Abstract
The noncanonical amino acid l-azidohomoalanine (Aha) can replace methionine in ribosomal translation under tightly controlled conditions. Aha has been commonly employed to functionalize proteins by the bioorthogonal conjugation with alkynes, the so-called “click chemistry”. However, its application for scalable recombinant protein production is currently hampered by the high price. To address this shortcoming, a biosynthesis cascade from inexpensive sodium azide (NaN3) as the precursor had been reported in the literature. Here, we advance the approach to a scalable bioprocess for the biosynthesis of Aha in Escherichia coli. We biosynthesized Aha via a two-enzyme cascade reaction using the cellular metabolite l-homoserine and NaN3 as the precursors. First, l-homoserine-O-acetyltransferase acetylates l-homoserine, then O-acetyl-l-homoserine sulfhydrylase catalyzes the conversion of the activated O-acetyl-l-homoserine to Aha by the nucleophilic attack of NaN3. In contrast to earlier studies, we focused on optimizing the biosynthesis of Aha in fed-batch bioreactor cultures of E. coli independent of its incorporation into target proteins. We established methods for the quantitative analysis of NaN3, the O-acetyl-l-homoserine intermediate and Aha to monitor the biosynthesis reaction. Combining gene-, strain- and process-engineering, we achieved a maximum Aha production of 1.4 mM or 0.05 mmol per gram of cell dry mass. Our study advances the biosynthesis of Aha to the next level as it demonstrates that the concentration routinely used for the global replacement of methionine can be exceeded by approximately three times. Nevertheless, further optimization is required to improve the conversion of the toxic precursor NaN3 such that the cobiosynthesis of Aha and its direct incorporation into a protein of interest become viable for scalable applications.


Introduction
The standard genetic code combines four nucleotides in 64 codons to govern the biosynthesis of proteins from a canonical set of 20 amino acids. The limited side-chain diversity of the canonical amino acids has prompted the expansion of this central cipher of life beyond its evolutionary boundaries. Numerous noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) have been incorporated into recombinant proteins, which has broadened the landscape of protein engineering. − Hundreds of ncAAs are now available to introduce chemical, structural and functional diversity into recombinant proteins. , Although ncAAs have become essential tools for chemistry and biology, ,− their scalable application is often hampered by their availability and cost. , Most ncAAs are chemically synthesized. However, the chemical synthesis of ncAAs is not sustainable and challenged by uncertain costs due to the shortage of raw materials. Biosynthetic pathways for ncAAs appear an innovative solution to address these challenges. Despite the fact that more than 700 ncAAs occur naturally, their biosynthesis pathways are largely unknown. Nevertheless, biosynthesis pathways for a small number of biotechnologically relevant ncAAs were previously reported. Provided that it is efficient, the biosynthesis approach bears the potential to facilitate the sustainable production of ncAAs at sufficient quantities.
In this study, we embarked on the biosynthesis of an ncAA that carries a unique biorthogonal chemical group and can be used directly in protein translation under controlled conditions. l-azidohomoalanine (Aha) combines these outstanding properties: it carries a bioorthogonal azide moiety in its side chain, can be biosynthesized and has been incorporated routinely into recombinant proteins in place of methionine (Met, reviewed by Marin et al.). In fact, Aha has become one of the most important bioorthogonal tags for a wide variety of applications in biotechnology such as labeling, imaging or engineered proteins and materials. − Aha’s azide moiety reacts spontaneously with ring-constrained cyclooctynes, such as the dibenzocyclooctyne group while the reaction with terminal unconstrained alkynes occurs only in the presence of copper(I) as the catalyst. The strain-promoted azido-alkyne cycloaddition reactions are considered bioorthogonal because they occur without interfering with naturally occurring biomolecules. ,, Aha has been exploited to study newly synthesized proteins , and Aha-labeled proteins can be selectively bound to antibodies or other affinity molecules, peptides, biomaterials or polymers. ,− Being an analog of Met, Aha has been incorporated predominantly in Met auxotrophic hosts by the so-called supplementation-based incorporation method , (SPI) (reviewed by Marin et al. (2025)). This approach globally reassigns the Met ATG codon to Aha and the selectivity of its incorporation depends on the occurrence and position of the ATG codon in the coding sequence. Indeed, Aha is readily tolerated as a Met surrogate by the methionyl-tRNA synthetases of bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells. ,, Recently, Koch et al. devised a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase mutant that can incorporate Aha site-specifically at an in-frame amber stop codon. However, the mutant enzyme promiscuously accepts Met as a substrate albeit to a lower extent than Aha.
Budisa and co-workers described a two-step biosynthesis pathway for Aha in Escherichia coli. The first enzyme, l-homoserine-O-acetyltransferase (MetX) uses the cellular metabolites acetyl-CoA and l-homoserine (Hse) to produce O-acetyl-l-homoserine (OAH) as a reactive intermediate. The second enzyme O-acetyl-l-homoserine sulfhydrylase (MetY) converts OAH and sodium azide (NaN3) to Aha (Figure ). The simultaneous biosynthesis and incorporation of Aha into target proteins in E. coli have been previously demonstrated. , However, the titers of Aha-labeled protein were below 50 mg/L and the concentration of the biosynthesized Aha has not been assessed yet.
1.

.Schematic illustration of the l-azidohomoalanine biosynthesis cascade.
We believe that monitoring the Aha biosynthesis independently of its incorporation into proteins could provide valuable insights for a subsequent improvement of the protein labeling efficiency with biosynthesized Aha. In this study, we combined gene-, strain- and process-engineering to systematically improve Aha biosynthesis in E. coli. Employing varied gene syntaxes, we modulated the expression of metX and metY such that the flux through the Aha biosynthesis pathway was optimized. The E. coli eXpress strain had been reported previously to improve recombinant protein production by decoupling it from growth. , This strain proved advantageous for the high-level production of the cascade enzymes MetX and MetY in comparison to the reference E. coli strain BL21(DE3). A MetX variant that is insensitive against OAH feedback inhibition further elevated Aha productivity. To our best knowledge, the current study first reports the upscaling of Aha’s biotechnological production from shake flask to fed-batch bioreactor cultures. We monitored the cascade reaction using different analytics, in particular the qualitative and quantitative analysis of NaN3, the intermediate product OAH and Aha. Guided by the analytics, we fine-tuned the feeding regime and the production time to maximally convert NaN3 to Aha. We found that the optimized production strain biosynthesized Aha at a maximal titer of 1.4 mmol/L under optimal bioprocess conditions.
Materials and Methods
All compounds were purchased at Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) or Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) unless indicated otherwise. Gibco Bacto yeast extract (LOT 2461100) was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA) and the noncanonical amino acids were from Iris Biotech (Marktredwitz, Germany).
Strains and Plasmids
Aha was biosynthesized in three different E. coli strains. EnGenes eXpress strains V1 (BL21(DE3)::TN7⟨pAraB-gp2⟩ΔaraBADC) and V2 (BL21-AI⟨gp2⟩) were compared to BL21(DE3) (E. coli B F– ompT hsdS B(rB – mB –)dcm + gal λ(DE3); Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) as the benchmark expression strain. The generation of the growth-decoupled strains eXpress V1 and V2 was previously described by Stargardt et al. , E. coli strain NEB5α (New England Biolabs GmbH (NEB), Ipswitch, MA) was used for the cloning steps. Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB) was employed for PCR amplification of DNA fragments and all restriction enzymes for the cloning procedures were from NEB. The plasmids were constructed using type II S restriction cloning. Briefly, the constructs were assembled from five DNA fragments carrying compatible 4-base overhangs for directed assembly using BsaI-HFv2 (NEB) and T4 DNA ligase (NEB) in a one-pot reaction. The amino acid sequences of MetX from Deinococcus radiodurans (genbank accession Q9RVZ8) and MetY from Bacillus stearothermophilus (genbank accession E16859.1) were reverse-translated using the codon scrambler software and ordered as clonal genes (Twist Bioscience, CA, USA). All fragments for the assembly reaction were PCR-amplified using the primers listed in Table S1 and gel purified (Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit, NEB). Plasmids pXYI, pXYII, pXYIII were assembled using fragments with compatible overhangs (Figure ). To generate pX*YIII, we excised the metX gene from pXYIII using NdeI and AatII and replaced it with the mutant allele metX L218A (Table S2) cut with the same enzymes. The insert metX L218A was purchased in gBlock format from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, IA). BL21(DE3) as well as the eXpress strain V1 and V2 were transformed with the plasmids by electroporation using a BTX ECM 630 electroporator (BTX, Holliston, MA) set at 1800 V, 200 Ω, 25 μF in a 0.1 cm electroporation cuvette (Biozym, Vienna, Austria). All plasmid sequences were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Microsynth, Vienna, Austria). Master and working cell banks were prepared using M9ZB complex medium and semisynthetic medium with d-glucose containing 50 mg/L kanamycin each for plasmid maintenance. The ingredients of the M9ZB and the semisynthetic medium were previously described. ,
2.

Plasmid architectures for the expression of the Aha biosynthesis genes metXY. The recombinant plasmid carries metXY, which encodes MetX and MetY. (A) Plasmid pXYI carrying a bicistronic expression cassette of metXY under the control of a single IPTG-inducible T7 lacO promoter (T7p) and T7 terminator (T7t). The translation of each open reading frame was controlled by an individual ribosome binding site (RBS); (B) plasmid pXYII carried divergent monocistronic expression cassettes of metX and metY, each under control of T7p and T7t; (C) plasmid pXYIII with two monocistronic T7p-metX-T7t and T7p-metY-T7t expression cassettes in tandem.
Biosynthesis of Aha in Fed-Batch-like μ-Bioreactor Cultures
The cultures were performed in the BioLector microfermentation system (fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures) in 48-well Flowerplates (m2p-laboratories GmbH, Baesweiler, Germany) as described by Stargardt et al. employing the following changes: initially, the medium in each well was inoculated with cells to an initial attenuance at 600 nm (D 600 start) of 0.1 as inoculation. The batch phase was carried out using 1% (w/v) d-glucose. The fed-batch phase was operated with enzymatic release of d-glucose from dextran using 0.6% (v/v) of enzyme mix (EnzMix, m2p-laboratories GmbH). 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (GERBU Biotechnik, Heidelberg, Germany) was used for the induction of gene expression in all strains. 10 mM l-arabinose (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) was used to induce the expression of gp2 in the eXpress strains. , Cells were grown in batch mode for 15 h. At induction of metXY, NaN3 was added in pulses every hour to reach a total addition of 5 μmol. For the analysis of different feedstocks in μ-bioreactor cultures, the compounds were added at the induction of metXY as a pulse feed at the concentration indicated in the result section. Biomass was continuously monitored every 15 min using scattered light detection at 620 nm, and the cell dry mass (CDM) was derived from a predefined calibration curve. 1 mg of CDM was collected for the analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, PA-gels were from ThermoFisher Scientific). SDS-PA gels were stained using Coomassie blue stain as previously described.
Biosynthesis of Aha in Fed-Batch Bioreactor Cultures
The fed-batch fermentation cultures were cultivated in computer-controlled Dasgip Parallel Bioreactor Systems (Eppendorf SE, Hamburg, Germany). The media compositions are indicated in Tables S4 and S5. Kanamycin was not added during the production phases in μ-bioreactor (see above) and fed-batch bioreactor cultures. The cells were precultured in semisynthetic medium with d-glucose containing 50 mg/L kanamycin in 250 mL baffled shake-flasks. The cultures were inoculated with the working cell bank to a D 600 start of 0.1 and incubated at 37 °C in an orbital shaker at 200 rpm until they reached a D 600 of 3. 400 mL of batch medium (composition Table S4) were supplemented with 2 mL of 1:10 diluted antifoam (Struktol J673A, Schill Seilacher, Germany) prior to inoculation. Foaming was further controlled by the addition of the antifoam based on a short circuit-driven level sensor. The batch culture medium was inoculated with the preculture to an initial D 600 of 0.08. The batch phase was conducted at 37 ± 0.2 °C until the CDM reached 10 g/L in 400 mL. The pH was set to pH 7 ± 0.2 by addition of 12.5% (v/v) NH3. The fed-batch phase at 30 ± 0.2 °C was separated into two phases: A first exponential feed phase at a growth rate of 0.1 h–1 for 21 h was followed by a linear feed phase at a growth rate ranging from 0.04 to 0.03 h–1 for 12 h. The calculated CDM at the end of fermentation was 45 g/L unless stated otherwise. Gene expression was induced at the beginning of the linear feed using 1 mM IPTG (metXY) and 10 mM l-arabinose (gp2) only for the eXpress strains. At induction, the 360 mM NaN3 stock solution was added to the culture as a linear feed to reach 20 to 50 mmol NaN3 at the end of the fermentation. pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) were continuously measured with probes from Hamilton (Bonaduz AG, Switzerland). DO was maintained above 30% saturation by adjusting the stirrer speed and the air flow.
Cell growth was monitored off-line by measuring the D 600 in a DiluPhotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany). To assess the CDM, 2 mL polypropylene tubes (Eppendorf) were dried at 105 °C for 48 h, cooled to room temperature for 4 h in a desiccator and weighed. 1 mL culture was sampled and centrifuged in the previously weighed 1.5 mL tubes using a tabletop centrifuge (Eppendorf; 10 min, 4 °C, 16,000g). The cell pellets were washed twice with 1.8 and 1.6 mL deionized H2O, centrifuged as described and the supernatants were discarded. The pellets were incubated at 105 °C for 48 h, cooled for 4 h in a desiccator and weighed. Soluble and insoluble protein fractions were analyzed according to Fink et al. by SDS-PAGE on 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (ThermoFisher Scientific) if not indicated otherwise. A mix of 65% (v/v) protein sample, 25% (v/v) 4× NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 10% (v/v) 10× NuPAGE reducing agent (ThermoFisher Scientific) was heated at 95 °C for 10 min prior to loading onto the gel. The gel was stained using Coomassie R250. The product concentration was estimated by densitometry using ImageJ-Fiji (version v1-54i) and bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) as the quantification standard.
Analytical Methods to Assess Aha, OAH and NaN3 Levels
Aha production was qualitatively analyzed by thin-layer chromatography using normal phase HPTLC-plates ALUGRAM Xtra Nano-SILGUR/UV254 with nano silica gel and concentration zone (Carl Roth). The TLC was developed in a mixture of chloroform, 96% (v/v) EtOH, acetic acid and 25% (v/v) NH3 at a ratio of 5:2.6:0.9:0.6 (v/v) in a rectangular TLC developing tank (Sigma-Aldrich). The plate was incubated in ethanolic ninhydrin solution (3% w/v) for 30 s. Compound spots were visualized after incubation of the plate for 10 min at 105 °C.
To assess the residual azide concentration, 20 μL of 0 to 10 mM NaN3 in water (for calibration) or medium supernatant were added to 180 μL of 50 mM FeCl3 in 10 mM HCl in a 96-well plate. After 5 min of incubation at room temperature, the absorbance of the ferric azide complex was determined at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer. The calibration curve was done in parallel to the samples of unknown concentration and each measurement was performed in triplicate.
In the μ-bioreactor cultures, Aha and OAH were quantified using precolumn derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde followed by high performance liquid chromatography separation (OPA-HPLC) on an InfinityLab Poroshell HPH-C18 (693975-502, 3.0 × 150 mm, 2.7 μm, 100 Å pore size) solvent saver column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). The samples were spiked with a final concentration of 2.5 mg/L 3-(2-thienyl-dl-alanine) as an internal standard for the derivatization. Prior to injection, the samples were filtered using a 0.2 μm pore size Whatman Puradisc syringe filter (Sigma-Aldrich). The protocol for the separation of amino acids by OPA-HPLC was as described by Széliová et al. Solvent A (10 mM of K2HPO4, 10 mM of K2B4O7·4H2O, pH 8.2 ± 0.05) and solvent B (45% (v/v) CH3OH, 45% (v/v) CH3CN, 10% (v/v) H2O) were prepared with ultrapure water from a Milli-Q system (Merck Millipore). Buffers were filtered (0.2 μm pore size, Sigma-Aldrich) and degassed prior to use. Samples were analyzed using a gradient elution from 2 to 57% solvent B over 23 min, followed by a step to 100% solvent B and re-equilibration at 2% solvent B. The total run time was 45 min. OPA fluorescence was monitored at 345 and 455 nm for excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. The calibration standards 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 mg/L Aha were prepared in μ-bioreactor culture medium diluted 1:4 with deionized H2O. The culture medium had been collected at the end of the μ-bioreactor culture with NaN3 but without induction of metXY. Likewise, the calibration standards 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 mg/L OAH were prepared.
In fed-batch bioreactor cultures, Aha was determined by mass spectrometry (MS). The samples were diluted 1:2 with 10% (v/v) acetic acid, centrifuged and the supernatant was collected for further analysis. The calibration curve was prepared with 0, 8, 40, 200, and 100 μM Aha in water using an internal standard (isotope labeled glutamine). 1 μL was injected of each sample for analysis by MS.
Results and Discussion
Gene Syntax Design to Enhance the Flux through the Biosynthesis Cascade toward Aha
Previously, the biosynthesis of Aha was published along its direct incorporation into recombinant target proteins by Schipp et al. They transformed the Met auxotrophic MDS15A E. coli strain with two different vectors. The first vector carried the biosynthesis genes, metX and metY both from Corynebacterium glutamicum. The second vector carried the gene encoding the recombinant target protein. Aha was biosynthesized and incorporated into the target protein in the same culture. Although appealing, this strategy complicates the control of the bioprocess. The incorporation of Aha occurs residue-specifically in a Met auxotrophic E. coli strain. In shake flask cultures, the cells are grown to late log phase in medium containing a limiting concentration of Met and the target gene expression is induced as soon as Met is depleted. Usually, 0.5–1 mM synthetic Aha are added at induction (reviewed by Marin et al.). For an efficient SPI of Aha, its biosynthesis must be synchronized with the depletion of Met such that the intracellular Aha concentration solidly exceeds that of Met at the induction of the target gene expression. Efficient Aha biosynthesis requires a steady supply of the metabolic precursors Hse and OAH, which calls for balanced and optimized routing of glucose-derived flux into the Hse and acetyl-CoA pathways. Metabolic engineering offers a route to achieve this, as evidenced by improvements in Hse and OAH titers in E. coli. , To dissect these aspects in our study, we focused on the biosynthesis of Aha and did not directly incorporate it into a target protein. This strategy allowed us to control the process parameters and establish analytics to monitor the Aha biosynthesis. In particular, we aimed at modulating gene expression and protein production to achieve a balanced stoichiometry of the cascade reaction. We hypothesized that the flux through the cascade would be maximal if the two enzyme activities and the supply with the precursors were balanced. We chose the metX sequence from D. radiodurans and the metY sequence from B. stearothermophilus (Table S2). We codon harmonized the sequences for expression in E. coli to preserve the translation rhythm from the source organisms. Since the gene syntax affects expression, we generated three expression constructs that differed in the mono- or bi-cistronic expression of metX and metY along with their mutual orientation (Figure ). To keep the metabolic burden of the cells as low as possible, we encoded both genes on a single plasmid that contained a basis of mobility element to improve its stability.
The Monocistronic Tandem Expression of metX and metY in a Growth-Decoupled E. coli Protein Production Strain Enhanced Aha Biosynthesis
We transformed three different E. coli strains with the metXY expression plasmids, which resulted in nine different strain/plasmid combinations (Table S6). BL21(DE3) is a commonly used E. coli strain for recombinant protein production and we designated it as the reference strain in this study. The E. coli eXpress strains V1 and V2 were used to optimize recombinant protein production in a nongrowing host. , The eXpress strains V1 and V2 derive from the E. coli strains BL21(DE3) and BL21-AI. A main difference between them concerns the regulation of the expression of the T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) gene. In eXpress V1, the T7 RNAP gene is under control of the lacUV5 promoter. In eXpress V2, its expression is controlled by the l-arabinose inducible araBAD promoter. gp2 is under the control of the arabinose-inducible araBAD promoter in both strains. Both strains exploit T7 RNAP and the Gp2 protein from bacteriophage T7 to constitute an orthogonal transcription system. T7 RNAP initiates transcription only from a T7 promoter but not from E. coli host promoters. Gp2 selectively inhibits E. coli RNA polymerase but not T7 RNAP. − If coexpressed, Gp2 prevents the de novo transcription of host genes while T7 RNAP transcribes the gene(s) of interest at high level. Since the host cells cease to grow without de novo protein synthesis, the cellular resources freed by the growth retardation can be channeled effectively into the accumulation of the recombinant protein(s) of interest. , In previous studies, this led to increased transcription of the gene(s) of interest such that the recombinant protein(s) amounted to 55% of cell dry mass (CDM). The yield of total as well as soluble protein fractions was elevated more than 3-fold in comparison to E. coli BL21(DE3). We hypothesized that decoupling growth from MetXY production would reduce the metabolic burden, increase the level of functional MetXY and thus enhance Aha biosynthesis. NaN3 inhibits E. coli cell growth by disrupting protein export and impairing respiratory processes. − Decoupling growth and the biosynthesis of Aha from NaN3 as the precursor would presumably minimize the toxic effects of NaN3 because we could add it after the growth phase.
We compared the efficiency of Aha biosynthesis between the nine strain/plasmid combinations in automated fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. The cells were cultivated in enzymatic glucose release medium to simulate a fed-batch-like process without external substrate feed. NaN3 was added in pulses every hour resulting in a cumulative addition of 5 μmol, which corresponded to a final concentration of up to 6 mM. This dosage was in agreement with the NaN3 supplementation reported in the literature, which had been optimized to balance Aha production while maintaining cell viability. We analyzed the production of MetX and MetY (Figure S1) and the biosynthesis of Aha at 8 h postinduction of metXY (Figures and S4). Out of the nine strain/plasmid combinations, BL21(DE3){pXYIII}, eXpress V1{pXYII}, eXpress V1{pXYIII} and eXpress V2{pXYIII} produced MetXY as indicated by the SDS-PAGE analysis (Figure S1). Notably, metY was more pronouncedly expressed than metX both from the mono- and bicistronic gene expression syntaxes (Figure S1). Independent of the E. coli strain, the monocistronic tandem architecture (pXYIII) yielded the highest metXY levels (Figure S1). We used thin-layer chromatography (TLC) as a straightforward method to qualitatively analyze the Aha production in multiple samples in parallel. According to the analytical TLC (Figure S4), E. coli eXpress V1{pXYIII} appeared to most efficiently biosynthesize Aha. This finding was consistent with the metX expression levels, which were highest in eXpress V1{pXYIII} compared to the other strains (Figure S1). Next, we established a reversed-phase HPLC method (the experimental details are described in the Materials and Methods section) to quantify Aha and OAH in the culture supernatant of shake-flask cultures and fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. The HPLC results confirmed the findings of the TLC analysis. The most productive strain reached 1.2 mM Aha, whereas the other strains produced substantially lower concentrations (0.2 and 0.1 mM). When normalized to biomass, strain eXpress V1{pXYIII} showed a markedly higher specific productivity (0.54 mmol/gCDM) compared to eXpress V2{pXYIII} (0.06) and BL21(DE3){pXYIII} (0.03) (Figure ), indicating that the improved volumetric production is primarily driven by enhanced cellular efficiency rather than biomass accumulation. This pattern mirrored the NaN3 supplementation (mmol/gCDM), which was lowest for strain BL21(DE3){pXYIII} and highest for eXpress V1{pXYIII} (Figure ). As expected, cell growth was markedly inhibited after induction of gp2 expression in the eXpress strains compared to the benchmark expression strain. For this reason, the final biomass concentrations at the end of fermentation ranged from 2.3 to 3.3 and 4.1 g/L for eXpress V1{pXYIII}, eXpress V2{pXYIII} and BL21(DE3){pXYIII}, respectively. However, while the NaN3 supplementation (mmol/gCDM) differed by roughly 2-fold between BL21(DE3){pXYIII} and eXpress V1{pXYIII}, the latter strain was 18-fold more productive. These results suggest that NaN3 supplementation alone did not account for the Aha yield differences. The likely driver was the higher MetX levels in eXpress V1{pXYIII} relative to the other strains (Figure S1).
3.

E. coli strain eXpress V1{pXYIII} behaved as the most proficient producer of Aha in fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. The Aha concentration in the culture supernatant was determined by HPLC as described in the Materials and Methods section at the end of the fermentation. Data from a representative biological experiment are shown and the results from an independent biological replicate are presented in Figure S2. All strains carried plasmid pXYIII for the expression of metXY. Strain designations are B, BL21(DE3); V2, eXpress V2; V1, eXpress V1. At induction of metXY, NaN3 was added in pulses every hour to reach a total addition of 5 μmol. The mmol NaN3/gCDM varied because the cultures reached different final cell densities.
Supplementation of the Production Strain with NH4OAc Doubled the Biosynthesis of Aha in Fed-Batch-like μ-Bioreactor Cultures
The precursors of the cascade reaction shown in Figure , Hse and acetyl-CoA are produced naturally in E. coli. Acetyl-CoA is a central metabolite for cell growth and metabolic regulation. In the production of Aha, it serves as a substrate in the biosynthesis of Hse and acts as a cosubstrate in the MetX-catalyzed O-acetylation reaction. To elevate the intracellular levels of acetyl-CoA, Schipp et al. supplemented cell cultures with pantothenic acid, the precursor for the biosynthesis of acetyl-CoA. However, the addition of precursors such as pantothenic acid or Hse is rather costly beyond the shake flask scale. , Thus, we searched for inexpensive culture supplements to further improve Aha biosynthesis. ,,− In E. coli, acetyl-CoA can be biosynthesized from d-glucose, acetate or fatty acids. , Among these pathways, the route from acetate is most efficient, as it is short and minimizes carbon loss. Acetyl-CoA is produced from acetate either via acetyl-CoA synthetase (Acs) or through the phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase (Pta–AckA) pathway. ,− The Pta–AckA pathway occurs efficiently only at high extracellular acetate level. If the acetate level is low, acetyl-CoA is broken down to acetate and CoA-SH since the Pta–AckA pathway is reversible. The Acs and Pta–AckA pathways consume both 1 mol of ATP per mol of acetyl-CoA produced. Therefore, we considered that enhancing the flux through the Pta–AckA pathway by adding acetate to the medium was a promising strategy to increase acetyl-CoA availability in E. coli. Acetyl-CoA enters the citrate cycle where it is consumed by citrate synthase for the condensation with oxaloacetate to yield citrate. To reduce the expenditure of acetyl-CoA for citrate biosynthesis, we extended our evaluation to the supplementation of the growth medium with sodium citrate as an economically viable feedstock. We screened different acetate and citrate feeding strategies in fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. The cell cultures were pulsed with NaN3 every hour to reach a total addition of 5 μmol (Figure ).
4.

Effect of media additives during Aha production. The impact of different media additives on the production of Aha and its intermediary metabolite OAH were analyzed in fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures of E. coli eXpress V1 {pXYIII} 8 h postinduction of metXY expression. The concentration of the intermediary metabolite OAH was measured with and without (OAH*) the addition of 5 μmol NaN3. Refer to the Materials and Methods section for details of HPLC analysis of Aha and OAH. Data from a representative biological experiment are shown and the results from an independent biological replicate are presented in Figure S3. At induction of metXY, NaN3 was added in pulses every hour to reach a total addition of 5 μmol equaling 2 mmol/gCDM.
We assessed the concentration of biosynthesized Aha and its metabolic intermediate, OAH to monitor the cascade reaction. Upon induction of metXY expression, OAH accumulated as expected when NaN3 was omitted (Figure ). We observed that the supplementation of citrate to the culture medium did not have a pronounced influence on the production of OAH nor Aha (Figure ), and therefore we excluded it from subsequent experiments. In contrast, we found that the addition of ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) to the culture medium led to a pronounced increase in the Aha level. While the supplementation of the cells with 9–10 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM led to a 2-fold increase in the production of OAH and Aha relative to the unsupplemented culture, 18–22 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM did not further elevate it. Acetate accumulation in E. coli leads to intracellular acidification, which increases the metabolic burden and may inhibit cell growth. We observed a growth retardation of up to 23% in the presence of 9 to 22 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM relative to the unsupplemented culture (Figure ).
Next, we explored whether supplementing the cells with Hse would alleviate a potential shortage of the metabolite for Aha biosynthesis. We found that relative to the unsupplemented culture, the addition of 1 mmol Hse/gCDM slightly increased the level of OAH in the absence of NaN3 yet doubled the production of Aha in its presence (Figure ). This observation indicates that the reaction of OAH with NaN3 acts as a “sink” for OAH. If it is not consumed, it accumulates and may trigger feedback inhibition of MetX as was observed previously in C. glutamicum. Although it is not known whether MetX from D. radiodurans is also feedback inhibited by its product OAH (vide infra), a block in the MetX step of Aha biosynthesis presumably leads to the accumulation of Hse, the precursor of OAH (Figure ). Kotre et al. demonstrated that Hse exerts feedback inhibition on its own biosynthesis in E. coli by inhibiting glutamate dehydrogenase activity. From this perspective, supplementation of Hse or elevated OAH levels, e.g. by feeding of NH4OAc, should be coupled to an efficient transformation of OAH into Aha for high productivity of the biosynthesis pathway. In our study, supplementation of 1 mmol Hse/gCDM yielded Aha levels comparable to those obtained by feeding 9–10 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM. Since the latter is substantially less expensive than the first (approximately 1.5 orders of magnitude per gram; our own online search result , ) NH4OAc represents a viable feed stock for scalable Aha biosynthesis.
To conclude, we improved the accumulation of Aha by supplying acetate as an inexpensive medium ingredient as opposed to the addition of expensive compounds such as Hse or pantothenic acid in previous reports. ,
Scaling Up from Fed-Batch-like μ-Bioreactor to 1 L Fed-Batch Bioreactor Cultures Reduced Aha Production
Next, we explored the optimal NaN3 feeding strategy. Since feeding fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures is not practical, we scaled-up the Aha production to 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures and first employed continuous addition of NaN3. In the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures d-glucose was enzymatically released from dextran to simulate a fed-batch phase. In the 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures in contrast, we continuously fed d-glucose medium (Table S5) to the cells in a controlled manner to maintain a predefined growth rate (see Materials and Methods for technical details). We started the bioprocess with a batch phase for 12 h at 37 °C until the CDM reached a total of 10 g/L. Afterward, we shifted the cells to an exponential feed phase for 21 h at 30 °C with a specific growth rate of 0.1 h–1 targeting a final CDM of 40 g/L. Finally, the cells were subjected to a linear feeding phase for 12 h with a decreasing growth rate ranging from 0.04 to 0.03 h–1. The targeted CDM at the end of fermentation was 45 g/L. This final feed phase was linear because the expression of the gp2 stalled growth as expected. , We evaluated the three strains that had shown the highest Aha production levels in the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures and confirmed that eXpress V1{pXYIII} was the most suitable variant for the production of Aha (Figure ). The lower NaN3-to-biomass ratio for BL21(DE3){pXYIII} reflected its continued biomass accumulation during the production phase, in contrast to the growth-decoupled eXpress V1{pXYIII} and V2{pXYIII} strains.
5.

E. coli eXpress V1{pXYIII} showed highest production of Aha in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures in comparison to the other variants. The Aha concentration in the medium supernatant was assessed using mass spectrometry at 12 h postinduction of metXY expression. NaN3 was linearly fed after metXY induction to reach 30 mmol at the end of fermentation. The resulting mmol NaN3/gCDM are indicated for each strain. The details of the bioprocess are outlined in the Materials and Methods section. E. coli strain designations are B, BL21(DE3); V2, eXpress V2; V1, eXpress V1. The data from single experiments are shown.
As in the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures (Figure S1), metY was clearly expressed at higher levels than metX in fed-batch bioreactor cultures (Figure S5). Figure shows a comparison of the MetXY levels of strain eXpress V1{pXYIII} normalized to cell dry mass at different scales, i.e. fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor culture (800 μL, 3.5 g/L CDM) and 1 L fed-batch bioreactor culture (1.2 L, 45 g/L CDM).
6.

Comparison of metXY expression in E. coli eXpress V1{pXYIII} at different scales. Soluble protein fractions were normalized to 1 mg biomass (CDM). (A) Fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor culture (800 μL, 3.5 g/L CDM); (B) 1 L fed-batch bioreactor culture (1.2 L, 45 g/L CDM). The calculated molecular weights of MetX and MetY are 35 and 47 kDa. A Coomassie-stained 4–12% SDS-PA gel is shown, the sizes of the molecular weight marker bands are indicated on the left margin. The production of MetXY is shown at different times, 8–20 h postinduction (h) of metXY. The lanes shown were cropped from the same gel.
There was no detectable difference in metXY expression between the two scales. MetX and MetY protein expression levels were respectively 320 mg (10 mg/gCDM) and 3.5 g (110 mg/gCDM) per liter of eXpress V1{pXYIII} fed-batch bioreactor culture (Figure B). However, the yield of Aha produced in the fed-batch bioreactor culture was approximately 20-fold lower than in the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor culture (0.03 mmol/gCDM vs 0.54 mmol/gCDM). This difference cannot be attributed to the expression levels of metXY genes as they were comparable at the two scales (Figure ). Currently, we do not have an explanation for this rather unexpected observation. Fed-batch-like μ-bioreactors are useful for screening process parameters at an early development stage, but their performance metrics do not necessarily translate directly to larger-scale bioreactors. A major difference between the two cultivation scales lies in the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) and utilization under differing biomass concentrations. NaN3 is well-known to inhibit components of the respiratory chain in E. coli, thereby reducing proton-motive-force-driven ATP synthesis. − This effect might be exacerbated in high cell density fed-batch bioreactor cultures where respiratory demand is elevated and respiratory control is tighter. Consequently, energy generation becomes more sensitive to partial inhibition of electron transport even under regulated oxygen conditions. In such cultures, the ATP demand as well as transport and biosynthetic flux might be higher than in fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. A reduction in cellular energy status can therefore affect pathways involved in amino acid biosynthesis. In particular, a diminished proton motive force impairs membrane-associated transport processes, including nutrient uptake, which may constrain metabolic flux toward Aha. Taken together, these energy-limiting effects provide a plausible physiological explanation for the reduced Aha yield observed at high cell density in the fed-batch scale relative to the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor scale. The observed limitation could also arise from differences in MetY turnover between the two scales or variations in the intracellular availability of NaN3. Intracellular factors such as metabolic flux distribution through Hse and acetyl-CoA pathways, redox balance, or the pyridoxal-5′-phosphate cofactor availability may influence MetY activity differently under μ-bioreactor conditions in comparison to fed-batch bioreactor cultures. MetY accepts a variety of nucleophiles, such as sulfide, methanethiol, ethanethiol, phenylthiol or cyanide for the synthesis of l-homocysteine, l-methionine, l-ethionine, S-phenyl-l-homocysteine and γ-cyano-α-aminobutyric acid. − Nevertheless, NaN3 appears to be a weak substrate under fed-batch cultivation conditions. The systematic analysis of the bioprocess parameters, alongside the characterization of MetY activity toward NaN3 compared to other nucleophiles, will help identify fed-batch bottlenecks and guide further improvement of Aha production via process optimization or enzyme engineering. Ultimately, the engineering of MetY to efficiently accept NaN3 as a substrate in combination with an optimized bioprocess that swiftly and quantitatively transforms the azide and OAH to Aha will be key for the scalable simultaneous biosynthesis and incorporation of Aha.
The uptake mechanism of NaN3 in E. coli is not known yet the compound is highly toxic to the cells, , so we focused on the NaN3 feeding regime as a key parameter for the Aha biosynthesis bioprocess. In shake-flask cultures, a maximum of 0.8 to 1 mM NaN3 can be added to a culture of 3 D 600. , The addition of approximately 1 mM NaN3 inhibits E. coli cell growth on agar plates. Mutant strains harboring mutations in the SecA protein exhibit a distinctive resilience to the inhibitory effects of NaN3, enabling them to sustain growth in the presence of elevated concentrations of NaN3, i.e. approximately 4 mM. We hypothesized that the toxicity limit in wild type strains could be avoided by the efficient conversion of NaN3 to Aha. To test the hypothesis, we continuously added NaN3 resulting in a cumulative addition of 0.6, 0.9, and 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM to eXpress V1{pXYIII} for 12 h postinduction of metXY (Figure ).
7.

Supplementation of the cells with 1 mmol of NaN3/gCDM resulted in the highest Aha production. This supplementation did not have a significant impact on the cell density. The results of 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures of E. coli eXpress V1 strain{pXYIII} are shown. (A) 0.6, 0.9, or 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM were fed to the three different bioreactor cultures over 12 h postinduction (p.i.) of metXY. The specific NaN3 supplementations (mmol/gCDM) correspond to a total amount of 20, 30, or 50 mmol NaN3 fed to the cells until the end of fermentation; (B) NaN3 feeding regimes did not influence the CDM of eXpress V1. 0, 0.6, 0.9, or 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM were fed to the three different bioreactor cultures over 12 h postinduction of metXY as described in the Materials and Methods section. CDM (g/L) values were corrected for dilution effects during the bioprocess. The data from single experiments are shown. n.d., not detected.
The cell density was slightly reduced compared to the control without NaN3 but the highest NaN3 supplementation of 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM did not significantly reduce the CDM in comparison to 0.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM (Figure B). We intended to measure the conversion of NaN3 into Aha by HPLC. However, the analysis failed because metabolites and other small molecules released by E. coli during the process increased the background compared to the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures. Alternatively, we determined the Aha levels in the medium supernatant of all fed-batch bioreactor cultures by mass spectrometry. Figure suggests that elevating the intracellular NaN3 levels increased the yield of Aha. The maximum Aha yield (0.030 mmol Aha/gCDM) was obtained by supplementing the cells with 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM. However, it was not significantly improved in comparison to the supplementation of 0.9 mmol NaN3/gCDM (Figure A). We measured the remaining NaN3 in the culture supernatant at the end of the fermentation. NaN3 is converted to ferric azide complex in the presence of a strong acid and ferric trichloride. Tsuge et al. described a spectrophotometric method to measure the ferric azide complex (Figure S6). Most of the NaN3 remained in the culture supernatant, which suggests a rather low conversion efficiency. Respectively, 96%, 83% and 92% of NaN3 were recovered in the culture supernatant of the 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures that received 0.6, 0.9, and 1.6 mmol NaN3/gCDM (Figure S7). Although cell viability was not significantly affected at the highest NaN3 supplementation tested (Figure B), intermediate supplementation was favorable for Aha biosynthesis. In this context, it might be relevant to further examine and potentially exploit the mutations implicated in the NaN3 resistance of some E. coli strains. − Since an elevated supplementation of NaN3 did not lead to a significantly enhanced cellular uptake and conversion of NaN3 to Aha, we opted for the specific supplementation of 0.9 mmol NaN3/gCDM in the subsequent experiments to maximize the conversion of NaN3. An efficient conversion of NaN3 to Aha during the bioprocess is key not only to maximize the product yield but also with respect to minimizing the disposal of the toxic educt.
Bioprocess Optimization Increased the Aha Biosynthesis to Levels Adequate for Supplementation-Based Incorporation
The supplementation of fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures with NH4OAc doubled the Aha production as described above. Thus, we scaled up the most suitable specific supplementation of NH4OAc according to the CDM of the 1 L fed-batch cultures. Even though the purpose of the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures was to facilitate the scale-up of the bioprocess, parameters such as the feeding regime, the shear stress, the osmotic pressure or oxygen concentrations differ substantially in the 1 L fed-batch culture. Therefore, we varied the supplementation with NH4OAc in the feed medium reaching 5, 10, and 14 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM at the end of fermentation. We hypothesized that we could increase the Aha yield by alleviating a potential feedback inhibition of D. radiodurans MetX by excess OAH, as previously reported for the enzyme from C. glutamicum. Wei et al. identified a triple F147L-M182I-M240A mutant of MetX from Leptospira meyeri that is insensitive to OAH inhibition. The homologous MetX from D. radiodurans contains the corresponding residues L137, I171 and L218. To generate a feedback inhibition-insensitive MetX, we mutated residue L218A while the remaining positions L137 and I171 were not changed. We constructed plasmid pX*YIII, encoding the potentially feedback inhibition-insensitive metX variant. The introduction of the feedback inhibition-insensitive MetX tripled the yield of Aha but slightly impaired the cell growth (Figure , pXYIII vs pX*YIII). This finding implies that MetX from D. radiodurans undergoes feedback inhibition as does the homologous enzyme from C. glutamicum.
8.

We produced up to 0.05 mmol Aha/gCDM corresponding to a titer of 1.4 mM Aha in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor culture. This increase in Aha biosynthesis was achieved by introducing a feedback inhibition-insensitive metX mutant (MetX L218A; X*) into the E. coli eXpress V1 host, the supplementation of 14 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM in the feed medium, and a gradient feeding regime of NaN3 (feed. regime). NH4OAc was supplemented continuously in the feed medium to reach the indicated specific supplementations at 12 h postinduction (p.i.) of metXY. For the continuous (conti.) NaN3 feeding regime, a total of 30 mmol NaN3 (1 mmol NaN3/gCDM) was fed over the time span of 12 h. For the gradient NaN3 feeding regime, we fed 15 mmol NaN3 from 0 to 4 h, 10 mmol from 4 to 8 h and 5 mmol from 8 to 12 h postinduction of metXY. The numbers above the bars indicate the measured CDM (g/L) at 12 h after induction of metXY. The data from single experiments are shown.
Since the feedback inhibition-insensitive metX allele (X*) increases the consumption of acetyl-CoA, we hypothesized that the depletion of this central metabolite led to an impairment of the cell growth. We intended to alleviate this impairment by increasing the NH4OAc supplementation, which might stimulate intracellular acetyl-CoA regeneration (Figure ). Although higher NH4OAc levels did not improve Aha yield per biomass, the volumetric Aha titers increased to 0.9, 1.0, and 1.1 mM for 6, 10, and 14 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM, respectively. This suggests that the higher ammonium acetate supply primarily enhanced biomass formation rather than the specific Aha production capacity of the cells. Finally, we fed the cells with a decreasing gradient of NaN3. A total of 30 mmol NaN3 was added in three steps, i.e. 15 mmol NaN3 from 0 to 4 h, 10 mmol from 4 to 8 h and 5 mmol from 8 to 12 h postinduction of metXY. This NaN3 feeding regime combined with the addition of 14 mmol NH4OAc/gCDM and the feedback inhibition-insensitive MetX mutant yielded a maximal Aha yield of 0.05 mmol/gCDM (1.4 mmol/L). As such, this production level well exceeds the commonly employed Aha concentration of 0.5 mM for SPI in shake-flask cultures as reviewed by Marin et al. Although we were able to scale-up and monitor the production of Aha in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures for the first time, 1.4 mM Aha might be insufficient for an upscaled SPI process at substantially higher cell density than shake flask cultures. Increased concentrations of NH4OAc supplementation in combination with the feedback inhibition-insensitive MetX mutant improved the Aha titer to a certain extent. In contrast, an increase in NaN3 did not lead to more Aha (Figure A), indicating a bottleneck at the MetY step of the pathway.
Under conditions yielding the highest Aha concentration (1.4 mM) in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures, we investigated whether Aha was unintentionally incorporated into the host proteome (Figure S8). Several factors influence this process. Aha is an approximately 400-fold poorer substrate for MetRS compared to methionine. In addition, the intracellular methionine concentration, around 100–300 μM, may be further elevated due to the activity of MetY, which produces the methionine precursor l-homocysteine from O-acetylhomoserine and hydrogen sulfide. Consistent with these considerations, barely detectable fluorescence was observed in the host proteome upon bioorthogonal conjugation with an alkyne fluorophore (Figure S8), indicating negligible misincorporation of biosynthesized Aha. However, elevated Aha production or Met limitation might increase the incorporation levels. To prevent potential cellular effects at higher intracellular Aha levels, in situ product removal strategies could be implemented to continuously remove Aha from the culture broth during fermentation. As T7 RNA polymerase, MetX, and MetY contain Met residues, it is relevant to consider producing them prior to NaN3 supplementation. This would ensure their synthesis with native Met to avoid reduced activity or stability as reviewed by Marin et al.
To examine whether a prolonged bioprocess would be beneficial, we monitored the accumulation of Aha over time, up to 18 h postinduction of metXY. The Aha titer increased during the supplementation of the cells with NaN3 and it peaked at 10 h post induction of metXY. However, it decreased substantially after we stopped the NaN3 feed (Figure ).
9.

The production of Aha peaked at 10 h postinduction (p.i.) of the metXY genes. We monitored the accumulation of Aha during the protein production phase in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor culture. The culture received 30 mmol NaN3 (0.9 mmol NaN3/gCDM) over the time span of 12 h postinduction of metXY. NH4OAc was continuously supplied through the feed medium to reach a total addition of 180 mmol (6 mmol/gCDM) at 18 h postinduction of metXY. The concentration of Aha in the culture supernatant of E. coli eXpress V1{pX*YIII} cells was determined by MS. The data from a single experiment is shown.
Since we considered the volume increase during the fed-batch phase, the observed decrease in Aha levels was not attributable to biomass dilution. Specifically, the Aha yield decreased from 33 to 23 μmol/gCDM between 12 and 18 h postinduction of metXY (Figure ). The eXpress V1 strain is not auxotrophic for Met and thus the accidental incorporation of Aha into the host proteome, specifically at the level the data in Figure suggests, appears unlikely. Alternatively, the cells might satisfy a potentially increased nitrogen demand by metabolizing the biosynthesized Aha. Rova and co-workers recently highlighted the importance of the nitrogen supply for the microbial production of l-arginine, another nitrogen-rich amino acid.
Conclusions
For the first time, this study sheds light on the intricacies of Aha biosynthesis in E. coli. Employing an eXpress strain with growth decoupled from target protein production proved efficient in maximizing the expression of the cascade enzymes MetX and MetY. We established various analytical methods to monitor Aha production. Thin-layer chromatography was ideal for fast screening and accurate HPLC protocols were introduced to measure Aha and OAH concentrations. Among the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures, we found that the highest yield was obtained with E. coli eXpress V1{pXYIII}. This result correlated with the strongest metX expression in this strain as observed in the SDS-PAGE analysis. Aha’s biotechnological production was upscaled to 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures. The complexity of the culture medium challenged the determination of Aha by HPLC due to the high background, which we were able to eliminate by a HPLC-MS approach. We observed a drop in Aha yield between the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor culture and the fed-batch bioreactor culture. This difference might be attributed to specific constraints in the fed-batch bioreactor culture; while OTR is a critical parameter for high-cell-density cultivation, it remains uncontrolled at the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor scale. Additionally, the NaN3 levels in the culture supernatant were measured spectrophotometrically. Fine-tuning of the NaN3 feeding regime and of the production time improved the conversion of NaN3 to Aha. Our optimization efforts included the introduction of an OAH feedback inhibition-insensitive variant of MetX. The analysis of the metabolites in fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor cultures revealed that NH4OAc supplementation doubled the biosynthesis of the intermediary OAH. We achieved a maximal Aha production of 1.4 mM or 0.05 mmol/gCDM in 1 L fed-batch bioreactor cultures of E. coli eXpress V1 expressing the feedback inhibition-insensitive metX together with metY in a tandem array; supplementation with 430 mM NH4OAc; and a gradient feeding regime for NaN3 (Figure ). Our study contributes to advancing Aha to biotechnological applications. We observed that the scale-up from the fed-batch-like μ-bioreactor to the fed-batch bioreactor cultures resulted in a markedly different Aha yield. Our findings suggest that MetY may function as the rate-limiting enzyme in the Aha biosynthesis pathway. More research is necessary to substantially improve the conversion of the toxic precursor NaN3 such that the scalable cobiosynthesis of Aha and its direct incorporation into a protein of interest become viable. Future work should focus on improving NaN3 conversion efficiency through protein engineering of MetY, for example via rational design and directed evolution, combined with the implementation of azide-tolerant production strains, to enable scalable biosynthesis and cotranslational incorporation of Aha.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We greatly acknowledge Johannes Helm and Friedrich Altmann from the Institute of Biochemistry at BOKU University for their assistance with HPLC. We sincerely thank Gabriele Lhota and Karola Vorauer-Uhl for their expert support and generous assistance in the quantitative analysis of Aha using the OPA-HPLC method. We thank Alexander Doleschal for his excellent technical assistance and support during the fed-batch bioreactor culture experiments.
Glossary
List of Abbreviations
- Aha
l-azidohomoalanine
- CDM
cell dry mass
- D 600
attenuance at 600 nm
- DO
dissolved oxygen
- Hse
l-homoserine
- IPTG
isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside
- Met
l-methionine
- MetX
l-homoserine-O-acetyltransferase
- MetY
O-acetyl-l-homoserine sulfhydrylase
- MS
mass spectrometry
- NaN3
sodium azide
- ncAA
noncanonical amino acid
- NH4OAc
ammonium acetate
- OAH
O-acetyl-l-homoserine
- OPA-HPLC
o-phthalaldehyde derivatization combined with high-performance liquid chromatography
- OTR
oxygen transfer rate
- RNAP
RNA polymerase
- SDS-PAGE
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- SPI
supplementation-based incorporation
- TLC
thin-layer chromatography
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c05952.
Additional experimental method; SDS-PA gels of metXY expression at different scales (Figures S1 and S5) and Aha misincorporation into the host proteome (Figure S8); biological replicates (Figures S2 and S3); thin-layer chromatography to monitor Aha biosynthesis (Figure S4); colorimetric assay for azide detection (Figure S6); residual NaN3 in media supernatants (Figure S7); primer list (Table S1), DNA and amino acid sequences list (Table S2), media recipes (Tables S3–S5); strains and plasmids used in the study (Table S6) (PDF)
B.W. conceived the general project idea. C.L. designed and performed the experiments. C.L. wrote the manuscript with support from B.W. and G.S. All authors provided critical feedback and contributed to the review of the manuscript.
This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [grant reference: No. 899732 (PURE Project)]. This work was supported by the Bioprocess Engineering Doctoral School of the BOKU University. The COMET center acib: Next Generation Bioproduction is funded by BMK, BMAW, SFG, Standortagentur Tirol, Government of Lower Austria and Vienna Business Agency in the framework of COMETCompetence Centers for Excellent Technologies. The COMET-Funding Program is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG. Open access funding provided by BOKU University. Open access funding provided by Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Zhou K. Z. Q., Obexer R.. Non-Canonical Amino Acids for Engineering Peptides and Proteins with new Functions. Isr. J. Chem. 2024;64(8–9):e202400006. doi: 10.1002/ijch.202400006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Birch-Price Z., Hardy F. J., Lister T. M., Kohn A. R., Green A. P.. Noncanonical amino acids in biocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(14):8740–8786. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer B., Della-Felice F., Illies J. H., Iglesias-Moncayo E., Roelfes G., Drienovská I.. Noncanonical Amino Acids: Bringing New-to-Nature Functionalities to Biocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(19):10877–10923. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costello A., Peterson A. A., Chen P.-H., Bagirzadeh R., Lanster D. L., Badran A. H.. Genetic Code Expansion History and Modern Innovations. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(21):11962–12005. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jann C., Giofré S., Bhattacharjee R., Lemke E. A.. Cracking the Code: Reprogramming the Genetic Script in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes to Harness the Power of Noncanonical Amino Acids. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(18):10281–10362. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu W., Guo J.. Cellular Site-Specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids in Synthetic Biology. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(18):10577–10617. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koch N. G., Budisa N.. Evolution of Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase: From Methanogenesis to Genetic Code Expansion. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(16):9580–9608. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casteleijn M. G., Abendroth U., Zemella A., Walter R., Rashmi R., Haag R., Kubick S.. Beyond In Vivo, Pharmaceutical Molecule Production in Cell-Free Systems and the Use of Noncanonical Amino Acids Therein. Chem. Rev. 2025;125(3):1303–1331. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osgood A. O., Huang Z., Szalay K. H., Chatterjee A.. Strategies to Expand the Genetic Code of Mammalian Cells. Chem. Rev. 2025;125(4):2474–2501. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J.-C., Kim Y., Cho S., Park H.-S.. Noncanonical Amino Acid Incorporation in Animals and Animal Cells. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(22):12463–12497. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravikumar Y., Nadarajan S. P., Hyeon Yoo T., Lee C.-s., Yun H.. Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis-based enzyme engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33(8):462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderhuber N., Fladischer P., Gruber-Khadjawi M., Mairhofer J., Striedner G., Wiltschi B.. High-level biosynthesis of norleucine in E. coli for the economic labeling of proteins. J. Biotechnol. 2016;235:100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen L., Xin X., Zhang Y., Li S., Zhao X., Li S., Xu Z.. Advances in Biosynthesis of Non-Canonical Amino Acids (ncAAs) and the Methods of ncAAs Incorporation into Proteins. Molecules. 2023;28:6745. doi: 10.3390/molecules28186745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, S. The non-protein amino acids. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Amino Acids; Barrett, G. C. , Ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 1985; pp 55–138. [Google Scholar]
- Zou H., Li L., Zhang T., Shi M., Zhang N., Huang J., Xian M.. Biosynthesis and biotechnological application of non-canonical amino acids: Complex and unclear. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018;36(7):1917–1927. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiick K. L., Saxon E., Tirrell D. A., Bertozzi C. R.. Incorporation of azides into recombinant proteins for chemoselective modification by the Staudinger ligation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99(1):19–24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012583299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marin Ž., Lacombe C., Rostami S., Arasteh Kani A., Borgonovo A., Cserjan-Puschmann M., Mairhofer J., Striedner G., Wiltschi B.. Residue-Specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids in Auxotrophic Hosts: Quo Vadis? Chem. Rev. 2025;125(10):4840–4932. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Majekodunmi T., Britton D., Montclare J. K.. Engineered proteins and materials utilizing residue-specific noncanonical amino acid incorporation. Chem. Rev. 2024;124(15):9113–9135. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hatzenpichler R., Scheller S., Tavormina P. L., Babin B. M., Tirrell D. A., Orphan V. J.. In situ visualization of newly synthesized proteins in environmental microbes using amino acid tagging and click chemistry. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;16(8):2568–2590. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beatty K. E., Fisk J. D., Smart B. P., Lu Y. Y., Szychowski J., Hangauer M. J., Baskin J. M., Bertozzi C. R., Tirrell D. A.. Live-Cell Imaging of Cellular Proteins by a Strain-Promoted Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition. ChemBioChem. 2010;11(15):2092–2095. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lacombe C., Leonhardt C., Humenik M., Wiltschi B., Scheibel T.. Directed Functionalization of Recombinant Spider Silk Nonwoven Membranes with Antibodies Using Non-Canonical Amino Acids. Adv. Mater. 2026;38(14):e19707. doi: 10.1002/adma.202519707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ngo J. T., Champion J. A., Mahdavi A., Tanrikulu I. C., Beatty K. E., Connor R. E., Yoo T. H., Dieterich D. C., Schuman E. M., Tirrell D. A.. Cell-selective metabolic labeling of proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009;5(10):715–717. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthew S. A. L., Seib F. P.. Silk Bioconjugates: From Chemistry and Concept to Application. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2024;10(1):12–28. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agard N. J., Prescher J. A., Bertozzi C. R.. A Strain-Promoted [3 + 2] Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition for Covalent Modification of Biomolecules in Living Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126(46):15046–15047. doi: 10.1021/ja044996f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pickens C. J., Johnson S. N., Pressnall M. M., Leon M. A., Berkland C. J.. Practical Considerations, Challenges, and Limitations of Bioconjugation via Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018;29(3):686–701. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rostovtsev V. V., Green L. G., Fokin V. V., Sharpless K. B. A.. Stepwise Huisgen Cycloaddition Process: Copper(I)-Catalyzed Regioselective “Ligation” of Azides and Terminal Alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41(14):2596–2599. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2596::AID-ANIE2596>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S., Zhu H., Wang J., Wang X., Li X., Ma C., Wen L., Yu B., Wang Y., Li J., Wang P. G.. Comparative analysis of Cu (I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) and strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) in O-GlcNAc proteomics. Electrophoresis. 2016;37(11):1431–1436. doi: 10.1002/elps.201500491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saleh A. M., Wilding K. M., Calve S., Bundy B. C., Kinzer-Ursem T. L.. Non-canonical amino acid labeling in proteomics and biotechnology. J. Biol. Eng. 2019;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0166-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beatty K. E., Xie F., Wang Q., Tirrell D. A.. Selective dye-labeling of newly synthesized proteins in bacterial cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127(41):14150–14151. doi: 10.1021/ja054643w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Y., Thota B. N. S., Haag R., Budisa N.. Dendronylation: Residue-specific chemoselective attachment of oligoglycerol dendrimers on proteins with noncanonical amino acids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015;25(22):5247–5249. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.09.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdeljabbar D. M., Piscotta F. J., Zhang S., James Link A.. Protein stapling via azide–alkyne ligation. Chem. Commun. 2014;50(94):14900–14903. doi: 10.1039/C4CC06528J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patel K. G., Swartz J. R.. Surface Functionalization of Virus-Like Particles by Direct Conjugation Using Azide–Alkyne Click Chemistry. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22(3):376–387. doi: 10.1021/bc100367u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dieterich D. C., Lee J. J., Link A. J., Graumann J., Tirrell D. A., Schuman E. M.. Labeling, detection and identification of newly synthesized proteomes with bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging. Nat. Protoc. 2007;2(3):532–540. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dieterich D. C., Link A. J., Graumann J., Tirrell D. A., Schuman E. M.. Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103(25):9482–9487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601637103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiltschi B., Wenger W., Nehring S., Budisa N.. Expanding the genetic code of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with methionine analogues. Yeast. 2008;25(11):775–786. doi: 10.1002/yea.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koch N. G., Goettig P., Rappsilber J., Budisa N.. Engineering pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase for the incorporation of non-canonical amino acids with smaller side chains. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11194. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schipp C. J., Ma Y., Al-Shameri A., D’Alessio F., Neubauer P., Contestabile R., Budisa N., di Salvo M. L.. An Engineered Escherichia coli Strain with Synthetic Metabolism for in-Cell Production of Translationally Active Methionine Derivatives. ChemBioChem. 2020;21(24):3525–3538. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Y., Biava H., Contestabile R., Budisa N., di Salvo M. L.. Coupling bioorthogonal chemistries with artificial metabolism: intracellular biosynthesis of azidohomoalanine and its incorporation into recombinant proteins. Molecules. 2014;19(1):1004–1022. doi: 10.3390/molecules19011004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stargardt P., Feuchtenhofer L., Cserjan-Puschmann M., Striedner G., Mairhofer J.. Bacteriophage inspired growth-decoupled recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli . ACS Synth. Biol. 2020;9(6):1336–1348. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stargardt P., Striedner G., Mairhofer J.. Tunable expression rate control of a growth-decoupled T7 expression system by L-arabinose only. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01512-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei L., Wang Q., Xu N., Cheng J., Zhou W., Han G., Jiang H., Liu J., Ma Y.. Combining protein and metabolic engineering strategies for high-level production of O-acetylhomoserine in Escherichia coli . ACS Synth. Biol. 2019;8(5):1153–1167. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Studier F. W., Moffatt B. A.. Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J. Mol. Biol. 1986;189(1):113–130. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang N. C., Chilkoti A.. Combinatorial codon scrambling enables scalable gene synthesis and amplification of repetitive proteins. Nat. Mater. 2016;15(4):419–424. doi: 10.1038/nmat4521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marisch K., Bayer K., Scharl T., Mairhofer J., Krempl P. M., Hummel K., Razzazi-Fazeli E., Striedner G.. A comparative analysis of industrial Escherichia coli K–12 and B strains in high-glucose batch cultivations on process-, transcriptome- and proteome level. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahm D. H., Kim S. H., Pan J., Rhee J. S.. Maximum yield of foreign lipase in Escherichia coli HB101 limited by duration of protein expression. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1995;79(3):236–241. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(95)90609-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fink M., Vazulka S., Egger E., Jarmer J., Grabherr R., Cserjan-Puschmann M., Striedner G.. Microbioreactor cultivations of Fab-producing Escherichia coli reveal genome-integrated systems as suitable for prospective studies on direct Fab expression effects. Biotechnol. J. 2019;14:1800637. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., Tinevez J.-Y., White D. J., Hartenstein V., Eliceiri K., Tomancak P., Cardona A.. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9(7):676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Széliová D., Štor J., Thiel I., Weinguny M., Hanscho M., Lhota G., Borth N., Zanghellini J., Ruckerbauer D. E., Rocha I.. Inclusion of maintenance energy improves the intracellular flux predictions of CHO. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2021;17(6):e1009022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Wei M., Zhao G., Zhang W., Li Y., Lin B., Li Y., Xu Q., Chen N., Zhang C.. High-level production of L-homoserine using a non-induced, non-auxotrophic Escherichia coli chassis through metabolic engineering. Bioresour. Technol. 2021;327:124814. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng Y., Maurais H. E., Etheridge K., Sarpeshkar R.. Gene syntaxes modulate gene expression and circuit behavior on plasmids. J. Biol. Eng. 2025;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13036-025-00493-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwaiger K. N., Voit A., Dobiašová H., Luley C., Wiltschi B., Nidetzky B.. Plasmid Design for Tunable Two-Enzyme Co-Expression Promotes Whole-Cell Production of Cellobiose. Biotechnol. J. 2020;15(11):2000063. doi: 10.1002/biot.202000063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosano G. L., Ceccarelli E. A.. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:172. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hesselbach B. A., Nakada D. A. I.. Inactive complex formation between E. coli RNA polymerase and inhibitor protein purified from T7 phage infected cells. Nature. 1975;258(5533):354–357. doi: 10.1038/258354a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hesselbach B. A., Nakada D.. Host Shutoff Function of Bacteriophage T7: Involvement of T7 Gene 2 and Gene 0.7 in the Inactivation of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase. J. Virol. 1977;24(3):736–745. doi: 10.1128/jvi.24.3.736-745.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nechaev S., Severinov K.. Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T7 gene 2 protein. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;289(4):815–826. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little R. H., Cheesman M. R., Thomson A. J., Greenwood C., Watmough N. J.. Cytochrome bo from Escherichia coli: binding of azide to CuB. Biochemistry. 1996;35(43):13780–13787. doi: 10.1021/bi961221d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huie J., Silhavy T.. Suppression of signal sequence defects and azide resistance in Escherichia coli commonly result from the same mutations in secA. J. Bacteriol. 1995;177(12):3518–3526. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.12.3518-3526.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fortin Y., Phoenix P., Drapeau G.. Mutations conferring resistance to azide in Escherichia coli occur primarily in the secA gene. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172(11):6607–6610. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.11.6607-6610.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver D., Cabelli R., Dolan K., Jarosik G.. Azide-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli alter the SecA protein, an azide-sensitive component of the protein export machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990;87(21):8227–8231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth, C. L-homoserine (2.35 EUR/g). https://www.carlroth.com/com/en/research-chemicals/l-homoserine/p/2n92.5 (accessed April 14, 2026).
- Roth, C. Calcium D(+)-pantothenate (0.79 EUR/g). https://www.carlroth.com/com/en/vitamine/calcium-d%28%2B%29-pantothenate/p/3812.1 (accessed April 14, 2026).
- Liu P., Zhang B., Yao Z.-H., Liu Z.-Q., Zheng Y.-G.. Multiplex Design of the Metabolic Network for Production of L-Homoserine in Escherichia coli . Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;86(20):e01477–01420. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01477-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu P., Liu J.-S., Zhang B., Liu Z.-Q., Zheng Y.-G.. Increasement of O-acetylhomoserine production in Escherichia coli by modification of glycerol-oxidative pathway coupled with optimization of fermentation. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021;43(1):105–117. doi: 10.1007/s10529-020-03031-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mu Q., Zhang S., Mao X., Tao Y., Yu B.. Highly efficient production of L-homoserine in Escherichia coli by engineering a redox balance route. Metab. Eng. 2021;67:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vo T. M., Park S.. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli W3110 for efficient production of homoserine from glucose. Metab. Eng. 2022;73:104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S., Yang W., Chen H., Liu B., Lin B., Tao Y.. Metabolic engineering for efficient supply of acetyl-CoA from different carbon sources in Escherichia coli . Microb. Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1177-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krivoruchko A., Zhang Y., Siewers V., Chen Y., Nielsen J.. Microbial acetyl-CoA metabolism and metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2015;28:28–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumari S., Tishel R., Eisenbach M., Wolfe A. J.. Cloning, characterization, and functional expression of acs, the gene which encodes acetyl coenzyme A synthetase in Escherichia coli . J. Bacteriol. 1995;177(10):2878–2886. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.10.2878-2886.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown T. D., Jones-Mortimer M. C., Kornberg H. L.. The enzymic interconversion of acetate and acetyl-coenzyme A in Escherichia coli . J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977;102(2):327–336. doi: 10.1099/00221287-102-2-327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enjalbert B., Millard P., Dinclaux M., Portais J.-C., Létisse F.. Acetate fluxes in Escherichia coli are determined by the thermodynamic control of the Pta-AckA pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):42135. doi: 10.1038/srep42135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li N., Zeng W., Zhou J., Xu S.. O-Acetyl-L-homoserine production enhanced by pathway strengthening and acetate supplementation in Corynebacterium glutamicum . Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell J. B., Diez-Gonzalez F.. The Effects of Fermentation Acids on Bacterial Growth. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 1997;39:205–234. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2911(08)60017-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotre A. M., Sullivan S. J., Savageau M. A.. Metabolic Regulation by Homoserine in Escherichia coli B/r. J. Bacteriol. 1973;116(2):663–672. doi: 10.1128/jb.116.2.663-672.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roth, C. Ammonium acetate (0.08 EUR/g). https://www.carlroth.com/com/en/a-to-z/ammonium-acetate/p/t872.5 (accessed April 14, 2026).
- Fink M., Cserjan-Puschmann M., Reinisch D., Striedner G.. High-throughput microbioreactor provides a capable tool for early stage bioprocess development. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):2056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81633-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noumi T., Maeda M., Futai M.. Mode of inhibition of sodium azide on H+-ATPase of Escherichia coli . FEBS Lett. 1987;213(2):381–384. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81526-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lichstein H. C.. Studies of the Effect of Sodium Azide on Microbic Growth and Respiration: III. The Effect of Sodium Azide on the Gas Metabolism of B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa and the Influence of Pyocyanine on the Gas Exchange of a Pyocyanine-Free Strain of P. aeruginosa in the Presence of Sodium Azide. J. Bacteriol. 1944;47(3):239–251. doi: 10.1128/jb.47.3.239-251.1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darvishi S., Girault H. H.. Revealing the Effects of Three Different Antimicrobial Agents on E. coli Biofilms by Using Soft-Probe Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Appl. Nano. 2023;4(3):260–279. doi: 10.3390/applnano4030015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Belfaiza J., Martel A., Margarita D., Saint Girons I.. Direct sulfhydrylation for methionine biosynthesis in Leptospira meyeri . J. Bacteriol. 1998;180(2):250–255. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.2.250-255.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chocat P., Esaki N., Tanaka H., Soda K.. Synthesis of Selenocystine and Selenohomocystine with O-Acetylhomoserine Sulfhydrylase. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985;49(4):1143–1150. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1985.10866849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Omura H., Ikemoto M., Kobayashi M., Shimizu S., Yoshida T., Nagasawa T.. Purification, characterization and gene cloning of thermostable O-acetyl-l-homoserine sulfhydrylase forming γ-cyano-α-aminobutyric acid. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2003;96(1):53–58. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90096-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolten C. J., Schröder H., Dickschat J., Wittmann C.. Towards methionine overproduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum--methanethiol and dimethyldisulfide as reduced sulfur sources. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;20(8):1196–1203. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1002.02018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamagata S.. Roles of O-acetyl-l-homoserine sulfhydrylases in microorganisms. Biochimie. 1989;71(11):1125–1143. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(89)90016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuge K., Kataoka M., Seto Y.. Rapid determination of cyanide and azide in beverages by microdiffusion spectrophotometric method. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2001;25(4):228–236. doi: 10.1093/jat/25.4.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kadner R. J.. Transport systems for L-methionine in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1974;117(1):232–241. doi: 10.1128/jb.117.1.232-241.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ginésy M., Rusanova-Naydenova D., Rova U.. Tuning of the Carbon-to-Nitrogen Ratio for the Production of L-Arginine by Escherichia coli . Fermentation. 2017;3(4):60. doi: 10.3390/fermentation3040060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
