Abstract
Background
ABO subtypes are characterized by attenuated antigen expression, rendering them susceptible to serological misclassification and posing substantial risks to transfusion safety. Splice-site variants represent one of the mechanisms underlying ABO subtype formation; however, previous mechanistic investigations have predominantly focused on the 5′ splice-site(5′SS), leaving the functional consequences of 3′ splice-site (3′SS) variants largely unexplored.
Methods
Serological phenotyping of a proband with ABO grouping discrepancy was performed using tube agglutination, microcolumn gel agglutination, and absorption-elution assays. Genotyping was resolved by long-range PCR coupled with Nanopore sequencing. The splicing impact of this novel variant and two previously reported variants, c.29-3C>G and c.29-10T>A, was predicted in silico and validated by in vitro minigene assay. Computational saturation mutagenesis was further deployed to systematically delineate a preliminary framework of regulatory principles governing 3′SS variation.
Results
A novel 3′SS variant, c.29-2A>G, was identified in an ABO*A1.02 background in a proband with an Ael phenotype. This novel variant and two previously reported variants disrupted the canonical 3’SS of intron 1, converging on exon 2 skipping as the predominant aberrant splicing event. Additionally, c.29-10T>A activated a cryptic acceptor site, generating a secondary transcript with an 8-bp intronic retention. All aberrant transcripts disrupt the open reading frame and introduce premature termination codons. Through computational saturation mutagenesis, we further established an initial position- and base-dependent risk stratification model for 3′SS variants.
Conclusion
This study provides the first direct mechanistic evidence linking ABO 3′SS variants to subtype pathogenesis, demonstrating that exon 2 skipping constitutes a shared molecular lesion across intron 1 3′SS variants, ultimately leading to attenuated blood group antigen expression. The preliminary computationally derived risk stratification framework established herein offers a clinically valuable reference for interpreting 3′SS variants, with implications that extend beyond blood group genetics to the broader landscape of splicing-mediated human diseases.
Keywords: ABO subtypes, antigen expression, exon skipping, splice-site variants, transfusion
1. Introduction
The ABO blood group system, discovered by Landsteiner in 1900, remains the most clinically significant human blood group, with importance extending beyond transfusion to transplantation and forensics (1–3). The synthesis of A or B antigens on erythrocytes is catalyzed by the glycosyltransferase A or glycosyltransferase B, respectively, both of which are encoded by the ABO gene at 9q34.2 (4). Genetic variants in the ABO gene can alter glycosyltransferase function, giving rise to a spectrum of ABO subtypes characterized by attenuated antigen expression (5). Among these, the Ael phenotype represents a particularly extreme example, defined by markedly diminished A antigen levels that are insufficient to produce direct agglutination with anti-A or anti-A,B antibodies, yet remain detectable by absorption-elution tests (6, 7). Clinically, such weak expression renders Ael individuals prone to serological misclassification, and the accompanying naturally occurring anti-A1 antibodies place them at risk of hemolytic transfusion reactions if transfused with incompatible blood (8). Accurate identification of such subtypes via genotypic and mechanistic characterization is therefore fundamental to diagnostic reliability and transfusion safety.
Currently, over 400 ABO variants have been documented, with the vast majority residing in exonic regions and a minority located in noncoding regions, including intronic regulatory elements and splice sites (9). Despite their relative rarity, splice-site variants are of considerable clinical and biological importance, as proper pre-mRNA splicing relies on accurate exon-intron junction demarcation, achieved by the spliceosome through recognition of the 5′SS and 3′SS (10). In this process, the 5′SS directs spliceosome assembly at the upstream boundary, while the 3′SS governs acceptor recognition and exon ligation (11, 12). Specifically, the 3’SS is defined through coordinated binding of Splicing Factor 1 (SF1) to the branch site and U2 small nuclear RNA auxiliary factor 2 (U2AF2) to the polypyrimidine tract, which together direct U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) recruitment and subsequent AG-dependent exon ligation (13–16). Given the precision of these recognition events, disruption by splice-site variants can occur via diverse mechanisms that ultimately lead to aberrant mRNA transcripts (17, 18). Previous mechanistic investigations into splice-site variations underlying the ABO phenotypes have largely focused on the 5′SS (19–22), whereas the contribution of 3′SS variants remains considerably unexplored. This skewed distribution may be partly attributable to the fact that 3′SS variants are inherently less frequent than 5′SS variants in human genes (23).
Third-generation sequencing (TGS), with its long-read advantage, enables full-length haplotype sequencing of the ABO gene, providing comprehensive coverage of coding regions, introns, and flanking regulatory sequences, thereby facilitating the detection of intronic variants that were previously challenging to identify with conventional approaches (24). Using TGS, we identified a novel 3′ splice-site variant, c.29-2A>G, in intron 1 of the ABO*A1.02 allele from a proband presenting with Ael phenotype. Of note, four distinct variants have been reported in close proximity to the intron 1 3′SS of the ABO gene: c.29-3C>G on ABO*B.01 (25), c.29-5T>G on ABO*A1.01 (26), c.29-10T>A (27), and c.29-10T>G on ABO*A1.02 (28). All four variants uniformly impair ABO antigen expression, giving rise to ABO subgroup phenotypes. Except for c.29-5T>G in ABO*A1.01, which exhibits mild inter-individual serological variability, the remaining three variants are consistently associated with the Bel or Ael phenotypes (24, 25). These findings suggest that such variants may converge on a shared splicing defect, ultimately leading to barely detectable antigen expression. To validate this hypothesis, we selected c.29-3C>G, c.29-10T>A, and our newly identified c.29-2A>G variant as representative 3′SS variants for functional characterization. We integrated in silico splicing predictions with in vitro minigene assays to dissect the molecular basis of these three 3′SS variants. Furthermore, computational saturation mutagenesis was employed to assess the impact of single-base substitutions at distinct positions on acceptor site stability, revealing shared regulatory signatures among these variants. Collectively, this study aimed to provide the first mechanistic evidence linking 3′SS variants to ABO phenotypes and establish a preliminary systematic framework for deciphering the regulatory logic governing splicing at this locus.
2. Methods
2.1. Peripheral blood sampling
The proband was a healthy individual of Chinese descent whose initial ABO grouping revealed discordant forward and reverse typing results. Exclusion criteria comprised a history of blood transfusion, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or other inherited disorders that could interfere with ABO antigen expression. Following written informed consent, 2 mL of peripheral venous blood was obtained and collected into an EDTA-containing tube.
2.2. ABO blood grouping
ABO phenotyping of the proband was performed in parallel using the standard tube agglutination test and the gel column agglutination test. For the tube test, forward grouping employed anti-A, anti-B, anti-A,B, and anti-H reagents (Shanghai Hemo-pharmaceutical Biological Company), while reverse grouping was carried out using A1, B, O, and A2 reagent erythrocytes (Shanghai Hemo-pharmaceutical Biological Company) for plasma antibody identification. For the gel card assay, testing was conducted with blood grouping gel cards (Bio-Rad, Switzerland) strictly in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, with reverse grouping employing A1 and B standard erythrocytes (Shanghai Hemo-pharmaceutical Biological Company). To confirm weak A antigen expression, an adsorption-elution assay was additionally performed using human-derived anti-A serum (Shanghai Hemo-pharmaceutical Biological Company), following the protocols specified in the AABB Technical Manual (20th edition).
2.3. ABO genotyping by long-range PCR and nanopore sequencing
The ABO gene haplotype of the proband was resolved using a three-fragment long-range PCR strategy with three overlapping primer pairs, generating three adjacent amplicons (9.0, 9.6, and 12.0 kb) sharing ~1.3-kb overlaps and covering the entire ABO locus. After library preparation, the amplicons were sequenced on the PolyseqOne platform. Following basecalling and demultiplexing (PolyseqSequence), reads were aligned to the T2T-CHM13v2.0 reference genome for ABO genotyping and variant calling (minimap2, v2.28-r1209). Detailed PCR conditions, library preparation, and bioinformatic analysis parameters have been described in our previous study on a 5′SS splice-site variant (29).
2.4. In silico splicing analysis of three ABO intron 1 3′SS variants
To explore how intron 1 3′SS variants perturb pre-mRNA splicing, we analyzed c.29-2A>G and two previously reported variants (c.29-3C>G and c.29-10T>A) in the ABO*A1.02 background (25, 27). Although originally identified on a B.01 allele, c.29-3C>G was evaluated in this background to rule out allelic confounders. Splicing patterns were predicted using RDDC (https://rddc.tsinghua-gd.org/zh), and quantitative scores for sites S1–S5 (Figure 1A) were obtained using SpliceRover (http://bioit2.irc.ugent.be/rover/splicerover), NetGene2 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetGene2-2.42), and ASSP (http://wangcomputing.com/assp/index.html).
Figure 1.

(A) Schematic of the partial ABO genomic locus (exons E1-E3 and flanking introns). S1/S4, canonical 5’ donors; S3/S5, canonical 3’ acceptors; S2, predicted alternative 3’ acceptor. (B) Schematic of the minigene constructs. The wild-type and three mutant constructs were generated by fragment assembly or site-directed mutagenesis. (C) Computational design of saturation mutagenesis library spanning the 20-nt region upstream of the intron 1 3′ acceptor. Wild-type, green; substituted, red.
2.5. Minigene splicing assay
Minigene splicing assays were performed to validate the in silico predictions. To obtain the insert, two fragments were amplified using two pairs of primers: one covering exon 1 and its downstream intronic region, and the other spanning the mutation-bearing intronic region to the 5′ end of exon 3 (Supplementary Table 1). These two amplicons were subsequently assembled to reconstruct the complete insert. Using genomic DNA from a healthy control and the proband as templates, the wild-type and c.29-2A>G inserts were obtained, respectively, and cloned into the pMini-CopGFP vector via the BamHI and XhoI sites to generate the wild-type plasmid and the c.29-2A>G construct (Figure 1B). For the two previously reported variations, c.29-3C>G and c.29-10T>A, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the wild-type plasmid as a template and primers carrying the desired substitutions (Supplementary Tables 2, 3). All resulting constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing prior to functional assays. HEK293T cells were selected for transient transfection. Compared with the K562 cell line (30), HEK293T cells offer a simpler experimental workflow and higher transfection efficiency. Moreover, HEK293T cells possess the full complement of splicing machinery required for accurate pre-mRNA processing, ensuring reliable detection of variant-induced aberrant splicing events (31). The pMini-CopGFP vector was chosen for its hPGK promoter, which provides moderate transcription levels suitable for splicing assays, as well as its built-in quality-control intron and independent CopGFP reporter for monitoring transfection efficiency. This pMini-CopGFP/HEK293T system was validated in our previous ABO splice-site functional study (29). All subsequent procedures, including cell transfection, total RNA extraction, RT-PCR (primers listed in Supplementary Table 4), and the analysis of the resulting splicing products by agarose gel electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, and Sanger sequencing, were performed as described previously.
2.6. Computational saturation mutagenesis of the ABO intron 1 3′SS upstream region
For a systematic dissection of the regulatory impact of single-base substitutions at different positions on native acceptor site (S3) stability, computational saturation mutagenesis was performed by substituting A/G/T/C at each position1 to20 upstream of the acceptor site in the ABO*A1.02 background (Figure 1C) (32). Splicing pattern prediction and S3 score acquisition were performed using the same methods as above (RDDC, ASSP, NetGene2, and SpliceRover) with the predicted scores visualized as bar charts and line graphs. To assess the relationship between positional distance and splicing scores while controlling for base identity, we selected positions where T was the wild-type base (10 of 20 positions) for correlation analysis. One position (10 T>A), corresponding to the c.29-10T>A variant, was identified as an extreme outlier for SpliceRover regression, based on its outlying scores (Figure 2B), and was excluded prior to modeling. Simple linear regression was performed using GraphPad Prism 11, and the results were presented as scatter plots with regression lines.
Figure 2.

In silico prediction of 3′ splice sites based on a computational saturation mutagenesis model of ABO intron 1. (A) Bar plots showing ASSP, NetGene, and SpliceRover scores for A/G/T/C substitutions at positions 1-20. (B) Line plots of score profiles across the same positions. In all panels, the X-axis denotes the distance to the 3’SS (bp), and the Y-axis shows tool-specific prediction scores. Horizontal dashed lines indicate the wild-type baseline.
3. Results
3.1. Serological results
The ABO blood group serology results for the proband are summarized in Table 1. Tube testing showed no reactivity with anti-A, anti-B, or anti-A,B, but strong (4+) reactivity with anti-H; reverse typing revealed 1+w agglutination with A1 cells, 2+s with B cells, and no agglutination with O or A2 cells. Gel column agglutination was consistent, showing no forward reactivity with anti-A or anti-B; reverse typing yielded 2+ agglutination with A1 cells, 4+ with B cells and no reaction in the control. Critically, adsorption-elution confirmed weak A antigen expression, with the eluate showing 1+w reactivity with A1 cells but no reactivity with B or O cells. Collectively, these findings are consistent with an Ael phenotype accompanied by naturally occurring anti-A1.
Table 1.
Serologic and molecular characteristics of the proband.
| Forward typing (tube method) |
Forward typing (gel column) |
Reverse typing (tube method) |
Reverse typing (gel column) |
Adsorption and elution |
Pheno-type | Genotype | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-A | Anti-B | Anti-A,B | Anti-H | Anti-A | Anti-B | A1c | Bc | Oc | A2c | A1c | Bc | Ctl | A1c | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 4+ | 0 | 0 | 1+W | 2+S | 0 | 0 | 2+ | 4+ | 0 | 1+W | Ael |
ABO*A1.02(c.29-2A>G)/ ABO*O.01.02 |
, weak reaction; S, strong reaction; 0, no agglutination.
3.2. Single-molecule nanopore sequencing results
Nanopore sequencing revealed a single-base substitution(c.29-2A>G)disrupted the invariant AG dinucleotide of the intron 1 acceptor splice site on the background of an ABO*A1.02 haplotype (Figure 3). This variant was identified with a mean sequencing depth of 620× and 100% coverage of the target amplicon. The variant allele frequency (VAF) was 7/10,000,000 in gnomAD(Genome Aggregation Database) and 1/100,000 in ExAC (Exome Aggregation Consortium). No other exonic or intronic variants were detected within this haplotype. The proband carried a novel ABO*A1.02-like allele, defined by the c.29-2A>G substitution, along with an ABO*O.01.02 allele.
Figure 3.

Nucleotide sequences flanking the c.29-2A>G variation in the proband, visualized using SnapGene v8.0.2.
3.3. In silico splicing predictions for three ABO intron 1 3’SS variants
3.3.1. Predicted splicing patterns
The RDDC RNA Splicer tool uniformly predicted exon 2 skipping (a 70-bp deletion) for all three variants. An additional aberrant transcript with an 8-bp insertion was predicted exclusively for c.29-10T>A, attributed to the activation of a novel acceptor site (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

RDDC RNA Splicer prediction of the c.29-2A>G, c.29-3C>G, and c.29-10T>A variants. All three are predicted to cause exon 2 skipping (70-bp deletion), with an additional 8-bp insertion exclusively for c.29-10T>A via a novel acceptor site activation. All aberrant transcripts result in frameshift and premature termination.
3.3.2. Splice-site prediction scores
Table 2 summarizes the prediction scores from three tools. The five splice sites are depicted in Figure 1A, where S1 and S4 represent canonical 5’ donors; S3 and S5 represent canonical 3’ acceptors; and S2 represents a predicted alternative 3’ acceptor. ASSP scored the wildtype S3 as a strong constitutive acceptor (10.314); this signal was completely lost in c.29-2A>G, weakened to 2.299 in c.29-3C>G, and shifted to 7.750 in c.29-10T>A. Notably, an S2 signal (9.955) was detected exclusively in c.29-10T>A. NetGene2 yielded similar results: the wild-type S3 score (0.7) decreased to 0.43 in c.29-10T>A, whereas no S3 signal was detected for c.29-2A>G or c.29-3C>G. Consistently, an S2 signal (0.51) was observed only for c.29-10T>A. SpliceRover similarly demonstrated marked S3 score reductions and moderate S4 decreases, with c.29-2A>G, c.29-3C>G, and c.29-10T>A showing reductions from 0.971258 to 0.090461, 0.11058, and 0.090461, respectively, and from 0.611193 to 0.361094, 0.462848, and 0.553425 at S4. Again, an S2 signal (0.771202) was detected exclusively in c.29-10T>A. Scores at S1 (13.372) and S5 (9.983) remained unchanged relative to the wild-type across all tools.
Table 2.
Splice-site prediction scores for wild-type and three 3' ss variants in intron 1 via SpliceRover, NetGene and ASSP.
| Prediction tool | Variant | S1 (GGCCGGT^GAGTG) | S2 (ACTCCAG^TTTTTC) | S3 (TTTCCAG^GAAAAA) | S4 (TTTGGGT^AAGAC) | S5 (TCTGCAG^TTACG) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSP | WT | 13.372 | — | 10.314 | 9.437 | 9.983 |
| c.29-2A>G | 13.372 | — | — | 9.437 | 9.983 | |
| c.29-3C>G | 13.372 | — | 2.299 | 9.437 | 9.983 | |
| c.29-10T>A | 13.372 | 9.955 | 7.750 | 9.437 | 9.983 | |
| NetGene 2 | WT | 0.99 | — | 0.77 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| c.29-2A>G | 0.99 | — | — | 0.35 | 0.29 | |
| c.29-3C>G | 0.99 | — | — | 0.35 | 0.29 | |
| c.29-10T>A | 0.99 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.29 | |
| SpliceRover | WT | 0.999453 | — | 0.971258 | 0.611193 | 0.772985 |
| c.29-2A>G | 0.999453 | — | 0.090461 | 0.361094 | 0.772985 | |
| c.29-3C>G | 0.999453 | — | 0.110580 | 0.462848 | 0.772990 | |
| c.29-10T>A | 0.999453 | 0.771202 | 0.090461 | 0.553425 | 0.772985 |
WT, ABO*A1.02 allele; —, no detectable splice signal. ASSP scores refers to the integrated log-likelihood score assigned by the pre-processing models, where default cutoffs are 2.2 (acceptor) and 4.5 (donor); higher scores reflect stronger splice site motif conservation. SpliceRover and NetGene2 scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating stronger splice site propensity.
3.4. Minigene assay validation of three ABO intron 1 3’SS variants
3.4.1. Fragment length analysis of minigene products
Gel electrophoresis of RT-PCR products revealed that the wild-type (WT) construct generated a single 238 bp product (comprising 71 bp of vector sequence, 40 bp of partial exon 1, 70 bp of exon 2, and 57 bp of exon 3). All three mutant constructs produced a shorter 168 bp band, with c.29-10T>A additionally yielding a longer 246 bp band (Figure 5A). Capillary electrophoresis further confirmed these results, showing a 236.29 bp fragment for the WT, a 167.85 bp fragment for both c.29-2A>G and c.29-3C>G, and both 167.85 bp and a minor 245.19 bp transcript in c.29-10T>A; no normal transcript was detected in any of the three mutant groups (Figure 5B).
Figure 5.

Minigene splicing assays. (A) Gel electrophoresis: WT yields a 238 bp band; c.29-2A>G and c.29-3C>G show a 168 bp band; c.29-10T>A produces two bands (168 bp and 246 bp). (B) Capillary electrophoresis: WT shows a 236.29 bp fragment; c.29-2A>G and c.29-3C>G show a 167.85 bp fragment; c.29-10T>A shows a 167.85 bp fragment and a small amount of 245.19 bp transcript. Percentages from peak areas (x: bp; y: RFU). (C) Sanger sequencing: all variants cause exon 2 skipping; c.29-10T>A additionally generates an 8-bp intronic insertion (c.29-1_29-8).
3.4.2. Minigene product sequencing and splicing mechanistic analysis
Sanger sequencing confirmed normal splicing in the WT construct, while all three mutants exhibited an aberrant transcript resulting from exon 2 skipping, with c.29-10T>A additionally producing a transcript retaining an 8-bp intronic sequence (Figure 5C). Mechanistically, all three variants disrupted the canonical acceptor splice site at the 3′ end of intron 1, leading to exon 2 skipping and a 70-bp deletion; c.29-10T>A additionally activated a novel acceptor site, resulting in an 8-bp intron retention (Supplementary Figure 1).
3.5. Computational saturation mutagenesis on ABO intron 1 3’SS prediction analyses
3.5.1. Splicing patterns induced by saturation mutagenesis
RDSS predictions (Table 3) revealed that not all variants disrupted the original splicing pattern. For instance, outside the conserved 1 to 3 region, T substitutions consistently preserved wild-type splicing. Likewise, at position 15, all tested substitutions also preserved wild-type splicing. As for all splicing-disruptive variants, exon 2 skipping was shared as a common aberrant event, with some variants additionally exhibiting other splicing abnormalities, such as activation of a novel acceptor site or alternative donor site.
Table 3.
Summary of RDDC splicing outcomes induced by Computational saturation mutagenesis.
| Position | A | G | T | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New acceptor del 1bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 2 | WT | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 3 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT |
| 4 | Alt donor insert 152bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | Consistent with WT | Consistent with WT | WT |
| 5 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Alt donor insert 152bp+ Exon skip del 70bp |
| 6 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Alt donor insert 152bp+ Exon skip del 70bp |
| 7 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 8 | Alt donor insert 152bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 9 | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Consistent with WT | Consistent with WT |
| 10 | New acceptor insert 8bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 11 | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | Consistent with WT | WT |
| 12 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | Consistent with WT | WT |
| 13 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 14 | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | New donor del 105bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | Consistent with WT | WT |
| 15 | WT | Consistent with WT | Consistent with WT | Consistent with WT |
| 16 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp |
| 17 | Exon skip del 70bp | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp | Consistent with WT | WT |
| 18 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp |
| 19 | Exon skip del 70bp | Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Exon skip del 70bp+ Consistent with WT |
| 20 | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Exon skip del 70bp | WT | Alt acceptor insert 431bp+ Consistent with WT+ Exon skip del 70bp |
Position,the distance (bp) to 3'SS;WT,the wild-type base at that position; Consistent with WT,a nucleotide substitution without altering the wild-type splicing pattern.
3.5.2. Position- and base-dependent effects on splice-site prediction scores
Prediction score distributions from ASSP, NetGene, and SpliceRover are presented as bar plots in Figure 2A. Mutations at proximal positions 1 and 2 nearly eliminated canonical acceptor scores; position 3 displayed marked base-dependent score heterogeneity; position 4 exhibited strong mutational tolerance, with scores remaining close to baseline. Substantial score variability emerged between positions 5 and 14, whereas scores from ASSP and SpliceRover gradually returned to baseline levels in the distal 15 to 20 region. Splicing score trajectories (Figure 2B) further revealed synchronized fluctuation profiles for pyrimidines (T/C) and purines (A/G) across positions 5 to 14, a trend most evident in ASSP outputs. T scores were consistently at or above baseline, slightly higher than those of C; A and G followed broadly similar trends but displayed pronounced troughs at multiple loci and yielded lower values overall. This position- and base-dependent stratification was consistent with the splicing patterns summarized in Table 3.
3.5.3. Correlation between positional distance and splicing scores
Linear regression on 10 wild-type T loci (Figure 6) revealed that T>A and T>G scores from all three tools were positively correlated with positional distance, with high goodness-of-fit across models (T>A: R² = 0.8140, P = 0.0004; T>G: R² = 0.9119, P < 0.0001). Position −10 was excluded as an extreme outlier from the SpliceRover T>A regression. For T>C variants, only ASSP and SpliceRover yielded statistically significant correlations (ASSP: R² = 0.4312, P = 0.0392; SpliceRover: R² = 0.5197, P = 0.0186), whereas NetGene showed no significant linear relationship (R² = 0.008392, P = 0.8013).
Figure 6.

Linear regression of prediction scores versus distance to the 3’SS. X-axis: distance to 3′SS (bp); Y-axis: prediction scores. R²: goodness-of-fit (values approaching 1 indicate stronger linear relationship). P-values: significance (P < 0.05). Slope: direction and magnitude of the trend.
4. Discussion
ABO subtypes are inherited variants of the ABO blood group system characterized by diminished antigen expression (33). This serological profile often leads to misinterpretation in routine typing, creating a potential for hemolytic transfusion reactions (34). Therefore, accurate identification of ABO subtypes, coupled with mechanistic elucidation of antigen weakening, is essential for establishing a regulatory framework for antigen modulation and has direct implications for transfusion safety.
In this study, we identified a novel 3’SS variant, c.29-2A>G, on an ABO*A1.02 allele. This variant has not been deposited in the ISBT database (35) nor previously reported in the literature. The corresponding serological phenotype was a classic Ael phenotype, with concomitant anti-A1.
Pre-mRNA splicing is a fundamental process in eukaryotic gene expression, whereby introns are removed and exons are ligated to generate mature mRNA (36). Accurate 5’ and 3’ splice site recognition is essential for splicing fidelity, with the 5’ site directing spliceosome assembly and the 3’ site governing acceptor recognition and exon ligation (37, 38). Variants near either splice site can disrupt normal splicing at the canonical splice site, resulting in exon skipping or cryptic splice-site activation (39). These aberrant splicing events produce abnormal transcripts, ultimately giving rise to proteins that are either partially functional or completely nonfunctional (40). Although splice-site variations have garnered increasing attention in the molecular characterization of ABO subtypes in recent years, mechanistic studies have largely concentrated on 5’ splice-site variants (19, 29). However, 3’SS variations are rarely documented, and mechanistic studies on them remain scarce to date.
To address this critical gap, we performed parallel functional characterization of the novel c.29-2A>G variant alongside two previously reported 3’SS variations (c.29-3C>G and c.29-10T>A) (25, 27). Although c.29-3C>G was initially identified on a B.01 allele, it was assessed here in the ABO*A1.02 background to rule out confounding effects from allelic differences. Integrating in silico predictions with a minigene assay, we elucidated the aberrant splicing mechanisms of the three variants.
The RDDC predicted that all three variants disrupt the canonical acceptor site (S3) and induce exon 2 skipping, with the c.29-10T>A variant additionally triggering activation of a cryptic acceptor site (S2) that generates an 8-bp intronic insertion (Figure 4). Consistently, prediction scores from SpliceRover, NetGene2, and ASSP corroborated these findings, showing marked reductions at the S3 site for all three mutants compared with the WT, along with detectable signals at S2 across all three tools (Table 2). These in silico predictions were experimentally validated by minigene assays, with both agarose gel electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis of RT-PCR products from transfected minigene constructs confirming the 70-bp deletion transcript in all three mutants, and the c.29-10T>A construct additionally yielding a transcript carrying an 8-bp insertion (Figures 5A, B). Sanger sequencing subsequently verified that these aberrant transcripts were attributable to exon 2 skipping, and retention of an 8-bp intronic segment immediately upstream of the native S3 acceptor site, respectively (Figure 5C). Mechanistically, both splicing events disrupt the open reading frame (ORF) and introduce premature termination codons (PTCs), with exon 2 skipping expected to yield p.Gly10ValfsTer5 and the 8-bp insertion predicted to generate p.Gly10ValfsTer14. However, based on established PTC-NMD recognition principles, transcripts harboring such PTCs are predicted to be degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in vivo (41). Given that our minigene assay only measures steady-state mRNA levels, it does not provide direct experimental evidence for NMD engagement. Nevertheless, even if these aberrant transcripts escape NMD surveillance in vivo, the resulting truncated glycosyltransferase polypeptides would lack the catalytic domain and thus be catalytically inactive.
Notably, despite the complete absence of normally spliced transcripts in the minigene system, the three variants nevertheless yield positive absorption-elution results, indicating residual antigen expression in vivo, consistent with recent findings by Zhang et al. on splice-site variants of the ABO*B.01 allele (30). This discrepancy implies that the minigene assay may not faithfully mirror the actual splicing events occurring in vivo. From the perspective of molecular regulatory architecture, the minigene construct retains only limited intronic and exonic sequences and thus lacks multiple distal regulatory elements of the native ABO locus, including splicing enhancers/silencers, Alu repeats, and the +5.8-kb erythroid-specific transcriptional enhancer (42–44). Some of these elements orchestrate pre-mRNA splice-site recognition (45), whereas others mediate tissue-specific ABO transcription (46). Loss of these elements in the minigene construct may exacerbate the splicing disruption conferred by the variants and compromise functional transcript production. In vitro, minigene-transfected cell lines lack the splicing factor repertoire, including serine/arginine-rich proteins (SR proteins) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), as well as the transcription factor landscape, including GATA-binding factor 1 (GATA-1) and runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1), that are characteristic of erythroid progenitors at specific differentiation stages. These two factor classes operate at distinct levels, namely splicing and transcriptional control, and erythroid differentiation entails a developmental stage-specific splicing regulatory network (47, 48), wherein compositional and abundance variations of cell-type-specific splicing factors profoundly affect splice-site usage. The absence of such factor combinations in non-erythroid cells may partially account for the discordance between in vitro splicing products and in vivo phenotypes. Lin et al. reported that splice-site variants yield discrepant splicing product spectra between minigene and full-length gene constructs, especially in detecting low-abundance correctly spliced transcripts (49). Thus, the intact regulatory network and cell-type-specific splicing factor milieu in vivo may partially offset splice-site variant-induced functional impairment, permitting low-frequency correct splicing. Synthesizing these lines of evidence, we postulate that the native 3’SS is not completely disrupted in vivo, permitting the production of extremely low-abundance correctly spliced transcripts that translate into minute amounts of glycosyltransferase and give rise to extremely weak blood group antigen expression. Another possible mechanism involves translation initiation from non-AUG start codons, which may generate N-terminally truncated GTA proteins that retain part of the C-terminal catalytic domain, thereby preserving residual enzymatic activity (50–52). However, we detected no evidence of normal transcripts or non-AUG translation initiation products in our experimental system. Furthermore, fresh blood samples from the proband were unavailable for RT-PCR analysis of endogenous ABO transcripts, which would have provided direct evidence of in vivo splicing products and helped clarify the discrepancy. This limitation precludes a definitive resolution of whether the residual antigen expression originates from extremely low-abundance correctly spliced transcripts or from translation initiation at non-AUG codons. Thus, the origin of functional glycosyltransferases in these variants remains undetermined and merits further experimental validation.
The three variants converged on a common aberrant splicing pattern and absorption-elution phenotype, suggesting that they may operate through shared regulatory mechanisms. Mutational tolerance near splice sites is determined by both distance and nucleotide identity, and is further modulated by cryptic splice-site activation and dynamic splicing factor competition (53, 54). To dissect this, we performed saturation mutagenesis coupled with in silico prediction across positions 1–20 upstream of the ABO intron 1 3’SS, and delineated four principles: (i) exon 2 skipping was the sole common aberrant event shared by all splicing-disruptive variants, identifying it as the predominant molecular mechanism underlying ABO subtype(Table 3); (ii) the AG dinucleotide at positions 1 and 2 was functionally irreplaceable, as any substitution nearly abolished 3’SS recognition, reinforcing AG as an absolutely conserved core element (55); position 3 was relatively conserved, with substitutions to A or G markedly reducing stability, whereas positions 4 and 15 exhibited high mutational tolerance, with all substitutions preserving normal splicing (Figure 2). (iii) within the 5 to 20 region, the impact of base substitutions on splice-site stability followed a strict chemical class-dependent hierarchy, wherein pyrimidines (T/C) conferred markedly higher stability than purines (A/G), with C>T being the least disruptive and T>G posing the highest risk (Figure 2); and (iv) at positions with a wild-type T, a distinct position-dependent distance effect was observed within the 5 to 20 region (Figure 6). Both T>G and T>A scores were positively correlated with distance, indicating that increased distance correlates with reduced splicing disruption.
Synthesizing these findings, we propose an initial position- and base-dependent risk stratification model. Spatially, positions 1 to 3 confer the highest disruptive potential, while positions 4 and 15 are relatively stable; within the 5 to 20 region, proximity to the 3’SS correlates positively with risk. With respect to base identity, substitutions to G or A confer higher risk, followed by C, with T being least deleterious; among all substitutions, T>G poses the highest risk, whereas C>T exerts the minimal impact. This model translates the relationship between position and base type into simple rules that can guide clinical decisions, allowing initial risk assessment using only the variation’s location and the specific base change.
This study has two main limitations. First, fresh blood samples were unavailable, precluding RT-PCR analysis of endogenous ABO transcripts and flow cytometric quantification of An antigen density. Second, the base- and distance-dependent patterns at the 3’SS were derived primarily from computational predictions; although three variants were experimentally validated, the dataset is too small to draw definitive conclusions. Therefore, the generalizability of the model is limited, and further validation using additional variants and functional assays is required.
5. Conclusion
Here, we identified a novel intronic 3’SS variant, c.29-2A>G, in a Chinese Ael individual carrying an ABO*A1.02 allele. The nucleotide sequence of this allele has been deposited in GenBank under accession number PZ263082. Functional analysis of this variant together with two previously reported variations, c.29-3C>G and c.29-10T>A, showed that all three disrupt 3’ splice site function, leading to aberrant splicing predominantly via exon 2 skipping, with c.29-10T>A additionally activating a cryptic acceptor site to generate a secondary transcript with an 8-bp intronic insertion. Through computational saturation mutagenesis, we further demonstrate that exon 2 skipping is the predominant splicing defect conferred by these 3’SS mutations, and propose an initial position- and base-dependent risk stratification model that converts base identity and acceptor-site proximity to a quantitative splicing risk score for clinical interpretation. Collectively, these findings provide the first in vitro evidence linking 3’SS variants to ABO subtype pathogenesis, point to exon 2 skipping as a core shared molecular pathway, and offer a preliminary computational derived framework for interpreting 3’SS variants in blood grouping and transfusion compatibility assessment, with implications that may extend to splice-site variant interpretation in other genetic systems.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the proband for his participation and cooperation in this study.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Chengdu Medical Research Fund (2025014).
Footnotes
Edited by: Gopal Kumar Patidar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Reviewed by: Karen Sherwood, Vancouver Coastal Health, Canada
Lingbo Li, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Cancer Hospital, China
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PZ263082.
Ethics statement
All donors provided written informed consent for participation in this study. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Chengdu Blood Center, and the ethics approval number is 202610.
Author contributions
HG: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Software, Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft. YY: Writing – original draft. JL: Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft. HZ: Methodology, Writing – original draft. XC: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. JG: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1959480/full#supplementary-material
Splicing patterns of WT and three variants. WT exhibited normal splicing, while all three variants promoted exon 2 skipping, with the c.29-10T>A variant additionally activating a cryptic acceptor site.
References
- 1. Ferri G, Bini C, Ceccardi S, Ingravallo F, Lugaresi F, Pelotti S. Minisequencing-based genotyping of Duffy and ABO blood groups for forensic purposes. J Forensic Sci. (2006) 51:357–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00058.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hosoi E. Biological and clinical aspects of ABO blood group system. J Med Invest JMI. (2008) 55:174–82. doi: 10.2152/jmi.55.174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yazer MH, Triulzi DJ. Immune hemolysis following ABO-mismatched stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Hematol. (2007) 14:664–70. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282e9a576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Paulson JC, Colley KJ. Glycosyltransferases. Structure, localization, and control of cell type-specific glycosylation. J Biol Chem. (1989) 264:17615–8. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84610-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ogasawara K, Sano R, Kominato Y. Review of ABO expression and variations based on transcriptional regulation of the ABO blood group gene. Transfusion Med Hemotherapy Offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie. (2024) 51:210–24. doi: 10.1159/000536556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jung BK, Choi GR, Chang JH, Cho HN, Hyun JJ, Nam MH, et al. ABO*Ael03/O genotype with ABO discrepancy: the first case in Korea. Ann Lab Med. (2015) 35:137–40. doi: 10.3343/alm.2015.35.1.137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li Y, Ding M, Ma Z, Zhou L, Wang C. A rare variant c.1024A>C in the ABO*A1.02 allele was associated with an A(el) phenotype. Transfusion Med Hemotherapy Offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie. (2025) 52:216–21. doi: 10.1159/000539130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Daniels G. ABO, H, and lewis systems. In: Daniels G, editor. Human Blood Groups, 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex: (2013). p. 11–95. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Red Blood Histo-Blood Group Antigen (2016). Available online at: http://bloodgmp.org/histo_group.html (Accessed August 4, 2026).
- 10. Shenasa H, Bentley DL. Pre-mRNA splicing and its cotranscriptional connections. Trends Genet TIG. (2023) 39:672–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Black DL. Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. (2003) 72:291–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. De Conti L, Baralle M, Buratti E. Exon and intron definition in pre-mRNA splicing. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. (2013) 4:49–60. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tholen J. Branch site recognition by the spliceosome. RNA (New York NY). (2024) 30:1397–407. doi: 10.1261/rna.080198.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Shao C, Hao Y, Jiang L, Wang D, Wang R, Li Y, et al. Dynamic U2AF cycling defines two phases of cotranscriptional pre-mRNA splicing. Sci (New York NY). (2025) 389:eadj9141. doi: 10.1126/science.adj9141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Corrionero A, Raker VA, Izquierdo JM, Valcárcel J. Strict 3' splice site sequence requirements for U2 snRNP recruitment after U2AF binding underlie a genetic defect leading to autoimmune disease. RNA (New York NY). (2011) 17:401–11. doi: 10.1261/rna.2444811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lv X, Sun X, Gao Y, Song X, Hu X, Gong L, et al. Targeting RNA splicing modulation: new perspectives for anticancer strategy? J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR. (2025) 44:32. doi: 10.1186/s13046-025-03279-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schärfen L, Bech P, Podszywałow-Bartnicka P, Neugebauer KM. Control of gene output by intron RNA structure. bioRxiv. (2025). doi: 10.1101/2025.11.08.687378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cortés-López M, Schulz L, Enculescu M, Paret C, Spiekermann B, Quesnel-Vallières M, et al. High-throughput mutagenesis identifies mutations and RNA-binding proteins controlling CD19 splicing and CART-19 therapy resistance. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:5570. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31818-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yang H, Long D, Lei H, Guo L, Gao C, Hao H, et al. Functional analysis of four splice-site variants, including a novel variant, on antigen expression and ABO subgroup formation. J Mol Diagnostics JMD. (2026) 28:170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yang YC, Zhou SH, Zhao W. A noncoding ABO variant suggests a trafficking defect in COPI-GOLPH3-mediated glycosyltransferase recycling. Int J Biol Macromol. (2026) 366:152567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.152567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hong X, Ying Y, Zhang J, Chen S, Xu X, He J, et al. Six splice site variations, three of them novel, in the ABO gene occurring in nine individuals with ABO subtypes. J Transl Med. (2021) 19:470. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03141-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Shao LN, Song WQ, Zhou L, Pan LZ, Duan Y, Xiao N, et al. Characterization of a novel AEL allele harboring a c.28 + 5G>A mutation on the ABO*A2.01 background: a study utilizing PacBio third-generation sequencing and functional assays. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1396426. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1396426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Krawczak M, Reiss J, Cooper DN. The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions in mRNA splice junctions of human genes: causes and consequences. Hum Genet. (1992) 90:41–54. doi: 10.1007/bf00210743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mobegi FM, Bruce S, El-Lagta N, Ayora F, Matern BM, Groeneweg M, et al. Characterisation of the ABO blood group phenotypes using third-generation sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. (2025) 26:5443. doi: 10.3390/ijms26125443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kong Y, Wang L, Kong C, Yang Q. A novel c.29-3C>G variant on the B allele forms the B(el) phenotype. Transfusion. (2024) 64:E28–9. doi: 10.1111/trf.17910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fennell K, Keller MA, Villa MA, Paccapelo C, Kucerakova M, Rosochova J, et al. New ABO intron 1 variant alleles. Immunohematology. (2021) 37:178–84. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2021-029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wang C, Tang Y, Zhang P, Xiong L, Chen W, Lv X. Detection and phenotype analysis of a novel Ael blood group allele. Vox Sang. (2024) 119:74–8. doi: 10.1111/vox.13557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kim TY, Yu H, Phan MT, Jang JH, Cho D. Application of blood group genotyping by next-generation sequencing in various immunohaematology cases. Transfusion Med Hemotherapy Offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie. (2022) 49:88–96. doi: 10.1159/000517565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Guan HL, Hou J, Gao JL, Li J, Zhang XM, Chen X, et al. A novel ABO splice site variant underlying the A(3) phenotype: immunogenetic basis and functional dissection. Front Genet. (2026) 17:1839848. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2026.1839848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang J, Ying Y, Hong X, Zhu F. c.98 + 3A>G and c.155 + 1G>T splice-site variants in the ABO*B.01 allele lead to weak antigen expression in the Chinese individuals. Front Immunol. (2026) 17:1739842. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1739842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Menezes AT, Nagasse HY, Lopes HRM, Coltri PP. Design of a GFP reporter for splicing analysis in mammalian cells. Biotechnol Rep (Amsterdam Netherlands). (2025) 46:e00887. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2025.e00887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tangermann C, Ghosh A, Ziegler M, Facchinetti F, Stappenbeck J, Carus Sahin YO, et al. Saturation mutagenesis identifies activating and resistance-inducing FGFR kinase domain mutations. Nat Genet. (2026) 58:157–68. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02431-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Romanos-Sirakis EC, Desai D. ABO blood group system. In: Statpearls. StatPearls Publishing LLC, Treasure Island (FL) (2026). Disclosure: Diana Desai declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.: StatPearls PublishingCopyright © 2026. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Liang S, Liang YL, Wu F, Liu T, Sun LY, Yu Q. Genetic characterization of an ABO*O.01.02-A2.05 hybrid allele associated with the A(el) phenotype in a Chinese individual. Transfusion Apheresis Sci Off J World Apheresis Assoc Off J Eur Soc For Haemapheresis. (2025) 64:104211. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2025.104211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Isbt Blood Group Database (2026). Available online at: https://www.isbtweb.org/ (Accessed August 4, 2026).
- 36. Fica SM. Cryo-EM snapshots of the human spliceosome reveal structural adaptions for splicing regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. (2020) 65:139–48. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wahl MC, Will CL, Lührmann R. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell. (2009) 136:701–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Parker MT, Fica SM, Simpson GG. RNA splicing: a split consensus reveals two major 5' splice site classes. Open Biol. (2025) 15:240293. doi: 10.1098/rsob.240293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Rogalska ME, Vivori C, Valcárcel J. Regulation of pre-mRNA splicing: roles in physiology and disease, and therapeutic prospects. Nat Rev Genet. (2023) 24:251–69. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00556-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Snyman M, Xu S. The effects of mutations on gene expression and alternative splicing. Proc Biol Sci. (2023) 290:20230565. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Behera A, Panigrahi GK, Sahoo A. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in human health and diseases: current understanding, regulatory mechanisms and future perspectives. Mol Biotechnol. (2025) 67:3374–90. doi: 10.1007/s12033-024-01267-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sanoguera-Miralles L, Llinares-Burguet I, Bueno-Martínez E, Ramadane-Morchadi L, Stuani C, Valenzuela-Palomo A, et al. Comprehensive splicing analysis of the alternatively spliced CHEK2 exons 8 and 10 reveals three enhancer/silencer-rich regions and 38 spliceogenic variants. J Pathol. (2024) 262:395–409. doi: 10.1002/path.6243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Liang L, Cao C, Ji L, Cai Z, Wang D, Ye R, et al. Complementary Alu sequences mediate enhancer-promoter selectivity. Nature. (2023) 619:868–75. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06323-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Nakajima T, Sano R, Takahashi Y, Watanabe K, Kubo R, Kobayashi M, et al. ABO alleles are linked with haplotypes of an erythroid cell-specific regulatory element in intron 1 with a few exceptions attributable to genetic recombination. Vox Sang. (2016) 110:90–2. doi: 10.1111/vox.12312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lei H, Vorechovsky I. Identification of splicing silencers and enhancers in sense Alus: a role for pseudoacceptors in splice site repression. Mol Cell Biol. (2005) 25:6912–20. doi: 10.1128/mcb.25.16.6912-6920.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sano R, Nogawa M, Nakajima T, Takahashi Y, Takahashi K, Kubo R, et al. Blood group B gene is barely expressed in in vitro erythroid culture of Bm-derived CD34+ cells without an erythroid cell-specific regulatory element. Vox Sang. (2015) 108:302–9. doi: 10.1111/vox.12220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Reimer KA, Neugebauer KM. Blood relatives: splicing mechanisms underlying erythropoiesis in health and disease. F1000Research. (2018) 7:1364. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15442.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Goldfarb AN. Megakaryocytic programming by a transcriptional regulatory loop: a circle connecting RUNX1, GATA-1, and P-TEFb. J Cell Biochem. (2009) 107:377–82. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lin JH, Wu H, Zou WB, Masson E, Fichou Y, Le Gac G, et al. Splicing outcomes of 5' splice site GT>GC variants that generate wild-type transcripts differ significantly between full-length and minigene splicing assays. Front Genet. (2021) 12:701652. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.701652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Cid E, Yamamoto M, Yamamoto F. Non-AUG start codons responsible for ABO weak blood group alleles on initiation mutant backgrounds. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:41720. doi: 10.1038/srep41720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Lee PJ, Sun Y, Soares AR, Fai C, Picciotto MR, Guo JU. Alternative translation initiation produces synaptic organizer proteoforms with distinct localization and functions. Mol Cell. (2024) 84:3967–3978.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.08.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ricci Hagman J, Hult AK, Hellberg Å, Olsson ML. Truncated glycosyltransferase coding regions in novel ABO alleles give rise to weak A or B blood group expression and discrepant typing results. Transfusion. (2023) 63:1951–61. doi: 10.1111/trf.17534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhang S, Samocha KE, Rivas MA, Karczewski KJ, Daly E, Schmandt B, et al. Base-specific mutational intolerance near splice sites clarifies the role of nonessential splice nucleotides. Genome Res. (2018) 28:968–74. doi: 10.1101/gr.231902.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Královicová J, Christensen MB, Vorechovský I. Biased exon/intron distribution of cryptic and de novo 3' splice sites. Nucleic Acids Res. (2005) 33:4882–98. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lee Y, Rio DC. Mechanisms and regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. (2015) 84:291–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Splicing patterns of WT and three variants. WT exhibited normal splicing, while all three variants promoted exon 2 skipping, with the c.29-10T>A variant additionally activating a cryptic acceptor site.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PZ263082.
