Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2026 Aug 11:2026.08.10.744059. [Version 1] doi: 10.64898/2026.08.10.744059

‘An NF2-wildtype malignant meningioma cell line for basic and translational science’

Perry Chien 1, Brendan F Kohrn 2, Megan Nguyen 2, Timothy J Martins 3, Samuel Emerson 4, Scott R Kennedy 2, Raymond J Monnat Jr 2,5,6
PMCID: PMC13640685  PMID: 42845513

Abstract

Background:

Meningiomas are the most common primary nervous system neoplasm in adults. There are few good cellular models, especially of high grade/malignant meningiomas, to use to identify new therapeutic agents and treatment regimens. The widely available, partially characterized, NF2-wildtype (NF2wt) Grade 3 malignant meningioma cell line IOMM-Lee can help meet this need.

Methods:

We generated new data to better characterize IOMM-Lee genomic and mtDNA variants, proliferation rate and colony-forming efficiency and sensitivity to ionizing radiation as a function of ATM kinase activity. A screen of 349 anti-cancer drugs identified multiple, mechanistically distinct clinical use drugs with nanomolar IC50 values and high drug sensitivity prediction scores.

Results:

Exome sequencing confirmed that IOMM-Lee is NF2wt, and contains a pathogenic TERT-promoter (c.−124C>T) variant. Population doubling times (PDT) were short (19–21 hrs), and colony forming efficiency (CFE) high, of up to 87%. IOMM-Lee is comparatively radiosensitive with a D10 of ~3.9 Gy, and could be radiosensitized by AZD-1390-mediated ATM kinase inhibition. Thirty-four anti-cancer compounds spanning several mechanistic classes were identified that potently suppressed cell proliferation at sub-micromolar IC50 values with high Breeze 2.0 Drug Sensitivity Scores.

Importance of the Study:

We provide new data to better characterize IOMM-Lee, the most widely used cell line model of human Grade 3 malignant meningioma. These data identify and characterize IOMM-Lee genomic alterations and mtDNA variants; quantify growth kinetics and ionizing radiation sensitivity; and identify multiple mechanistically distinct, clinical use drugs with nanomolar IC50 values, high drug sensitivity prediction scores and potential as meningioma systemic therapies. Our data more clearly locate IOMM-Lee in the landscape of genomically-defined meningiomas, and will aid better use of this experimentally tractable cell line model to understand meningioma biology and identify more effective malignant meningioma therapies and treatment regimens.

Keywords: meningioma cell line, nuclear and mtDNA genomic variants, high throughput drug screen, ionizing radiation, proliferation kinetics

Introduction

Meningiomas are the most common primary nervous system neoplasm in adults. They originate from the meningeal membranes covering the brain surface, and their origin reflects meningeal embryology and the action of genes and mutations that promote meningioma risk or progression 1–3. Intra-cranial meningiomas, the bulk of clinical cases in the U.S., had an annual incidence of 9.73/100,000 in recent CBTRUS data 4. Incidence has been increasing in individuals greater than age 65 with more cases in females than in males, and in individuals of African ancestry. The reasons driving these rate increases and epidemiologic disparities remain unknown, a reflection of our ignorance of important drivers of meningioma risk and pathogenesis.

Meningioma diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making has been driven largely by histopathology from first recognition as a discrete CNS tumor subtype 5. The most recent WHO CNS tumor classification recognizes three major histopathologic grades and 15 morphologic meningioma subtypes based on cytologic features, differentiation, growth pattern, evidence of brain invasion and mitotic activity 6. Grading ambiguities can be further resolved by using a growing number of molecular criteria 7. Most meningiomas are well-circumscribed, slow growing, low histopathologic grade neoplasms that can be effectively treated by surgical resection. However a subset invades adjacent brain or bone, are radiation-resistant and are likely to recur. This clinically challenging subset of meningiomas can be found across all three histopathologic tumor grades, and may represent up to 10% of patients in large case series or patient cohorts 8.

Molecular characterization has had a substantial impact on meningioma subtyping, while providing new insights into meningioma biology. Examples include the mutation or loss of NF2, CDKN2A/B and other genes, TERT promoter mutations, DNA copy number and chromosomal variants and distinct gene expression and DNA methylation profiles. However, these new results have not yet converged on a unitary classification scheme that reliably predicts clinical behavior or that identifies more useful therapies 8,9

The search for new, more effective meningioma therapies has been hampered by a paucity of pre-clinical disease models 8,10,11. This challenge — common across all of translational neuro-oncology — can be met in part by well-characterized cellular disease models. The most useful models capture and propagate key disease features; are experimentally tractable; and can support high content imaging, high throughput screens and the increasingly sophisticated roster of in vivo/hybrid disease modeling protocols 12

IOMM-Lee, the most widely used malignant meningioma cell line disease model 11,13, was initiated from surgical resection tissue of a recurrent, bone-invasive meningioma 2 years after first diagnosis with radiation treatment 14,15. IOMM-Lee is unusual among Grade 3 malignant meningiomas in lacking NF2 mutations (i.e., it is NF2wildtype or NF2wt), the most common genomic alteration across all meningioma subtypes 8. The ~70 kDa, 595 amino acid residue NF2/merlin protein interacts with cytoskeletal, ion transport and cell surface proteins to regulate contact-dependent cell proliferation, adhesion and signaling. These pathways, when altered, may promote meningioma pathogenesis and progression 16.

In order to better enable the use of IOMM-Lee for basic and translational meningioma science, we have generated new genomic, cellular and therapeutic response profiling data. These data include a more complete and publicly accessible whole exome sequence (WES); deep characterization of mtDNA variants by sensitive, high accuracy Duplex sequencing; new cell proliferation and colony-forming efficiency (CFE) data; and ionizing radiation dose-sensitivity and IR sensitization upon ATM kinase inhibition. A high throughput screen of 349 anti-cancer drugs and small molecules identified 34 distinct, clinically useful agents that potently suppressed cell proliferation with nanomolar-range IC50 values and with high FIMM Breeze 2.0 Drug Sensitivity Scores 17. All of these data are in the public domain to enable the better-informed use of IOMM-Lee for basic and translational malignant meningioma science, and its use to facilitate a wide range of in vitro, high throughput, and hybrid cell line-organoid/xenograft and related disease modeling protocols 12,18,19.

Methods

Cell line culture and proliferative kinetics:

IOMM-Lee was identified by a literature search for ‘human’ and ‘meningioma cell lines’, further qualified by search terms including ‘malignant, ‘high-grade’, ‘atypical’, ‘Grade III’ and ‘invasive’. We required ready availability to investigators; a well-documented origin; and at least partial characterization 13–15. We performed all experiments with an IOMM-Lee culture purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC CRL-3370/Cellosaurus reference CVCL_5779) authenticated by short tandem DNA repeat (STR) fingerprinting using the CellCheck9 Plus panel that also screens for contaminating species and Mycoplasma infection (IDEXX, Columbus MO).

IOMM-Lee can be continuously propagated using simple cell culture conditions: Dulbecco-modified Eagle’s Medium with added 4.5 g/L glucose and L-glutamine (Corning 10–017-CV) and supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (HyClone SH30396.03) and penicillin-streptomycin (100X Gibco-ThermoFisher 10378016, diluted to 1X). Standard cell culture plasticware was used throughout, with growth in a humidified 20% O2/5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Cultures were serially propagated by brief trypsin-EDTA (Gibco-ThermoFisher 15400054) treatment of near-confluent cultures to generate single cell suspensions that were diluted 10-fold (v/v) into fresh complete growth medium and new flasks for regrowth.

We newly determined the proliferation rate and population doubling time (PDT) of IOMM-Lee in light of a nearly 4-fold range of reported values. Hemocytometer counts in conjunction with WST-1 formazan dye generation (Takara Bio) were used to establish the relationship between cell number and formazan absorbance measured at 3 hrs and 440 nm. WST-1 absorbance was then used to track cell proliferation: triplicate wells were seeded with 50,000 to 780 cells/well in 96 well plates, then measured for absorbance over a 72 hr growth interval. The colony-forming efficiency (CFE) was determined by dilution cloning using triplicate wells seeded with 25–200 cells/well in 5 ml of complete growth medium in 6 well (60 mm) plates. Colonies formed after 7–10 days were then fixed and stained with crystal violet/methanol prior to counting colonies with ≥ 50 cells. CFE was calculated by dividing colonies formed by cells plated/well.

Radiation and drug sensitivity:

Ionizing radiation (IR) dose-survival curves were generated by quantifying CFE 14 days after X-irradiation. An initial dose range of 0–10 Gy was subsequently reduced in light of IOMM-Lee’s comparative IR sensitivity to 0–3 Gy, with CFE determined by seeded 100–250 cells/well in 5 ml of complete growth medium in 6 well plates. Irradiation was in ambient (20%) oxygen in a Rad-Source RS-2000 X-ray source, followed by growth for 14 days prior to fixation, staining and colony counting as described above. The ATM kinase inhibitor AZD-1390, added to 1 uM 1–3 hrs prior to IR treatment, was used to assess IR sensitization as a function of IR dose.

A high throughput drug screen was performed at the Quellos High-Throughput Screening Facility (UW Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle WA) using a library of 349 anti-cancer compounds (SelleckChem Anti-Cancer Drug Library Lots#AB-17461–70 and 17480)(Table S7). In brief, ~1000 cells/well were plated in 384 well plate wells in triplicate, in complete growth medium supplemented with 10mM HEPES to help stabilize medium pH. After incubation overnight at 37°C in a humidified 20% O2/5% CO2 incubator, drugs or small molecules were pinned to wells over 10 dilutions to give a final drug concentration of 10e-5 to 10e-9 M. After 3 days of undisturbed growth, viable cell number was estimated by CellTiter Glo 2.0 chemiluminescence versus untreated control wells (Promega Lot#0000586757) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Genomic characterization:

Whole exome sequencing (WES), Duplex mtDNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling were used to better-characterize IOMM-Lee genomic features. WES and methylation profiling were performed by the Northwest Genome Center (NWGC, University of WA, Seattle, WA), while Duplex mtDNA sequencing by the Kennedy Lab (UW Department of Lab Medicine/Pathology, Seattle WA). WES used a combination of Twist and RefSeq-targeted capture oligonucleotides, together with paired-end 100 bp reads to a depth of 300X coverage. Methylation profiling, performed by the NWGC, used the same WES DNA sample and an Infinium MethylationEPIC v2.0 kit that targets ~930K unique methylation sites in biologically significant regions of the human genome (Illumina).

High accuracy Duplex mtDNA sequencing was performed using in-house established protocols to characterize and quantify mtDNA variants 20–22. In brief, adapters containing double-stranded unique sequence identifier (UMI) tags (IDT, Coralville IA) were ligated to sonicated DNA samples that had been end-repaired using the NEBNext Ultra End II Repair/dA-Tailing and Ligation kits following the manufacturer’s instructions (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA). We used qPCR to normalize mtDNA input amounts prior to sample amplification and incorporation of TruSeq Illumina adapters:

MWS13s: 5’-ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGC-3’, and

MWS20: 5’-GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGC-3’.

Targeted capture probes specific for human mtDNA were used to enrich amplified libraries following the IDT xGen Lockdown protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Integrat- ed DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA). Libraries were indexed and sequenced using ~150–cycle paired-end reads (300-cycles total) on an Illumina HiSeq4000 to generate ~20×10e6 reads per sample.

Data Processing:

Exome data were processed by the NWGC to generate VCF files prior to conversion to MAF format using VCF2MAF v1.6.21 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/vcf2maf.mirror/files/v1.6.21/) and Ensemble Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) v104 (Ensembl Genome Browser https://grch37.ensembl.org). We lacked a matched patient control (non-tumor) tissue sample, and thus compared IOMM-Lee exome data with Human Reference Genome hg38 to identify potential cell line-specific variants after removing variants with frequencies of ≥ 1% in any gnomAD population and variants where the annotated gene was listed as “Unknown”.

Exome missense variants were annotated using AlphaMissense (https://github.com/google-deepmind/alphamissense) and REVEL (https://sites.google.com/site/revelgenomics/). Additional variant molecular types were assessed using SIFT and PolyPhen. Potential meningioma-relevant variants were identified by comparing IOMM-Lee variants with Project GENIE, CBioPortal-UToronto and other published meningioma data sets 23,24. Duplex mtDNA sequencing data were processed using an in-house bioinformatics pipeline (https://github.com/Kennedy-Lab-UW/Duplex-Seq-Pipeline; version 2.1.2) with default consensus-making parameters. Methylation profiling data, verified for integrity and quality, were archived with other project-specific genomic data at BioProject ID: PRJNA1483737 (see Data and Code Availability).

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was estimated from WES data by calculating the number of base substitution and indel mutations per megabase (Mb) 25–27 using all variants (TMB = 168.3/Mb) or likely germline variants (TMB = 66.5/Mb) with VAFs of 0.4–0.6 or >0.90 28. Tumor mutational signatures were analyzed using COSMIC SigProfiler (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/signatures/; v3.6) with a focus on single base substitution (SBS) signatures detection.

Drug sensitivity profiling data were analyzed to generate IC50 curves, then further assessed using the FIMM (Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine) Breeze 2.0 resource (https://breeze.fimm.fi/v2/, or https://breezetool.app) to calculate corresponding Drug Sensitivity Scores (DSS2) 17: DSS2 scores have proven more predictive than AUC or IC50 values in ranking potential therapeutic clinical utility 17, 29, 30.

Results

Cell culture:

IOMM-Lee cells (ATCC CRL-3370/Cellosaurus CVCL_5779) purchased from the American Type Culture Collection were authenticated by STR DNA typing and verified to be free of Mycoplasma or other contaminating species (Figure 1A, Table S1). Cultures grew as single cells or surface-attached monolayers of epitheloid cells with well-demarcated cell boundaries, moderate amounts of cytoplasm, and prominent nuclei with multiple nucleoli and perinuclear vacuoles (Figure 1B). We determined a culture population doubling time (PDT) or proliferation rate and colony-forming efficiency (CFE) using a range of starting cell numbers in light of the wide range of reported values. Culture PDTs under exponential growth ranged from 18.9 to 20.7 hrs, with a high growth fraction reflected in the many mitotic figures and dividing cells visible in all cultures (Figure 1B, C). We suspect from visual monitoring that IOMM-Lee cultures also display comparatively high rates of cell death and senescence, though did not formally quantify these additional cell states 31. IOMM-Lee culture CFE ranged of 87% to 69% in experiments initiated, respectively, from 25 – 200 cells/well in 6 well/60 mm plates (Figure 1D).

Figure 1: Characterization of IOMM-Lee as a malignant meningioma cell line model.

Figure 1:

(A) Workflow for characterization. (B) Exponentially growing cells in culture (100X magnification/scale bar = 100 um). (C) Population doubling times (PDT) as a function of initial cell number/well over a 72 hr growth interval. (D) Colony-forming efficiency (CFE) determined by dilution cloning in 96 well plate format. See Methods for detail.

Genomic analyses:

Whole exome sequencing (WES) of IOMM-Lee (Figure 1A) identified 2,437 genes that contained 5,598 variants when compared against a human hg38 reference genome (Table S2). Meningioma disease-relevant genes and variants identified by comparing IOMM-Lee WES data with AACR Project GENIE data that aggregated 1,324 meningioma samples from 1,273 patients across all meningioma histologies and subtypes 23 identified 83 variant IOMM-Lee genes among 746 genes altered in GENIE samples. We added 4 additional genes to GENIE meningioma variant genes from an analysis of 121 meningioma samples enriched for Grade 2 and 3 meningiomas 24: PDE4DIP, RELN and ZNF292, all plausibly linked to meningioma risk or pathogenesis, and MGAM that encodes maltase-glucoamylase (Table S3). This final set of 87 ‘meningioma overlap’ genes included >90% (59/65) that were OncoKB-annotated and identified as likely tumor suppressor and/or oncogenes (Table S3).

IOMM-Lee lacked deleterious variants in NF2, the gene most frequently altered in meningioma and further enriched for deleterious variants in atypical, anaplastic and malignant meningiomas 8. IOMM-Lee had variants in two genes, AKT1 and POLR2A, often found enriched in deleterious variants in NF2wt meningiomas 8, 32, though these are unlikely meningioma drivers: the AKT1 variants were intronic or synonymous, in contrast to recurrent, activating E17K substitutions found in many skull base meningiomas associated with upregulated PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling 32,33. The POLR2A variants were also either synonymous, or created a late C-terminal frameshift with variable functional consequence.

Functional consequences of all 122 variants identified in 86 of the 87 IOMM-Lee ‘meningioma overlap’ genes were analyzed after excluding PRSS1 variants: PRSS1 and PRSS2, a closely related member of the trypsinogen gene family, are 93% identical at the nucleotide sequence level and arranged in the 3’ end of the chromosome 7 T-cell receptor (TCR) beta (TRB) locus in direct repeat orientation. The many apparent base substitutions in IOMM-Lee in these 2 genes (Table 1 and S4), upon closer individual read inspection, appear to be artefacts generated by an inability to unambiguously map short reads to highly similar genes in a complex, repeat-rich region of the human genome.

Table 1:

Top 25 IOMM-Lee genes by exome variant count versus GENIE meningioma data as a function of NF2 genotype and histology1

Symbol OncoKB
Gene_Type
IOMM Lee GENIE
All NF2 wt ANM / ATM ANM / ATM
NF2 wt

PRSS1 INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE 43 0.0008
DUSP22 TSG 6
LRP6 ONCOGENE 5 0.0008 0.0023
ABL2 ONCOGENE 4 0.0151 0.0087 0.0164 0.0066
CIITA TSG 4 0.0038 0.0029 0.0023
RPTOR ONCOGENE 4 0.0234 0.0289 0.0280 0.0199
SETBP1 ONCOGENE 4 0.0332 0.0391 0.0280 0.0464
AKT1 ONCOGENE 3 0.0634 0.1100 0.0210 0.0464
CBFA2T3 TSG 3 0.0045 0.0029 0.0023 0.0066
PTEN TSG 3 0.0196 0.0217 0.0257 0.0331
ANKRD26 ONCOGENE 2
AXIN1 TSG 2 0.0151 0.0145 0.0187 0.0199
E2F3 ONCOGENE 2 0.0008 0.0014
FANCA TSG 2 0.0400 0.0420 0.0350 0.0397
FOXN4 ONCOGENE 2
HRAS ONCOGENE 2 0.0060 0.0087 0.0047 0.0066
IGF1 ONCOGENE 2
KMT2B TSG 2 0.0423 0.0420 0.0467 0.0464
KMT2D TSG 2 0.0921 0.1027 0.1075 0.1457
NCOR2 INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE 2
NF1 TSG 2 0.0347 0.0376 0.0327 0.0265
ACTG1 TSG 1
ADARB2 ONCOGENE 1
ALOX15B TSG 1
ANKRD11 TSG 1 0.0008 0.0014
1

OncoKB type refers to classification as a likely oncogene, tumor suppressor gene or other/insufficient evidence. IOMM-Lee count = number of distinct variants identified by WES. GENIE frequencies are shown for genes named at left, in the full GENIE meningioma dataset, or in anaplastic/atypical (ANM/ATM) meningiomas as a function of NF2 genotype.

Among all IOMM-Lee missense variants annotated by AlphaMissense and REVEL, 20% (n = 1,137) and 9.6% (n = 535) were annotated with, respectively 84 and 51 variants identified as ‘likely pathogenic’. AlphaMissense annotated an additional 68 variants as ‘ambiguous’, and 985 as ‘likely benign’, versus REVEL with 74 ‘ambiguous’ and 410 ‘likely benign’ variant calls. Among ‘ambiguous’ calls 13 were concordant, as were 303 of the ‘likely benign’ calls. Among the 122 IOMM-Lee gene variants identified in ‘meningioma overlap’ genes, 32 were in protein coding regions: AlphaMissense and REVEL annotated 17 of these, with 1 ‘likely pathogenic’, 4 ‘ambiguous’ and 12 ‘likely benign’. The sole ‘likely pathogenic’ variant was a p.D11V amino acid substitution in RAC1, a RAS superfamily molecular switch small GTPase. Two of 13 additional missense variants, in BRAF and MGAM, were annotated by SIFT and/or PolyPhen as ‘deleterious/probably damaging’ (Tables S2 and S9).

Eleven additional meningioma overlap genes had likely pathogenic variants that generated stop gain/protein truncation, frameshifts splice-frameshifts, and in-frame insertion/deletions in genes that regulate cell signaling (ABL2, IRS2, NOTCH4); chromatin structure and gene expression (EP300, KDM6D and KMT2D, SETBP1, SMARCA2 and ZFHX3); and DNA damage response pathways (FANCD2)(Tables S2, S10). Among these 9 variants were annotated as ‘deleterious’ by one or more of AlphaMisense, REVEL, SIFT and PolyPhen, as was one additional non-coding variant, c.−124C>T, in the TERT 5’ untranslated promoter region. This variant has been identified in other meningioma cell lines 34, and annotated as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’ when somatic where it has been associated with upregulated TERT expression in several types of CNS tumors as well as melanoma and bladder cancer (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/1299388/). The same variant as a germline mutation has also been linked, though less convincingly, to autosomal dominant Type 2 dyskeratosis congenita (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/RCV003470881.2/). Variant allele fractions (VAFs) of these 9 likely pathogenic variants indicate they were either heterozygous (n = 8) or, in the case of RAC1, homozygous mutant (Table S10).

IOMM-Lee had a comparatively high global tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 168.3/Mb calculated using all variants. We did not identify potential sources of a high TMB such as pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes, DNA polymerase proofreading domains or other genes known to confer a mutator phenotype 27. The IOMM-Lee cell line was initiated from heavily irradiated meningioma resection tissue, though radiation alone does not appear to be the source of a high TMB based upon a mutational signatures analysis that identified 9 single base substitution (SBS) signatures. Source-attributed SBS signatures included SBS1 (to deamination of 5-methylcytosine); SBS30 (to defective base excision repair/NTHL1 mutation); and SBS35 (to platinum therapy) 35,36 (Table S5).

We used sensitive, high accuracy Duplex mtDNA sequencing to take the deepest look to date at meningioma mtDNA variation. Among the 222 IOMM-Lee mtDNA variants identified, most (n=197, 89%) were single nucleotide substitutions (SNVs) with Variant Allele Fractions (VAFs) ranging from 1.0 to <1.0e-4; a majority (191/222, or 86%) were represented by ≤ 10 Duplex sequencing reads. We also identified smaller numbers of 1 bp insertions and deletions (indels), indels of >1 bp, and several more complex variants (Figure 2a, Table S6). Among mtDNA SNVs, three-quarters (76.6%) were G>A/C>T transitions with the remainder including putative oxidative damage-attributed G>T/C>A transversions (23.4%)(Figure 2B). Variants were distributed around the mtDNA genome, with 64% in regions including all 13 mtDNA-encoded genes. Slightly over half (55.2%) of mtDNA coding region variants were predicted to lead to missense insertions, followed by synonymous/no change (29.1%), frameshift (10.4%) and stop-gain (5.2%) changes (Figure 2B, Table S6). The 27 mtDNA SNVs with VAFs >0.99 have all been previously dbSNP-annotated as likely common population variants, as was 5’ regulatory D-loop region variants at mtDNA nucleotides 309–311, a previously reported mtDNA indel/length variation hotspot 37. The first novel mtDNA variants lacking dbSNP annotation had VAFs of ≤0.24, and included indels and complex variants in addition to SNVs (Figure 2B, Table S6).

Figure 2: Mitochondrial DNA variants identified by Duplex DNA sequencing.

Figure 2:

A. Circos Plot showing positions of unique mtDNA gene variants relative to mitochondrial genes, intergenic and regulatory control regions, together with an indication of predicted variant biochemical consequence. B. Molecular spectrum of IOMM-Lee mtDNA single base substitutions, indels and more complex rearrangements.

Radiation and Drug sensitivity profiling:

Radiation and surgery are used to treat many high grade invasive meningiomas, as few effective systemic therapies have been identified 8,38,39. IOMM-Lee displayed a highly reproducible IR dose-survival curve with survival as measured by CFE reduced to 67% at 1 Gy, and to 10% at ~3.9 Gy in ambient oxygen (Figure 3) with cultures effectively radio-sterilized at >7.5 Gy (0 surviving colonies from 1000 plated cells)(Figure 3A). IOMM-Lee could be radio-sensitized by AZD-1390, a potent orally bioavailable ATM kinase inhibitor with a cellular IC50 of 0.78nM 40. At a 1 uM concentration given 1–3 hrs prior to radiation, AZD-1390 strongly suppressed CFE at ≥ 2.5 Gy with cultures radio-sterilized at ≥ 5 Gy. Of note, 1 uM AZD-1390 suppressed the CFE of control(un-irradiated) cultures by 23% (or ~1.3-fold) (Figure 3B).

Figure 3: IOMM-Lee radiation sensitivity and IR sensitization.

Figure 3:

(A) IR dose-dependent suppression of CFE estimated by dilution cloning versus control, unirradiated cell samples. (B) Additional IR dose sensitization following ATM kinase inhibition by a clinical grade inhibitor AZD-1390.

We performed a high throughput screen to identify anti-cancer agents that potently suppressed IOMM-Lee proliferation at low nM IC50 values, and that represented mechanistically distinct drug classes. A screen of 349 agents in an anti-cancer drug library identified 9 such agents (with one duplicate, 2 alternative forms of gemcitabine) that had IC50 values of <10 nM; 8 agents with IC50s of 10–100 nM; and 18 agents with IC50 values of 100–1000 nM (Figure 4, Table S7). The most potent agents with single digit nM IC50 values included the top-ranked NAD biosynthesis inhibitor APO866 (FK866); 4 mitotic kinesin/kinase inhibitors; taxol family microtubule disassembly inhibitors; and 2 formulations of the DNA synthesis inhibitor gemcitabine (Figure 4). Additional drugs with IC50 in the 10–100 nM range inhibited microtubule dynamics, the 20S proteosome and DNA/RNA (the 5FU prodrug floxuridine) or tetrahydrofolate (the DHFR inhibitor methotrexate) synthesis. Agents with IC50 values of 100–1000 nM included similar enzyme, protein and process inhibitors or disruptors (Table S7). We used the most potent drug IC50 values together with the FIMM (Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine) Breeze 2.0 resource to calculate Drug Sensitivity Scores (DSS) that have proven more predictive of drug and small molecule therapeutic potential than AUC or IC50 values alone 17,29,30. Top non-redundant drug candidates with IC50 values of ≤ 100 nM were heavily biased toward high DSS2 scores of > 30 (n=3), with 5 drugs >25 and 15 of 17 overall with a DSS2 score of >20 (Figure 4, Table S7, Figure S1).

Figure 4: Waterfall plot of sensitivity of IOMM-Lee to dose-dependent proliferation suppression by 349 anti-cancer compounds.

Figure 4:

See text for additional detail on screen methods and results.

Discussion

We generated new cellular, genomic and high throughput drug screen data to better characterize IOMM-Lee, a widely used malignant meningioma cell line. Our aim was to provide data types to better inform the use of this widely available, experimentally tractable malignant meningioma disease model. IOMM-Lee gene variants and their likely pathogenicity were newly assessed; we better quantified proliferation rate, colony forming ability and dose-dependent radiation sensitivity; and identified drugs and small molecules that potently suppressed cell proliferation, by different mechanisms of action, at clinically achievable peak serum concentrations 41 and https://drugs.ncats.io/.

IOMM-Lee is unusual among meningiomas and especially Grade 3/malignant and similar meningiomas and cell lines in lacking NF2 mutations. Somatic NF2 loss is found in nearly half of all meningiomas, with heritable NF2 loss leading to autosomal dominant Type II neurofibromatosis, ependymomas and peripheral nerve sheath tumors 16. The loss of NF2/merlin protein function in multiple cellular compartments, where it binds actin and other cytoskeletal proteins to modulate Hippo pathway signaling, cell proliferation and apoptosis 16 is a likely, potent driver of meningioma pathogenesis.

Despite the absence of NF2 variants, IOMM-Lee is variant rich: whole exome sequencing (WES) identified 5,598 variants in 2,437 IOMM-Lee genes when compared with a reference human genome. Among potential drivers of meningioma pathogenesis we found likely pathogenic variants in 9 genes (Table S2 and S10), together with a c.−124C>T 5’ TERT promoter region somatic pathogenic variant associated with upregulated TERT expression in several types of CNS tumors as well as melanoma and bladder cancer. Other genes often mutated in NF2wt meningiomas included ‘likely benign’ variants in AKT1, and a potentially pathogenic variant allele in POLR2A 8. We failed to identify several other variants previously reported in IOMM-Lee, or other meningioma cell lines 34 (Table S2). This may reflect different sources of the IOMM-Lee cultures sequenced, and their analysis a decade apart when our much deeper WES variant dataset reflected substantial advances in both sequencing technology and variant calling.

Our analysis of mtDNA variants in IOMM-Lee was the deepest look to date at mtDNA variation in any meningioma sample: deep, highly accurate Duplex DNA sequencing identified 222 mtDNA sequence variants with variant allele fractions (VAFs) ranging from 1.00 to <9.75e-5 (Table S6). Both heritable and somatic mtDNA variants have been previously documented in meningiomas 42,43 and in many other human adult and pediatric tumor types 44,45. Of note, nearly three-quarters - 73.9%, or 164 - of IOMM-Lee mtDNA variants were detected as single reads in experiments with a median read depth of 5,618, attesting to the high sensitivity and accuracy of Duplex sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA variants of this type are cell-intrinsic ‘bar codes’, and are gaining widespread use for lineage tracing in many additional tumors and non-tumor cell types 46,47.

Ionizing radiation remains an important therapy for many malignant meningiomas. When performed a proof-of-concept experiment using the highly selective and potent ATM kinase inhibitor AZD-1390 40,48 to demonstrate substantial ATM kinase-dependent radiosensitization with a profound reduction in CFE when inhibitor was given prior to IR (Figure 3). Other IOMM-Lee radiosensitizers have been reported with modest (1.5–1.7-fold) IR dose-enhanced killing include maytansine 49; LY294002 50; and YM155 and 17-AAG (tanespimycin).

Several agents that radiosensitize IOMM-Lee also potently inhibited IOMM-Lee cell proliferation at low, clinically achievable drug concentrations. A high throughput screen was used to more systematically search for agents representing mechanistically distinct drug classes.that potently suppressed IOMM-Lee proliferation at nanomolar IC50 concentrations. Agents that were top-ranked included APO866 (FK866), a previously identified NAD biosynthesis inhibitor 51; 4 mitotic kinesin/kinase inhibitors; taxol-family microtubule disassembly inhibitors; and two different derivatives of the DNA synthesis inhibitor gemcitabine (Figure 4, Table S7). Nearly all of our most potent drugs had high DSS2 scores calculated using by the FIMM (Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine) Breeze DSS2 metric, where high scores have proven more predictive of drug and small molecule therapeutic potential than AUC or IC50 values alone 17,29,30. Additional drugs with IC50 values ranging up to 1 micromolar included 24 agents including 11 in the above mechanistic classes, together with additional agents that targeted HDAC and HSP proteins (5 agents), topoisomer- ases or telomerase (4 agents), induced apoptosis or disrupted proteasomal function (4 agents)(Figure 4, Table S7).

Our drug screen results substantially extend prior IOMM-Lee primary HTS screens that encompassed 119 NCI drug library agents 52, and 107 agents in a secondary screen of targeted 46 expressed genes 53. These three screens collectively assessed 575 agents of which 474 were unique. Seventy-one agents were considered highly active, with 3 agents (gemcitabine, KX2–391 and mitoxantrone) identified across all three screens (Table S8). Jungwirth and colleagues further demonstrated that many agents appeared to act by inducing cell cycle arrest and/or induced apoptosis leading to proliferation suppression 52,53. HDAC inhibitors identified by them and by others 54 have also been shown to suppress IOMM-Lee proliferation in culture, and the in vivo growth of patient-derived meningioma organoids 52,53.

IOMM-Lee gained wide use as a malignant meningioma cell line by virtue of capturing key features of meningioma genomics and biology, coupled with ease of culture, engineerability and broad availability. While IOMM-Lee lacks both NF2 and related mutations often found in NF2wt high grade/malignant meningiomas, it can be readily placed on the landscape of meningioma genomic and transcriptional subtypes 9,23. IOMM-Lee has also been shown to serve as a versatile and tractable starting point for many different in vitro and hybrid/in vivo disease modeling protocols including organoids and orthotopic xenografts 12,19. Once promising drug or drug-IR combinations are identified, they can be rapidly explored for potency and synergy across many different modeling formats and protocols using isogenic cell line pairs, allelic series and multigene and mutation combinations; all can be rapidly generated and used to explore new therapeutic targets, pathways and drug combinations. IOMM-Lee NF2-isogenic cell line pairs have already been generated to establish feasibility that display altered, NF2-dependent cellular phenotypes 18 and altered gene expression profiles after expressing NF2wt or L46R mutant protein (e.g., NCBI GEO record GSM1294910).

All of these new uses and directions need to be pursued while recognizing limitations of cell line disease models 55. Individual tumor-derived cell lines are often ‘n-of-1’ experiments accompanied by few or no data to indicate starting genomic features or tumor heterogeneity. This may make it difficult to assess phenotypic ‘drift’ in culture, and the role of ongoing genomic instability as potential experimental confounders. Cell line characterizations have often been done without a patient-specific, non-tumor cell type against which to identify somatic and potentially important germline variants or features, and few experiments fully report key experimental details. For example, it is remarkable that such a large fraction of reported results using IOMM-Lee reached print without clearly identifying source, authentication or contamination data despite the ready availability of these key quality control measures. Many of the above issues can be minimized by using unambiguously authenticated cultures free of contaminating cells and micro-organisms, that are minimally passaged and where important results are verified using replicate, early archival culture samples. Promising new results can then be rapidly and confidently extended in vitro, or in vivo using cell line-initiated xenograft or organoid models12,56–59. Moreover, we are just beginning to use powerful new approaches to explore new results and to identify and test disease-specific mechanistic and therapeutic ideas that draw deeply on a century’s worth of meningioma data and experience 60. Our results and new data should further enable these and additional uses of IOMM-Lee, to better understand meningioma biology with the aim of identifying new and more effective treatments and regimens for high grade/malignant meningiomas.

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (678.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 2

Key points:

  • IOMM-Lee lacks NF2 mutations, though is clearly related to but distinct from many other meningiomas and meningioma cell lines.

  • IOMM-Lee grows rapidly, is comparatively radio-sensitive, and can be suppressed by several mechanistic classes of anti-cancer agents at clinically achievable, sub-micromolar IC50 values with high Drug Sensitivity Scores.

  • The experimental tractability, simplicity and versatility of IOMM-Lee can facilitate analyses of many aspects of meningioma biology and therapeutic development across a wide range of in vitro, high throughput and in vivo xenograft/organoid protocols.

Acknowledgments:

We thank Drs. Jessica Young and Erica Jonlin of the Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle for early discussion of meningioma modeling and for evaluating appropriate, approved use of IOMM-Lee for all reported experiments. Dr. Mariya Sweetwyne (UW Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Seattle, WA) provided help for cell imaging, and members of the lab of Dr. Eleanor Chen (UW Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Seattle, WA) for help to establish a robust WST-1 assay protocol. Colleagues in the Northwest Genome Center, (Department of Genome Sciences, UW Seattle) performed WES and methylation profiling of IOMM-Lee cultures together with initial data analysis.

Support:

This work was supported by R35GM153370 to SRK, and a pilot grant from the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA to RJM Jr. and SRK.

Footnotes

Ethics: Work with IOMM-Lee is not considered human subjects research according to 45 CFR 46.102(e)(1): the resection specimen used to derive IOMM-Lee was obtained and characterized by others; we had no contact with the patient; and the anonymized cell line was purchased from a commercial vendor and distributed with no links to identifying patient information.

*

The 14 Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT: docs.casrai.org/CRediT) have been combined here under 6 broad, equivalent headings.

Data and Code Availability:

BioProject ID: PRJNA1483737

GEO accession #: GSE342164

Methylation data accession #: GSM9924397

Duplex sequencing analysis code: https://github.com/Kennedy-Lab-UW/Duplex-Seq-Pipeline; version 2.1.2

References

  • 1.Vinsland E, Salas SM, Kapustová I, et al. Cell atlas of the developing human meninges reveals a dura origin of meningioma. bioRxivorg. Published online July 13, 2025. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.08.663122 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boetto J, Plu I, Ducos Y, et al. Normal meninges harbor oncogenic somatic mutations in meningioma-driver genes. Acta Neuropathol. 2023;146(6):833–835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pamir MN, Erşen-Danyeli A, Özduman K. Current evidence on the cell of origin of meningiomas disputes the arachnoid cap cell dogma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2026;168(1). doi: 10.1007/s00701-026-06908-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Price M, Ballard C, Benedetti J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2017–2021. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(Supplement_6):vi1–vi85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cushing H. The meningiomas (Dural endotheliomas): Their source, and favoured seats of origin. Brain. 1922;45(2):282–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231–1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sahm F, Aldape KD, Brastianos PK, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 8: Clarifications on molecular risk parameters and recommendations for WHO grading of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2025;27(2):319–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang JZ, Landry AP, Raleigh DR, et al. Meningioma: International Consortium on Meningiomas consensus review on scientific advances and treatment paradigms for clinicians, researchers, and patients. Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(10):1742–1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thirimanne HN, Almiron-Bonnin D, Nuechterlein N, et al. Meningioma transcriptomic landscape demonstrates novel subtypes with regional associated biology and patient outcome. Cell Genom. 2024;4(6):100566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khan M, Hanna C, Findlay M, Lucke-Wold B, Karsy M, Jensen RL. Modeling meningiomas: Optimizing treatment approach. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2023;34(3):479–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jungwirth G, Hanemann CO, Dunn IF, Herold-Mende C. Preclinical models of meningioma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1416:199–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roy S, Zahin F, Nkrumah-Boateng PA, et al. Organoids as next-generation models for investigating intracranial tumours. Mol Brain. Published online May 30, 2026. doi: 10.1186/s13041-026-01317-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ragel BT, Couldwell WT, Gillespie DL, Wendland MM, Whang K, Jensen RL. A comparison of the cell lines used in meningioma research. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(3):295–307; discussion 307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee WH. Characterization of a newly established malignant meningioma cell line of the human brain: IOMM-Lee. Neurosurgery. 1990;27(3):389–395; discussion 396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee WH, Tu YC, Liu MY. Primary intraosseous malignant meningioma of the skull: case report. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(4):505–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Petrilli AM, Fernández-Valle C. Role of Merlin/NF2 inactivation in tumor biology. Oncogene. 2016;35(5):537–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Potdar S, Ianevski F, Ianevski A, et al. Breeze 2.0: an interactive web-tool for visual analysis and comparison of drug response data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(W1):W57–W61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waldt N, Kesseler C, Fala P, et al. Crispr/Cas-based modeling of NF2 loss in meningioma cells. J Neurosci Methods. 2021;356(109141):109141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamazaki S, Ohka F, Hirano M, et al. Newly established patient-derived organoid model of intracranial meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(11):1936–1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kennedy SR, Schmitt MW, Fox EJ, et al. Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(11):2586–2606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoekstra JG, Hipp MJ, Montine TJ, Kennedy SR. Mitochondrial DNA mutations increase in early stage Alzheimer disease and are inconsistent with oxidative damage. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(2):301–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sanchez-Contreras M, Sweetwyne MT, Tsantilas KA, et al. The multi-tissue landscape of somatic mtdna mutations indicates tissue specific accumulation and removal in aging. Elife. 2023;12. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.AACR Project GENIE Consortium. AACR Project GENIE: Powering precision medicine through an international consortium. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(8):818–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nassiri F, Liu J, Patil V, et al. A clinically applicable integrative molecular classification of meningiomas. Nature. 2021;597(7874):119–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703–713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chalmers ZR, Connelly CF, Fabrizio D, et al. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Campbell BB, Light N, Fabrizio D, et al. Comprehensive analysis of hypermutation in human cancer. Cell. 2017;171(5):1042–1056.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun JX, He Y, Sanford E, et al. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(2):e1005965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kytölä S, Vänttinen I, Ruokoranta T, et al. Ex vivo venetoclax sensitivity predicts clinical response in acute myeloid leukemia in the prospective VenEx trial. Blood. 2025;145(4):409–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Becker PS. VenEx precisely predicts ven-aza response. Blood. 2025;145(4):353–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chang TC, Tang W, Koh WJH, et al. Microwell arrays reveal cellular heterogeneity during the clonal expansion of transformed human cells. Technology (Singap World Sci). 2015;3(4):163–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Clark VE, Erson-Omay EZ, Serin A, et al. Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science. 2013;339(6123):1077–1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yesilöz Ü, Kirches E, Hartmann C, et al. Frequent AKT1E17K mutations in skull base meningiomas are associated with mTOR and ERK1/2 activation and reduced time to tumor recurrence. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(8):1088–1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mei Y, Bi WL, Greenwald NF, et al. Genomic profile of human meningioma cell lines. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0178322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alexandrov LB, Kim J, Haradhvala NJ, et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature. 2020;578(7793):94–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Díaz-Gay M, Vangara R, Barnes M, et al. Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(12). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stewart JB, Chinnery PF. The dynamics of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: implications for human health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(9):530–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mensah EO, Ghosh A, Rane A, Kim J, Bhatt PB, Alalade AF. Systemic therapy in the treatment of recurrent or refractory intracranial meningiomas: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2026;49(1). doi: 10.1007/s10143-026-04233-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Assadi M, Juweid ME, Lohmann P, et al. Multidisciplinary management of meningiomas in the era of precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2026;23(7):539–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Durant ST, Zheng L, Wang Y, et al. The brain-penetrant clinical ATM inhibitor AZD1390 radiosensitizes and improves survival of preclinical brain tumor models. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6):eaat1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liston DR, Davis M. Clinically relevant concentrations of anticancer drugs: A guide for nonclinical studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(14):3489–3498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kurtz A, Lueth M, Kluwe L, et al. Somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated tumors. Mol Cancer Res. 2004;2(8):433–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vega A, Salas A, Gamborino E, Sobrido MJ, Macaulay V, Carracedo A. mtDNA mutations in tumors of the central nervous system reflect the neutral evolution of mtDNA in populations. Oncogene. 2004;23(6):1314–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mohamed Yusoff AA. Role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in brain tumors: A mini-review. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015;11(3):535–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kaneva K, O’Halloran K, Triska P, et al. The spectrum of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in pediatric CNS tumors. Neurooncol Adv. 2021;3(1):vdab074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ludwig LS, Lareau CA, Ulirsch JC, et al. Lineage Tracing in Humans Enabled by Mitochondrial Mutations and Single-Cell Genomics. Cell. 2019;176(6):1325–1339.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li S, Wang K, Wang X, Hu Z. Single-cell mitochondrial lineage tracing: Opportunities and challenges. Quant Biol. 2026;14(1):e70018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Al-Zoubi RM, Garada K, Al Huneidi R, et al. ATM inhibitors in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms, clinical development, and future directions. Eur J Med Chem. 2025;300(118137):118137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yu J, Deng J, Ren L, et al. A high content clonogenic survival drug screening identifies maytansine as a potent radiosensitizer for meningiomas. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1557165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gogineni VR, Kargiotis O, Klopfenstein JD, Gujrati M, Dinh DH, Rao JS. RNAi-mediated downregulation of radiation-induced MMP-9 leads to apoptosis via activation of ERK and Akt in IOMM-Lee cells. Int J Oncol. 2009;34(1):209–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Deng Y, Hu B, Miao Y, et al. A nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase inhibitor, FK866, suppresses the growth of anaplastic meningiomas and inhibits immune checkpoint expression by regulating STAT1. Front Oncol. 2022;12:836257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jungwirth G, Yu T, Liu F, et al. Pharmacological landscape of FDA-approved anticancer drugs reveals sensitivities to ixabepilone, romidepsin, omacetaxine, and carfilzomib in aggressive meningiomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29(1):233–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jungwirth G, Cao J, Pan Y, et al. Drug screening on tumor organoids exposes therapeutic vulnerabilities of meningiomas to HDAC1/2i panobinostat. Sci Transl Med. 2026;18(839):eaea3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tatman PD, Wroblewski TH, Fringuello AR, et al. High-throughput screening of epigenetic inhibitors in meningiomas identifies HDAC, G9a, and Jumonji-domain inhibition as potential therapies. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023;84(5):452–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wilding JL, Bodmer WF. Cancer cell lines for drug discovery and development. Cancer Res. 2014;74(9):2377–2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Keiser DJ, Buddy MS, Mojarad-Jabali S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of TEAD inhibition in meningioma identifies MEK and mTOR inhibition as effective combination therapies against resistant lines. bioRxivorg. Published online March 25, 2026. doi: 10.64898/2026.03.20.713271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Youngblood MW, Tripathi S, Najem H, et al. STING activation induces cytotoxic and immune responses in meningiomas via inflammatory cell death pathways. Nat Commun. 2026;17(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69296-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Naewwan N, Talabnin K, Trasaktaweesakul T, et al. Piperlongumine induces meningioma cell death via the ROS-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and the alteration of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. J Neurooncol. 2025;175(3):1091–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Halder A, Maitra A, Attrish D, et al. Molecular profiling of belumosudil-treated IOMM-Lee meningioma cells reveals repurposing potential via enhanced oxidative phosphorylation and ROS-mediated cell death. J Proteome Res. 2025;24(10):4935–4951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ledford H. Teams of AI agents boost speed of research. Nature. Published online May 19, 2026. doi: 10.1038/d41586-026-01596-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.xlsx (678.4KB, xlsx)
Supplement 2

Data Availability Statement

BioProject ID: PRJNA1483737

GEO accession #: GSE342164

Methylation data accession #: GSM9924397

Duplex sequencing analysis code: https://github.com/Kennedy-Lab-UW/Duplex-Seq-Pipeline; version 2.1.2


Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES