Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1968 Jan;194(1):125–145. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008398

Responses in the dorsal accessory olive of the cat to stimulation of hind limb afferents

D M Armstrong, J C Eccles, R J Harvey, P B C Matthews
PMCID: PMC1365678  PMID: 5639760

Abstract

1. Field potentials and single unit discharges were recorded in the dorsal accessory olive of the cat following stimulation of nerves of the contralateral hind limb.

2. The largest field potentials were evoked when nerves were stimulated with brief trains at 200-300/sec. Responses were sometimes evoked from quadriceps nerve by volleys restricted to low threshold group I afferents, but responses were not usually evoked from other muscle nerves unless both group I and II afferents were excited.

3. The spatial distributions of the field potentials evoked from different nerves were very similar and individual units were made to discharge by stimulation of each of a wide range of nerves including muscle, skin and joint nerves. Single units were also made to discharge by stimulation of both the ipsilateral and the contralateral quadriceps nerve.

4. The latency of the field potentials evoked by stimulation of quadriceps nerve ranged from 14 to 23 msec in different preparations. The latency of responses evoked from various branches of the sciatic nerve was consistently longer and was usually between 20 and 30 msec.

5. The activity was conveyed by a tract which, at the upper lumbar level of the spinal cord, lay in the ventral quadrant ipsilateral to the olive. In the upper cervical region the tract lay close to the ventral surface of the cord. Values between 24 and 30 m/sec were found for the conduction velocity of the tract.

6. An excitatory response in the dorsal accessory olive was followed by a period of about 100 msec during which the amplitude of a second response was reduced.

Full text

PDF
125

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong B. D., Harvey R. J. Responses in the inferior olive to stimulation of the cerebellar and cerebral cortices in the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Dec;187(3):553–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong D. M., Harvey R. J. Responses to a spino-olivo-cerebellar pathway in the cat. J Physiol. 1968 Jan;194(1):147–168. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRADLEY K., ECCLES J. C. Analysis of the fast afferent impulses from thigh muscles. J Physiol. 1953 Dec 29;122(3):462–473. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRODAL A., SCHEIBEL A., SCHEIBEL M., WALBERG F. Areal distribution of axonal and dendritic patterns in inferior olive. J Comp Neurol. 1956 Nov;106(1):21–49. doi: 10.1002/cne.901060103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DI BIAGIO F., GRUNDFEST H. Afferent relations of inferior olivary nucleus. II. Site of relay from hand limb afferents into dorsal spino-olivary tract in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1955 May;18(3):299–304. doi: 10.1152/jn.1955.18.3.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DIBIAGIO F., GRUNDFEST H. Afferent relations of inferior olivary nucleus. IV. Lateral cervical nucleus as site of final relay to inferior olive in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1956 Jan;19(1):10–20. doi: 10.1152/jn.1956.19.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ECCLES J. C., ECCLES R. M., LUNDBERG A. Synaptic actions on motoneurones in relation to the two components of the group I muscle afferent volley. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):527–546. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GRUNDFEST H., CARTER W. B. Afferent relations of inferior olivary nucleus. I. Electrophysiological demonstration of dorsal spino-olivary tract in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1954 Jan;17(1):72–91. doi: 10.1152/jn.1954.17.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grant G., Oscarsson O. Mass discharges evoked in the olivocerebellar tract on stimulation of muscle and skin nerves. Exp Brain Res. 1966;1(4):329–337. doi: 10.1007/BF00237705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUNT C. C., McINTYRE A. K. An analysis of fibre diameter and receptor characteristics of myelinated cutaneous afferent fibres in cat. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:99–112. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUNT C. C., McINTYRE A. K. Characteristics of responses from receptors from the flexor longus digitorum muscle and the adjoining interosseous region of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:74–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUNT C. C. Relation of function to diameter in afferent fibers of muscle nerves. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Sep 20;38(1):117–131. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ito M., Obata K., Ochi R. The origin of cerebellar-induced inhibition of Deiters neurones. II. Temporal correlation between the trans-synaptic activation of Purkinje cells and the inhibition of Dieters neurones. Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(4):350–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00234780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KRIEGER H., GRUNDFEST H. Afferent relations of inferior olivary nucleus. III. Electrophysiological demonstration of a second relay in dorsal spino-olivary pathway in cat. J Neurophysiol. 1956 Jan;19(1):3–9. doi: 10.1152/jn.1956.19.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LAPORTE Y., BESSOU P. Etude des sous-groupes lent et rapide du groupe I (fibres afférentes d'origine musculaire de grand diamètre) chez le chat. J Physiol (Paris) 1957 Nov;49(5):1025–1037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LUNDBERG A., OSCARSSON O. Two ascending spinal pathways in the ventral part of the cord. Acta Physiol Scand. 1962 Mar-Apr;54:270–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1962.tb02351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MORIN F., LAMARCHE G., OSTROWSKI A. Z. Responses of the inferior olive to peripheral stimuli and the spinal pathways involved. Am J Physiol. 1957 May;189(2):401–406. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.189.2.401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mizuno N. An experimental study of the spino-olivary fibers in the rabbit and the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1966 Jun;127(2):267–292. doi: 10.1002/cne.901270209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SCHEIBEL M. E., SCHEIBEL A. B. The inferior olive; a Golgi study. J Comp Neurol. 1955 Feb;102(1):77–131. doi: 10.1002/cne.901020106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SKOGLUND S. Anatomical and physiological studies of knee joint innervation in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1956;36(124):1–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sedgwick E. M., Williams T. D. Responses of single units in the inferior olive to stimulation of the limb nerves, peripheral skin receptors, cerebellum, caudate nucleus and motor cortex. J Physiol. 1967 Apr;189(2):261–279. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES