Abstract
A recent review on Penicillium species highlighted steroids as a taxonomic marker of this genus. In the current study, three steroids (1–3), an acetophenone (4), and thirteen known compounds (5–17) were isolated from the solid culture of Penicillium tanzanicum, isolated from bull dung. The structures of the compounds were established using extensive spectroscopic and spectrometric analyses (NMR, HRMS) and by comparison with published data. The absolute configurations of steroids 1–3 were determined by electronic circular dichroism (ECD) calculations, confirming their identities as trestione (1), formestane (2), and oxandrolone (3). The crude extract exhibited moderate activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MIC = 400 µg mL−1) and significant activity against Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium (MIC = 50 µg mL−1). Compounds 8, 9, 11, and 13 displayed weak to moderate antibacterial and antimycobacterial activities against M. tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium, with MIC values ranging from 50 to 100 µg mL−1. Notably, compounds 1 and 2 demonstrated promising antiplasmodial activity against the multi-resistant Plasmodium falciparum (PfDd2) strain, with IC50 values of 26.58 and 15.03 µM, respectively, accompanied by low haemolytic effects. These findings underscore the potential of fungi from underexplored ecological niches as sources of new anti-infective leads warranting further optimisation and preclinical evaluation.
A recent review on Penicillium species highlighted steroids as a taxonomic marker of this genus.
1. Introduction
The genus Penicillium is among the most prolific and widely distributed fungal genera, renowned for the discovery of penicillin from P. notatum by Alexander Fleming.1 With over 550 accepted species,2 these fungi inhabit diverse environments, including soil, plants, and organic debris. Penicillium species are prolific producers of biologically active secondary metabolites.3,4
Beyond their historical significance in antibiotic production, Penicillium species are a rich reservoir of novel chemical scaffolds. They produce antibiotics, immunosuppressants, cholesterol-lowering agents, and mycotoxins. This diversity underscores their exceptional biosynthetic potential.5,6 A recent review in the journal Phytochemistry3 highlighted the genus as a source of bioactive and structurally unusual steroids. Despite this recognised potential, the chemical repertoire of many Penicillium species remains underexplored, particularly those from unique habitats or understudied phylogenetic lineages. Penicillium tanzanicum represents one such underexplored species. A recent investigation highlighted its ability to produce rare isotachin derivatives with promising anti-inflammatory activity.4 This aligns with broader evidence that endophytic and environmental Penicillium strains are rich sources of novel natural products with significant biological and pharmacological potential.1 Continued chemical investigation of these species is therefore crucial for expanding our understanding of fungal metabolism and for discovering new lead compounds.
In our continuous search for biologically active ingredients from underexplored fungal sources,7,8 we investigated the chemical constituents of Penicillium tanzanicum. This study led to the isolation of three pharmaceutically established steroid drugs, trestione (1), formestane (2), and oxandrolone (3) (Fig. 1). Additionally, a naturally occurring acetophenone (4), and thirteen known compounds (5–17) were isolated (Fig. S1). The structures of all isolates were elucidated through comprehensive spectroscopic and spectrometric analyses. The discovery that these therapeutically established molecules are natural products biosynthesised by a single fungal strain underscores the potential of the Penicillium genus as a prolific source of potent compounds. In addition, the antimicrobial activities of the purified compounds were investigated. The antiplasmodial properties and haemolytic effects of the three sterol-like natural products were also assessed, revealing their antiplasmodial potential. Collectively, these findings expand the chemical profile of Penicillium tanzanicum and reinforce the immense value of exploring under-investigated Penicillium species as reservoirs of novel drug leads.
Fig. 1. Structures of compounds 1–4.

2. Results and discussion
2.1. Structural analysis
Compound 1 was obtained as a white powder from the CH2Cl2/MeOH (dichloromethane/methanol) solvent system and is soluble in chloroform. Its molecular formula C19H26O2, consistent with seven degrees of unsaturation, was deduced from the positive-ion mode high-resolution electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry [(+)-HRESIMS] analysis, which displayed a molecular ion peak [M + H]+ at m/z 287.2004 (calcd for C19H27O2, 287.2006) (Fig. S2). The IR (infrared) spectrum exhibited characteristic absorption bands for alkyl (2966–2854 cm−1), conjugated olefin (1660 cm−1), and carbonyl (1735 cm−1) groups (Fig. S3). These were consistent with previously reported α,β-unsaturated steroidal ketones, including androst-4-ene-3,17-dione and 19-norandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione.9,10 UV (ultraviolet) maxima bands at λmax 241 nm (Fig. S4) confirmed the presence of the α,β-unsaturated ketone.
Analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (Fig. S5) in conjunction with the DEPT-HSQC (distortionless enhancement by polarisation transfer–heteronuclear single quantum coherence) spectrum (Fig. S7) revealed in the up-field region signals for a one-olefinic proton singlet at δH 5.84; five aliphatic methine protons at δH 2.11 (1H, m), 2.04 (1H, m), 1.67 (1H, ddd, J = 10.8, 7.2, 3.6 Hz), 1.40 (1H, ddd, J = 7.2, 6.0, 5.4 Hz), and 1.15 (1H, dddd, J = 10.8, 9.0, 6.6, 4.2 Hz); seven diastereotopic methylene protons in the range δH 2.49–1.24; and two methyl proton signals at δH 0.92 (3H, s) and 0.80 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz). These data suggested compound 1 as structurally similar to previously reported steroidal ketones, including androst-4-ene-3,17-dione and estr-4-en-3,17-dione.11 The 13C NMR spectrum (Fig. S6) revealed 19 distinct carbon resonances which were sorted out using the DEPT-HSQC (Fig. S7) spectrum into two ketonic carbonyl carbons at δC 220.3 (C-17) and 199.4 (C-3); two olefinic carbons at δC 164.1 (C-5) and 126.8 (C-4); five methine carbons at δC 47.1 (C-14), 42.9 (C-10), 42.3 (C-8), 42.2 (C-9), and 30.1 (C-7); seven methylene carbons at δC 43.2 (C-6), 36.6 (C-2), 35.6 (C-16), 31.2 (C-12), 26.8 (C-1), 26.2 (C-11), and 21.1 (C-15); two methyl carbons at δC 13.7 (C-18) and 12.8 (C-19); and one aliphatic quaternary carbon at δC 47.7 (C-13) (Table 1). The HMBC (heteronuclear multiple bond correlation) spectrum (Fig. S8) revealed that the two methyl groups (C-18 and C-19) were attached to C-13 and C-7, respectively. This was evidenced by key correlations between the proton signal at δH 0.92 (H-18) and carbons C-17, C-13, and C-12, as well as between the proton signal at δH 0.80 (H-19) and carbons C-6, C-7, and C-8 (Fig. 2). Further key HMBC cross-peaks were observed between the diastereotopic methylene proton signals at δH 2.28 and 1.58 (H-1a, H-1b) with carbons C-3, C-5, C-9, and C-10; δH 1.92 and 1.53 (H-15a, H-15b) with carbons C-17, C-13, C-16, C-14, and C-8; δH 2.49 and 2.31 (H-6a, H-6b) with carbons C-5, C-4, C-9, C-7, C-8, and C-19; and the olefinic proton singlet at δH 5.84 (H-4) with carbons C-3, C-5, C-10, and C-2 (Fig. 2). The 1H–1H COSY (correlation spectroscopy) spectrum (Fig. S9) further supported the connectivity. It showed correlations between H-4 and H-6, H-6 and H-7, and between H-8 and H-9, H-14, confirming the steroidal skeleton.
Table 1. 1H and 13C NMR data of compounds 1–3.
| No. | 1a | 2a | 3b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ H mult. (J in Hz) | δ C, type | δ H mult. (J in Hz) | δ C, type | δ H mult. (J in Hz) | δ C, type | |
| 1 | 2.28 m; 1.58 overlapped | 44.1, CH2 | 2.01 m; 1.63 m | 34.6, CH2 | 4.25 d (10.7); 4.00 d (10.7) | 82.6 |
| 2 | 2.41 m; 2.24 m | 36.6, CH2 | 2.52 m; 2.49 dd (6.6, 3.0) | 31.7, CH2 | — | — |
| 3 | — | 199.4, C | — | 193.4, C | 173.8, C | |
| 4 | 5.84 s | 126.8, CH | — | 139.1, C | 2.49 dd (12.9, 6.0); 2.23 dd (12.9, 6.0) | 34.6, CH2 |
| 5 | — | 164.1, C | — | 141.3, C | 1.77 m | 41.2, CH |
| 6 | 2.49 overlapped; 2.31 m | 43.2, CH2 | 3.04 m; 1.99 m | 35.7, CH2 | 1.45 m; 1.29 m | 28.1, CH2 |
| 7 | 2.11 m | 30.1, CH | 1.95 overlapped; 1.05 m | 29.8, CH2 | 1.74 m; 0.95 m | 31.9, CH2 |
| 8 | 1.67 ddd (10.8, 7.2, 3.6) | 42.3, CH | 1.68 m | 34.7, CH | 1.48 m | 36.9, CH |
| 9 | 1.15 dddd (10.8, 9.0, 6.6, 4.2) | 42.2, CH | 0.97 m | 54.3, CH | 0.89 m | 50.8, CH |
| 10 | 2.04 m | 42.9, CH | — | 37.8, C | — | 35.9, C |
| 11 | 1.98 m; 1.23 m | 26.2, CH2 | 1.66 m; 1.39 dddd (9.6, 9.0, 4.2, 3.6) | 20.2, CH2 | 1.51 m; 1.37 m | 22.2, CH2 |
| 12 | 1.80 m; 1.27 m | 31.2, CH2 | 1.84 m; 1.24 overlapped | 31.3, CH2 | 1.53 m; 1.31 m | 32.5, CH2 |
| 13 | — | 47.7, C | — | 47.5, C | — | 46.7 |
| 14 | 1.40 ddd (7.2, 6.0, 5.4) | 47.1, CH | 1.26 overlapped | 50.9, CH | 1.23 overlapped | 51.7, CH |
| 15 | 1.92 m; 1.53 m | 21.1, CH2 | 1.96 m; 1.54 m | 21.7, CH2 | 1.59 m; 1.29 m | 24.2, CH2 |
| 16 | 2.47 m; 2.09 m | 35.6, CH2 | 2.45 m; 2.08 m | 22.7, CH2 | 1.83 m; 1.65 m | 39.1, CH2 |
| 17 | — | 220.3, C | — | 220.6, C | — | 82.2, C |
| 18 | 0.92 s | 13.7, CH3 | 0.89 s | 13.7, CH3 | 0.85 s | 14.6, CH3 |
| 19 | 0.80 d (7.2) | 12.8, CH3 | 1.18 s | 17.1, CH3 | 1.00 s | 10.3, CH3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | 1.17 s | 26.2, CH3 |
| 4-OH | — | — | 6.08 s | — | — | — |
Recorded in CDCl3 (1H: 600 MHz; 13C: 150 MHz).
Recorded in CD3OD (1H: 600 MHz; 13C: 150 MHz).
Fig. 2. Key HMBC and 1H–1H COSY correlations for compounds 1–4.

The relative configurations of the chiral centres at C-7, C-8, C-9, C-10, C-13, and C-14 were established using the coupling constants, biogenesis considerations, and NOESY (nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy) correlations as follows: (a) on the basis of biogenetic considerations of similar reported compounds, the relative configurations of the chiral centres were assigned as (R) at C-8, C-10, C-14, and as (S) at C-9 and C-13. This was also supported by large coupling constants between H-8α/H-9β (J = 10.8 Hz), H-8α/H-14β (J = 7.2 Hz), and H-9β/H-10α (J = 9.0 Hz), indicating their trans-orientations.12,13 (b) The relative configuration at C-7 was assigned as (R) based on a cis-orientation between H-7α/H-8α (J = 3.6 Hz). This was further supported by a NOESY correlation between the two protons at δH 2.11 (H-7α) and 1.67 ppm (H-8α), respectively (Fig. S10 and 2). This NOESY correlation, distinct from 1H–1H COSY connectivity, confirmed their spatial proximity on the same face of the ring system. The cis-orientations of H-8 with both H-10 and H-18 were established by NOESY correlations observed between the proton signals at 1.67 (H-8α) and both the signals at δH 2.04 (H-10α) and δH 0.92 (H-18). Furthermore, the NOESY spectrum exhibited cross-peaks between the methyl protons H-19 (δH 0.80) and the methine protons H-9 (δH 1.15) and H-14 (δH 1.40), establishing their cis-orientations. Additional key NOESY correlations are shown in Fig. 3. Hence, the relative configurations were assigned as (7R,8R,9S,10R,13S,14S). The proposed structure was fully supported by HMBC, 1H–1H COSY, and NOESY correlations, as illustrated in Fig. 2 and 3.
Fig. 3. Key NOESY correlations for compounds 1–3.

The absolute configuration of compound 1 was determined by comparison of its experimental ECD (electronic circular dichroism) spectrum with TDDFT (time-dependent density functional theory)-calculated spectra for both enantiomers of the assigned relative configuration using the protocol described in Section 3.5. Conformational analysis using the CREST (conformer-rotamer ensemble sampling tool) program (300 K, 6 kcal mol−1 energy window) identified two major conformers for compound 1, with Boltzmann populations of 89.58% and 10.42% at 298 K based on DFT-computed Gibbs free energies [B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-TZVP, PCM (polarisable continuum model)/methanol]. The Boltzmann-weighted ECD spectrum, calculated at the TDDFT/B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-TZVP level (16 excited states, σ = 0.30 eV), showed excellent agreement with the experimental spectrum for the (7R,8R,9S,10R,13S,14S) enantiomer (Fig. 4A and S11). It reproduced both the sign and position of the diagnostic negative Cotton effect near 320 nm and the overall spectral profile. The opposite enantiomer gave a mirror-image spectrum that did not match. This assignment was further supported by the good agreement between the calculated (+97.1) and experimental (+66.8) optical rotation values. Thus, the absolute configuration of compound 1 was determined as 7R,8R,9S,10R,13S,14S. The structure of compound 1 was identified as 7α-methylestr-4-ene-3,17-dione (mentabolan, also known as MENT dione, or trestione), a synthetic anabolic–androgenic steroid (AAS) and derivative of 19-nortestosterone. This represents the first report of its isolation from a natural source.
Fig. 4. Calculated (dotted black and orange lines) and experimental (solid black line) ECD spectra of (A) trestione (1), (B) formestane (2), and (C) oxandrolone (3) in MeOH.

This compound has been clinically employed as a specialized androgen for male contraception, designed to preserve libido and muscle/bone health while potentially reducing prostate stimulation, a limitation of conventional testosterone therapy.14,15
4-Hydroxyandrost-4-ene-3,17-dione (2), trivially known as formestane, was isolated as a white powder. It was assigned the molecular formula C19H26O3 based on its (+)-HRESI mass spectrum, which revealed a molecular ion peak [M + H]+ (Fig. S12) at m/z 303.1952 (calcd for C19H27O3, 303.1955), corresponding to seven DBE (double bond equivalents). Its IR spectrum showed strong absorption bands for the diosphenol (3381, 1663, and 1628 cm−1), C–H (2968–2884 cm−1), C O (1736 cm−1), and Csp2–O (1159 cm−1) stretching vibrations (Fig. S13). The UV spectrum exhibited a characteristic absorption maximum at λmax 277 nm (Fig. S14).
It is worth noting that the molecular ion, as shown by the ESI-MS (electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry), differed by 16 mass units from that of compound 1. This suggests compound 2 has an additional hydroxyl group. The chemical structure of 2 was therefore deduced by comparison to that of compound 1. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 2 (Fig. S15 and S16) exhibited similarities to those of 1. Notably, analysis of the 13C NMR spectrum in conjunction with the HSQC spectrum (Fig. S17) also revealed the presence of 19 carbon signals: (a) four sp2 carbon signals in the downfield region, including two ketonic carbonyl carbons at δC 220.6 (C-17) and 193.4 (C-3), and two olefinic carbons at δC 141.3 (C-5) and 139.1 (C-4); and (b) fifteen sp3 carbon signals in the range of δC 54.3–13.7 ppm. The main differences, as deduced from the 1H NMR spectra of both compounds, were the signals of the following functional groups whose points of attachment in the structure of 2 were supported by HMBC correlations: (i) a hydroxyl group (δH 6.08) attached to C-4 as its proton showed cross-peaks with the carbon signals at δC 193.4 (C-3), 141.3 (C-5), 139.1 (C-4), 37.8 (C-10), and 31.7 (C-2); (ii) a methyl group (δH/C 1.18/17.1) was found to be attached to C-10 as its protons (H-19) correlated with the carbon signals of C-4, C-9 (δC 54.3), C-10 (δC 37.8), and C-1 (δC 34.6); and (iii) eight diastereotopic methylene signals were identified in the range of δH 3.04–1.05 for compound 2. Those for H-6 (δH 3.04; 1.99) showed cross-peaks with the carbon signals of C-5 (δC 141.3), C-4 (δC 139.1), C-10 (δC 37.8), and C-8 (δC 34.7) (Fig. 2 and S18). In contrast, in compound 1, seven such methylene signals were observed in the range of δH 2.49–1.24 ppm. The 1H–1H COSY spectrum (Fig. S19) confirmed the spin systems, including correlations between H-6 and H-7, and between H-8 and H-9. These data were consistent with previously reported findings for formestane,16 a synthetic steroidal compound that suppresses the oestrogen production by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme that converts androgens into estrogens.13
The absolute configuration of 2 was established by ECD calculations performed for both enantiomers using the same protocol described above for compound 1. The conformational search identified three conformers with Boltzmann populations of 94.95%, 5.04%, and 0.01%. Comparison of the Boltzmann-weighted spectrum (σ = 0.20 eV) revealed that the (8R,9S,10R,13S,14S) enantiomer well reproduced the experimental ECD profile. It particularly matched the sign, position, and relative intensity of the negative Cotton effect near 320 nm and the broader band centred around 280 nm (Fig. 4B and S21). The opposite enantiomer yielded the mirror-image spectrum, ruling out that configuration. Notably, the calculated optical rotation (+141.6) was opposite in sign to the experimental value (−78.1). Although this discrepancy is notable, it does not affect the configurational assignment, which was based primarily on ECD spectral comparison. Optical rotation is a single-value property that is highly sensitive to conformational averaging, solvent effects, and the choice of computational level.17,18 In contrast, ECD provides a wavelength-dependent fingerprint with multiple diagnostic bands and is therefore inherently more reliable for absolute configuration determination.19,20 The excellent agreement between the experimental and calculated ECD spectra for compound 2 supports the assigned (8R,9S,10R,13S,14S) configuration, consistent with the known configuration of formestane.
Possible contributing factors to the optical rotation discrepancy include: (i) incomplete conformational sampling, where high-energy conformers with large negative rotations may have been underrepresented or missed; (ii) limitations of the B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-TZVP level for accurate optical rotation prediction; (iii) neglect of explicit solute–solvent interactions and/or aggregation effects by the PCM model;21 and (iv) minor experimental uncertainties in the specific rotation measurement. Nonetheless, the ECD-based assignment is considered robust. Future VCD (vibrational circular dichroism) or ROA (Raman optical activity) studies could provide independent confirmation.22,23
Formestane (4-hydroxyandrostenedione) (2) is an aromatase inhibitor which significantly reduces plasma levels of estrogen and has shown antitumour activity in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. It was formerly used to treat hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, but has largely been replaced by cheaper, orally active medications.24
Oxandrolone (3) was isolated as a white powder. Positive-ion mode HRESIMS analysis established the molecular formula as C19H30O3, based on the observed molecular ion peak [M + H]+ at m/z 307.2266 (calcd for C19H31O3, 307.2268) (Fig. S22), corresponding to five degrees of unsaturation. Its IR spectrum revealed characteristic vibrational modes, including hydroxyl stretching (3516 cm−1), aliphatic C–H stretching (2976–2859 cm−1), lactone carbonyl (1717 cm−1), and C–O stretching (1036 cm−1) (Fig. S23). The UV spectrum showed a pronounced absorption maximum at λmax 201 nm (Fig. S24).
Analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum of oxandrolone (3) (Fig. S25), together with its 13C NMR (Fig. S26) and HSQC-DEPT (Fig. S27) spectra, revealed signals for: (a) three quaternary methyl groups at δH/C 1.17/26.2, 1.00/10.3, and 0.85/14.6; (b) eight sp3 methylene (CH2) groups, exhibiting sixteen diastereotopic protons. This includes a pair of geminal coupled protons at δH 4.25 and 4.00 (1H each, d, J = 10.7 Hz, δC 82.6), characteristic of an oxygenated CH2 group. Another methylene, attached to a sp2 carbon, appeared as two doublets of doublets at δH 2.49 and 2.23 (1H each, dd, J = 12.9, 6.0 Hz, δC 34.6). The remaining methylene signals were observed in the range of δH 1.83–0.95 ppm (δC 39.1–28.1 ppm); (c) four methines at δH/C 1.23/51.7, 0.89/50.8, 1.77/41.2, and 1.48/36.9; and (d) four quaternary carbons, including the lactone carbonyl at δC 173.8 and an oxygenated carbon at δC 82.2 as identified in the 13C NMR spectrum (Fig. S26). These data are consistent with those reported for oxandrolone (also known as 17β-hydroxy-17α-methyl-2-oxa-5α-androstan-3-one) and related compounds, including 6α-, 9α-, 12β-, and 15α-hydroxyoxandrolones.25 The structure was further corroborated by key HMBC and 1H–1H COSY correlations. Notably, HMBC cross-peaks were observed between the methyl proton signal at δH 1.17 and the carbon resonances at δC 82.2 (C-17), 46.7 (C-13), and 39.1 (C-16); and between the proton signal at δH 0.85 with the carbon signals at δC 82.2 (C-17), 51.7 (C-14), 46.7 (C-13), and 32.5 (C-12), which enabled attaching these protons at C-17 and C-13, respectively. The methyl group (C-19) was attached to C-10, as evidenced by HMBC correlations between its proton signals at δH 1.00 and the carbon signals at δC 82.6 (C-1), 50.8 (C-9), 41.2 (C-5), and 35.9 (C-10). Further HMBC cross-peaks were observed between the geminal methylene protons at δH 4.25 and 4.00 (H-1) with the signals of C-3 (δC 173.8), C-9, C-5, and C-10; and between the CH2 protons at δH 2.49 and 2.23 (H-4) with the carbon signals of C-6 (δC 28.1), C-5, and C-10 (Fig. 2). These CH2 protons also displayed 1H–1H COSY correlations with the methine proton signal at δH 1.77, which in turn showed cross-peaks with the CH2 protons at δH 1.45 and 1.23. Additionally, 1H–1H COSY correlations were observed between the methine proton at δH 1.26 (H-14) with both the methylene protons at δH 1.59 and 1.29 (H-15), as well as another methine at δH 1.48 (H-8) (Fig. 2 and S29).
The relative configurations of the chiral centres at C-8, C-9, C-10, C-13, and C-14 were assigned by analogy to compounds 1 and 2. Key NOESY correlations supported the relative stereochemistry. A cis-relationship was indicated between the methine proton H-8 (δH 1.48) with both methyl protons H-18 (δH 0.85) and H-19 (δH 1.00). Furthermore, NOESY correlations between H-5 (δH 1.77) and H-9 (δH 0.89), and between H-14 (δH 1.23) and H-20 (δH 1.17), established their spatial proximities (Fig. S30 and 3). The complete 1H and 13C NMR data assignments for oxandrolone (3) are summarised in Table 1.
The absolute configuration of compound 3 was determined by comparing experimental and calculated ECD spectra for both enantiomers according to the same protocol described above. For this compound, the conformational analysis identified two conformers (populations: 65.04% and 34.96%), differing primarily in the orientation of the hydroxyl group. The calculated spectrum of the (4aS,4bS,6aS,7S,9aS,9bR) enantiomer (σ = 0.15 eV) was found to be consistent with the experimental data. It correctly replicated the negative Cotton effect near 210 nm despite the relatively high noise-to-signal ratio of the experimental spectrum (Fig. 4C and S31). The mirror-image spectrum obtained for the opposite enantiomer was clearly incompatible. Additionally, the predicted optical rotation (−40.5) was in reasonable agreement with the experimental value (−63.7), reinforcing the configurational assignment. Collectively, these results led to the assignment of the absolute configuration of compound 3 as 4aS,4bS,6aS,7S,9aS,9bR, which matches the known configuration of oxandrolone.
Oxandrolone is a synthetic anabolic–androgenic steroid (AAS) with weak androgenic activity and a high anabolic effect. First synthesized in 1962, it was introduced to the U.S. market in 1964 under the brand names of Anavar® and Oxandrin®. It has been used to treat alcoholic hepatitis, Turner syndrome, and osteoporosis.18 It is the only U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration)-approved steroidal drug to promote weight gain after surgery, trauma, or chronic infection, and to relieve bone pain from osteoporosis.26
3,4-Dimethoxyacetophenone (4) was obtained as a white powder in CH2Cl2/MeOH (95 : 5), and its low-resolution EIMS (electron ionisation mass spectrum) displayed the [M]˙+ peak at m/z 180. Analysis of its mass spectrum along with its 1D and 2D NMR spectra enabled us to assign the molecular formula C10H12O3 to 4, implying five double bond equivalents.
Its 1H NMR spectrum exhibited proton signals at δH 7.56 (1H, dd, J = 8.3, 1.9 Hz), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), and 6.87 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz) characteristic of a 1,3,4-trisubstituted benzene ring system. In addition, signals for two methoxy protons were observed at δH 3.93 and 3.92. The signal of a deshielded 3-proton singlet was observed at δH 2.55 (Fig. S33 and Table 2). These data were similar to those previously reported for the natural acetophenone, apocynin.27
Table 2. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR data of compound 4 in CDCl3.
| No. | δ H mult. (J in Hz) | δ C, type |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | — | 196.8, C |
| 2 | 2.55 s | 26.3, CH3 |
| 1′ | — | 130.5, C |
| 2′ | 7.51 d (1.9) | 110.1, CH |
| 3′ | — | 149.1, C |
| 4′ | — | 153.3, C |
| 5′ | 6.87 d (8.3) | 110.0, CH |
| 6′ | 7.56 dd (8.3, 1.9) | 123.3, CH |
| 3′-OCH3 | 3.92 s | 56.2, CH3 |
| 4′-OCH3 | 3.93 s | 56.3, CH3 |
Analysis of its 13C NMR and HSQC spectra (Fig. S34 and S35) revealed the presence of one carbonyl at δC 196.8; three aromatic methine carbons at δC 123.3, 110.1, 110.0; three aromatic quaternary carbons at δC 153.3, 149.1, and 130.5; two methoxy carbons at δC 56.3 and 56.2; and a methyl carbon at δC 26.3 (C-2) (Table 2). The methoxyl groups were located at positions 3′ and 4′ of the aromatic ring based on HMBC correlations observed between the protons at δH 3.93 and C-4′ (δC 153.3), and between the protons at δH 3.92 and C-3′ (δC 149.1). The acetyl group was located at 1′ of the aromatic ring on the basis of observed HMBC correlations between the methyl protons at δH 2.55 and carbon signals at δC 130.5 (C-1′), 123.3 (C-6′), and 196.8 (C O) (Fig. S36 and 2). The 1H–1H COSY spectrum, in addition to the expected vicinal correlations (H-5′ and H-6′), exhibited weak but clear long-range correlations between the methoxy protons at δH 3.93 and H-5′ (δH 6.87), and between δH 3.92 and H-2′ (δH 7.51). This further confirmed the methoxyl groups assignment (Fig. S37 and 2).
The complete NMR data of compound 4 (Table 2) were consistent with those reported for 3,4-dimethoxyacetophenone,28 an intermediate in the synthesis of papaverine, a clinically used vasodilator and antispasmodic agent.
Overall, the chemical investigation of the dung-derived Penicillium tanzanicum strain led to the isolation of three pharmaceutically established steroid drugs viz. trestione (1), formestane (2), and oxandrolone (3), alongside a naturally occurring acetophenone (4). Notably, 1 and 2 were further detected in the crude extract of the strain cultured under identical conditions (Fig. S38). It is worth noting that the isolation of compounds from natural sources previously regarded as synthetic is not unprecedented, as synthetic benzodiazepines and gamma-hydroxybutyrate have subsequently been reported to occur naturally.29,30
2.2. Plausible biogenic relationship between steroids
A speculative biosynthetic pathway for the isolated steroids (1–3) is proposed in Fig. 5, based solely on structural correlations. The sequence follows known fungal sterol transformations, beginning with the cyclization of squalene 2,3-epoxide to yield cholesterol. Side-chain cleavage of cholesterol could afford pregnenolone, which might be converted to progesterone through the action of 3β-HSD (3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase). Progesterone is then hypothetically branched toward 17α-hydroxyprogesterone and androstenedione via oxidative modifications, including C-2β hydroxylation, methyl migration, and C-4 hydroxylation. It is worth noting that no genomic, enzymatic, or isotopic evidence is available in this study to support these specific transformations in this organism. The enzymatic assignments are inferential and should be treated as hypothetical. The scheme is presented as a working model, not as an established biogenetic route.31,32
Fig. 5. Proposed biogenic relationship for steroids 1–3. General background on fungal sterol metabolism can be found in the literature.31,32.

The thirteen known compounds were characterised as integracide G (5),33 anhydrofusarubin (6),34 5-hydroxydihydrofusarubin C (7),35 anhydrojavanicin (8),36 (+)-solaniol (9),37 (1S,4S,10S)-6,9-dihydroxy-8-methoxy-10-(2-oxopropyl)-3,4-dihydro-1,4-methanobenzo[c]oxepin-5(1H)-one (10),35 apocynin (11),27p-hydroxyacetophenone (12),38p-hydroxybenzaldehyde (13),39N-(2-phenylethyl)acetamide (14),40 (4R,5S)-5-hydroxy-4-hexanolide (15),41 3′-O-acetylchloramphenicol (16),42 and lignoren (17),43 by comparing the observed and reported spectroscopic data.
2.3. Biological assays
With the aim of identifying potential lead compounds among the reported steroidal drug-like natural products, their antimicrobial, antiplasmodial activities, and haemolytic effects were evaluated alongside the antimicrobial activities of other isolates. Notably, several studies have highlighted the emerging anti-infective potential of steroids, with demonstrated antimicrobial and antiplasmodial properties.44–46
2.3.1. Antimicrobial activity
The antimicrobial activity of the crude extract and the isolates (1–16) was evaluated using the broth microdilution method to determine their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (Table 3). The panel of test organisms included one mycobacterium (Mycobacterium tuberculosis), ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), and one fungus (Candida albicans).47
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity (MIC, µg mL−1) of crude extract and compounds 1–16a.
| Bacterial/fungal strain | 1–7, 10, 11, 14–16 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 13 | Crude extract | #Mfx | #RMP | #AmB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. tuberculosis H37Rv | >100 | — | >100 | >100 | 50 | 400 | — | 0.32 | — |
| S. aureus ATCC 29213 | >100 | — | 100 | — | 50 | >400 | <0.10 | — | — |
| S. aureus ATCC 700699 | >100 | >100 | >100 | — | 100 | — | 1.56 | — | — |
| E. faecalis ATCC 29212 | >100 | >100 | >100 | — | >100 | 50 | <0.78 | — | — |
| E. faecium ATCC 35667 | >100 | 50 | 50 | — | >100 | 50 | 3.12 | — | — |
| E. coli ATCC 25922 | >100 | — | >100 | — | >100 | >400 | — | 6.25 | — |
| P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 | >100 | — | >100 | — | >100 | >400 | — | 25 | — |
| A. baumannii BAA-747 | >100 | — | >100 | — | >100 | >400 | — | 1.56 | — |
| C. albicans ATCC 24433 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >400 | — | — | 0.78 |
MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration; — = not tested; serial dilution ranges: 100–0.78 µg mL−1 for test compounds and 400–3.125 µg mL−1 for the crude extract; #reference drugs: Mfx = moxifloxacin, RMP = rifampicin, AmB = amphotericin B.
The crude extract exhibited moderate activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv (MIC = 400 µg mL−1) and significant activity against E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecium ATCC 35667 (MIC = 50 µg mL−1). According to the threshold defined by Tamokou et al. (2017),48 compound 13 showed moderate activity against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC = 50 µg mL−1), and weak activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC = 100 µg mL−1). In addition, 8 displayed moderate activity against E. faecium ATCC 35667 (MIC = 50 µg mL−1). Compound 9 also demonstrated moderate activity against E. faecium ATCC 35667 (MIC = 50 µg mL−1) and weak activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC = 100 µg mL−1), while compound 11 exhibited only weak activity against E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (MIC = 100 µg mL−1).
2.3.2. Antiplasmodial efficacy
Compounds 1–3 were evaluated in vitro for their antiplasmodial potency against the multi-resistant Plasmodium falciparum (PfDd2) strain (Table 4). Activity was classified according to the criteria established by Batista and collaborators (2009).49 Trestione (1) and formestane (2) exhibited good antiplasmodial activity, with IC50 values of 26.58 and 15.03 µM, respectively. The dose–response curves for both compounds are presented in Fig. 6, showing a clear concentration-dependent inhibition of parasite growth. These findings are consistent with those of Douanla and co-workers (2015),50 who reported potent antiplasmodial activity of ergostane steroids. The comparatively stronger activity of compound 2 may be attributed to the presence of a hydroxyl group, which can enhance hydrogen bonding with parasite targets and improve molecular recognition within the binding pocket.51 Collectively, these results suggest that such compounds may represent promising candidates for further investigation as antiplasmodial agents.
Table 4. Antiplasmodial efficacy against the multi-resistant (PfDd2) strain of Plasmodium falciparum and haemolysis activity on normal erythrocytes (%) of compounds 1–3a.
| Compounds | IC50 value (µM) ± SD | % Haemolysis ± SD (conc. = 250 µg mL−1) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.58 ± 2.15 | 0.63 ± 0.28 |
| 2 | 15.03 ± 0.14 | 0.88 ± 0.21 |
| 3 | n.a | 0.86 ± 0.16 |
| DHA | 0.0058 ± 7.15 × 10−5 | — |
| ART | 0.020 ± 6.5 × 10−5 | — |
| CQ | 0.86 ± 0.0453 | — |
IC50: inhibitory concentration 50; n.a: not active; SD: standard deviation; DHA: dihydroartemisinin; ART: artemisinin; CQ: chloroquine; conc.: concentration.
Fig. 6. Dose–response curves of compounds 1 and 2 on PfDd2.

2.3.3. Haemolytic activity on normal erythrocytes
Compounds 1–3 induced minimal haemolysis (<2%) following 3 h treatment of fresh erythrocytes across a concentration range of 250 to 15.63 µg mL−1 (Table 4), when compared to the standard control Triton X-100 (100% haemolysis). Irrespective of the concentration tested, the compounds exhibited negligible haemolytic effects and did not cause adverse events on erythrocytes at drug concentrations effective against the parasite. These findings suggest that the observed antimalarial activity of these steroids is primarily not attributable to erythrocyte lysis, thereby supporting their potential as safe antiplasmodial agents.
3. Experimental
3.1. General experimental procedures
Silica gel-coated cards (0.25 mm thick, E. Merck, Germany) were used for TLC (thin layer chromatography) analyses. Flash silica gel (E. Merck, Germany 40–63 µm, 230–400 mesh) was used in column chromatography (CC) for initial fractionation. Final purification of compounds was carried out using silica gel (E. Merck, Germany 15–40 µm, 230–400 mesh) columns. Infrared (IR) spectra (cm−1) were recorded on a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 spectrophotometer equipped with a PIKE MIRacle ATR-Reflector (diamond crystal plate). The spectra were acquired in the solid state using the attenuated total reflection (ATR) technique over the 4000–600 cm−1 region with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 (25 scans). Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded on a Hitachi Spectrophotometer U-5100 in methanol using a Hellma Analytics quartz cuvette (spectral range 200–2500 nm). Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter in methanol at 20 °C (c = 0.1%); the specific optical rotation was the mean of 30 measurements, calculated by the device for a 10 cm path length.
High-resolution electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) spectra were recorded with an Agilent 1290 Infinity III UHPLC system (column 50 × 2.1 mm, 2 µm, C18 Ascentis Express; solvent A: H2O + 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: MeCN + 0.1% formic acid; gradient: 10% B increasing to 98% B in 8 min and then maintaining 98% B for 1 min; flow rate 0.4 mL min−1; UV-vis detection 200–600 nm) connected to a Bruker Daltonics timsTOF Pro 2 ESI-TOF mass spectrometer (scan range 100–2500 m/z). Electron impact mass spectra (EI-MS) were performed on a JEOL Single-Quadrupole-MS JMS-Q1600GC, while high-resolution electron impact mass spectra (HREI-MS) were recorded on a JEOL JMS HX-110.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were recorded on 600 and 500 MHz for 1H NMR, 150 and 125 MHz NMR spectrometers for 13C NMR, while two-dimensional NMR experiments were recorded on Bruker Avance 600 and 500 spectrometers. All NMR experiments were performed in deuterated chloroform or methanol. The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, and coupling constants (J) are measured in Hz.
3.2. Fungal material
The fungus was isolated using the moist chamber method.52 Partially decomposed bull dung was collected at Ecopark in Yaounde (Centre Region of Cameroon). The dung was rehydrated in deionized H2O supplemented with chloramphenicol and incubated in deep-dish Petri plates lined with filter paper to simulate natural dung decomposition. The Petri plates were examined periodically with a stereomicroscope for fungal growth. The strain of P. tanzanicum was isolated by germinating mycelium on malt extract agar amended with chloramphenicol and identified by Inqaba Biotec (https://inqababiotec.co.za/), through ITS nrDNA sequencing (Table S4). A voucher specimen of this strain is stored at −80 °C in our laboratory under the number CECA077.
For identification, genomic DNA was extracted using the Quick-DNA™ Fungal/Bacterial kit (Zymo Research, Catalogue no. D6005). The ITS target region was amplified with OneTaq® Quick-Load® 2X Master Mix (NEB, Catalogue no. M0486) using ITS-1 and ITS-4 primers. The PCR product was analysed by gel electrophoresis and cleaned up enzymatically using the EXOSAP method. The extracted fragments were sequenced in both the forward and reverse directions (Nimagen, BrilliantDye™ Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit V3.1, BRD3-100/1000) and subsequently purified (Zymo Research, ZR-96 DNA Sequencing Clean-up Kit™, Catalogue no. D4050). The purified fragments were analysed on the ABI 3500xl Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher Scientific). The resulting sequence data (*.ab1 files) were processed using DNASTAR software and identified through a BLAST search (NCBI).
3.3. Fermentation and extraction
A large-scale culture of P. tanzanicum mycelia was carried out in solid media using the method reported by Mountessou et al. (2023)53 with some modifications. A total of 60 flasks (1 L each) containing 110 g rice and 110 mL water were autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min. Each flask received about six small pieces of mycelium from an MEA plate under sterile conditions. After 15 days of growth at 27 °C, the culture media were extracted with EtOAc, yielding 83.0 g of crude extract.
3.4. Isolation
A portion of the EtOAc extract (80.0 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (70–230 mesh) using a stepwise gradient of ethyl acetate in n-hexane, followed by EtOAc. A total of 25 fractions, each approximately 500 mL were obtained and combined based on TLC profiles into five main fractions (Fr.1–5).
Fraction Fr.2 (10.5 g, n-Hex/EtOAc 80 : 20 and 70 : 30) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel (70–230 mesh) and eluted with an isocratic mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (98 : 2) to give compounds 1 (230 mg, 0.29%), 3 (23 mg, 0.029%), and 5 (2 mg, 0.0025%) and a mixture of 16 and 2. The mixture was further purified over Sephadex LH-20 (CH2Cl2/MeOH 50 : 50), affording 16 (1.9 mg, 0.0024%) and 2 (33 mg, 0.041%). Further purification of the intermediate fractions from this column yielded 14 (4 mg, 0.005%).
Fraction Fr.3 (3.0 g, n-Hex/EtOAc 60 : 40) was chromatographed on silica gel and eluted with an isocratic mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (95 : 5) to give compounds 4 (1.0 mg, 0.0013%), 11 (1.6 mg, 0.0020%), 12 (1.0 mg, 0.0013%), and 13 (1.5 mg, 0.0019%).
Fraction Fr.4 (2.6 g, n-Hex/EtOAc 50 : 50) was fractionated on silica gel and eluted with an isocratic mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (90 : 10) to give eight subfractions which were further purified by normal-phase HPLC (250 × 10 mm, 5 µm particle size, flow rate 4 mL min−1) with CH2Cl2/MeOH (90 : 10) to yield 10 (1.5 mg, 0.0019%), 7 (1.1 mg, 0.0014%), 6 (1.4 mg, 0.0018%), 9 (3.0 mg, 0.0038%), 8 (1.5 mg, 0.0019%), and 15 (4.0 mg, 0.0050%).
Fraction Fr.5 (1.8 g, n-Hex/EtOAc 40 : 60) was purified on silica gel and eluted with an isocratic mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (80 : 20) to yield 17 (1.0 mg, 0.0013%).
3.5. Calculation of ECD spectra
ECD spectra were calculated for compounds 1–3. The conformational search was carried out using the CREST program package54,55 with a temperature of 300 K and an energy window of 6 kcal mol−1. For compounds 1 and 3, two conformers were identified, whereas three conformers were found for compound 2. The resulting conformers were subsequently optimised at the DFT level employing the B3LYP-D3BJ functional in combination with the def2-TZVP basis set56–58 as implemented in the Gaussian 16 program package.59 To verify that the identified stationary points were true minima, vibrational frequencies were computed at the same level of theory; all frequencies were positive, enabling us to estimate Boltzmann populations of the conformers using Gibbs free energies (ΔG) calculated at 298 K. Solvent effects were included through the Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) using methanol as the solvent.21
For each geometry-optimised conformer, optical rotations were calculated at the wavelength of the sodium D-line (589.3 nm), as well as ECD spectra through time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations (considering 16 electronic excitations), using the same aforementioned functional and basis set combination. Both length and velocity formalisms showed comparable results for rotatory strengths R for all transitions, and all spectra were reported using the length formalism. ECD spectra were generated using a home-made Python script that applies a Gaussian line-broadening function to the calculated rotatory strengths. Different σ values used to match the experimental spectra were 0.30, 0.20, and 0.15 eV (ref. 60) for compounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experimental spectra were smoothed prior to analysis using a second-order Savitzky–Golay filter61 with a 15-point window and subsequently compared with the calculated spectra.
3.6. Physico-chemical properties of compounds 1–3
Trestione (1): white powder; [α]20D + 66.8 (c 0.1, MeOH) (calcd +97.1); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 241 (4.4521) 300 (2.3021) nm; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 287.2004 [M + H]+ (calcd for C19H27O2, 287.2006); IR (ATR) νmax 1735, 1660, 1616, 1449, 1387, 1250, 1040, 1009, 878 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (CDCl3, 600 MHz and 150 MHz) see Table 1.
Formestane (2): white powder; [α]20D −78.1 (c 0.1, MeOH) (calcd +141.6); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 277 (4.0816) nm; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 303.1952 [M + H]+ (calcd for C19H27O3, 303.1955); IR (ATR) νmax 3404, 3381 (OH), 2945, 2928, 1736, 1663, 1628, 1404, 1381, 1354, 1238, 1213, 1159, 1098, 2024 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (CDCl3, 600 MHz and 150 MHz) see Table 1.
Oxandrolone (3): white powder; [α]25D −63.7 (c 0.1, MeOH) (calcd −40.5); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 201 (3.0166) nm; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 307.2266 [M + H]+ (calcd for C19H31O2, 307.2268); IR (ATR) νmax 3516, 2936, 2918, 1717, 1406, 1366, 1223, 1204, 1036, 1028, 932 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (CD3OD, 600 MHz and 150 MHz) see Table 1.
3,4-Dimethoxyacetophenone (4): white powder; EI-MS m/z (rel. int., %): 180 (44), 165 (100), 150 (18), 137 (40), 122 (14), 83 (57); 1H and 13C NMR data (CDCl3, 400 MHz and 100 MHz) see Table 2.
3.7. Biological assays
3.7.1. Antimicrobial assay
3.7.1.1. Media and strains
Single colonies obtained from agar plates of Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Methicillin-resistant/Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA/VISA) ATCC 700699, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and E. faecium ATCC 35667, and Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Acinetobacter baumannii BAA-747 were grown in Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB, BD Difco, USA) and the yeast Candida albicans ATCC 24433 in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% dextrose). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C and shaken at 180 rpm.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv was grown in 7H9 medium supplemented with 10% ADS (0.85% NaCl, 5% BSA, 2% dextrose), 0.5% glycerol, and 0.05% tyloxapol at 37 °C at 80 rpm.
3.7.1.2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determination
MICs were determined using the broth microdilution method. The compounds and crude extract were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in a 96-well plate in 50 µL of the respective medium in a 1 : 1 serial dilution, resulting in a final concentration ranging from 100 µg mL−1 to 0.78 µg mL−1 for the compounds and from 400 µg mL−1 to 3.125 µg mL−1 for the crude extract. Fifty microlitres of adjusted cell suspension (106 CFU per mL for all bacteria, 5 × 103 CFU per mL for C. albicans) were added to each well. Plates were incubated statically at 37 °C for 20–24 h (ESKAPE bacteria and yeast), or for 5 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for M. tuberculosis. Readout was performed macroscopically for bacteria and C. albicans, whereas MIC is defined as the lowest concentration at which no visible growth appears in comparison to the controls. For M. tuberculosis, the resazurin reduction assay was utilized. Briefly, 10 µL of a 100 µg mL−1 resazurin solution was added to each well and re-suspended carefully. After 24 hours at room temperature, cells were fixed by adding 100 µL of a 10% formalin solution to each well. Fluorescence was measured at 535 nm excitation and 590 nm emission in a TECAN plate reader.
Moxifloxacin was used as a positive control for Gram-positive bacteria, rifampicin was used as a positive control for Gram-negative bacteria and M. tuberculosis, and amphotericin B was used as a positive control for C. albicans, while DMSO was used for all organisms as a solvent control.
Depending on the available quantity, the compounds were screened either as a single sample or in duplicate. For those exhibiting activity, the assay was subsequently repeated in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.
3.7.2. Antiplasmodial assay
3.7.2.1. Preparation of the drug master plate
Compounds 1–3 were dissolved in 100% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) at 10 mg mL−1. Afterwards, master plates were prepared by mixing 10 µL of sample solutions with 190 µl of fresh RPMI 1640 incomplete (without HEPES, Albumax I, hypoxanthine and gentamicin) culture medium into a 96-well plate to yield a concentration of 500 µg mL−1 (5% DMSO) followed by a five-fold serial dilution. For each inhibitor, the intermediate concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 500 µg mL−1. Chloroquine, Artemisinin and Dihidroartemisinin (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), which were used as standard drugs, were prepared at 10 mM in sterile distilled water for chloroquine and 100% DMSO for artemisinin and dihydroartemisinin and serially diluted in an incomplete RPMI1640 medium. The master plates were frozen at −80 °C until use or freshly made the day of the assay.
3.7.2.2. Plasmodium falciparum growth inhibition assay
3.7.2.2.1. Maintenance of P. falciparum asexual-blood stages
The multi-resistant (PfDd2) (resistant to chloroquine, pyrimethamine, and mefloquine) P. falciparum strain obtained from BEI resources (https://www.beiresources.org/) was cultured and maintained in the presence of O positive human erythrocytes as previously described.62 The cryotube containing the strain was pre-warmed to 37 °C for 2 min to facilitate thawing and the content was transferred to a 50 mL Falcon tube into which 100 µL of NaCl solution (12%) was added dropwise. After a 5 min rest, 5 mL NaCl solution (1.6%) was added dropwise to this mixture. The mixture was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was washed once with complete RPMI 1640 [16.2 g L−1 RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 25 mM HEPES (Gibco, UK), 11.1014 mM glucose, 0.2% sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5% Albumax II (Gibco, USA), 1× hypoxanthine (Sigma, USA) and 4 µM Gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich)]. The remaining pellet was maintained in fresh human group O positive erythrocytes suspended at 4% hematocrit in a complete RPMI 1640 culture medium. The suspension was placed in a 60 mm Petri dish and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The culture medium was renewed daily with a fresh complete medium to ensure optimal and continuous parasite growth. Blood smears were prepared and stained with 10% Giemsa solution, then observed under a light microscope (Huma Scope Classic) at 100× with oil immersion to check the conditions of the culture and parasite proliferation.
3.7.2.2.2. Synchronization of P. falciparum cultures
Prior to the antiplasmodial activity assessment, parasitic culture containing mainly the ring stage was synchronized 48 h beforehand. Synchronization consists of the selective destruction of advanced stages (trophozoite and schizont) of parasite development by treatment with 5% (w/v) d-sorbitol.63 The erythrocyte membrane is normally impermeable to sorbitol, but parasite-induced channels in the membrane of infected cells allow sorbitol to pass through. When late-stage parasitized erythrocytes are suspended in a sorbitol solution, there is a net uptake of sorbitol and water into the erythrocytes, leading to swelling and hemolysis of these cells.64 Experimentally, parasitic cultures containing at least 80% of the ring stage were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed and replaced with 5 mL of 5% (w/v) sorbitol solution. The mixture was thoroughly homogenized and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min, then centrifuged again at 2500 rpm for 5 min, followed by 3 rounds of washing with incomplete RPMI 1640 medium. After synchronization, the parasites were re-cultured in a complete RPMI 1640 medium at 4% hematocrit for the antiplasmodial experiments.
3.7.2.2.3. Inhibition of P. falciparum asexual blood stages
The antiplasmodial activity of the compounds (1–3) was assessed in 96-well flat-bottomed microplates (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the protocol described by Smilkstein et al. (2004),65 based on the ability of parasites to multiply and survive in the presence of a defined concentration of the compound or reference molecule. Parasite growth was determined using SYBR Green I (Sigma-Aldrich), which binds to double-stranded DNA, producing a strong fluorescence with intensity proportional to the number of parasites present in the medium. Briefly, 90 µL of ring-synchronized parasite suspension prepared at 2% parasitemia and 1% hematocrit was incubated with 10 µL of compound at different pre-diluted concentrations. The positive control consisted of the reference molecules (dihydroartemisinin, artemisinin and chloroquine), while the negative control (100% growth) consisted of 100 µL of the parasite suspension. Plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Final concentrations in the test plates ranged from 50 µg mL−1 to 0.08 µg mL−1 (DMSO ≤0.5%) for compounds and from 1 µM to 0.0016 µM for dihydroartemisinin, artemisinin and chloroquine in a final volume of 100 µL. At the end of the incubation period, 100 µL of SYBR Green I lysis buffer (0.2 µL SYBR Green I/mL lysis buffer) consisting of Tris (20 mM; pH 7.5), EDTA (5 mM), saponin (0.008%, w/v), and Triton X-100 (0.08%, v/v) were gently added to each well, followed by a further 1 h incubation in the dark.65 Fluorescence was then measured using a microplate reader (Infinite M200, Tecan) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 538 nm, respectively. Tests were performed in triplicate. The fluorescence values obtained were used to calculate inhibition percentages (% INH) using Microsoft Excel software, according to the formula:
Using GraphPad 8.0 software, median inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were determined from sigmoidal concentration-response curves obtained by plotting the percentage of inhibition against the decimal logarithm of inhibitor concentration. The experiments were conducted in duplicate for three independent experiments, and the IC50 was expressed as mean ± SD.
3.7.3. Hemolysis assay
A haemolysis assay was performed as previously described,66 against normal O+ human red blood cells to assess the haemolytic effect of the test compounds at concentrations ranging from 250 to 15.63 µg mL−1. Briefly, 100 µL of O+ human red blood cells at 2% haematocrit were mixed with 100 µL of the test sample at a concentration ranging from 250 to 15.625 µg mL−1 in a 96-well plate, followed by incubation for 2 h at 37 °C. Triton X-100 0.5% (v/v) and fresh RPMI 1640 incomplete (without HEPES, Albumax I, hypoxanthine and gentamicin) culture medium, which induced 100% and 0% haemolysis in RBCs, were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. After 3 h of incubation at 37 °C, the preparation composed of lysed red blood cells and free haemoglobin was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was separated. Next, the amount of haemoglobin released in each supernatant was quantified spectrophotometrically at 540 nm using a microtiter plate reader (TECAN Infinite M200, USA) and compared to the negative control. The haemolysis percentage was calculated as follows:
4. Conclusions
This study reports the first natural isolation of three pharmaceutically established steroidal drugs, trestione (1), formestane (2), and oxandrolone (3), together with fourteen additional metabolites from Penicillium tanzanicum. The discovery of these steroids from a natural source underscores the continued potential of the Penicillium genus as a prolific reservoir of bioactive compounds. Although the isolated steroids did not exhibit notable antimicrobial activity against the tested strains, compounds 1 and 2 demonstrated significant antiplasmodial activity against the multi-resistant Plasmodium falciparum (PfDd2) strain and low haemolysis activity on human erythrocytes, highlighting their promise as lead compounds warranting further investigation for antiplasmodial agents. In addition, the antimicrobial activities observed in the crude extract and selected isolates against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium reinforce the value of this fungal resource in the search for new antimicrobial leads. Collectively, these findings enrich the chemical profile of P. tanzanicum and validate the strategy of investigating fungi from underexplored ecological niches for drug discovery. Future work should focus on elucidating the biosynthetic pathways of compounds 1–3 and conducting in-depth biological assays to further characterize their activities.
Author contributions
J. T., and T. Y. D. Y.: isolation and purification of the fungus, fermentation, extraction, isolation, and structural elucidation of compounds. B. Y. G. M., A. T., L. V. G., and S. V.: data curation, and preparing the original data manuscript. A. T., L. V. G., K. J. N. T., M. B. T. T.: biological assays. J. T., A. A., R. K., and S. F. K.: reviewing, editing, and correcting the draft. J. T., B. Y. G. M., S. V., D. P., and S. F. K.: conceptualization and methodology. R. K., and S. F. K.: supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict interest.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted within the framework of the Humboldt Research Hub-CECANAPROF project (3.4-CMR-Hub), funded by the Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Foundation, which focuses on the investigation of antimicrobial natural products. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS) and the German Research Foundation (DFG). J. T. received funding through the TWAS-DFG Cooperative Visit Program for researchers from sub-Saharan Africa, while B. Y. G. M. and T. Y. Y. D. were supported by TWAS-ICCBS postdoctoral and postgraduate fellowships, respectively. The authors thank the CeMSA@HHU (Centre for Molecular and Structural Analytics @ Heinrich Heine University) for recording the mass-spectrometric data.
Data availability
The data generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data related to the chemical structures and spectroscopic analysis of the isolated compounds are available in the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra06849a.
References
- Singh S. and Khajuria R., in New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 201–215 [Google Scholar]
- Wang X.-C. Zhang Z.-K. Zhuang W.-Y. J. Fungi. 2023;9:1150. doi: 10.3390/jof9121150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindsay C. A. Kinghorn A. D. Rakotondraibe H. L. Phytochemistry. 2023;209:113638. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2023.113638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ge G.-B. Dai D.-C. Zhou X.-M. Wu W.-J. Zheng C.-J. Song X.-M. Luo Y.-P. Fitoterapia. 2022;157:105119. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2021.105119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pangging M. Nguyen T. T. T. Lee H. B. Mycobiology. 2021;49:363–375. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2021.1952814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visagie C. M. Renaud J. B. Burgess K. M. N. Malloch D. W. Clark D. Ketch L. Urb M. Louis-Seize G. Assabgui R. Sumarah M. W. Seifert K. A. Persoonia. 2016;36:247–280. doi: 10.3767/003158516X691627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mountessou B. Y. G. Tiani G. L. M. Tchamgoue J. Maharjan R. Trucksess A. Kalscheuer R. Choudhary M. I. Kouam S. F. Phytochem. Lett. 2026;71:104095. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2025.104095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kapche A. B. F. Eckhardt P. Tchamgoue J. Tsakem B. Kuete J. R. N. Trucksess A. Njouonkou A.-L. Ponou B. K. Tapondjou L. A. Opatz T. Kuete V. Kalscheuer R. Kouam S. F. Teponno R. B. Nat. Prod. Res. 2025:1–9. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2025.2565818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krstić N. M. Bjelaković M. S. Dabović M. M. Pavlović V. D. Molecules. 2010;15:3462–3477. doi: 10.3390/molecules15053462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Savić M. P. Škorić D. Đ. Kuzminac I. Z. Jakimov D. S. Kojić V. V. Rárová L. Strnad M. Djurendić E. A. Steroids. 2020;157:108596. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2020.108596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heidary M. Ghasemi S. Habibi Z. Ansari F. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020;42:1767–1775. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-02902-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aziz A. Bano S. Atia-tul-Wahab Choudhary M. I. Steroids. 2020;154:108467. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2019.108467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin G. D. A. Narvaez J. Marti A. J. Nat. Prod. 2013;76:1966–1969. doi: 10.1021/np400585t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramachandra S. Ramesh V. Krishnamurthy H. Kumar N. Sundaram K. Hardy M. Rao A. Reproduction. 2002;124:301–309. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1240301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walton M. J. Kumar N. Baird D. T. Ludlow H. Anderson R. A. J. Androl. 2007;28:679–688. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.107.002683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke A. Scarth J. Teale P. Pearce C. Hillyer L. Drug Test. Anal. 2011;3:74–87. doi: 10.1002/dta.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens P. J. Devlin F. J. Pan J. J. Chirality. 2008;20:643–663. doi: 10.1002/chir.20477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiberg K. B. Wang Y. Vaccaro P. H. Cheeseman J. R. Trucks G. Frisch M. J. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2004;108:32–38. doi: 10.1021/jp030361b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Berova N. Di Bari L. Pescitelli G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:914–931. doi: 10.1039/B515476F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pescitelli G. Bruhn T. Chirality. 2016;28:466–474. doi: 10.1002/chir.22600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mennucci B. Tomasi J. Cammi R. Cheeseman J. R. Frisch M. J. Devlin F. J. Gabriel S. Stephens P. J. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:6102–6113. doi: 10.1021/jp020124t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Polavarapu P. L. Chirality. 2006;18:348–356. doi: 10.1002/chir.20265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nafie L. A., Vibrational Optical Activity: Principles and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2011 [Google Scholar]
- Wiseman L. R. Goa K. L. Drugs Aging. 1996;9:292–306. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199609040-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Łyczko P. Panek A. Świzdor A. Catalysts. 2020;11:16. doi: 10.3390/catal11010016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqui M. Atia-tul-Wahab Naveed Shaikh N. Baydoun E. Atta-ur-Rahman Choudhary M. I. Phytochem. Lett. 2021;44:137–141. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2021.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mountessou B. Y. G. Mouafon I. L. Maharjan R. Tchamgoue J. Tiani G. L. M. Dibouloul P. Choudhary M. I. Kouam S. F. RSC Adv. 2025;15:25441–25449. doi: 10.1039/D5RA04180E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aksenov A. V. Grishin I. Y. Aksenov D. A. Grishin Y. I. Aksenova I. V. Aksenov N. A. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2024;73:1612–1622. doi: 10.1007/s11172-024-4277-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Crunelli V. Emri Z. Leresche N. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006;6:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wildmann J. Vetter W. Ranalder U. B. Schmidt K. Maurer R. Möhler H. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988;37:3549–3559. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(88)90384-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kristan K. Rižner T. L. Steroid J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012;129:79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nes W. D. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:6423–6451. doi: 10.1021/cr200021m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim S. R. M. Mohamed G. A. Ross S. A. Phytochem. Lett. 2016;15:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2015.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trisuwan K. Khamthong N. Rukachaisirikul V. Phongpaichit S. Preedanon S. Sakayaroj J. J. Nat. Prod. 2010;73:1507–1511. doi: 10.1021/np100282k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kornsakulkarn J. Dolsophon K. Boonyuen N. Boonruangprapa T. Rachtawee P. Prabpai S. Kongsaeree P. Thongpanchang C. Tetrahedron. 2011;67:7540–7547. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.07.078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang C.-X. Li J. Zhang J.-M. Jin X.-J. Yu B. Fang J.-G. Wu Q.-X. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019;67:1839–1846. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b05576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kehelpannala C. Kumar N. S. Jayasinghe L. Araya H. Fujimoto Y. J. Chem. Ecol. 2018;44:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0913-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senatore F. Nunziata A. D’Agostino M. De Feo V. Pharm. Biol. 1999;37:366–368. doi: 10.1076/phbi.37.5.366.6050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Woodhead S. Galeffi C. Bettolo G. B. M. Phytochemistry. 1982;21:455–456. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)95288-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M. J. Kim G. J. Shin M.-S. Moon J. Kim S. Nam J.-W. Kang K. S. Choi H. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:8866. doi: 10.3390/app11198866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun B. Li S. Yang Z.-D. Ma K.-Z. Li Y.-K. Yang X.-Q. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2025;61:164–168. doi: 10.1007/s10600-025-04599-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Groß F. Lewis E. A. Piraee M. Van Pée K.-H. Vining L. C. White R. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:283–286. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)00739-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berg A. Kemami Wangun H. V. Nkengfack A. E. Schlegel B. J. Basic Microbiol. 2004;44:317–319. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200410383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doğan A. Otlu S. Çelebi Ö. Aksu Kiliçle P. Gülmez Sağlam A. Doğan A. N. C. Mutlu N. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2017;41:302–305. doi: 10.3906/vet-1510-24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Singh R. Bansal R. RSC Med. Chem. 2025;16:2902–2918. doi: 10.1039/D5MD00027K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuzminac I. Z. Savić M. P. Ajduković J. J. Nikolić A. R. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2023;23:791–815. doi: 10.2174/1568026623666230126162419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elnaggar M. S. Mostafa N. M. Elissawy A. M. Phutthacharoen K. Eckhardt P. Sandargo B. van Geelen L. Ebada S. S. Opatz T. Singab A. N. B. Kalscheuer R. Fitoterapia. 2024;179:106254. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2024.106254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamokou J. D. D., Mbaveng A. T. and Kuete V., in Medicinal Spices and Vegetables from Africa, Elsevier, 2017, pp. 207–237 [Google Scholar]
- Batista R. De Jesus Silva Júnior A. De Oliveira A. B. Molecules. 2009;14:3037–3072. doi: 10.3390/molecules14083037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douanla P. D. Tabopda T. K. Tchinda A. T. Cieckiewicz E. Frédérich M. Boyom F. F. Tsabang N. Yeboah S. Nkengfack A. E. Tchuendem M. H. K. Phytochemistry. 2015;117:521–526. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sisodia B. S. Negi A. S. Darokar M. P. Dwivedi U. N. Khanuja S. P. S. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012;79:610–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2012.01323.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krug J. C., in Biodiversity of Fungi, Elsevier, 2004, pp. 589–593 [Google Scholar]
- Mountessou B. Y. G. Anoumedem E. G. M. Kemkuignou B. M. Marin-Felix Y. Surup F. Stadler M. Kouam S. F. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2023;19:1555–1561. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.19.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bannwarth C. Ehlert S. Grimme S. J. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15:1652–1671. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pracht P. Grimme S. Bannwarth C. Bohle F. Ehlert S. Feldmann G. Gorges J. Müller M. Neudecker T. Plett C. Spicher S. Steinbach P. Wesołowski P. A. Zeller F. J. Chem. Phys. 2024;160:114110. doi: 10.1063/5.0197592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weigend F. Ahlrichs R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005;7:3297–3305. doi: 10.1039/B508541A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weigend F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006;8:1057–1065. doi: 10.1039/B515623H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimme S. Antony J. Ehrlich S. Krieg H. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;132:154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frisch M. J., Trucks G. W., Schlegel H. B.et al., Gaussian 16, Revision C.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016 [Google Scholar]
- Bruhn T. Schaumlöffel A. Hemberger Y. Bringmann G. Chirality. 2013;25:243–249. doi: 10.1002/chir.22138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallagher N., Savitzky-Golay Smoothing and Differentiation Filter, 2020 [Google Scholar]
- Trager W. Jensen J. B. Science. 1976;193:673–675. doi: 10.1126/science.781840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lambros C. Vanderberg J. P. J. Parasitol. 1979;65:418–420. doi: 10.2307/3280287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirk K. Horner H. A. Elford B. C. Ellory J. C. Newbold C. I. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:3339–3347. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)41868-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smilkstein M. Sriwilaijaroen N. Kelly J. X. Wilairat P. Riscoe M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1803–1806. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1803-1806.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinha S. Batovska D. I. Medhi B. Radotra B. D. Bhalla A. Markova N. Sehgal R. Malar. J. 2019;18:421. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3060-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data related to the chemical structures and spectroscopic analysis of the isolated compounds are available in the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information is available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ra06849a.
