Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Physical activity is essential for breast cancer survivorship, yet its relationship with quality of life (QoL) remains inconsistent. This study investigated the psychological associations underlying this ‘activity paradox’ by examining the parallel mediating roles of unmet healthcare-seeking and health behaviour needs.
Design
A cross-sectional survey design.
Setting
A tertiary cancer centre in Hunan, China, between May 2025 and November 2025.
Participants
630 breast cancer survivors who had completed primary anti-tumour treatments within the past 1–5 years.
Main outcome measures
Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. QoL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast. Unmet needs were evaluated using the Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer. The parallel mediation model was tested using the PROCESS macro.
Results
The overall association between physical activity and QoL was non-significant (p=0.152), indicating a potential statistical suppression relationship. Physical activity was associated with lower unmet healthcare-seeking needs (B=−1.18, p=0.026). However, higher physical activity was associated with significantly higher unmet health behaviour needs (B=1.90, p<0.001). Through unmet health behaviour needs, physical activity showed a negative indirect association with lower overall QoL (indirect estimate: −1.57, 95% CI −2.96 to −0.25), which statistically counterbalanced the potential positive indirect association through unmet healthcare-seeking needs.
Conclusions
In this cross-sectional cohort, higher physical activity levels showed opposite-direction associations with unmet needs. Higher physical activity was associated with fewer unmet healthcare-seeking needs but with higher unmet needs for advanced lifestyle guidance. These findings suggest that clinical survivorship programmes may benefit from addressing the specific informational gaps reported by active survivors rather than relying solely on generic advice.
Keywords: Quality of Life, Cancer Survivors, Breast tumours
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.
The study used a relatively large sample of 630 breast cancer survivors from a tertiary cancer centre, providing robust statistical power to detect complex psychological associations.
The research integrates two distinct theoretical perspectives—Self-Efficacy Theory and the Patient Activation perspective—to systematically examine the ‘activity paradox’ through parallel mediation analysis.
All measurement tools, including the Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, were rigorously validated for the Chinese population, ensuring high internal consistency and cultural relevance.
The cross-sectional nature of the data precludes the establishment of temporal precedence or causal relationships between physical activity and unmet needs.
The use of convenience sampling at a single urban tertiary hospital and the reliance on self-reported physical activity measures may limit the generalisability of findings to rural populations and introduce recall bias.
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide,1 with incidence rates continuing to rise in China.2 3 As advances in early detection and therapies have been associated with improved survival rates,1 the primary goal of clinical care has shifted from solely extending life to addressing the long-term quality of life (QoL) of survivors.4 The transition from active treatment to post-treatment rehabilitation represents a vulnerable period. During active treatment, patients receive frequent clinical monitoring and maintain contact with healthcare providers. This support decreases during the rehabilitation phase when survivors return home and manage their health independently. They often report persistent challenges, including physical symptoms like fatigue and lymphedema, alongside psychosocial distress such as fear of recurrence5 and financial burden. These unresolved issues constitute unmet supportive care needs.6 Research identifies these needs as factors of poor outcomes, where high levels of unmet needs correlate with higher anxiety and lower care satisfaction. Identifying the factors associated with these needs remains a priority for cancer care.7
Physical activity is recognised as a standard component of survivorship care, and international guidelines recommend regular exercise for breast cancer survivors.8 Physical activity has been associated with multiple benefits, including better physical function and fewer treatment-related side effects,9 alongside lower depressive symptoms. While conventional wisdom assumes that higher levels of physical activity correspond to better QoL, the relationship between physical effort and perceived well-being is not always consistent.10 11 Clinical observations often reveal an activity paradox where some survivors who engage in high levels of physical activity still report psychological burden and suboptimal QoL.12 This phenomenon suggests that physical activity alone is not a guarantee for high QoL and that other psychosocial factors may influence this relationship. It is necessary to understand the factors associated with why physical activity is not consistently associated with a lower survivorship burden.13
Unmet supportive care needs may serve as a relevant factor. Two theoretical frameworks offer different perspectives on the relationship between physical activity and unmet needs. The Self-Efficacy Theory suggests a positive association in which regular physical activity may provide a mastery experience and may build self-efficacy. Survivors maintaining an exercise routine often report feeling more competent in managing their overall health. This generalised confidence is positively associated with the ability to navigate the healthcare system and communicate with medical professionals, which is associated with lower healthcare-seeking barriers and better QoL.14–16 The Patient Activation perspective offers a contrasting view. Physical activity requires proactive effort and indicates that a patient is activated.17 These survivors may become active health managers with higher health literacy and outcome expectations. In this framework, they may desire advanced guidance regarding exercise safety and dietary plans. Standard follow-up care typically provides generic advice, which may reflect a service discrepancy.18 The active survivor becomes aware of this gap, and this awareness is associated with higher unmet needs, cognitive dissonance and distress, which inversely correlate with QoL.19 In this study, we focused on two domains of unmet needs from the Cancer Survivor Profile-Breast Cancer (CSPro-BC) scale: healthcare-seeking needs (deficits in navigating the healthcare system) and health behaviour needs (deficits in receiving professional lifestyle guidance).
We propose that these two pathways exist simultaneously. Physical activity may be linked to higher competence and lower healthcare-seeking barriers while also being accompanied by higher-level needs and a greater burden of health behaviour needs. If physical activity is associated with both indirect associations, the total statistical association may appear non-significant, consistent with a suppression relationship,20 in which the negative indirect association statistically counterbalances the positive indirect association. Previous studies using variable-centred approaches like linear regression focus on overall associations and often overlook these opposing internal associations,21 leaving a gap in understanding the persistent burden reported by active survivors.
To date, few studies have empirically tested these competing indirect associations within a single framework. To address this gap, we analysed cross-sectional data from a sample of Chinese breast cancer survivors using a parallel mediation model to isolate specific indirect associations. We proposed three hypotheses. First, physical activity is negatively associated with unmet healthcare-seeking needs (supporting the competence indirect association). Second, physical activity is positively associated with unmet health behaviour needs (supporting the activation indirect association). Third, these two distinct unmet needs have opposing associations with QoL. Specifically, we hypothesise that higher unmet health behaviour needs statistically counterbalance the positive indirect association between physical activity and QoL. By elucidating these associations, this study provides an evidence base for precision survivorship care, emphasising the transition from generic advice to addressing the specific guidance needs of active survivors.
Methods
Study design and participants
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May 2025 and November 2025 at Hunan Cancer Hospital. Participants were recruited from the breast surgery inpatient wards and outpatient clinics using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria were: (1) pathologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer; (2) completion of primary anti-tumour treatments (ie, surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, excluding long-term endocrine therapy) within the past 1–5 years; (3) age ≥18 years and (4) ability to read and understand Chinese. Patients with cognitive impairments, severe psychiatric disorders, concurrent other malignancies or those who experienced active disease recurrence during the study period were strictly excluded. The sample size was estimated using G*Power 3.1.9.722 software based on the parameters for a linear multiple regression model (Fixed model, R2 deviation from 0). To ensure the study had sufficient statistical power to detect a small-to-medium effect size (f2=0.05)23 with 12 potential factors (including the independent variable, mediators and sociodemographic covariates), we set the significance level (α) at 0.05 and the statistical power (1−β) at 0.90. The calculation indicated a minimum requirement of 415 participants. Considering a potential invalid questionnaire rate of approximately 20%, we expanded the recruitment target. Ultimately, a total of 710 questionnaires were distributed. After excluding invalid responses, 630 valid questionnaires were included in the final analysis, which exceeded the required sample size and ensured robust statistical power.
Procedure
Data were collected by two trained oncology nurses and one postgraduate student. To ensure data quality, the investigators explained the purpose of the study and provided standardised instructions before the survey. Participants completed the self-report questionnaires independently in a quiet room, which took approximately 15–20 min. Questionnaires were checked immediately on retrieval, and those with missing data >20% or obvious pattern responding were excluded. Procedurally, we ensured participant anonymity, emphasised that there were no right or wrong answers and used established scales with clear instructions.
Patient and public involvement
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research.
Measures
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics
We designed a structured questionnaire to collect participant data. Sociodemographic variables included age, marital status, education level, occupation, monthly household income and payment method for medical expenses. Clinical variables included pathological stage, treatment modality, time since last clinical follow-up and family history of cancer.
Unmet supportive care needs
We assessed unmet needs using the Chinese version of the CSPro-BC.24 The original instrument contains five domains and 73 items.25 The revised Chinese version underwent rigorous cross-cultural adaptation and validation. The finalised version comprises 71 items across five domains: symptom burden (27 items), function (18 items), health behaviour (4 items), financial strain (4 items) and healthcare-seeking (18 items). Participants rate items on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Previous research demonstrated favourable psychometric properties for this scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.65 to 0.92, indicating robust internal consistency.
Physical activity
Physical activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF).26 This instrument assesses the frequency and duration of vigorous-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity and walking over the last 7 days. The Chinese version of the IPAQ-SF has demonstrated good test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient=0.79) and acceptable validity in Chinese populations.27 We converted data into Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET)-minutes per week according to the official IPAQ scoring protocol. Participants were categorised into three levels. Low level included those not meeting criteria for moderate or high levels. Moderate level required at least 3 days of vigorous activity (≥20 min/day) or 5 days of moderate activity/walking (≥30 min/day) or achieving ≥600 MET-min/week. High level required at least 3 days of vigorous activity achieving ≥1500 MET-min/week or 7 days of any combination achieving ≥3000 MET-min/week. For the purpose of correlation and regression analyses, physical activity levels were coded as an ordinal variable (1=Low, 2=Moderate, 3=High).
Quality of life
To assess the multidimensional QoL in patients with breast cancer, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scale was used.28 The scale consists of 36 items across five subscales: physical well-being, functional well-being, emotional well-being, social/family well-being and breast cancer-specific concerns. Each item is scored on a five-point Likert-type scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). The FACT-B has been translated into Chinese. Previous studies reported that the internal consistency of the Chinese version for these five domains ranged from 0.59 to 0.85.29
Statistical analysis
Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics V.26.0 (IBM Corp). Prior to analysis, continuous variables were assessed for normality using skewness and kurtosis indices (all values were strictly within the ±2 range) to justify the application of parametric tests. Missing data were handled using mean imputation at the subscale level, as preliminary analysis confirmed the data were missing at random (MAR). Continuous variables were described using mean±SD and categorical variables using frequency (n) and percentage (%).
Control for common method bias: since all data were self-reported, we employed both procedural and statistical remedies to minimise common method bias.30 Statistically, we conducted Harman’s single-factor test. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the first factor accounted for 42.64% of the total variance, which is below the recommended threshold of 50%. This indicates that common method bias was not a pervasive issue in this study.
Hypothesis testing: univariate analyses (t-tests and analysis of variance[ANOVA]) were first conducted to screen for potential sociodemographic and clinical confounders. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the bivariate relationships among key variables. Finally, the hypothesised parallel mediation model was tested using the PROCESS macro for SPSS (Model 4) developed by Hayes. Physical activity was entered as the independent variable (X), QoL as the dependent variable (Y) and the two unmet needs domains as parallel mediators (M1, M2). The model was adjusted for age, education level, current endocrine therapy status and surgical modality. We used the bootstrapping method with 5000 resamples to estimate the indirect pathways.31 An indirect estimate was considered statistically significant if the 95% bias-corrected CI did not include 0. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using complete-case analysis (listwise deletion, n=604) to strictly verify the robustness of the mediation model against the mean imputation method (detailed in online supplemental table S1).
Results
Participant flow and missing data
A total of 710 questionnaires were initially distributed, of which 685 were returned. On rigorous screening, 55 responses were completely excluded due to obvious pattern responding or missing data exceeding 20%. To assess potential attrition bias, we compared these 55 excluded participants with the final cohort and found no significant differences in age or basic clinical staging (p>0.05). The final analysis yielded 630 valid questionnaires (an effective response rate of 88.7%). Within this final sample, missing data were minimal (26 cases, 4.1%). Independent t-tests and χ2 tests confirmed no significant demographic or clinical differences between participants with complete data and those with missing data (all p>0.05), satisfying the MAR assumption for subsequent imputation.
Baseline characteristics
The demographic and clinical profiles of the final cohort are detailed in table 1. The mean age of participants was 51.00 years (SD=9.91). The majority were married (95.6%) and had an education level of middle school or below (76.0%). Clinically, 77.9% had completed primary treatment within the past year. Univariate analyses (t-tests and ANOVA) were conducted to identify demographic factors associated with QoL. The results indicated that marital status was significantly associated with QoL (F=3.26, p=0.021). However, this specific nominal association is statistically fragile and should be interpreted with caution due to the highly imbalanced group distribution (Married n=602 vs Unmarried/Divorced/Widowed n=28). Other sociodemographic and clinical variables, including age, education, income and physical activity level, did not show statistically significant associations with QoL in these univariate comparisons (p>0.05). Covariates included in the final parallel mediation model were age, education level, surgical modality and current endocrine therapy status. Age and education were selected a priori based on their established relevance to health literacy and overall QoL in cancer survivorship.32 Additionally, surgical modality and endocrine therapy were adjusted for due to their well-documented associations with physical symptom burden and psychosocial well-being.33 34 Although marital status showed a preliminary univariate association with QoL, it was excluded from the multivariable model due to extreme group imbalance (Married 95.6% vs Others 4.4%) to prevent statistical instability and potential overfitting.
Table 1. Characteristics of participants (n=630).
| Variables | Category | n (%) | FACT-B score (Mean±SD) | F/t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | – | 630 | 51.00±9.91 | −0.012 | 0.768 |
| Ethnicity | Han Chinese | 615 (97.6) | 95.23±18.47 | 0.228 | 0.820 |
| Ethnic minorities | 15 (2.4) | 94.13±16.37 | |||
| Marital status | Unmarried | 2 (0.3) | 78.50±9.19 | 3.259 | 0.021* |
| Married | 602 (95.6) | 94.86±18.41 | |||
| Divorced | 16 (2.5) | 101.50±17.47 | |||
| Widowed | 10 (1.6) | 109.40±13.50 | |||
| Education level | Middle school or below | 479 (76.0) | 95.07±18.23 | 0.137 | 0.872 |
| High school/technical | 45 (7.1) | 94.67±22.49 | |||
| College or above | 106 (16.8) | 96.03±17.49 | |||
| Occupation | Unemployed/retired | 200 (31.7) | 93.36±18.90 | 1.442 | 0.229 |
| Farmer/worker | 166 (26.3) | 95.84±17.51 | |||
| Employed/professional | 240 (38.1) | 96.61±18.63 | |||
| Other/unknown | 24 (3.8) | 92.04±17.65 | |||
| Monthly income (RMB) | <2000 | 88 (14.0) | 97.02±18.05 | 0.847 | 0.468 |
| 2000–5000 | 204 (32.4) | 96.13±17.46 | |||
| 5000–10 000 | 271 (43.0) | 94.32±18.94 | |||
| >10 000 | 67 (10.6) | 93.54±19.61 | |||
| Time Since Last Clinical Follow-up | <12 months | 491 (77.9) | 94.71±18.33 | 0.910 | 0.403 |
| 12–36 months | 81 (12.9) | 97.63±19.02 | |||
| >36 months | 56 (8.9) | 95.82±18.41 | |||
| Medical insurance | Employee-basic | 215 (34.1) | 95.60±17.00 | 1.302 | 0.273 |
| Resident-basic | 346 (54.9) | 94.37±18.98 | |||
| Self-pay/other | 68 (10.8) | 98.19±19.80 | |||
| Family history | No | 503 (79.8) | 95.49±18.22 | 0.760 | 0.445 |
| Yes | 127 (20.2) | 94.09±19.22 | |||
| Cancer stage | Stage I | 122 (19.4) | 92.95±19.31 | 1.004 | 0.405 |
| Stage II | 180 (28.6) | 95.70±18.53 | |||
| Stage III | 114 (18.1) | 94.68±19.08 | |||
| Stage IV (stable) | 42 (6.7) | 99.07±15.44 | |||
| Unknown/unverified | 172 (27.3) | 95.68±17.85 | |||
| Surgical modality | Mastectomy | 441 (70.0) | 94.83±18.45 | −0.771 | 0.440 |
| Breast-conserving | 189 (30.0) | 96.07±18.37 | |||
| Hormonal therapy | No | 200 (31.7) | 97.03±19.05 | 1.696 | 0.090 |
| Yes | 430 (68.3) | 94.36±18.07 | |||
| Physical activity | Low | 159 (25.2) | 97.33±17.44 | 1.427 | 0.241 |
| Moderate | 395 (62.7) | 94.51±18.53 | |||
| High | 76 (12.1) | 94.37±19.65 |
Comparisons were performed using independent sample t-tests (t) or one-way ANOVA (F).
p<0.05.
RMB, Renminbi, the official currency of China.
Correlations among key variables
Table 2 presents the descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations. A key finding emerged regarding the relationship between physical activity and unmet needs. Physical activity showed a moderate, positive correlation with unmet health behaviour needs (r=0.415, p<0.001), suggesting that more active survivors experienced a greater deficit in health guidance. Conversely, physical activity showed a weak, negative correlation with unmet healthcare-seeking needs (r=−0.087, p<0.05). Notably, the direct bivariate correlation between physical activity and QoL was not statistically significant (r=−0.058, p>0.05), hinting at a complex underlying association.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations of study variables (n=630).
| Variables | Mean±SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Age | 51.00±9.91 | 1 | ||||||
| 2. Physical activity | 1.87±0.60 | 0.002 | 1 | |||||
| 3. Symptom burden | 76.65±18.34 | 0.034 | 0.042 | 1 | ||||
| 4. Function needs | 50.56±11.57 | 0.068 | 0.025 | 0.575*** | 1 | |||
| 5. Health behaviour needs | 8.74±2.75 | 0.028 | 0.415*** | 0.467*** | 0.491*** | 1 | ||
| 6. Financial strain | 12.08±4.73 | 0.05 | 0.057 | 0.516*** | 0.439*** | 0.463*** | 1 | |
| 7. Healthcare-seeking needs | 55.98±7.95 | 0.032 | −0.087* | 0.491*** | 0.463*** | 0.451*** | 0.412*** | 1 |
| 8. QoL | 95.20±18.42 | −0.012 | −0.058 | −0.07 | −0.133*** | −0.168*** | −0.097* | −0.138*** |
The correlations shown are Pearson correlation coefficients.
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
QoL, quality of life.
Parallel mediation analysis: unpacking the suppression relationship
We used the PROCESS macro (Model 4) to test the hypothesised parallel mediation model (figure 1). The model summary and specific estimates are detailed in table 3. The model explained 18.2% of the variance in unmet health behaviour needs (R2=0.182). The analysis revealed a complete suppression relationship, characterised by the following indirect associations:
Figure 1. The parallel mediation model. Note: This figure illustrates the relationship between physical activity (X) and quality of life (Y), mediated by unmet health behaviour needs (M1) and unmet healthcare-seeking needs (M2). The solid lines represent significant indirect associations, while the dashed lines represent non-significant indirect associations.

Table 3. Summary of direct, indirect and total estimates of the associations between physical activity and QoL (n=630).
| Path | Estimate | SE | P value | 95% CI (LL to UL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total association (c) | −1.76 | 1.23 | 0.152 | (−4.18 to 0.65) |
| Direct association (c′) | −0.42 | 1.42 | 0.768 | (−3.20 to 2.37) |
| Specific indirect associations | ||||
| Via unmet health behaviour needs (M1) | −1.57 | 0.70 | – | (−2.96 to −0.25) |
| Via unmet healthcare-seeking needs (M2) | 0.23 | 0.17 | – | (−0.05 to 0.62) |
| Total indirect association | −1.34 | 0.78 | – | (−2.90 to 0.15) |
| Path coefficients | ||||
| Path a1 (physical activity→M1) | 1.90 | 0.17 | <0.001 | (1.57 to 2.23) |
| Path b1 (M1→QoL) | −0.83 | 0.35 | 0.017 | (−1.50 to −0.15) |
| Path a2 (physical activity→M2) | −1.18 | 0.53 | 0.026 | (−2.22 to −0.14) |
| Path b2 (M2→QoL) | −0.19 | 0.11 | 0.079 | (−0.40 to 0.02) |
Indirect associations were tested using 5000 bootstrap samples. ‘–’ indicates that p values are not available for indirect estimates; statistical significance is determined if the 95% bias-corrected CI does not contain 0. Model adjusted for age, education, surgical modality and endocrine therapy.
LL, lower limit; M1, unmet health behaviour needs; M2, unmet healthcare-seeking needs; QoL, quality of life; UL, upper limit.
Total association: the total association between physical activity and QoL was non-significant (estimate=−1.76, p=0.152), consistent with the correlation results. The negative ‘Activation’ indirect association: physical activity was strongly and positively associated with unmet health behaviour needs (B=1.90, p<0.001). In the model, these unmet needs were significantly and negatively associated with QoL (B=−0.83, p=0.017). The bootstrapping analysis confirmed a significant negative indirect association through unmet health behaviour needs (estimate=−1.57, 95% CI −2.96 to −0.25). This suggests that the informational burden associated with physical activity was inversely correlated with QoL.
The positive ‘Competence’ indirect association: physical activity was significantly and negatively associated with unmet healthcare-seeking needs (B=−1.18, p=0.026). However, the downstream association of these needs with QoL was not statistically significant in the full model (B=−0.19, p=0.079). Consequently, the indirect association through unmet healthcare-seeking needs was negligible (estimate=0.23, 95% CI −0.05 to 0.62)
In summary, the negative indirect association through health behaviour needs completely counterbalanced the potential beneficial associations of physical activity, resulting in a null total association. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis using complete-case data (n=604) confirmed that this complete suppression relationship and all significant indirect associations remained robust (online supplemental table S1).
Discussion
This study investigated the complex relationship between physical activity and QoL in Chinese breast cancer survivors using a parallel mediation framework. The results challenge the conventional clinical assumption that ‘more physical activity is always accompanied by better QoL’ by identifying a statistical ‘suppression relationship’.20 Specifically, we found that physical activity was significantly associated with higher unmet needs for health behaviour guidance, which appeared to counterbalance the potential benefits of exercise. This discovery provides a psychological perspective on the ‘activity paradox’.12
The activation paradox: high engagement, high needs
The most significant finding is the strong negative indirect association through unmet health behaviour needs. Our model explained 18.2% of the variance in this domain, suggesting a robust link between physical activity and the perceived need for professional guidance. Previous research often assumes that active survivors are self-sufficient and viewed as ‘model patients’ who require less support.32 35 Our findings are inconsistent with this view: higher physical activity was associated with significantly higher unmet needs for lifestyle guidance. In the model, these unmet needs were linked to lower QoL. This phenomenon aligns with the ‘Patient Activation’ framework in health psychology. Engagement in physical activity may reflect a shift in the patient’s mindset. Inactive patients are often passive recipients of care, whereas active survivors may become active seekers. These individuals generally possess higher health literacy and invest greater effort in their recovery, which correlates with higher expectations for their healthcare providers. Rather than generic advice like ‘rest well’, they desire specific guidance, such as protocols for exercise safety, detailed dietary plans to prevent recurrence36 and strategies to manage lymphedema during weight training. However, the current healthcare system in China often struggles to meet these advanced needs.37 Post-treatment follow-up typically focuses on medical surveillance, such as detecting recurrence,38 rather than providing comprehensive rehabilitation coaching.18 This service discrepancy represents a critical ‘guidance gap’. When an active survivor invests effort but receives insufficient feedback, this disconnect may be associated with psychological distress and cognitive dissonance. The survivor behaves proactively but feels unsupported informationally. This unfulfilled desire for guidance is associated with anxiety and fear of recurrence. In this context, physical activity without matching professional support may be associated with greater stress, characterising a ‘vulnerable active’ phenotype. These survivors appear healthy on the outside but report uncertainty on the inside. Current literature indicates that QoL in breast cancer survivorship is a complex concept involving both physical symptom management and psychosocial distress.39 40 Within Asian populations, specific healthcare delivery models and cultural backgrounds are associated with how survivors report and manage these unmet needs.41 These regional care characteristics may relate to our specific finding that high physical activity correlates with an increased demand for professional guidance rather than improved overall well-being. This alignment with recent evidence suggests that survivorship care should be adjusted to fit regional clinical contexts.
The competence indirect association: a positive but insufficient buffer
On the positive side, our study found a negative association between physical activity and unmet healthcare-seeking needs. This finding aligns with Self-Efficacy Theory, suggesting that success in one behavioural domain may generalise to others, a phenomenon known as ‘co-action’ or ‘behavioural spillover’.42 43 Survivors who maintain an exercise routine may develop a sense of mastery and trust their ability to manage challenges. This generalised confidence is linked to easier navigation of the healthcare system, better communication with physicians and fewer perceived barriers when seeking medical help. However, this positive indirect association was not significantly associated with overall QoL in our statistical model, as the indirect association through healthcare-seeking needs was non-significant. This pattern suggests a hierarchy of needs during survivorship. Competence in hospital navigation functions as a baseline requirement, acting as a ‘hygiene factor’44 or fundamental supportive care need.45 While it may be associated with less frustration, it is not necessarily associated with better well-being. In contrast, the need for lifestyle optimisation represents a growth need central to a survivor’s daily identity. If this core need remains unfulfilled, it may dominate their psychological state. Consequently, the negative indirect association through the guidance gap statistically outweighed the positive indirect association through healthcare competence.
Unpacking the suppression relationship
The statistical identification of a suppression relationship is a central contribution of this study. Simple correlation analyses showed no significant link between physical activity and QoL. A superficial interpretation might suggest that exercise is unrelated to well-being in this population. However, the mediation analysis reveals a more complex dynamic in which physical activity is associated with two mediators that have opposing associations with QoL. It is positively associated with competence and simultaneously associated with new, higher-level informational needs. These opposing indirect associations statistically counterbalance each other, resulting in a non-significant total association.20 This finding highlights the limitations of traditional variable-centred approaches, such as linear regression models, which focus on overall associations and often overlook these internal associations.21 Our results underscore the necessity of process-oriented research. We must look inside the ‘black box’ to understand how behavioural factors relate to psychological outcomes.46
Clinical implications
These findings provide practical implications for survivorship care. The current approach often relies on general advice. It is necessary to develop a tiered support system. Routine follow-up mainly evaluates physical compliance through basic questions about exercise habits. This practice may miss specific patient needs. Survivorship care protocols should add structured informational needs assessments. A high level of physical activity may serve as a clinical marker. It may help identify survivors who require advanced lifestyle guidance.
For active survivors, clinical support should include specific empowerment coaching. However, a recent perspective notes that oncology needs better systems rather than expecting individual clinicians to do everything.47 Asking busy frontline clinicians to serve as health coaches is difficult and may be associated with higher provider burnout. Addressing this guidance gap depends on systemic resources. Hospitals can integrate multidisciplinary teams, including rehabilitation nurses and exercise specialists, to develop advanced survivorship care plans.48 These plans can target specific goals like returning to work or engaging in sports. Additionally, digital health technologies such as mobile apps provide alternative options to meet these rehabilitation needs when face-to-face resources are limited.49
Psychological support is equally important. Active survivors might experience an effort-reward imbalance when their physical efforts lack professional validation. Addressing these psychological and informational gaps through multidisciplinary and digital methods may attenuate the negative indirect association through unmet health behaviour needs. This system-level approach may help reveal a positive indirect association between physical activity and QoL.
Limitations
We acknowledge several limitations. First, due to the cross-sectional design, causal inference cannot be drawn. While we hypothesised that physical activity is an antecedent to higher needs, it is also plausible that survivors with high unmet needs or anxiety engage in more physical activity as a coping strategy. Longitudinal studies are required to verify the temporal order. Second, participants were recruited via convenience sampling from a single tertiary cancer centre in an urban area. These survivors may possess higher health literacy and better access to medical resources compared with the general rural population, introducing selection bias. Consequently, the levels of unmet needs reported here might be underestimated compared with the broader population. Third, although we rigorously adjusted for key sociodemographic and clinical covariates (including age, education, surgical modality and endocrine therapy), residual confounding from other variables cannot be completely ruled out. Importantly, because this study used a pre-designed survey protocol, detailed data on body mass index, specific comorbidities and menstrual status were lacking, restricting our ability to account for these factors. Finally, physical activity and basic clinical characteristics were assessed via self-report, which limited measurement granularity and resulted in a notable proportion of ‘Unknown’ cancer stages.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this cross-sectional study identified a pattern of opposing statistical associations in breast cancer survivorship. Physical activity was associated with fewer unmet healthcare-seeking needs but also with higher unmet needs for advanced health guidance. The indirect association through health behaviour needs was significantly and inversely associated with QoL, whereas the indirect association through healthcare-seeking needs was not significant. This pattern resulted in a non-significant total association between physical activity and QoL. Physical activity may therefore have dual associations with survivor needs. Healthcare providers should consider these opposing associations. Future interventions could provide targeted informational support beyond general exercise recommendations. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether addressing these specific needs may be associated with better long-term well-being.
Supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank all the breast cancer survivors who participated in this study and the medical staff at Hunan Cancer Hospital for their support during data collection. We also thank the professional biostatistician from the clinical research centre of Hunan Cancer Hospital for their assistance in formulating the statistical plan and supervising its execution.
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by the Health Commission of Hunan Province (W20243281), the High-Level Talent Support Program of Hunan Cancer Hospital (20250731-1026) and the High-Level Health Talents Program of the Hunan Provincial Health Commission (20230222-1001). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.
Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118828).
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.
Ethics approval: This study involves human participants and was approved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hunan Cancer Hospital (Protocol code 2025-51, approved on 17 April 2025). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
Data availability free text: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request, without undue reservation.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zheng RS, Chen R, Han BF, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2024;46:221–31. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240119-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Qiu H, Cao S, Xu R. Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time‐trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020. Cancer Commun. 2021;41:1037–48. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mustață LM, Peltecu G, Gică N, et al. Evaluation of quality of life and socio-emotional impact of oncological treatment among patients with breast cancer. J Med Life. 2024;17:341–52. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ban Y, Li M, Yu M, et al. The effect of fear of progression on quality of life among breast cancer patients: the mediating role of social support. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19:178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01816-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Coyle N, Crowley A, McNicoll A, et al. A Systematic Review of Unmet Supportive Care Needs, Barriers, and Facilitators for People with Physical Disabilities and Cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2025 doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01900-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu M, Qin F, Wang D. A study of the mediating effect of social support on self-disclosure and demoralization in Chinese older adult homebound breast cancer patients. Front Psychol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ligibel JA, Bohlke K, May AM, et al. Exercise, Diet, and Weight Management During Cancer Treatment: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:2491–507. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Joaquim A, Leão I, Antunes P, et al. Impact of physical exercise programs in breast cancer survivors on health-related quality of life, physical fitness, and body composition: Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Front Oncol. 2022;12:955505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paganini S, Ramsenthaler C, Wurst R, et al. Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Mediation analysis of a psychological intervention. Health Psychol. 2022;41:573–84. doi: 10.1037/hea0001206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shimizu Y, Tsuji K, Narisawa T, et al. Physical activity and exercise behaviour of breast cancer survivors: nationwide cross-sectional survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025;15:498–511. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liao Z, Hu P, Xiao T, et al. Social support and self-compassion mediate the relationship between alexithymia and quality of life in postoperative breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1722515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1722515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown N, Muirhead F. Life Postdiagnosis: Female Adult Breast Cancer Survivors’ Experience With Physical Activity-A Qualitative Systematic Review. Breast J. 2025;2025:6926093. doi: 10.1155/tbj/6926093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 2006;84:191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dewi R, Letchmi Panduragan S, Syazana Umar N. The Relationship Between Self-efficacy and Coping Mechanisms with Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients. KSS . 2023 doi: 10.18502/kss.v8i14.13837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wechsler S, Fu MR, Lyons K, et al. The Role of Exercise Self-Efficacy in Exercise Participation Among Women With Persistent Fatigue After Breast Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study. Phys Ther. 2022;103 doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, et al. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:1005–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Speckemeier C, Maus K, Bialobrzeski A, et al. Exploring long-term cancer survivors’ care experiences and unmet needs: protocol for a qualitative study. BMC Cancer. 2024;24:783. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12527-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yarosh RA, Nichols HB, Hirschey R, et al. Unmet needs among long-term breast cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control. 2025;36:803–17. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01984-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci. 2000;1:173–81. doi: 10.1023/a:1026595011371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hayes A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2013
- 22.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lachenbruch PA, Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:1096. doi: 10.2307/2290095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng ASK, Liu X, Kwok CTT, et al. Chinese translation of a measure of symptom burden, functional limitations, lifestyle, and health care-seeking skills in breast cancer survivors: the Cancer Survivor Profile. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13:130–47. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-0733-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Todd BL, Feuerstein M, Gehrke A, et al. Identifying the unmet needs of breast cancer patients post-primary treatment: the Cancer Survivor Profile (CSPro) J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9:137–60. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0428-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qu N, Li K. Study on the reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire (Chinese Vision, IPAQ) Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004;25:265–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. JCO. 1997;15:974–86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wan C, Zhang D, Yang Z, et al. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:413–8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9511-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88:879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40:879–91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Paterick TE, Patel N, Tajik AJ, et al. Improving health outcomes through patient education and partnerships with patients. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2017;30:112–3. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Park J, Rodriguez JL, O’Brien KM, et al. Health-related quality of life outcomes among breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2021;127:1114–25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tibau A, Martínez MT, Ramos M, et al. Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with endocrine-sensitive hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the FLIPPER trial. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023;15 doi: 10.1177/17588359221148921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haering C, Heyne S, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, et al. The role of patient activation in mediating the effects of health literacy level on quality of life among patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Sci Rep. 2025;15:7295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91670-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR, et al. American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:230–62. doi: 10.3322/caac.21719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dai Q, Liu X, Xu X, et al. Development of a supportive care framework for breast cancer survivor’s unmet needs: A modified Delphi study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33:1376–86. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mayer DK, Nasso SF, Earp JA. Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e11–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30573-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bruce J, Mazuquin B, Canaway A, et al. Exercise versus usual care after non-reconstructive breast cancer surgery (UK PROSPER): multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. BMJ. 2021;375:e066542. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li M, Zhou K, Huo L, et al. Perceived needs and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e062407. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ho PJ, Gernaat SAM, Hartman M, et al. Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020512. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jackson SE, Steptoe A, Wardle J. The influence of partner’s behavior on health behavior change: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:385–92. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Henriksen HB, Kolle Å, Stenling A, et al. Spillover effect of a dietary intervention on physical activity in a randomized controlled trial with colorectal cancer patients. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025;22:54. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01757-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Herzberg FI. Work and the nature of man. 1966. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hill RE, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ, et al. Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes. Oncologist. 2020;25:e351–72. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Scheveneels S, Carpentier N. Underlying Working Mechanisms of Virtual Reality Exposure: Exploring the Role of Fearful Expectancies and Habituation. Behav Ther. 2025;56:555–65. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sedhom R, Dotan E, Booth C. When the System Is the Treatment: Rethinking Nonpharmacologic Breakthroughs in Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2026;44:1072–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-02664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Loughnane C, Laiti J, O’Donovan R, et al. Systematic review exploring human, AI, and hybrid health coaching in digital health interventions: trends, engagement, and lifestyle outcomes. Front Digit Health . 2025;7:1536416. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1536416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pimentel-Parra GA, Soto-Ruiz MN, San Martín-Rodríguez L, et al. Effectiveness of Digital Health on the Quality of Life of Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023;39:151418. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
