Abstract
1. Recordings have been obtained by intracellularly placed microelectrodes from cells of the superior cervical ganglion of the rabbit. The ganglion was left in situ.
2. In response to stimulation of the external carotid nerve, some cells responded with a single spike of short latency followed by a long-lasting hyperpolarization. These cells, presumably, were activated antidromically. The majority of cells, however, responded with an early spike followed by a long-lasting depolarization; superimposed on this depolarization were one or two spikes with latencies from 35 to 70 msec. Anatomical pathways responsible for this activation have been suggested.
3. A variety of responses were recorded from different neurones when the preganglionic sympathetic trunk was stimulated. Many of the cells responded to maximal stimulation of the nerve with repetitive spikes. Stimuli of constant strength could elicit variable responses from a single neurone. This variability and the multiple spike response may be due to multiple pathways leading to the same cell and the possibility of the presence of internuncial neurones in the ganglion is suggested.
4. Strong stimulation of the preganglionic sympathetic nerve trunk caused inhibitory effects at the ganglion cells.
5. Direct stimulation of the ganglion cells through the recording microelectrode elicited only one spike even at high intensity. Thus the multiple spike response to orthodromic stimulation must have been due to a temporally dispersed afferent input.
6. It is concluded that the organization of the rabbit superior cervical ganglion is more complex than has been suspected previously, and that integration as well as transmission takes place at the level of these neurones.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BARTON A. A., CAUSEY G. Electron microscopic study of the superior cervical ganglion. J Anat. 1958 Jul;92(3):399–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas W. W., Lywood D. W., Straub R. W. On the excitant effect of acetylcholine on structures in the preganglionic trunk of the cervical sympathetic: with a note on the anatomical complexities of the region. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153(2):250–264. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ECCLES R. M. Intracellular potentials recorded from a mammalian sympathetic ganglion. J Physiol. 1955 Dec 29;130(3):572–584. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eccles R. M. Orthodromic activation of single ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1963 Mar;165(3):387–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MARTIN A. R., PILAR G. DUAL MODE OF SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE AVIAN CILIARY GANGLION. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:443–463. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NISHI S., KOKETSU K. Electrical properties and activities of single sympathetic neurons in frogs. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Feb;55:15–30. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030550104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VOLLE R. L., KOELLE G. B. The physiological role of acetyl-cholinesterase (AChE) in sympathetic ganglia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1961 Aug;133:223–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]