Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2026 Sep 28;11(40):61966–61983. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6c08055

A Luminescent Pt-NCN Complex Anchored onto a Polyethylene Film for Sequential Detection of Iodide and Mercury

Josue Valdes-García †,*, Mireille Vonlanthen †, Fabián Cuétara-Guadarrama †, Ernesto Rivera †,*, Roxana Marisol Calderón-Olvera †,*, Juan Carlos Alonso-Huitrón †,*, David Garcia-Bassoco †, Hector Luis Valdés-Negrín †, Guillermina Burillo ‡, Alejandro Dorazco-González §
PMCID: PMC13670287  PMID: 42889521

Abstract

Luminescent polymers have attracted attention as solid-state sensing platforms for selective analyte recognition; however, the use of [Pt­(NCN)­Cl]-based polymers for chemosensing remains largely unexplored. Herein, luminescent platforms (PE- g -MC-1-X) based on a [Pt­(NCN)­Cl] complex (NCN = 1,3-bis­(benzimidazol-2-yl)­benzene derivative bearing two tetraethylene glycol (TEG) chains) (1) anchored onto polyethylene grafted with methacryloyl chloride (PE- g -MC) by gamma irradiation at different doses (X = 2, 4, 6, and 8 kGy) were synthesized and characterized. Among luminescent platforms, PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film was studied as a chemosensor for anions, nucleotides, and oxyanions in ethanol/water (1:1, v/v). The luminescent polymer exhibited a selective quenching response toward iodide (I–), with a quenching constant (Kq ) of 4.67(±0.49) × 103 M–1 and a limit of detection of 6.55(±0.26) ppm. Based on analyses by attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the binding mode of iodide was attributed to its accumulation within hydrophobic domains of TEG chains through an ion-specific effect, perturbing the electronic environment of the [Pt­(NCN)­Cl] unit. Sequential addition of mercury (Hg2+) in the presence of hydrochloric acid (HCl) restored the emission intensity, with a limit of detection of 2.40(±0.11) ppm. The luminescent material exhibited reversibility and reusability over multiple I–/Hg2+ sensing cycles. These results confirm that immobilization of the Pt-NCN complex onto a polymer matrix functionalized by gamma irradiation provides a solid-state sensing platform for the sequential detection of I– and Hg2+.


graphic file with name ao6c08055_0022.webp


graphic file with name ao6c08055_0020.webp

1. Introduction

Selective recognition of iodide (I–) and mercury (Hg2+) remains an active area of research owing to their industrial, environmental and biological relevance. − Iodide plays a crucial role in biological processes, including thyroid function, neurological development, and cell growth, − while an imbalance in iodide levels is associated with disorders such as hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, thyroiditis, and goiter. ,− In industry, I– is used in dietary supplements, X-ray contrast agents, − antiseptics, , and organic synthesis. , However, its widespread use can lead to its release into the environment as industrial waste, raising environmental concerns. , Among hazardous environmental contaminants, mercury is considered one of the most dangerous heavy metal pollutants due to its high toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation. , Hg2+ toxicity arises from its strong affinity for sulfur–containing biomolecules, disrupting essential biological processes and leading to severe neurological and renal damage. − Therefore, the development of selective and sensitive chemosensors for iodide and mercury detection is highly desirable.

Luminescent chemosensors are particularly attractive owing to their high sensitivity, low cost, real–time visual detection, and ease of operation. − In these systems, I– detection has been achieved through hydrogen bonding, − halogen bonding, , electrostatic interactions, , and coordination to metal centers. , Typically, metal–based chemosensors operate through sequential sensing, where mercury, − silver , or copper ,, are first recognized and subsequently displaced by iodide. However, platinum–based systems remain scarcely explored, despite platinum’s affinity for I– predicted by the hard–soft–acid–base (HSAB) principle. , In this context, Masih and coworkers reported a platinum porphyrin complex that exhibited a turn–off response toward I–. The quenching response was attributed to an axial electron–transfer process involving I– and the Pt center in the excited state. However, its selectivity was limited because bromide induced a quenching response comparable to that of iodide. On the other hand, Pt-NCN complexes possess tunable photophysical properties arising from modifications of the ligand structure and the Pt coordination environment. − These compounds generally display structured emission bands at 500–650 nm, attributed to mixed intraligand (3IL) and metal–to–ligand charge–transfer (3MLCT) excited states. − Although cationic Pt-NCN complexes have mainly shown selectivity toward Cl– through the cooperative hydrogen bonding and coordination at the Pt center, , Pt–I interactions have also been demonstrated in Pt-NCN crystals. − Moreover, computational studies have revealed axial coordination of I2 to these complexes, , highlighting the potential of Pt-NCN complexes for selective I– detection.

Beyond molecular chemosensors, polymeric sensing platforms have also attracted attention for anion detection, as their surface properties contribute to selective recognition through ion–specific effects. , Chaotropic ions, such as iodide, preferentially accumulate at hydrophobic polymer interfaces, where disruption of the bulk water hydrogen–bonding network is energetically more favorable than the simultaneous hydration of both the chaotropic ions and the polymer surface. − In this context, selective adsorption of chaotropic anions has been reported for several methyl–rich polymers, including poly­(propylene oxide), poly­(N-isopropylacrylamide), poly­(methyl methacrylate), and polydimethylsiloxane. This behavior has been attributed to enhanced London dispersion forces between large anions and electron–deficient methyl groups. Similarly, poly­(ethylene oxide) oligomers tend to accumulate chaotropic anions within the center of the macromolecule chain.

In this regard, poly­(3-alkoxy-4-methylthiophene) exhibited a bathochromic–shift in absorption upon I– binding, attributed to electrostatic interactions and the affinity of I– for the polymer’s apolar domains. On the other hand, a thiazole–containing conjugated polymer exhibited a turn–off response and color change from colorless to yellow upon addition of I–, attributed to interaction with the thiazole–containing polymer chains. The original optical properties were restored after subsequent addition of Hg2+, enabling sequential I–/Hg2+ sensing. However, the luminescent polymer exhibits blue emission, whose optical response can be affected by light scattering and background fluorescence. Considering these findings, the incorporation of a Pt-NCN complex into a polymeric platform could overcome these drawbacks by combining the properties of both components. Pt-NCN complexes have been immobilized on solid supports, including silica, , polyglycerol, , and nanostructured architectures, , for applications in catalysis. Nevertheless, their incorporation into polymeric matrices for luminescent chemosensing remains largely unexplored.

One strategy to immobilize chemosensors onto polymer surfaces involves their covalent attachment to functionalized polymers. Surface functionalization by gamma irradiation enables the grafting of reactive monomers, such as acryloyl chloride or methacrylic acid, through radical pathways. − Acyl chloride moieties allow covalent anchoring of metal complexes via linker or spacer molecules. Linker molecules such as tetraethylene glycol, − 1,8-diaminododecane, and cysteamine, can also modulate hydration capacity, analyte diffusion, steric environment, and local polarity, thereby influencing sensing performance.

Herein, we report a series of luminescent polymer platforms based on a Pt-NCN complex (1) anchored onto a functionalized polyethylene irradiated at different doses (PE-g -MC-1-X, X = 2, 4, 6, or 8 kGy). The synthesis, characterization and optical properties of luminescent polymers are reported. Among them, PE-g -MC-1-8kGy was used as a chemosensor for the selective detection of I– and Hg2+. Fluorescence recognition studies revealed that PE-g -MC-1-8kGy detects I– via an emission quenching response, whereas the subsequent addition of Hg2+ restores the emission intensity. The apparent quenching constant (Kq ) and the accessible fraction of receptor 1 (fa ) on the polymer surface were determined. In addition, PE-g -MC-1-8kGy was applied to the quantification of I– in a real dietary supplement sample. The limits of detection (LOD) for I– and Hg2+ were calculated. The interaction of I– within the luminescent polymer was supported by attenuated total reflectance Fourier–transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy–dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Stern–Volmer quenching studies. Finally, the reversibility and reusability of the material were demonstrated over multiple sensing cycles.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. General Conditions

A commercial polyethylene (PE) film (PEMEX, México) with a density of 0.926 g/mL, a crystallinity of 62%, and a thickness of 0.07 mm was used in this work. The film was cut into 1 × 5 cm pieces, washed with methanol (MeOH) overnight, and dried under vacuum until constant weight. Methacryloyl chloride (MC), purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, was distilled before use. The distillation was carried out with safety precautions due to its toxic and lachrymatory nature. Anhydrous toluene, dichloromethane (DCM), MeOH and triethylamine (Et3N) were used as received from Sigma–Aldrich. Nuclear magnetic resonance (1H and 13C NMR) spectra of the characterization were recorded on a Bruker Advance DPX 300 spectrometer, operating at 300 and 75.5 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) spectrum in positive–ion mode was recorded on an Agilent Tech 6530BA Q-TOF LC/MS spectrometer. ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS50 FTIR spectrometer. Elemental analysis (EA) was performed using a Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 instrument at 950 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was recorded on a TGA Q500 Instrument from 50 to 700 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed using a TA Instrument Q2000 differential scanning calorimeter from 20 to 200 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed using a JEOL JSPM-4210 atomic force microscope. SEM-EDS images were acquired using a JEOL 7600F Scanning Electron Microscope. XPS measurements were performed using a Physical Electronics PHI 5000 Versa-Probe II scanning XPS microprobe system under ultrahigh vacuum conditions. The chemical composition and oxidation states of the elements present in the samples were investigated by XPS. The XPS spectra were analyzed using MultiPak and SDP v4.1 software. UV-vis spectra were recorded as thin plastic films on a Shimadzu U-260 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Fluorolog 3 spectrofluorometer (Horiba) equipped with a xenon lamp as the light source.

2.2. Synthesis of Pt-NCN Complex, 1

Compound 1 was synthesized following the procedure previously reported by our research group. Spectroscopy data were consistent with those previously reported (Figures S1–S4). Yield 78% (57.2 mg). 1 H NMR (300 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, δ): 8.83–8.80 (m, 2H), 7.38 (dd, J = 7.7, 3.8 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (m, overlapped with residual CHCl3, 2H), 7.20 (m, 4H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H), 3.85 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 4H), 3.61 (m, 4H), 3.49–3.28 (m, 22H). 13 C NMR (75.5 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3, δ): 161.5, 161.0, 141.2, 134.4, 131.6, 124.5, 124.3, 123.1, 122.6, 119.1, 109.8, 72.5, 71.1, 70.6, 70.5, 70.2, 69.4, 61.6, 45.0. ESI­(+)-MS (m/z): calculated for C38H49N5O8Pt [1 – Cl– + MeCN]+, 898.91 m/z; found 898.30 m/z. ATR-FTIR (cm–1): ν = 3391.40 (w), 2863.77 (m), 1441.38 (m), 1096.75 (s), 745.84 (s), 721.74 (s), 437.67 (w). Elemental analysis calculated for C36H45ClN4O8Pt (%): C, 48.46; H, 5.08; Cl, 3.97; N, 6.28; O, 14.34; Pt, 21.86. Found: C, 47.83; H, 4.90; N, 5.77.

2.3. Grafting MC onto PE Films (PE-g-MC)

PE films were placed individually in Pyrex ampules containing 7 mL of a dry MC/toluene solution (50% v/v). The ampules were degassed under vacuum using freeze–pump–thaw cycles. Afterward, the ampules were sealed and irradiated with a 60Co γ–source (Gammabeam 651 PT, Nordion International Inc.) at a dose rate of 10.32 kGy h–1, yielding two PE-g-MC films irradiated at doses of 2, 4, 6, and 8 kGy. After irradiation, the PE-g-MC films were promptly and carefully removed from the ampules and placed in dry DCM in closed vials, where they were stirred overnight. After stirring, the PE-g-MC films were used immediately for the anchoring of complex 1 and for the esterification with MeOH, as described below.

2.4. Anchoring of Complex 1 onto PE-g-MC (PE-g-MC-1)

One PE-g-MC film from each irradiation dose was immersed in a solution of 1 (3 mM) in dry DCM (7 mL) containing Et3N (1%) and stirred overnight. Subsequently, the resulting films (PE-g -MC-1) were washed overnight with dry MeOH to convert the remaining chloride into the methyl ester. Finally, the PE-g -MC-1 films were dried under vacuum until constant weight. The remaining PE-g-MC films were immersed in dry MeOH containing Et3N (1%) and stirred overnight to complete esterification. The resulting films (PE-g -MC-MeO) were washed with MeOH to remove Et3N and dried under vacuum until constant weight. Equation was used to estimate the weight–based grafting yield:

Grafting(%)=100(W−W0)/W0 1

where W is the weight of PE-g -MC-MeO film and W 0 corresponds to the weight of PE film before grafting. The percentage in weight of the incorporated compound 1 was determined using the weights of the PE-g -MC-1 and PE-g -MC-MeO films at the same irradiation dose, as shown in eq :

Anchoringcomplex1(%)=100(W1−WMeOH)/W0 2

where W 1 and W MeOH are the weights of the PE-g -MC-1 and PE-g -MC-MeO films, respectively, and W 0 is the weight of the PE film before grafting. The PE-g-MC films were not used as references due to their reactivity to ambient humidity. For that reason, PE-g -MC-MeO films were used, as they are more stable and exhibit weights comparable to those of the chloride–containing films.

2.5. Analysis of a KI Dietary Supplement

The applicability of the proposed luminescent sensing platform was further evaluated through the analysis of a commercially available KI dietary supplement. One tablet was ground in a mortar to obtain a fine powder. Afterward, 7.4 mg of powder was dispersed into 10 mL of Milli–Q water. The resulting solution was sonicated for 10 min, filtered and diluted to a final volume of 15 mL in a volumetric flask. An aliquot of 5 mL of that solution was mixed with 5 mL of EtOH containing a circular PE-g -MC-1-8kGy sample and stirred for 1 h. Emission spectra were recorded before and after exposure.

2.6. Reusability of the PE-g-MC-1-8kGy Sensing Platform

The reusability of the proposed sensing platform was evaluated through successive iodide sensing and mercury–induced emission recovery cycles. Three circular PE-g -MC-1-8kGy samples were used for the experiments. Each sample was immersed in a solution of NaI (45 ppm) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) for 1 h. Afterward, the circular sample was blotted on absorbent paper, and its emission spectrum was recorded. Subsequently, it was immersed in a solution of HgCl2 (23 ppm) containing one drop of HCl (37 wt %) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) for 1 h. The circular sample was then removed from the solution, washed with distilled water, blotted on absorbent paper and its emission spectrum was recorded again.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of PE-g-MC-1 Films

The PE-g -MC-1 films were synthesized by the anchoring method, as depicted in Scheme . PE films immersed in a dry MC/toluene solution (50% v/v) were irradiated with a 60Co γ–source for different irradiation times to obtain PE-g-MC films at doses of 2, 4, 6, and 8 kGy. Finally, the anchoring of compound 1 onto the PE-g-MC films was performed by immersion of each PE-g-MC film in dry DCM containing compound 1 (3 mM) and Et3N (1%), yielding the corresponding PE-g -MC-1 film. The grafting and compound 1 anchoring percentages (% weight) of each film are listed in Table . Among the obtained PE-g -MC-1 films, PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film exhibited the highest grafting (28.22%) and anchoring (2.65%) percentages. However, these values are lower than those reported for PE films grafted with acryloyl chloride. − This difference can be attributed to the methacryloyl chloride, since it generates tertiary radicals via backbiting reactions, which possess reduced reactivity and lower propagation rate constants, as previously described in kinetic and theoretical studies comparing acrylates and methacrylates. , Furthermore, the α–methyl group induces additional steric effects. Nevertheless, surface functionalization of the PE film with MC was achieved.

1. Immobilization of Pt-NCN Complex (1) onto PE-g-MC Films, and Esterification with MeOH.

1

1. Grafting and Anchoring Percentages (% Weight) of Films Irradiated at 2, 4, 6, and 8 kGy.

Dose (kGy) Polymer film Incorporated group Grafting (% weight) Anchoringcomplex 1 (% weight)
2 PE- g -MC-1-2kGy 1 4.27 1.36
PE- g -MC-MeO-2kGy MeO 3.11 NC
4 PE- g -MC-1-4kGy 1 8.15 1.70
PE- g -MC-MeO-4kGy MeO 7.88 NC
6 PE- g -MC-1-6kGy 1 11.38 2.23
PE- g -MC-MeO-6kGy MeO 9.14 NC
8 PE- g -MC-1-8kGy 1 28.22 2.65
PE- g -MC-MeO-8kGy MeO 25.05 NC
a

The grafting (% weight) was calculated using eq .

b

Anchoringcomplex 1 (% weight) was calculated using eq .

c

NC = Not calculated.

3.2. Characterization of PE-g-MC-1 Films

3.2.1. ATR-FTIR Analysis

ATR-FTIR spectra of the PE-g -MC-1 films are shown in Figure . The strong bands at 2915 and 2847 cm–1 correspond to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of methylene (−CH2−) groups, respectively. The bands at 1462 and 718 cm–1 were attributed to −CH2– scissoring and rocking vibrations, consistent with the characteristic FTIR bands reported for PE. , Anchoring of compound 1 onto the films resulted in new bands, whose intensities augmented with the increasing irradiation dose. The band at 3395 cm–1 was assigned to the −OH stretching vibration, indicating that molecules of 1 may be anchored through a TEG chain. The carbonyl stretching vibration was observed at 1727 cm–1 and the band at 1158 cm–1 was associated with the −C–O–C– stretching vibration of the TEG chains. ,

1.

1

ATR-FTIR spectra of PE- g -MC-1 films at different irradiation doses.

3.2.2. Thermal Properties

The thermal properties of the films were studied by TGA and DSC at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1 under a nitrogen atmosphere. TGA and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) curves of the PE film revealed good thermal stability up to 400 °C. Subsequently, the decomposition of the polyethylene backbone was observed between 420 and 500 °C (Figure A). Interestingly, T5 and T10 values of the films decreased with increasing anchoring of compound 1 (see Table ), indicating that its incorporation makes the polymer more susceptible to degradation. Among the anchored films, PE-g -MC-1-8kGy exhibited the lowest thermal stability and showed two weight–loss steps at ∼150 and 250 °C (Figure B). These events can be attributed to the thermal degradation of the TEG chains, whose decomposition begins around 150 °C and proceeds through multiple −C–O–C– bond cleavage processes. Despite the lower thermal stability, the luminescent polymer remains thermally stable well above room temperature, supporting its use for sensing under ambient conditions. The final residue increased from 0.8 (PE film) to 1.5% for PE-g -MC-1-8kGy. This increase can be attributed to the formation of platinum oxide species, consistent with the anchoring percentage of compound 1 (2.65%), which corresponds to a ∼0.62% contribution. TGA and DTG curves of the rest of the anchored films are shown in Figure S5.

2.

2

TGA and DTG curves of (A) PE and (B) PE-g -MC-1-8kGy films.

2. Thermal Properties of PE and PE-g-MC-1 Films.
Polymer film T5 (°C) T10 (°C) Tm (°C)
PE 410 420 106
PE- g -MC-1-2kGy 390 420 106
PE- g -MC-1-4kGy 400 420 106
PE- g -MC-1-6kGy 350 410 106
PE- g -MC-1-8kGy 260 390 106

According to DSC thermograms (Figure ), anchored films exhibited an endothermic peak at 106 °C, corresponding to the melting temperature (T m) of PE. Although variations in the intensity of the melting endotherm were observed as a function of the irradiation dose, the melting temperature remained essentially unchanged. These changes in heat flow intensity may be associated with the combined effects of gamma irradiation, which can induce chain scission and crosslinking, and the incorporation of the grafted/anchored components into the PE matrix. A slight secondary endothermic event observed at 141 °C is associated with the melting of more stable polyethylene crystalline domains formed through a melting–recrystallization–remelting process, which is commonly observed in semicrystalline polyethylene.

3.

3

DSC curves of PE and PE- g -MC-1 films irradiated at 2, 4, 6, and 8 kGy.

3.2.3. AFM Analysis

Surface morphological changes of PE films after irradiation and anchoring of receptor 1 at 2 and 8 kGy were investigated by AFM analysis (Figure ). The PE film exhibited Ra, Rq and Rz values of 12.1, 16.9, and 311 nm, respectively. These values indicate the presence of surface domains associated with the crystalline structure of polyethylene. After irradiation and anchoring of receptor 1, surface roughness increased, reaching Ra, Rq and Rz values of 19.0, 24.1, and 154 nm at 8 kGy, respectively. In contrast, esterification with MeOH at 8 kGy produced an even higher roughness. This difference may be associated with the partial coverage of the grafted surface by the immobilization of complex 1, leading to a more homogeneous surface morphology. Surface height distribution histograms further support these observations: PE film showed a narrow and unimodal distribution, indicating a homogeneous surface (Figure S6A), while the irradiated films (2 and 8 kGy) displayed asymmetric distributions consistent with the formation of surface protrusions (Figure S6B–D).

4.

4

AFM topography images of (A) PE, (B) PE- g -MC-1-2kGy, (C) PE- g -MC-1-8kGy and (D) PE- g -MC-MeO-8kGy films.

3.2.4. SEM-EDS Analysis

The elemental composition of the PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film was investigated by SEM-EDS analysis. SEM images revealed smooth regions and irregular domains, indicating a heterogeneous surface (Figure A). EDS analysis revealed significant differences in the atomic percentages of platinum, chlorine and oxygen in the brighter regions (Figure B). These variations suggest that the anchoring process occurred in a non–uniform manner, leading to domains enriched with receptor 1. This heterogeneity may influence analyte diffusion, accessibility to active sites, and the emission response of the film samples during sensing. Overall, SEM-EDS analysis confirmed a heterogenous incorporation of receptor 1 on the functionalized polyethylene surface.

5.

5

(A) SEM images of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film. (B) Corresponding EDS spectra together with quantitative elemental analysis.

3.3. Optical Properties

PE-g -MC-1 films were studied as circular samples (7 mm diameter) by UV-vis and fluorescence spectroscopies, and the corresponding spectra are shown in Figure A and B, respectively. A higher–energy absorption band was observed at 308 nm, which was assigned to the intraligand (IL) [π → π*] transition of the NCN ligand, while a lower–energy absorption band around 380 nm was ascribed to mixed IL [π → π*] and metal–to–ligand charge transfer (MLCT) [dπ­(Pt) → π*] transitions. , Upon excitation at 380 nm, a vibronic–structured emission band was observed at 475–675 nm, originating from the 3IL [π → π*]/3MLCT [dπ­(Pt) → π*] excited states. , These absorption and emission bands were consistent with those for receptor 1 in solution. Under UV light (365 nm), films exhibited a green emission as illustrated in Figure C.

6.

6

(A) UV-vis and (B) emission spectra of circular samples of PE-g -MC-1 films. (C) Photograph of PE-g -MC-1 films under UV light (365 nm).

3.4. Swelling Analysis

A circular PE-g -MC-1-8kGy sample was initially weighed and then evaluated by immersion in EtOH/H2O and DMF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solutions at 25 °C for 60 min. At defined time intervals, the circular sample was removed from the solution, blotted on absorbent paper, and weighed again. Swelling percentage was calculated using eq

Swelling(%)=100(Ws−Wd)/Wd 3

Where Ws and W d correspond to the weights of the swollen and dry samples, respectively.

These solvents were selected based on the solubility of receptor 1 and their miscibility with water. The 1:1 (v/v) proportion was chosen to ensure solubility of both the analyte and receptor 1.

The swelling behavior in EtOH/H2O and DMF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solutions is shown in Figure . DMF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution exhibited a rapid initial uptake within the first 3 min, reaching a swelling percentage of ∼8%, which remained constant up to 60 min. In contrast, EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution displayed a two–stage swelling process. The first stage reached a swelling value of ∼12% within 5 min, while the second stage increased to ∼25% at 30 min. After this time, the swelling percentage remained constant until 60 min. Possibly, the first stage is associated with the solvation of the receptors accessible at the surface, whereas the second stage may correspond to progressive solvation of deeper receptor units. The higher swelling observed in EtOH/H2O compared to DMF/H2O may arise from differences in solvent–polymer and solvent–solvent interactions, which can affect solvent penetration within the functionalized polyethylene matrix. Similar solvent–dependent swelling behavior has been attributed to the balance between polymer–solvent and solvent–solvent interactions in polymeric networks. , Therefore, an EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution can contribute more analyte diffusion and interaction with receptor 1, leading to an enhanced sensing response compared to a DMF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution.

7.

7

Swelling behavior of circular PE- g -MC-1-8kGy samples in EtOH/H2O and DMF/H2O (1:1, v/v) solutions.

3.5. Fluorometric Iodide Recognition

To evaluate the performance of PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film as a luminescent polymer chemosensor for the detection of anions, a selective experiment was performed using fluorescence spectroscopy. The experiment consisted of immersing a circular sample (7 mm diameter) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) solutions containing NaBr, NaI, NaSCN, NaCN, guanosine triphosphate (GTP), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), cytidine triphosphate (CTP), cysteine (l-Cys) and histidine (l-His) ([analyte] = 230 ppm) and left stirring overnight. To account for sample–to–sample variations, all sensing responses were normalized as the relative emission intensity (I/I o ), where I and I o correspond to the emission intensities after analyte exposure and in the absence of the analyte, respectively. The observed changes in the emission spectra of the luminescent polymer after the addition of analytes are shown in Figure A. Overall, SCN–, CN–, ATP and CTP showed a quenching effect, with emission changes below 17% (Figure B). GTP and H2PO4 – produced a moderate turn–off response, leading to an emission intensity reduction of ∼25%. In contrast, Br– and l-His slightly enhanced the emission intensity (∼5%), while l-Cys caused negligible changes. Notably, I– exhibited the greatest emission change, exhibiting a turn–off response with an emission intensity decrease of ∼80%. The optical response generated by Br– suggests a different interaction pathway with complex 1 that does not promote the excited–state quenching observed for I–, despite their similar soft Lewis basicity. This distinct behavior may be associated with the higher polarizability and lower hydration energy of I–, , which favors its accumulation within the polymer matrix and its interaction with the Pt-NCN unit.

8.

8

(A) Changes in the emission spectrum (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film after the addition of analytes in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution. (B) Emission change percentage of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film calculated at 507 nm upon addition of analytes.

Considering that the emission change induced by I– was evaluated after overnight immersion, a time–dependent study was carried out to determine the time required to reach emission equilibrium under the same conditions. As shown in Figure A, the emission intensity gradually decreased over time upon exposure to iodide. A pronounced decrease in emission was observed within the first 15 min, suggesting that a significant fraction of receptor 1 is accessible for interacting with iodide. Subsequently, the turn–off response reached equilibrium at 165–180 min, with a residual green emission, as illustrated in Figure B. The relatively slow response can be attributed to the diffusion of iodide into the luminescent polymer. The diffusion of I– within the polymer matrix contributes to the overall sensing kinetics, requiring additional time for the analyte to access recognition sites located within less accessible regions of the polymer matrix. Given that the emission intensity notably decreased within the first 15 min, a lower NaI concentration (50 ppm) was selected to determine the time required to reach equilibrium. At this lower concentration, iodide is expected to interact with the most accessible recognition sites near the polymer surface. Figure S7 shows that the system reached equilibrium after approximately 1 h at 50 ppm of NaI. Therefore, a contact time of 1 h is required at 50 ppm of NaI, whereas higher concentrations (>50 ppm) require at least 3 h to reach equilibrium. Accordingly, all sensing measurements were performed after the corresponding equilibrium times were reached. Although relatively long contact times are required for iodide to access the recognition sites, the platform may be suitable for equilibrium–based applications, particularly given its selectivity, optical response, and reusability.

9.

9

(A) Time–dependent emission spectra (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film upon treatment with NaI (230 ppm) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v), recorded at 15 min intervals (0–180 min). (B) Photographs showing the progressive emission changes of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film under UV light over time.

Figure A shows changes in the emission spectrum of the PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film upon treatment with NaI at different concentrations (0–360 ppm) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v), after reaching equilibrium. The emission intensity dropped rapidly at low concentrations and more gradually at higher concentrations, reaching a residual green emission (Figure B). The quenching effect at 507 nm was analyzed using an I/I o vs [NaI] plot, which resulted in a downward–curving Stern–Volmer response, as shown in Figure C. This result suggests heterogeneity in the receptor 1 population within the polymer matrix, where a fraction of receptor 1 is more accessible to quenching by iodide. This fraction can be estimated using the modified Stern–Volmer eq (eq ), as reported for similar systems: ,

I/Io=(1−fa)+fa/(1+Kq[Q]) 4

where I and I o are the emission intensities in the presence and absence of iodide, respectively; fa represents the fraction of receptor 1 accessible to I–, Kq is the apparent quenching constant and [Q] is the concentration of NaI.

10.

10

(A) Changes in the intensity emission (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film upon treatment with NaI at different concentrations (0–360 ppm) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v). (B) Photographs show intensity emission changes at different concentrations of NaI. (C) Modified Stern–Volmer plot at 507 nm. The solid line represents the fit obtained using eq . Inset: Conventional Stern–Volmer plot at 507 nm. The solid line represents the linear fit using eq over the 0–45 ppm range.

The isotherm obtained from the I/I o vs [NaI] plot was well fitted using eq (Figure C), yielding fa and Kq values of 0.91 ± 0.03 and 4.67(±0.49) × 103 M–1, respectively. The fa value indicates that 91% of receptor 1 is available for interaction with I–, while 9% is less accessible. To compare the apparent quenching constant obtained from the modified Stern–Volmer model with the classical Stern–Volmer constant (KSV ), the data were also analyzed using the eq

Io/I=1+KSV[Q] 5

Accordingly, the inset of Figure C shows the corresponding I o /I versus [NaI] plot, for which a linear fit was obtained between 0 and 45 ppm, yielding a KSV value of 4.64(±0.20) × 103 M–1. The similarity between both constant values indicates that the fraction of inaccessible receptor 1 has a limited impact on the quenching efficiency, suggesting that most active sites are accessible to iodide. From the linear fit, the detection limit (LOD) for I– was estimated using the equation LOD = 3σ/S (where σ is the standard deviation of the blank and S is the slope of the linear fit), obtaining a value of LOD = 6.55(±0.26) ppm.

3.6. Emission Quenching Mechanism

The quenching of the emission PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film induced by iodide can be carried out by several mechanisms, such as the inner filter effect (IFE), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), the “heavy–atom” effect and photo–induced electron transfer (PET). In this case, FRET and IFE mechanisms can be excluded because the UV-vis spectrum of I– exhibits negligible overlap with both the emission and excitation spectra of PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film, as illustrated in Figure S8A and B. Since the emission arises from 3IL/3MLCT states, the quenching effect of iodide cannot be simply attributed to intersystem crossing via the classical “heavy–atom” effect. Instead, iodide is likely to reduce the population of the triplet excited state by promoting nonradiative deactivation pathways. In agreement with a previous report, the addition of I– has been shown to decrease the triplet state population in systems absorbing/emitting in the blue/green range through electron transfer processes. In particular, a Pt porphyrin complex displayed a quenching response toward iodide, which was attributed to an interaction of I– with the platinum center upon photoexcitation, thereby facilitating the electron transfer. Thus, a similar interaction between PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film and I– may contribute to the observed quenching response.

3.7. Interaction Mechanism

To elucidate the binding mode between I– and PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film, ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded in the absence and presence of I–, as shown in Figure . The band at 3395 cm–1, assigned to the −OH stretching vibration, showed slightly widening, implying hydrogen bonding between I– and −OH group. In contrast, a new band appeared at 1560 cm–1, which can be attributed to perturbations in the vibrational modes of the CC and CN bonds, suggesting an interaction between iodide and the Pt-NCN system. Notably, the spectral region between 1313–1095 cm–1 presented the most changes, indicating that iodide also interacts with TEG chains. This behavior is consistent with a previous report on poly­(ethylene oxide) oligomers, whose amphiphilic character promotes the formation of hydrophobic domains where the structure of water molecules is disordered. These water molecules can be readily displaced by weakly hydrated anions such as iodide, favoring their accumulation near the hydrophobic domains and reflecting an ion–specific effect.

11.

11

ATR-FTIR spectra of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film in the absence and presence of I–.

In accordance with the changes observed in the CC and CN vibrational modes, the interaction of I– with the Pt-NCN unit may proceed via displacement of the coordinated Cl– atom at the Pt center or through an outer–sphere interaction that perturbs the electronic environment of the Pt-NCN unit without Cl– substitution. Therefore, SEM-EDS analysis was performed on the luminescent polymer after treatment with 360 ppm of NaI to evaluate changes in the elemental composition associated with the presence of Cl– and I–. SEM micrographs shown in Figure A revealed a heterogenous and rough surface morphology, where I– was localized in the brighter regions. The atomic percentage of chlorine remained higher than that of iodine (Figure B), indicating that Cl– remains present after iodide exposure.

12.

12

(A) SEM images of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film after exposure to 360 ppm of NaI. (B) Corresponding EDS spectra together with quantitative elemental analysis.

Complementary XPS analysis was performed to further investigate the elemental composition and chemical environment of Pt, Cl and I. Figure A shows the high–resolution XPS spectrum of Pt 4f, which was deconvoluted into the spin–orbit components Pt 4f5/2 and Pt 4f7/2, centered at 75.96 and 72.64 eV, respectively. The corresponding spin–orbit splitting of 3.32 eV is consistent with the characteristic Pt 4f doublet reported (3.33 eV). Figure B shows the Cl 2p region, which was deconvoluted into components centered at 199.82 and 198.06 eV, assigned to Cl 2p1/2 and 2p3/2, respectively. The energy separation of 1.76 eV is consistent with the characteristic Cl 2p doublet reported. Furthermore, the binding–energy separations between Cl 2p3/2 and Pt 4f5/2 and Pt 4f7/2 were calculated as 122.10 and 125.42 eV, respectively. These values are comparable to those reported for Pt­(II)-Cl species. , The deconvolution of the I 3d region was not possible due to the low signal intensity and limited signal–to–noise associated with low iodide concentration in the material, as evidenced by the XPS survey spectrum (Figure S9). Nevertheless, the persistence of the Cl 2p signal, together with the characteristic Pt 4f/Cl 2p binding–energy separations, provides additional support for the retention of a Pt–Cl coordination environment after iodide exposure.

13.

13

High-resolution XPS spectra of the Pt 4f (A) and Cl 2p (B) regions of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy after exposure to 360 ppm of NaI.

The C 1s and O 1s high–resolution XPS spectra were also analyzed to further support the chemical composition of the functionalized polymer. Figure S10A shows the C 1s spectrum, which is consistent with the presence of CO, C–O, C–C, and C–Pt environments, centered at 289.05, 287.12, 284.80, and 282.92 eV, respectively. The O 1s spectrum was deconvoluted into three components centered at 533.68, 532.27, and 530.93 eV, assigned to C–O, O–C–O, and H2O, respectively, as illustrated in Figure S10B. XPS fitting parameters, including the binding energy, FWHM, and χ2 values for the fitted components, are summarized in Table S1.

Based on the ATR-FTIR, SEM-EDS, and XPS characterization, the proposed recognition mechanism involves the stabilization of I– within the hydrophobic domains of TEG chains, while −OH groups may contribute through hydrogen–bonding interactions. The absence of significant changes in the Cl signal after iodide exposure, together with the XPS analysis of the Pt and Cl environments, supports the preservation of the Pt–Cl coordination sphere. Therefore, the interaction of I– with the immobilized Pt-NCN complex is more attributable to an outer-sphere interaction, as illustrated in Scheme .

2. Proposed Binding Mechanism between PE-g-MC-1-8kGy Film and Iodide.

2

3.8. Application in a Real Sample

To probe the performance of PE-g-MC-1-8kGy film as a luminescent chemosensor for iodide, we quantified the I– concentration in a dietary supplement (DS). Figure shows the changes in the emission of the luminescent polymer in triplicate measurements, all of which exhibited a turn–off response. Iodide concentration was determined using the linear fit obtained from NaI calibration, expressed in terms of I– concentration (Figure , inset). Since the turn–off response of 50 ppm KI was similar to that observed for 45 ppm of NaI, the emission response was unaffected by the presence of the K+ cation (Figure S11). The KI content per tablet was determined according to the calculation procedure described in Supporting Information (pp S9 and S10). As summarized in Table , KI content was found from 30.1 to 34.4 mg. The mean KI content was 32.1 ± 2.1 mg (n = 3, % RSD = 6.54%), which is in good agreement with the labeled value (30 mg KI per tablet). These results demonstrated the ability of the luminescent polymer to detect iodide in a real sample.

14.

14

Emission intensity changes of PE-g-MC-1-8kGy film upon exposure to a KI–containing dietary supplement solution (n = 3). Inset: Io /I at 507 nm as a function of [I–] with the corresponding linear fit.

3. Emission Data and KI Quantification in the Dietary Supplement Using PE-g-MC-1-8kGy Film.

Measurement I o at 507 nm I f at 507 nm I o /I [I–] ppm KI found (mg)
A 269190 155983 1.725 20.7 31.8
B 276270 154768 1.785 22.4 34.4
C 247700 147423 1.680 19.6 30.1

3.9. Fluorometric Mercury Recognition

A PE-g -MC-1-8kGy sample treated with 45 ppm of NaI was immersed for 1 h in solutions containing Hg2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+ ([analyte] = 50 ppm) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v), using their corresponding Cl– salts and emission spectra were recorded afterward. Figure S12 displays emission spectra upon the addition of metal ions, in which the emission spectrum was unchanged. Iodide is likely strongly stabilized within the hydrophobic domains of the TEG chains, limiting the accessibility of metal ions. Hence, the addition of HCl was proposed as a strategy to modify the iodide stabilization sites by partial protonation of TEG chains, increasing the hydrophilicity of the polymer and facilitating the interaction with metal ions. This approach was supported by the stability of the PE-g -MC-1-8kGy film under acidic conditions. As shown in Figure S13, no significant changes in the emission profile of the PE-g -MC-1-8kGy sample were observed after exposure to EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) containing one drop of HCl (37 wt %) for at least 3 h. In addition, the corresponding solution showed no detectable emission attributable to complex 1, indicating that the receptor remains immobilized within the polymeric matrix. Under these acidic conditions, Hg2+ exhibited the greatest turn–on response (Figure A) of about ∼100% at 507 nm, as shown in Figure B. That effect is likely associated with the strong affinity of Hg2+ for I–, which may promote the formation of mercury–iodide species and restore the emission, as reported for other sensing systems. ,

15.

15

(A) Changes in the emission spectrum (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film treated with 45 ppm of NaI upon addition of metal ions in a EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) solution in the presence of one drop of HCl (37 wt %). (B) Emission change percentage of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy + 45 ppm of NaI calculated at 507 nm after addition of metal ions.

After addition of 400 ppm of Hg2+ and one drop of HCl (37 wt %) to PE-g -MC-1-8kGy samples treated with 225 and 360 ppm of NaI, an emission intensity increase of ∼43% was observed (Figure S14). These results indicated that the recovery of emission at high concentrations of I– was limited by the stabilization of iodide within deep hydrophobic domains. The reversibility of emission was evaluated using different concentrations of HgCl2 (0–23 ppm) in samples treated with 45 ppm of NaI. As shown in Figure A, the emission intensity increased 2.5–fold in the presence of 23 ppm of Hg2+, reaching ∼91.7% recovery of the initial emission of PE-g -MC-1-8kGy (Figure S15). As shown in the inset of Figure A, the I/I o ratio at 507 nm vs [HgCl2] plot presented good linearity (R2 = 0.991), with a limit of detection (LOD) value of 2.40(±0.11) ppm. The gradual recovery of the polymer emission at each Hg2+ concentration is illustrated in Figure B.

16.

16

(A) Changes in emission intensity (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy samples treated with 45 ppm of NaI upon addition of different concentrations of Hg2+ in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) together with one drop of HCl (37 wt %). Inset: I/Io ratio at 507 nm vs [HgCl2] plot with the corresponding linear fit. (B) Photographs showing emission intensity enhancement of polymer films upon treatment with increasing concentrations of HgCl2.

The reusability of PE-g -MC-1-8kGy luminescent polymer film was investigated through alternating treatments with NaI and HgCl2 in the presence of one drop of concentrated HCl over several cycles. Figure shows the reversible changes in the emission intensity of PE-g -MC-1-8kGy films during alternating treatment. The recovered emission intensities after the first, second and third cycles were 91.7%, 92.0% and 88.5%, respectively, relative to the initial emission intensity. The calculations of the recovery percentages are provided in the Supporting Information (pp S11). The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3), with % RSD values ranging from 2.5% to 4.5%, demonstrating good reproducibility of the measurements (Table S2). The slight decrease in the recovered emission intensity can be attributed to partial retention of I– or to gradual structural/conformational changes at the polymer surface. The recovery process was reproducible for at least three cycles, thus demonstrating the reusability of the luminescent polymer.

17.

17

Emission intensity changes (λex = 380 nm) of PE- g -MC-1-8kGy film over several cycles using NaI (45 ppm) and HgCl2 (23 ppm) in the presence of one drop of HCl (37 wt %) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v).

A comparative table of recently reported receptors for I– and Hg2+ are compiled in Table . Among these systems, several chemosensors operate in organic or organic–rich media, such as CH3CN or CH3CN/H2O mixtures, whereas PE-g -MC-1-8kGy enables sensing in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v). In addition, some reported receptors exhibit blue emission, whereas PE-g -MC-1-8kGy exhibits green emission, providing a distinguishable optical response. Moreover, several receptors are studied as dissolved molecular probes, which may complicate their recovery and reuse after sensing. In contrast, the immobilization of the Pt-NCN complex within the PE matrix provides a luminescent sensing material that can be handled and recovered, while retaining the optical response of the molecular receptor. Thus, PE-g -MC-1-8kGy combines the advantages of a luminescent receptor with those of a polymeric platform, offering an alternative strategy for the detection of I– and Hg2+.

4. Recent Chemosensors for the Detection and Quantification of I– and Hg2+ .

Receptor Detected ion Sensing response LOD K a or K SV (M–1) Medium Reference
Fluorenone Schiff-base I– Colorimetric and Turn-on 8 nM 4.21 × 106 H2O/THF (7:3, v/v)
PEPA-based COFs (TTETA) I– Turn-off 6.88 × 103
TMB-H2O2-filter paper I– Colorimetric 0.125 μM Aqueous media
Fluorenone-indole Schiff-base Hg2+ Turn-off 9.10 × 103 CH3CN
Imidazole-based chemosensor Hg2+ Turn-on 73 nM CH3CN/H2O (7:3, v/v)
Dithiocarbamate-OEG sensor Hg2+ Turn-on 6.2 nM Aqueous media
PE-g-MC-1-8kGy I–/Hg2+ Turn-off/Turn-on 6.55/2.40 ppm 4.67 × 103 EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) This work
a

K a is the apparent binding constant.

b

K SV is the Stern–Volmer constant.

c

Data not available.

4. Conclusion

We have developed a luminescent polymer film as a sensor containing a Pt-NCN complex (receptor 1) anchored to methacrylate–functionalized polyethylene films. These polymer films served as luminescent chemosensors for detection of different analytes such as anions, nucleotides, and amino acids. In the case of iodide anion, a remarkable selectivity was observed via turn–off response, with K q , and LOD values of 4.67(±0.49) × 103 M–1, and 6.55(±0.26) ppm, respectively. Iodide ions were stabilized within the hydrophobic domains of TEG chains, acting as recognition sites in the luminescent polymer together with a hydrogen bond involving −OH groups. Whereas the determined LOD value for Hg2+ was 2.40(±0.11) ppm. As a representative application, PE-g-MC-1-8kGy film was employed for the determination of KI in a dietary supplement, providing results in good agreement with the labeled value. Recovery of the system emission was achieved upon treatment with Hg2+ in the presence of HCl. Furthermore, the luminescent polymer exhibited high emission intensity recovery over several cycles, demonstrating the reversibility and reusability of the material. In contrast to previously reported polymer–supported Pt–based systems, which have been investigated for catalytic applications, the present work explores a Pt-NCN complex anchored onto a polymer matrix functionalized by gamma irradiation, resulting in a solid–state luminescent sensing platform for the detection of iodide and mercury in solution.

Supplementary Material

ao6c08055_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the UNAM Postdoctoral Program (POSDOC). We thank M.Sc. Everardo Tapia Mendoza, PhD. Adriana Romo Pérez, PhD. Isabel Chávez Uribe, Chem. María de la Paz Orta Pérez, Chem. Eng. Karla Eriseth Reyes Morales, physicists Carlos Flores Morales and Lázaro Huerta Arcos for their technical assistance in the characterization of the compounds. The authors thank PhD. Omar Novelo Peralta from LUME RRID:SCR_024400 for SEM image acquisition and technical support. The authors gratefully acknowledge PhD. Manuel García Hipólito for providing access to the fluorometer used in this work, as well as Caín González Sánchez and physicist Itsari Álvarez Hernández for technical support. We thank PAPIIT-UNAM for financial support through Projects IA102325, IN228226, IN104126, and IN105725. J.V.-G. is grateful to DGAPA-UNAM for a postdoctoral scholarship. D. G.-B. and H. L. V.-N. are grateful to SECIHTI for scholarship 1140194 and 1234491, respectively.

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the Supplementary Information.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c08055.

  • 1H, 13C NMR, ESI-MS spectrum, and ATR-FTIR spectrum of 1; TGA and DSC curves of luminescent platforms; roughness parameters and surface height distribution histograms of films; spectroscopic experiments of PE-g-MC-1-8kGy film; calculation of KI content (mg) per tablet; reproducibility data and statistical analysis; XPS fitting parameters (PDF)

The manuscript was prepared with input from all authors, who have reviewed and approved the final version.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. MacKeown H., von Gunten U., Criquet J.. Iodide sources in the aquatic environment and its fate during oxidative water treatment – A critical review. Water Res. 2022;217:118417. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Smyth P. P. A., O’dowd C. D.. Climate changes affecting global iodine status. Eur. Thyroid J. 2024;13(2):e230200. doi: 10.1530/ETJ-23-0200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jiang Z., Jiang Y., Hu Y., Dong Y., Shi L.. The crucial and versatile roles of bacteria in global biogeochemical cycling of iodine. Geo-Bio Interfaces. 2024;1:e5. doi: 10.1180/gbi.2024.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu B., Wang L., Li Z., Liang H., Zhao K., Guo Y., Deng T.. Innovative electrooxidation-adsorption technology for efficient iodine recovery from ultrahigh Cl/I ratio underground brine. Chem. Eng. J. 2025;512:162356. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.162356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sorrenti S., Baldini E., Pironi D., Lauro A., D’orazi V., Tartaglia F., Tripodi D., Lori E., Gagliardi F., Praticò M., Illuminati G., D’andrea V., Palumbo P., Ulisse S.. Iodine: Its role in thyroid hormone biosynthesis and beyond. Nutrients. 2021;13(12):4469. doi: 10.3390/nu13124469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brough L., Skeaff S.. Iodine. Adv. Nutr. 2024;15(2):100168. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bath S. C.. Thyroid function and iodine intake: Global recommendations and relevant dietary trends. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2024;20(8):474–486. doi: 10.1038/s41574-024-00983-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu M., Ren Z., Gao Y., Zhang H., Guo W., Zhang W., Zhang W.. Study of iodine transport and thyroid hormone levels in the human placenta under different iodine nutritional status. Br. J. Nutr. 2024;131(9):1488–1496. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524000084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Xie Q., Zhang X., Ma J., Lu X., Zhang Y., Tong N.. Effect of iodine nutritional status on the recurrence of hyperthyroidism and antithyroid drug efficacy in adult patients with Graves’ disease: A systemic review. Front. Endocrinol. 2023;14:1234918. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1234918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gong B., Wang X., Wang C., Yang W., Shan Z., Lai Y.. Iodine-induced thyroid dysfunction: A scientometric study and visualization analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2023;14:1239038. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1239038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang D., Li P., Zhou Z., Jin M., Li B., Li F., Shen H.. The association between endothelial function and autoimmune thyroiditis induced by iodine excess. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2024;83:127413. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2024.127413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatch-McChesney A., Lieberman H. R.. Iodine and iodine deficiency: A comprehensive review of a re-emerging issue. Nutrients. 2022;14(17):3474. doi: 10.3390/nu14173474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang P., Ma X., Guo R., Ye Z., Fu H., Fu N., Guo Z., Zhang J., Zhang J.. Organic nanoplatforms for iodinated contrast media in CT imaging. Molecules. 2021;26(23):7063. doi: 10.3390/molecules26237063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wrzesińska K., Kwiatkowski M., Terebun P., Zarzeczny D., Sumara A., Murakami T., Hayashi N., Krcma F., Benova E., Hensel K., Machala Z., Fornal E., Pawłat J.. Iodinated contrast mediafrom clinical use to environmental concern and treatment possibilities. Molecules. 2026;31(3):551. doi: 10.3390/molecules31030551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sengar A., Vijayanandan A.. Comprehensive review on iodinated X-ray contrast media: Complete fate, occurrence, and formation of disinfection byproducts. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;769:144846. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eggers M.. Infectious disease management and control with povidone iodine. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2019;8(4):581–593. doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-00260-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Durani P., Leaper D.. Povidone-iodine: Use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation. Int. Wound J. 2008;5(3):376–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00405.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen X. W., Chen J. L., Zhang L. H., Zhang H., Chen X., Fan X.. Advances in α-arylation of carbonyl compounds: Diaryliodonium salts as arylating agents. Molecules. 2025;30(14):3019. doi: 10.3390/molecules30143019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maitlis P. M., Haynes A., James B. R., Catellani M., Chiusoli G. P.. Iodide effects in transition metal catalyzed reactions. Dalton Trans. 2004;33(21):3409–3419. doi: 10.1039/b410128f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bjørklund G., Dadar M., Mutter J., Aaseth J.. The toxicology of mercury: Current research and emerging trends. Environ. Res. 2017;159:545–554. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu Y. S., Osman A. I., Hosny M., Elgarahy A. M., Eltaweil A. S., Rooney D. W., Chen Z., Rahim N. S., Sekar M., Gopinath S. C. B.. et al. The toxicity of mercury and its chemical compounds: Molecular mechanisms and environmental and human health implications: A comprehensive review. ACS Omega. 2024;9(5):5100–5126. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bakour I., Isaure M. P., Barrouilhet S., Goñi-Urriza M., Monperrus M.. Mercury interaction with S-containing molecules: Implications for methylation and demethylation processes in a sulfate reducing bacteria. Front. Environ. Chem. 2025;6:1559968. doi: 10.3389/fenvc.2025.1559968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oliveira C. S., Nogara P. A., Ardisson-Araújo D. M. P., Aschner M., Rocha J. B. T., Dórea J. G.. Neurodevelopmental effects of mercury. Adv. Neurotoxicol. 2018;2:27–86. doi: 10.1016/bs.ant.2018.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang B., Wang J., Guo S., Yang L.. Mercury-induced toxicity: Mechanisms, molecular pathways, and gene regulation. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;943:173577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Azevedo B. F., Furieri L. B., Pecanha F. M., Wiggers G. A., Vassallo P. F., Simoes M. R., Fiorim J., Rossi de Batista P., Fioresi M., Rossoni L.. et al. Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:949048. doi: 10.1155/2012/949048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gao Z., Wu N., Du X., Li H., Mei X., Song Y.. Toxic nephropathy secondary to chronic mercury poisoning: Clinical characteristics and outcomes. Kidney Int. Rep. 2022;7(6):1189–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shin S. R., Han A. L.. Improved chronic fatigue symptoms after removal of mercury in patient with increased mercury concentration in hair toxic mineral assay: A case. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2012;33(5):320–325. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.5.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. de Los Santos C., Pastor J. C., Calonge M.. Mercury intoxication and ophthalmic involvement: An update review. Front. Toxicol. 2023;5:1148357. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1148357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ganguly J., Kulshreshtha D., Jog M.. Mercury and movement disorders: The toxic legacy continues. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2022;49(4):493–501. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2021.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prasad T., Singh J., Hait M.. Recent advances in luminescent chemosensors for sensitive and selective detection of heavy metal ions in aqueous environments. Discovery Sens. 2026;2:19. doi: 10.1007/s44397-026-00050-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mal D. K., Pal H., Chakraborty G.. A comprehensive review on recent advances in fluorescence-based bio-analytes sensing. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2024;171:117493. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Prabakaran G., David C. I., Nandhakumar R.. A review on pyrene based chemosensors for the specific detection on d-transition metal ions and their various applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11(3):109701. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang W., Shao J., Xu Y., Zhou W., Xie J.. Fluorescence detection of iodide anion using a donor-acceptor (D-A) thiourea derivative. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2014;292:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen J., Lin Q., Li Q., Li W. T., Zhang Y. M., Wei T.-B.. A highly selective colorimetric chemosensor for detection of iodide ions in aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2016;6(89):86627–86631. doi: 10.1039/c6ra18490a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Junaid H. M., Waseem M. T., Khan Z. A., Munir F., Sohail S., Farooq U., Shahzad S. A.. Fluorenone-based fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for selective detection of I– ions: Applications in HeLa cell imaging and logic gate. ACS Omega. 2022;7(11):9730–9742. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Seah G. E. K. K., Tan A. Y. X., Neo Z. H., Lim J. Y. C., Goh S. S.. Halogen bonding ionophore for potentiometric iodide sensing. Anal. Chem. 2021;93(46):15543–15549. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mele A., Metrangolo P., Neukirch H., Pilati T., Resnati G.. A halogen-bonding-based heteroditopic receptor for alkali metal halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127(43):14972–14973. doi: 10.1021/ja054862h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mendecki L., Chen X., Callan N., Thompson D. F., Schazmann B., Granados-Focil S., Radu A.. Simple, robust, and plasticizer-free iodide-selective sensor based on copolymerized triazole-based ionic liquid. Anal. Chem. 2016;88(8):4311–4317. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Swords W. B., Li G., Meyer G. J.. Iodide ion pairing with highly charged ruthenium polypyridyl cations in CH3CN. Inorg. Chem. 2015;54(9):4512–4519. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumari N., Hasan M. A., Ward B. D., Mishra L.. Reactivity of tetrabutylammonium iodide with a heteronuclear 6Copper­(II)-4Na­(I) complex: Selective recognition of iodide ion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013;52(43):15007–15014. doi: 10.1021/ie401373m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Valdes-García J., Rosales-Vázquez L. D., Bazany-Rodríguez I. J., Dorazco-González A.. Recent advances in luminescent recognition and chemosensing of iodide in water. Chem. – Asian J. 2020;15(19):2925–2938. doi: 10.1002/asia.202000758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fukushima Y., Aikawa S.. Colorimetric detection of iodide ion by a nuclear fast red-based Hg2+ complex in aqueous media. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021;67:152877. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2021.152877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bayindir S., Hussein A. S., Lafzi F., Toprak M.. The switchable fluorescent detection of mercury, copper, and iodine in real water samples using bola-amphiphilic-tetraphenylethene. J. Mol. Liq. 2023;382:121939. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Satheeshkumar K., Kumar P. S., Shanmugapriya R., Nandhini C., Vennila K. N., Elango K. P.. An easy to make Hg­(II) complex as a selective and sensitive fluorescent turn-on chemosensor for iodide in an aqueous solution based on metal ion displacement mechanism. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022;138:109269. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Barkale H. V., Dey N.. Phenazine-based fluorescence probes for simultaneous sensing of silver and iodide ions. J. Mol. Struct. 2024;1303:137427. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.137427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. David C. I., Prabakaran G., Sundaram K., Ravi S., Parimala Devi D., Abiram A., Nandhakumar R.. Rhodanine-based fluorometric sequential monitoring of silver (I) and iodide ions: Experiment, DFT calculation and multifarious applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;419:126449. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin W., Yuan L., Cao X., Chen B., Feng Y.. A fluorescence turn-on probe for iodide based on the redox reaction between cupric and iodide. Sens. Actuators, B. 2009;138(2):637–641. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Seo H., An M., Kim B. Y., Choi J. H., Helal A., Kim H. S.. Highly selective fluorescent probe for sequential recognition of copper­(II) and iodide ions. Tetrahedron. 2017;73(31):4684–4691. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2017.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tanase, T. Introduction: What is a metal complex? In Coordination Chemistry: Molecular Science of Organic–Inorganic Complexes; Tanase, T. ; Ishii, Y. , Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 2024; Vol.: 1, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1039/9781837673254-00001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lippert B., Miguel P. J. S.. More of a misunderstanding than a real mismatch? Platinum and its affinity for aqua, hydroxido, and oxido ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016;327-328:333–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Masih D., Aly S. M., Alarousu E., Mohammed O. F.. Photoinduced triplet-state electron transfer of platinum porphyrin: A one-step direct method for sensing iodide with an unprecedented detection limit. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3(13):6733–6738. doi: 10.1039/C4TA07033J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wong K. M. C., Yam V. W. W.. Luminescence platinum­(II) terpyridyl complexes - From fundamental studies to sensory functions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007;251(17–20):2477–2488. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang Z., Tizzard G. J., Williams J. A. G., Goldup S. M.. Rotaxane PtII-complexes: Mechanical bonding for chemically robust luminophores and stimuli responsive behaviour. Chem. Sci. 2020;11(7):1839–1847. doi: 10.1039/c9sc05507j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stubbs C. L., Bryant M. J., Hatcher L. E., Raithby P. R.. Manipulating vapochromic or solvatochromic properties of platinum­(ii) pincer complexes through ligand modifications. CrystEngComm. 2025;27(46):7498–7513. doi: 10.1039/D5CE00747J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Luneva E. E., Kozina D. O., Mozzhukhina A. V., Porsev V. V., Solomatina A. I., Tunik S. P.. Pt­(II) complexes with a novel pincer N^C^N ligand: Synthesis, characterization, and photophysics. Inorganics. 2023;11(5):198. doi: 10.3390/inorganics11050198. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Salthouse R. J., Sil A., Gildea L. F., Yufit D. S., Williams J. A. G.. Platinum­(II) complexes of nonsymmetrical NCN-coordinating ligands: Unimolecular and excimeric luminescence properties and comparison with symmetrical analogues. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62(31):12356–12371. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang Z., Niu J. L., Zhang L. Z., Guo J. W., Hao X. Q., Song M. P.. Synthesis, characterization and photophysical properties of the pincer platinum­(II) complexes with m-bis­(benzimidazol-2′-yl)­benzene ligand. Tetrahedron. 2014;70(41):7496–7504. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.08.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Dorazco-Gonzalez A.. Chemosensing of chloride based on a luminescent platinum­(II) NCN pincer complex in aqueous media. Organometallics. 2014;33(4):868–875. doi: 10.1021/om4007054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Valdes-García J., Zamora-Moreno J., Pinzón-Vanegas C., Viviano-Posadas A. O., Martínez-Otero D., Barroso-Flores J., Ortiz-Lopez B., Ortiz-Navarrete V. F., Dorazco-González A.. Selective luminescent chemosensing of chloride based on a cyclometalated platinum­(II) complex in water: Crystal structures, spectroscopic studies, extraction, and bioimaging. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62(17):6629–6641. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gossage R. A., Ryabov A. D., Spek A. L., Stufkens D. J., van Beek J. A. M., van Eldik R., van Koten G.. Models for the initial stages of oxidative addition. Synthesis, characterization, and mechanistic investigation of η1-I2 organometallic ‘pincer’ complexes of platinum. X-ray crystal structures of [PtI­(C6H3{CH2NMe2}2-2,6)­(η1-I2)] and exo-meso-[Pt­(η1-I3)­(η1-I2)­(C6H3{CH2N­(t-Bu)­Me}2-2,6)] J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(11):2488–2497. doi: 10.1021/ja982095z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Canty A. J., van Koten G., Yates B. F.. Computational studies of ArPtII(NCN) (NCN = Pincer) Reactivity toward diiodine: Electrophilic cleavage by a singlet pathway or oxidative addition by a radical pathway? Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2025;28(24):e202500161. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202500161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Canty A. J., van Koten G.. Computational study of equilibria formed by diiodine (I2) and the pincer complex [2,6-bis­{(Me2NCH2)2}­C6H3]­PtIII: Intramolecular mobility of I2 using ′Pt-I 2 ′, ′Pt-I · · · I2′ and ′Cpara · · · I2′ species. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2024;27(26):e202400242. doi: 10.1002/ejic.202400242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Moghaddam S. Z., Thormann E.. The Hofmeister series: Specific ion effects in aqueous polymer solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;555:615–635. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lian L., Liu L., Ding Y., Hua Z., Liu G.. Specific anion effects on charged-neutral random copolymers: Interplay between different anion-polymer interactions. Langmuir. 2021;37(5):1697–1706. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Assaf K. I., Nau W. M.. The chaotropic effect as an assembly motif in Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(43):13968–13981. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Liu L., Kou R., Liu G.. Ion specificities of artificial macromolecules. Soft Matter. 2017;13(1):68–80. doi: 10.1039/C6SM01773H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Livney Y. D., Portnaya I., Faupin B., Ramon O., Cohen Y., Cogan U., Mizrahi S.. Interactions between inorganic salts and polyacrylamide in aqueous solutions and gels. J. Polym. Sci. B. 2003;41(5):508–519. doi: 10.1002/polb.10406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Cui X., Liu J., Xie L., Huang J., Zeng H.. Interfacial ion specificity modulates hydrophobic interaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;578:135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rogers B. A., Okur H. I., Yan C., Yang T., Heyda J., Cremer P. S.. Weakly hydrated anions bind to polymers but not monomers in aqueous solutions. Nat. Chem. 2022;14(1):40–45. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00805-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Qiu M., Long S., Li B., Yan L., Xie W., Niu Y., Wang X., Guo Q., Xia A.. Toward an understanding of how the optical property of water-soluble cationic polythiophene derivative is altered by the addition of salts: The Hofmeister effect. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117(42):21870–21878. doi: 10.1021/jp407430y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hussain S., De S., Iyer P. K.. Thiazole-containing conjugated polymer as a visual and fluorometric sensor for iodide and mercury. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5(6):2234–2240. doi: 10.1021/am400123j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mehendale N. C., Bezemer C., van Walree C. A., Klein Gebbink R. J. M., van Koten G.. Novel silica immobilized NCN-pincer palladium­(II) and platinum­(II) complexes: Aplication as Lewis acid catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006;257(1–2):167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.05.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. McDonald A. R., Dijkstra H. P., Suijkerbuijk B. M. J. M., van Klink G. P. M., van Koten G.. “Click” immobilization of organometallic pincer catalysts for C-C coupling reactions. Organometallics. 2009;28(16):4689–4699. doi: 10.1021/om900237g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Stiriba S. E., Slagt M. Q., Kautz H., Klein Gebbink R. J. M., Thomann R., Frey H., van Koten G.. Synthesis and supramolecular association of immobilized NCN-pincer platinum­(II) complexes on hyperbranched polyglycerol supports. Chem. – Eur. J. 2004;10(5):1267–1273. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Slagt M. Q., Stiriba S. E., Kautz H., Klein Gebbink R. J. M., Frey H., van Koten G.. Optically active hyperbranched polyglycerol as scaffold for covalent and noncovalent immobilization of platinum­(II) NCN-pincer complexes. Catalytic application and recovery. Organometallics. 2004;23:1525–1532. doi: 10.1021/om030603u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Dijkstra H. P., Kruithof C. A., Ronde N., van de Coevering R., Ramón D. J., Vogt D., van Klink G. P. M., van Koten G.. Shape-persistent nanosize organometallic complexes: Synthesis and application in a nanofiltration membrane reactor. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:675–685. doi: 10.1021/jo0257602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Suijkerbuijk B. M. J. M., Shu L., Klein Gebbink R. J. M., Schlüter A. D., van Koten G.. Single-site catalysts on a cylindrical support beyond nanosize. Organometallics. 2003;22(21):4175–4177. doi: 10.1021/om034078a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rojas-Montoya S. M., Vonlanthen M., Martínez-Serrano R. D., Cuétara-Guadarrama F., Burillo G., Rivera E.. New photoluminescent polyethylene films grafted with a fluorescein derivative using gamma radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022;194:110018. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rojas-Montoya S. M., Vonlanthen M., Ruiu A., Rodríguez-Alba E., Burillo G., Rivera E.. Photoluminescent grafted polymers: Synthesis and properties of a polyethylene matrix covalently linked with porphyrin units. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2018;219:1800041. doi: 10.1002/macp.201800041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Vonlanthen M., Rojas-Montoya S. M., Cuétara-Guadarrama F., Martínez-Serrano R. D., Burillo G., Rivera E.. Coumarin grafted polyethylene matrix as colorimetric and fluorescent chemosensor for metal ions. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2020;221(21):2000242. doi: 10.1002/macp.202000242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rojas-Montoya S. M., Vonlanthen M., Huerta-Roldán J. M., Aguilar-Ortíz E., Burillo G., Morales-Espinoza E. G., Rivera E.. Incorporation of photoluminescent 7-hydroxycoumarin units onto a polyethylene matrix by means of gamma radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019;163:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Flores-García L. A., López-Saucedo F., Bucio E.. One-step gamma radiation-induced grafting of poly­(N-vinylcaprolactam) and poly­(methacrylic acid) onto polypropylene suture threads. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2026;239:113279. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kaur I., Rattan S., Chauhan S., Gupta N.. Gamma-radiation-induced grafting of binary mixture of methacrylic acid and 4-vinyl pyridine onto Teflon-FEP film as an effective polar membrane for separation processes. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B. 2010;268(10):1642–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.01.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Esfandiari M., Havaei G., Zahiri S., Mohammadnezhad G.. Pincer complex immobilization onto different supports: Strategies and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;472:214778. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Oh S. Y., Yun Y. J., Kim D. Y., Han S. H.. Formation of a self-assembled monolayer of diaminododecane and a heteropolyacid monolayer on the ITO surface. Langmuir. 1999;15(14):4690–4692. doi: 10.1021/la9900268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhou Y., Weng Y., Zhang L., Jing F., Huang N., Chen J.. Cystamine immobilization on TiO2 film surfaces and the influence on inhibition of collagen-induced platelet activation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011;258(5):1776–1783. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Taneda H., Yamada N. L., Nemoto F., Minagawa Y., Matsuno H., Tanaka K.. Modification of a polymer surface by partial swelling using nonsolvents. Langmuir. 2021;37(51):14941–14949. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Jing G., Tang W., Zhao S., Xu X.. Reaction and diffusion coupling on polymer-modified surface: Insights from dynamic reaction Density Functional Theory. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023;62(24):9563–9571. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00704. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Barrios O., Rodriguez-Prieto T., Bort A., Okła E., Maly M., Chavez M., Escarpa A., Ionov M., Bryszewska M., Cano J.. et al. Tuning chemical properties on ruthenium­(ii) complexes through PEGylation of N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Dalton Trans. 2026;55(3):1473–1489. doi: 10.1039/D5DT02391B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Valdes-García J., Vonlanthen M., Cuétara-Guadarrama F., Garcia-Bassoco D., Valdés-Negrín H. L., López-Pérez A., Rivera E., Hernández-Ortega S., Dorazco-González A.. A dual luminescent and chromogenic Pt-NCN complex for the detection of GTP and CTP in aqueous media. Inorg. Chem. 2026;65(2):1436–1451. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c04987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Pirman T., Ocepek M., Likozar B.. Radical polymerization of acrylates, methacrylates, and styrene: Biobased approaches, mechanism, kinetics, secondary reactions, and modeling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021;60(26):9347–9367. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Takagi M., Shimazaki T., Kobayashi O., Ishimoto T., Tachikawa M.. Theoretical and machine learning models for reaction-barrier predictions: Acrylate and methacrylate radical reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025;27(4):1772–1777. doi: 10.1039/D4CP04656K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Li J., Shen Z., Tie L., Long T., Zhong Q., Chen X., Yin C., Liufu L., Huang X., Xiong B., Li X., Duan C., He C.. Surface microstructure study on corona discharge-treated polyethylene using positron annihilation spectroscopy. Molecules. 2024;29:4147. doi: 10.3390/molecules29174147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Jung M. R., Horgen F. D., Orski S. V., Rodriguez V., Beers K. L., Balazs G. H., Jones T. T., Work T. M., Brignac K. C., Royer S. J.. et al. Validation of ATR FT-IR to identify polymers of plastic marine debris, including those ingested by marine organisms. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018;127:704–716. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Naganathappa M., Chaudhari A.. Mono, di, tri and tetraethylene glycol: Spectroscopic characterization using density functional method and experiment. Vib. Spectrosc. 2018;95:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2017.12.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Belov E., Nadaraia K., Imshinetskiy I., Mashtalyar D., Ignatieva L., Marchenko Y., Osmushko I., Gerasimenko M., Sinebruykhov S., Gnedenkov S.. Polymer system based on polyethylene glycol and TFE telomers for producing films with switchable wettability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:4904. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Høisæter K. K., Buvik V., Gonzalez S. V., Vevelstad S. J., Knuutila H. K.. Oxidative degradation of triethylene glycol. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024;287:119706. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.119706. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ren M., Tang Y., Gao D., Ren Y., Yao X., Shi H., Zhang T., Wu C.. Recrystallization of biaxially oriented polyethylene film from partially melted state within crystallite networks. Polymer. 2020;191:122291. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Fagnani F., De Soricellis G. S., Colombo A., Dragonetti C., Roberto D., di Biase A., Fantacci S., Marinotto D.. Photophysical investigation of highly phosphorescent N^C^N platinum­(II) azido complexes and their triazole derivatives. Dyes Pigm. 2024;225:112064. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2024.112064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Moreth D., Cappellari M. V., Müller A., Oster A., Schwab D., Doltsinis N. L., Strassert C. A., Schatzschneider U.. Luminescent N^C^N pincer Ni (II), Pd­(II), and Pt­(II) complexes with a pendant coumarin group: The role of auxiliary ligands and environments. Inorg. Chem. 2025;64(9):4223–4235. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c03773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Mrad A. B., Sheibat-Othman N., Amorim A. P. A., Do Rosario R. L., McKenna T. F. L.. Polyethylene slurries: Swelling and solubility. Macromol. React. Eng. 2023;17:2300020. doi: 10.1002/mren.202300020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Islam M. R., Tanveer S., Chen C. C.. Modeling swelling behavior of hydrogels in aqueous organic solvents. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021;242:116744. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Koshevaya E., Lifanovsky N., Shishmakova E., Staltsov M., Dubovik A., Belousov A., Kaluzhny D., Kuzmin V., Morozov V., Kolyvanova M., Dement’eva O.. Interaction of BSA with Ta2O5 nanoparticles: The effect of polydopamine pre-coating. Molecules. 2026;31(2):241. doi: 10.3390/molecules31020241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Naik A. B., Naik L. R., Kadadevarmath J. S., Pal H., Rao V. J.. Fluorescence quenching of anthrylvinyl acetate by carbon tetrachloride. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A. 2010;214(2–3):145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Chmyrov A., Sandén T., Widengren J.. Iodide as a fluorescence quencher and promoter-mechanisms and possible implications. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114(34):11282–11291. doi: 10.1021/jp103837f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Tian Z., Da Y., Wang M., Dou X., Cui X., Chen J., Jian R., Xi S., Cui B., Luo Y.. et al. Selective photoelectrochemical oxidation of glucose to glucaric acid by single atom Pt decorated defective TiO2 . Nat. Commun. 2023;14:142. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35875-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Mateos M. J., Hou H., Rana A. G., Lao-Zea A., Romero N., Sala X., Minceva M., Suárez S., García-Antón J., Tasbihi M.. Enhanced gas-phase pollutant removal using Pt nanoparticle-modified exfoliated carbon nitride photocatalysts under UV and visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;500:156948. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Alharbi A. A., Wills C., Dixon C., Arca E., Chamberlain T. W., Griffiths A., Collins S. M., Wu K., Yan H., Bourne R. A.. et al. Efficient hydrogen evolution from dimethylamine borane, ammonia borane and sodium borohydride catalyzed by ruthenium and platinum nanoparticles stabilized by an amine modified polymer immobilized ion liquid: A comparative study. Catal. Lett. 2024;154(10):5450–5471. doi: 10.1007/s10562-024-04725-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Kolbeck C., Taccardi N., Paape N., Schulz P. S., Wasserscheid P., Steinrück H.-P., Maier F.. Redox chemistry, solubility, ande surface distribution of Pt­(II) and Pt­(IV) complexes dissolved in ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2014;192:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2013.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Ghosh S., Boje D., Pahari P., Atta A. K.. Fluorometric pyranose derivative for sequential detection of iodide and Hg2+ ions in aqueous medium: AIE phenomenon, real application and DFT studies. J. Mo. Struct. 2026;1349:143874. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.143874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Ghosh S., Malakar C. C., Pahari P., Atta A. K.. Amide/urea-based simple fluorometric receptors for iodide and Hg2+ ions in aqueous medium: Aggregation induced emission and DFT studies. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A. 2025;325:125134. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2024.125134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wang Y. C., Zhu F., Pan J., Geng T. M.. Application of the flexible polyethylene polyamine-based covalent organic frameworks for fluorescence sensing nitrophenols and iodide ions. J. Mol. Struct. 2025;1323:140695. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Khan A., Jafry A. T., Ajab H., Yaqub A., Jilani S., Hussain D., Abbas N.. Portable sensing platform for the visual detection of iodide ions in food and clinical samples. Chemosensors. 2024;12:102. doi: 10.3390/chemosensors12060102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Neha, Jain N., Kaur N.. Versatile fluorenone sensor for Swift identification of nerve agent mimic DCP and hazardous Cu2+/Hg2+ ions. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024;170:113168. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ranganathan S., Thangaraj B., Cingaram R., Kannan L., Bakthavachalam V., Iye S. K., Sundaramurthy K. N.. Lighting up imidazole-based fluorescent chemosensor for selective discrimination of Hg2+ ions and its application in sequential detection of histidine, solid-supported extractant. J. Mol. Struct. 2025;1323:140571. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.140571. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Liu J., Yuan F., Luo S., Wang Y., Wu X., Xie H., Tang Y., Li Y., Zou Q., Xi Q., Wen Q., Yi S.. Oligo (ethylene glycol)-functionalized fluorescent sensor for the determination of Hg2+ in aqueous solution. Polyhedron. 2023;243:116544. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2023.116544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao6c08055_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the Supplementary Information.


Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES