Abstract
The paired box transcription factor PAX6 is a master regulator of eye development. Pathogenic PAX6 variants predominantly cause aniridia, resulting in a wide range of ocular anomalies affecting both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. However, a detailed examination of the transcriptomic alterations that occur with these variants during early eye development has not yet been undertaken. To investigate this, human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC)-derived 3D optic vesicle-like organoids were generated up to day 35 from an aniridia patient with a heterozygous nonsense PAX6R261X variant. Bulk RNA sequencing analysis revealed dysregulation of genes in the cadherin and semaphorin receptor binding pathways in PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with healthy controls, including upregulation of SEMA3A and CDH1 and downregulation of CDH4. These genes are known to be involved in iris and foveal development but have not previously been found to be dysregulated at the optic vesicle stage, suggesting they have a spatiotemporal impact on eye development. This study reveals a novel link between the cadherins, semaphorins and aniridia and suggests a novel pathway that may contribute to iris and foveal hypoplasia in patients with pathogenic PAX6 variants. Expanding our knowledge of the complex interactions governing early eye development provides novel candidates for the development of potential targeted therapies and can help to guide translational research.
Keywords: PAX6, aniridia, RNA-seq, hiPSC, organoids, cadherins, semaphorins
1. Introduction
The paired box transcription factor, PAX6, is known to play a key role in early eye development, and its dysregulation results in a wide range of ocular anomalies in both the posterior (retina and optic nerve) and anterior (cornea, lens, iris and ciliary body) segments of the eye [1].
PAX6 (OMIM #607108) acts throughout oculogenesis, initially as an eye field transcription factor in the optic vesicle, before stimulating optic cup patterning and the development of the lens placode [2,3,4,5,6]. It plays a central role in the development of the anterior segment, regulating neural crest cell migration to form the corneal stroma and endothelium, and subsequently the ciliary body and iris stroma [4]. PAX6 stimulates separation of the lens vesicle from the overlying developing cornea in conjunction with CITED2 and E-, N- and P-cadherin [7,8,9]. Concurrent with the second wave of periocular mesenchymal migration into the anterior chamber to form the ciliary body and iris stroma, elongation of the peripheral optic cup tips to form the ciliary body and iris epithelium occurs [2,10]. The optic cup tips have the highest expression of PAX6 and also express CYP1B1 and MEIS2 [5,11,12]. Notably, studies of anterior segment development have found that PAX6 expression is high and continuous in cells of ectodermal origin (corneal, iris and ciliary body epithelia and lens) but cells originating from the periocular mesenchyme (corneal stroma and endothelium, iris and ciliary body stroma and trabecular meshwork) express PAX6 transiently and at a much lower level [2,3,5,13].
Aniridia is a pan-ocular disease which may occur in isolation or in association with Wilms tumour as part of the WAGR syndrome (Wilms tumour, aniridia, genital anomalies and a range of developmental issues). Classical aniridia (OMIM #106210) includes foveal and iris hypoplasia with resultant nystagmus and reduced visual acuity, often associated with lenticular opacities, juvenile- or adult-onset glaucoma and aniridia-associated keratopathy [1,14]. Other ocular features may include optic nerve hypoplasia, strabismus, microphthalmia, anophthalmia and coloboma spectrum, vascular retinopathy and choroidal degeneration. The condition is also associated with an array of systemic features, including olfactory deficits, hearing impairment, obesity, and behavioural and sleep disorders. Dominant heterozygous PAX6 mutations are identified in 90% of aniridia patients with a genetic diagnosis [1]. Approximately 70% of cases are due to the introduction of a premature termination codon in PAX6 as a result of a nonsense or frameshift mutation [15]. Missense variants in PAX6 have a highly variable phenotype and whilst some patients can present with isolated foveal hypoplasia, others have aniridia, corneal changes or rarely severe microphthalmia [14,16,17].
Techniques to culture ocular organoids from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) as in vitro models of disease have broadened our ability to study human eye development and the effects of specific germline mutations on underlying molecular processes [18,19]. Specific culture conditions can guide hiPSC differentiation into distinct ocular structures, such as cornea, lens, retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) [19,20,21,22,23]. However, at early stages of culture, progenitors of multiple different ocular tissues develop together, with co-cultures expressing markers for surface ectoderm, neural crest, lens, neural retina, RPE and ciliary margin, as shown by transcriptomic and immunochemistry analysis [21,22,24]. By day 20 of differentiation, early ocular organoids resemble the cellular composition and molecular expression profile of the week 4.5 human optic vesicle, with early lamination becoming apparent, and expression of retinal progenitor markers PAX6, RAX and OTX2, in addition to optic cup markers JAG1 and CITED2, and ocular surface markers TFAP2A, KRT15 and TP63/PAX6 co-expression [18,20,24]. By day 35, the organoids resemble developmental week 6 early optic cups with layering of the neural retina and RPE progenitors expressing PAX6, VSX2, MITF and SOX2, in addition to lens markers CRYAB, CRYBB1 and MAF [18,19,21,24]. These early ocular organoids can therefore be utilized to examine the molecular effects of pathogenic variants on the initial stages of eye development, providing insights into optic cup, retina and anterior segment formation.
We have previously generated hiPSC-derived early ocular organoids from an aniridia patient carrying a PAX6 nonsense variant, c.781C > T p.(Arg261*) (PAX6R261X), where we showed that aniridia optic vesicles produced increased expression of neural retina and proliferation markers VSX2 and MKI67, respectively [19]. In a subsequent study, we elucidated the transcriptomic differences between optic vesicles derived from a patient with microphthalmia caused by a PAX6 missense variant, c.372C > A p.(Asn124Lys) (PAX6N124K) and compared this to PAX6R261X and wild-type (WT) samples [17]. This revealed downregulation of SOX2 and Notch signalling components in PAX6N124K samples compared with both PAX6R261X and WT samples, with differences in PAX6 and SOX2 co-binding and reduced Notch pathway-related transcription factor binding in PAX6N124K optic vesicles. However, a detailed examination of the molecular changes in the aniridia PAX6R261X model during early eye development has not yet been undertaken. In this study we utilized bulk RNA-seq to identify transcriptomic disruption in hiPSC-derived PAX6R261X optic vesicles and found evidence of dysregulation of cadherin and semaphorin receptor binding pathways in aniridia.
2. Results
To elucidate the molecular pathways that are dysregulated in PAX6 aniridia, bulk RNA-seq analysis of day 20 and day 35 PAX6R261X aniridia optic vesicles compared with wild-type (WT) controls was undertaken. Results were filtered by base mean expression ≥ 10, absolute log2 fold change (LFC) ≥ 1 and adjusted p-value (padj) < 0.05. This gave a total of 1033 significantly upregulated and 1615 significantly downregulated genes in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles at day 20 compared to WT controls, and 615 significantly upregulated and 569 significantly downregulated genes at day 35.
There is clustering of the WT and aniridia cell lines at day 0, with separation by both time point and cell line at day 20 and day 35 (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S1). There is no separation by clone (Supplementary Figure S2). There are differences in the expression patterns of optic cup and retinal progenitor markers between the PAX6R261X aniridia and WT organoids at both day 20 and day 35. At day 20, the optic cup markers JAG1 and CITED2 are significantly downregulated in the PAX6R261X samples compared with WT, as is the retinal progenitor marker SOX2, and there is relative downregulation of the retinal progenitor markers RAX, OTX2 and PAX6 itself. At day 35, when layering of the primitive retina is becoming apparent, CITED2 remains significantly downregulated in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles; there is relative upregulation of the neural retinal marker VSX2 and the RPE marker MITF, while PAX6 and SOX2 remain downregulated (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 1.

PCA plot by cell line and time point. Green area, day 0; purple area, day 20; yellow area, day 35.
Consistent with previous work by this group in PAX6R261X optic vesicles [19], these results show no significant difference in expression of the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) activator UPF1 in the aniridia samples compared with WT, suggesting NMD escape for the PAX6 c.781C > T p.(Arg261*) variant. However, PAX6 haploinsufficiency limits protein production, and we have previously demonstrated a significant reduction in PAX6 protein to less than half of wild-type levels at day 35 in this PAX6R261X aniridia organoid model [19]. As PAX6 is one of the key transcription factors in early eye development, this impacts downstream pathways, with enrichment and overrepresentation analysis of this data highlighting differential expression within pathways relating to transcription (GO:0003899, GO:0034062, GO:0097747) and translation (GO:0019843, GO:0043022, R-HSA-72613, R-HSA-72649, R-HSA-72766, R-HSA-72737).
2.1. Dysregulation of Retinal and Foveal Genes Is Identified at an Early Stage in Aniridia-Derived Optic Vesicles
Dysregulation of genes involved in the formation of the retina and fovea is seen in these early PAX6R261X optic vesicles. At day 20, there is significant dysregulation of genes involved in retinal lamination (upregulation of CALB1; downregulation of DSCAM, PTF1A, SDK1, SDK2), RPE development (upregulation of MITF; downregulation of IHH, MFSD2A, PAX2), neural retina development (downregulation of ATP2B2, FOS, PER1, SLC17A7) and photoreceptor cell development and differentiation (upregulation of DIO1, HCN1; downregulation of BHLHE23, CRB2, FSCN2, NOTCH1, NTRK2, OLFM3, TH, VEGFA). At day 35, SDK2 and TH remain significantly downregulated, and there is significant upregulation of ATP8A2 from the retinal lamination gene set.
Specific to foveal development, there is significant upregulation of ANXA2, DIO2, FRZB, HOTAIR1 and LUM at day 20, with significant downregulation of CDKN1A at this point. At day 35, none of these genes remain significantly dysregulated, but there is instead significant upregulation of CD44 and HKDC1, and significant downregulation of CRYAB.
There is no significant dysregulation of genes involved in retinal vascular development seen at day 20. However, at day 35 there is significant upregulation of ACVRL1 and CYP1B1, with significant downregulation of ARHGEF15.
2.2. Dysregulation of Anterior Segment Genes Is Identified at an Early Stage in Aniridia-Derived Optic Vesicles
A comparison of the WT day 0 organoid data to WT day 20 and day 35 data was done, focused on genes pertaining to human anterior segment development (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). This demonstrates the differential expression of these genes at both day 20 and day 35 in WT optic vesicles and confirms that the dysregulation seen in these genes in the aniridia samples can confidently be used to infer impact on anterior segment development at this early developmental stage.
Figure 2.

Heatmap showing differential expression of genes involved in anterior segment development in WT samples, with a black dot in the tile signifying significant differential expression of that gene in WT day 20 or day 35 compared with WT day 0 optic vesicles.
At day 20, analysis of PAX6R261X optic vesicles showed dysregulation of genes involved in the formation of anterior segment tissues, as derived from gene ontology listings and published literature (Figure 3). Differential expression of genes involved in ocular surface/corneal development includes significant upregulation of ANXA2, EPHA1, KRT15, PRICKLE1 and WNT6. Additionally, there was non-significant upregulation of BMP4 and TP63 and downregulation of TFAP2A and PAX6 expression at this time point. Expression of the early corneal stromal markers LUM, DCN and COL5A2 was significantly upregulated, whilst COL6A1 expression was significantly downregulated. Differential expression of genes involved in iris development includes significant upregulation of MEIS2 and WNT2 and significant downregulation of OTX1 and LMX1B. Differential expression of genes involved in ciliary body development includes significant upregulation of DCN and significant downregulation of JAG1 and SLC6A1. Differential expression of genes involved in lens development includes significant upregulation of BFSP1, PLAAT1, PLAAT3, TDRD7 and WNT2 and significant downregulation of CITED2, EPHA2, HSF4, SOX1, VIM, WNT7A and WNT7B.
Figure 3.

Heatmaps showing differential expression of anterior segment genes in PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with WT at day 20. (a) Corneal genes, (b) lens genes, (c) iris and ciliary body genes, (d) trabecular meshwork genes.
At day 35, the PAX6R261X optic vesicles demonstrated persistent significant upregulation of KRT15 and significant downregulation of CITED2, COL6A1, LMX1B, SOX1 and WNT7B, with additional significant upregulation of the iris-related genes CYP1B1 and WNT16 and significant downregulation of the lens marker CRYAB (Figure 4). Although non-significant, there was relative upregulation of the lens marker CRYBB1 and downregulation of MAF in the day 35 aniridia organoids compared with WT.
Figure 4.

Heatmaps showing differential expression of anterior segment genes in PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with WT at day 35. (a) Corneal genes, (b) lens genes, (c) iris and ciliary body genes, (d) trabecular meshwork genes.
2.3. Cadherin and Semaphorin Pathways Are Dysregulated in PAX6R261X Aniridia Optic Vesicles
Gene ontology overrepresentation analysis revealed that cadherin binding (GO:0045296) and semaphorin receptor binding (GO:0030215) were significantly overrepresented in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with the WT samples (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Gene ontology overrepresentation analysis: top 25 overrepresented pathways, with cadherin binding and semaphorin receptor binding pathways boxed. Relative effect: how many times larger is the overlap between the specified pathway and the list of differentially expressed genes than would have been observed by chance.
Of the 337 genes comprising the cadherin binding pathway, 35 genes were differentially expressed in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles. These include significant upregulation at day 20 of CDH1 (E-cadherin), CDH3 (P-cadherin), ANXA1, ANXA2, CDH22, CAPG, CGN, COBLL1, DOCK9, EIF3E, EZR, GPRC5A, HSPA8, KRT18, LAD1, LIMA1, PAK6, PDLIM1, PKP2, PKP3 and ZC3HAV1; and significant downregulation of CDH4 (R-cadherin), CDH8, CDH23, ATXN2L, CDK5R1, CNGA3, CTNND2, DCHS1, EPHA2 and PLEC. At day 35, the cadherin binding pathway genes that remain significantly upregulated are CDH1, CAPG, GPRC5A, KRT18 and PKP3, and CDH4 remains significantly downregulated. There was additional significant upregulation of the cadherin binding pathway genes ARHGAP18, PKP1 and SFN noted at day 35 (Figure 6, Supplementary Table S2).
Figure 6.

Heatmap showing differential expression of genes in the cadherin binding pathway in PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with WT. (a) Day 20, (b) day 35.
Of the 24 genes comprising the semaphorin receptor binding pathway, 11 genes were differentially expressed in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles. These include significant upregulation at day 20 of SEMA3A, SEMA3C, SEMA3D and SEMA3E, and significant downregulation of SEMA3F, SEMA3G, SEMA4A, SEMA4D, SEMA5B, SEMA6C and RIT2. At day 35, SEMA3A, SEMA3C and SEMA3E remain significantly upregulated and SEMA3G remains significantly downregulated (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
Figure 7.

Heatmap showing differential expression of genes in the semaphorin receptor binding pathway in PAX6R261X optic vesicles compared with WT. (a) Day 20, (b) day 35.
Figure 8.

EPHA2 and L1CAM are significantly downregulated while SEMA3A and SEMA3C are significantly upregulated in PAX6R261X optic vesicles at day 35 compared to WT, confirming transcriptomic analysis. * p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
In addition to the cadherins and semaphorins, other cellular adhesion markers were dysregulated in the aniridia optic vesicles compared with WT. Expression of the transmembrane cellular adhesion glycoprotein L1CAM was significantly downregulated at both day 20 and day 35 (Figure 8). Significant upregulation of the claudins CLDN4, CLDN6, CLDN10 and CLDN11 was found at day 20, with CLDN4 and CLDN6 remaining significantly upregulated at day 35. Similarly, the integrin ITGA1 was significantly upregulated at day 20 and day 35 in the aniridia samples, while ITGA2B and ITGA5 were significantly downregulated at both time points. At day 20, OCLN (occludin) was significantly upregulated and NCAM1 was significantly downregulated; they remained up- and downregulated, respectively, at day 35, but the dysregulation was no longer significantly different from the WT samples (Supplementary Figure S1).
2.4. CDH1 and EPHA2 Proteins Are Dysregulated in PAX6R261X Early Ocular Organoids
Although there was no significant difference in fold change on qPCR at day 35, immunofluorescence staining for CDH1 confirmed increased expression in the PAX6R261X early ocular organoids in comparison to the wild-type organoids, with co-localisation with K18 but not with PAX6 (Figure 9, Supplementary Figure S3). Immunofluorescence staining for EPHA2 at day 35 is reduced in the PAX6R261X early ocular organoids in comparison to the wild-type organoids, in keeping with bulk RNA-seq and RT-qPCR results (Supplementary Figure S4).
Figure 9.

Immunofluorescence analysis of day 35 optic cups from WT and PAX6R261X hiPSC, showing staining of DAPI (blue), PAX6 (green) and CDH1 (red). Scale bar, 100 μm.
3. Discussion
This is the first study to report the transcriptomic changes occurring in patient-derived PAX6 haploinsufficient optic vesicles, contributing to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic changes seen in aniridia. In addition to the disruption to retinal, foveal and anterior segment pathways, which were anticipated given the heterozygous PAX6 p.(Arg261*) nonsense mutation and clinical phenotype, we identified dysregulation of the cadherin and semaphorin binding pathways, neither of which has been previously linked directly to aniridia.
Molecular signals originating in the optic vesicle influence surface ectoderm and lens development from the third week of gestation, with BMP4 and LHX2 acting to induce development of the lens placode [25]. Retinoic acid and bone morphogenic protein released from the lens placode and surrounding extraocular mesenchyme stimulate invagination of the optic vesicle, following which TGFß from the extraocular mesenchyme and FGF from the surface ectoderm act to stimulate differentiation of the presumptive retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and neural retina, respectively [25]. This study was undertaken on optic vesicles derived from hiPSCs. There is currently no hiPSC-derived organoid model that is able to reliably co-culture the developing neural retina with RPE, surface ectoderm and lens progenitors to form a true model of human oculogenesis. Furthermore, the model used herein has examined optic vesicles at day 20 and day 35 of development, which is far in advance of when the anterior segment truly begins developing [26], and the genes expressed at different time points throughout oculogenesis change in a precise and coordinated manner to ensure this progresses correctly. However, the use of these optic vesicles and the transcriptomic dysregulation seen with patient-derived mutations shed light on their potential impact on gene expression and development at later stages.
Many of the genes that regulate oculogenesis, including PAX6, are expressed at different time points throughout this process, with the precise combinations and balance of gene expression influencing different aspects of eye development. Dysregulation of the expression of one gene in the optic vesicle at day 20 or day 35 is likely to impact a different aspect of development than the same dysregulation at a later stage. For example, CYP1B1, JAG1, LMX1B and MEIS2 are all involved in both anterior and posterior segment development and are all dysregulated in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles.
CYP1B1 is expressed in the neural retina, optic cup tips, iris and trabecular meshwork, as well as playing a role in retinal vasculature development [12,27]. CYP1B1 mutations are known to cause primary congenital and juvenile glaucoma [28], Peters anomaly [29], aniridia [30] and other anterior segment anomalies [31,32]. JAG1 contributes to optic cup patterning and is primarily associated with Alagille syndrome but mutations have also been identified in patients with Axenfeld–Rieger syndrome [33,34,35], of which developmental iris anomalies are a key feature. LMX1B mutations are associated with juvenile-onset glaucoma as part of Nail–Patella syndrome, but studies in zebrafish have shown that it is expressed in the optic fissure as well as in the periocular mesenchyme and presumptive anterior segment [36,37]. MEIS2 is expressed by retinal progenitors at the optic cup stage in mice, then later in the ciliary margin zone and by retinal ganglion and amacrine cells [38,39]. Murine studies of Meis1/2 double mutants reported that these mice have hypocellularity of the retina with coloboma, incomplete lenticular development, iris and ciliary body anomalies, and reduced expression of Pax6 [38,40].
PAX6 interacts directly with CYP1B1 [41] and MEIS2 [3,42], and JAG1 [43] and LMX1B [42] are predicted to have PAX6 binding sites. CHI3L1 [44], EDN3 [45] and the non-canonical WNT signalling molecules [46] have all been shown to be downstream of PAX6, although whether this is direct or indirect regulation is unclear, while POSTN is known to be mediated by CYP1B1 [47]. This suggests that the phenotypic features seen in aniridia, including foveal and iris hypoplasia, early-onset glaucoma and ocular coloboma, are likely to be mediated in part through changes in PAX6 modulation of the expression of these genes at the various stages of oculogenesis. This evidence of their interaction contributes to our knowledge of the complex molecular pathways governing different stages of anterior and posterior segment morphogenesis and differentiation, but further work in tissue-specific models is required to fully define these processes.
The cadherins are a family of Ca2+-dependent transmembrane glycoproteins which regulate cell–cell adhesion in numerous tissues and are essential for normal retinal lamination, neural crest cell migration and iris development [8,48,49]. Normal CDH4 expression is necessary for proper retinal lamination, axonal pathfinding and synaptic formation among specific retinal ganglion cell (RGC) populations [50,51]; significant downregulation of CHD4 was found in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles at both time points. CDH4 is co-expressed with PAX6 in the ventral thalamus and the axons of the tract of the postoptic commissure during embryogenesis, and studies of PAX6−/− mice have shown that loss of PAX6 results in loss of R-cadherin expression in these regions [6,48]. Although foveal pit development does not begin until gestational week 25, the location of the future fovea is determined much earlier during oculogenesis by the development of the rod-free zone at the optic vesicle stage and subsequent development of the foveal avascular zone [52]. Patients with PAX6 aniridia commonly present with foveal hypoplasia, and it has been suggested that the influence of PAX6 on optic cup patterning, RPE differentiation and RGC development may all contribute to this [3,53], with the latter in particular resulting in a downstream reduction in pigment epithelium-derived factor and lack of formation of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) [54]. CDH4 downregulation resulting from PAX6 haploinsufficiency is therefore a potential mechanism contributing to impairment of forthcoming foveal maturation and foveal hypoplasia, although further studies at later stages of ocular development are required to investigate this fully.
The precise expression patterns of E- (CDH1), N- (CDH2) and P- (CDH3) cadherin in the developing lens contribute to controlling the separation of the lens vesicle from the overlying corneal surface ectoderm, and repression of CDH1 during chick neural crest development is required for induction of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process necessary for normal migration of iris cells to which L1CAM also contributes [8,55,56,57]. CDH1 expression has been shown to negatively correlate with PAX6 expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells [58], and knockout of CDH1 from the lens vesicle in mice resulted in severe iris hyperplasia, microphthalmia and abnormal lens fibre cell differentiation and elongation [8]. Whether PAX6 is acting directly to modulate CDH1 expression, or whether this is an indirect effect, is yet to be determined. L1CAM, which is directly regulated by PAX6 binding to its homeobox and paired domain-containing region [56], is associated with impairment of CDH1-related cellular adhesion and promotes cellular motility in breast carcinoma cells [57]. Here, we demonstrate significant upregulation of CDH1 and significant downregulation of L1CAM in patient-derived PAX6 aniridia optic vesicles. These results imply a conserved role for PAX6 as an upstream negative regulator of CDH1 and a positive regulator of L1CAM. Given this, we hypothesize that this pathway describes a potential mechanism by which PAX6 haploinsufficiency may repress iris development resulting in iris hypoplasia and aniridia, although anterior segment studies at later stages of oculogenesis are required to confirm this.
The receptor tyrosine kinase EPHA2 is a member of the cadherin-binding pathway alongside CDH1 and L1CAM, and contributes to global ocular growth and lenticular development during embryogenesis [59,60]. Pathogenic EPHA2 variants are associated with autosomal dominant congenital cataracts and microphthalmia [59,61]; both phenotypes have been associated with PAX6 aniridia, with childhood-onset cataracts reported in 63% of patients [62]. We demonstrate significant downregulation of EPHA2 in our PAX6R261X optic vesicles. Dysregulation of EPHA2 resulting from PAX6 haploinsufficiency could therefore be a potential mechanism influencing axial length in aniridia; coupled with dysregulation of other genes involved in lens morphogenesis (CITED2, SOX1), lens development (WNT2) and lens fibre cell development (WNT7B), this pathway may also contribute to cataract formation in these patients, although demonstration of these findings in lenticular tissue at an appropriate developmental stage is required for confirmation of this.
The semaphorin family of proteins shares an extracellular cysteine-rich sema domain and has multiple roles in embryogenesis, including retinal lamination, anterior segment formation and regulation of retinal and corneal angiogenesis [63,64,65]. SEMA3A is expressed by the neural retina, retinal angioblasts, lens epithelium, and iris and ciliary body mesenchyme, and is necessary for normal development of the retinal vasculature, cornea and anterior chamber [64,65,66,67]. Sema3A inhibition in chicks resulted in premature migration of neural crest cells into the anterior segment, lack of formation of the corneal endothelial monolayer and disordered corneal innervation and vascularisation [65,66,67]. Studies of Pax6Sey/+ mice have reported similar findings, with increased migration of neural crest cells into the anterior chamber during development with abnormal thickening of the corneal stroma and endothelium in adult mice [68], a feature that has also been reported in aniridia patients [69].
Along with Sema3c in mice, sema3aa in zebrafish has been shown to be regulated by PAX6 [70,71]. The dysregulation of SEMA3A and SEMA3C in our PAX6R261X optic vesicles indicates that PAX6 acts upstream of these semaphorins during human embryogenesis, either directly or indirectly. Taken together with the findings from animal studies, this implicates SEMA3A dysregulation in the development of anterior segment anomalies in aniridia. Turning to the retina, SEMA3A is expressed by retinal angioblasts and is thought to contribute to the development of the retinal vasculature and FAZ [64], whilst SEMA4A mutations have been identified as a cause of retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy [72]. Dysregulation of SEMA3A and CDH4 and their combined effects on the formation of the FAZ, particularly when coupled with SEMA4A disruption, describe a potential underlying mechanism for aniridia-related foveal hypoplasia which warrants further investigation.
The claudins and occludin are known to be key components in the formation and maintenance of tight junctions in both the blood–retinal barrier (BRB) and the cornea [73,74,75]. Our results show upregulation of CLDN2, CLDN4, CLDN6, CLDN10 and CLDN11 in the PAX6R261X optic vesicles, all of which are present in the retina of wild-type mice with the exception of CLDN6 [75]. CLDN2 is known to be a component of the inner BRB, whilst CLDN4, CLDN10 and CLDN11 contribute to RPE tight junction integrity [75]. CLDN2 and CLDN4 have also been identified as components of corneal epithelial tight junctions in rabbits [76]. Aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK) is known to be related to limbal stem cell deficiency and usually manifests clinically in adolescence and young adulthood in the mature cornea [77]. Our results from these PAX6R261X optic vesicles, indicating that PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes dysregulation of these claudins, raise the possibility that a similar effect in the cornea may contribute to the mechanism underlying AAK, but this cannot be proven with the model used herein. Studies in mature corneal models are required to further investigate this potential pathogenic mechanism.
Whilst this study has identified novel biological pathways contributing to the pathogenesis of aniridia, the limitations of this approach should be considered. As discussed above, this study utilized optic vesicles cultured from patient-derived hiPSCs, and we anticipate that the transcriptomic dysregulation resulting from PAX6 haploinsufficiency reported herein may reflect similar dysregulation at other stages of ocular development. Although the use of this model for investigating retinal development is becoming widespread, it is not currently possible to co-culture neural retina with RPE, surface ectoderm/cornea and lenticular progenitors to form a true model of human oculogenesis, enabling us to study the myriad complex interactions that occur between these tissues.
This study utilized bulk RNA-seq of optic vesicles to assess the transcriptome-wide changes in gene expression in a PAX6 nonsense mutation compared with wild type. Whilst single-cell RNA-seq provides resolution of variations in gene expression between individual cellular populations, bulk RNA-seq is more sensitive to subtle changes across the transcriptome and was therefore considered more appropriate for this study. Future work should utilize single-cell RNA-seq to help elucidate the influence of the dysregulation of the pathways identified herein on the developing cornea, iris, ciliary body and lens individually, both at this early developmental stage and in more mature models. Consideration should also be given to the design of studies to assess the impact of the optic cup tip-optic nerve PAX6 expression gradient on the transcriptome in the developing neural retina and RPE.
In this study, one patient-derived aniridia line and therefore a single PAX6 nonsense mutation was modelled, with two patient-derived wild-type lines for comparison. There is therefore the potential that line-specific variability may have influenced these findings. However, dysregulation of key genes reported in this paper was also identified in bulk RNA-seq of day 35 PAX6N124K optic vesicles, including significant upregulation of CDH1 and SEMA3A and significant downregulation of CDH4 in PAX6N124K organoids compared with wild type [17]. Whilst this supports PAX6 haploinsufficiency as the cause of these changes, replication of the findings in isogenic cell lines is paramount to confirm this.
4. Materials and Methods
This study received local (Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK) and national (Northwest London, UK) research ethics approval and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients gave written informed consent for participation through the Genetic Study of Inherited Eye Disease (REC ref 12/LO/0141).
4.1. HiPSC Culture and Organoid Differentiation
Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were harvested from skin biopsies from the affected patient and healthy wild-type (WT) controls and were reprogrammed into hiPSCs using episomal vectors as described by Méjécase et al. [78] and Lima Cunha et al. [19]. The affected patient had a heterozygous nonsense variant in PAX6, c.781C > T p.(Arg261*), confirmed by Sanger sequencing, which is located in exon 10, within the homeobox domain [79]. They presented with a classic aniridia phenotype including iris and foveal hypoplasia, nystagmus and cataracts.
HiPSCs were cultured on Matrigel-coated plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) in mTeSR Plus (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) and were passaged using ReLeSR (STEMCELL Technologies) when they reached 70% confluency.
Early ocular organoids were generated according to the protocol described by Eintracht et al. [18]. Briefly, on day 0, 0.5 mL of anti-adherence solution was added to each well of an AggreWellTM 400 microwell plate (STEMCELL Technologies) before centrifuging at 1300 RCF for 5 min, washing with 2 mL DMEM and replacing with 1 mL mTeSR Plus supplemented with 10 μm Y27632 (STEMCELL Technologies). Cells were washed with PBS and incubated with Accumax (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5–8 min at room temperature to induce dissociation into single cells. 3.6 × 106 cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 1 mL mTeSR/Y27632, then 3000 cells/microwell were added and centrifuged at 100 RCF for 3 min. On day 1, 1 mL of media was changed. On day 2, embryoid bodies were transferred to uncoated p60 dishes in Differentiation Media (DMEM/F12 + L-glutamine (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2% B27 (Gibco), 1% NEAA (Gibco), 5 ng/mL IGF-1 (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco) with 20% KOSR (Gibco) supplemented with 10 μm Y27632. Differentiation Media was changed on alternate days, with 15% KOSR from day 7, 10% KOSR from day 11 and supplementation with 10% FBS (Gibco), 0.1 mm Taurine (Sigma-Aldrich), 40 ng/mL Triiodothyronine (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.5 μm Retinoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) from day 18. To control for technical batch effects, two aniridia clones were cultured in parallel with two WT controls, with the same standardized methods and reagents used at each stage of the study.
4.2. RNA-Seq Library Preparation and Analysis
WT and PAX6R261X samples taken at days 0, 20 and 35 were used for bulk RNA-seq analysis, with at least three biological replicates from each genotype at each time point included in the final analysis. RNA-seq library preparation was done by Novogene (Cambridge, UK) using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA with Ribo Zero Plus rRNA depletion (Illumina cat 20020599) [17]. Sequencing was done using the HiSeq 2500 system with v4 chemistry (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to an average depth of 85 million paired-end 150 bp reads with an average of 53% duplication.
Bulk RNA-seq analysis was done according to the nf-core/RNA-seq pipeline v3.10.1 [80]. FASTQC v0.11.9 [81] and TrimGalore v0.6.7 [82] were used for quality control and adapter trimming. One PAX6R261X sample was removed from each of days 0 and 20 due to low RNA quantity. High-quality reads were aligned to the human genome GRCh38 [83] using STAR v2.7.10a [84] and quantified using RSEM v1.3.1 [85]. One PAX6R261X sample was removed from day 0 due to low read count and high duplication rate. DESeq2 v1.42.1 [86] was used to find differential genes using the negative binomial distribution to model counts, with IHW v1.30.0 [87] for multiple-testing correction and ashr v2.2-63 [88] for effect-size shrinkage to ensure reported fold changes are more robust. Clone was included as a covariate in the analysis to confirm that batch effects did not influence the results.
Gene ontology (GO) [89] and Reactome [90] were used for gene set enrichment and over-representation analysis. Curated gene sets for anterior segment development were derived from relevant GO pathways pertaining to cornea, lens, iris, ciliary body and trabecular meshwork development (listed in Supplementary Table S1) and published literature [2,7,10,91,92].
4.3. RT-qPCR
Day 35 organoids were collected and RNA was extracted according to the Quick-RNA™ Microprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). A total of 500 ng RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Used primer sequences are listed in Table 1. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) following the manufacturer’s instructions on a BioRad CFX96 system following standard cycling conditions.
Table 1.
Primers used for RT-qPCR.
| Gene | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer |
|---|---|---|
| EPHA2 | GCATCAACCAGACAGAGCCC | GATGCTCCAGGAGACGCTAAG |
| CDH1 | GGGTTAAGCACAACAGCAACAG | CTGACCCTTGTACGTGGTGG |
| CDH4 | CAAACGGGACTGGGTCATCC | CTTTGTCGGACCGGATCCTC |
| SEMA3A | CGAGACCCTTACTGTGCTTG | GTCGTCTTGTGCGTCTCTTTG |
| SEMA3C | CCTGTTTCTCGGAACAGATCG | CTCCTCCAGAATGAGCTCGC |
| L1CAM | GCGGCAAATACTCAGTGAAGG | CTGTACTCGCCGAAGGTCTC |
Data were analyzed using the ΔΔCT method, normalized to the average expression of the housekeepers GAPDH and ACTB. Fold change values were calculated by normalizing to control (WT) samples and results were visualized using GraphPad Prism 10.6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance of RT-qPCR data was determined using an unpaired Student’s t-test in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4.4. Immunofluorescence Stainings
Day 35 optic cups were collected using an EVOS XL imaging system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), washed with DPBS (Gibco) and fixed with 4% PFA at 4C for 30 min. Samples were processed, sectioned and stained as previously described [17,18,19]. Slides were imaged with an Axio Imager M2 microscope (ZEISS Research, Oberkochen, Germany) and images were analyzed with Zeiss ZEN 3.12 software (ZEISS Research). Details of all antibodies used are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Primary and secondary antibodies used for immunofluorescence staining.
| Antibody | ID | Company | Dilution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary antibodies | |||
| CDH1 | 610182 | BD Bioscience | 1:200 |
| EPHA2 | sc-398832 | Santa Cruz | 1:200 |
| SEMA3A | Ab23391 | Abcam | 1:50 |
| CRX | H00001406-M02 | Abnova | 1:100 |
| PAX6 | 901301 | Biolegend | 1:300 |
| K18 | MAB3234 | Millipore | 1:400 |
| VSX2 | Ab16141 | Abcam | 1:100 |
| Secondary antibodies | |||
| Donkey anti-Mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 647 | A-3157 | Invitrogen | 1:400 |
| Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 | A-11008 | Invitrogen | 1:400 |
| Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-sheep IgG | A-11016 | Invitrogen | 1:400 |
5. Conclusions
This is the first study to report a direct link between the cadherins, semaphorins and aniridia. This transcriptomic analysis of PAX6R261X optic vesicles, derived from hiPSCs from a patient with aniridia, has demonstrated differential expression of genes in the cadherin binding and semaphorin receptor binding pathways, as well as in genes already known to affect anterior segment development. The dysregulation of SEMA3A and CDH4 suggests a novel pathway that may contribute to foveal hypoplasia in patients with aniridia, whilst upregulation of CDH1 and downregulation of L1CAM are particularly notable in this context. We demonstrate a potential mechanism by which PAX6 haploinsufficiency may repress iris development resulting in iris hypoplasia and aniridia. Given the extensive overlap between causative genes and phenotypic features manifested in aniridia and other anterior segment dysgeneses [26], we hypothesize that these pathways may be dysregulated in other conditions causing anterior segment developmental anomalies.
Evidence of dysregulation of genes in these pathways and their interaction with PAX6 expands our knowledge of the complex interactions between the many factors controlling early eye development, and future work should investigate the impact of these individual factors on phenotypic changes, both in aniridia and in other anterior segment dysgeneses. The findings reported herein should be strengthened by replication in isogenic controls, with single-cell RNA-seq to provide resolution of differential gene expression within individual cell populations. Furthermore, expanding the known downstream molecular targets of PAX6 provides more candidates for future development of targeted therapies for related ocular diseases.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ivonne Vlijmen-Willems and the Department of Dermatology at Radboudumc for the use of and technical assistance with their microscopy equipment.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| AAK | Aniridia-associated keratopathy |
| BRB | Blood–retinal barrier |
| EMT | Epithelial–mesenchymal transition |
| FAZ | Foveal avascular zone |
| hiPSC | Human-induced pluripotent stem cells |
| LFC | log2 fold change |
| NMD | Nonsense-mediated decay |
| padj | Adjusted p-value |
| RGC | Retinal ganglion cell |
| RPE | Retinal pigment epithelium |
| WAGR | Wilms tumour, aniridia, genital anomalies and a range of developmental issues |
| WT | Wild type |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27198449/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M.; methodology, N.C., G.J., C.M., P.H., J.E., J.B., E.B., D.L.C. and M.M.; software, J.B.; formal analysis, N.C.; investigation, N.C., G.J., C.M., P.H., J.E., J.B. and D.L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, N.C.; writing—review and editing, N.C., P.H., J.B., D.L.C. and M.M.; supervision, M.M.; funding acquisition, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK (local) and Northwest London, UK (national), reference 12/LO/0141, approved on 2 November 2016.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The original data presented in the study is available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE318345).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funding organizations had no involvement in the design or execution of this research.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Moorfields Eye Charity, the Wellcome Trust (205174/Z/16/Z), the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology to M.M.; and by the Dutch Organisation for knowledge and innovation in health, healthcare and well-being (ZonMw) [04510012210043, 10250052410019], and UitZicht (UZ2025-32) to D.L.C.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Hingorani M., Hanson I., van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;20:1011–1017. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cvekl A., Tamm E.R. Anterior Eye Development and Ocular Mesenchyme: New Insights from Mouse Models and Human Diseases. BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2004;26:374. doi: 10.1002/bies.20009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shaham O., Menuchin Y., Farhy C., Ashery-Padan R. Pax6: A Multi-Level Regulator of Ocular Development. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012;31:351–376. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Takamiya M., Stegmaier J., Kobitski A.Y., Schott B., Weger B.D., Margariti D., Cereceda Delgado A.R., Gourain V., Scherr T., Yang L., et al. Pax6 Organizes the Anterior Eye Segment by Guiding Two Distinct Neural Crest Waves. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1008774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davis-Silberman N., Kalich T., Oron-Karni V., Marquardt T., Kroeber M., Tamm E.R., Ashery-Padan R. Genetic Dissection of Pax6 Dosage Requirements in the Developing Mouse Eye. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:2265–2276. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stoykova A., Götz M., Gruss P., Price J. Pax6-Dependent Regulation of Adhesive Patterning, R-Cadherin Expression and Boundary Formation in Developing Forebrain. Development. 1997;124:3765–3777. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.19.3765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cvekl A., Ashery-Padan R. The Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Vertebrate Lens Development. Development. 2014;141:4432–4447. doi: 10.1242/dev.107953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pontoriero G.F., Smith A.N., Miller L.-A.D., Radice G.L., West-Mays J.A., Lang R.A. Co-Operative Roles for E-Cadherin and N-Cadherin during Lens Vesicle Separation and Lens Epithelial Cell Survival. Dev. Biol. 2009;326:403–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen Y., Doughman Y., Gu S., Jarrell A., Aota S., Cvekl A., Watanabe M., Dunwoodie S.L., Johnson R.S., van Heyningen V., et al. Cited2 Is Required for the Proper Formation of the Hyaloid Vasculature and for Lens Morphogenesis. Development. 2008;135:2939–2948. doi: 10.1242/dev.021097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Napier H.R.L., Kidson S.H. Molecular Events in Early Development of the Ciliary Body: A Question of Folding. Exp. Eye Res. 2007;84:615–625. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Conte I., Carrella S., Avellino R., Karali M., Marco-Ferreres R., Bovolenta P., Banfi S. miR-204 Is Required for Lens and Retinal Development via Meis2 Targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:15491–15496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914785107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stoilov I., Rezaie T., Jansson I., Schenkman J.B., Sarfarazi M. Expression of Cytochrome P4501b1 (Cyp1b1) during Early Murine Development. Mol. Vis. 2004;10:629–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baulmann D.C., Ohlmann A., Flügel-Koch C., Goswami S., Cvekl A., Tamm E.R. Pax6 Heterozygous Eyes Show Defects in Chamber Angle Differentiation That Are Associated with a Wide Spectrum of Other Anterior Eye Segment Abnormalities. Mech. Dev. 2002;118:3–17. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00260-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsushita I., Izumi H., Ueno S., Hayashi T., Fujinami K., Tsunoda K., Iwata T., Kiuchi Y., Kondo H. Functional Characteristics of Diverse PAX6 Mutations Associated with Isolated Foveal Hypoplasia. Genes. 2023;14:1483. doi: 10.3390/genes14071483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.“pax6”[GENE]—ClinVar—NCBI. [(accessed on 27 January 2025)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar.
- 16.Williamson K.A., FitzPatrick D.R. The Genetic Architecture of Microphthalmia, Anophthalmia and Coloboma. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2014;57:369–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harding P., Owen N., Eintracht J., Cunha D.L., Chan B., Rainger J., Moosajee M. Variant-Specific Disruption to Notch Signalling in PAX6 Microphthalmia and Aniridia Patient-Derived hiPSC Optic Cup-like Organoids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2025;1871:167869. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2025.167869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eintracht J., Harding P., Lima Cunha D., Moosajee M. Efficient Embryoid-Based Method to Improve Generation of Optic Vesicles from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. F1000Research. 2022;11:324. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.108829.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lima Cunha D., Sarkar H., Eintracht J., Harding P., Zhou J.H., Moosajee M. Restoration of Functional PAX6 in Aniridia Patient iPSC-Derived Ocular Tissue Models Using Repurposed Nonsense Suppression Drugs. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2023;33:240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O’Hara-Wright M., Gonzalez-Cordero A. Retinal Organoids: A Window into Human Retinal Development. Development. 2020;147:dev189746. doi: 10.1242/dev.189746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mellough C.B., Collin J., Khazim M., White K., Sernagor E., Steel D.H.W., Lako M. IGF-1 Signaling Plays an Important Role in the Formation of Three-Dimensional Laminated Neural Retina and Other Ocular Structures from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2015;33:2416–2430. doi: 10.1002/stem.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Isla-Magrané H., Veiga A., García-Arumí J., Duarri A. Multiocular Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Displayed Retinal, Corneal, and Retinal Pigment Epithelium Lineages. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:581. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02651-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duot M., Viel R., Viet J., Le Goff-Gaillard C., Paillard L., Lachke S.A., Gautier-Courteille C., Reboutier D. Eye Lens Organoids Made Simple: Characterization of a New Three-Dimensional Organoid Model for Lens Development and Pathology. Cells. 2023;12:2478. doi: 10.3390/cells12202478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dorgau B., Collin J., Rozanska A., Boczonadi V., Moya-Molina M., Unsworth A., Hussain R., Coxhead J., Dhanaseelan T., Armstrong L., et al. Deciphering the Spatiotemporal Transcriptional and Chromatin Accessibility of Human Retinal Organoid Development at the Single-Cell Level. iScience. 2024;27:109397. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harding P., Moosajee M. The Molecular Basis of Human Anophthalmia and Microphthalmia. J. Dev. Biol. 2019;7:16. doi: 10.3390/jdb7030016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cronbach N., Méjécase C., Moosajee M. Genetic Basis of Non-Syndromic Childhood Glaucoma Associated with Anterior Segment Dysgenesis: A Narrative Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:1352. doi: 10.3390/ph18091352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhao W., Parrish A.R., Ramos K.S. Constitutive and Inducible Expression of Cytochrome P450IA1 and P450IB1 in Human Vascular Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 1998;34:671–673. doi: 10.1007/s11626-998-0060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Knight L.S.W., Ruddle J.B., Taranath D.A., Goldberg I., Smith J.E.H., Gole G., Chiang M.Y., Willett F., D’Mellow G., Breen J., et al. Childhood and Early Onset Glaucoma Classification and Genetic Profile in a Large Australasian Disease Registry. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1549–1560. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stingl J.V., Diederich S., Diel H., Schuster A.K., Wagner F.M., Chronopoulos P., Aghayeva F., Grehn F., Winter J., Schweiger S., et al. First Results from the Prospective German Registry for Childhood Glaucoma: Phenotype-Genotype Association. J. Clin. Med. 2021;11:16. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alzuhairy S., Abu-Amero K.K., Al-Shahwan S., Edward D.P. A Novel CYP1B1 Mutation with Congenital Glaucoma and Total Aniridia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36:89–91. doi: 10.3109/13816810.2013.833635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reis L.M., Seese S., Costakos D., Semina E.V. Congenital Anterior Segment Ocular Disorders: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations and Emerging Novel Mechanisms. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2024;102:101288. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2024.101288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al-Saei O., Malka S., Owen N., Aliyev E., Vempalli F.R., Ocieczek P., Al-Khathlan B., Genomics England Research Consortium. Fakhro K., Moosajee M. Increasing the Diagnostic Yield of Childhood Glaucoma Cases Recruited into the 100,000 Genomes Project. BMC Genom. 2024;25:484. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10353-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reis L.M., Amor D.J., Haddad R.A., Nowak C.B., Keppler-Noreuil K.M., Chisholm S.A., Semina E.V. Alternative Genetic Diagnoses in Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome Spectrum. Genes. 2023;14:1948. doi: 10.3390/genes14101948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.da Palma M.M., Igelman A.D., Ku C., Burr A., You J.Y., Place E.M., Wang N.-K., Oh J.K., Branham K.E., Zhang X., et al. Characterization of the Spectrum of Ophthalmic Changes in Patients with Alagille Syndrome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62:27. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.7.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bao Z.-Z., Cepko C.L. The Expression and Function of Notch Pathway Genes in the Developing Rat Eye. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:1425–1434. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01425.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mimiwati Z., Mackey D.A., Craig J.E., MacKinnon J.R., Rait J.L., Liebelt J.E., Ayala-Lugo R., Vollrath D., Richards J.E. Nail-patella Syndrome and Its Association with Glaucoma: A Review of Eight Families. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1505–1509. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.McMahon C., Gestri G., Wilson S.W., Link B.A. Lmx1b Is Essential for Survival of Periocular Mesenchymal Cells and Influences Fgf-Mediated Retinal Patterning in Zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 2009;332:287–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dupacova N., Antosova B., Paces J., Kozmik Z. Meis Homeobox Genes Control Progenitor Competence in the Retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2013136118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013136118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yan W., Laboulaye M.A., Tran N.M., Whitney I.E., Benhar I., Sanes J.R. Mouse Retinal Cell Atlas: Molecular Identification of over Sixty Amacrine Cell Types. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:5177–5195. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0471-20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Antosova B., Smolikova J., Klimova L., Lachova J., Bendova M., Kozmikova I., Machon O., Kozmik Z. The Gene Regulatory Network of Lens Induction Is Wired through Meis-Dependent Shadow Enhancers of Pax6. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng W., Tong T., Lee J., Liu X., Marcus C., Jefcoate C.R. Stimulation of Mouse Cyp1b1 during Adipogenesis: Characterization of Promoter Activation by the Transcription Factor Pax6. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013;532:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Coutinho P., Pavlou S., Bhatia S., Chalmers K.J., Kleinjan D.A., van Heyningen V. Discovery and Assessment of Conserved Pax6 Target Genes and Enhancers. Genome Res. 2011;21:1349–1359. doi: 10.1101/gr.124115.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dorà E.F. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh, UK: 2016. Regulation of Notch Ligands Dll1 and Jag1 by Pax6 during Cortical Development. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Davis J., Piatigorsky J. Overexpression of Pax6 in Mouse Cornea Directly Alters Corneal Epithelial Cells: Changes in Immune Function, Vascularization, and Differentiation. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52:4158–4168. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Villalba-Benito L., Torroglosa A., Luzón-Toro B., Fernández R.M., Moya-Jiménez M.J., Antiñolo G., Borrego S. ChIP-Seq-Based Approach in Mouse Enteric Precursor Cells Reveals New Potential Genes with a Role in Enteric Nervous System Development and Hirschsprung Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9061. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shah R., Amador C., Chun S.T., Ghiam S., Saghizadeh M., Kramerov A.A., Ljubimov A.V. Non-Canonical Wnt Signaling in the Eye. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2023;95:101149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhao Y., Wang S., Sorenson C.M., Teixeira L., Dubielzig R.R., Peters D.M., Conway S.J., Jefcoate C.R., Sheibani N. Cyp1b1 Mediates Periostin Regulation of Trabecular Meshwork Development by Suppression of Oxidative Stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013;33:4225–4240. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00856-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Andrews G.L., Mastick G.S. R-Cadherin Is a Pax6-Regulated, Growth-Promoting Cue for Pioneer Axons. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:9873–9880. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-30-09873.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu Q., Sanborn K.L., Cobb N., Raymond P.A., Marrs J.A. R-Cadherin Expression in the Developing and Adult Zebrafish Visual System. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999;410:303–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990726)410:2<303::AID-CNE11>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu Q., Marrs J.A., Raymond P.A. Spatial Correspondence between R-Cadherin Expression Domains and Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons in Developing Zebrafish. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999;410:290–302. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990726)410:2<290::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Olguin A.G.R., Rochon P.-L., Theriault C., Brown T., Yao H., Cayouette M., Cook E.P., Krishnaswamy A. Cadherin 4 Assembles a Family of Color-Preferring Retinal Circuits That Respond to Light Offset. Curr. Biol. 2025;35:1298–1310.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Daruich A., Duncan M., Robert M.P., Lagali N., Semina E.V., Aberdam D., Ferrari S., Romano V., des Roziers C.B., Benkortebi R., et al. Congenital Aniridia beyond Black Eyes: From Phenotype and Novel Genetic Mechanisms to Innovative Therapeutic Approaches. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2023;95:101133. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pedersen H.R., Baraas R.C., Landsend E.C.S., Utheim Ø.A., Utheim T.P., Gilson S.J., Neitz M. PAX6 Genotypic and Retinal Phenotypic Characterization in Congenital Aniridia. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61:14. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.5.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Provis J.M., Dubis A.M., Maddess T., Carroll J. Adaptation of the Central Retina for High Acuity Vision: Cones, the Fovea and the Avascular Zone. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013;35:63–81. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huber M.A., Kraut N., Beug H. Molecular Requirements for Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition during Tumor Progression. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005;17:548–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Meech R., Kallunki P., Edelman G.M., Jones F.S. A Binding Site for Homeodomain and Pax Proteins Is Necessary for L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Gene Expression by Pax-6 and Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:2420–2425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shtutman M., Levina E., Ohouo P., Baig M., Roninson I.B. Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 Disrupts E-Cadherin-Containing Adherens Junctions and Increases Scattering and Motility of MCF7 Breast Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:11370–11380. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wu D., Zhang T., Liu Y., Deng S., Han R., Liu T., Li J., Xu Y. The PAX6-ZEB2 Axis Promotes Metastasis and Cisplatin Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through PI3K/AKT Signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:349. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1591-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Harding P., Toms M., Schiff E., Owen N., Bell S., Lloyd I.C., Moosajee M. EPHA2 Segregates with Microphthalmia and Congenital Cataracts in Two Unrelated Families. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2190. doi: 10.3390/ijms22042190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cheng C., Wang K., Hoshino M., Uesugi K., Yagi N., Pierscionek B. EphA2 Affects Development of the Eye Lens Nucleus and the Gradient of Refractive Index. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2022;63:2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang T., Hua R., Xiao W., Burdon K.P., Bhattacharya S.S., Craig J.E., Shang D., Zhao X., Mackey D.A., Moore A.T., et al. Mutations of the EPHA2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Gene Cause Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract. Hum. Mutat. 2009;30:E603–E611. doi: 10.1002/humu.20995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Voskresenskaya A., Pozdeyeva N., Batkov Y., Vasilyeva T., Marakhonov A., West R.A., Caplan J.L., Cvekl A., Wang Y., Duncan M.K. Morphometric Analysis of the Lens in Human Aniridia and Mouse Small Eye. Exp. Eye Res. 2021;203:108371. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alto L.T., Terman J.R. Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 1493. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2017. Semaphorins and Their Signaling Mechanisms; pp. 1–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lutty G.A., McLeod D.S. Development of the Hyaloid, Choroidal and Retinal Vasculatures in the Fetal Human Eye. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018;62:58–76. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McKenna C.C., Ojeda A.F., Spurlin J., Kwiatkowski S., Lwigale P.Y. Sema3A Maintains Corneal Avascularity during Development by Inhibiting Vegf Induced Angioblast Migration. Dev. Biol. 2014;391:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lwigale P.Y., Bronner-Fraser M. Lens-Derived Semaphorin3A Regulates Sensory Innervation of the Cornea. Dev. Biol. 2007;306:750–759. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lwigale P.Y., Bronner-Fraser M. Semaphorin3A/Neuropilin-1 Signaling Acts as a Molecular Switch Regulating Neural Crest Migration during Cornea Development. Dev. Biol. 2009;336:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kanakubo S., Nomura T., Yamamura K., Miyazaki J., Tamai M., Osumi N. Abnormal Migration and Distribution of Neural Crest Cells in Pax6 Heterozygous Mutant Eye, a Model for Human Eye Diseases. Genes Cells. 2006;11:919–933. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Whitson J.T., Liang C., Godfrey D.G., Petroll W.M., Cavanagh H.D., Patel D., Fellman R.L., Starita R.J. Central Corneal Thickness in Patients with Congenital Aniridia. Eye Contact Lens Sci. Clin. Pract. 2005;31:221–224. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000152487.16012.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jones L., López-Bendito G., Gruss P., Stoykova A., Molnár Z. Pax6 Is Required for the Normal Development of the Forebrain Axonal Connections. Development. 2002;129:5041–5052. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.21.5041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tamamaki N., Fujimori K., Nojyo Y., Kaneko T., Takauji R. Evidence That Sema3A and Sema3F Regulate the Migration of GABAergic Neurons in the Developing Neocortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003;455:238–248. doi: 10.1002/cne.10476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Abid A., Ismail M., Mehdi S.Q., Khaliq S. Identification of Novel Mutations in the SEMA4A Gene Associated with Retinal Degenerative Diseases. J. Med. Genet. 2006;43:378–381. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.035055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ban Y., Dota A., Cooper L.J., Fullwood N.J., Nakamura T., Tsuzuki M., Mochida C., Kinoshita S. Tight Junction-Related Protein Expression and Distribution in Human Corneal Epithelium. Exp. Eye Res. 2003;76:663–669. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00054-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yoshida Y., Ban Y., Kinoshita S. Tight Junction Transmembrane Protein Claudin Subtype Expression and Distribution in Human Corneal and Conjunctival Epithelium. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50:2103–2108. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Luo Y., Xiao W., Zhu X., Mao Y., Liu X., Chen X., Huang J., Tang S., Rizzolo L.J. Differential Expression of Claudins in Retinas during Normal Development and the Angiogenesis of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52:7556–7564. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ortiz-Melo M.T., Sánchez-Guzmán E., González-Robles A., Valdés J., Gómez-Flores E., Castro-Muñozledo F. Expression of Claudins -2 and -4 and Cingulin Is Coordinated with the Start of Stratification and Differentiation in Corneal Epithelial Cells: Retinoic Acid Reversibly Disrupts Epithelial Barrier. Biol. Open. 2012;2:132–143. doi: 10.1242/bio.20123145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Latta L., Figueiredo F.C., Ashery-Padan R., Collinson J.M., Daniels J., Ferrari S., Szentmáry N., Solá S., Shalom-Feuerstein R., Lako M., et al. Pathophysiology of Aniridia-Associated Keratopathy: Developmental Aspects and Unanswered Questions. Ocul. Surf. 2021;22:245–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Méjécase C., Harding P., Sarkar H., Eintracht J., Lima Cunha D., Toualbi L., Moosajee M. Generation of Two Human Control iPS Cell Lines (UCLi016-A and UCLi017-A) from Healthy Donors with No Known Ocular Conditions. Stem Cell Res. 2020;49:102113. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2020.102113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Grønskov K., Rosenberg T., Sand A., Brøndum-Nielsen K. Mutational Analysis of PAX6: 16 Novel Mutations Including 5 Missense Mutations with a Mild Aniridia Phenotype. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1999;7:274–286. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rnaseq: Introduction. [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: https://nf-co.re/rnaseq/3.14.0.html.
- 81.Babraham Bioinformatics—FastQC A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- 82.Babraham Bioinformatics—Trim Galore! [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/
- 83.Ensembl Genome Browser 113. [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: http://www.ensembl.org/index.html.
- 84.Dobin A., Davis C.A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., Batut P., Chaisson M., Gingeras T.R. STAR: Ultrafast Universal RNA-Seq Aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Li B., Dewey C.N. RSEM: Accurate Transcript Quantification from RNA-Seq Data with or without a Reference Genome. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA-Seq Data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ignatiadis N., Klaus B., Zaugg J., Huber W. Data-Driven Hypothesis Weighting Increases Detection Power in Genome-Scale Multiple Testing. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:577–580. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Stephens M. False Discovery Rates: A New Deal. Biostatistics. 2017;18:275–294. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Gene Ontology Resource. [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: http://geneontology.org/
- 90.Reactome|Pathway Browser. [(accessed on 2 April 2025)]. Available online: https://reactome.org/PathwayBrowser/#TOOL=AT.
- 91.Davis-Silberman N., Ashery-Padan R. Iris Development in Vertebrates; Genetic and Molecular Considerations. Brain Res. 2008;1192:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Beebe D.C. Development of the Ciliary Body: A Brief Review. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK. 1986;105:123–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original data presented in the study is available from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE318345).
