Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Sep 21;17:1917424. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1917424

Listeria monocytogenes occurrence and genetic diversity within the pre-packaging area of an Italian cold-smoked salmon processing plant

Michela Berta 1,*, Pierluigi Di Ciccio 1, Maria Teresa Bottero 1, Daniele Pattono 1, Giacomo Manacorda 1, Alessandra Dalmasso 1
PMCID: PMC13635343  PMID: 42835411

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a major concern in ready-to-eat (RTE) food production, particularly in cold-smoked salmon, which has been linked to several listeriosis outbreaks. This study investigated the occurrence and genetic diversity of L. monocytogenes within the pre-packaging area of an Italian cold-smoked salmon processing plant. From March 2023 to December 2023, 69 samples were collected, including 44 food contact surfaces (FCS), 15 non-food contact surfaces (NFCS), and 10 food samples (F). Microbiological analyses were conducted according to the standard qualitative method EN ISO 11290:2017, and suspected colonies were confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Isolates were further characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). As results, 18 samples showed the presence of L. monocytogenes, corresponding to an overall detection rate of 26.09%. The highest positivity rate was observed among NFCS (86.67%), followed by F (10%) and FCS (9.09%). MLST grouped isolates into five STs: ST5 (38.89%), ST9 (27.78%), ST6 (16.67%), ST7 (11.11%), ST14 (5.56%). ST5 and ST9 were the predominant STs and were repeatedly detected throughout the sampling period. These findings highlighted the importance of environmental monitoring, strengthened sanitation measures, and molecular typing to improve L. monocytogenes control in cold-smoked salmon processing plants.

Keywords: cold-smoked salmon, food safety, genetic diversity, Listeria monocytogenes, ready-to-eat

1. Introduction

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive bacterium responsible for listeriosis, a serious foodborne disease potentially fatal for high-risk populations including immuno-compromised patients, elderly, and infants. Symptoms of listeriosis can range from mild, flu-like signs such as fever, muscle aches, and gastrointestinal disturbances to more severe and life-threatening complications like meningitis and endocarditis. Furthermore, in pregnant women, listeriosis increases the risk of miscarriage and pre-term birth (Koopmans et al., 2023; Møretrø et al., 2025). In 2024, the European listeriosis fatality rate reached 15.6%, with a notification rate of 0.69 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and a total of 3,041 confirmed cases, 238 of which were reported in Italy. Despite the relatively low incidence (0.40 per 100,000 people), Italy was involved in at least six listeriosis outbreaks between 2019 and 2024 (The European Union one health 2024 Zoonoses report, 2025). In food production, the management of L. monocytogenes is a significant concern and requires considerable efforts (Ferreira et al., 2014). The accidental introduction of this pathogen into food facilities may occur through various routes, including raw materials, personnel, contaminated utensils and pests. Once established in the processing environment, L. monocytogenes is able to withstand the various stresses typical of food production, such as refrigeration, high salt concentrations, acidic pH and low-oxygen condition (Bucur et al., 2018; Osek et al., 2022) In addition, the capacity to adhere to surfaces and form biofilm significantly enhances resistance to routine cleaning and disinfection procedures (Finn et al., 2023; Myintzaw et al., 2023). The presence of L. monocytogenes within food production environments may last extended periods, ranging from months to years (Carpentier and Cerf, 2011). Inevitably, this long-term persistence led to substantial economic losses for food producers and an increased likelihood for cross-contamination (Belias et al., 2024; Stessl et al., 2022). Listeriosis transmission has been mainly associated with the ingestion of contaminated ready-to-eat (RTE) foods (Kurpas et al., 2018). Among these, vacuum-packaged cold-smoked salmon is a widely consumed RTE that has been recently implicated in multiple listeriosis outbreaks (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority, 2018; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Food Safety Authority, 2023; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority, 2024).

This RTE product is characterized by high water activity (aw > 0.96) and a pH ranging from 6 to 6.5, conditions that favor the growth of L. monocytogenes (Løvdal, 2015). However, the susceptibility to pathogen contamination is closely related to its production process. Firstly, the technological procedures employed, such as salting, cold smoking, vacuum packaging, and low storage temperatures, could be insufficient to ensure the absence of L. monocytogenes in the finished product (Geraldo et al., 2024; Leong et al., 2015). In addition, throughout cold-smoked salmon production, the food matrix is subjected to several handling steps (bone removal, skinning, and weighing) and comes into contact with numerous processing surfaces (blades, conveyor belts, tables, and trolleys) that could serve as sources of L. monocytogenes (Gil et al., 2024; Jami et al., 2014).

Consequently, strict control of the processing environment is crucial to mitigate the risk of contamination. Accurate environmental monitoring allows food producers to detect the pathogen early, identifying contamination hotspots and assessing the effectiveness of sanitation procedures (Gil et al., 2024; Gupta and Adhikari, 2022; Jordan et al., 2018). Furthermore, the proper application of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) is essential to contain the spread of L. monocytogenes across different production areas (Geraldo et al., 2024).

In this context, culture-based methods are extensively and effectively used to determine the presence of L. monocytogenes in food industry monitoring programs (Jordan et al., 2018).

However, these approaches are limited to the detection and enumeration of the pathogen and do not provide information on the genetic diversity of the strains circulating within the production environment. Therefore, to further strengthen surveillance strategies, traditional microbiological analyses are often combined with molecular methodologies for strains characterization (Carpentier and Cerf, 2011; Gupta and Adhikari, 2022; Jordan et al., 2018). Among these, Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a widely adopted method that assigns L. monocytogenes isolates to specific sequence types (STs) based on allelic profiles of seven housekeeping genes (Ragon et al., 2008).

Several studies have shown that certain STs are overrepresented in food-processing environments, suggesting an enhanced capacity of these types to adapt to industrial stress conditions. Among these, ST9 and ST121 are frequently isolated from surfaces of food processing facilities (Alvarez-Molina et al., 2021; Maury et al., 2016). In contrast, ST1, ST2, ST4, and ST6 are predominantly associated with clinical samples and have been previously described as hypervirulent (Maury et al., 2016).

So far, numerous studies have assessed the distribution and genetic diversity of L. monocytogenes in meat and dairy processing plants. Conversely, investigations into RTE seafood production environments remain scarce. However, the recent listeriosis outbreaks associated with the consumption of contaminated cold-smoked salmon highlights the need for increased attention to the production of this RTE food. For these reasons, the aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of L. monocytogenes in the pre-packaging area of an Italian cold smoked salmon processing plant and assess the diversity of isolated strains by MLST.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Cold smoked salmon processing plant description

The Italian salmon processing plant involved in this study is a long-established enterprise with over two decades of experience, operating on an industrial scale.

The raw material, supplied weekly, is sourced mainly from Norwegian and Scottish fish slaughterhouses. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), received whole, pre-gutted, and under refrigerated conditions is firstly deheaded; subsequently fins and tail are removed by operators, and then conveyed to the filleting machine. Afterwards, salmon filets undergo a long salting process lasting approximately 20 h. This facility employs the dry curing method, carried out manually and exclusively with sea salt. After washing, product is subjected to cold smoking treatment at 30 °C for 3 h, followed by 20-h resting period in the drying chamber.

Smoked salmon filets are ready to be transferred to the pre-packaging area, where they will undergo trimming, skin removal and slicing. Finally, the sliced product is transferred to the packaging area, where it is weighed and finally vacuum packaged.

Each processing area operates daily from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., while cleaning and sanitation procedures are scheduled overnight immediately after production ends.

2.2. Samples collection

According to the plant’s self-monitoring plan, the product pre-packaging area consistently showed the highest rate of L. monocytogenes positivity and was therefore selected as the target area for sampling. Sampling sites corresponded to those routinely monitored within the existing self-monitoring-plan.

They were selected considering the processing workflow and the areas identified as having a higher potential risk for L. monocytogenes contamination. Sampling points are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Workflow diagram illustrating smoked salmon processing from arrival to packaging, including trolleys, trimming and slicing stations with workers, conveyor belts, and a drainage channel. Sampling points below show locations for trolley wheels, worker footwear, knives, slicer parts, and surfaces along each process step.

Workflow of the cold-smoked salmon pre-packaging area and sampling points. Smoked salmon fillets arrive on trolleys and are transferred to trimming table, where the skin is removed by a skinner machine and operators eliminate the brown muscle tissue using a knife and a circular blade. The processed fillets are then conveyed to an automatic slicing machine. Finally, the sliced cold-smoked salmon is transferred to the packaging area.

Processing plant was visited three times, in March 2023, July 2023, and December 2023 to cover the periods of medium, low, and high production intensity, respectively. Each sampling session was conducted at 10:00 a.m. during normal working conditions. Sample collection included food contact surfaces (FCS), non-food contact surfaces (NFCS), and food matrix (F).

Selected FC and NFC surfaces were sampled using sterile sponges by thoroughly swabbing the accessible surface area of each sampling site. F samples were obtained by collecting 25 g of salmon directly from the conveyor belt, immediately after the slicing step. Samples were transported to the laboratory under refrigerated conditions and were analyzed within 24 h.

In total, 69 samples were collected, 23 for each sampling visit. They included 44 FCS, 15 NFCS and 10 F samples (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1.

Overview of collected and L. monocytogenes-positive samples by category and sampling period.

Sampling period Collected samples Positive samples
NFCS FCS F Total NFCS FCS F Total
March 5 14 4 23 4 3 0 7
July 5 16 2 23 4 0 0 4
December 5 14 4 23 5 1 1 7
Total 15 44 10 69 13 4 1 18

Table 2.

Overview of total analysed samples.

Sample Classification Date L. monocytogenes Sequence type
Slicer FCS March 2023
Circular blade FCS March 2023
Conveyor belt FCS March 2023 + ST5
Conveyor belt FCS March 2023 + ST5
Trimming table FCS March 2023 + ST6
Skinner FCS March 2023
Sliced salmon F March 2023
Sliced salmon F March 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS March 2023 + ST5
Trolley wheels NFCS March 2023 + ST6
Skinner FCS March 2023
Trimming table FCS March 2023
Circular blade FCS March 2023
Knife FCS March 2023
Conveyor belt FCS March 2023
Conveyor belt FCS March 2023
Slicer FCS March 2023
Trimming table FCS March 2023
Trolley wheels NFCS March 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS March 2023 + ST9
Sliced salmon F March 2023
Sliced salmon F March 2023
Drainage channel NFCS March 2023 + ST14
Slicer FCS July 2023
Circular blade FCS July 2023
Trimming table FCS July 2023
Conveyor belt FCS July 2023
Conveyor belt FCS July 2023
Skinner FCS July 2023
Knife FCS July 2023
Trimming table FCS July 2023
Sliced salmon F July 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS July 2023 + ST5
Trolley wheels NFCS July 2023
Skinner FCS July 2023
Trimming table FCS July 2023
Circular blade FCS July 2023
Conveyor belt FCS July 2023
Conveyor belt FCS July 2023
Slicer FCS July 2023
Sliced salmon F July 2023
Knife FCS July 2023
Conveyor belt FCS July 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS July 2023 + ST9
Trolley wheels NFCS July 2023 + ST7
Drainage channel NFCS July 2023 + ST7
Skinner FCS December 2023
Trimming table FCS December 2023 + ST5
Circular blade FCS December 2023
Knife FCS December 2023
Conveyor belt FCS December 2023
Conveyor belt FCS December 2023
Slicer FCS December 2023
Sliced salmon F December 2023 + ST5
Sliced salmon F December 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS December 2023 + ST5
Trolley wheels NFCS December 2023 + ST9
Drainage channel NFCS December 2023 + ST6
Slicer FCS December 2023
Circular blade FCS December 2023
Conveyor belt FCS December 2023
Conveyor belt FCS December 2023
Trimming table FCS December 2023
Skinner FCS December 2023
Knife FCS December 2023
Sliced salmon F December 2023
Sliced salmon F December 2023
Worker’s footwear NFCS December 2023 + ST9
Trolley wheels NFCS December 2023 + ST9

2.3. Listeria monocytogenes isolation, confirmation and characterization

Microbiological analyses were conducted following the qualitative standard method EN ISO 11290-1:2017. The methodology included two enrichment steps in half-Fraser and Fraser broth to enhance the recovery of L. monocytogenes, including samples with low bacterial loads. Enriched samples were plated onto Oxoid™ Brilliance™ Listeria Agar (ISO) (CM1212B; Thermo Scientific Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. Presumptive L. monocytogenes colonies, identified by their blue-green coloration and characteristic halo, were subjected to species confirmation by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using the Bruker Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).

Genomic DNA of confirmed L. monocytogenes strains was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

MLST was performed according to the method previously described by Ragon et al. (2008). The seven housekeeping genes included in the MLST scheme (abcZ, bglA, cat, dapE, dat, ldh, and lhkA) were amplified by conventional PCR using the corresponding primers.

PCR products were verified by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and purified using ExoSAP-IT™ (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycle sequencing reactions were performed separately for forward and reverse strands using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the same primers used for PCR amplification. In each reaction, L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 and sterile nuclease-free water were included as positive and negative control, respectively.

Following cycle sequencing, the extension products were purified to remove unincorporated dye terminators and analyzed by Sanger sequencing with the Applied Biosystems SeqStudio™ Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). In each reaction, L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 and sterile nuclease-free water were included as positive and negative control, respectively.

The obtained chromatograms were quality-checked and edited using FinchTV version 1.4. Forward and reverse sequences were subsequently assembled to generate consensus sequences using MEGA version 12. The resulting sequences were compared with the MLST database available through the Institut Pasteur platform (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria/) to assign allele numbers, and the corresponding ST was determined based on the allelic profile.

Strains were deposited at the Turin University Culture Collection (TUCC) integrated in the Italian national node (MIRRI-IT) of the Research Infrastructure MIRRI-ERIC.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.5.1. Differences in the proportion of L. monocytogenes-positive samples among sampling periods (March, July, December) and sample categories (FCS, NFCS, F) were assessed using Fisher’s exact test. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and discussion

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in the pre-packaging area of an Italian cold-smoked salmon processing plant and to assess the genetic diversity of isolates.

A total of 69 samples were collected over three samplings visits, of which 18 (26.09%) were positive for the presence of L. monocytogenes (Table 1). The highest positivity rates were observed during the sampling visits conducted in March 2023 and December 2023. In both periods, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes was 30.43% (7/23), while the sampling performed in July 2023 showed a lower prevalence of 17.39% (4/23) (Table 1). Although higher positivity rates were observed during March and December compared with July, differences among sampling visits were not statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.49). Nevertheless, the variation in the number of positive samples might be associated with differences in production intensity. Indeed, in the visited smoked salmon processing plant, March and December correspond to periods of increased production demand, characterized by higher personnel traffic, more intensive equipment use, and larger volumes of raw materials handled. These conditions could increase the likelihood of environmental contamination and may have contributed to the observed variability in L. monocytogenes prevalence, thereby representing additional challenges to effective pathogen control within the processing environment.

Moreover, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes observed in this study is consistent with previous investigations conducted in seafood processing facilities. Wulff et al. (2006), monitoring four Danish smokehouses over a six-month period (78–105 samples per facility), reported L. monocytogenes prevalences ranging from 16 to 32%. Leong et al. (2015), who surveyed eight Irish seafood processing plants over a 20-month period (22–84 samples per facility), found considerably lower positivity rates (<4.3%) in most facilities, although one plant exhibited a prevalence of 33.3%. It should be noted, however, that the studies mentioned above assessed L. monocytogenes prevalence across different stages of the production process, including raw fish handling, processing and packaging areas. Conversely, the prevalence reported in the present study was specifically observed at the pre-packaging stage, which represents a critical point in the production chain. At this stage, the product will not undergo any further treatment capable of reducing L. monocytogenes contamination, while subsequent manual handling and packaging operations may contribute to an increased risk of cross-contamination. Therefore, these results highlight the need for stringent hygiene practices and effective environmental monitoring and sanitation procedures, particularly during the final stages of processing, to minimize the risk of contamination in finished products.

Of the 18 samples tested positive, the majority of them originated from NFCS (13/15; 86.67%), followed by F (1/10; 10.0%) and (4/44; 9.09%) of FCS (Tables 1, 2). Statistical analysis revealed a significantly greater likelihood of L. monocytogenes detection among NFCS compared with FCS (p < 0.001) and F (p < 0.001).

Regarding NFCS, L. monocytogenes was repeatedly detected in workers’ footwear, drainage channel and trolley wheels across all three sampling visits (Tables 2, 3).

Table 3.

STs distribution during samplings.

Source March July December
Workers’ footwear (NFCS) ST5 ST5 ST5
ST9 ST9 ST9
Trolley wheels (NFCS) ST6 ST7 ST9
– – ST9
Drainage channel (NFCS) ST14 ST7 ST6
Conveyor belt (FCS) ST5 – –
ST5
Trimming table (FCS) ST6 – ST5
Sliced salmon (F) – – ST5

Footwear and their soles may act as microbial niches due to constant contact with wet floors and the potential accumulation of organic residues. For these reasons, Food Business Operators (FBOs) should ensure frequent and effective cleaning and sanitation of workers’ footwear, particularly when staff move between different production areas. The replacement of worn or damaged footwear should be prioritized, as deteriorated soles (e.g., with cracks or crevices) may facilitate L. monocytogenes adherence (Belias et al., 2022). Notably, in the visited smoked salmon processing plant, footwear sanitation stations were located merely at the entrance to the processing environment. This configuration may have limited the frequency of footwear sanitization during working hours, particularly when moving between different production areas. Therefore, the installation of additional sanitation points, together with the implementation of targeted training programs to increase awareness of personal hygiene practices, should be considered (Tuytschaever et al., 2023).

Concerning the pathogen occurrence in drainage system, it is noted that drain offers an ideal habitat for microbial proliferation due to the accumulation of wastewater and organic debris. If not properly controlled, it may facilitate the dissemination of pathogen through aerosols, water flow, staff movement and equipment transfer residues (Ferreira et al., 2014; Gil et al., 2024).

Trolleys are mobile units widely used in cold-smoked salmon production to transport fish filets between processing areas, and they have frequently been identified as vectors for the spread of L. monocytogenes and contributing to its long-term persistence within the processing environment (Belias et al., 2022; Tuytschaever et al., 2023). In the present investigation, it was observed that the same trolley units were used for conveying dry-cured filets to the smoking chamber and subsequently for transporting smoked salmon to the pre-packaging area. Along this route, the wheels may come into contact with potential harborage sites located on the floor, thereby facilitating the dissemination of the pathogen to other production areas. Therefore, FBOs should reinforce sanitation procedures, with particular attention to the cleaning and disinfection of trolleys and their structural components.

Moreover, the consistent detection of L. monocytogenes on workers’ footwear, drainage channels, and trolley wheels across all three sampling visits, pointing out the need for the smoked salmon processing plant to strengthen control measures targeting frequently contaminated NFCS, with particular attention to these recurrently contaminated sites.

Regarding FCS, L. monocytogenes was isolated from trimming tables and in conveyor belts (Tables 2, 3). In this processing plant, the trimming table represents the first surface with which cold-smoked salmon comes into contact upon entering the pre-packaging area (Figure 1). As tables are FCS relatively easy to clean and sanitize (Belias et al., 2022), one possible explanation, which could be investigated through future upstream sampling, is that L. monocytogenes may be transferred to this site from early stages of production.

The detection of the pathogen on conveyor belts was not surprising, as these systems are consistently reported among the most common contaminated sites in food processing environments. This is mainly due to the difficulty associated with their effective cleaning and sanitation, which often requires complete disassembly of the equipment (Blatter et al., 2010). Furthermore, conveyor belts commonly present junctions, crevices, and gaskets that constitute ideal niches for microbial proliferation (Belias et al., 2024; Blatter et al., 2010; Carpentier and Cerf, 2011).

The presence of L. monocytogenes on trimming table and conveyor belt represents a significant concern for the cold-smoked salmon facility investigated in this study, not only due to the potential contamination of the food product itself but also because of the risk of pathogen dissemination to downstream areas and throughout the entire processing flow.

Concerning the isolation of L. monocytogenes from a single food matrix sample (Tables 2, 3), it was observed during the sampling visit carried out in December 2023. As previously mentioned, this period corresponds to a higher production intensity, therefore, potential failures in control strategies may have contributed to contamination of the food matrix. Moreover, this finding may indicate limited transfer to sliced products, possibly due to the presence of salmon competitive microflora, that could restrict pathogen proliferation. Indeed, interactions with background microflora have been shown to limit the growth of L. monocytogenes, suggesting that competitive microbial communities can influence its behavior within the food matrix (Lardeux et al., 2015).

The 18 L. monocytogenes collected isolates were molecularly characterized and grouped by MLST into five STs: ST5, ST6, ST7, ST9 and ST14. The most prevalent were ST5 (n = 7; 38.89%), and ST9 (n = 5; 27.78%) followed by ST6 (n = 3; 16.67%), ST7 (n = 2; 11.11%) and ST14 (n = 1; 5.56%). All identified STs profiles have been previously reported and globally distributed (Félix et al., 2022; Maury et al., 2016).

ST9 is one of the most frequently detected genotypes among food-processing isolates, together with ST121 (not detected in this study) (Alvarez-Molina et al., 2021; Maury et al., 2016). Particularly, ST9 is common in facilities processing meat where numerous episodes of persistence have been documented (Fagerlund et al., 2020; Guidi et al., 2022; Melero et al., 2019). Conversely, in fish and seafood sector the presence of ST9 has been observed to a more limited extent (Brauge et al., 2023). Due to its sporadic occurrence among clinical samples, genetic profile ST9 has previously been classified as hypovirulent (Maury et al., 2016).

ST5 has already been associated with industrial environments and with some cases of persistence (Kurpas et al., 2020; Lambrechts et al., 2023; Parra-Flores et al., 2022). Regarding its virulence potential, ST5 has been considered to display an intermediate profile (Maury et al., 2016). So far, it has been implicated in a limited number of listeriosis outbreaks and its frequency among clinical samples remain moderate (Chen et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2021).

Concerning ST6, it has been described as clinically relevant and has been repeatedly associated with several large-scale outbreaks [Guidi et al., 2023; EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control), 2018; Nüesch-Inderbinen et al., 2021]. A notable example is the 2017–2018 South African outbreak, in which ST6 was the predominant type, leading to 567 reported cases of infection (Thomas et al., 2020). The detection of this ST6 within the processing environment may represent a potential food safety concern. However, molecular typing alone does not provide sufficient information to fully assess the pathogenic potential of the isolates. Therefore, future phenotypic characterization combined with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) will be essential to better evaluate the virulence potential of these strains and to investigate their possible association with listeriosis outbreaks.

Finally, ST7 and ST14 have previously been isolated from various food processing facilities, including those handling meat, cheeses and smoked fish (Brauge et al., 2023; Brown et al., 2024; Morganti et al., 2016). Interestingly, ST7 seems to show a geographical association with Northern European countries, where it has frequently been detected in fish processing facilities and it is recognized as one of the most common among clinical cases (Fagerlund et al., 2022; Møretrø et al., 2024; Wagner et al., 2022). In the present investigation, ST7 and ST14 were observed to a limited extent, suggesting a sporadic occurrence of these strains within the cold-smoked salmon processing plant. Future samplings will help monitor the presence of these genotypes over time.

Examining STs distribution, ST5 and ST9 were detected in workers’ footwear during all three sampling visits (Table 3). This observed detection pattern is consistent with the possible persistence of specific L. monocytogenes strains or the presence of a recurrent contamination route associated with footwear. Nevertheless, MLST provides limited discriminatory power and does not allow confirmation of clonal relationships among isolates. Future analyses based on WGS and core-genome MLST (cgMLST) will provide information on genetic relatedness and help to clarify whether these recurrent STs represent persistent clones within the processing environment.

Conversely, trolley wheels and drainage channels showed a different temporal distribution pattern, with distinct STs detected across the three sampling visits (Table 3). This variability suggests that contamination at these sites may be driven by repeated introduction events rather than by the long-term persistence of a single strain. These findings highlight the importance of considering both persistent reservoirs and recurrent contamination pathways when designing environmental monitoring and control strategies for L. monocytogenes in food processing environments.

4. Conclusion

The results of this study highlight the main critical control points within the pre-packaging area of a cold-smoked salmon processing facility, identifying potential hotspots associated with the recurrence and dissemination of L. monocytogenes. Environmental monitoring proved to be a valuable tool for assessing the effectiveness of cleaning and sanitation procedures and for detecting potential weaknesses in the hygiene management system. Overall, these findings underscore the need for targeted corrective measures, including enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocols, more frequent disassembly and maintenance of equipment, and strengthened worker hygiene practices.

The use of MLST provided a preliminary overview of the genetic diversity of L. monocytogenes strains isolated within the pre-packaging area of the investigated processing plant. Moreover, it enabled the identification of potentially clinically relevant strains and suggested the potential persistence of isolates belonging to two STs. However, these findings should be interpreted in light of the limitations of the present study, including the low number of samples analyzed, the inclusion of a single processing area, and the restricted sampling period. Future studies should include additional production stages and extend monitoring periods to better characterize the distribution and persistence of L. monocytogenes within the facility.

In addition, future WGS-based analyses will expand the genetic characterization of L. monocytogenes strains by enabling the identification of virulence-associated and stress-resistance determinants. Furthermore, cg-MLST will provide higher-resolution information on strain relatedness, allowing the hypothesis of persistence to be further investigated and confirmed or refuted.

Acknowledgments

The Department of Veterinary Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, partially covered the open access APC.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Konstantinos Papadimitriou, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece

Reviewed by: Besart Jashari, Food and Veterinary Laboratory of Kosova, Albania

Ziwen Zhou, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, China

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

MB: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MTB: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. DP: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. GM: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. AD: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Validation.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Alvarez-Molina A., Cobo-Díaz J. F., López M., Prieto M., de Toro M., Alvarez-Ordóñez A. (2021). Unraveling the emergence and population diversity of Listeria monocytogenes in a newly built meat facility through whole genome sequencing. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 340:109043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109043, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belias A., Bolten S., Wiedmann M. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for risk-and systems-based control of Listeria monocytogenes transmission through food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 23:e70071. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70071, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belias A., Sullivan G., Wiedmann M., Ivanek R. (2022). Factors that contribute to persistent Listeria in food processing facilities and relevant interventions: a rapid review. Food Control 133:108579. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108579 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blatter S., Giezendanner N., Stephan R., Zweifel C. (2010). Phenotypic and molecular typing of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from the processing environment and products of a sandwich-producing plant. Food Control 21, 1519–1523. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brauge T., Leleu G., Hanin A., Capitaine K., Felix B., Midelet G. (2023). Genetic population structure of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from salmon and trout sectors in France. Heliyon 9:e18154. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18154, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown S. R., Bland R., McIntyre L., Shyng S., Weisberg A. J., Riutta E. R., et al. (2024). Genomic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes recovered from dairy facilities in British Columbia, Canada from 2007 to 2017. Front. Microbiol. 15:1304734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bucur F. I., Grigore-Gurgu L., Crauwels P., Riedel C. U., Nicolau A. I. (2018). Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to stress conditions encountered in food and food processing environments. Front. Microbiol. 9:2700. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02700, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carpentier B., Cerf O. (2011). Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 145, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.005, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y., Luo Y., Curry P., Timme R., Melka D., Doyle M., et al. (2017). Assessing the genome level diversity of Listeria monocytogenes from contaminated ice cream and environmental samples linked to a listeriosis outbreak in the United States. PLoS One 12:e0171389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) (2018). Multi-country outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes serogroup IVb, multi-locus sequence type 6, infections linked to frozen corn and possibly to other frozen vegetables– first update. EFSA supporting publication 2018:EN-1448. 22. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1448 [DOI]
  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority . Multi-country outbreak of Listeriamonocytogenes Sequence type 8 infections linked to consumption of salmon products – 25 October 2018. Stockholm and Parma: ECDC/EFSA; (2018).
  12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, European Food Safety Authority . Prolonged multi country cluster of Listeria monocytogenes ST155 infections linked to ready-to-eat fish products – 13 December. (2023).
  13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control European Food Safety Authority (2024). Prolonged multi Country Outbreak of Listeriamonocytogenes ST173 Linked to Consumption of fish Products – 19 June 2024
  14. Fagerlund A., Idland L., Heir E., Møretrø T., Aspholm M., Lindbäck T., et al. (2022). Whole-genome sequencing analysis of Listeria monocytogenes from rural, urban, and farm environments in Norway: genetic diversity, persistence, and relation to clinical and food isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, e02136–e02121. doi: 10.1128/aem.02136-21, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fagerlund A., Langsrud S., Møretrø T. (2020). In-depth longitudinal study of Listeria monocytogenes ST9 isolates from the meat processing industry: resolving diversity and transmission patterns using whole-genome sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86:e00579-20. doi: 10.1128/aem.00579-20, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Félix B., Sevellec Y., Palma F., Douarre P. E., Felten A., Radomski N., et al. (2022). A European-wide dataset to uncover adaptive traits of Listeria monocytogenes to diverse ecological niches. Sci. Data 9:190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira V., Wiedmann M., Teixeira P., Stasiewicz M. J. (2014). Listeria monocytogenes persistence in food-associated environments: epidemiology, strain characteristics, and implications for public health. J. Food Prot. 77, 150–170. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-150, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finn L., Onyeaka H., O’Neill S. (2023). Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in food-associated environments: a persistent enigma. Foods 12:3339. doi: 10.3390/foods12183339, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Geraldo V., Ampofo-Asiama J., Adinortey C. A., Okyere I., Tulashie S. K., Nuer A. T. K., et al. (2024). Implementation of good manufacturing practices (GMP) to improve the quality of smoked fish (Scomber colias). Heliyon 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gil M. I., Truchado P., Tudela J. A., Allende A. (2024). Environmental monitoring of three fresh-cut processing facilities reveals harborage sites for Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 155:110093. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110093 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guidi F., Centorotola G., Chiaverini A., Iannetti L., Schirone M., Visciano P., et al. (2023). The slaughterhouse as hotspot of CC1 and CC6 Listeria monocytogenes strains with hypervirulent profiles in an integrated poultry chain of Italy. Microorganisms 11:1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guidi F., Lorenzetti C., Centorotola G., Torresi M., Cammà C., Chiaverini A., et al. (2022). Atypical serogroup IVb-v1 of Listeria monocytogenes assigned to new ST2801, widely spread and persistent in the environment of a pork-meat producing plant of Central Italy. Front. Microbiol. 13:930895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gupta P., Adhikari A. (2022). Novel approaches to environmental monitoring and control of Listeria monocytogenes in food production facilities. Foods 11:1760. doi: 10.3390/foods11121760, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jami M., Ghanbari M., Zunabovic M., Domig K. J., Kneifel W. (2014). Listeria monocytogenes in aquatic food products—a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13, 798–813. [Google Scholar]
  25. Jordan K., Hunt K., Lourenco A., Pennone V. (2018). Listeria monocytogenes in the food processing environment. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 106–119. doi: 10.1007/s40588-018-0090-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koopmans M. M., Brouwer M. C., Vázquez-Boland J. A., van de Beek D. (2023). Human listeriosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 36, e00060–e00019. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00060-19, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kurpas M., Osek J., Moura A., Leclercq A., Lecuit M., Wieczorek K. (2020). Genomic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from ready-to-eat meat and meat processing environments in Poland. Front. Microbiol. 11:1412. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01412, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kurpas M., Wieczorek K., Osek J. (2018). Ready-to-eat meat products as a source of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Vet. Res. 62, 49–55. doi: 10.1515/jvetres-2018-0007, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lambrechts K., Rip D., Gouws P. (2023). Genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes from the fish products, the fish food processing environment and clinical origin in the Western Cape, South Africa using whole genome sequencing (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  30. Lardeux A. L., Guillier L., Brasseur E., Doux C., Gautier J., Gnanou-Besse N. (2015). Impact of the contamination level and the background flora on the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat diced poultry. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 60, 481–490. doi: 10.1111/lam.12395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leong D., Alvarez-Ordonez A., Zaouali S., Jordan K. (2015). Examination of Listeria monocytogenes in seafood processing facilities and smoked salmon in the Republic of Ireland. J. Food Prot. 78, 2184–2190. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-233, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Løvdal T. (2015). The microbiology of cold smoked salmon. Food Control 54, 360–373. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maury M. M., Tsai Y. H., Charlier C., Touchon M., Chenal-Francisque V., Leclercq A., et al. (2016). Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat. Genet. 48, 308–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Melero B., Manso B., Stessl B., Hernández M., Wagner M., Rovira J., et al. (2019). Distribution and persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in a heavily contaminated poultry processing facility. J. Food Prot. 82, 1524–1531. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-19-087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Møretrø T., Langsrud S., Heir E., Fagerlund A. (2025). Controlling Listeria monocytogenes in the food processing environment: lessons learned from a salmon processor associated with outbreaks. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 449:111604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2025.111604, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Møretrø T., Wagner E., Heir E., Langsrud S., Fagerlund A. (2024). Genomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes CC7 associated with clinical infections and persistence in the food industry. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 410:110482. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110482, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Morganti M., Scaltriti E., Cozzolino P., Bolzoni L., Casadei G., Pierantoni M., et al. (2016). Processing-dependent and clonal contamination patterns of Listeria monocytogenes in the cured ham food chain revealed by genetic analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 822–831. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03103-15, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Myintzaw P., Pennone V., McAuliffe O., Begley M., Callanan M. (2023). Association of virulence, biofilm, and antimicrobial resistance genes with specific clonal complex types of Listeria monocytogenes. Microorganisms 11:1603. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061603, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nüesch-Inderbinen M., Bloemberg G. V., Müller A., Stevens M. J., Cernela N., Kollöffel B., et al. (2021). Listeriosis caused by persistence of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b sequence type 6 in cheese production environment. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 284–288. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.203266, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Osek J., Lachtara B., Wieczorek K. (2022). Listeria monocytogenes–how this pathogen survives in food-production environments? Front. Microbiol. 13:866462. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.866462, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Parra-Flores J., Holý O., Bustamante F., Lepuschitz S., Pietzka A., Contreras-Fernández A., et al. (2022). Virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from ready-to-eat foods in Chile. Front. Microbiol. 12:796040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ragon M., Wirth T., Hollandt F., Lavenir R., Lecuit M., Le Monnier A., et al. (2008). A new perspective on Listeria monocytogenes evolution. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000146. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000146, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stessl B., Ruppitsch W., Wagner M. (2022). Listeria monocytogenes post-outbreak management-when could a food production be considered under control again? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 379:109844. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. The European Union one health 2024 Zoonoses report (2025). EFSA J. 23:e9759. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9759, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas J., Govender N., McCarthy K. M., Erasmus L. K., Doyle T. J., Allam M., et al. (2020). Outbreak of listeriosis in South Africa associated with processed meat. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 632–643. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907462, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tuytschaever T., Raes K., Sampers I. (2023). Listeria monocytogenes in food businesses: from persistence strategies to intervention/prevention strategies—a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 22, 3910–3950. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13219, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wagner E., Fagerlund A., Thalguter S., Jensen M. R., Heir E., Møretrø T., et al. (2022). Deciphering the virulence potential of Listeria monocytogenes in the Norwegian meat and salmon processing industry by combining whole genome sequencing and in vitro data. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 383:109962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wulff G., Gram L., Ahrens P., Vogel B. F. (2006). One group of genetically similar Listeria monocytogenes strains frequently dominates and persists in several fish slaughter-and smokehouses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 4313–4322. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02288-05, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang X., Liu Y., Zhang P., Niu Y., Chen Q., Ma X. (2021). Genomic characterization of clinical Listeria monocytogenes isolates in Beijing, China. Front. Microbiol. 12:751003. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.751003, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES