Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Dec;193(3):679–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008388

An analysis of facilitation of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog

A Mallart, A R Martin
PMCID: PMC1365523  PMID: 16992305

Abstract

1. Experiments were done on Mg-blocked neuromuscular junctions of the frog to study in detail the magnitude and time course of facilitation of the end-plate potential (e.p.p.).

2. When two shocks were applied to the motor nerve with an interval of 5 msec or less between them, the amplitude of the second e.p.p. was facilitated by approximately 100%. This facilitation decreased as the interval was lengthened.

3. The facilitation could be separated into two components on the basis of the time course of its decay as the interval between the two shocks was increased. The first component decayed exponentially after the conditioning shock with a time constant of about 35 msec. The second became apparent 60-80 msec after the conditioning shock, rose to a maximum of approximately 15% at about 120 msec and decayed thereafter with a time constant of the order of 250 msec.

4. The growth of e.p.p. amplitude during short trains of repetitive stimulation at frequencies up to 100/sec and its subsequent decay could be predicted by assuming that the magnitude and time course of both components of facilitation were the same for every shock in the train and that these individual facilitatory effects summed linearly.

Full text

PDF
679

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braun M., Schmidt R. F. Potential changes recorded from the frog motor nerve terminal during its activation. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;287(1):56–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00362454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun M., Schmidt R. F., Zimmermann M. Facilitation at the frog neuromuscular junction during and after repetitive stimulation. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1966;287(1):41–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00362453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DUDEL J. POTENTIAL CHANGES IN THE CRAYFISH MOTOR NERVE TERMINAL DURING REPETITIVE STIMULATION. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1965 Jan 11;282:323–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00412507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUBBARD J. I. REPETITIVE STIMULATION AT THE MAMMALIAN NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION, AND THE MOBILIZATION OF TRANSMITTER. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:641–662. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUBBARD J. I., SCHMIDT R. F. An electrophysiological investigation of mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:145–167. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LILEY A. W. The quantal components of the mammalian end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):571–587. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MARTIN A. R., PILAR G. PRESYNAPTIC AND POST-SYNAPTIC EVENTS DURING POST-TETANIC POTENTIATION AND FACILITATION IN THE AVIAN CILIARY GANGLION. J Physiol. 1964 Dec;175:17–30. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mallart A., Martin A. R. Two components of facilitation at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1967 Jul;191(1):19P–20P. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Electrical changes in pre- and postsynaptic axons of the giant synapse of Loligo. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jul;45:1181–1193. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.6.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES