Skip to main content
The Journal of Nutrition logoLink to The Journal of Nutrition
. 2026 Mar 23;156(5):101487. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2026.101487

Erratum to ‘Riboflavin deficiency is highly prevalent in women and children across high and low/middle income countries worldwide’ [J. Nutr. 2026; 156: 101277]

Liadhan McAnena 1, Mary Ward 1,⁎, Adrian McCann 1,2, Kristina Pentieva 1, Leane Hoey 1, Ryan Barlow 1, Harry R Jarrett 1, Maeve A Kerr 1, JJ Strain 1, Catherine Hughes 1, Albert Flynn 3, Janette Walton 3,4, Yvonne Lamers 5, Parveen Bhatti 6, Crystal D Karakochuk 5, Kyly C Whitfield 5,7, Michelle Murphy 8,9, Pere Cavallé-Busquets 9,10, Lorna J Cox 11, Ann Prentice 11, Damon A Parkington 12, Tabasum Makhdoomi 11,12, Sengchanh Kounnavong 13, Guy-Marino Hinnouho 14, Nelly Birungi 15, Tim J Green 5,16,17, Helene McNulty 1
PMCID: PMC13639620  PMID: 41887611

The Publisher regrets the below error.

In table 2, the heading that should identify the Irish data was mis-placed into the overall Table 2 heading. In addition, the line-return is missing. Please find the correct table 2 below.

Table 2.

Riboflavin intakes and status in Irish and UK women aged 18-45 years compared with men

All
Users of supplements containing B-vitamins excluded
Men Women Men Women
Ireland, NANS1(2008–2010) n=332 n=303 P n=282 n=251 P

Riboflavin intake
 Median (95% CI), mg/d 2.4 (2.3, 2.6) 1.6 (1.5, 1.7) <0.001 2.2 (2.1, 2.4) 1.5 (1.3, 1.6) <0.001
 Proportion below AR2, n (%) 29 (9) 103 (34) <0.001 29 (10) 101 (40) <0.001
Biomarker status (EGRac)3
 Median (95% CI) 1.34 (1.32, 1.36) 1.37 (1.35, 1.40) 0.006 1.35 (1.33, 1.38) 1.39 (1.36, 1.42) 0.028
 Proportion ≥1.40 (deficient), n (%) 120 (36) 136 (45) 0.025 112 (40) 122 (48) 0.039

UK, NDNS4(2014-2017) n=162 n=227 n=130 n=163

Riboflavin intake
 Median (95% CI), mg/d 1.7 (1.5, 1.8) 1.4 (1.3, 1.6) 0.003 1.5 (1.4, 1.7) 1.3 (1.2, 1.4) <0.001
 Proportion below AR2, n (%) 52 (32) 99 (43) 0.031 50 (38) 82 (50) 0.057
Biomarker status (EGRac)
 Median (95% CI) 1.32 (1.29, 1.37) 1.37 (1.35, 1.40) 0.023 1.36 (1.31, 1.41) 1.40 (1.37, 1.43) 0.041
 Proportion ≥1.40 (deficient), n (%) 64 (40) 103 (45) 0.294 58 (45) 82 (50) 0.395

Riboflavin intakes and status were compared between sexes using Mann Whitney U tests. The proportions of males vs. females with intakes below AR, and proportions with riboflavin deficiency, were compared using Chi-Square tests. P<0.05 was considered significant.

1

National Adult Nutrition Survey (NANS) of Irish adults, years 2008-2010.

2

Average Requirement; 1.3 mg/d as set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)48.

3

Erythrocyte glutathione reductase activation coefficient; riboflavin deficiency, EGRac ≥1.40.

4

Adults from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) of British adults; combined data from years 7, 8 and 9 of the rolling program (2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, respectively.


Articles from The Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition

RESOURCES