Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2026 Oct 5;22(10):e1014658. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1014658

Born to resist: Understanding natural resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep

Hannah Teddleton 1, Elizabeth Shepherd 1,*
Editor: Laura J Knoll2
PMCID: PMC13637852  PMID: 42832524

Fact 1: Infection with Haemonchus contortus is a major cause of clinical and economic losses in sheep driving anthelmintic resistance profiles

The hematophagous gastrointestinal nematode Haemonchus contortus (H. contortus) is widely recognized as one of the most significant parasites affecting sheep and goats, with annual losses estimated at $30–300 million globally [1]. H. contortus follows a direct life cycle, characterized by fecal oral transmission and a pre-patent period of 17–21 days (Fig 1). Adult H. contortus worms feed on blood by piercing the abomasal mucosa in the host, resulting in severe pathologies including hypoproteinemia, submandibular edema, anemia, and in severe cases, death [2]. Pathophysiology attributed to infection is characterized by anemia, caused by rapid blood loss from high parasite load, detectable ~10–12 days of infection [3]. Each adult H. contortus worm can consume about 50 μl of blood per day, leading to cumulative losses of 50–600 mL per day [1]. Without treatment, young or susceptible animals are vulnerable to infection, leading to nutrient imbalances, weight loss, and decreased wool and milk production [3]. Current available treatment involves the use of anthelmintic drugs, which include three major classes: benzimidazoles, cholinergic agonists, and macrocyclic lactones [2]. However, widespread use of anthelmintics has led to the development of multidrug resistance, resulting from a range of factors including genetic modifications in H. contortus populations, which have resulted in alterations of effective drug targets, physiochemical interactions, and drug distribution [4]. The prolific nature of H. contortus coupled with limited available control strategies highlights the urgent need to develop improved treatments for the effective control of H. contortus in sheep.

Fig 1. H. contortus life cycle in small ruminants.

Fig 1

H. contortus follows a direct fecal-oral life cycle in small ruminants following ingestion from grazing. Created with BioRender.com/d97np7e.

Fact 2: Different breeds of sheep display natural resistance to H. contortus

Sheep were one of the first domesticated animals, and although sheep share a common ancestor, substantial genetic diversity between sheep breeds influences economically relevant production traits such as carcass and wool characteristics, as well as disease resistance [5]. Natural resistance against H. contortus has been documented in sheep breeds, like hair breeds, which originate from humid tropical climates and have developed parasite resistance against nematodes such as H. contortus [6]. By contrast, wool breeds originating from the cooler environment of Europe have been selected for economically valuable traits such as carcass and wool characteristics without the environmental selective pressure against parasitism, which has resulted in increased levels of susceptibility to parasitic infection [7]. Within hair sheep, breeds such as the St. Croix, Gulf Coast Native, and Barbados Blackbelly demonstrate higher levels of resistance to H. contortus demonstrated by increased packed cell volumes and decreased fecal eggs counts and worm burdens in the abomasum at necropsy when compared European breeds of wool sheep such as the Suffolk and Dorset [8]. Studies investigating the resistance profiles between resistant tropical breeds demonstrated that the St. Croix demonstrated the highest resistance to H. contortus when compared to Gulf Coast Native, Barbados Blackbelly, and crossbred wool sheep [9], making the St. Croix sheep an ideal model for studying natural parasite resistance. However, despite their robust resistance against H. contortus, St. Croix sheep lack economically desirable traits, highlighting the importance of elucidating mechanisms driving a resistant phenotype in sheep.

Fact 3: Genetic selection of sheep to be naturally parasite resistant is highly variable

While parasite resistance is influenced by factors such as sex, age, and previous exposure, host genetics are a major contributor to variation in resistance against H. contortus [10]. Evidence for a genetic basis of parasite resistance is supported by marked differences in resistance observed between both sheep breeds and among individuals within the same breed [10]. Therefore, identifying genetic determinants contributing to differences in parasite resistance among sheep is essential in combating H. contortus. Originally bred in the 1950s, Katahdin sheep are a cross between parasite-resistant St. Croix hair sheep and breeds selected for desirable production traits, including Suffolk and Wiltshire Horn [11]. Despite being widely regarded as parasite resistant, considerable variation exists in post-weaning fecal egg count (PFEC) estimated breeding values (EBV) among Katahdins, highlighting opportunities for continued genetic improvement [12]. While PFEC is moderately heritable (0.23-0.46) [11], parasite resistance remains a complex trait influenced by many genes rather than a single major genetic locus [11]. No single resistance gene has been identified, as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and regional heritability mapping (RHM) in sheep have identified multiple regions [13], suggesting a resistant phenotype is polygenic. Consequently, understanding how these genetic differences influence immune function remains an important area of research.

Fact 4: Resistance to H. contortus is mediated by immune responses

Natural resistance to H. contortus infection is directed against the L3 stage, preventing establishment of adult worms in the abomasum without the reliance of anthelmintic drugs [14]. In general, gastrointestinal nematodes elicit a T-helper 2 type (Th2) response in the host which is characterized by the production of key cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13, mediating host protection [14]. Resistance in St. Croix sheep is characterized by an early Th2 response to the abomasum (Fig 2), exhibiting increased levels of eosinophilia, mastocytosis, IgG, IgA, and production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [15]. Additionally, depletion of CD4+ T cells in resistant sheep resulted in increased fecal egg counts and worm burdens [16], further demonstrating that natural resistance against H. contortus is predicated on the development of appropriate adaptive responses. Response to H. contortus in susceptible breeds, like Suffolk, is delayed, permitting H. contortus establishment and requiring anthelmintic treatment to prevent mortality [17]. Thus, differences in the host immune response to H. contortus could be the mediating factor driving the resistant or susceptible phenotype in sheep breeds [17]. Despite the identification of robust Th2-like responses in resistant sheep, the exact mechanisms that drive the resistant phenotype in St. Croix remains unknown.

Fig 2. Abomasal Th2 immune response to H. contortus infection.

Fig 2

Following the arrival of H. contortus larvae to the abomasum, the activation of innate immune cells responds to produce cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 to support the development of the T-helper 2 type (Th2) polarization. Antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells leave the abomasum and travel to local lymph nodes such as the abomasal lymph nodes to prime naïve CD4+ T cells for subsequent activation and differentiation. The naïve CD4+ T cells differentiate into Th2 cells where they travel to the site of infection to amplify cellular responses through the production of Th2-like cytokines and to activate B cell class switching and IgE and IgA production through IL-4 production, facilitating worm expulsion. Created with BioRender.com/l2pretl.

Fact 5: Utilization of parasite resistant sheep is a strong model to elucidate H. contortus mediated immunity

Apart from anthelmintic use, alternative methods of control such as the introduction of copper oxide wire particles [18] have gained popularity in the recent decade; however, application of the copper particles demonstrated relatively short anthelmintic activities in infected lambs (up to 35 days) [19] and often still requires anthelmintic drugs. While Barbervax, the only commercially available vaccine for H. contortus, is approved in Australia, the United Kingdom, and South Africa, the varying efficacy and high economic cost highlight the difficulties in vaccine development [20]. A protective efficacy study of Barbervax in parasite-susceptible Merino sheep showed a 60–75% decrease in fecal egg counts in low (300 H. contortus L3/weeks) and moderate (600 H. contortus L3/week) trickle infections but did not confer protection in animals given high (1,200 H. contortus L3/week) (2,400 H. contortus L3/week) trickle infections [20]. Because vaccination strategies like Barbervax may not confer protection to animals with high H. contortus infections [20] or high pasture contamination, alternative strategies are needed. Utilization of parasite-resistant St. Croix sheep is an ideal models to elucidate differences in the amplification of the early Th2-like response, thereby allowing for the characterization of the initiators and mechanisms that drive a resistant phenotype during H. contortus infection. Greater elucidation of the Th2-type immune response in parasite-resistant sheep will aid in development of cellular and cytokine-based immunotherapy strategies to aid in the control of H. contortus without the reliance of anthelminthic drugs.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Emery DL, Hunt PW, Le Jambre LF. Haemonchus contortus: The then and now, and where to from here? Int J Parasitol. 2016;46(12):755–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zajac AM. Gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants: Life cycle, anthelmintics, and diagnosis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2006;22(3):529–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roeber F, Jex AR, Gasser RB. Advances in the diagnosis of key gastrointestinal nematode infections of livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(8):1135–52. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodrigues JFV, Monteiro JP, Almeida TM, Molento MB. A systematic review of the molecular mechanisms related to anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus: A contemporary narrative. Vet Parasitol. 2025;334:110394. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wanjala G, Bagi Z, Gavojdian D, Badaoui B, Astuti PK, Mizeranschi A, et al. Genetic diversity and adaptability of native sheep breeds from different climatic zones. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):14143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97931-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whitlock JH. A study of the inheritance of resistance to trichostrongylidosis in sheep. Cornell Vet. 1955;45(3):422–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Notter DR, Andrew SA, Zajac AM. Responses of hair and wool sheep to a single fixed dose of infective larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Small Rumin Res. 2003;47(3):221–5. doi: 10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00279-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gamble HR, Zajac AM. Resistance of St. Croix lambs to Haemonchus contortus in experimentally and naturally acquired infections. Vet Parasitol. 1992;41(3–4):211–25. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90081-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Courtney CH, Parker CF, McClure KE, Herd RP. Resistance of exotic and domestic lambs to experimental infection with Haemonchus contortus. Int J Parasitol. 1985;15(1):101–9. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(85)90107-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayward AD. Causes and consequences of intra- and inter-host heterogeneity in defence against nematodes. Parasite Immunol. 2013;35(11):362–73. doi: 10.1111/pim.12054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ngere L, Burke JM, Morgan JLM, Miller JE, Notter DR. Genetic parameters for fecal egg counts and their relationship with body weights in Katahdin lambs. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(5):1590–9. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burke JM, Notter DR, Miller JE. Sire’s Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) for Fecal Egg Count (FEC) influences BW, FEC, and anemia measures of offspring in katahdin sheep. J Anim Sci. 2016;95:52. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Al Kalaldeh M, Gibson J, Lee SH, Gondro C, van der Werf JHJ. Detection of genomic regions underlying resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in Australian sheep. Genet Sel Evol. 2019;51(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0479-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Escribano C, Saravia A, Costa M, Castells D, Ciappesoni G, Riet-Correa F, et al. Resistance to Haemonchus contortus in Corriedale sheep is associated to high parasite-specific IgA titer and a systemic Th2 immune response. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55447-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lacroux C, Nguyen THC, Andreoletti O, Prevot F, Grisez C, Bergeaud J-P, et al. Haemonchus contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) infection in lambs elicits an unequivocal Th2 immune response. Vet Res. 2006;37(4):607–22. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peña MT, Miller JE, Horohov DW. Effect of CD4+ T lymphocyte depletion on resistance of Gulf Coast Native lambs to Haemonchus contortus infection. Vet Parasitol. 2006;138(3–4):240–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bowdridge SA, Zajac AM, Notter DR. St. Croix sheep produce a rapid and greater cellular immune response contributing to reduced establishment of Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol. 2015;208(3–4):204–10. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Burke JM, Miller JE. Sustainable approaches to parasite control in ruminant livestock. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2020;36(1):89–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Galindo-Barboza AJ, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Cámara-Sarmiento R, Sandoval-Castro CA, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Ojeda-Robertos NF, et al. Persistence of the efficacy of copper oxide wire particles against Haemonchus contortus in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2011;176(2–3):201–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kebeta MM, Hine BC, Walkden-Brown SW, Kahn LP, Doyle EK. Protective efficacy of Barbervax in Merino weaner sheep trickle infected with five doses of Haemonchus contortus infective larvae. Vet Parasitol. 2021;292:109386. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES