT, Surber B, et al. [3H]A-804598 ([3H]2-cyano-1-[(1S)-1-phenylethyl]-3-quinolin-5-ylguanidine) is a novel, potent, and selective antagonist radioligand for P2X7 receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:223–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Savall BM, Wu D, De Angelis M, et al. Synthesis, SAR, and pharmacological characterization of brain penetrant P2X7 receptor antagonists. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2015;6:671–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Mamad O, Heiland M, Lindner AU, et al. Anti-seizure effects of JNJ-54175446 in the intra-amygdala kainic acid model of drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2024;14:1308478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Eyolfson E, Khan A, Mychasiuk R, Lohman AW. Microglia dynamics in adolescent traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Todd BP, Chimenti MS, Luo Z, Ferguson PJ, Bassuk AG, Newell EA. Traumatic brain injury results in unique microglial and astrocyte transcriptomes enriched for type I interferon response. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Bodnar CN, Morganti JM, Bachstetter AD. Depression following a traumatic brain injury: Uncovering cytokine dysregulation as a pathogenic mechanism. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13:1693–1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Umpierre AD, Wu LJ. Microglia research in the 100th year since its discovery. Neurosci Bull. 2020;36:303–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Coll RC, Robertson AA, Chae JJ, et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Nat Med. 2015;21:248–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Coll RC, Hill JR, Day CJ, et al. MCC950 directly targets the NLRP3 ATP-hydrolysis motif for inflammasome inhibition. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:556–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Wannamaker W, Davies R, Namchuk M, et al. (S)-1-((S)-2-{[1-(4-Amino-3-chloro-phenyl)-methanoyl]-amino}-3,3-dimethyl-butanoyl)-pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid ((2R,3S)-2-ethoxy-5-oxo-tetrahydro-furan-3-yl)-amide (VX-765), an orally available selective interleukin (IL)-converting enzyme/caspase-1 inhibitor, exhibits potent anti-inflammatory activities by inhibiting the release of IL-1β and IL-18. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;321:509–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Mizutani H, Schechter N, Lazarus G, Black RA, Kupper TS. Rapid and specific conversion of precursor interleukin 1 beta (IL-1 beta) to an active IL-1 species by human mast cell chymase. J Exp Med. 1991;174:821–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Omoto Y, Tokime K, Yamanaka K, et al. Human mast cell chymase cleaves pro-IL-18 and generates a novel and biologically active IL-18 fragment. J Immunol. 2006;177:8315–8319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Maelfait J, Vercammen E, Janssens S, et al. Stimulation of toll-like receptor 3 and 4 induces interleukin-1β maturation by caspase-8. J Exp Med. 2008;205:1967–1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Moriwaki K, Bertin J, Gough PJ, Chan FK-M. A RIPK3–caspase 8 complex mediates atypical pro-IL-1β processing. J Immunol. 2015;194:1938–1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Vince JE, Wong WW-L, Gentle I, et al. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins limit RIP3 kinase-dependent interleukin-1 activation. Immunity. 2012;36:215–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Alves M, de Diego-Garcia L, Vegliante G, et al. P2X7R antagonism suppresses long-lasting brain hyperexcitability following traumatic brain injury in mice. Theranostics. 2025;15:1399–1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Zeiler FA, Thelin EP, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson PJ, Menon DK, Helmy A. Cerebrospinal fluid and microdialysis cytokines in severe traumatic brain injury: A scoping systematic review. Front Neurol. 2017;8:331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Cai Z, Lin S, Pang Y, Rhodes PG. Brain injury induced by intracerebral injection of interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the neonatal rat. Pediatr Res. 2004;56:377–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Zhu L, Liu X, Nemeth DP, et al. Interleukin-1 causes CNS inflammatory cytokine expression via endothelia-microglia bi-cellular signaling. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;81:292–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Jedrzejowska-Szypułka H, Straszak G, Larysz-Brysz M, et al. Interleukin-1beta plays a role in the activation of peripheral leukocytes after blood-brain barrier rupture in the course of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2010;7:39–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Yamagata K, Tagami M, Takenaga F, Yamori Y, Itoh S. Hypoxia-induced changes in tight junction permeability of brain capillary endothelial cells are associated with IL-1beta and nitric oxide. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;17:491–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Upthegrove R, Khandaker GM. Cytokines, oxidative stress and cellular markers of inflammation in schizophrenia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2020;44:49–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Upthegrove R, Manzanares-Teson N, Barnes NM. Cytokine function in medication-naive first episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2014;155:101–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Sharp AJ, Polak PE, Simonini V, et al. P2x7 deficiency suppresses development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroinflammation. 2008;5:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Ruiz-Ruiz C, Calzaferri F, García AG. P2X7 receptor antagonism as a potential therapy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Chessell IP, Hatcher JP, Bountra C, et al. Disruption of the P2X7 purinoceptor gene abolishes chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Pain. 2005;114:386–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. North RA, Jarvis MF. P2X receptors as drug targets. Mol Pharmacol. 2013;83:759–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data that support the findings of this study are present within the article. Data were generated at the University of Birmingham and Celentyx Ltd and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All materials are commercially available, except for JNJ-54175446.
