Abstract
Background
This study presents a simple chemical co-precipitation method for synthesizing a multifunctional ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite, utilizing distilled water as the reaction solvent and an eco-friendly medium, followed by thermal treatment at 500 °C for 2 h. This aqueous-based process allows precise control over the synthesis of a hybrid metal-oxide system, enhancing its thermal and functional properties.
Methods
Comprehensive characterization was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis).
Results
XRD results showed well-crystallized phases with average particle sizes in the nanometer range, while EDX revealed uniform elemental distribution without detectable impurities. The nanocomposite exhibits a direct optical band gap of approximately 2.97 eV and strong absorption in the UV-Vis region, indicating semiconductor behavior. Thermogravimetric analysis confirmed high thermal stability up to elevated temperatures. Additionally, the nanocomposite demonstrated strong antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), with inhibition zones reaching up to 18 mm.
Conclusion
The combination of high thermal stability, suitable optical properties, and robust antibacterial performance suggests the potential of this new nanocomposite for applications such as antimicrobial coatings and other multifunctional electronic materials.
Keywords: ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2, Nanocomposite, Bandgap, Antibacterial
Introduction
Metal oxides constitute a significant group of compounds celebrated for their extraordinary adaptability in a variety of applications due to their unique chemical and physical properties [1–4]. Among these oxides, zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), paramelaconite (Cu4O3), manganese dioxide (MnO2), and copper manganese oxide (CuMnO2) showcase outstanding structural, optical, and electronic characteristics. Zirconium dioxide is known for its remarkable thermal stability, mechanical strength, wide band gap of ∼5.0 eV, and compatibility with biological systems, making it essential in ceramics, dental materials, and fuel cell technologies. However, its wide band gap limits its optical and photocatalytic activity under visible light [1, 2]. Cu4O3, notable for its high electrical conductivity, catalytic performance, and a band gap of ∼2.34 eV, is widely used in sensor technology, energy storage systems, and catalytic applications [5]. MnO2 is notable for its crucial role in energy storage and environmental remediation due to its redox properties, multiple oxidation states, and a band gap of ∼3.0 eV that facilitates electron transfer processes [6–8]. CuMnO2 is a delafossite-type oxide recognized for its p-type conductivity, magnetic properties, and potential in catalysis and spintronic devices [9]. Although individual metal oxides exhibit useful properties, their practical application is often limited by intrinsic drawbacks such as wide band gaps, rapid charge carrier recombination, poor electrical conductivity, aggregation, and limited stability in aqueous or biological environments [10, 11]. To overcome these limitations, the design of multicomponent nanocomposites has emerged as an effective strategy. Combining oxides with different band gap energies, crystal structures, and charge transport behaviors can promote interfacial charge transfer, extend light absorption, and create synergistic effects that are not achievable in single-phase materials [11–15].
In recent years, creating materials made from many different parts at the nanoscale has become a major focus because combining different materials can enhance mechanical strength, thermal stability, and multifunctionality. Studies show that these nanocomposite materials often perform better than the individual components [12–15]. Several hybrid metal oxide systems have been reported, such as CuO-MgO for photocatalysis [16], ZrO2/TiO2 for supercapacitors [17], and CdO-MgO [18] for antibacterial activity. However, quaternary systems that integrate oxides with complementary properties remain rarely explored. The co-precipitation method stands out as a highly effective approach for producing nanocomposites, providing benefits such as simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and the capability to attain a uniform dispersion of nanoparticles with exact stoichiometry [19, 20]. Other common synthesis routes include sol-gel [21], hydrothermal [22], and solid-state methods [23]. While sol-gel offers good homogeneity and hydrothermal provides good crystallinity, they often require longer reaction times, high pressure, or expensive precursors. In contrast, co-precipitation allows simultaneous precipitation of precursor materials from solution at relatively low temperature, promoting the development of nanostructures essential for enhancing functional properties [19, 20]. The antimicrobial properties of metal oxide nanocomposites have become a key focus, especially given the increasing threat from antibiotic-resistant bacteria [20, 24]. Metal oxide nanocomposites show great potential due to their inherent antibacterial properties, providing a practical approach to address resistant bacterial strains [24, 25]. The scientific rationale for selecting the quaternary ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 system lies in the complementary roles of each component: ZrO2 provides structural stability and biocompatibility [1, 2], Cu4O3 and MnO2 contribute narrow band gaps for enhanced visible light absorption and redox activity [6–8, 26], and CuMnO2 introduces p-type conductivity and magnetic characteristics [9]. The combination of wide-bandgap, narrow-bandgap, and mixed-valence oxides in one matrix is expected to improve charge separation, broaden spectral response, and enhance antibacterial performance compared to reported binary or ternary systems [11, 26]. Despite progress in understanding metal oxide nanocomposites, there is still a lack of thorough studies on the structural, optical, spectral, morphological, and antibacterial characteristics of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite, especially when synthesized using the co-precipitation method. Addressing this knowledge gap is crucial to fully utilize the potential of these materials. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the structural, optical, spectral, morphological, and antibacterial properties of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite prepared through the co-precipitation approach. By examining these properties, this research seeks to offer significant insights for developing effective and cost-efficient antibacterial agents that can tackle the challenges of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in real-world scenarios.
Experimental procedures
Materials
The synthesis process utilized ZrCl4, 97% purity, BDH, MnCl2·4H2O, 99% purity, Fluka-Garantie, and CuCl2, 98% purity, Sigma-Aldrich as precursor materials. NaOH functioned as a precipitating agent, while distilled water(DW) and ethanol acted as solvents.
The Synthesis of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
The preparation process of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite(NC) was carried out through the following steps: Initially, 2.533 g of MnCl2.4H2O were dissolved in 20mL of Dw and stirred magnetically for 20 min at 22
until complete homogeneity was achieved. Simultaneously, 3.00 g of ZrCl4 and 1.723 g of CuCl2 were also dissolved separately under similar conditions to ensure uniform mixing. Subsequently, the three individual solutions were combined into a single beaker and stirred magnetically for two hours at room temperature. In parallel, a solution of 2.4 g of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in 20 mL of distilled water was prepared and gradually added dropwise to the mixture while stirring, until reaching a pH of 9.After pH adjustment, the resultant solution underwent filtration, and the precipitate obtained was meticulously washed with ethanol and distilled water multiple times to eliminate any contaminants. The precipitate was then dried in an electric oven at 200 ℃ for two hours, followed by grinding into a fine powder and calcination at 500 ℃ for two hours (see Fig. 1) [25]. Finally, the synthesized NC was stored in a clean container for further analysis and characterization.
Fig. 1.

Nanocomposite preparation process flow chart
Characterization techniques
The optical properties were assessed using a Hitachi U3900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Varian Cary-50 software. Measurements were conducted at ambient temperature, covering a wavelength range from 200 to 900 nm. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC1 star system (Columbus, OH, USA). Approximately 10 mg of each sample was heated from 25 °C to 1200 °C at a rate of 25 °C per minute in an air atmosphere. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected using an XD–2 X-ray diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) operated at 36 kV and 20 mA. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS10 spectrometer (Madison, WI, USA), employing the KBr pellet method over the range of 500 to 4000 cm⁻¹ with a resolution of 4 cm⁻¹ and accumulating 32 scans per spectrum. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were performed using equipment from Jeol Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
Results and discussion
XRD analysis
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the synthesized ZrO₂/Cu₄O₃/MnO₂/CuMnO₂ nanocomposite, following thermal annealing at 500 °C, is presented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

XRD patterns of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
The observed diffraction maxima were indexed to the orthorhombic phase of ZrO2 (space group P212121), the tetragonal structure of Cu4O3 (space group I41/amd), the orthorhombic MnO2 (space group Pnma), and the monoclinic CuMnO2 (space group C2/m). The clear resolution of all characteristic peaks for each constituent phase, without detectable impurity or secondary phases, confirms the successful formation of a high-purity, well-crystallized quaternary heterostructure. Phase identification was further substantiated by matching the diffraction angles with standard JCPDS reference cards: No. 34-1084 (ZrO2), No. 49-1830 (Cu4O3), No. 44–0142 (MnO2), and No. 50–0860 (CuMnO2). The corresponding full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) values and Miller indices for each phase are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
2 theta, FWHM and Miller indices of the prepared nanocomposite
| oxides | 2 θ (degree) | θ(degree) | (hkl) | FWHM (degree) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZrO2 | 30.501 | 15.250 | (111) | 0.302 |
| 33.984 | 16.992 | (002) | 0.114 | |
| 35.899 | 17.949 | (200) | 0.290 | |
| 53.664 | 26.832 | (202) | 0.110 | |
| 56.218 | 28.109 | (103) | 0.075 | |
| 59.003 | 29.501 | (113) | 0.130 | |
| 60.963 | 30.481 | (311) | 0.192 | |
| 63.555 | 31.777 | (222) | 0.148 | |
| MnO2 | 22.172 | 11.086 | (101) | 0.069 |
| 34.761 | 17.381 | (301) | 0.116 | |
| 38.253 | 19.127 | (400) | 0.054 | |
| 40.095 | 20.048 | (002) | 0.174 | |
| 43.627 | 21.814 | (401) | 0.165 | |
| 59.113 | 29.557 | (600) | 0.096 | |
| 63.077 | 31.539 | (103) | 0.093 | |
| 72.593 | 36.297 | (221) | 0.139 | |
| 74.551 | 37.276 | (213) | 0.084 | |
| Cu4O3 | 17.749 | 8.8745 | (101) | 0.093 |
| 30.842 | 15.421 | (200) | 0.392 | |
| 31.581 | 15.790 | (103) | 0.148 | |
| 35.899 | 17.949 | (202) | 0.290 | |
| 43.944 | 21.972 | (220) | 0.087 | |
| 44.350 | 22.175 | (213) | 0.065 | |
| 58.514 | 29.257 | (224) | 0.071 | |
| 72.593 | 36.296 | (420) | 0.079 | |
| CuMnO2 | 16.021 | 8.0105 | (001) | 0.237 |
| 31.196 | 15.598 | (002) | 0.239 | |
| 39.639 | 19.819 | (20 − 2) | 0.330 | |
| 40.095 | 20.047 | (111) | 0.174 | |
| 51.650 | 25.825 | (202) | 0.056 | |
| 59.113 | 29.556 | (31 − 1) | 0.096 | |
| 73.478 | 36.739 | (022) | 0.169 | |
| 74.551 | 37.275 | (-221) | 0.084 |
To estimate the average crystallite size (D) of the nanocomposite, the Debye–Scherrer formula was applied (Eq. (1)), where λ = 0.15406 nm, θ is the Bragg angle, and β is the FWHM [27].
![]() |
1 |
Concurrently, the dislocation density (δ), serving as an indicator of lattice imperfections, was calculated using Eq. (2) [28].
![]() |
2 |
Additionally, both crystallite size and microstrain (ε) were derived from the Williamson–Hall (W–H) method, as expressed in Eq. (3) [29]. The calculated average crystallite sizes are documented in Table 2.
![]() |
3 |
Table 2.
Average D(nm) and dislocation density of the prepared nanocomposite
| Oxides | average D(nm) | average dislocation density(lines/m2)*1014 | average lattice strain ( ) |
average D(nm) | average dislocation density(lines/m2)*1014 | lattice strain ( ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by Scherer method | by Williamson Hall (W-H) method | |||||
| ZrO2 | 67.47 | 2.197 | 0.000679 | 23.11 | 18.7241 | -0.00219 |
| Cu4O3 | 89.13 | 1.259 | 0.000631 | 30.28 | 10.9066 | -0.00163 |
| MnO2 | 92.30 | 0.391 | 0.000244 | 72.20 | 1.91751 | -0.000116 |
| CuMnO2 | 75.58 | 1.751 | 0.000695 | 84.08 | 1.414540 | -0.00174 |
For the orthorhombic ZrO2 phase, the Scherrer estimate yielded a crystallite size of approximately 67.47 nm, whereas the W–H analysis, which accounts for strain-induced broadening, gave a notably lower value of 23.11 nm. The retention of the metastable orthorhombic polymorph at ambient temperature, instead of the thermodynamically favored monoclinic form, is attributable to two primary influences: (i) the nanosize effect, which tends to stabilize higher-symmetry phases below a critical threshold of ~ 30 nm, and (ii) interfacial strain generated by the close contact between ZrO2 and the other oxide components within the composite. Such local orthorhombic distortions driven by size and strain effects have been corroborated by recent pair distribution function studies [30].
A notable divergence between Scherrer- and W–H-derived crystallite sizes was observed, particularly for ZrO2 and Cu4O3. This discrepancy arises because the Scherrer equation attributes peak broadening solely to crystallite dimensions, neglecting lattice strain. In contrast, the W–H method decouples size and strain contributions. The significantly smaller W–H sizes, together with relatively high negative microstrain values (− 0.00219 for ZrO2 and − 0.00163 for Cu4O3), indicate substantial compressive strain within the composite matrix. Such strain is likely induced by the coexistence of four distinct metal oxides with differing ionic radii and crystal symmetries, promoting lattice distortion and defect formation. Hence, the W–H approach offers a more reliable crystallite size estimation for this multicomponent system. Conversely, MnO2 exhibited comparable sizes from both methods, consistent with its minimal strain contribution. The microstrain data compiled in Table 2 reveal appreciable lattice strain throughout the nanocomposite, reflecting internal stresses arising from phase heterogeneity and interfacial interactions. Lattice strain can exert dual effects on material performance: moderate strain may enhance functional properties, such as electrical or ionic conductivity, by introducing additional active sites, which is advantageous for catalytic and energy-storage applications; however, excessive strain can compromise structural coherence and mechanical stability. Therefore, quantifying lattice strain is essential for rational synthesis optimization and property tailoring. The negative strain values confirm the prevalence of compressive strain, commonly observed in nanocomposites due to lattice mismatch and nanoscale surface tension. Such compressive strain not only improves structural robustness but may also modulate the electronic band structure and defect concentration.
FTIR analysis
FTIR spectroscopy was used to examine the chemical environment of the surface and to verify the formation of metal–oxygen linkages in the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite after thermal treatment at 500 °C. It should be clarified that FTIR identifies bond types and adsorbed species, but it cannot independently establish crystalline phase identity. Phase identification relies on XRD. The spectrum presented in Fig. 3 exhibits three characteristic regions. At high wavenumbers, the broad envelope at 3447 cm⁻¹ with an inflection at 3344 cm⁻¹ originates from O–H stretching of adsorbed water and surface hydroxyls. The band at 1630.7 cm⁻¹ corresponds to the bending mode of coordinated water. These features are expected for high-surface-area oxides produced via aqueous co-precipitation, where exposure to air leads to surface hydration even after calcination [31, 32]. Between 1200 and 800 cm⁻¹, three bands are resolved at 1136.9 cm⁻¹, 1064.7 cm⁻¹, and 849.7 cm⁻¹. A key point in interpreting transition metal oxides is that the primary M–O lattice stretching modes appear below 1000 cm⁻¹. Therefore, features above this limit should not be attributed to direct lattice metal–oxygen vibrations. In systems prepared from metal chlorides and precipitated with NaOH, bands in the 1100–1050 cm⁻¹ interval are commonly associated with surface-bound residues such as carbonate species and with hydroxyl deformation modes that survive decomposition of precursors [33]. This interpretation aligns with reports on ternary MnO2/CuO/ZrO2 composites, where absorptions in the 1000–1200 cm⁻¹ range were assigned to surface adsorbed species [33]. The band at 849.7 cm⁻¹ sits at the lower edge of this region and is best described as arising from M–O–M bridging vibrations formed during condensation of the hydroxide intermediates [34, 35]. The region below 1000 cm⁻¹ contains the most structurally informative bands. Two clear absorptions at 618.8 cm⁻¹ and 523.1 cm⁻¹ are observed. These wavenumbers are consistent with M–O stretching and O–M–O bending vibrations within oxide lattices, and they support the conclusion that metal–oxygen frameworks formed during calcination. Because the present material contains Zr, Cu, and Mn in multiple oxidation states, the vibrational modes of ZrO2, Cu4O3, MnO2, and CuMnO2 will overlap heavily in this region. As a result, FTIR cannot be used to deconvolute these contributions and assign individual peaks to specific metal–oxygen bonds or to specific phases. That level of assignment requires diffraction data [7, 25, 34, 36, 37].
Fig. 3.

FTIR spectra of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
SEM and EDX analysis
The surface morphology of the synthesized ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite, prepared via the co-precipitation method at 500 °C for 2 h, was examined using SEM. The SEM micrograph, presented in Fig. 4a, reveals a heterogeneous surface topography characterized by a wide distribution of particle sizes and irregular shapes. The microstructure consists of agglomerated clusters of fine primary particles, interspersed with larger, roughly spherical secondary particles. This irregular and non-uniform morphology is indicative of the complex nucleation and growth processes occurring during the co-precipitation and subsequent calcination steps, which involve the formation of multiple oxide phases simultaneously. The lack of well-defined, faceted crystallites suggests a relatively rapid growth rate, potentially hindered by the presence of different constituent elements, which can lead to the formation of less-ordered structures. To confirm the elemental composition and chemical purity of the synthesized nanocomposite, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy was performed. The corresponding EDX spectrum, shown in Fig. 4b, clearly displays the characteristic peaks for the constituent elements: manganese (Mn), zirconium (Zr), oxygen (O), and copper (Cu). No other elemental peaks were detected within the detection limit of the EDX system, confirming the high purity of the prepared nanocomposite and the absence of any significant contaminants from the synthesis process. The semi-quantitative elemental composition, as calculated from the EDX analysis, is indicated in the figure, providing further validation of the intended stoichiometry of the nanocomposite.
Fig. 4.

(a) SEM image (b) EDX analysis of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
TEM analysis
TEM was employed to provide a more detailed insight into the morphology, crystallinity, and particle size distribution of the synthesized nanocomposite. Figure 5a displays a representative TEM micrograph of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite. The image reveals a complex and diverse morphology, consistent with the SEM observations. The nanostructure consists of a mixture of distinctly different particle shapes, including a significant population of nearly spherical nanoparticles, alongside a notable fraction of polyhedral and highly irregular-shaped particles. The edges of the particles are generally not sharp, suggesting a degree of surface roughness at the nanoscale. Furthermore, the TEM image shows a high degree of particle agglomeration, which is a common characteristic of nanostructured materials synthesized via wet-chemical routes due to their high surface energy and the tendency to minimize it. The corresponding particle size distribution histogram, derived from measuring over 100 particles in multiple TEM images (Fig. 5b), shows a relatively broad size distribution, which is expected given the multiphasic composition of the nanocomposite. The calculated average particle size is 38.50 nm. The presence of orthorhombic ZrO2, tetragonal Cu4O3, and the mixed metal oxides MnO2 and CuMnO2, each with different crystal structures (tetragonal, hexagonal, etc.) and surface energies, dictates the final size and shape of the resulting nanoparticles. The formation of such a polydisperse system further confirms the complexity of the synthesis pathway and the successful integration of multiple components into a single nanocomposite.
Fig. 5.

(a) TEM image and (b) the corresponding histogram of the particle size distribution
It is important to distinguish between crystallite size obtained from XRD and particle size observed by TEM. The average particle size from TEM analysis was found to be 38.50 nm, while the crystallite size from XRD using the Scherrer method reached up to 92.30 nm for MnO2. This difference is expected because XRD measures the size of a single coherently diffracting crystalline domain, whereas TEM measures the physical size of the particle as it appears in the image. In many cases, a single particle observed in TEM can be composed of several aggregated crystallites. The high-temperature calcination at 500 °C used in this study likely promoted the agglomeration of smaller crystallites into larger secondary particles. Therefore, the TEM size represents the agglomerated particle size, while the XRD size represents the size of the individual crystallites within those particles. This behavior is commonly reported in multi-component metal oxide nanocomposites.
TGA analysis
The TGA curve of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite prepared by co-precipitation using only distilled water, shown in Fig. 6, exhibits complex thermal behavior reflecting its multiple components and their interactions with the gradual increase in temperature from room temperature up to 1000 °C.The curve begins with a slight weight loss of approximately 4% in the initial stage from room temperature to about 250 °C. This loss is mainly attributed to the evaporation of surface moisture and physically adsorbed water on the surface of the nanoparticles, a phenomenon common in oxide nanomaterials due to their large surface area [38].Subsequently, the compound exhibits a period of thermal stability from approximately 250 °C to about 500 °C, during which the curve is almost flat with negligible weight loss. This indicates the absence of residual organic solvent impurities, consistent with the use of distilled water as the sole solvent. However, upon exceeding 500 °C, the most critical stage of the analysis begins. The curve shows a significant weight loss of 8% continuing until approximately 800 °C, followed by an additional loss of 4% from 800 °C to 900 °C. These losses are mainly attributed to the thermal decomposition of manganese dioxide (MnO2) and its conversion to manganese trioxide (Mn2O3) with the release of oxygen gas, followed by possible further transformations (e.g., Mn2O3 to Mn3O4) or the formation of new phases such as copper-manganese spinel (CuMn2O4). The experimental weight loss matches the theoretical values expected for these reactions, confirming the presence of a large amount of MnO2 in the sample. As the temperature approaches 1000 °C, the curve begins to stabilize again, indicating the formation of thermally stable terminal phases [39, 40] .Based on this analysis, it can be concluded that the nanocomposite exhibits only limited thermal stability up to 500 °C. Above this temperature, the material undergoes progressive decomposition and phase transformations and does not become fully stable again until approximately 1000 °C. Therefore, the nanocomposite is suitable for applications operating only below 500 °C, but its use is limited in applications requiring prolonged exposure to temperatures exceeding 500 °C.
Fig. 6.

TGA analysis of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
UV-visible analysis
The optical characteristics of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 quaternary nanocomposite were investigated using UV-Visible spectroscopy in transmission mode. The spectra were recorded for a colloidal dispersion in a standard 1 cm quartz cell across 200–900 nm, as illustrated in Fig. 7. A pronounced absorption was observed in the ultraviolet region, which progressively declined into the visible range. The spectrum exhibits a broad absorption profile without well-defined peaks. This feature can be ascribed to the complex multi-component structure of the nanocomposite, where the electronic transitions of ZrO2, Cu4O3, MnO2, and CuMnO2 overlap, leading to a continuous absorption band [10, 41].
Fig. 7.

Absorption spectra of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
The direct optical band gap was extracted using Tauc’s approach for direct allowed transitions, expressed as (αhv)2 = A(hv - Eg) [42, 43]. The absorption coefficient(α), was derived from the absorbance values based on the Beer-Lambert law. The Tauc plot, presented in Fig. 8, gives a direct band gap of 2.97 eV for the nanocomposite. This value is lower than those reported for pure ZrO2 (5.0 eV), and lies between the values of Cu4O3 (2.34 eV), MnO2 (1.2–2.3 eV), and CuMnO2 (1.6 eV). The narrowing of the band gap relative to ZrO2 confirms the successful formation of a heterostructure, which enhances photon harvesting in the visible region [1, 2, 5–9].
Fig. 8.

Optical band gap of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite
Such a band gap in the visible range suggests that the prepared ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite can be activated by solar light. Therefore, it shows potential for application in solar-driven photocatalysis for environmental remediation.
Antibacterial activity
The growth-inhibitory potential of the quaternary nanocomposite ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 was assessed using the agar well diffusion method against two representative bacterial strains: Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus(S. aureus) and Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E.coli).Bacterial suspensions were prepared and uniformly spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Filter paper discs, 6 mm in diameter, were impregnated with nanocomposite dispersions at concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mg/mL prepared in deionized water. The loaded discs were placed on the inoculated plates and incubated at 37 °C for 22 h. Following incubation, the diameters of the zones of inhibition ZOI were measured. All experiments were performed in duplicate n = 2 [25, 44].The average ZOI values are presented in Table 3. The nanocomposite exhibited inhibitory effects against both strains, with comparatively larger inhibition zones observed for E. coli than for S. aureus, as illustrated in Fig. 9 .It should be noted that the disc diffusion assay provides evidence of growth suppression only and is not sufficient to confirm whether the effect is bacteriostatic or bactericidal. Further investigations, including determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration MBC, and time-kill kinetics, would be required to clarify the nature of the antibacterial action.The underlying mechanism responsible for the observed inhibition remains undefined in the current work and is therefore proposed as hypothetical. The effect may plausibly arise from a combination of factors: (a) release of metal ions from the nanocomposite surface, (b) direct physical interaction between high-surface-area nanoparticles and bacterial cells, and (c) possible generation of reactive oxygen species ROS [32, 38, 45, 46].Metal ions that could potentially be released include Mn⁴⁺, Mn²⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Cu⁺, and Cu²⁺. Their propensity for leaching in aqueous media is expected to vary. Cu²⁺ and Mn²⁺ are more likely to detach from the crystal lattice, whereas Zr⁴⁺ and Mn⁴⁺ are anticipated to remain largely embedded within the oxide framework and to be released only to a limited extent under specific conditions, such as acidic environments [29, 31, 38] .In general, positively charged ions may interact electrostatically with anionic components of the bacterial envelope and with thiol -SH groups in essential proteins, potentially leading to membrane destabilization [42]. A schematic representation of this proposed interaction is provided in Fig. 10. Given the hypothetical nature of the proposed mechanism, follow-up studies are warranted. These should include direct quantification of ROS, measurement of metal ion release under physiologically relevant conditions, and assessment of membrane integrity using fluorescent probes or electron microscopy.Regarding the apparent difference in susceptibility between the two strains, no conclusive explanation can be drawn from the present data. It is recognized that Gram-negative bacteria possess an additional outer membrane that may restrict penetration, while Gram-positive bacteria have a thicker peptidoglycan layer. Considering the interplay of these structural features along with other variables such as growth rate and surface composition, any interpretation of the observed difference remains preliminary and requires targeted comparative studies [47, 48]. The significance of these preliminary findings lies in providing initial evidence that the synthesized quaternary nanocomposite possesses measurable growth-inhibitory activity against representative bacterial species. The multi-component design may offer the possibility of synergistic effects not observed with single-phase oxides. Accordingly, this study establishes a foundation for subsequent research to explore effective dosages, detailed mechanisms, and potential applications in areas such as antibacterial surface coatings and environmental decontamination.
Table 3.
Antibacterial properties of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 at different concentrations
| Name of bacteria | Zone of inhibition (ZOI; diameter in mm) ± standard deviation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 mg/ml | 100 mg/ml | 200 mg/ml | Azithromycin (control) | |
| S. aureus |
|
|
|
|
| E.coli | - |
|
|
|
Fig. 9.

Antibacterial activity of ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite against S. aureus and E.coli. (1) 50 mg/ml (2) 100 mg/ml (3) 200 mg/ml, (C−) d.H2O as the negative control and(C+) Azithromycin (AZM) as the positive control
Fig. 10.

Antibacterial Activity Mechanism of the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2Nanocomposite
Conclusion
In conclusion, the ZrO2/Cu4O3/MnO2/CuMnO2 nanocomposite was successfully synthesized using an aqueous co-precipitation method. The use of distilled water as the reaction solvent makes the process environmentally friendly. Characterization revealed well-crystallized phases with an average crystallite size in the nanometer range, confirming a high surface area. The material exhibited a direct optical band gap of 2.97 eV and excellent thermal stability up to elevated temperatures, as shown by TGA analysis. Furthermore, the nanocomposite demonstrated significant antibacterial activity, with an inhibition zone of up to 18 mm against E. coli, indicating its potential for antimicrobial coating applications. These combined properties of thermal stability, suitable optical characteristics, and antibacterial performance suggest that the synthesized nanocomposite is a promising candidate for multifunctional material applications. Future research will focus on investigating the antibacterial mechanisms in detail and exploring the material’s performance in specific device configurations to further advance its practical applications in industrial and biomedical fields.
Acknowledgements
Author Adnan Alnehia would like to thank Mr.Adel Taleb for his support and cooperation in providing chemicals in Sana’a, Yemen.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: Adnan Alnehia. Methodology: Adnan Alnehia.Formal analysis and investigation: Adnan Alnehia, M. A. Ahlam, and Muhammad Hadi. Writing—original draft: Adnan Alnehia and M. A. AhlamWriting-review and editing: M. A. Ahlam and Muhammad Hadi.
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Dual publication
This manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Horti NC, Kamatagi MD, Nataraj SK, Wari MN, Inamdar SR. Structural and optical properties of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) nanoparticles: effect of calcination temperature. Nano Express. 2020;1:010022. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hadi M. Co3O4-CuO-ZrO2 nanocomposite: Optical, spectral, morphological,structural and antibacterial studies. Results Chem. 2024;7:101311. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaliyaperumal R, Nagaraj K, Kasilingam T, Kumaravel T, Gokulan R. Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Evaluation of PbO/g–C₃N₄ Nanocomposite: A Multifunctional Material for Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, Anti–inlammatory, and Cytotoxic Applications, BioNanoScience, vol. 15, p. 451, 2025.
- 4.Nagaraj K, Raja K, Fatimah O, Al–Otibi T, Kasilingam V, Poovan T, Kumaravel, et al. Structural Variability and Antimicrobial Eicacy of Barium Oxide–Doped Copper Oxide (BaO@CuO) Nanocomposites Via Co–Precipitation. Chem Afr. 2025;8:2035–44. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thanuja J, Udayabhanu G, Nagaraju, Naika HR. Biosynthesis of Cu4O3 nanoparticles using Razma seeds: application to antibacterial and cytotoxicity activities. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1:1646. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen L, Peng L, Fu R, Liu Z, Jiang X, Wang D, et al. Synthesis of flower-like MnO2 nanostructure with freshly prepared Cu particles and electrochemical performance in supercapacitors. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0269086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anguraj G, Kumar RA, Inmozhi C, Uthrakumar R, Elshikh MS, Almutairi SM et al. ,., MnO2Doped with Ag Nanoparticles and Their Applications in Antimicrobial and Photocatalytic Reactions, Catalysts vol. 13, p. 397, 2023.
- 8.Zhang L, Yang S, Fu W, Cui Y, Wang J, Zhao D et al. ,., Plasma-induce d ε-MnO2base d aqueous zinc-ion batteries and their dissolution-deposition mechanism JournalofMaterialsScience&Technology, vol. 127, pp. 206–213, 2022.
- 9.Zhang Q, Xiong D, Li H, Xia D, Tao H, Zhao X. A facile hydrothermal route to synthesize delafossite CuMnO2 nanocrystals. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2015;26:10159–63. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaliyaperumal R, Nagaraj K, Kasilingam T, Kumaravel T, Gokulan R, Rajkumar S et al. Synthesis, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Evaluation of NiO/CdO/ZnO Nanocomposites with Morphological and Structural Insights, BioNanoScience 15, p. 387, 2025. 10.1007/s12668-025-01996-2 [DOI]
- 11.Munawar T, Iqbal F, Yasmeen S, Mahmood K, Hussain A. Multi metal oxide NiO-CdO-ZnO nanocomposite–synthesis, structural, optical, electrical properties and enhanced sunlight driven photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int. 2020;46:2421–37. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nachimuthu S, Thangamani C, Thiyagarajulu N, Thangaraj K, Paramasivam D, Thangavel S, et al. Facile synthesis of ZnO-Y2O3 nanocomposite for photocatalytic and biological applications. Catal Commun vol. 2023;184:106786. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sabouri Z, Oskuee RK, Sabouri S, Moghaddas SSTH, Samarghandian S, Abdulabbas HS, et al. Phytoextract-mediated synthesis of Ag-doped ZnO–MgO–CaO nanocomposite using Ocimum Basilicum L seeds extract as a highly efficient photocatalyst and evaluation of their biological effects. Ceram Int vol. 2023;49:20989–97. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hammood SA, Abodood AAF, AlGalal HMAA, Khamees EJ, Abbas MF, Zabibah RS, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of PVA–Fe 2 O 3 –CuO Hybrid Structure for Biomedical Application. Int J Nanosci. 2022;21:2250030. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mukhtar F, Munawar T, Nadeem MS, Rehman MNu, Riaz M, Iqbal F. Dual S-scheme heterojunction ZnO–V2O5–WO3nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity. Mater Chem Phys vol. 2021;263:124372. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pricilla RB, Elsie AS, Mohan A, Kumar VM, Vidhya B, Nandhakumar R. Studies on the structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of CuO/MgO nanocomposite prepared by facile chemical co-precipitation. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;47:837–42. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sridevi Patil BS, Chikkatti AM, Sajjan, Banapurmath NR. Development of ZrO2–TiO2 binary nanocomposites for enhanced energy storage in supercapacitors. Discover Electrochem. 2025;2:13. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S. Ultrasonic-assisted CdO–MgO nanocomposite for multifunctional applications. Mater Technol. 2019;34:403–14. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Urooj A, Rani M, Shah AA, Aslam S, Siddiqui R, Siddiqa A, et al. Morphological and optical investigation of 2D material-based ternary nanocomposite: Bi2O3/MgO/GO synthesized by a co-precipitationtechnique. RSC Adv. 2022;12:32986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alnehia A, Al-Sharabi A, Alnahari H, Hadi M. Synthesis and Characterization of MgO–CuO–Fe2O3 Nanocomposite: A Study of Its Structural, Optical, and Antibacterial Properties, Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2024, p. 10, 2024.
- 21.Aepurwar DN, Shirsath SE, Batoo KM, Hadi M, Devmunde BH. Effect of Li1+ ion on the physico-chemical properties cation distribution of sol-gel synthesized Ni-Zn spinel ferrite nanoparticles. Ceram Int, 50, 2024. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.432 [DOI]
- 22.Rahmah MI. Novel triple hydrothermal method for preparation of CuO/Fe2O3/Ag2O nanocomposite with antimicrobial application. Inorg Nano-Metal Chem 2023. 10.1080/24701556.2023.2165680 [DOI]
- 23.Cherpin C, Lister D, Dacquait F, Liu L. Study of the Solid-State Synthesis of Nickel Ferrite (NiFe2O4) by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Raman Spectroscopy, Materials, vol. 14, p. 2557, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Munawar T, Mukhtar F, Yasmeen S, Naveed-ur-Rehman M, Nadeem MS, Riaz M, et al. Sunlight-induced photocatalytic degradation of various dyes and bacterial inactivation using CuO–MgO–ZnO nanocomposite. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:42243–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Munawar T, Yasmeen S, Hasan M, Mahmood K, Hussain A, Ali A, et al. Novel tri-phase heterostructured ZnO–Yb2O3–Pr2O3 nanocomposite; structural, optical, photocatalytic and antibacterial studies. Ceram Int. 2020;46:11101–14. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rahman A, Sabeeh H, Zulfiqar S, Agboola PO, Warsi MF, Shakir I. Structural, optical and photocatalytic studies of trimetallic oxides nanostructures prepared via wet chemical approach. Synth Met. 2020;259:116228. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Y. M. S. Jamil, A. N. Al-Hakimi, H. M. A. Al-Maydama, G. Y. Almahwiti, A. Qasem, and S. M. Saleh, "Optimum Green Synthesis, Characterization, and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Prepared from an Extract of Aloe fleurentinorum," International Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 2024, p. 8, 2024 10.1155/2024/2804165 [DOI]
- 28.Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Prabukumar S, Sivaramakrishnan S. Multifunctional properties of microwave assisted CdO–NiO–ZnO mixed metal oxide nanocomposite: enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2018;29:5459–71. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Karthik K, Dhanuskodi S, Gobinath C, Sivaramakrishnan S. Microwave-assisted synthesis of CdO–ZnO nanocomposite and its antibacterial activity against human pathogens. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc vol. 2015;139:7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rohan Pokratath K, Cordero-Edwards M, Bina SJL, Billinge, Roo JD. Local orthorhombic phase in zirconium oxide nanocrystals: insights from X-ray pair distribution function analysis. J Appl Crystallogr vol. 2025;58:688–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kannan K, Radhika D, Nikolova MP, Andal V, Sadasivuni KK, Lakkaboyana SK. Facile microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide CdO-CuO nanocomposite: photocatalytic and antimicrobial enhancing properties. Optik. 2020;218:165112. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kannan K, Radhika D, Gnanasangeetha D, Lakkaboyana SK, Sadasivuni KK, Gurushankar K, et al. Photocatalytic and antimicrobial properties of microwave synthesized mixed metal oxide nanocomposite. Inorg Chem Commun. 2021;125:108429. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Joysi MG, Senthil S, Jennifer JS, Muthupandi S, Galeb W, AnnieCanisius D, et al. Exploring ternary metal oxides MnO2/CuO/ZrO2 composites for supercapacitor applications. Results Chem. 2024;10:101682. [Google Scholar]
- 34.vasanthi TA, Balakrishnan G. Synthesize of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) nanoparticles and characterization. Malaya J Matematik. 2020;S:4955–9. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jothi L. Synthesis and Characterization of MnO2 Nanoparticles Prepared by Hydrothermal Processing. Int J Sci Eng Technol vol. 2019;6:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yasmeen S, Iqbal F, Munawar T, Nawaz MA, Asghar M, Hussain A. Synthesis, structural and optical analysis of surfactant assisted ZnO–NiO nanocomposites prepared by homogeneous precipitation method. Ceram Int. 2019;45:17859–73. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Allawi F, Juda AM, Radhi SW. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue over MgO/α-Fe2O3 nano composite prepared by a hydrothermal method, in The 8th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology (ICAST), 2020, p. 030020.
- 38.Kannan K, Radhika D, Kasai RD, Gnanasangeetha D, Palani G, Gurushankar K, et al. Facile fabrication of novel ceria-based nanocomposite (CYO-CSO) via co-precipitation: Electrochemical, photocatalytic and antibacterial performances. J Mol Struct. 2022;1256:132519. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zaki MI, Hasan MA, Pasupulety L, Kumari K. Thermochemistry of manganese oxides in reactive gas atmospheres: Probing redox compositions in the decomposition course MnO2 ~ MnO. Thermochimica Acta vol. 1997;303:171–81. [Google Scholar]
- 40.ZHANG P, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. Calorimetric studies on the thermodynamic properties of M2Mn3O8 materials. University of California; 2021. PhD Dissertation, Materials Science and Engineering.
- 41.Alnehia A, Sayed MEE, Murshed MN, Alwany AB, Samir A. BaO2/Mn2O3/ZnO/BaMnO3 nanocomposite: structural, optical, spectral, morphological and antibacterial properties. RSC Adv. 2026;16:15430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alnehia A, Hadi M, Alnahari H, Al–Sharabi A. Optical, structural and antibacterial properties of phase heterostructured Fe2O3–CuO–CuFe2O4 nanocomposite. Scientiic Rep. 2024;14:14392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alnehia A, Alnahari H, Al-Sharabi A. Characterization and antibacterial activity of MgO/CuO/Cu2MgO3 nanocomposite synthesized by sol-gel technique. Results Chem. 2024;8:101620. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khan MM, Harunsani MH, Tan AL, Hojamberdiev M, Poi YA, Ahmad N. Antibacterial Studies of ZnO and Cu-Doped ZnO Nanoparticles Synthesized Using Aqueous Leaf Extractof Stachytarpheta jamaicensis, BioNanoScience, vol. 10, pp. 1037–1048, 2020.
- 45.Kannan K, Radhika D, Gnanasangeetha D, Krishna LS, Gurushankar K. Y 3 + and Sm 3 + co-doped mixed metal oxide nanocomposite: Structural,electrochemical, photocatalytic, and antibacterial properties. Appl Surf Sci Adv. 2021;4:100085. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kannan K, Radhika D, Nesaraj AS, Sadasivuni KK, Krishna LS. Facile synthesis of NiO-CYSO nanocomposite for photocatalytic and antibacterial applications. Inorg Chem Commun vol. 2020;122:108307. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nasse M, Aslam U, Khalid B, Chen B. Green route to synthesize Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles using leaf extracts of Cassia fistula and Melia azadarach and their antibacterial potential. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.KOLL VR, CHARACTERIZATION, AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF ZnO NANOPARTICLES SYNTHESIZED BY CO PRECIPITATION METHOD. Int J Appl Pharm. 2018;10:224–8. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.












