Abstract
Daily supplements have emerged as a compelling strategy for heavy metal detoxification (e.g., Hg and Pb), given that conventional chelation therapy lacks chronic exposure data and is heavily reliant on the doctor’s experience. Among such natural agents, Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris), a commercially available supplement, is known for its notable heavy metal-binding capacity and ancillary benefits. Yet, the detoxification mechanisms of action of C. vulgaris have remained largely unexplored. In this study, our transcriptomic and signaling analyses demonstrated that the chemically characterized aqueous extract of C. vulgaris may have attenuated Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe in HEK-293 cells and was predicted to activate AKT signaling and modulate the expression of zinc finger protein-related genes. Furthermore, in corresponding DMT1-overexpressing cells, the protective effects of the extract were associated with the modulation of translation and ubiquitination pathways. These changes may coincide with the partial recovery of the two major ribosomal stress surveillance pathways. Intriguingly, under conditions in which Hg2+ did not provoke the more severe ribotoxic stress response, the C. vulgaris extract appeared to alleviate Hg2+-induced ribosomal stress by engaging both ribosomal quality control and the integrated stress response, particularly the response of GCN2 to amino acid deficiency. Ultimately, these findings suggest the protective effect of C. vulgaris extract against Hg2+ toxicity is associated with DMT1 at the transcriptome level, warranting further experimental investigation of its potential as a nutraceutical adjuvant in mercury detoxification.
Keywords: algal aqueous extract, heavy metal, DMT1, network pharmacology, mitotic catastrophe, ribosomal stress surveillance
1. Introduction
Despite the recognition of mercury toxicity, interest in its use has persisted across time and civilizations, resulting in pervasive human exposure. Mercury exposure comes from two principal forms: organic (mainly methylmercury, CH3Hg+) and inorganic mercury (including elemental mercury) [1]. Organic mercury exposure arises primarily from methylmercury in seafood consumption, and to a lesser extent, from the use of merbromin (C20H8Br2HgNa2O6) as an antiseptic and thimerosal (C9H9HgNaO2S, an ethylmercury-based compound), used as a preservative in children’s vaccines from the 1930s until its phase-out around 1999–2001 [2]. Inorganic mercury has historically been utilized in ancient medicine, skin-lightening products, topical antiseptics, diuretics, gold mining, and dental amalgam fillings [3]. However, organic mercury, primarily from fish consumption, has dominated concerns about human exposure, leaving the potential health risks of inorganic mercury underexplored. This study, therefore, addresses this gap by focusing on the toxicity of inorganic mercury, particularly, mercuric mercury (Hg2+).
Inorganic mercury has generally been regarded as having low neurotoxicity owing to poor absorption resulting from low lipophilicity and limited blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration relative to methylmercury [3]. Mercuric ion (Hg2+) can nonetheless access the CNS by retrograde axonal transport from peripheral sites [4]. Of note, inorganic mercury is predominantly nephrotoxic, as Hg2+ preferentially accumulates in the kidney through reabsorption in the proximal tubule cells [5]. This retention is mediated by cysteine-conjugated complexes (Cys-S-Hg-S-Cys) that utilize basolateral organic anion transporters and luminal amino acid transporters [6]. Hg2+ toxicity stems from its high affinity for sulfhydryl groups (-SH) that form thiol-bound mercury with cysteine, glutathione, and numerous other proteins, thereby driving broad-spectrum toxicity through concurrent impairment of protein functions and the facilitation of molecular mimicry, enabling its cellular uptake through transporters [7]. Nonetheless, studies on the genotoxicity of mercuric chloride (HgCl2) have yielded conflicting results. It is generally accepted that inorganic mercury acts as a clastogen, causing chromosome breakage in eukaryotes [8]. Mechanistic data present a heterogeneous picture. Accumulated evidence suggests Hg2+ inhibits microtubule assembly by binding to thiol groups on tubulin, acting as a spindle inhibitor [8,9]. Conversely, another study attributed altered chromosome segregation not only to spindle protein binding but also to inactivation of RNA polymerase I [10]. Adding to this complexity, some studies indicated that HgCl2 failed to induce chromosome aberration in leukocytes [11], while others found it decreased the chromosome length, stimulated metallothionein synthesis, and induced chromatin fragmentation [12,13], underscoring the multifaceted nature of its genotoxic profile.
Chelation therapy is the primary treatment for heavy metal intoxication. In this context, 3-dimercapto-propanesulphonate (DMPS) is used for both inorganic and organic mercury, while dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA or succimer) is considered superior for organic mercury. However, both carry the risk of depleting essential elements and eliciting other adverse effects. Thus, nutritional interventions based on foods and supplements, which promote chelation and supply essential micronutrients, are emerging as a lifestyle support strategy for heavy metal detoxification [14,15]. Sulfur-rich foods such as garlic [16], broccoli [17], and the sulfur-containing amino acids taurine and methionine [18,19,20] are suggested for alleviating oxidative stress and facilitating detoxification of heavy metals. Alpha lipoic acid, a naturally occurring antioxidant in food that regenerates vitamins E and C, also possesses metal-chelating activity [14]. Cilantro was reported to enhance mercury excretion after dental amalgam removal and remains popular, though the evidence remains limited [21]. N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), an orally available precursor of cysteine, can facilitate the function of a metal chelator [22]. Selenium, an essential trace mineral in Chlorella dietary supplements, forms stable complexes with mercury, acting as a potent antagonist to mercury toxicity. It even facilitates mercury transport through cell membranes by complex formation. A controlled trial among 103 mercury-exposed villagers demonstrated the benefit of selenium supplements [23]. Collectively, these lines of evidence point toward a prospect in which natural products may provide meaningful relief from mercury poisoning symptoms.
Living Chlorella cells possess a well-characterized metal-tolerance system, mainly through limiting entry, characterized by intracellular chelation by phytochelatins followed by vacuolar sequestration, active efflux, and antioxidant response [24]. However, processed Chlorella supplements instead use a passive physicochemical mechanism for detoxification, predominantly through the combined action of cell-wall metal-binding functional groups (e.g., carboxyl, amino, hydroxyl, phosphoryl), a rich nutrient profile, and antioxidant small molecules [25,26]. Several animal studies have demonstrated that Chlorella supplementation alleviates the heavy metal burden on the kidney and liver [27], increasing fecal and urinary excretion [25], for example, during methylmercury exposure [28], and additionally reducing intestinal absorption in some conditions [29]. For instance, it mitigates cadmium chloride-induced kidney dysfunction by reducing albumin and total protein loss in urine, while helping to restore normal renal tissue architecture [30]. Translation to humans nevertheless remains limited; no clinical recommendation for heavy metal detoxification has been established. A meta-analysis concluded that Chlorella supplementation improved total cholesterol levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but it did not affect high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels [25]. Further metadata to illuminate the direct mechanistic link to heavy metal detoxification modes of action of Chlorella supplementation is required to lay the groundwork for rigorous human studies.
Among the plethora of transporters governing metal homeostasis, few are as pivotal as DMT1 (Nramp2/DCT1), encoded by the SLC11A2 gene. DMT1 is a proton-coupled symporter that mediates the transport of various divalent metals (e.g., Fe2+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+) and is driven by the inwardly directed H+ electrochemical gradient [31,32]. Interestingly, Hg2+ may also be transported by DMT1 through proton-coupled symport and ionic mimicry [33]. The cell-based studies supported the role of DMT1 in the intestinal uptake of Hg2+, quantified by a continuous-flow cold-vapour generation atomic fluorescence spectrometer (CV-AFS) [33,34], whereas conflicting research suggested that DMT1 does not mediate Hg2+ uptake in Xenopus oocytes assessed by electrophysiology and fluorescence [35], demanding further investigation of the relationship between DMT1 and Hg2+. Of particular relevance to this study, Chlorella exhibited efficacy comparable to ferrous sulfate in rats with iron deficiency anemia [36], hinting at a potential modulatory role of Chlorella on the DMT1 transporter. Thus, combined with the evidence that Hg2+ may have been linked preliminarily to DMT1, we investigated whether DMT1 contributes to HgCl2 toxicity and to the protective action of Chlorella.
The present work aims to test the involvement of DMT1 in both mercuric chloride toxicity and Chlorella vulgaris-mediated protection, and to characterize the transcriptional pathways engaged. To test this, a cellular model of Chlorella-mediated protection of Hg2+ was established initially via resazurin assay. Furthermore, leveraging transcriptome analysis, we found that the protective effect of Chlorella extract in Hg2+-induced toxicity was critically associated with modulation of translation and ubiquitination pathways via the DMT1 transporter and coexisted with recovery of the two main ribosomal stress surveillance pathways: ribosomal quality control and the integrated stress response. These transcriptome-based observations tentatively position C. vulgaris as a promising, multi-mechanism supplement for mitigating Hg2+ poisoning that merits further functional and in vivo studies.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Aqueous Extraction of Chlorella vulgaris
The aqueous extract of C. vulgaris was prepared according to the methodology described in our prior publication, which also characterized its secondary metabolite profile [37]. Briefly, five grams of the chemically characterized C. vulgaris powder (batch number PZN-16735896, Roquette Klötze GmbH & Co. KG, Klötze, Germany) were subjected to ultrasonication with 300 mL of distilled water. The resulting extract was filtered through Whatman filter paper and concentrated to dryness under vacuum at 40–50 °C using a rotary evaporator. The crude aqueous extract yield was 18.8% (mg extract per g dry biomass weight) and was preserved at –20 °C for subsequent UPLC-HRMS/MS analysis as well as biological activity assessments. Stock solutions were prepared at 20 mg/mL in distilled water. The aqueous extract of C. vulgaris is characterized by several common and valuable flavonoids: tetrahydroxymethoxyflavone, luteolin, and apigenin, which bear a flavone core; alongside methyl quercetin, which is in the flavonol structure.
2.2. Cell Culture
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells and a derivative line stably overexpressing pIRES2 DsRed-Express2-DMT1 (isoform 1A-IRE(+)), referred to as HEK-293 DMT1 cells, were kindly provided by Prof. Matthias A. Hediger (University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland) [38]. HEK-293 cells were originally sourced from ATCC CRL-1573. DMT1 codes for the divalent metal transporter 1, and its overexpression was verified with qRT-PCR in our lab [37]. Both cell lines were used for the experiments within 25 passages to minimize phenotypic drift and were maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM Na-pyruvate, and 100 μM minimal essential medium nonessential amino acids at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Additionally, to maintain DMT1 overexpression, 500 μg/mL geneticin (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was added to the culture medium of HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
2.3. Cytotoxicity Assay
The cytotoxicity of the aqueous extract of a commercial C. vulgaris supplement (Roquette Klötze GmbH & Co. KG, Klötze, Germany) was determined in our previous study, which confirmed non-cytotoxicity up to 100 µg/mL [37]. For the present work, cytotoxicity towards mercury(II) chloride (HgCl2, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was assessed using a resazurin (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) reduction assay, measuring conversion of resazurin to highly fluorescent resorufin by living cells. Cytotoxicity of HgCl2 was evaluated across a concentration range from 0.003 µM to 10 µM in 72 h. To assess the cytoprotective potential of the aqueous extract of C. vulgaris, cells exposed to 0.01 µM HgCl2 were simultaneously treated with 0.01 to 30 µg/mL C. vulgaris aqueous extract for 72 h. The concentration of 0.01 µM HgCl2 was chosen deliberately as a sub-cytotoxic dose. This sub-cytotoxic concentration leaves the cells alive, so the mechanism readout reflects a primary molecular response, rather than being confounded by widespread death and membrane collapse that dominate at cytotoxic doses, which would otherwise mask the transporter-specific signaling [39]. The concentration range of C. vulgaris aqueous extract was based on our previous paper, in which it was shown to be non-cytotoxic [37]. The fluorescence intensity was measured with Infinite M2000 Pro™ plate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany) at an excitation/emission wavelength of 544/590 nm. IC50 values were calculated from concentration–response curves using a four-parameter logistic model in GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA), and IC50 values are presented with profile-likelihood 95% confidence intervals (Table 1). The experiments were conducted in three independent biological replicates, with six replicates per experiment.
Table 1.
IC50 values for HgCl2 in HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
| Cell Line | IC50 (μM) | 95% CI | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEK-293 | 3.84 | 2.43–6.09 | 0.95 |
| HEK-293 DMT1 | 0.87 | 0.75–1.00 | 0.98 |
95% CI: asymptotic 95% confidence interval. Data were fitted with a four-parameter variable-slope model in which the lower plateau was constrained to 0% viability.
2.4. RNA Extraction
HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/well in a 6-well plate overnight. Afterwards, cells were either left untreated (negative controls), treated with HgCl2 alone (0.01 µM), or co-treated with HgCl2 (0.01 µM) and C. vulgaris aqueous extract (30 µg/mL) for 24 h, with n = 2 independent biological replicates per group. The concentrations of HgCl2 and C. vulgaris aqueous extract were selected according to the optimal restoration of cell viability in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells following treatment with C. vulgaris aqueous extract. Total mRNA was isolated using the InviTrap® Spin Universal RNA Mini Kit (Invitek Molecular, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Afterwards, the total RNA concentrations and purity were determined using the NanoDrop1000 Spectrophotometer (PEQLAB, Erlangen, Germany) by measuring A260/A280 ratios. RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent Fragment Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with ProSize data analysis software (Version 5.0.1). All samples used for microarray and qRT-PCR analysis exhibited an RNA Quality Number (RQN) of 10.0 (scale 1–10), with 28S/18S ribosomal RNA ratios of 1.4–2.3 (mean 1.95), confirming high-quality, intact total RNA suitable for downstream transcriptomic analysis. The RNA samples were used for microarray analysis and qRT-PCR technical confirmation.
2.5. Microarray Hybridization
Total RNA from the control and treated samples underwent quality control, labeling, and hybridization to Affymetrix GeneChips® with human Clariom™ S assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany). The raw data were normalized using the robust multi-array average (RMA) method to correct for systematic differences between arrays. Normalized unscaled standard error (NUSE) was examined for each array for probe-level quality control. The detection-above-background (DABG) test was used to identify genes whose signal was significantly stronger than the array’s background noise. We considered a probe set detected in a sample if its DABG p-value was below 0.05, and excluded probe sets that were not detected from further analysis. Overall array quality was assessed with the arrayQualityMetrics package and standard oligo diagnostics. The per-sample intensity boxplot for confirming normalization, sample-to-sample Pearson correlation heatmap for assessing data quality, principal component analysis (PCA), and hierarchical clustering analysis were generated in R software (version 4.3.3), using base R t-test, readxl, pheatmap, and RColorBrewer packages (Supplementary Figure S1). Subsequent analysis was performed with the Chipster data analysis platform (CSC, Espoo, Finland) to identify candidate transcriptional changes. Genes were first pre-filtered by coefficient of variation (0.1) to remove low-variance genes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the empirical Bayes moderated t-test and defined as |log2 Fold change| ≥ 0.6 [40,41], together with the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted threshold of q < 0.1. As the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure does not prescribe the threshold of the FDR level [42], the threshold must be chosen according to the tolerated proportion of false positives. Thus, we set it at 0.1 for exploring transcriptomic screens whose outputs were subsequently confirmed by qRT-PCR. Venn diagrams illustrating the overlapping genes were generated using an online tool at the website http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ (accessed on 16 March 2026).
2.6. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)
To elucidate the biological impact of treatment, the curated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed via Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software (Version 01-23-01) (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA, USA) [43]. Pathway significance and predicted activation states in IPA were determined by two key metrics: p-value and activation Z-score. The enrichment p-value was derived from Fisher’s exact test to estimate the probability of chance overlap between the submitted DEGs list and a pre-defined pathway in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, independent of regulation direction. A −log p-value > 1.3 was considered significant. Activation Z-score predicts the directional perturbation of the pathways, with Z > 0 indicating activation and Z < 0 indicating inhibition; pathways with |Z| > 2 were considered significant. This algorithm quantitatively evaluates the concordance between the observed gene expression changes within a pathway and the causal relationships in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, thereby enabling the identification of functionally relevant signaling pathways modulated by the treatment conditions [44].
2.7. Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
To technically confirm the microarray results, two-step qRT-PCR was employed to examine the expression levels of eight genes of interest identified in the microarray, selected based on both high Log2 fold change and annotation to metal-handling or protein homeostasis-related genes, such as TFR2, NMNAT2, ESCO2, and MESD. We used aliquots of the same total RNA samples used for microarray analyses, specifically from the Hg2+ exposure and co-treatment of C. vulgaris water extract with Hg2+. Reverse transcription to cDNA was carried out with 1 µg of total RNA per sample using the LunaScript® RT SuperMix Kit cDNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs, Darmstadt, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Oligonucleotide primers specific to each target gene were designed on the NCBI Primer-BLAST website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/, accessed on 27 March 2025) and subsequently synthesized by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany). The primers are listed in Table 2, with amplicon sizes ranging from 100 to 292 base pairs. Melting-curve analysis was performed for each reaction. A single peak per amplicon confirmed product specificity, without evidence of non-specific amplification. GAPDH served as an internal reference gene for normalization, as its Ct values remained stable across all experimental groups. No-template controls (NTCs) were included in every run and yielded no detectable amplification. The cycle quantification (Cq) values were calculated using CFX Manager Software (version 3.1). The relative gene expression was calculated using the comparative 2−∆∆CT method, assuming approximately equal amplification efficiency between target and reference genes [45].
Table 2.
Primer sequences of internal reference and eight deregulated genes used for qRT-PCR.
| GENE Name | Gene Symbol | Forward Primer (5′-3′) | Reverse Primer (5′-3′) | Amplicon (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase |
GAPDH | GCTCTCTGCTCCTCCTGTTC | GACTCCGACCTTCACCTTCC | 100 |
| Solute carrier family 5 member 10 | SLC5A10 | TGCTCCAACATCGCCTACCC | GGAGGTCAGCGACGACATGA | 108 |
| Mesoderm development LRP chaperone | MESD | TCTGGCAGGGCAGCCTTTTC | AGTCCTTGATCTCCCAGGCG | 114 |
| Autophagy-related 16 like 1 | ATG16L1 | GTCCCGGACATGATGGCACA | CATCTCCCTGTCCTTCCGCT | 164 |
| Early growth response 1 | EGR1 | TTTCCTCACTCGCCCACCAT | TGGTCTCCACCAGCACCTTC | 292 |
| Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 2 | ESCO2 | GGAAAATCGTGTTGGTTCTGC | GCCTGTTTGATGGGTTCTGC | 196 |
| Nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 2 |
NMNAT2 | CCAGCACAGGGCTGCAAGTA | GTCGTGGACAGGGGAGACAA | 189 |
| Cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 |
CCAR1 | CAACCTCAGCAGGCCCTGTA | CCACCCCTGTGAAAACACGC | 205 |
| Transferrin receptor 2 | TFR2 | ACCCAGTTCCCTCCAGTTGC | AGGCTCCCCTGCCATTCTTG | 131 |
2.8. Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA). Data from the cell viability assay are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent biological replicates. A four-parameter logistic model was used for calculating the IC50, 95% confidence interval, and R2 value. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test to adjust for multiple pairwise comparisons. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences as follows: * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001, while “ns” represents not significant.
3. Results
3.1. Protective Effect of Chlorella vulgaris on Hg2+-Exposed Cells Is Associated with DMT1
Mercuric chloride cytotoxicity associated with DMT1 was evaluated by comparing the sensitivity of wild-type HEK-293 cells and the corresponding DMT1-overexpressing cell line to HgCl2 treatment. Consistent with the established role of DMT1 in mercury uptake [33], HgCl2 showed high sensitivity towards the HEK-293 DMT1 cell line, with a 4.41-fold reduction of the IC50 value compared to wild-type cells, with an IC50 value of 3.84 μM (95% CI 2.43–6.09) towards HEK-293 cells and 0.87 μM (95% CI 0.75–1.00) towards HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 1A, Table 1).
Figure 1.

Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) aqueous extract exerts a cytoprotective effect against Hg2+-induced toxicity. (A) The dose–response curves of Hg2+ towards HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cell lines using a four-parameter logistic model. (B) Cell viability of 0.01 μM Hg2+-exposed and co-treatment from 0.01 to 30 μg/mL C. vulgaris aqueous extract in HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cell lines. All data are presented as mean ± SD from n = 3 independent experiments, with six replicates per experiment. Statistical significance was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test comparing each co-treatment concentration with the Hg2+ alone control within each cell line, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
To further substantiate the cytoprotective role of C. vulgaris in Hg2+-induced toxicity, an in vitro model was established using its aqueous extract. The cell viability of 0.01 µM Hg2+-exposed cells and the co-treatment with C. vulgaris aqueous extract from 0.01 to 30 µg/mL of the HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cell lines was evaluated to identify optimal protective conditions mediated by the DMT1 transporter. The concentration of 0.01 µM HgCl2 maintained both cell lines with approximately 80% cell viability, placing this dose firmly in the sub-cytotoxic range defined by a reduction in viability less than 30% [39]. The aqueous extract of C. vulgaris was employed based on our prior study, which identified bioactive flavonoids (luteolin, apigenin) through secondary metabolic profiling, and established the selected concentration as non-cytotoxic [37]. In parental HEK-293 cells, the extract produced no significant protection (95% CI -3.4 to 11.0, p > 0.99, Figure 1B). Significant cell viability recovery was observed in DMT1-overexpressing cells after treatment with 10 µg/mL C. vulgaris water extract (95% CI 1.3 to 15.8, p < 0.05, Figure 1B). Treatment with 30 µg/mL C. vulgaris water extract showed maximum cell viability recovery with an increase of 12.28% from 83.92% to 96.20% (95% CI 5.1 to 19.5, p < 0.001, Figure 1B), suggesting a DMT1-associated enhancement of the protective effect.
3.2. Transcriptomic Responses of Hg2+Toxicity and Chlorella vulgaris Intervention
To investigate the potential mode of action of HgCl2 and the recovery mode of action of C. vulgaris extract on HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells, transcriptomic profiling was conducted by mRNA microarray hybridization coupled with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). The quality control of microarray data showed successful normalization, high within-cell-line correlation, and the absence of low-correlation arrays, indicating consistent data quality with no outlier samples. PCA and hierarchical clustering analysis revealed treatment-related patterns (Supplementary Figure S1). DEGs across all groups are listed in Supplementary Tables S1–S4. The results showed that HgCl2 exposure induced substantial transcriptional alterations, with 206 and 193 genes deregulated in HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells, respectively. Co-treatment with C. vulgaris aqueous extract was associated with a smaller number of deregulated genes, with 153 and 79 in HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells, respectively. Only 33 and 22 deregulated genes, respectively, were shared across treatment conditions in HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 2A).
Figure 2.

Preliminary analysis of microarray expression profiling. (A) Venn diagrams of deregulated gene expression upon treatment with 0.01 µM Hg2+ and co-treatment with 30 µg/mL C. vulgaris aqueous extract in HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells. (B) Technical and biological verifications by qRT-PCR analyses in HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells upon treatment with Hg2+ or Hg2+ plus C. vulgaris.
To validate the microarray hybridization results, eight selected genes (SLC5A10, MESD, ATG16L1, EGR1, ESCO2, NMNAT2, CCAR1, and TFR2) were quantified using qRT-PCR in both cell lines. Total mRNA was isolated from HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells following 24 h treatment with 0.01 µM HgCl2 alone or in combination with 30 µg/mL C. vulgaris aqueous extract. The concordance of the top eight upregulated and downregulated genes between microarray data and qRT-PCR was highly correlated, with the Pearson correlation coefficients (r) of 0.96 and 0.98 in HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells, respectively, underscoring the reliability of the gene expression analysis (Figure 2B).
3.3. Chlorella vulgaris Alleviates Hg2+-Induced Mitotic Catastrophe in HEK-293 Cells
Furthermore, comprehensive transcriptomic analysis was conducted using IPA. The analysis in HEK-293 cells suggested multiple lines of evidence that C. vulgaris mitigated a transcriptomic signature consistent with mitotic catastrophe in Hg2+-exposed cells. First, C. vulgaris alleviated Hg2+-induced DNA damage, as shown in the comparative analysis of biofunctions and canonical pathways using IPA. Hg2+ exposure significantly enriched DNA damage-related pathways (−log p-value > 1.3), including the lesioning of DNA, excision repair, mismatch repair, cross-link repair of DNA, and DNA damage response of cells. These perturbations were markedly attenuated following C. vulgaris treatment, with all pathways reduced to non-significant levels (−log p-value < 1.3) (Figure 3A). In contrast, binding of double-stranded DNA and binding of DNA biofunctions were significantly enriched (−log p-value > 1.3), indicating a strong ameliorative effect. Consistently, Hg2+ exposure was predicted to inhibit the activation of DNA endogenous promoter biofunctions and double-stranded DNA break repair (Z < 0) biofunctions in HEK-293 cells. Notably, C. vulgaris treatment alleviated the observed suppression, as evidenced by the reversal of activation of DNA endogenous promoter (Z > 0), abrogation of the double-stranded DNA break repair inhibition prediction (Z-score = 0 or N/A), and the concurrent activation of binding of DNA biofunction (Z > 0). Together, these findings collectively indicate that C. vulgaris attenuated DNA damage-related transcriptomic signatures.
Figure 3.

Comparative analysis of mitotic catastrophe-related biofunctions and canonical pathways among Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells. Biofunction heatmap of −log p-value and Z-score between Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells in (A) DNA damage-related biofunctions, (B) microtubule dynamics-related biofunctions, and (C) mitotic defects and nuclear morphology. (D) Canonical pathway heatmap of −log p-value and Z-score between Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells in mitotic defect-related pathways. Statistical significance was calculated based on the p-value and the Z-score. The color of the block indicates its predicted state: activation (orange), inhibition (blue). Darker colors indicate higher absolute p-values or Z-scores. The dot indicates no statistical significance.
Then, we found predicted associations for the ameliorative effect of C. vulgaris on microtubule dynamics perturbation in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. Multiple microtubule-related biofunctions were significantly enriched in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells (−log p-value > 1.3, Figure 3B), including quantity of astral microtubules, microtubule dynamics, growth of astral microtubules, destabilization of astral microtubules, length of astral microtubules, and instability of microtubules. Remarkably, all of these pathways were abrogated following C. vulgaris treatment (−log p-value < 1.3). Conversely, biofunctions enriched for annotations related to assembly of kinetochores, cycling of the centrosome, cross-linkage of microtubules, and delay in initiation of separation of centrosome functions emerged as new significant pathways after C. vulgaris treatment (−log p-value > 1.3). The biofunction of segregation of chromosome remained significant (−log p-value > 1.3) in both conditions, albeit with reduced significance upon C. vulgaris treatment. Importantly, an inhibition of microtubule dynamics was predicted in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 (Z < 0), an effect that was abolished by C. vulgaris treatment (Z-score = 0 or N/A), demonstrating an attenuation of transcriptomic alterations associated with microtubule dynamics.
The characterization of mitotic catastrophe is the profound change in nuclear organization and morphology [46]. Consistent with the defining feature, our transcriptomic analysis predicted that in HEK-293 cells, Hg2+ exposure significantly disrupted nuclear biofunctions including organization of nucleoli, organization of the nucleus, and morphology of the nuclear envelope (−log p-value > 1.3), all of which were normalized by C. vulgaris treatment (−log p-value < 1.3, Figure 3C). Alongside this, the IPA results also predicted that Hg2+ induced a strong mitosis arrest in HEK-293 cells, with significant enrichment (−log p-value > 1.3) of the biofunctions G2/M phase, M phase, arrest in mitosis of kidney cell lines, and arrest in mitosis of epithelial cell lines, accompanied by the prediction of inhibited mitosis (Z < 0). Remarkably, C. vulgaris treatment significantly reversed the cell cycle arrest as indicated by predicted activation (Z > 0) of “Mitosis”, “Mitosis of epithelial cell lines”, and “Cell cycle progression”.
The comparative analysis of canonical pathways provided further evidence supporting the mitotic catastrophe prediction, especially within the cell cycle checkpoints pathway. IPA results showed that the cell cycle checkpoints pathway was significantly enriched (−log p-value > 1.3) in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells and predicted its activation (Z > 0, Figure 3D). Both key metrics were reversed by C. vulgaris treatment (−log p-value < 1.3, Z < 0). A parallel effect of biofunctions analysis was observed in canonical pathway analysis for the DNA damage-related pathway “DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end joining”, which was also returned to baseline by C. vulgaris treatment (−log p-value < 1.3).
It should be noted that IPA biofunction categories are broad and partially overlapping annotations; enrichment of a given term therefore indicates statistical over-representation of associated genes within the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, rather than a direct measurement of biological activity. Altogether, the data suggested that DNA damage, microtubule dynamics, cell cycle checkpoint, and mitosis arrest pathways converged on nuclear morphological disruption, thereby driving a transcriptomic signature consistent with mitotic catastrophe in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. In contrast, C. vulgaris aqueous extract attenuated this response.
3.4. Mitotic Catastrophe-Related Gene Expression in HEK-293 Cells
We next sought to define a gene expression signature for C. vulgaris-mediated attenuation of Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe. We focused on the three pathways with opposing predicted activation states between Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells: activation of DNA endogenous promoter; mitosis; and cell cycle checkpoints. Within these pathways, eight genes exhibited significant inverse expression patterns; these were Histone deacetylase 10 (HDAC10), LDL receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group C member 2 (NR2C2), Mediator complex subunit 21 (MED21), Kinetochore scaffold 1 (KNL1), Charged multivesicular body protein 2A (CHMP2A), and Nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 2 (NSD2) (Figure 4). Of note, HDAC10 and KNL1 were both mapped in the mitosis pathway and also intersected with the activation of DNA endogenous promoter and cell cycle checkpoints pathways, respectively. Collectively, these eight genes may serve as a transcriptional signature of the C. vulgaris-alleviated Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe in HEK-293 cells.
Figure 4.

Gene expression heatmap of mitotic catastrophe-related pathways among Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells. (A) Activation of the DNA endogenous promoter, (B) Mitosis, (C) Cell cycle checkpoints. The color of the block indicates its expression direction: upregulated (red), downregulated (green). Darker colors indicate higher expression. The inversely expressed genes are underlined.
3.5. Signaling Landscape Underlying Mitotic Catastrophe in HEK-293 Cells
To understand the broader context, we analyzed the signaling landscape surrounding mitotic catastrophe. Transcription-related pathways, including transcription of DNA, transcription of RNA, and activation of gene exhibited activated predictions (Z > 0) in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells, collectively encompassing 41 out of 206 Hg2+-deregulated genes. Among these, six genes (LRP6, FADD, NR2C2, NSD2, MED21, and HDAC10) were implicated in the alleviation of mitotic catastrophe by C. vulgaris (Figure 5A). The metabolism of protein and metabolism of macromolecule pathways were inhibited (Z < 0), involving 79 of the 206 Hg2+-deregulated genes. Among these, LRP6, FADD, CHMP2A, NR2C2, NSD2, and HDAC10 were associated with alleviation of mitotic catastrophe (Figure 5B). Of note, the generic transcription pathway was activated (Z > 0) in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. While C. vulgaris co-treatment attenuated this activation, with a pronounced impact on zinc finger protein-encoding genes (14 of the 18 genes), including the NR2C2 and HDAC10 genes (Figure 5C). In parallel, recruitment of protein pathways was inhibited (Z < 0) in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells, implicating the CHMP2A, FADD, and NSD2 genes (Figure 5D). Collectively, LRP6, FADD, NR2C2, NSD2, MED21, CHMP2A, and HDAC10 emerge as candidate hubs bridging transcriptional activation and metabolic suppression during Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe in HEK-293 cells.
Figure 5.

Mitotic catastrophe occurs concurrently with transcriptional activation and metabolic suppression in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. DEGs in (A) transcription of DNA or RNA and activation of gene pathways and (B) metabolism of protein and metabolism of macromolecule pathways in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. (C) Heatmap of genes in the generic transcription pathway among Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells. (D) Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the recruitment of protein pathways in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. The relevant genes are highlighted in dashed frames and dotted circles.
The fate of mitotic catastrophe includes apoptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, and other cell death modes [46]. Our transcriptomic analysis revealed the inhibition of autophagy in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells, implicating the CHMP2A, FADD, and MED21 genes (Figure 6A). Concurrently, cell survival was also inhibited in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells, including the FADD, KNL1, and NSD2 genes (Figure 6B). Moreover, PI3K/AKT signaling was inhibited and dysregulated by LRP6 and NSD2 genes (Figure 6C). Remarkably, C. vulgaris co-treatment reversed this pattern, conferring activation of both AKT and NF-κB with the joint modulation of LRP6, NSD2, and FADD (Figure 6D). Taken together, C. vulgaris aqueous may counteract Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe by restoring cell survival-related pathways, especially through activation of the AKT pathway.
Figure 6.

C. vulgaris aqueous extract counteracts Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe by restoring cell survival-related pathways in HEK-293 cells. DEGs of the (A) autophagy and (B) cell survival pathways in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells. DEGs of the Akt network in (C) Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells and (D) C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells. The Z-score indicates the activation state, and the color indicates its direction: activation (orange), inhibition (blue). Darker colors indicate higher absolute Z-scores. Dashed circles and squares highlight genes associated with mitotic catastrophe.
3.6. Chlorella vulgaris Ameliorates Hg2+-Induced Translation and Ubiquitination Perturbations in DMT1-Overexpressing Cells
To delineate the detoxification mechanism of C. vulgaris in Hg2+ via DMT1, we compared the biofunctions and canonical pathways in Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. Hg2+ exposure significantly affected translation-related pathways, including initiation of translation of mRNA, initiation of translation of protein, translation, and translation of protein (Figure 7A). By contrast, C. vulgaris significantly affected nuclear export of mRNA biofunction (Figure 7A). Interestingly, C. vulgaris mitigated the inhibition of translation and translation of protein induced by Hg2+exposure in HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 7B, Z < 0). Comparative canonical pathway analysis also offered detailed insight into protein translation-related pathways. C. vulgaris reversed the significance of the GAIT translation signaling pathway, response of EIF2K4 (GCN2) to amino acid deficiency, and processing of capped intron-containing pre-mRNA compared with Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 7C). Hg2+ exposure elicited a pronounced inhibition in the response of EIF2K4 (GCN2) to amino acid deficiency and nonsense-mediated decay pathways (Figure 7D, Z < 0), while a more modest inhibition appeared in the processing of capped intron-containing pre-mRNA pathway. Of note, C. vulgaris mitigated the inhibition of all three translation-related pathways in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 7D, Z = 0 or N/A).
Figure 7.

IPA-based comparative biofunctions and canonical pathways analysis depict a translation- and ubiquitination-related pattern in Hg2+-exposed versus C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. −log p-value and Z-score in the biofunction heatmap (A,B) and canonical pathways heatmap (C,D) between Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. Statistical significance was calculated based on the p-value and the Z-score. The color of the block indicates its predicted state: activation (orange), inhibition (blue). Darker colors indicate higher absolute p-values or Z-scores. The dot indicates no statistical significance. Pathways and Biofunctions related to translation, ubiquitination and SUMOylation are underlined with orange, green and purple, respectively.
Following investigation of the translation pathway, we noted that C. vulgaris reversed the significance of ubiquitination-related pathways induced by Hg2+-exposure via the DMT1 transporter, including the protein ubiquitination pathway and E3 ubiquitin ligases ubiquitinate target proteins (Figure 7C). Notably, the protein ubiquitination pathway was also inhibited in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Z < 0), and C. vulgaris mitigated this pathway (Figure 7D).
SUMOylation frequently crosstalks with ubiquitination for the same lysine residues [47]. Our comparative biofunction analysis revealed that Hg2+ exposure significantly affected SUMOylation of protein biofunction, whereas C. vulgaris was associated with deSUMOylation of proteins (Figure 7A). Meanwhile, C. vulgaris co-treatment reversed the significance of SUMOylation of chromatin organization proteins, SUMOylation of DNA damage response and repair proteins, and SUMOylation of transcription cofactors compared with Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Figure 7C). However, no direct predictions (Z = 0 or N/A) were observed for any SUMOylation pathways in either Hg2+-exposed or C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells, limiting mechanistic inference.
3.7. Chlorella vulgaris Reversed Hg2+-Impaired Translation Initiation, Elongation, and Termination in DMT1-Overexpressing Cells
Comparative biofunctions and canonical pathways analysis underscore the capacity of C. vulgaris aqueous extract to restore translational homeostasis against DMT1-mediated Hg2+ toxicity. To gain a deeper mechanistic insight, we interrogated the three phases of “Eukaryotic translation: initiation, elongation, and termination”. Strikingly, a divergence pattern emerged between Hg2+-exposed (Figure 8) and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells across all three phases (Figure 9).
Figure 8.

Three predicted phases of the eukaryotic translation process: (A) initiation, (B) elongation, and (C) termination in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
Figure 9.

Three predicted phases of the eukaryotic translation process: (A) initiation, (B) elongation, and (C) termination in C. vulgaris co-treated Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
In the translation initiation process, Hg2+ attenuated the 60S ribosomal complex, the 80S ribosome, and the subunits of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) heterotrimeric complex (EIF2S1, EIF2S2, EIF2S3) (Figure 8A). Additionally, Hg2+ significantly impaired the function of the 80S initiation complex by dysregulating the GTPase/eIF5B interaction during the correct positioning of (Figure 8A), which represents the final step bridging translation initiation and elongation [48]. C. vulgaris reversed nearly all Hg2+-induced impairments in the translation initiation process via the DMT1 transporter, with the eIF2 heterotrimeric complex remaining as an exception (Figure 9A).
In the eukaryotic protein elongation process, the 80S ribosome coordinates aminoacyl-tRNA and elongation factors (eEFs) as the key regulators [49]. Hg2+ exposure significantly impaired both the key intermediate 80S:aminoacyl-tRNA:mRNA:eEF1A:GTP and the post-translocation elongation state (80S ribosome:mRNA:peptidyl-tRNA with elongating peptide) (Figure 8B). Notably, C. vulgaris fully rescued both perturbations (Figure 9B).
In the translation termination process, GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 in the Me-Q185-ETF1 (methylated eRF1) dimer form drives the shift from a stable pre-termination complex (GTP-bound state) to the release-competent post-pretermination complex (GDP-bound state), coupling hydrolysis to efficient termination before elongation factors rebind [50]. Hg2+ exposure significantly impaired this interaction (Figure 8C), while C. vulgaris fully abrogated it (Figure 9C).
3.8. Chlorella vulgaris Reinstates Ubiquitination Homeostasis Following Hg2+-Induced Perturbation in DMT1-Overexpressing Cells
The clear and main protein ubiquitination pathway in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells prompted a deeper mechanistic interrogation (Z < 0). As shown in Figure 10A and 10B, Hg2+ exposure significantly downregulated the Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme E2 A (UBE2A) gene, a crucial E2 enzyme in the initial stages of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Downstream, proteasome PA700/20S, known as the 26S proteasome, was compromised, as evidenced by downregulation of its essential component PSMC1 (Proteasome 26S Subunit, ATPase 1), which is the motor for unfolding ubiquitinated substrates and gatekeeper for the 20S catalytic core [51]. This happened alongside Proteasome 26S Subunit, Non-ATPase 13 (PSMD13), which supports the overall assembly and structural integrity [52]. Hg2+ ions have a high affinity for the sulfhydryl group (-SH) in cysteine, forming stable Cys-S-Hg-S-Cys [53]. In accordance with this finding, the cysteine-type deubiquitinating enzyme UPS40 was significantly downregulated in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells, implicating that the DMT1 transporter may contribute to this affinity, thereby disrupting the ubiquitination dynamics. Interestingly, the BAG1/HSP70/STUB1 misfolded complex exhibited bidirectional regulation by J-domain proteins, including DNAJC14 and DNAJC9. Strikingly, the main ubiquitination pathway showed no gene regulation in C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells, suggesting that C. vulgaris may restore it to the homeostatic state rather than inducing compensatory correction. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 10C, an inhibitory signature of macromolecule metabolism was observed, encompassing 71 of the 193 Hg2+-induced DEGs in the Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells, whereas it was markedly diminished upon Chlorella vulgaris co-treatment.
Figure 10.

Ubiquitination signature in Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. (A) Protein ubiquitination pathway between Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. (B) Gene expression heatmap of ubiquitination-related pathways among Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 cells. (C) Inhibition of the metabolism of macromolecule function in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
3.9. Chlorella vulgaris Mitigates Hg2+-Impaired Ribosomal Stress-Surveillance Pathways in DMT1-Overexpressing Cells
Surprisingly, when we connected the translation- and ubiquitination-related pathway datasets, we identified that two of the three ribosomal stress-surveillance pathways (ribosome quality control, integrated stress response, and ribotoxic stress response) appeared as an inter-pathway node [54].
First, mitigation of the response of GCN2 to amino acid deficiency in C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells (Z = 0 or N/A, Figure 11A) directly implicated the integrated stress response, as GCN2 kinase is one of the four main triggers [54,55], suggesting C. vulgaris aqueous extract may co-modulate the integrated stress response via GCN2 kinase. Furthermore, by comparing genes within pathways exhibiting the highest Z-score, we observed that RPL36A and RPL41 genes-both of which are components of the 60S eukaryotic ribosomal subunit-were significantly reversed upon C. vulgaris co-treatment in the pathways of response of GCN2 to amino acid deficiency and nonsense-mediated decay (Figure 11A). Additionally, the proteasome-related genes PSMC1 and PSMD13– were significantly downregulated in the protein ubiquitination pathway following Hg2+ exposure. This concurrent perturbation of the 60S ribosome and proteasome directed our attention to the ribosomal quality-control signaling pathway, in which the 60S ribosome ubiquitinates lysine residues on the nascent peptide for proteasome degradation. Strikingly, a divergent pattern before and after C. vulgaris co-treatment was observed, primarily driven by reversal of 60S ribosome (Figure 11B), implicating that C. vulgaris aqueous extract may help redirect the Hg2+-impaired ribosome quality control via the DMT1 transporter. Finally, overwhelmed ribosome collision will exceed the ribosome quality control capacity, inducing ribotoxic stress response [56]. However, we observed no alterations in the ribotoxic stress signaling pathway (Figure 11C), indicating that Hg2+ ions had not induced a substantial ribosome conformational change in our model.
Figure 11.

Mapping the ribosomal stress-surveillance pathways in Hg2+-exposed versus C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. (A) Gene expression heatmap of response of GCN2 to amino acid deficiency and nonsense-mediated decay pathways, (B) ribosome quality control signaling, and (C) ribotoxic stress response signaling between Hg2+-exposed and C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells. The 60S ribosome components RPL36A and RPL41 are underlined in purple.
Collectively, the ribosomal stress-surveillance pathways may act as a central hub linking Hg2+-induced translation and ubiquitination perturbations, as well as the protective effect of C. vulgaris aqueous extract via the DMT1 transporter.
3.10. RAR Activation Is Involved in the DMT1-Dependent Hg2+Ion Toxicity and Chlorella vulgaris Protective Effect
Evidence for disrupted retinoic acid receptor (RAR) activation, one of the key toxicity pathways related to the biologically active form of vitamin A [57], was identified in both Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells, with a more pronounced effect in DMT1-overexpressing cells (−log p-value > 1.3, Z = 2) compared with wild-type cells (−log p-value < 1.3, Z < 2, Figure 12A), suggesting that DMT1-mediated Hg2+uptake may exacerbate RAR activation pathway disturbances. Notably, no significant RAR activation signaling (−log p-value < 1.3) in C. vulgaris aqueous extract co-treated HEK-293 DMT1 cells was evident, underscoring its potential to restore RAR homeostasis. In addition, IPA-derived toxicity pathway analysis revealed that the cytochrome P450 panel and NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response were significantly affected (−log p-value > 1.3, Figure 12B) in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells, suggesting both xenobiotic metabolism and antioxidant defense pathways may contribute to the DMT1-mediated Hg2+ ion toxicity.
Figure 12.

RAR activation signaling is activated through DMT1-mediated Hg2+ ion uptake. (A) IPA-based comparative canonical pathways analysis in Hg2+-exposed versus C. vulgaris co-treated HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells. (B) Toxicity pathways generated by IPA in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
4. Discussion
Chelation therapy for heavy metals is highly reliant on the clinician’s experience in identifying chronic low-level metal exposure. However, often misleading results are obtained due to a lack of long-term reference data [58,59]. Chlorella supplementation holds promise due to its notable metal-binding capacity and broad nutritional profile, as well as its antioxidant properties. Yet, how Chlorella orchestrates mercury detoxification remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we established a mechanistic framework for Chlorella-mediated protection of mercury by targeting a critical endogenous protein for metal transport, DMT1, using combined genomic and functional cellular assays.
The first objective was to confirm the role of DMT1 in mercuric chloride toxicity. This was verified by the resazurin cell viability assay, in which mercuric chloride toxicity towards the DMT1-overexpressing cell line showed a 4.41-fold reduction in the IC50 value compared to wild-type cells, indicating that increased mercury sensitivity is consistent with DMT1 involvement, which aligns with other studies [33,34,60]. Furthermore, we aimed to construct a mechanistic model for assessing the protective effects of C. vulgaris aqueous extract against Hg2+ toxicity. The cell viability assay further established that C. vulgaris restored viability in Hg2+- exposed DMT1-overexpressing cells but produced no significant protection in wild-type cells, indicating a DMT1-associated cytoprotective effect. Among the concentrations tested, 30 µg/mL aqueous extract with 0.01 µM HgCl2 achieved the maximal recovery of cell viability in HEK-293 DMT1 cells. This concentration was therefore selected for further mechanistic study. This protective effect may be attributable to the antioxidant activity of the flavonoids luteolin and apigenin in the aqueous extract, which was demonstrated in our previous study [37], with luteolin additionally being able to bind metals through the oxygen atoms on its catechol and hydroxy groups [61,62].
We next proceeded with the transcriptomic analysis to map the cellular pathways dysregulated by Hg2+. A prominent mechanistic divergence between wild-type HEK-293 cells and HEK-293 DMT1 cells regarding Hg2+ toxicity was obvious, in which Hg2+ converged on the enrichment annotations related to mitotic catastrophe in HEK-293 cells, whereas HEK-293 DMT1 cells faced translational and post-translational dysfunction. Encouragingly, C. vulgaris aqueous extract proved effective in both cell lines, underscoring its broad protective effect while revealing DMT1-driven pathway specificity. In HEK-293 cells, Hg2+ toxicity was highly associated with mitotic catastrophe. Previous studies have shown that inorganic mercury causes cell cycle arrest in G0/G1, S phase, and G2/M arrest, depending on the concentration and cell type [63,64]. In our model, Hg2+ clearly enriched mitotic arrest-associated genes, consistent with earlier literature. The exogenous sources of mitotic catastrophe derive from altered DNA replication, cell cycle checkpoints, chromosome segregation, and/or microtubular dynamics, and are characterized by profound changes in nuclear organization and morphology [65]. Remarkably, our transcriptome results aligned perfectly with this signature. Although the extract did not strongly reverse the Hg2+-induced chromosome segregation, the significance of differential expression was reduced compared with Hg2+-exposed cells, concurrent with the significant alleviation of the severity of nuclear morphology, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and microtubular dynamics. Prior studies have documented the potential of inorganic mercury to induce mitotic catastrophe. For instance, the inhibition of mitogen-induced DNA synthesis by mercurials was mentioned in the 1990s [66], and an increase of 60% in nuclear damage was reported in a human fetal liver cell line following 0.5 µM HgCl2, escalating to 200% with a prolonged period of 7 days [7]. Our data provide the first transcriptome evidence that Chlorella mitigates the mercuric chloride-induced mitotic catastrophe.
Given the unique mitotic catastrophe signature observed, we therefore sought to dissect the comprehensive signaling underlying it. Intriguingly, we first identified an ameliorating effect reminiscent of our previous study on lead toxicity-specifically within the generic transcription pathway, once again dominated by the zinc finger proteins (ZFPs). This convergence highlights a broader detoxification role of ZFPs in C. vulgaris-mediated regulation of heavy metals. Zinc finger proteins rely on zinc ions for structural stability to bind targets, and toxic metals can displace these zinc ions [67,68]. Moreover, previous studies also link toxic metal exposure to metal-regulatory transcription factor-1 (MTF-1), a zinc finger protein that senses zinc status and coordinates metal homeostasis [69]. These results suggest that Chlorella may normalize mercury- and lead-induced transcriptional disruption through ZFP regulation in HEK-293 cells. Moreover, subsequent macromolecule metabolism, cell proliferation, and AKT signaling were restored by C. vulgaris, also indicating a systemic recovery.
Submicromolar HgCl2 has been shown to reversibly inhibit protein synthesis in astrocytes, and prolonged or higher concentrations lead to progressively slower reversibility [70]. Consistent with the translation-related perturbations observed here, our transcriptomic analysis revealed that Hg2+ inhibited the translation process in DMT1-overexpressing cells, indicating Hg2+ may impair the translation machinery in a DMT1-associated manner. Additionally, a recent study reported that growth factors in the C. vulgaris extract promoted cell growth in Chinese hamster ovary cells in both 2D and 3D cell culture by increasing protein expression [71]. This aligns with our observations linking protein function to Chlorella activity. Taken together, our findings suggest that C. vulgaris aqueous extract may modulate the translation pathways to recover Hg2+- impaired DMT1 function.
DMT1 is tightly regulated by the ubiquitin–proteasome system to prevent metal toxicity [72]. A Hg(II) coordination complex has been associated with the inhibition of the 26S proteasome activity in vitro [73]. These results support our finding that mercuric chloride inhibited the ubiquitination process in DMT1-overexpressing cells and suggest that Hg2+ may reduce DMT1 degradation via ubiquitination suppression, thereby facilitating more Hg2+ uptake. Our previous study measured the secondary metabolite profile of the C. vulgaris aqueous extract, which revealed two bioactive flavonoids (apigenin and luteolin), with apigenin being the most closely tied to ubiquitination regulation. Apigenin is a well-established controller of the ubiquitination pathway that specifically targets the chymotrypsin-like activity of the 26S proteasome [74], indicating that it may drive the recovery of ubiquitination. Luteolin’s role in ubiquitination has been investigated in fewer studies in normal cells than in cancer cells, where it promotes the ubiquitination of oncogenic proteins (e.g., STAT3 and AKT) [75,76]. One study on embryonic cardiomyocytes, however, found that luteolin potentially influenced ubiquitination through MDM2 (an E3 ubiquitin ligase) to protect H9C2 cells against apoptosis [77]. Altogether, C. vulgaris aqueous extract may detoxify Hg2+ through ubiquitination pathway modulation, with apigenin as a likely key contributor.
The study of ribosomes has undergone a renaissance over the past decade. Yet, it was unexpected to find that the detoxification mechanism of the microalga C. vulgaris intersects with this field. ZNF574 is a key component in the ribosomal quality control pathway to monitor ribosome assembly by targeting the 60S ribosome for ubiquitin–proteasome degradation in K562 lymphoblast cells. Furthermore, loss of ZNF574 leads to pre-60S ribosome accumulation dominated by eIF6, because release of eIF6 is the final step for 60S maturation. Moreover, ZNF574−/− homozygous mutant zebrafish embryos display several morphological defects reminiscent of ribosomopathies [78]. In our study, we found C. vulgaris aqueous extract specifically reversed the 60S ribosome component RPL36A and RPL41 caused by Hg2+ and concurrently recovered the EIF2AK4 amino acid deficiency response, highlighting the targeted role of C. vulgaris aqueous extract in mitigating Hg2+ toxicity via the DMT1 transporter. Ribosome heterogeneity has been reported [79]. Likewise, the toxicity of mercury may also be mediated by cell membrane components [80]. EIF2AK4 (also called GCN2) is a key eIF2α kinase, which binds to the ribosome P-stalk on the 60S subunit that is critical for detecting stalled ribosomes during amino acid deprivation [81]. Notably, in our model, Hg2+ did not trigger ribotoxic stress signaling, a pathway in which ribosome collisions target ZAKα [82] suggesting that the recovery effect of C. vulgaris aqueous extract on Hg2+ toxicity via the DMT1 transporter may operate independently of ribotoxic stress signaling.
Finally, our transcriptome results revealed that retinoic acid receptor (RAR) activation may be involved in the DMT1-mediated inorganic mercury toxicity. However, a previous study found that at the mRNA level, neither rat pituitary gland cells nor male Wistar rats exhibited RAR induction in response to inorganic mercury [83]—a discrepancy that, as we discussed earlier, underscores the critical role of cell type in shaping the mercury toxicity profile.
As a key consideration, our model showed that an active concentration of the C. vulgaris aqueous extract was 30 µg/mL. While reaching this concentration in blood serum is improbable owing to the hepatic first-pass metabolism, this concentration is biologically achievable locally in the gut. Multiple in vitro and in vivo gut models have confirmed Chlorella’s interaction with the gut lining and contents [84,85,86]. Moreover, the DMT1 transporter is particularly prevalent in the duodenum [87], collectively suggesting the gut constitutes a potential experimental model for Chlorella-mediated Hg2+ detoxification.
5. Conclusions
This study provides evidence that C. vulgaris aqueous extract exerts a cytoprotective effect against Hg2+-induced toxicity in a DMT1-associated manner, with transcriptomic signatures suggesting a multi-layered protective response. Exploratory transcriptomic analysis indicated that in HEK-293 cells, the extract mitigated Hg2+-induced mitotic catastrophe, concurrently modulating the generic transcription pathway dominated by zinc finger proteins and upregulating transcripts of pro-survival AKT signaling. In DMT1-overexpressing cells, transcriptomic profiling suggested C. vulgaris aqueous extract counteracted Hg2+-induced inhibition of the translation and ubiquitination pathways and shifted expression of genes in the two main ribosomal stress surveillance pathways, which serve as a biological buffering mechanism to recover from DMT1-associated Hg2+ toxicity. Intriguingly, in our model, under conditions in which Hg2+ did not provoke a severe ribotoxic stress response, pathway analysis suggested C. vulgaris extract alleviated Hg2+-induced sub-ribotoxic levels of ribosomal stress by engaging both ribosomal quality control and the integrated stress response, particularly the response of GCN2 to amino acid deficiency. These predicted mechanisms provide a framework for future functional studies.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Microarray Unit of the Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, for providing excellent expression profiling services. We are grateful to Matthias A. Hediger from the University of Bern for kindly providing us with the HEK-293 and HEK-293 DMT1 cells. The graphical abstract was created in BioRender. Jin, C. (2026) https://BioRender.com/9qug1dm.
Abbreviations
| BBB | Blood–brain barrier |
| CHMP2A | Charged multivesicular body protein 2A |
| DMT1 | Divalent metal transporter 1 |
| DEGs | Differentially expressed genes |
| DABG | Detection above background |
| DMPS | 3-dimercapto-propanesulphonate |
| FADD | Fas-associated death domain protein |
| FDR | False discovery rate |
| GCN2/EIF2K4 | Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 4 |
| HDAC10 | Histone deacetylase 10 |
| IPA | Ingenuity Pathway Analysis |
| IRPs | Iron regulatory proteins |
| KNL1 | Kinetochore scaffold 1 |
| LRP6 | LDL receptor-related protein 6 |
| MED21 | Mediator complex subunit 21 |
| NAC | N-acetyl-cysteine |
| NR2C2 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group C member 2 |
| NSD2 | Nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 2 |
| PSMD13 | Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 13 |
| RAR | Retinoic acid receptor |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| UBE2A | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 A |
| UPLC-HRMS/MS | Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15192896/s1, Figure S1: Global quality assessment of the normalized microarray data; Table S1: Deregulated genes in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells; Table S2: Deregulated genes in C. vulgaris co-treated Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 cells; Table S3: Deregulated genes in Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells; Table S4: Deregulated genes in C. vulgaris co-treated Hg2+-exposed HEK-293 DMT1 cells.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: C.J., T.E., X.L. (Xiao Lei) and X.L. (Xiaohua Lu); Data curation: C.J., S.M.K., X.L. (Xiao Lei) and D.L.; Investigation: C.J., X.L. (Xiao Lei), D.L. and Y.H.; Formal analysis: C.J. and S.M.K.; Resources: T.E.; Writing—original draft: C.J.; Writing and editing: S.M.K., T.E. and X.L. (Xiaohua Lu); Project administration: X.L. (Xiaohua Lu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by a private donation from Marc Strobel (Frankfurt, Germany) and supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82400917 and 82671052 to Y. H.) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2026A1515012757 to Y. H.). Ph.D. stipends to C.J. (No. 202209210023), X.L. (No. 202408420047) and D.L. (No. 202408210102) were from the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Cappon C.J. MERCURY|Properties and Determination. In: Caballero B., editor. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2nd ed. Academic Press; Oxford, UK: 2003. pp. 3852–3858. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ball L.K., Ball R., Pratt R.D. An assessment of thimerosal use in childhood vaccines. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1147–1154. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.107.5.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Park J.D., Zheng W. Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury. J. Prev. Med. Public Health. 2012;45:344–352. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arvidson B. Inorganic mercury is transported from muscular nerve terminals to spinal and brainstem motoneurons. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:1089–1094. doi: 10.1002/MUS.880151006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rafati-Rahimzadeh M., Rafati-Rahimzadeh M., Kazemi S., Moghadamnia A.A. Current approaches of the management of mercury poisoning: Need of the hour. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014;22:46. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lash L.H. Mercury nephrotoxicity. In: Kretsinger R.H., Uversky V.N., Permyakov E.A., editors. Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins. Springer New York; New York, NY, USA: 2013. pp. 1357–1362. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wu Y.S., Osman A.I., Hosny M., Elgarahy A.M., Eltaweil A.S., Rooney D.W., Chen Z., Rahim N.S., Sekar M., Gopinath S.C.B., et al. The toxicity of mercury and its chemical compounds: Molecular mechanisms and environmental and human health implications: A comprehensive review. ACS Omega. 2024;9:5100–5126. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Flora S., Bennicelli C., Bagnasco M. Genotoxicity of mercury compounds. A review. Mutat. Res. 1994;317:57. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(94)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bonacker D., Stoiber T., Wang M., Böhm K.J., Prots I., Unger E., Thier R., Bolt H.M., Degen G.H. Genotoxicity of inorganic mercury salts based on disturbed microtubule function. Arch. Toxicol. 2004;78:575–583. doi: 10.1007/S00204-004-0578-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Verschaeve L., Kirsch-Volders M., Hens L., Susanne C. Comparative in vitro cytogenetic studies in mercury-exposed human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 1985;157:221–226. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(85)90119-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sánchez-Alarcón J., Milić M., Bustamante-Montes L.P., Isaac-Olivé K., Valencia-Quintana R., Ramírez-Durán N. Genotoxicity of mercury and its derivatives demonstrated in vitro and in vivo in human populations studies. Systematic review. Toxics. 2021;9:326. doi: 10.3390/toxics9120326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andersen O., Ronne M., Nordberg G.F. Effects of inorganic metal salts on chromosome length in human lymphocytes. Hereditas. 1983;98:65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1983.tb00579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nirchio M., Choco-Veintimilla O., Quizhpe-Cordero P.F., Hernández J.G., Oliveira C. Genotoxic effects of mercury chloride on the neotropical fish Andinoacara rivulatus (Cichlidae: Cichlasomatini) Rev. Biol. Trop. 2019;67:745–754. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v67i4.34133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sears M.E. Chelation: Harnessing and enhancing heavy metal detoxification—A review. Sci. World J. 2013;13:219840. doi: 10.1155/2013/219840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar P., Dey S.R. Heavy Metal Toxicity and Neurodegeneration. Academic Press; Cambridge, UK: 2025. Dietary interventions for reducing heavy metal toxicity; pp. 407–425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abdalla F.H., Bellé L.P., De Bona K.S., Bitencourt P.E.R., Pigatto A.S., Moretto M.B. Allium sativum L. extract prevents methyl mercury-induced cytotoxicity in peripheral blood leukocytes (LS) Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010;48:417–421. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Venugopal N., Nithya V., Radhika J., Murali P., Sivasankari N.P., Veena R. The ameliorative effects of broccoli extract on lead-induced reproductive toxicity and DNA damage in pre-pubertal rats. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2025;29:6. doi: 10.25303/296rjce020030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Caylak E., Aytekin M., Halifeoglu I. Antioxidant effects of methionine, alpha-lipoic acid, N-acetylcysteine and homocysteine on lead-induced oxidative stress to erythrocytes in rats. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008;60:289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Flora S.J.S., Pande M., Bhadauria S., Kannan G.M. Combined administration of taurine and meso 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in the treatment of chronic lead intoxication in rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2004;23:157–166. doi: 10.1191/0960327104ht432oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gürer H., Ozgünes H., Saygin E., Ercal N. Antioxidant effect of taurine against lead-induced oxidative stress. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2001;41:397–402. doi: 10.1007/s002440010265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abascal K., Yarnell E. Cilantro-culinary herb or miracle medicinal plant? Altern. Complement. Ther. 2012;18:259–264. doi: 10.1089/act.2012.18507. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Flora S.J. Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and its reversibility following combined administration of N-acetylcysteine and meso 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid in rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1999;26:865–869. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li Y.F., Dong Z., Chen C., Li B., Gao Y., Qu L., Wang T., Fu X., Zhao Y., Chai Z. Organic selenium supplementation increases mercury excretion and decreases oxidative damage in long-term mercury-exposed residents from Wanshan, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:11313–11318. doi: 10.1021/es302241v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leong Y.K., Chang J.S. Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: Recent advances and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;303:122886. doi: 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2020.122886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bito T., Okumura E., Fujishima M., Watanabe F. Potential of Chlorella as a dietary supplement to promote human health. Nutrients. 2020;12:2524. doi: 10.3390/nu12092524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yadav M., Soni R., Chauhan M.K., Sandal N. Cellular and physiological approaches to evaluate the chelating effect of Chlorella on metal ion stressed lymphocytes. Biometals. 2021;34:351–363. doi: 10.1007/S10534-021-00285-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Diaz J.P., Pena E., El Alam S., Matte C., Cortés I., Figueroa L., Siques P., Brito J. Chlorella vulgaris supplementation attenuates lead accumulation, oxidative stress, and memory impairment in rats. Toxics. 2025;13:313. doi: 10.3390/TOXICS13040313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Uchikawa T., Yasutake A., Kumamoto Y., Maruyama I., Kumamoto S., Ando Y. The influence of Parachlorella beyerinckii CK-5 on the absorption and excretion of methylmercury (MeHg) in mice. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2010;35:101–105. doi: 10.2131/JTS.35.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shim J.A., Son Y.A., Park J.M., Kim M.K. Effect of Chlorella intake on Cadmium metabolism in rats. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2009;3:15. doi: 10.4162/NRP.2009.3.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Farag M.R., Alagawany M., Mahdy E.A.A., El-Hady E., Abou-Zeid S.M., Mawed S.A., Azzam M.M., Crescenzo G., Abo-Elmaaty A.M.A. Benefits of Chlorella vulgaris against cadmium chloride-induced hepatic and renal toxicities via restoring the cellular redox homeostasis and modulating Nrf2 and NF-KB pathways in male rats. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2414. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shawki A., Knight P.B., Maliken B.D., Niespodzany E.J., MacKenzie B. H(+)-coupled divalent metal-ion transporter-1: Functional properties, physiological roles and therapeutics. Curr. Top. Membr. 2012;70:169–214. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394316-3.00005-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Garrick M.D., Singleton S.T., Vargas F., Kuo H.C., Zhao L., Knöpfel M., Davidson T., Costa M., Paradkar P., Roth J.A., et al. DMT1: Which metals does it transport? Biol. Res. 2006;39:79–85. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602006000100009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vázquez M., Vélez D., Devesa V., Puig S. Participation of divalent cation transporter DMT1 in the uptake of inorganic mercury. Toxicology. 2015;331:119–124. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bridges C.C., Zalups R.K. Mechanisms involved in the transport of mercuric ions in target tissues. Arch. Toxicol. 2017;91:63–81. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1803-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Illing A.C., Shawki A., Cunningham C.L., Mackenzie B. Substrate profile and metal-ion selectivity of human divalent metal-ion transporter-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:30485–30496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.364208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gao F., Guo W., Zeng M., Feng Y., Feng G. Effect of microalgae as iron supplements on iron-deficiency anemia in rats. Food Funct. 2019;10:723–732. doi: 10.1039/c8fo01834k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jin C., Gündoğdu S., Hegazi N.M., Lu X., Elbadawi M., Kampf C., Klauck S.M., Rahali S., Achenbach N., Hegazy M.E.F., et al. Deciphering the complex mechanisms of action of lead detoxification by the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Phytomedicine. 2026;158:158349. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2026.158349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Montalbetti N., Simonin A., Dalghi M.G., Kovacs G., Hediger M.A. Development and validation of a fast and homogeneous cell-based fluorescence screening assay for divalent metal transporter 1 (dmt1/slc11a2) using the FLIPR tetra. J. Biomol. Screen. 2014;19:900–908. doi: 10.1177/1087057114521663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ramakrishnan R., Daly A.C. Revisiting ISO 10993-5 in vitro cytotoxicity standard tests for evaluation of extracellular matrix-based biomaterials. Int. J. Biomater. 2026;2026:7395612. doi: 10.1155/IJBM/7395612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vaes E., Khan M., Mombaerts P. Statistical analysis of differential gene expression relative to a fold change threshold on NanoString data of mouse odorant receptor genes. BMC Bioinform. 2014;15:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:765. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 1995;57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thomas S., Bonchev D. A survey of current software for network analysis in molecular biology. Hum. Genom. 2010;4:353–360. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-4-5-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Krämer A., Green J., Pollard J., Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bai Z., Zhou Y., Peng Y., Ye X., Ma L. Perspectives and mechanisms for targeting mitotic catastrophe in cancer treatment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2023;1878:188965. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xu H.D., Liang R.P., Wang Y.G., Qiu J.D. mUSP: A high-accuracy map of the in situ crosstalk of ubiquitylation and SUMOylation proteome predicted via the feature enhancement approach. Brief. Bioinform. 2021;22:bbaa050. doi: 10.1093/BIB/BBAA050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang J., Wang J., Shin B.-S., Dever T.E., Puglisi J.D., Fernández I.S. Large ribosomal subunit, eIF5B, Met-tRNA iMet and mRNA cooperate to complete accurate initiation. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.05.30.125153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dever T.E., Dinman J.D., Green R. Translation elongation and recoding in eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018;10:a032649. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wada M., Ito K. A genetic approach for analyzing the co-operative function of the tRNA mimicry complex, eRF1/eRF3, in translation termination on the ribosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:7851–7866. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aharoni S., Proskorovski-Ohayon R., Krishnan R.K., Yogev Y., Wormser O., Hadar N., Bakhrat A., Alshafee I., Gombosh M., Agam N., et al. PSMC1 variant causes a novel neurological syndrome. Clin. Genet. 2022;102:324–332. doi: 10.1111/cge.14195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li S., Izumi T., Hu J., Jacobson S.G., Bok D., Jin M. PSMD13 promotes degradation of disease-causing RPE65s via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55:3475. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bridges C.C., Bauch C., Verrey F., Zalups R.K. Mercuric conjugates of cysteine are transported by the amino acid transporter system b0,+: Implications of molecular mimicry. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:663. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000113553.62380.F5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vind A.C., Genzor A.V., Bekker-Jensen S. Ribosomal stress-surveillance: Three pathways is a magic number. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10648–10661. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhu J.Y., Marciniak S.J. GCN2 in proteostasis: Structural logic, signalling networks and disease. FEBS J. 2026;293:5627–5644. doi: 10.1111/FEBS.70480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Park J., Park J., Lee J., Lim C. The trinity of ribosome-associated quality control and stress signaling for proteostasis and neuronal physiology. BMB Rep. 2021;54:439. doi: 10.5483/BMBREP.2021.54.9.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Theodosiou M., Laudet V., Schubert M. From carrot to clinic: An overview of the retinoic acid signaling pathway. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:1423–1445. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0268-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kim J.J., Kim Y.S., Kumar V. Heavy metal toxicity: An update of chelating therapeutic strategies. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2019;54:226–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hoet P., Haufroid V., Lison D. Heavy metal chelation tests: The misleading and hazardous promise. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:2893–2896. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02847-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marciani P., Trotti D., Hediger M.A., Monticelli G. Modulation of DMT1 activity by redox compounds. J. Membr. Biol. 2004;197:91–99. doi: 10.1007/s00232-003-0644-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kumar S., Pandey A.K. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013;2013:162750. doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Malacaria L., La Torre C., Furia E., Fazio A., Caroleo M.C., Cione E., Gallelli L., Marino T., Plastina P. Aluminum(III), iron(III) and copper(II) complexes of luteolin: Stability, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2022;345:117895. doi: 10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2021.117895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kim J.Y., An M.J., Shin G.S., Lee H.M., Kim M.J., Kim C.H., Kim J.W. Mercury chloride but not lead acetate causes apoptotic cell death in human lung fibroblast mrc5 cells via regulation of cell cycle progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2494. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kim M.J., Park J., Kim J., Kim J.-Y., An M.-J., Shin G.-S., Lee H.-M., Kim C.-H., Kim J.-W. Transcriptome analysis reveals HgCl2 induces apoptotic cell death in human lung carcinoma H1299 cells through caspase-3-independent pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:2006. doi: 10.3390/ijms22042006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Galluzzi L., Vitale I., Aaronson S.A., Abrams J.M., Adam D., Agostinis P., Alnemri E.S., Altucci L., Amelio I., Andrews D.W., et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–541. doi: 10.1038/S41418-017-0012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Tan X., Tang C., Castoldi A.F., Manzo L., Costa L.G. Effects of inorganic and organic mercury on intracellular calcium levels in rat T lymphocytes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1993;38:159–170. doi: 10.1080/15287399309531709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hartwig A., Asmuss M., Blessing H., Hoffmann S., Jahnke G., Khandelwal S., Pelzer A., Bürkle A. Interference by toxic metal ions with zinc-dependent proteins involved in maintaining genomic stability. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002;40:1179–1184. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hartwig A. Zinc finger proteins as potential targets for toxic metal ions: Differential effects on structure and function. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2001;3:625–634. doi: 10.1089/15230860152542970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Laity J.H., Andrews G.K. Understanding the mechanisms of zinc-sensing by metal-response element binding transcription factor-1 (MTF-1) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007;463:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2007.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brookes N., Kristt D.A. Inhibition of amino acid transport and protein synthesis by HgCl2 and methylmercury in astrocytes: Selectivity and reversibility. J. Neurochem. 1989;53:1228–1237. doi: 10.1111/J.1471-4159.1989.TB07419.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ng J.Y., Chua M.L., Zhang C., Hong S., Kumar Y., Gokhale R., Ee P.L.R. Chlorella vulgaris extract as a serum replacement that enhances mammalian cell growth and protein expression. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8:564667. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.564667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lin N., Gao X.-Y., Li X., Chu W.-M. Involvement of ubiquitination in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurol. 2024;15:1459678. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1459678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tomco D., Schmitt S., Heeg M.J., Dou Q.P., Verani C.N. Inhibition of the 26S proteasome as a possible mechanism for toxicity of heavy metal species. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014;132:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2013.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Singh V., Sharma V., Verma V., Pandey D., Yadav S.K., Maikhuri J.P., Gupta G. Apigenin manipulates the ubiquitin-proteasome system to rescue estrogen receptor-β from degradation and induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015;54:1255–1267. doi: 10.1007/s00394-014-0803-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Xin Y., Chang W., Wang Q. Investigating the mechanism of luteolin in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease based on network pharmacology, normal mode analysis and experimental validation. Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2025;22:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.lddd.2025.100222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Li T., Fu X., Liu B., Wang X., Li J., Zhu P., Niu X., Bai J., Liu Y., Lu X., et al. Luteolin binds Src, promotes STAT3 protein ubiquitination and exerts anti-melanoma effects in cell and mouse models. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022;200:115044. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Chang H., Li C., Huo K., Wang Q., Lu L., Zhang Q., Wang Y., Wang W. Luteolin prevents H2O2-induced apoptosis in H9C2 Cells through modulating Akt-P53/Mdm2 signaling pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016;2016:5125836. doi: 10.1155/2016/5125836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Akers J.F., LaScola M., Bothe A., Suh H., Jung C., Stolp Z.D., Ghosh T., Yan L.L., Wang Y., Macurak M., et al. ZNF574 is a quality control factor for defective ribosome biogenesis intermediates. Mol. Cell. 2025;85:2048–2060.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Genuth N.R., Barna M. The discovery of ribosome heterogeneity and its implications for gene regulation and organismal life. Mol. Cell. 2018;71:364–374. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nakada S., Akio Nomoto N.I. Effect of methylmercury and inorganic mercury on protein synthesis in mammalian cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1980;4:184–190. doi: 10.1016/0147-6513(80)90018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Inglis A.J., Masson G.R., Shao S., Perisic O., McLaughlin S.H., Hegde R.S., Williams R.L. Activation of GCN2 by the ribosomal P-stalk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:4946–4954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813352116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wu C.C.C., Peterson A., Zinshteyn B., Regot S., Green R. Ribosome collisions trigger general stress responses to regulate cell fate. Cell. 2020;182:404–416.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mostböck S., Ficková M., Macejová D., Baranová M., Kotyzová D., Míčková V., Eybl V., Thalhamer J., Brtko J. Effect of cadmium and mercury on the nuclear retinoic acid receptors. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2002;21:443–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Janczyk P., Franke H., Souffrant W.B. Nutritional value of Chlorella vulgaris: Effects of ultrasonication and electroporation on digestibility in rats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007;132:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nass P.P., do Nascimento T.C., Fernandes A.S., Caetano P.A., de Rosso V.V., Jacob-Lopes E., Zepka L.Q. Guidance for formulating ingredients/products from Chlorella vulgaris and Arthrospira platensis considering carotenoid and chlorophyll bioaccessibility and cellular uptake. Food Res. Int. 2022;157:111469. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Delsante C., Pinna C., Sportelli F., Dalmonte T., Stefanelli C., Vecchiato C.G., Biagi G. Assessment of the effects of edible microalgae in a canine gut model. Animals. 2022;12:2100. doi: 10.3390/ani12162100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sawai H., Sugimoto H., Shiro Y. Iron in BiologyMolecular Structures, Cellular Processes and Living Systems. Royal Society of Chemistry; Piccadilly, London: 2025. Iron absorption in human duodenum by Dcytb and DMT1; pp. 73–88. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
