Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Sep;192(2):359–377. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008305

Micro-iontophoretic studies on neurones in the cuneate nucleus

A Galindo, K Krnjević, Susan Schwartz
PMCID: PMC1365562  PMID: 4292909

Abstract

1. Cuneate cells in anaesthetized cats were strongly excited by L-glutamate, and somewhat less by D-glutamate; cells which receive afferents from hair receptors were particularly sensitive.

2. Glutamate could be used to demonstrate post-synaptic inhibitory inputs from the dorsal column, the medial lemniscus and the frontal cortex.

3. Many cuneate cells were also strongly excited by adenosinetriphosphate (ATP); this was probably due to the chelating action of ATP, as citric acid was also quite effective.

4. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) readily blocked all forms of spontaneous and evoked activity, except antidromic invasion of cuneothalamic neurones; cells which receive proprioceptive afferents were particularly sensitive to GABA. Glycine had a comparable effect.

5. Acetylcholine (ACh), catecholamines, histamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and an extract containing substance P mostly had only weak depressant actions. Cholinergic and mono-aminergic mechanisms are probably not very significant in the cuneate.

6. These results are consistent with the possibility that glutamate and GABA (or glycine), or some closely related compounds, are the main excitatory and inhibitory transmitters in the cuneate nucleus.

7. If ATP is released from afferent nerve endings, it could also play a significant role in excitation.

Full text

PDF
359

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMIN A. H., CRAWFORD T. B., GADDUM J. H. The distribution of substance P and 5-hydroxytryptamine in the central nervous system of the dog. J Physiol. 1954 Dec 10;126(3):596–618. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSEN P., ECCLES J. C., SCHMIDT R. F., YOKOTA T. IDENTIFICATION OF RELAY CELLS AND INTERNEURONS IN THE CUNEATE NUCLEUS. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Nov;27:1080–1095. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.6.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaustein M. P., Goldman D. E. Competitive action of calcium and procaine on lobster axon. A study of the mechanism of action of certain local anesthetics. J Gen Physiol. 1966 May;49(5):1043–1063. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.5.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CRAWFORD J. M., CURTIS D. R. THE EXCITATION AND DEPRESSION OF MAMMALIAN CORTICAL NEURONES BY AMINO ACIDS. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1964 Oct;23:313–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01589.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CURTIS D. R., PERRIN D. D., WATKINS J. C. The excitation of spinal neurones by the ionophoretic application of agents which chelate calcium. J Neurochem. 1960 Aug;6:1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1960.tb13443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CURTIS D. R., PHILLIS J. W., WATKINS J. C. Cholinergic and non-cholinergic transmission in the mammalian spinal cord. J Physiol. 1961 Sep;158:296–323. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CURTIS D. R., WATKINS J. C. The excitation and depression of spinal neurones by structurally related amino acids. J Neurochem. 1960 Sep;6:117–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1960.tb13458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curtis D. R., Watkins J. C. The pharmacology of amino acids related to gamma-aminobutyric acid. Pharmacol Rev. 1965 Dec;17(4):347–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. EDWARDS C., KUFFLER S. W. The blocking effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the action of related compounds on single nerve cells. J Neurochem. 1959 Apr;4(1):19–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1959.tb13170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FRANKENHAEUSER B., HODGKIN A. L. The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):218–244. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. GORDON G., JUKES M. G. DESCENDING INFLUENCES ON THE EXTEROCEPTIVE ORGANIZATIONS OF THE CAT'S GRACILE NUCLEUS. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:291–319. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GORDON G., JUKES M. G. DUAL ORGANIZATION OF THE EXTEROCEPTIVE COMPONENTS OF THE CAT'S GRACILE NUCLEUS. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:263–290. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GORDON G., PAINE C. H. Functional organization in nucleus gracilis of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:331–349. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. GORDON G., SEED W. A. An investigation of nucleus gracilis of the cat by antidromic stimulation. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:589–601. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Graham L. T., Jr, Werman R., Aprison M. H. Microdetermination of glutamate in single cat spinal roots. Life Sci. 1965 May;4(10):1085–1090. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HARRIS G. W., HOLTON P. Vasodilator activity in extracts of various regions of the central nervous system. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):254–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HOLTON F. A., HOLTON P. The capillary dilator substances in dry powders of spinal roots; a possible role of adenosine triphosphate in chemical transmission from nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Oct 28;126(1):124–140. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HOLTON P. The liberation of adenosine triphosphate on antidromic stimulation of sensory nerves. J Physiol. 1959 Mar 12;145(3):494–504. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KRNJEVIC K., PHILLIS J. W. Iontophoretic studies of neurones in the mammalian cerebral cortex. J Physiol. 1963 Feb;165:274–304. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KRUGER L., SIMINOFF R., WITKOVSKY P. Single neuron analysis of dorsal column nuclei and spinal nucleus of trigeminal in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1961 Jul;24:333–349. doi: 10.1152/jn.1961.24.4.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Krnjević K., Schwartz S. Is gamma-aminobutyric acid an inhibitory transmitter? Nature. 1966 Sep 24;211(5056):1372–1374. doi: 10.1038/2111372a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krnjević K., Schwartz S. The action of gamma-aminobutyric acid on cortical neurones. Exp Brain Res. 1967;3(4):320–336. doi: 10.1007/BF00237558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. LEMBECK F. Zur Frage der zentralen Ubertragung afferenter Impulse. III. Das Vorkommen und die Bedeutung der Substanz P in den dorsalen Wurzeln des Rückenmarks. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1953;219(3):197–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. LEVITT M., CARRERAS M., LIU C. N., CHAMBERS W. W. PYRAMIDAL AND EXTRAPYRAMIDAL MODULATION OF SOMATOSENSORY ACTIVITY IN GRACILE AND CUNEATE NUCLEI. Arch Ital Biol. 1964 Apr 18;102:197–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PERL E. R., WHITLOCK D. G., GENTRY J. R. Cutaneous projection to second-order neurons of the dorsal column system. J Neurophysiol. 1962 May;25:337–358. doi: 10.1152/jn.1962.25.3.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. SHANES A. M. Electrochemical aspects of physiological and pharmacological action in excitable cells. II. The action potential and excitation. Pharmacol Rev. 1958 Jun;10(2):165–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steiner F. A., Meyer M. Actions of L-glutamate, acetylcholine and dopamine on single neurons in the nuclei cuneatus and gracilis of the cat. Experientia. 1966 Jan 15;22(1):58–59. doi: 10.1007/BF01897773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. TOWE A. L., JABBUR S. J. Cortical inhibition of neurons in dorsal column nuclei of cat. J Neurophysiol. 1961 Sep;24:488–498. doi: 10.1152/jn.1961.24.5.488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uddenberg N. Studies on modality segregation and second-order neurones in the dorsal funiculus. Experientia. 1966 Jul 15;22(7):441–442. doi: 10.1007/BF01900970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. V Euler U. S., Gaddum J. H. An unidentified depressor substance in certain tissue extracts. J Physiol. 1931 Jun 6;72(1):74–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1931.sp002763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. WINTER D. L. N. GRACILIS OF CAT. FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION AND CORTICOFUGAL EFFECTS. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Jan;28:48–70. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Werman R., Davidoff R. A., Aprison M. H. The inhibitory action of cystathionine. Life Sci. 1966 Aug;5(15):1431–1440. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(66)90119-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wheeler D. D., Boyarsky L. L., Brooks W. H. The release of amino acids from nerve during stimulation. J Cell Physiol. 1966 Feb;67(1):141–147. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040670116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES