Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1968 Feb;194(2):337–353. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008412

Thalamic projection of muscle nerve afferents in the cat

A Mallart
PMCID: PMC1365797  PMID: 5639358

Abstract

1. Evoked responses on stimulation of hind- and forelimb muscle nerves have been recorded in the ventro-postero-lateral (VPL) and centre median (CM) nuclei of the thalamus of the cat.

2. The stimulation of hind-limb muscle afferents with increasing strength usually did not evoke a thalamic response, either in the CM or in the VPL, until the threshold for Group III muscle afferents was reached.

3. Short latency potentials were evoked in the VPL on stimulation of low threshold Group I muscle afferents from forelimbs. The projection zone occupies the dorso-medio-rostral part of the nucleus.

4. An attempt was made to locate the medullary relay for forelimb Group I afferents either in the lateral part of the cuneate or in external cuneate.

5. Low threshold afferents from forelimb muscle nerves do not project to the CM. CM responses began to appear only when the threshold for Group II muscle nerve fibres was reached.

6. Group II afferents from hind- or forelimb muscle nerves projecting to the CM are probably not connected to spindle secondary endings.

7. The role played by muscle afferents in the somesthetic mechanisms is briefly discussed.

Full text

PDF
337

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALBE-FESSARD D., ROUGEUL A. Activités d'origine somesthésique évoquées sur le cortex non-spécifique du chat anesthésié au chloralose; rôle du centre médian du thalamus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958 Feb;10(1):131–152. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(58)90110-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albe-Fessard D., Liebeskind J., Lamarre Y. Projection au niveau du cortex somato-moteur du singe d'afférences provenant des récepteurs musculaires. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1965 Nov 8;261(19):3891–3894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albe-Fessard D., Liebeskind J. Origine des messages somato-sensitifs activant les cellules du cortex moteur chez le singe. Exp Brain Res. 1966;1(2):127–146. doi: 10.1007/BF00236866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson S. A., Landgren S., Wolsk D. The thalamic relay and cortical projection of group I muscle afferents from the forelimb of the cat. J Physiol. 1966 Apr;183(3):576–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRINDLEY G. S., MERTON P. A. The absence of position sense in the human eye. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:127–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GAZE R. M., GORDON G. The representation of cutaneous sense in the thalamus of the cat and monkey. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1954;39(4):279–304. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1954.sp001082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GIAQUINTO S., POMPEIANO O., SWETT J. E. EEG AND BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS OF FORE-AND HINDLIMB MUSCULAR AFFERENT VOLLEYS IN UNRESTRAINED CATS. Arch Ital Biol. 1963 Apr 2;101:133–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOLMQVIST B., OSCARSSON O., ROSEN I. Functional organization of the cuneocrebellar tract in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1963 Jun-Jul;58:216–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUNT C. C., McINTYRE A. K. Characteristics of responses from receptors from the flexor longus digitorum muscle and the adjoining interosseous region of the cat. J Physiol. 1960 Aug;153:74–87. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUNT C. C. Relation of function to diameter in afferent fibers of muscle nerves. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Sep 20;38(1):117–131. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LLOYD D. P. C., McINTYRE A. K. Dorsal column conduction of group I muscle afferent impulses and their relay through Clarke's column. J Neurophysiol. 1950 Jan;13(1):39–54. doi: 10.1152/jn.1950.13.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LUNDBERG A., OSCARSSON O. Three ascending spinal pathways in the dorsal part of the lateral funiculus. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Jan;51:1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MALLART A., PETIT D. [Non-specific afferent impulses conducted by the spinal collaterals of the long tracts in the posterior funiculi]. J Physiol (Paris) 1963;55:291–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MALLART A. PROJECTION DES AFF'ERENCES MUSCULAIRES DE LA PATTE ANT'ERIEURE AU NIVEAU DE THALAMUS CHEZ LE CHAT. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1964 Aug 3;259:1215–1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MALLART A. [Data on the types of fibers conducting somatic afferent impulses to the median central nucleus of the thalamus]. J Physiol (Paris) 1961 Mar-Apr;53:422–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MEGIRIAN D., TROTH R. VESTIBULAR AND MUSCLE NERVE CONNECTIONS TO PYRAMIDAL TRACT NEURONS OF CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1964 May;27:481–492. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.3.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MORIN F. A new spinal pathway for cutaneous impulses. Am J Physiol. 1955 Nov;183(2):245–252. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.183.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. MOUNTCASTLE V. B., COVIAN M. R., HARRISON C. R. The central representation of some forms of deep sensibility. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1952;30:339–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. MOUNTCASTLE V. B. Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jul;20(4):408–434. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MOUNTCASTLE V. B., POWELL T. P. Central nervous mechanisms subserving position sense and kinesthesis. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959 Oct;105:173–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oscarsson O., Rosén I. Short-latency projections to the cat's cerebral cortex from skin and muscle afferents in the contralateral forelimb. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(1):164–184. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. PAINTAL A. S. Functional analysis of group III afferent fibres of mammalian muscles. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:250–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PERL E. R. A comparison of monosynaptic and polysynaptic reflex responses from individual flexor motoneurones. J Physiol. 1962 Dec;164:430–449. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. POMPEIANO O., SWETT J. E. Identification of cutaneous and muscular afferent fibers producing EEG synchronization or arousal in normal cats. Arch Ital Biol. 1962;100:343–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. PROVINS K. A. The effect of peripheral nerve block on the appreciation and execution of finger movements. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):55–67. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. RENKIN B. Z., VALLBO A. B. SIMULTANEOUS RESPONSES OF GROUPS I AND II CAT MUSCLE SPINDLE AFFERENTS TO MUSCLE POSITION AND MOVEMENT. J Neurophysiol. 1964 May;27:428–450. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.3.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. REXED B., STROM G. Afferent nervous connexions of the lateral cervical nucleus. Acta Physiol Scand. 1952 Jun 6;25(2-3):219–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1952.tb00874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SWETT J. E., BOURASSA C. M., INOUE S. EFFECTS OF CUTANEOUS AND MUSCLE SENSORY NERVE VOLLEYS IN AWAKE CATS: A STUDY IN PERCEPTION. Science. 1964 Sep 4;145(3636):1071–1073. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. TAUB A., BISHOP P. O. THE SPINOCERVICAL TRACT: DORSAL COLUMN LINKAGE, CONDUCTION VELOCITY, PRIMARY AFFERENT SPECTRUM. Exp Neurol. 1965 Sep;13:1–21. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(65)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES