Abstract
Introduction: Vascular occlusion is a chronic condition that impairs blood flow to vital organs. This study developed a novel, low-cost photoacoustic imaging (PAI) system that utilizes phantom modeling to detect this condition. In this study, vascular occlusion was modeled using polyvinyl chloride–dioctyl terephthalate phantoms, which were categorized into healthy and occluded types.
Methods: The PAI system comprised an 808-nm laser diode as the radiation source, a condenser microphone as the detector, and a mechanical stage for sample scanning. The PAI system utilized a modulated continuous-wave diode laser, operating at a frequency of 14 kHz and a 50% duty cycle.
Results: Acoustic intensity analysis revealed that healthy vasculature consistently generated more intense signals than occluded vasculature. At a depth of 1 mm, the average intensities were 76.3 dB (healthy) and 65.2 dB (occluded), which decreased to 46.2 dB and 22.1 dB, respectively, at a 5-mm depth. Because of these differences, the contrast ratio between healthy and occluded regions ranged from 1.4 to 6.6 dB. Furthermore, the signal-to-noise ratio in healthy samples was measured at 16.1 dB (1 mm depth) and 3.2 dB (5 mm depth).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a simple PAI system can distinguish between healthy and occluded vasculature.
Keywords: PAI, Diode laser, Acoustic intensity, Occluded vascular
Introduction
Vascular occlusion occurs when a vascular system becomes restricted or obstructed.1 According to the World Health Organization, vascular occlusion of the heart is one of the second major causes of death, accounting for 633,842 annual fatalitiesin the United States, while 17.7 million deaths refer to the global burden of cardiovascular disease reported by the World Health Organization (WHO).2 Vascular occlusion is the first stage of cardiovascular illness.3 While clinical examinations can reliably diagnose this condition,3,4 the potential of photoacoustic imaging (PAI) for assessing vascular occlusion remains largely unexplored.
Vascular occlusion, a rather common condition in the general population, is primarily caused by modifiable risk factors such as a poor diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use, and excessive alcohol consumption.5 These factors contribute to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque—composed of fat, cholesterol, and other substances—along the arterial walls.6 This buildup narrows the vessels, reducing the blood flow to vital organs and other parts of the body.7 If untreated, the impaired circulation can cause major complications, including heart attacks, strokes, and other cardiovascular diseases.1,3,4,6
Vascular occlusion is currently detected using techniques such as X-ray angiography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and Doppler ultrasonography.8–11 Despite their widespread use, they have limitations such as inadequate soft tissue contrast for vascular imaging,8,9 exposure to ionizing radiation, the need for iodine-based contrast agents, high cost, motion sensitivity, poor spatial resolution, and the fundamental limitation of measuring blood flow without yielding optical or molecular data.12
PAI is a hybrid modality that generates high-resolution images based on the optical laser-light absorption by biological tissues to generate acoustic waves.13 In this technique, the absorption of modulated continuous-wave (CW) laser light by tissues causes harmonic thermal expansion, generating acoustic signals that are detected to form detailed vascular images.14,15
The photoacoustic (PA) effect, also referred to as the optoacoustic effect, occurs when a material absorbs modulated electromagnetic light and consequently generates sound waves.16,17. This phenomenon was first documented by Alexander Graham Bell in the late 19th century. Bell discovered that light absorption induced sound in solids via thermal expansion caused by localized heating.18 Although its practical utility remained unrealized for decades, the later development of sophisticated laser and ultrasound detectors laid the foundation for PAI. Since the early 2000s, PAI has matured into a popular biomedical imaging technique owing to its unique capacity to merge the high resolution of ultrasound with the superior optical contrast of biological tissues.19
PAI is based on the principle of converting light energy into acoustic signals through optical absorption and thermoelastic expansion.18 First, a modulated continuous-wave (CW) laser, typically in the infrared range, illuminates biological tissues. Chromophores (or natural photoabsorbers) within the tissues absorb this light energy, inducing a rapid, localized temperature rise.20 This heating triggers thermoelastic expansion, generating broadband ultrasonic waves (pressure waves).18 These waves propagate through the tissue and are detected by an acoustic sensor, such as an ultrasonic transducer.21 In this study, a point-by-point X-Y raster scanning approach is implemented to acquire photoacoustic data. Instead of using complex and time-consuming tomographic reconstruction algorithms, straightforward Maximum Amplitude Projection (MAP) mapping is utilized to generate high-contrast 2D vascular occlusion profiles in real-time.
PAI is highly advantageous for medical imaging owing to its sensitivity to key chromophores in biological tissues, such as hemoglobin, water, lipids, and melanin, which have high optical absorption coefficients.22 When light interacts with tissues, it undergoes absorption, scattering, and reflection.23 Among these mechanisms, absorption is the most critical one for PAI—the absorbed light energy is converted into heat, which subsequently generates acoustic waves through thermoelastic expansion.24 This principle enables PAI to noninvasively detect physiological changes—such as blood oxygenation, vascular density, and lesions or obstructions—with high sensitivity and in real time.25
The primary advantage of PAI is its noninvasive nature and high spatial resolution, which enable the detailed visualization of vasculature without using ionizing radiation.26 Furthermore, PAI provides rich optical absorption information for assessing the tissue state, is cost-effective and efficient, and has no aftereffects.4,27–29 Consequently, PAI holds much promise for detecting cardiovascular disease both before and after the onset of clinical symptoms.13
Phantoms serve as a crucial tool for testing and validating PAI systems before their clinical deployment.30 These models are often made of polymers with tissue-mimicking acoustic and optical properties. They allow researchers to simulate pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis and verify whether a technique or device performs as intended, yielding reliable data.31,32 Numerous studies have established a strong correlation between consistent phantom testing results and a system’s accuracy in in vivo experiments, highlighting the pivotal role of the phantom in transitioning a technology from the lab stage to the clinical stage.31,33
Current medical vascular occlusion detection methods have several limitations, including the need for ionizing radiation (which may damage healthy cells), the need for contrast agents (which can induce allergic reactions in patients), high cost, and sensitivity to movement.8–11 Against this backdrop, PAI can help to overcome the limitations of current vascular occlusion detection methods. PAI has several advantages, including the use of biologically safe, nonionizing radiation, the absence of contrast chemicals, low cost, and noninvasive quality.4,27–29
Nd: YAG lasers are commonly used in existing PAI systems.34,35 Nd: YAG laser generators on a research scale are often huge and heavy, and they need a significant amount of laboratory space. This limits the portability of photoacoustic systems for clinical applications at the patient’s bedside.36 Unlike high-cost pulsed laser systems (e.g., Nd: YAG), the modulated CW diode laser significantly reduces the overall instrumentation cost, making it highly accessible for clinical settings. The compact size of diode lasers enables the development of a portable, bedside-friendly photoacoustic imaging device. By avoiding the high peak power of pulsed lasers, the CW system minimizes the risk of thermal damage to biological tissues, adhering strictly to safety thresholds. As a result, the PAI system created employs a diode laser, which is significantly more compact, affordable, and portable. Therefore, this study aims to develop a tissue-mimicking phantom model and investigate the feasibility of continuous-wave diode laser photoacoustic imaging to enhance vascular occlusion detection.
Materials and Methods
Tissue-mimicking phantoms made of polyvinyl chloride–dioctyl terephthalate (PVC-DOTP) were used to model biological tissues, particularly soft tissues such as muscle and blood vessels. The choice of PVC-DOTP was motivated by its favorable characteristics: stable physical properties, an elastic yet dense structure, ease of shaping, and tunable optical properties achieved by incorporating dyes or light-absorbing particles.37 Owing to these features, the phantom’s absorption coefficient can be customized for specific wavelengths.
The phantom fabrication process involved several steps. First, a 1:5 PVC: DOTP mixture was homogenized using a magnetic stirrer at 200°C. Once uniform, the solution was transferred to a petri dish to cool and solidify at room temperature (25°C). Prior to the complete hardening of the mixture, a plastic tube was inserted to form a channel resembling a blood vessel. To replicate vascular occlusion, molten wax was first injected into the channel to create a blockage; subsequently, artificial blood was perfused to simulate circulation. This approach yielded a realistic biological model for validating the capability of the PAI system to identify vascular occlusions. The artificial blood mimic consisted of a commercial water-soluble food-grade red dye formulation (primarily composed of purified water and red colorant agents). Although its optical absorption coefficient is lower at the 808-nm wavelength compared to the visible spectrum, the concentration utilized provided a stable and detectable photoacoustic response under the system’s 14 kHz modulation protocol. The photoacoustic imaging process is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Workflow of photoacoustic imaging (PAI)
The PAI setup (Figure 2) consisted of a diode laser (M5-808-0500-0XX, Sunshine-Electronics, China) operated at 808 nm with a maximum power of 500 mW and a condenser microphone (ECM8000, Behringer, Germany) as the acoustic detector. Both components were mounted on a computer numerical control (CNC) platform driven by a NEMA 17 stepper motor (Zhongshan Shengyang Motor Co., Ltd., China), which facilitated raster scanning along the x and y axes. An Arduino Uno microcontroller (ATmega328P, Arduino.cc, Italy) modulated the laser, while the CNC (Chinese CNC Machine, China) controlled the stage movement. The laser beam was focused onto the sample via a convex lens. The sample was placed under the laser and detector, and it generated a PA signal upon absorption of the laser light. This signal was captured by the microphone, processed, and subsequently displayed on a personal computer using LabVIEW software (National Instruments, USA).
Figure 2.

PAI system setup
System components such as the laser, microphone, and stepper motor were calibrated. Laser calibration was performed in two stages: First, the proportional relationship between the duty cycle and laser power intensity was established. The modulation frequency was maintained constant while the duty cycle was varied from 10% to 90%, and an optical power meter measured the corresponding output power at each interval. These data were used to plot a linear graph of duty cycle versus laser power. Second, the temporal stability of the laser output was assessed. At a constant modulation frequency, the laser power was monitored at 5-minute intervals over 150 minutes for 30%, 40%, and 50% duty cycles. The results of this stability test were plotted as laser power over time.
The microphone was calibrated by comparing its output against a set of reference frequencies. The detected frequencies of the microphone were recorded and plotted against the reference values on a linear graph to evaluate the consistency of its frequency response. To mitigate the acoustic impedance mismatch and minimize insertion loss at the phantom-air interface, the condenser microphone was positioned as close as possible to the phantom surface without physical contact. This optimal proximity minimized acoustic attenuation through the air gap, while the 14 kHz modulation ensured a high signal-to-noise ratio.
The displacement accuracy of the stepper motor was characterized by comparing its measured travel distance against the commanded values. After determining the step size of the motor, the displacement was tested by commanding a range of 10–50 steps. The actual distance moved by the system was physically measured for each command set. This calibration procedure was performed separately for the x and y axes. Finally, a linear graph of the average measured displacement was plotted against the ideal displacement to quantify the accuracy.
The data processing protocol did not involve formal tomographic reconstruction. To generate the 2D images, the maximum peak-to-peak amplitude of the 14 kHz modulated photoacoustic signal was extracted at each (X, Y) coordinate. These raw amplitude values were then linearly mapped into a matrix to construct a 2D Maximum Amplitude Projection (MAP) plot representing the structural layout of the vascular phantom.
Five phantom models were developed to represent healthy and obstructed vessels. Each phantom contained vessels at five depths: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm. These depth variations were introduced to simulate diverse imaging conditions and to evaluate system performance at different penetration levels. The acquired images were subsequently analyzed by examining the cross-sectional amplitude profiles and the average acoustic intensity of the healthy and occluded vascular models. To ensure data reliability and reduce noise, image acquisition for each sample was repeated five times, and the average values were utilized for final analysis.
Results
Figure 3a shows the relationship between duty cycle and laser power. The results indicate a direct correlation between laser radiation power and duty cycle: an increase in duty cycle leads to a proportional increase in the amount of light energy delivered to the object. Figure 3b shows the relationship between laser radiation power and time. At a 50% duty cycle, the laser output remains stable within the range of 0.161–0.162 W. The effective maximum working beam density was maintained at 20 mJ/cm2, which is considerably lower than the safety threshold of 100 mJ/cm2.38 The graph further demonstrates that the laser output power remains generally stable throughout the 150-minute operation, confirming that the system delivers consistent performance.
Figure 3.

Calibration of the PAI system. (a) Calibration of laser radiation power characteristics as a function of duty cycle. (b) Relationship between laser radiation output and operating time. (c) Correlation between the acoustic signal frequency detected by the microphone and the reference frequency of the generator. (d) Average displacement per step along the x-axis. (e) Average displacement per step along the y-axis. (f) Acoustic intensity level under a 14 kHz duty cycle
Figure 3c shows the relationship between the reference frequency and the frequency detected by the microphone. The process of frequency detection by the microphone is illustrated using LabVIEW. The results confirm that the employed microphone accurately detects and distinguishes sound frequency magnitudes.
Figures 3d and 3e present the shift stability of the sample table along the x and y axes, respectively. Calibration in both directions is considered satisfactory when the mapping data reveal a strong linear correlation between the average measured displacement and the ideal displacement on both axes. Satisfactory calibration implies that the motor movement is both precise and accurate, as expected from the CNC control program. Stepper motor calibration was performed, achieving a single shift step of 0.2 mm. These results confirm that no part of the sample was scanned more than once, if at all.
The laser duty cycle was characterized at a modulation frequency of 14 kHz with values of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90%. The highest acoustic intensity was observed at a 50% duty cycle, with a value of −0.00005 dB (Figure 3f). This optimal duty cycle was selected to ensure the efficient absorption of laser energy in the sample. The raw acoustic voltage signal was converted to a relative logarithmic decibel (dB) scale using the equation 39, where Vref represents the baseline peak voltage obtained during system calibration. The relative acoustic intensity values close to zero (-0.000005 to -0.000009 dB) indicate that the detected signals across various duty cycles maintained high proximity to the calibrated baseline level.
Figure 4 shows the results of PAI for both healthy and occluded vascular phantoms. Figure 5 shows the cross-sectional amplitude profile analysis along with the average acoustic intensity. As shown in Figure 5, occluded vasculature consistently exhibited lower PA emission amplitudes than healthy vessels and empty tubes. This trend was evident across all depths, from shallow vessels (1 mm) to deeper vessels (5 mm). The cross-sectional amplitude profiles at different depths revealed oscillations in the PA signal range. These fluctuations were most likely caused by surface irregularities of the phantom, which create an uneven signal distribution, as well as by the reflection or diffraction of acoustic waves within the phantom medium, resulting in interference patterns that are manifested as variations in the recorded signal.
Figure 4.

Vascular phantom samples at depths of (a-1) 1 mm, (a-2) 2 mm, (a-3) 3 mm, (a-4) 4 mm, and (a-5) 5 mm. PA images of the vascular phantoms at depths of (b-1) 1 mm, (b-2) 2 mm, (b-3) 3 mm, (b-4) 4 mm, and (b-5) 5 mm
Figure 5.

Cross-sectional amplitude profiles of the PA signal at different vascular depths: (a) 1 mm, (b) 2 mm, (c) 3 mm, (d) 4 mm, and (e) 5 mm
Figure 6 shows the average acoustic intensity across the five phantom depths. The results show a consistent decrease in signal strength for both healthy and obstructed vessels as depth increases. At a depth of 1 mm, the average acoustic intensity was 76.3 dB for healthy vessels and 65.2 dB for obstructed vessels. At a depth of 5 mm, the intensity decreased to 46.2 and 22.1 dB in healthy and occluded vessels, respectively. The contrast ratio between healthy and obstructed vessels was in the range of 1.4–6.6 dB. In addition, the signal-to-noise ratios of healthy samples were 16.1 dB at 1 mm depth and 3.2 dB at 5 mm depth.
Figure 6.

Average acoustic intensity of healthy, occluded, and empty vasculature at different depths
Discussion
This study developed a PAI method for visualizing vascular occlusion based on acoustic intensity measurements. The system employed nonionizing radiation and utilized an 808-nm laser, a condenser microphone detector, and an x–y axis scanning device. Each component was calibrated in advance to ensure proper operation.
In previous studies, the laser and the detector were kept stationary while the test sample was moved along the x–y axes.28,40 This approach can lead to undesirable sample shifts. To address this problem, the present system was designed to achieve greater stability by keeping the test sample static while the laser and microphone performed the scanning. The PAI system developed in this study was a PA microscopy (PAM) device with minimal components, capable of imaging polymer phantoms.
PAI is based on the PA effect41—the generation of sound waves induced by modulated radiation interacting with biological materials 16. Hemoglobin, a natural photoabsorber or chromophore present in biological tissues—particularly within blood vessels—plays a key role in PAI.42 This chromophore interacts with the incoming radiation, and its absorption coefficient at an 808-nm laser wavelength is 8.0 cm−1.43 Irradiation of biological tissues by modulated radiation induces localized heating; the heat subsequently diffuses into the surrounding tissue. This thermal effect produces temperature variations that cause pressure changes, which propagate as acoustic waves.18 These acoustic signals are reconstructed into images,44 and the resulting sound intensity is used to differentiate healthy from occluded vasculature.
Changes in the pressure of a medium in which acoustic waves are generated can be expressed, as shown in Equation (1).25
| (1) |
where p0 is the pressure change; µa is the absorption coefficient (cm−1); Γ is Grüneisen’s coefficient and is expressed as , indicating the thermal and mechanical properties of the tissue; F is the fluence (J/cm2).27,43
A PAI system employing a diode laser was used to detect vascular occlusion. Analysis of the average acoustic intensity across different depths revealed that the deeper the signal source, the lower the measured acoustic intensity. This variation was caused by light attenuation within the phantom material and damping of the acoustic wave before it reached the microphone. At all depths, healthy vasculature consistently produced stronger signals than obstructed vessels, demonstrating the capability of the system to differentiate the optoacoustic properties of the two conditions. Normal flow of blood, a strong chromophore, generates a more intense signal than blood flow hindered by obstructions such as wax.
Vascular occlusion in clinical settings can be detected by various methods (e.g., angiography, electrocardiography, and magnetic resonance angiography) that rely on X-rays, contrast agents, or magnetic fields to visualize vascular conditions.8–11 These approaches are considered the gold standard for assessing vascular occlusion.45 However, such techniques often require ionizing radiation, which may damage healthy surrounding tissues. In addition, contrast agents can trigger allergic reactions in certain individuals,46 while the use of strong magnetic fields may cause discomfort in patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.47
The study identified acoustic intensity values that can be used to distinguish healthy and occluded vasculature. The findings suggest that the PAI system has the potential to be developed into a noninvasive, low-cost tool for detecting arterial occlusions in clinical settings. However, the PA system employed in this study was built using relatively simple components. Therefore, further refinement and optimization are required before it can be applied in clinical practice.
Medical researchers previously investigated ultrasound-based PAI (PA-US).20 This imaging approach typically requires a large and costly laser; in contrast, the present study utilized a compact and inexpensive diode laser. Future research should address the challenges associated with implementing PAI in clinical settings, with a focus on developing patient-friendly systems that utilize portable detectors.
This study demonstrates the capability of a PAI system to distinguish obstructed and healthy arteries. An increase in imaging depth results in a reduced acoustic intensity and image quality, primarily because of light attenuation and acoustic wave damping within the phantom medium. However, this study has limitations as it was conducted on a polymer phantom, and further comparisons with other imaging modalities are necessary to fully evaluate the effectiveness of PAI in detecting arterial occlusion.
Conclusion
This study aimed to demonstrate a noninvasive, low-cost imaging system for identifying arterial occlusion. The primary components of the PAI system—including a diode laser, a condenser microphone, and an x–y axis mechanical scanning system—were calibrated to ensure efficient sample scanning. The laser duty cycle and modulation frequency were set at 50% and 14 kHz, respectively. The results revealed that healthy vasculature consistently exhibited higher acoustic intensity than obstructed vessels—the PA images were clear even at a depth of 5 mm. These findings confirmed the effectiveness of this low-cost system for the noninvasive detection of arterial occlusions and highlighted its potential as a simple, affordable imaging technique for early vascular disease screening. Moreover, this basic PAI system can be further developed into a tomographic imaging platform that employs only portable components and is capable of real-time scanning.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study did not involve human participants or animal subjects. Therefore, ethical approval from an institutional review board or bioethics committee was not required. The experiments were conducted using inanimate polymer phantoms in a controlled laboratory environment. All laboratory safety protocols, particularly regarding laser safety and chemical handling for phantom fabrication, were strictly followed.
Funding
This research was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia through the Master’s Thesis Research Grant (Penelitian Tesis Magister/PTM) under Contract Number: 1103/UN1/DITLIT/Dit-Lit/PT.01.03/2026.
Please cite this article as follows: Vulgira N, Sari AW, Sillanpää M, Mitrayana. Low-cost photoacoustic imaging system for vascular occlusion detection in polymer phantoms. J Lasers Med Sci 2026;17: e51117. doi:10.34172/jlms.51117
References
- 1.Murray G, Convery C, Walker L, Davies E. Guideline for the management of hyaluronic acid filler-induced vascular occlusion. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021;14(5):E61–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naveed A, Atique R, Saeed HA, Sharif J, Haidar A, Samad A. Cardiovascular diseases: understanding the leading cause of death worldwide. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts. 2024;1(1):100–10. doi: 10.70445/gjmdsa.1.1.2024.100-110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hu K, Li Y, Ke Z, Yang H, Lu C, Li Y, et al. History, progress and future challenges of artificial blood vessels: a narrative review. Biomater Transl. 2022;3(1):81–98. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Altalhi R, Pechlivani N, Ajjan RA. PAI-1 in diabetes: pathophysiology and role as a therapeutic target. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3170. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jalali Z, Khademalhosseini M, Soltani N, Esmaeili Nadimi A. Smoking, alcohol and opioids effect on coronary microcirculation: an update overview. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01990-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miceli G, Basso MG, Pintus C, Pennacchio AR, Cocciola E, Cuffaro M, et al. Molecular pathways of vulnerable carotid plaques at risk of ischemic stroke: a narrative review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(8):4351. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Młynarska E, Czarnik W, Fularski P, Hajdys J, Majchrowicz G, Stabrawa M, et al. From atherosclerotic plaque to myocardial infarction-the leading cause of coronary artery occlusion. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(13):7295. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharina I, Awad R, Cobb S, Martin E, Marrelli SP, Reddy AK. Non-invasive real-time pulsed Doppler assessment of blood flow in mouse ophthalmic artery. Cell Rep Methods. 2025;5(2):100983. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Becker LM, Peper J, van Nes SH, van Es HW, Sjauw KD, van de Hoef TP, et al. Non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary artery obstruction on coronary computed tomography angiography. Neth Heart J. 2024;32(11):397–404. doi: 10.1007/s12471-024-01902-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li W, Zhang R, Zhang X, Wu S, Ma T, Hou Y, et al. Precise diagnosis of cardiac-cerebral vascular diseases with magnetic resonance imaging-based nanoprobes. iRadiology. 2024;2(3):264–84. doi: 10.1002/ird3.87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bankole ND, Dujardin PA, Bala F, Ehrmann S, Desplobain K, Patat F, et al. Transcranial doppler ultrasound for the diagnosis of large vessel occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024;245:108506. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wen Y, Guo D, Zhang J, Liu X, Liu T, Li L, et al. Clinical photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modal imaging: current status and future trends. Front Physiol. 2022;13:1036621. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1036621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kye H, Kang MS, Jo D, Park B, Jang HJ, Kim J, et al. Advances in high-resolution photoacoustic imaging techniques for cellular visualization. View (Beijing) 2026;7(1):20250125. doi: 10.1002/VIW.20250125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang H, Li D, Yang J, Wang J, Gan S, Cao K, et al. Study on preparation and properties of PAI materials containing trifluoromethyl in side chain. Macromol Res. 2021;29(10):727–34. doi: 10.1007/s13233-021-9077-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Çınar S, Gerçek AE, Bilgiç AE, Özdemir Ö. Automated noise removal system for photoacoustic imaging using independent component analysis. Digit Signal Process. 2025;159:105004. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Julianto R, Mujtahid Anas A, Mitrayana Mitrayana. Characterization of photoacoustic tomography based on 450 nm visible light and its application for detection of formalin fish meat. J Phys Conf Ser. 2023;2498(1):012015. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2498/1/012015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu J, Peng Z, Zhang X, He W, Yang C. Wavelet-ResNet: a deep residual network combined with wavelet transform for photoacoustic blood glucose detection. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024;97:106718. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neelamraju PM, Gundepudi K, Sanki PK, Busi KB, Mistri TK, Sangaraju S, et al. Potential applications for photoacoustic imaging using functional nanoparticles: a comprehensive overview. Heliyon. 2024;10(15):e34654. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Neprokin A, Broadway C, Myllylä T, Bykov A, Meglinski I. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine and life sciences. Life (Basel) 2022;12(4):588. doi: 10.3390/life12040588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen Z, Gezginer I, Zhou Q, Tang L, Deán-Ben XL, Razansky D. Multimodal optoacoustic imaging: methods and contrast materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2024;53(12):6068–99. doi: 10.1039/d3cs00565h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Manwar R, Zafar M, Xu Q. Signal and image processing in biomedical photoacoustic imaging: a review. Optics. 2020;2(1):1–24. doi: 10.3390/opt2010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Y, Li Z, Du Z, Pan J, Huang Y. Multifunctional upconversion nanoparticles transforming photoacoustic imaging: a review. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2025;15(14):1074. doi: 10.3390/nano15141074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ahmed KK, Muheddin DQ, Mohammed PA, Ezat GS, Murad AR, Ahmed BY, et al. A brief review on optical properties of polymer composites: insights into light-matter interaction from classical to quantum transport point of view. Results Phys. 2024;56:107239. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lembessis VE, Andrews DL. Forces in the interaction of light with matter. Appl Sci. 2024;14(16):7008. doi: 10.3390/app14167008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hosseinaee Z, Le M, Bell K, Haji Reza P. Towards non-contact photoacoustic imaging [review] Photoacoustics. 2020;20:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pang W, Yuan C, Zhong T, Huang X, Pan Y, Qu J, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic optical imaging in cardiovascular diseases. iScience. 2024;27(11):111216. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Windra Sari A, Widyaningrum R, Setiawan A, Mitrayana Mitrayana. Photoacoustic imaging of gingival inflammation using low-cost near-infrared diode laser. Appl Acoust. 2024;218:109903. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.109903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Windra Sari A, Widyaningrum R, Yana M. Photoacoustic imaging for periodontal disease examination. J Lasers Med Sci. 2022;13:e37. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Windra Sari A, Widyaningrum R, Setiawan A, Mitrayana Mitrayana. Recent development of photoacoustic imaging in dentistry: a review on studies over the last decade. Saudi Dent J. 2023;35(5):423–36. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hacker L, Joseph J, Lilaj L, Manohar S, Ivory AM, Tao R, et al. Tutorial on phantoms for photoacoustic imaging applications. J Biomed Opt. 2024;29(8):080801. doi: 10.1117/1.Jbo.29.8.080801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hobson N, Polster SP, Cao Y, Flemming K, Shu Y, Huston J, et al. Phantom validation of quantitative susceptibility and dynamic contrast-enhanced permeability MR sequences across instruments and sites. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(4):1192–9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hacker L, Ivory AM, Joseph J, Gröhl J, Zeqiri B, Rajagopal S, et al. A stable phantom material for optical and acoustic imaging. J Vis Exp 2023(196): e65475. doi: 10.3791/65475. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Jiang D, Zhu L, Tong S, Shen Y, Gao F, Gao F. Photoacoustic imaging plus X: a review. J Biomed Opt. 2024;29(Suppl 1):S11513. doi: 10.1117/1.Jbo.29.S1.S11513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Periyasamy V, Rangaraj M, Pramanik M. Photoacoustic imaging of teeth for dentine imaging and enamel characterization. In: Rechmann P, Fried D, eds. Lasers in Dentistry XXIV. Vol 10473. SPIE; 2018. p. 1-6. doi: 10.1117/12.2286733. [DOI]
- 35.Mozaffarzadeh M, Moore C, Barzegar Golmoghani E, Mantri Y, Hariri A, Jorns A, et al. Motion-compensated noninvasive periodontal health monitoring using handheld and motor-based photoacoustic-ultrasound imaging systems. Biomed Opt Express. 2021;12(3):1543–58. doi: 10.1364/boe.417345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu X, Li H, Pang M, Liu J, Song X, He R, et al. Photoacoustic imaging in brain disorders: current progress and clinical applications. View (Beijing) 2024;5(4):20240023. doi: 10.1002/VIW.20240023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.He Y, Qin S, Dyer BA, Zhang H, Zhao L, Chen T, et al. Characterizing mechanical and medical imaging properties of polyvinyl chloride-based tissue-mimicking materials. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(7):176–83. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang W, Li J, Yang S. Real-time interleaved photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging for guiding interventional procedures. Appl Acoust. 2019;156:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.06.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang X, Zhu G, Miao Y. Calibration of sound intensity instruments based on the double coupler technology. Appl Acoust. 2022;199:109008. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Alifkalaila A, Mitrayana Mitrayana, Widyaningrum R. Photoacoustic imaging system based on diode laser and condenser microphone for characterization of dental anatomy. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol. 2021;11(6):2363–8. doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.11.6.12902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rizwan A, Sridharan B, Park JH, Kim D, Vial JC, Kyhm K, et al. Nanophotonic-enhanced photoacoustic imaging for brain tumor detection. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu Y, Wu D, Wen Y, Yang Y, Zhang J, Chi Z, et al. Photoacoustic imaging in visualization of acupuncture mechanisms. Photonics. 2025;12(4):365. doi: 10.3390/photonics12040365. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu C, Chen J, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Wang L. Five-wavelength optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy of blood and lymphatic vessels. Adv Photonics. 2021;3(1):016002. doi: 10.1117/1.AP.3.1.016002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tian C, Shen K, Dong W, Gao F, Wang K, Li J, et al. Image reconstruction from photoacoustic projections. Photonics Insights. 2024;3(3):R06. doi: 10.3788/PI.2024.R06. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aljohani S. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) characteristics of acute retinal arterial occlusion: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel) 2025;13(16):2056. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rašiová M, Schlager O, Heiss C, Brodmann M, Olinic DM, Boc V, et al. Adverse reactions after intravascular iodinated contrast media administration and their management. Vasa. 2024;53(3):193–203. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jeong SY, Suh CH, Kim SJ, Lemere CA, Lim JS, Lee JH. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in the era of anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer’s disease: recent updates on clinical and imaging features and MRI monitoring. Korean J Radiol. 2024;25(8):726–41. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
