Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2026 Sep 4;17:10517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-77299-1

Ubiquity and seasonality of deep submesoscales in the Southern Ocean revealed by elephant seals

Lia Siegelman 1,✉, Matthew H Alford 1, Baptiste Picard 2, Christophe Guinet 2
PMCID: PMC13639041  PMID: 42834029

Abstract

Ocean submesoscale fronts with a size of 1–20 km have been extensively documented within the surface mixed layer, but little is known about their existence below it. We analyze a record of 133 598 dives performed by instrumented Southern Elephant Seals from 2014 to 2020 in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean with a sub-km resolution. Here, we show that submesoscale motions are intensified below the mixed layer and are present year-round from the surface down to depths of at least 500 m. They exhibit a seasonal cycle with an austral spring (Sep–Nov) intensification and a weakening in fall (Mar–May). These deep submesoscales follow the seasonality of surface eddy kinetic energy derived from altimetry, suggesting that they are generated by mesoscale eddies. Since submesoscales are known to be associated with strong vertical velocities, these results suggest that vertical exchanges of heat and nutrient at depth may be more important than commonly assumed.

Subject terms: Physical oceanography, Physical oceanography


Instrumented elephant seals reveal that deep submesoscale motions are a ubiquitous and seasonally varying component of Southern Ocean circulation, with their intensity below the mixed layer closely tracking mesoscale eddy activity and supporting an eddy-driven origin.

Introduction

Ocean submesoscales, characterized by fronts and eddies with horizontal scales of 1–20 km and lifetimes of hours to days, are known to be associated with vigorous vertical exchanges that mediate the transport of heat, carbon, nutrients, and other tracers between the ocean interior and the surface1–6. Submesoscale flows have been the focus of extensive research over the past two decades (see reviews by refs. 5,7,8). Initial insights into these processes emerged primarily from numerical simulations5,8–11, which established the ocean surface mixed layer (ML,  ~ 100 m deep) as the primary region of submesoscale activity12–17. Within the upper ocean, mesoscale strain continuously sharpens lateral buoyancy gradients through frontogenesis, generating intense submesoscale fronts that support ageostrophic circulations18,19 and strong vertical velocities11,19–21. Within the mixed layer, these fronts can become unstable through mixed-layer instability, which converts the potential energy stored in lateral buoyancy gradients into eddy kinetic energy (EKE)5,12,22. More recently, the proposed mixed transitional layer instability has extended the mixed-layer instability framework to the first  ~ 100 m beneath the mixed layer23.

Increasing evidence suggests that submesoscale dynamics can extend well into the ocean interior down to depths of 1000 m. Observations of submesoscale structures beneath the mixed layer date back to the 1980s24–27 and have recently been supplemented by new observations and numerical simulations23,28–35. Recent observational and modeling studies in geographically limited regions suggest that these deep-reaching features can generate vertical velocities approaching 100 m day−1 and substantially enhance vertical heat transport29,36–38. Whether these processes represent localized phenomena or a widespread component of the global ocean circulation remains unknown because existing observations are limited in space and time. Consequently, several fundamental questions remain unresolved: How prevalent are deep submesoscales? Do they exhibit a seasonal cycle analogous to that of mixed-layer submesoscales, which strengthen during winter and spring and weaken during summer and fall2,5,8,11,14,30,36,39? What physical mechanisms generate them?

Here, we address these questions by leveraging an in situ dataset acquired by Southern Elephant Seals over more than six years across the high-eddy-kinetic-energy Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. Spanning ~2000 km  × 9000 km (Fig. 1), this basin-scale observational record comprises 133,598 vertical profiles collected at sub-kilometer horizontal resolution and sub-20-minute temporal resolution (Table 1), including the first austral winter observations acquired by instrumented seals at a sub-kilometer resolution. This dataset enables a comprehensive in situ assessment of the spatial prevalence and seasonality of deep submesoscale motions. We show that deep submesoscales are ubiquitous throughout the region, occurring year-round from the surface to depths of at least 500 m. Their intensity peaks below the mixed layer and exhibits a pronounced seasonal cycle, with the strongest activity during austral spring (September–November) and the weakest during austral fall (March–May). Finally, the seasonality of deep submesoscales is positively correlated with surface eddy kinetic energy derived from satellite altimetry, consistent with the hypothesis that mesoscale-eddy-induced frontogenesis plays a dominant role in generating deep submesoscale motions.

Fig. 1. Statistics and distribution of the data used in this study.

Fig. 1

a Map of the Southern Elephant Seals trajectories colored by regions centered on the Kerguelen Islands. The background shows the mean EKE from 2014 to 2020 from the NeurOST altimetry product. ∘S refers to latitude and ∘E to longitude. Seasonal statistics for the (b) East, c South, d Northwest (NW), and (e) Southwest (SW) regions.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the tags used in this study

tag number med dist med time med dive max dive start end lat lat lon lon
of dives bw dive bw dive depth depth time time min max min ma
[m] [m] [min] [m] [UTC] [UTC]
ct112-033-14 7352 465 16 126 760 10/28/2014 1/15/2015 −56.9 −48.8 70.6 89.8
ct112-035-14 1506 758 20 456 858 10/20/2014 11/13/2014 −49.4 −44.9 68.9 72.5
ct112-048-14 6366 708 19 231 980 10/20/2014 1/16/2015 −57.3 −48.3 70.7 87.1
ct112-049-14 6302 475 24 226 767 10/24/2014 1/11/2015 −52.7 −48.3 70.5 84.1
ct112-050-14 6942 711 17 192 843 10/27/2014 1/20/2015 −53.9 −49.5 37.5 70.7
ct131-035BAT2-15 3879 820 22 479 968 10/27/2016 1/9/2017 −51.7 −47.3 70.4 85.9
ct131-048BAT2-15 5028 900 16 304 999 10/26/2016 1/14/2017 −53.3 −48.0 70.2 95.7
ct132-331-16 3816 1114 15 287 999 10/25/2016 12/28/2016 −50.8 −46.7 57.7 70.5
ct139-331BAT-16 2933 1047 16 327 908 10/20/2017 12/14/2017 −49.1 −44.9 64.6 70.4
ct139-622-17 4106 514 20 464 954 10/21/2017 1/1/2018 −49.2 −44.7 55.9 70.5
ct139-624-17 4533 710 19 431 904 10/4/2017 12/22/2017 −49.1 −41.8 52.3 70.2
ct139-F620-17 5388 896 17 297 999 10/19/2017 1/1/2018 −51.7 −48.2 37.0 69.9
ct158-198-19 7724 766 27 330 988 2/19/2020 8/1/2020 −63.6 −49.4 70.7 117.3
ct158-199-19 8329 1157 16 345 996 2/15/2020 7/25/2020 −64.9 −46.7 70.7 103.8
ct158-309-BAT-15 7578 851 24 263 998 2/17/2020 7/13/2020 −60.0 −49.4 70.6 112.2
ct158-310-BAT-15 7510 924 14 299 999 3/2/2020 7/23/2020 −63.6 −49.5 −4.0 70.5
ft22-686-18 4308 844 18 518 933 10/23/2018 1/2/2019 −49.9 −43.9 55.9 70.5
ft22-873-18 5840 351 26 231 841 10/21/2018 1/8/2019 −55.7 −48.6 56.2 70.0
ft22-874-18 6217 843 14 284 860 10/23/2018 1/5/2019 −56.8 −49.5 35.7 70.6
ft22-875-18 4675 844 23 340 838 10/26/2018 1/7/2019 −53.5 −46.3 70.3 95.5
ft22-876-18 6716 541 18 165 992 10/20/2018 1/8/2019 −56.8 −48.8 70.5 95.3
ft22-878-18 4795 835 18 390 830 10/22/2018 1/1/2019 −50.8 −48.1 70.8 86.7
ft22-879-18 5513 766 24 233 945 10/21/2018 1/8/2019 −56.2 −46.6 70.8 89.8
ft22-881-18 5294 621 16 140 798 10/27/2018 1/5/2019 −54.4 −49.5 70.5 96.5
ft22-882-18 948 1062 22 164 814 12/17/2018 12/31/2018 −51.8 −49.2 55.6 70.2
Total - 25 tags 133 598 781 18 301 999 10/20/2014 8/1/2020 −64.9 −41.8 −4.0 117.3

Results

We divide the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean into four distinct regions; East from 70.2167∘ E (i.e., the longitude of the Kerguelen Islands) to 120∘ E and from −40∘ S to −56.7∘ S (blue region in Fig. 1a), South corresponding to the area south of −56.7∘ S (green region in Fig. 1a), “Northwest” (NW) from 30∘ E to 70.2167∘ E and from −40∘ S to −49.35∘ S (i.e., the latitude of the Kerguelen Islands, red region in Fig. 1a) and “Southwest” (SW) west of 70.2167∘ E and between −49.3500∘ S and −56.7∘ S (orange region in Fig. 1a). These regions are chosen such that each of them contains enough data to study regional variability of submesocale motions; the East contains 49% of the profiles, the South 15 %, the NW 16 % and the SW 20 % (Fig. 1b–e). Eddy kinetic energy is statistically elevated in the East and NW regions and weaker in the SW and South regions (Fig. 1a).

Data in the East region are available continuously from 2014 to 2020, allowing study of the full seasonal cycle (Fig. 1b). In contrast, the South region solely contains data for the years 2014, 2015, 2018 and 2020 in summer (Dec-Jan-Feb), fall (Mar-Apr-May) and winter (Jun-Jul-Aug, Fig. 1c). The NW region contains data for the years 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 in summer and spring (Sep-Oct-Nov, Fig. 1d) and the SW region contains data for the years 2014 to 2020 in summer, fall and spring (Fig. 1e). Nevertheless, each season in each region is covered by a significant number of profiles - the smallest amount being 1 541 profiles for the summer in the South (Fig. 1c) and the largest 25 438 profiles in the summer in the East (Fig. 1a), allowing to derive robust statistics.

We start by analyzing a segment of a seal’s trajectory collected in the East during November 10–20, 2018, over  ~ 550 km (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1, tag ft22-875-18, Table 1). This transect is representative of the dynamics observed in areas of moderate to elevated EKE, as indicated by the altimetry-derived surface EKE along the transect, which reaches 0.035 m2 s−2 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The mixed layer depth (MLD, black line in Fig. 2) rapidly fluctuates between 20 m and 300 m, with an average value of 100 m. Temperature anomalies reach values as large as  ±  1. 5∘C (Fig. 2a,d) and are found down to depths of at least 500 m. They often take the shape of subsurface lenses intensified below the mixed layer (i.e., at 50–100 km and depth of 50–200 m or at 270–300 km and depth of 50–400 m in panel a), reminiscent of subsurface eddies26,40,41. These features are also apparent in the salinity anomalies, which reach values of  ±  0.3 psu (Fig. 2b) and on spice (a dynamically passive tracer characterizing temperature and salinity fluctuations42,43, see Methods), identifiying multiple coherent spicy and minty features below the mixed layer (Fig. 2c). The edges of these features are often bordered by vertically slanted lateral buoyancy gradients (bx), which have a width of 5–10 km and magnitudes larger than  ±  2 × 10−7 s−2 (Figs. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 1b,f). These values are consistent with what has been reported in the literature37,44–46. In contrast, the mixed layer hosts subdued bx with a typical magnitude ≤ 0.5 × 10−7 s−2. Another typical example in a region of higher EKE emphasizes the widespread nature of multiple subsurface features bordered by enhanced lateral gradients of buoyancy and more subdued bx within the mixed layer (Supplementary Fig. 2, tag ft22-878-18, Table 1). In contrast, the observed dynamics are drastically different in regions of weaker EKE. A transect collected in the South during March 7–14, 2020 (Supplementary Fig. 3, tag ct158-309-BAT-15, Table 1), for which the surface EKE reaches at most 0.01 m2 s−2 (panel e), shows that the MLD remains nearly constant around 80 m (e.g., panel a). While temperature and salinity anomalies are still present (panels a, b), bx have a very different phenomenology below the mixed layer; they are enhanced at its base and exhibit oscillating patterns that can extend to greater depths (Fig. 2f), consistent with high-frequency internal gravity waves (IGWs; Supplementary Fig. 4a)47. To disentangle IGWs from submesoscale motions, which is the focus of our study, we proceed to develop a dynamical filter based on the physical property that along-isopycnal spice gradients are not generated by IGWs42,43,48. The filter is intended to substantially reduce IGW contamination rather than provide a perfect dynamical separation. The filter, thoroughly described in the Methods, is applied to bx, and the filtered bx are used herein. To quantify the contrast in submesoscale dynamics within and below the mixed layer, we analyze the distribution of bx over the full dataset, which covers a cumulative distance of more than 118,000 km. Specifically, we divide the water column into two layers: a first one within the mixed layer, defined as the layer extending from the surface down to 5 m above the MLD and another one below the mixed layer, defined as the region starting 10 m below the MLD. We discard the 15 m-thick layer bracketing the MLD as a precaution to avoid capturing remnant enhanced bx at the base of the MLD that may not have been fully filtered out (see Methods). Figure 3a, b shows markedly different distribution of ∣bx∣ within and below the ML, in agreement with Fig. 2. The strongest values of ∣bx∣ are found below the mixed layer; the distribution of ∣bx∣ below the mixed layer exhibits a broader exponential tail than the distribution within the mixed layer (Fig. 3a). A significantly higher number of intense ∣bx∣ are found below the ML than within it, as highlighted by the cumulative distributions (Fig. 3b). These distributions show that 60% of ∣bx∣ are greater than 0.25 × 10−7 s−2 below the ML, compared to 40% within the ML. For values exceeding 0.5 × 10−7 s−2, these proportions are 35% and 20%, respectively. Similar results are obtained when comparing lateral gradients of spice and unfiltered bx below and within the mixed layer (Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). These domain-wide distributions highlight the ubiquity of deep submesoscales in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. In addition, wavenumber spectra of buoyancy at 300 m have a slope of k−2.8-k−2.34 (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4b–d), contrasting with the slope of k−5 expected for a quasi-geostrophic regime in the ocean interior33,49–51. Scales smaller than 10 km dominate bx variability as emphasized by their spectra (Fig. 3d). The exponential tail of the PDF, distinct from the Gaussian tail typically associated with mesoscale eddies in quasigeostrophic balance, and the shallow spectral slopes of buoyancy and bx spectra emphasize the ageostrophic character of deep submesoscales33,51. These results suggest that deep submesoscale are associated with large vertical velocities, consistent with previous studies33,36,37.

Fig. 2. Representative vertical section sampled by a seal.

Fig. 2

Example of vertical sections of conservative temperature anomalies (CT’, a), absolute salinity anomalies (SA’, b), spice (c), buoyancy (d), and unfiltered lateral gradients of buoyancy (bx, e) sampled by an instrumented elephant seal in the East. The temperature and salinity anomalies are derived by removing the mean at each depth over the transect shown in the figure.

Fig. 3. Characteristics of lateral gradients of buoyancy (bx).

Fig. 3

Probability distribution function (a) and cumulative distribution function (b) of ∣bx∣ within (in blue) and below the mixed layer (in orange). Wavenumber spectra in the East at 300 m at different seasons of (c) buoyancy and (d) bx (computed as the spectra of buoyancy  × k2). ∣bx∣ are intensified below the mixed layer and in spring.

We now examine the seasonality of submesoscale motions across the four regions, beginning with the mixed layer depth. Across the four regions, the MLD is deeper during winter and spring and shallower in summer and fall (Supplementary Fig. 6). The deepest values are observed in winter in the East where the MLD can be as deep at 325 m (Supplementary Fig. 6a), whereas the shallowest MLDs are observed in the SW during fall (Supplementary Fig. 6d) with values as small as a few tens of meters. The observed MLD seasonality is consistent with the literature45,46 and the fact the MLD deepens during the austral winter due to the action of intense wind and cooling events that deepen the mixed layer52,53. However, the MLD also experiences a high spatial variability, with typical variations of tens of meters on the vertical over distances of tens of kilometers, and which can be as large as 100 m over just a few kilometers (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. 1–3).

The seasonal variability of submesoscale dynamics is now assessed by analyzing the root mean square (rms) of bx across the upper 500 m of the water column (Fig. 4a–d). A key finding is that submesoscale motions, characterized by intense bx of the order of 10−7 s−2, are ubiquitous year-round throughout the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean and extend down to 500 m depth, supporting the analyses presented above (Figs. 2 and 3). The seasonality of submesoscale activity displays a consistent pattern well below the ML (i.e., below 170 m): it peaks in spring and weakens in fall. This seasonality is especially evident in the East and SW, where both seasons are sampled. In summer and winter, submesoscales exhibit no significant difference in strength, but submesoscales in both these seasons are generally weaker than in spring and stronger than in fall. This seasonality is confirmed in all regions by wavenumber spectra of buoyancy at depth (Fig. 3 c and Supplementary Fig. 4b–d).

Fig. 4. Seasonality of submesoscales.

Fig. 4

Root mean square (rms) of the filtered horizontal gradient of buoyancy (bx, a–d) and lateral gradient of along-isopycnal spice (spicex, e–h) as a function of depth in the East (a, e), South (b, f), Northwest (NW, e, g), Southwest (SW, d, h) colored by season. The shaded areas correspond to the 95% Student-t confidence interval. The horizontal dashed lines are the mean mixed layer depth.

Above 170 m the observed seasonality is different. There, rapid spatial fluctuations of the MLD, as large as 100 m over just a few kilometers, are collocated with similarly strong and localized spatial fluctuations of N2 at the base of the ML (Supplementary Fig. 1d, 2f). Elevated N2 tends to be associated with enhanced bx as discussed before (Supplementary Fig. 1d, f and Supplementary Figs. 2–3f, d) and further confirmed by the strong correlation between bx maxima and N2 maxima above 170 m (Supplementary Fig. 7). These fluctuations occurring over tens of meters on the vertical imply that the statistics above 170 m are not necessarily representative of the submesoscale seasonality within the mixed layer. Rather, some physical mechanisms explaining the observed local maxima may be remnant IGWs, which may not have been fully filtered out (see Methods) or frontogenesis54,55, which is known to produce fronts with a thin vertical extent at locations of elevated N256.

We now analyze the rms of along-isopycnal lateral gradients of spice (spicex, defined in the Methods). Spicex delineates the edges of subsurface coherent eddies noticeable in spice and are often coincident with bx (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 2h, i). As such, spicex provides a complementary variable to bx to trace submesoscale features. The seasonality of spicex rms remarkably mirrors that of bx rms below 170 m, except in the South in fall (the reason for this difference remains unknown, Fig. 4e–h), confirming the enhancement of submesoscales at depth, as well as their spring intensification and fall weakening.

In the last stage of our study, we investigate whether the observed seasonality of deep submesoscale motions down to 500 m is consistent with generation by mesoscale eddy turbulence. This hypothesis is physically motivated by the fact that the vertical and horizontal scales of mesoscale eddies are linked through the ratio of the Coriolis frequency to the Brunt-Väisälä frequency18. As a result, mesoscale eddies with horizontal scales of 50–100 km are expected to extend vertically over ~500–1000 m (see Methods section “Eddy depth scale”). Their associated strain field can therefore penetrate much of the upper ocean, providing a natural mechanism through which mesoscale dynamics generate and maintain submesoscale fronts well below the mixed layer. In particular, mesoscale eddies enhance frontogenesis along their peripheries, sharpening lateral buoyancy gradients and generating ageostrophic submesoscale motions5,12,54, including below the mixed layer51. This interpretation is supported by multiple independent observations. First, enhanced bx tends to be co-located with altimetry-derived sea level anomaly (SLA) and EKE fluctuations along the seal trajectories (Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1a,f & 2d,e), consistent with the theoretical framework in which mesoscale-eddy-induced frontogenesis gives rise to deep-reaching submesoscale motions37. To further investigate this relationship, we compare the seasonal cycles of surface EKE and deep submesoscale activity in the East region, where the seal observations provide the highest profile density and complete seasonal coverage. Both the rms and the mean of EKE display a pronounced seasonal cycle (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 8c, triangles). EKE increases from winter to spring and then continuously decreases through summer and fall, when it reaches a yearly minimum.

Fig. 5. Seasonality of EKE and bx.

Fig. 5

Rms of EKE (triangle) and filtered bx at 300 m (diamond) in the East region averaged per season. 95% confidence intervals are indicated by the vertical lines. EKE and bx are positively correlated (see insert), suggesting that submesoscales at depth are generated by mesoscale eddies.

The seasonal cycle of EKE closely mirrors that of deep submesoscale activity below 170 m, with both quantities displaying a maximum in spring and a minimum in fall (shown at 300 m in Fig. 5). EKE and bx are strongly positively correlated below 170 m, with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.86 between 170 and 500 m (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Although this correlation alone does not establish a causal relationship, it complements the observed spatial correspondence between enhanced deep bx and energetic mesoscale eddies along individual seal transects. Note that the altimetry product used here only resolves scales  ≳ 100 km57,58 and consequently cannot detect a surface signature of smaller eddies, whose existence is suggested by the previously mentioned spice lenses (Fig. 2c). Taken together, these independent lines of observational evidence are consistent with the interpretation that mesoscale-eddy-induced frontogenesis is a primary mechanism governing the seasonality of deep-reaching submesoscale motions.

Discussion

This study highlights the ubiquitous presence of deep submesoscales in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. Surprisingly, submesoscale motions below the mixed layer are generally stronger than within it (Fig. 2). The pervasive nature of deep submesoscales contrasts with most of the literature, which has primarily focused on submesoscale motions within the mixed layer8. It, however, extends the results of references23,30,31,36,37 to a much larger domain over a much longer time period, while calling for extended analysis of the global ocean. Indeed, recent results show that the large-scale vertical stratification modulates the strength of submesoscale flows59. As such, oceanic regions with different EKE and background stratification than the Southern Ocean may host a different deep submesoscale regime.

Deep submesoscales exhibit a distinct seasonality in the Southern Ocean, with a spring intensification and a weak expression in fall. Previous studies have reported a similar seasonality within the ML explained by deep mixed layers and enhanced mixed layer instabilities in spring12,14,39. Here, in contrast, the seasonality of deep submesoscale cannot be explained by mixed layer instabilities. The intriguing intensification of submesoscales at depth may be driven by large mesoscale eddies, as suggested by the seasonal correlation between EKE and bx at depth. In the Southern Ocean, mesoscale EKE is primarily generated by baroclinic instability of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current and adjacent currents60. Superimposed on this background, its seasonal cycle exhibits pronounced inter-annual variability61,62. This seasonality is explained by mixed layer instabilities, which strengthen EKE via an inverse kinetic energy cascade with a lag of a few months14,39,63,64, but also by the wind stress and wind stress curl, which are stronger in winter, increasing mesoscale baroclinic instability61. The enhancement of submesoscales at depth may also be explained by the presence of smaller eddies ( < 50 km) characterized by subsurface coherent cores of temperature and salinity anomalies, as well as spice, distinct from their surroundings (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3)65. These smaller eddies may stir temperature and salinity around their edges, leading to enhanced and slanted lateral gradients of buoyancy33,40,66.

Another key feature of this extensive dataset is the weak depth dependence of submesoscales below 170 m (Figs. 3c, d, 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4b, c). This depth-invariant behavior, together with the broad exponential tail of lateral buoyancy gradient distributions at depth (Fig. 3a), the shallow spectral slopes of buoyancy (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 4b–d) and the frequent occurrence of a balanced Richardson number of order one at the location of deep submesoscales (Supplementary Figs. 1e, 2g & 9, Methods), underscores the ageostrophic nature of the observed dynamics33,51. These findings imply that deep submesoscales are associated with energetic vertical velocities, unlike the weak vertical motions typically expected in a quasigeostrophic regime19.

The present results extend the observations of reference37 from localized case studies to the basin scale. Because the deep-reaching lateral buoyancy gradients and temperature anomalies documented here are comparable in magnitude to those reported by reference37, the associated vertical velocities (up to  ~ 100 m day−1) and vertical heat transports (of order 100 W m−2) inferred in that study may likewise be representative of a much broader region of the Southern Ocean. By the same reasoning, the vertical transport of biogeochemical tracers, including nutrients, previously inferred to accompany these deep-reaching submesoscale motions4 may also be substantially more widespread than previously recognized, with potentially important implications for biogeochemistry3 and the climate system2.

Since 2023, the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite altimeter measures SLA with a spatial resolution ten times finer than conventional altimetry, providing a revolutionary two-dimensional view of surface dynamics at the meso- and submesoscale67. Smaller eddies, similar to those sampled by the seals, may have a surface signature detectable by SWOT32,67–71 and may also be sampled by opportunistically deployed near-surface drifters71. Once seal data becomes concomitant with SWOT observations, combining them will constitute an exciting avenue of research. Leveraging the synergy of combining SWOT and seal observations will enable us to quantify the three-dimensional dynamics of deep submesoscales and their associated vertical velocities32,37, unraveling the role of deep submesoscale processes on heat transport and bio-geochemical systems.

Methods

Seal data

Marine ecologists initiated a pioneering program in 2004, which consists of instrumenting marine mammals, particularly Southern Elephant Seals, with oceanographic instruments such as CTDs, fluorometers, and oxygen sensors72,73. Instrumented seals have provided a dataset with temporal and spatial resolution unmatched by traditional oceanographic platforms. Thanks to their advanced swim capabilities, Southern Elephant Seals are capable of navigating the strong currents of the Southern Ocean over several consecutive months. Remarkably, they dive up to 80 times per day, from the surface down to depths exceeding 1000 m74, making them uniquely suited for sampling submesoscale ocean features37,75–77 and the undersampled polar regions73,78.

Here, we use high-resolution data collected by instrumented Southern Elephant Seals from the MEOP-SMS database72,73, among which 4 tags recorded for the first time data at high-resolution during the austral winter for periods as long as  ~ 5 months (tags ct158*, Table 1). The seals are localized through the Argos satellite system and are equipped with sensors that record conductivity, temperature and pressure (unpumped CTD-Satellite Relay Data Logger) at a continuous frequency of 0.5Hz. Only the ascending phase of a dive is used because it is more uniform in speed and direction compared to the descent when the seal dives sinuously to forage79. After post-processing and calibration, following references79,80, accuracies are estimated to be of  ± 0.02∘ C for temperature and  ± 0.03 g kg−1 for salinity. The main characteristics of the tags used in this study are presented in Table 1 but briefly, we analyze a total of 133 598 dives. The median distance between consecutive dives is 781 m, the median depth is 301 m (with 999 m being the maximal recorded depth), and the median time between consecutive dives is 18 min. Overall, the seal data cover the time period between 10/20/2014 and 08/01/2020 and the region 42–65∘ S/-4– 117∘ E, allowing us to study the seasonality of submesoscale motions over a vast portion of the Southern Ocean (e.g., most of the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, Fig. 1a). The animals in this study were handled in accordance with the Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) ethical and Polar Environment Committees guidelines as part of the SNO-MEMO and IPEV program 109 (PI H. Weimerskirch). The experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of IPEV and the Polar Environment Committees.

Mixed layer depth

The mixed layer depth is defined as the level of a 0.03 kg m−3 density increase from 15m depth53.

Buoyancy and its horizontal gradients

We compute horizontal gradients of buoyancy, i.e., a proxy for submesoscale fronts8,19,28. To do so, we follow the same methodology as in ref.37 and ref.32: first we compute along-track time series of buoyancy, b=g(1−ρρ0), where g is gravity, ρ is potential density and ρ0 = 1025 kg m−3 is a reference density. For the analysis, in particular the calculation of horizontal buoyancy gradients bx=∂b∂x, with x the along-track distance, buoyancy b was first linearly interpolated along the seal’s path onto a regular grid of 100 m resolution, which corresponds to the shortest along-track distance between two dives. A moving average with a 1 km window was then applied such that the final dataset had a horizontal resolution of 1 km and a vertical resolution of 1 m, yielding a total of 118 121 profiles (see statistics in Fig. 1). Horizontal gradients of buoyancy are resolved by multiple vertical profiles, such that the structures are not related to aliasing of the along-track data. Potential density used to compute b is calculated from the corrected conservative temperature and absolute salinity with the TEOS10 equation81.

Spice and its horizontal along-isopycnal gradients spicex

Spice is a dynamically passive tracer characterizing temperature and salinity fluctuations, which vary from cold and fresh to warm and salty42,43. Spice variance along isopycnals is often used to disentangle internal gravity waves from meso- and submesoscale flows48,82–85. Indeed, the signature of isopycnal heaving due to internal gravity waves (IGWs) on variables such as temperature, salinity or spice, is removed when projecting the variable along isopycnals42,48. As such, horizontal gradients of along-isopycnal spice are not generated by IGWs.

To compute along-isopycnal spice and its gradient, we proceed as follows: absolute salinity and conservative temperature are first projected along-isopycnals. Spice (kg.m−3) is then computed using the Gibbs SeaWater toolbox86 from along-isopycnal temperature and salinity. Then, horizontal gradients of spice (spicex) are computed from along-isopycnal spice and finally re-projected to pressure coordinates.

Within the mixed-layer, the final re-projection to pressure coordinates tends to create spurious gradients of spice (not shown). As such, within the mixed layer, spice gradients are directly computed from spice in pressure coordinates. Since IGWs are generally weak within the ML47, doing so should not introduce considerable spicex due to isopycnal heaving.

The final field of spicex considered in this study is thus composed of along-isopycnal horizontal spice gradients below the mixed layer and horizontal spice gradient (computed in pressure coordinates) within it. Spice shown in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 1–3 is computed in pressure coordinates for visualization purposes.

Note that along-isopycnal spicex is devoid of oscillating gradients present in spicex computed in pressure coordinates, e.g., at the base of the mixed layer in Supplementary Fig. 10i, j. Contrarily, when the signature of deep submesoscale motions is strong, both spicex along-isopycnals and in pressure coordinates are intensified, e.g., below the ML in Supplementary Fig. 10g, h, k, l), confirming the robustness of our approach.

Internal gravity waves filter based on along-isopycnal spicex

Guided by the physical principle that, to leading order, propagating internal gravity waves (IGWs) do not generate appreciable horizontal gradients of along-isopycnal spice (as discussed in the previous subsection), we develop a dynamical filter to reduce the signature of IGWs (e.g., associated with reversible isopycnal heaving) on bx.

We use spicex as a mask to filter bx. Specifically, we mask out 30% of the weakest values of along-isopycnal ∣spicex∣ below the mixed layer and discard the corresponding bx (i.e., bx occurring at the locations of weak along-isopycnal ∣spicex∣ are discarded). For statistical consistency, we also discard 30% of the weakest values of ∣spicex∣ within the ML. We performed a sensitivity analysis by varying the filtering threshold between 10% and 70%, and found that the results are robust to this choice. Increasing the threshold progressively selects only the strongest gradients, leading to artificially larger rms values in the depth-, season-, and region-dependent statistics. We therefore adopt a threshold of 30% as a compromise between sufficiently reducing IGW contamination while minimizing threshold-induced statistical biases.

The proposed filter should be regarded as a physically motivated approach for substantially reducing contamination from propagating IGWs rather than as a unique dynamical decomposition. It relies on the leading-order property that propagating IGWs are nearly adiabatic and therefore primarily manifest as reversible isopycnal displacements, producing negligible along-isopycnal spice gradients48,87. However, the filter does not provide a perfect separation between IGWs and submesoscale motions. In particular, irreversible processes such as internal-wave breaking and turbulent mixing may generate along-isopycnal spice anomalies47,88, while some submesoscale signals associated with isopycnal heave may also be partially removed. Consequently, the filtered fields should be interpreted as having substantially reduced, rather than completely eliminated, IGW contamination.

Despite these limitations, the filter successfully removes most of the IGW signal below the mixed layer, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 10(see in particular the base of the mixed layer in panels c, d, i, and j), while preserving coherent bx structures associated with strong along-isopycnal spicex (Supplementary Fig. 10a, b, e–h, k, l). For example, in the South, the spikes observed in DJF and MAM around the base of the ML are considerably reduced after filtering (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5f), indicating that they were due to isopycnal heaving induced by IGWs. Importantly, our principal conclusions are robust to the application of the filter: the seasonality of bx remains unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 5e–h), as does the correlation between EKE and filtered versus unfiltered bx (Supplementary Fig. 8b). This demonstrates that the filter does not drive the conclusions of this study but instead increases confidence that they are not dominated by propagating IGWs, pointing to the statistical dominance of submesoscales motions versus IGWs in the dataset analyzed here.

Balanced inverse Richardson number

We compute the non-dimensional balanced inverse Richardson number defined as Rib−1=bx2/f2N2, with f the Coriolis parameter and N the Brunt-Väissälä frequency. This expression is derived under the assumption of geostrophic and hydrostatic balance, whereby the vertical shear of the geostrophic flow is related to the horizontal buoyancy gradient through the thermal wind relation19. Values of Rib−1 of order one indicate an ageostrophic regime, where submesoscale fronts are typically associated with strong vertical velocities19. In contrast, smaller Rib−1 values correspond to a quasigeostrophic regime, characterized by weaker vertical velocities19,51. Because the balanced inverse Richardson number is derived assuming geostrophic balance, it should be interpreted with caution in the strongly ageostrophic frontal regions investigated here, where departures from thermal wind balance are expected.

Eddy depth scale

Mesoscale eddies are typically characterized by a Burger number of order one defined as Bu=NH∣f∣L, where H and L are the vertical and horizontal length scales, respectively18. In the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean, N ≈ 5 × 10−3s−1 and ∣f∣ ≈ 10−4s−1. Consequently, a mesoscale eddy with a horizontal scale of L ≈ 50 km is expected to have a vertical scale of ~H ≈ 1000 m. This scaling implies that the strain field associated with mesoscale eddies can extend throughout much of the upper ocean, providing a physically plausible mechanism for the generation and maintenance of deep-reaching submesoscale fronts.

Altimetry data

NeurOST synthesizes multi-modal satellite observations of sea surface height (SSH) and sea surface temperature (SST) using a deep learning framework. Namely, daily NeurOST Level 4 SSH and Surface Geostrophic Currents analysis product from the University of Washington and JPL are mapped by a neural network trained with sparse Level 3 nadir altimetry observations (CMEMS, E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information) and the MUR Level 4 gridded SST product (PO.DAAC). NeurOST has been validated using surface drifters and achieves up to a 30% improvement in spatial resolution for eddy geometry over the community-standard SSH product, such as DUACS57,58.

We derive the eddy kinetic energy from NeurOST as EKE=12(ugeos2+vgeos2), with ugeos the eastward surface geostrophic current velocity and vgeosa the northward surface geostrophic current velocity. The ugeos and vgeos values are calculated by using the geostrophic balance using the SSH58. EKE is computed along the seals’ tracks.

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Fabien Roquet for maintaining and operating the MEOP database, as well as all the field participants in IPEV program 109, who have deployed and retrieved the tags mounted on Southern Elephant Seals on the remote Kerguelen Islands throughout the years, and whom made this study possible. The authors also thank Patrice Klein, Rick Salmon, Lily Dove & Mara Freilich for insightful discussions. The data were collected as part of the SNO MEMO supported by CNRS the French Polar Institute (N° 1237) and CNES-ODATIS and CNES TOSCA SO-Bio-Sat research program.

Author contributions

L.S. designed and implemented the analysis. C.G. and B.P. collected the seal data. M.H.A. contributed scientific expertise on internal gravity wave, turbulence and method validation. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and writing of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Funding

L.S. acknowledges support of NASA award 80NSSC24K1653, NSF award 2428537 and ONR YIP award N000142612249. M.H.A. was supported with institutional funds from SIO/UCSD. C.G. and B.P. acknowledge support of CNES.

Data availability

The seal data is available online at https://meop.net/database/and the satellite altimetry data is available online at (https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/NEUROST_SSH-SST_L4_V2024.0). All the codes for the analysis and figure generation are available at (https://github.com/liasiegelman/deep_submesoscale_seals).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-77299-1.

References

  • 1.Ferrari, R. A frontal challenge for climate models. Science332, 316–317 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Su, Z., Wang, J., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F. & Menemenlis, D. Ocean submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget. Nat. Commun.9, 775 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mahadevan, A. The impact of submesoscale physics on primary productivity of plankton. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.8, 161–184 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lévy, M., Franks, P. J. & Smith, K. S. The role of submesoscale currents in structuring marine ecosystems. Nat. Commun.9, 4758 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Taylor, J. R. & Thompson, A. F. Submesoscale dynamics in the upper ocean. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.55, 103–127 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vivant, F. et al. Ocean submesoscale fronts induce diabatic heating and convective precipitation within storms. Commun. Earth Environ.6, 69 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Klein, P. & Lapeyre, G. The oceanic vertical pump induced by mesoscale and submesoscale turbulence. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.1, 351–375 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McWilliams, J. C. et al. Submesoscale Currents in the Ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences472 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Rosso, I. et al. Vertical transport in the ocean due to sub-mesoscale structures: impacts in the Kerguelen region. Ocean Model.80, 10–23 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balwada, D., Smith, K. S. & Abernathey, R. Submesoscale vertical velocities enhance tracer subduction in an idealized antarctic circumpolar current. Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 9790–9802 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klein, P. et al. Ocean-scale interactions from space. Earth Space Sci.6, 795–817 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fox-Kemper, B., Ferrari, R. & Hallberg, R. Parameterization of mixed layer eddies. Part I: Theory and diagnosis. J. Phys. Oceanogr.38, 1145–1165 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mensa, J. A. et al. Seasonality of the submesoscale dynamics in the Gulf Stream region. Ocean Dyn.63, 923–941 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sasaki, H., Klein, P., Qiu, B. & Sasai, Y. Impact of oceanic-scale interactions on the seasonal modulation of ocean dynamics by the atmosphere. Nat. Commun.5, 5636 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Chereskin, T. K. & Menemenlis, D. Seasonality of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension. Geophys. Res. Lett.43, 11–304 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sasaki, H., Klein, P., Sasai, Y. & Qiu, B. Regionality and seasonality of submesoscale and mesoscale turbulence in the North Pacific Ocean. Ocean Dyn.67, 1195–1216 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dong, J., Fox-Kemper, B., Zhang, H. & Dong, C. The seasonality of submesoscale energy production, content, and cascade. Geophys. Res. Lett.47, e2020GL087388 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vallis, G. K. et al. Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. (Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  • 19.Thomas, L. N., Tandon, A. & Mahadevan, A. Submesoscale processes and dynamics. Ocean Modeling Eddying Regime177, 17–38 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Klein, P. et al. Upper ocean turbulence from high-resolution 3d simulations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.38, 1748–1763 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Capet, X., Roullet, G., Klein, P. & Maze, G. Intensification of upper-ocean submesoscale turbulence through Charney baroclinic instability. J. Phys. Oceanogr.46, 3365–3384 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R. & Fox-Kemper, B. Mixed layer instabilities and restratification. J. Phys. Oceanogr.37, 2228–2250 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang, Z., Chang, J., Zhang, X. & Zhang, W. Mixed transitional layer instability: a mechanism for deep-penetrating submesoscale processes in the subtropical upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.55, 2269–2283 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McWilliams, J. C. Submesoscale, coherent vortices in the ocean. Rev. Geophys.23, 165–182 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McWilliams, J. C. et al. Vortex generation through balanced adjustment. J. Phys. Oceanogr.18, 1178–1192 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Armi, L. et al. The history and decay of a mediterranean salt lens. Nature333, 649–651 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Armi, L. et al. Two years in the life of a mediterranean salt lens. J. Phys. Oceanogr.19, 354–370 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thompson, A. F. et al. Open-ocean submesoscale motions: a full seasonal cycle of mixed layer instabilities from gliders. J. Phys. Oceanogr.46, 1285–1307 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cao, H., Jing, Z. & Fox-Kemper, B. Scale-dependent vertical heat transport inferred from quasi-synoptic submesoscale-resolving observations. Geophys. Res. Lett.51, e2024GL110190 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang, Z. et al. Submesoscale currents in the subtropical upper ocean observed by long-term high-resolution mooring arrays. J. Phys. Oceanogr.51, 187–206 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang, J., Zhang, Z. & Qiu, B. Parameterizing submesoscale vertical buoyancy flux by simultaneously considering baroclinic instability and strain-induced frontogenesis. Geophys. Res. Lett.50, e2022GL102292 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Siegelman, L., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., Torres, H. S. & Menemenlis, D. Altimetry-based diagnosis of deep-reaching sub-mesoscale ocean fronts. Fluids5, 145 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Siegelman, L. Energetic submesoscale dynamics in the ocean interior. J. Phys. Oceanogr.50, 727–749 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dong, H. et al. Warm rings in mesoscale eddies in a cold straining ocean. Nat. Commun.16, 9252 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thompson, A. F. et al. The three-dimensional structure of fine-scale, vertical velocities in the southern ocean inferred from space. Commun. Earth Environ.7, 712 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Yu, X. et al. An annual cycle of submesoscale vertical flow and restratification in the upper ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.49, 1439–1461 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Siegelman, L. et al. Enhanced upward heat transport at deep submesoscale ocean fronts. Nat. Geosci.13, 50–55 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cao, H. & Jing, Z. Submesoscale ageostrophic motions within and below the mixed layer of the northwestern Pacific Ocean. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans127, e2021JC017812 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qiu, B., Chen, S., Klein, P., Sasaki, H. & Sasai, Y. Seasonal mesoscale and submesoscale eddy variability along the north pacific subtropical countercurrent. J. Phys. Oceanogr.44, 3079–3098 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hua, B. L. et al. Layering and turbulence surrounding an anticyclonic oceanic vortex: In situ observations and quasi-geostrophic numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech.731, 418–442 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gula, J., Blacic, T. M. & Todd, R. E. Submesoscale coherent vortices in the Gulf Stream. Geophys. Res. Lett.46, 2704–2714 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Veronis, G. et al. On properties of seawater defined by temperature, salinity, and pressure. J. Mar. Res. 30, https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/journal_of_marine_research/1241 (1972).
  • 43.Munk, W. H. et al. Internal waves and small-scale processes. Evol. Physical Oceanogr. 264–291 (The MIT Press, 1981).
  • 44.Viglione, G. A., Thompson, A. F., Flexas, M. M., Sprintall, J. & Swart, S. Abrupt transitions in submesoscale structure in southern Drake Passage: Glider observations and model results. J. Phys. Oceanogr.48, 2011–2027 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dove, L. A., Thompson, A. F., Balwada, D. & Gray, A. R. Observational evidence of ventilation hotspots in the southern ocean. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans126, e2021JC017178 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dove, L. A., Balwada, D., Thompson, A. F. & Gray, A. R. Enhanced ventilation in energetic regions of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Geophys. Res. Lett.49, e2021GL097574 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alford, M. H., MacKinnon, J. A., Simmons, H. L. & Nash, J. D. Near-inertial internal gravity waves in the ocean. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.8, 95–123 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Klymak, J. M., Crawford, W., Alford, M. H., MacKinnon, J. A. & Pinkel, R. Along-isopycnal variability of spice in the north pacific. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans120, 2287–2307 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hua, B. & Haidvogel, D. Numerical simulations of the vertical structure of quasi-geostrophic turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci.43, 2923–2936 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smith, K. S. & Ferrari, R. The production and dissipation of compensated thermohaline variance by mesoscale stirring. J. Phys. Oceanogr.39, 2477–2501 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Molemaker, M. J., McWilliams, J. C. & Capet, X. Balanced and unbalanced routes to dissipation in an equilibrated Eady flow. J. Fluid Mech.654, 35–63 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Large, W. G. & Yeager, S. G. Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies. 10.5065/D6082260 (2004). [DOI]
  • 53.de Boyer Montégut, C., Madec, G., Fischer, A. S., Lazar, A. & Iudicone, D. Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: an examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans109, C12003 (2004).
  • 54.Hoskins, B. J. & Bretherton, F. P. Atmospheric frontogenesis models: mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci.29, 11–37 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Siegelman, L. & Klein, P. Frontogenesis at jovian high latitudes. Nat. Phys.20, 1346–1351 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Smith, K. S. & Bernard, E. Geostrophic turbulence near rapid changes in stratification. Phys. Fluids25, 046601 (2013).
  • 57.Martin, S. A., Manucharyan, G. E. & Klein, P. Synthesizing sea surface temperature and satellite altimetry observations using deep learning improves the accuracy and resolution of gridded sea surface height anomalies. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst.15, e2022MS003589 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Martin, S. A., Manucharyan, G. E. & Klein, P. Deep learning improves global satellite observations of ocean eddy dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett.51, e2024GL110059 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dove, L., Freilich, M., Siegelman, L., Fox-Kemper, B. & Hall, P. Pycnocline stratification shapes submesoscale vertical tracer transport. https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/8033/ (2024).
  • 60.Thompson, A. F. & Naveira Garabato, A. C. Equilibration of the antarctic circumpolar current by standing meanders. J. Phys. Oceanogr.44, 1811–1828 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Qiu, B. & Chen, S. Seasonal modulations in the eddy field of the South Pacific Ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.34, 1515–1527 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang, Y., Chambers, D. & Liang, X. Regional trends in southern ocean eddy kinetic energy. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans126, e2020JC016973 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qiu, B. & Chen, S. Fine-scale upper-ocean variability in the Kuroshio extension region from the wide-swath swot measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr.55, 2229–2242 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang, Z. et al. Submesoscale inverse energy cascade enhances southern ocean eddy heat transport. Nat. Commun.14, 1335 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Barceló-Llull, B. et al. Anatomy of a subtropical intrathermocline eddy. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanographic Res. Pap.124, 126–139 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Meunier, T., Ménesguen, C., Schopp, R. & Le Gentil, S. Tracer stirring around a meddy: The formation of layering. J. Phys. Oceanogr.45, 407–423 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Archer, M., Wang, J., Klein, P., Dibarboure, G. & Fu, L.-L. Wide-swath satellite altimetry unveils global submesoscale ocean dynamics. Nature640, 691–696 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stammer, D., Hinrichsen, H.-H. & Käse, R. H. Can meddies be detected by satellite altimetry? J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans96, 7005–7014 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Assassi, C. et al. An index to distinguish surface-and subsurface-intensified vortices from surface observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.46, 2529–2552 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ciani, D. et al. Surface signature of mediterranean water eddies in a long-term high-resolution simulation. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap.130, 12–29 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Verger-Miralles, E. et al. Swot enhances small-scale eddy detection in the Mediterranean Sea. Geophys. Res. Lett.52, e2025GL116480 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McMahon, C. R. & Roquet, F. Animal-borne ocean sensors: a decadal vision through new eyes. Mar. Technol. Soc. J.56, 36–38 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.McMahon, C. R. et al. An enduring, 20-year, multidisciplinary seal-borne ocean sensor research collaboration in the southern ocean. Elem. Sci. Anth13, 00071 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hindell, M. A. & Lea, M.-A. Heart rate, swimming speed, and estimated oxygen consumption of a free-ranging southern elephant seal. Physiol. Zool.71, 74–84 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Della Penna, A., De Monte, S., Kestenare, E., Guinet, C. & d’Ovidio, F. Quasi-planktonic behavior of foraging top marine predators. Sci. Rep.5, 18063 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rivière, P. et al. Sub-mesoscale fronts modify elephant seals foraging behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett.4, 193–204 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Siegelman, L., O’toole, M., Flexas, M., Rivière, P. & Klein, P. Submesoscale ocean fronts act as biological hotspot for southern elephant seal. Sci. Rep.9, 5588 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zheng, Y. et al. Winter seal-based observations reveal glacial meltwater surfacing in the southeastern Amundsen Sea. Commun. Earth Environ.2, 40 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Siegelman, L. et al. Correction and accuracy of high-and low-resolution CTD data from animal-borne instruments. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.36, 745–760 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mensah, V. et al. A correction for the thermal mass–induced errors of ctd tags mounted on marine mammals. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.35, 1237–1252 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ioc, Scor. The international thermodynamic equation of seawater–2010: Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, UNESCO Manuals and Guides No 56. no. 203, pp. 196 (2010).
  • 82.Cole, S. T., Rudnick, D. L. & Colosi, J. A. Seasonal evolution of upper-ocean horizontal structure and the remnant mixed layer. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans115, C04012 (2010).
  • 83.Cole, S. T. & Rudnick, D. L. The spatial distribution and annual cycle of upper ocean thermohaline structure. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans117, C02027 (2012).
  • 84.Ferrari, R. & Rudnick, D. L. Thermohaline variability in the upper ocean. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans105, 16857–16883 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Todd, R. E., Rudnick, D. L., Mazloff, M. R., Cornuelle, B. D. & Davis, R. E. Thermohaline structure in the California Current System: observations and modeling of spice variance. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans117, C02008 (2012).
  • 86.McDougall, T. J. & Barker, P. M. Getting started with Teos-10 and the Gibbs seawater (gsw) oceanographic toolbox. Scor/iapso WG127, 1–28 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ferrari, R. & Polzin, K. L. Finescale structure of the t–s relation in the eastern North Atlantic. J. Phys. Oceanogr.35, 1437–1454 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Garrett, C. What is the “near-inertial” band and why is it different from the rest of the internal wave spectrum? J. Phys. Oceanogr.31, 962–971 (2001). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The seal data is available online at https://meop.net/database/and the satellite altimetry data is available online at (https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/NEUROST_SSH-SST_L4_V2024.0). All the codes for the analysis and figure generation are available at (https://github.com/liasiegelman/deep_submesoscale_seals).


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES