Abstract
Earth’s climate has remained habitable for billions of years, a stability usually attributed to a negative feedback from silicate weathering – the chemical breakdown of silicate rocks on land, which consumes atmospheric carbon dioxide faster as climate warms. However, whether temperature or hydrology primarily drives this feedback remains uncertain. Here we show the two controls leave geographic fingerprints: in an ensemble of climate simulations with randomized continents, temperature-controlled weathering depends on tropical land fraction, whereas hydrology-controlled weathering depends on continental fragmentation. Stronger weathering removes more carbon dioxide, cooling the planet, so each regime predicts anti-correlation between temperature and its controlling geography. Reconstructed global temperatures spanning 480 million years are anti-correlated with tropical land fraction, except from roughly 295 to 200 million years ago – overlapping the supercontinent Pangea – when they anti-correlate with continental fragmentation. The mechanism stabilizing Earth’s climate may thus have evolved, with temperature control apparently dominant for most of this period.
Subject terms: Palaeoclimate, Carbon cycle
Simulations with randomized continents show that temperature- and hydrology-controlled weathering results in climates that track different features of continental geometry. The Earth’s record suggests the control may have shifted over 480 million years.
Introduction
Earth’s climate is regulated on long (105 to 106 year) timescales by stabilizing negative feedbacks within the carbonate-silicate cycle1,2. Silicate weathering reactions on Earth’s surface and seafloor release solutes that enter the ocean and react with oceanic carbon that is in chemical equilibrium with CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere to form carbonate minerals. This process is the primary inorganic sink of CO2 outgassed from Earth’s interior, and a combination of theoretical arguments, laboratory experiments, and observational evidence[e.g., refs. 1,3–5] suggest that weathering reactions accelerate under warmer conditions, providing a feedback mechanism to regulate Earth’s climate: When the planet warms, silicate weathering speeds up, accelerating the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. This carbon cycle response leads to CO2 drawdown and climatic cooling, which in turn slows the silicate weathering rate until CO2 is being removed from the atmosphere at the same pace that CO2 is added by volcanic outgassing. The same process happens in reverse in response to climatic cooling. Although transient imbalances between CO2 inputs and outputs due to organic carbon interactions6 or limitations in silicate mineral supply7 may have played important roles in Earth’s climate evolution, weathering-based coupling between atmospheric CO2 removal and background climate appears to play a key role in maintaining the quasi-equilibrium in the carbon cycle necessary to avoid frequent excursions to extremely high or low surface temperatures that would have threatened the existence of complex life on Earth during the Phanerozoic8,9.
However, despite a general agreement among researchers about the importance of negative feedback within the carbonate-silicate cycle in sustaining Earth’s habitability, the details of the mechanism(s) mediating this stabilization through Earth's history remain highly uncertain. In this study, we examine a fundamental open question regarding the silicate weathering feedback on land [e.g., refs. 10–16]: Is its coupling to the climate mediated primarily by temperature in the weathering zone, or does hydrology play a stronger role? Many attempts to model Earth’s silicate weathering feedback have based their estimates of the temperature-dependence of Earth’s weathering rate on direct laboratory measurements of the kinetics of silicate dissolution[e.g., ref. 17]. But some recent modeling and theoretical studies have argued that the apparent global temperature-dependence of silicate weathering is significantly weaker than would be expected from laboratory measurements[e.g.4,5,18]. One potential explanation for this discrepancy is that the feedback between climate and weathering may not be rooted directly in the kinetics of silicate dissolution, but is instead a result of the climate-dependence of the flux of water through the weathering zone12,19. Calculations of weathering rates that account for physicochemical interactions between water, dissolving silicates, and the secondary minerals (clays and silica) that precipitate during silicate weathering suggest that, depending on the local lithology, silicate weathering reactions can reach a chemical equilibrium where solutes in runoff are saturated, preventing further net silicate dissolution until unsaturated water flows through–a regime sometimes referred to as “chemostatic” or “runoff-limited” weathering12,20–22. In this regime, climate influences weathering through its influence on hydrologic intensity, with greater fluxes of water leading to proportional increases in silicate weathering, largely independent of local temperature. Since global runoff has a much weaker dependence on temperature than the kinetic temperature dependence of silicate weathering, hydrologically regulated weathering leads to a weaker apparent temperature-dependence and a significantly less effective thermostat compared to silicate weathering based on laboratory measurements of silicate dissolution19.
Although the behavior of silicate weathering and its interaction with the climate is still subject to debate, a substantial volume of work attempts to connect changes in paleogeography during the Phanerozoic Eon to changes in climate and CO2 through the weathering feedback using models of widely varying complexity [e.g., refs. 23–32]. Early models, such as refs. 23,24 assumed a strong temperature control on weathering with no direct runoff-dependence and used bulk estimates of land area and average landmass latitude to predict climate as a function of paleogeography. The GEOCARB and GEOCARBSULF lineage of global-mean box models26 used relationships derived from GCM studies like that of33 to represent the impact of paleogeography on global-mean runoff and temperature, allowing for an effect on climate through a global weathering relationship based on both an assumed strong temperature sensitivity and a moderate runoff sensitivity. The GEOCLIM lineage of models[e.g., refs. 29,30] and successors like SCION31 couple weathering parameterizations with strong temperature-dependence and strong (linear) runoff-dependence to output from GCM simulations in order to calculate spatially resolved weathering fluxes, allowing for investigations of climate and CO2 evolution that directly account for paleogeographic changes in Earth history[e.g., refs. 27,28,34–39]. However, these models all take their chosen weathering feedback strengths for temperature and runoff as given (modulo occasional sensitivity tests), introducing a major source of uncertainty into their results and reconstructions.
Here, to assist in differentiating between signatures of hydrology-controlled and temperature-controlled weathering in Earth history, we analyze a large ensemble of GCM simulations that are identical except for their randomized continental configurations and post-process their runoff and temperature fields to estimate global weathering rates from them. This allows us to demonstrate that these alternative weathering controls lead to alternative predictions for Earth’s climate response to changes in aspects of bulk planetary continental geometry. Then, we statistically compare proxy-based reconstructions of Earth’s climate and land configuration to assess whether the geologic record supports one hypothesis over the other. Ultimately, our calculations are consistent with the hypothesis that Earth’s weathering control mechanism shifted twice in the last 480 Ma, from a temperature-based to a hydrology-based configuration ≈ 300 Ma and then back to a temperature-based configuration ≈ 200 Ma, though this relies on assumptions like weakly varying outgassing, a tight relationship between CO2 and surface temperature, and the accuracy of uncertain paleogeographic reconstructions. Still, the results provide useful new insight into the structure of the carbon cycle which may lead to improved understanding of the evolution of Earth’s climate over the Phanerozoic.
Results
Sensitivity of silicate weathering to tropical land fraction and continental fragmentation
In this section, we present an analysis of the correlations between continental geometry and global weathering rates in an ensemble of idealized GCM simulations that suggests a relationship between planetary processes that might be observable in the geologic record. The key point is that the carbon cycle responds very differently to variations in TLF (defined as the land fraction between 15∘N/S for consistency with40, with results insensitive to variations in latitude range) and continental fragmentation (defined as continental perimeter divided by continental area) depending on whether the weathering feedback is mediated primarily by hydrology (see Fig. 1), temperature (see Fig. 2), or both (see Fig. 3). Figures 1, 2 both display weathering rates for the same nine land configurations, with the two figures differing only in that weathering varies linearly with hydrology with no direct temperature dependence in Fig. 1, while it varies exponentially with temperature and lacks hydrology dependence in Fig. 2. In both figures, each row of plots displays increasing continental fragmentation moving left to right, and TLF increasing moving downward. From Fig. 1, it is clear that hydrologically controlled weathering increases with increasing continental fragmentation (moving left to right) and is not strongly affected by TLF. On the other hand, temperature-controlled weathering (see Fig. 2) strongly increases with increasing TLF, while the effect of continental fragmentation is minimal or, in the case of the largest TLF cases, may even lead to a weathering increase with decreasing fragmentation (i.e., bottom row, Fig.2).
Fig. 1. Example continental configurations and hydrology-controlled weathering outputs from the global climate model (GCM) ensemble.

White areas denote the ocean, and colored areas denote land, with coloration mapping onto local weathering flux. Each map is labeled with its total global weathering rate in Tmol yr −1 in a white box in its bottom left corner. Left column: Continental configuration with small fragmentation index (supercontinental). Middle column: Configuration with medium fragmentation index (partially fragmented). Right column: Configuration with large fragmentation index (dispersed). Each row of three configurations shares one of the 40 initial random sets of spherical harmonic coefficients (see Methods for more information), allowing them to represent a sequence of snapshots from the assembly of the supercontinent in the right panel. The top row has the smallest tropical land fraction (TLF), the middle row has middling TLF, and the bottom row has the largest TLF. Weathering fluxes in each grid cell were calculated with α = 1 (linear correspondence between runoff and weathering) and k = 0 K−1 (no ditemperature dependencedence for weathering) in eqn. (2).
Fig. 2. Example continental configurations and temperature-controlled weathering outputs from the global climate model (GCM) ensemble.

White areas denote the ocean, and colored areas denote land, with coloration mapping onto local weathering flux. Left column: Continental configuration with small fragmentation index (supercontinental). Middle column: Configuration with medium fragmentation index (partially fragmented). Right column: Configuration with large fragmentation index (dispersed). Each row of three configurations shares one of the 40 initial random sets of spherical harmonic coefficients (see Methods for more information), allowing them to represent a sequence of snapshots from the assembly of the supercontinent in the right panel. The top row has the smallest tropical land fraction (TLF), the middle row has middling TLF, and the bottom row has the largest TLF. Weathering fluxes in each grid cell were calculated with α = 0 (no direct runoff-dependence of weathering) and (strong direct exponential temperature-dependence of weathering) K−1 in eqn. (2).
Fig. 3. Coefficient of determination between silicate weathering and fragmentation index (top panel) and tropical land fraction (TLF; bottom panel).

In each panel, the x-axis represents runoff sensitivity (α) and the y-axis represents temperature sensitivity (k). Contour color indicates coefficient of determination (R2) between weathering and the respective continental geometry variables.
We note for clarity that these weathering values are all calculated with the same background CO2 and global temperature and might therefore be better thought of as values of bulk “global weatherability,” since Earth’s climate would in reality adjust to bring the global weathering rate into balance with the background CO2 outgassing rate if a change to continental geometry were to cause a large transient shift in weathering. In other words, these calculations are not intended to imply that the equilibrium global weathering rate has varied by this magnitude over Earth history (since the equilibrium global rate of weathering is set by outgassing), but instead to illustrate the degree to which changes in continental geometry can act as carbon cycle forcings under different assumptions about global weathering controls41. Several studies have identified changing “weatherability” as a potential major driver behind climate changes during the Phanerozoic Eon due to its influence on the equilibrium point of the carbon cycle and climate system42–46.
To quantify the apparent relationships between weathering and continental geometry, we calculated coefficients of determination between the global weathering rate and TLF and continental fragmentation for our GCM ensemble over a wide range of values for k (temperature-dependence of weathering; see eqn. (2) in Methods) and α (runoff-dependence of weathering; see eqn. (2)), with results shown in Fig. 3. When the weathering feedback is dominated by hydrology instead of temperature (large α, small k), the coefficient of determination between the total global weathering rate (Wtot) and the fragmentation index, R2(Wtot, fragmentation index), can exceed 50% (bottom right corner of top panel in Fig. 3), while R2(Wtot, TLF) falls to nearly zero (bottom right corner of bottom panel in Fig. 3). Conversely, when temperature regulation dominates over hydrology (small α, large k), R2(Wtot, fragmentation index) falls to near zero, while R2(Wtot, TLF) climbs to more than 75%.
The reason for this divergence in response to continental geometry is straightforward. Within the GCM ensemble, global runoff is uncorrelated with TLF (R2 = 0%) but strongly correlated with continental fragmentation (R2 = 54%; see Fig. 4a, b). The lack of correlation between TLF and runoff is due to an increase in land evaporation in high-TLF simulations that compensates for increased land precipitation, similar to an effect observed by ref. 33. This occurs because tropical land intercepts more solar energy, allowing for more efficient recycling of water despite increased overall delivery to the land via precipitation in the wet tropics. Increasing fragmentation does not increase the ease of delivery of solar energy to land, but it does increase delivery of water, so runoff tends to increase as continents break up. So, when weathering is dominated by hydrology, changes to TLF have a minimal effect due to small changes in runoff, but more fragmented configurations produce more runoff, accelerating weathering.
Fig. 4. Scatter plots of average values of different variables from the global climate model (GCM) ensemble.

a shows the lack of correlation between runoff and tropical land fraction (TLF); b shows a relatively strong correlation between runoff and fragmentation; c shows a weak correlation between global-mean surface temperature and TLF; d shows no correlation between global-mean surface temperature and fragmentation; e shows a strong correlation between global-mean land temperature and TLF; and f shows a lack of correlation between global-mean land temperature and fragmentation.
Conversely, although global-mean surface temperature is weakly correlated with TLF (R2 = 16%) and uncorrelated with continental fragmentation (R2 = 0%; see Fig. 4c, d), global-mean land temperature is strongly correlated with TLF (R2 = 71%), while remaining uncorrelated with fragmentation (R2 = 1%; see Fig. 4e, f). So, when temperature is the main driver of weathering, changes to TLF can change the weathering rate by altering the amount of land that experiences higher temperatures near the equator. The small positive relationship between global-mean surface temperature and TLF visible in Fig. 4c is due to an increase in high-albedo land snow in low-TLF simulations where land is colder and closer to the poles, since snow on land has higher albedo than sea ice in these simulations. Warmer global conditions moderate this effect: a smaller ensemble of simulations with 30 of the 120 paleogeographies from this paper and40 with doubled CO2 (2000 ppm) showed a TLF-global temperature correlation with an even weaker R2 of 2% (see Supplementary Fig. 4 in Supplementary Information Section A.4) due to the reduced latitudinal extent of freezing temperatures while preserving a strong TLF-land temperature correlation. In general, the 30 warmer simulations showed the same basic behavior and relationships as the simulations seen in Fig. 4, as did a set of 30 colder simulations (500 ppm CO2) with the same subset of paleogeographies as the warmer simulations (see Supplementary Fig. 4 in Supplementary Information Section A.4).
These distinctive differences in the response of the weathering feedback to continental geometry naturally lead to a hypothesis: If Earth’s carbonate-silicate thermostat is dominated by surface weathering that is primarily sensitive to surface temperatures, then, for a given global outgassing rate, we should observe an anticorrelation between TLF and surface temperature through time, because an increase in TLF would be expected to increase the weathering rate and cause CO2 drawdown and cooling. Similarly, a reduction in TLF would slow weathering and allow CO2 to accumulate, leading to warming. Furthermore, we should not expect there to be a strong correlation between climate and continental fragmentation in this regime. Alternatively, if the silicate weathering response is dominated by Earth’s hydrological response to changes in climate, for a given outgassing rate and with all else being equal, we should expect an anticorrelation between continental fragmentation and climate and little influence from TLF. These opposing predictions provide a geological test that might shed light on the mechanisms that have stabilized Earth’s climate throughout planetary history. In the following section, we investigate Earth’s geologic record in the context of these findings.
Correlations between surface temperature and continental geometry over the Phanerozoic
To differentiate between the hypotheses described in the previous section, we analyzed the statistical relationships between the GMST reconstruction of47 and continental fragmentation and TLF calculated from the paleogeographic reconstruction of48 (see Fig. 5). We find that from 480 Ma to 295 ± 15 Ma (the range of possible transition times is shown as the rightmost error bar in Fig. 5), GMST displays a strong (r < − 0.5) and significant (p < 0.025) anti-correlation with TLF and no significant relationship to fragmentation. Then, at 295 ± 15 Ma, the apparent correlation switches, and subsequently GMST displays a strong, significant anti-correlation with continental fragmentation and no significant relationship to TLF (blue shaded region in Fig. 5) until 200 ± 10 Ma (leftmost error bar range in Fig. 5). Finally, from 200 ± 10 until the present, the relationships between variables revert back to their original behavior, with anti-correlation between GMST and TLF and no significant relationship between GMST and fragmentation. The period of anti-correlation with continental fragmentation notably overlaps with Pangea, which lasted from ≈ 325 Ma to ≈ 200 Ma[colored pink in Fig. 5,49]. The negative relationships between GMST and TLF and the fragmentation index during the three distinct periods are visible in the bottom three panels of Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Time series of reconstructed global-mean surface temperature (GMST), tropical land fraction (TLF), and continental fragmentation (top panel) and scatter plots of GMST vs. TLF and fragmentation index (bottom panels).

In the top panel, GMST47 is the red curve, TLF48 is the black dash-dotted curve, and continental fragmentation is the dark blue dashed curve. The translucent red envelope represents the 95% confidence interval for GMST from ref. 47. The light blue region in the top panel represents the period of continental fragmentation and GMST are significantly anti-correlated and the white regions are where TLF and GMST are significantly anti-correlated, with the error bars covering the range of times where the data allow for switches between the two modes (based on significant relationships between GMST and TLF or fragmentation, see Supplementary Information Section A.1). The hatched region covers the period during which Pangea existed49. The bottom three panels show correlation between GMST and (from left to right) TLF from 200 Ma to present, fragmentation index from 300 Ma to 200 Ma, and TLF again from 480 Ma to 300 Ma, with gray lines marking the lines of best fit, Pearson correlation coefficients in the upper right, and markers colored according to age.
The evolution of the relationships between GMST, TLF, and continental fragmentation is consistent with a dynamic scenario in which the main mechanism controlling the coupling between silicate weathering and climate has shifted across the Phanerozoic. Based on our GCM ensemble results, the anti-correlation between GMST and TLF at the beginning and end of the period under examination suggests temperature-controlled weathering, while the anti-correlation between GMST and fragmentation from ≈ 300 Ma to ≈ 200 Ma suggests that hydrology dominated the weathering response during that time span.
Discussion
As a sensitivity test of our results, we repeated the analysis of correlations between surface temperature and exposed continental geometry over the Phanerozoic, replacing the paleogeographic reconstructions from ref. 48 with those of ref. 50. The two sets of reconstructions differ primarily due to different underlying plate tectonic models48, although they are not entirely independent, since ref. 48 relied on some of the same data sources as ref. 50. With the Scotese reconstruction (see Supplementary Fig. 2), our results are qualitatively similar, with a significant negative relationship between TLF and GMST from 480 to 300 Ma (r = − 0.70, p = 2.7 × 10−6) and a significant negative relationship between fragmentation and GMST from 300 Ma to 200 Ma (r = − 0.62, p = 2.7 × 10−3), but the anti-correlation between TLF and GMST from 200 Ma to present is weaker (r = − 0.31) and marginally significant (p = 0.054).
Analyzing reconstructed CO2 may seem like a more direct route for demonstrating a relationship between climate and paleogeography, since changes to silicate weathering fluxes should manifest as changes to CO2 levels. While there do exist a number of CO2 records over the Phanerozoic based on modeling and data compilations51–53, pre-Cenozoic CO2 estimates are poorly constrained and often inconsistent54. Given the large uncertainties associated with CO2 paleo-records and the fact that Phanerozoic temperature variations are thought to mainly reflect CO2 forcing55,56, we choose to focus on GMST in this study. In any case, the reconstructed GMST of47 correlates strongly with (log-transformed) reconstructed CO2 over most of the Phanerozoic [r = 0.77, p < 0.01,47], and our GCM ensemble displayed weak or non-existent relationships between global-mean surface temperature and both TLF and continental fragmentation (Fig. 4c, d). This increases our confidence that it is a reasonable first-order assumption that CO2 and temperature were tightly linked over most of the Phanerozoic and that variations in continental geometry were unlikely to have a large direct (non-carbon-cycle-mediated) effect on surface temperatures, consistent with previous GCM ensemble studies [e.g., refs. 33,57].
It is also important to note that our GCM simulations and weathering calculations are idealized in ways that could impact the results of this study. For example, the land topography is muted compared to Earth, with a maximum elevation of 100 m40. This means there are no mountain ranges, so our results do not include the potentially important impact of orographic precipitation58 or possible interactions between uplift, erosion, and weathering59–62, which may vary systematically with continental fragmentation. We also did not attempt to explicitly represent variations in lithology, which could produce large variations in weathering parameters across the planet at any given time [e.g., refs. 22,63,64]. Additionally, the weathering calculations do not account for the potential biotic acceleration of silicate weathering by land plants [e.g., refs. 65–67], though it is unclear what impact the rise of forested ecosystems ≈ 385 Ma had on chemical weathering68,69. Furthermore, glacial weathering may be an important component of CO2 drawdown70, so since ice extent has varied during the past 485 Ma, glacial cover could provide another co-varying modulator of weathering rates that could impart spurious correlations to our data, with glacial periods during the Ordovician-Silurian, end-Carboniferous, and late Cenozoic71. Seafloor weathering is also absent from our model, despite indications that it may play a crucial role in Earth’s climate stabilization similar to that of silicate weathering on the land2,72,73. Similarly, we do not consider authigenic clay formation ("reverse weathering”) which consumes alkalinity and could impact climate equilibria and the response of the carbon cycle to perturbations [e.g., refs. 74–77].
More generally, given the interconnected and recursive nature of the Earth system, it is difficult to establish causality when analyzing relationships between geological quantities. Although we observe correlations between the variables of interest in this study (i.e., GMST, TLF, and continental fragmentation), it is possible that these relationships are being driven by other mechanisms or variables that are co-varying simultaneously. For example, we excluded variations in CO2 outgassing rate from our study even though such variations could have played a role in dictating the equilibrium weathering rate and climate state at any given time in Earth history. This is justified given the major uncertainty in reconstructions, with large inconsistencies in the magnitude and direction of outgassing changes depending on the set of processes considered and the methodology used for estimation30,31,48,71,78–82. Still, theoretical arguments and some data suggest outgassing may vary systematically across the supercontinent cycle, with periods of enhanced rifting corresponding to increases in the flux of CO2 from Earth’s interior [e.g., refs. 83–85]. If CO2 outgassing increases when continental fragmentation increases, then this may systematically bias the system away from displaying an anti-correlation between the degree of fragmentation and global surface temperature, since increased weathering could be partially or completely offset by increased outgassing. If that is the case, then the imprint of hydrologically controlled weathering on the geologic record might be reduced, biasing our analysis.
One potential geologic test of the hypothesis that the climate stabilization mechanism has shifted from temperature-dependence to hydrology-dependence and back during the Phanerozoic would be to examine global spatial and temporal trends in correlations between paleosol-based precipitation and temperature proxies with weathering proxies like chemical index of alteration86,87 or the weathering index of Parker88. Deng et al.15 used this method (except with direct temperature and precipitation measurements rather than proxies) to infer a strong temperature control on silicate weathering and a weak hydrologic control for the modern Earth, consistent with the results of our study. It is an open question whether geologic proxies would reveal the same pattern on Earth throughout the Phanerozoic across the period our analysis suggests may have displayed hydrologically-dominated weathering. Paleosols89 and GCM simulations29,90 of Earth during Pangea [which existed from ~ 325 Ma to ≈ 200 Ma,49] suggest that this would have been a period of unusually low global precipitation and runoff, which would tend to push weathering zones toward hydrologic control by reducing water fluxes and allowing solutes to build to higher concentrations12,64. This observation suggests that the aridity of the Pangea supercontinent might explain the potential shift to hydrologic control described in this study.
Beyond Earth’s history, if Earth’s thermostat oscillates between temperature control and hydrology control over time due to the supercontinent cycle (or because of some other driver), then in addition to being crucial for understanding Earth’s past, this effect could be important for accurately predicting the future lifespans of various components of Earth’s biosphere91,92. This is because (in the absence of unpredictable biotechnological intervention) Earth’s far future climate state will be determined by the interplay between the gradually brightening Sun and the behavior of atmospheric CO2 in response to this forcing, as dictated by the carbonate-silicate cycle, so the details of silicate weathering processes will be a primary control91–93. Similarly, the classical “circumstellar habitable zone” is typically defined as the band of orbits around a star where rocky exoplanets with CO2-N2-H2O atmospheres can in principle sustain liquid water oceans with the appropriate quantity of CO2 in the atmosphere94,95, and this concept is rooted in the idea that sufficiently Earth-like planets will have carbonate-silicate cycles capable of regulating their CO2 within bounds that allow for liquid water like Earth96. Some even propose to limit the width of the habitable zone based on simulations that suggest that silicate weathering behavior can cause periodic global glaciations for planets receiving somewhat less sunlight than Earth, but the precise details of the weathering parameterization used strongly impact the resulting climate behavior [e.g., refs. 97–99]. Therefore, the question of whether temperature or hydrology controls weathering on Earth directly affects predictions for the climates of potentially habitable exoplanets19,22,100,101.
In this study, we used weathering trends inferred from post-processing a large ensemble of GCM simulations to propose a pair of relationships between components of Earth’s continental geometry and silicate weathering behavior: If silicate weathering is primarily controlled by the local temperature in the weathering zone, then weathering should correlate strongly with tropical land fraction, but if weathering is controlled by hydrology, then it should correlate strongly with continental fragmentation. In turn, those relationships imply that temperature-controlled weathering should result in an anti-correlation between global-mean surface temperature and tropical land fraction, while hydrology-controlled weathering should result in an anti-correlation between global-mean surface temperature and fragmentation. We then analyzed Earth’s geologic record over the past 480 Myr and found that these relationships between continental geometry and climate seem to manifest in distinct periods: From 480 to 295 ± 15 Ma, surface temperature and tropical land fraction are anti-correlated, then from 295 ± 15 to 200 ± 10 Ma surface temperature and continental fragmentation are anti-correlated, and finally from 200 ± 10 Ma to the present surface temperature and tropical land fraction appear anti-correlated once again. The apparent shift in the mechanism stabilizing Earth’s climate overlaps with the existence of Pangea, suggesting a potential relationship between Earth’s dominant weathering mode and the mode of Earth’s supercontinent cycle, perhaps mediated by large changes in continental aridity.
Methods
Climate simulations
We use an ensemble of Community Earth System Model (CESM) global climate model (GCM) simulations originally presented by ref. 40 and available for download at ref. 102 to analyze the sensitivity of silicate weathering rates to tropical land fraction (TLF) and continental fragmentation, represented by the ratio of non-submerged continental perimeter to continental area, which we denote the “continental fragmentation index” following103. The GCM simulations were all carried out at T31 resolution ( ≈ 4∘ by 4∘), and all have an identical top-of-atmosphere subsolar insolation of 1285 W m−2, global land fraction of 30%, atmospheric CO2 concentration of 1000 ppm (parts per million by volume), obliquity of 23.5∘, eccentricity of 0, and lack of vegetation. They differ only in their continental geometries, which are stochastically generated spherical harmonics truncated at degree 12. For each land configuration40, generated a random set of spherical harmonic coefficients, then weighted them according to:
| 1 |
where S is the sum of squared coefficients in each expansion degree d and p represents the signal processing “color” of the expansion, where for example p = − 1 would correspond to “pink noise”. As p values become more negative, higher frequency terms are increasingly suppressed. The simulations from40 use continental boundary conditions with p = − 3 to approximate consolidated supercontinents, p = − 2 to approximate partly fragmented continents in the process of coming together or breaking apart, and p = − 1 to approximate fully fragmented continental configurations. There are 40 initial random coefficient sets, resulting in a total of 120 continental configurations after each initial set is duplicated and adjusted to create three harmonics with p = − 1, p = − 2, and p = − 3 according to Eqn. (1). Therefore, there are 40 sets of three configurations each that differ in the slope of their power spectrum but not in the relative values within each degree, preserving the qualitative shape of the continents and approximating snapshots of a supercontinental breakup or assembly, as in Figs. 1, 2. See the Extended Data from ref. 40 for more details on the generation of the GCM continental configurations.
Silicate weathering
We take silicate weathering to scale as an exponential function of surface temperature (T) and a power-law function of runoff (q), excluding a parameterization for CO2 dependence because all simulations are performed at the same atmospheric CO2:
| 2 |
where w [mol m−2 yr−1] is the local silicate weathering flux; q [m yr−1] is the local runoff output by the GCM; α is the runoff sensitivity of silicate weathering; T [K] is the local surface temperature output by the GCM; k [K−1] is the temperature sensitivity of weathering; wref = 0.05 [mol m−2 yr−1] is “weatherability”[e.g., ref. 42] tuned to a value that leads the GCM simulations to produce global weathering rates mostly within the range of ≈ 3–10 Tmol yr−1, based in estimates of global CO2 outgassing and analysis of river chemistry [e.g., refs. 79,104–106]; qref = 0.26 [m yr−1] is a reference global-mean runoff attained by dividing the estimate for Earth’s total modern runoff from ref. 107 (38,452 km3 yr−1) by Earth’s land area ( ≈ 148 × 106 km2); and Tref = 288 K is a pre-industrial reference temperature40. This is a variant of the classic “WHAK”1 formulation of continental silicate weathering, a widely used empirical expression to quantify CO2 drawdown as a function of climate variables in geologic carbon cycle models[e.g., ref. 108]. Models use a wide range of values for the temperature–and runoff-sensitivity parameters under investigation in this study, based on estimates from lab, field, geologic proxies, and theory1,4,26,53,109,110.
The total global weathering rate for a given simulation is calculated by summing the local weathering flux multiplied by the land area in each grid cell:
| 3 |
where i is an index for surface grid cells, Ai is surface area of the ith grid cell, γi is the land fraction in the ith grid cell, and wi is the weathering flux in the ith grid cell calculated according to eqn. (2).
Baum et al. 40 calculated weathering rates with a fixed set of sensitivity parameters (α = 1 and k = 0.09 K−1), which limits the applicability of their results due to the large uncertainties in temperature- and hydrology-dependence for silicate weathering. We extend their work by varying α across the range α ∈ [0, 1] with α = 0 corresponding to no runoff-dependence for silicate weathering (except if q = 0, we assume weathering shuts off, even if α = 0) and α = 1 corresponding to a linear dependence. We vary k across the range k ∈ [10−2, 10−1] K−1, corresponding to a range of e-folding temperatures Te ∈ [100, 10] K, which encompasses the wide range of weathering temperature sensitivity values that have recently been suggested in the literature4,5,15. This wide range of weathering parameters allows us to probe how variations in strength for different forms of coupling between climate and weathering interact with TLF and fragmentation index, two large-scale aspects of continental geometry that may impact global weathering rates. TLF is defined as the land fraction between 15∘N/S for consistency with40, with results insensitive to variations in latitude range. The fragmentation index is defined as the continental perimeter divided by the continental area. To quantify these relationships, we calculate the coefficient of determination (R2) between weathering rates and both TLF and fragmentation across the GCM simulations in our ensemble as functions of α and k to measure the proportion of variance in weathering rate that is explained by variations in TLF and fragmentation index.
The weathering parameterization we use in this study is based on the common formulation first suggested in ref. 1, sometimes referred to as the WHAK model[e.g., refs. 19,40,111]. An alternative or extension to the WHAK model presented by ref. 12 (MAC) allows for mechanistic transitions between the weathering regimes explored here, with a temperature-controlled regime dominated by silicate dissolution kinetics and a hydrologically regulated regime that occurs when secondary mineral precipitation in the weathering zone prevents solutes from accumulating to higher concentrations. Calculations with the MAC model display very similar patterns to results calculated with WHAK: parameter values with temperature-dependent weathering result in a strong correlation between global weathering and TLF, while hydrology-dependent weathering results in a strong correlation with continental fragmentation (see Supplementary Information Section A.3, Supplementary Fig. 3).
Analysis of reconstructed geologic data
Positive correlations between silicate weathering and TLF or fragmentation index, respectively, would imply, all else being equal, anti-correlations between global temperature and TLF or fragmentation index. This is because with a given CO2 outgassing rate, an increase in global weathering should cause a drawdown in CO2 and a corresponding reduction in temperature until the weathering rate is reduced back to equilibrium with outgassing. Further, the GCM/weathering results imply large differences between weathering regimes controlled by temperature and hydrology in terms of their responses to changes in TLF or changes in continental fragmentation. Therefore, by comparing proxy data for the evolution of global mean surface temperature (GMST) with reconstructed global continental geometry during the Phanerozoic and combining this information with the results from our GCM/weathering experiments, we can use the geologic record to gain insight into the relative strength of temperature vs. hydrology in stabilizing Earth’s climate through time.
To allow for the possibility that the Earth system may have shifted between hydrologically-controlled and temperature-controlled weathering at different times, we calculate the correlation coefficients across all time spans from 485 million years ago (Ma) to the present between a recent data-assimilation-based reconstruction of the Phanerozoic GMST record47 and the TLF and fragmentation index from a recent tectonic reconstruction of exposed land across the Phanerozoic48 using GPlates112. We converted the ShapeFiles from GPlates into NetCDF4 files encoding the exposed land from the48 reconstructions at every 10 Myr interval from 480 Ma to present on a latitude-longitude grid resolution of 1∘ by 1∘. Fragmentation index (total perimeter of exposed land divided by total area) only accounts for the outer boundary of land masses to avoid counting the boundaries of interior lakes and seas.
These calculations help differentiate between the competing hypotheses about the silicate weathering feedback described above by quantifying the statistical relationships between reconstructions of Earth’s paleogeography and surface temperature. See Supplementary Information Section A.1 for more detailed description of the correlation calculations.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Michael Foote for helpful input on an early version of this work.
Author contributions
R.G. conceived the study, carried out the analysis, and wrote the study; B.C. contributed to the analysis and writing of the study; M.F. ran the GCM simulations and contributed to analysis and writing; D.A. contributed to analysis and writing.
Peer review
Peer review information
: Nature Communications thanks Pam Vervoort, Alexandre Pohl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
This work was supported by NASA award No. 80NSSC21K1718, which is part of the Habitable Worlds program.
Data availability
Data and code for the paper are available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16732630. The GCM simulations are also available at Baum and Fu102 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6540321).
Code availability
Code for the paper is available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16732630.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77289-3.
References
- 1.Walker, J. C. G., Hays, P. B. & Kasting, J. F. A negative feedback mechanism for the long-term stabilization of Earth’s surface temperature. J. Geophys. Res.86, 9776—9782 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coogan, L. A. & Dosso, S. E. Alteration of ocean crust provides a strong temperature-dependent feedback on the geological carbon cycle and is a primary driver of the Sr-isotopic composition of seawater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.415, 38—46 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brantley, S.L., Kubicki, J.D. & White, A.F. Kinetics of water-rock interaction (Springer, 2008).
- 4.Krissansen-Totton, J. & Catling, D. C. Constraining climate sensitivity and continental versus seafloor weathering using an inverse geological carbon cycle model. Nat. Commun.8, 15423 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brantley, S., Shaughnessy, A., Lebedeva, M. I. & Balashov, V. N. How temperature-dependent silicate weathering acts as Earth’s geological thermostat. Science379, 382–389 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hülse, D. & Ridgwell, A. Instability in the geological regulation of Earth’s climate. Science389, 7730 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kump, L. R. Prolonged late Permian–early Triassic hyperthermal: failure of climate regulation? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci.376, 20170078 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Broecker, W. S. & Sanyal, A. Does atmospheric CO2 police the rate of chemical weathering? Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles12, 403—408 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeebe, R. E. & Caldeira, K. Close mass balance of long-term carbon fluxes from ice-core CO2 and ocean chemistry records. Nat. Geosci.1, 312 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eiriksdottir, E. S., Gislason, S. R. & Oelkers, E. H. Does runoff or temperature control chemical weathering rates? Appl. Geochem.26, 346–349 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eiriksdottir, E. S., Gislason, S. R. & Oelkers, E. H. Does temperature or runoff control the feedback between chemical denudation and climate? Insights from Iceland. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta107, 65–81 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maher, K. & Chamberlain, C. Hydrologic regulation of chemical weathering and the geologic carbon cycle. Science343, 1502–1504 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li, G. et al. Temperature dependence of basalt weathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.443, 59—69 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raymond, P. A. Temperature versus hydrologic controls of chemical weathering fluxes from United States forests. Chem. Geol.458, 1–13 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deng, K., Yang, S. & Guo, Y. A global temperature control of silicate weathering intensity. Nat. Commun.13, 1781 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Knapp, A. S. et al. When snowpacks shrink: declining weathering and export rates but rising stream solute concentrations in warming mountains. Hydrol. Process.40, 70539 (2026). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brady, P. V. The effect of silicate weathering on global temperature and atmospheric CO2. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth96, 18101–18106 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herbert, T. D. et al. Tectonic degassing drove global temperature trends since 20 Ma. Science377, 116–119 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Graham, R. & Pierrehumbert, R. Thermodynamic and energetic limits on continental silicate weathering strongly impact the climate and habitability of wet, rocky worlds. Astrophys. J.896, 9362 (2020).
- 20.Maher, K., Steefel, C. I., White, A. F. & Stonestrom, D. A. The role of reaction affinity and secondary minerals in regulating chemical weathering rates at the Santa Cruz soil chronosequence, California. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta73, 2804–2831 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Winnick, M. J. & Maher, K. Relationships between co2, thermodynamic limits on silicate weathering, and the strength of the silicate weathering feedback. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.485, 111—120 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hakim, K. et al. Lithologic controls on silicate weathering regimes of temperate planets. Planet. Sci. J.2, 49 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Worsley, T. R. & Kidder, D. L. First-order coupling of paleogeography and CO2, with global surface temperature and its latitudinal contrast. Geology19, 1161–1164 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Worsley, T.R., Moore, T.L., Fraticelli, C.M. & Scotese, C.R. Phanerozoic CO2 levels and global temperatures inferred from changing paleogeography. (University of Texas at Arlington, 1994).
- 25.Donnadieu, Y., Godderis, Y., Ramstein, G., Nedelec, A. & Meert, J. A ’Snowball Earth’ climate triggered by continental break-up through changes in runoff. Nature428, 303—306 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Berner, R. A. Geocarbsulf: a combined model for Phanerozoic atmospheric O2 and CO2. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta70, 5653—5664 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Donnadieu, Y. et al. A geoclim simulation of climatic and biogeochemical consequences of Pangea breakup. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.7, 1278 (2006).
- 28.Donnadieu, Y., Pierrehumbert, R., Jacob, R. & Fluteau, F. Modelling the primary control of paleogeography on Cretaceous climate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.248, 426—437 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goddéris, Y. et al. The role of palaeogeography in the Phanerozoic history of atmospheric CO2 and climate. Earth-Sci. Rev.128, 122–138 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Godderis, Y. & Donnadieu, Y. A sink-or a source-driven carbon cycle at the geological timescale? Relative importance of palaeogeography versus solid earth degassing rate in the Phanerozoic climatic evolution. Geol. Mag.156, 355–365 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mills, B.J., Donnadieu, Y., & Goddéris, Y. Spatial continuous integration of Phanerozoic global biogeochemistry and climate. Gondwana Res.100, 73–86 (2021).
- 32.Kemeny, P.C., Krause, A. & Kump, L. A historical perspective on long-term global biogeochemical box models. Hydrothermal Circulation and Seawater Chemistry: Links and Feedbacks, 263–295 (AGU, 2025).
- 33.Otto-Bliesner, B. L. Continental drift, runoff, and weathering feedbacks: implications from climate model experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.100, 11537–11548 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Godderis, Y. et al. Coupled modeling of global carbon cycle and climate in the neoproterozoic: links between Rodinia breakup and major glaciations. Cr Geosci.339, 212–222 10.1016/j.crte.2005.12.002 (2007). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nardin, E. et al. Modeling the early Paleozoic long-term climatic trend. Bulletin123, 1181—1192 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park, Y. et al. Emergence of the Southeast Asian islands as a driver for Neogene cooling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 25319—25326 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gurung, K. et al. Geographic range of plants drives long-term climate change. Nat. Commun.15, 1805 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Longman, J., Mills, B. J. & Merdith, A. S. Limited long-term cooling effects of Pangaean flood basalt weathering. Nat. Commun.16, 4813 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhang, F. et al. Lithium isotope evidence for enhanced continental weathering triggering the late Paleozoic greenhouse-to-icehouse climate transition. Natl. Sci. Rev.13, 168 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baum, M., Fu, M. & Bourguet, S. Sensitive dependence of global climate to continental geometry. Geophys. Res. Lett.49, 098843 (2022).
- 41.Penman, D.E., Rugenstein, J.K.C., Ibarra, D.E. & Winnick, M.J. Silicate weathering as a feedback and forcing in Earth’s climate and carbon cycle. Earth-Sci. Rev.209, 103298 (2020).
- 42.Kump, L.R. & Arthur, M.A. Global chemical erosion during the Cenozoic: weatherability balances the budgets. In Tectonic Uplift and Climate Change, pp. 399—426 (Springer, 1997).
- 43.Caves, J. K., Jost, A. B., Lau, K. V. & Maher, K. Cenozoic carbon cycle imbalances and a variable weathering feedback. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.450, 152–163 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Caves Rugenstein, J. K., Ibarra, D. E. & Blanckenburg, F. Neogene cooling driven by land surface reactivity rather than increased weathering fluxes. Nature571, 99—102 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bergmann, K.D., Macdonald, F.A. & Swanson-Hysell, N.L. The causes and consequences of Ordovician cooling. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.53, 651–685 (2025).
- 46.Hayes, N. R., Lunt, D. J., Goddéris, Y., Pancost, R. D. & Buss, H. Modelling the impact of palaeogeographical changes on weathering and CO2 during the Cretaceous–Eocene period. Climate21, 2601—2618 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Judd, E. J. et al. A 485-million-year history of Earth’s surface temperature. Science385, 3705 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Marcilly, C. M., Torsvik, T. H., Domeier, M. & Royer, D. L. New paleogeographic and degassing parameters for long-term carbon cycle models. Gondwana Res.97, 176–203 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nance, R. D. The supercontinent cycle and Earth’s long-term climate. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1515, 33–49 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Scotese, C. R. & Wright, N. Paleomap paleodigital elevation models (paleodems) for the Phanerozoic. Paleomap Proj. earthbyte.org (2018).
- 51.Berner, R. A. & Kothavala, Z. Geocarb III: a revised model of atmospheric co 2 over Phanerozoic time. Am. J. Sci.301, 182—204 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Foster, G. L., Royer, D. L. & Lunt, D. J. Future climate forcing potentially without precedent in the last 420 million years. Nat. Commun.8, 1–8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lenton, T. M., Daines, S. J. & Mills, B. J. Copse reloaded: an improved model of biogeochemical cycling over Phanerozoic time. Earth-Sci. Rev.178, 1–28 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Steinthorsdottir, M., Montañez, I.P., Royer, D.L., Mills, B.J. & Hönisch, B. Phanerozoic atmospheric CO2 reconstructed with proxies and models: current understanding and future directions. Treatise on Geochemistry, 467–492 (Elsevier, 2025).
- 55.Royer, D. L. et al. CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today14, 4–10 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mills, B. J. et al. Modelling the long-term carbon cycle, atmospheric CO2, and Earth's surface temperature from the Late Neoproterozoic to present day. Gondwana Res.67, 172–186 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lunt, D. J. et al. Palaeogeographic controls on climate and proxy interpretation. Climate12, 1181—1198 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Roe, G. H. Orographic precipitation. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.33, 645—671 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 59.West, A. J., Galy, A. & Bickle, M. Tectonic and climatic controls on silicate weathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.235, 211–228 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gabet, E. J. & Mudd, S. M. A theoretical model coupling chemical weathering rates with denudation rates. Geology37, 151–154 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 61.West, A. J. Thickness of the chemical weathering zone and implications for erosional and climatic drivers of weathering and for carbon-cycle feedbacks. Geology40, 811–814 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Coy, B., Graham, R.J. & Kite, E. The role of tectonic luck in long-term habitability of abiotic Earth-like planets. Planet Sci. J.6, 218 (2025).
- 63.Amiotte Suchet, P., Probst, J.-L. & Ludwig, W. Worldwide distribution of continental rock lithology: implications for the atmospheric/soil co2 uptake by continental weathering and alkalinity river transport to the oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles17, 1891 (2003).
- 64.Ibarra, D. E. et al. Differential weathering of basaltic and granitic catchments from concentration–discharge relationships. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta190, 265–293 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 65.Volk, T. Rise of angiosperms as a factor in long-term climatic cooling. Geology17, 107–110 (1989). [Google Scholar]
- 66.Berner, R. A. Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta56, 3225–3231 (1992). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ibarra, D. E. et al. Modeling the consequences of land plant evolution on silicate weathering. Am. J. Sci.319, 1–43 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dahl, T. W. et al. Low atmospheric co2 levels before the rise of forested ecosystems. Nat. Commun.13, 7616 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Maffre, P. et al. The complex response of continental silicate rock weathering to the colonization of the continents by vascular plants in the devonian. Am. J. Sci.322, 461–492 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li, X. et al. Globally elevated chemical weathering rates beneath glaciers. Nat. Commun.13, 407 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Merdith, A. S. et al. Phanerozoic icehouse climates as the result of multiple solid-earth cooling mechanisms. Sci. Adv.11, 9798 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Coogan, L. A. & Gillis, K. M. Evidence that low-temperature oceanic hydrothermal systems play an important role in the silicate-carbonate weathering cycle and long-term climate regulation. Geochem. Geophysi. Geosyst.14, 1771–1786 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 73.Coogan, L. A. & Gillis, K. M. Low-temperature alteration of the seafloor: impacts on ocean chemistry. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.46, 21–45 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 74.Isson, T. T. & Planavsky, N. J. Reverse weathering as a long-term stabilizer of marine pH and planetary climate. Nature560, 471 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li, F. et al. Reverse weathering may amplify post-snowball atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. Precambrian Res.364, 106279 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 76.Baldermann, A. et al. Exploring reverse silicate weathering across geological time: a review. Clay Miner.60, 1–27 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 77.Trapp-Müller, G. et al. Earth’s silicate weathering continuum. Nat. Geosci.18, 691–701 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kerrick, D. M. Present and past nonanthropogenic CO2 degassing from the solid earth. Rev. Geophys.39, 565–585 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 79.Coogan, L. & Gillis, K. The average Phanerozoic CO2 degassing flux estimated from the o-isotopic composition of seawater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.536, 116151 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 80.Müller, R. D. et al. Evolution of Earth’s tectonic carbon conveyor belt. Nature605, 629–639 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Black, B. A. et al. Cryptic degassing and protracted greenhouse climates after flood basalt events. Nat. Geosci.17, 1162–1168 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 82.Müller, R. D. et al. Solid earth carbon degassing and sequestration since 1 billion years ago. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.25, 011713 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 83.Foley, S. F. & Fischer, T. P. An essential role for continental rifts and lithosphere in the deep carbon cycle. Nat. Geosci.10, 897–902 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 84.Brune, S., Williams, S. E. & Müller, R. D. Potential links between continental rifting, CO2 degassing and climate change through time. Nat. Geosci.10, 941–946 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jellinek, A., Lenardic, A. & Pierrehumbert, R. Ice, fire, or fizzle: the climate footprint of Earth’s supercontinental cycles. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.21, 008464 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 86.Nesbitt, H. W. & Young, G. M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature299, 715–717 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- 87.McLennan, S. M. Weathering and global denudation. J. Geol.101, 295–303 (1993). [Google Scholar]
- 88.Parker, A. An index of weathering for silicate rocks. Geol. Mag.107, 501–504 (1970). [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tabor, N. J., Sidor, C. A., Smith, R. M., Nesbitt, S. J. & Angielczyk, K. D. Paleosols of the Permian-Triassic: proxies for rainfall, climate change and major changes in terrestrial tetrapod diversity. J. Vertebrate Paleontol.37, 240–253 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li, Z. et al. A simple model for the hydrological change over Phanerozoic: untangling contributions from climate and continental evolution. Geophys. Res. Lett.52, 115077 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 91.Farnsworth, A. et al. Climate extremes likely to drive land mammal extinction during next supercontinent assembly. Nat. Geosci.16, 901–908 (2023).
- 92.Graham, R., Halevy, I. & Abbot, D. Substantial extension of the lifetime of the terrestrial biosphere. Planet. Sci. J.5, 255 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 93.Caldeira, K. & Kasting, J. F. The life span of the biosphere revisited. Nature360, 721–723 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P. & Reynolds, R. T. Habitable zones around main-sequence stars. Icarus101, 108–128 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kopparapu, R. K. et al. Habitable zones around main-sequence stars: new estimates. Astrophys. J.765, 131 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kasting, J. F., Toon, O. B. & Pollack, J. B. How climate evolved on the terrestrial planets. Sci. Am.258, 90–97 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Haqq-Misra, J., Kopparapu, R. K., Batalha, N. E., Harman, C. E. & Kasting, J. F. Limit cycles can reduce the width of the habitable zone. Astrophys. J.827, 120 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Abbot, D. S. Analytical investigation of the decrease in the size of the habitable zone due to limited co2 outgassing rate. Astrophys. J.827, 117 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kadoya, S. & Tajika, E. Outer limits of the habitable zones in terms of climate mode and climate evolution of Earth-like planets. Astrophys. J.875, 7 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 100.Graham, R., Lichtenberg, T. & Pierrehumbert, R.T. CO2 ocean bistability on terrestrial exoplanets. J. Geophys. Res. Planets127 007456 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 101.Graham, R. J. & Pierrehumbert, R. T. Carbon cycle instability for high-CO2 exoplanets: implications for habitability. Astrophys. J.970, 32 10.3847/1538-4357/ad45fb (2024). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Baum, M. & Fu, M. Ensemble weathering results & project files. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.6540321. (2022). [DOI]
- 103.Gernon, T.M. Global chemical weathering dominated by continental arcs since the mid-Palaeozoic Nat. Geosci.14, 696–690 (2021).
- 104.Gaillardet, J., Dupré, B., Louvat, P. & Allegre, C. Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem. Geol.159, 3—30 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 105.Moon, S., Chamberlain, C. & Hilley, G. New estimates of silicate weathering rates and their uncertainties in global rivers. Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta134, 257–274 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 106.Catling, D.C. & Kasting, J.F. Atmospheric Evolution on Inhabited and Lifeless Worlds. (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
- 107.Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I. & Gudmundsson, L. Grun: an observation-based global gridded runoff dataset from 1902 to 2014. Earth Syst. Sci. Data11, 1655–1674 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 108.Pierrehumbert, R.T. Principles of planetary climate, pp. 503–514. (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
- 109.Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C. & Garrels, R. M. The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years. Am. J. Sci.283, 641—683 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sleep, N. H. & Zahnle, K. Carbon dioxide cycling and implications for climate on ancient Earth. J. Geophys. Res. Planets106, 1373—1399 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 111.Kump, L., Volk, T.: Gaia’s garden and BLAG’s greenhouse: global biogeochemical climate regulation. In: Scientists on Gaia, pp. 191–199. (MIT Press, 1992).
- 112.Müller, R. D. et al. Gplates: building a virtual Earth through deep time. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.19, 2243—2261 (2018). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data and code for the paper are available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16732630. The GCM simulations are also available at Baum and Fu102 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6540321).
Code for the paper is available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16732630.
