Abstract
Tantalum nitride (TaNx) thin films exhibit a wide range of electrical and optical properties that can be controlled by adjusting deposition conditions, making them attractive for microelectronics, protective coatings, and functional layers in radiation detectors and other advanced devices. In this work, TaNx films were deposited by ion‑assisted reactive magnetron sputtering while systematically varying the N2/Ar flow‑rate ratio. Optical transmission/reflectance spectroscopy combined with spectroscopic ellipsometry and the Tauc method analysis shows that increasing N2/Ar flow-rate ratio governs a continuous transition from quasi-metallic Ta-rich films to semiconducting N-rich films, with indirect optical bandgaps increasing from near zero to about 1.6 eV. This transformation is accompanied by a corresponding increase in resistivity over roughly five orders of magnitude, from ~10–2 to ~103 Ω·cm. Raman spectroscopy and grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction reveal that all films are nanocrystalline or quasi-amorphous TaNx with short-range order embedded in a disordered matrix; increasing N2/Ar suppressing cubic TaN-like formation and promoting nitrogen-rich, structurally disordered Ta–N configurations. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry confirms that N-rich films at N2/Ar ≈ 2 are compositionally uniform, with stoichiometry lying between Ta3N5 and Ta4N5. Overall, these results establish quantitative deposition–structure–property relationships in nanocrystalline TaNx thin films and demonstrate that ion-assisted reactive sputtering enables effective tuning of resistivity and optical bandgap. The identified correlations are essential for optimizing electro-optical performance in low-resistivity contacts and liners, as well as high-resistivity blocking and passivation layers for electronic, photonic, and detector applications.
Introduction
Tantalum nitride (TaNx) is a refractory transition-metal nitride widely used in microelectronics and related technologies, including thin-film resistors, Cu-interconnect diffusion barriers and liners, protective coatings and emerging photonic applications [1–5]. In most device‑relevant processes, TaNx is obtained as a nanocrystalline or quasi‑amorphous thin film whose composition, microstructure, and resulting electro‑optical properties are primarily determined by the deposition technique and can be tuned by parameters such as nitrogen content, deposition pressure, substrate temperature, deposition power, and total gas flow [6, 7].
A variety of thin-film deposition techniques have been employed to grow TaNx layers, including reactive DC (direct current) and RF (radio frequency) magnetron sputtering under combined nitrogen and argon gas flow, high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS), cathodic arc deposition, atomic layer deposition (ALD), and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [4, 5, 8, 9]. Among them, reactive magnetron sputtering is particularly attractive for bandgap and resistivity control because the N2/Ar flow ratio, plasma conditions, and substrate temperature can be adjusted to drive TaNx from Ta-rich, quasi-metallic phases to N-rich, semiconducting or insulating compositions, while maintaining compatibility with semiconductor process flows. Additionally, magnetron sputtering offers precise control over thickness, uniformity, and deposition rate, while ion assistance can improve film density and microstructure without requiring high processing temperatures.
The inherent flexibility of reactive magnetron sputtering has made it an attractive technique for the deposition of TaNx thin films as diffusion-barrier and liner layers in advanced Cu-interconnect metallization for CMOS-compatible integrated circuits, as well as in power-device metallization stacks [1–3, 10, 11]. Low- to moderate-resistivity Ta-rich TaNx layers are typically required to minimize series resistance and current crowding while maintaining robust suppression of Cu diffusion into surrounding dielectrics [12, 13]. In these stacks, the interplay between phase composition, nanocrystalline structure, and resistivity has a direct impact on electromigration reliability and via resistance. Beyond interconnects and power devices, the same ability to tune resistivity makes TaNx a widely used material in other integrated components. In thin-film resistor and integrated-heater applications, TaNx is widely used as a stable resistive material whose sheet resistance and temperature coefficient of resistance can be tailored by adjusting nitrogen content and deposition conditions, and similar TaNx films are employed in electro-microfluidic and chromatographic systems as biasing electrodes and microheaters, where controllable resistivity, chemical stability, and adhesion to silicon or glass substrates are essential [14–17].
For applications that rely on controlled charge injection or leakage suppression, such as optical sensors and multilayer photoconductive structures used in direct‑conversion radiation detectors, high‑resistivity blocking or passivation layers are commonly employed to reduce dark current, improve signal‑to‑noise ratio, and protect device surfaces [18–21]. Nitrogen‑rich, nanocrystalline TaNx films that combine high resistivity with structural stability and compatibility with CMOS and TFT processes can serve this purpose, provided that their bandgap, defect structure, and microstructure can be appropriately tuned.
It should be mentioned that TaNx is not unique in its sensitivity to nitrogen incorporation. In many reactively sputtered nitride systems, changes in nitrogen incorporation substantially affect film composition, phase formation, microstructure, bonding, and electrical and optical properties. For example, in TiNx films, increasing nitrogen content changes the phase composition from Ti–rich α-Ti toward Ti2N and, at higher nitrogen concentrations, TiN; the electrical resistivity initially increases strongly at low N content and subsequently decreases as the nitride phases become dominant [22]. Related studies of Ti–rich TiN, TiC, and TiCN films have further shown that changes in composition and local atomic coordination are accompanied by changes in bonding, structural order, defects, and phonon-related properties [23]. CrNx films show a similar sensitivity to nitrogen incorporation: increasing N2 flow drives the composition from Cr-rich toward stoichiometric and N-rich CrN, accompanied by a strong increase in resistivity and a transition from electron-dominated to hole-dominated transport [24, 25]. Nitrogen incorporation also strongly affects phase formation and microstructure in Cr-based nitride coatings, where increasing N content promotes evolution from metallic bcc-Cr toward Cr2N- and CrN-containing structures together with changes in grain structure and morphology [26]. In AlN films, variation of N2 flow affects crystallographic orientation, film density, surface morphology, local atomic coordination, and Raman-active phonon modes, demonstrating that nitrogen incorporation can influence both long-range and short-range structural order [27].
The above examples illustrate the broad role of nitrogen incorporation in controlling the evolution of composition, local bonding, microstructure, and electrical properties in reactively sputtered nitride films. Similar trends have been observed in reactively sputtered Ta–N films, where sputtering power, substrate temperature, nitrogen partial pressure (or N2/Ar flow-rate ratio), and other deposition parameters have been shown to control the structure, hardness, and electrical resistivity, demonstrating that both resistivity and phase composition can be tuned over a wide range [16, 28–30]. For example, it was demonstrated that the electrical properties of sputtered TaNx films can be tuned over several orders of magnitude by varying nitrogen content and deposition conditions. Hu et al. reported that resistivity varied by approximately three orders of magnitude with increasing N2 flow rate, accompanied by corresponding changes in optical constants [31]. Li et al. observed an almost two-order-of-magnitude increase in sheet resistance with nitrogen flow ratio, further confirming the strong sensitivity of TaNx electrical properties to nitrogen incorporation [16]. Recent work by Su et al. also showed composition-dependent resistivity variations of nearly three orders of magnitude and linked these changes to secondary electron emission behavior [29]. Studies have also reported transitions between amorphous, nanocrystalline, and columnar microstructures as a function of deposition parameters [7, 32–35]. Optical studies of Ta (oxy) nitrides have shown that nitrogen-rich compositions can exhibit semiconducting behavior with effective bandgaps in the visible range [32, 36–38].
Overall, the demonstrated tunability in structural and electro-optical properties of TaNx films is an attractive advantage of this material. However, full utilization of this advantage requires establishing the simultaneous correlation of optical bandgap, electrical resistivity, local bonding disorder, and composition as a function of deposition conditions, which we address in the present work.
Specifically, we investigate TaNx thin films deposited by ion-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering and show how the N2/Ar flow-rate ratio affects the structural, optical, and electrical properties of the films. We demonstrate continuous control of the optical bandgap from near-zero in Ta-rich, quasi-metallic films to approximately 1.6 eV in nitrogen-rich, semiconducting films, accompanied by a corresponding change in resistivity spanning five orders of magnitude (from ~10–2 to ~103 Ω·cm). Investigation of corresponding changes in structural and morphological properties suggests that this transition is governed predominantly by changes in short-range order, local Ta-N bonding, and disorder in nanocrystalline/quasi-amorphous films, rather than by well-defined phase transitions. The demonstrated results establish quantitative deposition-structure–property relationships and enable technology optimization for controlled fabrication of low-resistivity contacts and liners or high-resistivity blocking and passivation layers for electronic and radiation-detector applications.
Materials and methods
TaNx thin film deposition
Tantalum nitride (TaNx) thin films were deposited using a Nanochrome IV PARMS (Plasma-Assisted Reactive Magnetron Sputtering) system from Intlvac operated in dual-cathode AC. The deposition chamber was evacuated to a base pressure of 1.5 × 10–6 Torr. A tantalum target (diameter = 15 cm, thickness = 0.6 cm, purity = 99.9%) served as the sputtering source.
Depositions were performed on two types of substrates:
(100) Silicon wafers (diameter = 100 mm, thickness = 525 μm) for electrical, structural, and hardness measurements.
UV-grade fused silica substrates (diameter = 25 mm, thickness = 1.5 mm) for optical measurements (transmission, reflectance, and bandgap determination).
All depositions were performed using the 20 cm-diameter rotating substrate holder. A fused-silica witness sample was placed at the center of the holder, while silicon wafers were positioned symmetrically around it at equal distances. The deposition rates varied from approximately 0.5 to 1.2 Å/s for different N2/Ar gas flow ratios resulting in TaNx layers’ thicknesses, d, in the range of 190–430 nm.
During deposition, the sputtering power and substrate temperature were maintained at 1000 W and 150 °C, respectively, while the N2/Ar flow-rate ratio was systematically varied from 0.5 to 3.0.
Thickness and uniformity of TaNx were determined using a KLA P-16 surface profilometer. Measurements were performed across the wafer diameter at ~1 cm intervals, with a stylus force of 2 mg and total scan distance of 600 μm.
Morphological and structural characterization
Surface morphology of the deposited TaNx films was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The measurements were performed with a Thermo Scientific Scios field-emission scanning electron microscope operated at an accelerating voltage of 2 kV and a beam current of 0.20 nA using the T2 detector. Images were acquired at a magnification of 35,000×, corresponding to a horizontal field width of approximately 3.6 μm. The SEM analysis was used to evaluate the surface morphology, film continuity, and qualitative grain structure of the TaNx films.
Raman spectroscopy was employed to probe local bonding configurations and short‑range structural order in the TaNx films. Raman measurements were conducted using an in Via Raman microscope (Renishaw, UK) equipped with a 2400 lines mm⁻1 diffraction grating and providing a spectral resolution of approximately 1 cm⁻1. Prior to data collection, the spectrometer calibration was verified using the characteristic silicon Raman band at 520 cm⁻1. The spectra were obtained from the surface of the TaNx films under 532 nm laser excitation. The laser power was carefully minimized during acquisition to prevent thermal effects or photo-induced structural modifications, such as crystallization or phase transitions within the films [39, 40].
The long‑range structural properties and phase composition of the TaNx films were investigated by grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD). Diffraction measurements were carried out at a fixed incidence angle (ω = 0.7°), while the diffracted intensity was collected over a 2θ range of 20–80° at room temperature. Grazing-incidence geometry was used to enhance surface sensitivity and suppress contributions from the silicon substrate.
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) was used to determine the elemental composition and thickness of the TaNx films deposited on Si substrates. Measurements were performed using a 3.0 MeV He+ ion beam at normal incidence (0°) with a scattering angle of 170°, and a total accumulated charge of approximately 6.0 μC. The backscattered ions were detected with a solid-state detector positioned at the scattering angle, and the spectra were recorded as ion yield versus channel number (energy). Experimental spectra were analyzed using the MEISwin simulation software, which was used to reproduce the measured spectra and extract the elemental depth profiles of Ta, N, O, Ar, and Si. The simulations were performed assuming a TaN layer density of 11.44 g cm⁻3 (≈80% of the bulk TaN density of 14.3 g cm⁻3, as described in [41]). In the simulations, film thickness was obtained from the calculated areal atomic density (atoms cm⁻2) and converted to physical thickness using the assumed material density.
Optical characterization and bandgap determination
Optical transmittance (T) and reflectance (R) of the TaNx films deposited on UV-grade fused-silica substrates were measured using a Cary UV–vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Prior to each measurement, baseline correction was performed to eliminate instrumental background contributions. Spectra were recorded over the wavelength range of 350–2500 nm with a scan rate of 150 nm min⁻1. The optical losses (absorption) were evaluated using the relation
| 1 |
From the measured T and R spectra, the absorption coefficient (α) was calculated using the single-slab model that accounts for multiple reflections at both interfaces [42, 43]. When Rmeas2exp(− 2αd) << 1, α was obtained from.
| 2 |
where d is the film thickness.
The calculated absorption coefficient was then used to determine the optical bandgap (Eg) according to the Tauc method [44–46], which assumes that the absorption coefficient near the band edge follows
| 3 |
where hν is the photon energy, and n is the transition exponent (n = 2 for indirect and n = 0.5 for direct allowed transitions).
Tauc plots of (αhν)1/n vs. hν were constructed, and was obtained by linear extrapolation of the linear region to the x-axis intercept.
Likewise, variable-angle spectroscopic ellipsometry (VASE) measurements were performed to determine the optical constants and optical bandgap of the TaNx thin films. The ellipsometry parameters Ψ and Δ were measured over the spectral range of 245–1688 nm at five angles of incidence (55°, 60°, 65°, 70°, and 75°) using an M-2000 spectroscopic ellipsometer. The data were analyzed using CompleteEASE software (J.A. Woollam Co., Inc.) by fitting a multilayer optical model consisting of a silicon substrate, a native SiO2 layer, and the TaNx film, with surface roughness represented using an effective medium approximation (EMA).
For TaNx films deposited at N2/Ar ≥ 1.5, the complex dielectric function of the TaNx layer was parameterized using Cody–Lorentz oscillator within the General Oscillator (Gen-Osc) model [47–49]. The film thickness, surface-roughness thickness, and optical-model parameters were varied during analysis to obtain the best simultaneous fit to the experimental Ψ and Δ spectra measured at all five angles of incidence. The refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) were subsequently obtained from the fitted dielectric function, and the optical bandgap (Eg) was determined from the Cody–Lorentz model. For films deposited at N2/Ar < 1.5, the optical response was strongly metallic, with substantial absorption extending throughout the spectral range investigated; consequently, a reliable optical bandgap could not be determined from the ellipsometry data. Good agreement between the experimental and modeled Ψ and Δ spectra was obtained for all analyzed samples, with mean squared error (MSE) values below 5.
Resistivity measurements
The sheet resistance of the TaNx films was measured using both four-point and two-point probe techniques. For the four-point measurements, a Cascade C45 54/S probe head (osmium tips, 1 mm spacing) was mounted on a microscope translation stage. The outer probes were connected to the output terminals of a BK Precision 1787B DC power supply, while the current was measured using a Brymen BM257s multimeter. The voltage drop between the inner probes was measured using an HP 34401A multimeter. The applied voltage during measurements was 5 V. The setup provided simultaneous readings of current (I) and voltage (V) at the film surface. The sheet resistance Rs was calculated using the standard relation was used, and the electrical resistivity was obtained from , where d is the film thickness [50, 51]. Because of the measurable range of this method, the four-point probe was primarily used for low nitrogen-content films (N2/Ar = 0.5 and 1), which exhibited relatively low resistivity. For nitrogen-rich TaN films, where resistances were significantly higher, a DESCO two-point surface resistance measurement system was employed, operating over a range of 103–1012 Ω. This digital resistance meter directly provided the surface resistance of the film, which was then converted to resistivity using the same relation as above.
Results
Morphological and structural properties
The surface morphology of the TaNx films deposited at different N2/Ar ratios is shown in Fig. 1. All films exhibit homogeneous and uniform surfaces without visible cracks and voids. No pronounced faceted grains are observed, indicating a fine-grained or nanocrystalline microstructure. The film deposited at N2/Ar = 0.5 (d = 430 nm) shows relatively higher surface contrast and more pronounced morphological variations, suggesting greater surface heterogeneity. As the N2/Ar ratio increases to 1.5 (d = 235 nm) and 3 (d = 190 nm), the surface becomes progressively smoother and more homogeneous, with finer apparent surface features. Because individual nanocrystalline grains cannot be reliably resolved in the present SEM images, these observations are described as morphological refinement rather than as a quantitative reduction in grain size. Overall, the SEM observations indicate that higher nitrogen fractions lead to finer surface morphology while maintaining dense and continuous film coverage.
Fig. 1.

SEM images showing the surface morphology of TaN films deposited at a N2/Ar = 0.5 (d = 430 nm), b 1.5 (d = 235 nm), and c 3.0 (d = 190 nm)
The Raman spectra of the TaNx films (Fig. 2a) deposited under different sputtering conditions a structurally disordered Ta–N system with predominantly short-range order. All samples exhibit a broad low-frequency band in the 100–250 cm−1 range. At the lowest N2/Ar ratio of 0.5, the Raman response in this range appears as a single broad peak centered below 200 cm−1, consistent with overlapping acoustic-like Ta–N vibrational contributions reported for transition-metal nitride systems [52]. With increasing N2/Ar ratio, this band gradually evolves into two partially resolved peaks near 120 and 200 cm−1; the relative intensity of the ~120 cm−1 peak increases with increasing N2/Ar ratio, consistent with an increased occupation of interstitial nitrogen sites, as previously reported [53–55], while that of the ~200 cm−1 peak decreases, and at N2/Ar ≈ 3 the higher-frequency ~200 cm−1 peak is no longer distinguishable from the underlying broad band. The redistribution of intensity between these components is interpreted as evidence of changes in the local Ta–N coordination environment and short-range structural order with increasing nitrogen incorporation, within a disordered TaNx matrix.
Fig. 2.

a Raman spectra and b grazing-incidence diffraction (GID) patterns of TaNx films deposited at different N2/Ar flow ratios
In addition, a very broad spectral contribution extending from approximately 400 to 800 cm⁻1 is observed in most samples. This high-frequency continuum is characteristic of defect-assisted and/or second-order Raman scattering in disordered transition-metal nitrides [53, 54]. Although this spectral region overlaps with Raman bands reported for tantalum oxides, the absence of distinct, well-resolved oxide-related peaks indicates that the observed signal does not arise from a well-defined crystalline oxide phase. Overall, the broadening and redistribution of Raman intensity with increasing N2/Ar ratio are interpreted as evidence of changes in local Ta–N bonding and increasing structural disorder rather than of phase transformations. The grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GID) data (Fig. 2b) exhibit a broad diffraction peak centered at 2θ ≈ 34–35° for all N2/Ar gas flow ratios. With increasing nitrogen content, this feature becomes progressively broader and its intensity decreases, indicating increasing structural disorder and reduced long-range crystallinity. The position of this broad feature overlaps with reflections reported for several Ta–N phases, including diffraction peaks reported for the (111) planes of both cubic B1-type TaN and hexagonal Ta5N6 [16, 32, 52, 54–56]. Thus, this feature cannot be uniquely assigned to a single crystalline phase.
For the film deposited at N2/Ar = 0.5, additional weak diffraction peaks are observed at approximately 42°, 60°, and 72°. These peak positions are consistent with the (200), (220), and (311) reflections commonly reported for cubic TaN-like ordering [16, 33, 53, 55–57], although contributions from other Ta–N phases cannot be excluded because of the broad and overlapping nature of the diffraction features. The intensity of these peaks decrease with increasing N2/Ar ratio and they are no longer detectable at N2/Ar = 2. In addition, sharp peaks are observed near 52° and 56°. The peak near 52° is consistent with hexagonal TaN (201) [58], while the peak near 56°, detected only for N2/Ar = 1.5 and 2, may be associated with tetragonal TaN1.86 (112) [59]. These narrow peaks indicate the presence of minor crystalline Ta–N domains included in the predominantly disordered/nanocrystalline matrix, rather than a fully developed crystalline phase. At N2/Ar = 3, these sharp features disappear, suggesting that further nitrogen incorporation suppresses long-range crystalline ordering and promotes a more disordered nitrogen-rich Ta–N structure. Overall, the GIXRD data therefore support a predominantly disordered/nanocrystalline TaNx matrix with minor crystalline contributions whose relative prominence depends on the N2/Ar ratio.
Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy confirms the formation of dense TaNx films with compositions that depend on the N2/Ar ratio during deposition (Figs. 3 and 4). For N2/Ar = 1, the best-fit RBS simulation yielded an approximate composition of Ta0.42N0.50O0.05Ar0.019, which is close to the Ta4N5 configuration. Increasing the N2/Ar ratio to 2 results in a lower Ta fraction and a higher N/Ta ratio, with an approximate best-fit composition of Ta0.38N0.54O0.05Ar0.018. This composition lies between the Ta4N5 and Ta3N5 stoichiometries, suggesting a trend toward a more nitrogen-rich, or Ta-deficient, Ta–N phase at higher nitrogen flow. These compositions should be regarded as approximate best-fit stoichiometries rather than exact atomic ratios, since the determination of light elements, particularly nitrogen and oxygen, carries relatively large uncertainty in RBS due to their weak scattering signals and partial overlap with the Si substrate contribution. Within these limits, the RBS analysis nonetheless supports a systematic trend toward nitrogen enrichment with increasing N2/Ar ratio.
Fig. 3.

RBS spectra of TaNx shown in linear a and logarithmic b ion-yield scales. For N2/Ar = 2, the composition used in the simulation was Ta0.38N0.54O0.05Ar0.018, which lies approximately between the stoichiometries Ta3N5 and Ta4N5. For N2/Ar = 1, the composition used for the simulation (Ta0.42N0.50O0.05Ar0.019) is closer to Ta4N5
Fig. 4.

The RBS-simulated depth profiles for N2/Ar = 2 a and 1 b. Thicknesses were calculated using a density of 11.44 g/cm3 for the TaN layer (the bulk density is 14.3 g/cm3, and 11.44 g/cm3 corresponds to 80% of the bulk density)
The corresponding depth profiles show nearly uniform elemental distributions across the film thickness, with a slight increase in nitrogen content toward the film–substrate interface for both compositions. This indicates mostly homogeneous growth without significant compositional gradients (Fig. 4). The film thickness obtained from RBS simulations was approximately 278 nm for N2/Ar = 1 and 205 nm for N2/Ar = 2, which is in good agreement with the thickness measured by profilometry (275 nm and 220 nm, respectively).
Electro-optical properties
Transmission and reflectance spectra (Fig. 5) show that higher nitrogen content leads to a gradual increase in transmission over the visible and near-infrared range, consistent with suppression of metallic absorption and the emergence of semiconducting optical response. For N2/Ar ≥ 2, pronounced interference fringes appear in both T and R, indicating multiple internal reflections within the film.
Fig. 5.

Optical transmission a and reflectance b spectra of TaNx films deposited at varying N2/Ar flow ratios
The optical absorption coefficient was calculated from the measured transmittance and reflectance using Eq. (2). The applicability of this expression was numerically verified within the spectral regions selected for Tauc analysis by confirming that Rmeas2exp(− 2αd) << 1. For the nitrogen-rich semiconducting films Rmeas2exp(− 2αd) remained below approximately 5 × 10–3 in the selected fitting regions, indicating that the contribution of higher-order internal reflections was negligible for the optical bandgap determination. The calculation of the absorption coefficient assumes that attenuation arises predominantly from absorption. Because diffuse scattering was not measured independently, surface roughness and morphology may introduce some uncertainty into the absolute absorption coefficient.
Both direct- and indirect-bandgap Tauc analyses were performed for the nitrogen-rich semiconducting TaNx films. The Tauc plots corresponding to the indirect transition provided the most clearly defined linear fitting region (R2 ≥ 99%) and therefore were used to estimate the optical gap. [60] For the films deposited at an N2/Ar ratios of 0.5 and 1, it was not possible to reliably determine the bandgap, as the optical response exhibited a more metallic character without a well-defined absorption edge. At higher N2/Ar ratios, well-defined indirect bandgaps emerge and increase from about 1.52 eV at N2/Ar ≈ 1.5 to about 1.64 eV at N2/Ar = 3 as obtained by linear extrapolation of the curves. Considering the disordered nanocrystalline structure of the present TaNx films, these values should be regarded as estimates of the optical-gap values rather than transport-relevant mobility gap values.
The optical gaps derived from the Tauc plots are in reasonable agreement with those obtained independently from spectroscopic ellipsometry using a Cody–Lorentz oscillator model (Fig. 6b). This agreement supports the reliability of the extracted optical-gap values and the observed evolution of the optical gap with increasing N2/Ar ratio. The slight further increase in bandgap at higher N2/Ar ratios for nitrogen-rich films may indicate a narrowing of the band-tail region associated with shallow localized states near the band edges.
Fig. 6.

a Electrical resistivity (ρ) of TaNx films as a function of the N2/Ar flow-rate ratio, b Optical bandgap as a function of N2/Ar ratio obtained from Tauc analysis and spectroscopic ellipsometry
The dependence of electrical resistivity on the N2/Ar ratio (Fig. 6a) broadly follows the evolution of the optical gap. At low nitrogen flow (N2/Ar < 1), the films are Ta-rich and metallic, showing very low resistivity (~ 10⁻2 Ω cm). Increasing nitrogen fraction to 1–1.5 leads to formation of TaN with higher resistivity (~ 102 Ω cm). Further increase (N2/Ar > 2) produces over-stoichiometric, N-rich phases (Ta3N5-like), which are more semiconducting, but excessive nitrogen can introduce defects, thus slightly lowering resistivity again.
Discussion
The combined structural, morphological, and electro‑optical responses of the TaNx films show a strong dependence on the N2/Ar ratio, reflecting systematic changes in stoichiometry, and microstructure (Table 1). At low N2/Ar (< 1), the films are relatively Ta-rich, with compositions approaching metallic Ta-N -like configurations, characterized by high free-carrier density and low resistivity (~ 10–2 Ω·cm). With increasing N2/Ar, the composition progressively shifts toward nitrogen-rich TaNx, as confirmed by Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy. For N2/Ar = 1, RBS simulations yield a composition close to the Ta4N5 configuration. Increasing the N2/Ar ratio to 2 results in a more nitrogen-rich composition which lies between the Ta4N5 and Ta3N5 stoichiometries. These stoichiometries should be regarded as approximate best-fit values rather than exact atomic ratios because of the limited sensitivity of RBS to light elements such as nitrogen and oxygen; within these uncertainties, the data nonetheless support a monotonic nitrogen enrichment with increasing N2/Ar. Although these compositions correspond to nitrogen-rich, or Ta-deficient, Ta-N phase, the significant peak broadening observed in GIXRD indicates that the films do not form well-defined single crystalline phases but instead remain structurally disordered nanocrystalline TaNx.
Table 1.
Summary of composition, structural characteristics, electrical resistivity, and optical bandgap of TaNx films deposited at different N2/Ar flow-rate ratios
| N2/Ar | Deposition rate (Å/s) | d (nm) | RBS composition | Ta/N | ρ (Ω·cm) | Ega (eV) | Structural characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1.19 | 430 | – | – | 1.2 × 10–3 | – | TaN-like nanocrystalline structure; weak cubic TaN reflections |
| 1.0 | 0.76 | 275 | Ta0.42N0.50O0.05Ar0.019 | 0.84 | 2.0 × 10–2 | 0.73 | Disordered nanocrystalline TaNx; composition close to Ta4N5 |
| 1.5 | 0.65 | 235 | – | – | 4.0 | 1.52 | Disordered TaNx; minor crystalline Ta–N features |
| 2.0 | 0.61 | 220 | Ta0.38N0.54O0.05Ar0.018 | 0.70 | 6.7 × 101 | 1.52 | N-rich disordered TaNx; composition between Ta4N5 and Ta3N5 |
| 2.5 | 0.56 | 200 | – | – | 7.8 × 101 | 1.58 | Predominantly disordered nanocrystalline TaNx |
| 3.0 | 0.52 | 190 | – | – | 4.3 × 101 | 1.64 | Highly disordered N-rich TaNx; sharp crystalline features absent |
aOptical bandgap obtained from Tauc analysis
The evolution of the indirect optical bandgap from near-zero at low N2/Ar to ~1.6 eV at N2/Ar ≥ 1.5 follows this compositional trend toward N-rich TaNx. Increasing nitrogen incorporation leads to the emergence of semiconducting behavior and widening the optical gap. The very slight further increase in apparent bandgap at the highest N2/Ar values can be associated with some reduction in band-tail absorption associated with shallow localized states near the band edges, rather than a dramatic change in the fundamental gap.
Raman spectroscopy and grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction together provide a consistent picture of the structural evolution with N2/Ar ratio. Raman spectra at all N2/Ar exhibit broad, disorder-activated Ta-N vibrational bands and a high-frequency continuum characteristic of structurally disordered transition-metal nitrides. In GIXRD, the dominance of a single broad low-angle peak combined with the disappearance of higher-order cubic TaN diffraction peaks at elevated N2/Ar ratios indicates that long-range cubic TaN-like coherence is progressively lost as the films become more nitrogen-rich. This combination of broad Raman bands and broadened TaN-like diffraction peaks is characteristic of disordered nanocrystalline TaNx with predominantly short-range order, rather than distinct, well-separated crystalline TaN or Ta5N6 phases. These structural trends are further supported by the SEM results. All films exhibit dense and continuous surfaces; however, the apparent grain size decreases with increasing N2/Ar ratio, indicating that nitrogen incorporation suppresses grain growth during deposition. The resulting microstructural refinement increases the total grain-boundary area within the films. Grain boundaries introduce structural defects and localized states that can act as both scattering centers and trapping sites for charge carriers, reducing their effective mobility and contributing to the observed increase in electrical resistivity with increasing nitrogen content [61, 62]. Consequently, the progressive transition from quasi-metallic to semiconducting transport behavior can be attributed to the combined effects of reduced carrier concentration associated with nitrogen-rich bonding and enhanced carrier scattering at grain boundaries in these disordered nanocrystalline TaNx films.
From an application perspective, the property map established here demonstrates that ion-assisted reactive magnetron sputtering enables the fabrication of TaNx films spanning a wide range of electrical and optical properties within a single deposition platform. Ta-rich films deposited at low N2/Ar ratios exhibit low resistivity suitable for conductive layers and contacts, whereas nitrogen-rich TaNx films deposited at higher N2/Ar ratios exhibit higher resistivity and wider bandgaps, making them attractive for blocking or passivation layers in electronic and radiation-detector devices. The ability to tune these properties through controlled adjustment of the N2/Ar ratio highlights the versatility of nanocrystalline TaNx as a functional material system for electronic and photonic applications.
Conclusions
The combined structural, compositional, optical, and electrical characterization demonstrates that the properties of ion-assisted reactively sputtered TaNx films can be systematically tuned by varying the N2/Ar flow ratio. Across the investigated deposition conditions, the films exhibit a disordered nanocrystalline structure. Increasing the N2/Ar ratio drives a transition from Ta-rich, low-resistivity films with quasi-metallic behavior to N-rich, high-resistivity semiconducting films with well-defined indirect optical bandgaps of up to ~1.6 eV. These results establish deposition–structure–property relationships for TaNx and define a practical process space in which Ta-rich films are suited for conductive contacts and liners, whereas N-rich TaNx films are better suited for high-resistivity blocking or passivation layers in electronic and radiation-detector devices.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Lyudmila Goncharova from the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western University, for performing the Rutherford backscattering spectrometry measurements and for her valuable assistance in interpreting the RBS data.
Author contributions
G.N., M.V., M.C., D.D., and A.R. contributed to the study conception and experimental planning. G.N. performed the film deposition, optical and electrical measurements, data analysis, figure preparation, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with contributions from M.V. M.C. coordinated the work performed at Intlvac Thin Film Corporation and contributed to data interpretation and manuscript review. J.W. assisted with ellipsometry measurements and contributed to the interpretation of the results. SEM and GIXRD measurements were performed by A.C. S.K. contributed to results interpretation. D.D. contributed to project administration, resources, and definition of the project objectives at Intlvac Thin Film Corporation. A.R. supervised the project and contributed to data interpretation, manuscript drafting, and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery and Alliance programs, MITACS IT30395, Ontario Research Fund: Research Excellence, Terry Fox Foundation, and Research Institute, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canadian Research Chairs 2018–00015. Project No. NKTA-42 was implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National. Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021 funding scheme.
Data availability
Data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.S. Mardani, H. Norström, U. Smith, F. Gustavsson, J. Olsson, S.-L. Zhang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 34, 060603 (2016). 10.1116/1.4967372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.J.-S. Fang, C.-E. Lee, Y.-L. Cheng, G.-S. Chen, J. Alloys Compd. 951, 169974 (2023). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169974 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.H. Kim, C. Detavernier, O. van der Straten, S.M. Rossnagel, A.J. Kellock, D.-G. Park, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 014308 (2005). 10.1063/1.1935761 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.A. Achille, F. Mauvy, S. Fourcade, D. Michau, M. Cavarroc, A. Poulon-Quintin, Energies 17, 5099 (2024). 10.3390/en17205099 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.X. Li, J. Wang, W. Li, P. Liu, S. Wang, J. Li, B. Mi, G. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd. 1020, 179427 (2025). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.179427 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.S. Tsukimoto, M. Moriyama, M. Murakami, Thin Solid Films 460, 222–226 (2004). 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.01.073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.S.I. Baik, Y.W. Kim, Appl. Microsc. 50, 7 (2020). 10.1186/s42649-020-00026-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.I.-S. Kim, M.-Y. Cho, D.-W. Lee, P.-J. Ko, W.H. Shin, C. Park, J.-M. Oh, Thin Solid Films 697, 137821 (2020). 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.137821 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.B.H. Jeong, D.W. Kim, S.H. Lee, C.H. Kang, W. Long, D.H. Oh, Y.S. Jang, T. Aoyagi, Y. Taura, Y. Kokaze, E.J. Lee, S.H. Lee, G.Y. Yeom, Thin Solid Films 832, 140818 (2025). 10.1016/j.tsf.2025.140818 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.J.M. Choi, J. Kim, J.-H. Lee, W.-J. Son, S. Han, arXiv:2509.20662. (2025). 10.48550/arXiv.2509.20662
- 11.S. Aldana, C.-L. Nies, M. Nolan, Nanoscale 17, 12450–12464 (2025). 10.1039/D4NR04505J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.J.C. Tsao, C.P. Liu, Y.L. Wang, K.W. Chen, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 9, 759–763 (2009). 10.1166/jnn.2009.c019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Y.M. Zhou, M.Z. He, Z. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci. 315, 353–359 (2014). 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.T. Riekkinen, J. Molarius, T. Laurila, A. Nurmela, I. Suni, J.K. Kivilahti, Microelectron. Eng. 64, 289–297 (2002). 10.1016/S0167-9317(02)00801-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.M.T. Islam, H. Efeoglu, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 322, 118605 (2025). 10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118605 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Z. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Li, H. Zhao, Coatings 11, 1133 (2021). 10.3390/coatings11091133 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.H.R. Chen, Y.C. Chen, T.C. Chang, K.C. Chang, T.M. Tsai, T.J. Chu, C.C. Shih, N.C. Chuang, K.Y. Wang, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 9, 177 (2014). 10.1186/1556-276X-9-177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.O. Semeniuk, O. Grynko, G. Juska, A. Reznik, Sci. Rep. 7, 13272 (2017). 10.1038/s41598-017-13697-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.O. Grynko, T. Thibault, E. Pineau, A. Reznik, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 68, 2335–2341 (2021). 10.1109/TED.2021.3067616 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.S. Abbaszadeh, C.C. Scott, O. Bubon, A. Reznik, K.S. Karim, Sci. Rep. 3, 3360 (2013). 10.1038/srep03360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.E. Pineau, O. Grynko, T. Thibault, A. Alexandrov, A. Csík, S. Kökényesi, A. Reznik, Sensors 22, 5998 (2022). 10.3390/s22165998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.F. Vaz, J. Ferreira, E. Ribeiro, L. Rebouta, S. Lanceros-Méndez, J.A. Mendes, E. Alves, P. Goudeau, J.P. Rivière, F. Ribeiro, I. Moutinho, K. Pischow, J. de Rijke, Surf. Coat. Technol. 191, 317–323 (2005). 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.S. Jena, A. Madhuri, M. Gupta, B.P. Swain, J. Alloys Compd. 1002, 175217 (2024). 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175217 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.A. Garzon-Fontecha, H.A. Castillo, E. Restrepo-Parra, W. De La Cruz, Surf. Coat. Technol. 334, 98–104 (2018). 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.11.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.A. le Febvrier, D. Gambino, F. Giovannelli, B. Bakhit, S. Hurand, G. Abadias, B. Alling, P. Eklund, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104108 (2022). 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.104108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.S. Jathar, S.K. Honnali, A. Farhadizadeh, A. le Febvrier, M. Odén, P. Eklund, Surf. Coat. Technol. 494, 131489 (2024). 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131489 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.A. Madhuri, S. Jena, M. Gupta, B.P. Swain, Physica B: Condens. Matter 666, 415141 (2023). 10.1016/j.physb.2023.415141 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.B. Yang, T. Huang, Y. Dou, W. Kong, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 170, 107979 (2024). 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107979 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Y. Su, Q. Wang, T. Wang, Inorganics 13, 289 (2025). 10.3390/inorganics13090289 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Y. Chen, J. Zhang, H. Gou, X. Wang, Y. Chen, H. Guo, Vacuum 222, 113092 (2024). 10.1016/j.vacuum.2024.113092 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Y. Hu, M. Rasadujjaman, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Yan, M.R. Baklanov, Coatings 11, 937 (2021). 10.3390/coatings11080937 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.D.E. Cherfia, M. Guemmaz, M.E.H. Bourahli et al., Acta Phys. Pol. A 136, 849–854 (2019). 10.12693/APhysPolA.136.849 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.A. Zaman, E.I. Meletis, Coatings 7, 209 (2017). 10.3390/coatings7120209 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.M. Grosser, H. Seidel, U. Schmid, Thin Solid Films 629, 69–78 (2017). 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.03.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.W. Dai, Y. Shi, Coatings 11, 911 (2021). 10.3390/coatings11080911 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.K.B. Lee, K.H. Lee, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 55, 966–970 (2009). 10.3938/JKPS.55.966 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.W.-J. Chun, A. Ishikawa, H. Fujisawa, T. Takata, J.N. Kondo, M. Hara, M. Kawai, Y. Matsumoto, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 1798–1803 (2003). 10.1021/jp027593f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.E. Nurlaela, A. Ziani, K. Takanabe, Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 5, 18 (2016). 10.1007/s40243-016-0083-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.R.E. Tallman, A. Reznik, B.A. Weinstein, S.D. Baranovskii, J.A. Rowlands, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 212103 (2008). 10.1063/1.3026173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.A. Mishchenko, G.P. Lindberg, B.A. Weinstein, A. Reznik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 051912 (2014). 10.1063/1.4892836 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.H.O. Pierson, Handbook of Refractory Carbides and Nitrides (Noyes Publications, Westwood, 1996) [Google Scholar]
- 42.O.S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Solid Films (Dover Publications, New York, 1991) [Google Scholar]
- 43.L. Bychto, M. Maliński, Int. J. Thermophys. 39, 103 (2018). 10.1007/s10765-018-2424-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.J. Tauc, R. Grigorovici, A. Vancu, Phys. Status Solidi B 15, 627–637 (1966). 10.1002/pssb.19660150224 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.N.F. Mott, E.A. Davis, Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979) [Google Scholar]
- 46.O.J. Oghenekome, G.K. Asare, G. Ogburogho, Asian J. Phys. Chem. Sci. 13, 34–43 (2025). 10.9734/ajopacs/2025/v13i1240 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.A.S. Ferlauto, G.M. Ferreira, J.M. Pearce, C.R. Wronski, R.W. Collins, X. Deng, G. Ganguly, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2424–2436 (2002). 10.1063/1.1497462 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.H. Shahrokhabadi, A. Bananej, M. Vaezzadeh, J. Appl. Spectrosc. 84, 915–922 (2017). 10.1007/s10812-017-0565-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.G.E. Jellison, F.A. Modine, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 371–373 (1996). 10.1063/1.118064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.F.M. Smits, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 37, 711–718 (1958). 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03883.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.D.K. Schroder, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, 3rd edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2006). 10.1002/0471749095 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.V. Zin, F. Montagner, S.M. Deambrosis, C. Mortalò, L. Litti, M. Meneghetti, E. Miorin, Materials 15, 3354 (2022). 10.3390/ma15093354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.K. Valleti, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 27, 626–630 (2009). 10.1116/1.3136858 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Y. Wang, X. Shi, M. Liu, Y. Yang, Q. Gao, B. Zhu, L. Xu, Process. Appl. Ceram. 16, 191–200 (2022). 10.2298/PAC2203191W [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.D. Bernoulli, U. Müller, M. Schwarzenberger, R. Hauert, R. Spolenak, Thin Solid Films 548, 157–161 (2013). 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.09.055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.A. Aryasomayajula, K. Valleti, S. Aryasomayajula, D.G. Bhat, Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 4401–4405 (2006). 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.085 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.M. Alishahi, F. Mahboubi, S.M. Mousavi Khoie, M. Aparicio, E. Lopez-Elvira, J. Méndez, R. Gago, RSC Adv. 6, 89061–89072 (2016). 10.1039/C6RA17869C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.W. Wong-Ng, H.F. McMurdie, B. Paretzkin, Y. Zhang, K.L. Davis, C.R. Hubbard, A.L. Dragoo, J.M. Stewart, Powder Diffr. 2, 191–202 (1987). 10.1017/S0885715600012690 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.M. Bykov, E. Bykova, A.V. Ponomareva, I.A. Abrikosov, S. Chariton, V.B. Prakapenka, M.F. Mahmood, L. Dubrovinsky, A.F. Goncharov, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 9003–9008 (2021). 10.1002/anie.202100283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.J. Eichhorn, S.P. Lechner, C.-M. Jiang, G. Folchi Heunecke, F. Munnik, I.D. Sharp, J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 20653–20663 (2021). 10.1039/D1TA05282A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.S. Kasap, C. Koughia, J. Berashevich, R. Johanson, A. Reznik, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 26, 4644–4658 (2015). 10.1007/s10854-015-3069-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.A. Reznik, S.D. Baranovskii, O. Rubel, K. Jandieri, S.O. Kasap, Y. Ohkawa, M. Kubota, K. Tanioka, J.A. Rowlands, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 354, 2691–2696 (2008). 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.09.058 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
