Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1970 Sep;10(9):859–875. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86340-8

An Electrokinetic Model of Transduction in the Semicircular Canal

Dennis P O'Leary
PMCID: PMC1367819  PMID: 5496906

Abstract

Transduction in the semicircular canal was studied by focusing an infrared beam on either side of exposed ampullae from the posterior canals of Rana pipiens. The direction of fluid movement resulting from a stimulus was inferred by observing the polarity of the change in afferent impulse mean rate relative to the spontaneous value. On the basis of the accepted functional polarization of this receptor, the results indicate that fluid moved toward the warmer side of the ampulla. Convection and thermal reception were shown to be unlikely explanations for these results. Morover, cupular displacements toward the warmer side would not be expected. Because thermo-osmosis can cause fluid to move toward the warmer side in a gelatin membrane, the results can be interpreted as evidence that thermo-osmosis occurred in the gelatinous cupula and influenced the transduction mechanism. Thermo-osmosis of liquids appears to be due to an electric field that is set up in a charged membrane; hence, the hair cells might have detected an electric field that occurred in the cupula during thermo-osmosis. Electroreception might be an important link in the transduction of physiological stimuli also. Rotational stimuli could result in weak electric fields in the cupula by the mechanoelectric effect. Cupular displacements could be important for large stimuli, but extrapolations to threshold stimuli suggest displacements of angstrom amplitudes. Therefore, electroreception by the hair cells could be an explanation of the great sensitivity that has been observed in the semicircular canal and other labyrinthine receptors.

Full text

PDF
859

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DE VRIES H. The minimum perceptible angular acceleration under various conditions. Acta Otolaryngol. 1949 Jun;37(3):218–229. doi: 10.3109/00016484909120237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DOHLMAN G. Some aspects of the mechanism of vestibular haircell stimulation. Confin Neurol. 1960;20:169–180. doi: 10.1159/000104925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LOWENSTEIN O. The effect of galvanic polarization on the impulse discharge from sense endings in the isolated labyrinth of the thornback ray (Raja clavata). J Physiol. 1955 Jan 28;127(1):104–117. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Naftalin L. Some new proposals regarding acoustic transmission and transduction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:169–180. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Teorell T. Electrokinetic considerations of mechanoelectrical transduction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jul 14;137(2):950–966. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES