Skip to main content
International Journal of Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Microbiology
. 2026 Oct 5;2026:7422673. doi: 10.1155/ijm/7422673

Molecular Identification of Culturable Bacteria and Vibrio Virulence‐Related Genes Associated With Sea Turtle Eggshells and Nest Sediments in Pangandaran, Indonesia

Titin Herawati 1,2, Indriyani Rahayu 3,✉, Aisyah Aisyah 4, Mochamad Untung Kurnia Agung 2, Mochamad Rudyansyah Ismail 2, Donny Juliandri Prihadi 2, Eri Bachtiar 2, Adiana Ghazali 5, Yudi Nurul Ihsan 2
Editor: Abdelwahab Omri
PMCID: PMC13639395  PMID: 42840327

Abstract

Microbial conditions within sea turtle nesting environments may influence egg health and hatching outcomes, yet information on culturable bacteria associated with sea turtle eggs and nest sediments in Indonesia remains limited. This study characterized culturable bacteria from eggshell surfaces of green turtles (Chelonia mydas), olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea), unhatched eggs, and natural and seminatural hatchery sediments at Batu Hiu Beach, Pangandaran, Indonesia. Three eggs were sampled from each egg category, with eggs within each category originating from the same nest. Bacterial recovery was evaluated using selective and non‐selective media, followed by colony characterization, Gram staining, and 16S rRNA sequencing of 21 representative isolates. Vibrio‐related isolates were screened for toxR, tdh, and trh genes using PCR. Green turtle eggshell swabs showed the highest mean culturable bacterial count (2,358 C F U/m L), followed by olive ridley eggshell swabs (1,640 C F U/m L), whereasile hatchery sediment showed the lowest mean count (109 CFU/mL). Bacterial recovery differed among culture media (Friedman χ2 = 10.47, p = 0.0332; Kendall′’s W = 0.436). Molecular analysis showed affiliations with Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrio, and other environmental bacterial groups. All five Vibrio‐related isolates were positive for toxR, whereas tdh and trh were not detected.

Keywords: bacterial contamination, conservation, sea turtle eggs, toxin gene, zoonotic risk

1. Introduction

Sea turtles are globally categorized as endangered species, facing multiple threats including habitat loss, climate change, and direct exploitation through the illegal trade of their meat and eggs ([1–3] In Indonesia, the consumption of turtle eggs remains widespread and deeply rooted in coastal cultural traditions, despite national and international legal protection. Weak law enforcement and high demand, including cross‐border trade within Southeast Asia, continue to drive exploitation [4, 5]. Among the most frequently consumed are green turtle (Chelonia mydas) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs, valued for their perceived nutritional and cultural significance [6, 7]).

Unlike poultry eggs, turtle eggs lack a protective cuticle layer, making them highly vulnerable to microbial contamination. The porous eggshell structure facilitates bacterial penetration, leading to infections that disrupt embryonic development and reduce hatching success [8, 9]. Microorganisms associated with sea turtle eggs may originate from multiple sources, including maternal‐associated microorganisms, eggshell surfaces, and nesting sediments. These sources contribute to microbial exposure during incubation and may influence microbial conditions surrounding developing eggs [10, 11]. Environmental factors, including nest temperature, moisture, sediment characteristics, and oxygen availability, may further influence microbial colonization and succession during incubation [12, 13]). Changes in microbial composition have been associated with differences in egg conditions and incubation environments, although the direct relationship between microbial composition and hatching outcomes remains complex and requires further investigation [11, 14].

Bacterial communities associated with sea turtle eggs and nesting environments consist of diverse ecological groups. Previous culture‐based and molecular studies have reported the presence of Enterobacteriaceae, including Salmonella, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter, from sea turtle eggs, cloacal samples, and nesting substrates [8, 15–17]. These bacterial groups are important because several members possess opportunistic characteristics and may become relevant under favorable environmental conditions. Nevertheless, the direct contribution of these bacteria to embryo mortality or hatching failure remains unclear and requires additional experimental evidence.

In addition to bacterial communities, fungal infections have also been recognized as important microbial threats affecting sea turtle reproductive success. Sea turtle egg fusariosis (STEF) is one of the best documented fungal‐associated diseases affecting turtle eggs and has been linked to embryo mortality and reduced hatching success. Sarmiento‐Ramírez et al. [18] demonstrated that fungi associated with the Fusarium solani species complex were involved in infections of sea turtle eggs and represented important fungal agents in nesting environments. Further studies by Sarmiento‐Ramírez et al. [19] expanded this evidence by documenting the distribution of STEF‐associated Fusarium pathogens across geographically distinct sea turtle populations. Subsequent studies broadened the understanding of STEF‐associated Fusarium beyond sea turtle nesting systems. García‐Martín et al. [20] reported Fusarium keratoplasticum in eggs of the freshwater turtle Podocnemis unifilis, indicating that STEF‐associated Fusarium taxa may also occur in freshwater chelonians. Martínez‐Ríos et al. [21] further reported STEF‐associated Fusarium pathogens in turtle‐associated environments, supporting a broader ecological distribution of these fungi.

Although previous studies have substantially improved understanding of fungal‐associated diseases, particularly STEF, bacterial communities associated with sea turtle eggs and nesting sediments remain comparatively less characterized. Information regarding viable culturable bacteria, bacterial abundance, and molecular characteristics of bacterial isolates remains limited. Culture‐based approaches provide complementary information by enabling the recovery of living bacterial isolates that can be further characterized through molecular identification and functional gene screening.

In understanding the ecological and health relevance of marine‐associated bacteria, particular attention has been directed toward the genus Vibrio. The genes tdh and trh are recognized as important virulence‐associated markers in Vibrio parahaemolyticus, whereas toxR functions as a regulatory gene involved in controlling several virulence‐related pathways [10, 22]. However, detection of toxR alone does not confirm pathogenicity because virulence expression depends on additional genetic determinants and environmental regulation. Therefore, interpretation of environmental Vibrio isolates requires integration between taxonomic identification and analysis of virulence‐associated markers.

Despite increasing recognition of microbial influences on sea turtle egg health, microbiological investigations of sea turtle eggs in Indonesia remain limited. Previous studies have mainly focused on conservation monitoring, fungal infections, or descriptive microbial observations, whereas integrated assessments combining bacterial enumeration, culture‐based isolation, molecular identification, and screening of functional genetic markers remain scarce.

Therefore, this study is aimed at characterizing culturable bacterial communities associated with green turtle (Chelonia mydas) and olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs, unhatched eggs, natural nesting sediments, and seminatural hatchery sediments at Batu Hiu Beach, Pangandaran, Indonesia. The study integrates selective and nonselective bacterial cultivation, quantitative bacterial enumeration, colony characterization, 16S rRNA gene‐based identification, and detection of Vibrio‐associated genetic markers (toxR, tdh, and trh). Unlike previous studies that have predominantly focused on fungal‐associated egg mortality, this study provides baseline information regarding viable culturable bacterial populations associated with sea turtle eggs and nesting environments in Indonesia. The novelty of this study lies in integrating culture‐based bacterial assessment with molecular identification and targeted screening of Vibrio‐associated genetic markers to characterize the bacterial component of sea turtle nesting environments. These findings provide additional microbiological information that complements previous fusariosis‐focused studies and may support future microbial monitoring strategies for sea turtle conservation programs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Location

This study was conducted between September 2024 and March 2025 at Batu Hiu Beach, Pangandaran Regency, West Java, Indonesia. Sampling was carried out during a single nesting season at three purposively selected stations representing different nesting conditions: (1) a seminatural hatchery managed by the Raksa Bintana Foundation (7°41 ′32 ″ S, 108°32 ′9 ″ E), (2) a natural green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nest (7°41 ′21 ″S, 108°32 ′56 ″ E), and (3) a natural olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) nest (7°41 ′9 ″ S, 108°34 ′15 ″ E) (Figure 1). The purposive sampling approach was applied to capture contrasts between hatchery‐managed and natural nesting environments rather than to infer population‐level bacterial abundance. Due to ethical and conservation constraints, the number of eggs sampled per category was intentionally limited. Consequently, this study was designed as an exploratory assessment aimed at generating baseline microbiological information within the sampled nests.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sampling locations of olive ridley turtle eggs, green turtle eggs, and sediment (source: ArcGIS Pro).

2.2. Sample Collection

Eggs and associated nest sediments were collected during the nesting season in September 2024 at Batu Hiu Beach, Pangandaran, Indonesia. A total of three freshly laid olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs, three green turtle (Chelonia mydas) eggs, and three unhatched eggs were sampled, together with sediments from natural nests and seminatural hatchery nests. The three olive ridley turtle eggs were collected from one natural olive ridley turtle nest, whereas the three green turtle eggs were collected from a separate natural green turtle nest. The three unhatched eggs were obtained from another separate nest. Therefore, eggs within each category originated from the same nest and were treated as within‐nest subsamples rather than independent biological replicates. Natural sediment samples were collected from the corresponding green turtle and olive ridley turtle nesting environments, whereas hatchery sediment samples were collected from the seminatural hatchery area. Samples were included when eggs had intact eggshell surfaces suitable for nondestructive swab sampling and sediments were directly associated with the incubation environment. Eggs were processed individually to characterize within‐nest variation in culturable bacteria associated with eggshell surfaces. Sampling was conducted with permission from the local sea turtle conservation authority at Batu Hiu Beach. The study was also approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Padjadjaran (Ethical Approval No. 689/UN6.KEP/EC/2025). The number of eggs sampled was limited due to conservation and ethical considerations.

Eggs were collected using sterile gloves and sterile forceps. To standardize sample collection, the eggshell surface was gently cleaned with sterile gauze moistened with physiological saline prior to swabbing. Sterile Amies swabs were then applied to the eggshell surface and sediment samples. The swabbing method was selected as a nondestructive approach for assessing culturable bacteria associated with eggshell surfaces and nest sediments. This approach provided a consistent method for recovering culturable bacteria, particularly aerobic and facultative anaerobic Gram‐negative bacteria [11, 23]. Following collection, swabs were placed in sterile transport tubes, maintained at 4°C–8°C in insulated cool boxes, and transported to the laboratory within 24 h. Blank field controls were included to monitor potential environmental contamination during sampling. All samples were processed aseptically at the Microbiology and Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, and the Central Laboratory of Biological Activity, Universitas Padjadjaran.

2.3. Bacterial Culture and Enumeration

Bacterial culture was performed using swabs collected from the eggshell surfaces of green turtle (Chelonia mydas), olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea), and associated nest sediments [15]. Cultivation was carried out using a combination of selective and nonselective media, including Salmonella–Shigella agar (SSA; HiMedia, India), eosin‐methylene blue agar (EMBA; HiMedia, India), Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA; HiMedia, India), thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose (TCBS) agar (HiMedia, M189‐500G, India), and nutrient agar (NA; Oxoid, CM0003, United Kingdom). Media selection was based on their ability to support bacterial growth and enable presumptive differentiation of specific bacterial groups.

SSA was used for the presumptive isolation of Salmonella and Shigella, where bile salts and dyes inhibit Gram‐positive bacteria, whereas sodium thiosulfate facilitates the detection of hydrogen sulfide–producing bacteria, typically observed as black‐centered colonies associated with Salmonella spp. [24–26]. EMBA functioned as a selective and differential medium for enteric Gram‐negative bacteria. Lactose‐fermenting species such as Escherichia coli produced a characteristic metallic green sheen, whereas nonlactose fermenters, including Salmonella, appeared colorless [27–29].

MHA was used in this study exclusively as a nonselective medium for preliminary cultivation of culturable bacteria. The use of MHA was based on the limited availability of selective media specific for Bacillus cereus in the laboratory, whereas previous studies have shown that Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus spp. are able to grow well on Mueller–Hinton‐based media, particularly in the context of antimicrobial susceptibility testing [30]. In this study, MHA was not applied as a selective or confirmatory medium for species‐level identification of Bacillus cereus, but was restricted to preliminary cultivation and observation of colony characteristics indicative of Bacillus spp. Given that growth and colony morphology on MHA are not specific for Bacillus cereus, species‐level identification was not inferred, and all isolates recovered on MHA were conservatively reported as Bacillus‐like bacteria to avoid overinterpretation of the results [31–33].

TCBS agar was used for the selective isolation of Vibrio spp., as its alkaline pH and selective components suppress most nontarget organisms and enhance the recovery of Vibrio‐associated bacteria, including Vibrio parahaemolyticus [25]. NA served as a general‐purpose, nonselective medium to support the growth of heterotrophic bacteria and for maintaining stock cultures [28].

All inoculated plates were incubated at 37°C for 24–48 h. Colony growth was evaluated based on morphology, pigmentation, and surface characteristics. Presumptive isolates were subsequently subjected to Gram staining to determine Gram reaction and cell morphology [34].

Isolates recovered from SSA, EMBA, and MHA were reported at the presumptive level based on colony morphology and Gram‐stain characteristics, with reference to standard microbiological criteria [34–36]. Conversely, isolates obtained from TCBS and NA were subcultured into nutrient broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h to obtain pure cultures for subsequent molecular analysis. An incubation temperature of 37°C was used as a laboratory condition to support the recovery of mesophilic bacteria and bacterial groups relevant to the microbiological assessment [37]. This incubation condition may influence the bacterial groups recovered compared with the natural temperature conditions of the nesting environment.

2.4. Molecular Analysis of Bacteria Recovered From NA and TCBS Medium

Molecular analysis was conducted on bacterial isolates obtained from TCBS medium (Vibrio spp.) and NA (general heterotrophic bacteria). Isolates selected for molecular analysis were based on distinct colony morphology, particularly colony color and shape, observed after culture and purification. Representative isolates with distinct morphological characteristics were subsequently selected for molecular identification. Molecular identification followed the method of Delidow et al. [38] with several modifications. DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit A1120 (Promega).

PCR amplification targeted the universal 16S rRNA gene and the gyrB gene for higher resolution species‐level identification of Vibrio species. Two primer sets were used: 27F (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG) and 1492R (TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT) for the 16S rRNA gene (1460 bp; [39]) and VF1 (AARCARGGNCGTAACCGTAA) and VR1 (HGGGTADCGRCGRCTCAT) for the gyrB gene (510 bp; [40]). The PCR mixture (35 μL) consisted of 17.5 μL Green Taq Master Mix 2×, 11.9 μL nuclease‐free water, 1.4 μL forward primer, 1.4 μL reverse primer, and 2.8 μL DNA template.

The PCR conditions were as follows:

  • •

    16S rRNA: initial denaturation at 94°C for 90 s; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 48.5°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s; final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

  • •

    gyrB: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min; final extension at 72°C for 10 min; storage at 4°C [40].

PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels (Mupid‐exU, Japan) and visualized with a UV transilluminator (UVITEC Cambridge). Positive amplicons were subsequently sequenced (1st BASE DNA Sequencing). Sequence data were analyzed using BioEdit and MEGA11 [41] and compared with GenBank references using BLAST. Taxonomic assignments were based on sequence similarity, alignment quality, query coverage, and comparison with available reference sequences in the NCBI GenBank database [42–46]. Species‐level identification was assigned when sequence similarity and taxonomic resolution were sufficient. Isolates with insufficient resolution were reported at the genus level or as the closest related taxon rather than as confirmed species [42, 44, 46, 47]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the neighbor‐joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Isolates showing < 98.65% similarity to reference strains were considered potential novel species [40].

The 16S rRNA gene is widely used to identify microbial communities associated with turtle eggs [48], whereas the gyrB gene provides higher taxonomic resolution for differentiating closely related Vibrio species [49, 50]. Molecular analyses have also revealed that fungal pathogens such as Fusarium spp. are associated with hatching failures [51, 52]. Environmental factors such as nest moisture, temperature, and maternal effects strongly influence microbial communities and embryo survival [53].

2.5. Detection of Toxin Genes of Vibrio spp.

Detection of toxin genes in Vibrio spp. isolates was carried out using specific primers targeting the toxR, tdh, and trh genes (Table 1). PCR reactions were prepared in a final volume of 50 μL, consisting of 50 ng DNA template, 10 pmol of each primer, 25 μL of 2× PCR Master Mix (containing 2.4 mM dNTP and 0.3 units of Taq DNA polymerase; Promega, United States), and sterile distilled water.

Table 1.

Primer sequences used for detection of toxin genes in Vibrio spp.

Gene Primer name Nucleotide sequence (5 ′ → 3 ′) Product size (bp) References
toxR toxR‐F GTCTTCTGACGCAATCGTTG 367 [54, 55]
toxR‐R ATACGAGTGGTTGCTGTCATG 367 [54, 55]
tdh tdh‐F GTAAAGGTCTCTGACTTTTGGAC 500 [54, 55]
tdh‐R TGGAATAGAACCTTCATCTTCACC 500 [54, 55]
trh trh‐F TTGGCTTCGATATTTTCAGTATCT 269 [54, 55]
trh‐R CATAACAAACATATGCCCATTTCC 269 [54, 55]

Note: References: Luan et al., 2007; Marlina et al., 2007 [54, 55].

Abbreviations: tdh, thermostable direct hemolysin; tlh, thermolabile hemolysin; toxR, toxin operon regulator; trh, TDH‐related hemolysin.

Amplification was performed in an MJ Mini Thermal Cycler (Bio‐Rad, United States) with the following program: initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 50°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final extension was performed at 72°C for 7 min.

PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels using 1× TAE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized with a UV transilluminator system (DyNa Light).

2.6. Enumeration of Culturable Bacteria on Selective and Nonselective Media

Total plate count (TPC) was applied to estimate culturable bacterial counts recovered from eggshell surface swabs, unhatched egg swabs, and associated nest sediment swabs from natural and hatchery environments. Bacterial enumeration was performed using both selective and nonselective media, including SSA for presumptive Salmonella/Shigella‐like colonies, EMBA (Levine) for presumptive coliform or E. coli–like colonies, MHA for Bacillus‐like bacteria, TCBS agar for presumptive Vibrio spp., and NA as a general medium for total heterotrophic bacteria.

After incubation, colonies were counted on plates containing 30–300 colonies. Bacterial counts were expressed as colony‐forming units per milliliter of swab suspension using the following equation [56]:

Bacteria count CFU mL−1=no.of colonies×dilution factorvolume plated mL, (1)

where CFU denotes colony‐forming units.

Because bacteria were recovered from surface swabs eluted in sterile saline rather than from homogenized egg contents, all enumeration results were expressed as colony‐forming units per milliliter of swab suspension. Thus, the results describe culturable bacteria associated with the sample surfaces.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Culturable bacterial counts were analyzed using descriptive and exploratory nonparametric approaches because eggs within each category originated from the same nest and were not considered independent biological replicates. Data were summarized using the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum values for each sample category and culture medium. Overall differences among the five culture media were evaluated using the Friedman test, with sample categories treated as blocks and culture media as repeated recovery conditions [57–59]. Kendall′s W was calculated as the effect size. When the Friedman test was significant, paired Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests with Holm correction were used for exploratory pairwise comparisons among media [60, 61]. Because the number of independent nests was limited, differences among turtle species, egg categories, and nesting environments were interpreted descriptively rather than as population‐level inference. A log10 (CFU/mL + 1) transformation was used only for visualization. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05, and all analyses were performed using R software.

3. Result

3.1. Bacterial Counts Across Samples

Culturable bacterial recovery from sea turtle eggshell swabs and associated nest sediments was evaluated using selective and nonselective culture media (Figure 2). The analyzed samples included green turtle eggshell swabs, olive ridley turtle eggshell swabs, unhatched egg swabs, natural nest sediments associated with each turtle species, and seminatural hatchery sediment. Bacterial counts were expressed as colony‐forming units per milliliter of swab suspension.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Culturable bacterial counts recovered from sea turtle eggshell swabs and nest sediment samples across five culture media. Cell values indicate bacterial counts in colony‐forming units per milliliter, whereas the color gradient represents log10 (CFU/mL + 1). The heatmap presents descriptive patterns of bacterial recovery under the applied culture conditions.

Descriptively, the highest mean bacterial recovery was observed on NA (1423.3 CFU/mL), followed by EMBA (1295.0 CFU/mL), SSA (820.0 CFU/mL), TCBS (593.3 CFU/mL), and MHA (230.8 CFU/mL) (Table 2). The relatively large standard deviations observed for several media reflected substantial variation in bacterial recovery among the sampled eggshell and sediment categories.

Table 2.

Descriptive and exploratory statistical analysis of culturable bacterial recovery across culture media.

Medium Mean (CFU/mL) SD Median Min–Max
NA 1423.3 1271.0 1400 0–3300
EMBA 1295.0 1238.0 775 0–2900
SSA 820.0 1272.0 0 0–2570
TCBS 593.3 1070.0 140 0–2730
MHA 230.8 207.0 225 0–510

At the sample level, green turtle eggshell swabs showed the highest mean recovery across the five culture media (2358 CFU/mL), followed by olive ridley turtle eggshell swabs (1640 CFU/mL). Lower mean values were observed for unhatched eggs (510 CFU/mL), olive ridley nest sediment (364 CFU/mL), green turtle nest sediment (254 CFU/mL), and hatchery sediment (109 CFU/mL). These values represent descriptive patterns within the sampled nests and should not be interpreted as population‐level differences among turtle species or nesting environments.

3.2. Culturable Bacterial Recovery Across Culture Media

Differences in bacterial recovery among the five culture media were further examined using an exploratory Friedman test. Sample categories were treated as blocks, whereas culture media represented repeated laboratory recovery conditions. This analysis was used to evaluate overall variation in culture‐dependent bacterial recovery among media and was not interpreted as a population‐level comparison among turtle species or nesting environments (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Culturable bacterial counts across culture media. The Friedman test indicated an overall difference among media.

The Friedman test indicated an overall difference in culturable bacterial recovery among culture media (χ 2 = 10.47, df = 4, p = 0.0332). Kendall′s coefficient of concordance was 0.436, indicating a moderate effect size. However, pairwise Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests with Holm correction did not identify significant differences between individual pairs of culture media (all adjusted p > 0.05). Although NA and EMBA showed the highest mean recovery, followed by SSA, TCBS, and MHA, the absence of significant pairwise differences indicates that no individual medium could be statistically distinguished from another after correction for multiple comparisons. The significant overall Friedman result therefore reflects variation in the collective recovery pattern across the five media rather than a statistically supported difference between specific pairs of media.

3.3. Morphological Characteristics of Bacteria

Observations on selective and nonselective media revealed clear differences in colony appearance and Gram staining (Table 3). On NA, colonies were the most diverse, with variations in color (orange, white, and yellow) and cell shape (cocci, bacilli, and spiral), reflecting the broad heterotrophic community in turtle eggs and sediments.

Table 3.

Gram staining and morphological characteristics of bacteria isolated from selective and nonselective media.

Media Presumptive/isolated bacteria Gram result Morphology References/source
NA Total heterotrophic bacteria ± Cocci, bacilli, spiral; colonies orange/white/yellow, pink, black This study
TCBS Vibrio spp. − Curved rods, cocci; colonies yellow/green/orange This study
EMBA Escherichia coli − Bacilli; nonspore; lactose fermenter, metallic sheen [34]; [36]; [62]
SSA Salmonella spp. − Bacilli; nonspore; H2S producer, black colonies [34]; [36]; [62]
MHA Bacillus spp. + Large bacilli; spore‐forming; catalase + [35]; [63]; [64]

On TCBS, Vibrio spp. appeared as yellow, green, or orange colonies, consistent with sucrose‐fermenting and nonfermenting strains, and were confirmed as Gram‐negative curved rods (comma‐shaped). On EMBA, E. coli produced the characteristic metallic green sheen and was identified as Gram‐negative bacilli and lactose fermenting. On SSA, Salmonella spp. formed black‐centered colonies due to H2S production and were identified as Gram‐negative bacilli, nonspore forming, and nonlactose fermenting. On MHA, isolates were identified as Bacillus spp., forming large opaque colonies. Gram staining showed Gram‐positive bacilli in chains with endospores and catalase‐positive activity. Overall, colony morphology and Gram staining confirmed the presence of key pathogens (Vibrio spp., E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Bacillus spp.) on selective media, whereas NA highlighted the wider diversity of heterotrophic bacteria.

3.4. Molecular Identification of Culturable Bacterial Isolates Recovered From NA and TCBS Medium

Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was performed to identify representative culturable bacterial isolates recovered from NA and TCBS media (Figure 4, Table 4). A total of 21 isolates were successfully identified, representing enteric bacteria, marine‐associated taxa, and environmental bacteria cultivated under the applied culture conditions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Agarose gel electrophoresis of 16S rRNA and gyrB gene amplification from bacterial isolates.

Table 4.

Closest taxonomic matches of culturable bacterial isolates recovered from NA and TCBS media based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison with NCBI GenBank references.

No. Code Closest BLAST match (GenBank reference) GenBank accession no. E value 16S rRNA sequence similarity (%) Taxonomic assignment No. of isolates Isolated from Medium Colony color and shape
1 EG‐PNG01 Klebsiella sp. clone KT294091.1 3.0 × 10−51 83.40 Klebsiella‐related isolate 1 Unhatched egg NA White (bacilli, spiral)
2 EG‐PNG02 Klebsiella pneumoniae strain EMB.W.KL.GH1.C3 MK719834.1 0.0 94.29 Klebsiella sp. 1 Unhatched egg NA Orange (bacilli, spiral)
3 EG‐PNG03 Enterobacter asburiae strain RCB707 KT260919.1 7.0 × 10−92 76.38 Enterobacter‐related isolate 1 Unhatched egg NA Yellow (bacilli, spiral)
4 EG‐PNG04 Citrobacter sp. strain CPO 2.210 OR426156.1 0.0 91.19 Citrobacter sp. 1 Unhatched egg TCBS Green (comma, coccus)
5 EG‐PNG05 Shewanella sp. A2 MF‐2014 LK392351.1 1.0 × 10−53 79.34 Shewanella‐related isolate 1 Unhatched egg TCBS White flower‐like (comma, coccus)
6 EG‐PNG06 Providencia rettgeri strain CR PQ496001.1 8.0 × 10−74 81.95 Providencia‐related isolate 1 Unhatched egg TCBS Yellow flower‐like (comma, coccus)
7 GTE‐PNG07 Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain HSEMS PP116102.1 0.0 95.06 Vibrio sp. closely related to V. parahaemolyticus 1 Green turtle egg TCBS Orange (coccus, comma)
8 GTE‐PNG08 Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain CSBG PP106503.1 0.0 95.04 Vibrio sp. closely related to V. parahaemolyticus 1 Green turtle egg TCBS Green (comma, coccus)
9 ORE‐PNG09 Vibrio alginolyticus strain AA62 MW255275.1 0.0 94.14 Vibrio sp. closely related to V. alginolyticus 1 Olive ridley turtle egg TCBS Green (comma, coccus)
10 ORE‐PNG10 Vibrio alginolyticus strain NBRC 15630 PQ443934.1 0.0 90.20 Vibrio‐related isolate 1 Olive ridley turtle egg TCBS Dark green (comma, coccus)
11 ORS‐PNG11 Vibrio alginolyticus strain CICC 10889 OR965054.1 0.0 92.00 Vibrio sp. 1 Olive ridley turtle sediment NA White (bacilli)
12 ORS‐PNG12 Marinobacter sp. OQ570258.1 3.0 × 10−126 79.88 Marinobacter‐related isolate 1 Olive ridley turtle sediment NA Yellow (bacilli, spiral)
13 ORS‐PNG13 Sutcliffiella halmapala KU955629.1 0.0 85.40 Sutcliffiella‐related isolate 1 Olive ridley turtle sediment NA Orange (bacilli, spiral)
14 GTS‐PNG14 Pseudomonas fragi strain J5 PP725227.1 0.0 88.78 Pseudomonas sp. 1 Green turtle sediment NA White (spiral, bacilli)
15 GTS‐PNG15 Bacterium clone GBO51O2hO6 JN672574.1 0.0 95.31 Unclassified bacterium‐related isolate 1 Green turtle sediment NA Yellow (spiral, bacilli)
16 GTS‐PNG16 Bacillus sp. (Firmicutes) strain CJKOP‐136 MF537181.1 0.0 89.54 Bacillus‐related isolate 1 Green turtle sediment NA Orange (spiral, bacilli)
17 HS‐PNG17 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B strain CFSAN008708 CP074668.1 5.0 × 10−94 76.42 Salmonella‐related isolate 1 Hatchery sediment NA Black (spiral, bacilli)
18 HS‐PNG18 Bacterium clone GBO51O2hO JN672574.1 0.0 96.58 Unclassified bacterium‐related isolate 1 Hatchery sediment NA Pink (spiral, bacilli)
19 HS‐PNG19 Pseudomonas corrugata strain p17_D02 JQ833503.1 2.0 × 10−42 77.50 Pseudomonas‐related isolate 1 Hatchery sediment TCBS Yellow (coccus)
20 HS‐PNG20 Aeromonas sp. strain CQ11 16S OL477328.1 0.0 94.11 Aeromonas sp. 1 Hatchery sediment TCBS Orange (coccus)
21 HS‐PNG21 Citrobacter sp. HQ108124.1 0.0 99.77 Citrobacter sp. 1 Hatchery sediment TCBS Dark green (comma)

Figure 4 presents agarose gel electrophoresis images documenting successful PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA and gyrB genes prior to sequencing. Gel images are provided solely as technical verification of amplification quality and were not used for quantitative or ecological interpretation.

Unhatched eggs were associated with culturable bacterial isolates showing closest sequence matches to members of the Enterobacteriaceae, including Klebsiella‐related, Enterobacter‐related, Citrobacter-related, and Providencia-related taxa. In contrast, eggs from green and olive ridley turtles yielded isolates with closest relationships to Vibrio reference sequences, including taxa related to Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus. Sediment samples exhibited broader taxonomic affiliations and included isolates related to Marinobacter, Sutcliffiella, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Aeromonas, Salmonella, and Citrobacter.

Sequence similarity values varied among isolates and influenced the level of taxonomic assignment. Isolates were assigned at the genus level when supported by sufficient sequence resolution, whereas isolates with lower similarity values were reported as closely related taxa rather than confirmed species. Low sequence similarity values were not interpreted as evidence of novel species or strains because additional genomic characterization would be required. These results describe the taxonomic affiliations of culturable bacterial isolates recovered under selective and nonselective culture conditions and do not represent the complete bacterial community composition, microbiome structure, or relative abundance within turtle eggs or sediments.

Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed clustering patterns of isolates according to their taxonomic affiliations rather than their sampling sources (Figure 5). Isolates assigned to the genus Vibrio formed a distinct cluster within the Vibrio‐associated lineage, with closely related isolates showing bootstrap support values ranging from 81% to 87%. The clustering pattern indicated genetic similarity among Vibrio‐related isolates obtained from different turtle egg and sediment samples; however, species‐level identification was not inferred solely from 16S rRNA sequences.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of culturable bacterial isolates recovered from sea turtle eggs and surrounding sediments in Pangandaran, Indonesia. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor‐joining method, with bootstrap values calculated from 1000 replicates and displayed next to the branches.

Members of the Enterobacteriaceae‐related isolates formed closely related clusters distinct from marine‐associated bacterial groups, including Vibrio‐related isolates and Marinobacter‐related isolates. In contrast, isolates assigned to Bacillus‐ and Sutcliffiella‐related groups formed separate clades consistent with their broader taxonomic relationships. These phylogenetic patterns indicate that genetic relatedness among isolates was primarily associated with taxonomic affiliation rather than ecological origin or sampling environment.

3.5. Detection of Vibrio Virulence Genes

Figure 6 presents the agarose gel electrophoresis results of PCR amplification targeting toxR, tdh, and trh genes from presumptive Vibrio isolates recovered from TCBS medium. Clear amplification bands corresponding to the toxR gene were detected in all tested isolates, including isolates showing close relationships with Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio alginolyticus reference sequences based on 16S rRNA analysis. In contrast, no amplification products were observed for the hemolysin‐associated genes tdh and trh in any of the tested isolates.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products targeting Vibrio virulence genes (toxR, tdh, and trh).

The detection of toxR indicates the presence of a genetic marker associated with the Vibrio group, whereas the absence of tdh and trh indicates that these specific virulence‐associated genes were not detected among the analyzed isolates. The results demonstrate variation in the distribution of Vibrio‐associated genetic markers among culturable isolates recovered from sea turtle eggs and nest sediments.

Table 5 summarizes the detection of Vibrio‐associated and virulence‐related genes among culturable isolates recovered from turtle eggs and sediments. All tested isolates showed positive amplification of the toxR marker, whereas amplification of tdh and trh was not detected. These findings indicate that the analyzed isolates contained a Vibrio‐associated genetic marker but lacked the specific hemolysin‐associated genes evaluated in this study. The presence of toxR among the isolates was observed across different sampling sources, including turtle eggs and sediment samples. However, the detection pattern of toxR, tdh, and trh represents only the genetic characteristics of the analyzed isolates under the applied molecular conditions and does not represent the complete virulence profile of the bacterial strains.

Table 5.

Detection of Vibrio‐associated and virulence‐related genes (toxR, tdh, and trh) in culturable Vibrio isolates recovered from sea turtle eggs and sediments.

No. Isolate code Taxonomic assignment based on 16S rRNA toxR tdh trh Interpretation
1 VP strain HSEMS Vibrio sp. closely related to V. parahaemolyticus + − − toxR detected; tdh and trh not detected
2 VP strain CSBG Vibrio sp. closely related to V. parahaemolyticus + − − toxR detected; tdh and trh not detected
3 VA strain AA62 Vibrio sp. closely related to V. alginolyticus + − − toxR detected; tdh and trh not detected
4 VA strain NBRC15630 Vibrio‐related isolate + − − toxR detected; tdh and trh not detected
5 VA strain CICC10889 Vibrio sp. + − − toxR detected; tdh and trh not detected

4. Discussion

This study showed that culturable bacterial counts recovered from eggshell swabs of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) and olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs were higher than those recovered from natural and hatchery nest sediment samples. However, because eggs within each category originated from the same nest, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory observations describing within‐nest bacterial recovery patterns rather than population‐level differences. The limited number of independent nests and conservation restrictions during sampling were considered when interpreting bacterial abundance patterns.

Quantitative enumeration results summarized in Table 2 showed that eggshell swab samples generally yielded higher recoverable bacterial counts compared with associated sediment samples across the applied culture media. Fresh eggshell samples showed higher bacterial recovery compared with unhatched eggs and sediment samples. This pattern was also illustrated in Figure 2, where eggshell‐associated samples showed greater variability compared with sediment samples. These results suggest that eggshell surfaces may provide a distinct microenvironment that supports bacterial attachment and recovery during incubation. However, culture‐based enumeration represents only the fraction of bacteria capable of growing under the applied laboratory conditions and does not represent the complete bacterial composition associated with eggshell surfaces or nesting sediments.

The higher recovery of culturable bacteria from eggshell surfaces may be related to the structural characteristics of sea turtle eggs and their interaction with surrounding environments. Unlike poultry eggs, sea turtle eggs lack a protective cuticle layer, and their porous eggshell structure may facilitate bacterial attachment from sand, seawater, and maternal‐associated sources [8, 9]. Previous studies have demonstrated that microorganisms associated with sea turtle eggs originate from multiple sources, including eggshell‐associated microorganisms and nesting sediments [10, 11]. Environmental factors, including nest temperature, moisture, and sediment characteristics, may further influence microbial colonization patterns during incubation [52, 65]. Bézy et al. [66] reported that microbial abundance in olive ridley turtle nests was associated with hatching outcomes, whereas environmental conditions may modify microbial dynamics within nesting environments [11, 67]. Nevertheless, the recovery of culturable bacteria from eggshell surfaces does not directly indicate infection, embryo mortality, or reduced hatching success.

Beyond microbial processes, environmental stability remains an important factor influencing sea turtle reproductive success. Climate change may affect nesting habitats through shoreline loss, altered sediment characteristics, and increased flooding frequency. Rising sea levels can reduce suitable nesting areas, whereas prolonged flooding has been associated with increased egg mortality [68–70]. These environmental changes may influence nest conditions, including moisture and temperature, which can subsequently affect microbial dynamics. Therefore, conservation strategies should integrate habitat management, appropriate hatchery practices, and microbial monitoring approaches [71–73].

Culture‐based isolation followed by molecular identification revealed several bacterial groups associated with eggshell surfaces and nesting sediments (Table 4). Based on colony morphology and culture characteristics, several isolates were initially classified as presumptive enteric‐associated bacteria. However, these preliminary classifications require cautious interpretation because colony morphology and biochemical characteristics alone cannot confirm bacterial species identity. Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing provided additional taxonomic resolution for selected isolates. Isolates with sufficient sequence similarity were assigned to the corresponding taxonomic level, whereas isolates with lower similarity were interpreted as closely related taxa rather than definitive species identification.

The recovered isolates represented several bacterial groups, including Enterobacteriaceae‐associated bacteria, marine‐associated bacteria, and environmental bacterial taxa (Table 4). Enterobacteriaceae‐related isolates showed similarity with members of Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Salmonella‐associated groups. These bacterial groups have previously been reported from sea turtle eggs and nesting environments ([15]). Their occurrence may reflect environmental inputs from sand, seawater, or animal‐associated sources. Similar bacterial groups, including Bacillus, Salmonella, and Citrobacter, have also been reported in turtle‐associated samples [15, 74]. However, the detection of these bacterial groups on eggshell surfaces should not be interpreted as direct evidence of pathogenicity, embryo infection, or zoonotic transmission because this study evaluated only culturable bacteria recovered from external eggshell surfaces.

The phylogenetic relationships of selected bacterial isolates based on 16S rRNA gene sequences are presented in Figure 5. The isolates clustered mainly according to their taxonomic relationships rather than their sampling origin. Enterobacteriaceae‐associated isolates grouped with related reference sequences, whereas marine‐associated bacteria formed separate clusters. Several isolates showed lower similarity values compared with available GenBank references, indicating limitations in database representation and the need for additional molecular markers for more accurate taxonomic resolution [40].

Marine‐associated isolates related to Vibrio were also recovered from eggshell and sediment samples (Table 4). Several isolates showed similarity with Vibrio parahaemolyticus–associated and Vibrio alginolyticus–associated sequences. These bacterial groups are commonly distributed in coastal environments and may occur naturally in marine ecosystems [75–77]. However, these findings should be interpreted as the detection of Vibrio‐associated environmental bacteria rather than confirmation of pathogenic strains.

Virulence‐associated gene screening of Vibrio‐associated isolates is summarized in Table 5 and Figure 6. All tested isolates showed amplification of the regulatory gene toxR, whereas the hemolysin genes tdh and trh were not detected. Previous studies have shown that environmental Vibrio isolates may contain regulatory genes while lacking major toxin‐associated genes [78, 79]. The presence of toxR alone does not confirm pathogenicity because virulence expression depends on multiple genetic determinants and environmental regulation. Therefore, the detected Vibrio‐associated isolates should be interpreted as toxR‐positive environmental isolates rather than confirmed pathogenic bacteria. Tropical aquatic environments are recognized as reservoirs of diverse Vibrio populations, where genetic exchange may contribute to variation among environmental strains [80, 81].

Taken together, the findings indicate that sea turtle eggshell surfaces and associated nest sediments contain diverse culturable bacterial isolates, including presumptive enteric‐associated bacteria and molecularly characterized Vibrio‐associated isolates. The integration of bacterial enumeration (Table 2), molecular identification (Table 4; Figure 5), and Vibrio‐associated genetic screening (Table 5; Figure 6) provides baseline information regarding bacterial components of sea turtle nesting environments. Rather than defining turtle eggs as bacterial hotspots, pathogenic reservoirs, or direct zoonotic sources, this study provides preliminary microbiological evidence from a limited number of samples and highlights the importance of continued microbial monitoring within sea turtle conservation programs.

4.1. Limitations and Future Directions

This study has several limitations. The sample size was relatively small, and sampling was conducted during a single nesting season at one study site. In addition, samples were obtained using eggshell and sediment swabs, such that the results represent culturable bacteria associated with sample surfaces. Furthermore, isolates recovered from SSA, EMBA, and MHA media were identified based on colony morphology and Gram staining, whereas molecular confirmation was performed only for selected isolates recovered from NA and TCBS media. Future studies should include larger sample sizes, multiple nests, multiseasonal monitoring, and biochemical or molecular confirmation of presumptive isolates.

5. Conclusion

This study provides baseline information on culturable bacteria recovered from sea turtle eggshell surfaces and associated nesting sediments at Batu Hiu Beach, Pangandaran. Isolates with distinct colony morphology were further analyzed using 16S rRNA and, for selected Vibrio‐associated isolates, gyrB analysis. Molecular analysis enabled several isolates to be identified to the species level, whereas isolates with insufficient sequence resolution were reported at the genus level or as the closest related taxon. All tested Vibrio isolates carried the toxR gene, whereas tdh and trh were not detected. The presence of toxR was interpreted as a genetic characteristic of the tested isolates and not as evidence of confirmed virulence or pathogenicity. Given the limited number of eggs and nests, the single study location, and the focus on the culturable bacterial fraction, the findings are exploratory and should not be generalized to the broader sea turtle population or the complete bacterial community. These findings provide baseline information to support further research and microbiological monitoring of sea turtle nesting and seminatural hatchery environments at Batu Hiu Beach.

Author Contributions

Titin Herawati: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, methodology, funding, investigation, resources, and supervision; Indriyani Rahayu: writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, resources, software, validation, and visualization; Aisyah Aisyah: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, and investigation; Mochamad Untung Kurnia Agung: methodology, data curation, investigation, reviewing, and editing; Donny Juliandri Prihadi: reviewing and editing; Mochamad Rudyansyah Ismail: reviewing and editing; Eri Bachtiar: reviewing and editing; Adiana Ghazali: reviewing and editing; Yudi Nurul Ihsan: reviewing and editing.

Funding

This work was supported by Universitas Padjadjaran (10.13039/501100015690, 2200/UN6.M/PT.01.03/2025).

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia (Approval No. 689/UN6.KEP/EC/2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mr. Endin Sanudin, Manager of the Raksa Bintana Foundation, for granting permission to collect seminatural turtle nest sediment. We also extend our sincere appreciation to Prof. Dr. sc. agr. Yudi Nurul Ihsan, S.Pi., M.Si., Dean of the Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, for his continuous support and encouragement throughout the research process. The authors used OpenAI ChatGPT to assist with English language editing, grammar improvement, and manuscript formatting. The AI tool was not used for data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or generation of scientific conclusions. All AI‐assisted text was reviewed, verified, and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.

Herawati, Titin , Rahayu, Indriyani , Aisyah, Aisyah , Agung, Mochamad Untung Kurnia , Ismail, Mochamad Rudyansyah , Prihadi, Donny Juliandri , Bachtiar, Eri , Ghazali, Adiana , Ihsan, Yudi Nurul , Molecular Identification of Culturable Bacteria and Vibrio Virulence‐Related Genes Associated With Sea Turtle Eggshells and Nest Sediments in Pangandaran, Indonesia, International Journal of Microbiology, 2026, 7422673, 18 pages, 2026. 10.1155/ijm/7422673

Academic Editor: Abdelwahab Omri

Contributor Information

Indriyani Rahayu, Email: indriyani16001@mail.unpad.ac.id.

Abdelwahab Omri, Email: aomri@laurentian.ca.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supporting information of this article.

References

  • 1. Liu L., Li S., Chen M., Parham J. F., and Shi H., Sea Turtle Demand in China Threatens the Survival of Wild Populations, Iscience. (2021) 24, no. 6, 102517, 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Veríssimo D., Vieira S., Monteiro D., Hancock J. M., and Nuño A., Audience Research as a Cornerstone of Demand Management Interventions for Illegal Wildlife Products: Demarketing Sea Turtle Meat and Eggs, Conservation Science and Practice. (2020) 2, no. 3, e164, 10.1111/csp2.164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ingram D. J., Prideaux M., Hodgins N. K., Frisch-Nwakanma H., Avila I. C., Collins T., Cosentino M., Keith-Diagne L. W., Marsh H., Shirley M. H., van Waerebeek K., Djondo M. K., Fukuda Y., Glaus K. B. J., Jabado R. W., Lang J. W., Lüber S., Manolis C., Webb G. J. W., and Porter L., Widespread Use Of Migratory Megafauna For Aquatic Wild Meat In The Tropics And Subtropics, Frontiers in Marine Science. (2022) 9, 837447, 10.3389/fmars.2022.837447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jani J. M., Jamalludin M. A., and Long S. L., To Ban or Not to Ban? Reviewing an Ongoing Dilemma on Sea Turtle Egg Trade in Terengganu, Malaysia. Frontiers in Marine Science. (2020) 6, 10.3389/fmars.2019.00762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Poti M., Long S. L., Rusli M. U., Jani J. M., Hugé J., and Dahdouh-Guebas F., Changing Trends and Perceptions of Sea Turtle Egg Consumption in Redang Island, Malaysia, Ecology and Society. (2021) 26, no. 4, 10.5751/es-12717-260414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bernieri E. M., Medeiros L. S., Lopes U. H., Boas F. G. V., Dos Santos S. M., and de Lima Marques O. K., Patterns And Spatial Distribution Of Sea Turtle Strandings In Alagoas, Brazil, Brazil. Marine Pollution Bulletin. (2024) 201, 116127, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116127, 38412794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Praja R. N., Yudhana A., Haditanojo W., and Oktaviana V., Short Communication: Antimicrobial Properties in Cloacal Fluid of Olive Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea), Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. (2021) 22, no. 9, 10.13057/biodiv/d220909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Alduina R., Gambino D., Presentato A., Gentile A., Sucato A., Savoca D., Filippello S., Visconti G., Caracappa G., Vicari D., and Arculeo M., Is Caretta caretta a Carrier of Antibiotic Resistance in the Mediterranean Sea?, Antibiotics. (2020) 9, no. 3, 10.3390/antibiotics9030116, 32164241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kulshreshtha G., Benavides-Reyes C., Rodríguez-Navarro A. B., Diep T., and Hincke M. T., Impact of Different Layer Housing Systems on Eggshell Cuticle Quality and Salmonella Adherence in Table Eggs, Foods. (2021) 10, no. 11, 10.3390/foods10112559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li T., Yang Y., Li H., and Li C., Mixed-Mode Bacterial Transmission via Eggshells in an Oviparous Reptile Without Parental Care, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2022) 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.911416, 35836422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. McMaken C. M., Burkholder D. A., Milligan R., and Lopez J. V., Potential Impacts of Environmental Bacteria on the Microbiota of Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Green (Chelonia mydas) Sea Turtle Eggs and Their Hatching Success, MicrobiologyOpen. (2023) 12, no. 3, 10.1002/mbo3.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Esposito M., Canzanella S., Iaccarino D., Pepe A., Di Nocera F., Bruno T., Marigliano L., Sansone D., Hochscheid S., Gallo P., and Maffucci F., Trace Elements And Persistent Organic Pollutants In Unhatched Loggerhead Turtle Eggs From An Emerging Nesting Site Along The Southwestern Coasts Of Italy, Western Mediterranean Sea, Animals. (2023) 13, no. 6, 10.3390/ani13061075, 36978615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Salvarani P. I., Vieira L. R., Osten J. R., and Morgado F., Hawksbill Sea Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) Blood and Eggs Organochlorine Pesticides Concentrations and Embryonic Development in a Nesting Area (Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico), Toxics. (2023) 11, no. 1, 10.3390/toxics11010050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Capri F. C., Prazzi E., Casamento G., Gambino D., Cassata G., and Alduina R., Correlation Between Microbial Community and Hatching Failure in Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta, Microbial Ecology. (2023) 86, no. 3, 1923–1933, 10.1007/s00248-023-02197-8, 36805785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Katni N. H., Azmi A. F. M., Abdullah M. M., Rusli M. U., Zakaria Z., Azizan T. R. P. T., Amat A. C., Saad M. Z., Ina-Salwany M. Y., Nazarudin M. F., and Hassim H. A., Nutritional Compositions, Pathogenic Microorganisms and Heavy Metal Concentration in Green Turtle Eggs (Chelonia mydas) From Terengganu and Sabah, Malaysia, Frontiers in Marine Science. (2022) 9, 10.3389/fmars.2022.948427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sari A. R., Revulaningtyas I. R., Anoraga S. B., and Wijanarti S., The Effect of Housewives′ Food Safety Awareness on Processed Frozen Food Buying Interest During COVID19 Pandemic in D.I. Yogyakarta Region, 2022, Atlantis Press, 10.2991/absr.k.220305.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lamichhane B., Mawad A. M. M., Saleh M., Kelley W. G., Harrington P. J., Lovestad C. W., Amezcua J., Sarhan M. M., El Zowalaty M. E., Ramadan H., and Morgan M., Salmonellosis: An Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Innovative Approaches to Mitigate the Antimicrobial Resistant Infections, Antibiotics. (2024) 13, no. 1, 10.3390/antibiotics13010076, 38247636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sarmiento-Ramírez J. M., Abella E., Martín M. P., Tellería M. T., López-Jurado L. F., Marco A., and Diéguez-Uribeondo J., Fusarium solani is Responsible for Mass Mortalities in Nests of Loggerhead Sea Turtle, Caretta caretta, in Boavista, Cape Verde, Fems Microbiology Letters. (2010) 312, no. 2, 192–200, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02116.x, 20875054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sarmiento-Ramírez J. M., van der Voort M., Raaijmakers J. M., and Dieguez-Uribeondo J., Unravelling the Microbiome of Eggs of the Endangered Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata Identifies Bacteria With Activity Against the Emerging Pathogen Fusarium falciforme, Plos One. (2014) 9, no. 4, e95206, 10.1371/journal.pone.0095206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. García-Martín J. M., Sarmiento-Ramírez J. M., and Diéguez-Uribeondo J., Beyond Sea Turtles: Fusarium keratoplasticum in Eggshells of Podocnemis unifilis, a Threatened Amazonian Freshwater Turtle, Journal of Fungi. (2021) 7, no. 9, 10.3390/jof7090742, 34575781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Martínez-Ríos M., Martín-Torrijos L., and Diéguez-Uribeondo J., Trachemys scripta Eggs as Part of a Potential In Vivo Model for Studying Sea Turtle Egg Fusariosis, Journal of Fungi. (2025) 11, no. 1, 10.3390/jof11010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Li Y., Xie T., Pang R., Wu Q., Zhang J., Lei T., Xue L., Wu H., Wang J., Ding Y., Chen M., Wu S., Zeng H., Zhang Y., and Wei X., Food-Borne Vibrio parahaemolyticus in China: Prevalence, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Genetic Characterization, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2020) 11, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fernandes M., Grilo M. L., Carneiro C., Cunha E., Tavares L., Patino-Martinez J., and Oliveira M., Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Profiles of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta) of the Island of Maio, Cape Verde, Antibiotics. (2021) 10, no. 7, 10.3390/antibiotics10070771, 34202799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Al-Ahmer S. D., Al-Janabi M. K., and Aufi I. M., Evaluation of Molecular and Culture Method for Detection of Campylobacter, Salmonella, E. coli and Shigella in Children Infected With Diarrhea. Indian, Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. (2021) 15, no. 3, 5525–5531, 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i3.16635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Teshome B., Teklemariam Z., Ayana D. A., Marami D., and Asaminew N., Salmonella and Shigella Among Patients With Diarrhea at Public Health Facilities in Adama, Ethiopia: Prevalence, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern, and Associated Factors, Sage Open Medicine. (2019) 7, 2050312119846041, 10.1177/2050312119846041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang X., Wang J., Sun H., Xia S., Duan R., Liang J., Xiao Y., Qiu H., Shan G., and Jing H., Etiology of Childhood Infectious Diarrhea in a Developed Region of China: Compared to Childhood Diarrhea in a Developing Region and Adult Diarrhea in a Developed Region, Plos One. (2015) 10, no. 11, e0142136, 10.1371/journal.pone.0142136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cruz K. P. P., Gattamorta M. A., Matushima E. R., and Salvarani F. M., Fibropapillomatosis: A Review of the Disease With Attention to the Situation Northern Coast of Brazil, Animals. (2024) 14, no. 12, 10.3390/ani14121809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Daramola J. A., Kester C. T., and Kehinde A. A., Bacterial Assessment of Retailed Smoked Edible Frog (Hoplobatrachus Occipitalis), Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. (2023) 9, no. 2b, 50–57, 10.4314/dujopas.v9i2b.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Wamyil J. F., Ogbuagu C. N., Adewale O. S., Nabona J., Ntulume I., and Wamyil F., Microbiological Quality of Water Samples Obtained From Water Sources in Ishaka, Uganda, Sage Open Medicine. (2023) 11, 10.1177/20503121231194239, 38020800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Farina D., Bianco A., Manzulli V., Castellana S., Parisi A., Caruso M., Fraccalvieri R., Serrecchia L., Rondinone V., Pace L., Fasanella A., Vetritto V., Difato L. M., Cipolletta D., Iatarola M., and Galante D., Antimicrobial and Phylogenomic Characterization of Bacillus cereus Group Strains Isolated from Different Food Sources in Italy, Antibiotics. (2024) 13, no. 9, 10.3390/antibiotics13090898, 39335071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Aran G., Pleguezuelos V., Blanco M., Garcia C., Jallow M., López M., Monge S., Casamitjana N., Alonso-Nogués E., and Soria G., Validation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Fully Automated Detection of Bacillus cereus in Donor Human Milk, Microorganisms. (2025) 13, no. 7, 10.3390/microorganisms13071640, 40732149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kabir M. S., Hsieh Y., Simpson S., Kerdahi K., and Sulaiman I. M., Evaluation of Two Standard and Two Chromogenic Selective Media for Optimal Growth and Enumeration of Isolates of 16 Unique Bacillus Species, Journal of Food Protection. (2017) 80, no. 6, 952–962, 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-16-441, 28467187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Němečková I., Solichová K., Roubal P., Uhrová B., and Šviráková E., Methods for Detection of Bacillus sp., B. cereus, and B. licheniformis in Raw Milk, Czech Journal of Food Sciences. (2011) 29, S55–S60, 10.17221/313/2011-cjfs. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Coico R., Gram Staining, Current Protocols in Microbiology, 2006, no. 1, Wiley Online Library, 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bottone E. J., Bacillus cereus, a Volatile Human Pathogen, Clinical Microbiology Reviews. (2010) 23, no. 2, 382–398, 10.1128/cmr.00073-09, 20375358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Moyes R. B., Reynolds J., and Breakwell D. P., Differential Staining of Bacteria: Gram Stain, Current Protocols in Microbiology. (2009) 15, no. 1, 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Önen N., Törün B., and Yılmaz C., Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Citrobacter farmeri and Enterobacter cloacae From Unhatched Green Turtle Eggs, Veterinary Sciences. (2026) 13, no. 5, 10.3390/vetsci13050462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Delidow B. C., Lynch J. P., Peluso J. J., and White B. A., Polymerase Chain Reaction: Basic Protocols, PCR Protocols: Current Methods and Applications, 1993, Humana Press, 1–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lane D. J., Stackebrandt E. and Goodfellow M., 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing, Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang D., Ma L., Xiong B. B., Zhu J., Lu J. Z., Meng L. L., and Liu Y. G., Rapid Identification of Related Species of Vibrio by gyrB Gene Degenerative Primers, LWT. (2024) 191, 115594, 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115594. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., and Tamura K., MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms, Molecular Biology and Evolution. (2018) 35, no. 6, 1547–1549, 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chacón-Monge J. L., Abarca-Odio J. I., and González-Sánchez K., Evaluating the Reliability of DNA Barcoding for Central American Pacific Shallow Water Echinoderms Identification: A Molecular Taxonomy and Database Accuracy Analysis, Revista De Biología Tropical. (2026) 72, no. S1, e58997, 10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v72is1.58997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Guzmán-López O., Ricaño-Rodríguez C., Luis-Yong D., and Ricaño-Rodríguez J., NCBI: Generalidades Del Repositorio Y Breve Descripción De Recursos Aplicables Al Estudio De La Fitogenética, Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. (2023) 46, no. 1, 10.35196/rfm.2023.1.63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pulache I., Ordinola-Zapata A., Vieyra E. G., and Mendóza O., Identificación De Cepas Bacterianas Cultivables Presentes en Peces (Caballas) Utilizando Un Fragmento Del Gen 16S ARNr, Revista Veterinaria. (2021) 32, no. 1, 68–72, 10.30972/vet.3215638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sancho-Blanco C., Hernández-Noguera L., Vega-Alpízar L., Rojas R. S., and Umaña-Castro R., Identificación De Cuatro Especies De Clupeiformes (Actinopterygii) Mediante Análisis De Secuencias De ADN Mitocondrial en Zonas De Explotación Pesquera Del Golfo De Nicoya, Costa Rica, Revista Ciencias Marinas Y Costeras. (2021) 13, no. 1, 39–56, 10.15359/revmar.13-1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Silva H. D. D. and Aguilera L. A. P., Identificación Molecular De Microorganismos Aislados De Quesera Artesanal Ubicada en La Libertad-Chontales, Nicaragua, Revista Ciencia Y Tecnología El Higo. (2020) 10, no. 2, 62–78, 10.5377/elhigo.v10i2.10554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Cáceda Quiroz C. J., Maraza Choque G. J., Chachaque Callo D. M., Fora Quispe G. D., Farfan Pajuelo D. G., and Carpio Mamani M., Isolation and Phylogenetic Characterization of Cultivable Native Bacteria From Abandoned Mines in Tacna, Peru, Biotecnia. (2024) 26, 144–153, 10.18633/biotecnia.v26.2130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Sari W. E., Amini N. N., Sutriana A., Hanafiah M., Hambal M., Vanda H., Zamzami R. S., Awaluddin A., and Nurliana N., Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria From Eggshell of Leatherback Sea Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) in Lampuuk Beach, Aceh Besar Using 16S rRNA Gene, Veterinary Integrative Sciences. (2024) 22, no. 2, 579–593, 10.12982/vis.2024.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Gleason F. H., Allerstorfer M., and Lilje O., Newly Emerging Diseases of Marine Turtles, Especially Sea Turtle Egg Fusariosis (SEFT), Caused by Species in the Fusarium solani Complex (FSSC), Mycology: An International Journal on Fungal Biology. (2020) 11, no. 3, 184–194, 10.1080/21501203.2019.1710303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Smyth C. W., Sarmiento-Ramírez J. M., Short D. P. G., Diéguez-Uribeondo J., O′Donnell K., and Geiser D. M., Unraveling the Ecology and Epidemiology of an Emerging Fungal Disease, Sea Turtle Egg Fusariosis (STEF), Plos Pathogens. (2019) 15, no. 5, e1007682, 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Candan E. D., Molecular Identification of Fungal Isolates and Hatching Success of Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Nests, Archives of Microbiology. (2018) 200, no. 6, 911–919, 10.1007/s00203-018-1496-0, 29480404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Carranco A. S., Turtle Egg Microbiome Modulates Fusariosis Fungal Infection and Hatching Success, 2025, Research Square, 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7234466/v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Warner D. A., Jorgensen C. F., and Janzen F. J., Maternal and Abiotic Effects on Egg Mortality and Hatchling Size of Turtles: Temporal Variation in Selection Over Seven Years, Functional Ecology. (2010) 24, no. 4, 857–866, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01714.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Luan X. Y., Chen J. X., Zhang X. H., Jia J. T., Sun F. R., and Li Y., Comparison of different primers for rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus using the polymerase chain reaction, Letters in Applied Microbiology. (2007) 44, no. 3, 242–247, 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02074.x, 17309499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Marlina R. S., Kqueen C. Y., Napis S., Zakaria Z., Mutalib S. A., and Nishibuchi M., Detection of tdh and trh Genes in Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Isolated from Corbicula Moltkiana Prime in West Sumatera, Indonesia, Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. (2007) 38, no. 2, 349–355, 17539286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Aerobic Plate Count, Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM), 2001, FDA. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dabhi D., Pandya K. S., Soares J., Lezama F., and Vale Z., Cross Entropy Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy for Solving the Bi-Level Bidding Optimization Problem in Local Energy Markets, Energies. (2022) 15, no. 13, 10.3390/en15134838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Hao Q., Zhou Z., Wei Z., and Chen G., Parameters Identification of Photovoltaic Models Using a Multi-Strategy Success-History-Based Adaptive Differential Evolution, Ieee Access. (2020) 8, 35979–35994, 10.1109/access.2020.2975078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Islam M. S., Crawford T. W., and Shao Y., Evaluation of Predicted Loss of Different Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) due to Coastal Erosion in Bangladesh, Frontiers in Environmental Science. (2023) 11, 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1144686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hartono H., Risyani Y., Ongko E., and Abdullah D., HAR-MI Method for Multi-Class Imbalanced Datasets, Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control). (2020) 18, no. 2, 10.12928/telkomnika.v18i2.14818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Norinder U., Spjuth O., and Svensson F., Synergy Conformal Prediction Applied to Large-Scale Bioactivity Datasets and in Federated Learning, Journal of Cheminformatics. (2021) 13, no. 1, 10.1186/s13321-021-00555-7, 34600569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Sun S., Xu Z., Hu H., Zheng M., Zhang L., Xie W., Sun L., Liu P., Li T., Zhang L., Chen M., Zhu X., Liu M., Yang Y., and Zhou J., The Bacillus cereus Toxin Alveolysin Disrupts the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier by Inducing Microtubule Disorganization Through CFAP100, Science Signaling. (2023) 16, no. 785, 10.1126/scisignal.ade8111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Mato D. B., Orukotan A. A., Dadah A. J., Péter F., and Alfa A., Isolation and Identification of Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli From Food Sample Sold Within, Kaduna Town, South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology. (2021) 12–16, 10.9734/sajrm/2021/v11i330251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Rahimi E., Abdos F., Momtaz H., Baghbadorani Z. T., and Jalali M., Bacillus cereus in Infant Foods: Prevalence Study and Distribution of Enterotoxigenic Virulence Factors in Isfahan Province, Iran, Scientific World Journal. (2013) 2013, no. 1, 10.1155/2013/292571, 23781153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Vecchioni L., Pace A., Sucato A., Berlinghieri F., Cambera I., Visconti G., Hochscheid S., Arculeo M., and Alduina R., Unveiling the Egg Microbiota of the Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta in Nesting Beaches of the Mediterranean Sea, Plos One. (2022) 17, no. 5, e0268345, 10.1371/journal.pone.0268345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Bézy V. S., Valverde R. A., and Plante C. J., Olive Ridley Sea Turtle Hatching Success as a Function of the Microbial Abundance in Nest Sand at Ostional, Costa Rica, Plos One. (2015) 10, no. 2, e0118579, 10.1371/journal.pone.0118579, 25714355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Savage A. C. N. P., Coutou J., Rajh S., Stewart N., Watson A. D., Jehu A., Asmath H., Dziva F., Unakal C., Holder R. B., and Carthy R. R., Temporospatial Dynamics and Public Health Significance of Bacterial Flora Identified on a Major Leatherback Turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) Nesting Beach in the Southern Caribbean, Marine Ecology. (2017) 38, no. 2, 10.1111/maec.12412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Fish M., Côté I. M., Gill J. A., Jones A., Renshoff S., and Watkinson A. R., Predicting the Impact of Sea-Level Rise on Caribbean Sea Turtle Nesting Habitat, Conservation Biology. (2005) 19, no. 2, 482–491, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00146.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Fuentes M. M. P. B., Dawson J., Smithers S., Hamann M., and Limpus C. J., Sedimentological Characteristics of Key Sea Turtle Rookeries: Potential Implications Under Projected Climate Change, Marine and Freshwater Research. (2010) 61, no. 4, 464–473, 10.1071/mf09142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Limpus C. J., Miller J. D., and Pfaller J. B., Flooding-Induced Mortality of Loggerhead Sea Turtle Eggs, Wildlife Research. (2021) 48, no. 2, 10.1071/wr20080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Duffy H., McNamara A., Mulligan B., West K., Leng P., Vong R., Murray K. G., Kim S., Tiwari M., and Teoh M., An Assessment of Marine Turtle Population Status and Conservation in Cambodia, Oryx. (2023) 57, no. 2, 160–170, 10.1017/s0030605322000862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Kyaw E. M., Ong L., Naing N. H., Oo T. M., Naing K. H., Ko L. M. K., Tin T. S., Htun Y. Y., and Chen X., Turtles and Tortoises Losing the Race: Ecology and Conservation of Testudines in Indawgyi Lake, Myanmar, Integrative Conservation. (2024) 3, no. 1, 46–57, 10.1002/inc3.44. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Veelenturf C. A., Sinclair E. M., Paladino F. V., and Honarvar S., Predicting the Impacts of Sea Level Rise in Sea Turtle Nesting Habitat on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.(2019) 15, no. 7, e0222251, 10.1101/760538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Gifari T., Elfidasari D., and Sugoro I., The Effects of Contaminant Microorganism Towards Chelonia mydas Eggs Hatchery Results in Pangumbahan Green Sea Turtles Conservation, Sukabumi, Indonesia, Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. (2018) 19, no. 4, 1207–1212, 10.13057/biodiv/d190404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Letchumanan V., Yin W. F., Lee L. H., and Chan K. G., Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Isolated From Retail Shrimps in Malaysia, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2015) 6, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Takemura A. F., Chien D. M., and Polz M. F., Associations and Dynamics of Vibrionaceae in the Environment, From the Genus to the Population Level, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2014) 5, 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Sun Y., Yan Y., Yan S., Li F., Li Y., Yan L., Yang D., Peng Z., Yang B., Sun J., Xu J., Dong Y., and Bai Y., Prevalence, Antibiotic Susceptibility, And Genomic Analysis Of Vibrio Alginolyticus Isolated From Seafood And Freshwater Products In China, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2024) 15, 1381457, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1381457, 39050630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Canellas A. L. B., Lopes I. R., Mello M. P., Paranhos R., Oliveira B. F. R., and Laport M. S., Vibrio Species in an Urban Tropical Estuary: Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Interaction With Environmental Parameters, and Possible Public Health Outcomes, Microorganisms. (2021) 9, no. 5, 10.3390/microorganisms9051007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Narayanan S. V., Joseph T. C., Peeralil S., Mothadaka M. P., and Lalitha K. V., Prevalence, Virulence Characterization, AMR Pattern and Genetic Relatedness of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates From Retail Seafood of Kerala, India, Frontiers in Microbiology. (2020) 11, 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00592, 32318050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Bhowmik S. K., Pazhani G. P., and Ramamurthy T., Phylogenetic andIn SilicoFunctional Analyses of Thermostable-Direct Hemolysin andtdh-Related Encoding Genes inVibrio parahaemolyticusand Other Gram-Negative Bacteria, Biomed Research International. (2014) 2014, 576528, 10.1155/2014/576528, 25114910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. López-Hernández K. M., Pardío-Sedas V. T., Lizárraga-Partida L., Williams J. D. J., Martínez-Herrera D., Flores-Primo A., Uscanga-Serrano R., and Rendón-Castro K., Environmental Parameters Influence on the Dynamics of Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Densities in Crassostrea virginica Harvested From Mexico′s Gulf Coast, Marine Pollution Bulletin. (2015) 91, no. 1, 317–329, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Avanzato V. A., Matson M. J., Seifert S. N., Pryce R., Williamson B. N., Anzick S. L., Barbian K., Judson S. D., Fischer E. R., Martens C., and Bowden T. A., Case Study: Prolonged Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Shedding From an Asymptomatic Immunocompromised Individual With Cancer, Cell. (2020) 183, no. 7, 1901.e9–1912.e9, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.049, 33248470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Behera D. R., Nayak A. K., Nayak S. R., Nayak D., Swain S., Maharana P. K., Biswal B., Pany S., Pati S., and Pal B. B., Genomic diversities of ctx B, tcp A and rst R alleles of Vibrio cholerae O139 strains isolated from Odisha, India, India. Environmental Microbiology Reports. (2021) 14, no. 3, 376–384, 10.1111/1758-2229.13016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Davies N. G., Klepac P., Liu Y., Prem K., Jit M., and Eggo R. M., Age-Dependent Effects in the Transmission and Control of COVID-19 Epidemics, Nature Medicine. (2020) 26, no. 8, 1205–1211, 10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Jinrong T., Li S., Zhang M., Li F., Tang Y., and Yang F., Whole Genome Analysis of a Non-O1, Non-O139 Vibrio cholerae Detected From Human Blood in China, Infection and Drug Resistance. (2023) 16, 5453–5461, 10.2147/idr.s420095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Johnson M. G., Strizki J., Brown M., Wan H., Shamsuddin H., Ramgopal M., Florescu D. F., Delobel P., Хаертынова И. М., Flores J. F., Fouche L. F., Chang S., Williams-Diaz A., Du J., Grobler J. A., Paschke A., and Anda C. D., Molnupiravir for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Participants: Efficacy, Safety, and Virology Results From the Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled MOVe-OUT Trial. Infection. (2023) 51, no. 5, 1273–1284, 10.1007/s15010-022-01959-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Levin A., Hanage W. P., Owusu-Boaitey N., Cochran K., Walsh S. P., and Meyerowitz-Katz G., Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Public Policy Implications, European Journal of Epidemiology. (2020) 35, no. 12, 1123–1138, 10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1, 33289900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Li Z., Guan H., Wang W., Gao H., Feng W.-H., Li J., Diao B., Zhao H., Kan B., and Zhang J., Development of a Rapid and Fully Automated Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Identification and Differentiation of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus on the BD MAX Platform, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. (2021) 11, 10.3389/fcimb.2021.639473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Mian M. S., Rashid M. H., Kabir S. M. L., Akter S., Sumon M. A. A., Rahman M. A., Molla M. H. R., Alhaddad M. F., Alsohibany K. S., Moulay M., Gabr M. H., Haque M. M., and Teklemariam A. D., Bacterial Assessment and Isolation of Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria From the Indian Major Carp, Labeo Rohita, Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research. (2023) 22, no. 6, 34–45, 10.9734/ajfar/2023/v22i6589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Moritz M., Wiacek C., Weihe T., Ehlbeck J., Weltmann K., and Braun P. G., Effect of Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Eggshells on the Total Bacterial Count Inoculated Salmonella Enteritidis and Selected Quality Parameters, Plasma Processes and Polymers. (2020) 18, no. 1, 10.1002/ppap.202000061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Pertiwi N. P., Suhendro M. D., Yusmalinda N. L., Putra I. N., Putri I. G., Artiningsih E. Y., Al-Malik M. D., Cahyani N. K., and Sembiring A., Forensic Genetic Case Study: Species Identification and Traceability of Sea Turtle Caught in Illegal Trade in Bali, Indonesia, Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. (2020) 21, no. 9, 10.13057/biodiv/d210945. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Phillott A. D. and Godfrey M. H., Assessing the Evidence of ‘Infertile’ Sea Turtle Eggs, Endangered Species Research. (2020) 41, 329–338, 10.3354/esr01032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Prescott J. M. and Barkovskii A. L., In Situ Dynamics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in Water, Sediment and Triploid Crassostrea Virginica Oysters Cultivated in Floating Gear, Journal of Applied Microbiology. (2022) 132, no. 4, 3343–3354, 10.1111/jam.15435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. See K. W. and Latip N. S. A., Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC) in Nests of Hawksbill Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) With High Hatching Success in Melaka, Malaysia, Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology. (2023) 31, no. 5, 2601–2619, 10.47836/pjst.31.5.29. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Sevilla-Montoya R., Helguera-Reppeto A. C., Monroy-Muñoz I. E., Vargas-Pavía T. A., Valdés-Montoya E. I., Solis-Paredes J. M., Torres-Torres J., Velázquez-Cruz R., Muñoz-Medina J. E., Martínez-Cordero C., and Hidalgo-Bravo A., Blood Type Associated With the Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Pregnant Women, Diagnostics. (2023) 13, no. 7, 10.3390/diagnostics13071338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Sodagari H. R., Habib I., Shahabi M. P., Dybing N. A., Wang P., and Bruce M., A Review of the Public Health Challenges of Salmonella and Turtles, Veterinary Sciences. (2020) 7, no. 2, 10.3390/vetsci7020056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Sun J., Li X., Hu Z., Xue X., Zhang M., Wu Q., Zhang W., Zhang Y., and Lu R., Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolated From Stool Specimens of Diarrhea Patients in Nantong, Jiangsu, China During 2018–2020, Plos One. (2022) 17, no. 8, e0273700, 10.1371/journal.pone.0273700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Thornton C. S., Huntley K., Berenger B. M., Bristow M., Evans D. H., Fonseca K., Franko A., Gillrie M. R., Lin Y.-C., Povitz M., Shafey M., Conly J., and Tremblay A., Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 Infection Following Rituximab Treatment: Clinical Course and Response to Therapeutic Interventions Correlated With Quantitative Viral Cultures and Cycle Threshold Values, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. (2022) 11, no. 1, 10.1186/s13756-022-01067-1, 35123573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Waltenburg M. A., Perez A., Salah Z., Karp B. E., Whichard J. M., Tolar B., Gollarza L., Koski L., Blackstock A. J., Basler C., and Nichols M., Multistate Reptile- and Amphibian-Associated Salmonellosis Outbreaks in Humans, United States, 2009–2018, Zoonoses and Public Health. (2022) 69, no. 8, 925–937, 10.1111/zph.12990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information 1 File S1: Representative 16S rRNA gene sequence files of bacterial isolates used for molecular identification.

Supporting Information 2 File S2: Representative gyrB gene sequence files of selected bacterial isolates.

Supporting Information 3 File S3: NCBI BLAST search results and supporting molecular identification outputs for bacterial isolates.

IJM-2026-7422673-s002.zip (367.3KB, zip)

Supporting Information 4 File S4: Raw bacterial count data, Gram staining results, and statistical outputs used in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supporting information of this article.


Articles from International Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES