Skip to main content
BMC Microbiology logoLink to BMC Microbiology
. 2026 Jul 14;26:890. doi: 10.1186/s12866-026-05410-z

Genomic characterization of novel lytic bacteriophages targeting carbapenemase producing multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from Ethiopia: a molecular study

Assefa Asnakew Abebe 1,2,✉, Alemayehu Godana Birhanu 1, Molalegne Bitew 3, Dawit Hailu Alemayehu 4, Abaysew Ayele 4, Yimer Demssie 4, Keyru Tuki 3, Lanchisl Tsegaye Mulualem 5, Tesfaye Sisay Tessema 1
PMCID: PMC13670530  PMID: 42449213

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is a critical pathogen responsible for a wide range of severe infections. Its escalating resistance to frontline antimicrobials, particularly carbapenems, severely compromises existing therapeutic options and undermines current treatment strategies. This clinical challenge is further exacerbated by the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains and hypervirulent lineages, which substantially complicate infection management and worsen patient outcomes. Ultimately, this alarming convergence of resistance and virulence presents a severe public health threat that necessitates the urgent development of novel therapeutic approaches; in this regard, phage therapy is emerging as a promising strategy. Bacteriophages and their derivatives have garnered increasing recognition as targeted antibacterial agents, demonstrating potent activity against carbapenemase producing and MDR K. pneumoniae in vitro models. They effectively lyse MDR strains, disrupt biofilm formation, and have shown promising therapeutic efficacy across various in vivo models. To ensure safety in clinical applications, genome sequencing is essential to identify and exclude undesirable genes, thereby determining therapeutic suitability. Here, we have sequenced and analyzed the genomic characteristics of seven lytic bacteriophages targeting carbapenemase-producing MDR K. pneumoniae. Genomic evaluation confirmed that these phages are strictly lytic and revealed the presence of distinct lysis modules across the genomes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these phages cluster within four genera of Caudoviricetes: Taipeivirus, Drulisvirus, Przondovirus, and Webervirus. The phage genomes ranged from 15,773 to 166,437 base pairs (bp) in length and encoded core structural and replication modules. Furthermore, distinct lytic modules predicted to have function in bacterial capsule degradation were identified across the genomes. Importantly, the absence of known virulence or toxin genes guarantees therapeutic safety and satisfies rigorous genomic criteria for clinical translation. These findings underscore the potential of these phages as a promising alternative for combating MDR and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae infections. Future in vivo investigations and clinical trials are essential to validate their therapeutic efficacy, safety profile, and optimal treatment protocols.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-05410-z.

Keywords: Phage therapy, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Carbapenemase, Multidrug resistant, Genomic characterization

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents one of the most pressing global public health threats, rendering currently available antibiotics ineffective [1, 2]. ESKAPE pathogens epitomize this crisis, as they are the most formidable multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, rendering currently available antibiotics ineffective. Among these, K. pneumoniae emerges as a leading cause of MDR infections. K. pneumoniae is an opportunistic Gram-negative encapsulated bacillus and a key member of the ESKAPE group of critical MDR pathogens, posing a major global public health threat [3, 4]. K. pneumoniae commonly found in the gastrointestinal tracts, upper respiratory tracts, skin of humans, livestock, and wildlife, as well as environmental niches like soil, water, plants, and sewage, this clinically important pathogen causes a diverse range of severe infections including pneumonia, urinary tract infections (UTIs), bloodstream infections (BSIs), septicemia, and wound infections [5, 6]. Its remarkable capacity to acquire and disseminate antimicrobial resistance (AMR)-driven by mechanisms such as production of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes (e.g., beta-lactamases and carbapenemases), efflux pumps, and plasmid-mediated gene transfer-has transformed this treatable commensal into a deadly pathogen [7]. This renders last-resort antibiotics, such as carbapenems, ineffective. The emergence of hypervirulent strains further exacerbates this threat, significantly increasing the challenge of effective treatment [8].

The incidence of MDR K. pneumoniae strains continues to rise alarmingly. Although multiple molecular pathways underpin this resistance, the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenemases remains the dominant mechanism driving therapeutic failure in this pathogen [7, 9, 10]. Notably, K. pneumoniae strains producing ESBLs and carbapenemases pose major clinical challenges due to their extreme resistance profiles and severely limited treatment options [11–13]. This bacterium also poses significant pathogenicity concerns, driven by the synergistic action of multiple virulence factors that promote host colonization, immune evasion, and systemic dissemination. Key contributors include lipopolysaccharides, iron acquisition systems, polysaccharide capsules, mucoviscosity-associated exopolysaccharides, and adhesins.

Evidence shows that K. pneumoniae isolates are increasingly exhibiting MDR profiles, accompanied by rising global rates of carbapenem resistance [7, 14]. This convergence of escalating virulence and resistance to existing antibiotics underscores the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies [15, 16]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) as a pathogen of top priority. This designation is attributed to its significant resistance to a broad spectrum of antibiotics, its prevalence in both healthcare settings and community environments, and the limited treatment options available for infections caused by this organism [14, 16, 17].

Alongside ESβ-producing strains, CRKP poses considerable challenges in clinical environments worldwide, contributing to heightened morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. The WHO’s 2024 Bacterial Priority Pathogens List highlights carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae as the most critical pathogen, emphasizing the urgent need for new therapeutic strategies to address this threat [18–20]. In this regard, phages have shown promising therapeutic potential. Recent research indicates that phages can effectively target MDR K. pneumoniae, including strains resistant to carbapenems and those producing carbapenemases and ESβLs [16, 21]. This growing body of evidence highlights phage therapy as a valuable tool for managing infections caused by these challenging pathogens [11–13]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that bacteriophages can effectively target multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae strains in both in vitro and in vivo contexts [15, 22–24].

Whole-genome sequencing ensures the safety and efficacy of bacteriophages for clinical applications by verifying lytic cycles, identifying key host-targeting proteins, excluding undesirable genes, and facilitating taxonomic classification. This comprehensive genomic characterization ensures safety and therapeutic suitability and meets regulatory standards for therapeutic use. In this study, we present the whole-genome sequences and detailed functional annotations of lytic bacteriophages isolated from diverse environmental sources in Ethiopia. These phages specifically target multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae, providing essential molecular data for the development of locally optimized phage therapies to address the antimicrobial resistance crisis in Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Bacteriophage isolates and host strains

Lytic bacteriophages targeting K. pneumoniae were isolated from wastewater, hospital sewage, and soil samples (Table 1). These phages exhibited significant in vitro lytic activity and therapeutic efficacy against MDR strains of K. pneumoniae. A comprehensive biological characterization, encompassing molecular identification, isolation, and classification, is provided in our preceding studies [25]. The molecular characterization and AMR profile of the bacterial isolates used in this investigation are described in [9].

Table 1.

Isolation sources and characteristics of study bacteriophages

S.no Phage isolate Isolation source PCR−classified phage genus Host Host Virulence and AMR gene profile Host AMR Profile
1 KFM-TASP06 River Taipeivirus TASP06 blaCTX−M, blaNDM, blaSHV, blaTEM, MrkA, MdtK, gyrA, ArmA MDR
2 TTM-TASP117 Sewage Taipeivirus T ASP117 blaCTX−M, blaNDM, blaSHV, MdtK, gyrA MDR
3 ZHS-TASP18 Soil Drulisvirus TASP18 blaNDM, blaSHV, blaTEM, MrkA, gyrA, ArmA MDR
4 AKM-TASP09 River Webervirus TASP09 blaCTX−M, blaSHV, MrkA, mrkD, mdtK, rmpA MDR
5 BYM-TASP37 River Drulisvirus TASP37 blaCTX−M, blaNDM, blaSHV, gyrA, rmpA MDR
6 GKM-TASP92 River Taipeivirus TASP92 blaCTX−M, blaNDM, blaSHV, FimH MDR
7 MHM-TASP32 Sewage Przondovirus TASP32 MrkA, mrkD, mdtK, blaCTX−M, blaNDM, blaSHV MDR

Phage genome extraction and quality analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted following a previously established protocol [22]. Briefly, the phage lysates were treated with DNase and RNase (1 h, 37 °C) to degrade extracellular nucleic acids, followed by enzyme inactivation with 20 mM EDTA. Proteinase K digestion (3 mg/mL) was performed at 56 °C for 90 min, followed by phage DNA purification using the EZ-10 Spin Column Bacterial Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Omega Bio-tek, USA). The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed using a Nanodrop 2000/2000 C Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific™, USA), and its integrity was confirmed by running a 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

DNA libraries were prepared from purified phage DNA using the Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted in paired-end mode (2 × 150 bp) on the Illumina NextSeq 550 platform at the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) in Addis Ababa. The quality of raw sequencing reads was assessed using FastQC (v0.12.0) [26], and low-quality bases and adapters were trimmed using fastp (v0.23.0) [27, 28]. The quality of raw sequencing reads was assessed using FastQC (v0.12.0), and low-quality bases and adapters were trimmed using fastp (v0.23.0) [27]. Taxonomic classification was performed using Kraken2 (v2.1.2) [29] to categorize reads at the genus and species levels and to filter out potential contaminants. De novo assembly was performed with MEGAHIT (v1.2.9) [30], and contigs from each sample were scaffolded to improve assembly quality. QUAST (V5.0.2) [31] was used for assembly quality assessment, while CheckV (v1.5.0) [32] was used to evaluate genome completeness. Phage-specific downstream bioinformatics analysis, including completeness assessments, lifestyle predictions, structural gene annotations, and taxonomic classification, was performed using PhageScope [33], which provides comprehensive annotations including completeness assessments, phenotypic annotations, structural annotations, taxonomy, and functional annotations. The nucleotide sequences have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and are available under the accession numbers provided.

Molecular phylogenetics

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the nucleotide sequences of the major capsid protein (MCP) and the terminase large subunit (TerL) to evaluate the evolutionary relationships among the bacteriophages [34]. Additional sequences, including isolates from various countries, were retrieved from NCBI. For each query, MCP and TerL sequences with the best hits (e-value near zero and ≥ 90% sequence identity) were downloaded. To avoid geographic bias, no more than four phages per country were included when available. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm in MEGA 12 [35]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method in MEGA 12, employing the Tamura-Nei substitution model to accurately estimate evolutionary distances by accounting for multiple substitutions and varying transition/transversion rates. MCP sequences were employed as the primary phylogenetic marker for six phages. For one phage lacking adequate MCP sequence data, the terminase large subunit (TerL) sequence was used as an alternative. The resulting phylogenetic trees were visualized and annotated with metadata using iTOL (V.6) [36].

Results

Genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

Seven phages were sequenced for further characterization. The quality of the sequencing data was assessed and verified using FastQC to ensure the suitability of reads for downstream analysis. A total of 829,073 sequence reads were generated, with GC contents varying from 41 to 51%. Taxonomic classification using Kraken2 confirmed the presence of the target phage sequences while removing contaminant reads. The complete genome sequences of all phages were deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers PV588648, PV588649, PV588650, PV588651, PV588652, PV588653, and PV588654. All the sequenced bacteriophages had a linear double-stranded DNA genome (Table 2). The bacteriophages belong to the genera Taipeivirus, Drulisvirus, Przondovirus, and Webervirus (Table 2). The genomes of the bacteriophages ranged in size from 15,773 to 166,437 bp, and the G + C content ranged from 37.71 to 52.85% (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of seven bacteriophages sequenced in this study

Phage Gene bank accession number Genome size (bp) Genes GC content (%) Genus Family Life style Taxonomy
KFM-TASP06 PV588648 166,437 225 44.25 Taipeivirus Ackermannviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
TTM-TASP117 PV588649 167,792 227 44.87 Taipeivirus Ackermannviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
ZHS-TASP18 PV588650 47,475 57 52.85 Drulisvirus Ackermannviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
AKM-TASP09 PV588651 15,773 33 51.97 Webervirus Drexlerviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
BYM-TASP37 PV588652 17,666 26 44.50 Drulisvirus Ackermannviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
GKM-TASP92 PV588653 68,457 116 37.71 Taipeivirus Ackermannviridae Virulent Caudoviricetes
MHM-TASP32 PV588654 38,888 51 52.78 Przondovirus Studiervirinae Virulent Caudoviricetes

Molecular phylogeny

Phylogenetic relationships of the isolated phages were inferred using the major capsid protein (MCP) gene sequences for six phages, while the large terminase subunit gene was used for one phage, AKM-TASP09 (PV588651.1). The MCP-based phylogenetic analysis for six phages showed that phage BYM-TASP37 (PV588652.1) clusters closely with K. pneumoniae phage Kpn BHU3 (OL926437.1) and other members of the genus Drulisvirus (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic analysis of six phages based on major capsid protein nucleotide sequences. The figure illustrates the phylogenetic relationships among the phages KFM-TASP06 (PV588648.1), TTM-TASP117 (PV588649.1), GKM-TASP92 (PV588653.1), ZHM-TASP18 (PV588650.1), and BYM-TASP73 (PV588652.1), based on nucleotide sequences of their major capsid proteins. The concentric rings indicate the following classifications: the inner colored ring represents phage genus classification; the middle ring indicates the country of origin; and the outer ring shows the sample source

Phage ZHM-TASP50 (PV588650.1) grouped with K. pneumoniae phage VLCpiA1a (ON602732.1). Phages KFM-TASP06 (PV588648.1) and TTM-TASP117 (PV588649.1) formed a distinct cluster with K. pneumoniae phage Madison (PQ368523.1) (Fig. 1), with their MCP sequences exhibiting 100% nucleotide identity. Further BLAST analysis of phage KFM-TASP06 and TTM-TASP117 resulted in 99% identity and 96% coverage. Phylogenetic analysis of phage AKM-TASP09 was performed using the large terminase subunit gene. This analysis revealed its closest evolutionary relationship with Klebsiella phages vB_KpnS (NC_049836.1) and mfs (OP611406.1) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic analysis of phage AKM-TASP09 (PV588651.1) based on TerL

Genome annotation

Comprehensive annotation through PhageScope provided detailed functional categorization of predicted genes (Fig. 3). All phage genomes contained multiple proteins essential for various stages of the viral life cycle, including those involved in infection, assembly, replication, packaging, lysis, regulation, and several proteins with hypothetical functions. While the number and identities of these transmembranes differed among phages, several membrane-associated hypothetical proteins were identified. All phages encoded a range of infection-related proteins, particularly tail and tail spike proteins, which are essential for host recognition and adsorption. Structural components, such as capsid proteins and head scaffolding proteins, were universally present. None of the predicted open reading frames (ORFs) encode lysogenic phage-related proteins, such as transposases or integrases. Additionally, no genes associated with antibiotic resistance or bacterial virulence were detected.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Overview of genome annotation for seven sequenced bacteriophages

Hierarchical clustering of predicted protein sequences from seven bacteriophages revealed several conserved functional modules across the genomes. Proteins were categorized into groups such as lysis, integration, replication, tRNA-related functions, regulation, packaging, assembly, infection, immune response, and hypothetical proteins based on sequence similarity (Fig. 4). Canonical lysis modules, including lysozymes/endolysins and holins, were detected in dedicated clusters, with most phages exhibiting co-localization of these genes along with spanins, indicative of holin-lysozyme cassettes. Structural divergences were primarily observed in tail fiber proteins, while core structural components showed high conservation (supplementary file 2).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of predicted protein sequences from seven bacteriophages, grouped by functional modules

The annotated proteins were grouped into 10 functional categories: lysis, integration, replication, tRNA-related, regulation, packaging, assembly, infection, immune, and hypothetical, as indicated in Fig. 5 for phage ZHS-TASP18. Genome maps for the other six phages are provided in Supplementary file 1.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Annotated genome map of bacteriophage ZHS-TASP18

The Figure highlights the organization and distribution of protein-coding genes, categorized by their predicted roles in the phage lifecycle. The innermost rings indicate genomic coordinates, followed by GC content represented as a blue line graph. GC skew is shown with positive values in red and negative values in turquoise blue. The outermost ring depicts the identified open reading frames (ORFs). The genomes were analysed for proteins predicted to contain transmembrane helices (TMHs), revealing considerable variation among the phages. The number of proteins with transmembrane helices varied widely, from a single TMH protein annotated for BYM-TASP37 to up to 22 in KFM-TASP06. Notably, the proteins containing transmembrane helices were primarily holins and other membrane-associated proteins, as well as several hypothetical proteins. Circular genome maps of six phages, highlighting the locations of these TMH-containing proteins, can be found in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Annotated genome map of seven bacteriophages with transmembrane proteins. A phage AKM-TASP09, (B) phage KFM-TASP06, (C) phage GKM-TASP92, (D) phage MHM-TASP32, € phage TTM-TASP117, (F) phage ZHS-TASP18, and (G) BYM-TASP37. The innermost rings indicate genomic coordinates, followed by GC content represented as a blue line graph. GC skew is shown with positive values in red and negative values in turquoise blue. The outermost ring shows proteins identified with transmembrane proteins.

Analysis of transcriptional terminators across the seven sequenced phage genomes revealed notable variation in their abundance (Fig. 7). Phages TTM-TASP117 and KFM-TASP06 exhibited the highest number of predicted terminators, with 46 and 45, respectively. In contrast, BYM-TASP37 contained only a single predicted terminator, indicating a simpler transcriptional architecture that may facilitate rapid gene expression or streamlined lifecycle processes. Other phages, such as GKM-TASP92 with 11 terminators and ZHS-TASP18 with 2, show intermediate terminator counts.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

An annotated genome map of seven phages with transcription terminators: (A) phage ZHS-TASP18, (B) phage KFM-TASP06, (C) phage MHM-TASP32, (D) phage AKM-TASP09, (E) phage GKM-TASP92, (F) phage TTM-TASP117, and (G) phage BYM-TASP37

Discussion

In the current study, seven lytic bacteriophages targeting MDR K. pneumoniae were sequenced, revealing circular double-stranded DNA genomes, consistent with those of many tailed phages known to infect gram-negative bacteria [37]. All phages were confirmed to be strictly lytic, exhibiting no detectable genes associated with virulence factors or antimicrobial resistance. This finding is promising for their therapeutic potential, as temperate phages carry risks such as horizontal gene transfer and lysogenic conversion, which are not ideal for phage therapy. The phages were classified into the genera Przondovirus, Webervirus, Drulisvirus, and Taipeivirus. The sequence-based classification was in agreement with PCR-based identification [22]. Consistent with previous studies, the diversity of strictly lytic phages supports the genetic variability of bacteriophages targeting K. pneumoniae [38].

Whole-genome analysis of sequenced phages revealed conserved infection-related proteins, including tail and tail spike proteins, which are critical for host recognition and adsorption. These findings are consistent with previous research on phage host specificity [39]. We also identified fundamental structural elements, consistently observed across samples. Their ubiquitous presence underscores a conserved phage architecture essential for proper assembly and structural integrity. Additionally, the small terminase subunit, crucial for DNA packaging, was consistently annotated, supporting established roles in phage assembly [40]. The variable presence of endonucleases and exonucleases indicates diverse DNA processing strategies, similar to those found in other virulent phages. Importantly, no virulence factor or antibiotic resistance genes were detected, indicating the safety of these phages for therapeutic applications. This is in line with previous studies that emphasize the importance of strictly lytic phages, free from undesirable genes, for safe phage therapy. Similar genomic profiles have been reported by earlier studies in K. pneumoniae phages used against MDR strains [41, 42].

Sequence analysis of the lysis module indicated that the phages encode a diverse array of lytic enzymes, including holins, endolysins (lysozymes), spanins, peptidases, and lytic transglycosylases. These enzymes collectively contribute to the efficient degradation of bacterial cell walls and the subsequent lysis of host cells. Consistent with previous studies on Drulisvirus and Taipeivirus genera, which encode multiple putative depolymerases and lytic enzymes capable of degrading the polysaccharide capsule and peptidoglycan of K. pneumoniae [38], our phages harbor multiple ORFs with lyase, lytic transglycosylase, and peptidase activities. This supports the presence of enzymatic depolymerases targeting the bacterial cell wall, aligning with the known depolymerase profiles within these genera [43]. This correlation supports efficient and coordinated gene expression, consistent with previous studies showing regulatory elements scale with genome complexity [44].

The hierarchical clustering analysis revealed a modular organization within the bacteriophage genomes, highlighting conserved functional groups across diverse phages. The high sequence identity (65–92%) among major capsid proteins suggests a shared icosahedral architecture, consistent with their fundamental role in capsid formation [45]. Conversely, tail fiber proteins displayed significant divergence (25–55%), reflecting adaptations for different host recognition and specificity, a pattern typical in phages that accommodate host variability [46]. The presence of canonical lysis modules, including lysozymes/endolysins and holins. Structural protein modules associated with assembly and infection showed moderate to high homology, indicating functional conservation despite sequence differences. The observed mosaicism, particularly in tail fiber genes, underscores the dynamic evolution of phage genomes driven by host adaptation and horizontal gene transfer, influencing host range and infection efficacy [47].

The identification of Rz-like spanins in our phages highlights a conserved lysis mechanism characteristic of Klebsiella phages. Spanins disrupt the outer membrane following peptidoglycan degradation by endolysins, thereby completing the lysis process in Gram-negative hosts. Additionally, the detection of lysis inhibitors (RIIB and RIIA) reflects regulatory elements previously reported to modulate lysis timing, optimizing phage progeny release while preventing premature host cell lysis [48]. Notably, the putative depolymerase enzymes identified, particularly those containing lyase and lytic transglycosylase domains, represent promising candidates for novel antimicrobial agents. Prior research has demonstrated that Klebsiella phages encoding multiple depolymerases can degrade diverse capsule types, thereby enhancing infectivity and therapeutic efficacy [49].

Our findings suggest these phages may exhibit broad capsular specificity or be engineered to target specific K. pneumoniae capsule types, a strategy supported by the successful use of engineered phage depolymerases to overcome capsule-mediated resistance [49–52]. In the current study, the capsular type of the K. pneumoniae strains was not determined, which restricts our ability to assess the capsular specificity of the identified depolymerases. Future work should focus on characterizing the capsule types of the bacterial strains and evaluating the depolymerase activity against diverse capsule variants to better understand and optimize their therapeutic potential.

All phages encoded numerous lysis-associated ORFs, including holins, endolysins, spanins, and peptidases, consistent with their virulent lifestyles. Genus-level differences were observed: Taipeivirus phages (KFM-TASP06, TTM-TASP117, and GKM-TASP92) encoded multiple redundant RIIA/B lysis inhibitors and diverse lysozyme variants, indicating sophisticated regulation of lysis timing. This feature parallels Ackermannviridae phages such as phiAS5, which optimize host exploitation through lysis timing genes [53]. Conversely, the Przondovirus phage exhibited a minimalist lysis system with few core ORFs, consistent with the streamlined genomes of Studiervirinae phages that favor rapid replication over complex regulation [53]. Taipeivirus phages also encoded multiple Rz-like spanins (2–3 copies), exceeding the single-spanin systems typical of model phages like T4 [54, 55]. This multiplicity may enhance the disruption of the complex outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria.

The presence of both RIIA and RIIB lysis inhibitors in KFM-TASP06 is unusual. These proteins are typically encoded separately and function independently in many phage systems. Their co-occurrence suggests novel regulatory mechanisms in lysis control. RIIA and RIIB have previously been reported to regulate lysis [48]. The presence of transmembrane (TM) domains in holin and hypothetical proteins in the current Klebsiella phage sequences supports their roles as membrane-associated lysis factors. Holins, characterized by TM domains, form pores in the bacterial membrane to enable endolysin access for cell wall degradation, facilitating phage release. Additionally, hypothetical proteins with transmembrane (TM) regions likely represent other lysis components. These may include spanins or Rz-like proteins. Such proteins disrupt the outer membrane in Gram-negative hosts like Klebsiella. This clustering of multiple TM-containing proteins within phage lysis cassettes reflects a coordinated lysis mechanism, underscoring their critical function in efficient bacterial membrane disruption and phage replication [56].

Ackermannviridae phages consistently encoded lytic transglycosylases, whereas Drexlerviridae (e.g., AKM-TASP09) relied primarily on holin-endolysin systems, reflecting distinct lysis strategies that align with prior reports. Several ORFs predicted to encode lysozymes with conserved hydrolase activity were identified, specifically ORFs 26, 118, and 128 in KFM-TASP06; ORFs 25, 26, 115, and 127 in TTM-TASP117; and ORFs 45, 46, and 55 in ZHS-TASP18. These enzymes likely play a vital role in peptidoglycan degradation, a crucial step in the phage lytic cycle, thereby facilitating the release of progeny [55, 57].

Phage-encoded cell wall hydrolases, including lysozymes and lytic transglycosylases, facilitate the degradation of bacterial cell wall polymers, thereby compromising structural integrity and promoting bacterial lysis [58]. The presence of multiple hydrolase genes suggests a synergistic enzymatic system targeting different peptidoglycan bonds for efficient host cell wall breakdown, a hallmark of virulent phages [58]. Their identification underscores the crucial role of phage-encoded enzymes in bacterial cell wall degradation and highlights their promising potential as antibacterial agents for phage therapy and as valuable tools in biotechnology, given that these modules can be cloned and harnessed for various applications.

The variation in intermediate terminator counts among different phages, such as GKM-TASP92 with 11 terminators and ZHS-TASP18 with only 2, underscores the diversity in transcriptional regulation mechanisms employed by these viruses. Previous studies have shown that phages with more complex regulatory regions often possess a higher number of transcription factors and terminators, which facilitate precise control of gene expression [21, 59]. This suggests that GKM-TASP92’s numerous terminators may allow for fine-tuned transcriptional switches, enabling the phage to adapt to different stages of infection or host responses. Conversely, the lower number of terminators in ZHS-TASP18 indicates a simplified transcriptional architecture, potentially favoring rapid gene expression with less regulatory complexity, as observed in simpler phage genomes [59, 60]. These differences imply that transcriptional complexity is evolutionarily tailored to optimize phage survival and infectivity within specific ecological niches [61]. Understanding these regulatory variations not only provides insights into phage biology but also has implications for engineering phages for therapeutic purposes, where precise control of gene expression is crucial.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive genomic evaluation of seven novel, strictly lytic bacteriophages targeting carbapenemase-producing MDR K pneumoniae, reinforcing their potential as targeted biotherapeutic agents. The phages exhibit conserved structural and functional modules, including depolymerases and lytic enzymes, essential for efficient bacterial lysis and capsule degradation. Importantly, the absence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes confirms their safety profile for clinical application. Variations in lysis regulation mechanisms, such as the presence of multiple spanins and lysis inhibitors, suggest sophisticated control of lytic timing and membrane disruption strategies, which may enhance their efficacy against diverse K. pneumoniae strains. These findings support the continued development of these phages as targeted biotherapeutic agents, addressing the urgent need for innovative treatments against multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. In vivo studies and clinical evaluations are essential to validate their safety, efficacy, and potential for therapeutic deployment.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 2. (240.9KB, faa)

Authors’ contributions

AAA: Conceptualization, study design, experimental framework, methodology development, laboratory investigations, resource, sequence analysis, data curation, annotation, result interpretation, visualization, reporting, manuscript preparation, original draft writing, and review and editing.AGB: Conceptualization, study design, Resources, Supervision, Validation, review, and editingMB: Resources, Supervision, Validation, review, and editingDHA: Methodology, laboratory investigations, data curation, and experimental frameworkAY: Data analysis, data curation, visualization, reporting, review, and editing.YD: Laboratory investigations and data curationKT: Laboratory investigations and data curationLTM: Data curation, review, and editingTST: Conceptualization, study design, experimental framework, project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, review, and editing.

Funding

This study did not receive any financial support or funding from public, private, or nonprofit organizations.

Data availability

The genome sequences of the phages have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers [PV588648](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588648), [PV588649](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588649), [PV588650](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588650), [PV588651](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588651), [PV588652](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588652), [PV588653](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588653), and [PV588654](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588654) . The raw sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioSample accession numbers [SAMN53043033](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043033), [SAMN53043034](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043034), [SAMN53043035](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043035), [SAMN53043036](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043036), [SAMN53043037](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043037), and [SAMN53043038](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043038), associated with BioProject [PRJNA1355480](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1355480) .

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study proposal was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Institute of Biotechnology, Addis Ababa University (IoB/431/2016/2024). All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

The study involved environmental sampling for bacteriophage isolation. The requirement for informed consent was deemed not applicable, as the study did not involve human subjects, in accordance with the National Research Ethics Review Guideline (NRERG, No. 01/2020, October 2020) of Ethiopia, which allows exemptions for minimal-risk research involving environmental sampling without direct human involvement.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet, 2022; 399(10325): 629–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drug Resistance Development and Novel Strategies to Combat. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;16:7641–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ghatbale P, et al. Experimental phage evolution results in expanded host ranges against antibiotic resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):9903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG, Tessema TS. Isolation, purification, and phenotypic characterization of virulent Klebsiella pneumoniae phages from environmental samples in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A synergistic approach combining spot assay and streak plating. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(9):e0331955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh RP et al. Virulence factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae: insights into canonical and emerging mechanisms driving pathogenicity and drug resistance. The Microbe, 2025: 100289.
  • 6.Huang X, et al. Global trends of antimicrobial resistance and virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae from different host sources. Commun Med. 2025;5(1):383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG, Tessema TS. Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Mechanisms in Klebsiella pneumoniae: Understanding for Better Interventions. Bacteria. 2026;5(1):9. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li S et al. Genomic dissection of the clonal background and global dissemination of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae CG23-KL57 lineage. Nat Commun, 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG, Tessema TS. Molecular characterization of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from sputum samples at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. Scientific Reports; 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Zhu J, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of SHV, cmlv, and FosA6-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae based on whole genome sequences in Jiangsu, China. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1219733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO. Antimicrobial Resistance, Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae - Global situation. 2024.https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON527. searched in september 2024. 
  • 12.Li Y, Kumar S, Zhang L. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance and Developments in Therapeutic Strategies to Combat Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:1107–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Y, et al. Characteristics of antibiotic resistance mechanisms and genes of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Open Med (Wars). 2023;18(1):20230707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHO. Antimicrobial resistance. WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance.
  • 15.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG, Tessema TS. Isolation and characterization of lytic bacteriophages with therapeutic potential against multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from Ethiopia. Scientific Reports; 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Zhu J, et al. Successful control of the first carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak in a Chinese hospital 2017–2019. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control; 2020; 9: 91. 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.WHO, Antimicrobial Resistance, Hypervirulent Klebsiella Pneumoniae—Global Situation. 2024. Available onlinehttps://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON527. Accessed on August 20, 2025.. 2025.
  • 18.Abedon ST et al. Phage therapy: past, present and future. Frontiers Media SA. 2017: 981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Townsend EM, et al. Isolation and characterization of Klebsiella phages for phage therapy. Therapy Appl Res. 2021;2(1):26–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu J, et al. Transmission dynamics and novel treatments of high risk carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: the lens of one health. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17(9):1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zagaliotis P, et al. Bacteriophage treatment is effective against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC) in a neutropenic murine model of gastrointestinal translocation and renal infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025;69(2):e0091924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abebe AA, Birhanu AG, Tessema TS. Isolation and characterization of lytic bacteriophages with therapeutic potential against multidrug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):8000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ding W, et al. Bacteriophage Therapy Against Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Microorganisms. 2026;14(1):201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ichikawa M, et al. Bacteriophage therapy against pathological Klebsiella pneumoniae ameliorates the course of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abebe AGB. Tesfaye Sisiay Tessema, Isolation and Characterization of Lytic Bacteriophages with Therapeutic Potential against Multidrug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from Ethiopia. Scientifir Reports; 2026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Han SJ, Kim SK, Hong SM. Next-generation Sequencing of MicroRNA in Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(10):4374–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen S, et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abebe AA et al. Genome sequences of four virulent Klebsiella pneumoniae phages targeting multidrug-resistant clinical isolates from Ethiopia. Microbiol Resource Announcements, 2026: e01213–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic Anal Kraken 2 Genome biology. 2019;20(1):257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li D, et al. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gurevich A, et al. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nayfach S, et al. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(5):578–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang RH, et al. PhageScope: a well-annotated bacteriophage database with automatic analyses and visualizations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D756–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang W, et al. Characterization and genomic analysis of the first Oceanospirillum phage, vB_OliS_GJ44, representing a novel siphoviral cluster. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.FASTQC A quality control tool for high-throughput sequence datahttps://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 36.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(W1):W78–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adriaenssens E, Brister JR. How to Name and Classify Your Phage: An Informal Guide. Viruses, 2017; 9(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Beamud B, et al. Genetic determinants of host tropism in Klebsiella phages. Cell Rep. 2023;42(2):112048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu S, et al. Discovery, structural characteristics and evolutionary analyses of functional domains in Acinetobacter baumannii phage tail fiber/spike proteins. BMC Microbiol. 2025;25(1):73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Serwer P, Jiang W. Dualities in the analysis of phage DNA packaging motors. Bacteriophage. 2012;2(4):239–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Peng Q et al. Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Phage for Controlling Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microorganisms, 2020;8(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Peng Q, et al. Characterization of bacteriophage vB_KleM_KB2 possessing high control ability to pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kongari R, et al. Phage spanins: diversity, topological dynamics and gene convergence. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1):326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang H, et al. Transcription regulation mechanisms of bacteriophages: recent advances and future prospects. Bioengineered. 2014;5(5):300–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cao S, et al. Insights into the structure and assembly of the bacteriophage ϕ29 double-stranded DNA packaging motor. J Virol. 2014;88(8):3986–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Taslem Mourosi J, et al. Understanding bacteriophage tail fiber interaction with host surface receptor: the key blueprint for reprogramming phage host range. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Saint-Jean M, et al. Structural and genetic diversity of lysis modules in bacteriophages infecting the genus Streptococcus. Genes. 2025;16(7):842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martins W, et al. Diversity of lytic bacteriophages against XDR Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 16 recovered from sewage samples in different parts of the world. Sci Total Environ. 2022;839:156074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Townsend EM, et al. Isolation and Characterization of Klebsiella Phages for Phage Therapy. Phage (New Rochelle). 2021;2(1):26–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Islam MM, et al. Phage-encoded depolymerases as a strategy for combating multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1462620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zurabov F, et al. Bacteriophages with depolymerase activity in the control of antibiotic resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):15188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Topka-Bielecka G et al. Bacteriophage-Derived Depolymerases against Bacterial Biofilm. Antibiot (Basel), 2021;10(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Zhu Y, et al. Phage family classification under Caudoviricetes: A review of current tools using the latest ICTV classification framework. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1032186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Valencia-Toxqui G, Ramsey J. How to introduce a new bacteriophage on the block: a short guide to phage classification. J Virol. 2024;98(10):e01821–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Peterson RF, Kievitt KD, Ennis HL. Membrane protein synthesis after infection of Escherichia coli B with phage T4: the rIIB protein. Virology. 1972;50(2):520–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Park T, et al. Topological dynamics of holins in programmed bacterial lysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(52):19713–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fernandes S, São-José C. Enzymes and mechanisms employed by tailed bacteriophages to breach the bacterial cell barriers. Viruses. 2018;10(8):396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abdelrahman F et al. Phage-Encoded Endolysins Antibiot (Basel), 2021; 10(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.Hernandez-Doria JD, Sperandio V. Bacteriophage Transcription Factor Cro Regulates Virulence Gene Expression in Enterohemorrhagic < em>Escherichia coli. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(5):607–17. .e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Song E, et al. Single-mode termination of phage transcriptions, disclosing bacterial adaptation for facilitated reinitiations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(15):9092–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hohn T, Katsura I. Structure and assembly of bacteriophage lambda. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1977;78:69–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 2. (240.9KB, faa)

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences of the phages have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers [PV588648](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588648), [PV588649](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588649), [PV588650](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588650), [PV588651](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588651), [PV588652](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588652), [PV588653](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588653), and [PV588654](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PV588654) . The raw sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioSample accession numbers [SAMN53043033](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043033), [SAMN53043034](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043034), [SAMN53043035](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043035), [SAMN53043036](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043036), [SAMN53043037](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043037), and [SAMN53043038](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/53043038), associated with BioProject [PRJNA1355480](https:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1355480) .


Articles from BMC Microbiology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES