Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred treatment for large renal calculi. Fluoroscopic access conventionally requires iodinated contrast, which may precipitate anaphylaxis in sensitized individuals. We report two cases of contrast-induced anaphylaxis, in which air pyelography was successfully used to delineate the pelvicalyceal system and obtain safe renal access during PCNL.
Keywords: Air pyelogram, anaphylaxis, iodinated contrast allergy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde pyelography
Résumé
La néphrolithotomie percutanée (PCNL) est le traitement de choix des calculs rénaux volumineux. L’accès fluoroscopique nécessite classiquement l’utilisation de produit de contraste iodé, pouvant provoquer une anaphylaxie chez les individus sensibilisés. Nous rapportons deux cas d’anaphylaxie induite par le produit de contraste, dans lesquels la pyélographie à l’air a été utilisée avec succès pour délimiter le système pyélocaliciel et obtenir un accès rénal sûr lors de la PCNL.
Mots-clés: Allergie au contraste iodé, anaphylaxie, néphrolithotomie percutanée, pyélographie à l’air, pyélographie retrograde
INTRODUCTION
Iodinated contrast media are widely used during endourological procedures. Although nonionic agents have reduced adverse reactions, anaphylaxis remains a serious complication. Alternative imaging techniques such as air pyelography and ultrasonography (USG) are valuable in high-risk patients.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]
CASE REPORTS
Case 1
A 43 year old male patient with Right Renal pelvic calculus of size 16mm was planned for procedure of right Pcnl.During procedure patient developed severe hypotension and bronchospasm following intraoperative retrograde pyelography with iohexol. After stabilization, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was successfully performed using air pyelography for access in later procedure [Figures 1-4].
Figure 1.

Three dimensional Reconstructed CT image of Bilateral Kidneys and Urinary Bladder of Case 1
Figure 4.

Plain Xray Image Of Bilateral Kidney,Ureter and Urinary Bladder of Case
Figure 2.

Axial CT image of Bilateral Kidneys of Case 1
Figure 3.

Coronal CT image of Bilateral Kidneys,Ureter and Urinary Bladder of Case 1
The patient underwent cystoscopy + right DJ stenting on 14/4/2025.
5 Fr ureteric catheter could not be placed beyond the distal ureter.
Right check ureterorenoscopy (URS) was done. An unaccommodating, slightly narrow ureter was noted, and URS could not be negotiated above.
Right RIRS with the option to proceed to Right PCNL if required under GA was planned post DJ stenting on May 7, 2025.
The access sheath could not be negotiated over the guidewire into the right ureter.
4/70 ureteric catheter was placed over 0.025 inch guidewire into the right ureter up to the right kidney due to a narrow ureter.
Retrograde pyelography was done with 10cc iohexol + NS contrast (1:3).
The patient was about to be proned, but sudden hypotension (blood pressure – 60/40 mmHg) with tachycardia (120/min) and bronchospasm ensued.
Resuscitation was started with adrenaline, hydrocortisone, and intravenous fluids, and the patient was stabilized.
Procedure abandoned and right 4/26 Dj stent was placed.
Consultations and interdepartmental clinical meetings were held postoperatively with the department of anesthesiology and the department of dermatology to ascertain the cause of anaphylactic reaction.
Iohexol dye was determined as an allergic agent after ruling out anesthetic drugs such as propofol, nitrous oxide, and midazolam given during the procedure. Prior sensitization during computed tomography (CT) urography was also considered a contributory factor.
The patient was posted for PCNL on June 11, 2025, keeping the above in mind, with air pyelogram or USG-guided puncture as alternatives for puncture access.
Cystoscopy was done, and previous DJ stent was removed.
5/70 ureteric catheter was placed in the right ureter, and an air pyelogram was done with 5cc air in the supine position.
The patient turned to the prone position, and a lower calyceal puncture was taken after access was determined by PCS (PelviCalyceal System) opacification with air.
Guidewire was placed, and tract was dilated up to 22Fr by Seldinger approach.
Using a nephroscope, lithotripsy was done, fragments were removed, and 5/24 DJ stent was placed [Figure 5 and Video 1].
Figure 5.

Post PCNL Plain Xray Image Of Bilateral Kidney,Ureter and Urinary Bladder of Case 1
Case 2
A 61-year-old male with documented iodinated contrast anaphylaxis during CT urography which showed 15mm Right Renal middle calyceal calculus [Figures 6-10] underwent PCNL using an air pyelogram, resulting in complete stone clearance without complications. The patient planned for right prone PCNL.
Figure 6.

Anaphlyactic reaction Incident Identity Card of Case 2
Figure 10.

Three dimensional Reconstructed CT image of Bilateral Kidneys and Urinary Bladder of Case 2
Figure 7.

Patient of Case 2 showing skin reaction post Contrast CT scan
Figure 8.

Axial CT image of Bilateral Kidneys of Case 2
Figure 9.

Coronal CT image of Bilateral Kidneys,Ureter and Urinary Bladder of Case 2
Cystoscopy done
5/70 ureteric catheter was placed in the right ureter, and an air pyelogram was done with 5cc air in the supine position [Figure 11].
The patient turned to the prone position, and stone-guided puncture was taken after access was determined by PCS opacification with air.
Guidewire was placed, and tract was dilated up to 22Fr by Seldinger approach [Figure 12].
Using a nephroscope, lithotripsy was done, fragments were removed, and a 5/24 DJ stent was placed [Figure 13 and Video 2].
Figure 11.

Preoperative C-arm Xray image of Case 2
Figure 12.

Intraoperative C-arm Xray image of case 2
Figure 13.

Post Operative C-arm Xray image after stone removal of case 2
DISCUSSION
Air pyelography preferentially outlines posterior calyces in the prone position, aiding accurate puncture while avoiding contrast exposure. Radiation exposure may also be reduced. Although venous air embolism has been reported, the risk is extremely low when appropriate precautions are followed.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]
CONCLUSION
Air pyelogram is a safe and effective alternative to iodinated contrast during PCNL in patients with contrast-induced anaphylaxis.[21,22,23]
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Videos available on: www.annalsafrmed.org
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bettmann MA. Frequently asked questions: Iodinated contrast agents. Radiographics. 2004;24(Suppl 1):S3–10. doi: 10.1148/rg.24si045519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morcos SK, Thomsen HS. Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1267–75. doi: 10.1007/s003300000729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tramèr MR, von Elm E, Loubeyre P, Hauser C. Pharmacological prevention of serious anaphylactic reactions due to iodinated contrast media: Systematic review. BMJ. 2006;333:675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38905.634132.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology. 1990;175:621–8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Christiansen C. X-ray contrast media – An overview. Toxicology. 2005;209:185–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jangid DK, Sharma G, Yadav SS, Tomar V, Mathur R. A comparative study of antegrade air pyelogram and retrograde air pyelogram for initial puncture access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:C01–3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24821.9724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lipkin ME, Wang AJ, Toncheva G, Ferrandino MN, Yoshizumi TT, Preminger GM, et al. Reduced radiation exposure with air retrograde pyelogram during PCNL. J Endourol. 2011;25:563–7. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Basiri A, Ziaee AM, Kianian HR, Mehrabi S, Karami H, Moghaddam SM. Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2008;22:281–4. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lojanapiwat B. The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy? Indian J Urol. 2013;29:208–13. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.117284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Usha N, Droghetti L. Air embolism during PCNL. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:760–1. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: Types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1153–61. doi: 10.2214/ajr.157.6.1950858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Ellis JH. Contrast media reactions: Clinical management. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017;55:843–56. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brockow K. Contrast media hypersensitivity. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012;97:180–90. doi: 10.1159/000335631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, Gerber FH, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:845–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710013171401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dillman JR, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Strouse PJ, Jan SC, Davenport MS. Frequency and severity of acute allergic-like reactions to gadolinium-containing IV contrast media in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1533–8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cochran ST. Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005;5:28–31. doi: 10.1007/s11882-005-0051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greenberger PA, Patterson R. The prevention of immediate generalized reactions to radiocontrast media in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;87:867–72. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90135-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Torres WE, Small WC. Adverse reactions to intravenous iodinated contrast media: A primer for radiologists. Radiographics. 2006;26:1541–59. doi: 10.1007/s10140-006-0488-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U, et al. Imaging techniques in PCNL. Curr Opin Urol. 2009;19:235–40. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: Experience from over 300 cases. J Endourol. 2005;19:724–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05749.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wollin DA, Gupta M, Preminger GM. Alternatives to contrast in endourology. Urol Clin North Am. 2019;46:193–204. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus other treatments for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4:CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2023;84:38–55. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khandelwal A, Agarwal A, Bansal A, Gupta AK. Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014;24:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ramaswamy RS, Kalva SP, Sahani DV. Management of contrast reactions. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31:356–63. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
