Abstract
A simple mathematical model of synaptic activation shows that the response to synaptic activation depends inversely on the size of the subsynaptic process. This provides a theoretical foundation for: the relationship between excitability and cell size; a possible source of plasticity in nerve cell behavior; and the hypothesis that postsynaptic responses to activation at axodendritic synapses are of large amplitude. The last-mentioned idea provides for flexible nonlinear interaction in dendritic regions because the diminution of postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) by prior potential becomes significant at high levels of depolarization. Digital-computer simulations of nerve cell input-output behavior for axodendritic activation based on these ideas reveal: frequency-transfer curves for axodendritic activation saturate; activations combined on different dendritic branches sum approximately linearly while those on the same branch occlude; simultaneous activation of several synapses on a previously inactive dendritic branch results in a large “peak” response at the onset of stimulation; and such an initial peak may be markedly mitigated by a prior depolarization of the branch. The third-mentioned finding may represent a widespread mode of hypersensitivity to stimulus onset in neural systems and in particular may contribute to the “on” responses of sensory channels, and the fourth suggests that depolarizing synapses at extreme peripheries of dendritic fibers might in some cases serve an inhibitory function.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ANDERSSON Y., EDSTROM J. E. Motor hyperactivity resulting in diameter decrease of peripheral nerves. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957 Jun 8;39(2-3):240–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1957.tb01426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUGHES J. R. Post-tetanic potentiation. Physiol Rev. 1958 Jan;38(1):91–113. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1958.38.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henneman E., Somjen G., Carpenter D. O. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28(3):599–620. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purpura D. P., McMurtry J. G., Leonard C. F., Malliani A. Evidence for dendritic origin of spikes without depolarizing prepotentials in hippocampal neurons during and after seizure. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Sep;29(5):954–979. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.5.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RALL W. Electrophysiology of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2(2 Pt 2):145–167. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86953-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RALL W. Membrane potential transients and membrane time constant of motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1960 Oct;2:503–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wall P. D. Impulses originating in the region of dendrites. J Physiol. 1965 Sep;180(1):116–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willis W. D., Tate G. W., Ashworth R. D., Willis J. C. Monosynaptic excitation of motoneurons of individual forelimb muscles. J Neurophysiol. 1966 May;29(3):410–424. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.3.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]