Abstract
Background
Loss to follow-up (LTFU) remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). There is paucity of information on incidence and predictors of LTFU in the Metekel zone, which limits the ability to monitor the effectiveness intervention.
Objective
To assess the incidence and identify the predictors of loss to follow-up among adult people living with HIV at public health facilities in the Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 540 people living with HIV who enrolled in ART from June 28, 2017, to June 27, 2022, in the Metekel Zone. The study was conducted in one public hospital and eight public health centers. Patient records were randomly selected and extracted using a structured checklist. The Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the independent predictors of LTFU. The strength of the association was measured using adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Among 540 participants, 304 (56.3%) were females and the mean (SD) age participants was 35.7(12.41) years. The overall LTFU incidence rate was 15.12 (95% CI: 12.9–17.6) per 100 person-years. Tuberculosis infection at baseline (AHR: 2.12 95% CI: 1.33 − 3.38), underweight at ART initiation (AHR: 5.36, 95% CI: 3.46–8.31), poor ART adherence (AHR: 2.14, 95% CI: (1.32 − 3.46), and most recent viral load > 1000 copies/mL (AHR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.55 − 4.72) were identified significant predictors of LTFU.
Conclusion
The observed LTFU incidence rate among adults receiving ART in Metekel Zone was notably higher than documented in prior studies. Hence, enhanced monitoring and support strategies should target patients with baseline tuberculosis infection, poor treatment adherence, underweight at baseline, and high viral load, particularly within the first year of treatment initiation. In addition, effective strategies to improve patient retention in HIV care should be designed considering the identified risk factors.
Keywords: Antiretroviral therapy, HIV, Incidence, Loss to follow-up, Northwest Ethiopia, Predictors
Introduction
Retention in HIV care is a critical component of successful antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) in antiretroviral therapy (ART) is an administrative classification used when a patient has not been reported as dead or transferred out and has not attended a clinic or collected ART medications for three consecutive months or more after the last scheduled appointment [1]. Loss to follow-up remains a major challenge in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care, undermining efforts to improve treatment outcomes, reduce new infections, and address health inequities [2].
The rapid scale-up of ART has significantly improved the survival and quality of life among people living with HIV (PLWH) by reducing HIV-related mortality [3]. As ART coverage has expanded, particularly in resource-limited settings, the number of individuals receiving treatment has increased markedly [4]. However, retention in care remains a critical gap across the HIV treatment cascade, with attrition occurring at multiple stages of care [5, 6].
The burden of LTFU varies across geographic settings. Evidence from Asian countries reports LTFU levels of approximately 9% [6], while higher estimates have been observed in sub-Saharan Africa, with pooled proportions around 15.07% [7], and even higher levels reported in specific countries such as Nigeria (23.9%) [8]. In Ethiopia, incidence estimates show variation ranging from 3.7 [9] to 26.6 per 100 person-years [5]. Overall, these variations reflect substantial heterogeneity in LTFU across contexts, likely driven by variations in health system performance, patient characteristics, and service delivery models.
Loss to follow-up has serious clinical and public health consequences. It reduces the immunological and survival benefits of ART and increases the risk of AIDS-related morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization. It also associated with poor adherence, drug toxicity, treatment failure, and development of drug resistance [10, 11]. In addition, LTFU reverses the preventive benefits of ART by increasing the risk of HIV transmission and hindering progress toward the global goal of ending the HIV pandemic [12]. It also represents an inefficient use of limited health system resources [13, 14].
Studies have identified determinants of LTFU, including socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, educational status, marital status, occupational status, residence [5, 10, 15]; clinical and treatment-related factors such as cluster of differentiation (CD4) count, viral load, hemoglobin, disease stage, functional status, ART regimen, adherence, nutritional status, and opportunistic infections [13, 16–18]; and psychosocial and health system-related factors such as stigma and discrimination, non-disclosure of HIV status, lack of treatment supporters, long waiting times, and distance to health facilities [16–19]. However, these findings remain inconsistent across settings.
In Ethiopia, evidence on LTFU is highly variable, and most studies based on single-facility data, limiting generalizability [10–21]. In addition, contextual factors such as conflict, insecurity, and pastoralist mobility in regions like Benishangul Gumuz may further complicate retention in care by disrupting service delivery, limiting access to health facilities, and increasing patient movement [21]. These factors are likely to influence both the incidence and predictors of LTFU, yet they remain insufficiently explored in multi-facility studies.
Therefore, this study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of LTFU among adult PLWH receiving ART at public health facilities in the Metekel Zone. By incorporating data from multiple facilities in a conflict-affected and pastoralist setting, the study provides more contextually relevant evidence on retention challenges. The findings are expected to inform policymakers and program implementers in designing targeted, context-specific, and cost-effective interventions to improve ART retention and treatment outcomes.
Methods
Study design, period and setting
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in public health facilities in the Metekel Zone of Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State, Ethiopia. Benishangul-Gumuz Regional State is administratively divided into three administrative zones, one of which is Metekel zone. The Metekel Zone shares its border with Kamashi to the south and southwest, Sudan to the west, and the Amhara region to the north and east. The zone’s administrative center, Gelgel Belles, located approximately 540 km northwest of Addis Ababa. Metekel zone is administratively structured into seven districts and one town administration. According to the 2007 Ethiopian national census, the zone had a total population of 484,118, of whom 256,030 were males. The majority of the populations (278,752) resides in rural areas and primarily depends on agriculture for their livelihood.
The Metekel zone has three hospitals (one general hospital and two primary hospitals), 21 health centers, and 168 health posts. ART services are delivered by one general hospital and eight health centers based on the revised 2018 national guidelines. At the time of study, 3,187 individuals were actively receiving ART services based on the report Zonal Health Office, with adults comprising 96% patients. Charts of adults registered in ART were abstracted between June 20, 2022, and July 5, 2022. The study focused on data from June 28, 2017, to June 27, 2022, a period during which the updated standardized formats, documentation, and recording systems were fully and consistently implemented.
To enhance retention in care, the ART program employs several patient tracing and re-engagement mechanisms, including telephone follow-up by case managers and adherence supporters, home visits by community adherence supporters and networks of PLWH, appointment calendar or reminder systems, and mother support groups for pregnant women. During ART initiation, patients’ contact information, including residential address, telephone number, and treatment supporter details, is routinely collected to facilitate tracing of missed appointments.
Population
The source population consisted of all PLWH aged 15 years and older who received HIV care at public health facilities in Metekel Zone. The study population comprised of a randomly selected PLWH aged 15 years and older who were on HIV care at selected public health facilities between June 28, 2017, and June 27, 2022.
Eligibility criteria
The study included all PLWH aged 15 years and older who had at least one month of follow-up after initiating ART between June 28, 2017, and June 27, 2022. Patients with incomplete baseline and/or follow-up data, particularly on socio-demographic variables such as the date of ART initiation and/or the date of the last visit were excluded. Similarly, patients transferred from other health facilities were excluded if their record lacked complete baseline and follow-up information.
Sample size determination and sampling procedures
The sample size was determined using STATA version 15, considering the following assumptions: a 5% level of significance, 80% statistical power, probability of an event of 0.116, an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.09 for WHO clinical stage IV from previous study [21], and a 10% for potential withdrawals. Based on these parameters, the final calculated sample size was 554.
At the time of the study, one hospital and eight health centers were providing HIV care services in Metekel Zone. Of these facilities, Pawi General Hospital was included purposively because of its high patient load, while three health centers, namely Debati Health Center, Gilgel Belles Health Center, and Manbuk Health Center were selected randomly.
A total of 716 PLWH were enrolled in ART care in the selected facilities during the study period, of which 471 were from Pawi General Hospital, 76 from Debati Health Center, 92 from Gilgel Belles Health Center, and 78 from Manbuk Health Center. A separate sampling frame was prepared for each selected health facility using the unique identification numbers of all PLWH enrolled in ART from June 28, 2017, to June 27, 2022. The final sample size of 554 was then allocated proportionally to each facility based on the number of PLWH enrolled in ART. Finally, study participants were selected from each facility using a simple random sampling technique in Microsoft Excel by applying the random number function (RAND). Accordingly, 364 participants were selected from Pawi General Hospital, 59 from Debati Health Center, 71 from Gilgel Belles Health Center, and 60 from Manbuk Health Center.
Data collection procedures
The data abstraction tool was developed by adapting content from standardized ART intake, registration, and follow-up forms currently in use at ART clinics [22], as well as through review of relevant literatures [5, 10, 20, 23]. Data sources included patient intake forms, follow-up cards, ART registers, and the electronic database. Additional clinical documents such as laboratory test results were used to extract the CD4 cell and viral load counts. Individual patient cards or electronic records were identified using District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) identification numbers. Data collection was conducted by one health officer and three clinical nurses using standardized abstraction tool.
Study variables and operational definitions
The outcome variable of this study was LTFU, defined as a patient missing ART refills for three months or more from their last scheduled visit, without being recorded as ‘dead’ or ‘transferred out in their medical chart (1). Patients who died, transferred out, or remained in care at the end of the study period were considered censored. Participants were followed from ART initiation until the first occurrence of LTFU or a censoring event. Individuals who subsequently re-engaged in care after an LTFU episode were not followed further, as only the first LTFU event was considered in the survival analysis.
The predictor variables were baseline socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, marital status, educational level, religious, place of residence, occupational, presence of a primary caregiver, distance from health facilities, and availability of registered phone number). Clinical baseline variables included WHO clinical stage, functional status, CD4 cell count, viral load, HIV disclosure status, active tuberculosis (TB). Follow-up clinical and treatment-related factors included presence of opportunistic infections (OIs), duration of follow-up, initiation of isoniazid (INH) and cotrimoxazole preventive therapy (CPT), body mass index (BMI), type of ART regimen, presence of anemia, and level of adherence to ART.
Functional status was classified according to national ART guidelines: working–able to carry out routine tasks both at home and outside; bedridden–unable to perform activities for a daily living; ambulatory–able to perform some daily tasks [24]. Self-reported ART adherence was measured by ART clinicians during a patients’ routine follow-up appointment based on missed doses and categorized as follows: good adherence (≥ 95%)–missing fewer than 3 doses out of 30 or fewer than 4 doses out of 60; fair adherence (85 – <95%)–missing 3–5 doses out of 30 or 4–9 out of 60; and poor adherence (< 85%)–missing more than 6 doses out of 30 or missing more than 9 out of 60 [25]. A patient was classified as having disclosure HIV status if he/she informed at least one person, other than healthcare providers, about his/her HIV status [4].
Data processing and analysis
Data were checked for completeness and consistency, entered into Epi Data Manager 4.4, and subsequently exported to STATA version 15 for analysis. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and mean with standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables or median with interquartile range for skewed continuous variables.
Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were employed to estimate survival time and to compare survival probabilities across different variable categories. The Log-rank test (Mantel-Cox test) was used to determine statistically significant difference in survival rate between categories of variables. To identify the predictors of LTFU among patients receiving ART, a Cox proportional hazard model was performed. Variables with a p value of less than 0.25 in the bivariable Cox regression were included in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. The strength of the association was measured using adjusted hazard ratio (AHRs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The proportional hazards assumption of the model was assessed using the global Schoenfeld residual test and was satisfied (p = 0.273).
Data quality management
Data quality was maintained through careful development of the data abstraction tool, and selection of data collectors and supervisors based on their prior experience. A pretest was conducted on 5% of patient charts (27 charts) at Pawi general Hospital to evaluate the clarity and consistency of the tool, and the necessary modifications were made. Additionally, one-day training was provided for data collectors and supervisors on data collection tool and data collection procedures. Supervisors and the principal investigator monitored the data collection process daily.
Ethical consideration
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jimma University Institute of Health (JUIH) with reference number IHRPEJ1060/22. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the Metekel Zone Health Department and the heads of selected health facilities. Since the study used secondary data from patient medical charts, informed consent was waived. The study purpose was explained to coordinators and ART staff at health facilities prior to data collection. A unique identification number was assigned for each participant after data extraction to ensure confidentiality.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
A total of 554 records of PLWH receiving ART were reviewed, of which 540 met eligibility criteria, yielding a response rate of 97.5%. The mean age of the participants was 35.7 (SD = 12.41) years, with 29.3% falling within the 25–34 age group. Females accounted for 56.3% of the cohort, and 79.3% resided in rural areas. Concerning educational attainment, 227 (42%), had completed primary school, and more than half (57.6%) were married. Most of the patients were farmers (45.7%), and a significant majority (88.5%) had disclosed their HIV status. The majority (94%) of participants had mobile phone. Most of participants (68.7%) traveled over five kilometers the health facility, and 96.4% had caregiver (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline socio-demographic characteristics of PLWH on ART at public health facilities in Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
| Variables | Categories | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18–24 years | 122 | 22.6 |
| 25–34 years | 158 | 29.7 | |
| 35–44 years | 130 | 24.1 | |
| ≥ 45 years | 130 | 24.1 | |
| Sex | Male | 236 | 43.7 |
| Female | 304 | 56.3 | |
| Residence | Urban | 428 | 79.3 |
| Rural | 112 | 20.7 | |
| Marital status | Single | 152 | 28.1 |
| Married | 311 | 57.6 | |
| Divorced | 59 | 10.9 | |
| Widowed | 7 | 1.3 | |
| Separated | 11 | 2 | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 347 | 64.3 |
| Muslim | 140 | 25.9 | |
| Protestant | 40 | 7.4 | |
| Catholic | 13 | 2.4 | |
| Level of education | No education | 161 | 29.8 |
| Primary | 227 | 42 | |
| Secondary | 134 | 24.8 | |
| Tertiary | 18 | 3.3 | |
| Distance of ART clinic | < 5 KM | 169 | 31.3 |
| ≥ 5 KM | 371 | 68.7 | |
| HIV disclosure status | Disclosed | 478 | 88.5 |
| Not disclosed | 371 | 68.7 | |
| Occupational status | Driver | 15 | 2.78 |
| Daily laborer | 49 | 9.1 | |
| Merchant | 110 | 20.4 | |
| Farmer | 247 | 45.7 | |
| Government | 62 | 11.5 | |
| Self employed | 38 | 7 | |
| Othersa | 19 | 3.5 | |
| Partner HIV status | Known | 475 | 87.96 |
| Unknown | 65 | 12.04 | |
| Availability of care giver | Yes | 521 | 96.4 |
| No | 19 | 3.6 | |
| Telephone contact | Yes | 508 | 94 |
| No | 32 | 6 |
ahouse wife, soldiers, and sex-workers
Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of PLWH on ART
Among participants, 315 (58.3%) were linked to ART care from voluntary counseling and testing (VCT). The majority (83.7%) started ART with a working functional status. One-quarter (25%) were categorized at WHO clinical stage III or IV. Regarding immunological status, 15.4% of participants had a most recent CD4 count below cells/mL. In terms of hemoglobin profile, 490 individuals (90.7%) initiated ART with hemoglobin levels above 10 g/dL. At baseline, 43 (7.9%) of participants had tuberculosis, and 35.4% had an opportunistic infections (OIs). Among those with OIs, pneumonia was most common (38.5%), followed by TB (35.5%) and herpes zoster (10.7%) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Baseline clinical and laboratory related characteristics of PLWH on ART at public health facilities in the Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
| Variables | Categories | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| ART linkage point | VCT | 315 | 58.3 |
| OPD | 117 | 21.7 | |
| IPD | 9 | 1.7 | |
| MCH | 36 | 6.7 | |
| Others | 63 | 11.7 | |
| Recent CD4 count | < 350 cells/ml | 83 | 15.4 |
| ≥ 350 cells/ml | 457 | 84.6 | |
| Baseline functional status | Functional | 452 | 83.7 |
| Ambulatory | 78 | 14.4 | |
| Bedridden | 10 | 1.8 | |
| WHO clinical stage at baseline | Stage I | 394 | 72.96 |
| Stage II | 8 | 1.48 | |
| Stage III | 100 | 18.52 | |
| Stage IV | 38 | 7.04 | |
| Presence of opportunistic infection | Yes | 191 | 35.4 |
| No | 349 | 64.6 | |
| TB at baseline | Yes | 43 | 7.96 |
| No | 497 | 92.4 | |
| History of TB treatment | Yes | 45 | 8.33 |
| No | 495 | 91.67 | |
| Viral load count at 6 month | Not eligible/<6month | 89 | 16.4 |
| ≤ 1000 copies/mL | 423 | 78.3 | |
| > 1000 copies/mL | 28 | 5.2 | |
| Baseline Hemoglobin | ≤ 10 g/dL | 50 | 9.3 |
| > 10 g/dL | 490 | 90.7 |
Follow-up clinical and ART treatment-related characteristics of participants
Among the participants, 59.8% were on the TDF-3TC-EFV (1e) regimen, and 112 (20.7%) subsequently switched from their initial regimen. The main reasons for changing regimens were availability of new drugs, adverse drug reactions, and virologic failure. Regarding ART adherence, 23 participants (4.26%) had fair adherence, while 39 participants (7.22%) had poor adherence. At baseline, 243 participants (45%) were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), and 60% had utilized the appointment spacing model (ASM) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Follow-up and ART treatment-related characteristics of PLWH on ART at public health facilities in the Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
| Variables | Categories | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPT treatment at baseline | Yes | 330 | 61.1 |
| No | 210 | 38.9 | |
| Body mass index | < 18.5 kg/m2 | 243 | 45 |
| ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 | 297 | 55 | |
|
Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis at baseline |
Yes | 338 | 62.6 |
| No | 202 | 37.4 | |
| Initial ART regimen | TDF+3TC + EFV | 323 | 59.81 |
| AZT+3TC + EFV | 5 | 0.93 | |
| TDF+3TC + DTG | 212 | 39.6 | |
| Experience of regimen change | Yes | 112 | 20.7 |
| No | 428 | 79.2 | |
| Reason for change (n = 112) | Due to toxicity | 12 | 10.7 |
| Virology failure | 11 | 9.8 | |
| New drug | 89 | 79.4 | |
| Adherence to ART | Good | 478 | 88.52 |
| Fair | 23 | 4.26 | |
| Poor | 39 | 7.22 | |
| Appointment spacing model | Yes | 324 | 60 |
| No | 216 | 40 |
Incidence rate of loss to follow-up
A cohort of 540 PLWH receiving ART contributed a total of 1,037.0 person-years of follow-up, with a median follow-up period of 1.72 years (IQR = 0.87–2.84). At the end of the follow-up period, 157 patients (29.1%; 95% CI: 25.38–33.06) were classified as LTFU. The overall incidence density rate of LTFU was 15.12 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 12.76–17.49). Incidence rates of LTFU varied by duration of treatment, with highest rate observed during the first year: 17.76 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 14.22–22.14), followed by 16.90 (95% CI: 12.84–22.13) in the second year, 9.6 (95% CI: 5.92–15.50) in the third year, and 6.42 (95% CI: 2.62–15.14) in the fourth year. The rate increased in the fifth year, reaching 9.74 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 2.42–38.91).
The incidence of LTFU was slightly higher among females (15.72 per 100 person-years) compared to males (14.41 per 100 person-years). Similarly, a higher incidence was observed among rural residents compared to urban residents (18.57 vs. 14.25 per 100 person-years). However, there was no meaningful variation in the incidence of LTFU across age groups. Incidence of LTF was higher among patients with secondary educational status (17.80 per 100 person-years), without caregiver (34.20 100 person-years) and no telephone contact 25.50 per 100 person-years) (Table 4).
Table 4.
Incidence of loss to follow-up by selected sociodemographic charactersitics among PLWH enrolled to ART clinic at public health facilities in Metekel zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
| Variable | Category | Events (LTFU) | Person-years | Incidence rate per 100 person-years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 68 | 472.0 | 14.41 |
| Female | 89 | 566.0 | 15.72 | |
| Age group | 15–24 | 35 | 222.0 | 15.77 |
| 25–34 | 49 | 310.0 | 15.81 | |
| 34–44 | 36 | 255.0 | 14.12 | |
| ≥ 45 | 37 | 251.0 | 14.74 | |
| Residence | Urban | 118 | 828.0 | 14.25 |
| Rural | 39 | 210.0 | 18.57 | |
| Education | No education | 40 | 314.0 | 12.70 |
| Primary | 71 | 443.0 | 16.00 | |
| Secondary | 44 | 247.0 | 17.80 | |
| Tertiary | 2 | 33.7 | 5.94 | |
| Care/support | Yes | 147 | 1009.0 | 14.60 |
| No | 10 | 29.3 | 34.20 | |
| Telephone contact | Yes | 137 | 960.0 | 14.30 |
| No | 20 | 78.5 | 25.50 |
Kaplan–Meir survival analysis showed that most of LTFU events occurred within the earlier years following ART initiation, with a marked declined in losses in later years (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the loss to follow-up among PLWH enrolled to ART care at public health facilities in Metekel zone, Northwest Ethiopia from 2017–2022
The incidence of LTFU had shown differences with having TB at baseline. The incidence of LTFU among participants with TB at baseline was higher than the respondents with no TB at baseline (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

The Kaplan–Meier estimate of the loss to follow-up by TB at baseline among PLWH enrolled to ART clinic at public health facilities in Metekel zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
Figure 3 presented the probability of LTFU among participants with sub-optimal status of fair and poor adherence was higher than the participants with good adherence (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Kaplan–Meier estimates of loss to follow-up by adherence level among PLWH on attending the ART clinic at public health facilities in Metekel zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
Predictors of loss to follow-up from ART
Both bivariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of LTFU. In bivariable analysis, variables with p-value < 0.25, including residence, disclosure status, partner’s HIV status, presence of caregiver, telephone contact, distance from health facility, baseline OIs and TB, history of TB treatment, taking of cotrimoxazole preventive therapy at baseline, treatment adherence, body mass index (BMI), and recent CD4 and viral load status were identified as candidate variables for inclusion the multivariable model. After adjusting for potential confounders, the predictors of LTFU were baseline tuberculosis (AHR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.33 − 3.38), poor treatment adherence (AHR = 2.14; 95% CI: 1.32–3.46), being underweight at baseline (AHR = 5.36; 95% CI: 3.46–8.31), and elevated recent viral load (≥ 1000 copies/mL) (AHR = 2.71; 95% CI: 1.55 − 4.72) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Bivariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of predictors of LTFU among PLWH receiving ART at public health facilities in the Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022
| Factors | Category | Outcome | cHR (95% CI) | aHR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTFU, (157) | Censored, (383) | |||||
| Residence | Urban | 118 | 310 | 1 | 1 | |
| Rural | 39 | 73 | 1.30(0.90–1.87) | 1.23(0.82–1.83) | 0.30 | |
| Disclosure status | Disclosed | 130 | 348 | 1 | 1 | |
| Not disclosed | 27 | 35 | 1.77(1.16–2.68) | 1.40(0.85–2.30) | 0.18 | |
| Partner HIV status | Known | 132 | 343 | 1 | 1 | |
| Unknown | 25 | 40 | 1.59(1.03–2.44) | 1.66(0.98–2.89) | 0.06 | |
| Presence of care giver | Yes | 147 | 374 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 10 | 9 | 2.15(1.13–4.09) | 1.04(0.51–2.13) | 0.89 | |
| Telephone contact | Yes | 137 | 364 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 20 | 19 | 1.78(1.11–2.84) | 1.15(0.67–1.99) | 0.60 | |
| Distance from health facility | < 5 KM | 35 | 134 | 1 | 1 | |
| ≥ 5KM | 122 | 249 | 1.67(1.15–2.44) | 1.14(0.76–1.70) | 0.51 | |
| OIs at baseline | Yes | 70 | 121 | 1.44(1.05–1.98) | 1.40(0.95–2.05) | 0.08 |
| No | 87 | 262 | 1 | 1 | ||
| TB at baseline | Yes | 26 | 17 | 2.94(1.93–4.49) | 2.12(1.33–3.38) | < 0.001* |
| No | 131 | 366 | 1 | 1 | ||
| History of TB treatment | Yes | 36 | 21 | 2.50(1.65–3.79) | 1.44(0.91–2.29) | 0.11 |
| No | 121 | 362 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Baseline CPT treatment | Yes | 76 | 262 | 1 | 1 | |
| No | 81 | 121 | 2.15(1.57–2.95) | 1.27(0.88–1.82) | 0.19 | |
| Adherence status | Good | 126 | 352 | 1 | 1 | |
| Fair | 8 | 15 | 1.64(0.80–3.35) | 1.40(0.66–2.97) | 0.38 | |
| poor | 23 | 16 | 3.05(1.95–4.77) | 2.14(1.32–3.46) | 0.02* | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | < 18.5 | 129 | 114 | 7.40(4.90–11.1) | 5.36(3.46–8.31) | < 0.001* |
| >=18.5 | 28 | 269 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Recent CD4 (cells/mm) | < 350 | 35 | 48 | 1.96(1.34–2.86) | 1.26(0.84–1.89) | 0.25 |
| ≥ 350 | 122 | 335 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Recent viral load (copies/mL) | < 1000 | 138 | 374 | 1 | 1 | |
| ≥ 1000 | 19 | 9 | 4.06(2.51–6.58) | 2.71(1.55–4.72) | < 0.001* | |
1: reference category; * P value < 0.05
Discussion
Decentralized care and widespread of ART access greatly increased treatment availability, yet LTFU remains the major public health issue in HIV care. In this study, we assessed the incidence and predictors of LTFU among PLWH on ART at public health facilities in Metekel Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. The overall incidence of LTFU was 15.1 per 100 person-years. Presence of tuberculosis infection at baseline, poor treatment adherence, underweight, and elevated recent viral load (≥ 1000 copies/mL) were significant predictors of LTFU.
The observed incidence of LTFU in this study aligns with the prior studies conducted in Ethiopia and other settings [4, 10, 20, 26]. This high incidence may be attributed to the long distance from the health facility. As reported in Tables 5 and 122 (77.70%) of the LTFU participants travelled more than five kilometers to access healthcare services. Moreover, rural residence, lack of social support and absence of telephone contact may have contributed to the high incidence of the LTFU. In addition, contextual factors such as internal conflicts and pastoralist mobility may also have contributed for the observed high incidence. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital (12.26 per 100 PY) [10], Pawi general hospital, Northwest Ethiopia (11.6 per 100 PY) [21], Bahir Dar city, Northern Ethiopia (15 per 100 PY) [27]. The high incidence underscores ongoing challenges related to patient retention despite decentralization of the service.
In addition, the finding revealed a pronounced pattern of LTFU, with the highest incidence occurring during the first year of ART initiation (17.8 per100 person-years). Early LTFU may reflect initial adverse effects, stigma encounter during the early disclosure or inadequate patient preparation at ART initiation. It highlights the need for context-specific interventions to prevent early LTFU.
On the other hand, the current incidence of LTFU is notably higher than studies conducted in Arba Minch general hospital (5.3 per 100 PY) [28], University of Gondar Comprehensive hospital (10.90 per 100 PY) [4], Debre Markos referral hospital 3.7 per 100 PY) [9], Woldia, Northeast Ethiopia [29] and Agaro town, Southwest Ethiopia (4.7 per 100 PY) [30]. This discrepancy might be due to several contextual factors. First, the Meketel Zone has been affected by repeated unrest and is considered a war prone-region. Ongoing insecurity and high levels of internal displacement likely disrupted health seeking-behavior, ART continuity, and the actual reporting of death versus LTFU. Second, it is possible that some patients transferred to other facilities without notifying the original care provider, leading to their misclassification as lost to follow-up. Third, as a predominantly pastoralist region, Metekel has considerable population movement and long travel distances to facilities, which are known predictors of higher LTFU rates [31, 32]. Finally, the disruption of public health services due to COVID-19 pandemic in the Metekel Zone during 2020–2021 may have contributed to the observed high incidence of attrition during this period.
In contrast, the current finding is lower than those reported in Jigjiga town, Eastern Ethiopia (26.6%) [5], sub-Saharan Africa (24.6%) [33], 26.7 per 100 person-years in Uganda, and 23.9% in Nigeria [23, 34]. This discrepancy may be attributed to the recent rapid scale-up and accessibility of effective antiretroviral therapy. Additionally, the difference in sample size, duration of follow-up, and the sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants might contribute for this variation. Furthermore, the low rate observed in this study might be influenced by the implementation of the “test and start” strategy introduced in Ethiopia in 2016 [25]. This finding highlights the critical need for close monitoring PLWH, particularly during the first six months following ART initiation.
In this study, patients who had TB infection at baseline had a 2.12-fold higher hazard LTFU compared to those without TB at baseline. This finding aligns with previous studies conducted in Axum, Ethiopia [35], and sub-Saharan Africa [36]. A possible explanation is that TB/HIV co-infected patients often face overlapping drug toxicities due to the use of multiple medications. Adverse reactions to antiretroviral therapy are common, and there are significant overlaps in the toxicity profiles of the first-line anti-tuberculosis and antiretroviral drugs [37, 38]. Additionally, TB/HIV co-infected patients face a high pill burden, which can challenges adherence to treatment. Conversely, a study from Indonesia reported no significant association between TB infection and LTFU after ART initiation [39], possible due to stronger implementation of the TB-HIV collaborative programs and more consistent monitoring of co-infected patients. This finding highlights the importance of baseline TB screening, close monitoring for drug-related side effects, and comprehensive counseling for patients starting ART.
This study also revealed that undernourished patients with a BMI below 18.5 kg/m2 had a 5.36 times hazard of LTFU compared those with a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or higher. This result is consistent with studies conducted in southern Ethiopia, Northwest Ethiopia and Malawi [10, 31, 40]. The increased risk of LFTU among undernourished patients may be attributed to the complex interplay between HIV infection and nutritional status. HIV significantly compromises nutritional status through multiple pathways: it suppresses appetite, impairs nutrient absorption, increased the body’s energy requirements, and increases vulnerability to opportunistic infections [41]. These effects can weaken patients physically and mentally, making it difficult for them to maintain regular clinic visits and adhere to lifelong treatment regimens. Additionally, malnutrition is often a proxy indicator for poverty and food insecurity, which may further contribute to poor retention in care due to transportation challenges or competing survival priorities. Moreover, the increased risk of undiagnosed tuberculosis and mortality may account for the greater loss to follow-up observed among individuals with low BMI, given that undernutrition is a recognized risk factor for both outcomes [42, 43]. This finding underscores the critical need for routine nutritional screening and support as an integral part of ART services. Implementing regular nutritional assessments, providing therapeutic and supplementary feeding programs, and linking patients to social support systems are essential strategies for improving retention and treatment outcomes among undernourished PLWH.
In line with previous studies [3, 40], 44– [29], patients with poor adherence had a 2.14-times higher hazards of LTFU compared to those with good adherence. Adherence to ART is a cornerstone of successful HIV treatment, as sustained adherence is essential for achieving viral suppression, preventing drug resistance, and maintaining long-term engagement in care [46, 47]. Patients with poor adherence may be more likely to miss clinic appointments and attend follow-up visits irregularly, thereby reducing opportunities to receive adherence counseling, treatment support, and reinforcement of positive health behaviors [48]. Consequently, they may be less likely to develop the treatment literacy and self-efficacy required for sustained treatment engagement. Evidences suggest that treatment literacy and self-management skills improve through continuous interaction with healthcare providers and accumulated treatment experience, which may explain why patients with limited treatment experience are particularly vulnerable to poor adherence and subsequent disengagement from care [49, 50].
Furthermore, inadequate adherence can result in insufficient drug exposure, viral replication, virologic failure, and disease progression, all of which may increase the risk of disengagement from care and eventual LTFU [46, 51]. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at improving retention should address both patient-level and health system-level barriers through strengthened adherence counseling, early identification of missed appointments, and continuous patient education. Given that sustained adherence is a primary determinant of viral suppression, the observed association between poor adherence and LTFU may also help explain the increased risk of LTFU among patients with viral non-suppression observed in this study.
The study revealed that viral suppression level was a significant predictor of loss to follow-up from HIV care. Patients with a recent viral load greater than 1000 copies/mL had a 2.71-fold higher hazard of loss to follow-up compared to those with viral load ≤ 1000 copies/mL, after adjusting for confounders. This finding is in line with studies conducted in Ethiopia [10, 29] and Asia [52] that reported a strong association between viral suppression and continued engagement in HIV care. It is well-known fact that viral suppression is a key indicator of treatment success and effective ART adherence, whereas viral non-suppression often reflects underlying challenges such as poor adherence, treatment fatigue, psychosocial barriers, or treatment failure [53, 54]. Patients with unsuppressed viral loads are at increased risk of immunologic decline, advanced HIV disease, and opportunistic infections, which may contribute to worsening health status, and eventual disengagement from care [55]. However, the association between non-suppressed viral loads and LTFU is most probably bi-directional. While viral non-suppression may increase vulnerability to treatment interruption through disease progression and poor clinical outcomes, interruptions in ART adherence and clinic attendance may lead to viral rebound and subsequent non-suppression [54, 56]. Thus, viral non-suppression may serve both as a consequence of suboptimal retention and as a predictor of future disengagement from care. This finding contributes to the growing body of evidence by highlighting the dynamic interplay between virologic outcomes and retention in care within decentralized ART programs. It underscores the importance of strengthening enhanced adherence support (EAS), timely viral load monitoring, and targeted retention strategies for patients with unsuppressed viral loads. Expanding access to viral load testing and ensuring prompt management of viral non-suppression may improve both treatment outcomes and long-term retention in HIV care.
Strengths and limitations
The strength of this study is that it was conducted after the implementation of the updated guidelines, which indicate the status of retention on ART after the guidelines. The study also included multicenter facilities that provide ART service for PLWH. Moreover, the study included viral load, which is a key indicator for ensuring adherence and viral suppression can be considered strength.
However, the results should be interpreted with caution in light of several limitations. The retrospective nature of the study required reliance on secondary data, and 14 records with incomplete data were excluded from the analysis, which may resulted in misclassification of LTFU status and introduced selection bias. Furthermore, some exposure variables may have changed over time, but only the recorded values available in the medical charts were analyzed, potentially leading to exposure misclassification. Adherence to ART was measured using self-reported pill counts, which may have led to biased estimates of adherence due to social desirability bias among patients. In addition, psychosocial factors such as HIV-related stigma and discrimination, depression, substance use, perceived health status and opting for traditional medicine were not assessed. Moreover, the study did not consider system-level factors such as geographic and transportation cost, treatment disruption, and satisfaction of patients with care provision.
Conclusion
The incidence of LTFU among PLWH receiving ART was considerably high, with most LTFU occurring within the first year of ART initiation. Patients at higher risk of LFTU include those with baseline TB infection, undernutrition, poor ART adherence, and elevated recent viral load.
These findings indicate that LTFU is a multifactorial problem driven by clinical, behavioral, and health-system factors, particularly during the early phase of treatment when patients are still adapting to long-term care. Therefore, program implementers and healthcare providers should prioritize early and targeted interventions for high-risk patients. Strengthening TB–HIV integrated care is essential to ensure early detection and coordinated management of co-infected patients. Nutritional assessment and support programs should be incorporated into routine HIV care to address undernutrition among vulnerable clients. In addition, adherence monitoring should go beyond self-reported measures by incorporating objective approaches such as pharmacy refill tracking, appointment-keeping records, and, where feasible, digital adherence tools. Differentiated service delivery models, including community ART delivery, multi-month dispensing, and flexible appointment spacing, should be scaled up to improve retention, particularly for stable patients. Special attention should also be given to rural residents and mobile populations through tailored follow-up mechanisms, outreach services, and strengthened patient tracking systems.
Policy makers should emphasize expanding decentralized HIV services and ensuring universal access to viral load testing and integrated chronic care, as these are critical to improving retention outcomes.
Future research should examine contextual and psychosocial determinants of LTFU, including social support, mental health, substance use, and mobility, and evaluate the effectiveness of differentiated service delivery models in similar settings. In addition, conducting prospective study is recommended to better establish temporal relationships and casual pathways.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the data collectors and study participants.
Abbreviations
- AIDS
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- aHR
Adjusted hazard ratio
- ART
Antiretroviral therapy
- CD4
Cluster of differentiation
- CI
Confidence interval
- cHR
Crude hazard ratio
- CPT
Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis therapy
- HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
- IPD
Inpatient department
- LTFU
Loss to follow-up
- OIs
opportunistic infections
- OPD
outpatient department
- PLWH
People living with HIV
- TB
tuberculosis
- VCT
Voluntary Counseling and Testing
- WHO
World Health Organization
Author contributions
TD was involved in the conception, study design, execution and acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data. CF and AL made significant contributions to the study design, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors made substantial contributions to reviewing the manuscript, agreed to submit to the current journal, and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any fund.
Data availability
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author and are available upon request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for health research at Jimma University with reference number Ref. No IHRPEJ1060/22.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Clinical Trial Number
Not applicable.
Data sharing statement
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author and are available upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health organization. Consolidated guidelines on person-centred HIV patient monitoring and case surveillance. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978-92-4-151263-3
- 2.Holtzman CW, Brady KA, Yehia BR. Retention in care and medication adherence: current challenges to antiretroviral therapy success. Drugs. 2015;75(5):445–54. 10.1007/s40265-015-0373-2 . PubMed PMID: 25792300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Teka Z, Mohammed K, Workneh G, Gizaw Z. Survival of HIV/AIDS patients treated under ART follow-up at the University hospital, northwest Ethiopia. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):52. 10.1186/s12199-021-00976-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Teshale AB, Tsegaye AT, Wolde HF. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow up among adult HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital: A competing risk regression modeling. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1). 10.1371/journal.pone.0227473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Seifu W, Ali W, Meresa B. Predictors of loss to follow up among adult clients attending antiretroviral treatment at Karamara general hospital, Jigjiga town, Eastern Ethiopia, 2015: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):280. 10.1186/s12879-018-3188-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.De La Mata NL, Ly PS, Van Nguyen K, Merati TP, Pham TT, Lee MP, et al. Loss to follow-up trends in HIV-positive patients receiving antiretroviral treatment in Asia from 2003 to 2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(5):555–62. PubMed PMID: 28129256. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tesema Leshargie C, Demant D, Burrowes S, Frawley J. The proportion of loss to follow-up from antiretroviral therapy (ART) and its association with age among adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Eguzo KN, Lawal AK, Umezurike CC, Eseigbe CE. Predictors of Loss to Follow-up Among HIV-infected Patients in a Rural South-Eastern Nigeria Hospital: A 5-year Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(6):373–8. 10.4103/2141-9248.177988 . PubMed PMID: 27057373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Birhanu MY, Leshargie CT, Alebel A, Wagnew F, Siferih M, Gebre T, et al. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow-up among HIV-positive adults in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Trop Med Health. 2020;48(1):78. 10.1186/s41182-020-00266-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mekonnen N, Abdulkadir M, Shumetie E, Baraki AG, Yenit MK. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow-up among HIV infected adults after initiation of first line anti-retroviral therapy at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized Hospital Northwest Ethiopia, 2018: retrospective follow up study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):111. PubMed PMID: 30819236 10.1186/s13104-019-4154-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gesesew HA, Ward P, Hajito KW, Feyissa GT, Mohammadi L, Mwanri L. Discontinuation from Antiretroviral Therapy: A Continuing Challenge among Adults in HIV Care in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1). 10.1371/journal.pone.0169651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.World Health organization. Service delivery, adherence and retention [Internet]. 2025 Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/hiv/treatment/service-delivery-adherence-retention
- 13.Mberi MN, Kuonza LR, Dube NM, Nattey C, Manda S, Summers R. Determinants of loss to follow-up in patients on antiretroviral treatment, South Africa, 2004–2012: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):259. 10.1186/s12913-015-0912-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tweya H, Oboho IK, Gugsa ST, Phiri S, Rambiki E, Banda R, et al. Loss to follow-up before and after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1). 10.1371/journal.pone.0188488. PubMed PMID: 29373574.;. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Wekesa P, McLigeyo A, Owuor K, Mwangi J, Nganga E, Masamaro K. Factors associated with 36-month loss to follow-up and mortality outcomes among HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy in Central Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):328. 10.1186/s12889-020-8426-1 . PubMed PMID: 32171279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abugah M, Yabelang AM, Akorlie JK, Mahama H, Abuaku B. Predictors of loss to follow-up among people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in a rural health facility using paper-based records. Front Public Health. 2025;13. 10.3389/fpubh. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Salimo ZM, da Silva EF, Yakubu MN, Vilela YAS, Navarro RM, Nogueira PA, et al. Factors associated with loss to follow-up among people living with HIV at public health facilities in Manaus, Brazil: a multicentric study. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):4245. 10.1186/s12889-025-25565-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salimo ZM, Avelino-Silva VI, da Silva EF, Chaves YO, Kadri MR, de Nogueira AE. Factors related to loss to follow-up among people living with HIV: a systematic review. Rev Inst Med trop S Paulo. 2025;67:e53. 10.1590/S1678-9946202567053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oljira T, Megerso A, Deksisa A, Regea F, Zewdu T. Determinants of loss to follow-up in HIV care among adults on ART at Adama Hospital Medical College, Ethiopia: a case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25:1489. 10.1186/s12879-025-11946-8 . PubMed PMID: 41188780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Telayneh AT, Tesfa M, Woyraw W, Temesgen H, Alamirew NM, Haile D, et al. Time to lost to follow-up and its predictors among adult patients receiving antiretroviral therapy retrospective follow-up study Amhara Northwest Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2916. 10.1038/s41598-022-07049-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Assemie MA, Muchie KF, Ayele TA. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow up among HIV-infected adults at Pawi General Hospital, northwest Ethiopia: competing risk regression model. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:287. 10.1186/s13104-018-3407-5 . PubMed PMID: 29747698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chi BH, Cantrell RA, Mwango A, Westfall AO, Mutale W, Limbada M, et al. An Empirical Approach to Defining Loss to Follow-up Among Patients Enrolled in Antiretroviral Treatment Programs. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(8):924–31. 10.1093/aje/kwq008 . PubMed PMID: 20219765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nuwagira E, Lumori BAE, Muhindo R, Kanyesigye M, Amir A, Muyindike W, et al. Incidence and predictors of early loss to follow up among patients initiated on protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy in southwestern Uganda. AIDS Res Ther. 2021;18(1):7. 10.1186/s12981-021-00331-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Assefa Y, Van Damme W, Mariam DH, Kloos H. Toward universal access to HIV counseling and testing and antiretroviral treatment in Ethiopia: looking beyond HIV testing and ART initiation. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2010;24(8):521–5. 10.1089/apc.2009.0286 . PubMed PMID: 20672972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ethiopian Ministry of Health. National Guidelines for Comprehensive HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Health [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Dec 27]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/ethiopia/ethiopia-national-guidelines-comprehensive-hiv-prevention-care-and-treatment-february-2018
- 26.Carriquiry G, Fink V, Koethe JR, Giganti MJ, Jayathilake K, Blevins M, et al. Mortality and loss to follow-up among HIV-infected persons on long-term antiretroviral therapy in Latin America and the Caribbean. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(1):20016. 10.7448/IAS.18.1.20016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bantie B, Abate MW, Nigat AB, Birlie TA, Dires T, Minuye T, et al. Attrition rate and its predictors among adults receiving anti-retroviral therapy following the implementation of the Universal Test and Treat strategy at public health institutions in Northern Ethiopia. A retrospective follow-up study. Heliyon. 2022;8(11). 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11527 . PubMed PMID: 36411907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Gebremichael MA, Gurara MK, Weldehawaryat HN, Mengesha MM, Berbada DA. Predictors of Loss to Follow-Up among HIV-Infected Adults after Initiation of the First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy at Arba Minch General Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021. 10.1155/2021/8659372 PubMed PMID: 34805406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Dejen D, Jara D, Yeshanew F, Fentaw Z, Mengie Feleke T, Girmaw F et al. Attrition and Its Predictors Among Adults Receiving First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Woldia Town Public Health Facilities, Northeast Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. HIV AIDS. 2021;13:445–54. PubMed PMID: 33907472. 10.2147/HIV.S304657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Ahmed AM, Sisay AL, Gebre MN. Incidence and predictors of loss to follow-up among adult HIV patients attending antiretroviral therapy at public health facilities in Agaro town, Southwest Ethiopia, 2023. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):297. 10.1186/s12879-025-10646-7 . PubMed PMID: 40025429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dessu S, Mesele M, Habte A, Dawit Z. Time Until Loss to Follow-Up, Incidence, and Predictors Among Adults Taking ART at Public Hospitals in Southern Ethiopia. HIV AIDS. 2021. PubMed PMID: 33633468. 10.2147/HIV.S296226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Charlotte K, Claire H, Tracey F, Graham C. Are differences in travel time or distance to healthcare for adults in global north countries associated with an impact on health outcomes? A systematic review BMJ Open. [cited 2025 Dec 27]. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e013059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Asiimwe SB, Kanyesigye M, Bwana B, Okello S, Muyindike W. Predictors of dropout from care among HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy at a public sector HIV treatment clinic in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:43. 10.1186/s12879-016-1392-7 . PubMed PMID: 26832737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eguzo KN, Lawal AK, Umezurike CC, Eseigbe CE. Predictors of Loss to Follow–up Among HIV–infected Patients in a Rural South–Eastern Nigeria Hospital: A 5–year Retrospective Cohort Study. Annals Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5(6):373–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tadesse K, Haile F. Predictors of loss to follow up of patients enrolled on anti-retroviral therapy: A retrospective cohort study. Virol Mycol. 10.4172/2161-0517.S1.003 [DOI]
- 36.Kebede HK, Mwanri L, Ward P, Gesesew HA. Predictors of lost to follow up from antiretroviral therapy among adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):33. 10.1186/s40249-021-00822-7 . PubMed PMID: 33743815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tesfaye B, Alebel A, Gebrie A, Zegeye A, Tesema C, Kassie B. The twin epidemics: Prevalence of TB/HIV co-infection and its associated factors in Ethiopia; A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10). 10.1371/journal.pone.0203986 . PubMed PMID: 30281631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Sharan R, Bucşan AN, Ganatra S, Paiardini M, Mohan M, Mehra S, et al. Chronic Immune Activation in TB/HIV Co-infection. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(8):619–32. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.015 . PubMed PMID: 32417227; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7390597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tama TD, Ambarwati RD, Wardani HE. Tuberculosis Infection and Incidence of Loss to Follow Up among HIV Patients at Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Indonesia: A Retrospective Study. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2021;17(2):106. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tweya H, Oboho IK, Gugsa ST, Phiri S, Rambiki E, Banda R, et al. Loss to follow-up before and after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV facilities in Lilongwe, Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0188488. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188488 . PubMed PMID: 29373574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fox MP, Rosen S. Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs up to three years on treatment in sub-Saharan Africa, 2007–2009: systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15 Suppl 1(s1):1–15. 10.1111/j.1365-31562010.02508. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2948795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Franco JV, Bongaerts B, Metzendorf MI, Risso A, Guo Y, Peña Silva L, et al. Undernutrition as a risk factor for tuberculosis disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024;6(6):CD015890. 10.1002/14651858.CD015890.pub2. PubMed PMID: 38860538.;. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li Y, Cheng J, Bai X, Zheng J, Mao P, Zhou X. Impact of body mass index on mortality rates in tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pak J Med Sci. 2025;41(6):1836–44. 10.12669/pjms.41.6.11722 . PubMed PMID: 40621534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sifa JS, Manortey S, Talboys S, Ansa GA, Houphouet EE. Risk factors for loss to follow-up in human immunodeficiency virus care in the Greater Accra Regional Hospital in Ghana: a retrospective cohort study. Int Health. 2019;11(6):605–12. 10.1093/inthealth/ihz043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Megerso A, Garoma S, Eticha T, Workineh T, Daba S, Tarekegn M et al. Predictors of loss to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment for adult patients in the Oromia region, Ethiopia. HIV AIDS. 2016;8:83–92. PubMed PMID: 27175095. 10.2147/HIV.S98137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: recommendations for a public health approach [Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031593 [PubMed]
- 47.UNAIDS. Understanding Fast-Track [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2026 Jun 4]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2015/201506_JC2743_Understanding_FastTrack
- 48.Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Horn T, Thompson MA. The State of Engagement in HIV Care in the United States: From Cascade to Continuum to Control. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(8):1164–71. 10.1093/cid/cit420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Laws MB, Danielewicz M, Rana A, Kogelman L, Wilson IB. Health Literacy in HIV Treatment: Accurate Understanding of Key Biological Treatment Principles is Not Required for Good ART Adherence. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(4):635–44. 10.1007/s10461-014-0931-8. PubMed PMID: 25354736.;. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jara AG, Sema FD, Tekele MT, Ergena AE, Belachew EA, Tesfaye AH, et al. Self-efficacy of PLHIV for self-management at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Prim Care. 2024;25(1):255. 10.1186/s12875-024-02502-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bangsberg DR. Less than 95% adherence to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor therapy can lead to viral suppression. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(7):939–41. doi:10.1086/507526 PubMed PMID: 16941380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jiamsakul A, Kiertiburanakul S, Ng OT, Chaiwarith R, Wong W, Ditangco R, et al. Long-term loss to follow-up in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database (TAHOD). HIV Med. 2019;20(7):439–49. 10.1111/hiv.12734 . PubMed PMID: 30980495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Undetectable Viral Load &. Viral Suppression of HIV [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jun 4]. Available from: https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/staying-in-hiv-care/hiv-treatment/viral-suppression
- 54.World Health organization. Viral suppression for HIV treatment success and prevention of sexual transmission of HIV. 2018 [cited 2026 Jun 4]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-07-2018-viral-suppression-for-hiv-treatment-success-and-prevention-of-sexual-transmission-of-hiv
- 55.Yehia BR, French B, Fleishman JA, Metlay JP, Berry SA, Korthuis PT, et al. Retention in care is more strongly associated with viral suppression in HIV-infected patients with lower versus higher CD4 counts. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65(3):333–9. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000023 PubMed PMID: 24129370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yehia BR, Stephens-Shields AJ, Fleishman JA, Berry SA, Agwu AL, Metlay JP, et al. The HIV Care Continuum: Changes over Time in Retention in Care and Viral Suppression. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6). 10.1371/journal.pone.0129376 . PubMed PMID: 26086089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author and are available upon request.
