Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Oct 5;273(10):639. doi: 10.1007/s00415-026-14174-5

Neuroimaging signatures of facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy (FOSMN)

Angela Rosenbohm 1,✉, Francisco Herrera-Angeles 1, Hans-Jürgen Huppertz 2, Karl Georg Haeusler 1, Jochen H Weishaupt 1, Hans-Peter Müller 1,3,4,#, Jan Kassubek 1,#
PMCID: PMC13638678  PMID: 42831972

Abstract

Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy (FOSMN) is an exceptionally rare condition characterized by progressive facial paresthesia and the subsequent appearance of bulbar symptoms with rostro-caudal motor and sensory deficits sometimes extending to the hand muscles. The pathophysiological understanding of this disorder is very limited. In order to identify patterns of neuroanatomical involvement within the brain, we applied advanced magnetic resonance imaging-based techniques to a group of six patients with the diagnosis of FOSMN, using unbiased analysis techniques with atlas-based volumetry of volume-rendering T1-weighted data and whole brain-based spatial statistics of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The volumetric data showed significant global atrophy with prominent involvement of the medulla oblongata, while DTI demonstrated significant decreases in the right-hemispheric frontal lobe and bilaterally along the superior and inferior longitudinal fasciculi. In summary, this application of volumetry and DTI to a group of FOSMN patients demonstrated, beyond global brain atrophy as a correlate of a systemic disease process, regional atrophy in the brainstem/medulla oblongata, together with tract alterations of polymodal frontotemporoparietal interconnections. Future neuroimaging studies in larger patient groups of FOSMN are needed for detailed phenotype–neuroimaging correlations.

Keywords: Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Magnetic resonance imaging, Motor neuron disease, Atlas-based volumetry, Diffusion tensor imaging, Neuroimaging

Introduction

Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy (FOSMN) is an exceptionally rare condition, with only approximately 100 cases documented worldwide since its first description in 2006 [1–3]. FOSMN typically presents initially with unilateral facial paresthesia followed by muscle weakness that gradually progresses over a span of 2 to 6 years, characteristically spreading to encompass the entire face, scalp, and upper limbs [4], with the subsequent appearance of prominent bulbar symptoms, such as orofacial dysphagia, documented up to 6 years post-onset [5, 6]. A highly characteristic feature of the FOSMN syndrome is the atrophy of the temporal and masseter muscles. Nonetheless, several reports have documented cases where bulbar symptoms served as the presenting feature [3, 8–11]. Both motor and sensory deficits typically evolve in a strict rostro-caudal trajectory, eventually extending to the intrinsic hand muscles. While the progression of sensory impairment is well-documented, the evolution of motor deficits is frequently more prominent [9, 12, 13], with pareses and profound muscle atrophy noted as late as 10 years after initial symptom onset [1]. Notably, lower motor neuron signs—predominantly muscle atrophy—are a universal finding across all documented FOSMN cases [2, 12].

Diagnostic workup relies heavily on electrophysiology: a prolonged or absent blink reflex is a key clinical hallmark, while needle EMG shows neurogenic denervation and reinnervation across cranial, cervical, and thoracic levels, depending on the clinical involvement. Sensory nerve conduction studies typically show reduced SNAP amplitudes in upper limbs. Brain MRI, CSF analysis, and lab work are generally unremarkable, though MRI may demonstrate tongue or cord atrophy, and rare ALS-related genetic variants may be present [2, 7, 14].

Although the precise etiology of this disorder remains elusive, growing evidence suggests some clinical and pathophysiological overlap with both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD): the first due to motor symptoms with bulbar syndrome and pareses/muscle atrophy the latter, as cognitive deficits and behavioral changes became apparent in a subset of patients [2]. This link is underscored by recent genetic studies identifying mutations in ALS-associated genes, including SOD1, TARDBP, and SQSTM1 [7, 14]. To date, universally accepted diagnostic criteria have not been established, although diminished or absent corneal reflexes alongside abnormalities in blink reflex testing have been proposed as key diagnostic markers [15].

The main initial differential diagnoses for FOSMN include bulbar-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE), and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). While bulbar-onset ALS shares lower motor neuron features such as severe dysphagia, dysarthria, and tongue atrophy, it presents primarily as a pure motor disorder, lacking the prominent facial sensory loss and diminished corneal reflexes characteristic of FOSMN. Conversely, BBE and MFS can mirror cranial nerve involvement but are distinguished by their acute or subacute postinfectious presentation, presence of ophthalmoplegia and ataxia, contrasting sharply with the slow neurodegenerative course of FOSMN [16, 17].

Previously, routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with FOSMN are predominantly reported to be unremarkable; however, postmortem neuropathological examinations have revealed significant atrophy of the trigeminal nerve roots alongside degenerative changes within both the sensory and motor nuclei of the trigeminal nerve [18]. In addition, postmortem analyses provide definitive evidence of substantial anterior horn cell loss [19], further reinforcing the systemic motor neuron involvement. Consequently, the objective of the current study was to comprehensively delineate the spectrum of cerebral alterations of this entity in vivo by grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) analysis by use of advanced MRI techniques.

Methods

Subjects and patient characteristics

All incident patients with FOSMN who presented to the Department of Neurology at the University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany between 2016–2026 were included in this monocentric observational study. Six consecutive FOSMN patients (4 males/2 females, mean age 64.2 ± 16.2 years, range 48–84 years) consented to undergo MRI with DTI analysis.

FOSMN patients were compared with a group of 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (20 males/10 females, mean age 64.0 ± 4.3 years, range 54–78 years). Gross brain pathology, including vascular brain alterations, was excluded by conventional MRI. All controls lacked a family history of neuromuscular disease and had no history of neurological, psychiatric, or other major medical illnesses. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Ulm (references #19/12 and #20/12) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

MRI acquisition protocol

MRI scanning was performed on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetom Symphony (Siemens Medical, Erlangen, Germany); the DTI study protocol A (echo time (TE)/repetition time (TR), 95 ms/8000 ms) contained 52 volumes, including 4 b=0 (matrix 128 × 128 × 64, resolution 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.8 mm3), DTI study protocol B (TE/TR, 102 ms/8700 ms) contained 62 volumes, including 2 b=0 (matrix 128 × 128 × 64, resolution 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3). In this retrospective study, 2 FOSMN patients were recorded with protocol A, 4 with protocol B; 11 controls were recorded with protocol A, 19 with protocol B.

Structural MRI analysis: atlas-based volumetry (ABV)

The T1-weighted data were processed using MATLAB (version R2021b, The Mathworks, USA) and the Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 (SPM12) software (Wellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, London, UK, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), following a standardized processing pipeline for atlas-based volumetry (ABV) [20, 21]. ABV has already been successfully applied to several neurodegenerative conditions in previous studies (e.g., Refs. [22, 23]). In short, the processing steps included: (i) segmentation into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments, (ii) stereotaxic normalization into MNI space, and (iii) volumetric assessment using voxel-by-voxel multiplication and subsequent integration of normalized modulated component images (GM, WM, or CSF) with predefined masks from standardized brain atlases (here, LONI Probabilistic Brain Atlas [24]). All volumetric results were linearly standardized to the mean intracranial volume (ICV) of controls. Group-level differences were provided as z values.

DTI data analysis

The software Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking (TIFT) [25] was used for data analysis; details of the algorithms have been described in detail previously [26]. In short: after stereotaxic normalization to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, fractional anisotropy (FA) to analyze white matter microstructure. Prior to correction for the covariate age, a Gaussian filter of 8 mm full width at half maximum was applied for smoothing of FA maps. Smoothed FA maps were harmonized between protocols A and B. Voxel-wise statistical comparison of the DTI metrics was performed by Welch test to detect alterations between the subject groups (whole brain-based spatial statistics, WBSS); voxels with FA values below 0.2 were not considered for statistical comparison, since cortical grey matter shows FA values up to 0.2 [27]. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed using the false-discovery-rate (FDR) algorithm at p < 0.05 [28]; further reduction of the alpha error was performed by a spatial correlation algorithm eliminating small isolated groups of voxels in the size range of the smoothing kernel (8 mm) leading to a threshold cluster size of 512 voxels.

Results

Clinical characterization

We examined six patients with clinically confirmed FOSMN (4 m/2f, mean age at presentation 64.2 ± 16.2, range 48–84 years) (Table 1). The initial clinical manifestation was facial numbness in three patients, oropharyngeal dysphagia in one patient, paresis of the masticatory muscles in one patient, and weakness of the right upper limb due to paresis of the forearm flexor muscles in one patient. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was confirmed by Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in five patients. Two patients required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Two patients developed upper-limb paresis, with a mean interval from diagnosis to the onset of paresis of 48 months (range, 12 to 84 months). The mean follow-up duration in five patients was 4.1 years (range, 5 months to 10 years). P06 who died after implantation of PEG had a well-documented 12-month time course before admission to our hospital and fulfilled all clinical criteria of the disease with respect to the longitudinal course and the clinical status at admission.

Table 1.

FOSMN patients’ characteristics

Patient number P01 P02 P03 P04 P05 P06
Sex m f m m m f
Age at onset/years 46 51 74 40 54 84
Disease duration at MRI/months 50 3 25 >200 21 12
Initial manifestation Facial numbness Facial numbness Masticatory muscle paresis Right upper-limb weakness (forearm flexors) Facial numbness Oropharyngeal dysphagia
Sensory deficits face Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Dysphagia diagnosis/PEG placed or indicated FEES/yes FEES/no FEES/no Clinical/no FEES/no FEES/yes
Upper-limb paresis Yes Yes No Yes No No
lLower-limb paresis No No No No No No
Upper motor neuron affection No No No No Yes No
Follow-up 10 years 5 months 3 years 6 years 1 year 0 months
Blink reflex abnormal – – – – – Yes
EMG: denervation No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
NCS: SNAP amplitude reduced in upper extremities No No No No No No
Trigeminal SSEP – Normal – – – Normal
CSF abnormalities Normal Normal Elevated protein Elevated protein Elevated protein Normal
Deceased (age) No No No No No Yes (84)

FEES fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, PEG percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, EMG electromyography, NCS nerve conduction study, SNAP sensory nerve action potential, CSF cerebrospinal fluid

Volumetry

At the group level, FOSMN patients showed a significant global volume reduction (atrophy) with the highest negative z scores in the medulla oblongata followed by the insula. In general, GM showed a higher volume reduction overall than WM in the lobes and in gyral GM, when compared to controls (Table 2).

Table 2.

Atlas-based volumetry (ABV) results for white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) structures based on T1-weighted imaging (group level analysis: FOSMN (n=6) vs 30 age-matched controls)

graphic file with name 415_2026_14174_Tab2_HTML.webp

The z scores are color-coded, from blue (positive) to red (negative values)

DTI

By use of WBSS for microstructural differences, the group differences in white matter FA values between 6 patients with FOSMN and 30 controls demonstrated a significant decrease in the right frontal lobe and bilaterally along both the superior and the inferior longitudinal fascicles (Fig. 1); the significant clusters are summarized in Table 3.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) for the comparison of FA maps of 6 patients with FOSMN vs 30 controls. Significance level is coded according to the color bar. Corrections for multiple comparisons were performed with the false discovery rate at p < 0.05 and a cluster-size approach. Details of the corresponding clusters are shown in Table 2. A Slicewise representation at Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates (crosshair, x=30/y=− 26/z=8). B Projectional views

Table 3.

Whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) for cross-sectional comparison of FA maps of patients with FOSMN (n = 6) vs controls (n = 30); details of the clusters where FA changes were detected

Cluster size Hemisphere Anatomical location MNI (x/y/z) of center of cluster p
17,275 R Frontal lobe 28/25/3 < 0.000001
‍8668 R SLF 30/− 38/23 < 0.000001
3641 L ILF −17/− 34/3 < 0.000001
3200 L SLF −8/− 17/33 < 0.000001

MNI montreal neurological institute coordinate frame, ILF inferior longitudinal fasciculus, SLF superior longitudinal fasciculus

Discussion

The etiology and the pathophysiology of FOSMN remain elusive, including the question whether the underlying mechanism may be neurodegenerative, given that it is an extremely rare neurological disease with a multifaceted clinical phenotype [11]. To this end, in vivo characterization of the pathoanatomical patterns by advanced neuroimaging may help guide the definitions of the disease process. In the current study, we used two unbiased MRI analysis approaches, i.e., ABV for volumetric patterns and DTI/WBSS for WM tract alterations, to identify structural and microstructural changes in the MRI datasets of a group of six FOSMN patients, representing the spectrum of the clinical phenotype. Despite the small sample size, ABV demonstrated a significant global atrophy with the most prominent findings in the medulla oblongata and, with respect to the cerebral GM, in the frontal and temporal lobes. DTI/WBSS identified a pattern with several significant clusters of substantial size along the SLF and ILF (bilaterally) and in the WM of the right frontal lobe.

This pattern of volumetric changes supports the view that FOSMN is a disorder involving large parts of the brain, as evidenced by global cerebral GM volume reduction. More specifically, brainstem areas (i.e., the medulla oblongata) are involved, where major nucleus regions of the trigeminal nerve, together with the medial lemniscus, are located. This volumetric pattern—combining global cerebral changes with a focus on the brainstem—is plausible for a disorder that affects various functional systems of the brain associated with cranial nerve V and bulbar involvement. With respect to WM tract structures, both the superior and the inferior longitudinal fascicles (SLF/ILF) demonstrated FA reductions, whereas there was no significant involvement of the corticospinal tract (CST). In addition, there was a large cluster of microstructural alterations in the frontal WM, similar to DTI-based findings in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), such as alterations along the SLF and ILF [29]. This aligns with the general overlap between FOSMN and FTLD syndromes, which is also evident genetically [4, 7]. The SLF forms a large arcuate bundle that interconnects the frontal lobes with the post-Rolandic lobes and fans out into different parts of the temporal lobes, while the ILF constitutes an occipitotemporal projection system [30]. Direct connections to the face areas of the somatotopically structured human somatosensory cortex were not included in the significant clusters [31]; however, it is worth noting that affections of the trigeminal nerve (as in trigeminal neuralgia) have previously been associated with microstructural alterations of the SLF [32]. These findings of regional microstructural alterations support the view of FOSMN as a disorder which affects polymodal integration areas, providing a neuroanatomical correlate for the multifaceted clinical presentation. Concurrently, our data do not demonstrate a regional tract damage to the CST, as typically observed in motor neuron disease (MND) such as ALS. However, given the limited MND symptoms in this cohort, whether CST involvement occurs remains to be investigated in larger samples with more clinically pronounced motor neuron affection.

An obvious limitation of this study is the small sample size. However, against the background of about 100 cases reported worldwide so far, this number may be considered to be sufficient for a pilot study using a standardized advanced neuroimaging protocol on the same scanner. This constellation of significant volumetric findings alongside large clusters of regional WM alterations, even within this small sample, can be regarded as a strength, providing initial evidence for the potential of advanced MRI to define an in vivo neuroanatomical pattern for this rare disorder. Advanced MRI analysis techniques will be needed to address these aims, given that previous clinical reports had emphasized that the normal routine MRI studies in patients with FOSMN do not explain their symptoms [2]. Since DTI data cannot establish the directionality of tract alterations, these findings do not clarify the clinical rostro-caudal trajectory of symptoms. In addition, brain MRI cannot resolve the ongoing question of whether the nature of FOSMN is neurodegenerative or immune-mediated.

In summary, this first application of volumetry and DTI to a group of FOSMN patients demonstrated global brain atrophy with a regional focus in the medulla oblongata, together with tract alterations of polymodal frontotemporoparietal interconnections. This neuroanatomical pattern aligns with the clinical phenotype, characterized first by cranial nerve involvement at the brainstem level and second by a progression pattern involving different modalities including motor, somatosensory, and fronto-behavioral functions. Notably, the current data do not demonstrate a DTI-based pattern typical of motor neuron diseases like ALS, which characteristically involves the CST [33]—this absence of primary motor tract pathology is in line with the neurohistopathological findings that did not support a link to ALS in contrast to the existing clinical overlap [1, 2, 19]. However, CST involvement has to be further investigated in further MRI/DTI studies in patients with more prominent motor syndrome than our patients, since only one out of six patients in the current study showed upper motor neuron affection.

These signatures of GM atrophy and WM involvement contribute to the conceptual understanding of the processes that underlie this rare disorder; however, studies in larger cohorts, most likely in a multicenter design with standardized clinical and neuroimaging assessments, are needed to obtain sufficient sample sizes, which then could also incorporate volumetric and DTI-based data for the spinal cord. In particular, longitudinal studies evaluating phenotype–neuroimaging correlations of intraindividual symptom progression will potentially guide the pathophysiological understanding of FOSMN in the future.

Author contributions

AR: conceptualization, data curation, supervision, project administration, writing—original draft. FHA: data curation, writing—review and editing. HJH: analysis, software, writing—review and editing. KGH: writing—review and editing. JW: writing—review and editing. HPM: analysis, software, writing—review and editing. JK: conceptualization, supervision, writing—original draft.

Data availability

Reasonable data sharing requests can be addressed to the corresponding author and require a formal data sharing agreement with the University Hospital Ulm, Germany.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest and financial disclosures (for the preceding 12 months)

None of the authors has any potential conflicts of interest for this manuscript. All authors exclude financial support for this study.

Footnotes

Hans-Peter Müller, Jan Kassubek shared senior authorship.

References

  • 1.Vucic S, Tian D, Chong PS, Cudkowicz ME, Hedley-Whyte ET, Cros D (2006) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy (FOSMN syndrome): a novel syndrome in neurology. Brain 129(Pt 12):3384–3390. 10.1093/brain/awl258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Boer EMJ, Barritt AW, Elamin M, Anderson SJ, Broad R, Nisbet A, Goedee HS, Vázquez Costa JF, Prudlo J, Vedeler CA, Fernandez JP, Panades MP, Albertí Aguilo MA, Bella ED, Lauria G, Pinto WBVR, de Souza PVS, Oliveira ASB, Toro C, van Iersel J, Parson M, Harschnitz O, van den Berg LH, Veldink JH, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh PN, van Es MA (2021) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy: new cases, cognitive changes, and pathophysiology. Neurol Clin Pract 11(2):147–157. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ko S, Yamasaki R, Okui T, Shiraishi W, Watanabe M, Hashimoto Y, Kobayakawa Y, Kusunoki S, Kira JI, Isobe N (2024) A nationwide survey of facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy in Japan. J Neurol Sci 459:122957. 10.1016/j.jns.2024.122957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vucic S (2014) Facial onset sensory motor neuronopathy (FOSMN) syndrome: an unusual amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotype? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85(9):951. 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watanabe M, Shiraishi W, Yamasaki R, Isobe N, Sawatsubashi M, Yasumatsu R, Nakagawa T, Kira JI (2018) Oral phase dysphagia in facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy. Brain Behav 8(6):e00999. 10.1002/brb3.999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dobrev D, Barohn RJ, Anderson NE, Kilfoyle D, Khan S, McVey AL, Herbelin L, Dimachkie MM (2012) Facial onset sensorimotor neuronopathy syndrome: a case series. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 14(1):7–10. 10.1097/CND.0b013e31825f82b3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vázquez-Costa JF, Pedrola Vidal L, Moreau-Le Lan S, Teresí-Copoví I, Frasquet M, Chumillas MJ, Sevilla T (2019) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy: a motor neuron disease with an oligogenic origin? Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 20(3–4):172–175. 10.1080/21678421.2019.1582671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bruss DM, Venkataraman P, Mozaffar T (2022) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy-like syndrome: a case report. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis 24(1):55–58. 10.1097/CND.0000000000000402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fluchere F, Verschueren A, Cintas P, Franques J, Serratrice J, Weiller PJ, Azulay JP, Pouget J, Attarian S (2011) Clinical features and follow-up of four new cases of facial-onset sensory and motor neuronopathy. Muscle Nerve 43(1):136–140. 10.1002/mus.21884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hanawa H, Nagaoka R, Fukuda Y, Akutsu K, Yamada T, Hamaguchi S (2021) Facial onset sensory and motor neuropathy in a pain clinic outpatient: a case report. J Med Case Rep 15(1):609. 10.1186/s13256-021-03212-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Isoardo G, Troni W (2008) Sporadic bulbospinal muscle atrophy with facial-onset sensory neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 37(5):659–662. 10.1002/mus.20991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hu N, Zhang L, Yang X, Fu H, Cui L, Liu M (2023) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy (FOSMN syndrome): cases series and systematic review. Neurol Sci 44(6):1969–1978. 10.1007/s10072-023-06703-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Broad R, Leigh PN (2015) Recognising facial onset sensory motor neuronopathy syndrome: insight from six new cases. Pract Neurol 15(4):293–297. 10.1136/practneurol-2014-000984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Picher-Martel V, Babu S, Amato AA (2024) TARDBP mutations in facial-onset sensory and motor neuronopathy. Neurol Genet 10(3):e200160. 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng Q, Chu L, Tan L, Zhang H (2016) Facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy. Neurol Sci 37(12):1905–1909. 10.1007/s10072-016-2686-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lange KS, Maier A, Leithner C (2020) Elevated CSF neurofilament light chain concentration in a patient with facial onset sensory and motor neuronopathy. Neurol Sci 41(1):217–219. 10.1007/s10072-019-04033-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yepishin IV, Allison RZ, Kaminskas DA, Zagorski NM, Liow KK (2016) Miller fisher syndrome: a case report highlighting heterogeneity of clinical features and focused differential diagnosis. Hawaii J Med Public Health 75(7):196–199 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sonoda K, Sasaki K, Tateishi T, Yamasaki R, Hayashi S, Sakae N, Ohyagi Y, Iwaki T, Kira J (2013) TAR DNA-binding protein 43 pathology in a case clinically diagnosed with facial-onset sensory and motor neuronopathy syndrome: an autopsied case report and a review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 332(1–2):148–153. 10.1016/j.jns.2013.06.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vucic S, Stein TD, Hedley-Whyte ET, Reddel SR, Tisch S, Kotschet K, Cros D, Kiernan MC (2012) FOSMN syndrome: novel insight into disease pathophysiology. Neurology 79(1):73–79. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825dce13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huppertz HJ, Kröll-Seger J, Klöppel S, Ganz RE, Kassubek J (2010) Intra- and interscanner variability of automated voxel-based volumetry based on a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cerebral structures. Neuroimage 49(3):2216–2224. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huppertz HJ, Möller L, Südmeyer M, Hilker R, Hattingen E, Egger K, Amtage F, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Schnitzler A, Pinkhardt EH, Oertel WH, Knake S, Kassubek J, Höglinger GU (2016) Differentiation of neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndromes by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging analysis and support vector machine classification. Mov Disord 31(10):1506–1517. 10.1002/mds.26715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wiesenfarth M, Huppertz HJ, Dorst J, Lulé D, Ludolph AC, Müller HP, Kassubek J (2023) Structural and microstructural neuroimaging signature of C9orf72-associated ALS: a multiparametric MRI study. Neuroimage Clin 39:103505. 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Michelutti M, Huppertz HJ, Volkmann H, Anderl-Straub S, Urso D, Tafuri B, Nigro S, Manganotti P, Werner L, Lombardi J, Otto M, Logroscino G, Müller HP, Kassubek J (2025) Multiparametric MRI-based biomarkers in the non-fluent and semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia. J Neurol 272(8):490. 10.1007/s00415-025-13215-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V, Hojatkashani C, Salamon G, Narr KL, Poldrack RA, Bilder RM, Toga AW (2008) Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage 39(3):1064–1080. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Müller HP, Unrath A, Ludolph AC, Kassubek J (2007) Preservation of diffusion tensor properties during spatial normalization by use of tensor imaging and fibre tracking on a normal brain database. Phys Med Biol 52(6):N99-109. 10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/N01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Michelutti M, Huppertz HJ, Anderl-Straub S, Volkmann H, Urso D, Tafuri B, Nigro S, Manganotti P, Rosenbohm A, Ludolph AC, Otto M, Logroscino G, Müller HP, Kassubek J (2025) MRI-DTI biomarkers along the continuum of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Eur J Neurol 32(12):e70438. 10.1111/ene.70438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kunimatsu A, Aoki S, Masutani Y, Abe O, Hayashi N, Mori H, Masumoto T, Ohtomo K (2004) The optimal trackability threshold of fractional anisotropy for diffusion tensor tractography of the corticospinal tract. Magn Reson Med Sci 3(1):11–17. 10.2463/mrms.3.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T (2002) Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 15(4):870–878. 10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McKenna MC, Tahedl M, Murad A, Lope J, Hardiman O, Hutchinson S, Bede P (2022) White matter microstructure alterations in frontotemporal dementia: phenotype-associated signatures and single-subject interpretation. Brain Behav 12(2):e2500. 10.1002/brb3.2500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nieuwenhuys R, Voogd J, van Huijzen C (2019) The human central nervous system. Steinkopff-Verlag, Berlin [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roux FE, Djidjeli I, Durand JB (2018) Functional architecture of the somatosensory homunculus detected by electrostimulation. J Physiol 596(5):941–956. 10.1113/JP275243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li R, Sun H, Hao H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Wang G, Ming W (2021) White matter integrity in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia: a multi-node automated fiber tract quantification study. J Int Med Res 49(10):3000605211047071. 10.1177/03000605211047071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kassubek J, Müller HP (2026) MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): advanced MRI neuroimaging from the group level to individual subject analysis. In: Advanced MR techniques for neurodegenerative diseases (Eds, Chan WYC, Unschuld PG, van Zijl PCM, Knutsson L), Academic Press 2026, in press. eBook

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Reasonable data sharing requests can be addressed to the corresponding author and require a formal data sharing agreement with the University Hospital Ulm, Germany.


Articles from Journal of Neurology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES