Abstract
In anesthetized dogs, the potentials in the mucous coat and gastic cells were measured with microelectrodes. In the secreting stomach, with isotonic saline in contact with the mucosal surface, the orientation of the initial change in potential difference (PD) was often the same as that of the liquid junction potential between gastric juice and saline (the microelectrode became negative to a reference electrode in the saline) but the magnitude of the change was never more than 11 mv. On the basis of this finding an explanation is offered for the observation that in the secreting stomach replacing isotonic saline with isotonic HCl as the bathing fluid on the mucosal surface, results in a change in the serosal to mucosal PD of only 19 mv, which is 40% less than the liquid junction potential between gastric juice and saline. In the surface epithelial cells of both resting and secreting stomach, multiple levels of potentials were found. For the secreting stomach, the resistance between the interstitial fluid of the pit region and the fluid on the mucosal surface was 55 ohm cm2, determined as the change in PD per unit of applied current across stomach. The implications of these findings are discussed with reference to the separate site theory of HCl formation.
Full text
PDF















Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BORNSTEIN A. M., DENNIS W. H., REHM W. S. Movement of water, sodium, chloride and hydrogen ions across the resting stomach. Am J Physiol. 1959 Aug;197:332–336. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.2.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CANOSA C. A., REHM W. S. Microscopic dimensions of the pit region of the dog's gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 1958 Sep;35(3):292–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHOWDHURY T. K., SNELL F. M. A MICROELECTRODE STUDY OF ELECTRICAL POTENTIALS IN FROG SKIN AND TOAD BLADDER. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Mar 29;94:461–471. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(65)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DENNIS W. H., REHM W. S. Effect of the bicarbonate ion on gastric potential difference. Am J Physiol. 1958 Apr;193(1):15–20. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.193.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregor H. P., Berkowitz J. M. Gastric secretion: mechanism for production of hydrogen ions. Science. 1965 Nov 5;150(3697):773–776. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3697.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loewenstein W. R. Permeability of membrane junctions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):441–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REHM W. S., DENNIS W. H., BRODSKY W. A. A new explanation for the osmotic activity and ionic composition of gastric juice. Am J Physiol. 1958 Jan;192(1):14–22. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.192.1.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REHM W. S., DENNIS W. H., SCHLESINGER H. Electrical resistance of the mammalian stomach. Am J Physiol. 1955 May;181(2):451–470. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.181.2.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REHM W. S. Electrical resistance of resting and secreting stomach. Am J Physiol. 1953 Mar;172(3):689–699. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.172.3.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REHM W. S., HOKIN L. E., DE GRAFFENRIED T. P., 2nd, BAJANDAS F. J., COY F. E., Jr Relationship between potential difference of the resting and secreting stomach. Am J Physiol. 1951 Jan;164(1):187–201. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1950.164.1.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REHM W. S., SCHLESINGER H., DENNIS W. H. Effect of osmotic gradients on water transport, hydrogen ion and chloride ion production in the resting and secreting stomach. Am J Physiol. 1953 Dec;175(3):473–486. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.175.3.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VILLEGAS L. Cellular location of the electrical potential difference in frog gastric mucosa. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 Oct 22;64:359–367. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(62)90745-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WOODBURY J. W., BRADY A. J. Intracellular recording from moving tissues with a flexibly mounted ultramicroelectrode. Science. 1956 Jan 20;123(3186):100–101. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3186.100-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
