Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2026 Sep 23;17:1930808. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1930808

Effects of incubation temperature and in ovo supplementation of glucose and vitamin D3 on eggshell temperature, embryonic mortality, hatchability, chick quality, and post-hatch performance in broiler chickens

Maxwell Ansong Okai 1,2, Francis Kruenti 1, Yendouchamtchié Nadiedjoa 1,3, Clarice Temhoul Maa Maa 1,3, Ahmed Mijiyawa 1,3, Lijing Sun 1, Jumeng Yuan 1, Minghui Wang 1, Kokou Tona 3, Jacob Alhassan Hamidu 4, Benjamin Adjei-Mensah 5, Felix Kwame Amevor 1, Hai Lin 1,*
PMCID: PMC13642018  PMID: 42845887

Abstract

Introduction

Incubation temperature and embryonic nutrient availability are critical determinants of successful embryogenesis and early post-hatch performance in broilers. In ovo feeding has emerged as an effective strategy to enhance embryonic nutrient supply. However, the efficiency of nutrient utilization by developing embryos may be dependent on the incubation conditions. Therefore, the present study investigated the interactive effects of incubation temperature and in ovo supplementation of glucose or vitamin D3 on eggshell temperature, hatchability, chick quality, and post-hatch growth performance of broilers.

Methods

A total of 1,200 fertile eggs obtained from 58-week-old Arbor Acres breeder hens (62 ± 1 g) were incubated in an automatic dual-system incubator (Senjie DZ 47-53) at three machine air temperatures (36.5°C, 37.0°C, or 37.5°C), with relative humidity maintained at 60%. The assigned thermal treatments commenced on embryonic day (ED) 1 and were maintained continuously through ED18, with eggs remaining at their respective incubation temperatures (36.5°C, 37.0°C, or 37.5°C) throughout this incubation period. Each temperature treatment consisted of 400 eggs with four replicates. After candling on ED10, eggs within each incubation temperature treatment were randomly allocated to one of three in ovo treatments: a control group (eggs that were perforated but uninjected), a glucose injection group (5 mg/ml), or a vitamin D3 injection group (25 mg/ml). Thus, each incubation temperature group was subdivided into the three in ovo treatment groups on ED10, allowing the effects of incubation temperature, in ovo treatment, and their interaction to be evaluated. Following completion of the thermal treatment on ED18, all eggs were transferred to the hatcher for completion of embryonic development and hatching. The eggshell temperature was monitored throughout the incubation period, and the embryonic mortality, hatchability, chick quality traits, and post-hatch growth performance were evaluated.

Results

The results showed that the incubation temperature significantly influenced the eggshell temperature, with higher values recorded at 37.0°C and lower values at 36.5°C (p < 0.05). However, in ovo feeding also affected the eggshell temperature, which was generally lower in glucose-treated eggs and highest in vitamin D3-treated eggs (p < 0.05). Hatchability increased with increasing incubation temperature, reaching the highest value at 37.5°C (81.92%). The greatest hatchability (89.86%) was observed in glucose-injected eggs incubated at 37.5°C. In addition, embryonic mortality was significantly higher in the control group, whereas the glucose group exhibited the lowest mortality compared with the vitamin D3 and control groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, incubation at 37.5 C significantly reduced embryonic mortality compared with the 36.5 C and 37.0 C treatments (p < 0.05). The chick hatching weight was highest in the vitamin D3-treated eggs incubated at 37.5 C (51.72 g). The incubation temperature × in ovo feeding interaction significantly improved feed intake, with the highest intake recorded in birds from the glucose-injected eggs incubated at 37.0°C, proceeded by birds from the vitamin D3-injected eggs at the same temperature. Furthermore, for the post-hatch growth traits, broilers originating from eggs incubated at 37.0°C exhibited the greatest final body weight (1,283.52 g) and body weight gain (1,234.80 g; p < 0.05) at 42 days of age.

Conclusion

Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the incubation temperature significantly influenced eggshell temperature, whereas in ovo glucose and vitamin D3 administration at 37.5°C improved hatchability, whereas incubation at 37.0°C supported superior post-hatch growth performance. The combined optimization of incubation temperature and embryonic nutrient supplementation may therefore enhance the embryonic response, hatchery efficiency, and broiler production outcomes.

Keywords: eggshell temperature, glucose, in ovo feeding, incubation temperature, post-hatch performance, vitamin D3

Introduction

Incubation conditions play a pivotal role in determining the embryonic development, hatchability, and subsequent performance of broiler chickens (Yalcin et al., 2022). Among these factors, temperature is considered as the most critical environmental determinant of embryonic metabolism and development during incubation (Bednarczyk et al., 2016; Decuypere et al., 2001). Even slight deviations from the optimal incubation temperature can alter the embryonic growth rate, organ development, and chick quality at hatch, thereby affecting post-hatch performance (Decuypere et al., 2001). In addition to the incubation conditions, the availability of nutrients to the developing embryo is another key factor influencing embryogenesis and early chick viability (Tona et al., 2022; Yalcin et al., 2022). In recent years, in ovo feeding has received considerable attention as a nutritional strategy aimed at enhancing the nutrient supply available to the developing embryo. This technique involves the direct administration of nutrients into the egg during incubation to support embryonic growth and improve chick quality at hatch. Previous studies have shown that early nutrient supplementation through in ovo feeding can influence gene expression, enhance organ development, and improve early physiological functions in poultry embryos (Bednarczyk et al., 2016). Therefore, in ovo feeding has been increasingly explored as a method to improve hatchability and post-hatch performance in broiler production systems.

The environmental conditions during incubation may also interact with embryonic nutrition. In poultry science, the influence of incubation environment on embryonic development and chick quality has been extensively investigated. Studies have demonstrated that both incubation temperature and early in ovo nutrient supplementation can significantly affect the hatchability characteristics and overall chick health (Zhang et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2023). In ovo supplementation is designed to enhance the utilization of nutrients within fertile eggs and thereby support embryogenesis, hatchability, and post-hatch growth. However, the metabolic utilization of these nutrients by the developing embryo may be influenced by the incubation temperature, which regulates the embryonic metabolic rate and physiological activity (Foye et al., 2006; Zhai et al., 2011).

Among the various nutrients investigated for in ovo supplementation, glucose and vitamin D3 are of particular interest due to their important physiological roles during embryonic development. Glucose serves as a readily available energy source that supports the high metabolic demands of the developing embryo, especially during the later stages of incubation when the energy requirements increase (Moran, 2007). However, vitamin D3 plays a fundamental role in calcium and phosphorus metabolism, skeletal formation, immune regulation, and overall embryonic development (Di Rosa et al., 2011; Hrabia et al., 2023). Despite their recognized biological importance, there is limited information available regarding how the effectiveness of these nutrients may be influenced by incubation temperature conditions.

Incubation temperature and embryonic nutrient availability are closely interconnected determinants of embryonic development. Temperature regulates the embryonic metabolic rate, oxygen demand, tissue development, and the timing of developmental transitions, whereas in ovo nutrient supplementation directly modifies the availability of substrates or micronutrients to the developing embryo (Agyekum et al., 2022). However, the physiological response to an in ovo nutrient may be dependent on the thermal environment in which embryonic metabolism occurs. A temperature that alters metabolic activity may change the rate at which an injected nutrient is utilized, while additional nutrient availability may, in turn, influence embryonic metabolic activity and heat production. Eggshell temperature provides a noninvasive indicator of the thermal relationship between the embryo and its surrounding environment and can therefore provide additional information beyond the programmed machine temperature (Kpodo and Proszkowiec-Weglarz, 2023). This interaction is particularly relevant during the middle and late stages of incubation, when the embryonic metabolic activity increases and the embryo becomes progressively more dependent on efficient nutrient mobilization and utilization (Tona et al., 2022). Glucose can provide an immediately available energy substrate, whereas vitamin D3 is involved in calcium and phosphorus metabolism and skeletal development (Girgis et al., 2015; Okai et al., 2026). Therefore, the physiological consequences of these supplements may not be uniform across incubation temperatures. Examining the incubation temperature and in ovo supplementation simultaneously may consequently provide a more informative assessment of embryonic responses than evaluating either factor independently. Based on this, the present study evaluated whether the effects of glucose or vitamin D3 supplementation on eggshell temperature, embryonic survival, hatchability, chick quality, and subsequent growth performance differed according to the incubation temperature.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shandong Agricultural University (Taian, China) and were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Experimental Animals issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China.

Preparation and sterilization of in ovo feed supplements

All equipment used for the preparation and administration of the in ovo feed supplements was sterilized in a Panasonic MLS-3781 autoclave and subsequently dried in an Electric Blast Drying Oven (Shanghai-Heng Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) prior to use. The glucose solution was prepared by dissolving glucose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to obtain a concentration of 5 mg/ml. For the vitamin D3 solution, vitamin D3 was first dissolved in anhydrous ethanol to enhance solubility, after which PBS was added to obtain a final concentration of 25 mg/ml. The glucose and vitamin D3 concentrations were selected based on previously evaluated in ovo administration protocols using the same route and comparable experimental conditions. Glucose was prepared at 5 mg/ml and vitamin D3 at 25 mg/ml, and 0.2 ml of each respective solution was administered per egg. Thus, on incubation day 10, each egg was injected with 0.2 ml of the respective supplement through the shell overlying the air sac at the blunt end of the egg using an automatic syringe at egg level, as described by Kuka et al. (2023). The injection was performed on a UV-sterilized table. A small perforation was made through the eggshell over the air sac to facilitate insertion of the syringe, and the injection site was immediately sealed with wax after administration. The eggs were then returned to their respective incubators. These concentrations were selected as predefined experimental doses rather than as putative optimal doses. The present experiment was designed to investigate the interaction between incubation temperature and embryonic supplementation; therefore, dose optimization or dose–response relationships are beyond the scope of the present study. Furthermore, the fertilized eggs were incubated in an automatic dual-system incubator (Senjie DZ 47-53) at three machine air temperatures—36.5°C, 37.0°C, or 37.5°C—with relative humidity maintained at 60% from embryonic day (ED) 1 to ED18.

On ED10, eggs assigned to the treatment groups were injected with 0.2 ml of the respective solutions through the air sac using 1-ml sterile disposable syringes. ED10 was selected based on previous studies demonstrating effective embryonic nutrient uptake during mid-incubation while minimizing embryo injury risk (Dayan et al., 2023; Okai. et al., 2025a). All injections were performed on a UV-sterilized work surface that had been disinfected with sterile saline and anhydrous alcohol to maintain aseptic conditions. After injection, the perforation sites were sealed with sterile wax, and the eggs were returned to their respective incubators for further incubation.

Experimental design

A total of 1,200 fertile broiler breeder eggs (62 ± 1 g) were obtained from a 58-week-old Arbor Acres breeder flock. The eggs were randomly allocated to three incubation temperature treatments—36.5°C, 37.0°C, and 37.5°C—with 400 eggs assigned to each temperature treatment. The incubation temperatures were selected to represent a conventional reference condition and experimentally controlled lower-temperature conditions. The 37.5°C treatment represented the conventional machine air incubation temperature used as the reference condition, whereas 37.0°C and 36.5°C were included to generate a controlled thermal gradient for evaluating temperature-dependent responses to in ovo supplementation. The purpose of including these lower temperatures was not to recommend them for commercial hatchery use but to determine whether the effects of glucose and vitamin D3 supplementation were modified by the thermal environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that the broiler embryonic development, eggshell temperature, hatching characteristics, and post-hatch performance can respond to experimentally imposed differences in incubation temperature (Hamidu et al., 2018; Agyekum et al., 2022; Yalcin et al., 2022). Thus, the three temperature levels enabled the temperature°×°in ovo supplementation interaction to be evaluated within a controlled factorial design. Within each incubation temperature, the eggs were distributed among four independent replicate groups, with each replicate maintained in a separate automatic dual-system incubator (Senjie series DZ47-53, Shanghai, China; capacity, 528 eggs). Relative humidity was maintained at 60%, and the assigned incubation temperature was maintained from ED1 to ED21. On ED18, the eggs were transferred to the hatching compartment of the same incubator, which was maintained at the same temperature (36.5°C, 37.0°C, and 37.5°C) until hatch.

On ED10, following candling, the eggs within each incubation temperature treatment were randomly assigned to one of three in ovo feeding treatments: control (eggs that were perforated and handled similarly, but were not injected), glucose (eggs that received a glucose solution), or vitamin D3 (eggs that received a vitamin D3 solution). Thus, the experiment followed a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement consisting of three incubation temperatures and three in ovo feeding treatments. Each of the nine temperatures × in ovo feeding combinations contained four independent replicates, resulting in a total of 36 experimental units.

The replicate, rather than the individual egg, was considered the experimental unit because eggs within a replicate shared the same incubation and treatment conditions and therefore could not be considered statistically independent observations. Accordingly, measurements obtained from individual eggs or chicks within the same replicate were summarized as a replicate-level mean before statistical analysis.

Eggshell temperature was monitored from ED1 to ED20. The eggs used for eggshell temperature measurements were distributed among the corresponding replicate groups. For each incubation day, eggshell temperature measurements obtained from eggs belonging to the same replicate were averaged, and the resulting replicate mean was used as the statistical observation.

At hatch, 10 chicks were randomly selected from each treatment group for assessment of the chick quality traits, including body weight, chick length, and shank length. Because multiple chicks originated from the same experimental replicate, measurements obtained from chicks belonging to the same replicate were averaged, and the replicate mean was used for statistical analysis. Thus, individual eggs and chicks were not treated as independent experimental observations.

This experimental structure ensured that the four replicates within each temperature × in ovo feeding combination represented four independent experimental units for statistical analysis.

Animal management

The chicks were housed in battery cages measuring 38 cm in width (W) × 47 cm in length (L) × 35 cm in height (H), with 10 birds per cage. The chicks were maintained under the same management conditions throughout the post-hatch experimental period. At hatch, 10 chicks were randomly selected from each of the nine treatment combinations (three incubation temperatures × three in ovo treatments), resulting in a total of 90 chicks for the assessment of chick quality traits, including body weight, chick length, and shank length. The experimental facility was maintained at a temperature of 23 ± 2°C and a relative humidity of 65% ± 3% throughout the study period. The birds were provided ad libitum access to a commercial starter and finisher diet according to the nutrient requirements recommended by the National Research Council (NRC, 1994), containing 23% crude protein and 3,000 kcal/kg metabolizable energy. Fresh drinking water was supplied ad libitum through nipple drinkers. The Gumboro and first Newcastle vaccines were administered to the birds on days 7 and 14, respectively, but no medications were provided.

Measurement of eggshell temperature

With a human infrared camera (TP160 Serno: 900075013198), the eggshell temperature was measured at the equator of 80 randomly selected eggs from each subgroup at eight eggs each from the upper, middle, and lower positions of each horizontal rack in the incubators. Furthermore, the eggshell temperature of each egg was measured at 6:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m (Agyekum et al., 2022).

Hatching events (external pipping and hatching times)

The external pipping and hatching times were measured from the 19th day of incubation by examining the remaining eggs at each of the three incubation temperatures at intervals of 6 h (6 a.m., 12 p.m., 6 p.m., and 12 a.m.). After each check, the eggs or chicks were marked to help distinguish them from others that would pip or hatch at the subsequent check 6 h later. This helped to prevent confusion regarding which chicks were pipping or hatching.

Measurement of embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick quality parameters

Embryonic mortality was calculated as the percentage of fertile eggs in which the embryo dies during incubation before hatching. The hatchability of fertile eggs was calculated as the ratio of chicks hatched to the number of fertile eggs, expressed as a percentage. A total of 90 chicks from each treatment group were randomly evaluated for their body weight, body length, and shank length. The chick hatching weight was measured immediately after the chicks were pulled from the hatcher with an Ohaus External Chemical Balance (SP602AM; 165 mm × 142 mm, 2,000 g; resolution, 0.1 g). A pair of dividers and a ruler were used to measure chick length, i.e., the distance between the tip of the beak and the end of the middle toe, and shank length, i.e., the distance from the tibiotarsal–tarsometatarsal joint to the pad between the third and fourth toes (Agyekum et al., 2022).

Measurement of post-hatch growth traits

At 42 days of age, the individual body weight of chicks in each cage was taken with the Ohaus External Chemical Balance. The feed intake and body weight gain (BWG) were recorded weekly and were used to calculate the feed conversion ratio (FCR) using the following formula:

Feed intake=Total feed supplied–Total feed left
Body weight gain=Final body weight–iInitial body weight
FCR=Total feed IintakeTotal body weight gain 

Statistical analysis

The experiment was analyzed as a 3 × 3 factorial design using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with incubation temperature and in ovo feeding treatment as the two fixed factors. Incubation temperature included three levels (36.5°C, 37.0°C, and 37.5°C), and the in ovo feeding treatment included three levels (control, glucose, and vitamin D3). The replicate was considered as the experimental unit. Therefore, individual eggs or chicks within a replicate were not considered independent observations. All measurements obtained from eggs or chicks within the same replicate were first averaged to obtain a single replicate-level observation before statistical analysis. Thus, each temperature × in ovo feeding combination contributed four independent replicate observations, resulting in 36 experimental observations for the factorial analysis.

The statistical model was:

Yijk=μ+TEMPi+IOFj+(TEMP×IOF)ij+eijk

where Yijk is the response variable for replicate k receiving incubation temperature i and in ovo feeding treatment j; μ is the overall mean; TEMPi is the fixed effect of incubation temperature; IOFj is the fixed effect of in ovo feeding treatment; (TEMP × IOF)ij is the interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding treatment; and eijk is the random residual error associated with replicate k within the corresponding temperature × in ovo feeding treatment combination.

The analysis was performed using the General Linear Model procedure in Minitab version 19. When significant main effects or interactions were detected (p < 0.05), the treatment means were separated using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test.

Results

Effects of eggshell temperature pre in ovo feeding

Prior to in ovo feeding, the eggshell temperature was significantly influenced by the incubation temperature (p < 0.05). As shown in Table 1, the eggshell temperature increased progressively as the incubation temperature increased from 36.5°C to 37.0°C and 37.5°C during the early incubation period (ED1–ED9). During the early incubation period (ED1–ED9), the eggshell temperature generally reflected the programmed incubation temperature, although day-to-day fluctuations were observed. As shown in Table 1, incubation period, although the overall pattern remained associated with the machine-set incubation temperatures.

Table 1.

Effects of incubation temperature on eggshell temperature before in ovo feeding.

Incubation day Temperature (°C) SEM p-value
36.5 37.0 37.5
ED1 33.88c 34.72b 36.03a 0.0907 <0.0001
ED2 34.56c 35.97b 36.83a 0.0969 <0.0001
ED3 34.57c 36.58b 37.86a 0.0613 <0.0001
ED4 35.48c 36.84b 37.48a 0.0830 <0.0001
ED5 35.55c 36.41b 37.36a 0.0763 <0.0001
ED6 36.06c 36.68b 37.38a 0.0692 <0.0001
ED7 35.74c 36.87b 37.55a 0.0636 <0.0001
ED8 36.23c 36.73b 37.33a 0.0678 <0.0001
ED9 35.59c 36.50b 36.98a 0.0742 <0.0001
ED10 35.71b 36.04b 36.70a 0.113 <0.0001

Means with different lowercase letters in a row are significantly different. Probability value (p < 0.05).

ED, experimental/incubation day; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Effects of eggshell temperature post in ovo feeding

After in ovo feeding, the eggshell temperature was significantly affected by treatment during several stages of incubation. As presented in Table 2, in ovo feeding significantly influenced the eggshell temperature on incubation days 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, and 20 (p < 0.05). A significant interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding was also observed across the incubation period. At 36.5°C, the eggshell temperature was generally lowest in the control group, intermediate in the glucose-injected eggs, and highest in the vitamin D3-injected eggs. At 37.0°C, eggs that received vitamin D3 injection exhibited the lowest eggshell temperature, followed by the glucose-injected eggs, whereas the control group recorded the highest eggshell temperature values.

Table 2.

Effects of incubation temperature on eggshell temperature after in ovo feeding.

Factor Feeding group Incubation day
ED11 ED12 ED13 ED14 ED15 ED16 ED17 ED18 ED19 ED20
In ovo feeding CON 36.52 36.63a 36.73 36.64ab 36.33 36.74 36.75ab 36.39 35.78b 35.58ab
GLU 36.30 36.11b 36.70 36.48b 36.34 36.57 36.57b 36.57 35.10c 35.11b
VIT 36.48 36.31ab 36.69 37.84a 36.34 36.69 36.84a 36.43 36.32a 35.79a
SEM 0.0814 0.109 0.0623 0.0643 0.0584 0.0691 0.0679 0.0720 1.33 0.129
Incubation temperature (°C) 36.5 35.31c 35.03c 36.00c 36.59b 35.53c 35.52c 35.50b 35.46c 35.24b 35.54
37.0 37.31a 37.28a 36.88b 37.23a 36.42b 37.10b 37.42a 36.66b 36.38a 35.64
37.5 36.86b 36.74b 37.24a 37.14a 37.08a 37.37a 37.30c 37.27a 35.38b 35.30
SEM 0.0814 0.109 0.0623 0.0643 0.0584 0.0691 0.0679 0.0720 1.33 0.129
In ovo feeding × incubation temperature (°C) CON*36.5 34.76e 34.62c 35.76d 35.65c 35.38e 35.38c 35.44c 35.17d 34.78bc 35.10c
CON*37.0 37.83a 38.02a 37.20ab 37.23ab 36.57cd 37.46a 37.50a 36.87b 36.79a 36.32ab
CON*37.5 36.96bc 37.26ab 37.23ab 37.05ab 37.05ab 37.38ab 37.28ab 37.15ab 35.16bc 35.32bc
GLU*36.5 35.43d 35.02c 36.14d 35.45c 35.82e 35.71c 35.53c 35.64d 34.33c 35.09c
GLU*37.0 37.06b 36.88b 36.79bc 37.15ab 36.41cd 36.85b 37.40a 36.89b 35.38b 34.90c
GLU*37.5 36.41c 36.43b 37.18ab 36.85b 36.85bc 37.24ab 36.79b 37.19ab 35.62b 35.33bc
VIT*36.5 35.76d 35.44c 36.12d 35.68c 35.39e 35.71c 35.44c 35.59d 36.60a 36.44a
VIT*37.0 37.04bc 36.96b 36.63c 37.31ab 36.28d 36.85b 37.33a 36.22c 36.98a 35.70abc
VIT*37.5
SEM
36.70bc
0.141
36.53b
0.189
37.31a
0.108
37.51a
0.111
37.35a
0.101
37.51a
0.120
37.76a
0.118
37.48a
0.125
35.37b
1.78
35.24c
0.223
p-value IOF 0.130 0.005 0.902 0.001 0.949 0.204 0.022 0.192 <0.0001 0.001
Temp <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.159
IOF*Temp <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.045 <0.0001 0.003 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001

Means with different lowercase letters in a column are significantly different.

ED, experimental/incubation day; CON, control; GLU, glucose; VIT, vitamin; IOF, in ovo feeding; Temp, temperature; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Bold formatting in the table indicates statistically significant differences among the corresponding means, as determined by the statistical analysis (p < 0.05).

At 37.5°C, the eggshell temperature during the mid-incubation period (days 11–17) was generally lowest in the glucose-injected eggs, intermediate in the control eggs, and highest in the vitamin D3-injected eggs. However, during the late incubation (days 18–20), the eggshell temperature was lowest in the control eggs, followed by the vitamin D3-injected eggs, while the glucose-injected eggs exhibited the highest values.

Effects of in ovo feeding and incubation temperature on the external pipping and hatching times

The results showed that the external pipping and hatching times were significantly affected by the incubation temperature (p < 0.05) (Figures 1, 2). The external pipping time increased as the incubation temperature decreased. Eggs incubated at 37.5°C exhibited the shortest pipping duration (450–532 h), followed by those incubated at 37.0°C (455–569 h), whereas eggs incubated at 36.5°C required the longest time (458–570 h) to reach external pipping. In ovo feeding treatments also influenced the pipping time. The eggs injected with glucose (451–560 h) or vitamin D3 (456–569 h) reached external pipping earlier than the control eggs (458–570 h). A significant interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding was observed. Eggs incubated under 37.5°C with glucose injection exhibited the shortest pipping duration, followed by 37.0°C × glucose and 36.5°C × glucose treatments. However, non-injected eggs generally required longer durations to reach pipping.

Figure 1.

Five line graphs display external pipping counts against incubation period in hours. Figures 1A, 1B, and 1C show single-temperature results at 37.5, 37, and 36.5 degrees Celsius, respectively. Figure 1D compares three groups (CON, GLU, VIT) at one temperature, while Figure 1E overlays all group and temperature combinations, each represented by a different colored line.

(A–C) Effects of incubation temperature on external pipping at 37.5°C (A), 37°C (B), and 36.5°C (C). (D, E) Effects of in ovo feeding (D) and the interaction between temperature and in ovo feeding (E) on external pipping. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (p < 0.05).

Figure 2.

Five line graphs labeled A to E display the number of eggs hatched over time at different temperatures and treatment groups. Graphs A, B, and C show hatching trends at 37.0, 37.5, and 36.5 degrees Celsius respectively, each with differing peak times. Graph D compares control, glucose, and vitamin treatments at 37.0 degrees Celsius, while graph E overlays results by temperature and treatment group for comparison. All axes are labeled “Number of eggs hatched” and “Hatching Time (Hours).”

(A–C) Effects of incubation temperature on hatching time at 37.5°C (A), 37°C (B), and 36.5°C (C). (D, E) Effects of in ovo feeding (D) and the interaction between temperature and in ovo feeding (E) on hatching time. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (p < 0.05).

In addition, the hatching time was also significantly influenced by the incubation temperature (p < 0.05). Eggs incubated at 36.5°C required the longest time to hatch (529–570 h), followed by those incubated at 37.0°C (480–569 h), whereas eggs incubated at 37.5°C hatched earlier. In ovo feeding affected the hatching time as well. Eggs injected with glucose hatched earlier (480–560 h) than those injected with vitamin D3 (456–569 h), while control eggs required the longest time to hatch (458–570 h). A significant interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding was observed for hatching time, indicating that glucose injection combined with a higher incubation temperature shortened the duration to hatch, whereas control eggs generally exhibited longer hatching periods.

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on embryonic mortality and hatchability

The combined effects of incubation temperature and in ovo feeding on hatchability are presented in Figure 3. A significant interaction (p < 0.05) was observed between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding treatments. Across feeding treatments, hatchability increased with increasing incubation temperature. The highest hatchability (89.86%) was recorded in glucose-injected eggs incubated at 37.5°C, whereas the lowest hatchability (48.33%) occurred in vitamin D3-injected eggs incubated at 36.5°C. In addition, embryonic mortality was significantly higher in the control group compared with the glucose and vitamin D3 groups. However, the glucose group exhibited significantly lower embryonic mortality than both the vitamin D3 and control groups (p < 0.05). With regard to the effects of temperature, the 36.5°C group recorded significantly higher embryonic mortality compared with the 37.0°C and 37.5°C groups (p < 0.05), whereas the 37.5°C group showed the lowest embryonic mortality among all treatment groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Six bar graphs display hatchability and embryonic mortality percentages based on treatments (control, glucose, vitamin), temperature levels, and their interaction groups in an experimental study. Graphs use different colors for each group, show statistical differences with letters, and indicate significant differences (P < 0.0001). Upper row shows hatchability, lower row shows embryonic mortality, each measured by treatment, temperature, and treatment-temperature interaction group.

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on embryonic mortality and hatchability. Means with different lowercase letters in a column are significantly different. CON, control; GLU, glucose; VIT, vitamin; IOF, in ovo feeding; Temp, temperature; SEM, standard error of the mean. Probability value (p < 0.05).

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on chick quality

The chick quality traits were significantly influenced by the interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 3. At 36.5°C, chicks hatched from control eggs exhibited the greatest body weight, followed by those from the vitamin D3-injected eggs, while the lowest body weight was observed in chicks from the glucose-injected eggs. At 37.0°C, chicks from the vitamin D3-injected eggs had the highest body weight, followed by those from the glucose-injected eggs and the control eggs. Chick length was highest in chicks from the control eggs (18.76 cm), followed by those from the vitamin D3-treated eggs (17.96 cm), and lowest in the glucose-treated eggs (17.28 cm). Shank length was highest in chicks from the glucose-injected eggs (1.84 cm), intermediate in chicks from the vitamin D3-treated eggs (1.72 cm), and lowest in the control group (1.70 cm).

Table 3.

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on chick quality.

Factor Feeding group Chick weight (g) Chick length (cm) Shank length (cm)
In ovo feeding CON 48.61 18.13 2.14
GLU 46.88 17.92 1.81
VIT 48.91 18.51 1.76
SEM 0.992 0.183 0.134
Incubation temperature (°C) 36.5 46.31b 18.55 2.25a
37.0 48.17ab 18.00 1.75b
37.5 49.92a 18.01 1.71b
SEM 0.992 0.183 0.134
In ovo feeding × incubation temperature (°C) CON*36.5 47.26a 17.56bcd 1.64b
CON*37.0 48.48a 18.76abc 1.70b
CON*37.5 50.10a 18.08abcd 2.08a
GLU*36.5 45.40a 19.08a 1.76b
GLU*37.0 47.30a 17.28d 1.84b
GLU*37.5 47.94a 17.40cd 1.82b
VIT*36.5 46.26a 19.02a 1.72b
VIT*37.0 48.74a 17.96abcd 1.72b
VIT*37.5 51.72a
1.72
18.54abcd
0.317
1.84b
0.232
SEM
p-value IOF 0.307 0.085 0.106
Temp 0.047 0.061 0.012
IOF*Temp 0.024 <0.0001 0.012

Means with different lowercase letters in a column are significantly different. Probability value (p < 0.05).

CON, control; GLU, glucose; VIT, vitamin; IOF, in ovo feeding; Temp, temperature; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on post-hatch performance

Post-hatch growth performance was evaluated through body weight, BWG, feed intake, and FCR at 42 days of age (Table 4). In ovo feeding significantly affected the feed intake, with glucose-treated birds showing higher feed intake than the control birds, whereas the vitamin D3-treated birds were intermediate. However, in ovo treatment did not significantly affect the body weight, BWG, or FCR. The incubation temperature significantly affected post-hatch performance. Birds originating from eggs incubated at 37.0°C had the greatest body weight (1,283.52 g), BWG (1,234.80 g), and feed intake (1,864.52 g), whereas birds from the 36.5°C treatment had the lowest values for these traits. The interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo treatment was significant for feed intake, with the highest value observed in the glucose × 37.0°C treatment (1,968.95 g). These findings indicate that the incubation temperature exerted a stronger influence on the overall post-hatch growth than the in ovo treatments, although the interaction between the two factors affected the feed intake.

Table 4.

Effects of incubation temperature and early in ovo feeding on post-hatch performance.

Factor Feeding group Growth trait
Body weight (g) Feed intake (g) Body weight gain (g) FCR
In ovo feeding CON 1,192.14 1,570.10b 1,143.71 1.38
GLU 1,232.65 1,803.01a 1,185.11 1.55
VIT 1,232.66 1,697.01ab 1,184.23 1.43
SEM 36.4 50.6 36.4 0.0742
Incubation temperature (°C) 36.5 1,104.88b 1,490.88b 1,058.58b 1.43
37.0 1,283.52a 1,864.52a 1,234.80a 1.51
37.5 1,269.05a 1,714.72a 1,219.67a 1.41
SEM 36.4 50.6 36.4 0.0742
In ovo feeding × incubation temperature (°C) CON*36.5 1,101.69 1,337.48c 1,054.43 1.27
CON*37.0 1,279.65 1,671.17abc 1,229.55 1.36
CON*37.5 1,195.09 1,701.63abc 1,147.15 1.50
GLU*36.5 1,105.72 1,645.92abc 1,060.22 1.62
GLU*37.0 1,291.11 1,968.95a 1,242.37 1.59
GLU*37.5 1,301.11 1,794.15ab 1,252.63 1.44
VIT*36.5 1,107.24 1,489.23bc 1,060.98 1.40
VIT*37.0 1,279.79 1,953.44a 1,232.49 1.58
VIT*37.5 1,310.94 1,648.36abc 1,259.22 1.31
SEM 63.1 87.6 63.1 0.128
p-value IOF 0.669 0.015 0.663 0.274
Temp 0.004 <0.0001 0.005 0.638
IOF*Temp 0.862 0.036 0.879 0.435

Means with different lowercase letters in a column are significantly different. Probability value (p < 0.05).

FCR, feed conversion ratio; CON, control; GLU, glucose; VIT, vitamin; IOF, in ovo feeding; Temp, temperature; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Discussion

Eggshell temperature is a critical indicator of embryonic metabolic activity and thermal balance during incubation, and it strongly influences embryonic development, hatchability, chick quality, and subsequent growth performance (Wijnen et al., 2020; Okai et al., 2025b). Therefore, maintaining an optimal thermal environment throughout incubation is essential for successful hatchery outcomes. In the present study, the eggshell temperature prior to in ovo feeding showed an irregular but overall declining pattern across incubation days regardless of the incubation temperature applied. This trend likely reflects the dynamic balance between embryonic heat production and heat dissipation during early embryogenesis, when the metabolic heat production is still relatively low and embryos remain highly sensitive to environmental temperature fluctuations. Following in ovo feeding, a significant interaction between incubation temperature and nutrient supplementation was observed for eggshell temperature throughout the incubation period. Specifically, glucose supplementation combined with incubation at 37.5°C tended to reduce the eggshell temperature during several incubation days. Eggshell temperature typically reflects the embryo metabolic rate and the capacity of the incubator environment to dissipate metabolic heat (Uddin and Hamidu, 2014). The irregular fluctuations observed in the present study suggest that both nutrient availability and incubation temperature influenced the embryonic metabolic activity. Although in ovo feeding is intended to enhance the nutrient supply to the developing embryo, it may also alter metabolic processes and thereby influence eggshell temperature (Zhai et al., 2011). Previous studies reported increases in eggshell temperature following in ovo injection of nutrients such as vitamin D3 and amino acids (Fatemi et al., 2020; Molenaar et al., 2010). The gradual reduction in eggshell temperature observed during the late incubation phase (days 17–20) among in ovo-fed eggs may indicate a reduction in embryonic metabolic heat production as embryos approach hatching and shift physiological priorities toward pipping and hatching processes (Uni et al., 2005). Although 37.5°C is widely used as a conventional machine air incubation temperature, the present findings should not be interpreted as an indication that 36.5°C or 37.0°C is a preferable commercial incubation setting. Rather, the lower temperatures were included as experimental conditions to determine whether the response to in ovo supplementation changes when the thermal environment is altered. This distinction is important because machine air temperature does not directly represent embryonic temperature. As embryonic metabolism increases during incubation, metabolic heat production contributes to the eggshell temperature, making eggshell temperature a useful physiological indicator of the thermal conditions experienced by the embryo. The present study therefore combined programmed machine temperature with eggshell temperature measurements to distinguish the experimental thermal treatment from the physiological thermal response of the developing embryo. The observed temperature × in ovo treatment interactions further support the value of examining these factors simultaneously rather than considering 37.5°C as an isolated experimental condition.

The results obtained in this study also demonstrated a significant interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding on hatchability. Hatchability generally increased with increasing incubation temperature, with the highest value observed in the glucose-injected eggs incubated at 37.5°C. Glucose serves as an immediate energy source for developing embryos, particularly during the late stages of incubation when the glycogen reserves may become limited (Zhang et al., 2016). The improved hatchability observed in glucose-injected eggs may therefore be associated with enhanced embryonic energy availability during critical developmental stages. Similar improvements in hatchability following in ovo nutrient supplementation have been reported previously (Li et al., 2016; Molenaar et al., 2010). However, the results across studies remain inconsistent. For example, Ipek et al. (2004) reported no significant effect of glucose injection on hatchability, whereas Cardinal et al. (2015) and Retes et al. (2018) observed reduced hatchability following carbohydrate supplementation. Such discrepancies may arise from differences in the incubation temperature, the timing and site of injection, the dosage of the injected nutrients, and the genetic background of the embryos used in different studies (Salmanzadeh, 2012; Alves et al., 2020). However, vitamin D3 injection at the lowest incubation temperature (36.5°C) resulted in a markedly reduced hatchability. This outcome may reflect a metabolic mismatch between the physiological requirements of embryonic development and the prevailing thermal environment. Vitamin D3 plays an essential role in calcium and phosphorus metabolism and is critical for skeletal mineralization during embryonic development (Kovacs and Ward, 2026). However, its biological activity depends on enzymatic conversion and adequate metabolic activity within the embryo. Lower incubation temperatures may reduce the embryonic metabolic rate, potentially impairing vitamin D3 activation and subsequent mineral metabolism. As a result, skeletal development and the overall embryonic viability may be compromised, thereby increasing embryonic mortality and reducing hatchability.

In ovo feeding with vitamin D3 improves chick quality and growth and increases hatchability because early nutrient supplementation can enhance cell proliferation, organogenesis, and nutrient uptake (Okai et al., 2026). This is consistent with the results obtained in the present study. The chick quality parameters were also significantly influenced by the interaction between incubation temperature and in ovo feeding. Chick weight increased progressively with increasing incubation temperature across treatments, suggesting improved embryonic growth under warmer incubation conditions within the tested range. Previous studies have similarly reported that the incubation temperature affects chick quality traits such as body weight, chick length, and structural development (Hamidu et al., 2018). Although chick length exhibited some variability across treatments, the general pattern of increased body weight at higher incubation temperatures aligns with earlier findings indicating that moderate increases in incubation temperature can enhance the embryonic growth rate (Lourens et al., 2005). Shank length, which is widely regarded as an indicator of skeletal development, displayed a temperature-dependent increase in the control and vitamin D3 groups, while irregular patterns were observed in glucose-fed chicks. Enhanced skeletal growth at optimal temperatures may reflect improved mineral deposition and bone formation during embryogenesis (Maatjens et al., 2014). The relatively consistent increase in shank length in the vitamin D3 group may be linked to the role of vitamin D3 in regulating calcium absorption and bone mineralization. However, the fluctuating pattern observed in the glucose-injected groups may indicate an altered nutrient partitioning between soft tissue growth and skeletal development.

The post-hatch responses further demonstrated that the effect of incubation temperature was dependent on the specific trait evaluated and, for feed intake, on the in ovo treatment. A significant incubation temperature × in ovo feeding interaction was observed for feed intake, with the highest intake observed in birds originating from glucose-injected eggs incubated at 37.0°C, followed by those from vitamin D3-injected eggs at the same temperature. This interaction indicates that the effect of embryonic nutrient exposure on subsequent feed consumption was not uniform across incubation temperatures. However, the interaction was not significant for body weight, BWG, or FCR, indicating that these traits should not be interpreted as evidence of a temperature-dependent supplementation response. For these traits, the incubation temperature exerted significant main effects, with birds originating from eggs incubated at 37.0°C showing greater body weight and BWG than those originating from eggs incubated at 36.5°C. These findings suggest that the incubation temperature can have persistent effects on post-hatch growth, while the additional contribution of in ovo supplementation may be trait-specific. Thus, the present results support the interpretation that embryonic thermal conditions and nutrient availability can interact for selected post-hatch outcomes rather than producing a uniform interaction across all growth traits. Previous studies have demonstrated that optimal incubation temperature promotes endocrine balance and metabolic efficiency, whereas suboptimal temperatures can disrupt thyroid hormone regulation and impair growth and health (Veerle et al., 2000; Yalcin et al., 2022; Tona et al., 2022). Although in ovo feeding has been reported to improve nutrient utilization and feed efficiency in some studies (Roto et al., 2016; Sonálio et al., 2025), the present findings suggest that its benefits may be strongly dependent on the prevailing incubation conditions. Similar improvements in post-hatch performance following in ovo supplementation with carbohydrates or lipids have been reported previously (Bhanja and Mandal, 2005; Yuan-Hao et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2025). Increased feed intake after hatch has also been associated with early nutrient exposure through in ovo feeding (Jha et al., 2019).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the incubation temperature and in ovo supplementation interact to influence selected embryonic and post-hatch responses in broiler chickens. The interaction was particularly evident for eggshell temperature, hatching characteristics, hatchability, and chick quality, while the post-hatch interaction was significant for feed intake, but not for body weight, BWG, or FCR. Glucose supplementation at 37.5°C produced the highest hatchability, whereas birds originating from eggs incubated at 37.0°C exhibited superior post-hatch body weight and BWG. These findings indicate that the biological response to in ovo nutrient supplementation is dependent, at least for certain traits, on the thermal environment during embryonic development. Importantly, the lower incubation temperatures evaluated in this study are experimental conditions used to investigate temperature-dependent responses and should not be interpreted as recommendations to replace conventional commercial incubation settings. Further studies involving dose–response designs, physiological mechanisms, commercial-scale application, and economic feasibility are warranted to determine the practical relevance of these interactions.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Madam Zhao Mei of the Department of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, for her contributions towards the successful completion of the study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The study was supported by grants from the China-Togo Joint Laboratory on Poultry Nutrition and Intestinal Health (2025YFE0124600); the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System under Grant number CARS-40-K09; and the University Youth Innovation Team of Shandong Province under Grant number 2024KJI005.

Footnotes

Edited by: Colin Guy Scanes, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, United States

Reviewed by: Sadid Al Amaz, Clinvet, United States

Sabri Arda Eratalar, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Türkiye

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shandong Agricultural University (Taian, China) and conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Experimental Animals issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

MO: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Software, Data curation, Visualization, Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology. FK: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YN: Project administration, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. CMM: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft. AM: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LS: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JY: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Data curation. MW: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation. KT: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Supervision, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JH: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Supervision. BA-M: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Software, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis. FA: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Software, Writing – original draft, Validation, Formal Analysis. HL: Supervision, Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Formal Analysis, Resources.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Agyekum G., Okai M. A., Tona J. K., Donkoh A., Hamidu J. A. (2022). Impact of incubation temperature profile on chick quality, bone, and immune system during the late period of incubation of Cobb 500 broiler strain. Poult. Sci. 101, 101999. doi:  10.1016/j.psj.2022.101999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alves L. K. S., Viana G. P., dos Santos T. S., dos Reis B. Q., Guimarães E. B. B., Nascimento R. A., et al. (2020). In-ovo feeding: a review. Veterinária Notícias 26 (1), 18–18. doi:  10.14393/vtn-v26n1-2020-51611 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarczyk M., Stadnicka K., Kozłowska I., Abiuso C., Tavaniello S., Dankowiakowska A., et al. (2016). Influence of different prebiotics and mode of their administration on broiler chicken performance. Animal: An. Int. J. Anim. Bioscience 10, 1271–1279. doi:  10.1017/S1751731116000173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhanja S. K., Mandal A. B. (2005). Effect of in ovo injection of critical amino acids on pre-and post-hatch growth, immunocompetence and development of digestive organs in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 524–531. doi:  10.5713/ajas.2005.524 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardinal P. C., Caldas E. O. L., Lara L. J. C., Rocha J. S. R., Baião N. C., Vaz D. P., et al. (2015). In ovo feeding and its effects on performance of newly-hatched chicks. World's Poultry Sci. J. 71, 655–662. doi:  10.1017/S004393391500244541292463 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dayan J., Melkman-Zehavi T., Goldman N., Soglia F., Zampiga M., Petracci M., et al. (2023). In-ovo feeding with creatine monohydrate: implications for chicken energy reserves and breast muscle development during the pre-post hatching period. Front. Physiol. 14. doi:  10.3389/fphys.2023.1296342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Decuypere E., Tona K., Bruggeman V., Bamelis F. (2001). The day-old chick: a crucial hinge between breeders and broilers. World’s Poultry Sci. J. 57, 127–138. doi:  10.1079/wps2001001036007395 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Di Rosa M., Malaguarnera M., Nicoletti F., Malaguarnera L. (2011). Vitamin D3: a helpful immuno-modulator. Immunology 134, 123–139. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03482.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fatemi S. A., Elliott K. E. C., Bello A., Durojaye O. A., Zhang H. J., Peebles E. D. (2020). The effects of in ovo injected vitamin D3 sources on the eggshell temperature and early posthatch performance of Ross 708 broilers. Poult. Sci. 99, 1357–1362. doi:  10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foye O., Uni Z., McMurtry J., Ferket P. (2006). The effects of amniotic nutrient administration, "in ovo feeding" of arginine and/or & beta;-hydroxy- bet&beta;-methyl butyrate (HMB) on insulin-like growth factors, energy metabolism and growth in Turkey poults. Int. J. Poultry Sci. 5, 309–317. doi:  10.3923/ijps.2006.309.317 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Girgis C. M., Baldock P. A., Downes M. (2015). Vitamin D, muscle and bone: integrating effects in development, aging and injury. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 410, 3–10. doi:  10.1016/j.mce.2015.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamidu J. A., Torres C. A., Johnson-Dahl M. L., Korver D. R. (2018). Physiological response of broiler embryos to different incubator temperature profiles and maternal flock age during incubation. 1. Embryonic metabolism and day-old chick quality. Poult. Sci. 97, 2934–2946. doi:  10.3382/ps/pey089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hrabia A., Kamińska K., Socha M., Grzesiak M. (2023). Vitamin D3 receptors and metabolic enzymes in hen reproductive tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 17074. doi:  10.3390/ijms242317074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ipek A., Sahan U., Yilmaz B. (2004). The effect of in ovo ascorbic acid and glucose injection in broiler breeder eggs on hatchability and chick weight. Eur. Poult. Sci. 68, 132–135. doi:  10.1016/S0003-9098(25)00035-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jha R., Singh A. K., Yadav S., Berrocoso J. F. D., Mishra B. (2019). Early nutrition programming (in ovo and post-hatch feeding) as a strategy to modulate gut health of poultry. Front. Vet. Sci. 6, 82. doi:  10.3389/fvets.2019.00082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kovacs C. S., Ward L. M. (2026). “ Physiology of calcium, phosphorus, and bone metabolism during fetal and neonatal development,” in Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Endocrinology (Amsterdam: Academic Press; ), 645–658. doi:  10.1016/B978-0-443-23940-3.00036-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kpodo K. R., Proszkowiec-Weglarz M. (2023). Physiological effects of in ovo delivery of bioactive substances in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1124007. doi:  10.3389/fvets.2023.1124007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuka T. T., Bakoma B., Kuka F. C., Adjei-Mensah B. (2023). In ovo effect of soursop (Annona muricata L.) leaf extract on hatching and post-hatch performance of Noiler chickens. Vet. Anim. Sci. 21, 100311. doi:  10.1016/j.vas.2023.100311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li S., Zhi L., Liu Y., Shen J., Liu L., Yao J., et al. (2016). Effect of in ovo feeding of folic acid on the folate metabolism, immune function and epigenetic modification of immune effector molecules of broiler. Br. J. Nutr. 115, 411–421. doi:  10.1017/S0007114515004511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lourens A., van den Brand H., Meijerhof R., Kemp B. (2005). Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability, and posthatch development. Poult. Sci. 84, 914–920. doi:  10.1093/ps/84.6.914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu Y. N., Yue T. J., Ding W. L., Xu B. W., Li A. Y., Huang S. C. (2025). Gut-X axis and its role in poultry bone health: a review. Microorganisms 13, 757. doi:  10.3390/microorganisms13040757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Maatjens C. M., Reijrink I. A., Molenaar R., van der Pol C. W., Kemp B., van den Brand H. (2014). Temperature and CO2 during the hatching phase. I. Effects on chick quality and organ development. Poult. Sci. 93, 645–654. doi:  10.3382/ps.2013-03490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Molenaar R., Reijrink I., Meijerhof R., Van den Brand H. (2010). Meeting embryonic requirements of broilers throughout incubation: a review. Rev. Bras. Ciec. Avícola 12, 137–148. doi:  10.1590/s1516-635x201000030000141099703 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moran E. T., Jr. (2007). Nutrition of the developing embryo and hatchling. Poult. Sci. 86, 1043–1049. doi:  10.1093/ps/86.5.1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. National Research Council [NRC] (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed (Washington, DC: National Academy Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  26. Okai M. A., Kruenti F., Hamidu J. A., Tona K., Hai L. (2025. a). Relationship between in ovo feeding and eggshell temperature of breeder eggs during incubation. Front. Anim. Sci. 6, 1511023. doi:  10.3389/fanim.2025.1511023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Okai M. A., Kruenti F., Liu Z., Ma Y., Yendouchamtchié N., Ahmed M., et al. (2025. b). Interactive effects of incubation temperature and in ovo feeding on hatchability, organ development, bone minerals and blood metabolites in broiler chicks. Vet. Med. Sci. 12. doi:  10.1002/vms3.70726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Okai M. A., Kruenti F., Nadiedjoa Y., Koranteng A. A., Lamptey V. K., Adjei-Mensah B., et al. (2026). Interactive effects of early in ovo feeding and incubation temperature on egg quality traits and embryonic development dynamics in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 105, 107285. doi:  10.1016/j.psj.2026.107285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Retes P. L., Clemente A. H. S., Neves D. G., Espósito M., Makiyama L., Alvarenga R. R., et al. (2018). In ovo feeding of carbohydrates for broilers: a systematic review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 102, 361–369. doi:  10.1111/jpn.12807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roto S. M., Kwon Y. M., Ricke S. C. (2016). Applications of in ovo technique for the optimal development of the gastrointestinal tract and the potential influence on the establishment of its microbiome in poultry. Front. Vet. Sci. 3, 63. doi:  10.3389/fvets.2016.00063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salmanzadeh M. (2012). The effects of in-ovo injection of glucose on hatchability, hatching weight and subsequent performance of newly-hatched chicks. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 14, 137–140. doi:  10.1590/s1516-635x201200020000841099703 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sonálio K. C., Malcorra de Almeida L., Bassi L. S., Kuritza L. N., Dias I. C., Rocha C. D., et al. (2025). Effect of putrescine inoculation in ovo on hatchability, hepatic and muscular glycogen reserve, intestinal morphology, and performance of broilers. Animals: An. Open Access J. MDPI 15, 1259. doi:  10.3390/ani15091259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tona K., Voemesse K., N’nanlé O., Oke O. E., Kouame Y. A. E., Bilalissi A., et al. (2022). Chicken incubation conditions: role in embryo development, physiology and adaptation to the post-hatch environment. Front. Physiol. 13, 895854. doi:  10.3389/fphys.2022.895854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Uddin Z., Hamidu J. A. (2014). “ Prolong egg storage affects broiler breeder embryonic metabolism and chick quality,” in Journal of Animal Science Advances. (India: Gr. Journals; ), vol. 4. , 973–977. Available online at: https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-162911 (Accessed September 10, 2026). [Google Scholar]
  35. Uni Z., Ferket P. R., Tako E., Kedar O. (2005). In ovo feeding improves the energy status of late-term chicken embryos. Poult. Sci. 84, 764–770. doi:  10.1093/ps/84.5.764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Veerle M. D., Van der Geyten S., Kühn E. R. (2000). “ Thyroid hormone metabolism in poultry,” in Base. (New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)., vol. 4. , 13–20. Available online at: https://popups.uliege.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=15405 (Accessed September 10, 2026). [Google Scholar]
  37. Wijnen H. J., Molenaar R., van Roovert-Reijrink I. A. M., van der Pol C. W., Kemp B., van den Brand H. (2020). Effects of incubation temperature pattern on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 99, 3897–3907. doi:  10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu H., Hu Z., Lu Y., Jiang Y., Li D., Lei B., et al. (2023). “ Improvement in the early growth, immune system and tibia development of broilers in response to the in ovo injection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3,” in Journal of Applied Animal Research. (England: Taylor & Francis Ltd.), vol. 51. , 265–275. doi:  10.1080/09712119.2023.2187396 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yalcin S., Özkan S., Shah T. (2022). Incubation temperature and lighting: effect on embryonic development, post-hatch growth, and adaptive response. Front. Physiol. 13, 899977. doi:  10.3389/fphys.2022.899977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuan-Hao W., Ayalew H., Wang J., Wu S., Qiu K., Qi G., et al. (2024). N-carbamylglutamate in ovo feeding improves carcass yield, muscle fibre development, and meat quality in broiler chickens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 104, 8089–8098. doi:  10.1002/jsfa.13639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhai W., Gerard P. D., Pulikanti R., Peebles E. D. (2011). Effects of in ovo injection of carbohydrates on embryonic metabolism, hatchability, and subsequent somatic characteristics of broiler hatchlings. Poult. Sci. 90, 2134–2143. doi:  10.3382/ps.2011-01418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang H., Elliott K. E. C., Durojaye O. A., Fatemi S. A., Peebles E. D. (2018). Effects of in ovo administration of L-ascorbic acid on broiler hatchability and its influence on the effects of pre-placement holding time on broiler quality characteristics. Poult. Sci. 97, 1941–1947. doi:  10.3382/ps/pey040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang L., Zhu X. D., Wang X. F., Li J. L., Gao F., Zhou G. H. (2016). Individual and combined effects of in-ovo injection of creatine monohydrate and glucose on somatic characteristics, energy status, and post hatch performance of broiler embryos and hatchlings. Poult. Sci. 95, 2352–2359. doi:  10.3382/ps/pew130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES