Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1967 Nov;193(2):295–308. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008358

Cortical actions on hypoglossal motoneurones in cats: a proposed role for a common internuncial cell

R Porter
PMCID: PMC1365598  PMID: 6065879

Abstract

1. Intracellular records were made of the synaptic potentials produced in hypoglossal motoneurones when electrical stimuli were applied to the cat's motor cortex.

2. The depolarizing synaptic responses reached their maxima in steps similar to those produced in the same motoneurones by suprathreshold stimulation of the lingual nerve.

3. Interneurones in or near the spinal trigeminal nucleus were caused to discharge by cortical shocks adequate to produce synaptic potentials in hypoglossal motoneurones. The latencies and patterns of repetitive responses in these interneurones were consistent with their possible role as internuncial cells in the motor pathway from cerebral cortex to hypoglossal motoneurones.

4. Individual interneurones in or near the spinal trigeminal nucleus could be caused to discharge both by stimulation of the lingual nerve and by stimulation of the motor cortex. This convergence suggests a common function for the internuncial cell in reflexly and cortically induced excitation of hypoglossal motoneurones and would allow the internuncial cell to be a site for integration of spatially separated excitatory influences.

Full text

PDF
295

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BISHOP P. O., BURKE W., DAVIS R. The interpretation of the extracellular response of single lateral geniculate cells. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:451–472. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLOM S. Afferent influences on tongue muscle activity. A morphological and physiological study in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1960;49(170):1–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DARIAN-SMITH I. Neurone activity in the cat's trigeminal main sensory nucleus elicited by graded afferent stimulation. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:52–73. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Darian-Smith I., Yokota T. Corticofugal effects on different neuron types within the cat's brain stem activated by tactile stimulation of the face. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Mar;29(2):185–206. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HERN J. E., PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. Electrical thresholds of unimpaled corticospinal cells in the cat. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1962 Apr;47:134–140. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1962.sp001584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KUYPERS H. G. An anatomical analysis of cortico-bulbar connexions to the pons and lower brain stem in the cat. J Anat. 1958 Apr;92(2):198–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LIVINGSTON A., PHILLIPS C. G. Maps and thresholds for the sensorimotor cortex of the cat. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1957 Apr;42(2):190–205. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1957.sp001250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LUNDBERG A., VOORHOEVE P. E. Pyramidal activation of interneurones of various spinal reflex arcs in the cat. Experientia. 1961 Jan 15;17:46–47. doi: 10.1007/BF02157948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PHILLIPS C. G., PORTER R. Unifocal and bifocal stimulation of the motor cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:532–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Porter R. Synaptic potentials in hypoglossal motoneurones. J Physiol. 1965 Sep;180(1):209–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Porter R. The synaptic basis of a bilateral lingual-hypoglossal reflex in cats. J Physiol. 1967 Jun;190(3):611–627. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STEWART W. A., KING R. B. FIBER PROJECTIONS FROM THE NUCLEUS CAUDALIS OF THE SPINAL TRIGEMINAL NUCLEUS. J Comp Neurol. 1963 Oct;121:271–286. doi: 10.1002/cne.901210209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. TORVIK A. Afferent connections to the sensory trigeminal nuclei, the nucleus of the solitary tract and adjacent structures; an experimental study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1956 Nov;106(1):51–141. doi: 10.1002/cne.901060104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VALVERDE F. A new type of cell in the lateral reticular formation of the brain stem. J Comp Neurol. 1961 Oct;117:189–195. doi: 10.1002/cne.901170205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WALBERG F. Do the motor nuclei of the cranial nerves receive corticofugal fibres? An experimental study in the cat. Brain. 1957 Dec;80(4):597–605. doi: 10.1093/brain/80.4.597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES