Abstract
With the increasing frequency of extreme weather events globally, livestock are facing ever-increasing demands for environmental adaptability. Some goat populations have demonstrated remarkable adaptability under long-term extreme environmental stress, and their genomes retain characteristic genetic imprints formed by adaptive evolution. This study integrated whole-genome resequencing data from 496 individuals from 29 endemic goat populations in China, along with data from 11 environmental factors. Through signal selection analysis and genome-environment association analysis, we identified 262 candidate genes associated with environmental adaptation. Subsequently, we screened Chinese goat populations in extreme environments based on environmental data. We used the FST and θπ methods to scan the genomes of these goat populations. In four extreme environments (high elevation, hot, and arid), 95, 74, and 162 candidate genes were identified, respectively. Based on research related to environmental adaptation, we found that genes such as FGF5, CAMK4, COL4A3BP, and CACNG4 may play important roles in goat adaptation to extreme environments. This study not only deepens our understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms of environmental adaptation in Chinese goats, but also provides important theoretical basis for goat stress resistance breeding and germplasm resource conservation.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13176-x.
Keywords: Goat, Drought, Adaptation, SNP, Selection characteristics
Background
With the intensification of global climate change, the frequency and intensity of extreme climate events (such as heat waves, cold waves and abnormal precipitation) have become more frequent and intense [1], posing a severe challenge to the livestock production system [2]. China has a vast territory and complex climate types, and livestock in different ecological regions face different and constantly changing environmental pressures [3]. As an important livestock resource, the production performance and survival ability of Chinese goats are directly affected by climate change. Goats were domesticated in the Fertile Crescent about 10,000 years ago [4]. After being gradually introduced to China, they are widely distributed in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Loess Plateau, southwestern mountainous areas and southeastern coastal areas. Under the long-term effects of natural and artificial selection, Chinese goats have developed rich genetic diversity, making them a valuable resource for studying the mechanism of animal environmental adaptation.
Extreme environmental stress is considered to be one of the important driving forces shaping the structure and function of animal genomes [5]. For Chinese goats, their long-term distribution in various ecological environments such as high elevation, extreme cold, aridity and high humidity has evolved them to develop unique genetic adaptation characteristics in the process of coping with complex climatic conditions [6]. Under cold stimulation, the energy metabolism in goats is significantly reprogrammed, manifested as increased plasma glucose levels and decreased levels of non-esterified fatty acids and triglycerides, accompanied by increased liver glycogen content and decreased liver lipid deposition [7]. These metabolic changes help maintain the body’s energy supply and body temperature homeostasis, thereby enhancing their ability to survive in cold environments. For high-elevation populations such as Tibetan goats distributed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, they have formed specific genetic regulatory patterns in terms of hypoxic adaptation, energy metabolism regulation and cold stress resistance [8]. These studies provide important clues to reveal the adaptive evolution of Chinese goats in extreme environments, but they mostly rely on specific environmental interventions or single-population studies, which are not only time-consuming and costly, but also have certain limitations in their universality across different ecological regions. Therefore, it is necessary to combine multi-population comparison and genome-scale analysis strategies to systematically explore the adaptive genetic basis of Chinese goats in diverse ecological environments, so as to more comprehensively reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying their responses to complex climate change.
In recent years, with the development of high-throughput sequencing technology and population genomics, key genes and regulatory regions subjected to natural selection at the genome-wide level have been identified [9]. However, in commercial breeding, performance-oriented artificial selection often weakens or even masks genetic signals related to environmental adaptation. In contrast, indigenous goat breeds having been under relatively natural selection pressure for a long time, are more likely to reflect their adaptation process to specific ecological environments. Therefore, they have important research value for dissecting the mechanisms of adaptive evolution of animals under the background of climate change [10]. The continuous improvement of the global high-resolution climate databases provides critical data support for the systematic analysis of the environmental adaptation mechanism of Chinese goats. By integrating population geographic distribution information with multidimensional climate variables, genome-environment association (GEA) analysis can be performed to systematically reveal the interplay between genetic variation and environmental factors [11]. This analytical framework has been widely applied in a variety of livestock and poultry species and has successfully identified adaptive genes related to key ecological factors such as temperature, precipitation and elevation [12–14]. In Chinese goats, such methods can not only help to explore their genetic basis underlying cold tolerance, heat resistance, drought resistance and hypoxia adaptation, but also identify local breeds that have long inhabited extreme environments for a long time by combining long-term climate data [15], and analyze the selection signals and genetic characteristics formed elucidating the evolutionary trajectory of environmental adaptation of Chinese goats and its molecular regulatory mechanism.
To reveal the adaptation mechanisms of Chinese goats in different extreme environments, this study integrated whole-genome resequencing data of 496 individuals from 29 endemic goat populations in China and data from 11 environmental variables. By studying their population genetic structure and environmental clustering characteristics, Chinese goat populations in extreme environments, such as high elevation, heat, cold and drought, were defined and screened. Using selection signal analysis and GEA, we identified genomic regions and candidate genes associated with adaptation to extreme environments, elucidating their biological pathways for coping with challenging environments. This study analyzed the adaptation mechanisms of goats to extreme environments during long-term evolution, providing a scientific basis for the protection and rational utilization of China’s goat genetic resources and providing molecular markers for the breeding of environmentally adaptable goat breeds.
Materials and methods
Genomic data preparation and preprocessing
This study collected high-depth whole-genome resequencing data from 29 goat populations in my country. Data from 28 of these populations were downloaded from public databases, while the data from the Lüliang Black Goat population came from our research group’s previous independent sequencing data. (Table S1). Raw sequencing reads were quality controlled using fastp (v0.23.4) [16] to obtain high-quality, clean data for subsequent analysis. Filtering criteria included removing reads with > 1% base ambiguity, abnormal GC content, low-quality bases, and adapter contamination. Subsequently, clean reads were aligned to the reference genome (Capra hircus, https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/001/704/415/GCF_001704415.1_ARS1/GCF_001704415.1_ARS1_genomic.gff.gz) using BWA (v0.7.17) [17] Sequencing depth and genome coverage were calculated based on the alignment results, and individuals with a sequencing depth < 10× were removed. SNP quality control was performed using PLINK (v1.9) [18]. We retained only autosomal SNPs and then filtered them to exclude those with a detection rate ≤ 90%, minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤ 0.05, and outliers. Ultimately, 496 individuals were retained from the 510 individuals (Table S2).
Population clustering based on environmental variables
The high-resolution climate dataset (CRU TS v. 4.08) [19] comes from the Norwich Climate Research Unit (https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/cru_ts_4.08/cruts.2406270035.v4.08/). This dataset has a spatial resolution of 0.5°×0.5° and spans from 1901 to 2023, excluding the Antarctic region.
The dataset uses seven climate variables, including cloud cover (cld), diurnal temperature range (dtr), frost day frequency (frs), potential evapotranspiration (pet), precipitation (pre), wet day frequency (wet), and vapor pressure (vap). To more accurately reflect the environmental differences in temperature and elevation, this study further used four variables from WorldClim (v2.1) [20]higher resolution climate data (0.1667°): mean temperature (tavg), maximum temperature (tmax), minimum temperature (tmin), and elevation (elev). Subsequently, ArcMap (v10.8) [21] was used to process the raw climate data into annual and monthly mean land area latitude and longitude grids in the GCS_WGS_1984 coordinate system. Pearson correlation coefficients among 11 environmental variables were calculated in R (v4.2.0) [22] to assess collinearity and interdependencies.
Afterwards, we used the R package “terra” [23] to statistically analyze the annual average and monthly average data of climate variables, as well as the elevation data corresponding to the sampling origins of the 29 Chinese goat populations. Eventually, a comprehensive environmental dataset containing 131 environmental parameters was obtained for principal component analysis (PCA) (Table S3). Then, we used a K-means clustering algorithm to cluster the goat populations based on the Euclidean distance of the principal component scores, and the 29 goat populations were divided into two groups (CL1 and CL2) based on the clustering results. To check whether the grouping based on environmental variables is consistent with the population genetic clustering pattern, we first used PLINK (v1.9) [18] to remove the high LD sites in the data set with the parameter “-indep-pairwise 50 5 0.2”, and the remaining 1,242,943 SNPs from 496 individuals of 29 goat populations (CL1 and CL2) were used for population genetic structure analysis. Subsequently, Genetic PCA analysis was performed using PLINK (v1.9). Neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA (v11.0.13) [24] based on genetic distance. Ancestor components were inferred using ADMIXTURE (v1.30) (K = 2–10). Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees at the goat population level were constructed using TREEMIX (v1.13) [25].
Detection of genomic regions associated with environmental adaptation
To identify genomic regions related to goat environmental adaptation in goats, we used the genetic differentiation index
method for selection signal analysis [26] and the latent factor mixture model (LFMM) [27] method for genome-environment association analysis to analyze SNP data of 29 goat populations. Specifically, the
analysis was implemented using VCFtools (v0.1.16) [28], employing a sliding window method (window size of 50 kb, step size of 10 kb) to estimate the
value for each SNP; LFMM analysis was performed using the “lfmm” in R package [29]. 131 environmental variables were used, and the optimal number of latent factors were inferred using the lfmm_ridge_CV function. 1000 iterations and 100 burn-in times were performed to determine the z scores of all SNPs, and the P values were corrected with the genomic expansion factor to reduce systematic errors and false positive rates. The 50 kb genomic intervals upstream and downstream of the top 1% significant SNP sites were defined as the genomic regions associated with environmental adaptability.
Detecting of genomic regions associated with high-elevation adaptation
To identify genomic regions associated with high-elevation adaptation in goats, we defined high elevation as areas above 3,000 m and low elevation as areas below 100 m. Based on this criterion, we initially selected goat populations from high-elevation areas and low-elevation areas. To reduce the potential bias caused by unequal sample sizes among breeds/populations, individuals were randomly sampled within each breed/population, and the final groups used for the high-elevation adaptation analysis included high-elevation areas (G-high, n = 22) and low-elevation areas (G-low, n = 25). (Table S4) Subsequently, we used VCFtools (v0.1.16) [28] to calculate the
values and nucleotide diversity ratios (
ratio, (G-high/G-low)) among the two groups (G-high and G-low) to identify highly differentiated and significantly different genomic regions. The significant SNP site in the top 1% and their upstream and downstream 50 kb regions were defined as genomic regions associated with high-elevation adaptation in goats.
Detecting of genomic regions associated with environmental temperature adaptation
To identify genomic regions underlying extreme temperature adaptation in goats, we classified sampled goat populations into temperature-adaptive groups via equal-interval classification based on three meteorological variables: annual average temperature (tavg), maximum temperature (tmax) and minimum temperature (tmin). The value range of each variable was divided into equal intervals. Populations that fell into the high-temperature intervals for all three variables were defined as the hot group (G-hot, n = 80), while those consistently within the low-temperature intervals were assigned to the cold group (G-cold, n = 49). The Köppen–Geiger climate classification was only adopted to characterize the climatic background of the studied populations [30]. (Table S5) In addition, the
values and
ratios (G-high/G-low) methods were used to screen for selection signals related to extreme temperature adaptation, and the upstream and downstream 50 kb genomic regions of the top 1% significant SNP sites were defined as genomic regions related to temperature adaptation.
Detecting of genomic regions associated with arid adaptation
The Aridity Index of the United Nations Environment Programme (
) [31, 32]can be used as an important indicator for quantitatively assessing the degree of regional water shortage and the annual or seasonal aridity. The study used ArcMap (v10.8) [21] to calculate the
of the origin of each goat population according to the formula below.
![]() |
Where PRE represents annual average precipitation (mm), and PET represents potential evapotranspiration (mm). According to the
standard, regional climate can be divided into five categories: hyper-arid (0–0.05), arid (0.05–0.20), semi-arid (0.20–0.50), dry sub-humid (0.50–0.65), and humid (above 0.65).
We systematically evaluated the
values of 29 goat populations. Since the sample did not include populations in hyper-arid areas, populations distributed in arid, semi-arid, dry sub-humid, and humid environments were initially evaluated for comparison. Four populations located in dry sub-humid regions (
= 0.50–0.65), comprising 98 individuals in total, were excluded from the comparison. In addition, to increase the environmental contrast between the arid and wet groups, only three populations with the highest
values among the humid populations (
> 0.65) were retained as the wet group. After removing the relevant populations, the samples were divided into an arid group (G-arid, n = 62) and a wet group (G-wet, n = 38) (Table S6). The G-arid group mainly includes populations distributed in cold semi-arid grassland climate (BSk), cold desert climate (BWk), and temperate cool summer and dry winter climate (Dwb); while the G-wet group includes populations distributed in subtropical dry winter climate (Cwa), humid subtropical climate (Cfa), and tropical monsoon climate (Am) regions. In addition, the
values and
ratios (G-arid/G-humid) methods were used to screen for selection signals related to extreme temperature adaptation, and the significant SNPs in the top 1% and their upstream and downstream 50 kb regions were defined as candidate genomic regions related to arid adaptation.
Identification and functional annotation of candidate genes
The genomic regions detected above are mapped to goat gene annotation files in the Ensembl database for gene annotation (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-112/gff3/capra_hircus/Capra_hircus.ARS1.2.chr.gff3.gz). To analyze the function of the target genes, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) [33] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [34] functional enrichment analyses using the DAVID online software [35]. In this analysis, we retained the functional entries that passed Fisher’s exact test and had P < 0.05.
Result
Goat population quality control and annual environmental data statistics
After quality control and screening, we ultimately retained 496 goat individuals from 29 populations out of 510 individuals. Subsequently, we performed quality control on the SNP loci, ultimately retaining 13,128,570 SNP loci for subsequent analysis.
This study integrated 11 environmental variables, including cloud cover (cld), daily temperature range (dtr), frost frequency (frs), potential evapotranspiration (pet), precipitation (pre), wet day frequency (wet), vapor pressure (vap), mean temperature (tavg), elevation (elev), and maximum and minimum temperatures (tmax and tmin) (Fig. 1A-K). Temperature-related environmental variables (tmax, tmin, and tavg) show higher annual averages in southern and southeastern China, while they are lower in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and northern regions. The annual average frequency of frost days (frs) is higher in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and northern China, and lower in the southern region, showing an overall trend of gradually decreasing from northwest to southeast. The annual average water vapor pressure (vap) is higher in southern and southeastern coastal areas of China, and lower in the northwest and northern regions, showing an increasing trend from north to south.
Fig. 1.

Geographic distribution of annual average values for 11 environmental variables in China. A Cloud Cover (cld), percentage (%). B Diurnal Temperature Range (dtr), degrees Celsius (°C). C Wet Day Frequency (wet), days per month. D Potential Evapotranspiration (pet), millimeters per day (mm/day). E Precipitation (pre), millimeters per month (mm/month). F Frost Day Frequency (frs), days per month. G maximum temperature (tmax), degrees Celsius. (°C.) H Average Temperature (tavg), degrees Celsius. (°C.) I minimum temperature(tmin), degrees Celsius. (°C.) J Vapor Pressure (vap), hectopascals (hPa). K Elevation (elev), meters (m). L Pearson correlation coefficients among environmental variables, where red indicates positive correlations and blue indicates negative correlations, and color intensity reflects the strength of correlation
In the correlation analysis among the 11 environmental variables (Fig. 1L), the potential evapotranspiration (pet) had a weak correlation with most of the environmental variables, and the correlation with the frost day frequency (frs) was only − 0.02. Furthermore, water vapor pressure (vap) showed a significant positive correlation with precipitation (pre), average temperature (tavg), maximum temperature (tmax), and minimum temperature (tmin) (
), indicating ticollinearity between water vapor pressure (vap) and multiple environmental variables. The frequency of frost days (frs) showed a significant negative correlation with temperature-related variables (tavg, tmax, tmin) (
). Elevation (elev) showed a significant negative correlation with multiple environmental variables (
), and only showed a positive correlation with the frequency of frost days (frs) and daily temperature range (dtr) (
).
Cluster analysis of goat population environment
We performed PCA analysis on 131 environmental variables from 29 goat populations (Fig. 2A). The results showed that the eigenvalues of the first three principal components were 106.81, 24.56, and 18.18, respectively, explaining a total of 87.46% of the environmental variation (PC1 = 62.46%, PC2 = 14.36%, PC3 = 10.63%) (Fig. 2B). These 13 water vapor pressure (vap) variables are highly positively correlated with PC1 (mean loading: 0.92 ± 0.04), while the 13 daily temperature range (dtr) variables are strongly negatively correlated with PC1 (mean loading: -0.85 ± 0.04) (Fig. 2C and D; Table S7).
Fig. 2.

Environmental variable analysis of goat populations in China. A Distribution of goat populations along the first two principal components derived from environmental variables, were divided into two groups (CL1 and CL2) (B) Percentage of variance explained by each principal component based on environmental variables. C Contribution and direction of environmental variables to the principal components; arrow length represents the magnitude of contribution. D Loadings of 131 environmental variables on the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2)
Environmental genetic structure analysis of goat populations
Based on the PCA scores, we used Euclidean distance to perform hierarchical cluster analysis on the 29 goat populations, dividing them into two groups, CL1 and CL2 (Fig. 3A). Among them, the goat population in CL1 is mainly distributed in Southwest my country (Chongqing (n = 15), Sichuan (n = 70), Guizhou (n = 49), Yunnan (n = 38)), South China (Guangdong (n = 5), Guangxi (n = 32), Hainan (n = 15)), East China (Shanghai (n = 20), Jiangsu (n = 20)) and Central China (Hunan (n = 20)). The goat population in CL2 is mainly distributed in Northwest China (Shaanxi (n = 20), Gansu (n = 20), Ningxia (n = 20)), North China (Inner Mongolia (n = 20), Shanxi (n = 19)), Southwest China (Sichuan (n = 10), Tibet (n = 22)), as well as Liaoning (n = 20), Hubei (n = 20) and Shandong (n = 40) (Fig. 3B;Table S8).
Fig. 3.

Population genetic structure, geographic distribution and phylogenetic relationships of Chinese indigenous goats. A Heatmap of the top three principal components (PC1-PC3) from genome-wide PCA showing SNP loading values based on environmental variables. B Geographic distribution map of Chinese goat populations C ADMIXTURE ancestry components for K = 2–5. D PCA scatter plot of Chinese goat populations. E Treemix maximum likelihood population tree for Chinese goat populations. F NJ phylogenetic tree of Chinese goat populations
Genetic structure analysis of SNP data from 496 individuals in 29 goat populations (CL1 and CL2) revealed that, with increasing K values (K = 2–5), some goat populations in CL1 and CL2 exhibited varying degrees of ancestral component mixing, suggesting that some degree of gene exchange may have occurred during their evolutionary history (Fig. 3C). The PCA results showed a high degree of consistency with the ADMIXTURE results, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 6.48% and 4.57% of the genetic variation, respectively (Fig. 3D). Phylogenetic trees further support the above results. Among the 29 goat populations, most of the CL1 group clustered into one branch in the phylogenetic tree, while the CL2 group formed another major branch, showing obvious genetic differentiation. Among them, some individuals of the MTG and MGG populations in the CL2 group were observed in the CL1 group branch, indicating that these two populations may have had gene exchange with the CL1 group or recent interbreeding (Fig. 3E). The Treemix maximum likelihood population tree shows that the genetic drift values of most populations are mainly between 0.005 and 0.015, indicating a relatively concentrated branching structure. Furthermore, compared to other populations, YDG exhibits relatively long branch lengths and more pronounced genetic differentiation. (Fig. 3F).
Genomic regions related to environmental adaptation in goat populations
This study used
and LFMM to detect genomic regions significantly associated with goat environmental adaptation.
screened out 397 significant SNPs. The three SNPs with the highest
values were mainly located on chromosome 6 (95.45–95.60 Mb), chromosome 3 (96.5-96.65 Mb), and chromosome 22 (51.7–51.8 Mb). 685 genes were annotated within a 50 kb range upstream and downstream of these SNPs (Table S9), covering key biological functions such as regulation of heart development (TBX20 [36]), male reproductive, glycosylation (SRD5A3 [37, 38]), ion transport and protein glycosylation modification (TMEM165 [39]), intracellular signal transduction (RGS7 [40, 41]) (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4.

Selection signatures and functional enrichment related to environmental adaptation in Chinese indigenous goats. A Genome-wide
values with candidate genes labeled. B Genome-wide distribution of z-scores of SNP loci in the LFMM test. The dashed line indicates the top 0.1% threshold level; C Shared genes detected by
and LFMM. D Functional enrichment analysis of 262 genes identified using at two methods
LFMM results showed that, based on a determined number of latent factors (K = 5), environmental variable-genome association analysis identified 5,754 SNPs that were significantly associated with environmental variables. The three SNPs with the highest z-values were located on chromosome 28 (41.61 Mb), chromosome 19 (28.1 Mb), and chromosome 6 (95.43–95.56 Mb), respectively. The regions containing these SNPs annotated 2,664 genes (Table S10), covering biological functions such as angiogenesis (MMRN2 [42]), cell migration (EPHA2 [43], FMNL1 [44]), and cell cycle regulation (CDC25A [45]) (Fig. 4B).
The
method (n = 685) and the LFMM method (n = 2664) detected 262 shared genes across the gene sets (Fig. 4C; Table S11). A permutation test with 10,000 iterations showed that the observed overlap was significantly higher than expected by chance (expected overlap = 67.25 genes, empirical P = 9.999 × 10⁻⁵), suggesting that the shared genes were unlikely to result from random overlap. Subsequent functional enrichment using DAVID revealed that these genes were significantly enriched in 19 biological processes (BP), 12 cellular components (CC), 25 molecular functions (MF) categories, and 2 KEGG pathways (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4D; Table S12).
Genomic regions associated with high-elevation adaptation in goat populations
This study used the
and
ratio method to detect selection signals associated with high-elevation adaptation in goats. Using a 1% threshold,
detected a total of 398 SNP sites, covering 607 genes (Table S13). The three sites with the highest
values are located on chromosome 13 (22.15-22.35 Mb), chromosome 6 (95.45-95.55 Mb) and chromosome 20 (38.8-38.9 Mb). The regions where thes [46]e SNPs are located are annotated with these genes, covering genes related to hematopoietic development (SKIDA1 [47]) and reproduction and metabolism (PRLR [48]) (Fig. 5A). The
ratio method detected a total of 399 SNP sites and annotated a total of 883 genes (Table S14). Among them, the three sites with the highest
ratio were located on chromosome 5 (18.1-18.2 Mb), chromosome 6 (95.45-95.55 Mb), and chromosome 10 (94.35-94.45 Mb), covering genes related to key adaptive traits, including hair growth regulation (FGF5 [49]) and lipid transport (COL4A3BP [50]) (Fig. 5B). A total of 95 genes were detected by both methods (Fig. 5C; Table S15). They were significantly enriched in 13 biological processes (BP), 4 cellular components (CC), 9 molecular functions (MF) categories, and 1 KEGG pathways (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5D; Table S16).
Fig. 5.

Selection signatures and functional enrichment associated with high-elevation adaptation in Chinese indigenous goats. A Genome-wide distribution of
values between G-high and G-low. B Genome-wide distribution of
ratio between G-high and G-low. C Shared genes detected by
ratio and
. D Functional enrichment analysis of 95 genes identified using at two methods
Genomic regions associated with drought adaptation in goat populations
To explore the regulatory mechanisms by which goats adapt to arid environments, we screened goat populations located in arid and humid regions based on the United Nations Environment Programme Drought Index (
) and the Köppen-Geiger climate classification (Fig. 6A). We used the
method and the
ratio method to explore selection features related to drought adaptation in goats. At the top 1% threshold, the
method detected 390 SNPs covering 660 genes (Table S17). The three sites with the largest outlier values of
are on chromosome 6 (95.45-95.7 Mb), chromosome 7 (0.35-0.45 Mb), and chromosome 10 (94.3-94.45 Mb). The genes in the regions where these three sites are located cover signal transduction and kinase (CAMK4 [51] ), lipid transport (COL4A3BP [50]) and hair growth regulation (FGF5 [52]) (Fig. 6B).
Fig. 6.

Selection signatures and functional enrichment associated with aridity adaptation in Chinese indigenous goats. A The UNEP aridity index map of China. B Genome-wide distribution of
ratio between G-aird and G-wet. C Shared genes detected by
ratio and
. D Functional enrichment analysis of 162 genes identified using at two methods
The
ratio method detected 404 significant SNPs, of which the three sites with the highest
ratio were located on chromosome 6 (95.4-95.55 Mb), chromosome 10 (94.35-94.5 Mb), and chromosome 12 (51-51.1 Mb). The 809 annotated genes cover biological functions such as lipid transport (COL4A3BP [50], HMGCR [53]), nucleoplasmic transport (XPO4 [54]), metabolic regulation (BRSK2 [55]), and cell cycle regulation (LATS2 [56], MOB2 [57] ) (Fig. 6C; Table S18). In addition, COL4A3BP was not only identified as a drought adaptation-related locus in goats, but was also identified in high-elevation adaptation analysis.
Functional enrichment was performed on 162 candidate genes detected by both methods (Fig. 6D; Table S19). The results showed that they were significantly enriched in pathways such as “lipid metabolic process”, “positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesis”, “potassium chloride symporter activity” and “Glycerophospholipid metabolism”. These results indicate that the enrichment of lipid metabolism and membrane transport-related functions may help goats cope with drought by maintaining cell membrane homeostasis and osmotic regulation balance (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6E; Table S20).
Genomic regions related to environmental temperature adaptation in goat populations
We used the
method to detect the selective characteristics of goats in hot and cold environments. Under the first 1% threshold, 373 SNP sites were detected, covering 612 candidate genes. Among them, the three sites with the largest
outlier values were located on chromosome 6 (95.45-95.6 Mb), chromosome 7 (0.35-0.45 Mb), and chromosome 22 (56.45-56.55 Mb). The candidate genes in the regions where these three sites are located cover signal transduction and kinase (CAMK4 [51]), neural development (EXOC2 [58] ) and hair growth regulation (FGF5 [49]) (Fig. 7A; Table S21).
Fig. 7.

Selection signatures and functional enrichment associated with temperature adaptation in Chinese indigenous goats. A Genome-wide distribution of
values between G-hot and G-cold. B Genome-wide distribution of
ratio between G-hot and G-cold. C Shared genes detected by
ratio and
. D Functional enrichment analysis of 74 genes identified using at two methods
Further testing of the two populations using the
ratio method revealed that 653 candidate genes were annotated within the regions covered by the top 1% of 362 SNPs. Among them, the three loci with the highest
ratios were located on chromosome 6 (69.45–70.80 Mb), chromosome 16 (79.05–79.15 Mb), and chromosome 18 (57-57.1 Mb). These candidate genes are involved in RNA transcription and processing regulation (SCAF1 [59], FIP1L1 [60], PRMT1 [61]), protein transport (IPO9 [62], TIMM17A [63]), protein hydrolysis (RNPEP [64]), and neurodevelopment regulation (PRR12 [65]) (Fig. 7B; Table S22). Furthermore, the CAMK4 gene appears not only in genomic regions associated with drought adaptation but also with temperature adaptation. Meanwhile, FGF5 was detected in genomic regions associated with temperature, drought, and high-elevation adaptation, suggesting it is a core candidate gene for goats to cope with multiple extreme environments.
Candidate genes obtained by the
method (n = 579) and the
ratio method (n = 538) were integrated, and a total of 74 shared candidate genes were screened (Fig. 7C; Table S23). Functional enrichment analysis showed that these genes were significantly enriched in pathways such as “antibacterial innate immune response”, “keratinization”, “extracellular region”, and “NOD-like receptor signaling pathway” (P < 0.05). (Fig. 7D; Table S24).
Discussion
Understanding how Chinese goats adapt to diverse and complex ecological environments is crucial for deepening our understanding of evolutionary biology and promoting the sustainable development of animal husbandry. This study, based on a comprehensive analysis of whole-genome resequencing data and high-resolution environmental variables, systematically explores the adaptive genetic basis of Chinese goats under different ecological gradients at the genomic level. The results indicate that the environmental adaptation of Chinese goats exhibits significant multi-gene regulatory characteristics, involving synergistic responses to multiple key ecological factors such as elevation, temperature, and drought. The clusters in different environments showed good consistency, accompanied by significant genomic differentiation patterns, which together indicate that local adaptation played a dominant role in shaping the genetic structure of Chinese goat populations [10, 66]. These findings further reveal the complex adaptation strategies developed by Chinese goats under long-term natural selection pressure, providing important evidence for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of their environmental adaptation.
Environmental factors such as high temperature and drought play an important role in the evolution of goats in China. In the PCA of environmental variables, the mean temperature (tavg) and water vapor pressure (vap) are highly correlated with PC1, indicating that heat and drought gradient together constitute the main environmental level affecting the ecological differentiation of Chinese goat populations [67]. According to the Köppen climate classification [30], the CL1 population is mainly distributed in tropical to subtropical regions, while the CL2 population is concentrated in temperate regions, which suggests that long-term environmental differences may have affected the genetic structure of the two. Chinese goats were introduced from the Fertile Crescent of West Asia around 6,000–7,000 years ago [3, 68]. During their eastward spread, they gradually differentiated along the north-south climate gradient of China, forming a differentiated adaptation pattern to the hot and humid environment in the south and the dry and cold environment in the north [69]. The CL1 and CL2 differentiation pattern observed in this study is the result of the synergistic effect of long-term geographical diffusion and climate selection, reflecting the dynamic evolution of the genetic structure of Chinese goat populations driven by the environment.
In the genetic structure analysis, some goat groups in CL1 (Banjiao Goat (BJG) [70], Chongming White Goat (CMG) [71] and CL2 (Ziwuling Black Goat (ZBG) [72] and Zhongwei Goat (ZWG) [73]) all showed genetic characteristics dominated by a single ancestral component, suggesting that their genetic background is relatively stable and the level of gene exchange is low. This characteristic is influenced by its geographically isolated environment (such as mountains or islands), its long-term relatively closed breeding pattern, and the continuous natural selection under specific ecological conditions (such as arid or semi-desert environments), which together shape its relatively stable population genetic structure. The MTG and MGG goats in the CL2 population showed a certain degree of mixed characteristics in genetic structure analysis, suggesting that they may be influenced by different genetic backgrounds. Meigu goat (MGG) was formed by crossbreeding two introduced breeds with local goat breeds and gradually developed through long-term natural selection and spontaneous breeding by the masses, reflecting a clear background of human intervention [11]. Based on its genetic structure characteristics, it is evident that both human introduction and the natural environment jointly promoted gene exchange and introgression across taxa. In the phylogenetic tree, some individuals of the Matou Goat (MTG) [74] and Meigu Goat (MGG) [75] did not strictly cluster in the CL2 branch, but were embedded in or close to the CL1 branch, reflecting the complexity and mixing of their genetic origins. The Treemix maximum likelihood population tree shows that most goat populations gradually differentiate along the main trunk, exhibiting a hierarchical structure consistent with the CL1 and CL2 grouping results. Some populations cluster in relatively close branches, indicating a close genetic distance. It is worth noting that the Youzhou dark goat (YDG) exhibits a significantly longer branch length, which is distinct from other groups, indicating that it may have undergone strong genetic drift and a relatively independent evolutionary process, which is consistent with its distribution in karst landform areas, long-term geographical isolation and limited gene flow [76, 77].
Gene-environment association analysis revealed the adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of goats in a variety of complex environments. The limited overlap between
and LFMM detected genes may be mainly attributed to their different statistical frameworks.
identifies loci with strong genetic differentiation among predefined population groups, whereas LFMM detects genotype–environment associations while accounting for latent population structure. Nevertheless, the permutation test showed that the observed overlap was significantly higher than random expectation, supporting the shared genes as a conservative candidate set for environmental adaptation. Our findings suggest that the adaptation of Chinese goats does not depend on isolated responses to single stressors, but rather on the coordinated regulation of multiple physiological systems. In terms of metabolism and energy balance, CEBPZ [78] and RXRA [79] play a role in energy storage and body temperature maintenance by regulating adipocyte differentiation and lipid deposition. RGS7 [40] and CACNG4 [80] participate in G protein signaling and neural pathways, enabling them to quickly sense environmental changes and precisely regulate the body’s stress response, maintain homeostasis, and thus enhance their ability to adapt to complex environmental stresses. Defense and homeostasis were supported by the enrichment of OGG1 and chemotaxis-related genes [81], as well as the role of SCPEP1 [82] in blood pressure regulation. In summary, these results indicate that goat adaptation is a systematic and multi-pathway process that integrates metabolic, immune, homeostatic, and behavioral mechanisms.
High-elevation goat populations exhibit significant selection signals in several key genes related to physiological regulation, reproduction, and environmental adaptation, reflecting their comprehensive adaptation strategies to extreme environments such as hypoxia, low temperature, and high ultraviolet radiation. At the basic physiological level, SKIDA1 [47] enhances the hematopoietic function of high-elevation goats by participating in the hematopoietic process, thereby improving blood oxygen transport capacity and alleviating hypoxia stress. PRLR [48], KITLG [83] is involved in reproductive and developmental processes, suggesting the importance of reproductive adaptation in high-elevation environments; COL4A3BP [50] is involved in lipid transport and metabolism, and may improve an individual’s ability to survive in a resource-scarce environment by optimizing energy storage and utilization. Overall, these genes work synergistically across multiple levels, from hematopoietic regulation and energy metabolism to reproductive development and coat regulation, to construct a systematic adaptation mechanism for high-elevation goats to extreme environments. This pattern is consistent with the multi-system co-evolutionary features observed in other high-elevation adapted species [84–86].
As a complex climate phenomenon, drought needs to be assessed by comprehensively considering multiple dimensions such as precipitation and potential evapotranspiration [6]. Although temperature is closely related to the degree of drought and is often included in the calculation of drought indices (such as the Global Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Drought Index [87]), this study still focuses on the independent analysis of the drought adaptation mechanism of goats. The results showed that several key genes related to energy regulation, water maintenance and cellular homeostasis were identified, suggesting that drought-stricken goats cope with long-term water scarcity and high-temperature stress through multi-system synergistic regulation. Among them, CAMK4 [88], as an important signal transduction and kinase molecule, participates in regulating cellular stress response and metabolic balance; COL4A3BP [50] and HMGCR [89] participate in lipid transport and cholesterol synthesis to optimize lipid metabolism and energy reserves. Meanwhile, POLK [90] suggests that DNA damage caused by oxidative stress or environmental pressure in arid environments requires more efficient repair mechanisms to maintain genome stability. The role of FGF5 [52, 91]in regulating hair growth may be to enhance adaptability to arid environments by adjusting hair length and density, reducing evaporative heat loss or minimizing water loss. SEN1 [92] is upregulated in drought-resistant animals such as camels, and participates in antioxidant and cell protection processes, helping to alleviate oxidative damage caused by dehydration. Meanwhile, ZEB1 [93] further transmits external drought signals to the cellular response level by coordinating cell contraction, tissue remodeling, and osmotic pressure regulation, thereby promoting the occurrence and maintenance of the overall adaptive response. Overall, these genes work together at multiple levels, from signal transduction and lipid metabolism to DNA repair and cell cycle and phenotypic regulation, to construct a comprehensive adaptation strategy for drought-stricken goats to cope with water shortage and environmental stress.
In studies on extreme temperature adaptation, genes such as CAMK4 [51, 88], KIT [94], PRRG2 [95] and RRAS [96] are involved in cellular stress response and signal transduction processes, suggesting that the body can quickly sense temperature changes and regulate downstream physiological responses. As an important regulator of cell proliferation and differentiation, RAF1 [97] may enhance the body’s adaptability to extreme environments by regulating cell growth and repair processes. In addition, MKRN2 [98], LNX1 [99] and NOSIP [100] are involved in the ubiquitination regulation process, which helps maintain the dynamic balance between protein degradation and renewal under temperature stress. Regarding immunity and cell survival, IRF3 [101] is involved in the regulation of immune response, and BCL2L12 [102] is associated with the process of cell apoptosis, indicating that extreme temperatures may drive the body to enhance its immune capacity by inducing inflammatory responses or cell damage. In addition, CPT1C [103] and STARD4 [104] are involved in lipid metabolism and energy supply, suggesting that under extreme temperature conditions, the body needs to regulate lipid utilization to meet higher energy demands; LMOD1 [105] is involved in muscle contraction regulation, which may be related to maintaining the ability to produce heat in cold environments. Meanwhile, keratin family genes (KRT78, KRT79, KRT18 [106–108]) are often highly expressed in epithelial tissues such as skin and hair, maintaining the integrity of cell and tissue structures and buffering structural damage caused by low temperature freezing under extreme temperature conditions. Overall, these candidate genes work synergistically across multiple levels, including signal transduction, protein homeostasis, immune defense, and energy metabolism, to jointly construct a comprehensive adaptation mechanism for goats to extreme temperature environments.
Conclusions
This study systematically analyzed the selection signals of Chinese goats under different extreme environments (such as high elevation, hot, and arid), revealing that environmental pressures shape the adaptive evolutionary pattern of their genome through multidimensional selection. By integrating whole-genome resequencing data with high-resolution climate variables, we analyzed the association between environmental heterogeneity and genetic variation at the population scale, and identified a series of candidate genes related to energy metabolism, developmental regulation, immune response and morphological adaptation. Among them, genes such as CAMK4, COL4A3BP, CEBPZ and FGF5 showed selection signals in different environmental gradients, suggesting that they may play an important role in key adaptation processes such as regulating physiological homeostasis, signal transduction and energy metabolism. This study not only deepens our understanding of the evolutionary mechanism of environmental adaptation in Chinese goats, but also provides important theoretical basis for goat stress resistance breeding and germplasm resource protection. Against the backdrop of intensifying global climate change, exploring and utilizing the genetic diversity inherent in local breeds is of great significance for enhancing the environmental adaptability of livestock systems.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Summary information for 510 individuals undergoing resequencing. Table S2. Data overview of the screened 29 chinese goat breeds. Table S3. Environmental variables and their grouping based on environmental variables for 29 chinese goat breeds in their respective regions. Table S4. Goat populations in high and low elevation areas. Table S5.Goat populations in hot and cold regions. Table S6. Goat populations in arid and humid regions. Table S7. The climatic parameters' contribution for the principal component 1(PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2). Table S8. Goat populations with CL1 and CL2. Table S9. Candidate regions based on FST in CL1 and CL2. Table S10. Candidate regions based on z-scores in CL1 and CL2. Table S11. Shared genes detected by FST and LFMM methods in CL1 and CL2. Table S12. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in CL1 and CL2. Table S13. Candidate regions based on FST values in G-high and G-low. Table S14. Candidate regions based on ratio estimates in G-high and G-low. Table S15. Shared genes detected by and ratio methods in G-high and G-low. Table S16. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in G-high and G-low. Table S17. Candidate regions based on FST Values in G-arid and G-humid. Table S18. Candidate regions based on
ratio estimates in G-arid and G-humid. Table S19. Shared genes detected by FST and
ratio methods in G-arid and G-humid. Table S20. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in G-arid and G-humid. Table S21. Candidate regions based on FST values in G-hot and G-cold. Table S22. Candidate regions based on
ratio estimates in G-hot and G-cold. Table S23. Shared genes detected by FST and
ratio methods in G-hot and G-cold. Table S24. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in in G-hot and G-cold.
Acknowledgements
All authors thank the Department of Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University for providing the necessary equipment for this study.
Authors’ contributions
Methodology, W.W, and K.C; Software, W.W, K.C and J.D; Visualization, W.W and K.C; Validation, L.Q and K.Y; Supervision, L.Q and W. L; Formal Analysis, K.Y, and J.L; Investigation, K.Y and J.D; Funding Acquisition, K.Y and W.L; writing—original draft preparation, W.W and K.Y; writing—review and editing, W.L and K.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Shanxi Agricultural University (2020BQ75) and Open Project Fund of Shanxi Key Laboratory of Livestock Genetic Resources Exploration and Biotech Breeding (2025).
Data availability
In this study, we analyzed 510 goats, of which the whole-genome resequencing data of 491 goats were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB), while the remaining 19 goats [109]were sequenced by our research group. The detailed accession numbers of each individual sample are listed in Table S1.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanxi Agricultural University (approval number: SXAU-EAW-2022G.WX.0116211).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Benestad RE, Lussana C, Dobler A. Global record-breaking recurrence rates indicate more widespread and intense surface air temperature and precipitation extremes. Sci Adv. 2024;10(45):eado3712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Myhre G, Alterskjær K, Stjern CW, Hodnebrog Ø, Marelle L, Samset BH, Sillmann J, Schaller N, Fischer E, Schulz M, et al. Frequency of extreme precipitation increases extensively with event rareness under global warming. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Song G, Zhang X, Cao J, Hu S, Chen Q, Li W, Mo L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yan X, et al. Ancient mitochondrial genome reveals matrilineal genetic inheritance of Chinese goats. J Archaeol Sci. 2024;169:106026. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Petretto E, Dettori ML, Luigi-Sierra MG, Noce A, Pazzola M, Vacca GM, Molina A, Martínez A, Goyache F, Carolan S, et al. Investigating the footprint of post-domestication dispersal on the diversity of modern European, African and Asian goats. Genet Sel Evol. 2024;56(1):55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boothby TC. Mechanisms and evolution of resistance to environmental extremes in animals. Evodevo. 2019;10:30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang W, Cai K, Fan M, Pang Z, Pan Y, Cheng L, Qiao L, Wang R, Liu W, Liu J. Integrating SNP data to reveal the adaptive selection features of goat populations in extreme environments. BMC Genomics. 2025;26(1):553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Su D, Zhou T, Wang Y, Wang L. Cold Exposure Regulates Hepatic Glycogen and Lipid Metabolism in Newborn Goats. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(18):14330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Zhang H, Duan X, Li H, Niu L, Wang L, Li L, Zhang H, Zhong T. The complete mitochondrial genome of Chinese tibetan goat (Capra hircus). Mitochondrial DNA DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(2):1161–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pang Z, Yang P, Cai K, Wang W, Afe AE, Pan Y, Qiao L, Liu W. Integrating whole-genome resequencing data reveals adaptive selection signatures in sheep populations under extreme environments. BMC Genomics. 2025;26(1):1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peng W, Zhang Y, Gao L, Shi W, Liu Z, Guo X, Zhang Y, Li B, Li G, Cao J, et al. Selection signatures and landscape genomics analysis to reveal climate adaptation of goat breeds. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dauphin B, Rellstab C, Wüest RO, Karger DN, Holderegger R, Gugerli F, Manel S. Re-thinking the environment in landscape genomics. Trends Ecol Evol. 2023;38(3):261–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kebede FG, Derks MFL, Dessie T, Hanotte O, Barros CP, Crooijmans R, Komen H, Bastiaansen JWM. Landscape genomics reveals regions associated with adaptive phenotypic and genetic variation in Ethiopian indigenous chickens. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goitom S, Gicheha MG, Njonge FK, Kiplangat N. Landscape genomics and selection signatures of local adaptation of Eritrean indigenous cattle along environmental gradients. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021;53(4):423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Niu Y, Li Y, Zhao Y, He X, Zhao Q, Pu Y, Ma Y, Jiang L. Whole-genome sequencing identifies functional genes for environmental adaptation in Chinese sheep. J Genet Genomics. 2024;51(11):1278–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wiener P, Robert C, Ahbara A, Salavati M, Abebe A, Kebede A, Wragg D, Friedrich J, Vasoya D, Hume DA et al. Whole-Genome Sequence Data Suggest Environmental Adaptation of Ethiopian Sheep Populations. Genome Biol Evol 2021;13(3):evab014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. ArXiv: Genomics 2013:13033997.
- 18.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira M, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker P, Daly M, et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harris I, Osborn TJ, Jones P, Lister D. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci Data. 2020;7:109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;37(12):4302–15. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wampler PJ, Rediske RR, Molla AR. Using ArcMap, Google Earth, and Global Positioning Systems to select and locate random households in rural Haiti. Int J Health Geogr. 2013;12:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023.
- 23.Hijmans RJ. terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R package version 2022, 1.7.
- 24.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fitak RR. OptM: estimating the optimal number of migration edges on population trees using Treemix. Biol Methods Protoc. 2021;6(1):bpab017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38(6):1358–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Caye K, Jumentier B, Lepeule J, Francois O. LFMM 2: fast and accurate inference of gene–environment associations in genome-wide studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36(4):852–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Frichot E, Schoville SD, Bouchard G, François O. Testing for associations between loci and environmental gradients using latent factor mixed models. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(7):1687–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2007;11:1633–44. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zomer RJ, Xu J, Trabucco A. Version 3 of the Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration Database. Sci Data. 2022;9:409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.United Nations Environment P. World Atlas of Desertification. London: Edward Arnold; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D587–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang D, Shang X, Ji Q, Niu L. Exploring genetic mapping and co-expression patterns to illuminate significance of Tbx20 in cardiac biology. Transgenic Res. 2025;34(1):5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jain A, Budhraja R, Garapati K, Lam C, Schultz MJ, Kozicz T, Morava E, Pandey A. Extensive Hypoglycosylation of Serum N-Glycoproteins in SRD5A3 Deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2026;49(2):e70163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chávez B, Ramos L, García-Becerra R, Vilchis F. Hamster SRD5A3 lacks steroid 5α-reductase activity in vitro. Steroids. 2015;94:41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bammens R, Mehta N, Race V, Foulquier F, Jaeken J, Tiemeyer M, Steet R, Matthijs G, Flanagan-Steet H. Abnormal cartilage development and altered N-glycosylation in Tmem165-deficient zebrafish mirrors the phenotypes associated with TMEM165-CDG. Glycobiology. 2015;25(6):669–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tayou J, Wang Q, Jang GF, Pronin AN, Orlandi C, Martemyanov KA, Crabb JW, Slepak VZ. Regulator of G Protein Signaling 7 (RGS7) Can Exist in a Homo-oligomeric Form That Is Regulated by Gαo and R7-binding Protein. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(17):9133–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gerber KJ, Squires KE, Hepler JR. Roles for Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins in Synaptic Signaling and Plasticity. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;89(2):273–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pang J, Zhao X, Zhang Z, Wang H, Zhou X, Yang Y, Li S, Chang X, Li F, Li X. [Overexpression of multimerin-2 promotes cutaneous melanoma cell invasion and migration and is associated with poor prognosis]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2025;45(7):1479–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ventrella R, Kaplan N, Hoover P, Perez White BE, Lavker RM, Getsios S. EphA2 Transmembrane Domain Is Uniquely Required for Keratinocyte Migration by Regulating Ephrin-A1 Levels. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(10):2133–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang MF, Li QL, Yang YF, Cao Y, Zhang CZ. FMNL1 Exhibits Pro-Metastatic Activity via CXCR2 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10:564614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shen T, Huang S. The role of Cdc25A in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2012;12(6):631–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fick SEaH RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;37:4302–15. 10.1002/joc.5086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mendoza-Castrejon J, Yang W, Denby E, Muthukumar R, Casey EB, Patel RM, Tasian SK, Magee JA. SKIDA1 sustains MLL::ENL-expressing hematopoietic progenitors during neonatal stages and promotes B-lineage priming. Blood Neoplasia. 2026;3(1):100185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Paré P, Reales G, Paixão-Côrtes VR, Vargas-Pinilla P, Viscardi LH, Fam B, Pissinatti A, Santos FR, Bortolini MC. Molecular evolutionary insights from PRLR in mammals. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2021;309:113791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Carrion EA, Moses MM, Behringer RR. FGF5. Differentiation. 2024;139:100736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jain A, Beutel O, Ebell K, Korneev S, Holthuis JC. Diverting CERT-mediated ceramide transport to mitochondria triggers Bax-dependent apoptosis. J Cell Sci. 2017;130(2):360–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xu H, Yong L, Gao X, Chen Y, Wang Y, Wang F, Hou X. CaMK4: Structure, physiological functions, and therapeutic potential. Biochem Pharmacol. 2024;224:116204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu XL, Wu SJ, Qi SY, Chen MM, Liu ZM, Zhang R, Zhao Y, Liu SQ, Zhou WD, Zhang JL et al. Increasing GSH-Px Activity and Activating Wnt Pathway Promote Fine Wool Growth in FGF5-Edited Sheep. Cells 2024;13(11):985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Sharpe LJ, Brown AJ. Controlling cholesterol synthesis beyond 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR). J Biol Chem. 2013;288(26):18707–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen L, Wang Y, Lin J, Song Z, Wang Q, Zhao W, Wang Y, Xiu X, Deng Y, Li X, et al. Exportin 4 depletion leads to nuclear accumulation of a subset of circular RNAs. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wang Y, Wan B, Li D, Zhou J, Li R, Bai M, Chen F, Yu L. BRSK2 is regulated by ER stress in protein level and involved in ER stress-induced apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;423(4):813–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xie Y, Lv Y, Zhang Y, Liang Z, Han L, Xie Y. LATS2 promotes apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells via triggering Mff-dependent mitochondrial fission and activating the JNK signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:679–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jiang K, Yao G, Hu L, Yan Y, Liu J, Shi J, Chang Y, Zhang Y, Liang D, Shen D, et al. MOB2 suppresses GBM cell migration and invasion via regulation of FAK/Akt and cAMP/PKA signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(4):230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Van Bergen NJ, Ahmed SM, Collins F, Cowley M, Vetro A, Dale RC, Hock DH, de Caestecker C, Menezes M, Massey S et al. Mutations in the exocyst component EXOC2 cause severe defects in human brain development. J Exp Med 2020, 217(10):e20192040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Bhandare P, Narain A, Hofstetter J, Rummel T, Wenzel J, Schülein-Völk C, Lamer S, Eilers U, Schlosser A, Eilers M et al. Phenotypic screens identify SCAF1 as critical activator of RNAPII elongation and global transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 2025, 53(4):gkae1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Abu-Zahra A, Haque MZ, Saleem A, Hussain A, Nipu F. FIP1L1-PDGFRA Positive Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Presenting With Vestibular Neuritis. Clin Case Rep. 2025;13(6):e70554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wu J, Li D, Wang L. Overview of PRMT1 modulators: Inhibitors and degraders. Eur J Med Chem. 2024;279:116887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Keplinger AJ, Srinivasan PA, Christensen SM, Suarez C, Ruthenburg AJ. A revised model of nuclear actin import: Importin 9 competes with cofilin, profilin, and RanGTP for actin binding. J Biol Chem. 2026;302(2):111123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nguyen NGT, Sapkota H, Shibata Y, Fesiuk A, Antalek M, Sail V, Ansel DJ, Amici DR, Peelor FF, Van Remmen H et al. HSF1 remodels mitochondrial biogenesis and function in cancer cells via TIMM17A. bioRxiv 2025.
- 64.Piesse C, Tymms M, Garrafa E, Gouzy C, Lacasa M, Cadel S, Cohen P, Foulon T. Human aminopeptidase B (rnpep) on chromosome 1q32.2: complementary DNA, genomic structure and expression. Gene. 2002;292(1–2):129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nguyen AL, Smith EM, Cheeseman IM. Co-essentiality analysis identifies PRR12 as a cohesin interacting protein and contributor to genomic integrity. Dev Cell. 2025;60(8):1217–e12331217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Han ZP, Yang RZ, Zhou W, Zhang LL, Wang JR, Liu CJ, Liu SD. Population structure and selection signal analysis of indigenous sheep from the southern edge of the Taklamakan Desert. BMC Genomics. 2024;25(1):681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lu Y, Ma R, Li D, Gao Y, Sheng Z, Shi J, Peng Y, Gao Z, Deng W, He X. Genomic and Molecular Mechanisms of Goat Environmental Adaptation. Biology (Basel) 2025;14(6):654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Peng W, Zhang Y, Gao L, Feng C, Yang Y, Li B, Wu L, Wu A, Wang S, Ren X, et al. Analysis of World-Scale Mitochondrial DNA Reveals the Origin and Migration Route of East Asia Goats. Front Genet. 2022;13:796979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dan H, Zhong Ha, Akhatayeva Z, Lin K, Xu S. Whole-Genome Selective Scans Detect Genes Associated with Cashmere Traits and Climatic Adaptation in Cashmere Goats (Capra hircus) in China. Genes. 2025;16(3):292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhang L, Zhao S, Yu H, Duan Y, Zhang J, Xu N, Zhao Y. ASIP, AHCY and ITCH Genes Are Associated with the Coat Color of Local Goats (Capra hircus) of Southwestern China. Animals (Basel) 2025;15(13):1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 71.Gao J, Sun L, Liao R, Lyu Y, Zhang S, Xu J, He M, Wu C, Zhang D, Lin Y et al. Genomic Dissection of Chinese Yangtze River Delta White Goat Based on Whole Genome Sequencing. Animals (Basel) 2025;15(7):979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 72.Zhou C, Li Y, Cheng W, Lian Z. Genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes affecting major traits of Ziwuling black goat. BMC Genomics. 2025;26(1):1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Han M, Rong Y, Wang X, Ao X, Shang F, Wang Z, Su R, Wang R, Liu Y, Zhang Y. Population structure, regions of homozygosity (ROH) and selection signal of two domesitic goat breeds revealed by whole-genome resequencing. BMC Genomics. 2026;27(1):65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.HuangFu R, Li H, Luo Y, He F, Huan C, Ahmed Z, Zhang B, Lei C, Yi K. Illuminating genetic diversity and selection signatures in matou goats through whole-genome sequencing analysis. Genes (Basel) 2024;15(7):909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 75.Guo J, Tao H, Li P, Li L, Zhong T, Wang L, Ma J, Chen X, Song T, Zhang H. Whole-genome sequencing reveals selection signatures associated with important traits in six goat breeds. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sun X, Niu Q, Jiang J, Wang G, Zhou P, Li J, Chen C, Liu L, Xu L, Ren H. Identifying candidate genes for litter size and three morphological traits in youzhou dark goats based on genome-wide snp markers. Genes (Basel) 2023;14(6):1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 77.Wei C, Lu J, Xu L, Liu G, Wang Z, Zhao F, Zhang L, Han X, Du L, Liu C. Genetic structure of Chinese indigenous goats and the special geographical structure in the Southwest China as a geographic barrier driving the fragmentation of a large population. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Duan P, Yu YL, Cheng YN, Nie MH, Yang Q, Xia LH, Ji YX, Pan ZY. Correction: Exosomal miR-1a-3p derived from glucocorticoid-stimulated M1 macrophages promotes the adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs in glucocorticoid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head by targeting Cebpz. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pan Z, Li X, Wu D, Chen X, Zhang C, Jin S, Geng Z. The duck rxra gene promotes adipogenesis and correlates with feed efficiency. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(4):680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 80.Guan F, Zhang T, Liu X, Han W, Lin H, Li L, Chen G, Li T. Evaluation of voltage-dependent calcium channel γ gene families identified several novel potential susceptible genes to schizophrenia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Michel M, Benítez-Buelga C, Calvo PA, Hanna BMF, Mortusewicz O, Masuyer G, Davies J, Wallner O, Sanjiv K, Albers JJ, et al. Small-molecule activation of OGG1 increases oxidative DNA damage repair by gaining a new function. Science. 2022;376(6600):1471–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Pan X, Grigoryeva L, Seyrantepe V, Peng J, Kollmann K, Tremblay J, Lavoie JL, Hinek A, Lübke T, Pshezhetsky AV. Serine carboxypeptidase SCPEP1 and Cathepsin A play complementary roles in regulation of vasoconstriction via inactivation of endothelin-1. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(2):e1004146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wu S, Li J, Ma T, Li J, Li Y, Jiang H, Zhang Q. MiR-27a regulates WNT3A and KITLG expression in Cashmere goats with different coat colors. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;32(2):205–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yang J, Jin ZB, Chen J, Huang XF, Li XM, Liang YB, Mao JY, Chen X, Zheng Z, Bakshi A, et al. Genetic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Tibetans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(16):4189–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ge RL, Cai Q, Shen YY, San A, Ma L, Zhang Y, Yi X, Chen Y, Yang L, Huang Y, et al. Draft genome sequence of the Tibetan antelope. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li G, Luo J, Wang F, Xu D, Ahmed Z, Chen S, Li R, Ma Z. Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic diversity, differentiation, and selection signatures of yak breeds/populations in Qinghai, China. Front Genet. 2022;13:1034094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gao X, Zhao Q, Zhao X, Wu P, Pan W, Gao X, Sun M. Temporal and spatial evolution of the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) in the Loess Plateau under climate change from 2001 to 2050. Sci Total Environ. 2017;595:191–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Koga T, Kawakami A. The role of CaMK4 in immune responses. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28(2):211–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wang H, Shu L, Lv C, Liu N, Long Y, Peng X, Ling H, Tao T, Tang J, Cheng Y, et al. BRCC36 Deubiquitinates HMGCR to Regulate the Interplay Between Ferroptosis and Pyroptosis. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(11):e2304263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Palassin P, Lapierre M, Bonnet S, Pillaire MJ, Győrffy B, Teyssier C, Jalaguier S, Hoffmann JS, Cavaillès V, Castet-Nicolas A. RIP140 regulates POLK gene expression and the response to alkylating drugs in colon cancer cells. Cancer Drug Resist. 2022;5(2):401–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhao H, Hu R, Li F, Yue X. Five SNPs Within the FGF5 Gene Significantly Affect Both Wool Traits and Growth Performance in Fine-Wool Sheep (Ovis aries). Front Genet. 2021;12:732097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Haidurov A, Zheltukhin AO, Snezhkina AV, Krasnov GS, Kudryavtseva AV, Budanov AV. p53-regulated SESN1 and SESN2 regulate cell proliferation and cell death through control of STAT3. Cell Commun Signal. 2025;23(1):105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Jiang H, Wei H, Wang H, Wang Z, Li J, Ou Y, Xiao X, Wang W, Chang A, Sun W, et al. Zeb1-induced metabolic reprogramming of glycolysis is essential for macrophage polarization in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(3):206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sheikh E, Tran T, Vranic S, Levy A, Bonfil RD. Role and significance of c-KIT receptor tyrosine kinase in cancer: A review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022;22(5):683–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Yazicioglu MN, Monaldini L, Chu K, Khazi FR, Murphy SL, Huang H, Margaritis P, High KA. Cellular localization and characterization of cytosolic binding partners for Gla domain-containing proteins PRRG4 and PRRG2. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(36):25908–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Alarcón B, Martínez-Martín N. RRas2, RhoG and T-cell phagocytosis. Small GTPases. 2012;3(2):97–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Colanzi A, Sutterlin C, Malhotra V. RAF1-activated MEK1 is found on the Golgi apparatus in late prophase and is required for Golgi complex fragmentation in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 2003;161(1):27–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Shin C, Ito Y, Ichikawa S, Tokunaga M, Sakata-Sogawa K, Tanaka T. MKRN2 is a novel ubiquitin E3 ligase for the p65 subunit of NF-κB and negatively regulates inflammatory responses. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Park R, Kim H, Jang M, Jo D, Park YI, Namkoong S, Lee JI, Jang IS, Park J. LNX1 contributes to tumor growth by down-regulating p53 stability. Faseb j. 2019;33(12):13216–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pörschke M, Rodríguez-González I, Parfentev I, Urlaub H, Kehlenbach RH. Transportin 1 is a major nuclear import receptor of the nitric oxide synthase interacting protein. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(3):102932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Al Hamrashdi M, Brady G. Regulation of IRF3 activation in human antiviral signaling pathways. Biochem Pharmacol. 2022;200:115026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Feng BS, Wu YJ, Hong JY, Geng XR, Liu JQ, Liu ZG, Zheng PY, Yang PC. Bcl2L12 plays a critical role in the development of intestinal allergy. Immunol Lett. 2018;203:87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schlaepfer IR, Joshi M. CPT1A-mediated Fat Oxidation, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Potential. Endocrinology 2020;161(2):bqz046. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 104.Iaea DB, Spahr ZR, Singh RK, Chan RB, Zhou B, Bareja R, Elemento O, Di Paolo G, Zhang X, Maxfield FR. Stable reduction of STARD4 alters cholesterol regulation and lipid homeostasis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2020;1865(4):158609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Perisic Matic L, Rykaczewska U, Razuvaev A, Sabater-Lleal M, Lengquist M, Miller CL, Ericsson I, Röhl S, Kronqvist M, Aldi S, et al. Phenotypic Modulation of Smooth Muscle Cells in Atherosclerosis Is Associated With Downregulation of LMOD1, SYNPO2, PDLIM7, PLN, and SYNM. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(9):1947–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Cheon J, Kim B, Park J, Shin J, Kim TH. Unveiling Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Bioinformatics: The Role of SPP1 and KRT78. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25(22):12062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 107.Liang X, Qiu X, Ma Y, Xu W, Chen S, Zhang P, Liu M, Lin X. KRT18 regulates trophoblast cell migration and invasion which are essential for embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21(1):78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kim D, Choi I, Ha SK, Gonzalez FJ. Keratin 79 is a PPARA target that is highly expressed by liver damage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;650:132–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wang X, Zhou Z, Chai X, Li J, Wang W, Pang Z, Cheng L, Cheng C, Qiao L, Pan Y et al. Whole-genome resequencing to identify selection signatures associated with high fertility in lüliang black goat. Animals (Basel) 2024;15(1):36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Table S1. Summary information for 510 individuals undergoing resequencing. Table S2. Data overview of the screened 29 chinese goat breeds. Table S3. Environmental variables and their grouping based on environmental variables for 29 chinese goat breeds in their respective regions. Table S4. Goat populations in high and low elevation areas. Table S5.Goat populations in hot and cold regions. Table S6. Goat populations in arid and humid regions. Table S7. The climatic parameters' contribution for the principal component 1(PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2). Table S8. Goat populations with CL1 and CL2. Table S9. Candidate regions based on FST in CL1 and CL2. Table S10. Candidate regions based on z-scores in CL1 and CL2. Table S11. Shared genes detected by FST and LFMM methods in CL1 and CL2. Table S12. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in CL1 and CL2. Table S13. Candidate regions based on FST values in G-high and G-low. Table S14. Candidate regions based on ratio estimates in G-high and G-low. Table S15. Shared genes detected by and ratio methods in G-high and G-low. Table S16. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in G-high and G-low. Table S17. Candidate regions based on FST Values in G-arid and G-humid. Table S18. Candidate regions based on
ratio estimates in G-arid and G-humid. Table S19. Shared genes detected by FST and
ratio methods in G-arid and G-humid. Table S20. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in G-arid and G-humid. Table S21. Candidate regions based on FST values in G-hot and G-cold. Table S22. Candidate regions based on
ratio estimates in G-hot and G-cold. Table S23. Shared genes detected by FST and
ratio methods in G-hot and G-cold. Table S24. Functional enrichment analysis results of candidate genes in in G-hot and G-cold.
Data Availability Statement
In this study, we analyzed 510 goats, of which the whole-genome resequencing data of 491 goats were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB), while the remaining 19 goats [109]were sequenced by our research group. The detailed accession numbers of each individual sample are listed in Table S1.

