Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jul 23;31(6):521–535. doi: 10.1007/s00775-026-02168-7

Genetic dissection of formate hydrogenlyase-2 function: a metalloenzyme involved in bacterial hydrogen production

Thomas CP Reed 1, Alexander J Finney 1,3, Magali Roger 1,2, Frank Sargent 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13645896  PMID: 42489678

Abstract

Formate hydrogenlyases are metalloenzymes that can either produce molecular hydrogen gas or use H2 to convert carbon dioxide to formic acid, thus potentially contributing doubly to a sustainable energy future. The structure of formate hydrogenlyase reveals a membrane-bound redox enzyme that shares a common ancestor with the mitochondrial complex I (NADH dehydrogenase). As such, formate hydrogenlyase falls into a category of so‐called ‘complex‐I‐like’ enzymes, that are found in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotic organelles. They share a common core structure of a membrane arm (most likely involved in proton or ion translocation) and a peripheral arm containing metal cofactors and involved in electron transfer. In this work, we clone a gene cluster from Pectobacterium atrosepticum encoding formate hydrogenlyase-2 (FHL-2). A bank of Escherichia coli host strains, themselves devoid of various combinations of native formate hydrogenlyase genes, are employed to characterise FHL-2. We demonstrate that P. atrosepticum FHL-2 is active in an E. coli host in that it can generate H2 under fermentative growth conditions. Unlike native E. coli formate hydrogenlyase-1 (FHL-1), recombinant P. atrosepticum FHL-2 cannot perform the reverse reaction and generate formic acid from H2 and CO2. By testing different combinations of genes by taking an in vivo cross-complementation approach we conclude that the extended membrane arm exhibited by FHL-2 is a major factor in controlling directionality of the enzyme.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-026-02168-7.

Keywords: Mixed acid fermentation, Anaerobic metabolism, Molecular genetics, Hydrogenase, Formate dehydrogenase, Formate hydrogenlyase

Introduction

The model organism Escherichia coli is a facultatively anaerobic γ-Proteobacterium and therefore possesses a flexible metabolism that enables survival in a range of environmental conditions [1]. In the presence of oxygen, E. coli will preferentially perform aerobic respiration using short, quinone-dependent, electron transport chains for oxidative phosphorylation [2]. Under anaerobic conditions, however, E. coli can adapt its respiratory electron transport chain to utilise alternative terminal electron acceptors, such as nitrate, fumarate and dimethyl sulfoxide [2, 3]. In the complete absence of exogeneous terminal electron acceptors, E. coli will instead conduct ‘mixed-acid’ fermentation [4], where glucose is metabolised via the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas glycolytic pathway to generate ATP by substrate level phosphorylation [5]. This process results in the excretion of ethanol, acetic acid, formic acid and lactic acid as waste products [6]. Extracellular accumulation of formic acid, and the associated pH decrease, induces the production of the formate hydrogenlyase-1 complex (FHL-1), which then functions in pH regulation by catalysing the disproportionation of formic acid to molecular hydrogen and carbon dioxide [7]. This formate-dependent H2 evolution reaction can be considered the physiological ‘forward’ reaction of FHL-1. However, FHL-1 is also readily reversible and can carry out the ‘reverse’ reaction as a hydrogen-dependent CO2 reductase (HDCR) where formic acid can be generated from gaseous substrates under permissive environmental conditions [8].

The FHL-1 complex is encoded by the hycABCDEFGHI operon and the distally located fdhF gene. Expression of both the hyc operon and fdhF is mediated by the transcriptional activator FhlA and repressor HycA [9, 10]. The functional FHL-1 complex is comprised of a membrane arm made of two integral membrane proteins, HycC and HycD, connected to a cytoplasmic, catalytic, peripheral or soluble arm. The peripheral arm is comprised of the molybdenum- and selenium-dependent formate dehydrogenase-H (FdhF) connected to a group 4 [NiFe] hydrogenase (HycEG) by two Fe-S proteins (HycB and HycF) [9, 11, 12]. The hydrogenase component is called hydrogenase-3 (‘Hyd-3’) in E. coli. There is sequence similarity between all of the FHL-1 subunits and subunits of the respiratory NADH dehydrogenase complex I [13]. Formate hydrogenlyase can therefore be considered a member of a large group of membrane-bound enzymes collectively termed the ‘NADH dehydrogenase-like’, or ‘complex I-like’, enzymes.

The apparent evolutionary link between FHL-1 and complex I is another membrane-bound hydrogenase termed FHL-2. The FHL-2 complex is predicted to be comprised of a peripheral arm constituting a formate dehydrogenase (FdhF) linked to a group 4 [NiFe] hydrogenase [14] (this time termed ‘Hyd-4’) via three Fe-S cluster proteins (HyfA, HyfH and HyfI). The key difference between FHL-1 and FHL-2 type proteins is that FHL-2 is predicted to comprise a larger five-subunit membrane arm, that much more closely resembles the larger membrane arm found in bona fide complex I and other complex-I-like proteins.

The E. coli genome contains a gene cluster (hyfABCDEFGHIJR-focB) that would encode an FHL-2 complex [15]. However, the evidence for physiological FHL-2 activity in E. coli K-12 is inconsistent, with some studies highlighting that the FHL-2 complex is possibly not transcribed under natural [16] or other laboratory conditions [17]. Furthermore, E. coli strains lacking functional FHL-1 are usually incapable of producing hydrogen gas [18], while the inactivation of FHL-2 can have little or no effect on overall hydrogen production levels [19]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that there is some data pointing to FHL-2 activity in E. coli [20, 21].

Although E. coli FHL-2 remains to be more fully understood, research based on alternative model organisms has identified functional FHL-2 complexes in Vibrio tritonius [22], Trabulsiella guamensis [23] and Pectobacterium atrosepticum [24]. The FHL-2 from P. atrosepticum is encoded by the hyfABCDEFGHIJK-hyfR operon adjacent to the fdhF-hydN operon with the two predicted to be transcribed from divergent promotors [24, 25]. The hydN gene encodes a protein very similar to HycB and HyfA (Supplementary Figures S1-S10), which are considered the small subunits of the formate dehydrogenase in FHL-1 and FHL-2, respectively. Interestingly, the FdhF formate dehydrogenase of P. atrosepticum FHL-2 is predicted to display a catalytic cysteine residue at its active site rather than selenocysteine, as seen in E. coli FdhF [24, 26]. Similar to E. coli FHL-1 and FHL-2, the peripheral arm of the FHL-2 complex from P. atrosepticum contains the catalytic large subunit of a group 4 [NiFe] hydrogenase (encoded by hyfG). This protein is the equivalent to HycE in FHL-1 (Supplementary Figures S1-S10). The hydrogenase large subunit is linked directly to a hydrogenase small subunit (HyfI in FHL-2 and HycG in FHL-1) and the dimer is connected to the formate dehydrogenase by another Fe-S cluster protein (HyfH in FHL-2 and HycF in FHL-1) (Fig. 1B). The membrane arm of FHL-2 is comprised of 5 integral membrane subunits: the direct membrane anchor for the peripheral arm - HyfC; three antiporter-like protein homologs (HyfB, HyfD and HyfF); and the HyfE protein, which is not found in FHL-1 but shares some sequence similarity with NuoK from complex I [24].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Cloning FHL-2 from Pectobaterium atrosepticum. (A) The gene cluster encoding FHL-2 from P. atrosepticum. (B) A model of the predicted structure of the P. atrosepticum FHL-2 complex. Subunits are colour-coded exactly as the gene names in panel (A). The membrane arm comprises five proteins – HyfB, -C, -D, -E, and -F. The peripheral arm comprises five proteins - HyfA, -G, -H, -I, and FdhF. (C) A map of the 19.7 kbp pTotal (AmpR) plasmid carrying the entire FHL-2 cluster

P. atrosepticum is a phytopathogenic enterobacterium known to cause soft rot diseases [25]. This, combined with its slow growth rate and preference for relatively low temperatures, make it a suboptimal host for large scale biochemical or structural studies. Therefore, in this work, the genes encoding FHL-2 from P. atrosepticum were characterised using a plasmid-based approach. This enabled the FHL-2 complex to be studied in an E. coli host, where it was shown to be capable of producing molecular hydrogen during fermentative growth. Additionally, unlike FHL-1, the recombinant FHL-2 complex appears unable to function in reverse as a hydrogen-dependent carbon dioxide reductase (HDCR). The inability of FHL-2 to function bidirectionally may be a consequence of the biochemical properties of the Hyd-4 component of FHL-2 rather than the formate dehydrogenase component.

Materials and methods

Strain construction

The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Gene deletions were conducted by homologous recombination using pMAK705 protocol from the parental strain FTD89 (MC4100 ΔhyaB, ΔhybC) [27]. FTD200, which lacks all functional hydrogenases, was constructed from FTD89 through the removal of the hyc and hyf operons. First, 500 bp up- and downstream of the hyc operon (hycA-I) were amplified by PCR and assembled in pMAK705 [27]. Following this, the hyf operon was deleted using pGS1039 [17]. FTD250 was constructed from FTD200 via the deletion of fdhF using a pMAK705 vector, constructed as previously described, to provide a ‘clean’ platform strain for the expression of non-native FHL complexes. The strain 89F was made using the same protocol to allow for the testing of non-native formate dehydrogenases in complex with Hyd-3.

Table 1.

E. coli K-12 strains used and constructed in this study

Strain Genotype Reference
FTD89 As MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC [28]
FTD147 As MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE [18]
FTD150 As MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, ΔhyfB-R [19]
FTD250 As FTD89, ΔhycA-I, ΔhyfB-R, ΔfdhF This Work
FTD200 As FTD89, ΔhycA-I, ΔhyfB-R This Work
89F As FTD89, ΔfdhF This Work
MG059e1 As MG1655, hycEHis (internal His-tag) [29]
MR60 As MG059e1, ΔhycA, ΔfdhF, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔpflA, ΔfdhE PT5 ɸfdhFHA::hycB [30]
Tom001 As MR60, ΔhycCD [30]

Plasmid construction

For the expression of FHL-2 in an Escherichia coli host, genes encoding FHL-2 were amplified from the genome of P. atrosepticum SCRI1043 using Phusion™ High Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and assembled into pT7.5/Litmus. Due to the size of the operon encoding FHL-2 it was amplified as two fragments using the internal BglII site within hyfE. The downstream fragment was amplified via PCR and digested using HindIII and BglII, while the upstream fragment was amplified before digestion with BglII and XbaI. The fragments were assembled into pT7.5/Litmus using the HindIII and XbaI sites. The resultant plasmid was named pTotal. Differences between the cloned sequence and that of the SCRI1043 genome sequence are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

All complementation plasmids were constructed using HiFi Assembly (NEB) using DNA amplified from the genome of P. atrosepticum SCRI1043 or E. coli MG1655. Genes were cloned into pSU-PROM which contains the constitutive tatA promoter [31].

Whole-cell H2 production

Hydrogen production of anaerobic cultures in sealed Hungate Tubes was quantified by gas chromatography [32]. Cells were grown in LB Miller medium supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate at 37 °C for 20 h. 1 ml of headspace gas was collected using a gas-tight syringe with Luer lock valve (SGE). Samples were injected into a Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph fitted with a capillary column and TCD detector. Hydrogen was quantified using a hydrogen standard curve and normalised to culture density (OD 600 nm).

Whole-cell formate production

Cells were grown in LB medium supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose under anaerobic conditions before being harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 2773 x g and 4 °C. Cells were washed thrice with 20 mmol/L 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer, pH 7.4, before being resuspended to an OD600nm of 1.0 +/- 0.02. No anaerobic precautions were taken during these washing steps though cell resuspension was carried out gently using a glass homogeniser. Washed cells were transferred to Hungate tubes before the headspace was sparged with N2 followed by H2 and finally was subjected to the injection of 5 ml gaseous CO2. Cells were incubated at 37 °C without agitation for 20 h. Liquid samples were taken via syringe and clarified before HPLC analysis using a an UltiMate 3000 uHPLC system (Thermo) equipped with an Aminex HPX-87 H column (BioRad) using a RefractoMax521 refractive index detector (Thermo) and a Variable Wavelength Detector-3100 at 210 nm (Thermo). Samples of 10 µl previously clarified through a 0.45 μm filter were injected into the HPLC system that had been equilibrated with 5 mmol/L H2SO4 with a flow of 0.8 mL/min at 50 °C. Formate was quantified using a standard curve.

Results

Production of functional FHL-2 in E. coli

To enable characterisation of P. atrospeticum FHL-2, an E. coli K-12 host strain was required that was devoid of hydrogenase activity and all endogenous FHL-1 and FHL-2 structural genes. The FTD150 strain (ΔhyaB ΔhybC ΔhycE ΔhyfB-R, Table 1) was therefore used as a starting point [18]. This E. coli strain already carries in-frame deletions in the catalytic subunits of the three active [NiFe]-hydrogenases in E. coli [33] as well as a deletion of the hyfBCDEFGHIJ-hyfR cluster encoding Hyd-4 [17]. Note that an ‘in-frame deletion’ carefully removes all coding sequence from a gene while preserving start codon, stop codon, and any internal regulatory sequences related to adjacent genes (such as ribosome binding sites). This approach is particularly important when studying multi-cistronic operons to minimise downstream (or ‘polar’) effects on translation. To further modify this strain, first the entire hyc operon (hycA-I) was deleted from FTD150 resulting in the E. coli strain FTD200 (ΔhyaB ΔhybC ΔhycA-I ΔhyfB-R, Table 1). Then, the gene encoding the FdhF formate dehydrogenase was deleted from strain FTD200, resulting in the strain FTD250 (ΔhyaB ΔhybC ΔhycA-I ΔhyfB-R ΔfdhF, Table 1). When incubated under anaerobic, fermentative growth conditions, the new FTD250 strain was found to be incapable of biological H2 evolution (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

FHL-2 from Pectobaterium atrosepticum is capable of producing hydrogen during fermentation in an E. coli host. E. coli strains expressing either FHL-1 or FHL-2 were grown under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed three times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampling. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Next, the entire 15 kbp gene cluster encoding P. atrosepticum FHL-2 (i.e. the 11-cistron operon encoding the Hyd-4 module and its associated accessory proteins, hyfA-R, as well as the region comprising the genes encoding FdhF and HydN, Fig. 1A) were cloned into a single plasmid including the native, divergent, promotors of both operons (Fig. 1C; Table 2). Given the formate-responsive regulator HyfR would be present on this construct, and the relatedness of P. atrospeticum to gamma-Proteobacteria like E. coli, it was considered that the two operons could be anaerobically expressed in an E. coli host and there would be little need for synthetic overexpression strategies at this stage.

Table 2.

Plasmids constructed in this study

Name Relevant Genotype Resistance
pTotal pT7-Litmus carrying the entire fdhF-hyfR gene cluster for P. atrosepticum FHL-2 Amp
pTotal-hyfGHis As pTotal with internal 10-His coding sequence in hyfG between codons for Gly-93 and Glu-94 Amp
pTotal-hyfGHis ΔhyfB-F As pTotal-hyfGHis with in-frame deletion of hyfBCDEF Amp
pTotal-hyfGHis ΔhyfDEF As pTotal-hyfGHis with in-frame deletion of hyfDEF Amp
pTotal-hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN As pTotal-hyfGHis with deletion of fdhF and hydN Amp
pTotal ΔhyfG As pTotal-hyfGHis with in-frame deletion of hyfG Amp
pSU-hyfBC As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum hyfBC genes Kan
pSU-hyfB-F As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum hyfBCDEF genes Kan
pSU-hyfDEF As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum hyfDEF genes Kan
pSU-fdhF As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum fdhF Kan
pSU-fdhF/hydN As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum fdhF and hydN Kan
pSU-hyfG As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum hyfG Kan
pSU-hyfG-J As pSU-PROM carrying P. atrosepticum hyfGHIJ genes Kan
pSU-hycE As pSU-PROM carrying E. coli hycE Kan

A two-step strategy was devised for cloning the gene cluster due to the presence of a unique BglII restriction site within the hyfE gene. First, the hyfR-E region was amplified by PCR and cloned into pT.7-Litmus (AmpR), which was followed by amplification of the hyfE-fdhF region by PCR and addition to the new vector. This resulted in the p-Total (AmpR) plasmid encoding the full hyfR-fdhF gene cluster (Fig. 1C; Table 2). The p-Total plasmid was sequenced and, most likely due to its construction by PCR, found to contain several point mutations that are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Note that no non-sense mutations were introduced. Next, the p-Total plasmid was modified by the addition of a 10-His tag sequence between codons for Gly-93 and Glu-94 within the hyfG gene primarily to facilitate future protein purification studies but potentially also to be used as an epitope tag in immunological studies. The location of the internal 10-His loop in HyfG was selected based on previous work conducted on E. coli FHL-1where identically-His-tagged HycE enabled the successful purification of the FHL-1 complex with minimal disruption to complex stability or activity [29]. Purification of FHL-2 is not an aim of this particular study, however characterisation of the in vivo physiological activity of His-tagged FHL-2 certainly is. Following construction, the pTotal-hyfGHis vector was sequenced and no additional mutations were identified.

To test if either the pTotal or pTotal-hyfGHis vectors encoded hydrogenase activity, FTD250 was transformed with the plasmids and anaerobic cultures were incubated in sealed Hungate tubes containing LB medium supplemented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate. Following 20 h growth at 37 °C the headspace gas was analysed by gas chromatography (Fig. 2). FTD250[pTotal] produced 3.6 mM of hydrogen per OD, while FTD250[pTotal-hyfGHis] produced 3.4 mM of H2 per OD (Fig. 2). These values were clearly lower than the 15.5 mM/OD of H2 produced in strain FTD89 that contains native FHL-1 (Fig. 2). Nevertheless, it was evident from these results that the cloned FHL-2 complex from P. atrosepticum was active in an E. coli host.

Next, it was pertinent to determine if FHL-2 could function in reverse as a hydrogen-dependent carbon dioxide reductase. To explore this, anaerobically-grown cultures were harvested and washed in MOPS buffer (pH 7.4) and sealed in Hungate tubes before being supplied with the gaseous substrates. Following incubation with a CO2/H2 mixture, clarified samples were analysed by HPLC to quantify formate levels in the aqueous phase. No formate was detected in experiments using FTD250[pTotal] or FTD250[pTotal-hyfGHis] (Fig. 2). Conversely, the positive control experiment using FTD89 (producing active FHL-1) was capable of producing 4 mM formate under the same conditions (Fig. 2).

The role of the membrane domain in FHL-2 function

The FHL-2 complex is predicted to have major differences from FHL-1, including three additional membrane proteins (HyfDEF). To assess their role in recombinant FHL-2 activity mutant plasmids were constructed, including: pTotal hyfGHis ΔhyfD-F (lacking genes encoding HyfD, -E, and -F) and pTotal hyfGHis ΔhyfB-F (lacking genes encoding HyfB, -C, -D, -E, and -F) (Table 2). When the host strain FTD250 was transformed with pTotal hyfGHis ΔhyfD-F some FHL-2 activity was detected, however the mutant plasmid was found to produce less than 30% H2 than normally recorded for FTD250 expressing the whole FHL-2 complex (Fig. 3). The deletion of genes encoding all five membrane subunits of FHL-2 (ΔhyfB-F) resulted in an even greater reduction in hydrogen production activity, though it should be noted that trace levels of H2 could still be quantified here (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

FHL-2 from P. atrosepticum requires a membrane arm for maximal activity. E. coli strain FTD250 was transformed with pTotal, expressing all the functional genes of FHL-2, or varients of the plasmid lacking genes encoding three membrane subunits (ΔhyfD-F) or all five membrane subunits (ΔhyfB-F), and cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). Additionally, in trans complementation of the deleted genes was also tested using pSU-hyfB-F and pSU-hyfDEF plasmids. To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed three times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Next, the genes encoding the FHL-2 membrane arm were cloned into the pSU-Prom vector (KanR) (Table 2), which is compatible for co-expression with pLitmus (AmpR) derivatives. This enabled a series of in trans complementation experiments, which demonstrated full restoration of hydrogen production activity (Fig. 3).

Finally, hydrogen-dependent CO2-reduction experiments were carried out on FTD250 carrying pTotal hyfGHis ΔhyfD-F or pTotal hyfGHis ΔhyfB-F, but no formate was detected in any of the samples (Fig. 3).

The role of formate dehydrogenase subunits in FHL-2 function

Next, the importance of the P. atrosepticum formate dehydrogenase in FHL-2 activity was investigated. In P. atrosepticum the catalytic subunit of the formate dehydrogenase (fdhF) is encoded upstream of the hyf operon, on a divergent promoter, along with hydN. The HydN protein shares sequence similarity with HyfA and is therefore predicted to encode an alternative small subunit for the formate dehydrogenase. Therefore, a deletion in both fdhF and hydN together was made in the pTotal hyfGHis plasmid (Table 2). The resultant pTotal hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN vector was then tested in the FTD250 host strain and it was found that deletion of both fdhF and hydN together resulted in the complete loss of hydrogen production activity by FHL-2 (Fig. 4). Complementation in trans with pSU fdhF (KanR), which carries only one gene, restored hydrogen production activity to ~ 71% of that of that normally recorded for the whole FHL-2 complex (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the full rescue of FHL-2 activity was observed when pTotal hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN was co-expressed with a second plasmid encoding both fdhF and hydN together (Fig. 4). No hydrogen-dependent CO2-reductase activity was detectible in any of these experiments (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

FdhF and HydN are both required for maximal activity of FHL-2 from P. atrosepticum. E. coli strain FTD250 was transformed with pTotal-hyfGHis, expressing all the functional genes of FHL-2, or a varient of the plasmid lacking fdhF and hydN, was cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). Additionally, in trans complementation of the deleted genes were also tested using pSU-fdhF and pSU-fdhF/hydN. The strain FTD200 transformed with pTotal hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN was also used in these experiments to determine if E. coli FdhF could function with Hyd-4 from FHL-2. To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed three times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Cross-complementation between FHL-1 and FHL-2 subunits: FdhF

E. coli strain FTD200 differs from FTD250 in that it contains a native fdhF gene. Both strains lack native hydrogenase activity and therefore produce no H2 via FHL-1, nor are they capable of producing formate via HDCR (Fig. 2). However, when FTD200 was transformed with pTotal hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN hydrogen production activity was rescued to a high level - almost double that recorded for intact FHL-2 in FTD250 (Fig. 4). This suggests E. coli FdhF from FHL-1 can interact with P. atrosepticum Hyd-4 from FHL-2. Moreover, it should be noted that trace but detectable amounts of formate (61 nM) were detected in samples of FTD200 pTotal hyfGHis ΔfdhF ΔhydN when incubated under an H2/CO2 atmosphere (Fig. 4). This represents only 1.5% of the total normally recorded in native FHL-1 experiments.

Next, the ability of the formate dehydrogenase catalytic subunit from P. atrosepticum FHL-2 to substitute for that of native E. coli FHL-1 was tested. First, the E. coli strain 89F was constructed, which is devoid of Hyd-1 and Hyd-2 activity and carries a deletion in fdhF (Table 1). E. coli  89F displays no FHL-1-based H2 production activity (Fig. 5). When E. coli 89F was transformed with a plasmid encoding P. atrosepticum FdhF (pSU-fdhF) a partial restoration of hydrogen production activity was observed (Fig. 5). Interestingly, complementation with a plasmid containing both P. atrosepticum fdhF and hydN together resulted in less hydrogen production (5.2 mM/OD) than with the fdhF gene alone (8.8 mM/OD) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The formate dehydrogenase from P. atrosepticum FHL-2 can function as a Hydrogen-Dependent CO2 Reductase when in tandem with Hyd-3 from E. coli. E.coli strain FTD89 and 89F (as FTD89 ΔfdhF) were cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). Additionally, in trans complementation was tested using the FHL-2 homolog with and without its predicted alternative small subunit, using plasmids pSU-fdhF and pSU-fdhF/hydN. To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed 3 times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Hydrogen-dependent CO2 reduction experiments were also conducted in these strains (Fig. 5). As previously reported [8], E. coli strain FTD89, which has functional FHL-1, was able to generate formate from a H2/CO2 mixture at ambient pressure. Deletion of the gene encoding the formate dehydrogenase component of FHL-1 blocked this activity (Fig. 5). Complementation of strain 89F with P. atrosepticum fdhF alone, and in combination with P. atrosepticum hydN, produced chimeric complexes that were capable of HDCR activity and resulted in detectable formate generation from H2 and CO2 substrates (Fig. 5).

Cross-complementation between FHL-1 and FHL-2 subunits: HyfG/HycE

The possibility of cross-complementation between genes encoding the large subunits of Hyd-3 and Hyd-4 was investigated. A version of pTotal was prepared that carries an in-frame deletion of hyfG (pTotal ΔhyfG) (Table 2). The E. coli host strain FTD250 containing pTotal ΔhyfG was found to be devoid of hydrogen production activity (Fig. 6). A partial rescue in FHL-2 activity could be achieved through complementation in trans with a pSU-hyfG plasmid, and resulted in approximately half of the levels of H2 accumulation when compared to FHL-2 expressed from the intact operon. Interestingly, the gene encoding the large subunit of E. coli Hyd-3 (hycE) can also partially complement the hyfG deletion (Fig. 6). No hydrogen-dependent CO2-reductase activity was detectible in any of these experiments (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Tha large subunit of Hyd-4 is crutial for FHL-2 activity. E. coli strain FTD250 was transformed with pTotal-hyfGHis, expressing all the functional genes of FHL-2, or a varient of the plasmid lacking the gene encoding the large subunit of hydrogenase-4 (hyfG) were cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). Additionally, in trans complementation of the deleted gene was tested using pSU-hyfG and pSU-hycE, encoding the E. coli Hyd-3 large subunit. To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed three times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Next, it was determined whether the hydrogenase large subunit of P. atrosepticum FHL-2 (HyfG) was capable of interacting with E. coli FHL-1. To investigate this, the E. coli strain FTD147, which carries a ΔhycE allele and is devoid of H2 production activity (Fig. 7), was transformed with pSU-hyfG encoding P. atrosepticum HyfG. Only a trace amount of molecular hydrogen gas was detected in fermentative cultures of FTD147[pSU hyfG] (Fig. 7). A plasmid was also tested that not only encoded P. atrosepticum HyfG but also encoded the FHL-2 small hydrogenase subunit (HyfH), an iron sulfur cluster protein related to HycF (HyfI), and a predicted Hyd-4 maturase related to HycH (HyfJ). This pSU hyfG-J vector produced small (~ 9% of the positive control) but detectible levels of H2 when expressed in the E. coli FTD147 host (Fig. 7). No hydrogen-dependent CO2-reductase activity was detectible in any of the plasmid-based experiments (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The Hyd-4 hydrogenase large subunit from FHL-2 cannot functionally interact with an FHL-1 variant lacking the Hyd-3 equivalent. E. coli Strain FTD89 and FTD147 (FTD89 ΔhycE) were cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). Additionally, in trans complementation of the ΔhycE allele was tested using pSU-hycE (E. coli gene), and pSU-hyfG and pSU-hyfGJ (P. atrospeticum genes). To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed 3 times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard error of the mean

Cross complementation between FHL-1 and FHL-2 subunits: membrane domain

A key point of similarity, and a key point of difference, between FHL-1 and FHL-2 is the membrane domain. FHL-1 contains two subunits in the membrane domain, HycCD. The equivalent proteins exist in FHL-2 (HyfBC), with HyfD, -E, and -F being additional components. First, it was determined if the membrane domain of P. atrospeticum FHL-2 could complement the E. coli FHL-1 complex lacking its own membrane domain. E. coli strains MR60 (contains active FHL-1) and Tom001 (as MR60 but ΔhycCD) were transformed with constructs containing FHL-2 membrane subunits in varying combinations before hydrogen and formate production activities were determined (Fig. 8). The control experiments with MR60 and Tom001 alone displayed activities consistent with previous research [30], where the ΔhycCD retains a low level of H2 accumulation activity compared to the parent strain. When E. coli Tom001 was transformed with pSU-hyfBC a partial restoration of hydrogen production activity was observed reaching ~ 53% of that normally recorded for native FHL-1 (Fig. 8). Transformation of Tom001 with pSU-hyfDEF, encoding the three membrane subunits of FHL-2 not found in FHL-1, could not rescue H2 production activity (Fig. 8). Taken together, this showed a functional chimera could be formed using the soluble arm of FHL-1 and core conserved subunits from the membrane arm of FHL-2.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The membrane subunits of FHL-2 can interact with the peripheral domain of FHL-1. E. coli strain MR60 and Tom001 (MR60 ΔhycCD) were transformed with plasmids encoding various combinations of the membrane subunits of P. atrosepticum FHL-2, including pSU-hyfBC, pSU-hyfDEF and pSU-hyfB-F (encoding all five subunits). Strains were cultured under anearobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplimented with 0.4% (w/v) glucose and 0.2% (w/v) formate for 20 h at 37 °C (n = 3). To determine hydrogen production activity (forward reaction) of the FHL complexes, cultures were grown in Hungate tubes to allow for hydrogen accumulation in the headspace. Hydrogen was removed from the headspace using a gas-tight, Luer-lock syringe and quantified by gas chromatography. To determine the formate production activity (reverse reaction) of the FHL complexes, anaerobic cultures were washed three times in MOPS buffer, pH 7.4 and resuspended to an OD 600 nm of 1.0 before being transferred to Hungate tubes and supplied with gaseous substrates. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h before sampleing. Formate production was quantified via HPLC. Error bars represent standard

Next, E. coli Tom001 was transformed with pSU-hyfB-F encoding all five subunits of the P. atrosepticum FHL-2 membrane arm. In this case hydrogen production activity was observed to a level of ~ 76% that normally recorded for FHL-1 (Fig. 8).

The hydrogen-dependent CO2-reduction ‘reverse’ activities were also explored in these strains. Interestingly, Tom001 carrying either pSU-hyfBC or pSU-hyfB-F was found to be capable of formate production from H2/CO2 (Fig. 8). In both cases the formate production activity was less than 35% of that of the native FHL-1 complex from the positive control strain MR60. However, comparing the two, formate production activity was significantly greater for the strain carrying pSU-hyfBC compared to that carrying the larger construct pSU-hyfB-F (Fig. 8).

Discussion

P. atrosepticum FHL-2 is functional in an E. coli host

In this work, we set out to identify a suitable, physiologically active FHL-2 that could be produced in E. coli to allow direct comparison with the native FHL-1 isoenzyme. Here, it has now been shown that the P. atrosepticum FHL-2 is functional in an E. coli host. This was enabled by constructing an E. coli host strain (FTD250) devoid of the majority of structural genes involved in hydrogen metabolism, including the native hycABCDEFGHI and hyfABCDEFGHIJ-hyfR operons and the fdhF gene, known or predicted to be involved in the formate hydrogenlyase reaction. This allowed unambiguous characterisation of a cloned, recombinant version of P. atrosepticum FHL-2. The work with pTotal and its derivatives (Table 2) has clearly established that the enzyme can be produced and assembled at 37 °C and that the biosynthetic machineries for E. coli [NiFe] hydrogenases and E. coli molybdo-enzymes can facilitate maturation of the enzymes (Fig. 2).

P. atrosepticum formate dehydrogenase (FdhF) is bidirectional

In this work, the FHL-2 complex from P. atrosepticum was clearly shown to be able to contribute to H2 production under anaerobic fermentative conditions (the ‘forward’ reaction). However, unlike E. coli FHL-1, P. atrosepticum FHL-2 was unable to function in reverse as a hydrogen-dependent CO2 reductase, at least under the conditions tested here (Fig. 2). A series of genetic experiments were employed to begin to dissect the molecular basis of this unidirectionality.

The role of the P. atrosepticum formate dehydrogenase component was investigated. Indeed, sequence analysis of this protein, and genomic analysis of the organism, suggest it does not contain selenocysteine at its active site. This is interesting since substitution of the selenocysteine for a cysteine residue within the E. coli FdhF active site has been shown to significantly reduce its in vitro CO2 reduction activity to 19% of the native enzyme [34]. In our experiments, the selenium-free P. atrosepticum FdhF was shown to be readily reversible in vivo, but only when paired with the E. coli Hyd-3 enzyme (Fig. 5). The isolated P. atrosepticum FdhF was able to substitute for the E. coli enzyme in FHL-1 in both the H2 production and formate production directions, meaning the absence of selenocysteine is not regulating directionality of this component of FHL-2.

The interchangeability of the different species’ FdhF subunits was perhaps not entirely surprising. The P. atrosepticum FdhF shares 85% overall sequence similarity with the E. coli FHL-1 counterpart (Supplementary Figures S1-S10). Moreover, the interaction between E. coli FdhF and the remainder of the E. coli FHL-1 complex is known to be transient and weak and the proteins readily dissociated upon purification, especially under reducing conditions [32]. Structural studies have determined that E. coli FdhF interacts with E. coli HycB though hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Additionally, a single electrostatic interaction with Arg-122 of E. coli HycF was also noted. The data presented in this work would suggest that at least some of these interactions are conserved between FHL-1 and FHL-2. Lindenstrauß & Pinske (2019) have also demonstrated that the E. coli FdhF can form a functional complex with the Hyd-4 complex of T. guamensis, where the chimeric complex demonstrated the same level of hydrogen production as the native FHL-2 complex [23].

HydN is a functional subunit of the FHL-2 complex

The HydN protein is a small Fe-S protein with sequence identity to HyfA of FHL-2 and HycB of FHL-1 (Supplementary Figures S1-S10). Its possible role as a formate dehydrogenase small subunit has long been speculated upon, however the genetics and biochemistry of E. coli added confusion. In E. coli, hydN is encoded with a hydrogenase maturation gene hypF [35]. Deletion of the hydN gene in E. coli led to an slight reduction in dye-linked formate dehydrogenase activity [35] but overall FHL-1 activity was not significantly affected [36]. Indeed, E. coli FdhF can be purified in an active form without a small subunit [11] and HydN was not present in the E. coli FHL-1 cryo-EM structure [12]. The data presented in Figs. 4 and 5 show the functional importance of HydN and these data suggest that the cognate HydN studied here, along with FdhF, might have some influence in the directionality of the FHL-2 complex. Extra experimentation would be needed to explore this further, however, since the E. coli hydN gene is present in all of these experiments.

P. atrosepticum Hyd-4 is unidirectional

The unidirectionality of FHL-2 seems to stem for the most part from the Hyd-4 module, and most specifically the membrane arm. Deletion of the genes encoding the membrane arm from the native FHL-2 resulted in a loss in H2 evolution activity (Fig. 3). This is consistent with the behaviour of FHL-1 when its membrane arm is genetically removed [13]. More interestingly, it is shown here that the FHL-2 membrane arm, either in minimal HyfBC form (which is the equivalent to HycCD in FHL-1) or in extended HyfBCDEF form, can interact with the FHL-1 peripheral arm and restore H2 evolution activity (Fig. 8). However, it is clear that the reverse formate production activity is not restored in the same FHL-1/FHL-2 chimeras (Fig. 8). There, the presence of the full-length HyfBCDEF membrane arm reduces the ability of the enzyme to operate in reverse quite significantly (Fig. 8).

It should also be considered that changes in oxygen sensitivity could also contribute to these observations. No strict anaerobic precautions were put in place during the cell washing stage prior to anaerobic incubation with CO2/H2. While native FHL-1 survives this treatment, it could be that FHL-2, and/or the FHL-1/FHL-2 chimeras, are more sensitive to O2 attack.

The molecular basis of the interaction between the FHL-1 membrane arm and peripheral arm is now well understood. Structural data obtained for E. coli FHL-1 revealed the presence of a cluster of loops at the interface that are conserved across the complex I and complex I-like families, including membrane-bound hydrogenases [12]. Indeed, previous research has shown the disruption of glutamate residues within the loop that connects HycE with HycD can have significant negative effects on FHL activity [32, 37]. It should be considered that, in our chimeric FHL complexes, incorrect or unstable binding of peripheral arm to the membrane arm may be the basis of the unidirectionality observed. Indeed, further analysis into the native structure of FHL-2 will be required to effectively compare the loop-cluster structure and wider interaction interface.

Experiments focused on the hydrogenase catalytic subunits did not produce meaningful data (Figs. 6 and 7). This may not be altogether surprising when it is considered that these subunits are normally buried in the middle of a much larger complex with at least four other interacting partners to consider. Even cross-substitution of relatively conserved hydrogenase large and small subunits may not be straightforward. For example, a similar occurrence has been noted when attempting to form chimera of E. coli hydrogenase-1 and hydrogenase-2 [38]. To facilitate the assembly of chimeras between these two isoenzymes, a total of 13 residues required engineering at the large subunit – small subunit interface [39].

Many hydrogenases function bidirectionally and are capable of catalysing reactions reversibly [32, 39, 40]. Furthermore, Mo/W-dependent formate dehydrogenases are known to catalyse the oxidation of formate to CO2 reversibly [41]. However, bidirectionality is not uniform across these enzyme families. O2-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenases, such as E. coli Hyd-1, are generally thought to function unidirectionally in H2-uptake [42]. Several other [NiFe]-dependent hydrogenases have shown catalytic bias for hydrogen oxidation with little to no proton reduction activity [43–45]. Interestingly, Pyrococcus furiosus possesses a [NiFe] dependent membrane-bound hydrogenases that preferentially catalyses H2 production and displays very little H2 oxidation activity [46]. Outwith the O2-tolerance mechanism observed in some [NiFe] hydrogenases, and the properties of the metal centres and gas channels that are involved, the reversibility of metalloenzymes either in vitro or in vivo is difficult to predict.

Concluding remarks

In this work, the FHL-2 complex from P. atrosepticum was cloned and shown to be active in an E. coli host and capable of producing molecular hydrogen during fermentative growth. Furthermore, we have shown that this FHL-2 complex appears to function unidirectionally in favour of hydrogen production. The inability of FHL-2 to function in reverse appears to stem from subtle molecular differences in the Hyd-4 module and the presence of additional subunits in the membrane arm. There may also be some involvement with the HydN-containing formate dehydrogenase module. Indeed, this work identified HydN as an bona fide alternative formate dehydrogenase small subunit in FHL-2 and future work will focus on understanding the competing or complementary role of HydN with its homolog HyfA within the complex. Indeed, the molecular tools developed here will allow further characterisation of important aspects of FHL-2 activity, including the role the complex I-like membrane arm. Understanding how electron transport is coupled to proton translocation in membrane-bound hydrogenases has wider significance since complex-I-like enzymes are found in a broad range of microbes and eukaryotic organelles.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (15.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (31.2KB, docx)

Author contributions

TCPR, AJF and MR conducted experiments and analysed data; TCPR and FS wrote the manuscript text; TCPR prepared all figures; FS prepared the Supplementary Table; all authors reviewed the manuscript text.

Funding

Declaration.

This work was funded in the UK by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) through responsive mode awards BB/S000666/1 and BB/Y004302/1; a BBSRC training grant (BB/T508743/1) held by the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre in Scotland (IBIoIC); and the BBSRC EASTBIO Doctoral Training Program (studentship #1510231).

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Partridge JD, Sanguinetti G, Dibden DP, Roberts RE, Poole RK et al (2007) Transition of Escherichia coli from aerobic to micro-aerobic conditions involves fast and slow reacting regulatory components. J Biol Chem 282:11230–11237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Unden G, Dünnwald P (2008)The aerobic and anaerobic respiratory chain of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica: enzymes and energetics. EcoSal Plus 3. 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.2.2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Unden G, Bongaerts J (1997) Alternative respiratory pathways of Escherichia coli: energetics and transcriptional regulation in response to electron acceptors. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1320:217–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pinske C, Sawers RG (2016) Anaerobic formate and hydrogen metabolism. EcoSal Plus 7. 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0011-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Romano AH, Conway T (1996) Evolution of carbohydrate metabolic pathways. Res Microbiol 147:448–455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Metcalfe GD, Sargent F, Hippler M (2022) Hydrogen production in the presence of oxygen by Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiology (Reading) 168:1167 10.1099/mic.0.001167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Axleys J, Grahame A, Stadtman TC (1990) Escherichia coli formate-hydrogenlyase. Purification and properties of the selenium-dependent formate dehydrogenase component. J Biol Chem 265:18213–18218 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roger M, Brown F, Gabrielli W, Sargent F (2018) Efficient hydrogen-dependent carbon dioxide reduction by Escherichia coli. Curr Biol 28:140–145e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sauter M, Böhm R, Böck A (1992) Mutational analysis of the operon (hyc) determining hydrogenase 3 formation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 6:1523–1532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sawers RG (2005) Formate and its role in hydrogen production in Escherichia coli. Biochemical Society Transactions. 33:42–46 10.1042/bst0330042 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Boyington JC, Gladyshev VN, Khangulov SV, Stadtman TC, Sun PD (1997) Crystal structure of formate dehydrogenase H: Catalysis involving Mo, molybdopterin, selenocysteine, and an Fe4S4 cluster. Science 275:1305–1308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Steinhilper R, Höff G, Heider J, Murphy BJ (2022) Structure of the membrane-bound formate hydrogenlyase complex from Escherichia coli. Nat Commun13:5395. 10.1038/s41467-022-32831-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Marreiros BC, Batista AP, Duarte AMS, Pereira MM (2013) A missing link between complex i and group 4 membrane-bound [NiFe] hydrogenases. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1827:198–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC et al (2016) Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J 10:761–777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andrews SC, Berks BC, McClay J, Ambler A, Quail MA et al (1997) A 12-cistron Escherichia coli operon (hyf) encoding a putative proton-translocating formate hydrogenlyase system. Microbiology (Reading) 143:3633–3647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Self WT, Hasona A, Shanmugam KT (2004) Expression and regulation of a silent operon, hyf, coding for hydrogenase 4 isoenzyme in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:580–587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Skibinski DAG, Golby P, Chang YS, Sargent F, Hoffman R et al (2002) Regulation of the hydrogenase-4 operon of Escherichia coli by the σ54-dependent transcriptional activators FhlA and HyfR. J Bacteriol 184:6642–6653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Redwood MD, Mikheenko IP, Sargent F, Macaskie LE (2008) Dissecting the roles of Escherichia coli hydrogenases in biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278:48–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mirzoyan S, Vassilian A, Trchounian A, Trchounian K (2018) Prolongation of H2 production during mixed carbon sources fermentation in E. coli batch cultures: new findings and role of different hydrogenases. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:8739–8746 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bagramyan K, Mnatsakanyan N, Poladian A, Vassilian A, Trchounian A (2002) The roles of hydrogenases 3 and 4, and the F0F1-ATPase, in H2 production by Escherichia coli at alkaline and acidic pH. FEBS Lett 516:172–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mirzoyan S, Romero-Pareja PM, Coello MD, Trchounian A, Trchounian K (2017) Evidence for hydrogenase-4 catalyzed biohydrogen production in Escherichia coli. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:21697–21703 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matsumura Y, Al-saari H, Mino S, Nakagawa S, Maruyama F et al (2015) Identification of a gene cluster responsible for hydrogen evolution in Vibrio tritonius strain AM2 with transcriptional analyses. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:9137–9146 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lindenstrauß U, Pinske C (2019) Dissection of the hydrogen metabolism of the enterobacterium Trabulsiella guamensis: Identification of a formate-dependent and essential formate hydrogenlyase complex exhibiting phylogenetic similarity to complex I. J Bacteriol201:e00160-19 10.1128/JB.00160-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Finney AJ, Lowden R, Fleszar M, Albareda M, Coulthurst SJ et al (2019) The plant pathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum contains a functional formate hydrogenlyase-2 complex. Mol Microbiol 112:1440–1452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Babujee L, Apodaca J, Balakrishnan V, Liss P, Kiley PJ et al (2012) Evolution of the metabolic and regulatory networks associated with oxygen availability in two phytopathogenic enterobacteria. BMC Genomics13: 110. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Zinoni F, Birkmann A, Leinfelder W, Bock A (1987) Cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine into formate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli directed by a UGA codon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:3156–3160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hamilton CM, Aldea M, Washburn BK, Babitzke P, Kushner SR (1989) New method for generating deletions and gene replacements in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 171:4617–4622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sargent F, Stanley NR, Berks BC, Palmer T (1999) Sec-independent protein translocation in Escherichia coli. A distinct and pivotal role for the TatB protein. J Biol Chem 274:36073–36082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McDowall JS, Murphy BJ, Haumann M, Palmer T, Armstrong FA et al (2014) Bacterial formate hydrogenlyase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E3948–E3956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roger M, Reed TCP, Sargent F (2021) Harnessing Escherichia coli for bio-based production of formate under pressurized H2 and CO2 Gases. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e0029921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jack RL, Buchanan G, Dubini A, Hatzixanthis K, Palmer T et al (2004) Coordinating assembly and export of complex bacterial proteins. EMBO J 23:3962–3972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pinske C, Sargent F (2016) Exploring the directionality of Escherichia coli formate hydrogenlyase: a membrane-bound enzyme capable of fixing carbon dioxide to organic acid. MicrobiologyOpen 5:721–737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sargent F (2016) The Model [NiFe]-Hydrogenases of Escherichia coli. Adv Microb Physiol 68:433–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li F, Scheller S, Lienemann M (2023) Comparative analysis of CO2 reduction by soluble Escherichia coli formate dehydrogenase H and its selenocysteine-to-cysteine substitution variant. Journal of CO2 Utilization77: 102608 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102608 [DOI]
  • 35.Maier T, Binder U, Bock A (1996) Analysis of the hydA locus of Escherichia coli: two genes (hydN and hypF) involved in formate and hydrogen metabolism. Arch Microbiol 165:333–341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pinske C (2018) The ferredoxin-like proteins HydN and YsaA enhance redox dye-linked activity of the formate dehydrogenase-H component of the formate hydrogenlyase complex. Front Microbiol 9:1238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Peters K, Sargent F (2023) Formate hydrogenlyase, formic acid translocation and hydrogen production: dynamic membrane biology during fermentation. Biochim et Biophys Acta - Bioenergetics 1864:148919 10.1016/j.bbabio.2022.148919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fasano A, Guendon C, Jacq-Bailly A, Kpebe A, Wozniak J et al (2023) A chimeric NiFe hydrogenase heterodimer to assess the role of the electron transfer chain in tuning the enzyme’s catalytic bias and oxygen tolerance. J Am Chem Soc 145:20021–20030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Evans RM, Beaton SE, Rodriguez Macia P, Pang Y, Wong KL et al (2023) Comprehensive structural, infrared spectroscopic and kinetic investigations of the roles of the active-site arginine in bidirectional hydrogen activation by the [NiFe]-hydrogenase Hyd-2 from Escherichia coli. Chem Sci 14:8531–8551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gutekunst K, Chen X, Schreiber K, Kaspar U, Makam S et al (2014) The bidirectional NiFe-hydrogenase in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is reduced by flavodoxin and ferredoxin and is essential under mixotrophic, nitrate-limiting conditions. J Biol Chem 289:1930–1937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kumar H, Khosraneh M, Bandaru SSM, Schulzke C, Leimkühler S (2023)The mechanism of metal-containing formate dehydrogenases revisited: the formation of bicarbonate as product intermediate provides evidence for an oxygen atom transfer mechanism. Molecules28: 1537 10.3390/molecules28041537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Shafaat HS, Rüdiger O, Ogata H, Lubitz W (2013) [NiFe] hydrogenases: A common active site for hydrogen metabolism under diverse conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:986–1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Parkin A, Bowman L, Roessler MM, Davies RA, Palmer T et al (2012) How Salmonella oxidises H2 under aerobic conditions. FEBS Lett 586:536–544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lukey MJ, Parkin A, Roessler MM, Murphy BJ, Harmer J et al (2010) How Escherichia coli is equipped to oxidize hydrogen under different redox conditions. J Biol Chem 285:3928–3938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Campbell BJ, Sessions AL, Fox DN, Paul BG, Qin Q et al (2017) Minimal influence of [NiFe] hydrogenase on hydrogen isotope fractionation in H2-oxidizing Cupriavidus necator. Front Microbiol8: 1886. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Silva PJ, Van Den Ban ECD, Wassink H, Haaker H, De Castro B et al (2000) Enzymes of hydrogen metabolism in Pyrococcus furiosus. Eur J Biochem 267:6541–6551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (15.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (31.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES