Skip to main content
NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes logoLink to NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes
. 2026 Jun 19;12:191. doi: 10.1038/s41522-026-01048-x

Wrinkle-like structures emerge from matrix complementarity and mechanical discontinuity in heterogenous biofilms

Adrien Sarlet 1, Anja K Ehrmann 1, Namiko Mitarai 1, Liselotte Jauffred 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13639082  PMID: 42321190

Abstract

Biofilms are dynamic communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced extracellular matrix. The mechanical behaviour of a biofilm is shaped by the heterogenous composition of its matrix, both spatially and chemically. In turn, these mechanics influence the biofilm’s architecture at micro- and macroscopic scales, driving its complexity and adaptability. Morphologically, this is reflected in mechanical deformations of the biofilm known as wrinkles. In nature, biofilms often host different species of bacteria, allowing for a great diversity of matrix components. Here, we use a combination of two Escherichia coli strains as a model for a multispecies biofilm in which each bacterial strain produces one of two complementary matrix fibres: an amyloid protein (curli) or a polysaccharide (phosphoethanolamine-cellulose). Using fluorescence microscopy, we confirm that the two bacterial strains rapidly segregate into isogenic sectors, decreasing local heterogeneity. Furthermore, we show how wrinkles form, both in the homogenous central region of the biofilm, as well as at the boundary between sectors (i.e. where the two matrix producers co-localize). Finally, we show that increasing strain intermixing via the addition of bacteriophages results in thicker, taller wrinkles, irrespective of whether the two fibres are produced by two different strains or co-produced by the same bacteria.

Subject terms: Biological techniques, Microbiology

Introduction

Biofilms form when microorganisms attach to a surface, divide, and embed themselves in a self-secreted extra-cellular matrix of polymeric substances (e.g. polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA). Growth in a biofilm structure collectively provides mechanical stability1, enables nutrient and signal exchange2,3, protects bacteria against phage predation4,5, and protects against antibiotics6,7. Moreover, chemical treatments can either reinforce or weaken the mechanical stability of a biofilm depending on the matrix composition8. Biofilms are assumed to account for the majority of prokaryotic biomass on Earth9. They are involved in numerous diseases10 and, more generally, negatively impact most sectors of human industries11.

In Escherichia coli in particular, the extra-cellular matrix is mainly composed of curli amyloid fibres and phosphoethanolamine-cellulose (pEtN-cellulose)12–14. The closely related Salmonella spp. is also known to produce both curli and pEtN-cellulose14. Other Enterobacteriaceae were shown to produce curli and/or cellulose15 while possessing the genes necessary for their pEtN-modification16. All in all, the distribution of the genes responsible for the production of these two fibres is much more widespread than the few species in which their production was evidenced16,17. From E. coli populations producing only one of the two fibres, we know that curli-containing biofilms are stiffer (twice the Young’s modulus (Supplementary Note 1)) than those containing only pEtN-cellulose18. More broadly, polysaccharides are known to drive biofilm colony expansion and mechanical properties19. Together, these matrix fibres form a composite material that can withstand a higher compressive load than its individual components18.

When surface attached communities grow, bacteria divide and push against each other. This leads to a build-up of mechanical tension in the community, which can be relieved by the formation of chiral swirls20, new cell layers21, bacterial motility22, or by self-driven ordering of elongated cells (i.e. active nematics)23,24. Tension can also be released by the formation of wrinkles, which are generally understood as a mechanical buckling instability25,26. In other words, when compressive forces (arising from internal stresses) exceed a critical threshold, the biofilm undergoes out-of-plane deformation, resulting in the formation of wrinkles. Throughout this study, we use the term wrinkle to describe undulations in the surface of the biofilm, including those detaching from the surface (i.e. delamination) and with a length much larger than the width. Although environmental conditions leading to wrinkle formation differ between species, certain factors seem to be decisive, namely nutrient and oxygen availability27, as well as agar concentration (proxy for substrate elasticity and friction). Specifically, as the outward expansion of the biofilm is opposed by bacteria-substrate friction, compressive stress is building up and the biofilm releases this stress by wrinkling26,28,29. Therefore, in E. coli, increasing the concentration of agar generally promotes wrinkling30. Although many parameters are known, a clear understanding of the cues that govern the onset and dynamics of wrinkling remains elusive, especially in multi-species biofilms.

In nature, one species can benefit from the matrix of another31, e.g. Vibrio cholerae can protect E. coli against the predator bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus32 or phage T733. However, there are also examples of bacteria cooperating in matrix-formation. Namely, complementary mutant strains of E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, each producing one of the two curli subunits (CsgA and CsgB)34. Species-specific regulation of colony morphology has also been documented in Shewanella algae35. Furthermore, a mutant Bacillus subtilis and Pantoea agglomerans were found to form wrinkled biofilms when well-mixed. In this example, B. subtilis provided only the peptidic component TasA, while P. agglomerans provided the exopolysaccharide36.

During colony formation, stochastic fluctuations and cell-cell mechanics drive co-cultured strains to segregate into large isogenic sectors while competing for nutrients and space37. This large-scale patterning depends on relative growth rates38,39 and inoculation densities37,39,40 and can be influenced by intra-species interactions41 and phage predation42,43. But little is known about how this affects subsequent matrix formation and wrinkling.

In this study, we ask how the underlying spatial organization of the bacterial colony controls 3D biofilm architecture. We investigate how local cooperation between curli and pEtN-cellulose producing populations impacts wrinkle formation. Using gene recombination, we prepared a pair of (otherwise similar) E. coli strains, each producing one specific matrix fibre. We used this combination of strains as model biofilms, where different strains contribute complementary fibres to the extracellular matrix. Combining laser-scanning confocal microscopy and 3D-image analysis, we mapped the biofilms’ macroscopic architecture. We evaluated the role of genetic heterogeneity and found that wrinkles and wrinkle-like structures are not restricted to regions where curli and pEtN-cellulose producing strains are well-mixed. Instead, they can also form on the boundaries between isogenic sectors. Lastly, we added the virulent phage T6 to the system to distort the spatial patterning of the colony and investigate subsequent changes in wrinkling. Based on these results, we propose a mechanical model of wrinkle formation in heterogenous biofilms.

Results

pEtN-cellulose reconstituted in curli-producing E. coli

Starting from a standard curli-producing but cellulose deficient (Cur+) E. coli K-12 strain, MG1655, we repaired the production of pEtN-cellulose by P1 transducing bcsQ from AR3110, in which it had been previously repaired12. The resulting strain produces both curli and pEtN-cellulose (Cur+pCe+). From there, we mutated the curli producing genes csgBA by P1 transduction from the strain producing none of the two fibres (∅)20, to create a pEtN-cellulose-only strain (pCe+) (Fig. 1A and Table 1).

Fig. 1. pEtN-cellulose reconstituted in curli-producing E. coli.

Fig. 1

E. coli biofilms grown for 5 days on salt-free agar (B–E) and on salt-free agar supplemented with Congo red (F–I). A Illustration of the strain set used in this study. B+F AS011 producing both curli and pEtN-cellulose (Cur+pCe+); C+G MS613 producing only curli (Cur+); D+H AS012 producing only pEtN-cellulose (pCe+) and E+I: RMV612 producing neither curli, nor pEtN-cellulose (∅). Scale bar: 1 cm. Note in particular the difference of shade between H and I, which otherwise appear identical in (D and E). J Pseudo-coloured fluorescence image of a two-strain biofilm (pCe++Cur+) initially mixed in a 1:1 ratio grown for 5 days on salt-free agar. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Table 1.

Strains used in this work

Strain Name Genotype Matrix composition References
MS613 Cur+ MG1655 K-12 (F- λ- ilvG- rfb-50 rph-1) curli 22,79
RMV612 ∅ MG1655 csgAB::kan / 20
AS011 Cur+pCe+ MS613 bcsQ+ curli, pEtN-cellulose This work
AS012 pCe+ AS011 csgAB::kan pEtN-cellulose This work

Grown on salt-free agar, Cur+pCe+ biofilms exhibit long radial wrinkles (Fig. 1B) and a larger diameter than biofilms formed by other strains (Fig. S1). Cur+ biofilms form a previously described12 characteristic ring pattern around the central region (Figs. 1C and S2), but both the pCe+ strain and the ∅ mutant, producing none of the fibres, have smooth phenotypes (Fig. 1D, E). We confirmed the production of pEtN-cellulose in the pCe+ strain by supplementing the salt-free agar with Congo red, which binds both amyloid fibres and cellulose12,44 (Fig. 1H, I). Interestingly, the presence of Congo red also influences the biofilm phenotypes: the Cur+pCe+ biofilm showed shallower wrinkling (Fig. 1F), while the pCe+ biofilm exhibited dense wrinkles in the central region, otherwise absent without Congo red (Fig. 1H). A weakening of the interaction between curli and pEtN-cellulose could explain the relatively smoother phenotype in the Cur+pCe+ strain. Such an effect by Congo red was already reported in E. coli UTI89 by Reichhardt et al.44, who also reported increased wrinkling in their pEtN-cellulose-only strain in the presence of Congo red, due to a higher affinity of the dye for pEtN-cellulose than for curli.

We inoculated a suspension of the Cur+ and pCe+ strains (each labelled with a unique fluorescent reporter) in equal proportions. Once the colony expanded beyond the well-mixed area of the inoculation droplet, the population segregated into large isogenic sectors39, each formed by a strain with the ability to produce one of the matrix fibres (Fig. 1J). As segregation is the result of small variations at the fast-growing colony front, this happens before the onset of matrix production. Specifically, the fibre production starts 48–72 h after entry into stationary phase5,33. Therefore, we can use this system to test how a given spatial patterning affects the overall biofilm morphology. A zoom-in on the central region shows dense wrinkling and a pattern of curli and pEtN-cellulose producers (cyan and magenta) mixed at subwrinkle scales (Fig. S3A). The corresponding height map (h-map) emphasises the surface structure of the complex architecture in the mixed biofilms (Fig. S3B, C). We verified that curli and pEtN-cellulose fibres were present in both mixed and mono-strain biofilms by imaging biofilm cross-sections stained with Direct Red 23 (Fig. S4). We found a strong stratification as characterized in a very similar system45 and confirmed the presence of pEtN-cellulose within the wrinkle cavities and on the ridges. Based on this confirmation and to support readability, we will henceforth refer to strains capable of producing these fibres as producers. However, while remembering that matrix production varies in different layers of the biofilm and that certain subpopulations might not produce any fibres at all.

Wrinkle-like structures are formed on the boundaries of curli and pEtN-cellulose-rich regions

Outside of the homogenous central region, the two strains are only in contact at the boundary between their respective isogenic sectors (Fig. 2A). We verified that there was no strain stratification by cross-sectioning the biofilm (Fig. 2B). Despite this strong demixing of genotypes, the biofilm formed radial wrinkle-like structures at the sector boundaries exclusively. We did not observe any wrinkles in isogenic sectors, which indicates a synergistic interplay between the strains, each producing one matrix fibre. Morphologically, two types of radial wrinkle-like structures were observed. First, wrinkles formed on the boundaries between large adjacent sectors of mono-strains, each producing one of the fibres (Fig. 2C). Alternatively, wrinkles formed around a thin pCe+ sector enclosed between two Cur+ sectors (Fig. 2D). We cross-sectioned sector boundaries of mixed pCe++Cur+ biofilms (i.e. cross-sections perpendicular to wrinkles) to characterize the two different types of wrinkle-like structures (Fig. 2E, F]. In both cases, the pCe+ bacteria (magenta) dominate the ridge (white arrows) of the wrinkles. We also found that at the sector boundary, the mixed pCe+ and Cur+ layer was present at the surface, while the pCe+ bacteria extended underneath (Fig. 2E). In both cases pCe+ filled up the cavity of the wrinkle (Fig. 2E, F). Staining with Direct Red 23 confirms the presence of both matrix fibres in the wrinkle-like structure (Fig. S4D). The patterning of the two fibres in the wrinkle corresponds to the patterning of the two strains at the interaction interface, confirming the non-diffusive nature of the matrix fibres and the presence of pEtN-cellulose inside the wrinkle cavities.

Fig. 2. Wrinkle-like structures are formed on the boundaries of curli and pEtN-cellulose-rich regions.

Fig. 2

A Sketch of a two-strain biofilm from a 1:1 mixed suspension (Cur++pCe+). The letters indicate from where in the colonies the images in (C, D, black boxes) and the cross-sections in (B, E, F, black lines) were taken. B Pseudo-coloured wide-field fluorescence microscopy of a cross-section through a biofilm grown from a 1:1 suspension of curli- and pEtN-cellulose-producing strains (Cur++pCe+). Scale bar: 1 mm. C, D Pseudo-coloured maximum-intensity projections (periphery) and the respective height map (h-map) from the outer region of the two-strain colony (Cur++pCe+). Scale bar: 500 μm. Pseudo-coloured confocal imaging of cross-sections of wrinkle-like structures in the outer region, at the boundary between two larger sectors (E) and through a thin pEtN-cellulose sector (F). Scale bar: 100 μm.

Wrinkle-like structures are formed in curli-sparse regions

As curli and pEtN-cellulose fibres possess distinct mechanical properties18,46, they contribute differently to E. coli biofilm architecture. Curli is considered to be the stiff—but brittle—component that is able to withstand a large compressive load. In contrast, pEtN-cellulose acts as a glue-like tension-bearing matrix component47. We therefore investigated whether the wrinkle formation we observed on the boundaries between curli and pEtN-cellulose-rich regions requires both fibres or rather arises from the interruption of curli sectors. To do so, we mixed the Cur+ with the ∅ strain, which produces neither curli nor pEtN-cellulose. We found stronger wrinkling in the centre region of the pCe++Cur+ biofilm than in the ∅+Cur+ biofilm (Fig. 3A–C). This indicates that ∅-dilution of the Cur+ strain creates a more viscous material capable of dissipating the stress. Nevertheless, when considering the segregated periphery of the biofilm, the thin sectors (pCe+ or ∅) squeezed between two Cur+ sectors rose in wrinkle-like structures in both cases (Fig. 3D, E). The structures had similar topography and maximal heights (h ≈ 100 μm), similar in height to the wrinkles of the pCe++Cur+ mix’ central region (Fig. 3A). These results indicate that wrinkle formation at the sector boundaries of a multi-strain biofilm is the consequence of an interruption of rigid (curli-rich) sectors and does not necessarily require the presence of pEtN-cellulose. Therefore, wrinkling here is (at least partially) determined by the elastic properties of the biofilm.

Fig. 3. Wrinkle-like structures are formed in curli-sparse regions.

Fig. 3

A, B Pseudo-coloured maximum-intensity projections (centre) and the corresponding height map (h-map) of a region-of-interest from the central region of two-strain colonies of (pCe++Cur+) A and the curli-producer and the strain producing neither curli nor pEtN-cellulose (∅+Cur+) (B), see legends. Scale bar: 500 μm. Colour bar in (E) and note that the data in A is the same as in Fig. S3. C Height distributions of the h-maps in (A, B). The inset is a sketch of the biofilms, where the central region-of-interest is indicated (black box). N = 262144 in both cases. Pseudo-coloured maximum-intensity projections (periphery) and the corresponding height map (h-map) of a region-of-interest from the outer region of the two-strain colonies (pCe++Cur+) (D) and (∅+Cur+) (E), see legends. Scale bar: 500 μm. F Maximum wrinkle heights, h, versus the length of the radial wrinkle, l,measured from the centre and outwards. Examples of wrinkles from two-strain colonies of pCe++Cur+ (purple) and ∅+Cur+ (green), where the thicker full line is a spline-like smoothed curve-fit. Inset: h versus the axis perpendicular to the wrinkle, x, for pCe++Cur+ (purple) and ∅+Cur+ (green). Colour scale corresponds to the main plot.

Phage predation changes biofilm spatial organization through increased intermixing

We have established that biofilm morphology reflects the underlying multi-strain colony and that wrinkles form sub-sequent to growth-driven spatial organization. To quantify this, we calculated the distances from wrinkle ridges to sector boundaries in mixed biofilms (pCe++Cur+) and found a strong correlation compared to the mono-strain Cur+pCe+ biofilm producing both fibres (Figs. S7–S8). In the next step, we decided to manipulate this organization through bacteriophage infection. Indeed, Ruan and co-authors have previously demonstrated that predation by phage T6 on a growing colony slows down spatial segregation through increased cell-cell alignment42. In other words, we used phage predation to enforce homogeneity into our otherwise heterogenous biofilm matrix. First, we confirmed that all strains were sensitive to phage T6 and that the phage could infect and spread in salt-free medium (Fig. S5). Then we added phage T6 to a mixed (pCe++Cur+) biofilm shortly after initial inoculation and observed how segregation was suppressed during range expansion (Figs. 4A and and S7). As a consequence, wrinkling ceased to be restricted to the central region and predefined sector boundaries. Instead, pCe++Cur+ biofilm morphology resembled a Cur+pCe+ biofilm under phage T6 predation, characterized by large wrinkles with large separation (i.e. wavelength) (Fig. 4B). Specifically, the wrinkle expansion includes a broadening (in the surface plane) and a h-raise (Fig. 4C) for the radial wrinkles, reaching approximately 500 μm in both directions (Fig. 4D). From cross-sections of these radial wrinkles, we confirmed that the composite material (i.e. pCe+ and Cur+ under phage T6 predation) retained diversity throughout the biofilm. This also resulted in different patterning of the wrinkles (Fig. 4E, cf. Fig. 2E, F). Moreover, one large wrinkle often consisted of a small set of wrinkles (Fig. 4E), probably resulting from individual wrinkles pushed toward each other by the adjacent flat regions29. Alternatively, we also inoculated the phages a few mm away from the nascent colony. The result was that the phenotypical change (i.e. large wrinkles with large separation) was restricted to the area of contact with the phages (Fig. 4F). The above observations are consistent with phage T6 erasing faster-growing biofilm fronts, which prevents segregation of strains42. However, it is worth noting that T6 predation did not shape our biofilm fronts to mono-layers of bacteria, in contrast to what was reported for similar E. coli strains42. Instead, biofilms retained their volume (Fig. S6], indicating some protection (e.g. shielding) from matrix fibres.

Fig. 4. Phage predation changes biofilm spatial organization through increased intermixing.

Fig. 4

Pseudo-coloured fluorescence images of pCe++Cur+ biofilm (A) and Cur+pCe+ biofilm grown of isogenic but coloured (magenta+cyan) strains (B). In both cases, they were grown for 10 days on salt-free agar with (phages+) or without phage T6 added (see legends). Scale bar: 5 mm. The change in phenotype of the negative controls (compared to Figs. 1–4) is due to a change in growth conditions (see “Methods”). C, D Pseudo-coloured maximum-intensity projections and their respective height maps (h-map) from the central region (B) and outer periphery (C) region of the two-strain colony (Cur++pCe+) with T6 phages added (phages+). Scale bar: 500 μm. E Pseudo-coloured confocal imaging of cross-sections of wrinkles in the outer region (periphery) in two-strain colonies (Cur++pCe+) with T6 phages added (phages+). F Pseudo-coloured fluorescence images of the two-strain biofilm (pCe++Cur+) initially mixed in a 1:1 ratio, grown for 10 days on salt-free agar with phage T6 added next to the biofilm (see legends). Scale bar: 5 mm.

Discussion

Biofilm-formation relies on the secretion of an extracellular matrix that constitutes a robust three-dimensional architecture. The resulting surface wrinkles depend on cell-cell interactions, substrate adhesion, and the mechanical properties of the matrix fibres. For example, curli and pEtN-cellulose have either synergistic or antagonistic effects on bacterial adhesion, depending on the substrate48–50. Multiple studies have shown that the distribution of matrix component is heterogenous, even in isogenic systems18,51, and that heterogeneity arises from intricate regulation of matrix production51. To capture this spatial heterogeneity, agent-based models have incorporated substrate friction, adhesion, and nutrient dynamics52–54. In addition, small adhesion and nutrient variabilities were proposed to shape the global pattern55.

Building on this framework, we sought to decipher heterogeneity arising from the spatial organization of multiple strains contributing to a biofilm, rather than from variations in gene expression. To this end, we investigated matrix complementarity by mixing E. coli curli- and pEtN-cellulose producers (Cur++pCe+) with distinct mechanical properties18,47. The resulting surface-attached biofilms had a homogeneous composite centre and a heterogenous periphery composed of mono-strain sectors separated by well-defined boundaries.

In the homogeneous central region of the mixed biofilm, we observed intense wrinkling, even exceeding that of the strain producing both fibres (Cur+pCe+). While the initial deposition on the substrate causes an up-concentration of cells on the rim of the inoculation droplet (i.e., “coffee ring"56,57), likely the inwards growth will enhance the compressive stress and the resulting wrinkling29. However, wrinkling intensity was sensitive to subtle growth variations (compare Figs. 1B and 4A with Fig. S2). These variations may be reflected in substrate mechanics58–60, signalling3, cell death25 or matrix production51.

In contrast, in the heterogeneous peripheral region, wrinkle-like structures were restricted to boundaries between curli (Cur+) and pEtN-cellulose (pCe+) sectors, where complementary matrix fibres interact. Furthermore, under specific conditions, wrinkles formed on the boundary of sectors of the strain producing neither fibres (∅). These observations favours the conclusion that tension is building up in curli-rich regions of high rigidity and that this tension is released by spontaneous wrinkling in the more flexible (cellulose-rich) regions.

From the cross-sections, we found biofilms detaching from the substrate (i.e. delaminated), similar to what has been reported for Pseudomonas aeruginosa61 and Vibrio cholerae29. However, this matches the expectations for high substrate rigidity (1.5% agar) of delamination favoured over wrinkling29. We also found pEtN-cellulose producers filled the wrinkle interior, making it unlikely that these wrinkles could serve as transport channels12,14,62, as in B. subtilis63. However, it remains unresolved whether cellulose-producing cells progressively squeeze between leaflet and substrate or occupy gaps created by curli-layer delamination. In either case, this suggests that there could be more pEtN-cellulose producers in the biofilm, than what appears from the top views (Fig. S3A].

Biofilms have been shown to protect against phage infection. Mature E. coli biofilms resist phage T7 via curli-mediated inhibition of phage transport and binding5, and in Staphylococcus epidermidis, biofilm architecture strongly influences phage efficacy64. Phages can also degrade extracellular fibres or exploit them as receptors65–67. However, none of these activities have been observed for phage T6, and we did not test interactions between T6 and curli or pEtN-cellulose fibres as such68. Instead, phage exposure was used to delay segregation and, thereby, affect wrinkling. Indeed, we found that mono-strain (Cur+pCe+) and mixed (pCe++Cur+) biofilms had similar morphologies under infection. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of phage-induced changes in biofilm wrinkling. Following Ruan et al.42,43, we attribute this to changes in the directional order in the biofilm. While phage-mediated killing at the colony front increases alignment of rod-shaped bacteria (behind the front), diversity is retained, and the merging of sectors is delayed. This indicates that the resulting composite matrix resembled that of mono-strain biofilms.

Directional elastic instability is a general feature of anisotropic thin films, where wrinkle orientation and spacing depend on the alignment of the material director relative to the compressive stress69. In biofilms, orientational ordering of rod-shaped bacteria generates anisotropic stress distributions70, correlating with aspect ratio23, adhesion24,71, and matrix formation (in V. cholerae70,72). Thus, phage-induced alignment likely creates mechanical anisotropy and may bias wrinkling toward fewer, more dominant radial modes. Phage infection may additionally alter stress-signalling pathways, controlling matrix production3.

These observations were integrated within an extended mechanical framework, covering both the homogenous biofilm interior and the heterogenous periphery (Fig. 5). Mechanical thin sheet models73 regard biofilms as flexible material expanding radially, while the adhesion of the film to its substrate generates friction in the direction of the biofilm centre (anti-parallel to expansion). This leads to a build-up of shear stress in the biofilm, relieved by wrinkling. This description covers the homogeneous biofilm interior (Fig. 5A). To predict wrinkling size and periodicity, homogenous biofilms have been described as continuous thin elastic plates and wrinkles as Föppl-von Kármán equations (based on Young’s modulus, Cauchy tensors, and Poisson ratio)74,75. Furthermore, adding additional thin plates with different elastic properties can account for colony-substrate friction, gradients (e.g. of air, humidity, and nutrients)28,29,76, and viscous relaxation77. To encompass the peripheral region, we propose to incorporate spatial heterogeneity as thin (curli-rich) plates interrupted by softer tension-bearing (pEtN-cellulose) regions (Fig. 5B). Within this heterogeneous elastic landscape, stress accumulates in stiff domains and is released at compliant interfaces, explaining the emergence of wrinkles at sector boundaries.

Fig. 5. Wrinkling in homogenous and heterogenous biofilms.

Fig. 5

Illustration of wrinkle-formation in the homogenous central region (A) and on the heterogenous sector boundaries (B). The expansion of the biofilm is counteracted by the friction at the biofilm-agar interface (black arrows) and adhesion (grey arrows). The composite material of both strains and fibres (purple) is semi-rigid (dilute network of white lines), and the mono strain sectors of pEtN-cellulose (pCe+) and curli (Cur+) producers are soft or rigid (tight network of white lines), respectively. Conceptual model of orientational order prior to wrinkling (C, D) or after wrinkling (E, F) without phages (C+E) or with phages (D+F). The letters indicate from where in the colonies the top views (C, D, black boxes) and the cross-sections (E, F, black lines) were taken. Note that while the illustrations of the orientational order prior to wrinkling build on earlier reports42, the orientational order after wrinkling is an interpretation of the results of this study.

Phage-induced alignment further modifies this mechanical landscape by imposing directional elasticity and enhancing compositional homogeneity, thereby shifting wrinkle periodicity and regularity (Fig. 5C–F). In this way, we provide a unified mechanical interpretation linking matrix complementarity, spatial organization, and phage-mediated re-organization to global biofilm architecture (Fig. 5).

Our study establishes Escherichia coli as a versatile model for investigating wrinkle formation in Gram-negative biofilms. By reconstituting the two essential matrix components (curli amyloid fibres and phosphoethanolamine-cellulose), we created a fully controllable two-strain system that mimics multi-species heterogeneity. This approach enables systematic explorations of how matrix composition and spatial organization govern mechanical instabilities such as wrinkling manifest in the macroscopic biofilm morphology. Given the growing clinical threat of Gram-negative biofilms78, this model system provides a valuable platform to decipher the mechanics of biofilms and develop strategies to mitigate biofilm-associated problems.

Methods

M63+xyl media

The 5× M63 salt solution was composed of 15 g/l anhydrous KH2PO4 (≥98.0%, P9791, Sigma-Aldrich), 35 g/l anhydrous K2HPO4 (≥99.0%, 60353, Sigma-Aldrich), 10g/l (NH4)2SO4 (≥99.0%, 09978, Sigma-Aldrich), 2.5 ml 20 mM FeSO4 (≥99.5%, 44970, Sigma-Aldrich), 20 mM Na-Citrate (≥99.5%, 71402, Sigma-Aldrich). The M63 minimal agar was composed of 1× M63 salt, 1 μg/ml thiamine hydrochloride (≥99%, T4625, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM MgSO4 (≥99.5%, 63138, Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mg/ml xylose (≥99%, W360600, Sigma-Aldrich) and 15g/l BD Bacto™ agar (10455513, Fisher Scientific) dissolved in Millipore water.

M9 agar

The M9 agar was composed of 2 g/l glucose (22720, Serva), 1× M9 salts, 2 mM MgSO4 (0168, JT Baker), 100 μM CaCl2 (2461, Chemsolute), 1× trace elements and 0.5 μg/ml thiamine hydrochloride (T4625, Sigma-Aldrich) and 15 g/l BD Bacto™ agar (10455513, Fisher Scientific) dissolved in Millipore water. 5× M9 salts consist of 34g/l Na2PO4, 15 g/l KH2PO4, 2.5 g/l NaCl (27810.295, VWR) and 5 g/l NH4Cl (09711, Fluka). 2000× trace elements consist of 37 mM FeCl3, 7 mM ZnSO4, 2.3 mM CuSO4, 5.9 mM MnCl2, 2.5 mM CoCl2, 1.6 mM Na2EDTA, pH8. 50 μM NiCl2 was added when appropriate for counter-selection against tetA.

LB agar

The regular LB agar was composed of 10 g/l Gibco™ Bacto™ tryptone (16279751, Fisher Scientific), 5 g/l Gibco™ Bacto™ yeast extract (16279781, Fisher Scientific), 5 g/l NaCl (≥99%, S9888, Sigma-Aldrich) and 15 g/l BD Bacto™ agar (10455513, Fisher Scientific) dissolved in Millipore water. When specified, the LB agar was supplemented with 30 μg/ml kanamycin sulphate (≥95%, K1377, Sigma-Aldrich), 50 μg/ml spectinomycin dihydrochloride pentahydrate (≥62%, S-9007, Sigma) or 50 μg/ml tetracycline hydrochloride (T7660, Sigma-Aldrich).

Salt-free agar

The salt-free agar was composed of 10 g/l Gibco™ Bacto™ tryptone (16279751, Fisher Scientific), 5 g/l Gibco™ Bacto™ yeast extract (16279781, Fisher Scientific) and 15 g/l BD Bacto™ agar (10455513, Fisher Scientific) dissolved in Millipore water. When specified, the salt-free agar was supplemented with 30mg/l Direct Red 23 (≥30%, 212490, Sigma-Aldrich) or 40 mg/l Congo Red (≥35%, C6767, Sigma-Aldrich), previously filter-sterilized and added to the melted agar immediately before pouring.

Background

MS61379 is a MG1655 K-12 strain producing curli amyloid fibres but not pEtN-cellulose (Cur+) due to an early stop codon in bcsQ in E. coli K-12 strains. AR311012 is a W3110 (i.e. K-12) derivative in which bcsQ was repaired, thereby restoring pEtN-cellulose production.

AS011

From MS613, a xylose auxotrophic mutant was created by P1 transduction from the xylA mutant of the Keio collection (JW3537)80, xylA being distant from bcsQ by approximately 35 kbp, followed by selection on kanamycin. The resulting xylose auxotroph was then repaired by P1 transduction from AR3110, followed by selection on M63 + xylose medium. The resulting strains were subsequently inoculated on salt-free agar for biofilm growth. One of those strains, AS011, showed similar wrinkling to that of AR3110. Thus, that strain’s bcsQ was restored simultaneously with xylA, and therefore, it produces both curli fibres and pEtN-cellulose (Cur+pCe+). The P1 transduction protocol was adapted from81,82.

AS012

From AS011, csgBA was mutated by P1 transduction from RMV61220, which produces neither curli nor pEtN-cellulose (∅), thereby yielding AS012, which produces pEtN-cellulose but not curli (pCe+).

Introduction of fluorescent markers

For each of the four strains, MS613, RMV612, AS011 and AS012 variants were constructed expressing either gfp or rfp. The fluorescent reporter genes were integrated into the genome of the strains following the protocols for λ-Red recombineering and tetA dual-selection protocol as described by Bayer et al.83. Briefly, strains were first transformed with pSIM1984. The expression of the λ-Red proteins was induced by 20 min incubation at 42 °C. The cells were made electrocompetent by three rounds of washing in ice-cold water. 4 ng/μl gel-purified dsDNA or 400nM ssDNA oligonucleotide was used for the transformation (final concentration in 50 μl competent cells). In the first step, a J23100-gfp-tetA dsDNA cassette, amplified from the genomic DNA of the strain SEGA00783 was integrated into the glmS-pstS intergenic region of all strains. Successful recombinants were selected on LB agar containing 50 μg/ml tetracycline. Candidate colonies were restreaked at least once on LB+ tetracycline and subsequently verified by colony PCR and Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Germany). In order to exchange the gfp and tetA genes for rfp, or to remove tetA for a marker-less labelling with gfp, a second round of recombineering and tetA counter-selection was performed. Cells were transformed with either a rfp dsDNA fragment amplified from the genomic DNA of strain SEGA-007-rfp83 or a ssDNA oligonucleotide containing the appropriate homology sequences to remove tetA from the J23100-gfp-tetA cassette. To select for the correct recombinants, cells were first recovered in LB medium overnight, washed in 1× M9 salts and a dilution row plated on M9 glucose plates supplemented with 50 μM NiCl2. Candidate colonies were restreaked twice on LB agar and verified by colony PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Biofilm culture

A liquid culture was inoculated from a single colony and grown overnight in LB medium. The optical density of the resulting bacterial suspension was measured at 600 nm (OD600). The bacteria were diluted to reach a concentration corresponding to OD600 = 0.4. Four drops of 2 μl each were typically inoculated onto a salt-free agar Petri dish. The resulting biofilms were sealed with Parafilm ® and grown at 28 °C for 5 days. For biofilms inoculated from a mix of two different bacterial strains, each liquid culture was brought to OD600 = 0.4 before mixing them in the indicated proportion. Immediately before imaging, one biofilm was cut out from the agar and placed on a glass slide. The glass slide was flipped because the fluorescence and confocal microscopes were inverted.

Phage infection

The biofilms grown in the presence of T6 phages were inoculated as described above. After 6 h of incubation at room temperature, 1 μl of T6 phage suspension (6 ⋅ 108 pfu/ml) was spotted either 1 mm away from the dried bacterial drop (side inoculation) or was added on top of the dried bacterial drop (centre inoculation). The method was derived from refs. 42,43. The biofilms were then incubated at 21 °C (room temperature) for 10 days before imaging. The phage suspension was diluted in salt free LB broth from a phage stock solution prior to infection.

Note that the phage experiments were performed under different growth conditions than the other experiments, following the protocol by Ruan et al. closely42. They were also performed in a different lab facility using different stocks to prepare the growth medium.

To test susceptibility of strains to phage T6, liquid cultures of all bacterial strains were inoculated in LB medium from overnight cultures. Cultures were incubated at 37 °C until they reached exponential growth. 100 μl of bacterial culture was then mixed with 3 ml top agar (8g/l NaCl (27810.295, VWR), 6g/l BD Bacto™ agar (10455513, Fisher Scientific)) and poured on top of a fresh LB agar plate. After the top agar solidified, 2 μl of concentrated phage stock solution was added as a drop on top of the agar. Plates were incubated at 37 °C.

The possibility of phage T6 infection in salt free LB medium was evaluated by measuring OD600 growth curves of RMV612 (∅) in a FLUOstar Omega microtiter plate reader (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany). After an overnight preculture in standard LB broth, RMV612 was diluted 1:250 into fresh salt-free LB broth (without agar) and incubated at 37 °C under shaking. When reaching exponential phase (OD600 ≈ 0.3 − 0.4) the bacteria were diluted again 1:10 into a 96-well microtiter plate containing salt-free LB broth and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min. Then, dilutions of a phage stock prepared in salt-free medium were added, the plate sealed with a breathable film, and OD600 was measured every 5min over the course of 20 h. The control samples were grown in LB medium supplemented with 10 mM MgSO4. The equivalent amount of salt-free medium was added to the phage-free control samples.

Cross-section

Following 5 or 10-day growth, 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol (≥98%, C0378, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the Petri dish containing the biofilm to be sectioned. Prior to sectioning, the biofilm (and surrounding agar) was cut out and placed in a small Petri dish. There, the biofilm was embedded in agar also supplemented with 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol: ~12.5 ml 50 °C agar was poured into the dish without directly pouring on the biofilm. The role of chloramphenicol is to prevent further colonisation of bacteria into the newly poured agar. Once the top agar had solidified, the biofilm was cross-sectioned with a scalpel, flipped, and transferred into a glass-bottomed dish for imaging. The cross-sectioning procedure was simplified from30.

Brightfield microscopy

Brightfield images with and without Congo Red were acquired using a Reshape Imaging Device, Model 3.1a, Firmware 1.0.103 (Reshape Biotech, Copenhagen, Denmark), using the integrated 12 MP camera (Reshape Biotech) and top light illumination without optical magnification. Image analysis was performed via the Reshape Discovery Platform (2025).

Fluorescence microscopy

We used a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 4× air immersion objective (Nikon, Plan Fluor, 4×/0.13, ∞/1.2 WD 16.5) and paired with an Andor Neo camera (Andor, Belfast, UK). GFP and RFP were excited by an Hg lamp using the FITC (FITC Filter Cube Set, Olympus, York, UK) and Texas Red cubes (Texas Red™ Filter Cube Set, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. The tiles were stitched (20% overlap, pixel size: 1.625μm) automatically upon acquisition by the microscope’s native software: NIS-Elements Advanced Research (4.13.03, Nikon).

Confocal scanning microscopy

We used a Leica DMI6000 CS SP5 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with the Ar (488 nm) and HeNe (543 nm) laser lines sequentially to excite GFP and RFP, respectively. We used a 5× air objective (Leica, N Plan, 5×/0.12 PH0) with a focal depth of ~1.5 μm. We used z-steps of 0.5 μm, pinhole diameter of 88.44 μm, and scan speed of 400 Hz with line averaging of 3 (no frame averaging). For the cross sections, we used a 40× (Leica, N Plan, 40×/0.55) air objective with a focal depth of ~0.5 nm and a pinhole diameter of 154.41 μm, but same scan speed, z-steps, and line averaging (no frame averaging).

Height maps and profiles

Using custom-made Matlab (Matlab R2023, The MathWorks, Inc) procedures and starting from z-stack images with two channels (GFP and RFP), the maximum intensity projection over the (z)-dimension of each channel was computed individually. Both projections were normalised so that their intensities could be compared. Every pixel of the image was assigned one colour (green or red) by comparing the two projections for that pixel. Then for every pixel in (x, y) in the original z-stack, the z-coordinate of the maximum intensity pixel was determined in the colour channel previously assigned to that pixel. This procedure relies on the maximal fluorescence intensity to originate from air-cell interfaces and subsurface attenuation to be limited due to optical confinement in dense biofilms. However, this method could give rise to a systematic subsurface bias and should, thus, be limited to relative height measurements85. Then all z-coordinates were translated to the minimum value of the pixel and converted to metric units. This resulted in an (x, y)-image mapping the height of the brightest pixels: h-map. For wrinkle profiles, the h-map was used to find maximum wrinkle heights in pixel i over the length of the wrinkle: li=li-1+(xi-xi-1)2+(yi-yi-1)2.

Distances from wrinkle ridges to closest sector boundaries

The wrinkle ridge structures were extracted from h-maps using Gaussian smoothing (smoothing parameter of 4), Hessian-based ridge detection (threshold parameter 0.08), and skeletonization, where small objects below 100 pixels were removed. In parallel, sector boundaries were extracted from binarized maximum intensity projection over the (z)-dimension of the GFP-channel by removing small objects (less than 75–330 pixels), applying morphologic closing with a disk (radius of 1–3 pixels), and using the Canny edge detection filter. For each ridge coordinate, the Euclidean distance to the nearest sector boundary point was computed by using a k-d tree nearest-neighbour search with k = 1, and the histogram of the distance was created for each image, using the conversion of 6.0567 μm per pixel.

Strain occupancy

The images recorded from RFP-channels had generally lower intensities than the GFP channel. Therefore, when optimizing for full colony views, we underestimated the RFP in the thin bacterial periphery, compared to GFP (Fig. 4). To verify that this did not reflect a real attenuation, we did zoom-ins on the periphery (Fig. S6).

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sine Lo Svenningsen and Bertil Kent Gummesson for access to the Keio collection and to their microbiology facilities, Cécile Bidan and Jeannette Steffen for providing the AR3110 strain, and Stanley Brown for his mentoring regarding the P1 transduction. This research was supported by grants from the Independent Research Fund Denmark grant no. DFF0165-00032B and grant no. DFF0165-00103B (L.J.), Danish National Research Foundation grant no. DNRF137 (L.J.), and Novo Nordisk Foundation NERD grant no. NNF21OC0068775 (N.M.) and Synergy grant no. NNF23OC0086712 (L.J.).

Author contributions

A.S. conceived the original idea. A.S. and A.K.E. performed the experiments: both contributed to the strain engineering and to the imaging. A.S. did the data analysis. L.J. and N.M. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Data availability

The experimental data supporting the plots provided in this study are uploaded to the NBI research collection: https://doi.org/10.17894/ucph.5acab502-473c-433d-ae89-08e5b3c8dc88.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-026-01048-x.

References

  • 1.Gloag, E. S., Fabbri, S., Wozniak, D. J. & Stoodley, P. Biofilm mechanics: implications in infection and survival. Biofilm2, 100017 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bavaharan, A. & Skilbeck, C. Electrical signalling in prokaryotes and its convergence with quorum sensing in Bacillus. BioEssays44, e2100193 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Hengge, R. Linking bacterial growth, survival, and multicellularity – small signaling molecules as triggers and drivers. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.55, 57–66 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bond, M. C., Vidakovic, L., Singh, P. K., Drescher, K. & Nadell, C. D. Matrix-trapped viruses can prevent invasion of bacterial biofilms by colonizing cells. eLife10, 1–15 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vidakovic, L., Singh, P. K., Hartmann, R., Nadell, C. D. & Drescher, K. Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection. Nat. Microbiol.3, 26–31 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu, H. Y., Prentice, E. L. & Webber, M. A. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in biofilms. npj Antimicrob. Resist.2, 27 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bjarnsholt, T. The role of bacterial biofilms in chronic infections. APMIS121, 1–58 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tallawi, M., Opitz, M. & Lieleg, O. Modulation of the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms in response to environmental challenges. Biomater. Sci.5, 887–900 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Flemming, H.-C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.17, 247–260 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perry, E. K. & Tan, M.-W. Bacterial biofilms in the human body: prevalence and impacts on health and disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.13, 1–24 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cámara, M. et al. Economic significance of biofilms: a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral challenge. npj Biofilms Microbiomes8, 42 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Serra, D. O., Richter, A. M. & Hengge, R. Cellulose as an architectural element in spatially structured Escherichia coli biofilms. J. Bacteriol.195, 5540–5554 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Serra, D. O. & Hengge, R. Bacterial multicellularity: the biology of Escherichia coli building large-scale biofilm communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.75, 269–290 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thongsomboon, W. et al. Phosphoethanolamine cellulose: a naturally produced chemically modified cellulose. Science359, 334–338 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zogaj, X., Bokranz, W., Nimtz, M. & Römling, U. Production of cellulose and curli fimbriae by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun.71, 4151–4158 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Römling, U. & Galperin, M. Y. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol.23, 545–557 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dueholm, M. S., Albertsen, M., Otzen, D. & Nielsen, P. H. Curli functional amyloid systems are phylogenetically widespread and display large diversity in operon and protein structure. PLoS ONE7, e51274 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Siri, M. et al. Mechanical comparison of Escherichia coli biofilms with altered matrix composition: a study combining shear-rheology and microindentation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.11, 4523–4536 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Charlton, S. G. V., Kurz, D. L., Geisel, S., Jimenez-Martinez, J. & Secchi, E. The role of biofilm matrix composition in controlling colony expansion and morphology. Interface Focus12, 20220035 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Jauffred, L., Munk Vejborg, R., Korolev, K. S., Brown, S. & Oddershede, L. B. Chirality in microbial biofilms is mediated by close interactions between the cell surface and the substratum. ISME J.11, 1688–1701 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Copenhagen, K., Alert, R., Wingreen, N. S. & Shaevitz, J. W. Topological defects promote layer formation in Myxococcus xanthus colonies. Nat. Phys.17, 211–215 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cordero, M., Mitarai, N. & Jauffred, L. Motility mediates satellite formation in confined biofilms. ISME J.17, 1819–1827 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van den Berg, N. et al. Emergent collective alignment gives competitive advantage to longer cells during range expansion. Nat. Commun.17, 1039 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nijjer, J. et al. Biofilms as self-shaping growing nematics. Nat. Phys.19, 1936–1944 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Asally, M. et al. Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA109, 18891–18896 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krishnan, N., Knight, J., Tropini, C., Ruiz Pestana, L. & Fusco, D. The what, when, where, and why of wrinkly morphology in biofilms. Biophys. Rev. 6, 031301 (2025).
  • 27.Kolodkin-Gal, I. et al. Respiration control of multicellularity in Bacillus subtilis by a complex of the cytochrome chain with a membrane-embedded histidine kinase. Genes Dev.27, 887–899 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fei, C. et al. Nonuniform growth and surface friction determine bacterial biofilm morphology on soft substrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 7622–7632 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yan, J. et al. Mechanical instability and interfacial energy drive biofilm morphogenesis. eLife8, e43920 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Ziege, R. et al. Adaptation of Escherichia coli biofilm growth, morphology, and mechanical properties to substrate water content. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.7, 5315–5325 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang, L. et al. Current understanding of multi-species biofilms. Int. J. Oral Sci.3, 74–81 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wucher, B. R., Winans, J. B., Elsayed, M., Kadouri, D. E. & Nadell, C. D. Breakdown of clonal cooperative architecture in multispecies biofilms and the spatial ecology of predation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA120, 2017 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Winans, J. B., Wucher, B. R. & Nadell, C. D. Multispecies biofilm architecture determines bacterial exposure to phages. PLoS Biol.20, e3001913 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou, Y. et al. Promiscuous cross-seeding between bacterial amyloids promotes interspecies biofilms. J. Biol. Chem.287, 35092–35103 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martín-Rodríguez, A. J. et al. Regulation of colony morphology and biofilm formation in Shewanella algae. Microb. Biotechnol.14, 1183–1200 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yannarell, S. M., Grandchamp, G. M., Chen, S.-y., Daniels, K. E. & Shank, E. A. A dual-species biofilm with emergent mechanical and protective properties. J. Bacteriol. 201, e00670-18 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Eigentler, L., Davidson, F. A. & Stanley-Wall, N. R. Mechanisms driving spatial distribution of residents in colony biofilms: an interdisciplinary perspective. Open Biol. 12, 220194 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Hallatschek, O. & Nelson, D. R. Life at the front of an expanding population. Evolution64, 193–206 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hallatschek, O., Hersen, P., Ramanathan, S. & Nelson, D. R. Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 19926–19930 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van Gestel, J., Weissing, F. J., Kuipers, O. P. & Kovács, A. T. Density of founder cells affects spatial pattern formation and cooperation in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. ISME J.8, 2069–2079 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Booth, S. C. & Rice, S. A. Influence of interspecies interactions on the spatial organization of dual species bacterial communities. Biofilm2, 100035 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ruan, C. et al. Phage predation accelerates the spread of plasmid-encoded antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun.15, 5397 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ruan, C., Vinod, D. P. & Johnson, D. R. Phage-mediated peripheral kill-the-winner facilitates the maintenance of costly antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun.16, 5839 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Reichhardt, C. et al. Influence of the amyloid dye Congo red on curli, cellulose, and the extracellular matrix in E. coli during growth and matrix purification. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.408, 7709–7717 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Serra, D. O., Klauck, G. & Hengge, R. Vertical stratification of matrix production is essential for physical integrity and architecture of macrocolony biofilms of E scherichia coli. Environ. Microbiol.17, 5073–5088 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tyrikos-Ergas, T. et al. Synthetic phosphoethanolamine-modified oligosaccharides reveal the importance of glycan length and substitution in biofilm-inspired assemblies. Nat. Commun.13, 3954 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jeffries, J., Fuller, G. G. & Cegelski, L. Unraveling Escherichia coli ’s cloak: identification of phosphoethanolamine cellulose, its functions, and applications. Microbiology Insights12, 117863611986523 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jeffries, J. et al. Variation in the ratio of curli and phosphoethanolamine cellulose associated with biofilm architecture and properties. Biopolymers112, 1–11 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hollenbeck, E. C. et al. Phosphoethanolamine cellulose enhances curli-mediated adhesion of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to bladder epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA115, 10106–10111 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saldaña, Z. et al. Synergistic role of curli and cellulose in cell adherence and biofilm formation of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli and identification of Fis as a negative regulator of curli. Environ. Microbiol.11, 992–1006 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Serra, D. O. & Hengge, R. A c-di-GMP-based switch controls local heterogeneity of extracellular matrix synthesis which is crucial for integrity and morphogenesis of Escherichia coli macrocolony biofilms. J. Mol. Biol.431, 4775–4793 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li, B. et al. NUFEB: A massively parallel simulator for individual-based modelling of microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol.15, e1007125 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aguilar, B. et al. Cell death as a trigger for morphogenesis. PLoS ONE13, e0191089 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jayathilake, P. G. et al. A mechanistic Individual-based Model of microbial communities. PLoS ONE12, e0181965 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Verma, A. K., Mookherjee, A., Tropini, C., Fusco, D. & Ruiz Pestana, L. The interplay of adhesion, friction, and nutrient availability in modulating biofilm wrinkling behavior. npj Soft Matter1, 8 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Deegan, R. D. et al. Capillary flow as the cause of ring stains from dried liquid drops. Nature389, 827–829 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ruan, C., Ramoneda, J., Chen, G., Johnson, D. R. & Wang, G. Evaporation-induced hydrodynamics promote conjugation-mediated plasmid transfer in microbial populations. ISME Commun.1, 54 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nayar, V., Weiland, J., Nelson, C. & Hodge, A. Elastic and viscoelastic characterization of agar. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.7, 60–68 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lucia Stecchini, M., Del Torre, M., Donda, S., Maltini, E. & Pacor, S. Influence of agar content on the growth parameters of Bacillus cereus. Int. J. Food Microbiol.64, 81–88 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ryzhkov, N. V., Nikitina, A. A., Fratzl, P., Bidan, C. M. & Skorb, E. V. Polyelectrolyte substrate coating for controlling biofilm growth at solid–air interface. Adv. Mater. Interfaces8, 2001807 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Geisel, S., Secchi, E. & Vermant, J. The role of surface adhesion on the macroscopic wrinkling of biofilms. eLife11, e76027 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 62.Rooney, L. M., Amos, W. B., Hoskisson, P. A. & McConnell, G. Intra-colony channels in E. coli function as a nutrient uptake system. ISME J. 14, 2461–2473 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 63.Wilking, J. N. et al. Liquid transport facilitated by channels in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 848–852 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Melo, L. D. R. et al. The protective effect of staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm matrix against phage predation. Viruses12, 1076 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nobrega, F. L. et al. Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.16, 760–773 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M. & Moineau, S. Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.11, 675–687 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hu, Q., Huang, L., Yang, Y., Xiang, Y. & Liu, J. Essential phage component induces resistance of bacterial community. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp5057 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Visnapuu, A., Van der Gucht, M., Wagemans, J. & Lavigne, R. Deconstructing the phage-bacterial biofilm interaction as a basis to establish new antibiofilm strategies. Viruses14, 1057 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Soni, H., Pelcovits, R. A. & Powers, T. R. Wrinkling of a thin film on a nematic liquid-crystal elastomer. Phys. Rev. E94, 012701 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nijjer, J. et al. Mechanical forces drive a reorientation cascade leading to biofilm self-patterning. Nat. Commun.12, 6632 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhao, K. et al. Psl trails guide exploration and microcolony formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature497, 388–391 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yan, J., Sharo, A. G., Stone, H. A., Wingreen, N. S. & Bassler, B. L. Vibrio cholerae biofilm growth program and architecture revealed by single-cell live imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA113, E5337-43 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.Genzer, J. & Groenewold, J. Soft matter with hard skin: from skin wrinkles to templating and material characterization. Soft Matter2, 310 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Trejo, M. et al. Elasticity and wrinkled morphology of Bacillus subtilis pellicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 2011–2016 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dervaux, J., Ciarletta, P. & Ben Amar, M. Morphogenesis of thin hyperelastic plates: a constitutive theory of biological growth in the Föppl–von Kármán limit. J. Mech. Phys. Solids57, 458–471 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang, C., Li, B., Huang, X., Ni, Y. & Feng, X.-Q. Morphomechanics of bacterial biofilms undergoing anisotropic differential growth. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 143701 (2016).
  • 77.Matoz-Fernandez, D. A., Davidson, F. A., Stanley-Wall, N. R. & Sknepnek, R. Wrinkle patterns in active viscoelastic thin sheets. Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013165 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sati, H. et al. WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis.25, 1033–1043 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 79.Bachmann, B. J. Derivations and genotypes of some mutant derivatives of Escherichia coli K-12. in Escherichia Coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology (ed Neidhardt, F. C.) (ASM Press, 1996).
  • 80.Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 2006.0008 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 81.Miller, J. H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1972).
  • 82.Silhavy, T. J. & Berman, M. L. Experiments with Gene Fusions (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1984).
  • 83.Bayer, C. N., Rennig, M., Ehrmann, A. K. & Nørholm, M. H. H. A standardized genome architecture for bacterial synthetic biology (SEGA). Nat. Commun.12, 5876 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Datta, S., Costantino, N. & Court, D. L. A set of recombineering plasmids for Gram-negative bacteria. Gene379, 109–115 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Choi, H.-C., Kim, C. S. K. & Tarran, R. Automated acquisition and analysis of airway surface liquid height by confocal microscopy. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.309, L109–L118 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The experimental data supporting the plots provided in this study are uploaded to the NBI research collection: https://doi.org/10.17894/ucph.5acab502-473c-433d-ae89-08e5b3c8dc88.


Articles from NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES