Abstract
Background
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the fastest-growing orthopaedic procedures in India, driven by demographic transitions, increased life expectancy, and the rising burden of knee osteoarthritis. With expanding procedural volumes, periodic evaluation of scientific output is essential to identify evolving research priorities, institutional leadership, and collaborative patterns. This study aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of Indian TKA research published over the past five years.
Methods
Publications were retrieved from the Scopus database using a structured search strategy for TKA-related terms. The search was restricted to studies published between 1 January 2021 and 30 December 2025 and conducted in an Indian setting. Bibliometric indicators assessed publication trends, document types, journals, authorship, institutional productivity, and state-wise contributions. Network-based bibliometric visualizations were generated using VOSviewer.
Results
A total of 860 publications were identified, showing a steady increase in research output with peak productivity in 2025 (n = 221). Maharashtra and Delhi were the leading contributors, and the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences was the most productive institution. Original research articles accounted for 69.5% of publications. Emerging themes included robotic-assisted surgery, AI-based modeling, and advanced rehabilitation. International collaboration was observed in 24.18% of studies, mainly with the UK and USA.
Conclusion
Indian TKA research has demonstrated substantial growth and increasing thematic maturity over the past five years, with a shift toward technology-driven and collaborative research. Strengthening national registries, encouraging multicentric collaboration, and expanding research beyond metropolitan centers are essential to sustain future impact.
Trial registration
Not applicable.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06488-w.
Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty, Bibliometric analysis, India, Orthopaedics, Research trends
Background
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is widely regarded as the definitive surgical intervention for end-stage knee osteoarthritis and other debilitating knee conditions [1–3]. Globally, the demand for TKA has increased substantially over the past two decades, driven by population ageing, rising obesity rates, higher patient expectations, and continual improvements in implant design and surgical techniques [4, 5]. India has paralleled global growth patterns and experienced a substantial increase in TKA utilization, thereby, increasing life expectancy, and expanding access to advanced orthopaedic care [6, 7].
The last five years represent a particularly critical period for knee arthroplasty research in India. This timeframe coincides with the accelerated adoption of enhanced recovery protocols, widespread introduction of robotic-assisted and computer-navigated TKA, growing engagement of private-sector hospitals in academic research, and increasing international collaboration [8, 9]. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath have reshaped elective surgical practice, clinical research priorities, and health-system resilience, making recent literature especially reflective of contemporary clinical realities [10–12].
Scientific research plays a central role in guiding evidence-based arthroplasty practice by evaluating outcomes, refining surgical techniques, assessing implant performance, and optimising rehabilitation strategies [13, 14]. Bibliometric analysis offers a systematic and quantitative approach to evaluate the evolution, impact, and collaborative structure of research within a defined field [15, 16]. Recent bibliometric explorations have demonstrated the utility of this method in mapping the fragmented landscape of navigated and robotic-assisted arthroplasty, emphasizing how such analyses identify the transition from experimental technology to established clinical practice [17]. Furthermore, the evolution of knee-related research is increasingly characterized by a shift toward biological repair and the integration of biomechanical feedback, reflecting a global drive toward precision medicine and personalized rehabilitation in joint care [18, 19].
Previous scientometric studies have assessed orthopaedic and arthroplasty-related research output from India over extended periods [20, 21]; however, focused analyses specifically examining recent five-year trends in TKA research remain limited. This specific temporal focus is necessary because the last half-decade represents a distinct “inflection point” in Indian orthopaedics that longitudinal studies spanning 20 years often dilute. By isolating the 2021–2025 period, several unique insights emerge that are otherwise obscured in long-term analyses. First, this window captures the “maturation phase” of robotic and digital surgery in India, moving beyond early adoption reports to outcome-based studies. Second, it reflects the “Post-COVID Academic Pivot,” revealing how Indian researchers adapted to the temporary cessation of elective surgeries by shifting focus toward telemedicine, telerehabilitation, and health economics. Third, a focused five-year analysis uniquely highlights the rising academic prominence of high-volume private corporate hospitals, which are now challenging the traditional research dominance of government-funded medical colleges [19, 21, 22].
Given the rapid technological and clinical evolution of knee arthroplasty, an updated bibliometric evaluation centred on the most recent literature is essential. Analysing the past five years of Indian TKA research provides insight into contemporary research priorities such as the transition from implant-centric research to patient-reported outcome measures and cost-utility analyses. It further identifies institutional leadership and existing gaps that may inform future policy, funding, and collaborative strategies. Accordingly, the present study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Indian TKA research published from 1 January 2021 till 30 December 2025.
Materials and methods
Study design and data source
This bibliometric study was designed and reported in accordance with established methodological frameworks commonly adopted for scientometric analyses in orthopaedics and arthroplasty research, drawing on best practices described in recent bibliometric literature [23–26]. The Scopus database (https://www.scopus.com) was selected as the data source due to its broad coverage of peer-reviewed biomedical and orthopaedic journals and the availability of built-in analytical tools for bibliometric evaluation.
Search strategy and eligibility criteria
A structured search strategy was applied using relevant keywords and synonymous terms such as “total knee arthroplasty” OR “TKA” OR “total knee replacement arthroplasty” OR “total knee joint replacement” OR “knee replacement total” OR “total knee replacement” OR “knee replacement*” OR “TKR” OR “knee arthroplasty total” OR “knee arthroplast*” to the title, abstract, and keyword fields. The search was restricted to documents published from 1 January 2021 till 30 December 2025 and limited to publications with an Indian study setting. All document types indexed in Scopus, including original research articles, review articles, conference papers, and letters, were included.
The complete Scopus search strategy, including the exact search query, search date, filters applied, and the number of records retrieved at each stage of the screening process, is provided in Supplementary File 1. Studies were initially identified using the Scopus country filter and subsequently cross-verified through manual screening of author affiliations and publication details to confirm their relevance to the Indian setting.
Data extraction and analysis
Bibliographic data were exported from the Scopus database for analysis. The extracted variables included year of publication, authorship information, institutional affiliations, geographic location, document type, and source journal. For institutional and state-wise analyses, author affiliation data exported from Scopus were used. In publications involving multiple institutions or multiple Indian states, each unique institution and state represented within a publication was counted once to reflect collaborative research contributions, while duplicate affiliations within the same publication were excluded from repeated counting.
Descriptive bibliometric indicators available within the Scopus database were initially utilised to examine publication distribution and key bibliometric indicators. Subsequently, the extracted data were analysed using spreadsheet-based methods to evaluate annual publication trends, authorship patterns, journal distribution, institutional productivity, and geographic contribution. Collaborative relationships among authors, keywords, citations, and countries were explored using network-mapping techniques implemented in VOSviewer (version 1.6.20).
Results
Overview of retrieved literature
A total of 73,170 TKA-related documents were identified globally, of which 1,710 originated from India. After restricting the timeframe from 1 January 2021 till 30 December 2025, 860 Indian publications were included in the final analysis.
Temporal trends in Indian publication output
The temporal distribution of TKA-related publications from India shows a fluctuating but ultimately upward trajectory over the analyzed period. Publication output increased from 150 articles in 2021 to 176 in 2022, followed by a temporary decline in 2023 (n = 126). Research activity rebounded in 2024 (n = 168) and peaked in 2025 with 221 publications. The most prolific year was 2025, representing the highest volume of research and suggesting a surge in clinical and academic interest in knee arthroplasty within the Indian medical community. Additionally, 19 articles that were accepted in 2025 were identified as ahead-of-print publications for 2026, reflecting the most recent advancements in the field. The yearly distribution of the number of publications in TKA research in India is depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Annual publication output of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) research in India from 2021 to 2025
Growth trends in Indian publications on TKA from inception till present
The longitudinal analysis of 1,710 TKA-related documents from India reveals a distinct evolutionary trajectory spanning over three decades, starting from the first recorded publication in 1990. The research landscape is characterized by three developmental phases. The foundational phase (1990–2000) was marked by sporadic academic output, with several years specifically 1991, 1993, 1994, and 1996, recording zero publications. During this decade, the total output remained minimal, reflecting the early stages of arthroplasty adoption in the country.
The steady expansion phase (2001–2015) saw the field achieve year-on-year consistency. During this period, publication volume began to climb steadily as specialized arthroplasty units were established in major metropolitan hospitals. A significant milestone was reached in 2013, when annual output first surpassed 50 articles (n = 64). The acceleration phase (2016–2025) represents the most prolific era in the history of Indian TKA research, accounting for the vast majority of cumulative literature. Annual publications exceeded the 100-article threshold for the first time in 2019 (n = 105). The most recent five-year window (2021–2025) contributed increasing publications, representing 49.2% of the total historical output. Within this window, research output grew from 150 articles in 2021 to an all-time peak of 221 in 2025, the first instance of India exceeding 200 publications in a single year. Despite a transient decline in 2023 (n = 126), likely due to post-pandemic elective surgery disruptions, the rapid recovery in 2024 and the record-high volume in 2025 demonstrate a robust academic momentum. Early data for 2026 (n = 19) further indicates that this upward trend is sustained (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Line graph depicting the annual publication output of TKA research in India from inception to 2025. The line graph illustrates the progressive growth in publication output over time
Authorship patterns
Most publications were multi-authored, highlighting collaborative research practices. An analysis of authorship patterns reveals an average of approximately five authors per paper (mean = 4.96). Most studies involved mid-sized teams of four to six authors (n = 439), followed by two- to three-author collaborations (n = 243). Larger collaborative groups of seven to ten authors contributed substantially (n = 135), while single-author publications were uncommon (n = 28). A small proportion of studies (n = 15), involved extensive multi-institutional collaborations exceeding ten authors, underscoring increasing research networking within the field. This distribution underscores the collective nature of contemporary research in India, where multi-authored studies are the standard practice (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Network visualization of co-authorship in Indian TKA research generated using VOSviewer. The analysis includes authors with a minimum of five publications. Each node represents an author, with larger nodes indicating greater publication output. Links represent co-authorship relationships, and different colours denote distinct author collaboration clusters
State-wise distribution of publications
Research output was geographically concentrated in major academic and metropolitan regions. Maharashtra (n = 207) and Delhi (n = 168) were the leading contributors, followed by Tamil Nadu (n = 114), Karnataka (n = 95), and Telangana (n = 68). Several other states, including Chandigarh (n = 33) and Kerala (n = 32), demonstrated moderate output, while smaller and northeastern states contributed fewer publications. This distribution highlights a research landscape predominantly led by regions with established medical and technical institutions (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

State-wise distribution of TKA research publications in India from 2021 to 2025. Publication counts were determined through manual screening of the study settings reported in each article
Institutional contributions
Leading tertiary care hospitals and academic institutions dominated the publication output. The top 10 highest-contributing research institutions and hospitals in India demonstrate a mix of public academic centers and premier private healthcare providers. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (n = 92) leads as the most prolific research entity, followed by the Apollo Hospitals group (n = 52). Significant research contributions also originate from specialized private institutions such as Breach Candy Hospital Trust (n = 28) and Sunshine Hospitals (n = 27). The Safdarjung Hospital & Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (n = 24) and Max Super Speciality Hospital (n = 24) are also leading centers for research. The Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in Chandigarh (n = 21) and the Manipal Academy of Higher Education (n = 20) remain major hubs for academic excellence. Rounding out the top ten are Ganga Hospital (n = 18) and the Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital (n = 17), reflecting a diverse and balanced landscape of clinical and academic excellence in Indian medical research (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Institutional contributions to TKA research in India from 2021 to 2025. The bar chart presents the top 10 institutions ranked by the number of publications, highlighting the leading contributors to Indian TKA research
Journals and research dissemination
The scholarly dissemination of Indian research on TKA is distributed across a variety of specialized orthopaedic and surgical publications, with a strong emphasis on both domestic and international high-impact journals. The Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (n = 102) stands as the primary vehicle for publication, followed by the Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (n = 52). The Journal of Arthroplasty (n = 44) and the Journal of Orthopaedics (n = 38) also feature heavily in the dataset, underscoring the global relevance of Indian clinical data. Other significant contributors include the Journal of Robotic Surgery (n = 23), reflecting a growing interest in technology-assisted procedures, as well as the Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (n = 19) and the Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (n = 18). Rounding out the top ten are The Knee (n = 16), Journal of Orthopaedic Reports (n = 16), and International Orthopaedics (n = 15). Collectively, these top ten journals account for a substantial portion of the research output, providing a robust platform for the exchange of surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and technological advancements in the field (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.

Publication output of the top 10 journals publishing Indian TKA research from 2021 to 2025. Bars represent the number of publications contributed by each journal
Open access journals
The accessibility of TKA-related research from India demonstrates a balanced distribution between open-access and subscription-based models, reflecting a diverse dissemination strategy. Of the 860 publications analyzed, 52.7% (n = 453) are available through Open Access channels, while 47.3% (n = 407) are restricted to Subscription or pay-walled access. Within the open-access subset, Gold Open Access is the most prevalent route (n = 231), where research is made immediately and permanently free at the point of publication. A portion of the literature also utilizes Green Open Access (n = 312 including overlaps), indicating a strong practice of self-archiving in institutional or subject-specific repositories. Other models, such as Hybrid (n = 35) and Bronze (n = 40) access, contribute to a smaller share of the output.
Thematic areas in TKA research
The thematic landscape of TKA research in India is characterized by a strong surgical core complemented by a burgeoning interest in technological integration and post-operative care. The majority of research falls under the subdomain of Orthopaedics and Surgery (n = 603), focusing on clinical outcomes, prosthetic design, and traditional versus minimally invasive surgical techniques. A significant and rapidly expanding secondary domain is Engineering and Technology-related publications (n = 98), which explores the utility of robotic-assisted surgery, artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, and computer-navigated systems to enhance surgical precision. Additionally, a focused segment of the literature is dedicated to Rehabilitation and Allied Health (n = 56), highlighting the critical role of specialized physiotherapy protocols, gait analysis, and home-based recovery in optimizing long-term patient mobility. The remaining output (n = 103) spans General Medicine and Multi-disciplinary areas, addressing systemic comorbidities and public health implications of knee arthroplasty. This distribution underscores a shift in the Indian research paradigm from purely clinical observations toward a sophisticated, multi-disciplinary approach that integrates robotic technology and advanced rehabilitation sciences.
Type of studies
The TKA-related publications from India exhibit a diverse range of study types, reflecting a comprehensive approach to scientific inquiry that spans from primary clinical investigations to high-level evidence syntheses. Original research articles (n = 589) form the backbone of the dataset, accounting for nearly 69.5% of the total output and representing the high volume of primary clinical trials, observational studies, and surgical outcome reports. Review articles (n = 101) comprise the second-largest category, providing essential summaries of existing literature and expert perspectives on evolving trends. The academic breadth is further enhanced by book chapters (n = 58) and letters to the editor (n = 49). Other document types include conference papers (n = 31), which capture early-stage research presented at international forums, as well as editorials (n = 12) and short notes. This distribution indicates a mature research landscape where primary data collection is balanced by significant efforts in academic synthesis and professional discourse.
Keywords in TKA research
The distribution of keywords across the identified subdomains underscores the multifaceted nature of Indian research in TKA. Within the Orthopaedics and Surgery cluster (n = 603), the literature is primarily centered on established clinical concepts, with “total knee arthroplasty” (n = 458), “knee osteoarthritis” (n = 166), and “knee replacement” (n = 164) representing the most frequently occurring keywords. These high-frequency terms form the core of Indian TKA research and reflect the longstanding emphasis on degenerative joint disease management and surgical intervention.
The Engineering and Technology cluster (n = 98) highlights the increasing integration of advanced surgical technologies into TKA research. Frequently occurring keywords include “robotic-assisted surgery” (n = 44), “robotic surgery,” “computer navigation,” and “navigation,” reflecting growing interest in precision surgery and technology-assisted procedures. The Rehabilitation and Allied Health cluster (n = 56) focuses on patient-centered recovery, with keywords such as “quality of life” (n = 21), “functional outcomes” (n = 20), “rehabilitation,” and “range of motion,” emphasizing long-term postoperative function and quality of care. The General Medicine and Others category (n = 103) encompasses broader clinical themes including infection, analgesia, systematic reviews, and perioperative management, serving as a bridge between orthopaedic practice and multidisciplinary healthcare research.
Figure 7a depicts the network visualization and Fig. 7b represents the overlay visualization (publication year) of co-occurrence of all keywords in Indian TKA research in the past five years. The overlay visualization (Fig. 7b), generated using the average publication year of keywords, further demonstrates the temporal evolution of research themes over the five-year study period. Earlier research (predominantly 2021–2022; blue to cyan nodes) focused on conventional topics such as osteoarthritis, prosthetic joint infection, gait analysis, orthopaedics, rehabilitation, and pain management. Keywords with intermediate average publication years (2023–2024; green nodes) included robotic surgery, computer navigation, alignment techniques, quality of life, and functional outcomes, indicating a transition toward technology-assisted surgery and patient-centered outcome assessment. The most recent keywords (2024–2025; yellow-green nodes) include artificial intelligence, deep learning, robotic-assisted TKA, kinematic alignment, mechanical alignment, valgus deformity, varus knee, and joint line restoration, demonstrating a clear shift toward digital orthopaedics, intelligent surgical planning, and precision medicine. This temporal progression objectively supports the emergence of AI-, robotics-, and technology-driven research as contemporary themes in Indian TKA literature. Collectively, these findings illustrate that Indian TKA research has evolved from predominantly clinical and surgical investigations toward multidisciplinary research integrating engineering innovations, digital technologies, and comprehensive rehabilitation strategies.
Fig. 8.

Density visualization of author citations in Indian TKA research generated using VOSviewer. The analysis includes authors with a minimum of five citations. Regions with warmer colours (yellow) indicate areas of higher citation density, whereas cooler colours (green to blue) represent lower citation density, highlighting the most influential authors within the citation network
Fig. 7.

a Network visualization of keyword co-occurrence in Indian TKA research generated using VOSviewer. The analysis includes keywords with a minimum occurrence of five. Node size is proportional to keyword frequency, links represent co-occurrence relationships, and colours indicate distinct thematic clusters. b Overlay visualization of keyword co-occurrence in Indian TKA research generated using VOSviewer. Keywords with a minimum occurrence of five were included. Node size represents keyword frequency, links indicate co-occurrence relationships, and the colour gradient represents the average publication year of each keyword, ranging from earlier topics (blue; 2021–2022) to more recent topics (yellow; 2024–2025), illustrating the temporal evolution of research themes
High-cited authors and original papers
The impact of individual researchers within the Indian TKA landscape is characterized by high-volume contributors with sustained clinical influence and leaders of landmark original investigations. Singh, S. (n = 229 citations) and Sharma, S. (n = 215) emerge as the authors with the highest cumulative citation impact in the 2021–2025 period, driven by a high volume of peer-recognized clinical reports. They are followed closely by Vaishya, R. (n = 212 citations) and Meena, A. (n = 196 citations), whose prolific output across multiple sub-domains of arthroplasty has established them as central figures in the national research network. Notably, Malhotra, R. (n = 128 citations) represents academic leadership from premier public institutions like AIIMS, while researchers such as Mulpur, P. (n = 149 citations), Mullaji, A.B. (n = 145 citations), and Vaidya, N. (n = 141 citations) represent the vanguard of innovative private centers specializing in robotic integration and complex primary surgery. Figure 8 illustrates the citation network of prominent authors in the Indian TKA research landscape, specifically mapping individuals with a minimum threshold of five citations. The Top 5 highly cited original research papers are presented in Table 1, representing the most influential primary data coming out of India.
Table 1.
Bibliometric profile of top five highly cited papers in TKA research in India in the past five years
| Rank | Lead author | Journal | Title | Year | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kumar, R. | Materials Today: Proceedings | Multiple-criteria decision‐making and sensitivity analysis for selection of materials for knee implant femoral component | 2021 | 90 |
| 2 | Vaidya, N. | Journal of Robotic Surgery | Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial | 2022 | 87 |
| 3 | Mulpur, P. | Journal of Arthroplasty | Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction in fast-track total knee arthroplasty: An Indian perspective | 2022 | 68 |
| 4 | Maniar, R.N. | Knee Surgery & Related Research | Effectiveness of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in TKA: A randomized trial | 2021 | 61 |
| 5 | Mullaji, A.B. | The Knee | Coronal alignment and ligament balance in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study | 2022 | 56 |
TKA = Total Knee Arthroplasty
Language
The linguistic analysis of the TKA-related research output from India between 2021 and 2025 reveals a near-total dominance of the English language. Out of the 860 documents included in the final analysis, 859 (99.88%) were published in English. Only a single publication (0.12%) was identified in Spanish.
Collaboration analysis
Inter-institutional and inter-state collaborations increased over the five-year period. The international research output on TKA from India is supported by a diverse global network, with approximately 24.18% (n = 208) of all papers involving international co-authors. The United Kingdom (n = 71) and the United States (n = 64) are the primary collaborating partners, reflecting strong academic and clinical ties with Western institutions. European collaboration is also highly prominent, led by Italy (n = 31), Germany (n = 29), and Switzerland (n = 15), alongside significant partnerships with Australia (n = 27) and Canada (n = 18). Within the Asian and Middle Eastern regions, researchers have collaborated frequently with colleagues in Malaysia (n = 15), China (n = 12), and Saudi Arabia (n = 11). This wide geographical reach spanning North America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and Oceania demonstrate the global integration of the Indian arthroplasty community and its commitment to aligning with international surgical standards and technological innovations. Figure 9 depicts the visual representation of co-authorship countries in Indian TKA research in the past five years.
Fig. 9.

Network visualization of international country co-authorship in Indian TKA research generated using VOSviewer. Countries with a minimum of five publications were included in the analysis. Node size represents the number of publications contributed by each country, links indicate international co-authorship relationships, link thickness reflects the strength of collaboration (total link strength), and colours denote distinct collaboration clusters
The analysis reveals that interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary collaborations are pivotal drivers of research in this field, appearing most prominently in the management of specialized conditions and the integration of advanced technologies. The data highlights a significant synergy between engineering and medical disciplines accounting for approximately 7.2% (n = 62) of the publications as evidenced by collaborative research between technical institutes and orthopedic centers on robotic-assisted arthroplasty, biomechanical modeling, and AI-driven surgical planning software. These interdisciplinary efforts extend to the implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and fast-track protocols, which require coordinated action across surgical, anesthetic, and nursing teams, as well as the development of global surgical guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Collectively, these findings underscore that high-impact research in this domain is increasingly dependent on the convergence of clinical expertise, technological innovation, and integrated care pathways.
Discussion
This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of TKA research in India over the past five years, a period marked by rapid clinical expansion, technological adoption, and increasing global engagement. Unlike previous bibliometric evaluations that examined broader arthroplasty literature over longer timeframes, the present study specifically focuses on TKA during the contemporary period (2021–2025), providing an updated assessment of current publication trends, institutional productivity, collaborative networks, and research priorities in India. By focusing on this recent timeframe, the present study captures contemporary research priorities that are most relevant to current practice, policy-making, and future innovation in Indian arthroplasty care.
Evolution and growth trajectory in TKA research in India
The historical growth of TKA research in India, as evidenced by the 1,710 identified documents, reflects a transition from a nascent clinical discipline to a globally recognized research hub. The contrast between the “zero-publication” years of the early 1990s and the peak of 221 publications in 2025 highlights a maturation of the Indian orthopaedic ecosystem. Several factors contribute to this exponential surge. First, the acceleration phase (2016 onwards) coincides with the mass-market entry and clinical validation of robotic-assisted surgery and navigation systems in India. These technological advancements have not only improved surgical precision but have also provided a wealth of digital data that has fueled clinical trials and observational studies [27, 28]. Second, the institutionalization of research in both public centers (like AIIMS) and large private healthcare networks (like Apollo and Ganga Hospital) has created a sustainable pipeline for high-volume data collection [29, 30].
Nearly half of all Indian TKA publications have been produced in the last five years, indicating a marked acceleration in research activity and the growing contribution of Indian orthopaedic researchers to primary evidence generation [31, 32]. While the 2023 dip illustrates the vulnerability of elective surgical research to global health crises, the subsequent 75% growth by 2025 underscores a resilient recovery. This trajectory suggests that India is well-positioned to leverage its immense surgical volume to lead global discourse on TKA outcomes in the coming decade [28, 29, 32].
Growth trajectory and contemporary relevance of the past five years
The identification of 860 Indian publications within a five-year window reflects a substantial and accelerating contribution to global TKA literature. The transient decline observed in 2023 may plausibly reflect disruptions in elective surgical services and academic activity during the post-pandemic recovery phase, a pattern reported across multiple surgical disciplines. The subsequent rebound and marked surge in 2024–2025 indicate a strong recovery and renewed academic momentum. Focusing on the past five years is particularly important in the Indian context, as this period coincides with widespread adoption of robotic-assisted TKA, enhanced recovery protocols, improved implant availability, and increased participation of private healthcare institutions in research [9, 33]. Consequently, the recent literature is more likely to reflect current surgical standards, patient expectations, and health-system realities than earlier decades [8–10].
This focused evaluation also complements previous bibliometric studies, including those by Vaishya et al., which primarily examined broader arthroplasty literature or combined hip and knee arthroplasty publications over extended periods. Restricting the analysis to the recent five-year period enables a contemporary assessment of research activity during an era characterized by increasing adoption of robotic-assisted surgery, digital health technologies, and post-pandemic recovery of elective orthopaedic services [19, 21, 22, 34].
Global comparison: Where India stands and what is lacking
When compared to global benchmarks, the Indian TKA research landscape shows distinct characteristics. While the USA and UK lead in long-term survivorship data and multicentric registry-based studies [35, 36], and China and Japan dominate in biomechanical engineering and basic science research [34, 37, 38], India’s strength lies in clinical outcome reporting and “surgical technique” innovations [22, 39]. However, a critical gap remains. Unlike the UK’s National Joint Registry (NJR) or the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), India lacks a unified, mandatory national registry that translates into high-impact publications [36, 40]. The current research landscape is hampered by fragmented data sources, where high-quality clinical information remains siloed within individual institutions rather than being integrated into a national database.
Furthermore, there is a significant over-representation of metropolitan private centers in the literature, which may not accurately reflect the surgical realities, patient demographics, or resource constraints of rural and public-sector healthcare settings. Currently, Indian research is heavily weighted toward short-to-mid-term clinical outcomes (2–5 years), resulting in critically limited long-term survivorship data [22, 31, 39, 41]. To bridge the gap with global leaders like the USA or Japan, Indian researchers must pivot toward long-term (10–15 year) survivorship data and large-scale cost-effectiveness analyses that account for the unique socio-economic diversity of the Indian patient population.
Collaborative authorship and research evolution
The predominance of multi-authored publications, with an average of nearly five authors per paper, underscores the increasingly collaborative nature of TKA research in India. The dominance of mid-sized research teams suggests a balance between institutional collaboration and focused clinical leadership. The presence of larger author groups, including multi-institutional collaborations, reflects growing research networking and the conduct of more complex studies requiring diverse expertise. The rarity of single-author publications further indicates a shift away from isolated reporting toward team-based research, which is characteristic of mature scientific ecosystems. This trend aligns with global arthroplasty research patterns and supports the notion that Indian TKA research has progressed toward greater methodological rigor and shared academic responsibility [42, 43].
Geographic concentration and regional disparities
State-wise analysis revealed a pronounced concentration of research output in metropolitan and academically established regions, particularly Maharashtra (n = 207) and Delhi (n = 168), followed by southern states such as Tamil Nadu (n = 114), Karnataka (n = 95), and Telangana (n = 68). These regions host a dense network of tertiary care hospitals, academic institutions, and high-volume arthroplasty centers, which naturally facilitates both clinical research and publication output. While the emergence of moderate contributions from several other states is encouraging, the limited output from northeastern and smaller states highlights persistent regional disparities. Addressing these imbalances is essential for generating nationally representative data and for ensuring that research findings are applicable across diverse healthcare settings in India. Capacity-building initiatives, multicentric registries, and collaborative networks may help bridge this gap [44, 45].
Institutional leadership and the public–private research ecosystem
Institutional analysis demonstrates that both public academic centers and private healthcare institutions play a pivotal role in advancing TKA research in India. The leading contribution from AIIMS (n = 92) underscores the enduring importance of publicly funded academic institutions in driving high-quality clinical research. Simultaneously, the substantial output from large private hospital networks and specialty centers, such as the Apollo Hospitals group (n = 52), reflects the expanding role of the private sector in academic orthopaedics. This coexistence of public and private research leadership represents a distinctive strength of the Indian arthroplasty ecosystem [39]. High surgical volumes in private institutions, coupled with academic rigor in public centers, create complementary opportunities for innovation, large-scale data generation, and translational research [46, 47].
Journals and international visibility
The concentration of publications in established national journals, particularly the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (n = 102), highlights the importance of domestic platforms in disseminating context-specific research. Concurrently, the substantial presence of Indian studies in high-impact international journals such as the Journal of Arthroplasty (n = 44) and International Orthopaedics (n = 15) reflects increasing global recognition of Indian clinical data. The predominance of English-language publications (99.88%) further underscores the strategic alignment of Indian researchers with global scholarly standards, ensuring maximum international reach and citation potential. The appearance of technology-focused journals among the top publication outlets further reinforces the growing emphasis on robotics, navigation, and engineering integration in Indian TKA research [48, 49]. Additionally, the fact that over half of the research (52.7%) is disseminated via Open Access models reflects a commitment to clinical transparency and the democratization of surgical knowledge. This dual dissemination strategy: national relevance with international visibility strengthens the global positioning of Indian arthroplasty scholarship.
Thematic evolution toward technology and multidisciplinary research
The thematic distribution of publications clearly indicates a transition from predominantly clinical outcome reporting toward a more multidisciplinary research paradigm. While orthopaedics and surgery remain the core domains (n = 603), the substantial contribution from engineering and technology (n = 98) suggests an increasing research interest in robotics, computer navigation, artificial intelligence, and implant material science within the retrieved literature [49, 50]. The keyword overlay visualization further demonstrated the temporal evolution of research themes, with earlier publications focusing predominantly on conventional clinical topics and more recent studies emphasizing artificial intelligence, robotic-assisted surgery, computer navigation, and precision alignment techniques. This temporal shift objectively supports the emergence of technology-driven research themes within Indian TKA literature.
Equally noteworthy is the growing body of rehabilitation-focused literature (n = 56), emphasizing functional outcomes, quality of life, and post-operative recovery. This shift reflects a broader, patient-centered approach to arthroplasty research that extends beyond surgical success to long-term functional restoration [51]. Beyond identifying emerging research themes, the network-based analyses provided additional insights into collaborative research patterns, thematic relationships, and influential contributors within Indian TKA research. The co-authorship and citation network analyses identified key collaborative groups and leading authors, highlighting the increasingly multidisciplinary and interconnected nature of the field. These findings are consistent with recent bibliometric studies that have emphasized the value of network-based analyses in understanding research evolution and collaboration patterns [23–25].
Study types and research depth
The dominance of original research (n = 589) articles underscores strong primary research activity within India, supported by a meaningful volume of review articles (n = 101) that synthesize evolving evidence. The presence of book chapters, letters, and editorials suggests active scholarly dialogue and critical engagement within the orthopaedic community. Collectively, this distribution reflects a research environment that balances data generation with academic reflection and debate.
Influence, citations, and knowledge leadership
The citation analysis reveals that the most influential Indian TKA publications are closely linked to emerging technologies, biomaterials, and robotic surgery [52–54]. The prominence of authors contributing both high-volume and high-impact work indicates sustained academic leadership within the field. By focusing specifically on original research papers, the ranking highlights primary clinical data, confirming that Indian-led clinical trials are gaining significant global traction [55, 56]. Importantly, several highly cited studies address topics with global relevance, reinforcing the contribution of Indian researchers to international arthroplasty discourse [50, 54, 57].
International collaboration and global integration
Approximately 24.18% (n = 208) of Indian TKA publications involved international collaboration, with strong ties to the United Kingdom, the United States, and multiple European countries. Such collaborations enhance methodological quality, facilitate knowledge exchange, and improve the global applicability of research findings. The breadth of international partnerships observed in this study highlights India’s increasing integration into global arthroplasty research networks [42]. Furthermore, the synergy between medical and engineering disciplines (7.2%) underscores the multidisciplinarity required for modern surgical innovation.
Limitations and potential bias
This study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. Primarily, the data was retrieved exclusively from the Scopus database, which may not capture the entirety of TKA research output from India, potentially omitting journals indexed only in other databases such as PubMed or Embase. It is crucial to note that these findings reflect published academic output and not the actual clinical volume of TKA procedures performed across the country. Therefore, the institutional and state-wise rankings indicate productivity within Scopus indexed literature rather than surgical throughput. Readers should not be misled into thinking the listed institutions are the only ones performing TKA; rather, they are the entities publishing frequently in indexed journals. The study relied on author-provided keywords indexed in Scopus, which may not fully capture all thematic relationships within the literature.
Furthermore, bibliometric data is subject to inherent affiliation and authorship ambiguities within the Scopus database, which may affect the precision of institutional tracking. Regarding impact metrics, high citation counts should not be exclusively equated with clinical superiority or guideline level evidence. There may be citation inflation due to the inclusion of review articles or the novelty of technology focused studies. Consequently, citation impact reflects academic visibility rather than direct clinical effectiveness.
Another important aspect is that the bibliometric indicators quantify productivity and visibility but do not assess the methodological quality, level of evidence, or clinical robustness of individual studies. High publication volume does not necessarily equate to high quality or practice changing evidence. Finally, due to the lack of a mandatory national arthroplasty registry in India, this analysis could not incorporate standardized long-term survivorship or revision data. This limitation prevents a direct comparison with registry driven global studies which provide the gold standard for clinical outcomes.
Strategic insights and implications for future research
The focused assessment presented in this study demonstrates that Indian TKA research has entered a phase of accelerated growth and increasing sophistication during the contemporary era. By providing an updated benchmark of publication trends, institutional productivity, collaboration patterns, and thematic priorities, this work complements previous longitudinal bibliometric investigations and offers a current reference for future research planning. Future progress is heavily contingent on transitioning from predominantly single-center reporting to a robust, multicentric research ecosystem. Consistent with contemporary bibliometric insights, future work should move beyond the “bibliographic coupling” of established techniques and instead focus on the “frontier trends” of digital surgery, biomechanical joint loading optimization, and biological augmentation to remain globally competitive [17–19].
By strengthening national arthroplasty registries and fostering active collaborations between public academic centers and large private healthcare networks, researchers can generate high-impact, real-world evidence that accurately represents the pan-Indian patient population. Furthermore, it is essential to decentralize research activity; incentivizing universities and hospitals in underrepresented regions, such as the North-East and Central India, will address current geographic disparities and ensure that surgical standards and outcomes are validated across the country’s diverse socio-economic and regional landscapes. From a bibliometric perspective, future investigations could incorporate advanced network-based approaches such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis, and thematic evolution mapping to provide deeper insights into the intellectual structure, knowledge evolution, and emerging research frontiers of Indian TKA research.
Strategically, India is uniquely positioned to lead global discourse in value-based healthcare through indigenous innovation and cost-effectiveness analyses tailored specifically to the Indian healthcare context. While global research leaders dominate in specific niches, India has a unique opportunity to provide a blueprint for other developing economies regarding the implementation of cost-effective robotic pathways and the long-term performance of domestic implants. This evolution requires a deeper synergy between medical centers and technical institutes to move beyond clinical observations toward fundamental innovations in AI-driven surgical planning, personalized alignment, and biomechanically informed recovery protocols [19]. By emphasizing high-quality comparative studies, long-term survivorship data (10–15 years), and biomechanical rigor, the Indian orthopaedic community can transition from being a high-volume contributor to a global policy-setter, establishing the next generation of international standards in TKA care.
Conclusions
Indian research on TKA has demonstrated sustained growth, increased research productivity, thematic diversity, and global engagement over the past five years. The recent body of literature reflects a clear shift toward technology-driven, multidisciplinary, and collaborative research, with growing emphasis on robotics, advanced implant science, and optimized rehabilitation strategies. The peak publication counts in 2025 and the robust contribution of original research underscore a maturing academic ecosystem. Continued prioritization of multicentre collaboration, development of national arthroplasty registries, and inclusive research participation across diverse regions will be pivotal in shaping the next phase of TKA research and advancing clinical excellence in India.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) for providing all the support and resources for the conduct of this bibliometric analysis.
Abbreviations
- TKA
Total knee arthroplasty
- TKR
Total knee replacement
Author contributions
S.S. conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the methodology, data curation, data analysis, formal analysis, and writing of the manuscript. Y.N. performed the formal and methodological analysis, and review & editing of the manuscript. M.R.K.G. performed the formal analysis, and review & editing of the manuscript. S.V. performed the formal analysis, and review & editing of the manuscript. S.K.R. performed the review & editing of the manuscript, and overall supervision. B.M.G. performed the formal analysis, and review & editing of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Naili JE, Wretenberg P, Lindgren V, Iversen MD, Hedström M, Broström EW (2017) Improved knee biomechanics among patients reporting a good outcome in knee-related quality of life one year after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:122. 10.1186/s12891-017-1479-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile ÉL, Bourbonnais R, Champagne F, Frémont P (2013) Determinants of pain, functional limitations and health-related quality of life six months after total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabilitation Therapy Technol 5:2. 10.1186/2052-1847-5-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shetty S, Maiya GA, Rao KGM, Vijayan S, George BM (2024) Factors determinant of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 40:1588–1604. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sanna M, Sanna C, Caputo F, Piu G, Salvi M (2013) Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Joints 1:34–44 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Steinhaus ME, Christ AB, Cross MB (2017) Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis: Support for a Foregone Conclusion? HSS J 13:207–210. 10.1007/s11420-017-9558-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A (2016) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 50:518–522. 10.4103/0019-5413.189608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vaishya R, Vaish A (2024) Upsurge in Indian publications in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine. J Clin Orthop Trauma 49:102358. 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aneja K, Rudraraju RT, Shyam A (2024) Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Innovations, Precision, and the Future of Joint Reconstruction. J Orthop Case Rep 14:4–7. 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.4996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Desai KB, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T, Suhas Masilamani AB, Ranjan A, Gurava Reddy AV (2023) Adoption of robotics in arthroplasty- a survey of perceptions, utilization and challenges with technology amongst Indian surgeons. J Orthop 46:51–57. 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shetty S, Vijayan S, Maiya GA, Rao Kg M, George BM (2025) Patient-reported factors determining long-term follow-up after total knee arthroplasty in individuals with knee osteoarthritis visiting a tertiary care hospital. J Orthop 69:124–129. 10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Romanelli J, Gee D, Mellinger JD, Alseidi A, Bittner JG, Auyang E et al (2020) The COVID-19 reset: lessons from the pandemic on Burnout and the Practice of Surgery. Surg Endosc 34:5201–5207. 10.1007/s00464-020-08072-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Jabir A, Kerwan A, Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Khan M, Sohrabi C et al (2020) Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical practice - Part 1. Int J Surg 79:168–179. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Overgaard S, Grupp TM, Nelissen RG, Cristofolini L, Lübbeke A, Jäger M et al (2023) Introduction of innovations in joint arthroplasty: Recommendations from the ‘EFORT implant and patient safety initiative’. EFORT Open Rev 8:509–521. 10.1530/EOR-23-0072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tao S-S, Tang J, Liu Y-C, Xu S-Z, Chen Z, Pan H-F (2025) Evolutionary patterns and future perspectives of joint replacement in arthritis patients: a comprehensive analysis of findings over the past decades. EFORT Open Rev 10:646–659. 10.1530/EOR-2025-0071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Passas I (2024) Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia 4:1014–1025. 10.3390/encyclopedia4020065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoang A-D (2025) Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading. Eval Rev 49:1074–1102. 10.1177/0193841X251336839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Heerden X, Price A, Kotze N, Jemelik P (2026) Mapping the scientific landscape of navigated and robotic shoulder arthroplasty: A comprehensive bibliometric study. J Orthop 72:237–244. 10.1016/j.jor.2025.10.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu J, Chen Y, Zhou H, Su S, Lu H, Yang J et al (2026) Research hotspots and frontier trends of articular cartilage regeneration and repair technology in knee osteoarthritis: A bibliometric study and visual analysis. J Orthop 73:324–339. 10.1016/j.jor.2025.12.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Z, Chen X, Wu J, Chen Y, Hou Z (2025) Hotspot analysis and frontier exploration of biomechanical research on knee osteoarthritis: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis. J Orthop 69:288–304. 10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eraniyan K, Iftikhar N, Ganti L (2025) Global trends and hotspots related to complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop 70:215–219. 10.1016/j.jor.2025.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Kappi M, Vaish A (2022) A scientometric analysis of India’s publications in arthroplasty in the last two decades from the SCOPUS database. J Clin Orthop Trauma 34:102041. 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karlapudi V, Paleti ST, Kambhampati SBS, Vaishya R (2022) Bibliometric analysis of orthopaedic related publications by Indian authors from the last decade. J Clin Orthop Trauma 25:101775. 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Regmi A, Baral S (2026) Global research trends in allogenic bone and bone banking in orthopaedics: a 25-year bibliometric analysis (2000–2025). Cell Tissue Bank 27:11. 10.1007/s10561-026-10214-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Regmi A, Niraula BB (2026) Mapping the Scientific Landscape of Arthroscopy Research in Nepal (2010–2025): A Scopus-Indexed Bibliometric Study. J Arthroscopic Surg Sports Med 0:1. 10.25259/JASSM_62_2025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Regmi A, Jain V, Baral S, Niraula BB (2026) Global research landscape of artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A decade of trends from a Scopus-based bibliometric analysis (2015–2025). J Clin Orthop Trauma 73:103342. 10.1016/j.jcot.2026.103342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Regmi A, Niraula BB, Sharma KSA, Kumar C, Singh N (2026) Mapping the Growth and Patterns of Paediatric Orthopaedic Research in India (1971–2025): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Study. Indian J Orthop. 10.1007/s43465-025-01670-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wah JNK (2025) The rise of robotics and AI-assisted surgery in modern healthcare. J Robot Surg 19:311. 10.1007/s11701-025-02485-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nayak S, Nayak VC (2024) Exploring the acceptance of robotic assisted surgery among the Indian population: An empirical investigation. F1000Res 13:544. 10.12688/f1000research.145052.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Churi P, Pawar A, Moreno-Guerrero A-J (2021). A Comprehensive Survey on Data Utility and Privacy: Taking Indian Healthcare System as a Potential Case Study. Inventions 6(3):45. 10.3390/inventions6030045 [DOI]
- 30.Das AV (2021) People to policy: The promise and challenges of big data for India. Indian J Ophthalmol 69:3052–3057. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1045_21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jeyaraman M, Muthu S, Shyam A (2021) Indian Paradigm of Orthopedic Care in Post-COVID-19 Era. J Orthop Case Rep 11. 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i04.2174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Salgotra KR (2012) Evidence based orthopaedics – Western evidence in Indian context. Med J Armed Forces India 68:314–315. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tiwari A, Bagaria V (2026) Global adoption of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of trends and drivers from 2020 to 2025. J Robot Surg 20:271. 10.1007/s11701-026-03220-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wan X, Wang X, Pang R, Xu C, Shi W, Zhang H et al (2022) Mapping knowledge landscapes and emerging trends of the links between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: A bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health 10. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1019691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Delaunay C (2015) Registries in orthopaedics. Orthop Traumatology: Surg Res 101:S69–75. 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Porter M, Rolfson O, de Steiger R (2022) International Registries. J Bone Joint Surg 104(Suppl 3):23–27. 10.2106/JBJS.22.00561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nayar SK, Dein EJ, Bernard JA, Zikria BA, Spiker AM (2018) Basic Science Research Trends in Orthopedic Surgery: An Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles. HSS J 14:333–337. 10.1007/s11420-018-9625-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li B, Zheng JA, Bibliometric and Knowledge Map Analysis of Osteoarthritis Signaling Pathways from 2012 to 2022. J Pain Res 2022;Volume 15:3833–3846. 10.2147/JPR.S385482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Aneja K, Machaiah PK, Shyam A (2025) The Indian Joint Registry: Building Trust, Safety, and Excellence in Indian Orthopedics. J Orthop Case Rep 15:439–445. 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i11.6426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.de Steiger RN, Graves SE (2019) Orthopaedic registries: the Australian experience. EFORT Open Rev 4:409–415. 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Taylor JM, Dipane MV, Sassoon AA (2026) Rural vs Urban Outcomes in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Web-Based Tool Efficacy. Arthroplast Today 37:101885. 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ducharme LJ, Fujimoto K, Kuo J, Stewart J, Taylor B, Schneider J (2024) Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach. Eval Program Plann 102:102375. 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hosseini M, Lewis J, Zwart H, Gordijn B (2022) An Ethical Exploration of Increased Average Number of Authors Per Publication. Sci Eng Ethics 28:25. 10.1007/s11948-021-00352-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian S (2011) Health care and equity in India. Lancet 377:505–515. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61894-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Downey LE, Dabak S, Eames J, Teerawattananon Y, De Francesco M, Prinja S et al (2020) Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed Priority Setting in the Indian Health System: An International Collaborative Experience. Health Policy Open 1:100004. 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cohen AB, Stump L, Krumholz HM, Cartiera M, Jain S, Scott Sussman L et al (2022) Aligning mission to digital health strategy in academic medical centers. NPJ Digit Med 5:67. 10.1038/s41746-022-00608-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rossier L, Snäkä T, Graciotti M, Hernandez M, Matzinger O, Bernier J et al (2026) Clinical research in private hospitals: a perspective. J Transl Med 24:151. 10.1186/s12967-025-07542-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Luzo MVM, de C Ferreira M, Mestriner AB, de Palma IM, da S Franciozi CE, Kubota MS (2025) Technological Innovation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Navigation, Robotics, and Customization. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 60:001–6. 10.1055/s-0045-1810044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhang H, Jiang X, Jin B, Zhang H, Liang J (2025) Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview. J Orthop Surg Res 20:80. 10.1186/s13018-025-05490-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mahmoud RH, Lizardi JJ, Weinerman J, Vanden Berge DJ, Constantinescu DS, Yakkanti R (2022) Characteristics and trends of the most cited papers in robotic assisted arthroplasty. J Orthop 34:40–48. 10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Baldini A, Ardiri D, Benvenuti L, Chirico M, Fiorilli E, Singlitico A et al (2025) What Are the Game Changers in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Narrative Review. J Pers Med 15:389. 10.3390/jpm15080389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sappey-Marinier E, Dutra Vieira T, Schmidt A, Aït Si Selmi T, Bonnin M (2025) How New Technologies Will Transform Total Knee Arthroplasty from a Singular Surgical Procedure to a Holistic Standardized Process. J Clin Med 14:3102. 10.3390/jcm14093102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khan YIJ (2026) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits to clinical and functional outcomes offered by robotic-assisted total knee, arthroplasty, compared to a conventional approach. J Orthop Rep 100876. 10.1016/j.jorep.2025.100876 [DOI]
- 54.Zhao R, Ren H, Li P, Fan M, Zhao R, Liu T et al (2024) Research trends and frontiers in rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: based on bibliometric and visualization analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 19:897. 10.1186/s13018-024-05377-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Distel AP, Grimpe C, Poetz M (2026) From evidence to impact: The use of scientific research in policy documents. Res Policy 55:105426. 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105426 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Aliukonis V, Gefenas E (2026) Authority and Authorship: Examining Leadership’s Role in Medical Publications. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 21:49–59. 10.1177/15562646251392340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boddu SP, Moore ML, Rodgers BM, Brinkman JC, Verhey JT, Bingham JS (2023) A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Most Influential Studies on Robotic Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 22:101153. 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
