Skip to main content
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2026 Sep 22;14:1902573. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2026.1902573

Multifunctional Cu2-xSe nanomaterials for cancer theranostics: recent advances, therapeutic mechanisms, and translational challenges

Jingchao He 1,2,†, Jiachao Xie 1,2,†, Yunxiao Peng 1,2,†, Haicheng Yu 1,2,†, Lina Chen 3,*, Xiaohong Wang 1,2,*, Haibo Sun 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC13640611  PMID: 42841004

Abstract

Cu2-xSe has made many breakthroughs in tumor therapy due to its unique advantages. Cu2-xSe can enhance immunotherapy by multiple mechanisms, such as reshaping the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and triggering immunogenic cell death. Cu2-xSe possesses a variety of nanozyme-like activities that can disrupt the redox homeostasis of tumor cells and modulate the TME, enabling chemodynamic therapy (CDT) and improving the efficacy of multiple therapeutic modalities. Cu2-xSe not only acts as a cuproptosis inducer and an autophagy inhibitor, but also induces cell-cycle arrest and impairs mitochondrial function, thereby suppressing tumor proliferation and metastasis. Cu2-xSe is a multifunctional nanotheranostic agent that not only possesses photoacoustic imaging (PAI) property, but also exhibits excellent thermoelectric catalytic therapy (TECT), photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) functions, making it suitable for combined therapy and imaging-guided therapy. At present, studies on Cu2-xSe-based tumor therapy have reported a series of encouraging findings that warrant systematic summary and analysis to promote the development of nanomedicine. So far, there is no review article on the applications of Cu2-xSe in tumor diagnosis and therapy. In this review, we summarize the recent progress and prospects of Cu2-xSe in cancer diagnosis and therapy, focusing on the breakthroughs of Cu2-xSe in new strategies for tumor diagnosis and treatment and in solving medical problems. This review intends to offer insights that may accelerate the development of Cu2-xSe-based nanomedicine for cancer therapy.

Keywords: Cu2-xSe, diagnosis, multifunctional nanomaterial, therapy, tumor

1. Introduction

Nanomedicine enables integrated cancer diagnosis and therapy, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy (Das, 2025; Tong et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2024b). Nanomedicine-based technologies facilitate the resolution of challenges in cancer treatment and represent a Frontier for developing novel, safe and effective strategies for cancer diagnosis and therapy (Huang et al., 2025; Jia et al., 2025; Jiang and Lin, 2025; Lan et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2025). Several nanomaterials have already entered clinical practice for cancer diagnosis and therapy, demonstrating promising antitumor efficacy and prolonging survival in patients with cancer (Wang Y. et al., 2024; Yin et al., 2024). Safe and effective nanomaterials are fundamental to successful nanomedicine-based cancer therapy (Cao et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2022, Liu J. et al., 2023). Systematically identifying and reviewing highly effective and safe nanomaterials can provide valuable insights into advancing innovative strategies for tumor theranostics (Bindra et al., 2023; Li B. et al., 2024; Wang A. et al., 2024, Wang P. et al., 2024). Copper-based nanomedicines can induce tumor cell death through various death mechanisms, such as pyroptosis, ferroptosis, cuproptosis and apoptosis, making them a promising nanoplatform for the development of novel tumor treatment strategies (Xia et al., 2025). Copper-based nanomedicines can improve the efficiency of photodynamic therapy (PDT), lead to effective photothermal therapy (PTT) and sonodynamic therapy (SDT), and enhance the efficiency of immunotherapy, demonstrating enormous research value (Xia et al., 2025). As a copper-based nanomedicine, Cu2-xSe displays significant advantages in cancer therapy and has yielded numerous encouraging results in cancer monotherapy and combination therapy, demonstrating the qualities of a “star” nanomaterial (Chan et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2025; Cheng H. et al., 2025; Lin et al., 2025; Shen et al., 2025; Shi L. et al., 2025; Wang T. et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Yao et al., 2025; Yin et al., 2025).

The advantages of Cu2-xSe in tumor diagnosis and treatment primarily include the following aspects. (1) Cu2-xSe significantly enhances immunotherapy through multiple mechanisms. Cu2-xSe can lead to immunogenic cell death (ICD) and promote release of tumor-associated antigens (Wang T. et al., 2023); Cu2-xSe suppresses the expression of the metabolic immune checkpoint 5′-nucleotidase (CD73) and reverses the immunosuppressive state (Zhang H. et al., 2024); Cu2-xSe activates the ROS-TRAF6-IRF5-IL-23 signaling pathway, causing tumor-associated macrophages to repolarize toward the tumor-suppressive M1 macrophages and remodel the immunosuppressive microenvironment (Zheng et al., 2022); Cu2-xSe can serve as an effective nanocarrier for immunotherapeutic agents (Wang T. et al., 2023). (2) Cu2-xSe modulates the TME through various nanoenzyme activities, thereby disrupting cellular redox homeostasis and contributing to tumor therapy. Because it possesses intrinsic peroxidase (POD)-like and catalase (CAT)-like catalytic activities, Cu2-xSe can catalyze the high levels of intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxygen (O2), thereby enabling chemodynamic therapy (CDT) and enhancing the efficacy of O2-dependent treatment modalities including radiation therapy (RT) and PDT (Chen X. et al., 2022; Hu Y. et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2024); Cu2-xSe exhibits glutathione oxidase (GSHox) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) oxidase-like (NOX) activities, which can deplete intracellular glutathione (GSH) and NADH, the major antioxidant molecules, thereby reducing ROS scavenging, disrupting the redox homeostasis, and enhancing the efficacy of ROS-dependent therapies such as CDT, RT, and PDT (Chen X. et al., 2022; Hu Y. et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2024). (3) Cu2-xSe not only acts as a cuproptosis inducer and an autophagy inhibitor, but also suppresses mitochondrial respiration and impairs energy metabolism, thereby directly inhibiting tumor metastasis and proliferation (Chan et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2019, Liu Y. et al., 2023). (4) Cu2-xSe is a highly efficient multifunctional diagnostic and therapeutic agent that not only exhibits near-infrared II (NIR-II) photoacoustic imaging (PAI) capabilities but also demonstrates NIR-II PTT, PDT, and thermoelectrocatalytic therapy properties, making it highly suitable for cancer theranostics (Pan et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2019). (5) Cu2-xSe exhibits good biosafety (Luan et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2024). Since both copper and selenium are essential trace elements in the human body, Cu2-xSe demonstrates good biocompatibility (Yang et al., 2024); Cu2-xSe can be easily synthesized into ultrafine nanoparticles and excreted via the kidneys, thereby reducing the cumulative toxicity of the nanomaterial (Luan et al., 2022). Given these advantages, Cu2-xSe has enabled several novel therapeutic and diagnostic strategies (Luan et al., 2022; Pan et al., 2024; Zhang H. et al., 2024). Meanwhile, Cu2-xSe has shown significant potential in addressing medical challenges such as radiation resistance (Jiang W. et al., 2024), chemotherapy resistance (Huang et al., 2021), the low efficacy of catalytic therapy caused by high GSH expression and insufficient endogenous H2O2 (Hu Y. et al., 2022), and the limited efficacy of immunotherapy resulting from an immunosuppressive microenvironment (Zheng et al., 2022). Therefore, Cu2-xSe holds great research significance in tumor theranostics. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively review the research progress on Cu2-xSe in this field, thereby facilitating in-depth exploration of Cu2-xSe to promote the development of cancer therapy.

To date, there are no review articles regarding the application of Cu2-xSe in tumor diagnosis and therapy. This review timely and systematically summarizes the research progress regarding Cu2-xSe in tumor theranostics (Figure 1), and analyzes the challenges and future prospects of its clinical translation. This review focuses on recent advances in the application of Cu2-xSe for overcoming challenges in tumor diagnosis and treatment, aiming to provide insights into overcoming bottlenecks in cancer therapy and promoting effective advancements in this field.

FIGURE 1.

Circular infographic illustrating the therapeutic applications of Cu2-xSe, divided into monotherapy and combination therapy. Monotherapy includes chemotherapy, radiation therapy, PTT, immunotherapy, and related types. Combination therapy highlights diverse multi-modal treatments such as PTT with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, PDT, CDT, RT, and other integrated regimens.

Schematic illustration of the application of Cu2-xSe in tumor therapy.

2. Applications of Cu2-xSe in cancer diagnosis and treatment

2.1. Applications of Cu2-xSe in monotherapy

Studies on Cu2-xSe have reported a series of advances in Cu2-xSe-based monotherapeutic applications, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), PTT, catalytic therapy, and immunotherapy, thereby promoting the development of nanomedicine-based cancer therapy. Recent progress in Cu2-xSe-based monotherapy is summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Applications of Cu2-xSe in monotherapy.

Cu2-xSe-based nanosystem Surface modification Imaging Treatment options PCE Tumor model Administration route Refs
Cu2-xSe-GOx - - Catalytic therapy - Cervical cancer intravenous injection Hu Y. et al. (2022)
Cu2-xSe - - Autophagy inhibition - Hepatocellular carcinoma intravenous injection Liu et al. (2019)
Cu2-xSe-PEG PEG - CDT - Lung cancer intravenous injection Wang X. et al. (2022)
DCNV(CSD) Dendritic cell membrane - Immunotherapy - Glioblastoma/Melanoma subcutaneous injection Wang T. et al. (2024)
CS-J@CM/6 Cancer cell membranes - Immunotherapy - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Wang T. et al. (2023)
Cu2-xSe - - Immunotherapy - Melanoma Peritumoral subcutaneous injection Zheng et al. (2022)
Microneedle patch loaded with Cu2-xSe - - Immunotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection and intratumoral injection Wang Z. et al. (2024)
DMMA@Cu2-xSe RGD and DMMA - PTT - Melanoma Trans-surgical bed insertion of microneedle patch Chan et al. (2023)
bio-Cu2-xSe - - PTT 76.9% Breast cancer intravenous injection Wang X.-M. et al. (2023)
GPS-CS@PD-1 PD-1 PAI PTT 54.53% Breast cancer intravenous injection Bao et al. (2022)
Cu2-xSe@MnO2 - T1-MRI PTT 22% Colorectal cancer intravenous injection Fu et al. (2018)
CCMT Cancer cell membranes - RT - Cervical cancer intravenous injection Jiang W. et al. (2024)
Au@Cu2-xSe HS-PEG-SH PAI RT - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Xu et al. (2022)
Cu2-xSe@PtSe HS-PEG-SH PAI RT - Breast cancer intratumoral injection Zhou et al. (2020)
Cu2-xSe + DSF - PAI Chemotherapy - Hepatocellular carcinoma intravenous injection Zhang et al. (2022)
DOX-HCu - PAI Chemotherapy - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Wu et al. (2018)

2.1.1. Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy serves as one of the mainstays of cancer treatment and improves patients’ survival (Tsai et al., 2024). The nonspecific distribution of chemotherapeutic agents often causes toxicity to normal tissues, thereby limiting the clinical application of chemotherapy (Hani et al., 2024; Yassin et al., 2024; Zhao X. et al., 2024). Zhang et al. prepared biodegradable ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles that released Cu2+ in response to the acidic and H2O2-rich TME, enabling TME-responsive Cu2+ release. Zhang et al. administered biodegradable ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles to tumor-bearing mice via tail vein injection, together with oral administration of disulfiram (DSF), a repurposed FDA-approved drug for alcohol use disorder. This led to the in situ assembly of Cu2+released in response to the TME and DSF into highly toxic (N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate)-copper (CuET) at the tumor site for precision chemotherapy (Zhang et al., 2022). Cu2-xSe catalyzed the conversion of H2O2 into ROS and O2, thereby enhancing the chemotherapeutic efficacy of CuET. This Cu2-xSe-based strategy enabled TME-responsive Cu2+ release, thereby facilitating the site-specific formation of CuET at the tumor site. This overcame the problem of nonspecific drug distribution, enabling safe and effective tumor-specific chemotherapy. Wu et al. linked ultra-small Cu2-xSe particles to disulfide bond-rich hollow mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles (HMONs) through disulfide linkages to prepare HCu. They then loaded doxorubicin (DOX) into the cavities and mesopores of HCu to prepare DOX-HCu (Figure 2A). Because focused ultrasound induced blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption, DOX-HCu could effectively penetrate the BBB and accumulate in glioblastoma tissues. Because disulfide bonds are highly sensitive to reducing environments, DOX-HCu could undergo degradation (Figures 2B,C) and release DOX in the glutathione (GSH)-rich TME. This design enabled on-demand release of the chemotherapeutic agent in response to the TME, thereby improving the efficacy of chemotherapy and reducing toxic side effects. Ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles exhibit excellent PAI performance. DOX-HCu enabled PAI-guided chemotherapy and exhibited significant tumor growth inhibition in glioblastoma-bearing mice (Figure 2D) (Wu et al., 2018). This strategy combined biodegradable HMONs with renal-clearable ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles to form a composite material. This approach may reduce nanomaterial-associated cumulative toxicity and provide a novel nanoscale platform for safe tumor treatment. This study demonstrated that ultrasmall Cu2-xSe could be effectively adsorbed onto the surface of larger mesoporous materials through a simple adsorption method to form new composite materials, which simultaneously leveraged the excellent PAI performance of ultrasmall Cu2-xSe and overcame its limited drug-loading capacity caused by the lack of active functional groups and mesoporous structures.

FIGURE 2.

Panel A shows a schematic of the synthesis route, composition, and drug release mechanism of a hybrid nanoparticle drug system, including illustrations of blood-brain barrier passage and cellular endocytosis. Panel B and C contain transmission electron microscopy images depicting nanoparticle structure and degradation in cells over different days, with arrows highlighting key features. Panel D presents a Kaplan-Meier plot of survival rates for various treatment groups in a tumor model. Panel E features a diagram of a different nanoparticle system’s synthesis, injection, and action mechanism in a mouse model, illustrating the process and cellular effects. Panel F shows a line graph comparing oxygen concentration during different treatments over time. Panel G displays a line plot of relative tumor volume in different treatment groups across days. Panel H has immunofluorescence microscopy images of Ki67 staining in tumor sections from different experimental groups.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of DOX-HCu and its application in chemotherapy, (B) TEM image of HCu in 10 mM GSH solution. (C) Bio-TEM images for evaluating degradation ability of HCu in cancer cells. (D) Survival times of tumor-bearing mice in different groups. Reproduced from (Wu et al., 2018). Copyright 2018 Advanced Science. (E) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of CSP–ACF and its radiosensitization mechanism. (F) Evaluation of O2 levels in different groups. (G) The variation of relative tumor volume in different groups. (H) Ki67 staining of tumor tissues in different groups. Reproduced from (Zhou et al., 2020). Copyright 2020 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces.

In summary, Cu2-xSe-based nanosystems enabled the site-specific generation of highly toxic chemotherapeutic species at tumor sites and TME-responsive drug release, thereby addressing the limitations of nonspecific chemotherapeutic distribution and unintended drug release in non-tumor areas, which enhanced chemotherapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse effects.

2.1.2. Radiation therapy

RT primarily kills cancer cells by inducing direct DNA damage through ionizing radiation and by generating ROS through reactions with water, which further damages DNA (Zhu et al., 2022). Hypoxia in the TME leads to insufficient ROS production during irradiation, resulting in radiation resistance (Pi et al., 2023; Wang X. et al., 2024; Xiong et al., 2025). Tumor cells often exhibit robust DNA repair capacity, and X-ray irradiation can lead to protective autophagy, both of which induce the development of radioresistance (de Bakker et al., 2024; Porrazzo et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024). Xu et al. prepared core–shell-structured Au@Cu2-xSe (Au@CS) particles with PAI properties. Through multiple radiosensitization mechanisms, these particles achieved highly effective radiotherapy for orthotopic glioblastoma (Xu et al., 2022). Au@CS increased the expression of SQSTM1/p62 and LC3-II proteins to inhibit X-ray-induced protective autophagy, enhancing radiosensitivity through autophagy inhibition. Au@CS increased the ubiquitination of Rad51, a key protein involved in homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA damage repair, thereby promoting its proteasomal degradation. This process blocked the critical HR repair pathway and inhibited DNA damage repair, enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy. Au@CS catalyzed the conversion of H2O2 into O2, improving hypoxia in the TME and increasing tumor radiosensitivity. This study enhanced RT efficacy and mitigated treatment resistance through multiple mechanisms, including alleviation of hypoxia and inhibition of protective autophagy and DNA damage repair, thereby providing new insights into radiosensitization (Xu et al., 2022). There are numerous causes of radiation resistance and multiple pathways for radiosensitization (Krayem et al., 2022). Currently, effective methods for enhancing radiosensitivity include improving hypoxia to increase ROS production during radiotherapy, utilizing high-Z element nanomaterials to enhance the absorption of ionizing radiation, and inducing cell-cycle arrest in the radiosensitive G2/M phase (Carigga Gutierrez et al., 2024; Ding et al., 2024; Shestovskaya et al., 2024). Zhou et al. prepared the core–shell-structured Cu2-xSe@PtSe (CSP) by utilizing the Kirkendall effect. They then loaded the HIF-1α inhibitor acriflavine (ACF) onto CSP via electrostatic interactions to obtain CSP-ACF (Figure 2E). CSP-ACF contained the high-Z element Pt and catalyzed H2O2 to generate O2, which catalyzed H2O2 to induce the generation of O2, thereby alleviating tumor hypoxia (Figure 2F). CSP-ACF also induced cell-cycle arrest in the radiosensitive G2/M phase and suppressed HIF-1α expression, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation. By enhancing radiosensitivity through four complementary mechanisms, CSP-ACF achieved significant radiotherapeutic effects (Figures 2G,H) (Zhou et al., 2020). This study not only provided a multifunctional platform for radiosensitization but also enriched the theoretical framework of radiosensitization research. RT is currently one of the primary clinical tumor treatment modalities, and many patients with cancer require RT (Huang and Zhou, 2020). However, tumors often develop intrinsic or acquired radioresistance, leading to cancer recurrence and metastasis (Darvish et al., 2023). Jiang et al. constructed CCMT by encapsulating Cu2-xSe within cancer cell membranes modified with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). TRAIL specifically binds to death receptors DR4 and DR5 and induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Owing to TRAIL-modified cancer cell membranes, CCMT could evade immune clearance and actively target cervical cancer cells overexpressing DR4/5. Cu2-xSe could deplete GSH and catalyze H2O2 to induce the generation of ROS, disrupting the redox homeostasis of cancer cells and sensitizing them to radiotherapy. Upon irradiation, CCMT induced mitochondrial dysfunction, inhibited oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis, and blocked energy production, reversing radioresistance. By utilizing different mechanisms, CCMT exhibited highly effective anticancer activity against radioresistant cervical cancer cells (Jiang W. et al., 2024). This study suggested that Cu2-xSe can generate ROS and disrupt the redox homeostasis of tumor cells, acting as a radiosensitizer. By employing a combined strategy of disrupting redox homeostasis, inducing mitochondrial dysfunction, and inhibiting energy metabolism, this study reversed radioresistance, thereby expanding the therapeutic strategies for overcoming radioresistance. However, this therapeutic strategy was primarily investigated in cervical cancer cells overexpressing DR4/5, and its ability to reverse radioresistance in cervical cancer cells with low DR4/5 expression was not assessed, limiting the generalizability of this approach.

In summary, the Cu2-xSe-based nanosystems can disrupt the redox homeostasis in tumor cells, improve O2 levels at the tumor site, inhibit energy metabolism, suppress DNA damage repair, arrest the cell cycle at the G2/M phase, and inhibit autophagy, thereby sensitizing tumors to radiotherapy through various mechanisms. Tumor cells are heterogeneous, diverse, and highly adaptive, making them prone to developing resistance to single-mechanism therapies. Importantly, the Cu2-xSe-based nanosystems integrated the aforementioned radiosensitization mechanisms into a single platform, synergistically combining these diverse mechanisms to enhance radiotherapeutic efficacy.

2.1.3. PTT

As an effective therapeutic modality, PTT involves photothermal agents absorbing laser energy and converting it into thermal energy, thereby destroying tumors through high temperatures. PTT possesses advantages such as low toxicity, operational simplicity, and high therapeutic selectivity (Delgado-Corrales et al., 2025; Li L. et al., 2024). However, the complicated synthesis of many photothermal agents and their relatively low photothermal conversion efficiencies hinder the development of PTT. Wang et al. added a culture medium containing Cu2+ and SeO3 2- to Shewanella MR-1 to biosynthesize bio-Cu2-xSe with high photothermal activity and excellent water solubility through a green biosynthetic approach (Figure 3A). Under 1,064 nm laser irradiation, Bio-Cu2-xSe exhibited a photothermal conversion efficiency (PCE) of 76.9% which was significantly higher than that of many reported photothermal agents. Bio-Cu2-xSe demonstrated good biosafety and showed highly efficient second near-infrared window (NIR-II) PTT, achieving 87% tumor tissue ablation. This study utilized a simple and environmentally friendly biosynthetic method to prepare photothermal agents with high PCE and good safety, providing new insights into the green synthesis of NIR-II photothermal agents and promoting the development of bacteria-mediated nanocomposite therapeutic platforms (Wang X.-M. et al., 2023). Bao et al. synthesized core–satellite-structured nanoparticles (GPS-CS) by growing gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the surface of Cu2-xSe. They then prepared GPS-CS@PD-1 by modifying the GPS-CS surface with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Due to the presence of PD-1, GPS-CS@PD-1 could actively target triple-negative breast cancer cells overexpressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), effectively accumulating at the tumor site. Cu2-xSe modified with low-toxicity AuNPs could oxidize the more toxic Cu+ to the less toxic Cu2+, thereby reducing the toxicity of Cu2-xSe. GPS-CS exhibited a PCE of 54.53%, which was higher than that of Cu2-xSe (35.84%), demonstrating excellent photothermal performance. GPS-CS@PD-1 exhibited excellent biocompatibility, actively targeted triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and enabled PAI-guided PTT, markedly suppressing tumor growth and liver metastasis (Bao et al., 2022). This study utilized a simple method to prepare GPS-CS@PD-1 with active targeting ability and high PCE, enabling highly efficient actively targeted PTT for TNBC. Multifunctional photothermal agents with imaging and photothermal properties can enable precise localization of the irradiation region in PTT, thereby improving PTT efficiency and reducing adverse effects (Aboeleneen et al., 2023; Wang R. et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024). Fu et al. performed a redox reaction of KMnO4 onto polyacrylamide-modified Cu2-xSe through a simple and mild method to prepare core–shell-structured Cu2-xSe@MnO2. Cu2-xSe@MnO2 exhibited a PCE of 22% and enabled T1-weighted MRI-guided NIR-II PTT, effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Fu et al., 2018). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe was an excellent photothermal agent that could be combined with imaging-capable nanomaterials to construct multifunctional photothermal platforms. Because intracellular copper levels are tightly regulated by copper metabolism and homeostasis, insufficient copper accumulation can lead to inefficient cuproptosis induction (Chan et al., 2023; Chen L. et al., 2022). Developing copper-based nanocarriers capable of site-specifically and efficiently releasing Cu2+ at tumor sites can enhance cuproptosis and reduce adverse effects, making it a topic of significant research value (Chan et al., 2023). Chan et al. modified the surface of Cu2-xSe with polyethyleneimine (PEI) and the active-targeting agent RGD, and 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride (DMMA), resulting in the preparation of DMMA@Cu2-xSe. The PEI-mediated positive surface charge markedly enhanced cellular uptake of the nanosystem. DMMA shielded the strongly positively charged PEI on the nanoparticle surface to reduce nonspecific cellular uptake of the nanosystem in the bloodstream. Due to DMMA’s acid-responsive degradation properties, DMMA@Cu2-xSe underwent charge reversal in the acidic TME, exposing highly cationic PEI and RGD on the Cu2-xSe surface (Figure 3C). Owing to RGD-mediated active targeting and PEI’s strong positive charge, PEI/RGD-exposed Cu2-xSe nanoparticles could efficiently enter tumor cells. Researchers used Western blotting (WB) to demonstrate that the Cu2+ released by DMMA@Cu2-xSe caused oligomerization of dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (DLAT), downregulated FDX1 protein expression, and caused abnormal expression of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle-related proteins (Figure 3D). These effects inhibited aerobic respiration, induced cuproptosis in tumor cells, and enhanced PTT efficacy. DMMA@Cu2-xSe-mediated PTT caused mitochondrial damage and promoted the production of ROS. The generated ROS promoted the release of copper ions, enhanced the cuproptosis effect, and consequently further enhanced the efficacy of PTT. DMMA@Cu2-xSe enabled cuproptosis-enhanced PTT, effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Figure 3B) (Chan et al., 2023). DMMA@Cu2-xSe served as an effective copper-ion nanocarrier, exhibiting strong copper-ion retention and releasing Cu2+ under acidic and H2O2-rich conditions. This enabled precise and efficient copper-ion release at the tumor site, inducing highly effective cuproptosis and overcoming the issue of low cuproptosis efficacy caused by insufficient copper ions accumulation (Chan et al., 2023).

FIGURE 3.

Panel A diagram illustrates biosynthesis of Cu2-xSe nanoparticles and their application in photothermal therapy in a mouse model. Panel B schematic shows DMMA-modified Cu2-xSe inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and cuproptosis via reactive oxygen species, copper ion release, and TCA cycle disruption. Panel C presents TEM images comparing Cu2-xSe and DMMA@Cu2-xSe nanoparticles under different pH and hydrogen peroxide concentrations, highlighting particle stability and morphological changes. Panel D displays Western blot results for FDX1, LIAS, DLST, DBT, and β-actin protein expression in control, CuCl2, Cu2-xSe, and DMMA@Cu2-xSe treated samples, with quantified values and molecular weights listed for each band.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of Cu2-xSe and its application in photothermal therapy. Reproduced from (Wang X.-M. et al., 2023). Copyright 2023 ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. (B) Schematic illustration of the application of DMMA@Cu2-xSe-mediated cuproptosis-enhanced photothermal therapy. (C) Degradation behavior of DMMA@Cu2-xSe under acidic and H2O2-rich conditions. (D) Changes in the expression of cuproptosis-related proteins regulated by DMMA@Cu2-xSe. Reproduced from (Chan et al., 2023). Copyright 2023 Advanced Functional Materials.

In summary, Cu2-xSe can enhance PTT efficacy in the following ways: 1) Cu2-xSe can be easily synthesized via simple and environmentally friendly methods to produce photothermal agents with high PCE; 2) Cu2-xSe can be combined with other photothermal agents to form composites that improve photothermal conversion efficiency; 3) Cu2-xSe can be combined with imaging-capable nanomaterials to create multifunctional photothermal agents with simultaneous imaging and photothermal capabilities; 4) Cu2-xSe can induce cuproptosis to enhance PTT efficiency; 5) Cu2-xSe-based platforms can be modified by active-targeting ligands to effectively accumulate at tumor sites and improve photothermal effects.

2.1.4. Catalytic therapy

Catalytic therapy primarily refers to the application of enzyme-active nanocatalysts to induce catalytic reactions in tumor cells, thereby inducing tumor cell death. One representative catalytic therapy strategy involves converting elevated intratumoral H2O2 into ROS, thereby leading to tumor cell death (Liu C. et al., 2024). Insufficient intracellular H2O2 levels and elevated intracellular GSH that acts as an ROS scavenger reduce the efficacy of catalytic therapy (He L. et al., 2023; Li Y. et al., 2023, Li Q. et al., 2024). Hu et al. attached glucose oxidase (GOx) to the surface of NH2-PEG-NH2-modified Cu2-xSe by utilizing amide bonds to obtain Cu2-xSe-GOx. Cu2-xSe exhibited catalase-like (CAT-like) activity, catalyzing H2O2 in the TME to generate O2 and thereby enabling catalytic reactions activated by the TME. GOx consumed O2 to catalyze the conversion of glucose into gluconic acid and substantial amounts of H2O2, thereby compensating for the deficiency of endogenous H2O2. Cu2-xSe also exhibited peroxidase-like (POD-like) activity, catalyzing the conversion of H2O2 into hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and thereby killing tumor cells. Cu2-xSe also possessed glutathione oxidase-like (GSHOx-like) activity, significantly depleting GSH that scavenged ROS. Cu2-xSe-GOx exhibited good biocompatibility and had achieved highly effective catalytic therapy (Hu Y. et al., 2022). By combining nanozymes with biological enzymes, this study demonstrated TME-activated “four-in-one” enzyme-mimicking activities, enabling cascade catalytic reactions. This approach addressed the low efficiency of catalytic therapy induced by elevated intracellular GSH levels and insufficient endogenous H2O2 in the TME, thereby enabling efficient and safe catalytic therapy (Hu Y. et al., 2022). The TME is characterized by mild acidity, hypoxia, and high levels of GSH and H2O2, which contributes to radioresistance, chemoresistance, and poor PDT efficacy (Chen et al., 2024a; Liu et al., 2025; Meng et al., 2024). Cu2-xSe can exhibit various nanozyme-like activities and reshape the TME by scavenging GSH and catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 into O2 and •OH. By reshaping the TME, Cu2-xSe can enhance the efficacy of multiple cancer therapeutic modalities and show considerable research potential.

2.1.5. Immunotherapy

In some patients, tumor resection may be incomplete, making tumor prone to recurrence. Therefore, developing new strategies to prevent postoperative tumor recurrence is of great value. Microneedle patches are transdermal drug delivery systems consisting of needle arrays with lengths of 25–2000 μm, which enable loaded drugs to achieve high concentrations in the superficial skin layers, rendering them attractive for skin tumor therapy (Ma and Wu, 2017; Wang Z. et al., 2024). Cu2-xSe possessed GSHOx and POD activity, which scavenged GSH and catalyzed the conversion of elevated intracellular H2O2 into ROS, thereby leading to immunogenic cell death (ICD) and enhancing large amounts of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) release. Wang et al. applied Cu2-xSe-loaded microneedle patches (CSN-M) to the postoperative tumor sites in tumor-bearing mice, where they induced ICD and acted as an in situ tumor vaccine, resulting in highly effective immunotherapy and significant suppression of postoperative tumor recurrence (Figure 4A) (Wang Z. et al., 2024). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe can induce ICD in tumor cells when delivered using a simple and cost-effective microneedle-based strategy, making it an effective agent for enhancing the antitumor immune response (Wang Z. et al., 2024). Tumor-associated macrophages are classified into tumor-suppressive M1-like macrophages and tumor-promoting M2-like macrophages (Santarsiero et al., 2024). M1-like macrophages can directly phagocytose and kill tumor cells, effectively present antigens, and activate antitumor T-cell immunity (Wang D. et al., 2024). M2-like macrophages can suppress T cells through recruiting regulatory T cells (Tregs), thereby promoting tumor metastasis and recurrence (DeNardo and Ruffell, 2019; Zheng et al., 2022). Repolarizing M2-like macrophages into M1-like macrophages to remodel the immunosuppressive TME is a key strategy for enhancing immunotherapy (Zheng et al., 2022). Ultrasmall Cu2-xSe (CS) particles could activate the ROS-TRAF6-IRF5-IL-23 signaling pathway, ultimately leading to the repolarization of tumor-associated macrophages into M1-like macrophages. This process induced a specific CD8+ T-cell immune response and generated a significant immune memory effect in tumor-bearing mice, effectively inhibiting tumor metastasis and growth (Figure 4B) (Zheng et al., 2022). This study demonstrated that CS was an effective immunomodulator with adjuvant-like effects that could remodel the immunosuppressive TME and enhance antitumor immune responses (Zheng et al., 2022). The reduced infiltration and dysfunction of T cells in the tumor region lead to immune evasion, limiting the efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma (Fecci et al., 2014; Wang T. et al., 2023). Wang et al. prepared CS-J@CM/6 b y loading the small-molecule inhibitor JQ1 onto Cu2-xSe, coating the prepared nanomaterials with cancer cell membranes, and modifying the surface of the cell membranes with CD6. Wang et al. orally administered paroxetine (PX) and intravenously injected CS-J@CM/6 into tumor-bearing mice. This combination increased infiltration of T-cell in the tumor region and reversed T-cell dysfunction in the TME, yielding significant immunotherapeutic effects (Wang T. et al., 2023). Due to the specific interaction between the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) expressed on endothelial cells and CD6, CS-J@CM/6 could effectively cross the BBB and subsequently actively target cancer cells via homologous targeting. PX acted as a G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) inhibitor, stabilizing sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) on the surface of T cells, thereby promoting the release of T cells sequestered in the bone marrow and increasing T-cell infiltration at the tumor site. JQ1 in CS-J@CM/6 not only reduced the expression of immune checkpoint molecules PD-1 and TIM-3 on T cells but also downregulated PD-L1 expression, simultaneously inhibiting multiple immune checkpoints and synergistically enhancing T-cell function and activity. In CS-J@CM/6, Cu2-xSe generated ROS via a Fenton-like reaction, thereby inducing ICD in tumor cells and promoting the TAAs release to elicit an immune response. This study increased T-cell infiltration in the tumor region and simultaneously inhibited multiple immune checkpoints to synergistically enhance T-cell function and activity, achieving significant immunotherapeutic effects and providing insights for improving immunotherapy for glioblastoma (Figure 4C) (Wang T. et al., 2023). Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines can significantly enhance immunotherapy and demonstrate broad application prospects (Borges et al., 2024; Kumari et al., 2024; Shah et al., 2025). Due to their large size and instability in vivo, traditional DC-based vaccines exhibit inefficient lymph-node homing and are unable to efficiently activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Park et al., 2006; Wang T. et al., 2024). Insufficient presentation of tumor antigens by DCs and low expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) prevent the efficient activation of CD8+ T cells, which are primarily responsible for antitumor immune responses (Saxena et al., 2021; Wang T. et al., 2024). To address these limitations, Wang et al. prepared DCNV(CSD) by coating Cu2-xSe with mature DC membranes. CDT mediated by DCNV(CSD) induced ICD in tumor cells, promoting the release of abundant TAAs. Owing to overexpression of MHC-I, the DCNV(CSD) nanovaccine could activate CD8+ T cells more effectively. Because of its small size, good stability, and high expression of chemokine receptors CCR7, the DCNV(CSD) nanovaccine could effectively accumulate in lymph nodes, thereby effectively inducing tumor-specific T-cell responses. The DCNV(CSD) nanovaccine induced potent tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses and generated memory T cells in the spleen of mice, effectively suppressing highly aggressive glioblastoma and highly metastatic melanoma, and effectively preventing tumor recurrence after treatment (Figure 4D) (Wang T. et al., 2024). DCNV(CSD) nanovaccines overcame the limitations of conventional DC-based vaccines, such as low accumulation in lymph nodes and low MHC-I expression, thereby improving immunotherapeutic efficacy (Wang T. et al., 2024).

FIGURE 4.

Panel A shows a schematic workflow for creating Cu2Se microneedles, their implantation into mice after tumor resection, and the resulting immunomodulation pathways, including dendritic cell activation and T cell differentiation. Panel B illustrates how chitosan (CS) administration shifts tumor-associated macrophages from M2-like to M1-like phenotypes via a ROS-TRAF6-IRF5 pathway, enhancing immune response markers. Panel C depicts mechanisms reversing T cell sequestration in lymphoid organs and preventing T cell exhaustion within tumors using JQ1-loaded microneedles. Panel D visualizes tumor antigen release, dendritic cell maturation, and T cell activation in mice, leading to immune-mediated tumor attack.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of CSN-M and its antitumor mechanism. Reproduced from (Wang Z. et al., 2024). Copyright 2024 Adv Healthc Mater. (B) Schematic illustration of CS-mediated immunotherapy through inducing the repolarization of tumor-associated macrophages to the M1-like phenotype. Reproduced from (Zheng et al., 2022). Copyright 2022 Advanced Functional Materials. (C) Schematic illustration of the application of CS-J@CM/6-mediated immunotherapy. Reproduced from (Wang T. et al., 2023). Copyright 2023 Advanced Science. (D) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of dendritic cell-based vaccines for highly effective immunotherapy. Reproduced from (Wang T. et al., 2024). Copyright 2024 ACS Nano.

In summary, Cu2-xSe can enhance immunotherapy primarily through the following mechanisms: 1) Cu2-xSe can induce ICD in tumor cells by generating ROS; 2) Cu2-xSe can cause tumor-associated macrophages to repolarize into M1-like macrophages by activating the ROS-TRAF6-IRF5-IL-23 signaling pathway, thereby reshaping the immunosuppressive TME; 3) Cu2-xSe can serve as a carrier for immunomodulatory agents to increase T-cell infiltration and activity; 4) Cu2-xSe can serve as an effective carrier for DC-based vaccines, overcoming the limitations of conventional DC vaccines, such as low MHC-I expression and poor lymph-node accumulation, thereby enhancing immunotherapy.

2.1.6. Others

Autophagy is a process by which cells degrade organelles and misfolded proteins by lysosomes, and recycle the degraded materials to provide energy for the cells (Rahdan et al., 2024; Shang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2025a). Autophagy plays a role in tumor progression and the efficacy of multiple cancer treatment methods, making it an important therapeutic target for cancer (Rahdan et al., 2024; Shang et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2025a). Cu2-xSe was identified as a novel autophagy inhibitor that reduced the activity of lysosomal cathepsins, thereby inhibiting the degradation of autophagic contents. By inhibiting autophagy, Cu2-xSe significantly enhanced the anti-tumor activity of oxaliplatin, markedly suppressing tumor growth (Liu et al., 2019). Inhibiting autophagy can enhance the efficacy of multiple cancer treatment methods such as PTT, PDT, CDT, and chemotherapy (Ding et al., 2025; Liu Y. et al., 2024). The autophagy inhibitors chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, which are currently in clinical trials, exhibit nonspecific distribution in the human body, have a short circulation half-life, and possess side effects (Liu Y. et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2022). Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify highly effective and safe autophagy inhibitors. Cu2-xSe is a nanoscale autophagy inhibitor, which expands the range of available autophagy inhibitors. Cu2-xSe can improve the efficacy of multiple cancer treatment methods such as chemotherapy, CDT, and PDT through autophagy inhibition. Because of its copper vacancies, PEG-modified Cu2-xSe (Cu2-xSe-PEG) could generate ROS under ultrasound irradiation, thereby killing tumor cells. Under ultrasonic irradiation, Cu2-xSe-PEG enhanced the efficiency of the Fenton-like reaction, thereby improving Cu2-xSe-PEG-mediated CDT (Wang X. et al., 2022). Cu2-xSe induced cell-cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and significantly suppressed the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines HepG2 and SMMC-7721, with IC50 values of 15.91 and 43.15 µM, respectively. Cu2-xSe impaired mitochondrial respiration by inhibiting the activity of mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes, thereby reducing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels, which impaired energy-dependent actin cytoskeleton assembly, inhibited the formation of tumor cell pseudopods, and consequently suppressed tumor cell migration. Cu2-xSe could be used to treat liver cancer by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and migration (Liu Y. et al., 2023).

In summary, Cu2-xSe was a nanoscale autophagy inhibitor that might improve the efficacy of various treatment modalities, such as PTT, PDT, RT and chemotherapy, through inhibiting autophagy. Cu2-xSe induced cell-cycle arrest and inhibited ATP generation, suppressing tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Although Cu2-xSe is a potent anticancer agent, there is currently a lack of genomic sequencing data for Cu2-xSe-treated cells, and the specific signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms underlying its inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and migration have not been thoroughly elucidated. This lack of information hinders the development of Cu2-xSe-based combination therapies with other anticancer agents.

2.2. Applications of Cu2-xSe in combination therapy

As a multifunctional nanomaterial, Cu2-xSe is highly suitable for combination therapy and Cu2-xSe-based strategies have advanced the development of combination therapeutic approaches. The applications of Cu2-xSe-based combination therapies are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Applications of Cu2-xSe in combination therapy.

Cu2-xSe- based nanosystem Surface modification Imaging Treatment options PCE Tumor model Administration route Refs
Cu2-xSe(R837)-iRGD RGD - RT + immunotherapy - Osteosarcoma intravenous injection Yao et al. (2025)
Cu2-xSe-DOX - PAI PDT + chemotherapy - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Zhang et al. (2019)
Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA FA - Chemotherapy + immunotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection Li K. et al. (2023)
CS−CD−Ce6 β-cyclodextrin PAI PDT + immunotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection Wang et al. (2019)
CS-P@CM Cancer cell membrane PAI CDT + glutamine metabolism inhibition - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Wang L. et al. (2023)
Cu2-xSe@SOR@PEG PEG - PTT + targeted therapy 27.6% Hepatocellular carcinoma intravenous injection Huang et al. (2022)
CS@CM Cancer cell membrane - PTT + catalytic therapy 37.68% Glioblastoma intravenous injection Lin et al. (2025)
Cu2-xSe - - PTT + catalytic therapy 43.7% Breast cancer intravenous injection Liu J. et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe@Fc lauric acid - PTT + immunotherapy 70.58% Esophageal cancer intratumoral injection Shi L. et al. (2025)
CS-I/J@CM Cancer cell membrane PAI PTT + immunotherapy - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Wang T. et al. (2022)
Cu2-xSe/PDA/AIPH - - PTT + chemotherapy - Osteosarcoma intratumoral injection Cheng H. et al. (2025)
DSF/Cu2-xSe@PCM PCMs PAI PTT + chemotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection Pan et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe-CB@MEM Cancer cell membrane - PTT + chemotherapy 46.7% Glioblastoma intravenous injection Song et al. (2023)
PT-V@TPDOX FA PAI PTT + chemotherapy 42.8% Breast cancer intravenous injection Ji et al. (2021)
Cu2-xSe-POED POED - PTT + CDT 67.5% Breast cancer intravenous injection Shen et al. (2025)
MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 AS1411 PAI PTT + CDT 82.33% Breast cancer intravenous injection Liang et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe-BSA BSA PAI PTT + CDT - Breast cancer intravenous injection Luan et al. (2022)
CS-GOD@CM Cancer cell membrane PAI PTT + CDT 62.9% Breast cancer intravenous injection Wang T. et al. (2020)
ICG@Cu2-xSe-ZIF-8 - - PTT + CDT 15.5% Breast cancer intratumoral injection Zou et al. (2022)
Au@Cu2-xSe - CT and PAI PTT + CDT 56.6% Breast cancer intravenous injection Zhang et al. (2021)
Ag2S-Cu(II)-Cu2-xSe - FI PTT + CDT 61.2% Cervical cancer - Han et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe-Au HS-PEG-SH PAI and CT PTT + RT 80.8% Breast cancer intravenous injection Huang et al. (2019)
Cu2-xSe/Au-TAT TAT - PTT + RT 64.6% Breast cancer intratumoral injection Ran et al. (2023)
Cu2-xSe - - PTT + catalytic therapy + TECT 67.0% Colorectal cancer intravenous injection Yang et al. (2024)
C&P-DOX - - PTT + chemotherapy + immunotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection Chen et al. (2025)
DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe@AC AC - PTT + CDT + chemotherapy 57% Hepatocellular carcinoma oral administration Yin et al. (2025)
Au@Cu2-xSe - PAI chemotherapy + RT + immunotherapy - Glioblastoma intravenous injection Zhang H. et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG PEG CT and T1-MRI PTT + CDT + RT 79.72% Breast cancer intravenous injection Chen X. et al. (2022)
MCSN-SNO/DOX - - Gas Therapy + chemotherapy + PTT - Hepatocellular carcinoma intravenous injection Huang et al. (2021)
Cu2-xSe@cMOF - - Gas Therapy + SDT + immunotherapy - Breast cancer intravenous injection Zhao C. et al. (2024)
Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG PEG CT and T1-MRI PTT + PDT + CDT 60.4% Hepatocellular carcinoma intratumoral injection Wang et al. (2021)
HMPC-D/G@PCM Tetradecyl - PTT + CDT + chemotherapy 41.42% Hepatocellular carcinoma intravenous injection Hu P. et al. (2022)
Au-Cu2-xSe@ZIF-8@P18 - - PTT + PDT + immunotherapy - Melanoma intravenous injection Yan et al. (2024)
RGD-dpGCS RGD PAI and CT PTT + CDT + PCT 71.0% Glioblastoma intravenous injection Shan et al. (2022)
Cu2-xSe-Au - PAI and CT PTT + CDT + PCT 67.2% Breast cancer intratumoral injection Wang Y. et al. (2020)

2.2.1. PTT + chemotherapy

Currently, many studies have explored strategies for synthesizing highly toxic CuET by complexing copper ions with low-toxicity disulfiram (DSF), thereby enabling in situ chemotherapy at tumor sites and improving treatment efficacy (Huang et al., 2024; Kang et al., 2023). However, most studies have primarily utilized copper-based nanoparticles loaded with DSF, which cannot achieve spatiotemporally synchronized release of sufficient Cu2+ and DSF for rapid and sufficient CuET formation, hindering effective chemotherapy (Pan et al., 2024). Pan et al. prepared DSF/Cu2-xSe@PCM (DCP) by encapsulating ultrasmall Cu2-xSe and DSF in a thermoresponsive biodegradable organic phase-change material (PCM) composed of lauric acid and stearic acid. Below the melting point of the PCM, the DCP remained in a solid state, preventing premature reactions between Cu2-xSe and DSF as well as drug leakage into the bloodstream, thereby enhancing treatment safety. Under near-infrared laser irradiation, the high temperatures induced by the Cu2-xSe caused the PCM to melt, thereby triggering the simultaneous burst release of Cu2-xSe and DSF. Due to their high defect density, small size, and high surface reactivity, ultrasmall Cu2-xSe particles could directly chelate DSF at their surface defect sites without prior Cu2+ release, thereby rapidly forming abundant highly toxic Cu2-xSe-ET complexes for tumor-site-specific in situ chemotherapy. Cu2-xSe-ET and CuET shared similar antitumor mechanisms, while Cu2-xSe-ET exhibited higher antitumor activity than CuET. DCP possessed PAI capability, enabling synergistic photothermal–chemotherapy (Pan et al., 2024). This study leveraged the high-temperature degradation property of phase-change materials to simultaneously and explosively release Cu2-xSe and DSF at tumor sites, thereby enabling the rapid and abundant generation of highly toxic Cu2-xSe-ET complexes. This strategy precisely controlled the conversion of relatively low-toxicity DSF into highly toxic complexes at tumor sites, achieving safe and highly efficient in situ chemotherapy and offering a new approach to precision cancer therapy. Currently, effective chemotherapeutic options for glioblastoma remain limited. Many drugs cannot effectively accumulate at tumor sites because of their limited ability to cross the BBB, hindering the advancement of glioblastoma treatment (Ambele et al., 2024; Cheng W. et al., 2025; Ferreira et al., 2024). Song et al. prepared Cu2-xSe-CB@MEM by loading cinobufotalin (CB) onto Cu2-xSe and coating the resulting nanoparticles with LN229 glioblastoma cell membranes. CB inhibited inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 (IMPDH1) activity, leading to tumor cell death. Because of the LN229 glioblastoma cell membrane coating, Cu2-xSe-CB@MEM was capable of crossing the BBB and homologously targeting glioblastoma, thereby enabling the effective accumulation of CB and Cu2-xSe at the tumor sites. Cu2-xSe-CB@MEM enabled synergistic photothermal–chemotherapy, inhibiting tumor growth (Song et al., 2023). Chemoresistance remains a major bottleneck in tumor therapy and the development of effective strategies to reverse it is of great significance (Wang et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025b). Ji et al. encapsulated Cu2-xSe within mesoporous silica (MSN) and modified the MSN shell with folic acid (FA). They then used the MSN shell to load triphenylphosphine-modified doxorubicin (TPDOX), and utilized lauric acid, a thermoresponsive phase-change material, to modify the pores of the MSN shell, thereby preparing PT-V@TPDOX. Under 808-nm laser irradiation, PT-V@TPDOX generated heat, which melted lauric acid to trigger thermoresponsive TPDOX release and impaired P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function, thereby reducing drug efflux. TPDOX actively targeted mitochondria, reversing chemotherapy resistance. PT-V@TPDOX possessed a drug-loading capacity of 10.12% and a PCE of 42.8%, reversed chemoresistance and achieved PAI-guided combined PTT and chemotherapy, producing potent antitumor efficacy against DOX-resistant breast cancer (Ji et al., 2021). This study utilized Cu2-xSe composites as photothermal carriers to achieve spatiotemporally controlled drug release and enhance intracellular drug retention, offering a new approach to overcoming chemoresistance (Ji et al., 2021). Cheng et al. mixed 2,2′-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane] dihydrochloride (AIPH), dopamine hydrochloride, and Cu2-xSe to prepare Cu2-xSe/PDA/AIPH. The biodegradable PDA shell helped maintain the structural stability of AIPH under physiological conditions and prevented its premature degradation during circulation. Under near-infrared laser irradiation, the high temperatures generated by Cu2-xSe/PDA/AIPH triggered AIPH decomposition and ROS generation, thereby inducing ROS-mediated chemotherapy. Cu2-xSe/PDA/AIPH enabled combined PTT with ROS-mediated chemotherapy, effectively inhibiting tumor growth in osteosarcoma-bearing mice. PDT and RT require O2 to generate ROS. The hypoxic nature of the TME limits ROS production during PDT and RT. This strategy utilized the high-temperature decomposition of AIPH to generate ROS, thereby overcoming the hypoxia-imposed limitation on ROS production and providing an effective approach for ROS-based tumor therapy (Cheng H. et al., 2025).

2.2.2. PTT + CDT

CDT primarily uses metal ions such as Fe2+, Cu+, and Mn2+ to catalyze the generation of OH from intracellular H2O2 via the Fenton reaction, thereby killing tumor cells (Meng et al., 2025; Zhang X. et al., 2025). Relatively low intratumoral H2O2 levels and limited Fenton reaction efficiency restrict the efficacy of CDT (Rao et al., 2023; Shen et al., 2023; Wang Z. et al., 2022). Wang et al. prepared CS-GOD@CM by encapsulating ultrasmall Cu2-xSe particles loaded with glucose oxidase (GOD) within 4T1 breast cancer cell membranes. Due to the cancer cell membrane, CS-GOD@CM could specifically target breast cancer cells while minimizing the exposure of GOD, thereby reducing adverse reactions. GOD catalyzed the conversion of glucose into gluconic acid and H2O2, overcoming the issue of insufficient endogenous H2O2. Cu+ in Cu2-xSe catalyzed the decomposition of H2O2 to form •OH, thereby facilitating CDT. CS-GOD@CM-mediated PTT enhanced Fenton reaction efficiency through temperature elevation, thereby boosting CS-GOD@CM-mediated CDT. CS-GOD@CM enabled PAI-guided PTT combined with CDT, effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Wang T. et al., 2020). This study suggested that the Cu2-xSe nanosystem served as an effective carrier for bioenzymes and enhanced the efficiency of CDT through photothermal heating and in situ H2O2 supply, thereby providing insights into efficient CDT-based cancer therapy. There are currently no effective treatments for bone metastases in breast cancer (Fan et al., 2024; Wang J. et al., 2024; Yu and Zhu, 2024). The monoclonal antibody denosumab and bisphosphonate zoledronic acid, which are used clinically to treat bone metastases, may cause osteonecrosis of the jaw and hypocalcemia (Menshawy et al., 2018; Zou et al., 2022). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new therapeutic agents for bone metastases. Zou et al. prepared ICG@Cu2-xSe-ZIF-8 by encapsulating Cu2-xSe within zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) and using ZIF-8 to load the photosensitizer indocyanine green (ICG). The PTT mediated by Cu2-xSe and ICG enhanced Cu2-xSe-mediated CDT. The selenium in Cu2-xSe could regulate selenoprotein expression, inhibit tumor cell activity and osteoclast function, suppressing bone metastasis in breast cancer. ICG@Cu2-xSe-ZIF-8 achieved combined PTT and CDT under laser irradiation, significantly inhibiting tumor growth, alleviating tumor-induced bone resorption, and effectively suppressing breast cancer bone metastasis (Zou et al., 2022). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe has potential for treating bone metastasis by inhibiting osteoclasts, providing a new therapeutic agent for bone metastasis (Zou et al., 2022). Liang et al. grew Cu2-xSe nanosheets in situ on the surface of mesoporous platinum nanoparticles (MPNPs) and modified the Cu2-xSe surface with the AS1411-NH2 aptamer to prepare MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411. Due to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect induced by the MPNPs and copper vacancies, the MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 had a PCE of 82.33%, which was higher than that of many reported photothermal agents. Due to the presence of AS1411-NH2, MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 could actively target breast cancer cells and efficiently accumulate at the tumor sites. The Cu2+ in MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 catalyzed H2O2 to induce the generation of highly toxic •OH for CDT. The Cu2+ in MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 oxidized GSH to form oxidized glutathione (GSSG), thereby reducing the clearance of •OH and enhancing CDT efficacy. MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411 exhibited good biocompatibility and high-spatial-resolution NIR-II PAI performance, enabling synergistic PTT–CDT treatment (Liang et al., 2024). Liang et al. mixed polyvinylpyrrolidone, selenium dioxide (SeO2), copper chloride dihydrate (CuCl2.2H2O), and ascorbic acid with an MPNPs solution and stirred the mixture for 48 h at room temperature, resulting in the growth of Cu2-xSe on the MPNPs surface. This finding suggests that Cu2-xSe can readily grow on the surface of functional materials without the need for complex processes or harsh reaction conditions, providing a useful method for preparing novel Cu2-xSe-based multifunctional composites. Zhang et al. synthesized core–shell-structured Au@Cu2-xSe using a simple two-step reduction method. Because of enhanced LSPR coupling between Au and Cu2-xSe, Au@Cu2-xSe had a PCE of 56.6%, exhibiting excellent photothermal performance. Cu2-xSe-mediated PTT enhanced the catalytic efficiency of Cu+-mediated Fenton-like reactions, thereby improving CDT efficacy. Au possessed X-ray attenuation capability, demonstrating CT imaging property. Au@Cu2-xSe achieved CT/PAI-guided combined PTT and CDT, indicating that Cu2-xSe-based composites could be promising multifunctional nanoplatforms for combination therapy and multimodal imaging (Zhang et al., 2021). The kidneys can clear ultrasmall nanomaterials, facilitating their rapid excretion from the body and reducing accumulation-related toxicity. However, rapid renal clearance also reduces tumor-site accumulation, leading to limited therapeutic efficacy (Luan et al., 2022). Luan et al. prepared ultrasmall Cu2-xSe-BSA nanoparticles using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a template (Figure 5A). Under acidic conditions, ultrasmall Cu2-xSe-BSA could self-assemble into aggregates, enabling tumor lysosome targeting and prolonging retention at tumor sites. Under NIR II light excitation, the self-assembled Cu2-xSe-BSA exhibited enhanced PAI performance, high PCE (Figure 5B), and ROS-generating capacity, inducing lysosomal lipid peroxidation (LPO) and altering lysosomal membrane permeability and inducing tumor cell death. Cu2-xSe-BSA exhibited limited cytotoxicity toward normal cells, which may be partly attributed to its low accumulation in these cells. After leaving the acidic TME, Cu2-xSe-BSA could dissociate from its aggregated state and revert to its ultrasmall size, thereby restoring renal clearability and reducing long-term accumulation-related toxicity. Cu2-xSe-BSA enabled PAI- and photothermal imaging-guided combined PTT and CDT, significantly inhibiting tumor growth (Figure 5C) (Luan et al., 2022). This study utilized pH-responsive self-assembled Cu2-xSe-BSA to resolve the fundamental conflict between rapid clearance and efficient accumulation at tumor sites, thereby offering a new approach for achieving effective and safe cancer treatment. Currently, most nanosystems operate in an always-on mode for both diagnostic signaling and therapy, resulting in poor cancer-cell specificity and hindering precise and safe cancer theranostics (Cai et al., 2024; Han et al., 2024; Pourmasoumi et al., 2024). Han et al. prepared Ag2S-Cu(II)-Cu2-xSe by cross-linking silver sulfide quantum dots (Ag2S QDs) with Cu2-xSe. The Ag2S QDs exhibited NIR-II fluorescence imaging (FI) and PTT capabilities. Due to the formation of Cu2+ coordination, fluorescence resonance energy transfer occurred between Cu2-xSe and Ag2S QDs in Ag2S-Cu(II)-Cu2-xSe, resulting in negligible NIR-II fluorescence. Under high GSH levels and acidic TME conditions, Ag2S-Cu(II)-Cu2-xSe could decompose, restoring NIR-II fluorescence and releasing Cu2+, thereby enabling TME-responsive NIR-II FI and CDT. The released Cu2+ underwent a redox reaction with GSH to form Cu+ and GSSG, thereby reducing GSH-mediated ROS scavenging. Cu2+ catalyzed intracellular H2O2 to induce the generation of ROS for CDT. Ag2S-Cu(II)-Cu2-xSe enabled NIR-II FI-guided combined PTT and CDT, demonstrating potent antitumor efficacy in vitro (Han et al., 2024). The TME is characterized by a dense extracellular matrix and increased interstitial fluid pressure, which hinder the accumulation and retention of nanoparticles at the tumor region, thereby decreasing the efficacy of cancer treatment (Shen et al., 2025). Shen et al. prepared pH-sensitive Cu2-xSe-POED by modifying Cu2-xSe with poly(ethylene glycol)-ortho ester-dihydrolipoic acid (POED). In the acidic TME, Cu2-xSe-POED underwent hydrophilicity changes and aggregated into larger particles, thereby prolonging its retention and accumulation In the tumor region. Under 808-nm laser irradiation, the aggregated Cu2-xSe-POED increased ROS production and enhanced the photothermal performance. With a PCE of 67.5%, Cu2-xSe-POED achieved a combination of CDT and PTT, effectively inhibiting breast cancer growth (Shen et al., 2025). This study used a pH-induced aggregation strategy to increase the penetration and accumulation of nanomaterials at tumor sites, improving antitumor efficacy.

FIGURE 5.

Scientific figure combining graphics, charts, and photographs to depict a multifunctional treatment strategy using Cu₂₋ₓSe nanoparticles and hybrid nanostructures for targeted cancer therapy, tumor inhibition, and metastasis prevention, demonstrated through synthesis pathways, mechanism-of-action illustrations, infrared thermal images, tumor progression graphs, specimen images, and stained tissue slides for comparative analysis.

(A) The preparation process of Cu2-xSe-BSA and its application in multimodal imaging-guided photothermal–chemodynamic therapy. (B) Photothermal imaging of tumor-bearing mice in different groups. (C) Tumor tissues in different groups. Reproduced from (Luan et al., 2022). Copyright 2022 Advanced Functional Materials. (D) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA and its use in combined ferroptosis-mediated chemotherapy and immunotherapy through O2 generation and GSH depletion. (E) pH responsive drug release behavior of Erastin. (F) The variations of tumor volumes in different groups. (G) HE staining of lung tissues in different groups. Reproduced from (Li et al., 2023a). Copyright 2023 ACS Nano.

Cu2-xSe-based nanoplatforms can serve as efficient platforms for integrating PTT and CDT. Cu2-xSe can be integrated with other photothermal agents to construct nanocomposites with high PCE, thereby enhancing photothermal performance and improving CDT efficacy by accelerating Fenton-like reaction kinetics. Cu2-xSe-based nanoplatforms can address major limitations of CDT by enabling in situ H2O2 generation and GSH depletion, thereby improving the therapeutic efficacy of CDT. Ultrasmall Cu2-xSe-BSA nanoparticles can self-assemble into larger aggregates in the acidic TME, thereby reducing premature renal clearance and promoting tumor accumulation. After leaving the acidic TME, these aggregates can dissociate into ultrasmall nanoparticles, enabling renal clearance and reducing long-term systemic toxicity. This strategy addressed the poor tumor accumulation of ultrasmall nanoparticles caused by premature renal clearance, thereby improving therapeutic efficacy and reducing systemic toxicity. Cu2-xSe-based nanoplatforms had TME-responsive NIR-II FI capability, which could enable precise tumor localization and image-guided combined CDT/PTT, thereby providing a potential platform for precision cancer theranostics.

2.2.3. PTT + catalytic therapy

Nanozymes with NADH oxidase-like activity can convert NADH to NAD+, thereby disrupting tumor metabolism for antitumor therapy (Li D. et al., 2025). Owing to tumor heterogeneity, many NOX-like nanozymes exhibit oxygen-dependent catalytic activity under normoxic and hypoxic tumor conditions, which limits their therapeutic efficacy (Bedard et al., 2013; Liu J. et al., 2024). Owing to Cu vacancies, Cu2-xSe exhibited efficient NOX-like activity under both normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (2% O2) conditions, significantly scavenging NADH. Cu2-xSe also possessed GSHOx-like, POD-like, and CAT-like activities, enabling it to scavenge GSH and catalyze the conversion of H2O2 into ROS and O2. Leveraging its multiple nanozyme activities, Cu2-xSe promoted ROS generation, inhibited lactate secretion, and impaired energy production, thereby disrupting tumor metabolism to achieve catalytic therapy. Cu2-xSe combined PTT with catalytic therapy to effectively ablate tumor tissue (Liu J. et al., 2024). Cu2-xSe overcame hypoxia-induced reductions in NOX-like nanozyme activity, inhibited energy metabolism, and enhanced the efficacy of PTT (Liu J. et al., 2024). Lin et al. prepared CS@CM by encapsulating Cu2-xSe within glioma cell membranes. Due to the glioma cell membrane, CS@CM could effectively cross the BBB and homotypically target glioma cells. The copper ions in CS@CM catalyzed the generation of ROS from H2O2, enabling catalytic therapy. Hyperthermia generated by CS@CM-mediated PTT further enhanced its catalytic activity and amplified oxidative stress-induced damage The high temperatures generated by CS@CM-mediated PTT enhanced the catalytic performance of CS@CM and increased oxidative stress damage. By combining PTT with catalytic therapy, CS@CM efficiently inhibited the growth of orthotopic gliomas (Lin et al., 2025). However, CS@CM lacked the imaging capabilities commonly used in clinical practice, such as CT and MRI, which hindered real-time and precise evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in orthotopic gliomas.

2.2.4. PDT + chemotherapy

PDT primarily involves the irradiation of a photosensitizer to generate ROS, thereby destroying tumors (Aebisher et al., 2024). PDT is a clinically used anticancer modality, showing advantages such as low toxicity and high therapeutic specificity (Zhang et al., 2024a). However, the tissue penetration of conventional PDT excitation light is limited, which severely restricts its therapeutic efficacy (Zhou et al., 2024). Zhang et al. developed Cu2-xSe-DOX through loading doxorubicin (DOX) onto cyclodextrin-modified ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles with an average diameter of 3.3 ± 0.4 nm. Under focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the BBB, Cu2-xSe-DOX could effectively cross the BBB and accumulate in glioblastoma lesions. Under 1,064 nm laser irradiation, Cu2-xSe could effectively handle H2O2 and O2 within the tumor via electron transfer and energy transfer mechanisms, generating abundant ROS to facilitate effective PDT. Cu2-xSe-DOX enabled PAI-guided chemotherapy combined with PDT, inhibiting the growth of orthotopic glioblastoma (Zhang et al., 2019). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe could act as an effective NIR-II photosensitizer with deep light penetration, thereby overcoming the issue of low PDT efficacy caused by shallow light penetration.

2.2.5. Chemotherapy + immunotherapy

Hypoxia in the TME leads to immunosuppression and ferroptosis resistance, thereby promoting tumor progression (Feldman, 2024; Guo et al., 2024; Liu X.-Q. et al., 2024). Developing strategies to address hypoxia in the TME is of great significance (Debnath et al., 2024). Li et al. encapsulated Cu2-xSe within ZIF-8, loaded erastin into the ZIF-8 shell, and further modified the surface with PEG and folic acid (FA) as an active targeting ligand, thereby constructing Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA (Figure 5D). The Cu2+ in Cu2-xSe catalyzed H2O2 to induce the production of O2. Cu2+ oxidized intracellular GSH to generate Cu+ and GSSG. Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA enhanced intracellular O2 production and GSH consumption through the interconversion of Cu+ and Cu2+. This disrupted the GPX4/GSH pathway to induce ferroptosis and inhibit hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression, thereby reducing ferroptosis resistance. Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA exhibited pH-responsive release behavior of Erastin (Figure 5E). Erastin, a ferroptosis inducer, also upregulated the expression of NOX4 protein and increased intracellular H2O2 levels, thereby enhancing Cu2-xSe-mediated O2 production. The O2 generated by Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA could reduce the expression of miR-301, thereby polarizing macrophages toward the M1 phenotype and increasing IFN-γ secretion by CD8+ T cells. These effects remodeled the immunosuppressive TME, enhanced antitumor immunity, and sensitized tumors to erastin-induced ferroptosis. Cu2-xSe/ZIF-8@Era-PEG-FA could actively target breast cancer cells and release erastin in a pH-responsive manner, thereby achieving a combination of ferroptosis-mediated chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and effectively inhibiting tumor growth and lung metastases (Figures 5F,G) (Li K. et al., 2023). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe could serve as an immunomodulatory nanoplatform that generated O2 through catalytic reactions, thereby reshaping the immunosuppressive TME, enhancing immunotherapy and sensitizing tumors to ferroptosis (Li K. et al., 2023).

2.2.6. PDT + immunotherapy

Wang et al. prepared CS−CD−Ce6 by loading the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) onto β-cyclodextrin-modified Cu2-xSe. CS−CD−Ce6 catalyzed the decomposition of H2O2 into O2 and ROS, thereby enhancing the efficacy of PDT. The abundant ROS generated by CS−CD−Ce6-mediated PDT led to tumor cell death. PDT-generated ROS induced immunogenic cell death and promoted macrophage polarization toward the M1 phenotype, thereby enhancing immunotherapy. CS−CD−Ce6 achieved PAI-guided combination of PDT and immunotherapy, effectively suppressing tumor recurrence and metastasis (Wang et al., 2019). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe not only served as an effective photosensitizer carrier but also enhanced PDT efficacy by promoting O2 generation and ROS production.

2.2.7. CDT + glutamine metabolism inhibition

Wang et al. prepared CS-P@CM by encapsulating purpurin-loaded ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles within cancer cell membranes, with purpurin serving as a glutamine metabolism inhibitor. Under focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the BBB, CS-P@CM effectively crossed the BBB and exhibited homologous targeting toward glioblastoma cells. Purpurin inhibited glutamine metabolism, reduced intracellular GSH levels to decrease ROS scavenging, and increased intracellular H2O2 concentrations, thereby providing abundant substrates for CDT and enhancing the efficacy of Cu2-xSe-mediated CDT. CS-P@CM generated abundant ROS upon irradiation with NIR-II light, thereby killing tumor cells and enabling light-enhanced CDT. CS-P@CM achieved a PAI-guided combination of light-enhanced CDT and glutamine metabolism inhibition, effectively suppressing the growth of orthotopic glioblastoma tumors (Wang L. et al., 2023). Inhibiting glutamine metabolism addressed the issue of low CDT efficacy caused by elevated GSH levels and insufficient endogenous H2O2, significantly improving CDT performance (Wang L. et al., 2023).

2.2.8. PTT + immunotherapy

Because glioblastoma has a complex and highly immunosuppressive TME, it is considered an immunologically “cold” tumor and has limited efficacy of immunotherapy (Wang T. et al., 2022). The immunosuppressive TME contains abundant M2-like macrophages, which promote tumor progression, as well as regulatory T cells (Tregs), which contribute to immune evasion by suppressing antigen-presenting cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Li G. et al., 2025; Shi X. et al., 2025). Wang et al. utilized cancer cell membranes to encapsulate Cu2-xSe loaded with indoximod (IND) and the PD-L1 inhibitor JQ1, thereby preparing CS-I/J@CM. Under ultrasound irradiation, CS-I/J@CM effectively crossed the BBB and homologously targeted glioblastoma. The Cu2-xSe in CS-I/J@CM catalyzed the decomposition of H2O2 into O2 and ROS, thereby repolarizing M2-like macrophages toward the tumor-suppressive M1 phenotype and increasing M1 macrophage infiltration in the tumor region. IND in CS-I/J@CM reduced Treg infiltration at the tumor site and increased intratumoral CD8+ T-cell abundance, thereby reversing the tumor’s immunosuppressive microenvironment. JQ1 in CS-I/J@CM downregulated the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells, thereby facilitating immunotherapy. Under NIR-II laser irradiation, CS-I/J@CM generated abundant ROS and induced ICD in tumor cells, improving the efficacy of immunotherapy. CS-I/J@CM achieved a PAI-guided combination of PTT and immunotherapy, effectively preventing glioblastoma recurrence (Wang T. et al., 2022). This study achieved significant immunotherapeutic effects against immunologically “cold” glioblastoma through three complementary mechanisms: remodeling the immunosuppressive TME, leading to ICD, and modulating immune checkpoint signaling, thereby providing a method for enhancing immunotherapeutic effects for “cold” tumors (Wang T. et al., 2022). Cu2-xSe@GG nanohydrogels loaded with the Toll-like receptor 7/8 (TLR7/8) agonist resiquimod (R848) enabled effective combined PTT and immunotherapy (Lu et al., 2023). Shi et al. prepared Cu2-xSe@Fc by loading the ferroptosis inducer ferrocene (Fc) onto Cu2-xSe and coating the nanoparticles with lauric acid, a phase-change material that melted upon heating. Under 980 nm laser irradiation, the high temperature induced by Cu2-xSe@Fc dissolved the lauric acid to release Fc, thereby achieving near-infrared light-responsive drug release. Cu2-xSe@Fc-mediated PTT and ferroptosis elicited ICD in tumor cells, improving the efficacy of anti-PD-1 blockade therapy. Cu2-xSe@Fc had a PCE of 70.58% and achieved synergistic photothermal–immunotherapy (Shi L. et al., 2025). The surface of Cu2-xSe lacks sufficient reactive functional groups and mesoporosity, which may result in limited drug-loading capacity. Researchers can utilize mesoporous materials such as metal-organic frameworks and mesoporous SiO2 to coat Cu2-xSe-based nanoparticles, thereby increasing the drug-loading capacity.

2.2.9. PTT + RT

PTT can enhance tumor radiosensitivity. The combination of PTT and RT is an effective therapeutic approach in cancer treatment (Ji et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2023). Huang et al. successfully synthesized dumbbell-shaped heterostructured Cu2-xSe-Au by utilizing the spontaneous redox reaction between Cu2-xSe and an HAuCl4 solution at room temperature. They then modified the Cu2-xSe-Au with dimercaptopoly(ethylene glycol) (HS-PEG-SH) to prepare CSA. 99mTc-labeled CSA enabled excellent in vivo single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Because Au is a high-atomic-number (high-Z) element, Cu2-xSe-Au exhibited excellent radiosensitizing effects. CSA exhibited a high photothermal conversion efficiency of 80.8%, enabling PAI- and computed tomography (CT)-guided combined PTT and radiotherapy, thereby effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Huang et al., 2019). This study suggested that nanomaterials containing high-Z elements could be combined with Cu2-xSe to form composites that possessed both outstanding radiosensitizing properties and high PCE, providing an efficient nanoscale platform for combined PTT and radiotherapy. Ran et al. grew AuNPs on hollow Cu2-xSe particles and modified the surface of the material with the cell-penetrating peptide TAT to prepare Cu2-xSe/Au-TAT. Cu2-xSe/Au-TAT effectively targeted breast cancer cells and exhibited a PCE of 64.6%, enabling highly effective combined PTT and RT (Ran et al., 2023).

2.2.10. Other dual-modality combination therapies

Targeted therapy refers to the use of agents that selectively interfere with tumor-associated molecular targets, signaling pathways, or genetic alterations to inhibit tumor growth. Huang et al. modified the surface of Cu2-xSe with PEG and used Cu2-xSe to load the targeted therapeutic agent sorafenib (SOR) to prepare Cu2-xSe@SOR@PEG. Cu2-xSe@PEG had a PCE of 27.6%, indicating good photothermal effects. Cu2-xSe@SOR@PEG exhibited good biocompatibility, reduced the adverse effects of SOR, and achieved a combination of PTT and targeted therapy, suggesting that Cu2-xSe was an effective nanocarrier (Huang et al., 2022). Hypoxia in the TME can stabilize and upregulate HIF-1α, promoting tumor metastasis and chemoresistance (Basheeruddin and Qausain, 2024; Song et al., 2025). Yang et al. prepared CS-YC1@CM by encapsulating Cu2-xSe, loaded with the HIF-1α inhibitor YC1, within a cancer cell membrane. Yang et al. administered CS-YC1@CM intravenously via tail-vein injection and disulfiram (DSF) orally to glioblastoma-bearing mice, resulting in significant antitumor efficacy. Under ultrasound irradiation, CS-YC1@CM effectively penetrated the BBB and homologously targeted glioblastoma. The Cu2+ released from CS-YC1@CM combined with DSF to form toxic CuET for chemotherapy. YC1 significantly reduced HIF-1α expression, and enhanced the chemotherapeutic efficacy of CuET (Yang et al., 2022). This study combined HIF-1α suppression with CuET-mediated chemotherapy, offering a new therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma. Yao et al. prepared Cu2-xSe(R837)-iRGD by loading Cu2-xSe and imiquimod (R837) onto PLGA-PEG-iRGD. During radiotherapy, Cu2-xSe(R837)-iRGD generated abundant ROS and induced cuproptosis in tumor cells, thereby triggering immunogenic cell death. R837 is a Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonist that promotes dendritic cell (DC) maturation, thereby enhancing immunotherapy. The combination of Cu2-xSe(R837)-iRGD with anti-PD-1 antibodies achieved a synergistic effect of RT and immunotherapy, effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Yao et al., 2025). RT requires precise delineation of the target volume to avoid irradiation of normal tissues. The X-ray attenuation characteristics of osteosarcoma are similar to those of normal bone tissue, making it difficult to accurately delineate the boundary between osteosarcoma and normal bone tissue (Yao et al., 2025). This study lacked imaging studies such as fluorescence imaging (FI), CT, and MRI, which limited its ability to support precise target delineation for osteosarcoma RT.

2.2.11. PTT + catalytic therapy + TECT

Thermoelectric catalytic therapy (TECT) utilizes thermoelectric catalysts to convert thermal energy into electrical energy via a temperature gradient, thereby generating ROS to destroy tumors (Wang S. et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2024). The photothermal conversion efficiency of a thermoelectric catalytic agent significantly influences temperature-gradient formation and is a key indicator of TECT efficacy (Yang et al., 2024). Currently, many thermoelectric catalytic agents have complex structures and compositions, which may make them difficult to synthesize reproducibly and pose safety concerns, restricting the application of TECT (Yang et al., 2024; Zhu Y. et al., 2024). Under 1,064 nm laser irradiation, Cu2-xSe exhibited strong plasmonic absorption due to abundant copper vacancies, achieving a PCE of 67% and efficient photothermal effect. Furthermore, Cu2-xSe exhibited POD-like and CAT-like activities, catalyzing the generation of OH and O2 from H2O2 for therapeutic applications. Cu2-xSe-mediated PTT enhanced its enzyme-like catalytic activity. The photothermal effect of Cu2-xSe promoted the separation of e− and H+, leading to ROS generation and thereby successfully achieving combined PTT and TECT. Western blotting (WB) analysis showed that under 1,064 nm laser irradiation, Cu2-xSe promoted DLAT oligomerization, a characteristic event in cuproptosis, and reduced the levels of the iron–sulfur (Fe–S) cluster proteins FDX1 and LIAS, thereby inducing tumor cell cuproptosis. Cu2-xSe possessed PAI properties and suppressed tumor growth through combined cuproptosis and apoptosis. Cu2-xSe achieved a combination of PTT, catalytic therapy, and TECT, significantly inhibiting tumor growth (Figures 6A–E) (Yang et al., 2024). This study reported structurally and compositionally simple Cu2-xSe with a high PCE, providing a potentially safe and efficient thermoelectric catalytic agent for TECT.

FIGURE 6.

Panel A contains an illustrated schematic of the synthesis pathway and mechanisms of plasmonic photo-thermoelectric catalytic therapy using Cu₂₋ₓSe nanostructures, showing cellular interactions and therapeutic effects. Panel B shows a transmission electron microscopy image of Cu₂₋ₓSe nanostructures with a scale of 100 nanometers. Panel C presents four ultrasound images with green-highlighted regions, tracking tumor changes before and at three, six, and twelve hours after treatment. Panel D is a line graph comparing tumor volume over time across four groups, with statistical significance values annotated. Panel E displays excised tumor samples from four groups aligned in rows above a centimeter ruler for size comparison.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of urchin-like Cu2-xSe hollow nanospheres and their application in combined photothermal therapy, catalytic therapy, and thermoelectric catalytic therapy by the mechanisms of cuproptosis and apoptosis. (B) TEM images of urchin-like Cu2-xSe hollow nanospheres. (C) The photoacoustic imaging images of urchin-like Cu2-xSe hollow nanospheres at different time points. (D) Changes in tumor volume in different groups. (E) Images of tumor tissue in different groups. Reproduced from (Yang et al., 2024). Copyright 2024 Nature Communications.

2.2.12. Chemotherapy + RT + immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) is a commonly used approach in clinical cancer immunotherapy (Wei et al., 2024). Owing to the low infiltration and reduced activity of antitumor T cells within the immunosuppressive microenvironment, ICT has shown limited efficacy in the clinical treatment of glioblastoma (Lee et al., 2025; Zhang H. et al., 2024). There is an urgent need to explore new strategies to enhance the efficacy of ICT in glioblastoma. In Au@Cu2-xSe (ACS), Cu2-xSe catalyzed H2O2 to induce the generation of O2 by Fenton reaction, thereby downregulating the expression of the metabolic immune checkpoint CD73. This, in turn, reduced adenosine (ADO) levels, reversed the immunosuppressive state, and enhanced the infiltration of antitumor T cells into the tumor site. Cu2+ released from Cu2-xSe reacted with the low-toxicity DSF to form the highly toxic CuET, thereby mediating chemotherapy. The Au in ACS served as a high-Z radiosensitizer, enhancing RT efficacy. The combination of RT and CuET-mediated chemotherapy induced ICD in tumor cells, promoting TAAs release, and thereby enhancing the infiltration of antitumor T-cell at the tumor site. The combination of ACS and DSF demonstrated PAI property and achieved combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, which achieved significant antitumor effects (Figures 7A–C) (Zhang H. et al., 2024). This study simultaneously suppressed the expression of the metabolic immune checkpoint CD73 and utilized a combination of RT and chemotherapy to enhance the release of TAAs, thereby increasing the infiltration of antitumor T cells into the tumor region. This approach offered a new strategy for improving the efficacy of immunotherapy in glioblastoma. The study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe functioned as an immune checkpoint-modulating nanomaterial by generating O2 to suppress CD73 expression, thereby facilitating immunotherapy (Zhang H. et al., 2024).

FIGURE 7.

Scientific figure showing a multi-panel schematic and experimental validation for a nanoparticle-based cancer therapy approach. Panel A illustrates the synthesis, administration, and mechanism of immune activation via Cu2-xSe@MOF nanoparticles in mice. Panel B presents fluorescence images tracking accumulation in tumors from pre-injection to twelve hours post-injection. Panel C displays stained tumor cross-sections at various time points, with percentages indicating remaining tumor tissue. Panel D describes the combined therapeutic mechanisms: cuproptosis, gas therapy, sonodynamic therapy (SDT), and immunotherapy. Panel E shows electron microscopy images of tumor tissue under various treatments, highlighting cellular damage or structural changes.

(A) Schematic illustration of the application of ACS in combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. (B) Photoacoustic images of ACS. (C) HE staining images of tumor tissues in the different groups. Reproduced from (Zhang et al., 2024a). Copyright 2024 ACS Nano. (D) Schematic illustration of Cu2-xSe@cMOF for trimodal tumor therapy. (E) The morphology of mitochondria in different groups. Reproduced from (Zhao et al., 2024a). Copyright 2024 ACS Nano.

2.2.13. Gas therapy + SDT + immunotherapy

Cuproptosis represents a distinct mode of regulated cell death, differing from apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. The primary mechanism of cuproptosis involves the interaction of accumulated Cu2+ with lipoylated proteins in the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle, leading to the aggregation of lipoylated proteins and the destabilization of Fe-S cluster proteins, triggering proteotoxic stress and inducing cell death (Li et al., 2024a; Zhu Z. et al., 2024). Cuproptosis is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation and metastasis, representing an emerging therapeutic target for tumor therapy (Hu et al., 2024; Jiang Q. et al., 2024). However, cancer therapies based on this mechanism often lack specificity and may cause adverse effects on normal tissue cells (Zhao C. et al., 2024). Zhao et al. synthesized Cu2-xSe@carbonized metal–organic frameworks (cMOFs) by heating a 3:1 mixture of HKUST-1 and selenium powder in a muffle furnace at 700 °C. Due to the protective effect of the carbon layer, the structure and function of Cu2-xSe@cMOF remained intact before entering the TME, thereby reducing toxicity to normal tissues and cells. After entering the TME, Cu2-xSe@cMOF released Cu2+ under acidic conditions and ultrasound irradiation, inducing cuproptosis in tumor cells (Figure 7E). This mechanism enabled externally triggered and tumor cell-specific cuproptosis, thereby reducing off-target toxicity associated with cuproptosis-based therapies. Under ultrasound irradiation, the selenium ions released by Cu2-xSe@cMOF generated H2Se in an acidic TME, enabling gas therapy to induce tumor cell death. Due to the presence of porphyrin-like structures, Cu2-xSe@cMOF generated ROS under ultrasound irradiation, enabling SDT. Under ultrasound irradiation, Cu2-xSe@cMOF induced ICD, enhancing the efficacy of aPD-L1-mediated immunotherapy. Cu2-xSe@cMOF enabled combined gas therapy, SDT, and immunotherapy, effectively integrating cuproptosis with other anticancer therapeutic modalities. This approach not only suppressed primary tumors but also effectively inhibited tumor recurrence and metastasis (Figure 7D) (Zhao C. et al., 2024). The Cu2-xSe@cMOF nanoplatform maintained its integrity in normal tissues but released Cu2+ under acidic TME conditions and ultrasound irradiation. This enabled TME-responsive and tumor cell-specific cuproptosis, providing a new approach for the safe and effective exploitation of cuproptosis in cancer therapy (Zhao C. et al., 2024).

2.2.14. PTT + CDT + RT

Hypoxia and high levels of H2O2 in the TME reduce radiation-induced ROS generation, thereby promoting radioresistance (Li et al., 2024b; Yao et al., 2024; Yuan et al., 2022). Chen et al. synthesized the heterostructure Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe using a simple microwave-assisted thermal injection method and applied SH-PEG-NH2 to modify Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe to prepare Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG. Compared to Bi2Se3 and Cu2-xSe, the heterostructure Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG exhibited stronger near-infrared absorption and a higher PCE of 79.72%. Since bismuth (Bi) possessed a high X-ray attenuation coefficient, Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG demonstrated radiosensitizing property and exhibited CT imaging capability with an X-ray absorption rate (38.4 HU L/g), which was higher than that of clinically used iodine-based contrast agents. Due to the paramagnetic nature of Cu2+, Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG exhibited excellent T1-weighted MRI performance. The Cu2+ in Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG catalyzed the generation of OH and O2 from high concentrations of intracellular H2O2, facilitating CDT and enhancing the efficacy of RT. Cu2+ scavenged GSH to generate Cu+, thereby disrupting tumor antioxidant defenses and enhancing the efficacy of RT. Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe-PEG enabled CT and T1-weighted MRI-guided combination of PTT, CDT, and RT, achieving significant antitumor effects (Chen X. et al., 2022). This study developed a Cu2-xSe-based heterostructure that alleviated hypoxia and enhanced GSH depletion, providing a new strategy for enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy and a platform for multimodal imaging-guided integrated therapy.

2.2.15. Gas therapy + chemotherapy + PTT

Drug-resistant tumor cells often overexpress P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which pumps chemotherapeutic drugs out of cells and reduces intracellular drug accumulation, thereby contributing to chemoresistance (Poma et al., 2024). Huang et al. prepared MCSN-SNO/DOX by encapsulating Cu2-xSe in mesoporous silica (SiO2) and using the SiO2 shell to load the NO donor S-nitrosothiol (SNO) and the chemotherapeutic agent DOX. Under NIR-II laser irradiation, MCSN-SNO/DOX generated a photothermal effect that triggered NO and DOX release, achieving light-responsive and on-demand delivery of these agents. The released NO induced mitochondrial dysfunction, blocked adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, suppressed ATP-dependent P-gp expression levels, and reduced the efflux of DOX, thereby reversing chemoresistance. MCSN-SNO/DOX exhibited good biocompatibility and combined gas therapy, chemotherapy, and PTT to reverse chemoresistance, demonstrating potent antitumor effects against doxorubicin-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Huang et al., 2021).

2.2.16. PTT + PDT + CDT

Wang et al. employed a cation-exchange strategy to grow Bi2Se3 on Cu2-xSe and used PEG to modify the resulting material, synthesizing the heterostructure Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG (CB3@PEG). Due to the narrower bandgap of Bi2Se3, CB3@PEG exhibited stronger NIR absorption and a higher PCE of 60.4% compared with Cu2-xSe, demonstrating excellent photothermal performance. Due to the heterostructure of CB3@PEG, which resulted in stronger photo-generated electron-hole pair separation and enhanced photoredox potential, CB3@PEG generated abundant ROS under laser irradiation, leading to effective PDT. CB3@PEG could catalyze H2O2 to induce the generation of ROS, thereby facilitating CDT. Owing to the unpaired electron of Cu2+, Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG exhibited T1-weighted MRI capability. Benefiting from the strong X-ray attenuation of bismuth, CB3@PEG demonstrated CT imaging capability. CB3@PEG achieved a photothermal imaging-, CT-, and T1-weighted MRI-guided combination of CDT, PTT, and PDT, resulting in marked suppression of tumor growth (Figures 8A,B) (Wang et al., 2021). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe-based composites could improve the photothermal performance of Cu2-xSe and enable multimodal imaging-guided integrated therapy, representing a valuable source of multifunctional nanoplatforms.

FIGURE 8.

Multi-panel scientific figure showing nanoparticle-based cancer therapy mechanisms and results: A) schematic diagram illustrating Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG nanoparticles facilitating synergistic photodynamic, chemodynamic, and photothermal therapy in tumor cells; B) mouse CT imaging comparing saline and nanoparticle-treated groups, with tumor regions highlighted; C) synthesis steps and structural illustrations of RGD-dpGCS nanocomposites and their targeting mechanism in mouse tumor models; D) fluorescent microscopy images showing live/dead cell staining across different treatment groups, with increased red fluorescence indicating cell death in the RGD-dpGCS NCs plus laser group; E) tumor growth curve line chart comparing four groups over fifteen days, showing significant tumor suppression in nanoparticle plus laser treatment; F) photographs of mice at day zero and fifteen, with reduced tumor size only in the nanoparticle plus laser group.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process and application of Cu2–xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG. (B) CT images of tumor-bearing mice after Cu2–xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG injection. Reproduced from (Wang et al., 2021). Copyright 2021 Biomater Sci. (C) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of RGD-dpGCS and its application in combination therapy. (D) Images of calcein-AM/PI co-stained cancer cells in different groups. (E) The variations of tumor volumes in different groups. (F) Images of tumor-bearing mice in different groups. Reproduced from (Shan et al., 2022). Copyright 2022 Small.

2.2.17. PTT + CDT + chemotherapy

Hu et al. adsorbed ultrasmall Cu2-xSe nanoparticles onto hollow mesoporous polydopamine (HMPDA) through hydrophilic interactions, loaded DOX and GOx onto the HMPDA via π–π stacking and electrostatic interactions, and coated the surface of the prepared material with 1-tetradecanol (1-TD), resulting in the synthesis of HMPDA@Cu2-xSe-DOX/GOx-PCM (HMPC-D/G@PCM). Under 1,064 nm laser irradiation, PTT mediated by HMPC-D/G@PCM induced the melting of the 1-TD phase-change layer, leading to photothermally triggered release of DOX and GOx. GOx catalyzed the conversion of glucose into H2O2 and gluconic acid, compensating for the deficiency of endogenous H2O2 and supplying sufficient H2O2 substrate for CDT. Cu2-xSe in HMPC-D/G@PCM catalyzed the conversion of H2O2 into ROS, thereby enabling CDT. HMPC-D/G@PCM exhibited NIR-II laser- and pH-responsive drug release, thereby supporting integrated PTT, CDT, and chemotherapy, and effectively inhibiting tumor growth (Hu P. et al., 2022). This study demonstrated that Cu2-xSe could be adsorbed onto nanomaterials rich in reactive groups and mesopores to form composite materials, thereby overcoming the limited drug- and enzyme-loading capacity of Cu2-xSe caused by its lack of reactive groups and mesoporosity. Yin et al. prepared sea-urchin-like manganese-doped copper(II) selenide nanoparticles (Mn-Cu2-xSe) using anion exchange, loaded DOX onto Mn-Cu2-xSe, and coated the nanoparticles with calcium alginate/chitosan (AC) to synthesize DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe@AC. Following oral administration of DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe@AC, the pH-responsive swelling behavior of the AC coating helped DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe overcome various biological barriers and maintained stability in the acidic gastric environment. Calcium alginate protected DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe@AC from degradation in the acidic gastric environment and rapidly degraded in the mildly alkaline intestinal environment, thereby facilitating DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe release for absorption in the small intestine. DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe exhibited a drug-loading capacity of 0.28 mg/mg and enabled both light- and pH-responsive drug release. Mn ion doping enhanced the CDT effect of Mn-Cu2-xSe. Following oral administration, DOX/Mn-Cu2-xSe@AC effectively enabled combined chemotherapy, CDT, and PTT, significantly inhibiting tumor growth (Yin et al., 2025). This study indicated that, with appropriate surface modification, Cu2-xSe could serve as an oral drug-delivery carrier, thereby expanding the biomedical applications of Cu2-xSe (Yin et al., 2025).

2.2.18. PTT + CDT + PCT

Shan et al. modified the RGD peptide onto the surface of core-shell Au@Cu2-xSe to prepare RGD-dpGCS. Due to the plasmonic hot-hole effect, RGD-dpGCS catalyzed the generation of •OH under NIR-II laser irradiation, thereby enabling photocatalytic therapy (PCT). RGD-dpGCS depleted GSH, thereby enhancing its CDT efficacy. RGD-dpGCS actively targeted glioblastoma and enabled PAI-, thermal imaging-, and CT-guided combined PTT, CDT, and PCT (Figure 8C-F) (Shan et al., 2022). Wang et al. synthesized a “double-faced” Cu2-xSe–Au structure that enabled CT-, PAI-, and infrared thermal imaging-guided combined PTT, CDT, and PCT (Wang Y. et al., 2020).

2.2.19. PTT + PDT + immunotherapy

Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death mediated by gasdermin, which can induce ICD, promote the release of TAAs, and enhance immunotherapeutic efficacy (Ding et al., 2022; Liu Z. et al., 2024; Yan et al., 2024). Yan et al. prepared Au-Cu2-xSe@ZIF-8@P18 (ACS-Z-P) by encapsulating Au-Cu2-xSe with ZIF-8 and loading the photosensitizer P18 onto the ZIF-8 shell. Under near-infrared laser irradiation, ACS-Z-P catalyzed H2O2 decomposition to generate O2 and downregulated HIF-1α expression, enhancing P18-mediated PDT efficacy. ACS-Z-P enabled pH-responsive release of Zn2+, and the released Zn2+ dysregulated zinc-responsive gene/protein expression and induced DNA damage, thereby inducing pyroptosis. Cu2+ released from ACS-Z-P catalyzed the conversion of H2O2 into ROS, while P18-mediated PDT generated abundant ROS. Zn2+ and abundant ROS induced pyroptosis in tumor cells, further leading to ICD and the release of DAMPs, thereby enhancing immunotherapy. Under laser irradiation, ACS-Z-P promoted the repolarization of M2-like macrophages toward the tumor-suppressive M1 phenotype, thereby remodeling the immunosuppressive TME and enhancing immunotherapy efficacy. With a drug loading capacity of 10.13%, ACS-Z-P enabled the combination of PTT, PDT, and immunotherapy, suppressing tumor growth (Yan et al., 2024). Currently, pyroptosis-inducing nanomaterials show limited mechanistic diversity and suboptimal therapeutic efficacy (Yan et al., 2024). This study employed a combined strategy based on Zn2+ release and abundant ROS generation to effectively induce pyroptosis, thereby triggering ICD. Simultaneously, this strategy reshaped the immunosuppressive microenvironment and enhanced the efficacy of immunotherapy, offering a promising strategy for effectively integrating phototherapy with immunotherapy.

2.2.20. PTT + chemotherapy + immunotherapy

There are few effective treatment options for TNBC. Poor drug penetration into deep tumor regions, the immunosuppressive microenvironment, and high intracellular concentrations of GSH are major obstacles to TNBC treatment (Chen et al., 2025). Chen et al. synthesized C&P by asymmetrically growing disulfide-bridged periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMO) on the surface of Cu2-xSe. They used C&P to load DOX, preparing C&P-DOX. Under laser irradiation, Cu2-xSe generated localized hyperthermia, and the asymmetric structure of C&P-DOX created a thermal gradient that drove the nanomotor into deep tumor regions. C&P-DOX functioned as a light-driven nanomotor that overcame the stromal barrier under illumination and penetrated deeply into tumor tissue, facilitating uniform DOX distribution throughout the tumor. This helped address treatment failure caused by insufficient drug distribution in certain tumor regions due to the dense extracellular matrix and abnormal vasculature of TNBC. Under the influence of high intracellular GSH concentrations, the disulfide bonds in C&P-DOX broke, inducing the degradation of PMO and enabling GSH-responsive drug release. The disulfide bonds in C&P-DOX efficiently depleted GSH, disrupted the antioxidant defense system, and enhanced the chemotherapeutic efficacy of DOX. C&P-DOX-mediated PTT and chemotherapy induced ICD, inducing the release of DAMPs and TAAs. This promoted DC maturation and enhanced T-cell activation, reversing the immunosuppressive microenvironment and thereby enhancing the immunotherapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibodies. C&P-DOX exhibited PAI property, and enabled combined chemotherapy, PTT and immunotherapy, inhibiting breast cancer growth (Figures 9A–D) (Chen et al., 2025). This study addressed major obstacles to TNBC treatment by using light-driven nanomotors to deliver drugs into deep tumor regions, depleting GSH to mitigate chemoresistance, and combining PTT with chemotherapy to remodel the immunosuppressive TME and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy, providing an effective strategy for treating TNBC (Chen et al., 2025).

FIGURE 9.

Panel A presents a schematic showing the synthesis and mechanism of a nanoparticle-based cancer therapy combining chemotherapy and photothermal therapy to activate immune responses and promote tumor cell death. Panel B displays ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging of a mouse tumor at time points before and after treatment, with merged images illustrating agent accumulation. Panel C shows fluorescence microscopy images of tumor sections stained for TUNEL to assess cell apoptosis under different treatments. Panel D presents photographs of dissected tumors from experimental groups, aligned in rows with a ruler for size reference.

(A) Schematic illustration of the preparation process of C&P-DOX and its application in combined immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and photothermal therapy. (B) Photoacoustic imaging of C&P-DOX in vivo. (C) TUNEL staining of tumors in different groups. (D) Photograph of dissected tumors in different groups. Reproduced from (Chen et al., 2025). Copyright 2025 Advanced Functional Materials.

3. Clinical translation challenges

The clinical translation of Cu2-xSe remains challenging. Nanomaterials may undergo long-distance transportation and prolonged storage before being administered to patients. Because the surface of Cu2-xSe lacks reactive groups, it may undergo aggregation during long-term storage, which could compromise its clinical application. Additionally, Cu2-xSe must remain stable within the complex circulatory system to effectively reach tumor sites. Currently, various materials, including MOFs, mesoporous silica, and cell membranes, have been used to coat the surface of Cu2-xSe, thereby enhancing its stability in physiological environments. However, the storage stability of these Cu2-xSe-based nanosystems has not yet been evaluated over a 3-month period. Liposome nanosystems in clinical use demonstrate excellent aqueous dispersibility and stability. Therefore, liposomes may be used to modify Cu2-xSe to improve its long-term storage stability. However, liposome-modified Cu2-xSe has not yet been reported. Cu2-xSe has poor biodegradability, and its prolonged retention or repeated administration can lead to cumulative toxicity, hindering its clinical translation. The prepared ultrafine Cu2-xSe is easily cleared by the kidneys, thereby reducing systemic toxicity. However, ultrafine Cu2-xSe exhibits limited tumor accumulation at the tumor site, which reduces therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, the development of biodegradable Cu2-xSe is of great significance for improving its translational potential. In addition, Cu2-xSe may accumulate in normal tissues due to nonspecific distribution, leading to off-target toxicity and hindering its clinical application. Promoting the selective accumulation of Cu2-xSe at tumor sites is a key strategy for improving the efficacy of cancer treatment and reducing toxicity. From a theoretical perspective, researchers can adsorb ultra-small Cu2-xSe particles onto the surface of larger biodegradable nanomaterials, and further utilize cancer cell membranes or active targeting agents to modify the prepared nanocomposite. This Cu2-xSe-based therapeutic system can actively target tumors, leading to the efficient accumulation of Cu2-xSe in the tumor tissue and enhancing therapeutic efficacy. After treatment, as the larger biodegradable material degrades, the ultra-small Cu2-xSe particles are released from the Cu2-xSe-based therapeutic system and cleared by the kidneys, thereby reducing the toxic side effects caused by nonspecific distribution. However, the application of this strategy in Cu2-xSe-based nanomaterials has not yet been reported. The safety of nanomaterials is a key factor determining their clinical translation. Currently, safety evaluations of Cu2-xSe primarily involve short-term toxicity studies in tumor-bearing mice, including assessments of damage to major organs and hematological toxicity. There is a lack of research on the metabolic pathways, in vivo distribution, and long-term toxicity of Cu2-xSe in large animal models, which hinders its clinical translation. Cu2-xSe can be synthesized using various methods and exhibits different morphologies. Cu2-xSe with different particle sizes, shapes, and synthesis methods may exhibit distinct therapeutic effects and toxicity. Currently, there is a lack of comparative studies on the efficacy and toxicity of Cu2-xSe with different particle sizes, shapes, and synthesis methods, which hinders its clinical translation. Extensive studies are needed to identify Cu2-xSe formulations with superior therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity, thereby providing optimized candidates for further clinical translation and application. Preclinical studies and clinical applications of Cu2-xSe require large quantities of high-quality material. However, most current methods for synthesizing Cu2-xSe are limited to small-scale production, hindering its clinical translation. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop scalable and highly reproducible synthesis methods for Cu2-xSe to provide sufficient material for preclinical research and future clinical applications.

4. Summary and future prospects

Compared with other commonly used photothermal agents such as Prussian blue (PB), copper sulfide (CuS) and gold nanorods (AuNRs), Cu2-xSe has its own advantages (Table 3). Cu2-xSe is not only a cuproptosis inducer and an autophagy inhibitor, but also a multifunctional nanomaterial that integrates imaging and various therapeutic functions. Owing to the unique advantages of Cu2-xSe, Cu2-xSe-based nanomaterials have achieved significant progress in the development of novel, potentially effective, and safe strategies for cancer treatment. Furthermore, Cu2-xSe-based strategies have yielded valuable findings in addressing therapeutic challenges such as tumor drug resistance, radioresistance, and immunosuppression. Cu2-xSe served as a promising multifunctional nanomaterial and possessed significant research value. However, Cu2-xSe still faces several challenges and shortcomings in tumor therapy, which must be addressed to further improve therapeutic outcomes.

TABLE 3.

Comparative therapeutic and diagnostic profiles of Cu2-xSe and representative nanomaterials for tumor theranostics.

Nanomaterials Tumor treatment performance Photothermal stability PCE Catalytic activity Imaging
Cu2-xSe PTT, PDT, CDT and TECT High 43.7% (Liu J. et al., 2024) GSHOx-like, POD-like, NADH oxidase-like and CAT-like activities PAI
PB PTT and CDT High 20.5% (Hoffman et al., 2014) POD-like, SOD-like and CAT-like activities MRI and PAI
CuS PTT and CDT High 38% (Liu et al., 2014) GSHOx-like and POD-like activities PAI
AuNRs PTT and radiosensitization Low 20.86% (Lebepe and Oluwafemi, 2022) — PAI and CT

Cu2-xSe contributes to cancer therapy by inducing cuproptosis and inhibiting autophagy. Cu2-xSe can arrest the cell cycle and damage mitochondria, thereby directly suppressing tumor cell proliferation and migration. Cu2-xSe enhanced immunotherapy through multiple mechanisms. In summary, Cu2-xSe demonstrates significant potential in anticancer applications. However, the specific molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways underlying the antitumor effects of Cu2-xSe remain unclear, which hinders the development of combination therapies that integrate Cu2-xSe with other therapeutic agents. Currently, there is a need to conduct genomic sequencing of Cu2-xSe-treated cells and perform extensive biological experiments to elucidate the specific antitumor mechanisms of Cu2-xSe.

Cu2-xSe shows CAT-like activity and catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to O2 within tumors, thereby modulating the TME and alleviating immunosuppression. This enhances the efficacy of O2-dependent therapies such as PDT and RT, and also potentiates immunotherapy. Cu2-xSe possesses POD-like activity, catalyzing the conversion of H2O2 to •OH to induce efficient CDT. Adequate CAT-like and POD-like activities of Cu2-xSe require sufficient availability of the substrate H2O2. The concentration of intracellular H2O2 is less than 100 μM (Yu et al., 2023), limiting the efficacy of CDT. Combining Cu2-xSe with H2O2-generating strategies is crucial for enhancing its CDT efficacy. Currently, GOx capable of generating H2O2 has been loaded onto Cu2-xSe-based nanostructures to enhance CDT efficacy. However, GOx may detach from Cu2-xSe-based nanostructures in the complex bloodstream environment, potentially leading to adverse reactions. Cu2-xSe can be combined with H2O2-generating materials, such as AuNPs, ZnO2, MgO2 and CaO2, to form composites that address insufficient endogenous H2O2 and improve antitumor efficacy.

GSH is a main antioxidant substance that can clear ROS and reduce the efficiency of ROS-based therapeutic strategies. Copper ions released from Cu2-xSe can promote the oxidation of GSH to GSSG, reducing intracellular GSH levels. However, in response to GSH depletion, tumor cells may activate compensatory mechanisms that promote GSH biosynthesis, thereby restoring redox homeostasis and reducing the efficiency of tumor treatment. L-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) can inhibit GSH biosynthesis by restricting glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-GCS) (Jiang et al., 2026). Cu2-xSe-based nanoplatforms can be used to load BSO, simultaneously consuming intracellular GSH through copper ion-mediated oxidation and suppressing compensatory GSH biosynthesis via BSO. This strategy may achieve efficient intracellular GSH depletion, thereby enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of ROS-based treatment strategies.

Compared to NIR-I light, NIR-II light can penetrate deeper into tumor tissues and permits a higher maximum permissible skin exposure dose (Li N. et al., 2024). Cu2-xSe exhibits high photothermal stability, strong absorption in the NIR-II region, and high PCE, making it an excellent NIR-II photothermal agent. In particular, Cu2-xSe-based composites, such as MPNPs@Cu2-xSe-AS1411, Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG, and Cu2-xSe-Au, demonstrate higher PCE and photothermal performance. Conventional PTT often results in temperatures exceeding 50 °C at the treatment site, which may cause skin damage, inflammatory responses, and even promote tumor metastasis (He X. et al., 2023). Low-temperature PTT maintains the treatment-site temperature between 42 °C and 45 °C, making it a safer therapeutic modality that is more compatible with clinical safety requirements (Wang P. et al., 2022). As the temperature of the irradiated region increases, heat shock proteins (HSPs), such as HSP70 and HSP90, are upregulated, conferring thermotolerance and limiting the efficacy of low-temperature PTT (Xin et al., 2022). However, current Cu2-xSe-based strategies have not fully addressed how to achieve efficient and safe low-temperature PTT, which remains a major bottleneck in PTT. Traditional Chinese medicine (gambogic acid and curcumin), small-molecule inhibitors (AT533), and glycolysis inhibitor (lonidamine) can suppress the expression of HSPs enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of low-temperature PTT (Chen et al., 2024b; Xiang et al., 2025; Zhang Z. et al., 2024, Zhang Y. et al., 2025). However, these agents are often limited by poor aqueous solubility, short circulation half-lives, and potential systemic toxicity, which hinder their clinical translation. Cu2-xSe-based nanoplatforms may serve as photothermal nanocarriers for these agents, addressing their limitations, improving low-temperature PTT efficacy, and facilitating their clinical application.

Cu2-xSe has demonstrated significant advantages in cancer treatment and holds great research value, warranting further investigation. In-depth research into Cu2-xSe will help overcome the challenges associated with its use in cancer treatment, facilitate the emergence of new strategies for addressing medical challenges, and promote the development of nanomedicine in cancer therapy.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The work was supported by the LvyangJinfeng Talent Program (5022/137013704) from JH.

Footnotes

Edited by: Kelong Fan, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by: Cong Xia, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China

Rongcheng Han, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Author contributions

JH: Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. JX: Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Investigation. YP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Investigation. HY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Investigation. LC: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. XW: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. HS: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Aboeleneen S. B., Scully M. A., Kramarenko G. C., Day E. S. (2023). Combination cancer imaging and phototherapy mediated by membrane-wrapped nanoparticles. Int. J. Hyperth. 40, 2272066. 10.1080/02656736.2023.2272066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aebisher D., Czech S., Dynarowicz K., Misiołek M., Komosińska-Vassev K., Kawczyk-Krupka A., et al. (2024). Photodynamic therapy: past, current, and future. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 11325. 10.3390/ijms252011325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambele M. A., Maebele L. T., Mulaudzi T. V., Kungoane T., Damane B. P. (2024). Advances in nano-delivery of phytochemicals for glioblastoma treatment. Discov. Nano 19, 216. 10.1186/s11671-024-04172-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bao J., Wang Y., Li C., Yang C., Xu H., Liang Q., et al. (2022). Gold-promoting-satellite to boost photothermal conversion efficiency of Cu2-xSe for triple-negative breast cancer targeting therapy. Mat. Today Nano 18, 100211. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2022.100211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Basheeruddin M., Qausain S. (2024). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-Alpha (HIF-1α) and cancer: mechanisms of tumor hypoxia and therapeutic targeting. Cureus 16, e70700. 10.7759/cureus.70700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedard P. L., Hansen A. R., Ratain M. J., Siu L. L. (2013). Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic. Nature 501, 355–364. 10.1038/nature12627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bindra A. K., Wang D., Zhao Y. (2023). Metal-organic frameworks meet polymers: from synthesis strategies to healthcare applications. Adv. Mat. 35, 2300700. 10.1002/adma.202300700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borges F., Laureano R. S., Vanmeerbeek I., Sprooten J., Demeulenaere O., Govaerts J., et al. (2024). Trial watch: anticancer vaccination with dendritic cells. Oncoimmunology 13, 2412876. 10.1080/2162402X.2024.2412876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai Y., Wang W., Jiao Q., Hu T., Ren Y., Su X., et al. (2024). Nanotechnology for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 13805–13821. 10.2147/IJN.S490661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao Y., Ding S., Hu Y., Zeng L., Zhou J., Lin L., et al. (2024). An immunocompetent hafnium oxide-based STING nanoagonist for cancer radio-immunotherapy. Acs Nano 18, 4189–4204. 10.1021/acsnano.3c09293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carigga Gutierrez N. M., Clainche T. L., Bulin A.-L., Leo S., Kadri M., Abdelhamid A. G. A., et al. (2024). Engineering radiocatalytic nanoliposomes with hydrophobic gold nanoclusters for radiotherapy enhancement. Adv. Mat. 36, e2404605. 10.1002/adma.202404605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan L., Liu Y., Chen M., Su Y., Guo J., Zhu L., et al. (2023). Cuproptosis-driven enhancement of thermotherapy by sequentially response Cu2-xSe via copper chemical transition. Adv. Funct. Mat. 33, 2302054. 10.1002/adfm.202302054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen L., Min J., Wang F. (2022). Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis in health and disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 378. 10.1038/s41392-022-01229-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen X., Qiu M., Liu L., Ji Q., Xu Z., Xiong Z., et al. (2022). Intelligent Bi2Se3@Cu2-xSe heterostructures with enhanced photoabsorption and photoconversion efficiency for tri-modal imaging guided combinatorial cancer therapy by near-infrared II light. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 625, 614–627. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Y., Chen Y., Wang Z., Yang L., Zhang Y., Zhang Z., et al. (2024a). Iron-based MOF with catalase-like activity improves the synergistic therapeutic effect of PDT/ferroptosis/starvation therapy by reversing the tumor hypoxic microenvironment. J. Nanobiotechnology 22, 705. 10.1186/s12951-024-02921-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen Y., Ran Y., Rao Z., Wang Q., Wang J., Liu Z., et al. (2024b). Self-assembled chemo/photothermal nanoplatform for enhanced cancer therapy: sensitizing photothermal ablation and reprogramming inflammatory microenvironment. Acs Mat. Lett. 6, 3915–3924. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c01066 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen B.-Q., Shi Y.-H., Zhang Y., Zhang D.-G., Lu X.-C., Xu Q.-X., et al. (2025). Four-pronged nanomotor strategy achieves efficient TNBC treatment via synergistic chemo-photothermal-immune therapy. Adv. Funct. Mat. 35, 2504621. 10.1002/adfm.202504621 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng H., Ma B., Xia W., Yu Y., Li J., Zhang K., et al. (2025). Synergistic photothermal and chemo-therapeutic platform utilizing Cu2-xSe/PDA/AIPH nanoparticles for targeted tumor eradication. Biomater. Adv. 169, 214196. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng W., Qu H., Yang J., Chen H., Pan Y., Duan Z., et al. (2025). Hierarchically engineered self-adaptive nanoplatform guided intuitive and precision interventions for deep-seated glioblastoma. Acs Nano 19, 557–579. 10.1021/acsnano.4c11006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Darvish L., Bahreyni Toossi M. T., Azimian H., Shakeri M., Dolat E., Ahmadizad Firouzjaei A., et al. (2023). The role of microRNA-induced apoptosis in diverse radioresistant cancers. Cell. Signal. 104, 110580. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Das B. (2025). Transition metal complex-loaded nanosystems: advances in stimuli-responsive cancer therapies. Small 21, 2410338. 10.1002/smll.202410338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de Bakker T., Maes A., Dragan T., Martinive P., Penninckx S., Van Gestel D. (2024). Strategies to overcome intrinsic and acquired resistance to chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Cells 14, 18. 10.3390/cells14010018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Debnath S. K., Debnath M., Ghosh A., Srivastava R., Omri A. (2024). Targeting tumor hypoxia with nanoparticle-based therapies: challenges, opportunities, and clinical implications. Pharmaceuticals 17, 1389. 10.3390/ph17101389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Delgado-Corrales B. J., Chopra V., Chauhan G. (2025). Gold nanostars and nanourchins for enhanced photothermal therapy, bioimaging, and theranostics. J. Mat. Chem. B 13, 399–428. 10.1039/d4tb01420k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. DeNardo D. G., Ruffell B. (2019). Macrophages as regulators of tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 369–382. 10.1038/s41577-019-0127-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ding B., Zheng P., Tan J., Chen H., Bian Y., Yang C., et al. (2022). Pyroptosis adjuvants: gram-scale production, Cascade catalysis, and in situ antitumor immunity activation. Chem. Mat. 34, 1800–1808. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ding G., Liu S., Yang X., Lv H., Jia M., Li J., et al. (2024). Metabolizable alloy clusters assemble nanoinhibitor for enhanced radiotherapy of tumor by hypoxia alleviation and intracellular PD-L1 restraint. J. Nanobiotechnology 22, 774. 10.1186/s12951-024-03057-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ding Q., Chen H., Zhang Y., Yang J., Li M., He Q., et al. (2025). Innovative integration of nanomedicines and phototherapy to modulate autophagy for enhanced tumor eradication. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 377, 855–879. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.11.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan D., Li J., Li L., An M., Yang H., Zhou G., et al. (2024). Phosphate ion-responsive and calcium peroxide-based nanomedicine for bone-targeted treatment of breast cancer bone metastasis. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 13, 2402216. 10.1002/adhm.202402216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fecci P. E., Heimberger A. B., Sampson J. H. (2014). Immunotherapy for primary brain tumors: no longer a matter of privilege. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 20, 5620–5629. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Feldman L. (2024). Hypoxia within the glioblastoma tumor microenvironment: a master saboteur of novel treatments. Front. Immunol. 15, 1384249. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ferreira N. N., Leite C. M., Moreno N. S., Miranda R. R., Lins P. M. P., Rodero C. F., et al. (2024). Nose-to-Brain delivery of biomimetic nanoparticles for glioblastoma targeted therapy. Acs Appl. Mat. Interfaces 17, 484–499. 10.1021/acsami.4c16837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fu D., Ding X., Wu J., Li C., Wang Q., Jiang J. (2018). Cationic polyelectrolyte mediated synthesis of MnO2-Based core-shell structures as activatable MRI theranostic platform for tumor cell ablation. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 35, 1800078. 10.1002/ppsc.201800078 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Guo Y., Hu P., Shi J. (2024). Nanomedicine remodels tumor microenvironment for solid tumor immunotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 10217–10233. 10.1021/jacs.3c14005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Han T., Cui D., Wu M., Sun Q., Chen Y., Niu N., et al. (2024). An effective and specific cancer theranostic nanoplatform with NIR-II fluorescence imaging-guided photothermal/chemodynamic therapy. Microchem. J. 206, 111466. 10.1016/j.microc.2024.111466 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hani U., Choudhary V. T., Ghazwani M., Alghazwani Y., Osmani R. A. M., Kulkarni G. S., et al. (2024). Nanocarriers for delivery of anticancer drugs: current developments, challenges, and perspectives. Pharmaceutics 16, 1527. 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. He L., Ji Q., Chi B., You S., Lu S., Yang T., et al. (2023). Construction nanoenzymes with elaborately regulated multi-enzymatic activities for photothermal-enhanced catalytic therapy of tumor. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 222, 113058. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. He X., Zhang S., Tian Y., Cheng W., Jing H. (2023). Research progress of nanomedicine-based mild photothermal therapy in tumor. Int. J. Nanomedicine 18, 1433–1468. 10.2147/IJN.S405020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoffman H. A., Chakrabarti L., Dumont M. F., Sandler A. D., Fernandes R. (2014). Prussian blue nanoparticles for laser-induced photothermal therapy of tumors. Rsc Adv. 4, 29729–29734. 10.1039/c4ra05209a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hu P., Zhao S., Shi J., Li F., Wang S., Gan Y., et al. (2022). Precisely NIR-II-activated and pH-responsive Cascade catalytic nanoreactor for controlled drug release and self-enhanced synergetic therapy. Nanoscale 14, 12219–12231. 10.1039/d2nr00487a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hu Y., Wang K., Ye C. (2022). “Four-in-One” nanozyme and natural enzyme symbiotic system of Cu2-xSe-GOx for cervical cancer therapy. Chemistry 28, e202102885. 10.1002/chem.202102885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hu J., Zhu J., Chen T., Zhao Y., Xu Q., Wang Y. (2024). Cuproptosis in cancer therapy: mechanisms, therapeutic application and future prospects. J. Mat. Chem. B 12, 12191–12206. 10.1039/d4tb01877j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huang R.-X., Zhou P.-K. (2020). DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 60. 10.1038/s41392-020-0150-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang Q., Zhang S., Zhang H., Han Y., Liu H., Ren F., et al. (2019). Boosting the radiosensitizing and photothermal performance of Cu2-xSe nanocrystals for synergetic radiophotothermal therapy of orthotopic breast cancer. ACS Nano 13, 1342–1353. 10.1021/acsnano.8b06795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Huang Y., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Shi L., Qin X., Lu B., et al. (2021). P-glycoprotein suppression by photothermal-responsive nitric oxide releasing nanoplatform for triple-combination therapy of multidrug resistant cancer. Mat. Des. 211, 110160. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110160 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Huang A.-T., Du J., Liu Z.-Y., Zhang G.-C., Abuduwaili W., Yan J.-Y., et al. (2022). Sorafenib-loaded Cu2-xSe nanoparticles boost photothermal-synergistic targeted therapy against hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomaterials 12, 3191. 10.3390/nano12183191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Huang L., Zhu J., Wu G., Xiong W., Feng J., Yan C., et al. (2024). A strategy of “adding fuel to the flames” enables a self-accelerating cycle of ferroptosis-cuproptosis for potent antitumor therapy. Biomaterials 311, 122701. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Huang X., Hou S., Li Y., Xu G., Xia N., Duan Z., et al. (2025). Targeting lipid metabolism via nanomedicine: a prospective strategy for cancer therapy. Biomaterials 317, 123022. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.123022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ji C., Cheng W., Hu Y., Liu Y., Liu F., Yin M. (2021). A nano vector with photothermally enhanced drug release and retention to overcome cancer multidrug resistance. Nano Today 36, 101020. 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ji C., Zhao M., Wang C., Liu R., Zhu S., Dong X., et al. (2022). Biocompatible tantalum nanoparticles as radiosensitizers for enhancing therapy efficacy in primary tumor and metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. ACS Nano 16, 9428–9441. 10.1021/acsnano.2c02314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jia W., Wu Y., Xie Y., Yu M., Chen Y. (2025). Advanced polymeric nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy: materials engineering, immunotherapeutic mechanism and clinical translation. Adv. Mat. 37, 2413603. 10.1002/adma.202413603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiang X., Lin W. (2025). Innate immune activation with multifunctional nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 64, e202423280. 10.1002/anie.202423280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jiang Q., Tong F., Xu Y., Liu C., Xu Q. (2024). Cuproptosis: a promising new target for breast cancer therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 24, 414. 10.1186/s12935-024-03572-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jiang W., Huang G., Pan S., Chen X., Liu T., Yang Z., et al. (2024). TRAIL-Driven targeting and reversing cervical cancer radioresistance by seleno-nanotherapeutics through regulating cell metabolism. Drug Resist. Updat. 72, 101033. 10.1016/j.drup.2023.101033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jiang H., Wu H., Wang T., Jiang D., Ainiwaer T., Gu Y., et al. (2026). Biomimetic PtPd nanozyme induce glutamylcysteine synthetase inhibition for enhanced radioimmunotherapy. Mikrochim. Acta 193, 298. 10.1007/s00604-026-08005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kang X., Jadhav S., Annaji M., Huang C.-H., Amin R., Shen J., et al. (2023). Advancing cancer therapy with copper/disulfiram nanomedicines and drug delivery systems. Pharmaceutics 15, 1567. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Krayem M., Ghanem G. E., Van Gestel D. (2022). Recent advances in radiosensitivity determinants in melanoma. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 34, 131–138. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kumari K., Singh A., Chaudhary A., Singh R. K., Shanker A., Kumar V., et al. (2024). Neoantigen identification and dendritic cell-based vaccines for lung cancer immunotherapy. Vaccines 12, 498. 10.3390/vaccines12050498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lan Y., Li X., Liu B., Lu J., Zuo B., Wang Y., et al. (2024). Framework nucleic acid-based nanoparticles enhance temozolomide sensitivity in glioblastoma. Drug Resist. Updat. 76, 101122. 10.1016/j.drup.2024.101122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lebepe T. C., Oluwafemi O. S. (2022). Photothermal conversion profiling of large-scaled synthesized gold nanorods using binary surfactant with hydroquinone as a reducing agent. Nanomaterials 12, 1723. 10.3390/nano12101723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee J., Kang Y., Lee H., Saravanakumar G., Park S. A., Ahn S., et al. (2025). Amplifying glioblastoma immunotherapy: t cell shielding through nitric oxide/reactive oxygen species scavenging nanoparticles potentiates anti-PD-1. Biomaterials 315, 122904. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Li K., Xu K., He Y., Yang Y., Tan M., Mao Y., et al. (2023). Oxygen self-generating nanoreactor mediated ferroptosis activation and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. ACS Nano 17, 4667–4687. 10.1021/acsnano.2c10893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Li Y., Zhang Y., Dong Y., Akakuru O. U., Yao X., Yi J., et al. (2023). Ablation of gap junction protein improves the efficiency of nanozyme-mediated Catalytic/starvation/mild-temperature photothermal therapy. Adv. Mat. 35, e2210464. 10.1002/adma.202210464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li B., Ashrafizadeh M., Jiao T. (2024). Biomedical application of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in cancer therapy: stimuli-Responsive and biomimetic nanocomposites in targeted delivery, phototherapy and diagnosis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 260, 129391. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li L., Pan J., Huang M., Sun J., Wang C., Xu H. (2024). Metal-phenolic networks: a promising frontier in cancer theranostics. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 11379–11395. 10.2147/IJN.S491421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li N., Wang Y., Li Y., Zhang C., Fang G. (2024). Recent advances in photothermal therapy at Near-Infrared-II based on 2D MXenes. Small 20, 2305645. 10.1002/smll.202305645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li Q., Wu S., Li B., Zhou P., Wang H., Zhang X., et al. (2024). “All-in-One” MnO2@PtAuRu nanoreactor for self-replenishing and Cascade catalytic therapy of cancer. Small 20, e2405321. 10.1002/smll.202405321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li Y., Sun W., Yuan S., Liu X., Zhang Z., Gu R., et al. (2024a). The role of cuproptosis in gastric cancer. Front. Immunol. 15, 1435651. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1435651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li Y., Zhang Y., Feng N., Yu F., Liu B. (2024b). Three-in-One nanozyme for radiosensitization of bladder cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 10873–10883. 10.2147/IJN.S463242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li D., He J., Ding G., Xin Y., Feng F., Ma S., et al. (2025). Advancements in NADH oxidase nanozymes: bridging nanotechnology and biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 14, 2402785. 10.1002/adhm.202402785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li G., Li S., Jiang Y., Chen T., An Z. (2025). Unleashing the power of immune checkpoints: a new strategy for enhancing treg cells depletion to boost antitumor immunity. Int. Immunopharmacol. 147, 113952. 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liang J., Yang Y., Luo Y., Huang L., Zhao S. (2024). Mesoporous platinum@copper selenide-based NIR-II photothermal agents with photothermal conversion efficiency over 80% for photoacoustic imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 496, 154172. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.154172 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lin S., Xing H., Zeng Y., Galimova E., Chernov A., Liu G., et al. (2025). Biomimetic Cu2-xSe nanoplatforms for efficient glioblastoma treatment: overcoming the blood-brain barrier and boosting Immunogenetic cell death. J. Nanobiotechnology 23, 609. 10.1186/s12951-025-03696-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu X., Li B., Fu F., Xu K., Zou R., Wang Q., et al. (2014). Facile synthesis of biocompatible cysteine-coated CuS nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for cancer therapy. Dalton Trans. 43, 11709–11715. 10.1039/c4dt00424h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu Y., Liu W., Huang J., Lai W., Leng F., Hu C., et al. (2019). Cu2-xSe nanoparticles enhance the anticancer activity of oxaliplatin by inhibiting autophagic degradation. Nanomed 14, 1307–1321. 10.2217/nnm-2018-0284 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Liu J., Yuan Y., Cheng Y., Fu D., Chen Z., Wang Y., et al. (2022). Copper-based metal-organic framework overcomes cancer chemoresistance through systemically disrupting dynamically balanced cellular redox homeostasis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 4799–4809. 10.1021/jacs.1c11856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu J., Dong S., Gai S., Dong Y., Liu B., Zhao Z., et al. (2023). Design and mechanism insight of monodispersed AuCuPt alloy nanozyme with antitumor activity. Acs Nano 17, 20402–20423. 10.1021/acsnano.3c06833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu Y., Liu W., Li G., Lai W., Hu C., Zhang Q., et al. (2023). Cu2-xSe nanoparticles suppress cell proliferation and migration in hepatocellular carcinoma by impairing mitochondrial respiration. Biomed. Mat. 18, 035013. 10.1088/1748-605X/acc43e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu C., Xu X., Chen Y., Yin M., Mäkilä E., Zhou W., et al. (2024). Metabolism-regulating nanozyme system for advanced nanocatalytic cancer therapy. Small 20, e2307794. 10.1002/smll.202307794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Liu J., Yu B., Rong M., Sun W., Lu L. (2024). A new strategy to fight tumor heterogeneity: integrating metal-defect active centers within NADH oxidase nanozymes. Nano Today 54, 102113. 10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102113 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Liu X.-Q., Shi M.-Z., Bai Y.-T., Su X.-L., Liu Y.-M., Wu J.-C., et al. (2024). Hypoxia and ferroptosis. Cell. Signal. 122, 111328. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2024.111328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu Y., Meng Y., Zhang J., Gu L., Shen S., Zhu Y., et al. (2024). Pharmacology progresses and applications of chloroquine in cancer therapy. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 6777–6809. 10.2147/IJN.S458910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Liu Z., Xu S., Chen L., Gong J., Wang M. (2024). The role of pyroptosis in cancer: key components and therapeutic potential. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS 22, 548. 10.1186/s12964-024-01932-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Liu T., Lu C., Jiang X., Wang Y., Chen Z., Qi C., et al. (2025). Nano-based strategies aiming at tumor microenvironment for improved cancer therapy. Mol. Pharm. 22, 647–677. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lu S., Wu Y., Liu Y., Sun X., Li J., Li J. (2023). Multifunctional photothermal hydrogel in the second near-infrared window for localized tumor therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mat. 6, 4694–4702. 10.1021/acsabm.3c00492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Luan X., Pan Y., Zhou Y., Zhou D., Zhao W., Zeng F., et al. (2022). Targeted self-assembly of renal clearable Cu2-xSe to induce lysosome swelling for multimodal imaging guided photothermal/chemodynamic synergistic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mat. 32, 2208354. 10.1002/adfm.202208354 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ma G., Wu C. (2017). Microneedle, bio-microneedle and bio-inspired microneedle: a review. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 251, 11–23. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ma M., Zhang Y., Pu K., Tang W. (2025). Nanomaterial-enabled metabolic reprogramming strategies for boosting antitumor immunity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 54, 653–714. 10.1039/d4cs00679h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Meng W., Huang L., Guo J., Xin Q., Liu J., Hu Y. (2024). Innovative nanomedicine delivery: targeting tumor microenvironment to defeat drug resistance. Pharmaceutics 16, 1549. 10.3390/pharmaceutics16121549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Meng W., Chen T., Li X., Li Y., Zhang L., Xu Y., et al. (2025). A dual-targeting biomimetic nanoplatform integrates SDT/CDT/Gas therapy to boost synergistic ferroptosis for orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Adv. Sci. 12, 2413833. 10.1002/advs.202413833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Menshawy A., Mattar O., Abdulkarim A., Kasem S., Nasreldin N., Menshawy E., et al. (2018). Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients with advanced cancers-related bone metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support. Care Cancer 26, 1029–1038. 10.1007/s00520-018-4060-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Pan Y.-J., Zhang Y., Chen B.-Q., Zhao Y., Wang J.-Y., Li C.-Y., et al. (2024). NIR-II light triggered burst-release Cascade nanoreactor for precise cancer chemotherapy. Bioact. Mat. 33, 311–323. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Park D., Lapteva N., Seethammagari M., Slawin K. M., Spencer D. M. (2006). An essential role for Akt1 in dendritic cell function and tumor immunotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1581–1590. 10.1038/nbt1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Pi F., Deng X., Xue Q., Zheng L., Liu H., Yang F., et al. (2023). Alleviating the hypoxic tumor microenvironment with MnO2-coated CeO2 nanoplatform for magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 21, 90. 10.1186/s12951-023-01850-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Poma P., Rigogliuso S., Labbozzetta M., Nicosia A., Costa S., Ragusa M. A., et al. (2024). Epigenetic and cellular reprogramming of doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cells treated with curcumin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 13416. 10.3390/ijms252413416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Porrazzo A., Cassandri M., D’Alessandro A., Morciano P., Rota R., Marampon F., et al. (2024). DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics. Cell. Oncol. 47, 717–732. 10.1007/s13402-023-00906-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Pourmasoumi P., Banihashemian S. A., Zamani F., Rasouli-Nia A., Mehrabani D., Karimi-Busheri F. (2024). Nanoparticle-based approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors. J. Clin. Med. 13, 7449. 10.3390/jcm13237449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rahdan F., Abedi F., Dianat-Moghadam H., Sani M. Z., Taghizadeh M., Alizadeh E. (2024). Autophagy-based therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: from standard treatments to combination therapy, oncolytic virotherapy, and targeted nanomedicines. Clin. Exp. Med. 25, 13. 10.1007/s10238-024-01527-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ran R., Guo S., Jiang X., Qian Z., Guo Z., Wang Y., et al. (2023). A cell-penetrating peptide modified Cu2-xSe/Au nanohybrid with enhanced efficacy for combined radio-photothermal therapy. Molecules 28, 423. 10.3390/molecules28010423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Rao Y., Fan T., Zhou L., Fang K., Sun Y., Hu X., et al. (2023). A positive self-amplified H2O2 and acidity circulation for boosting CDT-PTT-starvation therapy. J. Control. Release 354, 701–712. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.01.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Santarsiero A., Convertini P., Iacobazzi D., Infantino V., Todisco S. (2024). Metabolic crossroad between macrophages and cancer cells: overview of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomedicines 12, 2684. 10.3390/biomedicines12122684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Saxena M., van der Burg S. H., Melief C. J. M., Bhardwaj N. (2021). Therapeutic cancer vaccines. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 360–378. 10.1038/s41568-021-00346-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Shah S., Nag A., Lucke-Wold B. (2025). Autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccination in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review of literature. Clin. Transl. Oncol. Off. Publ. Fed. Span. Oncol. Soc. Natl. Cancer Inst. Mex. 27, 2889–2903. 10.1007/s12094-024-03830-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Shan B., Liu H., Li L., Lu Y., Li M. (2022). Near-infrared II plasmonic phototheranostics with glutathione depletion for multimodal imaging-guided hypoxia-tolerant chemodynamic-photocatalytic-photothermal cancer therapy triggered by a single laser. Small 18, e2105638. 10.1002/smll.202105638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Shang J., Zhao F., Xie L., Wang Y., Li B., Jin C. (2024). Trends and future directions of autophagy in osteosarcoma: a bibliometric analysis. Open Med. 19, 20241080. 10.1515/med-2024-1080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Shen Y., Nie C., Pan T., Zhang W., Yang H., Ye Y., et al. (2023). A multifunctional Cascade nanoreactor based on Fe-driven carbon nanozymes for synergistic photothermal/chemodynamic antibacterial therapy. Acta Biomater. 168, 580–592. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Shen X., Fang W., Sun T., Yao Y., Chen X., Xia L., et al. (2025). pH-induced in suit aggregation of Cu2-xSe-POED with extended tumor retention for enhanced chemodynamic/photothermal therapy. Eur. Polym. J. 228, 113859. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.113859 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Shestovskaya M. V., Luss A. L., Bezborodova O. A., Kulikov P. P., Antufrieva D. A., Plotnikova E. A., et al. (2024). Radiosensitizing effects of heparinized magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in colon cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomedecine Pharmacother. 175, 116668. 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Shi X., Li Q., Zhang C., Pei H., Wang G., Zhou H., et al. (2021). Semiconducting polymer nano-radiopharmaceutical for combined radio-photothermal therapy of pancreatic tumor. J. Nanobiotechnology 19, 337. 10.1186/s12951-021-01083-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Shi Z., Hu C., Zheng X., Sun C., Li Q. (2024). Feedback loop between hypoxia and energy metabolic reprogramming aggravates the radioresistance of cancer cells. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 55. 10.1186/s40164-024-00519-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shi L., Yu Y., Li J., Ma B., Zhang X., Yang P., et al. (2025). NIR-Responsive Cu2 - xSe@Fc nanoparticles for photothermal-ferroptosis combination therapy in esophageal cancer. J. Nanobiotechnology 23, 356. 10.1186/s12951-025-03434-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Shi X., Askari Rizvi S. F., Yang Y., Liu G. (2025). Emerging nanomedicines for macrophage-mediated cancer therapy. Biomaterials 316, 123028. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.123028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Song Z., Zhao L., Fang W., Guo S., Xu A., Zhan Z., et al. (2023). Glioma cell membrane camouflaged cinobufotalin delivery system for combinatorial orthotopic glioblastoma therapy. Nano Res. 16, 11164–11175. 10.1007/s12274-023-5807-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Song C. W., Kim H., Kim M.-S., Park H. J., Paek S.-H., Terezakis S., et al. (2025). Role of HIF-1α in the responses of tumors to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Cancer Res. Treat. 57, 1–10. 10.4143/crt.2024.255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Tong P.-H., Yang J.-J., Zhou Y.-F., Tang Y.-F., Tang M.-T., Zang Y., et al. (2025). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for phototherapy and synergistic phototherapy of cancer. Coord. Chem. Rev. 526, 216381. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216381 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Tsai C.-C., Wang C.-Y., Chang H.-H., Chang P. T. S., Chang C.-H., Chu T. Y., et al. (2024). Diagnostics and therapy for malignant tumors. Biomedicines 12, 2659. 10.3390/biomedicines12122659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wang T., Zhang H., Han Y., Liu H., Ren F., Zeng J., et al. (2019). Light-enhanced O2-Evolving nanoparticles boost photodynamic therapy to elicit antitumor immunity. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 11, 16367–16379. 10.1021/acsami.9b03541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Wang T., Zhang H., Liu H., Yuan Q., Ren F., Han Y., et al. (2020). Boosting H2O2-Guided chemodynamic therapy of cancer by enhancing reaction kinetics through versatile biomimetic fenton nanocatalysts and the second near-infrared light irradiation. Adv. Funct. Mat. 30, 1906128. 10.1002/adfm.201906128 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Wang Y., Li Z., Hu Y., Liu J., Guo M., Wei H., et al. (2020). Photothermal conversion-coordinated Fenton-like and photocatalytic reactions of Cu2-xSe-Au janus nanoparticles for tri-combination antitumor therapy. Biomaterials 255, 120167. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang Y., Wang W., Sang D., Yu K., Lin H., Qu F. (2021). Cu2-xSe/Bi2Se3@PEG Z-scheme heterostructure: a multimode bioimaging guided Theranostic agent with enhanced photo/chemodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomater. Sci. 9, 4473–4483. 10.1039/d1bm00378j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang P., Chen B., Zhan Y., Wang L., Luo J., Xu J., et al. (2022). Enhancing the efficiency of mild-temperature photothermal therapy for cancer assisting with various strategies. Pharmaceutics 14, 2279. 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wang T., Zhang H., Qiu W., Han Y., Liu H., Li Z. (2022). Biomimetic nanoparticles directly remodel immunosuppressive microenvironment for boosting glioblastoma immunotherapy. Bioact. Mat. 16, 418–432. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Wang X., Wan Z., Li C., Meng X., Zhao L., Lu J., et al. (2022). Defective Cu2-xSe crystals for ultrasound-enhanced CDT of tumor therapy. Ceram. Int. 48, 34564–34570. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  124. Wang Z., Shi Y., Shi Y., Zhang J., Hao R., Zhang G., et al. (2022). Ultrasmall gold-coated mesoporous polydopamine nanoprobe to enhance chemodynamic therapy by self-supplying H2O2 and photothermal stimulation. Acs Appl. Mat. Interfaces 14, 54478–54487. 10.1021/acsami.2c14031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang L., Han Y., Gu Z., Han M., Hu C., Li Z. (2023). Boosting the therapy of glutamine-addiction glioblastoma by combining glutamine metabolism therapy with photo-enhanced chemodynamic therapy. Biomater. Sci. 11, 6252–6266. 10.1039/d3bm00897e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wang R., Huang Z., Xiao Y., Huang T., Ming J. (2023). Photothermal therapy of copper incorporated nanomaterials for biomedicine. Biomater. Res. 27, 121. 10.1186/s40824-023-00461-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wang S., Qiao Y., Liu X., Zhu S., Zheng Y., Jiang H., et al. (2023). Reduced graphene oxides modified Bi2Te3 nanosheets for rapid photo-thermoelectric catalytic therapy of bacteria-infected wounds. Adv. Funct. Mat. 33, 2210098. 10.1002/adfm.202210098 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang T., Zhang H., Han Y., Zheng Q., Liu H., Han M., et al. (2023). Reversing T cell dysfunction to boost glioblastoma immunotherapy by paroxetine-mediated GRK2 inhibition and blockade of multiple checkpoints through biomimetic nanoparticles. Adv. Sci. 10, 2204961. 10.1002/advs.202204961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang X.-M., Pan S., Chen L., Wang L., Dai Y.-T., Luo T., et al. (2023). Biogenic copper selenide nanoparticles for near-infrared photothermal therapy application. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 15, 27638–27646. 10.1021/acsami.3c03611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wang A., Walden M., Ettlinger R., Kiessling F., Gassensmith J. J., Lammers T., et al. (2024). Biomedical metal-organic framework materials: perspectives and challenges. Adv. Funct. Mat. 34, adfm.202308589. 10.1002/adfm.202308589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Wang D., Han X., Liu H.-L. (2024). The role and research progress of tumor-associated macrophages in cervical cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 14, 5999–6011. 10.62347/FFXL7288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang J., Liang S., Chen S., Ma T., Chen M., Niu C., et al. (2024). Bacterial outer membrane vesicle-cancer cell hybrid membrane-coated nanoparticles for sonodynamic therapy in the treatment of breast cancer bone metastasis (vol 22, 328, 2024). J. Nanobiotechnology 22, 405. 10.1186/s12951-024-02649-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wang P., Sun S., Bai G., Zhang R., Liang F., Zhang Y. (2024). Nanosized Prussian blue and its analogs for bioimaging and cancer theranostics. Acta Biomater. 176, 77–98. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.12.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wang T., Han M., Han Y., Jiang Z., Zheng Q., Zhang H., et al. (2024). Antigen self-presented personalized nanovaccines boost the immunotherapy of highly invasive and metastatic tumors. Acs Nano 18, 6333–6347. 10.1021/acsnano.3c11189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wang X., Yang Y., Wang P., Li Q., Gao W., Sun Y., et al. (2024). Oxygen self-supplying nanoradiosensitizer activates cGAS-STING pathway to enhance radioimmunotherapy of triple negative breast cancer. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 376, 794–805. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.10.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang Y., Si Y., Wu J., Lu H., Wei J., Ding Q. (2024). Preoperative ultrasound-guided injection of nanocarbon for central lymph node dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 14, 29185. 10.1038/s41598-024-80364-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Wang Z., Dong M., Pan Y., Zhang L., Lei H., Zheng Y., et al. (2024). Turning threat to therapy: a nanozyme-patch in surgical bed for convenient tumor vaccination by sustained in situ catalysis. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 13, e2304384. 10.1002/adhm.202304384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wang X., Liu G., Pu X., Ren T., Zhang F., Shen M., et al. (2025). Combating cisplatin-resistant lung cancer using a coiled-coil lipopeptides modified membrane fused drug delivery system. J. Control. Release 379, 45–58. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Wei J., Li W., Zhang P., Guo F., Liu M. (2024). Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Mol. Cancer 23, 279. 10.1186/s12943-024-02179-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Wu M., Chen W., Chen Y., Zhang H., Liu C., Deng Z., et al. (2018). Focused ultrasound-augmented delivery of biodegradable multifunctional nanoplatforms for imaging-guided brain tumor treatment. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700474. 10.1002/advs.201700474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Xia C., Luo Z., Feng Z., Zhang Q., Xia C. (2025). Mechanism and application of copper-based nanomedicines in activating tumor immunity through oxidative stress modulation. Front. Pharmacol. 16, 1646890. 10.3389/fphar.2025.1646890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Xiang C., Ding Q., Jiang T., Liu Y., Li C., Yang X., et al. (2025). Reprogrammed glycolysis-induced augmentation of NIR-II excited photodynamic/photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 320, 123235. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Xin Y., Sun Z., Liu J., Li W., Wang M., Chu Y., et al. (2022). Nanomaterial-mediated low-temperature photothermal therapy via heat shock protein inhibition. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1027468. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1027468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Xiong Y., Li J., Jiang X., Zhen W., Ma X., Lin W. (2025). Nitric oxide-releasing nanoscale metal-organic layer overcomes hypoxia and reactive oxygen species diffusion barriers to enhance cancer radiotherapy. Adv. Sci. 12, e2413518. 10.1002/advs.202413518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Xu Q., Zhang H., Liu H., Han Y., Qiu W., Li Z. (2022). Inhibiting autophagy flux and DNA repair of tumor cells to boost radiotherapy of orthotopic glioblastoma. Biomaterials 280, 121287. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Yan X., Chen C., Ren Y., Su T., Chen H., Yu D., et al. (2024). A dual-pathway pyroptosis inducer based on Au-Cu2-xSe@ZIF-8 enhances tumor immunotherapy by disrupting the zinc ion homeostasis. Acta Biomater. 188, 329–343. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Yang S., Han Y., Bao B., Hu C., Li Z. (2022). Boosting the anti-tumor performance of disulfiram against glioblastoma by using ultrasmall nanoparticles and HIF-1? Inhibitor. Compos. Part B-Eng. 243, 110117. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Yang L., Zhao Z., Tian B., Yang M., Dong Y., Zhou B., et al. (2024). A singular plasmonic-thermoelectric hollow nanostructure inducing apoptosis and cuproptosis for catalytic cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 15, 7499. 10.1038/s41467-024-51772-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Yao Y., Xu R., Shao W., Tan J., Wang S., Chen S., et al. (2024). A novel nanozyme to enhance radiotherapy effects by lactic acid scavenging, ROS generation, and hypoxia mitigation. Adv. Sci. 11, e2403107. 10.1002/advs.202403107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Yao J., Chen P., Xie D., Chen J., Lin X., Xu Y. (2025). Copper-induced cuproptosis and immunogenic cell death synergize with radiotherapy and PD-1 blockade in osteosarcoma. Acs Appl. Mat. Interfaces 17, 46635–46650. 10.1021/acsami.5c08888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Yassin M. T., Al-Otibi F. O., Al-Sahli S. A., El-Wetidy M. S., Mohamed S. (2024). Metal oxide nanoparticles as efficient nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy: addressing chemotherapy-induced disabilities. Cancers 16, 4234. 10.3390/cancers16244234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Yin L., Jiang W., Liu S., Fu Y., Zhou L., Pei X., et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages III-IV, unresectable ovarian cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase Ib/II study. Bmc Med. 22, 496. 10.1186/s12916-024-03697-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Yin H., Gao Y., Zhou X., Chen X., Hu Z., Zhang L., et al. (2025). Oral multistage nanomedicine for synergistic chemo/chemodynamic/near-infrared-II photothermal cancer therapy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 684, 244–253. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.01.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Yu X., Zhu L. (2024). Nanoparticles for the treatment of bone metastasis in breast cancer: recent advances and challenges. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 1867–1886. 10.2147/IJN.S442768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Yu W., Jia F., Fu J., Chen Y., Huang Y., Jin Q., et al. (2023). Enhanced transcutaneous chemodynamic therapy for melanoma treatment through cascaded fenton-like reactions and nitric oxide delivery. Acs Nano 17, 15713–15723. 10.1021/acsnano.3c02964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Yu X., Xu C., Sun J., Xu H., Huang H., Gan Z., et al. (2024). Recent developments in two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide-based multimodal cancer theranostics. J. Nanobiotechnology 22, 515. 10.1186/s12951-024-02785-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Yuan Z., Liu X., Ling J., Huang G., Huang J., Zhu X., et al. (2022). In situ-transition nanozyme triggered by tumor microenvironment boosts synergistic cancer radio-/chemotherapy through disrupting redox homeostasis. Biomaterials 287, 121620. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhang H., Wang T., Liu H., Ren F., Qiu W., Sun Q., et al. (2019). Second near-infrared photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy of orthotopic malignant glioblastoma with ultra-small Cu2-xSe nanoparticles. Nanoscale 11, 7600–7608. 10.1039/c9nr01789e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhang L., Jiang C., Li B., Liu Z., Gu B., He S., et al. (2021). A core-shell Au@Cu2-xSe heterogeneous metal nanocomposite for photoacoustic and computed tomography dual-imaging-guided photothermal boosted chemodynamic therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 19, 410. 10.1186/s12951-021-01159-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhang H., Wang T., Liu H., Han Y., Zheng Q., Xu Q., et al. (2022). Boost therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma by amplifying vicious cycle between mitochondrial oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress via biodegradable ultrasmall nanoparticles and old drug. Nano Today 46, 101601. 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101601 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Zhang Z., Lo H., Zhao X., Li W., Wu K., Zeng F., et al. (2023). Mild photothermal/radiation therapy potentiates ferroptosis effect for ablation of breast cancer via MRI/PA imaging guided all-in-one strategy. J. Nanobiotechnology 21, 150. 10.1186/s12951-023-01910-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Zhang H., Yang L., Han M., Han Y., Jiang Z., Zheng Q., et al. (2024). Boost infiltration and activity of T cells via inhibiting Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) immune checkpoint to enhance glioblastoma immunotherapy. Acs Nano 18, 23001–23013. 10.1021/acsnano.4c04553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Zhang W., Chen S., Bai Z., Gan M., Chen M., Zhang Y., et al. (2024a). Photodynamic therapy for oral squamous cell carcinoma: current status, challenges, and prospects. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 10699–10710. 10.2147/IJN.S481901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zhang W., Li X., Feng C., Huang Z., Zhang C., Shuai X., et al. (2024b). Photoferroptosis as a potent strategy for neuroblastoma treatment. Nano Today 59, 102498. 10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102498 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zhang Z., Yue X., Lan N., Zhang Y., Li Z., Jin F., et al. (2024). Effective antitumor synergistic treatment with fiber-photothermal therapy and heat shock protein inhibitors. Acs Appl. Mat. Interfaces 17, 4368–4379. 10.1021/acsami.4c11734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang J., Zhang J., Yang C. (2025a). Autophagy in brain tumors: molecular mechanisms, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities. J. Transl. Med. 23, 52. 10.1186/s12967-024-06063-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhang J., Zhou Y., Guo J., Yan M., Liu C., Du B. (2025b). Core-shell nanoparticles with sequential drug release depleting cholesterol for reverse tumor multidrug resistance. Acs Appl. Mat. Interfaces 17, 6689–6702. 10.1021/acsami.4c17858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhang X., Li Y., Zhang Y., Wang S., Zhao J., Wang T. (2025). Glutathione depletion-based pH-responsive injectable hydrogels for synergistic treatment of Colon tumor. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 297, 139557. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.139557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Zhang Y., Yang L., Su M., Wang J., Wang R., Li H., et al. (2025). Synergistic gambogic acid nanomedicine and mild photothermal therapy suppress metastatic lung cancer. Mat. Des. 256, 114320. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114320 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zhao C., Tang X., Chen X., Jiang Z. (2024). Multifaceted carbonized metal-organic frameworks synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors for precision and augmented cuproptosis cancer therapy. ACS Nano 18, 17852–17868. 10.1021/acsnano.4c04022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhao X., Qi X., Liu D., Che X., Wu G. (2024). A novel approach for bladder cancer treatment: nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. Int. J. Nanomedicine 19, 13461–13483. 10.2147/IJN.S498729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Zheng Y., Han Y., Wang T., Liu H., Sun Q., Hu S., et al. (2022). Reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages via ROS-mediated novel mechanism of ultra-small Cu2-xSe nanoparticles to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Adv. Funct. Mat. 32, 2108971. 10.1002/adfm.202108971 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Zhou X., Liu H., Zheng Y., Han Y., Wang T., Zhang H., et al. (2020). Overcoming radioresistance in tumor therapy by alleviating hypoxia and using the HIF-1 inhibitor. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 12, 4231–4240. 10.1021/acsami.9b18633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Zhou Y., Zou P., Chen X., Chen P., Shi M., Lang J., et al. (2024). Overcoming barriers in photodynamic therapy harnessing nanogenerators strategies. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 5673–5694. 10.7150/ijbs.100317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Zhu L., Zhao Y., Liu T., Chen M., Qian W. P., Jiang B., et al. (2022). Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase-ROS signal using hyaluronic acid nanoparticles for overcoming radioresistance in cancer therapy. ACS Nano 16, 18708–18728. 10.1021/acsnano.2c07440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Zhu Y., Hao Q., Zhu H., Zhao R., Feng L., He S., et al. (2024). Thermoelectric nanoheterojunction-mediated multiple energy conversion for enhanced cancer therapy. Acs Nano 18, 34257–34271. 10.1021/acsnano.4c12261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Zhu Z., Zhu K., Zhang J., Zhou Y., Zhang Q. (2024). Elucidating the evolving role of cuproptosis in breast cancer progression. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 20, 4872–4887. 10.7150/ijbs.98806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zou B., Xiong Z., He L., Chen T. (2022). Reversing breast cancer bone metastasis by metal organic framework-capped nanotherapeutics via suppressing osteoclastogenesis. Biomaterials 285, 121549. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES