Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2026 Oct 15;31(41):2600075. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2026.31.41.2600075

High levels of domestic transmission and drug resistance –analysis of national surveillance data for shigellosis, the Netherlands, 2018 to 2024

Boas van der Putten 1,2,*, Hendrik Sauskojus 1,3,*, Anouk Meijs 1, Daan Notermans 1, Maren Lanzl 1, Eelco Franz 1, Maaike van den Beld 1, Roan Pijnacker 1; on behalf of the ISIS-AR study group4
PMCID: PMC13675696  PMID: 42885490

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Shigella species is increasing, which is concerning. Strengthening surveillance is key to obtaining accurate, timely and actionable data on shigellosis.

AIM

We aimed to describe Dutch national shigellosis surveillance data from 2018 to 2024, spanning the implementation of national genomic surveillance in 2022.

METHODS

We described notified shigellosis cases and used logistic regression models to analyse associations between shigellosis and age, sex, year of infection, province, MSM (men who have sex with men) association, travel status, severity of disease and Shigella species.

RESULTS

In 2018–2024, 3,020 shigellosis cases were notified. Incidence of shigellosis decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic years 2020–2021 but returned to pre-pandemic incidence in 2023 and 2024. Most cases were males (n = 1,887; 62.5%). Of the 1,731 cases with available data, 732 (42.3%) reported recent contact with MSM, representing 24.2% of all shigellosis cases. The proportion of extensive drug resistant (XDR) isolates increased from 2018 (1/58) to 2023 (24/109; 22.0%) (p < 0.001). Cases were more likely to be part of a cluster if they reported a recent MSM contact (p < 0.001) or harboured an XDR isolate (p < 0.001). Cases with recent MSM contact were more likely to harbour an XDR strain (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of genomic surveillance facilitated detection of clusters, provided more timely data on AMR and allowed for more detailed analyses of risk factors for Shigella transmission. Continued intervention efforts promoting hygiene and raising awareness on shigellosis and AMR are important to curb the increase of XDR shigellosis.

Keywords: Shigellosis, antimicrobial resistance, surveillance, whole-genome sequencing, the Netherlands


Key public health message.

What did you want to address in this study and why?

Shigella bacteria can cause an intestinal infection (shigellosis) with severe diarrhoea and stomach cramps. In the Netherlands, approximately 400–600 persons are annually diagnosed with shigellosis. Antibiotics are becoming less effective against shigellosis. We wanted to investigate shigellosis in the Dutch population between 2018 and 2024.

What have we learnt from this study?

Between 2018 and 2024, 3,020 shigellosis cases were notified. In recent years, shigellosis cases often reported international travel or sexual contact between men. Almost half of the cases were infected in the Netherlands. As reported in other countries, antibiotics are becoming less effective against Shigella infections in the Netherlands. We were able to track transmission of Shigella bacteria better with genomic data.

What are the implications of your findings for public health?

Our findings highlight the ongoing need for promoting hygiene and of raising awareness about antimicrobial resistance, especially among travellers and men who have sex with men. Continued public health messaging on symptoms recognition and prevention is crucial for these risk groups.

Introduction

Shigellosis is an intestinal infection caused by Shigella spp. This illness typically manifests with acute watery diarrhoea, fever, vomiting or abdominal cramps, but can lead to severe intestinal complications [1]. Shigella spp. are transmitted through faecal-oral contact and a very low infectious dose of the bacteria can cause an infection. Prevention mainly consists of good sanitary conditions and common hygienic measures. Antimicrobials are reserved for the treatment of severe infections, as mild cases typically recover within a week. Due to growing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), Shigella spp. are classified as high-priority pathogens by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2].

Annually, over 200 million shigellosis infections and over 200,000 deaths are estimated to occur worldwide [3]. The disease can be endemic in high-income countries, where imported and domestically acquired shigellosis pose a substantial public health burden, with growing concerns around extensive drug resistance (XDR) [4]. In many countries, shigellosis is also often associated with transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) [1].

In the Netherlands, 400–600 shigellosis cases are annually reported to the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Previously it was estimated that only one in 53 cases was detected, corresponding to an estimated true number of 27,000 shigellosis cases per year in the Netherlands [5].

The most recent update on national shigellosis surveillance data in the Netherlands covered data up to 2017 [6]. Since then, whole genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance has been implemented in the Netherlands and multiple international reports have been published on the rise of AMR in Shigella spp. [7]. We aimed to investigate epidemiology of shigellosis in the Netherlands from 2018 to 2024, including genomic epidemiology, explore risk factors for transmission and analyse AMR.

Methods

Epidemiological surveillance data and setting

Data on shigellosis cases were obtained from the registration system for notifiable infectious diseases (OSIRIS) at the RIVM. Shigellosis is notifiable for any person with (i) a positive culture for Shigella spp. or (ii) at least one of the four symptoms fever, diarrhoea, vomiting or abdominal pain and recent (< 2 weeks) contact with a culture-confirmed case [8]. Detection of Shigella spp. by PCR alone is not notifiable as accurate differentiation between Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli still requires culture. Cases are notified by a physician or the medical microbiological laboratory (MML) to the municipal health service which conducts source and contact tracing with a standardised questionnaire (including the question “Did you have MSM contact in the week before illness onset?”). Pseudonymised information on disease manifestation, demographics (age, postal code, sex) and risk factors, such as travel history, is shared with the RIVM. Domestic and non-domestic transmission is based on the most likely country of infection, as ascertained through the questionnaire.

Genomic surveillance data

Since 1 May 2022, all MMLs in the Netherlands have been asked to voluntarily submit Shigella spp. isolates for national genomic surveillance. We included all genomic Shigella data from the national genomic surveillance that could be linked to a notified case. The isolates were whole genome sequenced using Illumina NextSeq (Illumina, San Diego, the United States (US)) and subsequently analysed with Juno pipelines (https://github.com/RIVM-bioinformatics). Mykrobe version 0.13.0 (https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/mykrobe/README.html) and sonneityping version 20210201 (https://github.com/ShigellaGenomics/sonneityping) were used to assign S. sonnei lineages. Clustering analysis was carried out using Ridom SeqSphere (https://www.ridom.de/seqsphere/ug/v40/Overview.html), including allele calling.

Genetic clusters were defined based on core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), using the Enterobase Escherichia/Shigella scheme version 1 [9]. Clusters were assigned using single-linkage clustering with a threshold of ≤ 5 alleles difference.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing data

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing data for isolates sampled from 2018 to 2023 were collected from the Dutch Infectious Diseases Surveillance Information System for Antimicrobial Resistance (ISIS-AR) which is based on medical routine diagnostics [10]. Data for cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole and meropenem/imipenem were selected for analysis. Subsequently, isolates were categorised as susceptible (including susceptible, increased dosing) or resistant by reinterpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and inhibition zone diameters according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) clinical breakpoints version 14.0 (https://www.eucast.org/bacteria/clinical-breakpoints-and-interpretation/clinical-breakpoint-tables/).

Data linkage

Case notifications were linked to the genomic surveillance data and AST data using score-based matching with following matching criteria: age, date of onset (or if unavailable date of sampling), postal code (four digits) and sex.

Definition of extensive drug resistance

Isolates were considered XDR if they either harboured genetic resistance determinants or displayed phenotypic resistance against all four types of antimicrobials recommended by the Dutch guidelines [11]. The four antimicrobials we included were, with the relevant genetic resistance determinants written in parentheses: (i) cefotaxime/ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime (any ESBL or AmpC gene); (ii) ciprofloxacin (at least two of gyrA S83L, gyrA D87N/G/Y, parC S80I/R or qnrS1); (iii) co-trimoxazole (one of sul1, sul2 or sul3 and one of dfrA1, dfrA14 or dfrA17) and (iv) azithromycin (one of mphA, ermB). If data were missing for one or more relevant antimicrobials, isolates could not be classified as XDR.

Annual proportions of phenotypically and genotypically predicted resistant isolates were compared to assess concordance between methods at the population level.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.4.0 (https://www.r-project.org/). We included cases from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2024 and genomic data from 1 May 2022 to 31 December 2024. Cases without an identification code (ID) or with a duplicated ID were excluded.

Determination of MSM association was based on self-reported MSM contact in the week prior to the onset of symptoms. A binary cluster variable was created for clusters with at least two related cases.

Cases were described by age, sex, having MSM contact in the week before illness onset (categorised as yes, no or unknown), country of infection, severity of disease (requiring hospitalisation) and Shigella species. The annual incidence of shigellosis per 100,000 population was calculated at the provincial and national level. Representativeness of genomic surveillance was assessed by comparing cases with and without linked genome sequences on age, sex, year, province, MSM association, travel status, severity of disease and Shigella species using multivariable logistic regression.

We used chi-square test to compare categorical variables and a two-proportion z-test for comparing proportions. A two-tailed p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Combinations of two variables with associations in cross-tabulations and previous studies on shigellosis were assessed using bivariate logistic regression. As a result, we investigated sex, MSM association and travel history as exposures, and their associations with being part of a cluster, the severity of the infection, having an XDR strain and travel history as outcomes.

Considering the results from the univariate regression models and relationships between two variables that seemed to be confounded by other variables resulted in the construction of two multivariable logistic regression models. As being part of a cluster satisfied the conditions for a potential confounder of the relationship between having an MSM association (exposure) and travel history (outcome), this was tested in the first model. The second model, based on the same assumptions of confounding, examined the association between MSM association (exposure) and being part of a cluster (outcome), adjusted for being a domestic or non-domestic case. Multicollinearity was assessed using variance inflation factor analysis.

Testing statistical significance of changing resistance proportions over time was done by using univariate logistic regression of resistance to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole and third-generation cephalosporins, using year as continuous independent variable and Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing.

Results

We included 3,020 notified cases of shigellosis in the analysis after excluding cases with missing IDs (n = 72). Of the notified cases, 1,133 (37.5%) were females and 1,887 (62.5%) were males. Female cases were a median age of 37 years (interquartile rage (IQR): 25–54), while male cases were a median age of 41 years (IQR: 29–55). Of the 3,020 notified cases, 105 (3.5%) were not laboratory-confirmed. The incidence was highest in the province of Noord-Holland, which includes Amsterdam (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The incidence of shigellosis was highest in the region Noord-Holland, which includes Amsterdam and is in the northwestern part of the Netherlands, and lowest in Limburg, which is located south-east.

Average incidence of shigellosis per 100,000 population, by province, the Netherlands, 2018–2024 (n = 3,020)

In 2018, 3.01 cases per 100,000 population (n = 518) were notified, dropping to 1.13 and 1.26 cases per 100,000 population in 2020 (n = 196) and 2021 (n = 221), respectively. The incidence increased between 2022 and 2023, with 2.50 (n = 440) and 3.39 (n = 604) cases per 100,000 population, respectively, but decreased to 2.73 cases per 100,000 population in 2024 (n = 490) (Figure 2). On average, 46.2% of cases were domestic, with the highest proportions in 2020 (70.7%) and 2021 (70.4%) and the lowest in 2018 (36.4%).

Figure 2.

The incidence of shigellosis was highest during 2019 and 2023, and lowest during the COVID-19 pandemic years 2020 and 2021. However, the percentage of domestic cases was highest during 2020 and 2021.

Incidence of shigellosis per 100,000 population and percentage of domestic cases, the Netherlands, 2018–2024 (n = 3,020)

Most notified cases were males, with a high proportion of 72.9% (161/221) in 2021, and in those aged 21–50 years (n = 1,665; 55.1%), followed by those aged ≥ 51 years (n = 1,046; 34.6%) (Table 1). Of the 1,731 cases with available data, 732 (42.3%) reported recent MSM contact, representing 24.2% of all shigellosis cases. The proportion of MSM-associated cases among males increased from 31.2% in 2018 to 41.6% in 2024, with a peak of 48.6% in 2020. Among MSM-associated cases, 82.1% (n = 601) were considered domestically acquired, compared with 43.3% (n = 433) of male cases that reported no MSM contact.

Table 1. Characteristics of shigellosis cases, the Netherlands, 2018–2024 (n = 3,020).

Characteristic 2018 (n = 518) 2019 (n = 551) 2020 (n = 196) 2021 (n = 221) 2022 (n = 440) 2023 (n = 604) 2024 (n = 490) Total (n = 3,020)
n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %
Sex
Female 239 46.1 206 37.4 54 27.6 60 27.1 181 41.0 225 37.3 168 34.3 1,133 37.5
Male 279 53.9 345 62.6 142 72.4 161 72.9 259 59.0 379 62.7 322 65.7 1,887 62.5
Age (years)
0–5 16 3.1 18 3.3 2 1.0 10 4.5 14 3.2 15 2.5 16 3.3 91 3.0
6–10 26 5.0 20 3.6 2 1.0 6 2.7 15 3.4 19 3.1 12 2.4 100 3.3
11–20 24 4.6 23 4.3 9 4.6 11 5.0 15 3.4 25 4.1 13 2.7 120 4.0
21–50 279 53.9 295 53.5 122 62.2 137 62.0 235 53.4 334 55.3 261 53.3 1,663 55.1
≥ 51 173 33.4 195 35.4 61 31.1 57 25.8 161 36.6 211 34.9 188 38.4 1,046 34.6
Men who have sex with men
Yes 87 31.2 147 42.6 69 48.6 73 45.3 86 33.2 139 36.7 131 40.7 732 38.8
No 169 60.6 173 50.1 65 45.8 75 46.6 152 58.7 211 55.7 154 47.8 999 52.9
Unknown 23 8.2 25 7.2 8 5.6 13 8.1 21 8.1 29 7.7 37 11.5 156 8.3
Shigella species (n = 2,958)
S. sonnei 316 62.8 347 64.0 85 43.6 96 44.0 273 64.1 423 70.7 256 53.8 1,796 60.7
S. flexneri 155 30.8 155 28.6 100 51.3 111 50.9 123 28.9 161 26.9 192 40.3 997 33.7
S. boydii 17 3.4 17 3.1 9 4.6 9 4.1 16 3.8 9 1.5 18 3.8 95 3.2
S. dysenteriae 15 3.0 23 4.2 1 0.5 2 0.9 14 3.3 5 0.8 10 2.1 70 2.4
Travelled outside the Netherlands (n = 1,568)
Female 189 59.1 173 55.4 31 55.4 28 44.4 142 53.0 173 54.2 118 51.3 854 54.5
Male 131 40.9 139 44.6 25 44.6 35 55.6 126 47.0 146 45.8 112 48.7 714 45.5

Among cases with information on Shigella species (n = 2,958), most were caused by S. sonnei (n = 1,796; 60.7%) or S. flexneri (n = 997; 33.7%), whereas S. boydii (n = 95; 3.2%) and S. dysenteriae (n = 70; 2.4%) were much less common. Most S. sonnei infections with information on the country of transmission (n = 1,752) were contracted in the Netherlands (n = 739; 42.2%), followed by Morocco (n = 36; 2.1%). Similarly, most cases of S. flexneri were contracted in the Netherlands (552/947; 58.2%), followed by Morocco (140/947; 14.8%). In 2020–2021, the proportion of cases caused by S. flexneri increased in the Netherlands compared with 2018–2019.

The two most common countries among travel-related cases were Morocco (n = 194; 12.4%) and Egypt (n = 169; 10.8%). In 2022, most travel-related cases came from Cabo Verde (n = 56; 12.7% of all cases in 2022), the centre of a multi-country outbreak of shigellosis [12]. Female cases were more likely to report recent travel and also contracted shigellosis abroad more often than male cases, such as Morocco (n = 115; 59.3%) and Egypt (n = 110; 65.1%). However, notable exceptions were Spain (male cases: 52/59) and Germany (male cases: 34/36), where a higher proportion of male cases were observed. Spain (n = 36) and Germany (n = 28) were also the most common countries among 125 non-domestic cases with an MSM association.

Severity of disease

A higher proportion of male cases (17.9%; n = 338) was admitted to a hospital compared with female cases (11.9%; n = 135) (p < 0.001). The authors make an additional table of comparisons by sex and recent MSM contact available in Supplementary Table 1. There was no significant difference in hospitalisation between MSM-associated and non-MSM-associated male cases (p = 0.3). Two hundred forty-one (13.4%) S. sonnei cases and 211 (21.2%) S. flexneri cases were hospitalised.

Representativeness of genomic surveillance

Since the start of the comprehensive genomic surveillance in 2022, 50.6% (776/1,534) of notified cases were matched to genomic data, with isolates submitted by nearly all MMLs in the Netherlands (n = 43). Only cases with S. boydii (n = 39) (OR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50–0.84; p < 0.001) or S. dysenteriae (n = 27) (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.41–0.81; p = 0.001) infections were less likely to have a linked genome sequence, compared with cases with a S. flexneri infection (n = 446) since the start of comprehensive genomic surveillance. Additionally, the proportion of cases linked to a genome sequence differed between provinces (p < 0.001). For one province (Fryslân), no cases could be linked to genome sequences (0/49), while genome linkage among cases ranged from 15 of 54 to 100 of 140 for other provinces. No significant association could be identified between linkage of a genome sequence with either transmission mode (domestic vs. travel-acquired), recent MSM contact, age, year, antimicrobial resistance or hospitalisation when adjusting for all investigated variables.

Trends in phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance

Some antimicrobial susceptibility data were available from 2,089 cases: 1,313 with only phenotypic data, 347 with only genomic data and 429 with both phenotypic and genomic data. The proportion of isolates resistant against third-generation cephalosporins increased from 15.3% (49/321) in 2018 to 40.3% (137/340) in 2023 (p < 0.001). Ciprofloxacin resistance among isolates increased from 26.3% (92/350) to 39.4% (156/396) (p = 0.041). The proportion of XDR isolates increased from 1.7% (1/58) in 2018 to 22.0% (24/109) in 2023 (p < 0.001), based on isolates with phenotypic data available for all four antimicrobials. No statistically significant changes were observed for co-trimoxazole (2018: 254/350; 72.6% and 2023: 277/391; 70.8%) and azithromycin (2018: 22/65; 33.8% and 2023: 46/134; 34.3%). No isolates showed carbapenem resistance or harboured carbapenemase genes. The authors make additional visualisations available in Supplementary Figures 1 and 2, describing antimicrobial resistance by species and transmission (domestically acquired versus travel-acquired).

Phenotypic AST data for all four antimicrobials or antimicrobial groups were reported for only 14.5% (439/3,020) of cases, particularly due to the low completeness of azithromycin data (16.4%; 495/3,020). An additional overview of the completeness of antimicrobial susceptibility data is available in Supplementary Table 2. For ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole, around 80% of AST data originated from automated testing systems, while nearly all azithromycin AST data originated from E-tests. For cefotaxime/ceftriaxone, this information was not readily available.

Presence of genotypic resistance markers corresponded well to phenotypic AMR on a population level (Figure 3). A total of 153 cases with an XDR isolate were identified, of which 112 solely in genomic surveillance and 21 solely in phenotypic AST surveillance. The remaining 20 XDR cases were identified in both genomic and phenotypic surveillance. Either genotypic or phenotypic susceptibility data on all four relevant antimicrobials was available for 1,100 cases.

Figure 3.

Percentages of Shigella species isolates either genotypically predicted to be resistant or phenotypically resistant against azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole and third-generation cephalosporins, the Netherlands, 2018–2024 (n = 2,089)a

a Only phenotypic data (azithromycin: n = 378; ciprofloxacin: n = 1,304; co-trimoxazole: n = 1,300; third-generation cephalosporins: n = 1,197; extensive drug resistance: n = 1,265); only genomic data (azithromycin: n = 659; ciprofloxacin: n = 347; co-trimoxazole: n = 351; third-generation cephalosporins: n = 394; extensive drug resistance: n = 392), phenotypic and genomic data (azithromycin: n = 117; ciprofloxacin: n = 429; co-trimoxazole: n = 425; third-generation cephalosporins: n = 382; extensive drug resistance: n = 384).

Resistance against co-trimoxazole was highest and was observed in up to three-quarter of isolates, depending on year. Phenotypic extensive drug-resistance increased from 2% in 2018 to 22% in 2023.

Description of detected genetic clusters

Nine genetic clusters with ≥ 20 cases of S. sonnei (n = 6) and S. flexneri (n = 3) were identified in genomic surveillance between 2022 and 2024 (Table 2). Among these clusters, cases reported either predominantly recent MSM contact (six clusters) or recent international travel (three clusters). Three of the S. sonnei clusters in which cases reported MSM contact comprised XDR isolates. Clusters 1 and 7 mostly comprised XDR isolates, accounting for 58.2% (89/153) of all XDR cases. Both clusters (1 and 7) were reported in other countries [13-24] and belonged to lineages 3.6.1.1 and 3.6.1.1.2. Cluster 1 harboured blaCTX-M-15 as ESBL gene while cluster 7 harboured blaCTX-M-27. Thirteen of 44 isolates in Cluster 2 were XDR and belonged to S. sonnei lineage 3.6.1.1. The first Dutch case of this cluster was detected in November 2022, and in June 2024, cases with XDR were identified. This cluster gained XDR through the acquisition of blaDHA-1 and mphA. An additional epidemiological curve of this cluster is available in Supplementary Figure 3.

Table 2. Description of the nine largest genetic clusters of Shigella species identified in genomic surveillance, the Netherlands, May 2022–2024a.

Cluster Species (lineage) Cases (n) MSM Travel history Country of travel Antimicrobial XDR Relation to previous studies Enterobase HC5 label
n % n %
1 S. sonnei (3.6.1.1) 72 44 61.1 13 18.1 Several countries 3GC, AZM, CIP, TMP-SMX Yes [14-16] 194512
2 S. sonnei (3.6.1.1) 44 24 54.5 10 22.7 Several countries 3GCb, AZMb, CIP, TMP-SMX Yesb No studies 219392
3 S. sonnei (3.6.2) 41 0 0 28 68.3 Morocco TMP-SMX No [13] 26701
4 S. sonnei (3.7.17) 34 0 0 30 88.2 Cabo Verde TMP-SMXc No No studies 181425
5 S. flexneri 29 16 55.2 4 13.8 Several countries 3GC, CIP No [17,32] 181248
6 S. flexneri 25 16 64.0 2 8.0 NDd No [13,18,19,33] 81361
7 S. sonnei (3.6.1.1.2) 24 16 66.7 6 25.0 3GC, AZM, CIP, TMP-SMX Yes [13,17-24] 98748
8 S. sonnei (3.7.25) 22 0 0 16 72.7 Jordan, Egypt 3GC, TMP-SMX No [14,24,34] 127002
9 S. flexneri 20 16 80.0 4 20.0 Several countries AZM, CIP No [17] 189644

3GC: third generation cephalosporins; AZM: azithromycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; HC5: hierarchical cluster at 5 allelic differences; MSM: men who have sex with men; ND: not detected; TMP-SMX: co-trimoxazole; XDR: extensive drug resistance.

a Percentages are calculated from the number of cases with available data for that variable. Predominant country of travel is indicated only for clusters where most cases reported recent travel outside the Netherlands.

b A sub-cluster of 13 cases with isolates typed as XDR due to additional resistance against third-generation cephalosporins and azithromycin.

c 17 cases with isolates encoding co-trimoxazole resistance.

d Resistance markers against first line antimicrobials were not detected.

Regression analysis

Univariate logistic regression

Male cases had higher odds of being hospitalised (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.31–2.02; p < 0.001) but were less likely to be a non-domestic case when compared with female cases (OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.16–0.23; p < 0.001) (Table 3). Male cases also had higher odds of having been infected with an XDR strain (OR = 4.22; 95% CI: 2.69–6.99; p < 0.001) and being part of a cluster (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.58–2.95; p < 0.001).

Table 3. Associations between variables associated with shigellosis in univariate regression analysis, the Netherlands, 2018–2024 (n = 3,020).
Variable Hospitalisation Being part of a cluster XDR strain Travel outside the Netherlands
Estimate 95% CI p value Estimate 95% CI p value Estimate 95% CI p value Estimate 95% CI p value
Sex (reference: female)
Male 1.62 1.31–2.02 < 0.001 2.16 1.58–2.95 < 0.001 4.22 2.69–6.99 < 0.001 0.19 0.16–0.23 < 0.001
MSM association (reference: no)
MSM contact 0.86 0.67–1.11 0.24 3.14 1.96–5.15 < 0.001 3.15 2.15–4.69 < 0.001 0.17 0.13–0.21 < 0.001
History of travel (reference: no)
Travelled 0.41 0.36–0.51 < 0.001 0.30 0.21–0.41 < 0.001 0.35 0.24–0.50 < 0.001 NA

CI: confidence interval; MSM: men who have sex with men; NA: not applicable; XDR: extensive drug resistance.

Cases with an MSM association were not more likely to be hospitalised (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.66–1.11; p = 0.24), but had higher odds of being part of a Shigella cluster (OR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.96–5.15; p < 0.001), harbouring an XDR strain (OR = 3.15; 95% CI: 2.15–4.69; p < 0.001) and lower odds of having acquired the infection outside the Netherlands (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.13–0.21; p < 0.001) when compared with male cases without an MSM association.

Non-domestic cases had lower odds of belonging to a Shigella cluster (OR = 0.30; 95% 0.21–0.41; p < 0.001) and being hospitalised (OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.36–0.51; p < 0.001). Lastly, cases with XDR were more likely to be part of a cluster (OR = 4.52; 95% CI: 2.66–8.27; p < 0.001), but not more likely to be hospitalised.

Multinomial logistic regression

Transferring the relationship between having an MSM association (predictor) and being a non-domestic case (outcome) into a model that adjusted for clustering, the initial OR (0.17; 95% CI: 0.13–0.21) increased to 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15–0.37). The association between having an MSM association (predictor) and being part of a cluster (outcome) (OR = 3.14; 95% CI: 1.96–5.15) weakened when adjusted for the domestic or non-domestic transmission (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.33–3.81).

Including the year of infection, age or Shigella species as a covariate did not significantly alter the relationship between being a non-domestic case and MSM association or being part of a cluster and MSM association.

Discussion

The incidence of shigellosis in the Netherlands varied significantly across the years 2018–2024, with a marked decline during the COVID-19 pandemic years of 2020–2021, likely due to a decrease in travel-related cases, similar to other gastrointestinal infections [25]. In 2020–2021, most cases in the Netherlands were caused by S. flexneri which contrasts with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) reporting more S. sonnei than S. flexneri cases during this period across the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries [26,27]. Males accounted for a higher proportion of cases, largely driven by MSM-associated transmission, and had higher odds of being hospitalised and being part of a genomic cluster. Cases associated with MSM had higher odds of having acquired their infection domestically and harbouring an XDR Shigella strain, while XDR status was also associated with an increased odds of being part of a genomic cluster, but not with being hospitalised. This risk was lower in non-domestic cases compared with domestic ones. However, all logistic regression analyses were exploratory, and we do not claim that the identified risk factors are causal, due to limitations in constructing more complex models. Several large clusters linked to other international clusters were detected in the Netherlands, two of which mainly comprised XDR isolates. Similar to other countries, we observed an increase in AMR among shigellosis cases in the Netherlands [4].

The incidence of shigellosis cases per 100,000 population was 30-40% higher in the Netherlands than in most other EU/EEA countries, for which public data are available up to 2022 [4]. Only a few countries, including Spain and France, showed higher shigellosis incidence rates. Germany, which was frequently mentioned in the travel histories of our cases, recorded a much lower incidence than the Netherlands. Differences between country incidence rates might be due to several reasons, including applied case definitions, coverage of the surveillance system and differences in healthcare systems.

In line with our findings, increased transmission among MSM is thought to contribute to the differences between case numbers among females and males in the other EU/EEA countries [4]. The proportion of MSM-associated cases among males in our analysis (42.2% in 2024) contrasts sharply with the estimated 6.9% of males in the Netherlands identifying as either gay or other gender and sexual minorities. In addition, some provinces, such as Noord-Holland, which include highly urbanised hubs where people from gender and sexual minority communities are more likely to live, such as Amsterdam [28], had the highest case numbers. These findings confirm that MSM contact is a risk factor for contracting shigellosis, as supported by other studies [4,29], and should hence continue to be addressed in tailored risk communication strategies, such as through targeted websites.

Both ECDC and WHO have identified the increasing AMR of Shigella as a public health concern [2,4]. This is in line with Dutch surveillance data which also showed an increase in phenotypic resistance against ciprofloxacin and third-generation cephalosporins in recent years. In genomic surveillance, 10-20% of cases in recent years were classified as XDR. Given the association between being part of a cluster and XDR status, it seems likely that expansion of resistant clones contributed to rising resistance.

Since 1 May 2022, all Shigella spp. isolates submitted to the RIVM are whole genome sequenced [13]. The implementation of genomic surveillance enabled detection of 61 clusters (with at least two cases), of which nine clusters comprised at least 20 cases. Many other high-income countries currently use routine WGS in surveillance [22,29], allowing comparison of international data and improved detection of cross-border transmission [4]. Seven of the nine large clusters in our study were also reported in other countries. Notably, five international clusters included only few cases with recent travel reported, suggesting predominantly domestic transmission despite being reported in multiple countries.

Additionally, routine WGS has enabled genotypic AMR prediction which is used in risk assessments of newly detected clusters. This allowed the detection of XDR emergence in a cluster which has been present in the Netherlands for at least 1.5 years. Genomic AMR surveillance complements phenotypic AMR surveillance well: results become available quicker at the national institute and genomic surveillance covers more resistance classes than usually tested by MMLs (e.g. for azithromycin). National genomic AMR surveillance can also inform specialised guidelines for treatment of people with a risk of acquiring resistant strains.

In the current questionnaire for shigellosis cases, MSM status is defined as reporting MSM contact within the week prior to the onset of disease. The results are, therefore, only extendable to these individuals, and not to people that are part of the general MSM community. Furthermore, among non-domestic cases, we were unable to distinguish between travel for family visits and tourism, limiting our ability to develop targeted interventions to prevent infections acquired abroad. Although shigellosis is a notifiable disease, there is likely substantial underreporting [5], and cases in our study may represent more severe cases or more resistant infections [30]. Genomic data were more commonly available for cases infected by S. sonnei and S. flexneri, and for cases in certain provinces. While the paucity of genomic data on S. boydii and S. dysenteriae is not ideal, S. sonnei and S. flexneri are most relevant for public health in the Netherlands due to their much higher incidence. The varying geographical coverage of genomic surveillance could influence the exact estimates of our regression analyses, although general findings would remain valid since other important variables were not associated with availability of genomic data.

The phenotypic azithromycin susceptibility data were mainly based on E-tests. For Salmonella Typhi, interpretation of the E-test might be challenging [31]. This might also be the case for Shigella spp., which might explain rare discrepancies between phenotypic and genotypic data in our study.

Conclusion

In the Netherlands, shigellosis mainly affects risk groups such as MSM and travellers. In recent years, AMR has sharply increased, limiting treatment options. The implementation of routine WGS has enabled tracking of Shigella clusters, improved timely detection of AMR and allowed further analyses of risk groups. Furthermore, sexual transmission of resistant Shigella should be closely monitored and hygiene promotion to prevent faecal-oral transmission during sexual activities is crucial. Lastly, the linkage between epidemiological and microbiological data should be improved and the efforts to reduce underreporting should be increased, such as raising awareness about the increase in AMR, and specifically XDR, both of which also remain crucial for the prevention and control of shigellosis.

Ethical statement

This study was performed on deidentified surveillance data collected for public health purposes. Therefore, no ethical approval was required.

Use of artificial intelligence tools

None declared.

Acknowledgements

ISIS-AR study group

JWT Cohen Stuart, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Department of Medical Microbiology, Alkmaar; DC Melles, Meander Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Amersfoort; K van Dijk, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam; RP Schade, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam; M Scholing, OLVG Lab BV, Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam; SD Kuil, Public Health Service, Public Health Laboratory, Amsterdam; A Alzubaidy, Unilabs, Department of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam; GJ Blaauw, Gelre Hospitals, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection prevention, Apeldoorn; ISIS-AR Project team: W Altorf-van der Kuil, SM Bierman, SC de Greeff, SR Groenendijk, R Hertroys, L Kruithof, IM Nauta, DW Notermans, J Polman, WJ van den Reek, AF Schoffelen, CCH Wielders, BJ de Wit, RE Zoetigheid, Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven; W van den Bijllaardt, Microvida Amphia, Laboratory for Microbiology and Infection Control, Breda; EM Kraan, IJsselland hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Capelle a/d Ijssel; MB Haeseker, Reinier de Graaf Group, Department of Medical Microbiology, Delft; JM da Silva, Deventer Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Deventer; E de Jong, Slingeland Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Doetinchem; B Maraha, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Dordrecht; MPA van Meer, Dicoon, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elst; A van Arkel, Admiraal De Ruyter Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Goes; V Hira, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Gouda; AE Muller, Haaglanden MC, Department of Medical Microbiology, 's-Gravenhage; M Wong, Haga Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, 's-Gravenhage; P Huizinga, Certe Medical Diagnostics and Advice Foundation, Department of Medical Microbiology, Groningen; E Bathoorn, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Groningen; M Lokate, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Groningen; J Sinnige, Regional Public Health Laboratory Haarlem, Haarlem; LEA Bank, St Jansdal Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Harderwijk; FW Sebens, Labmicta, Hengelo; E Kolwijck, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, 's-Hertogenbosch; EA Reuland, CBSL, Tergooi MC, Department of Medical Microbiology, Hilversum; S de Jager, Comicro, Department of Medical Microbiology, Hoorn; MA Leversteijn-van Hall, Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden; J Gooskens, Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden; SP van Mens, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Maastricht; E Schaftenaar, St Antonius Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Nieuwegein/Utrecht; JC Rahamat-Langendoen, Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen; PDJ Sturm, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond; B Wintermans, Bravis Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Roosendaal; DSY Ong, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Rotterdam; M van Rijn, Ikazia Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Rotterdam; S Dinant, Maasstad Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Rotterdam; M den Reijer, Star-SHL, Rotterdam; EIGB de Brauwer, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Sittard-Geleen; ALE van Arkel, Microvida ZorgSaam, Department of Medical Microbiology, Terneuzen; N van der Moeren, Microvida ZorgSaam, Department of Medical Microbiology, Terneuzen; JJJM Stohr, Microvida Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Department of Medical Microbiology, Tilburg; ALM Vlek, Diakonessenhuis, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Utrecht; FNJ Frakking, University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Medical Microbiology, Utrecht; KB Gast, Clinical Diagnostics Pamm Bv, Department of Medical Microbiology, Veldhoven; HRA Streefkerk, VieCuri Medical Center, Department of Medical Microbiology, Venlo; SB Debast, Isala Hospital, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Zwolle.

We would like to thank all Dutch medical microbiological laboratories for submitting their Shigella isolates. B van der Putten and H Sauskojus would also like to thank their respective ECDC Fellowship Programme supervisory team (in alphabetical order): Aura Aguirre-Beltran, Kim Benschop, Carlos Carvalho, Susan Hahné and Kamelia Stanoeva. The authors would also like to thank Wieke Altorf-van der Kuil, Rony Zoetigheid and Annelot Schoffelen of the ISIS-AR team for their contributions.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Material

Author’s contributions: Boas van der Putten: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Hendrik Sauskojus: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Anouk Meijs: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Daan Notermans: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Maren Lanzl: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Eelco Franz: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Maaike van den Beld: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Roan Pijnacker: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding statement: Not applicable.

Disclaimer

Two authors are fellows of the ECDC Fellowship Programme, supported financially by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The views and opinions expressed herein do not state or reflect those of ECDC. ECDC is not responsible for the data and information collation and analysis and cannot be held liable for conclusions or opinions drawn.

Data availability

Whole genome sequencing data have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB106896 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home). Epidemiological data are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  • 1.Kotloff KL, Riddle MS, Platts-Mills JA, Pavlinac P, Zaidi AKM. Shigellosis. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):801-12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization (WHO). WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance, to guide research, development, and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: WHO; 17 May 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240093461
  • 3.Anderson JD, 4th, Bagamian KH, Muhib F, Amaya MP, Laytner LA, Wierzba T, et al. Burden of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and shigella non-fatal diarrhoeal infections in 79 low-income and lower middle-income countries: a modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(3):e321-30. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30483-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Shigellosis - Annual Epidemiological Report for 2022. Stockholm: ECDC; 8 Feb 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/shigellosis-annual-epidemiological-report-2022
  • 5.Haagsma JA, Geenen PL, Ethelberg S, Fetsch A, Hansdotter F, Jansen A, et al. Community incidence of pathogen-specific gastroenteritis: reconstructing the surveillance pyramid for seven pathogens in seven European Union member states. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(8):1625-39. 10.1017/S0950268812002166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pijnacker R, Friesema IHM, Franz E, Van Pelt W. Trends van shigellosemeldingen in Nederland, 1988-2015. [Trends on shigellosis notifications in the Netherlands, 1988–2015]. Dutch. Infect Bull. 2017;28(4):121-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Trivett H. Increase in extensively drug resistant Shigella sonnei in Europe. Lancet Microbe. 2022;3(7):e481. 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00160-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Shigellose - LCI-richtlijn. [Shigellosis – LCI guidelines]. Bilthoven: RIVM; 26 Mar 2025. Dutch. Available from: https://lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen/shigellose
  • 9.Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Mohamed K, Fan Y, Agama Study Group. Achtman M. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 2020;30(1):138-52. 10.1101/gr.251678.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altorf-van der Kuil W, Schoffelen AF, de Greeff SC, Thijsen SF, Alblas HJ, Notermans DW, et al. National laboratory-based surveillance system for antimicrobial resistance: a successful tool to support the control of antimicrobial resistance in the Netherlands. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(46):17-00062. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.46.17-00062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stichting Werkgroep Antibioticabeleid (SWAB). Acute infectieuze diarree/2023. [Acute infectious diarrhoea]. Leiden: SWAB. [Accessed: 12 Oct 2026]. Dutch. Available from: https://swab.nl/nl/acute-infectieuze-diarree
  • 12.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Outbreak of Shigella sonnei in the EU/EEA, the United Kingdom, and the United States among travellers returning from Cabo Verde. Stockholm: ECDC; 17 Feb 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/shigella-sonnei-risk-assessment-february-2023.pdf
  • 13.van den Beld M, Pijnacker R, van Dam A, Bovée L, Kwa D, Linde I, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Shigella for surveillance purposes shows (inter)national relatedness and multidrug resistance in isolates from men who have sex with men. Microb Genom. 2023;9(4):000978. 10.1099/mgen.0.000978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bogaerts B, Winand R, Van Braekel J, Mattheus W, De Keersmaecker SCJ, Roosens NHC, et al. Phylogenomic investigation of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance among Belgian cases of shigellosis between 2013 and 2018 indicates both travel-related imports and domestic circulation. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):767. 10.3390/microorganisms9040767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Charles H, Greig DR, Swift C, Olonade I, Simms I, Sinka K, et al. Epidemiologic and genomic investigation of sexually transmitted Shigella sonnei, England. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025;31(7):1394-405. 10.3201/eid3107.241584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Caldera JR, Shaw B, Uslan DZ, Yang S. Cluster of extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei carrying blaCTX-M-15 in Los Angeles, California, 2023 to 2024. Am J Infect Control. 2025;53(4):524-6. 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jacqueline C, Minetti C, Monzon Fernandez S, Silveira L, Cuesta De La Plaza I, Pista Â, et al. Genomic epidemiology of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri in the Iberian Peninsula from 2015 to 2022. J Infect Dis. 2025;231(5):1176-85. 10.1093/infdis/jiae596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mason LCE, Greig DR, Cowley LA, Partridge SR, Martinez E, Blackwell GA, et al. The evolution and international spread of extensively drug resistant Shigella sonnei. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1983. 10.1038/s41467-023-37672-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moreno-Mingorance A, Espinal P, Rodriguez V, Goterris L, Fàbrega A, Serra-Pladevall J, et al. Circulation of multi-drug-resistant Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri among men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Spain, 2015-2019. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;58(3):106378. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ingle DJ, Andersson P, Valcanis M, Barnden J, da Silva AG, Horan KA, et al. Prolonged outbreak of multidrug-resistant Shigella sonnei harboring blaCTX-M-27 in Victoria, Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(12):e01518-20. 10.1128/AAC.01518-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fischer N, Maex M, Mattheus W, Van den Bossche A, Van Cauteren D, Laisnez V, et al. Genomic epidemiology of persistently circulating MDR Shigella sonnei strains associated with men who have sex with men (MSM) in Belgium (2013-19). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;77(1):89-97. 10.1093/jac/dkab377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lefèvre S, Njamkepo E, Feldman S, Ruckly C, Carle I, Lejay-Collin M, et al. Rapid emergence of extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei in France. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):462. 10.1038/s41467-023-36222-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Worley JN, Javkar K, Hoffmann M, Hysell K, Garcia-Williams A, Tagg K, et al. Genomic drivers of multidrug-resistant Shigella affecting vulnerable patient populations in the United States and abroad. MBio. 2021;12(1):e03188-20. 10.1128/mBio.03188-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Campos-Madueno EI, Bernasconi OJ, Moser AI, Keller PM, Luzzaro F, Maffioli C, et al. Rapid increase of CTX-M-producing Shigella sonnei isolates in Switzerland due to spread of common plasmids and international clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(10):e01057-20. 10.1128/AAC.01057-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pijnacker R, Mughini-Gras L, Verhoef L, van den Beld M, Franz E, Friesema I. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic on pathogens transmitted via food in the Netherlands. Epidemiol Infect. 2024;152:e130. 10.1017/S0950268824000815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Shigellosis - Annual Epidemiological Report for 2020. Stockholm: ECDC; 8 Sep 2022. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/shigellosis-annual-epidemiological-report-2020
  • 27.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Shigellosis - Annual Epidemiological Report for 2021. Stockholm: ECDC; 23 May 2024. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/shigellosis-annual-epidemiological-report-2021
  • 28.Statistics Netherlands (CBS). The Netherlands has 2.7 million LGBTQIA people. Hague: CBS; 11 Oct 2024. Available from: https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2024/41/the-netherlands-has-2-7-million-lgbtqia-people
  • 29.Charles H, Sinka K, Simms I, Baker KS, Godbole G, Jenkins C. Trends in shigellosis notifications in England, January 2016 to March 2023. Epidemiol Infect. 2024;152:e115. 10.1017/S0950268824001006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Quinn E, Najjar Z, Huhtinen E, Jegasothy E, Gupta L. Culture-positive shigellosis cases are epidemiologically different to culture-negative/PCR-positive cases. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(1):41-5. 10.1111/1753-6405.12844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goldblatt J, Ward A, Yusuf M, Day M, Godbole G, Morris-Jones S. Azithromycin susceptibility testing for Salmonella enterica isolates: discordances in results using MIC gradient strips. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(7):1820-3. 10.1093/jac/dkaa097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thorley K, Charles H, Greig DR, Prochazka M, Mason LCE, Baker KS, et al. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant Shigella flexneri serotype 2a associated with sexual transmission among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, in England: a descriptive epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(6):732-9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00807-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tansarli GS, Long DR, Waalkes A, Bourassa LA, Libby SJ, Penewit K, et al. Genomic reconstruction and directed interventions in a multidrug-resistant Shigellosis outbreak in Seattle, WA, USA: a genomic surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(6):740-50. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00879-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smaoui F, Ksibi B, Mezghani S, Guermazi E, Charfi F, Ktari S, et al. Molecular epidemiology of a multidrug-resistant Shigella sonnei outbreak in Tunisia (2022-2023) using whole-genome sequencing. Microb Genom. 2025;11(3):001362. 10.1099/mgen.0.001362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

Whole genome sequencing data have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under BioProject PRJEB106896 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home). Epidemiological data are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.


Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES