Abstract
1. The adaptation state of a uniformly illuminated patch of human cone retina was determined by finding the threshold for a small, brief light spot seen flashing in its centre.
2. When the illuminated patch of the retina is increased in diameter, the adaptation state is first raised, and beyond a critical background diameter, lowered.
3. This is interpreted as a manifestation of excitatory and inhibitory interaction of adaptation stimuli: illumination of retinal regions in the immediate neighbourhood of the area tested acts to raise the adaptation level, and of those further removed acts to lower it.
4. The critical area beyond which adapting light produces inhibition is about 5 min of arc in diameter in the eye's object space for foveal observation. For peripheral cone vision it increases much as the minimum angle of resolution.
5. The inhibiting action of outlying areas is substantially reduced, or perhaps even eliminated, by lowering the background luminance.
6. Surrounding the retinal patch with a pair of juxtaposed narrow concentric black and white rings superimposed on a uniform field, simulating a border, irrespective of diameter, does not influence the threshold of the probing spot. This argues against a possible threshold raising effect of the border of the background.
7. The inhibiting action on a patch of cone retina of a surrounding annulus occurs only when the annulus is seen by the same eye and not when it is seen by the other eye: the site of inhibitory interaction is, therefore, retinal.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BATTERSBY W. S., WAGMAN I. H. LIGHT ADAPTATION KINETICS: THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL FACTORS. Science. 1964 Mar 6;143(3610):1029–1031. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3610.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CORNSWEET T. N. The staircrase-method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol. 1962 Sep;75:485–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HARTLINE H. K., RATLIFF F. Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jan 20;40(3):357–376. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RATOOSH P., GRAHAM C. H. Areal effects in foveal brightness discrimination. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Dec;42(6):367–375. doi: 10.1037/h0056503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SCHADE O. H., Sr Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Sep;46(9):721–739. doi: 10.1364/josa.46.000721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teller D. Y., Andrews D. P., Barlow H. B. Local adaptation in stabilized vision. Vision Res. 1966 Dec;6(12):701–705. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(66)90081-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WESTHEIMER G. VISUAL ACUITY. Annu Rev Psychol. 1965;16:359–380. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.16.020165.002043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(4):881–894. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]