Abstract
The folding of the α-helix domain hbSBD of the mammalian mitochondrial branched-chain α-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex is studied by the circular dichroism technique in absence of urea. Thermal denaturation is used to evaluate various thermodynamic parameters defining the equilibrium unfolding, which is well described by the two-state model with the folding temperature TF = 317.8 ± 1.95 K and the enthalpy change ΔHG = 19.67 ± 2.67 kcal/mol. The folding is also studied numerically using the off-lattice coarse-grained Go model and the Langevin dynamics. The obtained results, including the population of the native basin, the free-energy landscape as a function of the number of native contacts, and the folding kinetics, also suggest that the hbSBD domain is a two-state folder. These results are consistent with the biological function of hbSBD in branched-chain α-ketoacid dehydrogenase.
INTRODUCTION
Understanding the dynamics and mechanism of protein folding remains one of the most challenging problems in molecular biology (1). Single domain α-proteins attract much attention of researchers because most of them fold faster than β- and αβ-proteins (2,3) due to relatively simple energy landscapes and one can, therefore, use them to probe main aspects of the funnel theory (4). Recently, the study of this class of proteins becomes even more attractive because the one-state or downhill folding may occur in some small α-proteins (5–7).
The mammalian mitochondrial branched-chain α-ketoacid dehydrogenase (BCKD) complex catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of branched-chain α-ketoacids derived from leucine, isoleucine, and valine to give rise to branched-chain acyl-CoAs. In patients with inherited maple syrup urine disease, the activity of the BCKD complex is deficient, which is manifested by often fatal acidosis and mental retardation (8). The BCKD multienzyme complex (4000 KDa in size) is organized about a cubic 24-mer core of dihydrolipoyl transacylase (E2), with multiple copies of heterotetrameric decarboxylase (E1), a homodimeric dihydrogenase (E3), a kinase (BCK), and a phosphatase attached through ionic interactions. The E2 chain of the human BCKD complex, similar to other related multifunctional enzymes (9), consists of three domains: the amino-terminal lipoyl-bearing domain (hbLBD, 1–84), the interim E1/E3 subunit-binding domain (hbSBD, 104–152), and the carboxy-terminal inner-core domain. The structures of these domains serve as bases for modeling interactions of the E2 component with other components of α-ketoacid dehydrogenase complexes. The structure of hbSBD (Fig. 1) has been determined by NMR spectroscopy, and the main function of the hbSBD is to attach both E1 and E3 to the E2 core (C. Chang, Y. Lin, D. Chung, and T.-H. Huang, unpublished data). The two-helix structure of this domain is reminiscent of the small protein BBL (7), which may be a good candidate for observation of downhill folding (5,6). So the study of hbSBD is interesting not only because of the important biological role of the BCKD complex in human metabolism but also for illuminating folding mechanisms.
FIGURE 1.
Ribbon representation of the structure of hbSBD domain. The helix region H1 and H2 include residues Pro-12–Glu-20 and Lys-39–Glu-47, respectively.
From the biological point of view, hbSBD could be less stable than hbLBD and one of our goals is, therefore, to check this by the circular dichroism (CD) experiments. In this article we study the thermal folding-unfolding transition in the hbSBD by the CD technique in the absence of urea and pH = 7.5. Our thermodynamic data do not show evidence for the downhill folding and they are well fitted by the two-state model. We obtained folding temperature TF = 317.8 ± 1.95 K and the transition enthalpy ΔHG = 19.67 ± 2.67 kcal/mol. Comparison of such thermodynamic parameters of hbSBD with those for hbLBD shows that hbSBD is indeed less stable as required by its biological function. However, the value of ΔHG for hbSBD is still higher than those of two-state α-proteins reported in Kubelka et al. (3), which indicates that the folding process in the hbSBD domain is highly cooperative.
From the theoretical point of view it is very interesting to establish if the two-state foldability of hbSBD can be captured by some model. The all-atom model would be the best choice for a detailed description of the system but the study of hbSBD requires very expensive CPU simulations. Therefore, we employed the off-lattice coarse-grained Go-like model (11,12), which is simple and allows for a thorough characterization of folding properties. In this model amino acids are represented by point particles or beads located at positions of Cα atoms. The Go model is defined through the experimentally determined native structure (10), and it captures essential aspects of the important role played by the native structure (12,13).
It should be noted that the Go model by itself cannot be employed to ascertain the two-state behavior of proteins. However, one can use it in conjunction with experiments providing the two-state folding because this model does not always provide the two-state behavior as has been clearly shown in the seminal work of Clementi et al. (12). In fact, the Go model correctly captures not only the two-state folding of proteins CI2 and SH3 (more two-state Go folders may be found in Koga and Takaga (14)) but also intermediates of the three-state folder barnase, RNase H, and CheY (12). The reason for this is that the simple Go model ignores the energetic frustration but it still takes the topological frustration into account. Therefore, it can capture intermediates that occur due to topological constraints but not those emerging from the frustration of the contact interactions.
With the help of Langevin dynamics simulations and the histogram method (15), we have shown that, in agreement with our CD data, hbSBD is a two-state folder with a well-defined transition state (TS) in the free-energy landscape. The two helix regions were found to be highly structured in the TS. The two-state behavior of hbSBD is also supported by our kinetics study showing that the folding kinetics follows the single exponential scenario. The two-state folding obtained in our simulations suggests that for hbSBD the topological frustration is more important than the energetic factor.
The dimensionless quantity, Ωc (16), which characterizes the structural cooperativity of the thermal denaturation transition was computed and the reasonable agreement between the CD experiments and Go simulations was obtained. Incorporation of side chains may give a better agreement (16,17), but this problem is beyond the scope of this article.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample preparation
hbSBD protein was purified from the BL21(DE3) strain of Escherichia coli containing a plasmid that carried the gene of hbLBD(1–84), a TEV cleavage site in the linker region, and hbSBD (104–152), generously provided to us by Dr. D. T. Chuang of the Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas. There is one extra glycine preceding Glu-104, left over after TEV cleavage, as well as the extra leucine and glutamic acid, preceding the string of six histidine residues at the C-terminus. The protein was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, and the purity of the protein was found to be better than 95%, based on the Coomassie blue-stained gel. The complete sequence of N = 52 residues for hbSBD is (G)EIKGRKTLATPAVRRLAMENNIKLSEVVGSGKDGRILKEDILNYLEKQT(L)(E).
Circular dichroism
CD measurements were carried out in Aviv CD spectrometer model 202 with temperature and stir control units at different temperature taken from 260 to 195 nm. All experiments were carried at 1-nm bandwidth in 1.0-cm quartz square cuvette thermostated to ±0.1°C. Protein concentration (∼50 μM) was determined by ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm using ε280nm = 1280 M−1cm−1 with 50 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.5. Temperature control was achieved using a circulating water bath system, and the equilibrium time was 3 min for each temperature point. The data was collected at each 2-K increment in temperature. The study was performed at heating rate of 10°C/min and equilibration time of 3 min. The volume changes as a result of thermal expansion as well as evaporation of water were neglected.
Fitting procedure
Suppose the thermal denaturation is a two-state transition, we can write the ellipticity as
![]() |
(1) |
where θD and θN are values for the denaturated and folded states. The fraction of the folded conformation fN is expressed as (18)
![]() |
(2) |
Here ΔHG and ΔCp are jumps of the enthalpy and heat capacity at the midpoint temperature TG (also known as melting or folding temperature) of thermal transition, respectively. Some other thermodynamic characterization of stability such as the temperature of maximum stability (TS), the temperature with zero enthalpy (TH), and the conformational stability (ΔGS) at TS can be computed from results of regression analysis (19)
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
(5) |
Using Eqs. 1–5 we can obtain all thermodynamic parameters from CD data.
It should be noted that the fitting of Eq. 2 with ΔCp > 0 allows for an additional cold denaturation (20) at temperatures much lower than the room temperature. The temperature of such a transition, T′G, may be obtained by the same fitting procedure with an additional constraint of ΔHG < 0. Because the cold denaturation transition is not seen in Go models, to compare the simulation results to the experimental ones we also use the approximation in which ΔCp = 0.
Simulation
We use coarse-grained continuum representation for hbSBD protein, in which only the positions of 52 Cα-carbons are retained. We adopt the off-lattice version of the Go model (11) where the interaction between residues forming native contacts is assumed to be attractive and the nonnative interactions repulsive. Thus, by definition for the Go model the Protein Data Bank structure is the native structure with the lowest energy. The advantage of this model is its simplicity, which allows one to study model proteins in detail. Following Clementi et al. (12), we write the energy of the Go-like model as
![]() |
(6) |
Here Δφi = φi − φ0i, Rij = r0ij/rij; ri,i+1, and θi and φi stand for the ith bond length between the ith and (i + 1)th residues, the bond angle between the (i − 1)th and ith bonds, and the dihedral angle around the ith bond, respectively; rij is the distance between the ith and jth residues. The subscript “0” refers to the native conformation; “NC” and “NNC” are the number of native and nonnative contacts, respectively. The first harmonic term keeps the chain connectivity, whereas the second and third terms represent the local angular interactions. Two last terms are nonlocal interactions, where the former includes native contact interactions and the latter is nonspecific repulsion between nonnative pairs. We choose Kr = 100εH, Kθ = 20εH, Kφ(1) = εH, Kφ(3) = 0.5εH, E1 = εH, ε2 = εH, and C = 4 Å, where εH is the characteristic hydrogen bond energy (12).
The nativeness of any configuration is measured by the number of native contacts Q. We define that the ith and jth residues are in the native contact if r0ij is smaller than a cutoff distance dc taken to be dc = 7.5 Å, where r0ij is the distance between the ith and jth residues in the native conformation. Using this definition and the native conformation of C. Chang, Y. Lin, D. Chung, and T.-H. Huang (unpublished data) we found that the total number of native contacts Qtotal is 62. To study the probability of being in the native state we use the following overlap function (21)
![]() |
(7) |
where Δij is equal to 1 if residues i and j form a native contact and 0 otherwise, and θ(x) is the Heaviside function. The argument of this function guarantees that a native contact between i and j is classified as formed when rij is shorter than 1.2r0ij (12).
The overlap function χ, which is 1 if the conformation of the polypeptide chain coincides with the native structure and 0 for unfolded conformations, can serve as an order parameter for the folding-unfolding transition. The probability of being in the native state, fN, which can be measured by the CD and other experimental techniques, is defined as fN = 〈 χ 〉, where 〈 … 〉 stands for a thermal average.
The dynamics of the system is obtained by integrating the following Langevin equation (22)
![]() |
(8) |
where m is the mass of a bead, ζ is the friction coefficient,
The random force
is a white noise, i.e., 〈 Γi(t)Γj(t′) 〉 = 2ζkBTδijδ(t − t′), where i and j refer to components x, y, and z. It should be noted that the folding thermodynamics does not depend on the environment viscosity (or on ζ) but the folding kinetics depends on it (23). We chose the dimensionless parameter
where m is the mass of a bead and a is the bond length between successive beads. One can show that this value of
belongs to the interval of the viscosity where the folding kinetics is fast. We have tried other values of
but the results remain unchanged qualitatively.
We measure time in units of τL = (ma2/εH)1/2. Using the typical value m = 3.10−25 kg (24), a = 4 Å, and εH = 0.91 kcal/mol (this choice of εH follows from the requirement that the simulated folding temperature coincides with the experimental one; see below) we obtained τL ≈ 3 ps. The dynamics Eq. 8 was solved by the Verlet algorithm (25) with the time step Δt = 0.005τL. All thermodynamic quantities are obtained by the histogram method (15).
RESULTS
CD experiments
The structure of hbSBD is shown in Fig. 1. Its conformational stability is investigated in this study by analyzing the unfolding transition induced by temperature as monitored by CD, similar to that described previously (26,27). The reversibility of thermal denaturation was ascertained by monitoring the return of the CD signal upon cooling from 95 to 22°C; immediately after the conclusion of the thermal transition. The transition was found to be >80% reversible. Loss in reversibility to greater extent was observed on prolonged exposure of the sample to higher temperatures. This loss of reversibility is presumably due to irreversible aggregation or decomposition. Fig. 2 shows the wavelength dependence of mean residue molar ellipticity of hbSBD at various temperatures between 278 and 363 K. In a separate study, the thermal unfolding transition as monitored by ellipticity at 228 nm was found to be independent of hbSBD concentration in the range of 2–10 μM. It was also found to be unaffected by change in heating rate between 2 and 20°C/min. These observations suggest absence of stable intermediates in heat-induced denaturation of hbSBD. A valley at ∼220 nm, characteristic of the helical secondary structure, is evident for hbSBD.
FIGURE 2.
Dependence of the mean residue molar ellipticity on the wave length for 11 values of temperatures between 278 and 363 K.
Fig. 3 shows the temperature dependence of the population of the native conformation, fN, for wave lengths λ = 208, 212, and 222 nm. We first try to fit these data to Eq. 2 with ΔCp ≠ 0. The fitting procedure gives slightly different values for the folding (or melting) temperature and the enthalpy jump for three sets of parameters. Averaging over three values, we obtain TG = 317.8 ± 1.95 K and ΔHG = 19.67 ± 2.67 kcal/mol. Other thermodynamic quantities are shown on the first row of Table 1. The similar fit but with ΔCp = 0 gives the thermodynamic parameters shown on the second row of this table. Since the experimental data are nicely fitted to the two-state model we expect that the downhill scenario does not apply to the hbSBD domain.
FIGURE 3.
Temperature dependence of the fraction of folded conformations fN, obtained from the ellipticity θ by Eq. 2, for wave lengths λ = 208 (•), 212 (▪), and 222 nm (♦). The solid line corresponds to the two-state fit given by Eq. 2 with ΔCp ≠ 0. We obtained TG = TF = 317.8 ± 1.9 K, ΔHG = 19.67 ± 2.67 kcal/mol and ΔCp = 0.387 ± 0.054.
TABLE 1.
Thermodynamic parameters obtained from the CD experiments and simulations for hbSBD domain
| Domain | TG (K) | ΔHG (kcal/mol/K) | ΔCp (kcal/mol/K) | ΔSG (cal/mol/K) | TS (K) | TH (K) | ΔGS (kcal/mol) | T′G (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBD(exp) | 317.8 ± 1.9 | 19.67 ± 2.67 | 0.387 ± 0.054 | 61.64 ± 7.36 | 270.9 ± 2.0 | 267.0 ± 2.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 212 ± 2.5 |
| SBD(exp) | 317.9 ± 2.2 | 20.02 ± 3.11 | 0.0 | 62.96 ± 9.92 | – | – | – | – |
| SBD(sim) | 317.9 ± 7.95 | 11.46 ± 0.29 | 0.0 | 36.05 ± 1.85 | – | – | – | – |
| LBD(exp) | 344.0 ± 0.2 | 78.96 ± 1.28 | 1.51 ± 0.04 | 229.5 ± 3.7 | 295.7 ± 3.7 | 291.9 ± 1.3 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 249.8 ± 1.1 |
For the experimentally studied temperature interval two types of the two-state fit (Eq. 2) with ΔCp = 0 and ΔCp ≠ 0 give almost the same values for TG, ΔHG, and ΔSG. However, pronounced different behaviors of the population of the native basin, fN, occur when we interpolate results to the low temperature region (Fig. 4). For the ΔCp = 0 case, fN approaches the unity as
but it goes down for ΔCp ≠ 0. This means that the ΔCp ≠ 0 fit is valid if the second cold denaturation transition may occur at TG′. This phenomenon was observed in single domains as well as in multidomain globular proteins (20). We predict that the cold denaturation of hbSBD may take place at T′G ≈ 212 K, which is lower than T′G ≈ 249.8 K for hbLBD shown on the fourth row of Table 1. It would be of great interest to carry out the cold denaturation experiments in cryosolvent to elucidate this issue.
FIGURE 4.
The dependence of fN for various sets of parameters. The dotted and dashed curves correspond to the thermodynamic parameters presented on the first and the second rows of Table 1, respectively. Open circles refer to simulation results for the Go model. The solid curve is the two-state fit (ΔCp = 0), which gives ΔHG = 11.46 kcal/mol and TF = 317.9.
To compare the stability of the hbSBD domain with the hbLBD domain, which has been studied in detail previously (27) we also present the thermodynamic data of the latter on Table 1. Clearly, hbSBD is less stable than hbLBD by its smaller ΔGS and lower TG values. This is consistent with their respective backbone dynamics as revealed by 15N-T1, 15N-T2, and 15N-1H nuclear Overhauser effect studies of these two domains using uniformly 15N-labeled protein samples (C. Chang, Y. Lin, D. Chung, and T.-H. Huang, unpublished data). Biologically, hbSBD must bind to either E1 or E3 at different stages of the catalytic cycle, thus, it needs to be flexible to adapt to local environments of the active sites of E1 and E3. On the other hand, the function of hbLBD is to permit its Lys-44 residue to channel acetyl group between donor and acceptor molecules and only the Lys-44 residue needs to be flexible (28). In addition, the NMR observation for the longer fragment (comprising residues 1–168 of the E2 component) also showed that the hbLBD region would remain structured after several months whereas the hbSBD domain could degrate in a shorter time.
Folding thermodynamics from simulations
To calculate the thermodynamics quantities we have collected histograms for the energy and native contacts at six values of temperature: T = 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 εH/kB. For sampling, at each temperature 30 trajectories of 16 × 107 time steps have been generated with initial 4 × 107 steps discarded for thermalization. The reweighting histogram method (15) was used to obtain the thermodynamics parameters at all temperatures.
Fig. 4 (open circles) shows the temperature dependence of population of the native state, defined as the renormalized number of native contacts (see Material and Methods) for the Go model. Because there is no cold denaturation for this model, to obtain the thermodynamic parameters we fit fN to the two-state model (Eq. 2) with ΔCp = 0.
The fit (black curve) works pretty well around the transition temperature but it gets worse at high T due to slow decay of fN, which is characteristic for almost all of the theoretical models. In fitting we have chosen the hydrogen bond energy εH = 0.91 kcal/mol in Hamiltonian (Eq. 6) so that TG = 0.7εH/kB coincides with the experimental value 317.8 K. From the fit we obtain ΔHG = 11.46 kcal/mol, which is smaller than the experimental value indicating that the Go model is less stable compared to the real hbSBD.
Fig. 5 shows the temperature dependence of derivative of the fraction of native contacts with respect to temperature dfN/dT (we also call this value the structural susceptibility) and the specific heat Cv obtained from the Go simulations. The collapse temperature Tθ, defined as the temperature at which Cv is maximal, almost coincides with the folding temperature TF (at TF the structural susceptibility has maximum). According to Klimov and Thirumalai (29), the dimensionless parameter
may serve as an indicator for foldablity of proteins. Namely, sequences with σ ≤ 0.1-fold much faster that those that have the same number of residues but with σ exceeding 0.5. From this perspective, having σ ≈ 0 hbSBD is supposed to be a good folder in silico. However, one has to be cautious about this conclusion because the pronounced correlation between folding times τF and the equilibrium parameter σ, observed for simple on- and off-lattice models (29,24) may be not valid for proteins in laboratory (30). In our opinion, since the data collected from theoretical and experimental studies are limited, further studies are required to clarify the relationship between τF and σ.
FIGURE 5.
The upper part refers to the temperature dependence of dfN/dT obtained by the simulations (dashed curve) and the CD experiments (solid curve). The experimental curve is plotted using two-state parameters with ΔCp = 0 (see the second row on Table 1). The temperature dependence of the heat capacity CV(T) is presented in the lower part. The dotted lines illustrate the baseline subtraction. The results are averaged over 20 samples.
Using experimental values for TG (as TF) and ΔHG and the two-state model with ΔCp = 0 (see Table 1) we can obtain the temperature dependence of the population of native state fN and, therefore, dfN/dT for hbSBD (Fig. 5). Clearly, the folding-unfolding transition in vitro is sharper than in the Go modeling. One of the possible reasons is that our Go model ignores the side chain that can enhance the cooperativity of the denaturation transition (16).
The sharpness of the fold-unfolded transition might be characterized quantitatively via the cooperativity index Ωc that is defined as follows (31)
![]() |
(9) |
where ΔT is the transition width. From Fig. 5, we obtain Ωc = 51.6 and 71.3 for the Go model and CD experiments, respectively. Given the simplicity of the Go model used here the agreement in Ωc should be considered reasonable. We can also estimate Ωc from the scaling law suggested in Li et al. (32), Ωc = 0.0057 × Nμ, where exponent μ is universal and expressed via the random walk susceptibility exponent γ as μ = 1 + γ ≈ 2.22(γ ≈ 1.22). Then we get Ωc ≈ 36.7, which is lower than the experimental as well as simulation result. This means that hbSBD in vitro is, on average, more cooperative than other two-state folders.
Another measure for the cooperativity is κ2 that is defined as (33) κ2 = ΔHvh/ΔHcal, where
are the van't Hoff and the calorimetric enthalpy, respectively; CV(T) is the specific heat. Without the baseline subtraction in CV(T) (34), for the Go model of hbSBD we obtained κ2 ≈ 0.25. Applying the baseline subtraction as shown in the lower part of Fig. 5 we got κ2 ≈ 0.5, which is still much lower than κ2 ≈ 1 for a truly all-or-none transition. Because κ2 is an extensive parameter, its low value is due to the shortcomings of the off-lattice Go models but not due to the finite size effects. More rigid lattice models give better results for the calorimetric cooperativity (17). Thus, for the hbSBD domain the Go model gives the better agreement with our CD experiments for the structural cooperativity Ωc than for the calorimetric measure κ2.
Free-energy profile
To get more evidence that hbSBD is a two-state folder we study the free-energy profile using some quantity as a rection coordinate. The precise reaction coordinate for a multidimensional process such as protein folding is difficult to ascertain. However, Onuchic and co-workers (35) have argued that, for minimally frustrated systems such as Go models, the number of native contact Q may be appropriate. Fig. 6 a shows the dependence of free energy on Q for T = TF. Because there is only one local maximum corresponding to the transition state, hbSBD is a two-state folder. This is not unexpected for hbSBD, which contains only helices. The fact that the simple Go model correctly captures the two-state behavior as was observed in the CD experiments, suggests that the energetic frustration ignored in this model plays a minor role compared to the topological frustration (12).
FIGURE 6.
(a) The dependence of free energy on the number of native contacts Q at T = TF. The typical structures of the denaturated state, transition state, and folded state are also drawn. The helix regions H1 (green) and H2 (orange) of the TS structure involve residues 13–19 and 39–48, respectively. For the FS structure H2 is the same as for the TS structure but H1 has two residues more (13–21). (b) Distributions of RMSD for three ensembles shown in panel a. The average values of RMSD are equal to 9.8, 4.9, and 3.2 Å for the DS, TS, and FS, respectively.
We have generated 104 conformations in equilibrium at T = TF, then used them to sort out structures of the denaturated state (DS), TS, and the folded state (FS). The distributions of the root mean square deviation (RMSD), PRMSD, of these states are plotted in Fig. 6 b. As expected, PRMSD for the DS spreads out more than that for the TS and FS. According to the free-energy profile in Fig. 6 a, the TS conformations have 26–40 native contacts. We have found that the size (number of folded residues) (36) of the TS is equal to 32. Comparing this size with the total number of residues (N = 52) we see that the fraction of folded residues in the TS is higher than the typical value for real two-state proteins (36). This is probably an artifact of Go models. The TS conformations are relatively compact having the ratio
where
is the average radius of gyration of the TS ensemble and
is the radius of gyration of the native conformation shown in Fig. 1. Because the RMSD, calculated only for two helices, is ∼0.8 Å, the structures of two helices in the TS are not distorted much. It is also evident from the typical structure of the TS shown in Fig. 6 b where the helix regions H1 and H2 involve residues 13–19 and 39–48, respectively (a residue is considered to be in the helix state if its dihedral angle is ∼60°). Note that H1 has two residues less compared to H1 in the native conformation (see the caption to Fig. 1) but H2 has even one bead more than its native state counterpart. Overall, the averaged RMSD of the TS conformations from the native conformation (Fig. 1) is ∼4.9 Å indicating that the TS is not close to the native one. As seen from Figs. 6 a and 1, the main difference comes from the tail parts. The most probable conformations (corresponding to maximum of PRMSD in Fig. 6 b of the FS have RMSD ∼2.5 Å. This value is reasonable from the point of view of the experimental structure resolution.
Folding kinetics
The two-state foldability, obtained from the thermodynamics simulations may be also probed by studying the folding kinetics. For this purpose we monitored the time dependence of the fraction of unfolded trajectories Pu(t) defined as follows (38)
![]() |
(10) |
where
is the distribution of first passage folding times
![]() |
(11) |
Here τf,1i is time for the ith trajectory to reach the native state for the first time; M is the total number of trajectories used in simulations. A trajectory is said to be folded if all of native contacts form. As seen from Eqs. 10 and 11, Pu(t) is the fraction of trajectories that do not reach the native state at time t. In the two-state scenario the folding becomes triggered after overcoming only one free-energy barrier between the transition state and the denaturated one. Therefore, Pu(t) should be a single exponential, i.e., Pu(t) ∼ exp(−t/τF) (a multiexponential behavior occurs in the case when the folding proceeds via intermediates) (38). Because the function Pu(t) can be measured directly by a number of experimental techniques (39,40), the single exponential kinetics of two-state folders is supported by a large body of experimental work (see, i.e., Naik et al. (26)).
Fig. 7 shows the semilogarithmic plot for Pu(t) at T = TF for the Go model. Because the single exponential fit works pretty well, one can expect that intermediates do not occur on the folding pathways. Thus, together with the thermodynamics data our kinetic study supports the two-state behavior of the hbSBD domain as observed on the CD experiments.
FIGURE 7.
The semilogarithmic plot of the time dependence of the fraction of unfolded trajectories at T = TF. The distribution Pu(t) was obtained from first passage times of 400 trajectories, which start from random conformations. The straight line corresponds to the fit ln Pu(t) = −t/τF, where τF = 0.1 μs.
From the linear fit in Fig. 7 we obtain the folding time τF ≈ 0.1 μs. This value is consistent with the estimate of the folding time defined as the average value of the first passage times. If we use the empirical formula for the folding time
where prefactor
and N is a number of amino acids (31) then τF = 1.1 × 103 μs for N = 52. This value is about four orders of magnitude larger than that obtained from the Go model. Thus, the Go model can capture the two-state feature of the denaturation transition for hbSBD domain but not folding times.
DISCUSSION
We have used CD technique and the Langevin dynamics to study the mechanism of folding of hbSBD. Our results suggest that this domain is a two-state folder. The CD experiments reveal that the hbSBD domain is less stable than the hbLBD domain in the same BCKD complex, but it is more stable and cooperative compared to other fast folding α-proteins.
Both the thermodynamics and kinetics results, obtained from the Langevin dynamics simulations, show that the simple Go model correctly captures the two-state feature of folding. It should be noted that the two-state behavior is not the natural consequence of the Go modeling because it allows for fishing folding intermediates caused by the topological frustration. From this standpoint it may be used to decipher the foldability of model proteins for which the topological frustration dominates. The reasonable agreement between the results obtained by the Go modeling and our CD experiments, suggests that the native state topology of hbSBD is more important than the energetic factor.
The theoretical model gives the reasonable agreement with the CD experimental data for the structural cooperativity Ωc. However, the calorimetric cooperativity criterion κ2 ≈ 1 for two-state folders is hard to fulfill within the Go model. From the ΔCp ≠ 0 fitting procedure we predict that the cold denaturation of hbSBD may occur at T ≈ 212 K and it would be very interesting to verify this prediction experimentally. We are using the package SMMP (41 and F. Eisenmenger, U. H. E. Hanamann, S. Hayryan, and C.-K. Hu, unpublished data), a parallel algorithm for calculating protein energy (43), and an algorithm for computing solvent accessible surface area (44,45) to perform all-atom simulation of hbSBD to check the relevant results.
Acknowledgments
The NMR spectra used to determine hbSBD structure were obtained at the high-field NMR Core Facility, National Research Program for Genomic Medicine, Taiwan, Republic of China.
This work was supported by KBN-State Committee for Scientific Research (grant No. 1P03B01827), National Science Council in Taiwan (grant Nos. NSC 93-2112-M-001-027 and 94-2119-M-002-001 to C.K.H. and grant No. NSC 92-2113-M-001-056 to T.H.H.), and by Academia Sinica in Taiwan (grant No. AS-92-TP-A09).
References
- 1.Daggett, V., and A. R. Fersht. 2003. Is there a unifying mechanism for protein folding? Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:18–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jackson, S. E. 1998. How do small single domain proteins fold? Fold. Des. 3:R81–R91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kubelka, J., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 2004. The protein folding “speed limit”. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14:76–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bryngelson, J., J. N. Onuchic, N. D. Socci, and P. G. Wolynes. 1995. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins. 21:167–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garcia-Mira, M. M., M. Sadqi, N. Fischer, J. M. Sanchez-Ruiz, and V. Munoz. 2002. Experimental identification of downhill protein folding. Science. 298:2191–2195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oliva, F. Y., and V. Munoz. 2004. A simple thermodynamic test to discriminate between two-state and downhill folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:8596–8597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ferguson, N., P. J. Schartau, T. D. Sharpe, S. Sato, and A. R. Fersht. 2004. One-state downhill versus conventional protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 344:295–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chuang, D. T., and V. E. Shih. 2001. Maple syrup urine disease (branched-chain ketoaciduria). In The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. C. R. Scriver, A. L. Beaudet, W. S. Sly, D. Valle, B. Vogelstein, and B. Childs, editors. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 1971–2006.
- 9.Perham, R. N. 2000. Swinging arms and swinging domains in multifunctional enzymes: catalytic machines for multistep reactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:961–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Reference deleted in proof.
- 11.Go, N. 1983. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 12:183–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clementi, C., H. Nymeyer, and J. Onuchic. 2000. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and “en-route” intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 298:937–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takada, S. 1999. Go-ing for the prediction of protein folding mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11698–11700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koga, N., and S. Takaga. 2001. Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model. J. Mol. Biol. 313:171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferrenberg, A. M., and R. H. Swendsen. 1989. Optimized Monte-Carlo data analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63:1195–1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klimov, D. K., and D. Thirumalai. 1998. Cooperativity in protein folding: from lattice models with sidechains to real proteins. Fold. Des. 3:127–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li, M. S., D. K. Klimov, and D. Thirumalai. 2005. Finite size effects on calorimetric cooperativity of two-state proteins. Physica A. 350:38–44. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Privalov, P. L. 1979. Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 33:167–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Becktel, W. J., and J. A. Schellman. 1987. Protein stability curves. Biopolymers. 26:1859–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Privalov, P. L. 1990. Cold denaturation of proteins. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25:281–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Camacho, C. J., and D. Thirumalai. 1993. Kinetics and thermodynamics of folding in model proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:6369–6372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Allen, M. P., and D. J. Tildesley. (1987) Computer Simulations of Liquids. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK.
- 23.Klimov, D. K., and D. Thirumalai. 1997. Viscosity dependence of the folding rates of proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79:317–320. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Veitshans, T., D. K. Klimov, and D. Thirumalai. 1997. Protein folding kinetics: time scales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence dependent properties. Fold. Des. 2:1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Swope, W. C., H. C. Andersen, P. H. Berens, and K. R. Wilson. 1982. Computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters and molecules: application to small water clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 76:637–649. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Naik, M., Y.-C. Chang, and T.-H. Huang. 2002. Folding kinetics of the lipoic acid-bearing domain of human mitochondrial branched chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase complex. FEBS Lett. 530:133–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Naik, M., and T.-H. Huang. 2004. Conformational stability and thermodynamic characterization of the lipoic acid bearing domain of human mitochondrial branched chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase. Protein Sci. 13:2483–2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chang, C.-F., H.-T. Chou, J. L. Chuang, D. T. Chuang, and T.-H. Huang. 2002. Solution structure and dynamics of the lipoic acid-bearing domain of human mitochondrial branched-chain alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase complex. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 277:15865–15873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Klimov, D. K., and D. Thirumalai. 1996. Criterion that determines the foldability of proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:4070–4073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gillepse, B., and K. W. Plaxco. 2004. Using protein folding rates to test protein folding theories. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:837–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li, M. S., D. K. Klimov, and D. Thirumalai. 2004. Thermal denaturation and folding rates of single domain proteins: size matters. Polym. 45:573–579. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li, M. S., D. K. Klimov, and D. Thirumalai. 2004. Finite size effects on thermal denaturation of globular proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:268107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaya, H., and H. S. Chan. 2000. Energetic components of cooperative protein folding. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:4823–4826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chan, H. S., S. Shimizu, and H. Kaya. 2004. Cooperativity principles in protein folding. Methods Enzymol. 380:350–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nymeyer, H., A. E. Garcia, and J. N. Onuchic. 1998. Folding funnels and frustration in off-lattice minimalist protein landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:5921–5926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bai, Y., Y. Zhou, and H. Zhou. 2004. Critical nucleation size in the folding of small apparently two-state proteins. Protein Sci. 13:1173–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reference deleted in proof.
- 38.Klimov, D. K., and D. Thirumalai. 1999. Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 97:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Greene, L. H. ed. (2004). Investigating Protein Folding, Misfolding and Nonnative States: Experimental and Theoretical Methods. Methods 34. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2005. Elucidation of the protein folding landscape by NMR. Methods Enzymol. 394:299–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eisenmenger, F., U. H. E. Hansmann, S. Hayryan, and C.-K. Hu. 2001. [SMMP]: a modern package for simulation of proteins. Comput. Phys. Commun. 138:192–212. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reference deleted in proof.
- 43.Hayryan, S., C.-K. Hu, S.-Y. Hu, and R. J. Shang. 2001. Multicanonical parallel simulations of proteins with continuous potentials. J. Comput. Chem. 22:1287–1296. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hayryan, S., C.-K. Hu, J. Skvrivanek, E. Hayryan, and I. Pokorny. 2005. A new analytical method for calculating the solvent accessible surface area of macromolecules and its gradients. J. Comput. Chem. 26:334–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Busa, J., J. Dzurina, E. Hayryan, S. Hayryan, C.-K. Hu, J. Plavka, I. Pokorny, J. Skrivanek, and M.-C. Wu. 2005. ARVO: a Fortran package for computing solvent accessible surface area and volume of overlapping spheres via analytic equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 165:59–96. [Google Scholar]


















