Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Sep;192(2):309–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008301

Dependence of the magnitude of the Stiles—Crawford effect on retinal location

Gerald Westheimer
PMCID: PMC1365558  PMID: 6050150

Abstract

1. The directional sensitivity (Stiles—Crawford effect) of retinal cones is supposed to be associated with their shape, but only extrafoveal cones have a cone-like shape; cones in the central fovea are elongated and look like rods.

2. To determine whether the directional sensitivity of cones depends on their shape, the Stiles—Crawford effect was measured both in the central fovea and in the parafovea of the human eye.

2. To ensure that the cone population tested was homogeneous, a small brief test flash, brought into the eye through the centre of the pupil, was placed at threshold by varying the intensity of a large adapting field. The directional sensitivity of the cones was determined by finding the efficiency of light to act as an adapting background as a function of position of entry in the pupil.

4. Central foveal cones have a less pronounced directional sensitivity than parafoveal cones and this lends support to the conclusion that the Stiles—Crawford effect is connected with the shape of the retinal receptors.

Full text

PDF
309

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COHEN A. I. The fine structure of the extrafoveal receptors of the Rhesus monkey. Exp Eye Res. 1961 Dec;1:128–136. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(61)80018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DONNER K. O., RUSHTON W. A. Rod-cone interaction in the frog's retina analysed by the Stiles-Crawford effect and by dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1959 Dec;149:303–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DOWLING J. E. FOVEAL RECEPTORS OF THE MONKEY RETINA: FINE STRUCTURE. Science. 1965 Jan 1;147(3653):57–59. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3653.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FUORTES M. G., GUNKEL R. D., RUSHTON W. A. Increment thresholds in a subject deficient in cone vision. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:179–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flamant F., Stiles W. S. The directional and spectral sensitivities of the retinal rods to adapting fields of different wave-lengths. J Physiol. 1948 Mar 15;107(2):187–202. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES