Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2026 Sep 21;17:1919002. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1919002

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated FeS-ELF3 inactivation overcomes heteromorphic self-incompatibility in common buckwheat

Artur Pinski 1,*,†, Magdalena Zaranek 2,†, Joanna Lusinska 1,†, Przemyslaw Kopec 3,†, Agnieszka Plazek 4,†, Meiliang Zhou 5,†, Alexander Betekhtin 1,*,†
PMCID: PMC13635116  PMID: 42835033

Abstract

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is a climate-resilient pseudocereal; however, its global adoption is constrained by the heteromorphic self-incompatibility associated with distyly. While the S-locus early flowering 3 (FeS-ELF3) gene has been identified as a key regulator of self-compatibility, a stable genetic transformation of F. esculentum has not yet been developed. In this study, we established an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol for F. esculentum by adapting an F. tataricum procedure, incorporating a heat-shock treatment at 43 °C for 5 min. This achieved a transgenic frequency of 27.27% among regenerated plants (6/22) and an absolute editing efficiency of 4.55% (1/22) in the agronomically relevant ‘Panda’ cultivar. Targeted knockout of FeS-ELF3 via CRISPR/Cas9 yielded a self-compatible line with long-homostylous flowers. Plants derived from this single edited founder event exhibited architectural shifts - specifically reduced height and shorter inflorescences – without an apparent reduction in seed yield under greenhouse conditions. Because these observations stem from a single edited line, further evaluation of independent mutant lines or complementation assays is required to definitively distinguish FeS-ELF3-specific pleiotropic effects. Nevertheless, this study provides a proof-of-concept for overcoming self-incompatibility and establishes a genomic framework for the rapid improvement of Fagopyrum esculentum.

Keywords: buckwheat, CRISPR/Cas9 system, Fagopyrum esculentum, heterostylous self-incompatibility, plant transformation

1. Introduction

Buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.), a member of the Polygonaceae family, comprises 26 recognised species, among which Fagopyrum esculentum Moench (commonly referred to as sweet or common buckwheat) and Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. (known as bitter or Tartary buckwheat) are the most widely cultivated. As an underutilised orphan crop, buckwheat has considerable potential to enhance global food and nutritional security. Naturally gluten-free and rich in high-quality proteins, essential minerals, and bioactive compounds such as rutin, buckwheat is considered a functional food. Its seeds are typically dehulled and milled into flour, which serves as a base for food products such as bread, noodles, pasta, cakes, biscuits, and fermented products such as wine, beer, and vinegar. The flowers are highly valued for honey production due to their distinctive colour and abundant nectar. Importantly, buckwheat is a resilient crop that can thrive in low-fertility, acidic soils and high altitudes, where many staple cereals fail. This adaptability makes it particularly suitable for cultivation in marginal environments and is relevant to sustainable agriculture (Jha et al., 2024; Ding et al., 2025; Pinski et al., 2025). Despite its nutritional and ecological value, common buckwheat suffers from self-incompatibility and relies on insect pollinators for fertilisation, leading to unstable yields (Kasajima et al., 2017).

Successful fertilisation in F. esculentum occurs only between plants bearing complementary floral morphs - Thrum and Pin - due to a heteromorphic self-incompatibility (SI) system. This mechanism is genetically controlled by a hemizygous S-locus present in Thrum plants and is tightly linked to floral morphology. Previous studies have demonstrated that breakdown of SI and the emergence of long-homostyle flowers result from inactivation of S-ELF3, a homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3), located within the S-locus (Yasui et al., 2012). Mechanistically, ELF3 acts as a central node in the plant circadian clock - via both Evening Complex-dependent and independent signalling - to coordinate photoperiodic flowering, architecture, and environmental adaptability under changing climate conditions. Consequently, targeted manipulation of ELF3 offers a valuable strategy for crop optimisation. Nevertheless, while its role is well defined in A. thaliana, significant knowledge gaps remain in non-model crops such as Fagopyrum, where the phenotypic effects of ELF3 disruption have yet to be systematically characterised (Zhu and Wang, 2024). In buckwheat, research on S-ELF3 has primarily focussed on its central role in floral morphology and SI. For instance, the F. esculentum PL4 line carries a nonsense mutation in S-ELF3, inherited from F. homotropicum. Additionally, ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis has produced a long-homostyle F. esculentum line due to splice site mutations in S-ELF3. This work relies on the analysis of single mutant alleles to establish gene–trait relationships at the S-locus (Fawcett et al., 2023). F. tataricum, a homomorphic and self-compatible species, exhibits structural variation in S-ELF3: an inverted duplication of the 5′ region and a retrotransposon insertion (Yasui et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings firmly establish S-ELF3 as the key genetic determinant of SI in buckwheat. To overcome self-incompatibility in an elite genetic background, we established an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol and targeted FeS-ELF3 with CRISPR/Cas9, thereby generating a self-compatible F. esculentum cv. ‘Panda’.

2. Results and discussion

2.1. Inactivation of the FeS-ELF3 gene leads to self-compatible F. esculentum plants

The sequencing of the coding sequence of FeS-ELF3 revealed no single-nucleotide polymorphisms between F. esculentum “Pintian4” and F. esculentum cv. ‘Panda’ (Supplementary Data 1). Given that FeS-ELF3 is located within a hemizygous genomic region exclusive to Thrum plants (Fawcett et al., 2023), a Cas9 construct targeting FeS-ELF3 was introduced into Thrum embryogenic calli induced from immature embryos using the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system described here (Supplementary Figures S1a, b; Supplementary Data 1). The previously reported transformation protocol for F. tataricum was modified by the inclusion of a heat-shock step (43 °C for 5 min), which has been shown to increase transformation efficiency (Patel et al., 2013). Transgenic status was confirmed by PCR targeting a partial Cas9 fragment, yielding a frequency of transgenics among regenerated plants of 27.27% (6 transformed out of 22 regenerated plants) and an absolute editing efficiency of 4.55% (1 edited plant out of 22 regenerated plants). These results align with the ~20% transgenic frequency previously achieved using our optimised F. tataricum protocol (Supplementary Figure S1c; Table 1). However, while transformation efficiency remained relatively high, the regeneration rate for F. esculentum is notably low; consequently, multiple independent transformation cycles were required to produce viable plants. To overcome this limitation, vector constructs could be further optimised by incorporating developmental regulators, such as the GRF4–GIF1 chimaera, which are known to significantly enhance shoot regeneration efficiency in recalcitrant transgenic plants (Debernardi et al., 2020).

Table 1.

Summary of Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101-mediated transformation and CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficiency in Fagopyrum esculentum.

Species Target gene Regenerated plants (T0​) Frequency of transgenics among regenerated plants (T-DNA+) Absolute editing efficiency
F. esculentum FeS-ELF3 22 6/22 (27.27%) 1/22 (4.55%)

The frequency of transgenic regenerated plants is calculated as the percentage of regenerated plants containing T-DNA (T-DNA+). Absolute editing efficiency is calculated as the percentage of edited plants among all regenerated plants.

The targeted mutagenesis yielded a mutant carrying a single-nucleotide insertion in FeS-ELF3, resulting in a frameshift and the introduction of a premature stop codon, generating a loss-of-function allele (Figure 1a; Supplementary Figure S2a; Supplementary Data 1). The resulting fes-elf3 mutant displayed long-homostylous flowers, a characteristic phenotype associated with the breakdown of self-incompatibility in F. esculentum (Figure 1b). T1 progeny were resequenced to confirm the inheritance of the targeted FeS-ELF3 mutations identified in the parental T0 line (Supplementary Figure S2b). Subsequently, transgene-free T2 individuals were identified and characterised under greenhouse conditions. This stable transmission of edited alleles to the T1 generation demonstrates the effectiveness of this strategy for developing new buckwheat varieties.

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram shows FeS-ELF3 gene structure and CRISPR-Cas9 mutation site. Three flower cross-sections compare Fe Pin, Fe Thrum, and fes-elf3 mutant floral morphology. Microscopy image displays pollen grains stained for viability. Boxplot graph quantifies pollen viability percentages across flower types. Photograph contrasts Fe and fes-elf3 mutant plants in overall growth habit. Boxplot presents reduced plant height in fes-elf3 mutants. Image displays inflorescences of Fe and fes-elf3 plants. Boxplot illustrates difference in inflorescence length. Boxplot shows nectar volume per flower, which is reduced in fes-elf3 compared with WT.Close-up shows the long-homostylous flowers of fes-elf3. Boxplot compares seed number per plant between fes-elf3 and WT, showing no significant difference. Final panel shows representative seeds from fes-elf3 and WT plants.

Inactivation of FeS-ELF3 leads to long-homostylous flowers and self-compatibility. (a) Schematic representation of the FeS-ELF3 gene located in a hemizygous genomic region specific to Thrum plants, with the sgRNA target site indicated. PAM, protospacer adjacent motif. (b) Floral morphotypes of F. esculentum cv. ‘Panda’. Pin flowers exhibit long styles and low anthers, whereas Thrum flowers have short styles and elevated anthers. Long-homostylous flowers result from nonsense mutations in FeS-ELF3 from the T0 generation. Scale bar, 1 mm. (c) Pollen viability assessed by Alexander’s staining (Pin: n = 10; Thrum: n = 12; fes-elf3 T0: n = 18; fes-elf3 T2: n = 7). Scale bar, 100 µm. (d) Quantification of pollen viability in Pin, Thrum, and fes-elf3 (T0 and T2 generations) flowers. (e) Representative photographs of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants grown under greenhouse conditions. Scale bar, 10 cm. (f) Plant height of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants grown in the greenhouse (n = 10 plants per genotype). (g) Representative inflorescences of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants. Scale bar, 2 mm. (h) Inflorescence length of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants (n = 9 plants per genotype, averaged from 5 inflorescences per plant). (i) Nectar volume per flower in fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants. Nectar was collected from 50 flowers per plant and expressed as mean nectar volume per flower; n = 10 plants per genotype. (j) Inflorescence of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) showing flowers and developing seeds. Scale bar, 1 cm. (k) Seed number per plant in fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT under greenhouse conditions (n = 10 plants per genotype). (l) Representative seeds of fes-elf3 (T2 generation) and WT plants. Scale bar, 2 mm. Boxplots indicate the median (horizontal line) and interquartile range (IQR; 25th–75th percentiles), with whiskers extending to 1.5×IQR. Data points beyond the whiskers were identified as outliers and are highlighted in red. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (h, k), Welch’s t-test (f, i), or Dunn’s test following Kruskal–Wallis (d). Shared letters indicate no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) (d).

Reproductive potential was assessed by evaluating pollen viability in the T0 and T2 plants. Although pollen viability in fes-elf3 was slightly reduced relative to Thrum and Pin flowers, (Thrum, 88.9 ± 13.1%; Pin, 95.6 ± 4.1%; fes-elf3 T0, 83.4 ± 10.1%; fes-elf3 T2 80.4 ± 6.2%; mean ± SD; Figures 1c, d) (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 19.19, df = 3, p = 0.0002) mutant plants retained sufficient reproductive capacity to produce seeds under the tested conditions. Dunn’s post hoc test revealed that viability was significantly reduced in fes-elf3 T0 (padjusted = 0.0021) and T2 (padj = 0.0014) compared to Pin flowers, as well as in T2 compared to Thrum flowers (padj = 0.0440), whereas all other pairwise comparisons were non-significant (padj > 0.05; Figure 1d). Mild reductions in pollen viability without loss of overall fertility align with findings in related early flowering (ELF) family knockouts; CRISPR/Cas9-edited elf mutants in A. thaliana exhibit impaired pollen germination and altered anther morphology relative to WT while retaining partial reproductive competence (Jan et al., 2026).

Furthermore, we observed that fes-elf3 plants were significantly shorter than wild-type (WT) plants, with average heights of 61.9 ± 2.7 cm compared with 97.1 ± 21.1 cm in WT (Welch’s t-test, t(9.3) = 5.22, p = 0.0005) (Figures 1e, f). Phenotypic variance was also significantly lower in fes-elf3 than in WT, as demonstrated by Levene’s test (F(1, 18) = 61.37, p < 0.0001). Consistent with this result, the coefficient of variation was substantially lower in fes-elf3 (CV = 4.41%) than in WT (CV = 21.79%), indicating reduced phenotypic dispersion and greater uniformity in plant height among mutant individuals. However, because F. esculentum is an obligate outcrossing species, part of the reduced variance in the mutant line likely stems from its reduced genetic heterogeneity (as derived from a single homozygous line) compared to the genetically diverse wild-type population. This height reduction aligns with phenotypic effects observed in other crops; for example, in chickpea (Cicer arietinum), ELF3 loss-of-function mutations confer photoperiod insensitivity - dramatically accelerating flowering under non-inductive short days to match long-day timing - which prematurely ends vegetative growth and yields significantly shorter, compact plants (Ridge et al., 2017). From an agronomic perspective, this combination of dwarfing and height uniformity in fes-elf3 is highly desirable for improving lodging resistance and facilitating mechanical harvesting, aligning with ELF3’s established role in regulating shade avoidance and stem elongation (Jiménez-Gómez et al., 2010; Xiang et al., 2019; Hornyák et al., 2020). Indeed, a previously developed ethyl methanesulfonate–induced dwarf mutant of F. tataricum (ftdm) was shown to be suitable for high-density planting and commercial cultivation (Sun et al., 2021). In addition to reduced plant height, fes-elf3 plants exhibited shorter inflorescences (1.54 ± 0.12 cm) relative to WT plants (2.71 ± 0.16 cm; Figures 1g, h). Variances did not differ significantly between the two groups (Levene’s test, F(1, 16) = 0.750, p = 0.3992), and a Student’s t-test confirmed a significant difference in inflorescence length (t(16) = 17.35, p < 0.0001).

To date, pleiotropic alterations in plant height or inflorescence architecture have not been reported for fes-elf3 mutants, as FeS-ELF3 has been characterised predominantly as a specific regulator of style length and female compatibility (Ma et al., 2022; Fawcett et al., 2023; He et al., 2023; Lin et al., 2023). However, given its function as a transcriptional regulator, FeS-ELF3 likely modulates downstream gene networks involved in vegetative elongation and inflorescence development (Yasui et al., 2012; Zhu and Wang, 2024). Alternatively, these unexpected phenotypic shifts could result from somaclonal variation induced during tissue culture or Cas9 off-target activity. To evaluate specificity, we analysed six predicted off-target sites via Sanger sequencing; no off-target mutations were detected (Supplementary Data 1), suggesting a low likelihood of detectable off-target editing at these loci. All predicted genic off-target sites were experimentally tested, whereas only intergenic sites remained untested. Furthermore, FeS-ELF3 knockout renders the plants self-compatible, which facilitates stable line propagation, but continuous selfing inherently reduces genetic diversity across generations (Peer and Mir, 2025). Evaluating additional independent lines and performing transgenic complementation will further rule out tissue culture effects and confirm generalisability.

Given that F. esculentum is an important nectar source for pollinators (Plazek et al., 2023), nectar production was also evaluated. Nectar volume per flower was moderately reduced in fes-elf3 plants (0.481 ± 0.083 µL) compared with WT plants (0.572 ± 0.027 µL; Figure 1i). Homogeneity of variance was violated (Levene’s test, F(1, 18) = 11.517, p = 0.0032); therefore, Welch’s t-test was used and revealed a significant difference in nectar volume between WT and fes-elf3 plants (t(10.9) = 3.30, p = 0.0072). Reduced nectar production in fes-elf3 plants could potentially decrease the floral reward available to pollinators, as reduced nectar availability in buckwheat during drought stress has been associated with lower pollinator attraction and cascading effects on reproductive success (Rering et al., 2020). Although the potential consequences for seed production may be partly mitigated by the self-compatibility of fes-elf3 plants, the reduction in nectar availability may still influence plant-pollinator interactions and warrants further investigation.

To verify autonomous self-compatibility, fes-elf3 plants were isolated in a separate growth chamber devoid of insect pollinators or mechanical cross-pollination. Under these isolated conditions, the mutant plants successfully set seeds, providing direct functional evidence of self-compatibility (Figure 1j). Seed number per plant was comparable between WT (134.2 ± 24.6) and fes-elf3 (160.3 ± 46.8) plants under greenhouse conditions (Figures 1k, l). Variances did not differ significantly between the two groups (Levene’s test, F(1, 18) = 1.926, p = 0.1821), and a Student’s t-test indicated no significant difference in seed number (t(18) = −1.56, p = 0.1355). It should be emphasised that these experimental environments differed in design: obligate self-incompatible WT plants were maintained with Calliphora vicina flies to facilitate necessary cross-pollination, whereas self-compatible fes-elf3 mutants were strictly isolated without insect vectors to verify autonomous selfing capacity. While this isolation confirms that fes-elf3 can set seeds without pollinator assistance, comparing direct yield potential between these distinct microenvironments requires caution. Large-scale field trials in a uniform environment will be essential for precisely quantifying the commercial yield capacity of fes-elf3 mutant. Given previous results of stable high-yielding self-compatible F. esculentum (Kasajima et al., 2017), we hypothesised that self-compatible lines of F. esculentum cv. ‘Panda’ could offer more consistent year-to-year yields by reducing reliance on pollinator availability. In self-incompatible buckwheat, pollination success is vulnerable to unpredictable weather conditions, particularly given the narrow one-day flowering window of individual blossoms (Cawoy et al., 2009). However, while our greenhouse observations demonstrate viable seed production in self-compatible plants, validating these potential agronomic benefits will require extensive multi-year, multi-location field trials across diverse climatic conditions.

In summary, this study demonstrates the efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing to overcome heteromorphic self-incompatibility in common buckwheat. We successfully generated a self-compatible line in the commercially relevant Polish cultivar ‘Panda’ and confirmed the stable inheritance of the edited trait in the T1 generation, and conducted phenotypic characterisation using transgene-free T2 plants. A current limitation of this study is that only a single fes-elf3 mutant line was obtained, warranting further independent transformation events to fully validate phenotypic consistency and to advance mechanistic understanding of FeS-ELF3. Nonetheless, as a New Genomic Technique (NGT) with a globally favourable regulatory trajectory compared to traditional GMOs (Menary and Fuller, 2024), this self-compatible ‘Panda’ line represents a valuable genetic resource. It can be integrated directly into agricultural production or leveraged in breeding programs (Suzuki et al., 2014) to stack traits such as dwarfism, waxy starch, reduced allergenicity, and abiotic stress tolerance, ultimately contributing to resilient food systems.

3. Methods

3.1. Plant material

Embryogenic calli of F. esculentum, derived from Thrum immature zygotic embryos, were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Because FeS-ELF3 is localised within a hemizygous genomic region unique to the S-locus of Thrum individuals (Fawcett et al., 2023), verification of its presence confirms the Thrum origin of the tissue. Once sufficient tissue was obtained, genomic DNA was isolated using the CTAB method. A fragment of the FeS-ELF3 gene was subsequently amplified (FeS-ELF3_partial_F and FeS-ELF3_partial_R) using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, UK) and sequenced to verify the Thrum-type origin of the callus and confirm the presence of the FeS-ELF3 gene (Supplementary Figure S1a, Supplementary Data 1). The oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 2. The callus was maintained on RX medium according to (Betekhtin et al., 2017) at 25 °C (± 1 °C) in the dark and subcultured every two weeks. Before transformation, embryogenic Thrum type callus of F. esculentum was put on regeneration medium containing macro- and micro-elements as in MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962), 3.0 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine, 1.0 mg/L thidiazuron, 30 g/L sucrose, 3 g/L phytagel and cultured in a growth room at 28°C (± 1 °C) with a 16/8 h (light/dark) photoperiod, under light intensity of 55 µmol/m2/s for 12–14 days to induce somatic embryos. Callus with forming somatic embryos was transformed.

3.2. Cloning of FeS-ELF3, vector design, and selection of CRISPR/Cas9 target sites

To validate the FeS-ELF3 coding sequence in F. esculentum cv. ‘Panda’ for sgRNA design, total RNA was isolated from young Thrum-type flowers using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). First-strand cDNA was synthesised using the Maxima H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with dsDNase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The complete FeS-ELF3 coding sequence was subsequently amplified using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB, UK) with the primers BsaI_FeS-ELF3_F and BsaI_FeS-ELF3_R. These oligonucleotides were designed using the F. esculentum “Pintian4” reference genome from the Chinese National Genomics Data Center (GWHBJBK00000000). The oligonucleotides were designed to remove the STOP codon and add BsaI recognition overhangs, allowing Golden Gate cloning into vector pGGC000 from the GreenGate cloning system. The vectors with cloned FeS-ELF3 were sequenced using M13F and SP6 oligonucleotides (Supplementary Data 1). For targeted mutagenesis, we used the binary vector pGG-Cas9-AtU6-lacZ-kanR, constructed using the GreenGate cloning system (Lampropoulos et al., 2013). The empty vector was assembled as described in Pinski and Betekhtin (2023) with two modifications: pGG-Cas9(ΔSTOP) was replaced with pGG-Cas9(STOP), and the pGGD001 (linker-GFP) module was substituted with pGGD002 (C-tag, D-dummy) (Supplementary Figure S3, GenBank accession number: PZ366425). sgRNA sequences targeting FeS-ELF3 were designed using Geneious Prime 2022.0.2. sgRNA specificity was assessed with Cas-OFFinder (Bae et al., 2014) against the F. esculentum ‘Pintian4’ reference genome, allowing up to five mismatches and no insertions or deletions. The selected sgRNA sequence was 5′-GGTGTGCCGATCTCACAAGT-3′ (PAM: 5′-GGG-3′). Final sgRNA selection was based on predicted editing efficiency, proximity to the 5′ end of the coding region, and the fewest off-target sites in the reference genome. Target-specific sgRNA sequence was introduced into the vector pGG-Cas9-AtU6-lacZ-kanR via Golden Gate assembly using flanking AarI restriction sites, and the assembly was confirmed by sequencing. The assembled vector was electroporated into the A. tumefaciens GV3101 strain.

3.3. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

Agrobacterium preparation, callus transformation, and plant regeneration were performed according to the protocol previously described by Pinski and Betekhtin (2023) for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of F. tataricum, with minor modifications. For F. esculentum, Thrum type callus with somatic embryos (5–7 g) was placed in 30 mL of liquid RX medium supplemented with 30 mg/L acetosyringone and 0.1% Pluronic F-68 for heat shock in a water bath at 43 °C for 5 min. Afterwards, the RX liquid medium was removed, and the tissue was incubated in 30 mL of Agrobacterium suspension for 10 min. Subsequently, the Agrobacterium suspension was removed, and the tissue was dried on 110 mm filter papers in open Petri dishes for 15 min. The next steps were the same as for F. tataricum Agro-transformation. To minimise the occurrence of chimeric plants, the kanamycin concentration used for selection was increased from 50 mg/L to 100 mg/L, and the selection period was extended from 3–4 weeks to 6–7 weeks.

3.4. Regenerated plants cultivation

Regenerated plants with developed roots were transferred to an aero-hydroponic propagator for 20 cuttings (Hemp) filled with medium containing 20 ml of Aqua Vega A (Canna, Netherlands) and 20 ml of Aqua Vega B (Canna, Netherlands) per 10 L of water. For the first week, the lid was applied to maintain humidity; after this time, the lid was gradually removed to acclimate the plants (Supplementary Figure S1b). Rooted and strong plants were transferred to pots filled with moss-coconut fibre substrate (Ceres International) and grown under greenhouse conditions (18–26 °C, 16/8 photoperiod, light intensity of 40 µmol/m2/s sodium lamps Lucalox LU600W/PSL, HU, optimally irrigated). Seeds from the T0 generation were collected in successive rounds. The fes-elf3 plants were maintained in a greenhouse chamber without any other F. esculentum plants to prevent cross-pollination. The nectar analysis was performed as described previously (Plazek et al., 2023); nectar was collected from 50 open flowers per plant, and the total nectar volume was divided by the number of flowers to calculate nectar volume per flower. Ten plants were analysed per genotype, and each plant was treated as an independent biological replicate. Wild-type F. esculentum plants were grown in a separate chamber containing Calliphora vicina flies, enabling efficient cross-pollination between Pin and Thrum plants.

3.5. Mutants characterisation

The DNA from the leaves of regenerated plants was isolated using the CTAB method, as previously described by Hus et al (Hus et al., 2020). Successful transformation and T-DNA integration were first confirmed by PCR amplification of a fragment of the Cas9 gene (Cas9_partial_F and Cas9_partial_R). In the case of FeS-ELF3, because a single copy of the gene is present in F. esculentum Thrum plants, the PCR product was directly sequenced. The resulting sequencing data were aligned with the corresponding reference sequences using Geneious Prime 2022.0.2 to identify potential mutations within the target genes and to characterise potential influence on protein formation. The Sanger sequencing results for WT and mutant sequences are in Supplementary Data 1. The transgene-free plants were assessed by PCR amplification of a fragment of the Cas9 gene (Cas9_partial_F and Cas9_partial_R). Among the 24 potential off-target sites identified, six were prioritised - favouring those within gene coding regions - and validated via Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Table 1) using the primers given in Supplementary Data 2. Of these, five were located within gene bodies, including two in exonic regions and three in intronic regions, while one site was located in an intergenic region. Sanger sequencing trace files were subsequently analysed for indel frequencies using Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE) (Brinkman et al., 2014) to estimate indel proportions and size distributions. The alignment window was set to 100 bp upstream of the predicted Cas9 cleavage site, and the decomposition window extended 100 bp downstream of the cleavage site. Indels ranging from 1 to 20 bp were considered, with a significance cut off for decomposition set at p < 0.001. All primary sequencing results are provided in Supplementary Data 1.

3.6. Microscopic observations

The bright field images of the flower and seeds were captured using a KEYENCE VHX-7000 digital microscope (Keyence, Japan).

3.7. Pollen viability

Pollen viability was assessed according to Alexander’s staining method (Alexander, 1969). Fully open flowers were collected from the greenhouse-grown plants (Pin: n = 10; Thrum: n = 12; fes-elf3 T0: n = 18; fes-elf3 T2: n = 7, where n represents individual flowers, each collected from a separate plant). Then, fresh pollen was placed on a drop of Alexander’s stain on microscope slides and covered with a coverslip. The slides were examined under an inverted Leica DMi8 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) equipped with a Leica DFC 7000 T camera conjugated with LAS X Extended Depth of Field and Deconvolution Modules. The number of viable (dark red cytoplasm with a green wall) and non-viable (entirely green) pollen grains was counted. Pollen viability was expressed as the percentage of viable pollen.

3.8. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (R version 4.4.1; RStudio PBC, Boston, MA, USA) using the following R packages: readxl, dplyr, tidyr, purrr, rstatix, ggplot2, ggsignif, patchwork, and RColorBrewer. Unless otherwise indicated, data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The individual plant was the experimental unit for plant height (cm), inflorescence length (cm; n = 9 plants per genotype, averaged from 5 inflorescences per plant), nectar volume (µL per flower; n = 10 plants per genotype, averaged from 50 flowers per plant), and seed number per plant; pollen viability (%) was assessed per flower.

Data distributions were evaluated for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and inspection of Q–Q plots, and homogeneity of variances was assessed using Levene’s test. For two-group comparisons of normally distributed data with equal variances, two-sided Student’s t-tests were used (inflorescence length, seed number). When the assumption of homogeneity of variance was violated, Welch’s t-test was applied (plant height, nectar volume). For multi-group comparisons of non-parametric data (pollen viability), the Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted, followed by Dunn’s post hoc pairwise test with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 or padj < 0.05 for pairwise comparisons. Potential outliers were identified using boxplots based on the 1.5×IQR criterion. All observations were retained in the statistical analyses, and no data points were excluded.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Urszula Czech from the University of Agriculture in Poland, Marta Sowa, Katarzyna Pierzchała, Florian Brzostyński and Jacek Matyjaszek for their excellent care of the greenhouse plants. The plasmid kit used to generate plant transformation constructs was a gift from Jan Lohmann (Addgene kit #1000000036).

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland. Research project OPUS-19 (No. Reg. 2020/37/B/NZ9/01499 awarded to AB) and SONATA BIS 10 (No. Reg. 2020/38/E/NZ9/00033 awarded to AB).

Footnotes

Edited by: Siddharth Tiwari, National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, India

Reviewed by: Shugao Fan, Ludong University, China

Kalyani Prasad, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), India

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author contributions

APi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. MZa: Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. JL: Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. PK: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. APl: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MZh: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AB: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1919002/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of F. esculentum. (a) Callus derived from F. esculentum Thrum type. Scale bar, 2 mm. (b) Regenerated F. esculentum plant. (c) PCR identification of transformed plants with integrated T-DNA (by detection of a fragment of the Cas9 gene using oligonucleotides Cas9_partial_F and Cas9_partial_R). Plant number 20 carries a mutated fes-elf3 copy, which was further characterised in this study.

Image1.jpg (510.7KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure 2

Sequence alignment of fes-elf3 mutants. (a) Sequence profile of the fes-elf3 T0 founder line. (b) Representative sequences of ten T1 progeny derived from the fes-elf3 T0 mutant, demonstrating the stable inheritance of the edited alleles. The WT reference, sgRNA target site, and PAM sequence are indicated.

Image2.jpg (2.1MB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure 3

Plasmid map of pGG-Cas9-AtU6-lacZ-kanR, a binary CRISPR/Cas9 vector for sgRNA-mediated targeted mutagenesis in buckwheat. The T-DNA region, flanked by left (LB) and right (RB) borders, contains the AtU6–26 promoter driving sgRNA expression, with the protospacer cloning site defined by flanking AarI restriction sites and the gRNA scaffold. Cas9 is expressed from the CaMV 35S promoter, and the kanamycin plant selectable marker (neomycin phosphotransferase II) from the pNOS promoter. The bacterial backbone carries a spectinomycin resistance cassette (SpR) for bacterial selection, a pBR322 origin, and the pVS1 replicon for stable maintenance in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Image3.jpg (1.6MB, jpg)
Supplementary Data Sheet 1

The Sanger sequencing results of WT sequences and mutants of F. esculentum.

DataSheet1.zip (3.1MB, zip)
Supplementary Data Sheet 2

Oligonucleotides used in the study. Regions of sgRNA sequence overlap are underlined. Lowercase letters indicate cloning overhangs. A bold red “G” highlights the C->G substitution introduced to eliminate a stop codon.

DataSheet2.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 1

Potential off-target sites identified by Cas-OFFinder with parameters allowed up to five mismatches with no bulges.

Table1.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Alexander M. P. (1969). Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44, 117–122. doi:  10.3109/10520296909063335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bae S., Park J., Kim J. S. (2014). Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btu048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Betekhtin A., Rojek M., Jaskowiak J., Milewska-Hendel A., Kwasniewska J., Kostyukova Y., et al. (2017). Nuclear genome stability in long-term cultivated callus lines of Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. PloS One 12, e0173537. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0173537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brinkman E. K., Chen T., Amendola M., Van Steensel B. (2014). Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168. doi:  10.1093/nar/gku936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cawoy V., Ledent J. F., Kinet J. M., Jacquemart A.-L. (2009). Floral biology of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Eur. J. Plant Sci. Bio/Technol. 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Debernardi J. M., Tricoli D. M., Ercoli M. F., Hayta S., Ronald P., Palatnik J. F., et al. (2020). A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1274–1279. doi:  10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ding M., Yang Y., Yi Z., Zhou M., Luo H. (2025). Across the ages: Buckwheat meets era-specific needs. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 166, 105359. doi:  10.1016/j.tifs.2025.10535942574925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fawcett J. A., Takeshima R., Kikuchi S., Yazaki E., Katsube-Tanaka T., Dong Y. M., et al. (2023). Genome sequencing reveals the genetic architecture of heterostyly and domestication history of common buckwheat. Nat. Plants 9, 1236–1251. doi:  10.1038/s41477-023-01474-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. He Q., Ma D., Li W., Xing L., Zhang H., Wang Y., et al. (2023). High-quality Fagopyrum esculentum genome provides insights into the flavonoid accumulation among different tissues and self-incompatibility. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 1423–1441. doi:  10.1111/jipb.13459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hornyák M., Slomka A., Sychta K., Dziurka M., Kopec P., Pastuszak J., et al. (2020). Reducing flower competition for assimilates by half results in higher yield of Fagopyrum esculentum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8953. doi:  10.3390/ijms21238953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hus K., Betekhtin A., Pinski A., Rojek-Jelonek M., Grzebelus E., Nibau C., et al. (2020). A CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis protocol for Brachypodium distachyon and its allopolyploid relative, Brachypodium hybridum. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 614. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2020.00614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jan R., Iqbal S., Ali S., Almalki M. A., Alfredan M., Ibrahim R. I. H., et al. (2026). Early flowering (ELF) gene integrates vegetative growth, flowering regulation, and reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 27, 5615. doi:  10.3390/ijms27125615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jha R., Zhang K., He Y., Mendler-Drienyovszki N., Magyar-Tábori K., Quinet M., et al. (2024). Global nutritional challenges and opportunities: Buckwheat, a potential bridge between nutrient deficiency and food security. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 145, 104365. doi:  10.1016/j.tifs.2024.10436542574925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiménez-Gómez J. M., Wallace A. D., Maloof J. N. (2010). Network analysis identifies ELF3 as a QTL for the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. PloS Genet. 6, e1001100. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1001100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kasajima S., Katagiri C., Morishita T., Suzuki T., Mukasa Y. (2017). Growth and yield of self-compatible and hybrid common buckwheat lines pollinated with and without flies. Plant Prod. Sci. 20, 384–388. doi:  10.1080/1343943x.2017.137538037339054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lampropoulos A., Sutikovic Z., Wenzl C., Maegele I., Lohmann J. U., Forner J. (2013). GreenGate---a novel, versatile, and efficient cloning system for plant transgenesis. PloS One 8, e83043. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0083043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin H., Yao Y. J., Sun P. C., Feng L. D., Wang S., Ren Y. M., et al. (2023). Haplotype-resolved genomes of two buckwheat crops provide insights into their contrasted rutin concentrations and reproductive systems. BMC Biol. 21, 87. doi:  10.1186/s12915-023-01587-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma Z. Y., Yang Q. Y., Zeng L. T., Li J. Y., Jiao X. Y., Liu Z. X. (2022). FaesAP3_1 regulates the gene involved in filament-length determination of long-homostyle. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 14403. doi:  10.3390/ijms232214403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Menary J., Fuller S. S. (2024). New genomic techniques, old divides: Stakeholder attitudes towards new biotechnology regulation in the EU and UK. PLoS One 19, e0287276. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0287276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Murashige T., Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum 15, 473–497. doi:  10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x40046247 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patel M., Dewey R. E., Qu R. D. (2013). Enhancing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency of perennial ryegrass and rice using heat and high maltose treatments during bacterial infection. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 114, 19–29. doi:  10.1007/s11240-013-0301-730311153 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peer L. A., Mir B. A. (2025). Molecular mechanisms and genetic regulation of self-incompatibility in flowering plants: implications for crop improvement and evolutionary biology. Plant Mol. Biol. 115, 76. doi:  10.1007/s11103-025-01610-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pinski A., Betekhtin A. (2023). Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and genome editing of Fagopyrum tataricum. Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2023.1270150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pinski A., Mehdi S. M. M., Betekhtin A. (2025). Molecular mechanisms underlying abiotic stress responses in buckwheat. Plant Sci. 357, 112526. doi:  10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Plazek A., Dziurka M., Slomka A., Kopec P. (2023). The effect of stimulants on nectar composition, flowering, and seed yield of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 12852. doi:  10.3390/ijms241612852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rering C. C., Franco J. G., Yeater K. M., Mallinger R. E. (2020). Drought stress alters floral volatiles and reduces floral rewards, pollinator activity, and seed set in a global plant. Ecosphere 11, e03254. doi:  10.1002/ecs2.325442587375 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ridge S., Deokar A., Lee R., Daba K., Macknight R. C., Weller J. L., et al. (2017). The chickpea Early Flowering 1 (Efl1) locus is an ortholog of Arabidopsis ELF3. Plant Physiol. 175, 802–815. doi:  10.1104/pp.17.00082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun Z. X., Wang X. F., Liu R. H., Dun W., Ma M. C., Han Y. H., et al. (2021). Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals the regulatory mechanism of the gibberellic acid pathway of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) dwarf mutants. BMC Plant Biol. 21, 206. doi:  10.1186/s12870-021-02978-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Suzuki T., Morishita T., Mukasa Y., Takigawa S., Yokota S., Ishiguro K., et al. (2014). Breeding of 'Manten-Kirari', a non-bitter and trace-rutinosidase variety of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Breed. Sci. 64, 344–350. doi:  10.1270/jsbbs.64.344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Xiang D. B., Song Y., Wu Q., Ma C. R., Zhao J. L., Wan Y., et al. (2019). Relationship between stem characteristics and lodging resistance of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). Plant Prod. Sci. 22, 202–210. doi:  10.1080/1343943x.2019.157714337339054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yasui Y., Mori M., Aii J., Abe T., Matsumoto D., Sato S., et al. (2012). S-LOCUS EARLY FLOWERING 3 is exclusively present in the genomes of short-styled buckwheat plants that exhibit heteromorphic self-Incompatibility. PLoS One 7, e31264. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0031264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhu X., Wang H. (2024). Revisiting the role and mechanism of ELF3 in circadian clock modulation. Gene 913, 148378. doi:  10.1016/j.gene.2024.148378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of F. esculentum. (a) Callus derived from F. esculentum Thrum type. Scale bar, 2 mm. (b) Regenerated F. esculentum plant. (c) PCR identification of transformed plants with integrated T-DNA (by detection of a fragment of the Cas9 gene using oligonucleotides Cas9_partial_F and Cas9_partial_R). Plant number 20 carries a mutated fes-elf3 copy, which was further characterised in this study.

Image1.jpg (510.7KB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure 2

Sequence alignment of fes-elf3 mutants. (a) Sequence profile of the fes-elf3 T0 founder line. (b) Representative sequences of ten T1 progeny derived from the fes-elf3 T0 mutant, demonstrating the stable inheritance of the edited alleles. The WT reference, sgRNA target site, and PAM sequence are indicated.

Image2.jpg (2.1MB, jpg)
Supplementary Figure 3

Plasmid map of pGG-Cas9-AtU6-lacZ-kanR, a binary CRISPR/Cas9 vector for sgRNA-mediated targeted mutagenesis in buckwheat. The T-DNA region, flanked by left (LB) and right (RB) borders, contains the AtU6–26 promoter driving sgRNA expression, with the protospacer cloning site defined by flanking AarI restriction sites and the gRNA scaffold. Cas9 is expressed from the CaMV 35S promoter, and the kanamycin plant selectable marker (neomycin phosphotransferase II) from the pNOS promoter. The bacterial backbone carries a spectinomycin resistance cassette (SpR) for bacterial selection, a pBR322 origin, and the pVS1 replicon for stable maintenance in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Image3.jpg (1.6MB, jpg)
Supplementary Data Sheet 1

The Sanger sequencing results of WT sequences and mutants of F. esculentum.

DataSheet1.zip (3.1MB, zip)
Supplementary Data Sheet 2

Oligonucleotides used in the study. Regions of sgRNA sequence overlap are underlined. Lowercase letters indicate cloning overhangs. A bold red “G” highlights the C->G substitution introduced to eliminate a stop codon.

DataSheet2.xlsx (11KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 1

Potential off-target sites identified by Cas-OFFinder with parameters allowed up to five mismatches with no bulges.

Table1.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES