Skip to main content
Annals of African Medicine logoLink to Annals of African Medicine
. 2025 Dec 5;25(6):1491–1496. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_433_25

To Correlate the Relationship between Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, and Its Association with Glycemic Control in Rural Population of South India

Sri Archana 1,✉, T R Manjula 2, Chethan B Shetty 3, Sangeetha Jeganathan 1, Keerthan Rao 1
PMCID: PMC13645244  PMID: 41348436

Abstract

Background:

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) are among the most prevalent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), both of which stem from microvascular complications and are believed to have a shared underlying pathophysiology. A notable challenge is that patients may go unnoticed for either condition by their treating physician, given that these complications typically fall under different medical specialties. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate the clinical correlation between the severity of DR and DPN and explore their associations with glycemic variability and the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Methodology:

This is a hospital-based cross-sectional observational study involving 156 patients attending the ophthalmology outpatient department and the inpatient department at a tertiary care hospital in rural South India over a period of 2 years.

Results:

There was an increase in the severity of DR with increasing duration of DM among patients (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with DPN notably increased with increasing severity of DR among the patients (P < 0.001). Notably, the number of patients with DR and DPN changes increased with increasing glycemic values. These findings suggest a statistically significant association between DR and DPN and glycemic control.

Conclusion:

This study revealed a positive correlation between the severity of DR and the presence of DPN, along with an association with HbA1c variability. This underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration for comprehensive evaluation and management.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, glycated hemoglobin, peripheral neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has become a major global health challenge. Patients with DM are prone to various complications that can pose life-threatening risks and significantly impact their quality of life. The vasa nervorum is vulnerable to damage from chronic hyperglycemia, which can result in changes, ultimately leading to microangiopathy.[1] Progressive vascular dysfunction in the retina results in DR, whereas vascular dysfunction in peripheral nerves leads to diabetic neuropathy. These chronic complications associated with the disease represent the primary causes of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure related to DM.[2]

Both DR and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) are microangiopathies sharing similar pathophysiologies.[3] Consequently, the presence and severity of one can affect the other. The eye serves as a crucial indicator of diabetic microangiopathic complications, highlighting the relationship between retinopathy and neuropathy.[,5,6] However, since these conditions are typically diagnosed and treated by different medical specialties, patients may receive care and treatment for only one aspect, potentially leading to untreated systemic complications and prolonged suffering. A deeper awareness of the interrelationship between DR and DPN underlines the importance of screening for other complications, thus enabling comprehensive management and improved outcomes.

Glycemic indices were used to determine glycemic control and to analyze the association and severity of DR and DPN. Therefore, this study was carried out with the aim of correlating the grade of DR with that of DPN and gauging their link with glycemic control.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 156 patients diagnosed with DM were included in this cross-sectional study; these patients visited the outpatient department (OPD) of ophthalmology at a tertiary care hospital in rural South India. The study was conducted over a period of 2 years. All patients who were diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy (DR) were included in the study. Patients with gestational DM and retinopathy due to other causes and patients with DPN due to other causes, such as Vitamin B12 deficiency, traumatic neuropathy, and HIV neuropathy (ruled out by examining clinical features related to the disease) were all excluded from the study. Ethical clearance prior to the commencement of the study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee. All the patients who fulfilled the selection criteria were informed about the nature of the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants before enrollment. Demographic details of patients with detailed ophthalmological examination was carried out, followed by assessment of glycemic status by fasting blood sugar (FBS), postprandial blood sugar (PPBS), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.

DR was determined through fundus examination and graded clinically using the “Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study” classification for DR. Neurological examination was performed on the basis of the “Toronto clinical neurological scoring system,” which included the extent of paresthesia, tingling or numbness, the presence of burning, vibration, light touch, temperature, and relevant examination.

RESULTS

This study compared the severity of DR with the occurrence of DPN in diabetic patients. A total of 156 patients who attended the ophthalmology OPD in the setting and fulfilled the previously stated inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study.

The study included 106 (67.9%) males and 50 (32.1%) females [Graph 1].

Graph 1.

Graph 1

Gender distribution of patients with diabetic retinopathy

The study group had a mean age of 58.85 ± 10 years, with most of the population falling into the fifth (36%) or sixth (32%) decade in both the male and female categories [Table 1].

Table 1.

Age group distribution

Age group Number of patients
<31 1
31–40 5
41–50 25
51–60 56
61–70 49
71–80 17
>80 2
Total 156

The majority of the patients, i.e. 152 (96.8%), had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the remaining patients had T1DM (3.2%) [Table 2].

Table 2.

Type of diabetes mellitus

DM n (%)
Type 1 DM 5 (3.2)
Type 2 DM 151 (96.8)

DM=Diabetes mellitus

The number of years of diabetes and the severity of retinopathy were studied, and patients with mild and moderate DR had average durations of diabetes of 6 years 6 months and 8 years, respectively. Nine years in severe DR patients and a mean of 13 years were noted in both proliferative DR (PDR) patients and advanced diabetic eye disease (ADED) [Table 3]. The severity of DR increased with increasing duration of DM among patients (P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Duration of diabetes

Grading of DR Mean (years)
Mild DR 6.56
Moderate DR 8.70
Severe/very severe DR 9.20
PDR 13.00
ADED 13.30

DR=Diabetic retinopathy, ADED=Advanced diabetic eye disease, PDR=Proliferative DR

DR severity was assessed. As shown in Table 4, most of the patients fall into the category of mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 45%, followed by moderate NPDR, 34%. Severe NPDR corresponds to 10%, and PDR is present in 5% of patients. ADED is observed in 6.4% of patients.

Table 4.

Frequency of severity of diabetic retinopathy

Grading of DR Number of patients (%)
Mild NPDR 70 (44.9)
Moderate NPDR 53 (34.0)
Severe/very severe NPDR 15 (9.6)
PDR 8 (5.1)
ADED 10 (6.4)

DR=Diabetic retinopathy, NPDR=Nonproliferative DR, PDR=Proliferative DR, ADED=Advanced diabetic eye disease

Our study revealed that there was a striking increase in the severity of retinopathy with increasing HbA1c levels [Graph 2] and that the HbA1c level overlapped with the severity of retinopathy. The mean HbA1c values for mild and moderate DR patients were 6.8% and 7.4%, respectively. In severe DR patients, the mean HbA1c level was 8.7%, and in PDR and ADED patients, it was 8.9% and 9.5%, respectively.

Graph 2.

Graph 2

Association between glycated hemoglobin values and severity of diabetic retinopathy among patients. HbA1c = Glycated hemoglobin, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, PDR = Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, ADED = Advanced diabetic eye disease

DPN was noted in 33 patients (21.2%) in the study group, with varying severity [Table 5].

Table 5.

Peripheral neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy Frequency (%)
Present 33 (21.2)
Absent 123 (78.8)

The mean HbA1c in those with DPN (n = 33) was 9.7 ± 1.6, whereas it was 6.9 ± 1.5 among patients without DPN (n = 123) (t = 9.395, P < 0.001) [Graph 3].

Graph 3.

Graph 3

Peripheral neuropathy and glycated hemoglobin. HbA1c = Glycated hemoglobin

FBS and PPBS were high in patients with peripheral neuropathy in comparison to patients with only DR. Our study revealed mean FBS and PPBS values of 269 (±94) and 310 (±78), respectively, in patients with DPN. The mean FBS and PPBS were significantly higher among patients with DPN compared with those with DR alone (P < 0.001) [Graph 4].

Graph 4.

Graph 4

Fasting blood sugar and postprandial blood sugar correlation with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and DR without DPN. FBS = Fasting blood sugar, PPBS = Postprandial blood sugar, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, DPN = Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

The percentage of patients with DPN increases as the severity of DR increases as 50% of those with PDR have DPN. However, it increases to 70% in ADED patients. The proportion of patients with peripheral neuropathy increased with increasing severity of DR among the patients (P < 0.001) [Table 6].

Table 6.

Staging of diabetic retinopathy patients in comparison with that of diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients

Grading DPN present (%) DPN absent (%)
Mild DR 5 (7.1) 65 (92.9)
Moderate DR 10 (18.9) 43 (81.1)
Severe/very severe DR 7 (81.1) 8 (53.3)
PDR 4 (50.0) 4 (50.0)
ADED 7 (70.0) 3 (30.0)
Total 33 (21.2) 123 (78.8)

DR=Diabetic retinopathy, PDR=Proliferative DR, ADED=Advanced diabetic eye disease, DPN=Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

DISCUSSION

The current cross-sectional observational study was carried out in the Department of Ophthalmology at a tertiary care hospital in rural South India for a duration of 2 years with the aim of correlating the severity of DR with DPN and assessing their relationship with variations in glycemic indices and HbA1c levels. The study included 156 patients diagnosed with both T1DM and T2DM who fulfilled the selection criteria and provided written informed consent.

Two clinic-based studies revealed that the occurrence rates of DR in T2DM patients in South India were 34.1% and 37%, respectively.[7,8] Agarwal et al. in their study revealed the prevalence rate of 28.9% of DR among DM patients.[9] Another study conducted by Narendran et al. concluded a 26.2% prevalence rate of DR.[10]

Kalpana et al.[11] noted that among DR patients, males were affected more than females. A study by Sharma et al.[12] reported that the number of males with retinopathy was greater than that of females. Similarly, in our study, 67.9% of males and 32.1% of female patients were found to have retinopathy; therefore, a higher incidence of DR was noted among the male population than among the female population.

Katulanda et al.[13] reported that the occurrence of DPN was almost equal between the two sexes. Ji et al.[14] in a study conducted in 2012 reported the same occurrence of DPN in both males and females, accounting for 43.3% and 49.8%, respectively. In our study, a slightly greater male preponderance was noted than in the other studies.

The duration of DM, an essential predictor of DR, decides the contact time of other risk factors. Rema et al.,[15] in their CURES study, reported that the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) increased by 1.89 times for every 5-year increase in the duration of diabetes. Al-Sarraf et al.[16] detected that patients with a duration of 10-19 years of disease are twice as likely to be anticipated to have DR and approximately three times more likely to have DR when the duration of exposure is more than 20 years. Agarwal et al.’s study has shown that the maximum prevalence of DR in patients with more than 15 years of diabetes was 52.2%.[9] In our study, it was noted that overall, the severity of DR increased with increasing duration of DM among patients (P < 0.001).

Won et al.[17] and Ji et al.[14] also concluded that DPN was more common in individuals who had a longer course of disease. A study conducted by Feldman et al.,[18] Gill et al.,[19] and Ashok et al.[20] revealed that the period of diabetes was a significant determinant of neuropathy, which was similarly noted in our study.

Kumar et al.[21] reported that with increasing age, the duration of DM and increased HbA1c were common risk factors for both DR and DPN. A study conducted by Meena et al.[22] reported that an increase in the FBS, PPBS, and HbA1c biochemical parameters was associated with an increase in the degree of DR severity. In our study, the FBS average in retinopathy patients was 178 mg/dL and that of PPBS 222 mg/dL. As the levels of FBS and PPBS increased, the severity of DR and DPN increased. Kilpatrick et al.,[23] in a DCCT study, reported a significantly increased risk of retinopathy, not only with higher mean HbA1c values but also with greater fluctuations. For every increase in the SD of HbA1c by a value of one as the absolute percentage, the hazard ratio of both the development and progression of DR increased by more than 100%. In the CURES[24] Eye study, as the level of HbA1c increased by 2%, the risk of DR increased by 1.7. Another study conducted by Nanda and Mohanta[25] demonstrated that HbA1c is a strong predictor of the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Our study revealed a striking increase in the severity of retinopathy with increasing HbA1c levels.

Salwa and Ayman[26] acknowledged HbA1c as a modifiable risk factor for diabetic neuropathy. In their corresponding studies, Won et al.,[17] Ji et al.,[14] and Rema et al.[15] reported that DPN is more common in diabetic patients with a higher HbA1c. The rate of increase in DPN is much greater than that in DR.

Foo et al.[27] and Takao et al.[28] reported that HbA1c variability, measured as HbA1c-standard deviation or HbA1c-coefficient of variation, was predictive of the development of DR and neuropathy. In their study, Su et al.[29] reported that the incidence of neuropathy increased with increasing variability in HbA1c.

Lee et al.[30] conducted a study which revealed that HbA1c level was a quantitative indicator of the severity of polyneuropathy and that poor glycemic control (HbA1c level > 6.5%) may increase the incidence of polyneuropathy in DM patients by more than fivefold. Their study revealed close relationships between glycemic erraticism parameters and DPN in type II diabetes patients. Raman et al.[31] reported that those with a higher coefficient of variability of fasting plasma glucose had an evidently greater risk of DPN. In our study, the FBS and PPBS were found to be high in patients with peripheral neuropathy in comparison to patients with only DR. The mean FBS and mean PPBS were significantly higher in patients with DPN than in those without DPN (P < 0.001). The mean FBS and the mean PPBS were significantly higher in the PDR group than in the other DR group (P < 0.001). Sharma et al.[12] reported that the prevalence of DPN in patients with DR was 2.75 times greater than that in patients without DR (14%). Kumar et al.[21] and Won et al.[17] reported that the incidence of DPN was increased in patients with retinopathy. Salwa and Ayman[26] and Katulanda et al.[13] reported that DR was the most significant risk factor for a patient with DPN, and their ratio of association was similar to the findings of our study. The percentage of patients suffering from both the microvascular complications was almost equal to that in our study.

Ashok et al.,[20] in a study to perceive the prevalence of neuropathy, compared the incidence of retinopathy in patients with and without neuropathy and reported a higher incidence in those with neuropathy. In our study, the percentage of patients with DPN increased as the severity of retinopathy increased. The proportion of patients with peripheral neuropathy increased significantly with increasing severity of DR in both eyes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the present study which was conducted, it was observed that there was a clinical correlation between the severity of DR and the presence of DPN. DPN was remarkably more common in diabetic patients with retinopathy than in those without retinopathy. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the severity of DR and the incidence of DPN. Uncontrolled DM when present for a longer duration was concluded to be a common risk factor for both DR and DPN. Higher glycemic index variability and elevated HbA1c levels were associated with both DR and DPN.

Hence, these parameters become important in the long run and further support the need for aggressive early intervention and long-term monitoring to prevent vision-threatening stages of the disease. Our findings also highlight the potential value of screening for DPN in patients with DR and vice versa. Early detection and management of one complication may offer opportunities to intervene before the other progresses, especially in resource-limited settings where access to ophthalmologic or neurologic services may be constrained.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Giacco F, Brownlee M, Holt R, Cockram C, Flyvbjerg A, Goldstein B. Textbook of Diabetes. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons Ltd (Wiley-Blackwell); 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Metascreen Writing Committee. , Bonadonna R, Cucinotta D, Fedele D, Riccardi G, Tiengo A. The metabolic syndrome is a risk indicator of microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes: Results from metascreen, a multicenter diabetes clinic-based survey. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2701–7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: A unifying mechanism. Diabetes. 2005;54:1615–25. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein R. Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:258–68. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.2.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abdollahi A, Moghimi S, Tabasi A, Rajabi MT, Sabet B. Neuropathy and retinopathy in diabetes: Is there any association? Int J Ophthalmol. 2009;2:57–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the diabetes control and complications trial. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:647–61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30973-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lumbroso B, Rispoli M, Savastano CM. Diabetic Retinopathy. 1 st ed. Delhi: Jaypee; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Harrison T, Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson LJ, et al. 20 th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. Harisson’s Principles of Internal Medicine. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Agarwal RP, Ranka M, Beniwal R, Gothwal SR, Jain GC, Kochar DK, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes in relation to risk factor: Hospital based study. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2003;23:16–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Narendran V, John RK, Raghuram A, Ravindran RD, Nirmalan PK. Diabetic retinopathy among self-reported diabetics in Southern India: A population based assessment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1014–8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.9.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kalpana R, Kothandaraman K, Anuradha P. Association of peripheral neuropathy with retinopathy in diabetic patients. Indian J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;4:115–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sharma VK, Joshi MV, Vishnoi AA. Interrelation of retinopathy with peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2016;4:83–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katulanda P, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, Constantine GR, Sheriff MH, Matthews DR. The prevalence, patterns and predictors of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a developing country. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2012;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ji N, Zhang N, Ren ZJ, Jia KB, Wang L, Ni JX, et al. Risk factors and pain status due to diabetic neuropathy in chronic long-term diabetic patients in a Chinese urban population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:4190–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rema M, Premkumar S, Anitha B, Deepa R, Pradeepa R, Mohan V. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in urban India: The Chennai urban rural epidemiology study (CURES) eye study, I. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2328–33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Sarraf A, Al-Bannai SK, Al-Furaih AM, El-Shazly M. Prevalence and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy: A multi-centric study in Kuwait. Bull Alex Fac Med. 2010;46:99–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Won JC, Kwon HS, Kim CH, Lee JH, Park TS, Ko KS, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in hospital patients with type 2 diabetes in Korea. Diabet Med. 2012;29:e290–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03697.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feldman EL, Callaghan BC, Pop-Busui R, Zochodne DW, Wright DE, Bennett DL, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:41. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0092-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gill HK, Yadav SB, Ramesh V, Bhatia E. A prospective study of prevalence and association of peripheral neuropathy in Indian patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60:270–5. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.138750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ashok S, Ramu M, Deepa R, Mohan V. Prevalence of neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients attending a diabetes centre in South India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2002;50:546–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumar HK, Kota S, Basile A, Modi K. Profile of microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes in a tertiary health care hospital in India. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2:103–8. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.105654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meena N, Meena HS, Meena MM. Correlation of blood sugar and Hba1c levels in different stages of diabetic retinopathy at our tertiary care center in Ajmer. Int J Sci Res. 2019;8:77–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL. A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: Data from the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2198–202. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rema M, Ponnaiya M, Mohan V. Prevalence of retinopathy in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus at a diabetes centre in Southern India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996;34:29–36. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(96)01327-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nanda PK, Mohanta S. Correlation between HbA1c and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Evid Based Med. 2020;7:182–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salwa SI, Ayman SA. Explorative study on diabetic neuropathy among type 2 diabetic patients in university Sains Malaysia Hospital. Diabet Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2012;6:167–72. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Foo V, Quah J, Cheung G, Tan NC, Ma Zar KL, Chan CM, et al. HbA1c, systolic blood pressure variability and diabetic retinopathy in Asian type 2 diabetics. J Diabetes. 2017;9:200–7. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takao T, Ide T, Yanagisawa H, Kikuchi M, Kawazu S, Matsuyama Y. The effects of fasting plasma glucose variability and time-dependent glycemic control on the long-term risk of retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91:e40–2. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Su JB, Zhao LH, Zhang XL, Cai HL, Huang HY, Xu F, et al. HbA1c variability and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:47. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0693-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lee WJ, Jang S, Lee SH, Lee HS. Correlation between the severity of diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy and glycosylated hemoglobin levels: A quantitative study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40:263–70. doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Raman R, Verma A, Pal SS, Gupta A, Vaitheeswaran K, Sharma T. Influence of glycosylated hemoglobin on sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: A population-based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92:168–73. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of African Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES