Abstract
The strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), in terms of streamfunction, is considered to depend partly on salt supply from the Indian Ocean through Agulhas Leakage (AL). In turn, AL is regulated by the position of the Southern Ocean subtropical front, which creates the pathway of the leaking around the African continent. Here, to evaluate the links between the subtropical front, AL and AMOC, we present latitudinal shifts of the subtropical front, and thereby potential AL changes, using dinoflagellate cysts and biomarkers in sediment cores from the Agulhas Plateau covering the late Pliocene (3,600–2,580 thousand years ago (ka)). We subsequently compare our frontal migration and AL reconstruction with ocean surface and bottom records along the AMOC pathway, and climate model simulations, to evaluate the influence of the AL on the AMOC. We find that the northward migration of the subtropical front gradually reduced the volume and salt supply of AL from 3,600 ka to 3,300 ka, whereas the AMOC intensified. We conclude that the causal link between the AL and AMOC was disconnected during the late Pliocene, challenging the presumed role of the AL in modulating the AMOC.
Subject terms: Palaeoceanography, Palaeoclimate, Physical oceanography
Northward movement of the Southern Ocean subtropical front diminished salt transport by Agulhas Leakage in the late Pliocene, although this had no apparent influence on the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, according to proxy records from marine sediment cores.
Main
The Agulhas Leakage (AL), consisting of large mesoscale eddies of saline, warm Indian Ocean waters that enter the Atlantic Ocean during the retroflection of the Agulhas Current south of Africa, is thought to be a key component of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), based on numerical model experiments and observations1–4. In the prevailing paradigm, AL is primarily driven by wind forcing: intensified Southern Hemisphere westerlies promote a southward shift of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC)5, displacing the subtropical front (STF) poleward and facilitating increased leakage of Indian Ocean water into the Atlantic3,4,6. Thus, STF migration is commonly interpreted as an integrated response to wind stress that regulates AL intensity7,8, albeit with spatiotemporal complexities9,10.
According to this paradigm, salt supplied to the Atlantic via AL is ultimately transported northwards by surface currents, notably the North Atlantic Current (NAC). The AL is thus critical for establishing the density required for North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) formation3,8,11,12. However, contrasting views exist regarding the role of AL in AMOC under the present-day warming background2,4,7,13,14 and uncertainties remain concerning the proportion of AL that ultimately enters the North Atlantic15. Furthermore, debate exists over the fate of AMOC itself16. Palaeoceanographic data of past climates therefore provide a critical test of the theoretical causal link between AL and AMOC.
The late Pliocene (3,600–2,580 thousand years ago (ka)) is characterized by periods of global warmth, including the mid-Piacenzian Warm Period (mPWP; ∼3,264–3,025 ka)17, which is considered to be the most recent geological analogue for a warmer modern world17–19. Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) M2 (~3,300 ka), before the mPWP, was a transient global cooling phase seen as a failed attempt for a large-scale Northern Hemisphere glaciation20,21 and provides insights into cold-to-warm climate transitions. Most coupled general circulation model simulations focus only on the mPWP (explicitly KM5c at 3,205 ka) and have suggested an AMOC similar to22 or stronger than the present AMOC23,24. However, mPWP simulation outputs are highly dependent on palaeogeographic boundary conditions, which remain debated25,26, and on spatial resolution. Moreover, while extensive research has focused on the upper (NAC)27–33 and lower (NADW)28,34 limbs of the AMOC, these components are rarely examined in conjunction, and the presumed interhemispheric connectivity through AL remains underexplored. Reconstructions from the Southern Benguela region did not detect clear AL changes35,36, underscoring the complexity of the Agulhas system and highlighting the need for improved constraints on AL. Collectively, testing whether variability in AL forced late Pliocene AMOC changes requires reconstructions of the STF and comparison with AMOC reconstructions.
To fill this critical knowledge gap, we focus on reconstructions of the local oceanography at the Agulhas Plateau, which is located between the Agulhas Retrocurrent (ARC) and the STF and thus can record the STF migration. We first generate records of dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) assemblages, which distinctively differ between water masses and frontal systems in the Southern Ocean37, and biomarker-based sea surface temperature (SST) records (alkenone unsaturation index UK′37 and tetraether index of 86 carbon atoms TEX86) for International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) site U1475 (Fig. 1). From these, we infer latitudinal migrations of the STF, wherein a southward STF position is interpreted as high AL potential, and vice versa7,11. To evaluate the connection of AL with AMOC variations, we also generated UK′37 and TEX86 records for Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) site 625 in the northern Gulf of Mexico (GoM) (Fig. 1), where the NAC originates and the NADW passes by. These records allow us to trace changes in current strength and the salinity of the AMOC loop in the context of previous studies. Finally, we revisit numerical modelling outputs of the mPWP and MIS M2 ocean circulation to assess the consistency with our proxy-based reconstructions.
Fig. 1. Schematic deep and surface ocean circulation in the Atlantic Ocean and Agulhas.

a, Conceptual representation of the AMOC and Southern Ocean circulation72. The orange arrows indicate surface currents. The blue arrows indicate intermediate and deep ocean water masses. Crosses indicate locations of deep and intermediate water formation. Dots indicate sites with relevant Pliocene data. Stars indicate sites studied. b, Agulhas system overlaying modern annual mean SST73. The orange lines indicate the Agulhas-associated currents. Circles denote filaments and eddies. The dashed black line denotes the outline of the Agulhas Plateau. Approximate positions of oceanic fronts are marked by SST contours (12 °C, 8 °C and 4 °C isotherms indicate STF, SAF and PF, respectively). AAIW, Antarctic Intermediate Water; AC, Agulhas Current; GS, Gulf Stream; SAF, subantarctic front; PF, polar front. Basemap in a created with tmap74. Basemap in b generated with Giovanni (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni)75.
STF migration during the late Pliocene
Dinocyst assemblages indicate substantial and reiterative frontal migrations (Fig. 2b,d and Extended Data Fig. 1). The overall increase of Nematosphaeropsis labyrinthus, an indicator species for the STF37, suggests that the STF approached site U1475, reflected by the increase in the STF index (Fig. 2c and Methods). Between 3,400 ka and MIS M2, SSTs derived from UK′37 and TEX86 decline, superimposed on orbital-scale variability (Extended Data Figs. 2 and 3). Notably, TEX86 indicates a more pronounced cooling than UK′37, resulting in a divergence of UK′37- and TEX86-based temperatures from 3,400 ka onwards (Fig. 3). Given the complexity of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether (GDGT) distributions and the challenges in reliably interpreting TEX86-based temperatures (Supplementary Discussion and Extended Data Fig. 4), our interpretation of SST evolution at this site is based on only UK′37.
Fig. 2. Palaeoceanographic changes at Agulhas Plateau.

a, SST records for the Agulhas region36,38,39 and this study with calibration (cali) error bars indicated. Site U1475 UK′37 SST is a 4-point moving average as shown in Extended Data Fig. 1. b, XRF Ti/Al of ODP site 1087 (ref. 36). The teal line denotes LOESS regression (span = 0.1). The grey band denotes the 95% confidence interval. c,e, Dinocyst assemblages of site U1475 indicating STF migration, primary productivity and sea ice conditions. d, STF index (Methods) indicating the relative latitudinal position of the STF and strength of AL. f, Global benthic foraminiferal δ18O compilation76 in Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite with marine isotope stages indicated and obliquity77. The pink interval and bar highlight mPWP and MIS KM5c. Darker and lighter purple highlight MIS M2 and its deglaciation stage. Basemap in a generated with Giovanni (https://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni)75.
Extended Data Fig. 1. Relative abundance of dinoflagellate cyst assemblages at Site U1475 in the mid-late Pliocene.

Dinocysts are grouped and ordered from equatorward (down) to poleward (up) based on their modern distribution37.
Extended Data Fig. 2. Sea surface temperature record of Site U1475 in the mid-late Pliocene.

TEX86-based SSTs (dots) are derived from TEX86H87 and BAYSPAR102 calibrations respectively. UK′37-based SSTs (triangles) are derived from linear core-top88 and BAYSPLINE105 calibrations respectively. Solid lines denote 4-point moving averages. LR04 benthic δ18O stack80 is plotted on the secondary y-axis (right). Marine Isotope Stages (MIS) nomenclature follows ref. 80. The mid-Piacenzian Warm Period (mPWP) and Marine Isotope Stage M2 are highlighted by the pink and blue bands, respectively. Paleomagnetic reversals are based on ref. 77.
Extended Data Fig. 3. Evolutionary spectral analyses of TEX86 and UK′37 at Site U1475.

a, c) Detrended temperature records of TEX86 and UK′37 respectively along with eccentricity75. (b, d) Evolutionary spectral analyses using a moving window of 405 kyr.
Fig. 3. Palaeoceanographic changes associated with the AMOC.

a, Difference between UK′37- and TEX86-derived SSTs for IODP site U1475 (teal, this study), East Atlantic ODP site 959 (red)47 and ODP site 625 (brown, this study). b, SST difference between the North Atlantic sites with a 100-kyr moving average. Smaller differences caused by cooling indicate a reduced northward reach of the NAC. It should be noted that the moving average gradient may not capture the full variability27. The green line indicates the longitudinal SST difference between 3° E and 12.7° W. The yellow, black and purple lines indicate latitudinal SST differences. c, Relative surface salinity (orange) based on planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides sacculifer δ18O and sand fraction accumulation rate (dark blue) with age revised28 at ODP site 99934,60. The latter indicates NADW strength. d, STF index indicating Agulhas Leakage, as in Fig. 2d. e, Global benthic foraminiferal δ18O stack76 and obliquity77. The pink interval and bar highlight mPWP and MIS KM5c. Darker and lighter purple highlight UK′37 and TEX86 divergence, MIS M2 and its deglaciation stage.
Extended Data Fig. 4. Uncorrected GDGTs indices and ratios in samples from two labs, from Site U1475.

(a) TEX8690 (b) BIT, threshold=0.392. (c) Methane Index, threshold=0.495 (d) GDGT-2/ crenarchaeol, threshold=0.593. (e) GDGT-0/crenarchaeol, threshold=296. (f) GDGT-2/GDGT-3, threshold=550. (g) Ring Index98. Red dashed lines indicate thresholds, above which a non-thermal overprint is expected on TEX86. Dots=UMass, triangles=UU. It should be noted that UU and UMass samples are not always from the same holes and cores from Site U1475.
The abundance of cold, present-day polar front-affiliated species (Islandinium spp.) (Supplementary Fig. 3) and a reduction in species found today north of STF species during MIS M2 (Fig. 2) suggest that the site was under the influence of subpolar conditions at this time. The high contributions of Islandinium spp. at site U1475 during MIS M2 indicate the northernmost position of the STF. In addition, the 3 °C cooling during M2, as seen in multiple records from the Agulhas region (Fig. 2a)36,38,39, is comparable to the degree of cooling reconstructed for Pleistocene glacial–interglacial cycles8, in which 3 °C cooling has been linked with ACC and STF migration by a few latitudinal degrees40–42 and the potential shutdown of AL8. The northward migration of the STF from 3,400 ka to MIS M2, inferred from dinocyst assemblages, is consistent with results from coccolithophores at the same site43. The subpolar conditions at U1475 were swiftly terminated during the deglaciation stage of the M2 interval (3,287 ka), as indicated by the substantial increase of the warm-temperate and relatively higher-salinity species Operculodinium centrocarpum37,44,45 (Figs. 2b and 3d).
During the mPWP, species from south and north of the STF alternate in dominance on time scales of 40 kyr (sampling resolution is ~3 kyr; Fig. 2b,c). Apart from during MIS M2, the STF reaches a northern position at ~3,240 ka and ~3,160 ka, corresponding to MIS KM6 and approximately KM2, respectively. By contrast, MIS KM5c (3,205 ka) is characterized by a more poleward-positioned STF, indicated by reduced abundance of N. labyrinthus, prevalence of warm-water species and increased SST (Fig. 2b).
In theory, the STF migration described above should have introduced substantial variations in AL. However, late Pliocene records from the northeastern boundary of the modern AL pathway in the Southern Benguela region (ODP site 1087) contain very few Indian Ocean planktonic foraminifera that are typically used as AL indicators35,36. Instead, these studies reported an extended and/or southward-shifted Benguela upwelling zone and enhanced dust input in the late Pliocene, which are interpreted as strengthened southeasterly trade winds. The discrepancy between our STF record and the lack of changes in the Benguela Upwelling region leads to two possible explanations: (1) STF migration did not lead to any AL change or (2) AL variability was not adequately captured at site 1087. The elevated Ti/Al ratios between 3,500 ka and 2,800 ka at site 1087 suggest a generally poleward-positioned Southern Hemisphere wind belt during this period36, whereas the relatively lower Ti/Al values during MIS M2 suggest a more northward position, in line with our dinocyst results. Although the site is in the pathway of AL today, it is difficult to exclude that the main AL pathway was shifted poleward and bypassed site 1087 in the Pliocene3,36.
To assess from numerical model simulations whether there was a change in AL in the late Pliocene, we revisit previously published MIS M2–mPWP modelling outputs21,46, focusing on the Agulhas area. The decrease in SST and salinity in the Agulhas region and the weakened wind stress in the Southern Benguela region during MIS M2 than mPWP would have reflected a northward-positioned STF and a reduced AL (Extended Data Figs. 5 and 6).
Extended Data Fig. 5. Simulated ocean surface conditions for MIS M2 and mPWP.

(a-b) Subsurface ocean temperature at 100 m depth. According to the definition of the Subtropical Front (STF) by Orsi et al.72, the approximate location of the STF lies within a band where temperatures at 100 m depth increase from 10 °C to 12 °C. In this study, considering model biases and the likely position relative to the modern STF, we use the 8 °C isotherm as a theoretical STF position specifically for the modelling results. (c) Zonal ocean water mass transport through the passage between southernmost Africa and Antarctica. Positive values denote eastward transport. The rectangular area represents the region where the major Agulhas Leakage (AL) occurs. (d-e) SST and salinity differences between MIS M2 and mPWP. Figure generated with Ferret (http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret).
Extended Data Fig. 6. Simulated wind stress for MIS M2 and mPWP.

(a, b) wind stress over ocean for mPWP and MIS M2. (c) differences between MIS M2 and mPWP. Figure generated with Ferret (http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret).
Shoaled Atlantic thermocline and strong overturning at M2
UK′37-based SST estimates in the northern GoM range from 26 °C to 28 °C (Extended Data Fig. 7). In addition, TEX86 shows a distinct, stepwise decline of ~3 °C centred around 3,400 ka (Fig. 3a). This pronounced cooling marks the onset of a divergence between TEX86- and UK′37-derived temperatures, synchronous with the divergence observed at site U1475 (Fig. 3a). Besides sites U1475 and 625, a divergence between TEX86 and UK′37 is also recorded at site 959 in the equatorial east Atlantic47 (Figs. 1 and 3a). At site 959, the thermocline shoaled at ~3,400 ka, indicated by an increase in the vertical gradient between surface- and thermocline-dwelling foraminiferal δ18O and Mg–Ca47,48. Analogously, we attribute the divergence between TEX86- and UK′37-derived SSTs at site 959 to increased GDGT contribution from below the shoaled thermocline (Supplementary Fig. 1)47,49,50. Furthermore, a reduced ring index (RI) and increased GDGT-0/crenarchaeol coincide with the thermocline shoaling at ~3,400 ka (Supplementary Discussion and Extended Data Figs. 4 and 7) and are recorded synchronously at all three sites47. Similar trends in the RI, together with increased TEX86- and UK′37-temperature difference related to thermocline dynamics, also characterize the Atlantic Ocean in the Pleistocene, although the former was not described in the original publication51. Consequently, we surmise that thermocline shoaling was likely pan-Atlantic. This may have been forced by changes in the water properties of the NADW, which was present at depth at all three sites52. As proposed by previous studies51,53–55, once NADW formation intensifies, the Atlantic subsurface cools owing to an enhanced supply of relatively cold water and the thinning of the upper ocean layer56,57, leading to thermocline shoaling. Another potential contributor to shoaling thermocline can be an intensification of intermediate water formation close to the Southern Hemisphere STF, which feeds site 959 as South Atlantic Central Water52,58, site 625 as Antarctic Intermediate Water and/or Subantarctic Mode Water59, and site U1475 locally, given the general northward migration trend of STF from 3,400 ka onwards (Fig. 2c).
Extended Data Fig. 7. GDGTs indices and ratios of Site 625 in the late Pliocene.

(a) TEX86H and UK′37 based temperature with calibration error87,88 (b) BIT, threshold=0.392. (c) Methane Index, threshold=0.495. (d) GDGT-2/crenarchaeol, threshold=0.593. (e) GDGT-0/crenarchaeol, threshold=296. (f) GDGT-2/GDGT-3, threshold=550. (g) Ring Index98. Red dashed lines indicate thresholds, above which a non-thermal overprint is expected on TEX86.
Model simulation results regarding the AMOC broadly agree with the proxy-based interpretation. The simulated AMOC in MIS M2 was overall enhanced at greater depths but decreased in the surface layer and north of 58° N compared with the mPWP (Fig. 4a–c). The AMOC strength, defined as the maximum streamfunction value north of 20° N and below 500 m water depth, is about 11.78 Sv in MIS M2 and 10.94 Sv in the mPWP. Furthermore, simulations indicate a noticeably shoaled warm-water layer in the upper 500 m during MIS M2, compared with the mPWP (Fig. 4d,e), which is also seen in site-specific water-column temperature profiles (Extended Data Fig. 8).
Fig. 4. Simulated AMOC and zonal-mean upper-ocean temperature profiles of MIS M2 and mPWP along the Atlantic transect.

a,b, AMOC streamfunction during mPWP (a) and MIS M2 (b). Positive values mean seawater travels clockwise along the contour. c, AMOC streamfunction difference between MIS M2 and mPWP. d, 0–500 m Atlantic Ocean temperature profile during mPWP. e, 0–500 m Atlantic Ocean temperature profile during MIS M2. Figure generated with Ferret (http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret).
Extended Data Fig. 8. Site-specific water column temperature profile of MIS M2 and mPWP.

(a) ODP 959, 0-2400 m water depth. (b) IODP U1475, 0-2800 m water depth. (c) ODP 625, 0-600 m water depth. Modelling outputs were processed as in Fig. 4.
Disconnected AL and AMOC dynamics
In theory, the diminishing AL from 3,400 ka to MIS M2 should lead to a lower salinity in the AMOC loop, thereby weakening AMOC. Several sites (IODP sites 982, U1313, 642 and 610) along the NAC pathway show a decrease in SST and a simultaneous increase in the SST gradient between sites U1313 (40° N) and 610 (53° N)27,29–31 (Figs. 3b and 5) from 3,400 ka to MIS M2. This trend was interpreted as reflecting reduced NAC influence on these high-latitude sites (Figs. 3b and 4)27,29,31–33 and an Arctic front position south of these sites29,33. Simultaneously, the salinity in the Caribbean Sea increased, indicated by planktonic foraminifer δ18O60 and dinocyst assemblages28. Even if AL ultimately contributed to Caribbean Sea salinity, we consider it unlikely that the changes in AL salinity compensated for the reduction of AL during phases of northward STF migrations. Taking the Pleistocene as a reference 61, the salinity of AL waters is set by Indian Ocean salinity changes, which in turn relates to changes in the Indonesian Throughflow (ITF). However, it is unlikely that this had a role at the higher sea level of the Pliocene. An existing ITF record also indicates a relatively fresher ITF between 3,500 ka and the onset of MIS M2 than before or after62, implying that Indian Ocean salinity variability was not comparable to its Pleistocene amplitude and unlikely relevant to the salinity of the Caribbean Sea in the late Pliocene through AL.
Fig. 5. Conceptual oceanographic changes of the AL, NADW and NAC across MIS M2.

a, At 3,400 ka and during MIS KM5c, the STF was southerly positioned, allowing a strong, low-salinity AL into the Atlantic. NADW formation happened far north, and a large latitudinal SST gradient persisted in the North Atlantic. b, During the MIS M2 peak glaciation, the STF moved equatorward and possibly shut down the AL. A weaker but slightly saltier AL entered the Atlantic. The NAC did not reach far north and sank at lower latitudes; subsequently, North Atlantic SSTs dropped, and its latitudinal gradient collapsed. Intensified NADW formation thus happened at lower latitudes and shoaled the Atlantic thermocline. The reach of the NAC and location of NADW formation are based on Fig. 4 and ref. 28. Colours of the sea surface indicate SST. The vertical profile, represented by the teal-white shading, indicates the water column, and the white shading line indicates the thermocline. The thickness of the arrows indicating currents reflects salinity. It should be noted that all colours and patterns are for descriptive purposes only; thus, there is no quantitative scale. Visualization is based on this study and refs. 27,61. Basemap in a created with tmap74.
Counterintuitive with respect to diminished NAC influence in the Norwegian Sea are signs of an intensification of NADW formation around 3400 ka, inferred from increasing carbonate-sand fraction in Caribbean Sea sediments (Fig. 3c)34,60 and a diminished benthic δ13C gradient along the Atlantic transect63. Conspicuously, this strengthening of NADW formation is concomitant with the thermocline shoaling recorded at sites U1475, 959 and 625 (Figs. 3 and 5b). Thus, the outstanding question is: how does a decrease in the northward reach of the NAC relate to an increase in the strength of the lower limb of the AMOC and thermocline shoaling at several Atlantic locations? Taking modelling outputs and proxy-based reconstructions together, modelling outputs suggest a weakened NAC influence in the high-latitude Atlantic alongside an intensified NADW formation during MIS M2 compared with warm climate conditions (Fig. 4a,b), consistent with palaeoceanographic evidence presented in previous studies mentioned above28,29,34. There is also a substantial streamfunction reduction at 60°–70° N in the upper 2,000 m of the water column, pointing to a basin-average southward shift of NADW formation, at least from the Nordic Sea, indicated by the location of maximum winter mixed-layer depth (Extended Data Fig. 9). The Atlantic overturning at lower latitudes becomes even stronger during MIS M2 than in the surrounding warm periods (Figs. 4b and 5)20. Modelling outputs also reproduce pan-Atlantic thermocline shoaling (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 7), consistent with the thermocline shoaling when NADW formation intensifies56,57.
Extended Data Fig. 9. Maximum winter mixed layer depth.

(a). mPWP (b). Figure generated with Ferret (http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret).
In the deglaciation phase of MIS M2, dinocyst assemblages at site U1475 record an abrupt southward STF migration, implying a revival of AL (Fig. 2). Besides the prevailing Operculodinium, the high-salinity species Tuberculodinium vancampoae is sporadically present in the same sample45. The presence of this warm, lagoonal species could suggest episodic release of relatively saline Indian Ocean water into the Southern Atlantic through AL during M2 deglaciation. A similar scenario has been proposed for the Pleistocene, in which salinity built up in the Indian Ocean during glacial phases is released into the Atlantic during deglaciations61. This scenario could also be true for MIS M2, although the overall high Pliocene sea levels64 may have complicated this. However, our record does not provide evidence for the proposed link between AMOC and the release of saline Indian Ocean water during the deglaciation phase of MIS M261. Notably, the inferred increased salinity of AL during the MIS M2 deglaciation does not seem to be conveyed to the Caribbean Sea, where decreased planktonic foraminifer δ18O instead indicates freshening60 (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, no abrupt change in NADW strength can be observed in the Caribbean Sea grain-size record (Fig. 3c). Therefore, STF migration and subsequent variations in AL strength appear disconnected from the AMOC strength during the deglaciation of MIS M2 as well.
During the mPWP, including 3,205 ka (MIS KM5c), dinocyst species typically found north of the STF are abundant in our records, indicating that the STF reached its southernmost location, implying a potential maximum in AL. Our reconstruction is consistent with the findings from the modelling simulations, which suggest that a poleward shift of the STF and Westerlies during the mPWP is plausible (Extended Data Fig. 6)65. Regarding the AMOC, palaeoceanographic records and available modelling results20,21 suggest a further northern reach of the NAC27,28,32, but a fresher Caribbean Sea60 along with weaker NADW formation34 during the mPWP relative to MIS M2 (Figs. 3c, 4b and 5c).
There is now an increasing body of work suggesting that, rather than AL, local North Atlantic buoyancy forcing exerts a direct major influence on AMOC strength in the Quaternary66,67. The exact architecture of Arctic gateways governs low-salinity water entering the North Atlantic and therefore has an important role in AMOC, especially in the mPWP simulation ensemble23,24. However, the available simulation ensemble does not enable a comparison of AMOC with MIS M2. Given the uncertainties in these geological settings25,26,68, we can hardly support an implication that conditions of Arctic gateways changed concurrently during the late Pliocene. Available ice-rafted debris records69,70 suggest that meltwater was only possible to be prevalent during MIS M2, which should, in theory, reduce the AMOC strength together with diminished AL. With the Greenland ice sheet being smaller in the late Pliocene71 than today, the buoyancy forcing likely came from other sources: high-latitude precipitation and sea ice boundary, for instance.
In summary, we find no apparent relationship between AL and AMOC during the late Pliocene. In addition, the divergence in TEX86- and UK′37-based SST records around 3,400 ka, recorded at multiple sites along the AMOC pathway, reveals a pan-Atlantic thermocline shoaling. We therefore propose that a southward shift in the NADW formation locus is concomitant with AMOC intensification and the pan-Atlantic thermocline shoaling. However, these AMOC dynamics are independent of AL but more likely dependent of local factors in the North Atlantic24. Our data imply that the majority of AL either did not reach the Caribbean Sea and North Atlantic15 or did not cause an essential salinity change to regulate AMOC, and thus challenge the long-held hypothesis1 that AMOC dynamics are (partly) forced by AL7,8,11, at least in the late Pliocene.
Methods
Site description
IODP site U1475 (41° 25.61′ S, 25° 15.64′ E; 2,669 m water depth) was drilled on the southwestern flank of the Agulhas Plateau, at the intersect of the Southern, Indian and Atlantic Oceans (Fig. 1)78. Today, site U1475 is located between the ARC and the STF, with seasonal SSTs between 11 °C and 17 °C (ref. 79). The site is currently bathed by the NADW78. Thus, it records the history of not only the latitudinal migration of the STF but also consequent SST changes in the geological past78. We use sediments retrieved from site U1475 holes B, C and F as a continuous splice of composite depth (CCSF) between 70 m and 140 m CCSF.
ODP site 625 (28° 49.9′ N, 87° 09.6′ W; 889 m water depth) was drilled in GoM, which is under the influence of NADW59, during ODP leg 100. Site 625 is on the path of warm Caribbean waters, which subsequently feed the Gulf Stream and the NAC (Fig. 1). Annual SST at site 625 ranges from 21 °C to 29 °C79. We use the sediments retrieved from site 625 hole B between 129 m and 165 m below the sea-floor.
Age models
The age model of site U1475 used in this study follows ref. 43. The shipboard age model78 was refined by aligning the shipboard physical properties records80 with the LR04 global benthic foraminiferal81 and probabilistic82 δ18O stacks (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Table 1). We linearly interpolate sample ages using LOESS smoothing. The late Pliocene interval of site 625 was dated using benthic foraminiferal δ18O stratigraphy by calibrating to the LR04 global benthic foraminiferal stack81 by ref. 83 (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Palynology and a dinoflagellate cyst-based STF migration reconstruction
A total of 112 sediment samples from site U1475 were processed for palynology, focusing on dinoflagellate cyst assemblages. The mPWP interval has a higher sampling resolution (average 4 kyr per sample) than the rest of the record (average 30 kyr per sample). Approximately 9 g of sediment was freeze-dried and subsequently crushed. A known number (n = 9,666 or 19,855) of Lycopodium clavatum spores was added to each sample for quantification. Hydrochloric acid (30%) and cold hydrofluoric acid (38%) were added to remove carbonates and silicates, respectively. The remaining residues were then sieved through a 10-μm nylon mesh, with an ultrasonic bath to disaggregate agglutinated organic particles. Subsequently, the residues were mounted on glass slides using glycerine jelly, sealed with varnish and counted using an Olympus CX41 optical microscope (under ×200 and ×400 magnification). At least 200 dinocyst specimens were counted per sample, if possible. No samples yielded fewer than 50 dinocyst specimens. Terrestrial and other aquatic palynomorphs were also counted but not determined to species level45.
We apply a recent overview of modern Southern Ocean dinocyst distributions37 to reconstruct mid-Pliocene surface ocean conditions at site U1475. K-means cluster analysis grouped Southern Ocean surface sediment samples into nine clusters, each with one dominant dinocyst species. We use the observations in ref. 37 that samples in these clusters are strongly geographically separated latitudinally, tied to specific ocean zones in the Southern Ocean. Specifically, these clusters reflect the strong latitudinal gradients in SST, sea ice existence, salinity and nutrient conditions. In particular, the cluster with dominant N. labyrinthus is characteristic of the Subantarctic Zone, south of the STF; those with dominant Impagidinium aculeatum (Iacu-cluster), O. centrocarpum (high-ocean cluster) and Spiniferites spp. (spin cluster) thrive north of the STF; Protoperdinium cysts are considered as a high-productivity indicator and dominate in samples from around the polar front (high-brig cluster); Islandinium spp. (Imin cluster) indicate the presence of (summer) sea ice and occur particularly around the Antarctic Peninsula today. Supplementary Fig. 3 provides an overview of the latitudinal distribution of dinocyst assemblage clusters in the modern ocean. The latitudinal position of the STF is then inferred from an STF index, based on the relative abundances of dinocyst taxa south of the STF (south of STF/(south + north of STF)) to show the migration of the STF. Although it does not directly indicate the exact latitude of the STF, a higher value indicates that the STF is positioned relatively further north and therefore, in theory, has less AL, and vice versa.
Biomarker analyses
A total of 183 sediment samples from site U1475, collected roughly every 15 cm from the splice, were processed for lipid analysis in the GeoLab at Utrecht University (UU). About 6 g of sediment was freeze-dried and homogenized before extraction with 25 ml of 9:1 (v/v) dichloromethane (DCM)–methanol (MeOH) using a Milestone Ethos X microwave system at 70 °C for 30 min. Sediments from ODP site 625 (n = 137) were extracted with DCM–MeOH (9:1, v/v) using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE 350, Dionex) in the GeoLab at UU. The ASE extraction method consisted of three 5-min extraction cycles at 100 °C and 7.6 × 106 Pa.
C46 standard (99 ng) was added to the total lipid extracts to quantify the absolute concentration of GDGTs. Activated Al2O3 columns were used to separate the total lipid extract into three fractions, using hexane–DCM (9:1, v/v), hexane–DCM (1:1, v/v) and DCM–MeOH (1:1, v/v) for apolar, ketone and polar fractions, respectively. Polar fractions were dried under a gentle N2 stream, then redissolved in hexane–isopropanol (99:1, v/v) and filtered using a 0.45-μm polytetrafluoroethylene filter before analysis on an Agilent 1260 Infinity series HPLC system coupled to an Agilent 6130 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer, following instrumental and analytical set-up as described in ref. 84.
At UU, the ketone fractions were dissolved in ethyl acetate and analysed on a gas chromatograph (GC) coupled to a flame ionization detector (GC-FID; Hewlett Packard 6890 series) equipped with a CP-Sil 5 fused-silica capillary column (25 m × 0.32 mm; film thickness 0.12 µm) and a 0.53-mm precolumn. The fractions were injected on-column at 70 °C with helium as a carrier gas at a constant pressure of 100 kPa. The oven programme was as follows: 70 °C for 1 min, then ramped to 130 °C at 20 °C min−1, then to 320 °C at 4 °C min−1, and finally held isothermally for 10 min. Di- and tri-unsaturated C37 alkenones were identified based on retention time, and a known amount of squalane was used as an internal standard for quantification.
A second set of samples from site U1475 was analysed for GDGTs (n = 128) and alkenones (n = 302) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst (UMass) and the University of Notre Dame (ND), respectively. At UMass, GDGTs were analysed using an Agilent 1260 series HPLC coupled to an Agilent 6120 single-quadrupole mass detector. The instrument was set up according to ref. 84. At ND, alkenones in the ketone fractions were identified and quantified using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Trace 1310 GC-FID coupled to an ISQ MS system, using 5α-androstane as an internal standard. The Trace 1310 GC was equipped with an Rtx-5 column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) with a temperature programme starting at 70 °C, then increasing by 20 °C min−1 to 130 °C, and finally, increasing by 4 °C min−1 up to 320 °C, where it was held for 20 min85.
Interlaboratory comparison to integrate SST records for site U1475
As mentioned above, biomarker data were generated in different laboratories, including UU, UMass and ND, which warrants an assessment of the interlaboratory consistency and the fidelity of merging the results from different instruments.
A first compilation of the biomarker data from IODP site U1475 indicated that the records from different laboratories are consistent in timing and direction of trends. However, the proxy values from UMass and ND are approximately 0.03 (TEX86) and 0.05 (UK′37) higher than those from UU (Supplementary Fig. 4). Such offsets are well within the ranges reported in global interlaboratory comparisons for TEX86 (0.023–0.053, translating into 1–3 °C)86, or the UK′37 (2.1 °C)87, and can be attributed to differences in instrument settings and maintenance. Furthermore, when converting TEX8688 and UK′3789 into SSTs, we note that, irrespective of the laboratory, UK′37-based SSTs89 are consistently 2–3 °C higher than TEX86-based SSTs (Supplementary Fig. 5)88.
However, to merge the data from different laboratories into one temperature record for each biomarker proxy, a subset of 15 sediment samples (randomly selected from the samples measured at UU) was also measured in the two other laboratories. This exercise showed that TEX86 values from UMass are consistently 0.01–0.04 (median = 0.024, average = 0.023, s.d. = 0.0085) higher than those from UU (Supplementary Table 2), comparable to the offset between the two TEX86 records generated at these laboratories (Supplementary Fig. 5). Hence, the TEX86 data generated at UMass were adjusted to the UU-TEX86 record by subtracting 0.024 TEX86 units. Unlike in the separate UK′37 records (Supplementary Fig. 4), UK′37 values show negligible difference (median = −0.0004, average = 0.0024, s.d. = 0.0068) between ND and UU in the comparison (Supplementary Table 3). Given that the UK′37-based SSTs are consistently higher than TEX86-based SSTs in the composite records (Supplementary Fig. 5), the UK′37 data generated at ND were adjusted to the UU-UK′37 record by subtracting 0.05 UK′37 units to resolve the temperature difference and generate a composite UK′37-SST record as shown in Fig. 2 and Extended Data Fig. 1. Thus, even though the data were generated from sediment cores retrieved from different holes of site U1475 and by different people in different laboratories, we were able to generate ‘one’ record for this site. Collectively, it should be noted that such interlaboratory offsets are unfortunately quite common86,90. Therefore, comparisons between records generated by different laboratories should be interpreted with caution, as should model-palaeo data comparisons, especially when the difference is subtle.
SST reconstructions
TEX86 values are derived from the relative amount of cyclopentyl moieties in GDGTs91, which are produced by Nitrososphaerota (previously Thaumarchaeota)92. Several indices and ratios have been developed to identify potential contributions to the sedimentary GDGT pool from other types of archaea and are examined here (Extended Data Figs. 3 and 5). In short, the branched and isoprenoid tetraether (BIT) index is proposed to indicate a contribution of terrestrial organic matter input93, in which the terrestrially produced isoGDGTs94 can alter the TEX86 in marine sediments. However, BIT index values should be interpreted cautiously because in situ production of branched GDGTs in coastal marine settings can alter the BIT index itself95. The methane index (MI)96 and the ratio of GDGT-0/crenarchaeol97 might indicate inputs by anaerobic methane-metabolizing archaea or methanogenic archaea, respectively, although not in every setting98. The RI is a more general indicator of GDGTs from non-Nitrososphaerotal sources or the impact of factors other than temperature99. Thus, downcore changes in the RI likely indicate shifts in the archaeal community in the water column. The provenance depth in the water column of GDGTs in marine sediments is a topic of attention in recent marine isoGDGT calibration studies47. It is clear that Nitrososphaerotal GDGTs are predominantly produced in the water-column subsurface, at depths with maximum ammonia production below the mixed layer and near the thermocline49,100. However, deeper-dwelling archaea can also produce GDGTs that do not relate to surface temperature in the same way. Their contribution can be qualitatively traced by the ratio between GDGT-2 and GDGT-349,50,101. Available core-top TEX86-temperature calibrations calibrate TEX86 either to the modern SST, given the strong correlation that usually exists between SSTs and thermocline temperatures, or to an assumed export depth, thus providing a subsurface calibration102–104. TEX86 values are converted to SSTs using an exponential regression88. A comparison of the results using this calibration with those of ref. 103 can be found in Extended Data Fig. 1. As TEX86 does not deliver a reliable SST signal at both sites (Supplementary Discussion), we do not favour either calibration.
UK′37 is based on the ratio between the di- and tri-unsaturated alkenones105. UK′37 is subsequently converted into SST using a core-top linear calibration89, which is consistent with most published data, thus enabling inter-site comparison. A comparison with another calibration106 can be found in Extended Data Fig. 1. The difference in reconstructed SST between calibrations is very small.
Evolutionary spectral analyses
For spectral analysis, the merged UK′37- and TEX86-based SST records were smoothed with a 4-point moving average and interpolated to uniform spacing of 1.5 kyr and 3.3 kyr, respectively. The evolutionary spectral analyses were computed with a 405-kyr sliding window on the interpolated and then detrended records of UK′37- and TEX86-based SST. All the data preparation and analyses were conducted with Acycle107.
Climate modelling
Climate simulations used in this work are derived from ref. 21 and were run with the Institut Pierre–Simon Laplace atmosphere–ocean coupled general circulation (IPSL-CM5A) model. More details about the IPSL-CM5A model can be found in ref. 108. In their work, the simulation ‘mPWP’ was performed based on the PRSIM3D boundary conditions109–111 and was the core simulation for the PlioMIP phase 1. ‘MIS M2’ was performed based on the equilibrated state of ‘mPWP’, by considering different forcing representing the M2 glacial, typically with a lowering of pCO2 (from 400 ppm to 220 ppm), the minimum summer insolation (around 3,313 ka) and the expansion of land ice sheet. More details of the experimental set-up can be found in ref. 21.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02055-5.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–5 and Tables 1– 3.
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Nierop, M. Hoorweg, D. Eefting, N. Welters and G. Dammers for the laboratory assistance at GeoLab, UU. Special thanks to K. Nierop (UU) and R. Williams (ND) for their generous support with the biomarker interlaboratory comparison. V. Verhelst helped with preliminary data analysis for site U1475. We thank IODP, specifically the Kochi Core Center and Bremem Core Repository, for providing samples from sites U1475 and 625. We are grateful to A. Rice, J. Weiffenbach and V. Rigalleau for discussions, and to D. Tangunan, M. Sinnesael and S. Schouten for providing data of previous studies. The authors acknowledge use of the Ferret program for analysis and graphics in this paper. Ferret is a product of NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (information is available at http://ferret.pmel.noaa.gov/Ferret).
Extended data
Author contributions
P.K.B. designed the research. S.H. and M.S. generated the palynology data for site U1475. S.H., A.C.-S., M.A.B., I.S.C. and M.S. generated the biomarker data for site U1475. C.M.H.v.d.W. generated the biomarker data for site 625. S.H. and F.L. conducted the spectral analysis for site U1475. N.T. revisited the model simulations. S.H. interpreted the data and wrote the paper with input from all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Geoscience thanks Benjamin Petrick and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: James Super, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.
Funding
P.K.B. acknowledges the European Research Council, H2020 OceaNice (grant number 802835). N.T. acknowledges the support from the Strategy Priority Research Program (Category B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant number XDB0710000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42488201). M.A.B. acknowledges US National Science Foundation (NSF-OCE-1737218). F.S., F.P. and A.C.-S. acknowledge the program of the Netherlands Earth System Science Centre (NESSC), financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW). A.S.v.d.H. acknowledges funding by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) under a Vici project (project number VI.C.202.081) and by the European Union to the Past to Future (P2F) project, which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement number 101184070. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the paper.
Data availability
All new data are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15906076 (ref. 45). Modelling outputs used in this study21 are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20379908 (ref. 46).
Code availability
Due to the update of the model version, the code of IPSL-CM5A is not publicly available now and might be available on request from the IPSL group. The general information for this model can be found in the IPSL Climate Modelling Centre Wiki page (https://cmc.ipsl.fr/ipsl-climate-models/ipsl-cm5/; last accessed 26 May 2026) and in ref. 104.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02055-5.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02055-5.
References
- 1.Broecker, W. S. & Denton, G. H. The role of ocean–atmosphere reorganizations in glacial cycles. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta53, 2465–2501 (1989). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rühs, S. et al. Robust estimates for the decadal evolution of Agulhas Leakage from the 1960s to the 2010s. Commun. Earth Environ.3, 318 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Biastoch, A., Böning, C. W., Schwarzkopf, F. U. & Lutjeharms, J. R. E. Increase in Agulhas Leakage due to poleward shift of Southern Hemisphere westerlies. Nature462, 495–498 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schulzki, T., Schwarzkopf, F. U. & Biastoch, A. Atlantic meridional overturning response to increased Southern Ocean wind stress in a climate model with an eddy-rich ocean. J. Clim.37, 5769–5792 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wegwerth, A. et al. South Pacific sea surface temperature and global ocean circulation changes since the late Miocene. Nat. Commun.16, 6593 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Toggweiler, J. R., Russell, J. L. & Carson, S. R. Midlatitude westerlies, atmospheric CO2, and climate change during the ice ages. Paleoceanography21, PA2005 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beal, L. M. et al. On the role of the Agulhas system in ocean circulation and climate. Nature472, 429–436 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bard, E. & Rickaby, R. E. M. Migration of the subtropical front as a modulator of glacial climate. Nature460, 380–383 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van Sebille, E., Biastoch, A., van Leeuwen, P. J. & de Ruijter, W. P. M. A weaker Agulhas Current leads to more Agulhas Leakage. Geophys. Res. Lett.36, L03601 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Durgadoo, J. V., Loveday, B. R., Reason, C. J. C., Penven, P. & Biastoch, A. Agulhas Leakage predominantly responds to the Southern Hemisphere westerlies. J. Phys. Oceanogr.43, 2113–2131 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Caley, T., Giraudeau, J., Malaizé, B., Rossignol, L. & Pierre, C. Agulhas Leakage as a key process in the modes of Quaternary climate changes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA109, 6835–6839 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Peeters, F. J. C. et al. Vigorous exchange between the Indian and Atlantic oceans at the end of the past five glacial periods. Nature430, 661–665 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang, R., Sun, S., Chen, Z. & Wu, L. Limited influence of the Agulhas Leakage on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation under present-day climate conditions. Commun. Earth Environ.6, 1–8 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Großelindemann, H., Castruccio, F. S., Danabasoglu, G. & Biastoch, A. Long-term variability and trends in the Agulhas Leakage and its impacts on the global overturning. Ocean Sci.21, 93–112 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bernardo, P. S. et al. The trapping of Agulhas Rings in the South Brazil Bight. Deep Sea Res. Part I219, 104486 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ditlevsen, P. & Ditlevsen, S. Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nat. Commun.14, 4254 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haywood, A. M. et al. On the identification of a Pliocene time slice for data–model comparison. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A371, 20120515 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De la Vega, E., Chalk, T. B., Wilson, P. A., Bysani, R. P. & Foster, G. L. Atmospheric CO2 during the Mid-Piacenzian warm period and the M2 glaciation. Sci. Rep.10, 11002 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dowsett, H. et al. The PRISM4 (mid-Piacenzian) paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Clim. Past12, 1519–1538 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dolan, A. M. et al. Modelling the enigmatic late Pliocene glacial event — marine isotope stage M2. Glob. Planet. Change128, 47–60 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan, N. et al. Exploring the MIS M2 glaciation occurring during a warm and high atmospheric CO2 Pliocene background climate. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.472, 266–276 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang, Z.-S. et al. Mid-pliocene Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation not unlike modern. Clim. Past9, 1495–1504 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weiffenbach, J. E. et al. Unraveling the mechanisms and implications of a stronger mid-Pliocene Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in PlioMIP2. Clim. Past19, 61–85 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiffenbach, J. E., Chan, W.-L., Abe-Ouchi, A. & von der Heydt, A. S. Impact of mid-Pliocene boundary conditions on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Geophys. Res. Lett.52, e2024GL113118 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brierley, C. M. & Fedorov, A. V. Comparing the impacts of Miocene–Pliocene changes in inter-ocean gateways on climate: Central American Seaway, Bering Strait, and Indonesia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.444, 116–130 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Horikawa, K. et al. Pliocene cooling enhanced by flow of low-salinity Bering Sea water to the Arctic Ocean. Nat. Commun.6, 7587 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Naafs, B. D. A., Voelker, A. H. L., Karas, C., Andersen, N. & Sierro, F. J. Repeated near-collapse of the Pliocene sea surface temperature gradient in the North Atlantic. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.35, e2020PA003905 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 28.De Schepper, S. et al. Northern Hemisphere glaciation during the globally warm early late Pliocene. PLoS ONE8, e81508 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Naafs, B. D. A. et al. Late Pliocene changes in the North Atlantic Current. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.298, 434–442 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lawrence, K. T., Herbert, T. D., Brown, C. M., Raymo, M. E. & Haywood, A. M. High-amplitude variations in North Atlantic sea surface temperature during the early Pliocene warm period. Paleoceanography24, PA2218 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bachem, P. E., Risebrobakken, B., De Schepper, S. & McClymont, E. L. Highly variable Pliocene sea surface conditions in the Norwegian Sea. Clim. Past13, 1153–1168 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Panitz, S., Salzmann, U., Risebrobakken, B., De Schepper, S. & Pound, M. J. Climate variability and long-term expansion of peatlands in Arctic Norway during the late Pliocene (ODP Site 642, Norwegian Sea). Clim. Past12, 1043–1060 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Schepper, S., Head, M. J. & Groeneveld, J. North Atlantic Current variability through marine isotope stage M2 (circa 3.3 Ma) during the mid-Pliocene. Paleoceanography24, PA4206 (2009).
- 34.Haug, G. H. & Tiedemann, R. Effect of the formation of the Isthmus of Panama on Atlantic Ocean thermohaline circulation. Nature393, 673–676 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Petrick, B. et al. Late Pliocene upwelling in the Southern Benguela region. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.429, 62–71 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Petrick, B. et al. Oceanographic and climatic evolution of the southeastern subtropical Atlantic over the last 3.5 Ma. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.492, 12–21 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thöle, L. M. et al. An expanded database of Southern Hemisphere surface sediment dinoflagellate cyst assemblages and their oceanographic affinities. J. Micropalaeontology42, 35–56 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Martínez-Garcia, A., Rosell-Melé, A., McClymont, E. L., Gersonde, R. & Haug, G. H. Subpolar link to the emergence of the modern equatorial Pacific cold tongue. Science328, 1550–1553 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Taylor, A. K. et al. Plio-Pleistocene continental hydroclimate and Indian Ocean sea surface temperatures at the southeast African margin. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.36, e2020PA004186 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu, L. et al. Extremely poleward shift of Antarctic Circumpolar Current by eccentricity during the Last Interglacial. Nat. Commun.16, 8869 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Starr, A. et al. Shifting Antarctic Circumpolar Current south of Africa over the past 1.9 million years. Sci. Adv.11, eadp1692 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu, S. et al. Zonally asymmetric changes in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current strength over the past million years. Nat. Geosci.19, 201–208 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tangunan, D. N. et al. Southern Ocean and southern African monsoon forcing of the Subtropical Indian Ocean Early Pliocene ‘Biogenic Bloom’. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.39, e2024PA004927 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zonneveld, K. A. F. et al. Atlas of modern dinoflagellate cyst distribution based on 2405 data points. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.191, 1–197 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hou, S. et al. Data for ‘Agulhas Leakage disconnected to Atlantic Meridional Overturning in the Late Pliocene’. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.15906076 (2025). [DOI]
- 46.Tan, N. Modeling output for ‘Agulhas Leakage disconnected to Atlantic Meridional Overturning in the Late Pliocene’. Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.20379908 (2026). [DOI]
- 47.van der Weijst, C. M. H. et al. A 15-million-year surface- and subsurface-integrated TEX86 temperature record from the eastern equatorial Atlantic. Clim. Past18, 1947–1962 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 48.van der Weijst, C. M. H. et al. Pliocene evolution of the tropical Atlantic thermocline depth. Clim. Past18, 961–973 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hurley, S. J., Lipp, J. S., Close, H. G., Hinrichs, K.-U. & Pearson, A. Distribution and export of isoprenoid tetraether lipids in suspended particulate matter from the water column of the Western Atlantic Ocean. Org. Geochem.116, 90–102 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Taylor, K. W. R., Huber, M., Hollis, C. J., Hernandez-Sanchez, M. T. & Pancost, R. D. Re-evaluating modern and Palaeogene GDGT distributions: implications for SST reconstructions. Glob. Planet. Change108, 158–174 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lopes dos Santos, R. A. et al. Glacial–interglacial variability in Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and thermocline adjustments in the tropical North Atlantic. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.300, 407–414 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 52.van der Weijst, C. M. H. et al. A ternary mixing model approach using benthic foraminifer δ13C-δ18O data to reconstruct late Pliocene deep atlantic water mass mixing. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.35, e2019PA003804 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chiang, J. C. H., Cheng, W. & Bitz, C. M. Fast teleconnections to the tropical Atlantic sector from Atlantic thermohaline adjustment. Geophys. Res. Lett.35, L07704 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sévellec, F. & Fedorov, A. V. AMOC sensitivity to surface buoyancy fluxes: stronger ocean meridional heat transport with a weaker volume transport? Clim. Dyn.47, 1497–1513 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang, J. Increasing Antarctic sea ice under warming atmospheric and oceanic conditions. J. Clim.20, 2515–2529 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang, R. X., Cane, M. A., Naik, N. & Goodman, P. Global adjustment of the thermocline in response to deepwater formation. Geophys. Res. Lett.27, 759–762 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Steph, S. et al. Early Pliocene increase in thermohaline overturning: a precondition for the development of the modern equatorial Pacific cold tongue. Paleoceanography25, PA2202 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Peterson, R. G. & Stramma, L. Upper-level circulation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr.26, 1–73 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Portela, E. et al. Hydrography of the central and western Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans123, 5134–5149 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Haug, G. H., Tiedemann, R., Zahn, R. & Ravelo, A. C. Role of Panama uplift on oceanic freshwater balance. Geology29, 207–210 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Nuber, S. et al. Indian Ocean salinity build-up primes deglacial ocean circulation recovery. Nature617, 306–311 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Auer, G. et al. Timing and acing of Indonesian throughflow restriction and its connection to late Pliocene climate shifts. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.34, 635–657 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bell, D. B., Jung, S. J. A., Kroon, D., Lourens, L. J. & Hodell, D. A. Local and regional trends in Plio-Pleistocene δ18O records from benthic foraminifera. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.15, 3304–3321 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Braaten, A. H. et al. Limited exchange between the deep Pacific and Atlantic oceans during the warm mid-Pliocene and marine isotope stage M2 ‘glaciation’. Clim. Past19, 2109–2125 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li, X. et al. Mid-Pliocene westerlies from PlioMIP simulations. Adv. Atmos. Sci.32, 909–923 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wharton, J. H. et al. Relatively warm deep-water formation persisted in the Last Glacial Maximum. Nature650, 116–122 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weijer, W. et al. Interactions between the Arctic Mediterranean and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: a review. Oceanography35, 118–127 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 68.Marincovich, L. Jr. Central American paleogeography controlled Pliocene Arctic Ocean molluscan migrations. Geology28, 551–554 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kleiven, H. F., Jansen, E., Fronval, T. & Smith, T. M. Intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciations in the circum Atlantic region (3.5–2.4 Ma)—ice-rafted detritus evidence. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.184, 213–223 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 70.Smith, Y. M. et al. Icebergs in the Nordic seas throughout the late Pliocene. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.33, 318–335 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.De Schepper, S., Gibbard, P. L., Salzmann, U. & Ehlers, J. A global synthesis of the marine and terrestrial evidence for glaciation during the Pliocene Epoch. Earth Sci. Rev.135, 83–102 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 72.Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T. & Nowlin, W. D. On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep Sea Res. Part I42, 641–673 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 73.Earth Science Data Systems, NASA MODIS Aqua Level 3 SST Thermal IR 8 Day 4km Nighttime V2019.0 Earthdata (2025); 10.5067/MODSA-8D4N9 [DOI]
- 74.Tennekes, M. tmap: thematic maps in R. J. Stat. Softw.84, 1–39 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 75.Acker, J. G. & Leptoukh, G. Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union88, 14–17 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 76.Westerhold, T. et al. An astronomically dated record of Earth’s climate and its predictability over the last 66 million years. Science369, 1383–1387 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Laskar, J. et al. A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys.428, 261–285 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hall, I. R. et al. Site U1475. In Proc. Int. Ocean Discovery Program Vol. 361 (eds Hall, I. R. et al.) (IODP, 2017); 10.14379/iodp.proc.361.104.2017 [DOI]
- 79.Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2013. Volume 1, Temperature, NOAA atlas NESDIS (2013); https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/14847
- 80.Gruetzner, J. et al. A new seismic stratigraphy in the Indian-Atlantic Ocean gateway resembles major paleo-oceanographic changes of the last 7 Ma. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.20, 339–358 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography20, PA1003 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ahn, S., Khider, D., Lisiecki, L. E. & Lawrence, C. E. A. probabilistic Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of benthic δ18O using a profile hidden Markov model. Dyn. Stat. Clim. Syst.2, dzx002 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dearing Crampton-Flood, E. et al. Identifying marine and freshwater overprints on soil-derived branched GDGT temperature signals in Pliocene Mississippi and Amazon River fan sediments. Org. Geochem.154, 104200 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S.Fi The effect of improved chromatography on GDGT-based palaeoproxies. Org. Geochem.93, 1–6 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cartagena-Sierra, A. et al. Latitudinal migrations of the subtropical front at the Agulhas Plateau through the mid-Pleistocene transition. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.36, e2020PA004084 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 86.Schouten, S. et al. An interlaboratory study of TEX86 and BIT analysis of sediments, extracts, and standard mixtures. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.14, 5263–5285 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rosell-Melé, A. et al. Precision of the current methods to measure the alkenone proxy U37K′ and absolute alkenone abundance in sediments: results of an interlaboratory comparison study. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.2, 1046 (2001).
- 88.Kim, J.-H. et al. New indices and calibrations derived from the distribution of crenarchaeal isoprenoid tetraether lipids: implications for past sea surface temperature reconstructions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta74, 4639–4654 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 89.Müller, P. J., Kirst, G., Ruhland, G., von Storch, I. & Rosell-Melé, A. Calibration of the alkenone paleotemperature index U37K′ based on core-tops from the eastern South Atlantic and the global ocean (60°N–60°S). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta62, 1757–1772 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- 90.Bijl, P. K. et al. Reviews and syntheses: best practices for the application of marine GDGTs as proxy for paleotemperatures: sampling, processing, analyses, interpretation, and archiving protocols. Biogeosciences22, 6465–6508 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 91.Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C., Schefuß, E. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Distributional variations in marine crenarchaeotal membrane lipids: a new tool for reconstructing ancient sea water temperatures? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.204, 265–274 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 92.Oren, A. & Garrity, G. M. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.71, 005056 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hopmans, E. C. et al. A novel proxy for terrestrial organic matter in sediments based on branched and isoprenoid tetraether lipids. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.224, 107–116 (2004). [Google Scholar]
- 94.Weijers, J. W. H., Schouten, S., Spaargaren, O. C. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Occurrence and distribution of tetraether membrane lipids in soils: implications for the use of the TEX86 proxy and the BIT index. Org. Geochem.37, 1680–1693 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 95.Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Spatial heterogeneity of sources of branched tetraethers in shelf systems: the geochemistry of tetraethers in the Berau River delta (Kalimantan, Indonesia). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta186, 13–31 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 96.Zhang, Y. G. et al. Methane index: a tetraether archaeal lipid biomarker indicator for detecting the instability of marine gas hydrates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.307, 525–534 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 97.Blaga, C. I., Reichart, G.-J., Heiri, O. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Tetraether membrane lipid distributions in water-column particulate matter and sediments: a study of 47 European lakes along a north–south transect. J. Paleolimnol.41, 523–540 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hou, S. et al. Lipid-biomarker-based sea surface temperature record offshore Tasmania over the last 23 million years. Clim. Past19, 787–802 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M. & Wang, Z. Ring index: a new strategy to evaluate the integrity of TEX86 paleothermometry. Paleoceanography31, 220–232 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 100.Schouten, S., Hopmans, E. C. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. The organic geochemistry of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether lipids: a review. Org. Geochem.54, 19–61 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hernández-Sánchez, M. T., Woodward, E. M. S., Taylor, K. W. R., Henderson, G. M. & Pancost, R. D. Variations in GDGT distributions through the water column in the South East Atlantic Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta132, 337–348 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kim, J.-H. et al. Influence of deep-water derived isoprenoid tetraether lipids on the TEX86H paleothermometer in the Mediterranean Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta150, 125–141 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 103.Tierney, J. E. & Tingley, M. P. A Bayesian, spatially-varying calibration model for the TEX86 proxy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta127, 83–106 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tierney, J. E. & Tingley, M. P. A TEX86 surface sediment database and extended Bayesian calibration. Sci. Data2, 150029 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Prahl, F. G. & Wakeham, S. G. Calibration of unsaturation patterns in long-chain ketone compositions for palaeotemperature assessment. Nature330, 367–369 (1987). [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tierney, J. E. & Tingley, M. P. BAYSPLINE: a new calibration for the alkenone paleothermometer. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol.33, 281–301 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 107.Li, M., Hinnov, L. & Kump, L. Acycle: time-series analysis software for paleoclimate research and education. Comput. Geosci.127, 12–22 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 108.Dufresne, J.-L. et al. Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth system model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim. Dyn.40, 2123–2165 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 109.Contoux, C., Ramstein, G. & Jost, A. Modelling the mid-Pliocene warm period climate with the IPSL coupled model and its atmospheric component LMDZ5A. Geosci. Model Dev.5, 903–917 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 110.Dowsett, H. J. et al. Assessing confidence in Pliocene sea surface temperatures to evaluate predictive models. Nat. Clim. Change2, 365–371 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 111.Salzmann, U., Haywood, A. & Lunt, D. J. The past is a guide to the future? Comparing Middle Pliocene vegetation with predicted biome distributions for the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A367, 189–204 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Discussion, Figs. 1–5 and Tables 1– 3.
Data Availability Statement
All new data are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15906076 (ref. 45). Modelling outputs used in this study21 are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20379908 (ref. 46).
Due to the update of the model version, the code of IPSL-CM5A is not publicly available now and might be available on request from the IPSL group. The general information for this model can be found in the IPSL Climate Modelling Centre Wiki page (https://cmc.ipsl.fr/ipsl-climate-models/ipsl-cm5/; last accessed 26 May 2026) and in ref. 104.
