Abstract
Vascular access-related infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). In developing countries like Nigeria, the reliance on central venous catheters (CVCs) as a primary vascular access point increases the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). This report highlights the clinical management of CRBSI and the systemic constraints faced in resource-limited settings. The index case was a 49-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to diabetes mellitus, currently on MHD via a CVC, presented with a high-grade fever during a dialysis session. Clinical examination and positive blood cultures drawn from the dialysis tubing confirmed a CRBSI. No other focal source of infection was identified. Microbiological analysis identified the pathogen (consistent with common isolates like Staphylococcus aureus). The patient was managed with a combination of topical and parenteral antibiotics tailored to the microbiogram. Following initial stabilization and antibiotic therapy, a catheter exchange was performed to eliminate the source of the infection.The patient showed clinical improvement with the resolution of fever and clearance of the bloodstream infection. However, the management process was complicated by significant local constraints, including the inability to monitor serum trough levels for antibiotic dosing, the high cost of specialized medications, and the limited availability of drugs effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Catheter-related bloodstream infection remains a formidable complication for hemodialysis patients in Nigeria. While definitive treatment involving targeted antibiotics and catheter exchange is effective, there is an urgent need for improved access to affordable MRSA-active antibiotics and laboratory facilities for therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize patient outcomes.
Keywords: Catheter salvage, catheter-related bloodstream infection, hemodialysis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , resource-limited setting, Nigeria
Résumé
Les infections liées à l’abord vasculaire constituent une cause importante de morbidité et de mortalité chez les patients en hémodialyse chronique. Dans les pays en développement comme le Nigeria, le recours aux cathéters veineux centraux (CVC) comme principal point d’accès vasculaire augmente le risque d’infections du sang liées au cathéter (ISLC). Ce rapport met en lumière la prise en charge clinique des ISLC et les contraintes systémiques rencontrées dans les milieux à ressources limitées. Le cas d’espèce concerne une femme de 49 ans atteinte d’insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT) secondaire au diabète sucré, actuellement sous hémodialyse via un CVC, qui a présenté une forte fièvre lors d’une séance de dialyse. L’examen clinique et les hémocultures positives prélevées sur la tubulure de dialyse ont confirmé une ISLC. Aucune autre source d’infection focale n’a été identifiée. L’analyse microbiologique a identifié l’agent pathogène (correspondant aux isolats courants tels que Staphylococcus aureus). La patiente a été traitée par une combinaison d’antibiotiques topiques et parentéraux adaptés à l’antibiogramme. Après une stabilisation initiale et l’antibiothérapie, un changement de cathéter a été effectué pour éliminer la source de l’infection. La patiente a présenté une amélioration clinique avec la résolution de la fièvre et l’élimination de l’infection sanguine. Cependant, le processus de prise en charge a été compliqué par d’importantes contraintes locales, notamment l’impossibilité de surveiller les taux résiduels sériques pour le dosage des antibiotiques, le coût élevé des médicaments spécialisés et la disponibilité limitée de médicaments efficaces contre le S. aureus résistant à la méthicilline (SARM). L’infection du sang liée au cathéter reste une complication redoutable pour les patients hémodialysés au Nigeria. Bien qu’un traitement définitif impliquant des antibiotiques ciblés et le remplacement du cathéter soit efficace, il est urgent d’améliorer l’accès à des antibiotiques actifs contre le SARM abordables ainsi qu’aux installations de laboratoire pour le suivi thérapeutique des médicaments afin d’optimiser les résultats pour les patients.
Mots-clés: Infection du sang liée au cathéter, hémodialyse, sauvetage de cathéter, staphylococcus aureus résistant à la méthicilline (SARM), milieu à ressources limitées, Nigeria
INTRODUCTION
Effective hemodialysis is fundamentally dependent on reliable vascular access.[1] While the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the international “gold standard” due to its longevity and lower infection rates, achieving permanent access remains one of the most significant hurdles in the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Sub-Saharan Africa.
In Nigeria, the utilization of permanent vascular access is critically low. While clinical guidelines suggest that the majority of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients should utilize an AVF, local studies reveal a starkly different reality.[2,3,4]
Consequently, over 90% of patients in Nigerian dialysis centers rely on catheter-based vascular access. These primarily include femoral catheters, tunneled and nontunneled internal jugular catheters (IJC). Recent data underscores this trend; at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, 7.2% of patients utilize nontunneled IJCs, while a 6-year review at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital reported a significantly higher rate of 28.5%.[5,6]
The overwhelming reliance on central venous catheters (CVCs) exposes a vulnerable patient population to severe complications, most notably Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). These infections are a primary driver of morbidity, hospital readmission, and mortality among hemodialysis patients.[7]
In resource-limited settings, the challenge is two-fold. The first is high prevalence. This arises from high turnover and prolonged use of temporary catheters due to the prohibitive cost of AVF surgery. Then, the issue of management barriers arising from a lack of facilities for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) – specifically serum trough levels – and the scarcity of potent antibiotics for resistant strains like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).[7,8] This case report discusses the clinical course of a 59-year-old patient with CRBSI, highlighting the diagnostic process and the systemic constraints that complicate the management of such infections in the Nigerian healthcare system.
CASE PRESENTATION
Patient information
The patient is a 49-year-old woman, known diabetic of 8 years, and has been managed for ESRD secondary to diabetic nephropathy on MHD.
Clinical findings
The patient presented to the dialysis unit with a 6-day history of high-grade, continuous fever (38.8°C) accompanied by rigors and generalized weakness. Notably, the fever exacerbated approximately 1 h into each dialysis session.
Vascular access history
Non-tunneled right-sided IJC in situ for 3 months. The reason for the CVC is the primary failure of a previous AVF. Figure 1 showed failed radio-cephalic fistula and a central vascular catheter for MHD inserted in the index patient. The CVS was maintained by regular exit-site cleaning and routine use of antibiotic locks postdialysis.
Figure 1.

(a) Both forearms of the patient with radiocephalic fistula failure. (b) Uncuffed internal jugular vascular access
Physical examination
The patient was acutely ill-looking, febrile (38.8°C), and tachypneic (28 cycles/min). The cardiovascular system showed tachycardia (pulse rate - 112 bpm), blood pressure = 140/80 mmHg. The apex beat was displaced to the 6th left intercoastal space (LICS), lateral to the mid-clavicular line. Heart sounds were normal, first, and second heart sounds.
Local site
The IJC exit site showed hyperemia, mild swelling, tenderness, and purulent discharge.
Systems review
No signs of meningeal irritation, clear lung fields, and no evidence of focal infections (no dysuria, cough, or abdominal pain).
Diagnostic assessment
Following admission, an extensive workup was conducted to identify the pathogen and assess for systemic seeding:
Peripheral blood film
Revealed significant leukocytosis with toxic granulations and a left shift, consistent with a severe bacterial infection [Table 1]. Red cell morphology showed a normochromic, normocytic pattern with occasional microcytes, typical of anemia of chronic disease/ESRD.
Table 1.
Results of investigations
| Variable | Result | Reference range |
|---|---|---|
| WBC (cells/µL) | 16×103 | 4–11×103 |
| Granulocyte (%) | 86.5 | 45–55 |
| Monocyte (%) | 3 | 1–5 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 38 | 10–40 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 11 | 10.5–13.5 |
| Platelets (cells/µL) | 212 | 150–400 |
| ESR (mm 1 h) | 98 | 0–15 |
WBC=White blood cells, ESR=Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Microbiology
Catheter exit-site swab: Gram stain showed Gram-positive cocci in clusters. Culture yielded S. aureus
Blood culture (from dialysis tubing): Confirmed S. aureus with weak beta-hemolysis. The isolate was sensitive to vancomycin, rifampicin, and trimethoprim (TMP)-sulfamethoxazole, but resistant to methicillin, confirming MRSA
Imaging: An echocardiogram was performed to rule out infective endocarditis. Findings included concentric left ventricular hypertrophy with a preserved ejection fraction (57%), but notably, no valvular vegetations or pericardial effusions were detected.
Diagnosis
A clinical diagnosis of Sepsis secondary to CRBSI was made. The diagnosis was supported by:
Temporal relationship: Fever spikes during dialysis
Local signs: Purulent discharge and inflammation at the catheter exit site
Microbiological evidence: Positive blood cultures (drawn from the blood tubing at the peak of fever), which identified the causative pathogen, in the absence of any other identifiable source of infection.
Therapeutic interventions
The patient was initially started on empiric intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone (1 g every 12 h) and IV metronidazole (500 mg every 8 h). On confirmation of MRSA, the regimen was pivoted to definitive therapy with intravenous vancomycin initiated with a loading dose of 1 g (15–20 mg/kg), followed by a maintenance dose of 900 mg adjusted for her renal status. To prevent “Red Man Syndrome,” each dose was administered via infusion pump at a rate of 10 mg/min over 1 h.
Topical therapy
The catheter exit site was dressed twice daily with mupirocin cream.
Source control
On the 3rd day of vancomycin therapy, clinical stability allowed for catheter salvage and eventually a scheduled exchange.
Follow-up and outcomes
The patient showed rapid clinical and biochemical improvement within 4 days.
Clinical
Resolution of fever, chills, and rigors during dialysis sessions.
Inflammatory markers
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) dropped from 98 mm/h to 35 mm/h, and the total white cell count (WBC) normalized from 16 × 103/mm3 to 5 × 103/mm3.
The patient was discharged after 1 week of inpatient care to continue IV vancomycin as an outpatient (twice daily for 1 week, then transitioned to postdialysis administration for 2 weeks).
Long-term outcome
A repeat blood culture and exit-site swab 1 week after completing the antibiotic course showed no growth. Two weeks posttreatment, the noncuffed IJC was successfully exchanged for a tunneled catheter. The patient has remained clinically stable with a healed exit site and no recurrence of sepsis.
DISCUSSION
This case illustrates the classic presentation and successful management of a CRBSI in an MHD patient. However, it also highlights the precarious nature of managing such infections in a resource-limited setting where the “gold standard” of care often meets the “reality of the clinic.”
The primary driver of infection in this patient was the prolonged use of a nontunneled IJC.[8] As noted in local literature from Ibadan and Benin City, over 90% of Nigerian dialysis patients rely on these temporary measures.[5,6] The failure of this patient’s primary AVF forced a transition to a CVC, which inherently carries a higher risk of biofilm formation and subsequent bacteremia.
The isolation of MRSA in this case is consistent with global trends in dialysis units but presents a unique set of hurdles in Nigeria.[9] While vancomycin remains the workhorse for MRSA, newer alternatives like Linezolid or Daptomycin are often prohibitively expensive or entirely unavailable in local pharmacies.[10,11,12] The sensitivity to TMP-Sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin in this patient is a positive finding, as these can sometimes serve as adjuncts or oral step-down options. However, they are rarely used as monotherapy for CRBSI.
A critical highlight of this case is the lack of TDM. In ideal settings, vancomycin dosing is guided by serum trough levels to ensure the concentration stays between 15 and 20 µg/mL.[13,14,15] This is vital to prevent ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity: High troughs can damage remaining vestigial renal function or hearing.[16,17] Low troughs promote the development of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.[18] In this instance, the clinicians had to rely on calculated renal adjustments and clinical observation rather than biochemical confirmation. The success of the treatment – evidenced by the drop in ESR and WBC – demonstrates that clinical vigilance can mitigate the absence of TDM, though it remains a significant risk factor for treatment failure or toxicity.
While current guidelines often recommend immediate catheter removal for S. aureus CRBSI, the scarcity of vascular access options and the financial burden of repeated insertions often lead clinicians in Nigeria to attempt catheter salvage.[19,20] In this case, the combination of parenteral vancomycin and topical Mupirocin allowed for stabilization before the eventual transition to a tunneled catheter, which provides a better long-term infection barrier than nontunneled IJCs.
CONCLUSION
The management of CRBSI in Nigerian hemodialysis patients represents a delicate balancing act between clinical necessity and resource availability. As this case demonstrates, the heavy reliance on nontunneled catheters – often necessitated by the high failure rate or late initiation of AVFs – creates a persistent reservoir for high-risk pathogens like MRSA. While the gold standard of care dictates immediate catheter removal and stringent TDM, the Nigerian reality frequently mandates a salvage-first approach. This case underscores several critical takeaways for practicing clinicians in similar environments: Clinical Vigilance as a Proxy, Strategic Antibiotic Stewardship, and vascular access crisis (an urgent need to improve the uptake of tunneled catheters and early AVF creation to reduce the duration of exposure to high-risk temporary access sites). Ultimately, the successful resolution of this infection serves as a testament to the efficacy of aggressive parenteral therapy and clinical oversight. However, it also serves as a call to action for the expansion of diagnostic infrastructure – specifically TDM and advanced vascular access services – to bridge the gap between Nigerian nephrology practice and global benchmarks.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Portolés J, López-Gómez JM, Gruss E, Aljama P, MAR Study Group Course of vascular access and relationship with treatment of anemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:1163–9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01320307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ulasi II, Ijoma CK. The enormity of chronic kidney disease in Nigeria: The situation in a teaching hospital in South-East Nigeria. J Trop Med 2010. 2010:501957. doi: 10.1155/2010/501957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ekpe EE, Ekirikpo U. Challenges of vascular access in a new dialysis centre – Uyo experience. Pan Afr Med J. 2010;7:23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nwankwo EA, Wudiri WW, Bassi A. Practice pattern of hemodialysis vascular access in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Int J Artif Organs. 2006;29:956–60. doi: 10.1177/039139880602901006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raji YR, Jinadu YO, Bello T, Uloko AR, Coker JM, Oguntoye RA, et al. Pattern of Haemodialysis Access Use at University College Hospital, Ibadan. Astract Presented at the Conference of Nigerian Association of Nephrology, Owo/Akure. 2014:37–8. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ojeh-Oziegbe O, Okwuonu CG, Adejumo OA, Okugbo S, Efosa O. Changing pattern of vascular access use for maintenance haemodialysis in a tertiary hospital in Southern Nigeria. Trop J Nephrol. 2014;9:7–14. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Costantine AR, Urasa SJ, Sadiq AM, Shao ER, Lyamuya FS, Niccodem EM, et al. Catheter-related bloodstream infections among hemodialysis patients in Northern Tanzania: Insights from a single-centre retrospective study. Health Sci Rep. 2025;8:e70338. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weldetensae MK, Weledegebriel MG, Nigusse AT, Berhe E, Gebrearegay H. Catheter-related blood stream infections and associated factors among hemodialysis patients in a tertiary care hospital. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:3145–56. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S409400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scheuch M, Freiin von Rheinbaben S, Kabisch A, Engeßer J, Ahrendt S, Dabers T, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in hemodialysis patients: A prospective 25 months observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:153. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1332-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maya ID, Carlton D, Estrada E, Allon M. Treatment of dialysis catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with an antibiotic lock: A quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50:289–95. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raad I, Hanna H, Jiang Y, Dvorak T, Reitzel R, Chaiban G, et al. Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1656–60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00350-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hwang LE, Yang JL, Lin CY, Huang SH, Chuang YC, Wang JT, et al. High-dose daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infections: Role of pharmacodynamic target attainment. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2026;59:237–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.005. [doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2025.08.005] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chander S, Kumari R, Wang HY, Mohammed YN, Parkash O, Lohana S, et al. Effect of low versus high vancomycin trough level on the clinical outcomes of adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:1114. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09927-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tsutsuura M, Moriyama H, Kojima N, Mizukami Y, Tashiro S, Osa S, et al. The monitoring of vancomycin: A systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:153. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05858-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tuon FF, Romero R, Gasparetto J, Cieslinski J. Vancomycin trough level and loading dose. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:2393–6. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S184897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sel EK, Tufan B, Atagun GK, Oguz VA, Ozbek OA, Gumustekin M, et al. Association of vancomycin trough levels, AUC and AUC/MIC ratios with clinical outcomes in patients with enterococcal bacteremia: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25:958. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11400-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yahav D, Abbas M, Nassar L, Ghrayeb A, Kurnik D, Shepshelovich D, et al. The association of vancomycin trough levels with outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections: Retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hong KH, Park JS, Kim EC. Two cases of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolated from joint tissue or wound. Korean J Lab Med. 2008;28:444–8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.6.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yaxley J. Tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion: Technical and clinical considerations. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023;33:76–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Auer J, Braun J, Lenk J, Gollrad J, Ro SR, Hamm B, de Bucourt M. Tunneled hemodialysis catheter insertion: Above, within, or below the right atrium-Where is the tip? Acta Radiol Open. 2022;11:20584601221122421. doi: 10.1177/20584601221122421. [doi: 10.1177/20584601221122421] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
