Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jul 11;49(1):195. doi: 10.1007/s10753-026-02561-z

Crohn’s Disease: From Immune Dysregulation to Intestinal Damage

Silvia Salvatori 1,2, Rachele Frascatani 2, Pasquale De Vico 3, Irene Marafini 1,2, Giovanni Monteleone 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13638675  PMID: 42435143

Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a long-lasting, recurring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) marked by segmental, transmural inflammation that may affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract. Growing evidence suggests that CD does not originate from a single pathogenic mechanism, but instead results from the convergence of various biological disturbances that collectively disrupt intestinal homeostasis. Genetic alterations that weaken microbial detection, autophagy, and epithelial protection appear to establish initial vulnerabilities, enabling microbes to trigger exaggerated immune responses. This vulnerability is further exacerbated by environmental factors that intensify host microbial imbalance. The ensuing microenvironment fosters a significant production of effector molecules, which exacerbate the existing inflammation and activate stromal cells, which in turn drive tissue remodeling and structural complications such as ulceration, strictures, and fistulas. In this article, we synthesize the knowledge on the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in CD pathogenesis, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between immune and stromal components that contributes to a disease-permissive environment. We also examine key inflammatory pathways and signaling networks involved in disease progression and discuss how these mechanistic insights inform existing and emerging therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Crohn’s disease, IBD pathogenesis, Immune dysregulation, Mucosal inflammation, Cytokines

Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD), a principal form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in humans, is characterized by chronic, relapsing, tissue-destructive inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Unlike ulcerative colitis (UC), which is limited to the rectum and colon and primarily affects the mucosal layer, CD can involve any tract of the gastrointestinal tract, with segmental inflammation affecting all layers of the intestinal wall. This deep inflammatory process results in aphthous and longitudinal ulcers, fibrostenotic strictures, and penetrating lesions (i.e., fistulas and abscesses), which can lead to clinical consequences (e.g., malabsorption, malnutrition, bowel obstruction, and an increased risk of intestinal cancer) [1].

A central hallmark of CD pathogenesis is the disruption of intestinal homeostasis, a tightly regulated state that normally ensures harmonious interactions between the host immune system, the intestinal epithelium, and the commensal microbiota. In healthy individuals, epithelial cells form a dynamic physical and biochemical barrier, while innate and adaptive immune responses maintain tolerance towards resident microbes and mount rapid, controlled responses against pathogens [2, 3]. In CD, defects in epithelial barrier integrity facilitate microbial translocation across the mucosa, thus triggering exaggerated immune responses that culminate in excessive production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [4].

Growing evidence suggests that the development of CD cannot be attributed to a single pathogenic defect. Instead, it results from the complex interplay of genetic susceptibility, environmental exposures, and host-microbial interactions, which establishes a disease-permissive microenvironment that drives persistent inflammation, progressive tissue remodeling, and the development of the characteristic complications of CD [1, 4].

This article provides an updated overview of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying CD pathogenesis, with particular emphasis on the key inflammatory pathways and signaling networks that orchestrate immune activation, stromal cell engagement, and tissue remodeling. Understanding these interconnected processes is essential for elucidating disease progression and guiding the development of targeted therapeutic strategies to restore intestinal homeostasis and prevent long-term complications.

Genetic and Environmental Priming of Immune Dysregulation

More than 240 susceptibility loci have been identified in IBD through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Some are common to both IBD types, while others are unique to either CD or UC [5]. Approximately one-third of CD patients carry single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), within or near the leucine-rich repeat domain, of NOD2. In particular, SNP8, SNP12, and SNP13, which are associated with CD in Caucasians but not Asians, result in amino acid changes (Arg702Trp, Gly908Arg) or a frameshift (1007insC) leading to a truncated protein. NOD2 variants are linked to ileal CD and, consequently, their presence identifies individuals at increased risk of fibrostrictures [6, 7].

NOD2 controls the production of α-defensin by Paneth and immune cells [8], and NOD2 SNPs are linked to decreased NF-kB activation and defensin synthesis in CD patients [9]. Nod2-null mice do not spontaneously develop pathology. However, after infection, NOD2-deficient mice develop ileitis, which is marked by enlarged Peyer’s patches and elevated levels of T helper type 1 (Th1) cytokines. The inflammatory phenotype in these mice is reversed when NOD2 function is restored [10]. These data are in line with the demonstration that NOD2 controls the myeloid cell response to bacteria and the production of interleukin-12 (IL-12) [11, 12], the master inducer of Th1 cell differentiation [13].

NOD2 mediates the protective effects of Enterococcus faecium in the gut. Specifically, bacterial DL-endopeptidase SagA-driven NOD2 activation in myeloid cells induces IL-1β secretion, thereby increasing the proportion of IL-22-producing CD4 + T helper (Th) cells and innate lymphoid cells that promote tissue repair. Interestingly, the protective effects of Enterococcus faecium are abolished in mice carrying the IBD-associated NOD2 gene variant [14].

NOD2 is also essential for autophagy, a process necessary for eliminating bacteria and maintaining cellular health. It recruits the autophagy protein ATG16L1 to sites of bacterial invasion. Variants in the ATG16L1 gene, particularly the rs2241880 mutation, are associated with CD. These gene alterations impair autophagy, resulting in the accumulation of harmful substances [15–17]. Furthermore, defective autophagy in individuals with CD leads to a failure to effectively eliminate microbial pathogens, exacerbating inflammation and increasing the likelihood of bacterial persistence, particularly adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC), a pathogen closely associated with CD [18]. ATG16L1 also interacts with murine norovirus and helps prevent necroptosis in Paneth cells by maintaining mitochondrial function [19, 20]. Another CD susceptibility locus is Immunity-Related GTPase M (IRGM), which regulates autophagy and inflammasome signaling. Deficiency or dysregulation of IRGM results in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and reactive oxygen species, which can potentiate NLRP3 inflammasome activation, increased secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 and enhanced pyroptosis. Furthermore, impaired IRGM-mediated bacterial clearance may contribute to persistent microbial stimulation of the mucosal immune system, thereby exacerbating disease progression and chronic intestinal injury in CD [21]. GWA studies have identified a connection between the TNFSF15 gene, which encodes tumor necrosis factor-like ligand 1 A (TL1A), and increased susceptibility to both CD and UC [22]. Interestingly, in Korean patients with CD, non-risk allele homozygotes of TNFSF15 SNPs rs6478108 and rs4574921 were identified as independent genetic predictors for the development of strictures/non-perianal penetrating complications and perianal fistulas, respectively [23].

For a detailed description of the genetic alterations associated with CD, the reader is directed towards recent reviews [24–26].

Early life factors, such as being born by caesarean section, antibiotic use, and formula feeding, contribute to the development of an abnormal microbiome, which can impede the establishment of immune tolerance and increase the risk of CD later in life [25, 27, 28]. For example, caesarean section births disrupt the natural colonization of microbiota, and early antibiotic administration can reduce microbial diversity and encourage the proliferation of pathobionts [29, 30].

Additional environmental factors contributing to an increased risk of CD include dietary habits in western cultures, such as high salt intake [31], high saturated fat [32], high refined sugar consumption [33], and food preservatives [34–36], which all alter gut microbiota by providing an advantage for bacteria that degrade mucus, are resistant to bile acids, and therefore increase the permeability of the epithelial barrier [37]. Furthermore, pesticides can alter the composition and function of the gut microbiota, increase intestinal permeability, and promote oxidative stress, potentially increasing the risk of CD onset and progression [38]. Cigarette smoking is another important environmental risk factor for CD. It increases oxidative stress and damages the repair process of the epithelial cells. Furthermore, cigarette smoking alters the composition of the gut microbiota in humans and animals, allowing for the proliferation of harmful bacteria [39]. Cigarette smoking worsens Paneth cell defects in CD patients and mice that possess mutations in the ATG16L1 gene [39]. Patients with CD who carry the ATG16L1 mutation and smoke have a higher risk of postoperative recurrence compared to those who either do not smoke but have the ATG16L1 mutation, or who smoke but do not carry the mutation [39].

Taken together, these observations suggest that multiple genetic alterations and environmental factors contribute to triggering an abnormal immune response in the gut of patients with CD.

Innate Immune Dysregulation

The body’s primary defense against microbial threats is the innate immune system. In CD, the function of innate immune cells is both impaired and exaggerated, resulting in a prolonged inflammatory response. Macrophages, which normally respond to pathogens by ingesting and destroying them, exhibit deficiencies in recognizing and clearing microorganisms in CD. Simultaneously, immunostimulatory molecules derived from the gut microbiota bind to toll-like receptors and activate signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB, MAP kinases) in various antigen-presenting cells (APCs), including CD14 + myeloid cells recruited from the systemic circulation and dendritic cells (DCs). This activation leads to increased production of effector cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-34, TNF, and TL1A), which amplify mucosal inflammation and contribute to the disruption of epithelial integrity [40–43]. These cells also produce master cytokines, such as IL-12 and IL-23, which influence Th-cell polarization [44], as well as IL-1β and IL-18, as a result of inflammasome activation. This activation results in auto-processing of caspase-1 and subsequent maturation of IL-1β and IL-18 [45] as well as cleavage of gasdermin D that induces pores in the cell membrane thereby promoting pyroptosis [46]. Research using experimental colitis models has demonstrated that inhibiting inflammasome components, such as NLRP3 or caspase-1, reduces gut inflammation [47, 48]. In contrast, mice lacking GBP5, a positive regulator of inflammasome activation, show resistance to colitis [49]. Consistently, administration of anti-mature IL-18 antibodies or IL-1β blockers ameliorates experimental colitis in mice [50, 51], as well as treatment of children with refractory very early onset IBD with IL-1β blockers appears to be safe and effective [52].

Increasing evidence indicates that, regardless of the driving stimulus, several factors amplify the innate immune response in CD. For example, OTUD5, an enzyme that stabilizes proteins by cleaving ubiquitin linkages, is overexpressed in the inflamed gut of CD patients and enhances TNF production [53]. Excessive cytokine production in CD also depends on reduced SIRT1 expression, a protein deacetylase that inhibits immune pathways. Consistently, activating SIRT1 with Cay10591 reduces NF-κB activation and alleviates colitis in mice [54]. Additionally, defective expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on APCs impairs T regulatory cell (Treg) function, leading to a breakdown of immune tolerance [55]. In CD, there is over-expression of Smad7, an inhibitor of TGF-β signaling. Knockdown of Smad7 in CD mucosal cells with a specific antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) reduces inflammatory cytokine production, and administration of the Smad7 ASO in mice with CD-like experimental colitis attenuates ongoing inflammation [56]. Consistently, selective deletion of Smad7 gene in DC enhances TGF-β1 signaling and promotes Treg differentiation, thus protecting mice against intestinal inflammation [57].

CD-associated inflammation is also marked by a reduced expression of other immune counter-regulators, such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-10, and IL-25. TSLP, produced primarily by intestinal epithelial cells, promotes a tolerogenic phenotype in DCs, limiting the production of IL-12 and IL-23 [58, 59]. IL-10, secreted by Tregs, regulatory B cells, macrophages, and ILCs, acts directly on intestinal macrophages and DCs to suppress the production of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-23) [60]. IL-25, which is produced by epithelial cells, tuft cells, and other stromal populations, restrains inflammatory responses by inhibiting the activation of ILC1s and ILC3s and myeloid cells [61–63].

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), a ligand-activated transcription factor expressed by multiple innate immune populations including macrophages, DCs, and ILC3s, is also downregulated in CD [52]. AHR signaling normally suppresses NF-κB-driven inflammatory pathways, limits the production of TNF and IL-6 by myeloid cells, and supports the maintenance of IL-22-producing ILC3s that contribute to epithelial barrier integrity and antimicrobial defense [64]. In addition, AHR promotes the differentiation and stability of Tregs while restraining excessive Th17 responses [65, 66].

Overall, these findings contribute to delineating a scenario in which a complex network of signals enhances the innate immune response in CD, leading to an excessive production of inflammatory cytokines.

The Role of Neutrophils and Innate Lymphoid Cells in Tissue-Damaging Inflammation in Crohn’s Disease

Accumulating evidence suggests that excessive neutrophil recruitment and activation in response to microbial antigens in the lamina propria contribute significantly to mucosal damage in CD. The active phases of CD are characterized by the accumulation of neutrophils within the mucosal layer, with their presence correlating with disease severity. In contrast, the resolution of neutrophil infiltration is associated with improved clinical outcomes, such as reduced corticosteroid use and fewer hospitalizations [67–69]. Calprotectin, a calcium- and zinc-binding protein predominantly produced by neutrophils, is often elevated in faecal samples of IBD patients and serves as a useful biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring disease progression [70]. The accumulation of neutrophils in the affected areas of CD patients relies on various mechanisms. The recruitment of neutrophils from the bloodstream is favored by signaling molecules largely released by epithelial cells [e.g. IL-8, IL-6, IL-33, CXCL5, CXCL7, CXCL10, CCL20, leukotriene B4, hepoxilin A3, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)] [71]. When arrived in the inflamed tissue of CD patients, neutrophils tend to survive longer due to defective apoptosis, a phenomenon influenced by cytokines, hypoxia, extracellular acidosis, and bacterial products (e.g., LPS, lipoproteins, peptidoglycans, and lipoteichoic acids) [72, 73]. The resolution of mucosal inflammation involves specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), a class of lipids synthesized from omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. SPMs interact with specific G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to halt neutrophil migration and induce their apoptosis [74, 75]. The expression of chemokine-like receptor 1, also known as chemerin receptor 23 (ChemR23), a GPCR targeted by resolvin E1 and highly expressed in macrophages, DCs, and neutrophils [76, 77], is up-regulated in the inflamed mucosa of CD patients unresponsive to biologic treatments and associated with increased neutrophil accumulation [78]. Consistently, studies in colitic mice showed that treatment with an anti-ChemR23 antibody facilitated the transition of pro-inflammatory macrophages to an anti-inflammatory state, promoting neutrophil apoptosis and clearance [78].

Within the gut mucosa, neutrophils secrete various proteolytic enzymes and reactive oxygen species, which can damage the epithelial barrier [79]. Neutrophils also contribute to CD pathogenesis by secreting cytokines and chemokines (e.g., CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5, IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-17), which recruit other immune cells such as monocytes, T cells, and NK cells [80]. Neutrophils can respond to microbial stimuli and other factors (e.g. cytokines) secreted within the inflamed gut by forming neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), an extracellular network composed of DNA, histones, and antimicrobial proteins that trap and neutralize pathogens [81]. A key step in the process of NET formation, or NETosis, is the citrullination of histones H1, H3, and H4 by peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), which facilitates chromatin decondensation and expulsion [82]. The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 (TREM-1) is another component of NETs, and pharmacologic inhibition or genetic ablation of TREM-1 reduces NETosis thus limiting NET-dependent pathology [83]. NET formation is enhanced in the mucosa of IBD patients, including those with CD, and correlates with disease activity [84]. Experimental evidence suggests links NETs to gut pathology, as NETs can trigger epithelial cell apoptosis, compromising the intestinal barrier and worsening inflammation in the CD-like TNBS-induced colitis model [84].

ILCs are essential components of the immune system, particularly in mucosal immunity. They provide a rapid immune response, complement adaptive immune cells, and are critical for maintaining intestinal homeostasis [85, 86]. The gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) contains various subsets of ILCs, primarily ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s, which respond to signals from the microbiota, cytokines, and environmental cues [87]. In patients with CD, a distinct population of intraepithelial ILC1s characterized by IFN-γ production, expression of CD127, lack of NKp44, and low c-kit levels is selectively expanded following stimulation with IL-12 and IL-18 [88]. This subset is absent from the intestines of alymphoid mice reconstituted with a human immune system but emerges in the colons of mice subjected to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis [88]. Although these cells are classified as ILC1s, their low-level expression of RORγt suggests that they may originate from RORγt-positive ILC3s under inflammatory conditions. A distinct ILC1-related population, referred to as intraepithelial ILC1-like cells, expresses NKp44, NKp46, CD56, CD103, granzyme, and perforin, and resides within the intestinal epithelial layer. Unlike conventional ILC1s, these cells lack IL-7Rα expression and do not depend on IL-15 for their development or survival. Nevertheless, they remain functionally responsive to IL-12 and IL-15, resulting in enhanced IFN-γ secretion [89]. Intraepithelial ILC1-like cells are enriched in the inflamed intestinal tissue of CD patients and have been shown to drive pathology in anti-CD40-induced colitis in Rag1-deficient mice [89].

ILC3s are primarily localized to the intestinal mucosa, where they secrete multiple effector molecules, including RegIIIβ, RegIIIγ, IL-17 A, IL-22, and GM-CSF. Their protective activity is largely attributed to IL-22. This pathway has been demonstrated in mice colonized with segmented filamentous bacteria or invasive Escherichia coli, as well as in animals treated with acetate or propionate, ligands of free fatty acid receptor 2, conditions under which ILC3-derived IL-22 supports epithelial repair [90–92]. The beneficial effects of IL-22 on epithelial cells require activation of AHR [93]. Consistently, AHR-deficient mice display increased susceptibility to colitis and Citrobacter rodentium infection due to reduced intestinal IL-22 production [64, 94, 95]. Colonization with Lactobacillus reuteri D8 further highlights this pathway, as bacterial production of indole-3-aldehyde, an AHR agonist, enhances IL-22 secretion by ILC3s and alleviates DSS-induced colitis [96].

Mechanistic studies indicate that optimal cytokine production by ILC3s relies on distinct intracellular signaling pathways. Although RORγt deficiency does not impair IL-22 production required for maintaining intestinal homeostasis, it significantly reduces the secretion of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor by activated ILC3s, a factor necessary for protection against DSS-induced colitis [97]. In addition, post-transcriptional regulation through the p38α–eIF6–Nsun2 signaling axis is essential for the appropriate expression of protective cytokines, and disruption of this pathway increases susceptibility to intestinal inflammation [98]. SIRT6 has been identified as a negative regulator of IL-22 production in ILC3s; selective deletion of SIRT6 enhances IL-22 secretion without altering ILC3 numbers, thereby conferring increased resistance to DSS-induced colitis [99].

Recent evidence has identified a population of RORγt-expressing ILCs in anti-CD40-induced colitis that co-express markers associated with both ILC2s and ILC3s and produce IL-10. Targeted deletion of IL-10 in these cells exacerbates both innate and adaptive immune-driven colitis, highlighting their regulatory potential [100].

The abundance of IL-17-producing ILC3s in the intestine is positively regulated by neuropilin-1 (NRP1), a transmembrane protein whose expression is elevated in CD. Loss of NRP1 reduces both the frequency of intestinal ILC3s and their capacity to produce IL-17 A, leading to alterations in the gut microbiota and attenuation of DSS-induced colitis [101]. Furthermore, IL-23 and IL-1β activate the IRE1α/XBP1 stress-response pathway in ILC3s through mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, resulting in enhanced production of IL-17 A and IL-22. IRE1α/XBP1-expressing ILC3s are enriched in experimental colitis and in inflamed intestinal tissue from CD patients, where their frequency correlates positively with responsiveness to ustekinumab, an antibody targeting IL-12/IL-23p40 [102]. Collectively, these findings indicate that ILC3s adopt distinct functional programs in response to environmental and inflammatory cues, thereby playing context-dependent roles in both the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and the development of gut pathology.

Adaptive Immune Dysregulation in Crohn’s Disease

The inflamed mucosa in CD is heavily infiltrated by adaptive immune cells, including T and B lymphocytes, memory T cells, T follicular helper cells, and stem-like CD4⁺ T cells. These cells are mainly recruited from the circulation in response to chemokines produced in the inflamed tissue. T cell trafficking to the gut also depends on interactions between integrins (e.g., α4β7) and endothelial ligands [i.e., Mucosal Vascular Addressin Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1)]. Lymphocyte accumulation is further enhanced by apoptosis resistance, which is mainly mediated by locally produced cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-15, and IL-21) [103, 104]. Mucosal T cells display activation markers, express various transcription factors, and secrete multiple effector cytokines. Historically, CD was considered a Th1-mediated disease, with high IFN-γ production and elevated Th1 transcription factors (i.e., Stat4, T-bet) [105, 106]. Recent studies, however, revealed that CD mucosa harbors additional Th subsets, such as Th9 cells, Th17 cells and T follicular helper cells, which likely amplify inflammation [107, 108].

In CD, the major driver of Th1 differentiation is IL-12 [44], whereas Th17 cell differentiation and expansion require TGF-β1 and Stat3-activating cytokines (i.e., IL-6, IL-21, and IL-23) [108, 109]. Microbiota and microbial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids, and indole derivatives, further shape Th17 development. Indeed, germ-free mice display reduced intestinal T cells, restored by colonization with commensals. Transferring IBD-associated microbiota into germ-free mice increases Th17 cells, decreases Tregs, and exacerbates colitis [110]. Specific microbes, such as segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), and bacterial components, such as SFB flagellins, strongly induce Th17 responses via epithelial production of serum amyloid A (SAA), which can substitute for TGF-β1 in Th17 induction [111, 112]. Other bacteria, including Propionibacterium, Prevotella, and Lactobacillus casei, similarly promote Th17 accumulation [113–115]. CD mucosa contains also high numbers of IL-17-producing CD8 + T cells (Tc17 cells), which express a distinct immune signature (CD6high, CD39, CD69, PD-1, CD27low) linked to disease activity [116]. Microbiota-reactive CD4⁺ memory T cells are normally present in the gut but expand in CD, where they produce high levels of IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-17 A, and TNF-α, and their abundance correlates with disease activity. CD8⁺ memory T cells, predominantly in the epithelium, express markers like CD49a, CD69, and CD103, which facilitate tissue retention. Cytokines such as TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-33 promote memory T cell differentiation, whereas IL-12 and IFN-β inhibit it [117].

A disruption of the balance between effector T cells and Tregs also marks CD-associated inflammation. Treg frequency is often increased, yet effector T cells may resist to Treg-mediated suppression due to Smad7-mediated inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling [56]. Tregs can also acquire effector-like properties (e.g., Th17-like cells), thus reducing their suppressive capacity [118]. Finally, in CD, Tregs express lower α4β7 integrin, limiting gut homing and function [119].

B cells and plasma cells accumulate in the CD mucosa, and are supposed to contribute to CD-associated tissue damage. In the inflamed ileum and colon of CD patients, IgA production is reduced, whereas IgG production is increased compared with that in normal controls [120]. IgG4 + plasma cells are abundant in areas with high histologic score of fibrosis [121], although it remains to be determined whether these cells contribute to fibrogenesis or merely represent an epiphenomenon of the fibrotic process. CD patients produce elevated levels of IgG and IgA antibodies against microbial antigens, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, flagellin, and E. coli [122–124]. Granzyme B–expressing plasmablasts, which can kill intestinal epithelial cells in vitro, infiltrate the mucosa of CD patients [107]; however, the contribution of these cells to tissue damage in CD remains to be validated.

Ectopic lymphoid formations, also known as tertiary lymphoid tissues, are observed in the inflamed intestines of CD patients. These formations, usually not found in healthy tissues, serve as locations where B cells and T cells become activated and interact, thereby enhancing the immune reaction. The development of these clusters is believed to be influenced by cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-17) [125], with their occurrence linked to disease severity and connected to resistance against specific treatments [126]. Additionally, these formations facilitate the attraction of B cells and their maturation, into IgG4 plasmablasts. IgG4 plasma cells produce platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), which could stimulate PDGF-receptor-expressing fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, thereby resulting in uncontrolled fibrosis [127].

Interactions Between Immune Cells and Stromal Cells are Crucial in Expanding the Mucosal Inflammation and Promoting Tissue Damage

The stromal section, consisting of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells offers both integrity and functional assistance to the intestinal tissue. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts react strongly to cues and play a role, in tissue repair and healing of wounds. In CD, upon activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-17, and IL-21), fibroblasts proliferate, migrate, and differentiate into myofibroblasts, which play a role in the breakdown of the epithelial barrier and the development of ulcers in CD. This process is mainly driven by their secretion of MMPs, such, as MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-12, which degrade the extracellular matrix (ECM) thus inducing the detachment of epithelial cells (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the role of stromal cells in Crohn’s disease (CD). In the CD mucosa, stromal cells amplify inflammation by releasing cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), which inhibit T-cell apoptosis, as well as chemokines—including chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), and CXCL10—that promote the recruitment of immune cells from the circulation to sites of inflammation. In addition, stromal cells are a major source of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), enzymes responsible for extracellular matrix degradation, thereby contributing to ulcer and fistula formation. Furthermore, stromal cells secrete profibrogenic factors, such as collagen and fibronectin, which facilitate the development of intestinal strictures

As noted above, the release of these MMPs is primarily induced by cytokines produced by immune cells, underscoring how interactions between immune and stromal cells can exacerbate tissue injury [128–131]. Mucosal regions in CD showing epithelial damage are enriched in IL-11-positive inflammatory fibroblasts, suggesting that these cells may contribute to ulcer formation [132, 133]. These cells also expressed cytokines and chemokines induced in proximity to T cells or epithelial cells, suggesting that inflammatory fibroblasts help orchestrate immune responses [133]. Indeed, intestinal fibroblasts release chemokines like CCL2, CXCL1 and CXCL10 that draw cells, including monocytes, T lymphocytes, and neutrophils to inflammatory regions [134, 135]. Furthermore, fibroblasts secrete cytokines such as IL-6, which support the survival and maintenance of inflammatory cells, within the impacted tissue [136] (Fig. 1).

Activated fibroblasts produce also ECM components such as collagen, fibronectin, and laminin [137], thus contributing to the formation of strictures. Creeping fat, the expansion and invasion of mesenteric adipose tissue in and around regions of the inflamed gut, is a feature of CD. Notably, creeping fat contains a population of fibroblasts expressing CTHRC1 that exhibit a transcriptional profile enriched for YAP/TAZ pathway components, cytoskeletal remodeling genes, and profibrotic effector programs [138]. These cells can respond to mechanosensitive priming with enhanced deposition of ECM thus exacerbating tissue rigidity and fibrostricturing processes [138].

Single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses of CD samples revealed that intestinal strictures are marked by a depletion of intraepithelial CD8⁺ T cells, absorptive enterocytes, and resident fibroblasts, alongside an expansion of immune cell populations. These include IgG⁺ plasma cells, CCR7-hi CD4 + T cells consistent with naïve or central memory phenotypes, and IL-11–expressing inflammatory fibroblasts. Analysis of ligand-receptor interactions suggests that IL-1 drives inflammatory fibroblast polarization, while CCL2 facilitates monocyte co-localization [133]. Accordingly, serum IL-11 levels are higher in stricturing than in non-stricturing CD and correlate with an increased risk of surgical intervention [139].

Mucosal myofibroblasts expressing MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-9 are also abundant in fistulous tracts, supporting their involvement in the development of such lesions. Recent single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies of rectal tissue from perianal fistulas have shown active interaction between myeloid and stromal cells and highlight CHI3L1 as one of the top upregulated genes in stromal cells within fistulas. These cells express destructive and fibrotic gene signatures, implying they have dual functions in tissue remodeling and disease processes [140]. Further scRNA-seq studies by McGregor et al. has identified nine distinct fibroblast subsets within fistulating CD tissue. Notably, a subset of fibroblasts, termed FAS cells, displays gene expression profiles associated with fibrosis, tissue remodeling, and the secretion of multiple cytokines and chemokines, suggesting their involvement in ECM remodeling, tissue repair, and immune modulation. Analysis of transcription factors showed that TWIST1 activates fibrotic mechanisms in these cells while the transcription factor Odd-skipped related 2 (OSR2) controls pathways that encourage ECM breakdown aiding epithelial recovery and tissue remodeling. FAS cells share also characteristics with inflammatory fibroblasts, including CHI3L1 expression, and can establish localized inflammatory niches through interactions with SPP1-positive macrophages and other immune populations [141].

More recently, Gudiño and colleagues demonstrated that the rectal mucosa of patients with perianal fistulising CD displays distinct cellular and transcriptomic changes driven by TL1A signaling in CD4⁺ T cells. In this context, TL1A promotes lymphotoxin-β production which, together with IL-22, induces a TNF-α–independent gene program associated with perianal fistulising disease, characterized by the upregulation of MMPs in fibroblasts [142].

Collectively, these studies indicate that inflamed CD tissue harbors heterogeneous fibroblast populations, with some subsets contributing to epithelial injury and others participating in tissue repair, fibrosis, and fistula tract formation. Therapeutically, selectively targeting pathogenic fibroblast subsets may offer a promising approach for the treatment of distinct CD phenotypes.

Novel Therapeutic Targets

The growing resolution with which the mucosal immune system can be analyzed (e.g., single-cell transcriptomics, spatial profiling, and high-parameter cytometry) has reshaped our understanding of CD and is driving innovation in therapeutic strategies. Historically, treatment has focused on targeting inflammatory cytokines or lymphocyte trafficking. Anti-TNF agents (e.g., infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) remain widely used and highly effective for inducing and maintaining remission. The development of anti-IL-12/23p40 therapy (ustekinumab) and, more recently, selective IL-23p19 inhibitors (risankizumab, guselkumab, mirikizumab) reflects the centrality of the IL-23 axis in sustaining pathogenic Th17 and ILC3 responses. These agents have shown clinically meaningful rates of endoscopic and histologic improvement, supporting the relevance of this pathway across CD phenotypes. Anti-integrin therapy, particularly vedolizumab (α4β7 inhibitor), provides gut-selective immunosuppression by inhibiting T lymphocyte trafficking to the intestinal mucosa. Moreover, vedolizumab modulates innate immunity by altering macrophage populations and the expression of molecules involved in microbial sensing and chemoattraction [143]. By tracking intravenously administered fluorescently labeled vedolizumab in the gut, Gabriëls and colleagues showed that the drug binds to several immune cell populations, including plasma cells, macrophages, and eosinophils, whereas little or no binding to T cells was detected. These observations suggest that the therapeutic effects of vedolizumab are not mediated exclusively through T cells [144]. Additional benefit comes from small molecules, such as JAK inhibitors (e.g., upadacitinib) that suppress a wide cytokine network, while S1P receptor modulators (e.g., ozanimod) that restrict egress of lymphocytes from secondary lymphoid organs represent another valid therapeutic option [145]. Nonetheless, primary non-response and loss of response affect a substantial proportion of patients, thus indicating the necessity for novel treatments.

The main findings discussed in this article suggest that targeting additional effector molecules involved in CD pathogenesis could offer new therapeutic strategies, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Emerging therapeutic targets for Crohn’s disease. AhR: Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor, CHI3L1: Chitinase 3-Like 1, NLRP3: NACHT, LRR and PYRIN domain containing 3, PAD4: Peptidylarginine deiminase 4, PD-L1: Programmed Death-Ligand 1, SIRT1: Sirtuin 1, Smad-7: Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 7, TGFβ1: Transforming Growth Factor β11, TL1A: Tumor necrosis factor-like ligand 1 A, TAZ: transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif, TWIST1: Twist Family bHLH Transcription Factor 1, YAP: Yes-associated protein

These approaches aim to intervene earlier in the inflammatory cascade or selectively reprogram cellular niches that sustain chronic inflammation. Several upstream innate immune nodes could be promising druggable checkpoints. For instance, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, caspase-1 blockers, and PAD4 inhibitors targeting NETosis could help inhibit the initial cytokine bursts that activate downstream adaptive pathways and promote tissue destruction [47, 48, 146]. Further approaches include the targeting of intracellular kinases amplifying cytokine production, SIRT1-modulating compounds that restore metabolic restraint of innate activation, and agents that enhance PD-L1 expression or other tolerogenic signals on APCs [147–149]. The AhR pathway is another promising target, because its activation supports Treg differentiation, enhances epithelial barrier repair, and limits pro-inflammatory cytokine production [150]. Furthermore, approaches that normalize Th17/Treg balance, through the use of low-doses of recombinant IL-2 [151] are being evaluated for their capacity to restore physiological immune tolerance without global immunosuppression.

Restoring TGF-β1 signaling is another potential goal of CD therapies. Early phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials have demonstrated both clinical and endoscopic efficacy of Mongersen, an oral Smad7 inhibitor, in patients with active CD [152–156]. However, a phase 3 trial was halted early after a futility analysis indicated that Mongersen was ineffective in these patients [157]. The reasons for the discrepancies across the clinical trials are not well understood, although recent evidence indicates that different batches of Mongersen used in the phase 3 study had chemical variations, with some failing to effectively downregulate Smad7 expression [158]. Therefore, new clinical studies using more potent Smad7 inhibitors are needed to further assess its role in CD.

One of the most significant conceptual advances is the recognition that stromal cell subsets, rather than being passive bystanders, actively orchestrate chronic inflammation, thus contributing to the formation of ulcers, fibrosis, and fistulas. This could inspire new therapeutic avenues aimed at disrupting fibroblast-immune cell crosstalk. Promising targets include CHI3L1 signaling, TWIST1-driven profibrotic programs, and fibroblast-derived chemokine networks (e.g., CCL2, CXCL10) that sustain immune infiltration [159–161]. The discovery of inflammatory fibroblast subsets, including FAS cells enriched in fistulizing disease, offers an opportunity to selectively inhibit or reprogram stromal populations responsible for maintaining pathogenic microenvironments. Similarly, approaches aimed at blocking SPP1⁺ macrophage-fibroblast interactions or modulating OSR2 or YAP/TAZ-regulated pathways may allow specific treatment of fibrosis and fistulas. Fibroblast activation protein, IL-7 receptor, and transcription factor AP-2 gamma could be additional targets to treat the fibrostricturing phenotype [162]. In this context, it is also important to note that growing evidence suggests that TL1A plays a role in propagating signals, which promote Th9 cell-mediated gut inflammation, fibrosis, and fistula formation [163]. Therefore, inhibiting TL1A may offer a promising strategy for managing inflammatory, fibrostricturing, and fistulizing CD [164, 165].

Conclusions

Accumulating evidence reinforces the notion that CD does not arise from a single pathogenic mechanism, but rather, from the interplay of multiple biological pathways that collectively alter the intestinal homeostasis. Several genetic changes and environmental factors can promote defects in epithelial barrier integrity and microbial detection/response, leading to inappropriately controlled crosstalk between immune cells and non-immune cells, thus causing varying degrees of mucosal injury, fibrosis, and complications. Nonetheless, we do not yet know the exact sequence of molecular events that activate the pathogenic immune response, and whether the pathogenic immune alterations occur stably in all patients. Notably, the profile of effector cytokines can vary over time even in the same patient [166], and emerging evidence suggests that different immune responses can drive similar morphological lesions [167], thus explaining why not all patients respond to the current drugs.

The mechanistic insights emerging from recent studies emphasize the role of specific cell subsets in the propagation of gut-damaging immune responses, and suggest a shift in therapeutic strategies. For example, therapies like CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, which is showing promise in refractory UC, could represent a more targeted approach by selectively modulating immune responses that are resistant to current drugs [167, 168]. Additionally, restoring microbial-immune tolerance through microbiota-based interventions or antigen-specific therapies could offer another avenue for combating the pathological inflammation. An alternative strategy involves combination therapies that target multiple inflammatory pathways or simultaneously suppress effector signaling while restoring epithelial regulatory functions. At the same time, it is clear that a more comprehensive understanding of the complex biological mechanisms underlying CD is essential for the development of personalized and more effective therapeutic approaches tailored to the distinct pathophysiological characteristics of individual patients [169, 170].

Author Contributions

S.S. and R.F. wrote the original draft; P.D.V., I.M., and G.M. conducted the bibliographic research and edited the final draft.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

Giovanni Monteleone served as a consultant for First Wave BioPharma and Giuliani SpA and as a speaker for Takeda, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, Galapagos, and Pfizer and filed a patent related to the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with Smad7 antisense oligonu-cleotides. Irene Marafini served as a consultant and speaker for Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Galapagos.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Dolinger, M., J. Torres, and S. Vermeire. 2024. Crohn’s Disease. Lancet 403:1177–1191. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02586-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wiertsema, S. P., J. van Bergenhenegouwen, J. Garssen, and L. M. J. Knippels. 2021. The Interplay between the Gut Microbiome and the Immune System in the Context of Infectious Diseases throughout Life and the Role of Nutrition in Optimizing Treatment Strategies. Nutrients 13:1–14. 10.3390/nu13030886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahluwalia, B., M. K. Magnusson, and L. Öhman. 2017. Mucosal Immune System of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Maintaining Balance between the Good and the Bad. Scandinavian Journal Of Gastroenterology 52:1185–1193. 10.1080/00365521.2017.1349173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jostins, L., S. Ripke, R. K. Weersma, R. H. Duerr, D. P. McGovern, K. Y. Hui, J. C. Lee, L. P. Schumm, Y. Sharma, C. A. Anderson, J. Essers, M. Mitrovic, K. Ning, I. Cleynen, E. Theatre, S. L. Spain, S. Raychaudhuri, P. Goyette, Z. Wei, C. Abraham, J. P. Achkar, T. Ahmad, L. Amininejad, and C. J. Ananthakr. 2012. Host-Microbe Interactions Have Shaped the Genetic Architecture of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nature 491:119–124. 10.1038/nature11582.Host-microbe [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Torres, J., J. Halfvarson, I. Rodríguez-Lago, C. R. H. Hedin, T. Jess, M. Dubinsky, K. Croitoru, and J. F. Colombel. 2021. Results of the Seventh Scientific Workshop of ECCO: Precision Medicine in IBD-Prediction and Prevention of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 15:1443–1454. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ogura, Y., D. K. Bonen, N. Inohara, D. L. Nicolae, F. F. Chen, R. Ramos, H. Britton, T. Moran, R. Karaliuskas, and R. H. Duerr et al. 2001. A Frameshift Mutation in NOD2 Associated with Susceptibility to Crohn’s Disease. Nature 411:603–606. 10.1038/35079114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hugot, J. P., M. Chamaillard, H. Zouali, S. Lesage, J. P. Cézard, J. Belaiche, S. Almer, C. Tysk, C. A. O’morain, and M. Gassull et al. 2001. Association of NOD2 Leucine-Rich Repeat Variants with Susceptibility to Crohn’s Disease. Nature 411:599–603. 10.1038/35079107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ogura, Y., S. Lala, W. Xin, E. Smith, T. A. Dowds, F. F. Chen, E. Zimmermann, M. Tretiakova, J. H. Cho, and J. Hart et al. 2003. Expression of NOD2 in Paneth Cells: A Possible Link to Crohn’s Ileitis. Gut 52:1591–1597. 10.1136/gut.52.11.1591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aldhous, M. C., E. R. Nimmo, and J. Satsangi. 2003. NOD2/CARD15 and the Paneth Cell: Another Piece in the Genetic Jigsaw of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 52:1533–1535. 10.1136/gut.52.11.1533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biswas, A., Y. J. Liu, L. Hao, A. Mizoguchi, N. H. Salzman, C. L. Bevins, and K. S. Kobayashi. 2010. Induction and Rescue of Nod2-Dependent Th1-Driven Granulomatous Inflammation of the Ileum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:14739–14744. 10.1073/pnas.1003363107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Watanabe, T., A. Kitani, and P. J. Murray. 2004. NOD2 Is a Negative Regulator of Toll-like Receptor 2-Mediated T Helper Type 1 Responses. Nature Immunology 5(8):800–808. 10.1038/ni1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang, H., Fang, M., Jostins, L., Umićević Mirkov, M., Boucher, G., Anderson, C. A., Andersen, V., Cleynen, I., Cortes, A., Crins, F., D'Amato, M., Deffontaine, V., Dmitrieva, J., Docampo, E., Elansary, M., Farh, K. K., Franke, A., Gori, A. S., Goyette, P., Halfvarson, J., Haritunians, T., Knight, J., Lawrance, I. C., Lees, C. W., Louis, E., Mariman, R., Meuwissen, T., Mni, M., Momozawa, Y., Parkes, M., Spain, S. L., Théâtre, E., Trynka, G., Satsangi, J., van Sommeren, S., Vermeire, S., Xavier, R. J., Weersma, R. K., Duerr, R. H., Mathew, C. G., Rioux, J. D., McGovern, D. P. B., Cho, J. H., Georges, M., Daly, M. J., and J. C. Barrett. 2017. Fine-mapping inflammatory bowel disease Loci to single-variant resolution. Nature 547:173–178. 10.1038/nature22969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Becker, C., S. Wirtz, and M. F. Neurath. 2005. Stepwise Regulation of TH1 Responses in Autoimmunity: IL-12-Related Cytokines and Their Receptors. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 11:755–764. 10.1097/01.MIB.0000172808.03877.4d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jang, K. K., T. Heaney, M. London, Y. Ding, G. Putzel, D. Ercelen, Y. Chen, J. Axelrad, S. Gurunathan, and C. Zhou et al. 2023. Antimicrobial overproduction sustains intestinal inflammation by inhibiting Enterococcus colonization. Cell Host & Microbe 31:1450–1468. 10.1016/j.chom.2023.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Homer, C. R., A. L. Richmond, N. A. Rebert, J. Achkar, and C. McDonald. 2010. ATG16L1 and NOD2 Interact in an Autophagy-Dependent Antibacterial Pathway Implicated in Crohn’s Disease Pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 139:1630–1641. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simovic, I., I. Hilmi, R. T. Ng, K. S. Chew, S. Y. Wong, W. S. Lee, S. Riordan, and N. Castaño-Rodríguez. 2024. ATG16L1 Rs2241880/T300A Increases Susceptibility to Perianal Crohn’s Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Risk and Clinical Outcomes. United Eur Gastroenterol J 12:103–121. 10.1002/ueg2.12477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Travassos, L. H., L. A. M. Carneiro, M. Ramjeet, S. Hussey, Y. G. Kim, J. G. Magalhes, L. Yuan, F. Soares, E. Chea, and L. Le Bourhis et al. 2010. Nod1 and Nod2 Direct Autophagy by Recruiting ATG16L1 to the Plasma Membrane at the Site of Bacterial Entry. Nature Immunology 11:55–62. 10.1038/ni.1823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pierre Lapaquette, Anne-Lise, Alan Glasser, Ramnik J. Huett, and Xavier. 2010. Crohn’s Disease-Associated Adherent-Invasive E. Coli Are Selectively Favoured by Impaired Autophagy to Replicate Intracellularly. Cellular Microbiology 12:99–113. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01381.x.Crohn [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghazi, H. F., N. A. Mohammed, and R. J. Hussein. 2015. Detection of Norovirus in Association with ATG16L1 T300A Genetic Variant in Crohn’s. International Journal of Advanced Research 3:623–628. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matsuzawa-Ishimoto, Y., Y. Shono, L. E. Gomez, V. M. Hubbard-Lucey, M. Cammer, J. Neil, M. Z. Dewan, S. R. Lieberman, A. Lazrak, and J. M. Marinis et al. 2017. Autophagy Protein ATG16L1 Prevents Necroptosis in the Intestinal Epithelium. Journal Of Experimental Medicine 214:3687–3705. 10.1084/jem.20170558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mehto, S., K. K. Jena, P. Nath, S. Chauhan, S. P. Kolapalli, S. K. Das, P. K. Sahoo, A. Jain, G. A. Taylor, and S. Chauhan. 2019. The Crohn’s Disease Risk Factor IRGM Limits NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation by Impeding Its Assembly and by Mediating Its Selective Autophagy. Molecular Cell 73:429–445e7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamazaki, K., D. McGovern, J. Ragoussis, M. Paolucci, H. Butler, D. Jewell, L. Cardon, M. Takazoe, T. Tanaka, and T. Ichimori et al. 2005. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in TNFSF15 Confer Susceptibility to Crohn’s Disease. Human Molecular Genetics 14:3499–3506. 10.1093/hmg/ddi379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang, D. H., S. K. Yang, K. Song, M. Hong, S. H. Park, H. S. Lee, J. B. Kim, H. J. Lee, S. K. Park, and K. W. Jung et al. 2014. TNFSF15 Is an Independent Predictor for the Development of Crohn’s Disease-Related Complications in Koreans. J Crohn’s Colitis 8:1315–1326. 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aleksejs Sazonovs, Christine R., R. Stevens, K. Guhan, B. Venkataraman, T. Avila, Tariq Maria, Matthieu Abreu, A. N. A. Ahmad, Allez, Gil, and Atzmon et al. 2022. Large-Scale Sequencing Identifies Multiple Genes and Rare Variants Associated with Crohn’s Disease Susceptibility. Nature Genetics 54(9):1275–1283. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu, Z., R. Liu, H. Gao, S. Jung, X. Gao, R. Sun, X. Liu, Y. Kim, H. Lee, and Y. Kawai et al. 2023. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Breastfeeding and the Risk of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. 55:796–806. 10.1038/s41588-023-01384-0 [DOI]
  • 26.Liu, J. Z., and S. Sommeren. 2016. Association Analyses Identify 38 Susceptibility Loci for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Highlight Shared Genetic Risk across Populations. Nature Genetics 47:979–986. 10.1038/ng.3359. HuangH.Ng, S.C.; Alberts, R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hellsing, C., A. K. Örtqvist, E. Hagel, C. Mesas-Burgos, U. O. Gustafsson, and A. L. Granström. 2022. Delivery Mode and Risk of Gastrointestinal Disease in the Offspring. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 101:1146–1152. 10.1111/aogs.14427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bernstein, C. N. 2013. Antibiotic Use and the Risk of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterologia Y Hepatologia 9:393–395. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Inchingolo, F., Inchingolo, A. D., Palumbo, I., Trilli, I., Guglielmo, M., Mancini, A., Palermo, A., Inchingolo, A. M., and G. Dipalma. 2024. The impact of cesarean section delivery on intestinal microbiota: Mechanisms, consequences, and perspectives—A systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:1055. 10.3390/ijms25021055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Kwon, Y., Y. S. Cho, Y. M. Lee, S. J. Kim, J. Bae, and S. J. Jeong. 2022. Changes to Gut Microbiota Following Systemic Antibiotic Administration in Infants. Antibiotics 11:1–12. 10.3390/antibiotics11040470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ivan Monteleone, Irene, Vincenzo Marafini, Davide Di Dinallo, Edoardo Fusco, Francesca Troncone, and F. L. Zorzi. 2016. Sodium Chloride-Enriched Diet Enhances Inflammatory Cytokine Production and Exacerbates Experimental Colitis in Mice. J Crohn’s Colitis 11:237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ananthakrishnan, A. N., H. Khalili, G. G. Konijeti, L. M. Higuchi, P. De Silva, C. S. Fuchs, W. C. Willett, J. M. Richter, and A. T. Chan. 2014. Long-Term Intake of Dietary Fat and Risk of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease. Gut 63:776–784. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laffin, M., R. Fedorak, A. Zalasky, H. Park, A. Gill, A. Agrawal, A. Keshteli, N. Hotte, and K. L. Madsen. 2019. A High-Sugar Diet Rapidly Enhances Susceptibility to Colitis via Depletion of Luminal Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Mice. Scientific Reports 9:1–11. 10.1038/s41598-019-48749-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trakman, G. L., W. Y. Y. Lin, A. L. Hamilton, A. L. W. Brien, A. Stanley, J. Y. Ching, J. Yu, J. W. Y. Mak, Y. Sun, and J. Niu et al. 2022. Processed Food as a Risk Factor for the Development and Perpetuation of Crohn ’ s Disease — The ENIGMA Study. Nutrients 14(17):362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bancil, A. S., A. M. Sandall, M. Rossi, B. Chassaing, and J. O. Lindsay. 2021. W.K. Food Additive Emulsifiers and Their Impact on Gut Microbiome, Permeability, and Inflammation: Mechanistic Insights in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 15(6):1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Laudisi, F., D. Di Fusco, V. Dinallo, C. Stol, A. Grazia, I. Di, A. Mara, A. Colantoni, C. Ortenzi, Alteri, and F. Guerrieri et al. 2019. The Food Additive Maltodextrin Promotes Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Driven Mucus Depletion and Exacerbates Intestinal Inflammation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(2):457–454. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Severino, A., E. Tohumcu, L. Tamai, P. Dargenio, S. Porcari, D. Rondinella, I. Venturini, M. Maida, A. Gasbarrini, and G. Cammarota et al. 2024. The Microbiome-Driven Impact of Western Diet in the Development of Noncommunicable Chronic Disorders. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 72:101923. 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanmarco, L. M., C. Chao, Y. Wang, J. E. Kenison, Z. Li, J. M. Rone, C. M. Rejano-gordillo, C. M. Polonio, C. Gutierrez-vazquez, and G. Piester et al. 2023. Identification of Environmental Factors That Promote Intestinal Inflammation. Nature 611:801–809. 10.1038/s41586-022-05308-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Papoutsopoulou, S., J. Satsangi, B. J. Campbell, and C. S. Probert. 2020. Review Article: Impact of Cigarette Smoking on Intestinal Inflammation—Direct and Indirect Mechanisms. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 51:1268–1285. 10.1111/apt.15774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Monteleone, G., D. Fina, R. Caruso, and F. Pallone. 2006. New Mediators of Immunity and Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Current Opinion In Gastroenterology 22:361–364. 10.1097/01.mog.0000231808.10773.8e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Marafini, I., S. Sedda, V. Dinallo, and G. Monteleone. 2019. Inflammatory Cytokines: From Discoveries to Therapies in IBD. Expert Opinion On Biological Therapy 19:1207–1217. 10.1080/14712598.2019.1652267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Franzé, E., I. Monteleone, M. L. Cupi, P. Mancia, F. Caprioli, I. Marafini, A. Colantoni, A. Ortenzi, F. Laudisi, and G. Sica et al. 2015. Interleukin-34 Sustains Inflammatory Pathways in the Gut. Clinical Science 129:271–280. 10.1042/CS20150132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tettoni, E., R. Gabbiadini, A. Dal Buono, G. Privitera, V. Vadalà, G. Migliorisi, P. Bertoli, A. Quadarella, C. Bezzio, and Armuzzi. 2025. A. TL1A as a Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Exploring Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. International Journal Of Molecular Sciences 26:1–15. 10.3390/ijms26115017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pallone, F., and G. Monteleone. 1998. Interleukin 12 and Th1 Responses in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 43:735–736. 10.1136/gut.43.6.735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zheng, D., Liwinski, T., and E. Elinav. 2020. Inflammasome activation and regulation: Toward a better understanding of complex mechanisms. Cell Discovery 6:36. 10.1038/s41421-020-0167-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Yang, W., Y. Wang, T. Wang, C. Li, L. Shi, P. Zhang, Y. Yin, K. Tao, and R. Li. 2023. Protective Effects of IRG1/Itaconate on Acute Colitis through the Inhibition of Gasdermins-Mediated Pyroptosis and Inflammation Response. Genes Dis 10:1552–1563. 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dhani, S., Y. Zhao, and B. A. Zhivotovsky. 2021. Long Way to Go: Caspase Inhibitors in Clinical Use. Cell Death And Disease 12:1–13. 10.1038/s41419-021-04240-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ali, F. E. M., I. M. Ibrahim, O. M. Ghogar, E. K. Abd-Alhameed, H. S. Althagafy, and E. H. M. Hassanein. 2023. Therapeutic Interventions Target the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Ulcerative Colitis: Comprehensive Study. World Journal Of Gastroenterology 29:1026–1053. 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Luu, L. D. W., A. Pandey, S. Paramsothy, C. Ngo, N. Castaño-Rodríguez, C. Liu, M. A. Kamm, T. J. Borody, S. M. Man, and N. O. Kaakoush. 2024. Profiling the Colonic Mucosal Response to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Identifies a Role for GBP5 in Colitis in Humans and Mice. Nature Communications 15:2645. 10.1038/s41467-024-46983-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Mu, J., K. Maeda, A. Ohashi, T. Urano, Y. Nariai, H. Kamino, M. Nakamura, T. Yamamura, T. Sawada, and E. Ishikawa et al. 2024. Monoclonal Antibodies Against Mature Interleukin-18 Ameliorate Colitis and Repair Goblet Cell Function. Digestive Diseases And Sciences 69:2573–2585. 10.1007/s10620-024-08453-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liso, M., G. Verna, E. Cavalcanti, S. De Santis, R. Armentano, A. Tafaro, A. Lippolis, P. Campiglia, A. Gasbarrini, and M. Mastronardi et al. 2022. Interleukin 1β Blockade Reduces Intestinal Inflammation in a Murine Model of Tumor Necrosis Factor–Independent Ulcerative Colitis. Cmgh 14:151–171. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shaul, E., M. A. Conrad, N. Dawany, T. Patel, M. C. Canavan, A. Baccarella, S. Weinbrom, D. Aleynick, and K. E. Sullivan. 2022. K.J. Canakinumab for the Treatment of Autoinflammatory Very Early Onset- in Fl Ammatory Bowel Disease. Frontiers In Immunology 13(972114). 10.3389/fimmu.2022.972114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Dinallo, V., D. Di Fusco, A. Di Grazia, F. Laudisi, E. Troncone, G. Di Maggio, E. Franzè, I. Marafini, A. Colantoni, and A. Ortenzi et al. 2022. The Deubiquitinating Enzyme OTUD5 Sustains Inflammatory Cytokine Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 16:122–132. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Caruso, R., I. Marafini, E. Franzè, C. Stolfi, F. Zorzi, I. Monteleone, F. Caprioli, A. Colantoni, M. Sarra, and S. Sedda et al. 2014. Defective Expression of SIRT1 Contributes to Sustain Inflammatory Pathways in the Gut. Mucosal Immunology 7:1467–1479. 10.1038/mi.2014.35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Francisco, L. M., V. H. Salinas, K. E. Brown, V. K. Vanguri, G. J. Freeman, V. K. Kuchroo, and A. H. Sharpe. 2009. PD-L1 Regulates the Development, Maintenance, and Function of Induced Regulatory T Cells. Journal Of Experimental Medicine 206:3015–3029. 10.1084/jem.20090847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Troncone, E., I. Marafini, C. Stolfi, and G. Monteleone. 2018. Transforming Growth Factor-Β1/Smad7 in Intestinal Immunity, Inflammation, and Cancer. Frontiers In Immunology 9:4–9. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garo, L. P., A. K. Ajay, M. Fujiwara, V. Beynon, C. Kuhn, G. Gabriely, S. Sadhukan, R. Raheja, S. Rubino, and H. L. Weiner. 2019. Smad7 Controls Immunoregulatory PDL2/1-PD1 Signaling in Intestinal Inflammation and Autoimmunity. Cell Rep 28:3353–3366. 10.1002/hep.30150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Soumelis, V., P. A. Reche, H. Kanzler, W. Yuan, G. Edward, B. Homey, M. Gilliet, S. Ho, S. Antonenko, A. Lauerma, K. Smith, D. Gorman, S. Zurawski, J. Abrams, S. Menon, T. McClanahan, R. de Waal-Malefyt Rd, F. Bazan, and R. A. Kastelein. 2002. Human Epithelial Cells Trigger Dendritic Cell Mediated Allergic Inflammation by Producing TSLP. Nature Immunology 3(7):673–678. 10.1038/ni805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rimoldi, M., M. Chieppa, V. Salucci, F. Avogadri, A. Sonzogni, G. M. Sampietro, A. Nespoli, G. Viale, and P. Allavena. 2005. Intestinal Immune Homeostasis Is Regulated by the Crosstalk between Epithelial Cells and Dendritic Cells. Nature Immunology 6(5):507–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shouval, D. S., D. S. Shouval, J. Ouahed, A. Biswas, J. A. Goettel, B. H. Horwitz, C. Klein, and A. M. Muise. 2014. Interleukin 10 Receptor Signaling: Master Regulator of Intestinal Mucosal Homeostasis in Mice and Humans. Advances In Immunology 122:177–121. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800267-4.00005-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Caruso, R., C. Stolfi, M. Sarra, A. Rizzo, M. C. Fantini, F. Pallone, T. T. MacDonald, and G. Monteleone. 2009. Inhibition of Monocyte-Derived Inflammatory Cytokines by IL-25 Occurs via P38 Map Kinase-Dependent Induction of Socs-3. Blood 113:3512–3519. 10.1182/blood-2008-08-172767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Owyang, A. M., C. Zaph, E. H. Wilson, K. J. Guild, T. Mcclanahan, H. R. P. Miller, D. J. Cua, M. Goldschmidt, C. A. Hunter, and R. A. Kastelein et al. 2006. Interleukin 25 Regulates Type 2 Cytokine- Dependent Immunity and Limits Chronic Infl Ammation in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Journal Of Experimental Medicine 203:843–849. 10.1084/jem.20051496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ostrand-Rosenberg, S., and S. P. Myeloid-Derived. 2009. Suppressor Cells: Linking Inflammation and Cancer. The Journal Of Immunology 182(8):449. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ju Qiu, Jennifer J., Xiaohuan Heller, Zong-ming E Guo, Kamonwan Chen, and Fish; Yang-Xin Fu. 2012. The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulates Gut Immunity through Modulation of Innate Lymphoid Cells. Immunity 36:92–104. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mellor, A. L., and D. H. Munn. 2004. IDO expression by dendritic cells: tolerance and tryptophan catabolism. Nature Reviews Immunology 4:762–774. 10.1038/nri1457 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mezrich, J. D., J. H. Fechner, X. Zhang, B. P. Johnson, and J. William. 2011. HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR CAN GENERATE REGULATORY T. The Journal Of Immunology 185:3190–3198. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Therrien, A., L. Chapuy, M. Bsat, M. Rubio, G. Bernard, E. Arslanian, K. Orlicka, A. Weber, B. P. Panzini, and J. Dorais et al. 2019. Recruitment of Activated Neutrophils Correlates with Disease Severity in Adult Crohn’s Disease. Clinical And Experimental Immunology 195:251–264. 10.1111/cei.13226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pai, R. K., D. J. Hartman, C. R. Rivers, M. Regueiro, M. Schwartz, D. G. Binion, and R. K. Pai. 2020. Complete Resolution of Mucosal Neutrophils Associates With Improved Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology 18(e5):2510–2517. 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bryant, R. V., D. C. Burger, J. Delo, A. J. Walsh, S. Thomas, A. Von Herbay, O. C. Buchel, L. White, O. Brain, and S. Keshav et al. 2016. Beyond Endoscopic Mucosal Healing in UC: Histological Remission Better Predicts Corticosteroid Use and Hospitalisation over 6 Years of Follow-Up. Gut 65:408–414. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Walsham, N. E., and R. A. Sherwood. 2016. Fecal Calprotectin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical And Experimental Gastroenterology 9:21–29. 10.2147/CEG.S51902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chen, T., J. Liu, R. Hang, Q. Chen, D. Wang, and Neutrophils. 2025. From Inflammatory Bowel Disease to Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer. J Inflamm Res 18:925–947. 10.2147/JIR.S497701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Noseykina, E. M., I. A. Schepetkin, and D. N. Atochin. 2021. Molecular Mechanisms for Regulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis under Normal and Pathological Conditions. Journal Of Evolutionary Biochemistry And Physiology 57:429–450. 10.1134/s0022093021030017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kobayashi, S. D., F. R. DeLeo, and M. T. Quinn. 2023. Microbes and the Fate of Neutrophils. Immunological Reviews 314:210–228. 10.1111/imr.13163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.El Kebira, D., P. Gjorstrup, and J. G. Filepa. 2012. Resolvin E1 Promotes Phagocytosis-Induced Neutrophil Apoptosis and Accelerates Resolution of Pulmonary Inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109:14983–14988. 10.1073/pnas.1206641109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Schett, G., and M. F. Neurath. 2018. Resolution of Chronic Inflammatory Disease: Universal and Tissue-Specific Concepts. Nature Communications 9:3261. 10.1038/s41467-018-05800-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 76.Magdalena Herová, Mattia, Claudio Schmid, and M. H. Gemperle. 2015. ChemR23, the Receptor for Chemerin and Resolvin E1, Is Expressed and Functional on M1 but Not on M2 Macrophages. The Journal Of Immunology 194(5):233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vermi, W., Riboldi, E., Wittamer, V., Gentili, F., Luini, W., Marrelli, S., Vecchi, A., Franssen, J. D., Communi, D., Massardi, L., Sironi, M., Mantovani, A., Parmentier, M., Facchetti, F., and S. Sozzani. 2005. Role of ChemR23 in directing the migration of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells to lymphoid organs and inflamed skin. Journal of Experimental Medicine 201:509–515. 10.1084/jem.20041310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 78.Trilleaud, C., V. Gauttier, K. Biteau, I. Girault, L. Belarif, C. Mary, S. Pengam, G. Teppaz, V. Thepenier, and R. Danger et al. 2021. Agonist Anti-ChemR23 MAb Reduces Tissue Neutrophil Accumulation and Triggers Chronic Inflammation Resolution. Science Advances 7:1–14. 10.1126/sciadv.abd1453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Phillipson, M., and P. Kubes. 2019. The Healing Power of Neutrophils. Trends In Immunology 40:635–647. 10.1016/j.it.2019.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Danne, C., J. Skerniskyte, B. Marteyn, H. Sokol, and Neutrophils. 2024. From IBD to the Gut Microbiota. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 21:184–197. 10.1038/s41575-023-00871-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Drury, B., G. Hardisty, R. D. Gray, and G. Ho. 2021. tzer Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Clinical Translation. Cmgh 12:321–333. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wu, Y., and J. Shen. 2024. Unraveling the Intricacies of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathways, Biomarkers, and Promising Therapies. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 80:156–167. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2024.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Boufenzer, A., K. Carrasco, L. Jolly, B. Brustolin, E. Di-pillo, M. Derive, and S. Gibot. 2021. Potentiation of NETs Release Is Novel Characteristic of TREM-1 Activation and the Pharmacological Inhibition of TREM-1 Could Prevent from the Deleterious Consequences of NETs Release in Sepsis. Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 10.1038/s41423-020-00591-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Dinallo, V., I. Marafini, D. Di Fusco, F. Laudisi, E. Franzè, A. Grazia, M. M. Di; Figliuzzi, F. Caprioli, C. Stolfi, and I. Monteleone et al. 2019. Neutrophil Extracellular traps Sustain Inflammatory Signals in Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis 13:772–784. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Eberl, G., Colonna, M., Di Santo, J. P., and A. N. J. McKenzie. 2015. Innate Lymphoid cells: A new paradigm in immunology. Science 348. 10.1126/science.aaa6566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 86.Artis, D., and H. Spits. 2015. The Biology of Innate Lymphoid Cells. Nature 517:293–301. 10.1038/nature14189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Spits, H., and T. Cupedo. 2012. Innate Lymphoid Cells: Emerging Insights in Development, Lineage Relationships, and Function. Annual Review Of Immunology 30:647–675. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bernink, J. H., C. P. Peters, M. Munneke, A. A. Te Velde, S. L. Meijer, K. Weijer, H. S. Hreggvidsdottir, S. E. Heinsbroek, N. Legrand, and C. J. Buskens et al. 2013. Human Type 1 Innate Lymphoid Cells Accumulate in Inflamed Mucosal Tissues. Nature Immunology 14:221–229. 10.1038/ni.2534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Anja Fuchs, William, Jacob S. Vermi, Silvia Lee, Susan Lonardi, R. D. Gilfillan, Marina Newberry, and Cella. 2013. Intraepithelial Type 1 Innate Lymphoid Cells Are a Unique Subset of Cytokine Responsive Interferon-γ-Producing Cells. Immunity 38:769–781. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Teruyuki Sano, Wendy, Jason A. Huang, Yi Hall, Alessandra Yang, Samuel J. Chen, June-Yong Gavzy, Joshua Lee, Emily R. Ziel, Richard Miraldi, A. Bonneau, and D. R. Littman. 2015. An IL-23R/IL-22 Circuit Regulates Epithelial Serum Amyloid A to Promote Local Effector Th17 Responses. Cell 163:381–393. 10.1002/hep.30150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Viladomiu, M., Kivolowitz, C., Abdulhamid, A., Dogan, B., Victorio, D., Castellanos, J. G., Woo, V., Teng, F., Tran, N. L., Sczesnak, A., Chai, C., Kim, M., Diehl, G. E., Ajami, N. J., Petrosino, J. F., Zhou, X. K., Schwartzman, S., Mandl, L. A., Abramowitz, M., Jacob, V., and R. S. Longman et al. 2017. IgA-coated E. coli enriched in Crohn's disease Spondyloarthritis promote TH17-dependent inflammation. Science Translational Medicine 9. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf9655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 92.Eunyoung Chun, Sydney, Diogo Lavoie, Sena Fonseca-Pereira, M. M. Bae, R. Hamid, Graeme L. Hoveyda, Carey Ann Gallini Fraser, J. N. Comeau, Miles H. Glickman, Brian T. Fuller, and W. S. G. Layden. 2019. Metabolite-Sensing Receptor Ffar2 Regulates Colonic Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells and Gut Immunity. Immunity 51:871–884. 10.1002/hep.30150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Marafini, I., Monteleone, I., Laudisi, F., and G. Monteleone. 2024. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling in the control of gut inflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:4527. 10.3390/ijms25084527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 94.Kiss, E. A., C. Vonarbourg, S. Kopfmann, E. Hobeika, D. Finke, C. Esser, and A. Diefenbach. 2011. Natural aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands control organogenesis of intestinal lymphoid follicles. Science 334:1561–1565. 10.1126/science.1214914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lee, J., M. Cella, K. Mcdonald, C. Garlanda, G. D. Kennedy, M. Nukaya, A. Mantovani, R. Kopan, and C. A. Bradfield. 2012. AHR drives the development of gut ILC22 cells and postnatal lymphoid tissues via pathways dependent on and independent of Notch. Nature Immunology 13:144–151. 10.1038/ni.2187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hou, Q., L. Ye, H. Liu, L. Huang, Q. Yang, J. Turner, and Q. Yu. 2018. Lactobacillus Accelerates ISCs Regeneration to Protect the Integrity of Intestinal Mucosa through Activation of STAT3 Signaling Pathway Induced by LPLs Secretion of IL-22. Cell Death And Differentiation 25:1657–1670. 10.1038/s41418-018-0070-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Li, P., Y. Zhang, Y. Shen, X. Zhao, R. Mu, and C. Zhong. 2025. RORγt Is Crucial for Gut Homeostasis by Regulating the Expression of HB-EGF Rather than IL-22 in Activated ILC3s. Cell Rep 44:115793. 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Huang, J., J. Zhang, P. Song, J. Huang, Z. Yang, J. Han, L. Wu, and X. Guo. 2025. P38α-EIF6-Nsun2 Axis Promotes ILC3’s Rapid Response to Protect Host from Intestinal Inflammation. Journal Of Experimental Medicine 222. 10.1084/jem.20240624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 99.Su, X., L. Zhao, H. Zhang, D. Wang, J. Sun, and L. Shen. 2024. Sirtuin 6 Inhibits Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cell Function and Gut Immunity by Suppressing IL-22 Production. Frontiers In Immunology 15:1–12. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1402834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li, J., J. Jacobse, J. M. Pilat, H. Kaur, W. Gu, S. W. Kang, M. Rusznak, H. Huang, J. Barrera, and P. A. Oloo et al. 2025. Interleukin-10 production by innate lymphoid cells restricts intestinal inflammation in mice. Mucosal Immunology 18:643–655. 10.1016/j.mucimm.2025.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wang, Y., J. Wang, G. Liu, X. Yi, J. Wu, H. Cao, L. Zhang, P. Zhou, Y. Fan, and Y. Yu et al. 2025. NRP1 Instructs IL-17-Producing ILC3s to Drive Colitis Progression. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 22:161–175. 10.1038/s41423-024-01246-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cao, S., J. L. Fachi, K. Ma, A. U. Antonova, Q. Wang, Z. Cai, R. J. Kaufman, M. A. Ciorba, P. Deepak, and M. Colonna. 2024. The IRE1α/XBP1 Pathway Sustains Cytokine Responses of Group 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Invest 134:1–16. 10.1172/JCI174198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Monteleone, G., I. Monteleone, D. Fina, P. Vavassori, G. Del Vecchio Blanco, R. Caruso, R. Tersigni, L. Alessandroni, L. Biancone, and G. C. Naccari et al. 2005. Interleukin-21 Enhances T-Helper Cell Type I Signaling and Interferon-γ Production in Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 128:687–694. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Boirivant, M., M. Marini, G. Di Felice, A. M. Pronio, C. Montesani, R. Tersigni, and W. Strober. 1999. Lamina Propria T Cells in Crohn’s Disease and Other Gastrointestinal Inflammation Show Defective CD2 Pathway-Induced Apoptosis. Gastroenterology 116:557–565. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70177-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Parrello, T., G. Monteleone, S. Cucchiara, I. Monteleone, L. Sebkova, P. Doldo, F. Luzza, and F. Pallone. 2000. Up-Regulation of the IL-12 Receptor Β2 Chain in Crohn’s Disease. The Journal Of Immunology 165:7234–7239. 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Marafini, I., E. Angelucci, F. Pallone, and G. Monteleone. 2015. The IL-12/23/STAT Axis as a Therapeutic Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Evidence in Man. Digestive Diseases 33:113–119. 10.1159/000437106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Menghini, P., L. F. Buttó, A. Gomez-Nguyen, N. Aladyshkina, K. A. Buela, A. Osme, R. Chan, H. L. Wargo, S. De Santis, and G. Bamias et al. 2025. Tumor Necrosis Factor-Like Ligand 1A/Death Receptor 3 Signaling Regulates the Generation of Pathogenic T Helper 9 Cells in Experimental Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 169:892–908. 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Monteleone, I., F. Pallone, and G. Monteleone. 2011. Th17-Related Cytokines: New Players in the Control of Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Bmc Medicine 9:122. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 109.Monteleone, G., F. Pallone, and T. T. MacDonald. 2008. Interleukin-21: A Critical Regulator of the Balance between Effector and Regulatory T-Cell Responses. Trends In Immunology 29:290–294. 10.1016/j.it.2008.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wang, J., Y. Hou, L. Mu, M. Yang, and X. Ai. 2024. Gut Microbiota Contributes to the Intestinal and Extraintestinal Immune Homeostasis by Balancing Th17/Treg Cells. International Immunopharmacology 143:113570. 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lee, J. Y., J. A. Hall, L. Kroehling, L. Wu, T. Najar, H. H. Nguyen, W. Y. Lin, S. T. Yeung, H. M. Silva, and D. Li et al. 2020. Serum Amyloid A Proteins Induce Pathogenic Th17 Cells and Promote Inflammatory Disease. Cell 180:79–91e16. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ivanov, I. I., K. Atarashi, N. Manel, E. L. Brodie, U. Karaoz, D. Wei, K. C. Goldfarb, C. A. Santee, V. Lynch, and T. Tanoue et al. 2010. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139:485–498. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Colliou, N., Y. Ge, B. Sahay, M. Gong, M. Zadeh, J. L. Owen, J. Neu, W. G. Farmerie, F. Alonzo, and K. Liu et al. 2017. Commensal Propionibacterium Strain UF1 Mitigates Intestinal Inflammation via Th17 Cell Regulation. J Clin Invest 127:3970–3986. 10.1172/JCI95376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ren, Q., Y. J. Tang, L. Zhang, Y. Xu, N. Liu, and H. Ren. 2020. Exopolysaccharide Produced by Lactobacillus Casei Promotes the Differentiation of CD4 + T Cells into Th17 Cells in BALB/c Mouse Peyer’s Patches in Vivo and in Vitro. Journal Of Agriculture And Food Chemistry 68:2664–2672. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Huang, Y., Tang, J., Cai, Z., Zhou, K., Chang, L., Bai, Y., and Y. Ma. 2020. Prevotella induces the production of Th17 cells in the colon of mice. Mediators of Inflammation 2020:9607328. 10.1155/2020/9607328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 116.Globig, A., A. V. Hipp, M. Heeg, V. Tomov, R. Thimme, P. Hasselblatt, B. Bengsch, L. S. Mayer, S. Ehl, and H. Schwacha et al. 2022. High-Dimensional pro Fi Ling Reveals Tc17 Cell Enrichment in Active Crohn ’ s Disease and Identi Fi Es a Potentially Targetable Signature. Nature Communications 13(1):3688. 10.1038/s41467-022-31229-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chen, K., X. Gu, S. Yang, R. Tao, M. Fan, W. Bao, and X. Wang. 2023. Research Progress on Intestinal Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Scandinavian Journal Of Immunology 98:1–18. 10.1111/sji.13332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ge, L., M. Xu, M. Huang, S. Liu, Z. Zhou, Z. Xia, S. Dong, Q. Zhao, R. Zhu, and F. Zhou. 2025. The Canonical Hippo Pathway Components Modulate the Differentiation of Lamina Propria Regulatory T Cells and T Helper 17-like Regulatory T Cells in Mouse Colitis. International Immunology 37:25–38. 10.1093/intimm/dxae043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Goldberg, R., C. Scotta, D. Cooper, E. Nissim-Eliraz, E. Nir, S. Tasker, P. M. Irving, J. Sanderson, P. Lavender, and F. Ibrahim et al. 2019. Correction of Defective T-Regulatory Cells From Patients With Crohn’s Disease by Ex Vivo Ligation of Retinoic Acid Receptor-α. Gastroenterology 156:1775–1787. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wu, K. C., Y. R. Mahida, J. D. Priddle, D. P. J. G. Unit, and R. Infirmary. 1989. Immunoglobulin Production by Isolated Intestinal Mononuclear Cells from Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn ’ s Disease. Clin exp Immunol 78:37–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Escobar, D., O. Bushara, L. Sun, and J. Liao. 2023. High-Density IgG4 + Plasma Cells Infiltration Is Associated With Fibroplasia in Fibrostenotic Crohn’s Disease. International Journal Of Surgical Pathology 31(6):1085–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhang, S., X. Morgan, B. Dogan, F. P. Martin, S. Strickler, A. Oka, J. Herzog, B. Liu, S. E. Dowd, and C. Huttenhower et al. 2022. Mucosal Metabolites Fuel the Growth and Virulence of E. Coli Linked to Crohn’s Disease. JCI Insight 7:1–20. 10.1172/jci.insight.157013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lodes, M. J., Y. Cong, C. O. Elson, R. Mohamath, C. J. Landers, S. R. Targan, M. Fort, and R. M. Hershberg. 2004. Bacterial Flagellin Is a Dominant Antigen in Crohn Disease. J Clin Invest 113:1296–1306. 10.1172/jci20295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Walker, L. J., M. C. Aldhous, H. E. Drummond, B. R. K. Smith, E. R. Nimmo, I. D. R. Arnott, J. Satsangi, and Anti-Saccharomyces. 2004. Cerevisiae Antibodies (ASCA) in Crohn’s Disease Are Associated with Disease Severity but Not NOD2/CARD15 Mutations. Clinical And Experimental Immunology 135:490–496. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2003.02392.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.McNamee, E. N., and J. Rivera-Nieves. 2016. Ectopic tertiary lymphoid tissue in inflammatory bowel disease: protective or provocateur? Frontiers In Immunology 7:308. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 126.Nagase, Y., S. Okano, A. Furukawa, T. Kanazawa, K. Yamamoto, K. Yamamoto, K. Ohashi, T. Yamana, S. Nojiri, and Y. Suzuki et al. 2024. Tertiary Lymphoid Structure as a Therapeutic Target of Crohn’s Disease: Modulation by TNFα Blockade. bioRxiv 2024.11.23.625032.
  • 127.Bushara, O., D. J. Escobar, S. E. Weinberg, L. Sun, J. Liao, and G. Y. Yang. 2022. The Possible Pathogenic Role of IgG4-Producing Plasmablasts in Stricturing Crohn’s Disease. Pathobiology 89:187–197. 10.1159/000521259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Monteleone, G., F. Pallone, and T. T. Macdonald. 2009. Interleukin-21 (IL-21)-Mediated Pathways in T Cell-Mediated Disease. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 20:185–191. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Monteleone, G., T. T. MacDonald, N. C. Wathen, F. Pallone, and S. L. F. Pender. 1999. Enhancing Lamina Propria Th1 Cell Responses with Interleukin 12 Produces Severe Tissue Injury. Gastroenterology 117:1069–1077. 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70391-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Biancheri, P., S. L. F. Pender, F. Ammoscato, P. Giuffrida, G. Sampietro, S. Ardizzone, A. Ghanbari, R. Curciarello, A. Pasini, and G. Monteleone et al. 2013. The Role of Interleukin 17 in Crohn’s Disease-Associated Intestinal Fibrosis. Fibrogenes Tissue Repair 6:13. 10.1186/1755-1536-6-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 131.Diez-Martin, E., L. Hernandez-Suarez, C. Muñoz-Villafranca, L. Martin-Souto, E. Astigarraga, A. Ramirez-Garcia, and G. Barreda-Gómez. 2024. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of Molecular Bases, Predictive Biomarkers, Diagnostic Methods, and Therapeutic Options. International Journal Of Molecular Sciences 25:7062. 10.3390/ijms25137062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 132.Garrido-Trigo, A., A. M. Corraliza, M. Veny, I. Dotti, E. Melón-Ardanaz, A. Rill, H. L. Crowell, Á. Corbí, V. Gudiño, and M. Esteller et al. 2023. Macrophage and Neutrophil Heterogeneity at Single-Cell Spatial Resolution in Human Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nature Communications 14:1–18. 10.1038/s41467-023-40156-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kong, L., S. Subramanian, Å. Segerstolpe, V. Tran, A. R. Shih, G. T. Carter, H. Kunitake, S. W. Twardus, J. Li, and S. Gandhi et al. 2025. Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics of Stricturing Crohn’s Disease Highlights a Fibrosis-Associated Network. Nature Genetics 57:1742–1753. 10.1038/s41588-025-02225-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mike, G., Porfirio Laukoetter, and A. N. Nava. 2008. Intestinal Barrier in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. World Journal Of Gastroenterology 14:401–407. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kerami, Z., N. W. Duijvis, E. W. Vogels, F. H. van Dooren, P. D. Moerland, and A. A. Te Velde. 2014. Effect of Interleukin-17 on Gene Expression Profile of Fibroblasts from Crohn’s Disease Patients. J Crohn’s Colitis 8:1208–1216. 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Neurath, M. F. 2014. Cytokines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nature Reviews Immunology 14:329–342. 10.1038/nri3661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lin, S. N., J. Wang, P. K. Mukherjee, I. Veisman, W. J. Massey, R. Mao, J. Chandra, C. Fiocchi, and F. Rieder. 2025. The Functional Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated Gut Fibrosis. Matrix Biology 139:29–48. 10.1016/j.matbio.2025.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Bauer-Rowe, K. E., B. Pham, M. Griffin, N. E. Liang, A. Kim, J. M. Lu, M. Januszyk, J. L. Guo, S. De Santis, Y. Xing, A. Prystupa, I. Sidhu, E. J. Suh, D. S. Foster, M. Korah, A. Goyal, D. C. Wan, J. A. Norton, D. Delitto, T. T. Pizarro, S. L. Naik, and J. S. Hyun. 2025. Creeping Fat-Derived Mechanosensitive Fibroblasts Drive Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease Strictures. Cell 188:6536–6553ko. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Jinyu Tan, Xiaomin, Weidong Wu, Jinshen Huang*, J. N. He, Zishan Longyuan Zhou, Yu Liu, Caiguang Wang, Jie Liu, Y. Z. Li, and R. M. Minhu Chen. 2025. Fibroblast-Derived Interleukin-11 as a Potential Biomarker for Intestinal Fibrostenosis in Crohn’s Disease. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 18:1–16. 10.1177/https [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Levantovsky, R. M., Tastad, C., Zhang, J., Gettler, K., Sabic, K., Werner, R., Chasteau, C., Korie, U., Paguay, D., Bao, M., Han, H., Maskey, N., Talware, S., Patel, M., Argmann, C., Suarez-Farinas, M., Harpaz, N., Chuang, L. S., and J. H. Cho. 2024. Multimodal single-cell analyses reveal mechanisms of perianal fistula in diverse patients with Crohn’s disease. Med 5:886–908.e11. 10.1016/j.medj.2024.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 141.McGregor, C., Qin, X., Jagielowicz, M., Gupta, T., Yin, Z., Lentsch, V., Fawkner-Corbett, D., Lai, V. W., Castro, P. G., Bridges, E., Lee, C. H. J., Chuang, H. W., Deng, L., Aulicino, A., Teague, R., Moradi, S., Park, J. S., Woo, J., Xu, K., Tandon, R., Cianci, N., Bornschein, J., Ho, L. P., Siejka-Zielinska, P., et al. 2026. Spatial fibroblast niches define Crohn’s Fistulae. Nature 649:703–712. 10.1038/s41586-025-09744-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 142.Gudiño, V., J.-W. Cho, B. Caballol, A. M. Corraliza, M. Veny, I. Dotti, L. M. Genaro, Á. Sanzo-Machuca, E. Melón-Ardanaz, and M. C. Masamunt et al. 2025. TL1A-Activated T Cells Remodel the Rectal Mucosa in Crohn’s Disease Patients with Perianal Fistulizing Disease. Gut. 10.1136/gutjnl-2025-336246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zeissig, S., E. Rosati, C. M. Dowds, K. Aden, J. Bethge, B. Schulte, W. H. Pan, N. Mishra, M. Zuhayra, M. Marx, M. Paulsen, A. Strigli, C. Conrad, D. Schuldt, A. Sinha, H. Ebsen, S. C. Kornell, S. Nikolaus, A. Arlt, D. Kabelitz, M. Ellrichmann, U. Lützen, P. C. Rosenstiel, and A. Franke. 2019. Vedolizumab Is Associated with Changes in Innate Rather than Adaptive Immunity in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 68(1):25–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Gabriëls, R. Y., A. M. Waaij, M. D. Van Der Linssen, M. Dobosz, P. Volkmer, S. Jalal, D. Robinson, D. Hooge, Festen, and E. A. M. Hermoso et al. 2024. M.A.;. Fluorescently Labelled Vedolizumab to Visualise Drug Distribution and Mucosal Target Cells in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 73(9):1454. 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Monteleone, G., A. Moscardelli, A. Colella, I. Marafini, and S. Salvatori. 2023. Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Common and Different Pathogenic and Clinical Features. Autoimmun Rev 22:103410. 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Dragoni, G., B. J. Ke, L. Picariello, S. Abdurahiman, E. Ceni, F. Biscu, T. Mello, S. Polvani, T. Innocenti, and V. Spalart et al. 2025. The Impact of Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase 4-Dependent Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation on the Early Development of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 19:1–12. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Wu, H., and Q. Hao. 2013. Research Progress in Molecular Targeted Therapy for Gynecological Cancer. Chinese J Clin Oncol 40:1341–1343. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.20130819 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Samant, S. A., S. K. Hyoju, and J. C. Alverdy, G.M. 2025. The Multifaceted Role of Sirtuins in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. American Journal Of Physiology. Gastrointestinal And Liver Physiology 329(1):G58–G68. 10.1100/tsw.2011.139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Song, E. M., Y. H. Joo, S. A. Jung, J. R. Byeon, A. R. Choe, Y. Park, C. H. Tae, C. M. Moon, S. E. Kim, and H. K. Jung et al. 2024. The Role of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Ulcerative Colitis and Changes Following Tonsil-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treatment. Korean Journal Of Internal Medicine 39:917–930. 10.3904/kjim.2024.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Haupt, J., Keminer, O., Neser, C., Windshügel, B., Wiltzsch, V., Schmidt, J. R., Pliushcheuskaya, P., Künze, G., Scholz, U., Müller, C., Oliveira da Rocha, G. H., Biermann, M. K., Zdzieblo, D., Metzger, M., Schiefke, I., Neurath, M. F., Siegmund, B., Claussen, C., Köhl, U., Geisslinger, G., et al. 2025. Novel Aryl Hydrocarbon receptor agonists as potential anti-inflammatory therapeutics: Identification and validation through drug repurposing. Biochemical Pharmacology 240:117066. 10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117066. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 151.Allegretti, J. R., V. Mitsialis, J. B. Canavan, M. Hamilton, J. Barends, M. Carrellas, K. Freer, J. Gringauz, J. Green, and N. Herwood et al. 2023. Low-Dose Interleukin 2 for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 165:492–495e2. 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Monteleone, G., M. C. Fantini, S. Onali, F. Zorzi, G. Sancesario, S. Bernardini, E. Calabrese, F. Viti, I. Monteleone, and L. Biancone et al. 2012. Phase I Clinical Trial of Smad7 Knockdown Using Antisense Oligonucleotide in Patients with Active Crohn’s Disease. Molecular Therapy 20:870–876. 10.1038/mt.2011.290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Monteleone, G., M. F. Neurath, S. Ardizzone, A. Di Sabatino, M. C. Fantini, F. Castiglione, M. L. Scribano, A. Armuzzi, F. Caprioli, and G. C. Sturniolo et al. 2015. Mongersen, an Oral SMAD7 Antisense Oligonucleotide, and Crohn’s Disease. New England Journal Of Medicine 372:1104–1113. 10.1056/nejmoa1407250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zorzi, F., E. Calabrese, I. Monteleone, M. Fantini, S. Onali, L. Biancone, F. Pallone, and G. A. Monteleone. 2012. Phase 1 Open-Label Trial Shows That Smad7 Antisense Oligonucleotide (GED0301) Does Not Increase the Risk of Small Bowel Strictures in Crohn’s Disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 36:850–857. 10.1111/apt.12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Monteleone, G., A. Di Sabatino, S. Ardizzone, F. Pallone, K. Usiskin, X. Zhan, G. Rossiter, and M. F. Neurath. 2016. Impact of Patient Characteristics on the Clinical Efficacy of Mongersen (GED-0301), an Oral Smad7 Antisense Oligonucleotide, in Active Crohn’s Disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 43:717–724. 10.1111/apt.13526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Marafini, I., C. Stolfi, E. Troncone, E. Lolli, S. Onali, O. A. Paoluzi, M. C. Fantini, L. Biancone, E. Calabrese, and A. Di Grazia et al. 2021. A Pharmacological Batch of Mongersen That Downregulates Smad7 Is Effective as Induction Therapy in Active Crohn’s Disease: A Phase II, Open-Label Study. Biodrugs : Clinical Immunotherapeutics, Biopharmaceuticals And Gene Therapy 35:325–336. 10.1007/s40259-021-00482-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sands, B. E., B. G. Feagan, W. J. Sandborn, S. Schreiber, L. Peyrin-Biroulet, J. F. Colombel, G. Rossiter, K. Usiskin, S. Ather, and X. Zhan et al. 2020. Mongersen (GED-0301) for Active Crohn’s Disease: Results of a Phase 3 Study. American Journal Of Gastroenterology 115:738–745. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Arrico, L., C. Stolfi, I. Marafini, G. Monteleone, S. Demartis, S. Bellinvia, F. Viti, M. Mcnulty, I. Cabani, and A. Falezza et al. 2022. Inhomogeneous Diastereomeric Composition of Mongersen Antisense Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotide Preparations and Related Pharmacological Activity Impairment. Nucleic Acid Ther 32:312–320. 10.1089/nat.2021.0089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Deutschmann, C., M. Sowa, J. Murugaiyan, U. Roesler, N. Röber, K. Conrad, M. W. Laass, D. Bogdanos, N. Sipeki, and M. Papp et al. 2019. Identification of Chitinase-3-Like Protein 1 as a Novel Neutrophil Antigenic Target in Crohn’s Disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 13:894–904. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Zhang, Y., J. Wang, H. Sun, Z. Xun, Z. He, Y. Zhao, J. Qi, S. Sun, Q. Yang, and Y. Gu et al. 2024. TWIST1 + FAP+ Fibroblasts in the Pathogenesis of Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn’s Disease. J Clin Invest 134:1–16. 10.1172/JCI179472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Rieder, F., P. K. Mukherjee, W. J. Massey, Y. Wang, and C. Fiocchi. 2024. Fibrosis in IBD: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Targets. Gut 73:854–866. 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Nikolakis, D., A. Y. F. Li Yim, K. L. Overberg, M. Ghiboub, M. E. Wildenberg, W. J. de Jonge, D. Lartey, F. Rieder, G. R. D’Haens, and M. G. H. van de Sande. 2025. L.M. Drug Repurposing Approach for the Discovery of Therapeutic Agents for Crohn’s Disease-Associated Intestinal Fibrosis. J Crohns Colitis 19(9):jjaf137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Valatas, V., G. Kolios, and G. Bamias. 2019. TL1A (TNFSF15) and DR3 (TNFRSF25): A Co-Stimulatory System of Cytokines with Diverse Functions in Gut Mucosal Immunity. Frontiers In Immunology 10:1–14. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Feagan, B. G., Sands, B. E., Siegel, C. A., Dubinsky, M. C., Longman, R. S., Sabino, J., Laurent, O., Luo, A., Lu, J., Nguyen, D. D., Muñoz-Elias, E. J., Llewellyn, H., Wang, Y., Jang, I., Bilsborough, J., Marchelletta, R., Towfic, F., Yen, M., Anderson, J. K., DuVall, A., Kierkus, J., Woynarowski, M., and M. D. Al Kharrat. 2025. Safety and efficacy of the anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody tulisokibart for Crohn’s disease: A phase 2a induction trial. Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 10(8):e10. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 165.Jacob, N., Jacobs, P. J., Kumagai, K., Ha, C. W. Y., Kanazawa, Y., Lagishetty, V., Altmayer, K., Hamill, A. M., Von Arx, A., Sartor, R. B., Devkota, S., Braun, J., Michelsen, K. S., and S. R. Targan S.D. 2018. Inflammation independent TL1A-mediated intestinal fibrosis is dependent on the gut microbiome. Mucosal Immunology 11(5):1466–1476. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Zorzi, F., Monteleone, I., Sarra, M., Calabrese, E., Marafini, I., Cretella, M., Sedda, S., Biancone, L., Pallone, F., and G. Monteleone. 2013. Distinct profiles of effector cytokines mark the different phases of Crohn’s disease. PLoS ONE 8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0054562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 167.Czarnewski, P., Parigi, S. M., Sorini, C., Diaz, O. E., Das, S., Gagliani, N., and E. J. Villablanca. 2019. Conserved transcriptomic profile between mouse and human colitis allows unsupervised patient stratification. Nature Communications 10:1–11. 10.1038/s41467-019-10769-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Marafini, I., Salvatori, S., Troncone, E., and G. Monteleone. 2025. CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for refractory ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 118–120. 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Marafini, I., and G. Monteleone. 2021. Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel diseases. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12:1–6. 10.3389/fphar.2021.653924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Digby-Bell, J. L., Atreya, R., Monteleone, G., and N. Powell. 2020. Interrogating host immunity to predict treatment response in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17:9–20. 10.1038/s41575-019-0228-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES