Skip to main content
Sustainable Microbiology logoLink to Sustainable Microbiology
editorial
. 2026 Oct 5;3(4):qvag042. doi: 10.1093/sumbio/qvag042

Rebooting soil microbiomes for soil health and climate resilience

Karsten Zengler 1,2,3,4,5,6,✉, Trent Northen 7,✉
PMCID: PMC13637485  PMID: 42836079

“If we feed the soil, it will feed us” (Hayne 1940). This widely referenced statement by Ralph A. Haynes, highlighting the foundational link between soil health and human health, is of ever-growing importance given the current state of global soils.

It is estimated that ~40% of soils are moderately to severely degraded and approximately half of soil carbon has been lost, directly impacting 3.2 billion people (UNCCD 2022). UNESCO predicts that 90% of the world’s soils could be degraded by 2050. Major drivers for reduction in soil health and soil losses include soil erosion, extractive farming practices that do not return organics and micronutrients to soils, and loss of biodiversity. Besides their importance for agriculture, soils also contain more carbon than the atmosphere and phytobiomass combined. Unfortunately, it is estimated that between 30 and 62 gigatons of carbon has been lost since 1850 from croplands making land use a leading contribution of atmospheric carbon (Sanderman et al. 2017).

This drastic shift in soil health has major implications for world food production and directly affects national food security. Additionally, reduced carbon storage and loss of soil organics which will compound the stresses resulting from poor soil quality, negatively impacts water retention and water infiltration making it more difficult for farmers to achieve high yields during periods of drought and flooding. Similarly, biodiversity losses reduce the abundance of microbes that naturally protect plants from water and heat stress and compete with plant pathogens.

In his now classic paper, Rattan Lal describes this downward spiral of soil degradation and an upward spiral for soil restoration with three basic strategies for restoring soil quality. These include (1) minimizing soil losses, (2) creating a positive soil carbon budget while also enhancing biodiversity, and (3) improving water and elemental cycling. This and other papers make it clear that restoring soil organics alongside soil biodiversity can be key drivers for achieving these other goals by improving soil structure, water retention, and nutrient cycling. As Lal puts it “The importance of soil health on mitigating climate change, improving water quality, enhancing biodiversity, etc. cannot be overemphasized. The environmental consequence of soil health is also determined by the SOC (soil organic carbon) pool, its dynamics and the turnover time, and that of climate change by both SOC and soil inorganic carbon dynamics” (Lal 2016).

The compounding of these factors is both a major liability and opportunity. For example, in a downward spiral, loss of soil organics can reduce plant inputs further increasing losses. Similarly loss of nitrogen-fixing microbes can both reduce the productivity of plants and other microbes, accelerating degradation. However, by restoring soil organics and soil biodiversity we have a chance to turn these negative effects around and increase plant productivity and climate resilience with compounding positive feedback—a win-win-win-win (Lehmann et al. 2020, Qiao et al. 2022).

Here, we focus on the soil microbe-organic axis of soil restoration, especially the development of new technologies that can help improve microbial diversity by identifying missing microbial functions and supporting the growth of resident microbes with these functions. Our hope is that approaches like we describe here can be developed and deployed to help reboot soils as part of national and global soil restoration efforts.

Restoring soil organics

It is estimated that healthy agricultural soils can store up to 5 Pg CO2-equivalent per year (Bossio et al. 2020). The organic fraction that is associated with minerals in soil has a particular slow turnover time, often in hundreds to several thousands of years, making it one of the most viable pools for managing atmospheric carbon (Georgiou et al. 2022) (Fig. 1). But what defines a healthy soil and why are healthy soils so important? Root-derived carbon is one of the most important, if not the most important, driver of soil organics (Poeplau et al. 2021). While poorly understood, some estimates suggest that rhizosphere processes can account for a large fraction of global primary production on land (Dijkstra et al. 2021).

Figure 1.

Alt text: The figure shows five boxes, four of them (labeled from the left clockwise as climate, plants, soil properties, and soil microbes) arranged in a square with the five's box (soil organics) in the center. The outside boxes are connected by arrows pointing in both directions to the central box, i.e. soil organics. Additionally, the outside boxes (climate, plants, soil properties, soil microbes) are connected to each other by dual pointed arrows as well, forming a square of arrows. The figure indicates the connection and dependencies of climate, plants, soil properties, and soil microbes to each other and the dependency of all of them to soil organics.

Soil organics are key determinants of soil health. Soil organics influence multiple factors, they affect the climate, are consumed (and produced) by plant and soil microbes, thus playing a critical part in agriculture, and influence soil properties, such as water retention.

There are several conceptional frameworks for stabilization of organics in soils including the Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization framework (Cotrufo et al. 2013) where organics are stabilized through entombment and interaction with mineral surfaces. It has been shown that most agricultural soils are currently undersaturated in soil organics (Georgiou et al. 2022) further supporting the large potential for soils as a natural and high-capacity atmospheric carbon sink. Influencing microbial functions in the rhizosphere would thus directly impact entombment and could boost organic soil carbon.

Restoring microbial functional diversity

We refer to microbial functional diversity as a direct measure of in vivo activity of microbes, in contrast to widely used diversity measurements by tracking phylogenetic markers (i.e. 16S rRNA by amplicon sequencing) or genetic potential (i.e. metagenomics by shotgun sequencing) (Fierer et al. 2021).

Microbial functional diversity can in theory be modulated by adding probiotics (i.e. biologicals), adding prebiotics, or by altering plant exudation directly (Fig. 1). Major efforts have been made to use biologicals to help improve soil functions. However, there are many challenges to this approach. Typically microbes are not adapted to compete with the resident microflora and environmental conditions. We can speculate that this may partially explain why conservation strategies that are focused on first building soil organics which in turn increases soil microbial biodiversity generally work across diverse ecosystems. While there are many key microbial functions related to plant and soil health, key ones include: Nitrogen fixation and phosphorous mobilization, priming for drought tolerance and EPS production, pathogen exclusion or induction of plant defenses, and growth promotion.

New technologies for prescriptive microbial and organic management

Over the last years several methods have become available to determine microbial functional diversity in soils and to predict strategies to alter this diversity. Exometabolomics is an approach for measuring composition and biological transformations of small molecule metabolites (Zhalnina et al. 2018). Relevant applications include characterization of root exudates coupled with analysis of microbial consumption to provide insights into plant selection of rhizosphere microbial community assembly and dynamics (Zhalnina et al. 2018). AI tools like the webofmicrobes.org use exometabolomic data to predict metabolites that can be added to alter soil microbial community composition (in addition to other applications) (Northen et al. 2026). Another approach is Microbial Interaction and Niche Determination (MIND) that allows for rapid analysis of what microbes occupy what niches in vivo and provides a framework to design intervention strategies to boost microbial functional diversity, e.g. by addition of prebiotics (Moyne et al. 2026).

Exometabolomics and MIND generate hypotheses that are readily testable in the lab, if needed, by using synthetic microbial communities (synComs) (Coker et al. 2022). Furthermore, both exometabolomics as well as MIND generate AI-ready data sets that can be interoperable, linking multi-omic measurements with soil physicochemical, climatic, ecological, and soil management context with the goal to improve prediction of soil functions across ecosystems and crop types (Fig. 2). The webofmicrobes.org is one example of using AI for predicting metabolites that can be added to soils to boost the growth of target organisms (Northen et al. 2026). However, it will be critical to go beyond taxonomy based predictions to actual functions. One promising opportunity is the integration of MIND with the exometabolomics to improve predictions of metabolites that can selectively boost the growth of microbes expressing the target functions (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Alt text: The figure depicts an upward spiral with depleted soil, characterized by low organic matter and dormant microbial functions at the bottom. Every turn of the spiral increases soil health and productivity. From bottom to top the turns of the spiral are labeled: Targeted organic amendments, reboot depleted microbial functions, promote plant growth, build soil organic matter and structure, climate resilience and sustained productivity. The figure highlights how this self-reinforcing cycle benefits healther soil development and how each turn of the spiral builds on each other.

Concept of rebooting soil metabolism with targeted soil amendments.

Conclusion

We argue here that measurements and evaluations of soil functional diversity in vivo will provide us with a direct readout of soil health and a roadmap for designing interventions to improve soil health. If effective, these interventions could aid in haltering soil degradation or, ideally, help soil health restoration—i.e. turning the downward spiral upward again. These targeted soil alterations could potentially remediate soil loss, reboot soil organic and micronutrient content, and positively impact water and carbon management.

Acknowledgment

Anthropic Fable 5.1 was used to generate Figs 1 and 2.

Contributor Information

Karsten Zengler, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Program in Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Soil Health Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Prosper Soils Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94597, United States.

Trent Northen, Prosper Soils Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94597, United States.

Authors contribution

Both K. Zengler and T. Northen contributed equally to conceptualization, investigation, writing, and editing of this manuscript, as well as in directing and reviewing the work generated by the Gen AI Tool to ensure accuracy of the figure output.

Conflicts of interest

K. Zengler and T. Northen are co-founders of the Prosper Soils Institute, a nonprofit organization to build resilient agriculture.

Funding

None declared.

Data availability

No data were generated or analyzed for this Editorial.

References

  1. Bossio  DA, Cook-Patton  SC, Ellis  PW  et al.  The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nat Sustain. 2020;3:391–8. 10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coker  J, Zhalnina  K, Marotz  C  et al.  A reproducible and tunable synthetic soil microbial community provides new insights into microbial ecology. mSystems. 2022;7:e0095122   10.1128/msystems.00951-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cotrufo  MF, Wallenstein  MD, Boot  CM  et al.  The microbial efficiency-matrix stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?. Global Change Biol. 2013;19:988–95. 10.1111/gcb.12113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dijkstra  FA, Zhu  B, Cheng  W. Root effects on soil organic carbon: a double-edged sword. New Phytologist. 2021;230:60–65. 10.1111/nph.17082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fierer  N, Wood  SA, Bueno de Mesquita  CP. How microbes can, and cannot, be used to assess soil health. Soil Biol Biochem. 2021;153:108111 [Google Scholar]
  6. Georgiou  K, Jackson  RB, Vindušková  O  et al.  Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3797   10.1038/s41467-022-31540-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayne  RA. Make the Soil Productive: We Can’t Grow Crops on Poor Land, Education Series 2, Chicago, IL, USA, International Harvester Company, 1940. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lal  R. Soil health and carbon management. Food Energy Sec. 2016;5:212–22. 10.1002/fes3.96. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lehmann  J, Bossio  DA, Kögel-Knabner  I  et al.  The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 2020;1:544–53. 10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moyne  O, Norton  GJ, Al-Bassam  M  et al.  Predicting competition and substrate preferences for targeted microbiome alteration. Cell. 2026;189:3324–3338.e23. 10.1016/j.cell.2026.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Northen  TR, de Raad  M, Kosina  SM  et al.  What microbes want: exploring microbial substrate preferences with the web of microbes agent. BioRxiv, 10.64898/2026.02.23.707520, 24 February 2026, preprint: not peer reviewed. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Poeplau  C, Don  A, Schneider  F. Roots are key to increasing the mean residence time of organic carbon entering temperate agricultural soils. Global Change Biol. 2021;27:4921–34. 10.1111/gcb.15787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Qiao  L, Wang  X, Smith  P  et al.  Soil quality both increases crop production and improves resilience to climate change. Nat Clim Chang. 2022;12:574–80. 10.1038/s41558-022-01376-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sanderman  J, Hengl  T, Fiske  GJ. Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9575–80. 10.1073/pnas.1706103114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) . The Global Land Outlook (GLO2), Land Restoration for Recovery and Resilience. 2nd edn, 2022.
  16. Zhalnina  K, Louie  KB, Hao  Z  et al.  Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:470–80. 10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data were generated or analyzed for this Editorial.


Articles from Sustainable Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press on behalf of Applied Microbiology International

RESOURCES